EP1354303A2

EP1354303A2 - Method and apparatus for detecting objects

Info

Publication number: EP1354303A2
Application number: EP02768271A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Rida M. Hamza; Marek Gierczak; Darren D. Cofer
Original assignee: Honeywell International Inc
Current assignee: Honeywell International Inc
Priority date: 2001-01-19
Filing date: 2002-01-18
Publication date: 2003-10-22
Anticipated expiration: 2022-01-18
Also published as: DE60204280D1; EP1354303B1; ATE296471T1; DE60204280T2

Abstract

An object detection system is provided that projects one or more patterns onto a monitored area, captures one or more live images of the monitored area, and detects objects that enter the monitored area by detecting changes in the one or more patterns in the live images. Such an object detection system may be less susceptible to dynamic lighting ocnditions, and more sensitive to object motion and/or presence.

Description

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING OBJECTS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S. C.§119(e)(1) to co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/262,925, filed January 19, 2001, and entitled "OBJECT DETECTION USING MOIRE INTERFERENCE".

Field of the Invention The present invention relates to object detection, and more specifically, to object intrusion and/or presence detection within a monitored area or region.

Background of the Invention Motion detection and object detection systems are well known in the art.

Frequently, such systems monitor a user-defined area to detect when an object enters or passes through a monitored area. Such systems typically include an image capture device < (typically a video camera or still camera) capable of capturing an image of the monitored . area and, if required, a device for digitizing the captured images. The digitized images are analyzed in an attempt to detect whether an object has entered the monitored area. There are many different known methods and algorithms for analyzing digitized images for determining when an object has entered a monitored area. One of the most common methods is generally referred to as a change detection method.

Change detection is often accomplished by examining the difference between a current live image and a reference image, where the reference image contains only the static background of the monitored area. A reference image can be thought of as a representation of the monitored area as it would appear if no transitory objects were in view. Change detection algorithms often take two digitized images as input and return the locations in the field of view where differences between the images are identified. Object detection systems are commonly used in environments that have dynamic lighting conditions. For example, in industrial settings, moving shadows can be cast on a monitored area or region, which can cause significant changes in ambient lighting conditions. Many existing object detection systems, including those that use change detection algorithms to detect objects, can be challenged by such shadows and/or other dynamic lighting conditions.

Summary of the invention The present invention overcomes many of the disadvantages of the prior art by providing an object detection system that is less susceptible to dynamic lighting conditions, and/or more sensitive to three-dimensional object motion and/or presence. This is preferably accomplished by projecting one or more static or dynamic patterns onto the monitored area, capturing one or more live images of the monitored area including the one or more patterns, and detecting objects in the monitored area by detecting changes in the one or more patterns in selected captured images..

In a first illustrative embodiment of the present invention, a single pattern is projected onto the monitored area. One or more live images of the monitored area are then captured at selected times, and analyzed to detect changes in the projected pattern. The changes in the pattern may indicate a topographical change in the monitored area, and thus the entry or movement of an object in the monitored area. Because the. pattern is projected onto the monitored area, changes in the ambient lighting conditions may have less effect on the efficacy of the object detection system.

In another illustrative embodiment, a moire interference pattern is used to help detect objects in the monitored area. Moire interference patterns are particularly sensitive to relative motion between the two or more underlying patterns that are used to create the moire interference pattern. As such, the use of moire interference patterns can be highly effective in detecting objects that intrude into a monitored area.

A moire interference pattern may be created in any number of ways. For example, two or more similar patterns may be projected onto the monitored area from offset illumination positions. Alternatively, or in addition, one pattern may be projected onto the monitored area, while another may be imposed by a patterned grating positioned in the image plane of the image capture device. Yet another way of creating a moire interference pattern is to capture two images of the same area having a single projected pattern, and digitally or optically rotating or otherwise changing the position of one of the images relative to the other to create a moire interference pattern. Any number of other methods may also be used to create a moire interference pattern, as desired.

