EP1339646A1 - Nutrient delivery system - Google Patents

Nutrient delivery system

Info

Publication number
EP1339646A1
EP1339646A1 EP01996516A EP01996516A EP1339646A1 EP 1339646 A1 EP1339646 A1 EP 1339646A1 EP 01996516 A EP01996516 A EP 01996516A EP 01996516 A EP01996516 A EP 01996516A EP 1339646 A1 EP1339646 A1 EP 1339646A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
nutrient
media
nutrients
water
support material
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP01996516A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Genevieve Ann Boshoff
Robert M. Kalin
Kayleen The Queen's University of Belfast WALSH
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Queens University of Belfast
Original Assignee
Queens University of Belfast
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Queens University of Belfast filed Critical Queens University of Belfast
Publication of EP1339646A1 publication Critical patent/EP1339646A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/20—Bacteria; Culture media therefor
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
    • B09C1/002—Reclamation of contaminated soil involving in-situ ground water treatment
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
    • B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
    • B09C1/10—Reclamation of contaminated soil microbiologically, biologically or by using enzymes
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2101/00—Nature of the contaminant
    • C02F2101/30—Organic compounds
    • C02F2101/36—Organic compounds containing halogen
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
    • C02F2103/06—Contaminated groundwater or leachate
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2305/00—Use of specific compounds during water treatment
    • C02F2305/06—Nutrients for stimulating the growth of microorganisms

