EP1425737A1 - System and method for speech verification using a robust confidence measure - Google Patents
System and method for speech verification using a robust confidence measureInfo
- Publication number
- EP1425737A1 EP1425737A1 EP02794872A EP02794872A EP1425737A1 EP 1425737 A1 EP1425737 A1 EP 1425737A1 EP 02794872 A EP02794872 A EP 02794872A EP 02794872 A EP02794872 A EP 02794872A EP 1425737 A1 EP1425737 A1 EP 1425737A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- score
- recognition
- confidence measure
- pseudo filler
- calculator
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L15/00—Speech recognition
- G10L15/08—Speech classification or search
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to electronic speech recognition systems, and relates more particularly to a system and method for speech verification using a robust confidence measure.
- Voice-controlled operation of electronic devices is a desirable interface for many system users. For example, voice- controlled operation allows a user to perform other tasks simultaneously. For instance, a person may operate a vehicle and operate an electronic organizer by voice control at the same time. Hands-free operation of electronic systems may also be desirable for users who have physical limitations or other special requirements. Hands-free operation of electronic devices may be implemented by various speech-activated electronic systems. Speech-activated electronic systems thus advantageously allow users to interface with electronic devices in situations where it would be inconvenient or potentially hazardous to utilize a traditional input device. Electronic entertainment systems may also utilize speech recognition techniques to allow users to interact with a system by speaking to it.
- Speech-activated electronic systems may be used in a variety of noisy environments such as industrial facilities, manufacturing facilities, commercial vehicles, passenger vehicles, homes, and office environments.
- noisy environments such as industrial facilities, manufacturing facilities, commercial vehicles, passenger vehicles, homes, and office environments.
- a significant amount of noise in an environment may interfere with and degrade the performance and effectiveness of speech-activated systems.
- System designers and manufacturers typically seek to develop speech- activated systems that provide reliable performance in noisy environments.
- sound energy detected by a speech-activated system may contain speech and a significant amount of noise.
- the speech may be masked by the noise and be undetected. This result is unacceptable for reliable performance of the speech-activated system.
- sound energy detected by the speech-activated system may contain only noise.
- the noise may be of such a character that the speech-activated system identifies the noise as speech. This result reduces the effectiveness of the speech-activated system, and is also unacceptable for reliable performance. Verifying that a detected signal is actually speech increases the effectiveness and reliability of speech-activated systems.
- a speech-activated system may have a limited vocabulary of words that the system is programmed to recognize.
- the system should accurately respond to words or phrases that are in its vocabulary, and should not respond to words or phrases that are not in its vocabulary. Verifying that a recognized word is in the system's vocabulary increases the accuracy and reliability of speech-activated systems.
- a search module from a speech recognizer may preferably access feature vectors for a given utterance, and may then compare the feature vectors to word models corresponding to a system vocabulary.
- the search module may then responsively generate a series of potential recognition candidates with their corresponding recognition scores based on the foregoing comparison with the word models.
- the search module may also rank the recognition candidates into a sorted N-best list according to their respective recognition scores.
- a pseudo filler ' score calculator from a speech verifier may then access the sorted N-best list to calculate a pseudo filler score in accordance with the present invention.
- the pseudo filler score calculator may determine a pseudo filler score in any effective manner.
- the pseudo filler score calculator may preferably generate a pseudo filler score by averaging selected recognition scores from the N-best list, excluding only the highest or best recognition score and the lowest or worst recognition score.
- a confidence measure calculator from the speech verifier may then calculate a confidence measure by utilizing any effective means or technique.
- the confidence measure calculator may preferably access the pseudo filler score, as well as the highest or best recognition score and the lowest or worst recognition score from the N-best list in order to perform a confidence measure calculation.
- a comparator from the speech verifier may then compare the confidence measure to a threshold value obtained from local threshold registers or from any other appropriate source.
- the threshold value may include any selectable value. For example, a single simplified threshold value may be selected for use by the comparator. Alternately, multiple thresholds may be utilized depending upon the degree of accuracy required during the speech recognition process. In certain embodiments, a different threshold may be selected to correspond to each best recognition candidate that is evaluated by the speech verifier.
- the speech verifier may preferably verify the best recognition candidate as a valid utterance. Conversely, if the comparator determines that the confidence measure is not greater than the threshold value, then the speech verifier may preferably reject the best recognition candidate as an invalid utterance.
