EP1527154B1 - Detergent compositions - Google Patents

Detergent compositions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1527154B1
EP1527154B1 EP03792208A EP03792208A EP1527154B1 EP 1527154 B1 EP1527154 B1 EP 1527154B1 EP 03792208 A EP03792208 A EP 03792208A EP 03792208 A EP03792208 A EP 03792208A EP 1527154 B1 EP1527154 B1 EP 1527154B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
copolymer
laundry detergent
mole
detergent composition
sodium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP03792208A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1527154A1 (en
Inventor
Donna Unilever R&D Port Sunlight MACNAB
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Publication of EP1527154A1 publication Critical patent/EP1527154A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1527154B1 publication Critical patent/EP1527154B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02Anionic compounds
    • C11D1/12Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof
    • C11D1/22Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof derived from aromatic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37Polymers
    • C11D3/3746Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • C11D3/3769(Co)polymerised monomers containing nitrogen, e.g. carbonamides, nitriles or amines
    • C11D3/3776Heterocyclic compounds, e.g. lactam

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to laundry detergent compositions containing certain vinyl pyrrolidone copolymers.
  • the compositions exhibit improved detergency on oily soils as well as reduced soil redeposition during the wash.
  • Polyvinyl pyrrolidone and some related polymers are known ingredients of laundry detergent compositions, providing the benefit of reduced dye transfer between fabrics in a mixed load.
  • Laundry detergent compositions containing polyvinyl pyrrolidone as a dye transfer inhibitor are disclosed, for example, in WO 92 18597A, WO 94 03567A, WO 95 03390A, WO 95 17496A, WO 95 27028A and WO 95 34627A (Procter & Gamble), and WO 94 06354A, WO 94 24249A and WO 97 03166A (Henkel).
  • GB 1 354 498 discloses laundry detergent compositions containing vinyl pyrrolidone/vinyl acetate copolymers as antiredeposition agents. During the wash, the polymers effectively prevent or reduce redeposition onto washed fabrics of soil suspended in the wash liquor. Polyvinyl pyrrolidone itself is stated to be ineffective.
  • vinyl pyrrolidone/vinyl alcohol copolymers are also effective to enhance oily soil detergency, especially in detergent compositions containing anionic surfactants, more especially alkylbenzene sulphonate.
  • the present invention provides a the use of a water-soluble random copolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate in a laundry detergent composition comprising an organic surfactant and optionally a detergency builder to improve the oily soil detergency of the composition.
  • PVP/PA copolymer The random copolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone/vinyl acetate used in accordance with the present invention will be referred to hereinafter for convenience as a PVP/PA copolymer.
  • the PVP/PA copolymer preferably contains not more than 30 mole% of vinyl acetate (VA) monomer units. Copolymers containing higher proportions of VA units are less water-soluble and therefore less preferred. More preferably the copolymer contains not more than 50 mole% of VA units.
  • VA vinyl acetate
  • the copolymer contains from 50 to 70 mole% of vinyl pyrrolidone (VP) monomer units and from 30 to 50 mole% of VA units.
  • VP vinyl pyrrolidone
  • the copolymer preferably has a molecular weight within the range of from 10 000 to 100 000, more preferably from 25 000 to 75 000.
  • PVP/PA copolymers A wide selection of PVP/PA copolymers is available from International Speciality Products (ISP). These are supplied as solutions (clear viscous liquids) in ethanol, isopropanol or water, or as solid (white powder). Some examples are shown in the table below.
  • Grade Solvent or form Mole ratio VP:VA Approximate molecular weight E-335 Ethanol 30:70 28 800 E-535 50:50 36 700 E-635 60:40 38 200 E-735 70:30 56 700 1-335 Isopropanol 35:65 12 700 I-535 50:50 19 500 I-735 70:30 22 300 W-735 Water 70:30 27 300 S-630 Solid 60:40 51 000
  • the solutions have a solids content of approximately 50 wt%.
  • PVP/PA copolymers are also available from BASF as the Luviskol (Trade Mark) VA series. Luviskol VA Solvent or form Mole ratio VP:VA 28E Ethanol 20:80 37E 30:70 55E 50:50 64E 60:40 28I Isopropanol 20:80 37I 30:70 55I 50:50 64I 60:40 64W Water 60:40 73W 70:30 64 powder Solid 60:40
  • polymers are marketed as film-formers for cosmetic and personal products, and for use in hair styling formulations such as mousses, gels and setting lotions.
  • the laundry detergent composition is a laundry detergent composition
  • the polymer is present in an amount sufficient to enhance oily soil detergency.
  • the polymer is present in an amount of from 0.5 to 3 wt%, preferably from 1 to 2 wt%.
  • the detergent composition may suitably comprise:
  • the organic surfactant is the organic surfactant
  • the detergent composition in accordance with the invention may contain any organic surfactants (detergent-active compounds) suitable for incorporation into laundry detergent compositions.
  • Detergent-active compounds may be chosen from soap and non-soap anionic, cationic, nonionic, amphoteric and zwitterionic detergent-active compounds, and mixtures thereof.
  • suitable detergent-active compounds are available and are fully described in the literature, for example, in "Surface-Active Agents and Detergents", Volumes I and II, by Schwartz, Perry and Berch.