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a nutrient delivery system and material for use particularly but not exclusively in biological groundwater remediation systems.
  • PRBs Permeable Reactive Barriers
  • PRBs are a passive intervention remediation technology.
  • PRBs contaminated groundwater passes, under natural or induced hydraulic gradients, through an in situ reactive material, where the contaminant is either abiotically or biotically degraded or sorbed.
  • PRB's are unique as they can be inserted to prevent contaminant movement across site boundaries prior to risk receptors, or simply to intercept a contaminant plume. They also do not suffer from the same limitations as the pump-and -treat method as only those contaminants already in solution are treated (Borden et al . 1997).
  • Bio processes are ] nown to effect the cycling of numerous elements in nature.
  • biological PRBs that utilise the attenuating capacity of the indigenous microbial population in the groundwater, have been developed.
  • Biologically enhanced PRBs have been suggested as a method for controlling the migration of dissolved hydrocarbons and other readily biodegradable contaminants (Borden et al . 1997) such as the dissolved gasoline components benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and toluene (BTEX) (Alvarez & Vogel 1991) .
  • Chlorinated solvents such as tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) have also been found to be degradable in reactive barriers (Keeley et al . 1999, Kao & Lei 2000) .
  • the rate, type of active microbial population within the barrier and the level of activity and degradation are controlled by nutrient concentration, biogeochemical and environmental conditions.
  • compounds which play a major role in the supply (electron donors e.g. toluene)
  • the transfer of electrons (electron acceptors e.g. N0 3 " , S0 4 2 ⁇ ) or are principal construction elements of cells (e.g. C, N and P) will strongly influence the biodegrading of contaminates.
  • ETEX degradation can occur under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions and reports of degradation of toluene and benzene under nitrate reducing (Barbaro et al .
  • ORC methyl tert butyl ether
  • PCP pentachlorophenol
  • VC vinyl chloride
  • the typical lifetime of ORC is approximately 6 months and it does not require continuous maintenance. It is currently being used in groundwater and soil remediation on over 2800 sites in the USA and in several other countries with an estimated treatment cost of $47-83 per 1000 gallons. However, its performance is limited by the presence of elevated concentrations of metals, particularly iron, in target waters.
  • a nutrient delivery material for a media remediation system comprising a support material having immobilised therewith one or more nutrients, which nutrient (s) are releasable upon the flow of media thereover.
  • the nutrient delivery material that has been developed will facilitate the delivery of a range of nutrients, both organic and inorganic, possibly to a subsurface, over an extended period of time i.e. a number of years.
  • the nutrient immobilised within the material will be dependent on the specific site requirements but will normally be an inorganic or organic nutrient that is deficient in the media that is to be treated.
  • the media could be water, air, etc.; generally water such as groundwater.
  • This delivery material provides a system will have numerous advantages over other systems in that it will be maintenance free for long periods of time i.e. it will only need to be replaced once the nutrient has run out. It will also allow the nutrient delivered to be site-specific thereby optimising degradation. Nutrients can be released at a rate determined by the growth of the microbial population. Nutrients released will immediately be utilised by the bacterial population growing on the material. This will prevent the unnecessary release of nutrients into the surrounding environment.
  • the material of the nutrient system could be made and provided in a number of different ways and forms. It could be manufactured in pellets and granules of different size and shape. It could be used as a matrix or solid surface on which bacteria can attach and grow. The material could also be sprayed onto suitable surfaces. The material could also be used as a pH control mechanism for the treatment of acidic media. In this the incoming acidic media will flow over the material and due to the release of hydroxides and carbonates, the pH of the water will be elevated.
  • the material could also be injected into media (e.g. sub-surface) where it will dry. forming a barrier.
  • This material can be used in ex-si tu treatment processes i.e. processes above ground.
  • the material could also be used as a material in biological trickling filters and bioscrubbers .
  • the material could serve as a matrix for the growth of bacteria while also compensating for any pH changes that may occur in the incoming air or water stream.
  • the support material for the nutrient system generally has the following composition: Any fine aggregate, e.g. sand. Any cement, e.g. Portlandite cement Water
  • the sand: cement :water is preferably in an approximate ratio of 3:2:1 by volume. However these ratios can be different depending on the strength of the product that is to be obtained and the nutrients to be added to this mixture. More than one nutrient can be added.
  • the support material includes an aluminium, and the aluminium: silica and/or cement: aluminium: silica ratio also varies the strength of the support material as desired or necessary.
  • the support material also includes an admixture.