When using a moire interference pattern, one or more live images of the monitored may be captured at selected times. The images may then be analyzed to detect changes in the moire interference pattern. Changes in the moire interference pattern may indicate a topographical change in the monitored area and thus the entry or movement of an object in the monitored area. An advantage of using moire interference patterns is that shadows and/or other changes in ambient lighting conditions may have little or no effect on the position, frequency or other characteristics of the moire interference pattern. To help prevent the projected pattern from being overwhelmed by ambient light, it is contemplated that a portion of the spectrum or lighting frequency that is not typically found in the ambient lighting conditions may be used to project the one or more patterns on the monitored area, such as near infrared.

The present invention may be used to monitor a user-defined safety zone for the intrusion of people or other objects. However, numerous other applications are also contemplated including security, recording, and other monitoring and/or detection applications.

Brief Description of Drawings Figures 1 A- IB are schematic diagrams showing one illustrative object detection system in accordance with the present invention;

Figures 2A-2B are schematic diagrams showing other illustrative object detection systems in accordance with the present invention;

Figures 3A-3B depict two example patterns that can be used in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention; Figures 4A-4B depict two examples of patterns that can be used in accordance with other embodiments of the present invention;

Figures 5A-5C depict an example of moire interference phenomena in accordance with the present invention; Figures 6A-6C depict an illustrative reference image, live image and comparison image, respectively, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

Figure 7 is a flow diagram showing an illustrative method in accordance with present invention; Figure 8 is a flow diagram showing another illustrative method in accordance with the present invention; and

Figure 9 is a flow diagram showing yet another illustrative method in accordance ' with the present invention.

Detailed Description of the Invention The following description should be read with reference to the! drawings wherein! < like reference numerals indicate like elements throughout the several drawϊώgsi - h ■ detailed description and drawings represent select illustrative ' intended to be limiting.

. The present invention provides an object detection system that may be lessi susceptible to dynamic lighting conditions, and or may be more sensitive tc c-bjeet motion and/or presence than prior art systems. The system is also sensitive ltd lall three-' dimensional extraneous objects that intrude into the monitored area. This may.bei accomplished by, for example, projecting one or more static or dynamic patterns ₍dn-=the'. monitored area, capturing one or more images of the monitored area including the -one or more patterns, and detecting objects in the monitored area by detecting changes in the one or more patterns in selected captured images.

Figures 1 A- IB are schematic diagrams showing a first illustrative object detection system in accordance with the present invention. The illustrative object detection system of Figures 1 A includes an illumination source 2, an image capture device 4, an image storage device 6, and a processing device 8. In some embodiments, the illumination source 2, image capture device 4, image storage device 6, and processing device 8 are integrated into a common device, while in other embodiments, separate devices are provided, as desired.

The illumination source 2 is located above a monitored area 14, such as near a ceiling. The illumination source 2 illuminates the monitored area 14 with a desired pattern. The pattern may be generated by, for example, projecting through a patterned grating, projecting interference patterns where the interference fringes are formed by a phasor or wavelength shifting, projecting a pattern using a scanning mechanism, or any - 5 other suitable method.

As noted above, the pattern may be static or dynamic. A dynamic pattern is ones where the spatial position of the light areas and dark areas is moving, and vgeneral the^* ' movement is periodic in nature. One way to realize a dynamic moire pattemis^'to:pr©jq©t'' an interference. pattern from a Mach-Zender interferometer, which may incfadetaimirrore. p

,10 - , on a peso-actuator: Thesfrequeήe ofmovement of the mirror may deteimine:tthet.>. frequency of interference fringe movement. . Itsis: contemplated that the mdhit<ρred,areBL lι4?c ■may be recitang ar roundjOranjy. other sha'pe; -asidesired. As shown in Figure 'lBy-the!'- illustrative monitored area 14 extends around three side of a machine 18.