  • the preferred detergent-active compounds that can be used are soaps and synthetic non-soap anionic and nonionic compounds.
  • the total amount of surfactant present is suitably within the range of from 5 to 60 wt%, preferably from 5 to 40 wt%.
  • Anionic surfactants are well-known to those skilled in the art. Examples include alkylbenzene sulphonates, particularly linear alkylbenzene sulphonates having an alkyl chain length of C 8 -C 15 ; primary and secondary alkylsulphates, particularly C 8 -C 20 primary alkyl sulphates; alkyl ether sulphates; olefin sulphonates; alkyl xylene sulphonates; dialkyl sulphosuccinates; and fatty acid ester sulphonates.
  • Sodium salts are generally preferred.
  • Nonionic surfactants that may be used include the primary and secondary alcohol ethoxylates, especially the C 8 -C 20 aliphatic alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 1 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol, and more especially the C 10 -C 15 primary and secondary aliphatic alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 1 to 10 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
  • Non-ethoxylated nonionic surfactants include alkylpolyglycosides, glycerol monoethers, and polyhydroxyamides (glucamide).
  • Cationic surfactants that may be used include quaternary ammonium salts of the general formula R 1 R 2 R 3 R 4 N + X - wherein the R groups are long or short hydrocarbyl chains, typically alkyl, hydroxyalkyl or ethoxylated alkyl groups, and X is a solubilising anion (for example, compounds in which R 1 is a C 8 -C 22 alkyl group, preferably a C 8 -C 10 or C 12 -C 14 alkyl group, R 2 is a methyl group, and R 3 and R 4 , which may be the same or different, are methyl or hydroxyethyl groups); and cationic esters (for example, choline esters).
  • R 1 is a C 8 -C 22 alkyl group, preferably a C 8 -C 10 or C 12 -C 14 alkyl group
  • R 2 is a methyl group
  • R 3 and R 4 which may be the same or different, are methyl or
  • Amphoteric surfactants and/or zwitterionic surfactants may also be present.
  • Preferred amphoteric surfactants are amine oxides. These are materials of the general formula R 1 R 2 R 3 N ⁇ O wherein R 1 is typically a C 8 -C 18 alkyl group, for example, C 12 -C 14 alkyl, and R 2 and R 3 , which may be the same or different, are C 1 -C 3 alkyl or hydroxyalkyl groups, for example, methyl groups.
  • the most preferred amine oxide is coco dimethylamine oxide.
  • Preferred zwitterionic surfactants are betaines, and especially amidobetaines.
  • Preferred betaines are C 8 -C 18 alkyl amidoalkylbetaines, for example, coco amidopropyl betaine (CAPB).
  • CAPB coco amidopropyl betaine
  • the composition comprises a sulphonate anionic surfactant.
  • the sulphonate anionic surfactant comprises linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS).
  • the compositions contains from 3 to 30 wt%, more preferably from 10 to 25 wt%, of LAS.
  • the detergent compositions in accordance with the invention also contain one or more detergency builders.
  • the total amount of detergency builder in the compositions may suitably range from 5 to 80 wt%, preferably from 10 to 60 wt%.
  • Preferred builders are alkali metal aluminosilicates, more especially crystalline alkali metal aluminosilicates (zeolites), preferably in sodium salt form.
  • zeolites crystalline alkali metal aluminosilicates
  • Zeolite builders may suitably be present in a total amount of from 5 to 60 wt%, preferably from 10 to 50 wt%.
  • the zeolites may be supplemented by other inorganic builders, for example, amorphous aluminosilicates, or layered silicates such as SKS-6 ex Clariant.
  • the zeolites may be supplemented by organic builders, for example, polycarboxylate polymers such as polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers; monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono-, di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyloxymalonates, dipicolinates, hydroxyethyliminodiacetates, alkyl- and alkenylmalonates and succinates; and sulphonated fatty acid salts.
  • polycarboxylate polymers such as polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers
  • monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono-, di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyloxymalonates, dipicolinates, hydroxyethyliminodiacetates, alkyl- and
  • compositions in accordance with the invention may contain phosphate builders, for example, sodium tripolyphosphate.
  • phosphate builders for example, sodium tripolyphosphate.
  • organic builders are citrates, suitably used in amounts of from 1 to 30 wt%, preferably from 2 to 15 wt%; and acrylic polymers, more especially acrylic/maleic copolymers, suitably used in amounts of from 0.5 to 15 wt%, preferably from 1 to 10 wt%.
  • Builders, both inorganic and organic, are preferably present in alkali metal salt, especially sodium salt, form.
  • the detergency builder which is present in an amount of from 5 to 80 wt%, preferably from 10 to 60 wt%, is selected from sodium tripolyphosphate, zeolites, sodium carbonate and mixtures thereof.
  • Detergent compositions in accordance with the invention may also suitably contain a bleach system.
  • a bleach system Preferably this will include a peroxy bleach compound, for example, an inorganic persalt or an organic peroxyacid, capable of yielding hydrogen peroxide in aqueous solution.
  • Preferred inorganic persalts are sodium perborate monohydrate and tetrahydrate, and sodium percarbonate, the latter being especially preferred.
  • the sodium percarbonate may have a protective coating against destabilisation by moisture.
