EP1558701B1 - Fischer-tropsch process using a fischer-tropsch catalyst and a zeolite-containing catalyst - Google Patents

Fischer-tropsch process using a fischer-tropsch catalyst and a zeolite-containing catalyst Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1558701B1
EP1558701B1 EP03810426A EP03810426A EP1558701B1 EP 1558701 B1 EP1558701 B1 EP 1558701B1 EP 03810426 A EP03810426 A EP 03810426A EP 03810426 A EP03810426 A EP 03810426A EP 1558701 B1 EP1558701 B1 EP 1558701B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
catalyst particles
fischer
tropsch
catalytic cracking
fluid catalytic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP03810426A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1558701A1 (en
Inventor
Edgar Evert Steenwinkel
Marieke Paulyne Rénate SPEE
Johannes Petrus Jozef Verlaan
Eelco Titus Carel Vogt
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Albemarle Netherlands BV
Original Assignee
Albemarle Netherlands BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Albemarle Netherlands BV filed Critical Albemarle Netherlands BV
Priority to EP03810426A priority Critical patent/EP1558701B1/en
Publication of EP1558701A1 publication Critical patent/EP1558701A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1558701B1 publication Critical patent/EP1558701B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon
    • C10G2/30Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen
    • C10G2/32Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts
    • C10G2/33Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G2/331Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen with the use of catalysts characterised by the catalyst used containing group VIII-metals