It is contemplated that the illumination-source 2 maybe any type of illumihation s

15..: isource .capable of pfojecting a.desiredipattern.όri the monitored areaM. Εxamples'of ^!'i 1 suitable. illuiriination sources, 2 mcl deta incaήdeseent or fluorescent lampiwithla i ^■patterned mask, amd ill mination optics^ Other examples of suitable illurninatiiM:s^'ources^ll2i.ι include a lasing sourc such as a modulated lights-stripe illumination module,, bria laser<^; diode^"source uniformly illuminating a patterned grating with the grating re-imaged onto

20 the monitored area with an objective projection lens. Yet another example'of a'.suitablei illumination source 2 may be an infrared source. Using a portion of the spectrum, not '. . ordinarily found in the ambient lighting conditions, such as the near infrared,! may help_' keep the projected pattern from being overwhelmed by the ambient lighting conditions, and may also help enhance the differentiation between the projected pattern and other

25 sources of light in the environment. In addition, or alternatively, the image capture device may be a sensor (CCD or the like) that is attuned to a desired spectrum, such as the spectrum of the illumination source.

The illumination source 2 preferably projects at least one pattern on the monitored area 14. The pattern used may depend on the particular application at hand. For example, in one illustrative embodiment, the pattern may be any pattern that has transitions between areas that have illumination (e.g. light areas) and areas that lack illumination (e.g. dark areas). Generally, the average distance between transitions should be approximately the same size as the smallest object for which detection is desired, ^{■ ■•} 5 although this is not required. Examples of suitable patterns included striped or checker board patterns where illuminated and non-illuminated areas alternate. , Some illustrative •patterns are shown in Figures 3A-3B and.Figures:4A-4B, but any suitable pattern -may be αised.-,

Once illuminated; and in-one,άllu.strative embodiment,'- the image capture device 4-?

10,;, < captures, a refer encei agetof he. monitored area 1 ^;. The reference. iirιageis,rpijeferably ^•. an image, of the monitoredsarea 14. with, no.transitory-lαbj ects in the monitoredιar.ea 4- The reference' image; is preferably stό ed;-at;least temporarily, in theimageistorageidevice .6. ; A new reference image may.be; captured periodically, if desired. Once/a reference, image; is captured, the. image; captureidevice^'4. may 'Capture successive livesimages ofthe :;.

'15; - \; .monitored area 14;ι.pfeferably at a÷ selected jtime interval._' < Like the reference'image,;the:N •live, images. are. preferably stored; atleasttdrnporarilyi' in the image storagedevioe ό., The ■image' storagedevice 6 mayiprovide the 'reference image and the live images to_/the.; processing device 8. for; processing.

The processing device 8 preferably analyzes.the live images to detect changes in

20 the illuminated pattern, In some embodiments, the monitored area is divided into' aι number of image segments called mask windows. The size of each mask window is ' preferably chosen so that it is no bigger than the approximate size of the smallest object for which detection is desired. While objects smaller than the mask window may be detected, the probability of detecting such objects decreases with object size. The

25 position of the various mask windows may be chosen so that the entire area to be monitored is covered by overlapping mask windows. The image area that corresponds to each mask window may be analyzed separately for object detection, if desired. In addition, it is contemplated that the analysis method that is used to analyze the various mask windows may differ across the image, and the triggered response may vary depending on which mask window detects an object, if desired.

The comparison between a reference image and a live image can be accomplished in any number of ways. One method is to simply do a pixel-by-pixel comparison of the images, such as by subtracting one image from the other. If there is no entry or movement of objects in the monitored area, the projected pattern in the two images will substantially cancel out. However, if there is entry or movement of an object in the monitored area, part of the projected pattern shown in one image may be shifted or otherwisedeformed relative:tό^;thepatternιshownin the other image. A threshold value ' > may be^'used to help, determineif there' is . sufficient difference between the reference image and.a live image to; indicate.! a detected obj feet, as further described below.. ■• • • ^•. Another method for comparing_' one image toi another is to calculate a difference ' "gref.' between he value, ofithe brightness levels .corresponding to the light area's of th .. pattern.(such as. in amask window),. and tshe.ivalύe^' .®f the brightness, levels corresponding to the dark areas inthe maskwindow, of the-refef ence image.⁾ A similar calculation may be made for the masklwindows of a live image.. Whenever the^:second calculation is, ■ different from the first calculation:b a specified amount,, a change may be inferred.. A further discussion of this and other methods for comparing images is included in co- pending U.S. Patent Application Serial No. ________^__^, entitled "Object Detection", which is incorporated herein by reference.