- the present invention advantageously utilizes only information that is normally provided by the search module (for example, the N-best list and corresponding recognition scores) to perform the speech verification process.
- the present invention thus provides a non-intrusive system and method for performing a robust speech verification procedure.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram for one embodiment of a computer system, in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram for one embodiment of the memory of FIG. 1 , in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram for one embodiment of the speech detector of FIG. 2, in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram for one embodiment of the recognizer of FIG. 3, in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of one embodiment of an N-best list, in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating a speech verification procedure, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart of method steps for performing a speech verification procedure, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- the present invention relates to an improvement in speech recognition systems.
- the following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements.
- Various modifications to the preferred embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles herein may be applied to other embodiments.
- the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
- the present invention comprises a system and method for speech verification using a robust confidence measure, and may include a speech verifier which may preferably compare a confidence measure for a recognized word to a predetermined threshold value in order to determine whether the recognized word is valid, where the recognized word corresponds to a word model that produces a highest recognition score.
- the foregoing confidence measure may preferably be calculated by advantageously utilizing the recognition score for the recognized word, a background score, and a pseudo filler score which may preferably be based upon selected average recognition scores from an N-best list of recognition candidates.
- FIG. 1 a block diagram for one embodiment of a computer system 110 is shown, according to the present invention.
- the FIG. 1 embodiment includes a sound sensor 112, an amplifier 116, an analog-to- digital converter 120, a central processing unit (CPU) 128, a memory 130, and an input/ output interface 132.
- CPU central processing unit
- Sound sensor 112 detects sound energy and converts the detected sound energy into an analog speech signal that is provided via line 114 to amplifier 116.
- Amplifier 116 amplifies the received analog speech signal and provides the amplified analog speech signal to analog- to-digital converter 120 via line 118.
- Analog- to-digital converter 120 then converts the amplified analog speech signal into corresponding digital speech data.
- Analog-to- digital converter 120 then provides the digital speech data via line 122 to system bus 124.
- CPU 128 may then access the digital speech data on system bus 124 and responsively analyze and process the digital speech data to perform speech detection according to software instructions contained in memory 130. The operation of CPU 128 and the software instructions in memory 130 are further discussed below in conjunction with FIGS. 2-7. After the speech data is processed, CPU 128 may then provide the results of the speech detection analysis to other devices (not shown) via input/ output interface 132.
- Memory 130 may alternately comprise various storage-device configurations, including random access memory (RAM) and storage devices such as floppy discs or hard disc drives.
- RAM random access memory
- memory 130 includes, but is not limited to, a speech detector 210, model score registers 212, confidence measure register 214, threshold registers 216, pseudo filler score register 218, and N-best list registers 220.
- speech detector 210 includes a series of software modules that are executed by CPU 128 to analyze and detect speech data, and which are further described below in conjunction with FIGS. 3-4. In alternate embodiments, speech detector 210 may readily be implemented using various other software and/ or hardware configurations.
- Model score registers 212, confidence measure register 214, threshold registers 216, pseudo filler score register 218, and N-best list registers 220 contain respective variable values that are calculated and utilized by speech detector 210 to implement the speech verification method of the present invention.
- the utilization and functionality of model score registers 212, confidence measure register 214, threshold registers 216, pseudo filler score register 218, and N-best list registers 220 are further discussed below in conjunction with FIGS. 3-7.
- Speech detector 210 includes, but is not limited to, a feature extractor 310, an endpoint detector 312, and a recognizer 314.
- Analog-to-digital converter 120 provides digital speech data to feature extractor 310 via system bus 124.
- Feature extractor 310 responsively generates feature vectors, which are provided to recognizer 314 via path 320.
- Feature extractor 310 further responsively generates speech energy to endpoint detector 312 via path 322.
- Endpoint detector 312 analyzes the speech energy and responsively determines endpoints of an utterance represented by the speech energy. The endpoints indicate the beginning and end of the utterance in time. Endpoint detector 312 then provides the endpoints to recognizer 314 via path 324.
- Recognizer 314 is preferably configured to recognize isolated words or commands in a predetermined vocabulary of system 110.
- recognizer 314 is configured to recognize a vocabulary of approximately one hundred twenty five words or commands.
- a vocabulary including any number of words or commands is within the scope of the present invention.
- the foregoing vocabulary may correspond to any desired commands, instructions, or other communications for system 110.
- verifying a recognized word or phrase as valid is significant for proper operation of system 110.
