EP1535294A1 - Method of disabling the keyboard keys of a command-emitting device - Google Patents

Method of disabling the keyboard keys of a command-emitting device

Info

Publication number
EP1535294A1
EP1535294A1 EP03793981A EP03793981A EP1535294A1 EP 1535294 A1 EP1535294 A1 EP 1535294A1 EP 03793981 A EP03793981 A EP 03793981A EP 03793981 A EP03793981 A EP 03793981A EP 1535294 A1 EP1535294 A1 EP 1535294A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
keys
command
inhibition
transmitter
order
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP03793981A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1535294B1 (en
Inventor
Alain Bejean
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Somfy SA
Original Assignee
Somfy SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Somfy SA filed Critical Somfy SA
Publication of EP1535294A1 publication Critical patent/EP1535294A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1535294B1 publication Critical patent/EP1535294B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H9/00Details of switching devices, not covered by groups H01H1/00 - H01H7/00
    • H01H9/02Bases, casings, or covers
    • H01H9/0214Hand-held casings
    • H01H9/0235Hand-held casings specially adapted for remote control, e.g. of audio or video apparatus
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H3/00Mechanisms for operating contacts
    • H01H3/02Operating parts, i.e. for operating driving mechanism by a mechanical force external to the switch
    • H01H2003/0293Operating parts, i.e. for operating driving mechanism by a mechanical force external to the switch with an integrated touch switch
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H2217/00Facilitation of operation; Human engineering
    • H01H2217/022Part of keyboard not operable
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H2239/00Miscellaneous
    • H01H2239/03Avoiding erroneous switching
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H2300/00Orthogonal indexing scheme relating to electric switches, relays, selectors or emergency protective devices covered by H01H
    • H01H2300/022Application wake up; switches or contacts specially provided for the wake up or standby shift of a circuit