  • the peroxy bleach compound is suitably present in an amount of from 5 to 35 wt%, preferably from 10 to 25 wt%.
  • the peroxy bleach compound may be used in conjunction with a bleach activator (bleach precursor) to improve bleaching action at low wash temperatures.
  • the bleach precursor is suitably present in an amount of from 1 to 8 wt%, preferably from 2 to 5 wt%.
  • Preferred bleach precursors are peroxycarboxylic acid precursors, more especially peracetic acid precursors and peroxybenzoic acid precursors; and peroxycarbonic acid precursors.
  • An especially preferred bleach precursor suitable for use in the present invention is N,N,N' ,N'-tetracetyl ethylenediamine (TAED).
  • a bleach stabiliser may also be present.
  • Suitable bleach stabilisers include ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA), diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (DTPA), ethylenediamine disuccinate (EDDS), and the polyphosphonates such as the Dequests (Trade Mark), ethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonate (EDTMP) and diethylenetriamine pentamethylene phosphate (DETPMP).
  • compositions in accordance with the invention may contain alkali metal, preferably sodium, carbonate, in order to increase detergency and ease processing.
  • Sodium carbonate may suitably be present in amounts ranging from 1 to 60 wt%, preferably from 2 to 40 wt%.
  • sodium silicate may also be present.
  • the amount of sodium silicate may suitably range from 0.1 to 5 wt%.
  • Sodium silicate, as previously indicated, is preferably introduced via the second base granule.
  • Powder flow may be improved by the incorporation of a small amount of a powder structurant.
  • powder structurants include, for example, fatty acids (or fatty acid soaps), sugars, acrylate or acrylate/maleate polymers, sodium silicate, and dicarboxylic acids (for example, Sokalan (Trade Mark) DCS ex BASF).
  • fatty acids or fatty acid soaps
  • sugars acrylate or acrylate/maleate polymers
  • sodium silicate for example, Sokalan (Trade Mark) DCS ex BASF
  • dicarboxylic acids for example, Sokalan (Trade Mark) DCS ex BASF.
  • One preferred powder structurant is fatty acid soap, suitably present in an amount of from 1 to 5 wt%.
  • antiredeposition agents such as cellulosic polymers; soil release agents; anti-dye-transfer agents; fluorescers; inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate; enzymes (proteases, lipases, amylases, cellulases); dyes; coloured speckles; perfumes; and fabric conditioning compounds. This list is not intended to be exhaustive.
  • compositions in accordance with the invention may be of any suitable physical form, for example, particulates (powders, granules, tablets), liquids, pastes, gels or bars.
  • the detergent composition is in particulate form.
  • Powders of low to moderate bulk density may be prepared by spray-drying a slurry, and optionally postdosing (dry-mixing) further ingredients.
  • “Concentrated” or “compact” powders may be prepared by mixing and granulating processes, for example, using a high-speed mixer/granulator, or other non-tower processes.
  • Tablets may be prepared by compacting powders, especially "concentrated” powders.
  • liquid detergent compositions which may be prepared by admixing the essential and optional ingredients in any desired order to provide compositions containing the ingredients in the requisite concentrations.
  • the polymers may be incorporated at any suitable stage in the manufacture of the compositions in accordance with the invention. As previously indicated, the polymers are commercially available both in solution form and in solid form.
  • polymer in powder or solution preferably aqueous form may be incorporated in the slurry.
  • polymer powder or solution may be easily introduced into mixing and granulating apparatus, either alone or in admixture with other solid or liquid ingredients as appropriate.
  • wash liquors containing 1 g/litre or 2.5 g/litre of a notional detergent composition (the "product") containing linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS) and sodium carbonate were prepared to the following general formulation: Ingredient Weight% in "product” Weight% in 1 g/l wash liquor Weight% in 2.5 g/l wash liquor Sodium LAS 14.82 0.1482 0.3705 Sodium carbonate 11.50 0.1150 0.2785 Polymer (see below) 0, 0.20 or 0.80 0, 0.0020 or 0.0080 0, 0.0050 or 0.0200 Water Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance
  • Detergency on white cotton cloth soiled with dirty motor oil was assessed using a high throughput small scale wash method.
  • the wash was carried out in water of 20° (French) hardness (Ca:Mg 2:1), at a temperature of 20°C for 20 minutes.
  • Whiteness before and after the wash was determined using the technique of colour change by image analysis using a greyness scale.
  • the results are analogous to reflectance changes at 460 nm as measured by a reflectance spectrophotometer and are expressed as ⁇ R and ⁇ R.
  • Soil removal was determined using samples of woven white cotton cloth soiled with two different model oily soils coloured to increase visibility: soya bean oil coloured with violet dye, and mechanical grease mixed with carbon black.
  • the assessments were carried out in tergotometers at a wash temperature of 20-25°C in water of 19° French hardness (Ca:Mg 2:1) at a liquor to cloth ratio of 8:1.
  • the wash regime was as follows: 10 minute soak, 15 minute wash, two 2 minute rinses.
  • the product dosage for the soak and wash was 4.4 g/l.
  • Example 17 the wash liquor for both soak and wash additionally included a 70:30 PVP/VA polymer (W735 ex ISP as described above). The amounts used were:

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to laundry detergent compositions containing certain vinyl pyrrolidone copolymers. The compositions exhibit improved detergency on oily soils as well as reduced soil redeposition during the wash.
  • BACKGROUND AND PRIOR ART
  • Polyvinyl pyrrolidone and some related polymers are known ingredients of laundry detergent compositions, providing the benefit of reduced dye transfer between fabrics in a mixed load.
  • Laundry detergent compositions containing polyvinyl pyrrolidone as a dye transfer inhibitor are disclosed, for example, in WO 92 18597A, WO 94 03567A, WO 95 03390A, WO 95 17496A, WO 95 27028A and WO 95 34627A (Procter & Gamble), and WO 94 06354A, WO 94 24249A and WO 97 03166A (Henkel).
  • GB 1 354 498 (Unilever) discloses laundry detergent compositions containing vinyl pyrrolidone/vinyl acetate copolymers as antiredeposition agents. During the wash, the polymers effectively prevent or reduce redeposition onto washed fabrics of soil suspended in the wash liquor. Polyvinyl pyrrolidone itself is stated to be ineffective.
  • DE 2 165 898A (Henkel) also discloses the antiredeposition benefits of these copolymers.
  • It has now been discovered that vinyl pyrrolidone/vinyl alcohol copolymers are also effective to enhance oily soil detergency, especially in detergent compositions containing anionic surfactants, more especially alkylbenzene sulphonate.
  • DEFINITION OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention provides a the use of a water-soluble random copolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate in a laundry detergent composition comprising an organic surfactant and optionally a detergency builder to improve the oily soil detergency of the composition.
  • The random vinyl pyrrolidone/vinyl acetate polymer
  • The random copolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone/vinyl acetate used in accordance with the present invention will be referred to hereinafter for convenience as a PVP/PA copolymer.
  • The PVP/PA copolymer preferably contains not more than 30 mole% of vinyl acetate (VA) monomer units. Copolymers containing higher proportions of VA units are less water-soluble and therefore less preferred. More preferably the copolymer contains not more than 50 mole% of VA units.
  • Most preferably, the copolymer contains from 50 to 70 mole% of vinyl pyrrolidone (VP) monomer units and from 30 to 50 mole% of VA units.
  • The copolymer preferably has a molecular weight within the range of from 10 000 to 100 000, more preferably from 25 000 to 75 000.
  • A wide selection of PVP/PA copolymers is available from International Speciality Products (ISP). These are supplied as solutions (clear viscous liquids) in ethanol, isopropanol or water, or as solid (white powder). Some examples are shown in the table below.
    Grade Solvent or form Mole ratio VP:VA Approximate molecular weight
    E-335 Ethanol 30:70 28 800
    E-535 50:50 36 700
    E-635 60:40 38 200
    E-735 70:30 56 700
    1-335 Isopropanol 35:65 12 700
    I-535 50:50 19 500
    I-735 70:30 22 300
    W-735 Water 70:30 27 300
    S-630 Solid 60:40 51 000
  • The solutions have a solids content of approximately 50 wt%.
  • PVP/PA copolymers are also available from BASF as the Luviskol (Trade Mark) VA series.
    Luviskol VA Solvent or form Mole ratio VP:VA
    28E Ethanol 20:80
    37E 30:70
    55E 50:50
    64E 60:40
    28I Isopropanol 20:80
    37I 30:70
    55I 50:50
    64I 60:40
    64W Water 60:40
    73W 70:30
    64 powder Solid 60:40
  • These polymers are marketed as film-formers for cosmetic and personal products, and for use in hair styling formulations such as mousses, gels and setting lotions.
  • The laundry detergent composition
  • In a laundry detergent composition in accordance with the invention, the polymer is present in an amount sufficient to enhance oily soil detergency. Suitably the polymer is present in an amount of from 0.5 to 3 wt%, preferably from 1 to 2 wt%.
  • The detergent composition may suitably comprise:
    • (a) from 5 to 60 wt%, preferably from 10 to 40 wt%, of organic surfactant,
    • (b) optionally from 5 to 80 wt%, preferably from 10 to 60 wt%, of detergency builder,
    • (c) from 0.5 to 3 wt%, preferably from 1 to 2 wt%, of the random copolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate,
    • (d) optionally other detergent ingredients to 100 wt%.
    The organic surfactant
  • The detergent composition in accordance with the invention may contain any organic surfactants (detergent-active compounds) suitable for incorporation into laundry detergent compositions.
  • Detergent-active compounds (surfactants) may be chosen from soap and non-soap anionic, cationic, nonionic, amphoteric and zwitterionic detergent-active compounds, and mixtures thereof. Many suitable detergent-active compounds are available and are fully described in the literature, for example, in "Surface-Active Agents and Detergents", Volumes I and II, by Schwartz, Perry and Berch. The preferred detergent-active compounds that can be used are soaps and synthetic non-soap anionic and nonionic compounds. The total amount of surfactant present is suitably within the range of from 5 to 60 wt%, preferably from 5 to 40 wt%.
  • Anionic surfactants are well-known to those skilled in the art. Examples include alkylbenzene sulphonates, particularly linear alkylbenzene sulphonates having an alkyl chain length of C8-C15; primary and secondary alkylsulphates, particularly C8-C20 primary alkyl sulphates; alkyl ether sulphates; olefin sulphonates; alkyl xylene sulphonates; dialkyl sulphosuccinates; and fatty acid ester sulphonates. Sodium salts are generally preferred.
  • Nonionic surfactants that may be used include the primary and secondary alcohol ethoxylates, especially the C8-C20 aliphatic alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 1 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol, and more especially the C10-C15 primary and secondary aliphatic alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 1 to 10 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol. Non-ethoxylated nonionic surfactants include alkylpolyglycosides, glycerol monoethers, and polyhydroxyamides (glucamide).
  • Cationic surfactants that may be used include quaternary ammonium salts of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+ X- wherein the R groups are long or short hydrocarbyl chains, typically alkyl, hydroxyalkyl or ethoxylated alkyl groups, and X is a solubilising anion (for example, compounds in which R1 is a C8-C22 alkyl group, preferably a C8-C10 or C12-C14 alkyl group, R2 is a methyl group, and R3 and R4, which may be the same or different, are methyl or hydroxyethyl groups); and cationic esters (for example, choline esters).
  • Amphoteric surfactants and/or zwitterionic surfactants may also be present.
  • Preferred amphoteric surfactants are amine oxides. These are materials of the general formula