Yet another method for comparing one image to another is to measure a correlation between each pixel and some neighboring pixels and/or a correlation between selected features, and then compare the correlation values. Whenever the correlation values are different by a specified amount, a change may be inferred. Alternatively, or in addition, the image analysis may extract the moire spatial frequency and phase using a Fourier transform. Other image analysis techniques may also be used including, for example, unsharp masking, thresholding, contrast segmentation, filtering processing, skeletonization processing, multi-resolution analysis, deformable contour modeling, image clustering, morphology, etc. These comparison methods are meant to be only illustrative, and that any suitable method may be used to compare the images or selected characteristics of the images, depending on the application.

It is also contemplated that the reference and/or live images may be preprocessed , ^' before they are compared. For example, the reference image and/or live images may be provided to a filter that helps removes speckle, provides smoothing, changes overall intensity, or otherwise cleans-up the images.

Changes that are detected in the illuminated pattern may indicate a topographical change within the monitored area 14, and thus entry or movement of an object in the monitored area 14. When an object is detected, the processing device 8 may sound an .alarm,. shut down the machine 18, and/or provide some other alarm or action. Images of the monitored area with the detected object present may be retained for subsequent analysis, and/or sent to a monitoring station if desired.

Figures 2A-2B are schematic diagrams showing yet other illustrative object detection systems in accordance with the present invention. In Figure 2 A, the illumination source 2 includes a radiation source 20, an obj ective proj ection lens 22, and a patterned grating 24. In the illustrative embodiment, the patterned grating 24 provides the desired pattern on the monitored area 14. It is contemplated that any pattern suitable for creating a moire interference pattern may be used. Some suitable patterns are shown in Figures 4A-4B. Rather than providing a separate patterned grating, the illumination source 2 itself may be configured to provide the desired pattern, if desired.

In the illustrative embodiment shown in Figure 2A, the image capture device 4 captures a first image of the monitored area 14 through a second grating 26. The second grating 26 may be any type of grating, filter or mask that produces the desired pattern. In some cases, the second grating 26 may be provided by the CCD pixel array of the image capture device 4 itself. The first grating 24 and the second grating 26 preferably collectively produce a live image that including a moire interference pattern therein. In some embodiments, the second pattern may be imposed digitally on the live image after the live image has been captured, if desired. The image capture device 4 transmits the live image to an image storage device 28, which in the embodiment shown, may also include a processing device.

The position of the illumination source 2 and the image capture device 4 are preferably spaced from each other by a distance. This distance can be small to large. This space may help encourage a change in the pattern that reaches the image capture device 4 when a topographical change occurs in the monitored area 14. Typically, the space should be larger as the resolution of the projected pattern is increased. Finally, a warning device 30 may be attached to the image storage device 28, and may be activated upon detection of an object. In Figure 2B, two illumination sources 36 and 38 are provided for projecting two separate patterns on the monitored area 14. Illumination source 36 includes a radiation source 40, an objective projection lens 42, and a patterned grating 44. The illumination source 36 preferably projects a first pattern on the monitored area 14. Likewise, illumination source 38 includes a radiation source 46, an objective projection lens 48, and a patterned grating 50. Illumination source 38 preferably proj ects a second pattern on the monitored area 14. The first pattern and the second pattern preferably collectively cause a moire interference pattern to be formed on the monitored area 14.

Image capture device 4 is used to capture a live image of the monitored area 14. Like above, the image capture device 4 may include an image storage device and a processing device. The live images are preferably analyzed to detect changes in the moire interference pattern over time. Changes in the moire interference pattern may indicate a topographical change in the monitored area 14 and thus the entry or movement of an object in the monitored area 14.

The illustrative embodiments shown in Figures 2 A-2B both cause a moire interference pattern to be provided in the resulting live image. It is contemplated that the image analysis may be similar to that discussed above with respect to Figures 1 A-1B. Alternatively, or in addition, the image analysis may extract the moire spatial frequency and phase using a Fourier transform. Other image analysis techniques may also be used including, for example, unsharp masking, thresholding, contrast segmentation, filtering processing, skeletonization processing, multi-resolution analysis, deformable contour modeling, image clustering, morphology, etc. Alternatively, or in addition, a radon filter may be oriented perpendicular to the moire interference bands, and any loss of correlation between the filtered results from the reference image and the live image may indicate a change in the moire interference bands.