  • An admixture is a material other than water, aggregate, cement and fibre support, which can be used as an ingredient of concrete and added to the batch immediately before or during mixing. The addition of these admixtures serves to enhance the properties of the support material .
  • Chemical admixtures that can be used in the present invention include: water reducers, superplasticisers, polymers, retards, accelerators and air entrainers .
  • Mineral admixtures that can be added include microsilica, pulverized fuel ash, ground granulated blastfurnace slag, rice husk ash, high reactivity metakaoline, zeolite or fuel ash.
  • any inorganic nutrient can be added to the material of the nutrient delivery system, either in the form of a powder or salt that will dissolve in water, or in the form of a concentrated liquid solution.
  • the nutrient can also be added in the form of a nutrient sorbed onto a porous aggregate that is used.
  • Organic nutrients can be added in the same form.
  • the support material can be formed as a clay-like material, but is more usually a concrete-like material.
  • the material is generally allowed to dry and then ground into the required size.
  • a process for the preparation of a nutrient delivery material comprising the steps of; (a) admixing a fine aggregate, cement, water, and optionally aluminum and/or an admixture as hereinbefore defined, to form a support material, and one or more nutrients either simultaneously or thereafter; (b) drying the so-formed material; and (c) grinding the dried material; wherein the ratio of ingredients in step (a) and/or degree of grinding in step (c) determines the rate of release of the or each nutrient from the support material.
  • a process for delivering one or more nutrients for a media, generally water, remediation system comprising locating a nutrient delivery material as hereinbefore defined in the path of the media.
  • a support material for a media remediation nutrient delivery system which material is adapted to immobilise one or more nutrients which are releasable upon a flow of media thereover .
  • the present invention provides a material that can be used in a PRB or other reactive zone for enhanced natural attenuation.
  • the material can be formed as a porous structure, e.g. if the nutrient (s) are within a suitable aggregate, or in a more solid- formed material like concrete, which can be subsequently crushed to form the desired shaped and/or sized material suitable for nutrient release over time.
  • the nutrient (s) are well known in the art, and comprise any substance adapted to sustain bacteria known for their media-remediation.
  • BiNDs Biological Nutrient Delivery System
  • the BiNDs material was characterised by Powder X-ray diffraction and Infra-red spectroscopy. These techniques serve to give a fingerprint of the main components in the material and indicate how the structure of the material changes during nutrient release.
  • To the BiNDs material was added either a "nitrate” in the form of potassium nitrate, an "ammonium” in the form of ammonium phosphate, or a "phosphate” in the form of potassium phosphate.
  • Figures 1-14 and Tables 1-7 hereinafter show X-ray powder diffraction or Infra-Red patterns, peaks and scans for samples of the BiNDs materials either before leaching or at times after leaching.
  • Figure 15 hereinafter is an electron microscope photograph of the BiNDS material at the initial stages of biofilm development.
  • the leaching data was provided by passing deionised water over time through a column of the relevant BiNDs material.
  • In-si tu implementation of the material in a groundwater remediation system could, for example, be carried by the digging of a trench as conventionally done when constructing permeable reactive barriers. The material can then be added to the trench either in pockets separated by an appropriate metal or chemically inert material or in a continuous trench. Pockets will facilitate the removal of sections of the barrier for replacement and investigation.
  • the groundwater will flow through the material. Bacteria present in the groundwater will attach to the material to gain access to the immobilised nutrients either by active mechanisms or by passive diffusion from the material. An active biofilm will form on the material. This microbial biofilm will breakdown contaminants in the groundwater passing through the material
  • Ex-si tu implementation of the material could involve, for example, the packing of the material into a reactor of appropriate design e.g. biological trickling filter, air scrubber.
  • the reactor will be seeded with a population of micro-organisms that are able to degrade the contaminant of interest.
  • the material When used as a method for elevating the pH of acidic effluents, the material will be placed into a bed over which the effluent will flow. The flow rate will be determined by the pH and composition of the effluent.
  • the present invention provides a nutrient delivery system which can supply nutrients to a bacterial population that in turn will breakdown contaminants. This system can be used to enhance natural attenuation processes by supplying essential nutrients in conditions where these nutrients are limiting or completely absent.
  • This nutrient delivery system can be used in sub- surface environments e.g. as a packing material in Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRBs) , or in reactors treating contaminated wastewater and gaseous streams.
  • PRBs Permeable Reactive Barriers
  • This nutrient delivery system will passively supply nutrients for extended periods of time.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Soil Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Mycology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biological Treatment Of Waste Water (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Biological Wastes In General (AREA)