            R1R2R3N→O

    wherein R1 is typically a C8-C18 alkyl group, for example, C12-C14 alkyl, and R2 and R3, which may be the same or different, are C1-C3 alkyl or hydroxyalkyl groups, for example, methyl groups. The most preferred amine oxide is coco dimethylamine oxide.
  • Preferred zwitterionic surfactants are betaines, and especially amidobetaines.
  • Preferred betaines are C8-C18 alkyl amidoalkylbetaines, for example, coco amidopropyl betaine (CAPB).
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the composition comprises a sulphonate anionic surfactant. According to an especially preferred embodiment, the sulphonate anionic surfactant comprises linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS).
  • An especially favourable interaction between LAS and the PVP/VA copolymer has been observed, giving improved primary detergency on difficult oily soils such as dirty motor oil. Without being bound by theory, it is postulated that the this benefit may be attributed to a reduction in the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of the LAS.
  • The known benefit of reduced redeposition of soil onto the washload during the wash (sometimes referred to as secondary detergency) is also observed.
  • Preferably, the compositions contains from 3 to 30 wt%, more preferably from 10 to 25 wt%, of LAS.
  • The optional detergency builder
  • Preferably, the detergent compositions in accordance with the invention also contain one or more detergency builders. The total amount of detergency builder in the compositions may suitably range from 5 to 80 wt%, preferably from 10 to 60 wt%.
  • Preferred builders are alkali metal aluminosilicates, more especially crystalline alkali metal aluminosilicates (zeolites), preferably in sodium salt form.
  • Zeolite builders may suitably be present in a total amount of from 5 to 60 wt%, preferably from 10 to 50 wt%.
  • The zeolites may be supplemented by other inorganic builders, for example, amorphous aluminosilicates, or layered silicates such as SKS-6 ex Clariant.
  • The zeolites may be supplemented by organic builders, for example, polycarboxylate polymers such as polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers; monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono-, di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyloxymalonates, dipicolinates, hydroxyethyliminodiacetates, alkyl- and alkenylmalonates and succinates; and sulphonated fatty acid salts.
  • Alternatively, the compositions in accordance with the invention may contain phosphate builders, for example, sodium tripolyphosphate.
    Especially preferred organic builders are citrates, suitably used in amounts of from 1 to 30 wt%, preferably from 2 to 15 wt%; and acrylic polymers, more especially acrylic/maleic copolymers, suitably used in amounts of from 0.5 to 15 wt%, preferably from 1 to 10 wt%. Builders, both inorganic and organic, are preferably present in alkali metal salt, especially sodium salt, form.
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the detergency builder, which is present in an amount of from 5 to 80 wt%, preferably from 10 to 60 wt%, is selected from sodium tripolyphosphate, zeolites, sodium carbonate and mixtures thereof.
  • Other detergent ingredients
  • Detergent compositions in accordance with the invention may also suitably contain a bleach system. Preferably this will include a peroxy bleach compound, for example, an inorganic persalt or an organic peroxyacid, capable of yielding hydrogen peroxide in aqueous solution.
    Preferred inorganic persalts are sodium perborate monohydrate and tetrahydrate, and sodium percarbonate, the latter being especially preferred. The sodium percarbonate may have a protective coating against destabilisation by moisture. The peroxy bleach compound is suitably present in an amount of from 5 to 35 wt%, preferably from 10 to 25 wt%.
  • The peroxy bleach compound may be used in conjunction with a bleach activator (bleach precursor) to improve bleaching action at low wash temperatures. The bleach precursor is suitably present in an amount of from 1 to 8 wt%, preferably from 2 to 5 wt%. Preferred bleach precursors are peroxycarboxylic acid precursors, more especially peracetic acid precursors and peroxybenzoic acid precursors; and peroxycarbonic acid precursors. An especially preferred bleach precursor suitable for use in the present invention is N,N,N' ,N'-tetracetyl ethylenediamine (TAED).
