EP1322268B1 - Terminal auditif pour regulation des bruits - Google Patents

Terminal auditif pour regulation des bruits Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1322268B1
EP1322268B1 EP01963616A EP01963616A EP1322268B1 EP 1322268 B1 EP1322268 B1 EP 1322268B1 EP 01963616 A EP01963616 A EP 01963616A EP 01963616 A EP01963616 A EP 01963616A EP 1322268 B1 EP1322268 B1 EP 1322268B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
ear
sound
protecting device
microphone
signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP01963616A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1322268A1 (fr
Inventor
Jarle Svean
Svein Sorsdal
Odd Kr. O. Pettersen
Georg E. Ottesen
Sverre Stensby
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Honeywell Hearing Technologies AS
Original Assignee
Nacre AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nacre AS filed Critical Nacre AS
Publication of EP1322268A1 publication Critical patent/EP1322268A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1322268B1 publication Critical patent/EP1322268B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R1/00—Details of transducers, loudspeakers or microphones
    • H04R1/10—Earpieces; Attachments therefor ; Earphones; Monophonic headphones
    • H04R1/1083—Reduction of ambient noise
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R1/00—Details of transducers, loudspeakers or microphones
    • H04R1/10—Earpieces; Attachments therefor ; Earphones; Monophonic headphones
    • H04R1/1016—Earpieces of the intra-aural type
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/40—Arrangements for obtaining a desired directivity characteristic
    • H04R25/405—Arrangements for obtaining a desired directivity characteristic by combining a plurality of transducers
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/55—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using an external connection, either wireless or wired
    • H04R25/554—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using an external connection, either wireless or wired using a wireless connection, e.g. between microphone and amplifier or using Tcoils
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/60—Mounting or interconnection of hearing aid parts, e.g. inside tips, housings or to ossicles
    • H04R25/604—Mounting or interconnection of hearing aid parts, e.g. inside tips, housings or to ossicles of acoustic or vibrational transducers
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/65—Housing parts, e.g. shells, tips or moulds, or their manufacture
    • H04R25/652—Ear tips; Ear moulds
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/65—Housing parts, e.g. shells, tips or moulds, or their manufacture
    • H04R25/658—Manufacture of housing parts