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for inhibiting the keys of the keyboard of a command transmitter intended for controlling an item of equipment.
  • the invention also relates to a command transmitter comprising a microcontroller connected to keys and to command transmission means and intended to implement such a method.
  • Such a method applies in particular to remote control, for example by radio frequencies, of maneuvering or locking doors, such as garage doors or entrance doors to dwellings.
  • the invention can be applied to the fields of access security and / or protection by alarm.
  • the transmitter of orders is of the nomadic type and, in particular, when it is carried in the pocket or in the bag of a user, there is a risk of accidental pressing on the control keys of the transmitter.
  • a remote control device for example for a television or video recorder, the power supply of which is activated by pressing any key on the keyboard and deactivated automatically after issuing the associated command. to the key in order to save energy.
  • Application EP 0 930 409 describes a system for remote control of functions in a vehicle. The application distinguishes between central locking functions and comfort functions. Certain functions must be activated as long as a receiver receives an order from a transmitter. To avoid interruption of these functions by a transmission problem following a slight movement of the transmitter when it is at the limit of range, the sensitivity threshold of the receiver is lowered for a certain time from the start of issuance of the order.
  • the object of the invention is to provide an inhibition method improving the solutions of the prior art and overcoming the problem mentioned above.
  • the invention proposes to provide a method for inhibiting the keys of the keyboard of an order transmitter when it is slipped into a pocket or in a bag and to produce an order transmitter allowing the implementation of such a process.
  • the method according to the invention is characterized by the characterizing part of claim 1.
  • the order transmitter according to the invention is defined by claim 8.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of a command transmitter allowing the execution of the method according to the invention.
  • Figure 2 is a flow chart of the method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 1 represents in diagram form a transmitter of orders 10 allowing the execution of the method according to the invention.
  • This command transmitter 10 comprises a microcontroller 13 connected to a keyboard with several keys 14, 15, 16 and to a radio frequency transmitter 12, itself connected to an antenna 11.
  • This command transmitter is powered by a battery 17.
  • this command transmitter makes it possible to control the opening and closing of a garage door and the activation and deactivation of an alarm.
  • Key 14 controls both the opening of the door and the deactivation of the alarm.
  • the key 16 controls both the closing of the door and the activation of the alarm and the key 15 is a key for stopping the operation of the door.
  • This order transmitter communicates with one or more order receivers not shown and controlling the garage door and the alarm.
  • a program 100 authorizes the reading of the keys of the keyboard and puts in an active state an inhibition indicator.
  • This press causes the activation of a test program 120 making it possible to determine whether the key or one of the keys actuated is a specific key, that is to say if one of the keys is not inhibited. If all the keys pressed are disabled, then there is a loop back to program 100. If, on the other hand, one of the keys pressed is a specific key, then a test program 140 is activated. This test makes it possible to determine whether pressing the key or the keys corresponds to a specific sequence of presses such as a determined series of presses but which can also be summed up by a long press.
  • a program 160 is activated. This causes the command transmitter to issue the command corresponding to the specific key pressed.
  • the command transmitter can have the stop key 15 as the only specific key. For safety reasons, even a brief press on this key stops the door maneuvering.
  • a program 200 is activated. This causes the inhibition to be deleted, i.e. all the keys on the keyboard become active.
  • the arrow A2 represents a new action on a key on the keyboard. This action causes the activation of a program 220 which then allows the transmission of the order corresponding to the key pressed.
  • a program 240 is activated. This program inhibits the keyboard keys except the specific keys. This program is executed, either immediately after sending the order, or after a time delay which optionally allows other orders to be sent to the order receiver. In the latter case, any new action on one of the keys on the keyboard also extends the time window during which the keys remain active.
  • test programs 120 and 140 relate to the identification of the key pressed:
  • the command associated with the button is sent and looped back to program 100, if it is the protected key 14, the command associated with the key is transmitted and the inhibition is temporarily removed.
  • the two variants can be combined, in the case where no key is mechanically protected: on the one hand, the specific stop key remains uninhibited and, on the other hand, a long press or a particular sequence touching other keys makes the keys active.
  • a program replacing programs 120 and 140 then tests whether the stop key is pressed or whether it is a particular sequence of presses. In the first case, the command corresponding to the key pressed is sent, in the second case, there is temporary suppression of the inhibition. If the support does not correspond to either of the two previous cases, then there is a loopback on program 100.
  • the action Al can only be applied to certain keys on pain of being ignored by the microcontroller.
  • the test program 120 becomes useless and the test program 140 directs towards the simple execution of the order if it is the stop key or towards the temporary suppression of the inhibition if a particular sequence of pressing is recognized.
  • the program 100 then consists in causing the passage to sleep mode or the partial disconnection of the power supply.
  • the order transmitter may optionally have a grip sensor 18.
  • the suppression of the inhibition of the keys can in this case be caused by a signal coming from the grip sensor 18.
  • This sensor can be of thermal, galvanic or capacitive type, or can also consist of a pressure detector.
  • US patents 6,330,457 and US 6,246,862 are known, sensors used for a use strictly opposite to that which concerns the invention since it involves invalidating the use of the keys of a telephone when the latter enters mode. operational.
  • the sensor delivers a signal indicating that the command transmitter is held in the hand and not tossed in a pocket or a bag, then this signal can be used to control the suppression of the inhibition of the keys. Similarly, the disappearance of the signal can be used to cause the inhibition of the keys.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Input From Keyboards Or The Like (AREA)
  • Selective Calling Equipment (AREA)
  • Lock And Its Accessories (AREA)
  • Superconductors And Manufacturing Methods Therefor (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Compositions Of Oxide Ceramics (AREA)
  • Transmitters (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method of disabling the keyboard keys of a command-emitting device. The inventive method is characterised in that it comprises repeated iterations of the following steps: the automatic disabling of at least some keys on the command-emitting device once a command has been sent and the cancellation of said key-disabling operation by means of a specific action on the command-emitting device. One such method can be used to disable the keyboard keys of a command-emitting device when said device is being placed in a pocket or bag.