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a Fischer-Tropsch process for the conversion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to C 5 + hydrocabon mixtures using a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst and a zeolite-containing catalyst.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch process generally comprises the following process steps.
  • the first step involves reacting a source of carbon (such as coal or natural gas) with a source of oxygen (such as steam, air or oxygen) to form a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, usually referred to as synthesis gas.
  • the second step involves contacting the carbon monoxide and hydrogen with a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst leading to hydrocarbons and water.
  • the main products of the Fischer-Tropsch reaction are linear olefins and paraffins and water, but limited isomerisation and inclusion of heteroatoms such as oxygen may occur.
  • Generally applied catalysts for this second step are iron and/or cobalt-containing catalysts.
  • the third step involves isomerisation of the hydrocarbons formed in the second step to produce more valuable products.
  • the longer chains in the product may be cracked to form products in the diesel or gasoline range, and linear paraffins may be isomerized to improve diesel product properties like cloud point and pour point.
  • adapted hydrotreating catalysts are used for this third step.
  • US 5,928,980 discloses the use - in the second step of the Fischer-Tropsch process - of a spent fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalyst impregnated with a group VIII metal, preferably cobalt and/or iron.
  • This catalyst composition is prepared by impregnating the spent FCC catalyst with a metal salt, calcining the impregnated FCC catalyst to obtain a supported metal oxide, and reducing the metal oxide to the metal in a reducing gas atmosphere.
  • the impregnated metal serves as the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst.
  • This prior art catalyst composition requires a cumbersome process - involving the steps of impregnation, calcination, and reduction. It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a process for the conversion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to C 5 + hydrocabon mixtures using a system of a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst and an FCC catalyst, which system is easier to prepare.
  • a second object is to provide a process using a catalyst system which can be used more flexibly according to need.
  • a third object is to provide an Inexpensive catalyst system.
  • US-A-4 906 671 describes a process for producing diesel from hydrogen and carbonoxides using a catalyst system comprising a FCC catalyst and a FT catalyst.
  • example 6 discusses a process in which a Fischer-Tropsch type synthesis is utilized as an exothermic addition reaction, the heat derived therefrom serving to effect an endothermic dehydration reaction. There is discussion of a dehydration of isobutanol to isobutylene catalysed by a synthetic Y-zeolite. The reactions are carried out at atmospheric pressure.
  • the process according to the invention uses Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles.
  • the catalyst composition according to the present invention can be prepared by simply mixing existing Fischer Tropsch catalyst particles and FCC catalyst particles. Its preparation does not require industrially undesired impregnation steps.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and the FCC catalyst particles may be used in the form of shaped bodies in which both particles are embedded.
  • shaped bodies are spray-dried particles (microspheres), extrudates, pellets, spheres, etc.
  • Such shaped bodies can be prepared by shaping a physical mixture of Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and FCC catalyst particles. Suitable methods to obtain such shaped bodies include spray-drying, pelletising, extrusion (optionally combined with kneading), beading, or any other conventional shaping method used in the catalyst and absorbent fields or combinations thereof. For instance, if the preparation of the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles involves a spray-drying step, it is possible to add the FCC catalyst to the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst before spray-drying and subsequently spray-dry the resulting mixture.
  • a matrix or binding material can be added to improve the mechanical strength of the shaped bodies.
  • suitable matrix or binding materials are alumina, silica, clays, and mixtures thereof. Matrix or binding materials comprising alumina are generally preferred.
  • the matrix or binding material, if present, is preferably present in an amount of 10-40 wt%, more preferably 15-35 wt%, and most preferably 25-35 wt%, based on the total weight of the catalyst composition.
  • the term 'FCC catalyst' includes fresh FCC catalysts, spent FCC catalysts and equilibrium catalysts (E-cat).
  • a spent FCC catalyst is less expensive than a fresh FCC catalyst. Furthermore, its use results in re-use of waste materials, which is economically and environmentally favourable.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles are not in the form of shaped bodies in which both particles are embedded, the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and the FCC catalyst particles can be dosed individually - according to need - to the Fischer-Tropsch unit. This creates great flexibility. For instance, if the process conditions change during processing or if one of the catalysts deactivates faster than the other, one of the catalysts might be added with a faster dosing rate than the other.