Abstract

A nutrient delivery material for use in a media remediation system comprising a support material conjoined one or more nutrients, which nutrient(s) are releasable upon the flow of media thereover is described. The present invention provides nutrients to a bacterial population that in turn will breakdown contaminants. This system can be used to enhance natural attenuation processes by supplying essential nutrients in conditions where these nutrients are limiting or completely absent. The media could be water, air, etc.; generally water such as groundwater. The delivery system is maintenance free for long periods of time. It will also allow the nutrient delivered to be site-specific thereby optimising degradation. Nutrients can be released at a rate determined by growth of the microbial population. Nutrients released will immediately be utilised by the bacterial population growing on the material. This will prevent the unnecessary release of nutrients into the surrounding environment.

Description

Nutrient Delivery System
This invention relates to a nutrient delivery system and material for use particularly but not exclusively in biological groundwater remediation systems.
Conventionally groundwater remediation has involved ex si tu technologies such as pump-and-treat and bioventing. Pump-and-treat involves the continuous input of energy for pumping water from the extraction wells and operating the water treatment systems. Remediation costs utilising this technology therefore tend to be large. The efficiency of this method is also limited by the low solubility of many contaminants and the low rate of contaminant dissolution (Borden et al . 1997) .
Emphasis has therefore switched to passive in si tu remediation technologies . Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRBs) are a passive intervention remediation technology. In PRBs, contaminated groundwater passes, under natural or induced hydraulic gradients, through an in situ reactive material, where the contaminant is either abiotically or biotically degraded or sorbed. PRB's are unique as they can be inserted to prevent contaminant movement across site boundaries prior to risk receptors, or simply to intercept a contaminant plume. They also do not suffer from the same limitations as the pump-and -treat method as only those contaminants already in solution are treated (Borden et al . 1997).
Initial development of this technology took place at the University of Waterloo, Canada. Since then numerous laboratory and bench-scale investigations have been carried out. Zero valent iron (FeO) , used for the reduction of chromate and the dechlorination of chlorinated hydrocarbons such as TCE and PCE, is the most common reactive material and most full scale PRBs are of this type. However, the long -term performance of these reactors is still unpredictable. Problems also arise when products from the incomplete breakdown of contaminants accumulate within the barrier necessitating replacement of the iron. Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) is another widely investigated reactive media mostly used for the interception and sorption of hydrophobic compounds such as Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) .
Although the applicability of this technology has been proven, periodic maintenance is required to maintain its efficiency. These systems are also strongly affected by geochemical changes and contaminant flux and the range of compounds they can act on is limited.
Biological processes are ] nown to effect the cycling of numerous elements in nature. In recent years biological PRBs that utilise the attenuating capacity of the indigenous microbial population in the groundwater, have been developed. Biologically enhanced PRBs have been suggested as a method for controlling the migration of dissolved hydrocarbons and other readily biodegradable contaminants (Borden et al . 1997) such as the dissolved gasoline components benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and toluene (BTEX) (Alvarez & Vogel 1991) . Chlorinated solvents such as tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) have also been found to be degradable in reactive barriers (Keeley et al . 1999, Kao & Lei 2000) .
The rate, type of active microbial population within the barrier and the level of activity and degradation are controlled by nutrient concentration, biogeochemical and environmental conditions. In particular compounds which play a major role in the supply (electron donors e.g. toluene) , the transfer of electrons (electron acceptors e.g. N03 ", S04 2~) or are principal construction elements of cells (e.g. C, N and P) will strongly influence the biodegrading of contaminates. For example, BTEX degradation can occur under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions and reports of degradation of toluene and benzene under nitrate reducing (Barbaro et al . 1992), iron reducing (Lovley et al . 1989), sulphate reducing (Rabus et al . 1993) and methanogenic (Edwards & Grbic-Galic 1992) conditions, have been made. The establishment of these conditions is dependent on the supply of a terminal electron acceptor (TEA) to which reducing equivalents or electrons can be transferred, thereby producing energy (Azadpour-Keeley et al . 1999). Many organic contaminants can be used as primary substrate for microbial metabolism (Alvarez-Cohen 1993) particularly hydrocarbons in gasoline and other petroleum derivatives (Armstrong et al . 1991) . However, in cases where contaminants are degraded by secondary metabolism or co-metabolism it may be necessary to supply alternate substrates.
The supply of oxygen has also been identified as a critical and limiting factor in aerobic bioremediation A number of methods have been employed to increase the availability of dissolved oxygen (DO) within contaminated groundwaters , thereby enhancing aerobic degradation. Air sparging, which involves the direct injection of air into a water-saturated soil matrix via a pervious pipe (Brown 1997), has proven to be very popular. It has been shown to aid the biodegradation of hydrocarbons and chlorinated compounds (Fiorenza et al . 1999). More recently a patented formulation called Oxygen Release Compound (ORC) has been developed. This consists of magnesium peroxide that slowly releases oxygen when hydrated. It has proven effective in the bioremediation of BTEX (Bianchi-Mosquera 1994) as well as methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE) , pentachlorophenol (PCP) and vinyl chloride (VC) . The typical lifetime of ORC is approximately 6 months and it does not require continuous maintenance. It is currently being used in groundwater and soil remediation on over 2800 sites in the USA and in several other countries with an estimated treatment cost of $47-83 per 1000 gallons. However, its performance is limited by the presence of elevated concentrations of metals, particularly iron, in target waters.
More recently the use of oxygen releasing concrete briquettes has been investigated for the remediation of a BTEX plume (Borden et al . 1997).
The supply of inorganic and organic nutrients also poses a problem and may be a limiting factor to the use and efficiency of biological PRBs. In the past organic carbon sources such as lactic acid have been added in regular high concentration pulses to stimulate natural attenuation (Johnson et al . 1999). However, this tends to be expensive and in many situations results in fouling of injection wells. Hydrogen Release Compound (HRC) , which was developed by Regenesis, San Jan Capistrano, California, is a lactic acid ester which, when on delivery to the subsurface, releases lactic acid. The lactic acid serves as an electron donor for the enhancement of natural biodegradation processes. It can be used to deliver nutrients passively and has been shown to be effective in the remediation of chlorinated volatile organic compounds (cVOC's) with a lifetime of 12 months being predicted (Johnson et al . 1997) .
Although the above nutrient delivery systems have proven to be effective, their limited life span and large replacement cost have made them prohibitively expensive in the United Kingdom and led to limited use in Europe. It is therefore of vital importance that a nutrient delivery system be developed for the sustained release of nutrients into the surrounding environment .
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a nutrient delivery material for a media remediation system comprising a support material having immobilised therewith one or more nutrients, which nutrient (s) are releasable upon the flow of media thereover.