Description

Procédé d' inhibition des touches du clavier d'un émetteur d'ordres. Method for inhibiting the keys of the keyboard of a command transmitter.
L'invention concerne un procédé d'inhibition des touches du clavier d'un émetteur d'ordres destiné à commander un équipement. L'invention concerne encore un émetteur d'ordres comprenant un microcontrôleur relié à des touches et à des moyens d'émission d'ordres et destiné à mettre en œuvre un tel procédé.The invention relates to a method for inhibiting the keys of the keyboard of a command transmitter intended for controlling an item of equipment. The invention also relates to a command transmitter comprising a microcontroller connected to keys and to command transmission means and intended to implement such a method.
Un tel procédé s'applique notamment à la commande à distance, par exemple par radiofréquences, de manœuvre ou de verrouillage de portes, telles que des portes de garages ou des portes d'entrées d'habitations.Such a method applies in particular to remote control, for example by radio frequencies, of maneuvering or locking doors, such as garage doors or entrance doors to dwellings.
Plus généralement, l'invention peut être appliquée aux domaines de la sécurité d'accès et/ou de la protection par alarme. Quand l'émetteur d'ordres est de type nomade et, en particulier, quand il est transporté dans la poche ou dans le sac d'un utilisateur, il existe un risque d'appui accidentel sur les touches de commande de l'émetteur.More generally, the invention can be applied to the fields of access security and / or protection by alarm. When the transmitter of orders is of the nomadic type and, in particular, when it is carried in the pocket or in the bag of a user, there is a risk of accidental pressing on the control keys of the transmitter.
Ce problème d'appui accidentel est connu. Diverses solutions ont été imaginées pour y remédier.This problem of accidental support is known. Various solutions have been devised to remedy this.
On connaît des brevets US 3,906,814 et US 5,290,979, des dispositifs de commande présentant des organes permettant de verrouiller mécaniquement certaines touches pour interdire leur usage. On connaît du brevet US 4,820,887, un clavier à membrane présentant des caches plus ou moins rigides recouvrant des touches critiques du clavier et permettant de rendre impossible ou plus difficile une action sur celles-ci.US patents 3,906,814 and US 5,290,979 are known, control devices having members making it possible to mechanically lock certain keys to prohibit their use. There is known from US Pat. No. 4,820,887, a membrane keyboard having more or less rigid covers covering critical keys of the keyboard and making it possible to make action on them impossible or more difficult.
On connaît encore du brevet US 5,385,417, un cache rigide destiné à recouvrir une touche et présentant un trou de manière à ce que cette touche puisse être actionnée par un objet pointu tel qu'une pointe de stylo.Also known from US patent 5,385,417 is a rigid cover intended to cover a key and having a hole so that this key can be actuated by a pointed object such as a pen point.
Par ailleurs, il est courant que l'alimentation d'un dispositif portable, tel qu'un téléphone ou une calculatrice, soit provoquée par l'ouverture d'un capot de protection du clavier, l'alimentation ayant pour conséquence de rendre actives les touches du clavier. De tels dispositifs sont décrits dans la demande EP 0 924 915 et dans le brevet US 6,005,497. Dans le même domaine, on connaît de la demande EP 0 453 089 un téléphone portable dont les touches peuvent être inhibées suite à une action de l'utilisateur sur certaines d' entre-elles, les touches pouvant, par la même action, être désinhibées.Furthermore, it is common for the power supply to a portable device, such as a telephone or a calculator, to be caused by the opening of a protective cover for the keyboard, the power supply having the effect of making the active keyboard keys. Such devices are described in patent application EP 0 924 915 and in US patent 6,005,497. In the same field, there is known from application EP 0 453 089 a mobile telephone the keys of which can be disabled following an action by the user on some of them, the keys being able, by the same action, to be disabled .
On connaît aussi du brevet US 4,544,924, un dispositif de commande à distance, par exemple pour téléviseur ou magnétoscope, dont l'alimentation électrique est activée par l'appui sur une touche quelconque du clavier et désactivée automatiquement après l'émission de la commande associée à la touche afin d'économiser 1' énergie. La demande EP 0 930 409 décrit un système de commande à distance de fonctions dans un véhicule. La demande établit une distinction entre fonctions de fermeture centralisée et fonctions de confort. Certaines fonctions doivent être activées tant qu'un récepteur reçoit un ordre d'un émetteur. Pour éviter l'interruption de ces fonctions par un problème de transmission suite à un léger mouvement de l'émetteur lorsque celui-ci se trouve en limite de portée, le seuil de sensibilité du récepteur est abaissé pendant un certain temps à partir du début de l'émission de 1' ordre.Also known from US Pat. No. 4,544,924 is a remote control device, for example for a television or video recorder, the power supply of which is activated by pressing any key on the keyboard and deactivated automatically after issuing the associated command. to the key in order to save energy. Application EP 0 930 409 describes a system for remote control of functions in a vehicle. The application distinguishes between central locking functions and comfort functions. Certain functions must be activated as long as a receiver receives an order from a transmitter. To avoid interruption of these functions by a transmission problem following a slight movement of the transmitter when it is at the limit of range, the sensitivity threshold of the receiver is lowered for a certain time from the start of issuance of the order.