  • the quality of E-cat or spent FCC catalyst will vary from batch to batch. This difference can be compensated for by adapting the dosing rate of the FCC catalyst particles compared to that of the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles.
  • zeolite Y-containing FCC catalysts are used.
  • Such FCC catalysts generally contain zeolite Y, clay (e.g. kaolin, metakaolin, bentonite), silica, alumina, rare-earth metal compounds, etc.
  • suitable metals are rare earth metals, e.g. Ce, La, and transition metals of Groups IV-VIII of the Periodic System, e.g. V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zr, Nb, Ru, Re, etc.
  • the metal compounds can serve to, e.g., increase the particle strength (e.g. La compounds), enhance the catalyst's stability (e.g. Ni compounds), or enhance CO conversion (e.g.
  • This metal compound is preferably present in or on the FCC catalyst particles in amounts of 0.1 to 10 wt%, more preferably 0.3 to 2 wt%, calculated as oxide, and based on the total weight of metal-containing FCC catalyst.
  • the metal compound can be deposited on the FCC catalyst particles in any manner known in the art. Examples of such methods are impregnation, ionexchange, and deposition precipitation of soluble metal salts. If desired, the metal-deposited FCC catalyst particles is calcined and/or prereduced after the metal compound has been deposited.
  • An additional advantage of using a spent FCC catalyst compared to a fresh FCC catalyst is that a spent FCC catalyst will generally contain a desired metal compound, due to the fact that the hydrocarbon feed to be cracked in an FCC unit generally contains various metals - e.g. nickel, vanadium. Consequently, no additional deposition step is required to introduce such a metal compound.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst can be any conventional Fischer-Tropsch catalyst, preferably comprising iron and/or cobalt. For the preparation of such catalysts it is referred to, e.g., WO 01/97968 , WO 01/89686 / and WO 01/70394 .
  • the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst can be promoted with various metals, e.g. Al, Ti, Cr, Mn, Ca, Na and/or K.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles can contain binder materials, such as silica and/or alumina.
  • Both the FCC catalyst particles and the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles can be used in the second step of the Fischer-Tropsch process, either in the form of separate particles, or in the form of shaped bodies in which both particles are embedded.
  • the FCC catalyst particles are preferably be used in an amount of 5 to 40 wt%, more preferably from 10 to 30 wt%.
  • the second step can be carried out in any suitable reactor, such as a (fixed) fluldised bed reactor.
  • the temperature ranges preferably from 250° to 400°C, more preferably from 300° to 370°C, and most preferably from 330° to 350°C.
  • the pressure ranges from 10 to 60 bar, more preferably 15 to 30 bar, and most preferably about 20 bar.
  • the H 2 /CO volume ratio preferably ranges from 0.2 to 6.0, preferably 0.5-6, most preferably 1-3.
  • the third step is generally conducted at temperatures of 150 to 600°C, more preferably 200 to 500°C, and most preferably 300 to 400°C
  • the pressure preferably ranges from 5 to 60 bar, more preferably from 15 to 40 bar, and most preferably from 20 to 30 bar.
  • the resulting hydrocarbon product preferably contains, on a mass basis, at least 35%, more preferably at least 45%, and most preferably at least 50% of C 5 + compounds.
  • the process may be used for the production of branched hydrocarbons, olefins, and/or aromatics.
  • the process is used for the production of liquid fuel, especially diesel and gasoline, and preferably unleaded gasoline.
  • the FCC catalysts were reduced in situ in the reactor under 20 bar hydrogen pressure 340°C for 1 hr. After the reduction procedure was completed, the nitrogen flow was introduced and subsequently 1-hexene was dosed (0.11 ml/min). The composition of the reaction product was followed by on-line GC analysis.
  • FCC catalysts Three different types were tested according to this procedure: a fresh FCC catalyst containing a low amount of rare earth (RE), a fresh FCC catalyst containing a high amount of rare earth metals, and an equilibrium FCC catalyst (E-cat) resulting from the FCC catalyst with a low amount of RE.
  • RE rare earth
  • E-cat equilibrium FCC catalyst
  • n - C 6 refers to normal C 6 paraffins
  • i - C 6 refers to branched C 6 paraffins
  • n - C 6 refers to normal C 6 olefins
  • i - C 6 refers to branched C 6 olefins
  • ⁇ C 6 and >C 6 refers to compounds with less and more than 6 carbon atoms, respectively.
  • the total amounts of isomerized products at 0.5 hr and 17.5 hr runtime were 52.0 wt% and 60.1 wt%, respectively.
  • This high isomerization selectivity was accompanied with a low level of cracking; only 3.4 wt% of products smaller than C 6 ( ⁇ C 6 ) were obtained at 17.5 hr runtime.
  • the amount of aromatic products was far below 1 wt% during the whole run.
  • the total amounts of isomerized products at 0.5 hr and 17.5 hr runtime were 44.8 wt% and 60.5 wt%, respectively.
  • the level of cracking was 5.3 wt% at 17.5 hr runtime.
  • the amount of aromatic products was far below 1 wt% during the whole run.
  • the total amounts of isomerized products at 0.5 hr and 17.5 hr runtime were 38.2 wt% and 39.8 wt%, respectively.
  • the level of cracking was only 3.0 wt% at 17.5 hr runtime. Again, the amount of aromatic products was far below 1 wt% during the whole run.
  • the level of isomerization of this E-cat was lower than that of the fresh FCC catalysts, it is still acceptable for use in the Fischer-Tropsch product, especially as co-catalyst in the second step..