  • A bleach stabiliser (heavy metal sequestrant) may also be present. Suitable bleach stabilisers include ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA), diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (DTPA), ethylenediamine disuccinate (EDDS), and the polyphosphonates such as the Dequests (Trade Mark), ethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonate (EDTMP) and diethylenetriamine pentamethylene phosphate (DETPMP).
  • The compositions in accordance with the invention may contain alkali metal, preferably sodium, carbonate, in order to increase detergency and ease processing. Sodium carbonate may suitably be present in amounts ranging from 1 to 60 wt%, preferably from 2 to 40 wt%.
    As previously indicated, sodium silicate may also be present. The amount of sodium silicate may suitably range from 0.1 to 5 wt%. Sodium silicate, as previously indicated, is preferably introduced via the second base granule.
  • Powder flow may be improved by the incorporation of a small amount of a powder structurant. Examples of powder structurants, some of which may play other roles in the formulation as previously indicated, include, for example, fatty acids (or fatty acid soaps), sugars, acrylate or acrylate/maleate polymers, sodium silicate, and dicarboxylic acids (for example, Sokalan (Trade Mark) DCS ex BASF). One preferred powder structurant is fatty acid soap, suitably present in an amount of from 1 to 5 wt%.
  • Other materials that may be present in detergent compositions in accordance with the invention include antiredeposition agents such as cellulosic polymers; soil release agents; anti-dye-transfer agents; fluorescers; inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate; enzymes (proteases, lipases, amylases, cellulases); dyes; coloured speckles; perfumes; and fabric conditioning compounds. This list is not intended to be exhaustive.
  • Product form and preparation
  • The compositions in accordance with the invention may be of any suitable physical form, for example, particulates (powders, granules, tablets), liquids, pastes, gels or bars. According to one especially preferred embodiment of the invention, the detergent composition is in particulate form.
  • Powders of low to moderate bulk density may be prepared by spray-drying a slurry, and optionally postdosing (dry-mixing) further ingredients. "Concentrated" or "compact" powders may be prepared by mixing and granulating processes, for example, using a high-speed mixer/granulator, or other non-tower processes.
  • Tablets may be prepared by compacting powders, especially "concentrated" powders.
  • Also preferred are liquid detergent compositions, which may be prepared by admixing the essential and optional ingredients in any desired order to provide compositions containing the ingredients in the requisite concentrations.
  • Incorporation of the PVP/VA copolymer
  • The polymers may be incorporated at any suitable stage in the manufacture of the compositions in accordance with the invention. As previously indicated, the polymers are commercially available both in solution form and in solid form.
  • For example, in the manufacture of spray-dried particulate compositions, polymer in powder or solution (preferably aqueous) form may be incorporated in the slurry. For non-tower particulates, polymer powder or solution may be easily introduced into mixing and granulating apparatus, either alone or in admixture with other solid or liquid ingredients as appropriate.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The invention is further illustrated by the following Examples, in which parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise stated.
  • EXAMPLES 1 to 16, COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES A and B Detergency benefits on dirty motor oil using model wash liquors