- Valid recognized vocabulary words or commands are output to system 110 via path 332.
- FIG. 4 a block diagram for one embodiment of the recognizer 314 of FIG. 3 is shown, according to the present invention.
- Recognizer 314 includes, but is not limited to, a search module 416, a model bank 412, and a speech verifier 414.
- Model bank 412 includes a word model for every word or command in the vocabulary of system 110. Each model may preferably be a Hidden Markov Model that has been trained to recognize a specific word or command in the vocabulary.
- Search module 416 preferably receives feature vectors from feature extractor 310 via path 320, and receives endpoint data from endpoint detector 312 via path 324. Search module 416 compares the feature vectors for an utterance (the signal between endpoints) with each word model in model bank 412. Search module 416 produces a recognition score for the utterance from each model, and stores the recognition scores in model score registers 212. Search module 416 preferably ranks the recognition scores for the utterance from highest to lowest, and stores a specified number of the ranked recognition scores as an N-best list in N-best list registers 220.
- the word model that corresponds to the highest recognition score is the first recognition candidate
- the word model that corresponds to the next-highest recognition score is the second recognition candidate
- the word model that corresponds to the third-highest recognition score is the third recognition candidate
- word models in model bank 412 may be ranked.
- the first recognition candidate is considered to be the recognized word.
- Search module 416 outputs the ranked N-best list to speech verifier
- speech verifier 414 calculates a confidence measure for the utterance, and then stores the confidence measure in confidence measure register 214. Speech verifier 414 next compares the confidence measure for the utterance to a threshold value stored in threshold registers 216.
- the value of the confidence measure is a measure of the confidence that the recognized word is a valid vocabulary word of system 110.
- the word identified as the first candidate, or recognized word is considered valid, and recognizer 314 outputs the result on path 332. If the confidence measure is less than the threshold value, then the first candidate is considered an invalid vocabulary word, and recognizer 314 outputs no result.
- threshold values stored in threshold registers 216 typically depend on the vocabulary words of system 110. Different sets of threshold values may be used in speech verifier 414, each set of threshold values providing different advantages to system 110.
- N-best list 510 may preferably include a recognition candidate 1 (512(a)) through a recognition candidate N (512(c)).
- N-best list 510 may readily include various other elements or functionalities in addition to, or instead of, those elements or functionalities discussed in conjunction with the FIG. 5 embodiment.
- N-best list 510 may readily be implemented to include any desired number of recognition candidates 512 that may include any required type of information.
- FIG. 5 illustrates a block diagram of an N-best list 510, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- N-best list 510 may preferably include a recognition candidate 1 (512(a)) through a recognition candidate N (512(c)).
- N-best list 510 may readily include various other elements or functionalities in addition to, or instead of, those elements or functionalities discussed in conjunction with the FIG. 5 embodiment.
- N-best list 510 may readily be implemented to include any desired number of recognition candidates 512 that may include any required type of information.
- each recognition candidate 512 may preferably include a search result (a word, phrase, or command) in text format, and a corresponding recognition score.
- the recognition candidates 512 of N-best list 510 are preferably sorted and ranked by their recognition score, with recognition candidate 1 (512(a)) having the highest or best recognition score, and recognition candidate N (512(c)) have the lowest or worst recognition score.
- the utilization of N-best list 510 is further discussed below in conjunction with FIGS. 6 and 7.
- search module 416 may preferably access feature vectors for a given utterance via path 320, and then may compare the feature vectors to word models that may be accessed via path 422. Search module 416 may then responsively generate a series of potential recognition candidates 512 with their corresponding recognition scores based on the foregoing comparison to word models. Search module 416 may also rank the recognition candidates 512 into a sorted N-best list according to their respective recognition scores.
- a pseudo filler score calculator 618 may access the sorted N-best list via path 616 to calculate a pseudo filler score in accordance with the present invention. Pseudo filler score calculator 618 may determine a pseudo filler score in any effective manner. However, in the FIG. 6 embodiment, pseudo filler score calculator 618 may preferably generate a pseudo filler score by averaging the recognition scores from the N- best list 510, excluding only the highest or best recognition score and the lowest or worst recognition score (also referred to herein as the background score).
- pseudo filler score calculator 618 may preferably calculate a pseudo filler score by determining an arithmetic average of selected recognition scores from N-best list 510 (omitting the best recognition score and the worst recognition score) in accordance with the following formula:
- F is the pseudo filler score
- Si is the recognition score of the "i” word of N-best list 510
- "N" is a selectable integer value that is equal to "N" of the N-best list 510.