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Low-Molecular Organic Synthesis Reactions Using Catalysts (AREA)

Abstract

Fischer-Tropsch process for the conversion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to C5<+> hydrocarbon mixtures in which process use is made of Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalyst particles. The FCC catalyst can be a fresh FCC catalyst, or an equilibrium catalysts (E-cat).

Description

  • The present invention relates to a Fischer-Tropsch process for the conversion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to C5 + hydrocabon mixtures using a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst and a zeolite-containing catalyst.
  • The Fischer-Tropsch process generally comprises the following process steps. The first step involves reacting a source of carbon (such as coal or natural gas) with a source of oxygen (such as steam, air or oxygen) to form a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, usually referred to as synthesis gas.
    The second step involves contacting the carbon monoxide and hydrogen with a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst leading to hydrocarbons and water. Depending on the process conditions and the catalyst used, the nature of the hydrocarbons and the chain length may vary. The main products of the Fischer-Tropsch reaction are linear olefins and paraffins and water, but limited isomerisation and inclusion of heteroatoms such as oxygen may occur. Generally applied catalysts for this second step are iron and/or cobalt-containing catalysts. In order to enhance isomerisation during this second step, a co-catalyst can be added.
    The third step involves isomerisation of the hydrocarbons formed in the second step to produce more valuable products. For instance, the longer chains in the product may be cracked to form products in the diesel or gasoline range, and linear paraffins may be isomerized to improve diesel product properties like cloud point and pour point. Generally, adapted hydrotreating catalysts are used for this third step.
  • US 5,928,980 discloses the use - in the second step of the Fischer-Tropsch process - of a spent fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalyst impregnated with a group VIII metal, preferably cobalt and/or iron. This catalyst composition is prepared by impregnating the spent FCC catalyst with a metal salt, calcining the impregnated FCC catalyst to obtain a supported metal oxide, and reducing the metal oxide to the metal in a reducing gas atmosphere. The impregnated metal serves as the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst.
  • The preparation of this prior art catalyst composition requires a cumbersome process - involving the steps of impregnation, calcination, and reduction. It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a process for the conversion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to C5 + hydrocabon mixtures using a system of a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst and an FCC catalyst, which system is easier to prepare.
    A second object is to provide a process using a catalyst system which can be used more flexibly according to need.
    A third object is to provide an Inexpensive catalyst system.
  • The prior art only discloses the use of spent FCC catalyst in a Fischer-Tropsch process. It is a fourth object of the present invention to enlarge the scope of FCC catalyst to be used in Fischer-Tropsch processes by using also other types of FCC catalysts. US-A-4 906 671 describes a process for producing diesel from hydrogen and carbonoxides using a catalyst system comprising a FCC catalyst and a FT catalyst.
  • US3254023 , example 6 discusses a process in which a Fischer-Tropsch type synthesis is utilized as an exothermic addition reaction, the heat derived therefrom serving to effect an endothermic dehydration reaction. There is discussion of a dehydration of isobutanol to isobutylene catalysed by a synthetic Y-zeolite. The reactions are carried out at atmospheric pressure.
  • According to the invention there is provided a process as defined in claim 1.
  • The process according to the invention uses Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles.
    Hence, the catalyst composition according to the present invention can be prepared by simply mixing existing Fischer Tropsch catalyst particles and FCC catalyst particles. Its preparation does not require industrially undesired impregnation steps.
  • In one embodiment, the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and the FCC catalyst particles may be used in the form of shaped bodies in which both particles are embedded. Examples of shaped bodies are spray-dried particles (microspheres), extrudates, pellets, spheres, etc.
  • Such shaped bodies can be prepared by shaping a physical mixture of Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and FCC catalyst particles. Suitable methods to obtain such shaped bodies include spray-drying, pelletising, extrusion (optionally combined with kneading), beading, or any other conventional shaping method used in the catalyst and absorbent fields or combinations thereof.