Figures 5A-5C depict an example of moire interference phenomena in accordance with the present invention. Figure 5 A shows an image of a first pattern projected onto a monitored area. The first pattern includes a number of parallel lines extending in the vertical direction. Figure 5B shows an image of the monitored area with a second pattern superimposed on the first pattern. The second pattern includes a number of parallel lines extending in a direction that is radially offset relative to the vertical direction, hi the illustrative embodiment shown, the surface of the monitored area is spherical in shape, resulting in a number of curved moire interference bands 50. Figure 5C shows an image of the monitored area with an object 52 positioned in the monitored area. The object 52 causes a change in the moire interference bands relative to Figure 5B. As indicated above, the moire interference bands are highly sensitive to topographical changes in the monitored area, which in the embodiment shown, is illustrated by the introduction of the three-dimensional object 52 into the monitored area.

Figures 6A-6C depict an illustrative reference image, live image and comparison image, respectively, where only a single pattern is projected onto the monitored area and no grating is positioned between the monitored area and the image capture device. The image shown in Figure 6A is a reference image of the monitored area. The image shown in Figure 6B is an image of the monitored area when a hand is placed in the monitored area. The image shown in Figure 6C is an image that results from the comparison (e.g. subtraction) of the image shown in Figure 6A and the image shown in Figure 6B. As can be seen, the image shown in Figure 6C highlights the object, including its boundary, within the monitored area. In addition, virtual interference bands appear in and around the object. Under some circumstances, it may be desirable to provide a tolerance or threshold below which differences are likely due only to normal variations in lighting conditions or between images taken of the same area at different times. This tolerance may reduce the likelihood of false positives, and increase the reliability of the system. Figure 7 is a flow diagram showing an illustrative method in accordance with present invention. The illustrative method is entered at step 70, wherein a threshold value is selected. Control is then passed to step 72. Step 72 illuminates a monitored area with a pattern. As described above, the pattern may be any suitable pattern. Step 74 then captures a reference image of the monitored area. The reference image preferably contains only the static background of the monitored area, with no transitory objects present. In some embodiments, the reference image can be captured/updated upon manual initiation, as shown at 88.

Step 76 then captures a live image of the monitored area. Step 78 compares the reference image and the live image to determine a difference parameter. As detailed above, the comparison of the reference image and the live image can be accomplished in any number of ways. One method is to simply do a pixel-by-pixel comparison of the images, such as by subtracting one image from the other. If there is no entry or. movement of objects in the monitored area, the projected pattern in the two images will substantially cancel out. However, if there is entry or movement of an object inthe monitored area, part of the projected pattern shown in one image may be shifted or otherwise deformed relative to the pattern shown in the other image. Another method is to calculate a difference "gref ' between the value of the brightness levels corresponding to the light areas of the pattern (such as in a mask, window), and the value of the brightness levels corresponding to the dark areas in the mask window of the reference image. A similar calculation may be made for the mask windows of the live image. Yet another method is to measure a correlation between each pixel and some neighboring pixels and/or a correlation between selected features, and then compare the correlation values. Other illustrative methods include extracting the moire spatial frequency and phase using a Fourier transform, unsharp masking, thresholding, contrast segmentation, filtering processing, skeletonization processing, multi-resolution analysis, deformable contour modeling, image clustering, morphology, etc. These comparison methods are meant to be only illustrative, and that any suitable method may be used to compare the images or selected characteristics of the images, depending on the application.

It is also contemplated that the reference and/or live images may be preprocessed before they are compared. For example, the reference image and/or live images may be provided to a filter that helps removes speckle, provides smoothing, changes overall intensity, or otherwise cleans-up the images.