- a confidence measure calculator 624 may then calculate a confidence measure (CM) by utilizing any effective means or technique.
- confidence measure calculator 624 may preferably access the pseudo filler score via path 620, and may also access the highest or best recognition score (Si) from search module 416 via path 622 and the lowest or worst recognition score (SN) from search module 416 via path 621 to perform a confidence measure calculation.
- confidence measure calculator 624 may preferably calculate a confidence measure in accordance with the following formula:
- CM the confidence measure
- Si the best recognition score of the first recognition candidate 512(a) of N-best list 510
- SN the worst recognition score of the lowest-ranked recognition candidate 512(c) of N-best list 510
- F the foregoing pseudo filler score
- a comparator 628 may then access the confidence measure (CM) via path 626, and compare the confidence measure to a threshold value obtained from threshold registers 216 (FIG. 2) or from any other appropriate source.
- the threshold value may include any selectable value. For example, a single simplified threshold value may be selected for use by comparator 628. Alternately, multiple thresholds may be utilized depending upon the degree of accuracy required during the speech recognition process. In certain embodiments, a different individual threshold may be selected to correspond to each best recognition candidate that is evaluated by speech verifier 414.
- speech verifier 414 may preferably verify the first recognition candidate 512(a) as a valid utterance, as shown in block 630. Conversely, if comparator 628 determines that the confidence measure is not greater than the threshold value, then speech verifier 414 may preferably reject the first recognition candidate 512(a) as an invalid utterance, as shown in block 632.
- the present invention advantageously utilizes only information normally provided by search module 416 (N-best list 510 and corresponding recognition scores) to perform the speech verification process. The present invention thus provides a non-intrusive system and method for performing a robust speech verification procedure.
- FIG. 7 a flowchart of method steps for performing a speech verification procedure is shown, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- the FIG. 7 embodiment is presented for purposes of illustration, and in alternate embodiments, the present invention may readily utilize various steps and sequences other than those discussed in conjunction with the FIG. 7 embodiment.
- search module 416 may preferably generate a sorted N-best list 510 corresponding to a particular utterance. Then, in step 710, a pseudo filler score calculator of a speech verifier 414 may preferably access the sorted N-best list 510, and responsively calculate a pseudo filler score, as discussed above in conjunction with FIG. 6.
- a confidence measure calculator 624 of speech verifier 414 may preferably determine a confidence measure corresponding to a potential recognized word.
- Confidence measure calculator 624 may preferably utilize the foregoing pseudo filler score, a background score corresponding to the worst recognition score of a worst recognition candidate 512(c) of the N-best list 510, and a best recognition score corresponding to the best recognition candidate 512(a) of the N-best list 510 to determine the confidence measure, as discussed above in conjunction with FIG. 6.
- a comparator from speech verifier 414 may preferably compare the confidence measure to a selected threshold value, as discussed above in conjunction with FIG. 6.
- comparator 414 may preferably determine whether the confidence measure is greater than the threshold value. If comparator 628 determines that the confidence measure is greater than the threshold value, then speech verifier 414 may preferably verify the first recognition candidate 512(a) as a valid utterance, as shown in step 718. Conversely, if comparator 628 determines that the confidence measure is not greater than the threshold value, then speech verifier 414 may preferably reject the first recognition candidate 512(a) as an invalid utterance, as shown in step 720.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US31250101P | 2001-08-14 | 2001-08-14 | |
US312501P | 2001-08-14 | ||
PCT/US2002/025577 WO2003017253A1 (en) | 2001-08-14 | 2002-08-13 | System and method for speech verification using a robust confidence measure |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1425737A1 true EP1425737A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 |
EP1425737A4 EP1425737A4 (en) | 2005-11-09 |
Family
ID=23211748
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02794872A Withdrawn EP1425737A4 (en) | 2001-08-14 | 2002-08-13 | System and method for speech verification using a robust confidence measure |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1425737A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2005500580A (en) |
GB (1) | GB2394590B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003017253A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3819896B2 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2006-09-13 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Speech recognition method, apparatus for implementing this method, program, and recording medium |