    For instance, if the preparation of the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles involves a spray-drying step, it is possible to add the FCC catalyst to the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst before spray-drying and subsequently spray-dry the resulting mixture.
  • If desired, a matrix or binding material can be added to improve the mechanical strength of the shaped bodies. Examples of suitable matrix or binding materials are alumina, silica, clays, and mixtures thereof. Matrix or binding materials comprising alumina are generally preferred. The matrix or binding material, if present, is preferably present in an amount of 10-40 wt%, more preferably 15-35 wt%, and most preferably 25-35 wt%, based on the total weight of the catalyst composition.
  • The term 'FCC catalyst' includes fresh FCC catalysts, spent FCC catalysts and equilibrium catalysts (E-cat). A spent FCC catalyst is less expensive than a fresh FCC catalyst. Furthermore, its use results in re-use of waste materials, which is economically and environmentally favourable.
  • If the FCC catalyst particles and the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles are not in the form of shaped bodies in which both particles are embedded, the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and the FCC catalyst particles can be dosed individually - according to need - to the Fischer-Tropsch unit. This creates great flexibility. For instance, if the process conditions change during processing or if one of the catalysts deactivates faster than the other, one of the catalysts might be added with a faster dosing rate than the other.
  • Furthermore, the quality of E-cat or spent FCC catalyst will vary from batch to batch. This difference can be compensated for by adapting the dosing rate of the FCC catalyst particles compared to that of the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles.
    In addition, it is possible to either use both types of catalyst particles in the second step of the Flscher-Tropsch process, or to use the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles in the second step and the FCC catalyst particles in the third step.
  • In the process according to the invention zeolite Y-containing FCC catalysts are used. Such FCC catalysts generally contain zeolite Y, clay (e.g. kaolin, metakaolin, bentonite), silica, alumina, rare-earth metal compounds, etc.
    Examples of suitable metals are rare earth metals, e.g. Ce, La, and transition metals of Groups IV-VIII of the Periodic System, e.g. V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zr, Nb, Ru, Re, etc. The metal compounds can serve to, e.g., increase the particle strength (e.g. La compounds), enhance the catalyst's stability (e.g. Ni compounds), or enhance CO conversion (e.g. Fe, Co, or Ru compounds).
    This metal compound is preferably present in or on the FCC catalyst particles in amounts of 0.1 to 10 wt%, more preferably 0.3 to 2 wt%, calculated as oxide, and based on the total weight of metal-containing FCC catalyst.
    The metal compound can be deposited on the FCC catalyst particles in any manner known in the art. Examples of such methods are impregnation, ionexchange, and deposition precipitation of soluble metal salts.
    If desired, the metal-deposited FCC catalyst particles is calcined and/or prereduced after the metal compound has been deposited.
  • An additional advantage of using a spent FCC catalyst compared to a fresh FCC catalyst is that a spent FCC catalyst will generally contain a desired metal compound, due to the fact that the hydrocarbon feed to be cracked in an FCC unit generally contains various metals - e.g. nickel, vanadium. Consequently, no additional deposition step is required to introduce such a metal compound.
  • The Fischer-Tropsch catalyst can be any conventional Fischer-Tropsch catalyst, preferably comprising iron and/or cobalt. For the preparation of such catalysts it is referred to, e.g., WO 01/97968 , WO 01/89686 / and WO 01/70394 .
    The Fischer-Tropsch catalyst can be promoted with various metals, e.g. Al, Ti, Cr, Mn, Ca, Na and/or K. Furthermore, the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles can contain binder materials, such as silica and/or alumina.
  • Both the FCC catalyst particles and the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles can be used in the second step of the Fischer-Tropsch process, either in the form of separate particles, or in the form of shaped bodies in which both particles are embedded. Based on the total weight of FCC catalyst particles and Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles, the FCC catalyst particles are preferably be used in an amount of 5 to 40 wt%, more preferably from 10 to 30 wt%.
  • The second step can be carried out in any suitable reactor, such as a (fixed) fluldised bed reactor. The temperature ranges preferably from 250° to 400°C, more preferably from 300° to 370°C, and most preferably from 330° to 350°C.
    The pressure ranges from 10 to 60 bar, more preferably 15 to 30 bar, and most preferably about 20 bar.
    The H2/CO volume ratio preferably ranges from 0.2 to 6.0, preferably 0.5-6, most preferably 1-3.