Enfin, on connaît du brevet US 4,992,784 un dispositif de télécommande nécessitant, pour émettre certaines commandes particulières, un appui simultané sur plusieurs touches. Cette procédure rend improbable l'émission par erreur de ces commandes particulières. De la même façon, sur les ordinateurs PC, les systèmes d'exploitation de la société Microsoft nécessitent un appui simultané sur les touches « Ctrl », « Alt » et « Suppr » pour effectuer un redémarrage à chaud (reset) .Finally, there is known from US Pat. No. 4,992,784 a remote control device requiring, in order to issue certain particular commands, simultaneous pressing of several keys. This procedure makes it unlikely that these particular commands will be issued in error. Similarly, on PC computers, Microsoft operating systems require simultaneous pressing of the keys "Ctrl", "Alt" and "Del" to perform a warm restart (reset).
Cependant, les solutions de l'art antérieur présentent un problème. Elles ne sont pas applicables aux émetteurs d'ordres de type nomade et, en particulier, de type « porte-clés » ou ne répondent pas exactement au besoin. Ce type d'émetteur contrôlant l'ouverture de portes donnant accès à l'ensemble d'un bâtiment ou permettant d'activer ou de désactiver une alarme, il est nécessaire de garantir qu'un appui intempestif sur une des touches de l'émetteur d'ordres ne provoquera pas l'ouverture d'une porte ou la désactivation de 1' alarme.However, the solutions of the prior art present a problem. They are not applicable to issuers of nomadic type orders and, in particular, of “keychain” type or do not exactly meet the need. This type of transmitter controls the opening of doors giving access to an entire building or enabling or disabling an alarm, it is necessary to guarantee that an untimely press on one of the keys of the command transmitter will not cause the opening of a door or the deactivation of the alarm.
Le but de l'invention est de fournir un procédé d'inhibition améliorant les solutions de l'art antérieur et palliant le problème précédemment cité. En particulier, l'invention se propose de fournir un procédé permettant l'inhibition des touches du clavier d'un émetteur d'ordres lorsqu'on glisse celui-ci dans une poche ou dans un sac et de réaliser un émetteur d'ordres permettant la mise en œuvre d'un tel procédé.The object of the invention is to provide an inhibition method improving the solutions of the prior art and overcoming the problem mentioned above. In particular, the invention proposes to provide a method for inhibiting the keys of the keyboard of an order transmitter when it is slipped into a pocket or in a bag and to produce an order transmitter allowing the implementation of such a process.
Le procédé selon l'invention est caractérisé par la partie caractérisante de la revendication 1.The method according to the invention is characterized by the characterizing part of claim 1.
Les revendications dépendantes 2 à 7 définissent différents modes d'exécution du procédé selon 1' invention.The dependent claims 2 to 7 define different modes of carrying out the method according to the invention.
L'émetteur d'ordres selon l'invention est défini par la revendication 8.The order transmitter according to the invention is defined by claim 8.
La revendication dépendante 9 définit une variante de réalisation de l'émetteur d'ordres.Dependent claim 9 defines an alternative embodiment of the order transmitter.
Le dessin annexé représente, à titre d'exemple, un mode d'exécution du procédé selon l'invention.The accompanying drawing shows, by way of example, an embodiment of the method according to the invention.
La figure 1 est un schéma d'un émetteur d'ordres permettant l'exécution du procédé selon l'invention. La figure 2 est un ordinogramme du procédé selon 1' invention.FIG. 1 is a diagram of a command transmitter allowing the execution of the method according to the invention. Figure 2 is a flow chart of the method according to the invention.
La figure 1 représente sous forme de schéma un émetteur d'ordres 10 permettant l'exécution du procédé selon l'invention. Cet émetteur d'ordres 10 comprend un microcontrôleur 13 relié à un clavier à plusieurs touches 14, 15, 16 et à un émetteur radiofréquences 12, lui-même relié à une antenne 11. Cet émetteur d'ordres est alimenté par une pile 17.FIG. 1 represents in diagram form a transmitter of orders 10 allowing the execution of the method according to the invention. This command transmitter 10 comprises a microcontroller 13 connected to a keyboard with several keys 14, 15, 16 and to a radio frequency transmitter 12, itself connected to an antenna 11. This command transmitter is powered by a battery 17.
Pour illustrer, on suppose que cet émetteur d'ordres permet de commander l'ouverture et la fermeture d'une porte de garage et l'activation et la désactivation d'une alarme. La touche 14 commande à la fois l'ouverture de la porte et la désactivation de l'alarme. La touche 16 commande à la fois la fermeture de la porte et l'activation de l'alarme et la touche 15 est une touche d'arrêt de la manœuvre de la porte.To illustrate, it is assumed that this command transmitter makes it possible to control the opening and closing of a garage door and the activation and deactivation of an alarm. Key 14 controls both the opening of the door and the deactivation of the alarm. The key 16 controls both the closing of the door and the activation of the alarm and the key 15 is a key for stopping the operation of the door.