  • Wash liquors containing 1 g/litre or 2.5 g/litre of a notional detergent composition (the "product") containing linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS) and sodium carbonate were prepared to the following general formulation:
    Ingredient Weight% in "product" Weight% in 1 g/l wash liquor Weight% in 2.5 g/l wash liquor
    Sodium LAS 14.82 0.1482 0.3705
    Sodium carbonate 11.50 0.1150 0.2785
    Polymer (see below) 0, 0.20 or 0.80 0, 0.0020 or 0.0080 0, 0.0050 or 0.0200
    Water Balance Balance Balance
  • The polymers used, all commercial products from ISP provided as 40 wt% solutions, were as follows:
    Example Trade name VP/VA mole ratio Solvent
    1, 2, 9, 10 E535 50:50 ethanol
    3, 4, 11, 12 E735 70:30 ethanol
    5, 6, 13, 14 I535 50:50 isopropanol
    7, 8, 15, 16 I735 70:30 isopropanol
  • Detergency on white cotton cloth soiled with dirty motor oil was assessed using a high throughput small scale wash method. The wash was carried out in water of 20° (French) hardness (Ca:Mg 2:1), at a temperature of 20°C for 20 minutes.
  • Whiteness before and after the wash was determined using the technique of colour change by image analysis using a greyness scale. The results are analogous to reflectance changes at 460 nm as measured by a reflectance spectrophotometer and are expressed as ΔR and ΔΔR.
  • Results at 1 g/litre "product" concentration
  • Example Polymer Polymer level in "product" ΔR ΔΔR
    A none 0 81.76 0
    1 E535 0.2 84.53 + 2.77
    2 E535 0.8 83.78 + 2.02
    3 E735 0.2 83.86 + 2.10
    4 E735 0.8 85.05 + 3.29
    5 I535 0.2 82.99 + 1.23
    6 I535 0.8 83.16 + 1.40
    7 E735 0.2 84.90 + 3.14
    8 E735 0.8 84.66 + 2.90
  • Results at 2.5 g/litre "product" concentration
  • Example Polymer Polymer level in "product" ΔR ΔΔR
    B none 0 82.04 0
    9 E535 0.2 84.53 + 2.49
    10 E535 0.8 82.51 + 0.47
    11 E735 0.2 83.69 + 1.65
    12 E735 0.8 84.65 + 2.61
    13 I535 0.2 83.59 + 1.55
    14 I535 0.8 82.38 + 0.34
    15 E735 0.2 84.99 + 2.95
    16 E735 0.8 84.58 + 2.54
  • EXAMPLE 17, COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE C Assessment of soil removal and whiteness for polymer in a detergent powder composition
  • A detergent powder composition was prepared to the following formulation:
    Ingredient Weight%
    Sodium linear alkylbenzene sulphonate 9.31
    Nonionic surfactant 3.58
    Sodium tripolyphosphate 21.32
    Sodium carbonate 12.97
    Sodium hydroxide 1.95
    Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose 0.62
    Sodium silicate (r = 2.4) 5.18
    Fluorescers 0.13
    Zeolite 1.24
    Sodium perborate tetrahydrate 15.00
    Tetraacetyl ethylenediamine 3.80
    Enzymes (protease, lipase, amylase) 2.27
    Antifoam granule 2.00
    Dequest 2047 0.50
    Granular sodium tripolyphosphate 10.00
    Perfume 0.65
    Citric acid 2.75
    Water to 100.00
  • Soil removal was determined using samples of woven white cotton cloth soiled with two different model oily soils coloured to increase visibility: soya bean oil coloured with violet dye, and mechanical grease mixed with carbon black.
  • The assessments were carried out in tergotometers at a wash temperature of 20-25°C in water of 19° French hardness (Ca:Mg 2:1) at a liquor to cloth ratio of 8:1. The wash regime was as follows: 10 minute soak, 15 minute wash, two 2 minute rinses. The product dosage for the soak and wash was 4.4 g/l.
  • In Example 17, the wash liquor for both soak and wash additionally included a 70:30 PVP/VA polymer (W735 ex ISP as described above). The amounts used were:
    • Soak: 0.20 g/l, equivalent to 4 wt% of the product
    • Wash: 0.05 g/l, equivalent to 1 wt% of the product Example C was a control without polymer.
  • Soil removal was measured by whole spectrum reflectance spectrophotometry and expressed as soil removal index (SRI), which is defined as SRI = 100 - ΔE
    Figure imgb0001
    where ΔE is the difference between reflectance before and after the wash. A difference of 0.6 percentage units is considered statistically significant.
  • The SRI results were as shown in the Table below.
    Soil Example C Example 17
    Soya bean oil with violet dye 84.07 84.69
    Mechanical grease/carbon black 51.24 57.08