  • The third step is generally conducted at temperatures of 150 to 600°C, more preferably 200 to 500°C, and most preferably 300 to 400°C The pressure preferably ranges from 5 to 60 bar, more preferably from 15 to 40 bar, and most preferably from 20 to 30 bar.
  • The resulting hydrocarbon product preferably contains, on a mass basis, at least 35%, more preferably at least 45%, and most preferably at least 50% of C5 + compounds. The process may be used for the production of branched hydrocarbons, olefins, and/or aromatics. Preferably, the process is used for the production of liquid fuel, especially diesel and gasoline, and preferably unleaded gasoline.
  • EXAMPLE
  • The following experiments illustrate the suitability of zeolite-Y-based FCC catalysts (fresh and E-cat), for the isomerisation of linear olefinic products under typical Fischer-Tropsch process conditions.
    Catalysts which are suitable for this purpose can be used either in the second step (as co-catalyst) or in the third step of the Fischer-Tropsch process in order to enhance the isomerisation of the linear olefinic products.
  • To this end, the performance of the FCC catalysts was tested in a hydroisomerization of 1-hexene. The reaction conditions (temperature, total pressure and dihydrogen pressure) for the performance tests were identical to the conditions present in a typical high temperature Fischer-Tropsch process:
    Temperature : 340°C
    Total Pressure : 20 bar
    Catalyst intake : 2.2 g
    WHSV, 1-Hexene : 2.85 g/g/hr (based on zeolite present)
    H2 Partial pressure : 9 bar
    N2 Partial pressure : 10.8 bar
    1-Hexene Partial pressure : 0.22 bar
    Mole ratio H2/1-Hexene : 40.9
    Mole ratio N2/1-Hexene : 49.1
  • The FCC catalysts were reduced in situ in the reactor under 20 bar hydrogen pressure 340°C for 1 hr. After the reduction procedure was completed, the nitrogen flow was introduced and subsequently 1-hexene was dosed (0.11 ml/min). The composition of the reaction product was followed by on-line GC analysis.
  • Three different types of FCC catalysts were tested according to this procedure: a fresh FCC catalyst containing a low amount of rare earth (RE), a fresh FCC catalyst containing a high amount of rare earth metals, and an equilibrium FCC catalyst (E-cat) resulting from the FCC catalyst with a low amount of RE.
    The product distribution obtained in these tests at 0.5 hr and at 17.5 hr runtime are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.
  • In these Tables, n-C6 refers to normal C6 paraffins, i-C6 refers to branched C6 paraffins, n-C6 = refers to normal C6 olefins, i-C6 = refers to branched C6 olefins, and <C6 and >C6 refers to compounds with less and more than 6 carbon atoms, respectively. Table 1 - test results at 0.5 hr. runtime
    Fresh FCC Fresh FCC E-cat
    low RE high RE
    Conversion 1-hexene, wt% 93.8 99.4 94.0
    n-C6, wt% 19.8 28.5 29.6
    i-C6, wt% 19.2 41.6 13.7
    n-C6=, wt% 9.4 0.7 24.3
    i-C6=, wt% 32.8 3.2 24.5
    <C6, wt% 10.9 20.2 4.4
    >C6, wt% 8.2 6.0 3.7
    i-C6 + i-C6=, wt% 52.0 44.8 38.2
    Table 2 - test results at 17.5 hr. runtime
    Fresh FCC Fresh FCC E-cat
    low RE high RE
    Conversion 1-hexene, wt% 90.8 91.4 91.8
    n-C6, wt% 10.0 11.0 15.5
    i-C6, wt% 12.8 14.9 9.3
    n-C6=, wt% 20.2 15.1 39.3
    i-C6=, wt% 47.3 45.6 30.6
    <C6, wt% 3.4 5.3 3.0
    >C6, wt% 6.5 8.4 2.7
    i-C6 + i-C6=, wt% 60.1 60.5 39.9
  • As can be seen from these tables, the fresh FCC catalyst with a low amount of RE has a high selectivity to branched C6 olefins (i-C6=) and branched C6 paraffins (i-C6). The total amounts of isomerized products at 0.5 hr and 17.5 hr runtime were 52.0 wt% and 60.1 wt%, respectively. This high isomerization selectivity was accompanied with a low level of cracking; only 3.4 wt% of products smaller than C6 (<C6) were obtained at 17.5 hr runtime. The amount of aromatic products was far below 1 wt% during the whole run.
  • The fresh FCC catalyst with a high amount of RE also showed a high selectivity to branched C6 olefins (i-C6=) and branched C6 paraffins (i-C6). The total amounts of isomerized products at 0.5 hr and 17.5 hr runtime were 44.8 wt% and 60.5 wt%, respectively. The level of cracking was 5.3 wt% at 17.5 hr runtime. The amount of aromatic products was far below 1 wt% during the whole run.
  • The equilibrium FCC catalyst showed a somewhat lower selectivity to branched C6 olefins (i-C6=) and branched C6 paraffins (i-C6) than the fresh FCC catalysts. The total amounts of isomerized products at 0.5 hr and 17.5 hr runtime were 38.2 wt% and 39.8 wt%, respectively. The level of cracking was only 3.0 wt% at 17.5 hr runtime. Again, the amount of aromatic products was far below 1 wt% during the whole run.
    Although the level of isomerization of this E-cat was lower than that of the fresh FCC catalysts, it is still acceptable for use in the Fischer-Tropsch product, especially as co-catalyst in the second step..
  • These experiments show that FCC catalysts are able to isomerise linear olefinic hydrocarbons under typical Fischer-Tropsch conditions. This indicates their suitability for use in the second and third step of the Fischer-Tropsch process.