Cet émetteur d' ordres communique avec un ou plusieurs récepteurs d'ordres non représentés et pilotant la porte de garage et l'alarme.This order transmitter communicates with one or more order receivers not shown and controlling the garage door and the alarm.
Sur l'ordinogramme de la figure 2, on suppose dans un premier temps que l'émetteur d'ordres est partiellement inhibé. Dans cet état, l'appui sur les touches du clavier (sauf sur certaines dites touches spécifiques) n'a aucune conséquence. Un programme 100 autorise la lecture des touches du clavier et met dans un état actif un indicateur d'inhibition. On représente, par une flèche Al, une action volontaire ou involontaire de l'utilisateur sur une ou plusieurs touches du clavier.On the flow diagram of FIG. 2, it is initially assumed that the order transmitter is partially inhibited. In this state, pressing the keys on the keyboard (except on certain so-called specific keys) has no consequence. A program 100 authorizes the reading of the keys of the keyboard and puts in an active state an inhibition indicator. We represent, by an arrow A1, a voluntary or involuntary action of the user on one or more keys of the keyboard.
Cet appui provoque l'activation d'un programme de test 120 permettant de déterminer si la touche ou l'une des touches actionnées est une touche spécifique, c'est à dire si l'une des touches est non inhibée. Si toutes les touches actionnées sont inhibées, alors il y a rebouclage sur le programme 100. Si, au contraire, une des touches actionnées est une touche spécifique, alors un programme de test 140 est activé. Ce test permet de déterminer si l'appui sur la touche ou sur les touches, correspond à une séquence spécifique d'appuis telle qu'une série déterminée d'appuis mais pouvant aussi se résumer à un appui long.This press causes the activation of a test program 120 making it possible to determine whether the key or one of the keys actuated is a specific key, that is to say if one of the keys is not inhibited. If all the keys pressed are disabled, then there is a loop back to program 100. If, on the other hand, one of the keys pressed is a specific key, then a test program 140 is activated. This test makes it possible to determine whether pressing the key or the keys corresponds to a specific sequence of presses such as a determined series of presses but which can also be summed up by a long press.
S'il ne s'agit pas d'une séquence spécifique, un programme 160 est activé. Celui-ci provoque l'émission par l'émetteur d'ordres de la commande correspondant à la touche spécifique actionnée. Par exemple, l'émetteur d'ordres peut présenter pour seule touche spécifique, la touche d'arrêt 15. Pour des raisons de sécurité, un appui même bref sur cette touche commande l'arrêt de la manœuvre de la porte.If it is not a specific sequence, a program 160 is activated. This causes the command transmitter to issue the command corresponding to the specific key pressed. For example, the command transmitter can have the stop key 15 as the only specific key. For safety reasons, even a brief press on this key stops the door maneuvering.
S'il s'agit d'une séquence spécifique, un programme 200 est activé. Celui-ci provoque la suppression de l'inhibition, c'est-à-dire que toutes les touches du clavier deviennent actives. On représente par la flèche A2 une nouvelle action sur une touche du clavier. Cette action provoque l'activation d'un programme 220 qui permet alors l'émission de l'ordre correspondant à la touche actionnée.If it is a specific sequence, a program 200 is activated. This causes the inhibition to be deleted, i.e. all the keys on the keyboard become active. The arrow A2 represents a new action on a key on the keyboard. This action causes the activation of a program 220 which then allows the transmission of the order corresponding to the key pressed.
Après cet envoi, un programme 240 est activé. Ce programme provoque l'inhibition des touches du clavier à l'exception des touches spécifiques. Ce programme est exécuté, soit juste après l'envoi de l'ordre, soit après une temporisation qui permet éventuellement l'envoi d'autres commandes vers le récepteur d'ordres. Dans ce dernier cas, toute nouvelle action sur une des touches du clavier prolonge d'autant la fenêtre temporelle pendant laquelle les touches demeurent actives.After this sending, a program 240 is activated. This program inhibits the keyboard keys except the specific keys. This program is executed, either immediately after sending the order, or after a time delay which optionally allows other orders to be sent to the order receiver. In the latter case, any new action on one of the keys on the keyboard also extends the time window during which the keys remain active.
Dans une variante d'exécution du procédé, il existe deux touches spécifiques. La première est la touche d'arrêt 15 comme précédemment et la deuxième est la touche d'ouverture 14. Si cette touche est protégée par un moyen mécanique 19, son activation peut donner lieu à la suppression de l'inhibition des touches. Ainsi, les programmes de test 120 et 140 portent sur l'identification de la touche actionnée :In an alternative embodiment of the method, there are two specific keys. The first is the stop key 15 as before and the second is the open key 14. If this key is protected by mechanical means 19, its activation can give rise to the suppression of the inhibition of the keys. Thus, the test programs 120 and 140 relate to the identification of the key pressed:
- s'il s'agit d'une touche autre que les deux touches spécifiques, il y a rebouclage sur le programme 100,- if it is a key other than the two specific keys, there is a loop back to program 100,
- s'il s'agit de la touche d'arrêt 15, il y a émission de l'ordre associé à la touche et rebouclage sur le programme 100, s'il s'agit de la touche protégée 14, il y a émission de l'ordre associé à la touche et suppression temporaire de l'inhibition.- if it is the stop button 15, the command associated with the button is sent and looped back to program 100, if it is the protected key 14, the command associated with the key is transmitted and the inhibition is temporarily removed.
De même, les deux variantes peuvent être combinées, dans le cas où aucune touche n'est protégée mécaniquement : d'une part, la touche spécifique d'arrêt reste non inhibée et, d'autre part, un appui prolongé ou une séquence particulière portant sur d'autres touches permet de rendre actives les touches. Un programme remplaçant les programmes 120 et 140 teste alors si la touche d'arrêt est actionnée ou s'il s'agit d'une séquence particulière d'appui. Dans le premier cas, il y a envoi de la commande correspondant à la touche actionnée, dans le deuxième cas, il y a suppression temporaire de l'inhibition. Si, l'appui ne correspond à aucun des deux cas précédents, il y a alors bouclage sur le programme 100.Likewise, the two variants can be combined, in the case where no key is mechanically protected: on the one hand, the specific stop key remains uninhibited and, on the other hand, a long press or a particular sequence touching other keys makes the keys active. A program replacing programs 120 and 140 then tests whether the stop key is pressed or whether it is a particular sequence of presses. In the first case, the command corresponding to the key pressed is sent, in the second case, there is temporary suppression of the inhibition. If the support does not correspond to either of the two previous cases, then there is a loopback on program 100.
Enfin, il est clair qu'un couplage étroit peut être réalisé entre, d'une part, les composantes matérielles et, d'autre part, les composantes logicielles de l'émetteur d'ordres pour obtenir un tel comportement. On peut ainsi prévoir que seules certaines touches du clavier peuvent activer l'alimentation 17 de l'émetteur ou peuvent, de manière analogue, faire sortir le microcontrôleur et/ou l'émetteur d'un mode sommeil .Finally, it is clear that close coupling can be achieved between, on the one hand, the hardware components and, on the other hand, the software components of the command transmitter to obtain such behavior. It can thus be provided that only certain keys of the keyboard can activate the power supply 17 of the transmitter or can, in a similar manner, bring the microcontroller and / or the transmitter out of a sleep mode.
En envisageant un tel cas, l'action Al ne peut être appliquée que sur certaines touches sous peine d'être ignorée par le microcontrôleur. Le programme de test 120 devient inutile et le programme de test 140 oriente vers la simple exécution de l'ordre s'il s'agit de la touche d'arrêt ou vers la suppression temporaire de l'inhibition si une séquence particulière d'appui est reconnue.By considering such a case, the action Al can only be applied to certain keys on pain of being ignored by the microcontroller. The test program 120 becomes useless and the test program 140 directs towards the simple execution of the order if it is the stop key or towards the temporary suppression of the inhibition if a particular sequence of pressing is recognized.
Le programme 100 consiste alors à provoquer le passage en mode sommeil ou la déconnexion partielle de 1' alimentation.The program 100 then consists in causing the passage to sleep mode or the partial disconnection of the power supply.
L'émetteur d'ordres peut présenter de manière facultative un capteur de prise en main 18.The order transmitter may optionally have a grip sensor 18.
La suppression de l'inhibition des touches peut dans ce cas être provoquée par un signal issu du capteur de prise en main 18.The suppression of the inhibition of the keys can in this case be caused by a signal coming from the grip sensor 18.
Ce capteur peut être de type thermique, galvanique ou capacitif, ou peut encore consister en un détecteur de pression. On connaît des brevets US 6,330,457 et US 6,246,862, des capteurs utilisés pour un usage strictement opposé à celui qui intéresse l'invention puisqu'il s'agit d'invalider l'usage des touches d'un téléphone lorsque celui-ci passe en mode opérationnel.This sensor can be of thermal, galvanic or capacitive type, or can also consist of a pressure detector. US patents 6,330,457 and US 6,246,862 are known, sensors used for a use strictly opposite to that which concerns the invention since it involves invalidating the use of the keys of a telephone when the latter enters mode. operational.
Si le capteur délivre un signal indiquant que l'émetteur d'ordres est tenu dans la main et non ballotté dans une poche ou dans un sac, alors ce signal peut être utilisé pour commander la suppression de l'inhibition des touches. De même, la disparition du signal peut être utilisée pour provoquer l'inhibition des touches. If the sensor delivers a signal indicating that the command transmitter is held in the hand and not tossed in a pocket or a bag, then this signal can be used to control the suppression of the inhibition of the keys. Similarly, the disappearance of the signal can be used to cause the inhibition of the keys.