The nutrient delivery material that has been developed will facilitate the delivery of a range of nutrients, both organic and inorganic, possibly to a subsurface, over an extended period of time i.e. a number of years. The nutrient immobilised within the material will be dependent on the specific site requirements but will normally be an inorganic or organic nutrient that is deficient in the media that is to be treated. The media could be water, air, etc.; generally water such as groundwater.
The release of the nutrient from the material, either by active mechanisms or passive diffusion, will stimulate the growth of a population of bacteria. This population of bacteria will break down the contaminant in question, thereby remediating the groundwater .
This delivery material provides a system will have numerous advantages over other systems in that it will be maintenance free for long periods of time i.e. it will only need to be replaced once the nutrient has run out. It will also allow the nutrient delivered to be site-specific thereby optimising degradation. Nutrients can be released at a rate determined by the growth of the microbial population. Nutrients released will immediately be utilised by the bacterial population growing on the material. This will prevent the unnecessary release of nutrients into the surrounding environment.
The material of the nutrient system could be made and provided in a number of different ways and forms. It could be manufactured in pellets and granules of different size and shape. It could be used as a matrix or solid surface on which bacteria can attach and grow. The material could also be sprayed onto suitable surfaces. The material could also be used as a pH control mechanism for the treatment of acidic media. In this the incoming acidic media will flow over the material and due to the release of hydroxides and carbonates, the pH of the water will be elevated.
The material could also be injected into media (e.g. sub-surface) where it will dry. forming a barrier. This material can be used in ex-si tu treatment processes i.e. processes above ground.
The material could also be used as a material in biological trickling filters and bioscrubbers . The material could serve as a matrix for the growth of bacteria while also compensating for any pH changes that may occur in the incoming air or water stream.
The support material for the nutrient system generally has the following composition: Any fine aggregate, e.g. sand. Any cement, e.g. Portlandite cement Water
The sand: cement :water is preferably in an approximate ratio of 3:2:1 by volume. However these ratios can be different depending on the strength of the product that is to be obtained and the nutrients to be added to this mixture. More than one nutrient can be added. Preferably the support material includes an aluminium, and the aluminium: silica and/or cement: aluminium: silica ratio also varies the strength of the support material as desired or necessary.
Optionally, the support material also includes an admixture. An admixture is a material other than water, aggregate, cement and fibre support, which can be used as an ingredient of concrete and added to the batch immediately before or during mixing. The addition of these admixtures serves to enhance the properties of the support material . Chemical admixtures that can be used in the present invention include: water reducers, superplasticisers, polymers, retards, accelerators and air entrainers . Mineral admixtures that can be added include microsilica, pulverized fuel ash, ground granulated blastfurnace slag, rice husk ash, high reactivity metakaoline, zeolite or fuel ash.
Any inorganic nutrient can be added to the material of the nutrient delivery system, either in the form of a powder or salt that will dissolve in water, or in the form of a concentrated liquid solution. The nutrient can also be added in the form of a nutrient sorbed onto a porous aggregate that is used. Organic nutrients can be added in the same form.
The support material can be formed as a clay-like material, but is more usually a concrete-like material. The material is generally allowed to dry and then ground into the required size.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a process for the preparation of a nutrient delivery material comprising the steps of; (a) admixing a fine aggregate, cement, water, and optionally aluminum and/or an admixture as hereinbefore defined, to form a support material, and one or more nutrients either simultaneously or thereafter; (b) drying the so-formed material; and (c) grinding the dried material; wherein the ratio of ingredients in step (a) and/or degree of grinding in step (c) determines the rate of release of the or each nutrient from the support material.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a process for delivering one or more nutrients for a media, generally water, remediation system, comprising locating a nutrient delivery material as hereinbefore defined in the path of the media.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a support material for a media remediation nutrient delivery system, which material is adapted to immobilise one or more nutrients which are releasable upon a flow of media thereover .
In general, the present invention provides a material that can be used in a PRB or other reactive zone for enhanced natural attenuation. The material can be formed as a porous structure, e.g. if the nutrient (s) are within a suitable aggregate, or in a more solid- formed material like concrete, which can be subsequently crushed to form the desired shaped and/or sized material suitable for nutrient release over time. The nutrient (s) are well known in the art, and comprise any substance adapted to sustain bacteria known for their media-remediation.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying figures and Tables.
A general Biological Nutrient Delivery System (hereafter "BiNDs") material was prepared comprising sand, Portlandite cement and water in a ratio of 3:2:1 respectively.
The BiNDs material was characterised by Powder X-ray diffraction and Infra-red spectroscopy. These techniques serve to give a fingerprint of the main components in the material and indicate how the structure of the material changes during nutrient release. To the BiNDs material was added either a "nitrate" in the form of potassium nitrate, an "ammonium" in the form of ammonium phosphate, or a "phosphate" in the form of potassium phosphate.
Figures 1-14 and Tables 1-7 hereinafter show X-ray powder diffraction or Infra-Red patterns, peaks and scans for samples of the BiNDs materials either before leaching or at times after leaching. Figure 15 hereinafter is an electron microscope photograph of the BiNDS material at the initial stages of biofilm development.
The leaching data was provided by passing deionised water over time through a column of the relevant BiNDs material.
In-si tu implementation of the material in a groundwater remediation system could, for example, be carried by the digging of a trench as conventionally done when constructing permeable reactive barriers. The material can then be added to the trench either in pockets separated by an appropriate metal or chemically inert material or in a continuous trench. Pockets will facilitate the removal of sections of the barrier for replacement and investigation. The groundwater will flow through the material. Bacteria present in the groundwater will attach to the material to gain access to the immobilised nutrients either by active mechanisms or by passive diffusion from the material. An active biofilm will form on the material. This microbial biofilm will breakdown contaminants in the groundwater passing through the material
Ex-si tu implementation of the material could involve, for example, the packing of the material into a reactor of appropriate design e.g. biological trickling filter, air scrubber. The reactor will be seeded with a population of micro-organisms that are able to degrade the contaminant of interest. When used as a method for elevating the pH of acidic effluents, the material will be placed into a bed over which the effluent will flow. The flow rate will be determined by the pH and composition of the effluent.
The present invention provides a nutrient delivery system which can supply nutrients to a bacterial population that in turn will breakdown contaminants. This system can be used to enhance natural attenuation processes by supplying essential nutrients in conditions where these nutrients are limiting or completely absent.
This nutrient delivery system can be used in sub- surface environments e.g. as a packing material in Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRBs) , or in reactors treating contaminated wastewater and gaseous streams.
This nutrient delivery system will passively supply nutrients for extended periods of time.