Claims (11)

  1. Fischer-Tropsch process for the conversion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to C5 + hydrocarbon mixtures in which process use is made of Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and zeolite Y-containing fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles, said process comprising contacting the carbon monoxide and hydrogen with the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles at a pressure in the range from 10 to 60 bar leading to hydrocarbons and water, and isomerising the hydrocarbons with the fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles.
  2. Process according to claim 1 wherein the mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen is contacted with a mixture of Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles, wherein the fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles comprise from 5 to 40 wt% of said mixture.
  3. Process according to claim 2 wherein the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and the fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles are dosed individually to the reaction mixture.
  4. Process according to claim 2, wherein the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles and fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles are used in the form of shaped bodies in which both particles are embedded.
  5. Process according to claim 1 wherein the step of contacting Fischer Tropsch catalyst particles with a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen to form a C5+ hydrocarbon mixture is followed by a separate step of contacting the C5+ hydrocarbon mixture with the fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles.
  6. Process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles comprise iron.
  7. Process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles comprise cobalt.
  8. Process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the fluid catalytic cracking catalyst is a spent or equilibrium fluid catalytic cracking catalyst.
  9. Process according to any one of the preceding claims wherein a metal compound has been deposited on the fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles.
  10. Process according to claim 1 comprising:
    a first step involving reacting a source of carbon with a source of oxygen to form a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen;
    a second step in which the carbon monoxide and hydrogen are contacted with the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst particles leading to hydrocarbons and water; and
    a third step in which the hydrocarbons formed in the second step are isomerised; wherein
    the zeolite Y-containing fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles are used in the third step.
  11. Process according to any one of the proceeding claims in which the fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles isomerise linear olefinic hydrocarbons.
EP03810426A 2002-11-05 2003-10-30 Fischer-tropsch process using a fischer-tropsch catalyst and a zeolite-containing catalyst Expired - Lifetime EP1558701B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP03810426A EP1558701B1 (en) 2002-11-05 2003-10-30 Fischer-tropsch process using a fischer-tropsch catalyst and a zeolite-containing catalyst

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP02079646 2002-11-05
EP02079646 2002-11-05
US42740802P 2002-11-19 2002-11-19
US427408P 2002-11-19
PCT/EP2003/012166 WO2004041970A1 (en) 2002-11-05 2003-10-30 Fischer-tropsch process using a fischer-tropsch catalyst and a zeolite-containing catalyst
EP03810426A EP1558701B1 (en) 2002-11-05 2003-10-30 Fischer-tropsch process using a fischer-tropsch catalyst and a zeolite-containing catalyst

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1558701A1 EP1558701A1 (en) 2005-08-03
EP1558701B1 true EP1558701B1 (en) 2009-08-12

Family

ID=32313840

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP03810426A Expired - Lifetime EP1558701B1 (en) 2002-11-05 2003-10-30 Fischer-tropsch process using a fischer-tropsch catalyst and a zeolite-containing catalyst

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1558701B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE439415T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003276228A1 (en)
DE (1) DE60328811D1 (en)
DK (1) DK1558701T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2331517T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2004041970A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2930733B1 (en) * 2008-04-30 2014-04-11 Inst Francais Du Petrole ACTIVE OXYDO-REDUCTION MASS AND CHEMICAL LOOP COMBUSTION METHOD
US9290700B2 (en) 2014-08-11 2016-03-22 Infra XTL Technology Limited Method for preparing synthetic liquid hydrocarbons from CO and H2