Step 80 determines if the differences identified in step 78 exceed the threshold value specified in step 70. If the differences exceed the threshold value, control is passed to step 82. Step 82 signals that an object is present in the monitored area. In some embodiments, an action is then taken, such as sounding an alarm, shutting down a machine, and/or providing some other alarm or action. If the differences do not exceed the threshold value, control is passed to step 84. Step 84 signals that an object is not present in the monitored area, and control is passed to step 86. Step 86 determines if an updated reference image is desirable. Under some circumstances, such as when the lighting conditions are dynamic in or around the monitored area, it may be advantageous to periodically update the reference image. If it is determined that an updated reference image is desirable, control is passed to step 74. Step 74 updates the reference image with the previous live image. Alternatively, a new reference image may be captured, if desired, so long as no objects have entered the monitored area. If it is determined that an updated reference image is not needed, control is passed to step 76, wherein a new live image is captured.

Figure 8 is a flow diagram showing another illustrative method in accordance with the present invention. The illustrative method is entered at step 90, wherein a threshold value is selected. Control is then passed to step 92. Step 92 illuminates a monitored area with a first pattern. Control is then passed to step 94. Step 94 imposes a second pattern relative to the first pattern. Step 94 may, for example, illuminate the monitored area with the second pattern, or a grating may be placed between the monitored area and an image capture device, as desired. Step 96 then captures a reference image of the monitored area. The reference image preferably contains only the static background of the monitored area, with no transitory objects present. In some embodiments, the reference image can be captured/updated upon manual initiation, as shown at 110. Step 98 captures a live image of the monitored area. Step 100 compares the reference image and the live image to determine selected differences. Step 102 determines if the differences identified in step 100 exceed the threshold value specified in step 90. If the differences exceed the threshold value, control is passed to step 104. Step 104 signals that an object is present in the monitored area, hi some embodiments, an action is then taken, such as. sounding an alarm, shutting down a machine, and/or providing some other alarm or action. If the differences do not exceed the threshold value, control is passed to step 106. Step 106 signals that an object is not present in the monitored area, and control is passed to step 108.

Step 108 determines if an updated reference image is desirable. Under some circumstances, such as when the lighting conditions are dynamic in or around the monitored area, it may be advantageous to periodically update the reference image. If it is determined that an updated reference image is desirable, control is passed to step 96. Step 96 updates the reference image with the previous live image. Alternatively, a new reference image maybe captured, if desired, so long as no objects have entered the monitored area. If it is determined that an updated reference image is not needed, control is passed to step 98, wherein a new live image is captured.

Figure 9 is a flow diagram showing yet another illustrative method in accordance with the present invention. The illustrative method is entered at step 120, wherein a threshold value is selected. Control is then passed to step 122. Step 122 illuminates a monitored area with at least one pattern. Step 124 captures a reference image of two or more mask windows of the monitored area. Each mask window preferably corresponds to a sub-area or region within the monitored area. In some embodiments, the reference , image can be captured/updated upon manual initiation, as shown at 140.

Step 126 captures a live image of each mask window within the monitored area. Then, for each mask window, step 128 compares the reference image and the live image to determine differences therebetween. In some embodiments, selected mask windows of the reference image and the live image are compared using different compare algorithms. Step 130 determines if any of the differences identified in step 128 exceed the threshold value specified in step 120. In some embodiments, each mask window or group of mask windows has a different threshold value.

If any of the differences exceed the threshold value(s), control is passed to step 132. Step 132 signals that an object is present in the monitored area. In some embodiments, an action is then taken, such as sounding an alarm, shutting down a machine, and/or providing some other alarm or action. In some embodiments, the action taken niay depend on which mask window detects an object. For example, for one mask window, the action may include sounding an alarm, while for another mask window the action may include shutting down a machine within the monitored area. In any event, if the differences do not exceed the threshold value(s), control is passed to step 134. Step 134 signals that an object is not present in the monitored area, and control is passed to step 136.