Claims

Revendications claims
1. Procédé d'inhibition des touches (14, 15, 16) du clavier d'un émetteur d'ordres (10) destiné à commander un équipement, caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend des itérations des étapes suivantes : inhibition automatique d'au moins certaines touches (14, 16) de l'émetteur d'ordres (10) après l'envoi d'un ordre, suppression de l'inhibition des touches (14, 16) par une action spécifique sur l'émetteur d' ordres (10) .1. Method for inhibiting the keys (14, 15, 16) of the keyboard of a command transmitter (10) intended for controlling an item of equipment, characterized in that it comprises iterations of the following steps: automatic inhibition of at least some keys (14, 16) of the command transmitter (10) after sending an order, removal of inhibition of the keys (14, 16) by a specific action on the transmitter of orders (10).
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l' inhibition se fait immédiatement après l'envoi d'un ordre par l'émetteur d'ordres (10).2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the inhibition takes place immediately after the sending of an order by the order transmitter (10).
3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'inhibition se fait à l'issue d'une temporisation enclenchée après l'envoi d'un ordre par l'émetteur d'ordres (10).3. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the inhibition is done at the end of a time delay started after the sending of an order by the order transmitter (10).
4. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'inhibition est provoquée par la disparition d'un signal émis par un capteur de détection de prise en main (18).4. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the inhibition is caused by the disappearance of a signal emitted by a pick-up detection sensor (18).
5. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la suppression de l'inhibition est provoquée par une manipulation spécifique d'une ou de plusieurs touches (15). 5. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the suppression of the inhibition is caused by a specific manipulation of one or more keys (15).
6. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que la suppression de l'inhibition est provoquée par une action sur un moyen de verrouillage mécanique (19).6. Method according to one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the suppression of the inhibition is caused by an action on a mechanical locking means (19).
7. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que la suppression de l'inhibition est provoquée par un signal émis par un capteur de détection de prise en main (18) .7. Method according to one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the suppression of the inhibition is caused by a signal emitted by a pick-up detection sensor (18).
8. Emetteur d'ordres (10) comprenant un microcontrôleur (13) relié à des touches (14, 15, 16) et à des moyens d'émission d'ordres (11, 12), caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend des programmes permettant la mise en œuvre du procédé selon les revendications 1, 2, 3, 4 ou 6.8. Command transmitter (10) comprising a microcontroller (13) connected to keys (14, 15, 16) and to command transmission means (11, 12), characterized in that it comprises programs allowing the implementation of the method according to claims 1, 2, 3, 4 or 6.
9. Emetteur d'ordres (10) selon la revendication 8 et destiné à mettre en œuvre le procédé selon la revendication 5 ou 7, caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend un capteur de prise en main (18) . 9. command transmitter (10) according to claim 8 and intended to implement the method according to claim 5 or 7, characterized in that it comprises a grip sensor (18).
EP03793981A 2002-09-05 2003-08-27 Method of disabling the keyboard keys of a command-emitting device Expired - Lifetime EP1535294B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0210999 2002-09-05
FR0210999A FR2844388B1 (en) 2002-09-05 2002-09-05 METHOD OF INHIBITING THE KEYBOARD KEYS OF AN ORDER TRANSMITTER
PCT/IB2003/003786 WO2004023502A1 (en) 2002-09-05 2003-08-27 Method of disabling the keyboard keys of a command-emitting device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1535294A1 true EP1535294A1 (en) 2005-06-01
EP1535294B1 EP1535294B1 (en) 2009-02-25

Family

ID=31725860

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP03793981A Expired - Lifetime EP1535294B1 (en) 2002-09-05 2003-08-27 Method of disabling the keyboard keys of a command-emitting device

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US7256726B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1535294B1 (en)
CN (1) CN100338704C (en)
AT (1) ATE424032T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003253221A1 (en)
DE (1) DE60326359D1 (en)
ES (1) ES2239933T1 (en)
FR (1) FR2844388B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2004023502A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2844388B1 (en) 2002-09-05 2005-05-27 Somfy METHOD OF INHIBITING THE KEYBOARD KEYS OF AN ORDER TRANSMITTER
US7784088B2 (en) * 2004-07-30 2010-08-24 Research In Motion Limited Method and system for managing delayed user authentication
EP1779248A4 (en) * 2004-07-30 2008-02-27 Research In Motion Ltd Method and system for coordinating client and host security modules
US7378964B1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2008-05-27 Israel Amir Very low power active RFID receiver
US20090033521A1 (en) 2007-08-01 2009-02-05 Ladouceur Norman M Key designs for compact keypad of handheld communication device
EP2020666B1 (en) * 2007-08-01 2013-11-06 BlackBerry Limited Key designs for compact keypad of handheld communication device
JP2009213126A (en) * 2008-02-08 2009-09-17 Rohm Co Ltd Remote control apparatus and electronic device using electrostatic sensor, and control method of switch
US8330584B1 (en) 2009-07-16 2012-12-11 John Pfanstiehl Remote control with lockable keys
US20130135535A1 (en) * 2011-11-30 2013-05-30 Curtis Ling Method and apparatus for fast channel change
JP7028064B2 (en) * 2018-05-30 2022-03-02 横河電機株式会社 Equipment maintenance equipment, equipment maintenance methods, equipment maintenance programs and recording media
WO2019246129A2 (en) 2018-06-18 2019-12-26 Magic Leap, Inc. Augmented reality display with frame modulation functionality
WO2019246058A1 (en) * 2018-06-18 2019-12-26 Magic Leap, Inc. Systems and methods for temporarily disabling user control interfaces during attachment of an electronic device
US11624909B2 (en) 2018-06-18 2023-04-11 Magic Leap, Inc. Head-mounted display systems with power saving functionality