Claims

Claims
1. . A nutrient delivery material for use in a media remediation system comprising a support material conjoined with one or more nutrients, which nutrient (s) are releasable upon the flow of media thereover.
2. A material as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the or each nutrient is an inorganic or organic nutrient that is deficient in the media that is to be treated.
3. A material as claimed in Claim 1 or Claim 2 wherein the media is water.
4. A material as claimed in Claim 3 wherein the media is groundwater.
5. A material as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein the release of the or each nutrient is adapted to stimulate the growth of a population of bacteria.
6. A material as claimed in Claim 5 wherein the or each nutrient is adapted to be released at a rate determined by the growth of the microbial population.
7. A material as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein the material is used as a matrix or solid surface.
8. A material as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein the remediation system provides a pH control mechanism.
9. A material as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein the material is provided in a biological trickling filter or a bioscrubber.
10. A material as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein the support material comprises one or more fine aggregates, one or more cements, and water.
11. A material as claimed in Claim 10 wherein the fine aggregate is sand.
12. A material as claimed in Claim 10 or Claim 11 wherein the cement is Portlandite cement.
13. A material as claimed in Claim 10, 11 or 12 wherein the aggregate : cement :water has an approximate ratio of 3:2:1 by volume.
14. A material as claimed in any one of Claims 10 to 13 wherein the support material further includes an aluminium.
15. A material as claimed in Claim 14 wherein the aluminium: silica ratio or cement : aluminium: silica ratio varies the strength of the support material.
16. A material as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein the material includes an admixture.
17. A material as claimed in Claim 16 wherein the admixture is one or more of the group comprising.-water reducers, superplasticisers, polymers, retards, accelerators, air entrainers, microsilica, pulverized fuel ash, ground granulated blastfurnace slag, rice husk ash, high reactivity metakaoline, zeolite and fuel ash.
18. A material as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein the or each nutrient is added to the support material in the form of a powder or a salt.
19. A material as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein the conjoined support material and nutrient are ground to size.
20. A material as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein the delivery material is provided in pellet or granule form.
21. A process for the preparation of a nutrient delivery material comprising the steps of; (a) admixing a fine aggregate, cement, water, and optionally aluminum and/or an admixture as defined in Claim 17, to form a support material, and one or more nutrients either simultaneously or thereafter,- (b) drying the so-formed material; and (c) grinding the dried material ,- wherein the ratio of ingredients in step (a) and/or degree of grinding in step (c) determines the rate of release of the or each nutrient from the support material .
22. A process for delivering one or more nutrients for a media remediation system comprising locating a nutrient delivery material as defined in any one of Claims 1 to 20 in the path of the media.
23. A support material for a media remediation nutrient delivery material, which support material is adapted to immobilise one or more nutrients which are releasable upon a flow of media thereover.
EP01996516A 2000-11-14 2001-11-14 Nutrient delivery system Withdrawn EP1339646A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0027722 2000-11-14
GBGB0027722.8A GB0027722D0 (en) 2000-11-14 2000-11-14 Nutrient delivery system
PCT/GB2001/005013 WO2002040413A1 (en) 2000-11-14 2001-11-14 Nutrient delivery system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1339646A1 true EP1339646A1 (en) 2003-09-03