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3254023A (en) 1964-06-08 1966-05-31 Socony Mobil Oil Co Inc Method of heat balancing in organic catalytic reactions
US4906671A (en) * 1985-08-29 1990-03-06 Mobil Oil Corporation Fischer-tropsch process
US5928980A (en) * 1997-02-06 1999-07-27 Research Triangle Institute Attrition resistant catalysts and sorbents based on heavy metal poisoned FCC catalysts
US6255358B1 (en) 2000-03-17 2001-07-03 Energy International Corporation Highly active Fischer-Tropsch synthesis using doped, thermally stable catalyst support
CN100384964C (en) 2000-06-20 2008-04-30 Sasol技术股份有限公司 Hydrocarbon synthesis catalyst and process

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE60328811D1 (en) 2009-09-24
DK1558701T3 (en) 2009-12-14
AU2003276228A1 (en) 2004-06-07
ATE439415T1 (en) 2009-08-15
ES2331517T3 (en) 2010-01-07
EP1558701A1 (en) 2005-08-03
WO2004041970A1 (en) 2004-05-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
ZA200504526B (en) Fischer-Tropsch process using a Fischer-Tropsch catalys and a zeolite-containing catalyst
ZA200504525B (en) Fischer-Tropsch process using a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst and zeolite Y
US5576256A (en) Hydroprocessing scheme for production of premium isomerized light gasoline
AU590208B2 (en) Enhanced conversion of syngas to liquid motor fuels
US4385193A (en) Process for the preparation of middle distillates
EP1227885A1 (en) Process for the preparation or reactivation of carbon monoxide hydrogenation catalysts
JP4452021B2 (en) Hydrocarbon catalytic cracking process
EP0421422A2 (en) Novel faujasite-type aluminosilicates, a method of producing the same, and hydrocracking catalysts for heavy hydrocarbon oils
GB2169919A (en) Process for the preparation of hydrocarbons
EP0857513B1 (en) Catalytic composition useful in the Fischer Tropsch reaction
US4617320A (en) Enhanced conversion of syngas to liquid motor fuels
EP1627026A1 (en) Process to prepare a gasoline
ZA200210039B (en) Fischer-Tropsch processes and catalysts using aluminum borate supports.
EP0153517A1 (en) Novel catalysts and their preparation and process for the production of liquid paraffins
CN101210190A (en) Method for preparing low-carbon olefin and gasoline by synchronously feeding heavy petroleum hydrocarbon and methanol
EP1558701B1 (en) Fischer-tropsch process using a fischer-tropsch catalyst and a zeolite-containing catalyst
CA2003394A1 (en) Conversion of synthesis gas into hydrocarbons
RU2674161C1 (en) Catalyst for producing synthetic hydrocarbons from co and h2 and method for preparation thereof
JP2004500977A (en) Hydrocracking catalyst and method for producing diesel oil
JPH0136811B2 (en)
AU613813B2 (en) Conversion of synthesis gas into hydrocarbons
EP0154063A1 (en) Modified silicalite catalysts and their preparation and process for the use thereof
JPH07103381B2 (en) Liquid hydrocarbon production method
JPS63267442A (en) Hydrocracking catalyst for forming middle distillate
JPH0352827A (en) Oligomerization process of olefin and catalyst therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20050408

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: ALBEMARLE NETHERLANDS B.V.

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60328811

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20090924

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2331517

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090812

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090812

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E006704

Country of ref document: HU

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091212

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091112

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090812

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091031

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090812

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20100517

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091113

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091031

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091030

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091030

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090812

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090812

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20161027

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20161025

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20161027

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20161026

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20161025

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20161027

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20161026

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20161027

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20161024

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20171012

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20171010

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60328811

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20171031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20171101

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20171030

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171030

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171101

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180501

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171030

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20171031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171030

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20181221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181030

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181031