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3906814A (en) 1973-10-26 1975-09-23 Rolf I Magnussen Keyboard key lock mechanism
US4544924A (en) 1982-12-22 1985-10-01 Rca Corporation On-off arrangement in a microprocessor controlled remote transmitter for a consumer instrument
DE3738532A1 (en) 1987-11-13 1989-05-24 Preh Elektro Feinmechanik REMOTE CONTROL DEVICE
US4820887A (en) 1988-05-02 1989-04-11 Honeywell Inc. Membrane keyboard blockout apparatus
GB2243117B (en) * 1990-04-20 1994-04-20 Technophone Ltd Portable radio telephone
US5385417A (en) 1993-04-12 1995-01-31 Wade; Lawrence E. Key cover for individual key of computer keyboard
US5290979A (en) 1993-04-19 1994-03-01 Eaton Corporation Handle block for electrical switching device
DE4326272A1 (en) * 1993-08-05 1995-02-09 Vdo Schindling Method for activating/deactivating a security device for a motor vehicle and remote control for carrying out the method
SE507449C2 (en) * 1996-03-01 1998-06-08 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Method and apparatus for activating and automatically deactivating keypad for a mobile radio terminal
KR100247341B1 (en) * 1996-12-27 2000-03-15 윤종용 Method for locking control key of electric device by use of remote controller
US6005497A (en) 1997-10-20 1999-12-21 Ericsson Inc. Power control latch
FI104928B (en) 1997-11-27 2000-04-28 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd Wireless Communication and a Method of Making a Wireless Communication Device
DE19801885A1 (en) * 1998-01-20 1999-07-22 Mannesmann Vdo Ag Receiving device of a remote control system and method for operating a remote control system
KR20000010415A (en) 1998-07-31 2000-02-15 서평원 Method for providing speech service according to sensing of carrying of mobile phone
US6246862B1 (en) 1999-02-03 2001-06-12 Motorola, Inc. Sensor controlled user interface for portable communication device
US6718240B1 (en) * 2002-08-28 2004-04-06 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Remote keyless entry system
FR2844388B1 (en) 2002-09-05 2005-05-27 Somfy METHOD OF INHIBITING THE KEYBOARD KEYS OF AN ORDER TRANSMITTER

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2004023502A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7256726B2 (en) 2007-08-14
FR2844388A1 (en) 2004-03-12
AU2003253221A1 (en) 2004-03-29
CN1679128A (en) 2005-10-05
EP1535294B1 (en) 2009-02-25
ATE424032T1 (en) 2009-03-15
WO2004023502A1 (en) 2004-03-18
CN100338704C (en) 2007-09-19
ES2239933T1 (en) 2005-10-16
FR2844388B1 (en) 2005-05-27
DE60326359D1 (en) 2009-04-09
US20050237230A1 (en) 2005-10-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1535294B1 (en) Method of disabling the keyboard keys of a command-emitting device
US5805084A (en) System for activation of a keyboard lock
WO2019157804A1 (en) Method and apparatus for fingerprint unlocking
US20180157817A1 (en) Unlocking method and apparatus, and storage medium
EP1821261A1 (en) Method and device for automatically locking the doors of a vehicle
WO2012009891A1 (en) Method and apparatus for locking touch keys of mobile terminal
WO2018064886A1 (en) Fingerprint collection method and terminal
EP3266003A1 (en) Method for controlling access to at least one function of a motor vehicle
EP2084355A1 (en) Lock for a portable device
CA2316913A1 (en) Apparatus and method for prevention of accidental activation of keys in a wireless communication device
JP2000067182A (en) Method and device for preventing card from being taken out
EP1561192B1 (en) Method for securing the recording mode of a home automation device
CA2306431C (en) Lock managing a parameter related to the surroundings
US9489319B1 (en) Operating time supervisory system
WO2007134675A1 (en) Detection device with reduced electrical consumption
EP1328907B1 (en) Method for processing detection signals for a motor vehicle
CA2299552C (en) System for local or remote switching on and off of computers and/or peripherals with differentiation of local and remote switching-on mode and switching-off software
EP3367184A1 (en) Method for configuring a home-automation sensor and home-automation sensor implementing such a method
WO2014190569A1 (en) Self-calibration method and apparatus for device with touch switch
CN110782561B (en) Mistaken touch prevention control method of touch panel, touch panel and intelligent door lock
CN209731445U (en) Switch thermomechanical components and hard disk video recorder for electronic equipment
CN112241654A (en) Fingerprint acquisition method and device
EP1046557A1 (en) Access authorization system for a vehicle
FR2752993A1 (en) Non-volatile memory data protection device with time switching circuit
EP4377161A1 (en) Method for opening a vehicle and associated hands-free key

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20041130

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: BEJEAN, ALAIN

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20080307

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60326359

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20090409

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090525

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090605

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090812

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090525

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20091126

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SOMFY SAS

Effective date: 20090831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20090827

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090526

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090827

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090827

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090826

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090225

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20180725

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20180816

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60326359

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200303

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190827

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20210721

Year of fee payment: 19

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220831