Family

ID=9903108

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01996516A Withdrawn EP1339646A1 (en) 2000-11-14 2001-11-14 Nutrient delivery system

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1339646A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2002223799A1 (en)
GB (1) GB0027722D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2002040413A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3865563B1 (en) 2014-11-25 2023-08-23 Corning Incorporated Cell culture media extending materials and methods

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ATE211760T1 (en) * 1992-10-20 2002-01-15 Canon Kk CARRIER FOR MICROORGANISMS, SOIL DETOXIFYERS USING SUCH CARRIER, AND METHODS FOR DETOXIFICATION OF SOIL
JPH10327850A (en) * 1997-05-29 1998-12-15 Res Dev Corp Of Japan Microelement/inorganic nutrient salt diffusion-type carrier for microbial cell culture
KR19990065800A (en) * 1998-01-16 1999-08-05 손경식 Wastewater Treatment Microorganisms and Microbial Agents
JP3975239B2 (en) * 1998-05-28 2007-09-12 エスペック株式会社 Contaminated groundwater purification method and apparatus

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0240413A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2002223799A1 (en) 2002-05-27
WO2002040413A1 (en) 2002-05-23
GB0027722D0 (en) 2000-12-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Thiruvenkatachari et al. Permeable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation
Lu et al. Application of calcium peroxide in water and soil treatment: a review
Kuppusamy et al. Ex-situ remediation technologies for environmental pollutants: a critical perspective
Scherer et al. Chemistry and microbiology of permeable reactive barriers for in situ groundwater clean up
Obiri-Nyarko et al. An overview of permeable reactive barriers for in situ sustainable groundwater remediation
O'Day et al. Mineral-based amendments for remediation
US6214607B1 (en) Method and apparatus for treating perchlorate-contaminated drinking water
US6331300B1 (en) Compositions for providing a chemical to a microorganism
Careghini et al. Biobarriers for groundwater treatment: a review
US6432693B1 (en) Advanced inorganic solid-chemical composition and methods for anaerobic bioremediation
Hongjiang et al. Three-stage aged refuse biofilter for the treatment of landfill leachate
Kao et al. Laboratory column studies for evaluating a barrier system for providing oxygen and substrate for TCE biodegradation
Yin et al. Enhanced nitrobenzene removal and column longevity by coupled abiotic and biotic processes in zero-valent iron column
Sengupta et al. Investigation of solid‐phase buffers for sulfur‐oxidizing autotrophic denitrification
Zhang et al. Bioaugmented soil aquifer treatment for P-nitrophenol removal in wastewater unique for cold regions
Alawa et al. Source reduction, recycling, disposal, and treatment
Zein et al. Treatment of groundwater contaminated with PAHs, gasoline hydrocarbons, and methyl tert-butyl ether in a laboratory biomass-retaining bioreactor
Yuan et al. An overview of in situ remediation for groundwater co-contaminated with heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons
Rolph et al. Achieving drinking water compliance levels for metaldehyde with an acclimated sand bioreactor
WO2002040413A1 (en) Nutrient delivery system
CN115611433A (en) Ecological filter tank for preventing and treating river pollution and method for preventing and treating river pollution
CN105800797A (en) Modified cellulose controlled-release carbon material and permeable reactive barrier structure using same
Yang Enhanced bioremediation of trichloroethene contaminated by a biobarrier system
Granger et al. A case of phosphorus limiting monoaromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation in groundwater
Pichtel Biofilms for Remediation of Xenobiotic Hydrocarbons—A Technical Review

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20030520

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20050601