Claims (10)

  1. Use of a water-soluble random copolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate in a laundry detergent composition comprising an organic surfactant and optionally a detergency builder to improve the oily soil detergency of the composition.
  2. Use as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the copolymer contains not more than 30 mole%, preferably not more than 50 mole%, of vinyl acetate monomer units.
  3. Use as claimed in claim 2, characterised in that the copolymer contains from 50 to 70 mole% of vinyl pyrrolidone monomer units and from 30 to 50 mole% of vinyl acetate units.
  4. Use as claimed in any preceding claim, characterised in that the copolymer has a molecular weight within the range of from 10 000 to 100 000, preferably from 25 000 to 75 000.
  5. Use as claimed in any preceding claim, characterised in that the laundry detergent composition contains from 0.5 to 3 wt%, preferably from 1 to 2 wt%, of the copolymer.
  6. Use as claimed in any preceding claim, characterised in that the laundry detergent composition comprises:
    (a) from 5 to 60 wt%, preferably from 10 to 40 wt%, of organic surfactant,
    (b) optionally from 5 to 80 wt%, preferably from 10 to 60 wt%, of detergency builder,
    (c) from 0.5 to 3 wt%, preferably from 1 to 2 wt%, of the random copolymer of vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate,
    (d) optionally other detergent ingredients to 100 wt%.
  7. Use as claimed in any preceding claim, characterised in that the organic surfactant comprises a sulphonate anionic surfactant.
  8. Use as claimed in claim 7, characterised in that the organic surfactant comprises linear alkylbenzene sulphonate.
  9. Use as claimed in claim 8, characterised in that the laundry detergent composition contains from 3 to 30 wt%, preferably from 10 to 25 wt%, of linear alkylbenzene sulphonate.
  10. Use as claimed in any preceding claim, characterised in that the laundry detergent composition comprises from 5 to 80 wt%, preferably from 10 to 60 wt%, of detergency builder selected from sodium tripolyphosphate, zeolites, sodium carbonate and mixtures thereof.
EP03792208A 2002-08-10 2003-07-16 Detergent compositions Expired - Lifetime EP1527154B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB0218636.9A GB0218636D0 (en) 2002-08-10 2002-08-10 Detergent compositions
GB0218636 2002-08-10
PCT/EP2003/007753 WO2004018602A1 (en) 2002-08-10 2003-07-16 Detergent compositions

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1527154A1 EP1527154A1 (en) 2005-05-04
EP1527154B1 true EP1527154B1 (en) 2006-09-20

Family

ID=9942092

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP03792208A Expired - Lifetime EP1527154B1 (en) 2002-08-10 2003-07-16 Detergent compositions

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1527154B1 (en)
AR (1) AR040833A1 (en)
AT (1) ATE340240T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003250085A1 (en)
BR (1) BR0312344A (en)
DE (1) DE60308526T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2273076T3 (en)
GB (1) GB0218636D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2004018602A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1354498A (en) * 1970-08-12 1974-06-05 Unilever Ltd Detergent composition
BE793420A (en) * 1971-12-31 1973-06-28 Henkel & Cie Gmbh DETERGENT CONTAINING ADDITIVES INHIBITORS OF TERNISSURE
GB1536136A (en) * 1975-03-03 1978-12-20 Unilever Ltd Detergent composition
EP0350449A3 (en) * 1988-07-08 1990-10-24 Ciba-Geigy Ag Liquid detergent containing optical brighteners
DE3840056A1 (en) * 1988-11-28 1990-05-31 Henkel Kgaa METHOD FOR THE WASHING OF COMPOSITE SENSITIVE TEXTILES
US5466802A (en) * 1993-11-10 1995-11-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent compositions which provide dye transfer inhibition benefits
CN1146779A (en) * 1994-03-04 1997-04-02 普罗格特-甘布尔公司 Polyhydroxy amides to provide dye transfer inhibition benefits during fabric laundering
GB9526181D0 (en) * 1995-12-21 1996-02-21 Unilever Plc A detergent composition
US5912406A (en) * 1997-05-28 1999-06-15 Black; Robert H. Method of cleaning soiled fabrics

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0218636D0 (en) 2002-09-18
AU2003250085A1 (en) 2004-03-11
DE60308526D1 (en) 2006-11-02
DE60308526T2 (en) 2007-01-18
BR0312344A (en) 2005-04-12
ES2273076T3 (en) 2007-05-01
ATE340240T1 (en) 2006-10-15
AR040833A1 (en) 2005-04-20
WO2004018602A1 (en) 2004-03-04
EP1527154A1 (en) 2005-05-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1558717B1 (en) Laundry detergent composition
EP1305387B1 (en) Coloured speckle composition and particulate laundry detergent compositions containing it
EP1287101B1 (en) Detergent compositions
ZA200504393B (en) Laundry detergent compositions containing polymers
EP1254202B1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP1527154B1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP1527155B1 (en) Detergent compositions
CA2463234C (en) Detergent compositions comprising an alkali metal carbonate salt and a water soluble-organic acid
EP1299512B1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP1436378B1 (en) Detergent compositions containing potassium carbonate and process for preparing them
US20030114347A1 (en) Detergent compositions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20041207

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60308526

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20061102

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061220

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061220

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061220

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070312

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2273076

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20070621

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070731

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070716

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070716

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060920

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070321

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20090727

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20090717

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20090729

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20090727

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20090727

Year of fee payment: 7

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20100716

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20110331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60308526

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100802

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100716

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100716

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20110818

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100717