TWI466101B (en) * | 2012-05-18 | 2014-12-21 | Asustek Comp Inc | Method and system for speech recognition |
CN103426428B (en) * | 2012-05-18 | 2016-05-25 | 华硕电脑股份有限公司 | Audio recognition method and system |
JP6585022B2 (en) | 2016-11-11 | 2019-10-02 | 株式会社東芝 | Speech recognition apparatus, speech recognition method and program |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5842163A (en) * | 1995-06-21 | 1998-11-24 | Sri International | Method and apparatus for computing likelihood and hypothesizing keyword appearance in speech |
US20010049600A1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2001-12-06 | Sony Corporation And Sony Electronics, Inc. | System and method for speech verification using an efficient confidence measure |
EP1189202A1 (en) * | 2000-09-18 | 2002-03-20 | Sony International (Europe) GmbH | Duration models for speech recognition |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5737489A (en) * | 1995-09-15 | 1998-04-07 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Discriminative utterance verification for connected digits recognition |
-
2002
- 2002-08-13 JP JP2003522082A patent/JP2005500580A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-08-13 GB GB0402781A patent/GB2394590B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-08-13 EP EP02794872A patent/EP1425737A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-08-13 WO PCT/US2002/025577 patent/WO2003017253A1/en active Search and Examination
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5842163A (en) * | 1995-06-21 | 1998-11-24 | Sri International | Method and apparatus for computing likelihood and hypothesizing keyword appearance in speech |
US20010049600A1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2001-12-06 | Sony Corporation And Sony Electronics, Inc. | System and method for speech verification using an efficient confidence measure |
EP1189202A1 (en) * | 2000-09-18 | 2002-03-20 | Sony International (Europe) GmbH | Duration models for speech recognition |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of WO03017253A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB0402781D0 (en) | 2004-03-10 |
GB2394590A (en) | 2004-04-28 |
EP1425737A4 (en) | 2005-11-09 |
JP2005500580A (en) | 2005-01-06 |
WO2003017253A1 (en) | 2003-02-27 |
GB2394590B (en) | 2005-02-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6778959B1 (en) | System and method for speech verification using out-of-vocabulary models | |
US7103543B2 (en) | System and method for speech verification using a robust confidence measure | |
Prabhavalkar et al. | Automatic gain control and multi-style training for robust small-footprint keyword spotting with deep neural networks | |
US6850886B2 (en) | System and method for speech verification using an efficient confidence measure | |
US9633652B2 (en) | Methods, systems, and circuits for speaker dependent voice recognition with a single lexicon | |
US10013985B2 (en) | Systems and methods for audio command recognition with speaker authentication | |
US6735562B1 (en) | Method for estimating a confidence measure for a speech recognition system | |
US6226612B1 (en) | Method of evaluating an utterance in a speech recognition system | |
US7447634B2 (en) | Speech recognizing apparatus having optimal phoneme series comparing unit and speech recognizing method | |
US6505155B1 (en) | Method and system for automatically adjusting prompt feedback based on predicted recognition accuracy | |
TWI475558B (en) | Method and apparatus for utterance verification | |
US20120191455A1 (en) | System and Method for an Endpoint Detection of Speech for Improved Speech Recognition in Noisy Environments | |
US20050182628A1 (en) | Domain-based dialog speech recognition method and apparatus | |
JPH10319988A (en) | Speaker identifying method and speaker recognizing device | |
US6473735B1 (en) | System and method for speech verification using a confidence measure | |
Herbig et al. | Self-learning speaker identification for enhanced speech recognition | |
US6970818B2 (en) | Methodology for implementing a vocabulary set for use in a speech recognition system | |
WO2004086357A2 (en) | System and method for speech recognition utilizing a merged dictionary | |
WO2019097215A1 (en) | Enrolment in speaker recognition system | |
CN101123090A (en) | Speech recognition by statistical language using square-rootdiscounting | |
EP1425737A1 (en) | System and method for speech verification using a robust confidence measure | |
US6823304B2 (en) | Speech recognition apparatus and method performing speech recognition with feature parameter preceding lead voiced sound as feature parameter of lead consonant | |
KR101229108B1 (en) | Apparatus for utterance verification based on word specific confidence threshold | |
US7231352B2 (en) | Method for computer-supported speech recognition, speech recognition system and control device for controlling a technical system and telecommunications device | |
Lee et al. | Dynamic time warping-based Korean spoken word detection system using euclidean distance in intelligent personal assistants |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20040225 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20050928 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20081111 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G10L 17/00 20060101ALI20100208BHEP Ipc: G10L 15/08 20060101AFI20100208BHEP |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20100713 |