Step 136 determines if an updated reference image is desirable. If it is determined that an updated reference image is desirable, control is passed to step 124. Step 124 updates the reference image with the previous live image. Alternatively, a new reference image may be captured, if desired, so long as no objects have entered the monitored area. If it is determined that an updated reference image is not needed, control is passed to step 126, wherein a new live image is captured of the mask windows of the monitored area. While the invention is susceptible to various modifications, and alternative forms, specific examples thereof have been shown in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not to be limited to the particular forms or methods disclosed, but to the contrary, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:

1. A method for detecting an object in a monitored area, the method comprising the steps of: illuminating the monitored area with a pattern; capturing a live image of the monitored area, including the pattern; and detecting an object in the monitored area when a change is detected in the pattern in the live image.

2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the detecting step detects an object in the monitored area when the change in the pattern exceeds a predetermined threshold.

3. A method according to claim 1 further comprising the steps of: capturing a reference image of the monitored area, including the pattern; and comparing the reference image and the live image to detect a change in the pattern in the live image.

4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the monitored area is illuminated with a static pattern.

5. A method according to claim 1 wherein the monitored area is illuminated with a dynamic pattern.

6. A method according to claim 3 wherein the reference image and the live image each have a number of mask windows, and wherein the comparing step compares selected mask windows of the reference image to selected mask windows of the live image.

7. A method according to claim 6 wherein the comparing step compares the selected mask windows of the reference image and the live image using one or more comparing algorithms.

8. A method according to claim 7 wherein the comparing step compares two or more of the selected mask windows using different comparing algorithms.

9. A method according to claim 6 further comprising the step of performing a predefined action if the detecting step detects an object in one of the selected mask windows.

10. A method according to claim 9 wherein the predefined action is different depending on in which mask window an object is detected.

11. A method for detecting an obj ect in a monitored area, the method comprising the steps of: illuminating the monitored area with a first pattern; creating moire interference bands by imposing a second pattern shifted relative to the first pattern; capturing a live image of the monitored area, including the moire interference bands; and detecting an object in the monitored area when a change is detected in the moire interference bands in the live image.

12. A method according to claim 11 wherein the detecting step detects an object in the monitored area when the change in the moire interference bands exceeds a predetermined threshold.

13. A method according to claim 11 further comprising the steps of: capturing a reference image of the monitored area, including the moire interference bands; and comparing the reference image and the live image to detect a change in the moire interference bands in the live image.

14. A method according to claim 13 wherein the comparing step includes subtracting at least part of the live image from at least part of the reference image or visa- versa.

15. A method according to claim 11 wherein the moire interference bands are created by illuminating the monitored area with the second pattern.

16. A method according to claim 11 wherein the moire interference bands are created by providing a mask or grating having the second pattern between the monitored area and an image capture device.

17. A method according to claim 11 wherein the moire interference bands are created by digitally imposing the second pattern on the live image.

18. A method according to claim 11, wherein the reference image of the monitored area and the live image of the monitored area are captured with a sensor.

19. A method according to claim 18, wherein the first pattern is illuminated using light from a specified spectral region and the sensor is attuned to the spectral region.

20. A method according to claim 19, wherein the specified spectral region is near infrared.

21. A method according to claim 11 , wherein the first pattern is illuminated using light from a first illumination source, and the second pattern is imposed using a second illumination source.

22. A method according to claim 11, wherein the method for comparing the interference bands of the reference image and the live image uses a Radon filter oriented perpendicular relative to the interference bands.

23. A method for detecting an object in a monitored area comprising: illuminating the monitored area with a specified pattern having bright areas and dark areas, each with a brightness level; capturing a plurality of reference image mask windows, each mask window covering at least part of the monitored area; for each reference image mask window, calculating a difference "gref between the brightness levels corresponding to the light areas in the mask window and the brightness levels corresponding to the dark areas in the mask window; for each reference image mask window, capturing a corresponding live image mask window; for each live image mask window, calculating a difference "glive" between the brightness levels corresponding to the light areas in the mask window and the brightness levels corresponding to the dark areas in the mask window; and indicating that an object has been detected when, for any mask window, the calculated value "glive" is different from the corresponding calculated value "gref by at least a specified threshold value.

24. A method according to claim 23 wherein the illuminating step includes illuminating the monitored area with a first specified pattern and a second specified pattern to create one or more moire interference bands.