Definitions

  • the invention concerns the physical design of an adaptive hearing protective earplug combined with an audio communications terminal.
  • an ear terminal having none of these shortcomings, being a lightweight, all-in-the-ear intelligent hearing protector with wireless communication.
  • the noise attenuation is automatically adapted to the noise conditions and communication modes.
  • the device therefore simultaneously protects the hearing and provides improved communication abilities in different noise environments. It is intended for continuous use during the working day or other periods when hearing protection and/or voice communication is needed.
  • the protectors take the form either of sealing cups which enclose the ear, or ear plugs which block the ear canal.
  • the latter type of protector is often preferred because of its small size and relatively good comfort.
  • a speech signal of high quality and low noise masking is produced.
  • the device here described solves this problem by filtering and mixing in the user's own voice picked up by either the outer or the inner microphone at one ear and reproduce the signal at the loudspeaker in the other ear. It is also possible to reproduce the signal by the loudspeaker in the same ear, in which case feedback cancellation has to be applied. Thus the user's voice is felt more natural both with respect to frequency response and speech level. This feature will increase the level of acceptance for continuous use of hearing protectors during the whole working day. The own voice signal is added and reproduced in such a way that the noise reduction property of the hearing protector is maintained.
  • the object of this invention is to provide a programmable personal noise exposure dose meter that measures the true exposure in the user's ear and calculates the hearing damage risk.
  • Present day noise exposure dose meters also called dosimeters, usually consist of a microphone and a small electronics unit that may be attached to the body or worn in a pocket.
  • the microphone may be mounted on the electronics unit or it may be fastened to the collar or on the shoulder.
  • ANSI S1.25 specifies dosimeters.
  • the invention solves these problems by using a microphone that measures the sound at the eardrum and employs analysis procedures that take into account both stationary and impulsive sound.
  • the dose meter is part of a communications terminal this includes external noises, incoming communication signal, as well as possible malfunctioning of the equipment.
  • Present day hearing protectors take the form either of sealing cups which enclose the ear, or ear plugs which blocks the ear canal. For both types, it is critically important to avoid leakage of the noise sound through or around the sealing and blocking parts of the hearing protectors.
  • leakage is reduced damping of potentially harmful noise.
  • the leakage should be detected and remedied prior to noise exposure.
  • the leakage may not be clearly audible.
  • noise situations may comprise of intermittent or impulsive components which may damage the hearing almost instantaneously if a hearing protector should be malfunctioning or imperfect without the user's knowledge.
  • the device here described solves these problems by an in situ acoustical measurement, which is analysed and reported to the user in audible form, or to external equipment by means of communication signals.
  • the devices necessary for the measurement are an integral part of the hearing protector. Verification may be activated by the user at any time, or be continuously running when the application is critical. Optionally, verification may be activated by other persons (or devices) than the user, e.g. to verify hearing protector function before admittance to a noisy area is allowed.
  • US 5317273 shows a device for measuring noise alteration of a hearing protector, using internal and external microphones.
  • US 5757930 describes a system for conducting assessment of the actual attenuation provided by a hearing protection device.
  • US 5426719 shows a communication system incorporated into earmuffs for use in a hazardous noise environment.
  • US 5577511 concerns an earmold with interior and exterior microphones for measuring occlusion.
  • the physical design of an embodiment of the present invention enables the construction of a complete all-in-the-ear hearing protector and communications terminal with strong passive sound attenuation, strong active sound attenuation, high quality sound restoration, high quality sound pick-up, small size, low weight, and comfortable fit.
  • FIG. 1 One embodiment of this invention is illustrated in Fig. 1 , and provides the general physical design of a complete all-in-the-ear hearing protector and communications terminal, regarded as a combination of passive sealing, characteristics and placement of electro-acoustic transducers as well as acoustic filters, electric circuitry, and a ventilation system for pressure equalisation.
  • the ear terminal comprises an outer section 1 arranged for sitting adjacent to the outward facing portion of the sealing section 2 and a part of the inward facing portion of the outer section 1 is formed to fit the concha around the outer portion of the meatus 3.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates an embodiment according to the invention.
  • the earplug comprises a main section 1 containing two microphones M1 and M2 and a sound generator SG.
  • the main section is designed in a way that provides comfortable and secure placement in the concha (the bowl-shaped cavity at the entrance of the ear canal). This may be obtained by using individually moulded ear-pieces that are held in position by the outer ear or by using a flexible surrounding pressing against the structure of the outer ear.
  • a sealing section 2 is attached to the main section.
  • the sealing section may be an integral part of the earplug, or it may be interchangeable.
  • the sound inlet of microphone M1 is connected to the outside of the earplug, picking up the external sounds.
  • the microphone M2 is connected to the inner portion of the meatus 3 by means of an acoustic transmission channel T1.
  • the acoustic transmission channel may contain optional additional acoustic filtering elements.
  • An outlet S SG of sound generator SG is open into the inner portion of the meatus 3 by means of an acoustic transmission channel T2 between the sound generator SG and the inward facing portion of the sealing section 2.
  • the acoustic transmission channel T2 may contain optional additional acoustic filtering elements.
  • the two microphones and the sound generator are connected to an electronics unit 11, which may be connected to other equipment by a connection interface 13 that may transmit digital or analogue signals, or both, and optionally power.
  • Electronics and a power supply 12 may be included in main section 1 or in a separate section.
  • the microphones M1,M2 may in a preferred embodiment be standard miniature electret microphones like the ones used in hearing aids. Recently developed silicon microphones may also be used.
  • the sound generator SG may in a preferred embodiment be based on the electromagnetic or electrodynamic principle, like sound generators applied in hearing aids.
  • a safety valve V is incorporated in the ventilation duct comprising the channels T3 and T4.
  • the valve V is arranged to open if the static pressure in the inner part of the meatus 3 exceeds the outside pressure by a predetermined amount, allowing for pressure equalisation during rapid decompression. Such decompression may occur for military or civilian air personnel experiencing rapid loss of external air pressure. Such a decompression may also occur for parachuters, divers, and the like. Pressure equalisation for slowly varying pressure changes is obtained by using a narrow vent T4 which may bypass the valve V. A proper design of this vent T4 allows for static pressure equalisation without sacrificing low-frequency noise attenuation.
  • the main section of the earplug may be made of standard polymer materials that are used for ordinary hearing aids.
  • the sealing part may be made of a resilient, slowly re-expanding shape retaining polymer foam like PVC, PUR or other materials suitable for earplugs.
  • the earplug may be moulded in one piece 1,2 combining the main section 1 and the sealing section 2.
  • the material for this design may be a typical material used for passive earplugs (Elacin, acryl) .
  • the earplug in one piece comprising the main section 1 and the sealing section 2, all made of a polymer foam mentioned above, but then the channels T1,T2,T3,T4 have to be made of a wall material preventing the channels T1,T2,T3,T4 to collapse when the sealing section 2 is inserted in the meatus 3.
  • the microphone M1 picks up the ambient sound.
  • a signal from the microphone M1 is amplified in E1 and sampled and digitised in an analogue to digital converter E2 and fed to a processing unit E3 that may be a digital signal processor (DSP), a microprocessor ( ⁇ P) or a combination of both.
  • a signal 51 from microphone M2, which picks up the sound in the meatus 3 between the isolating section 2 and the tympanum 4 is amplified in the amplifier E4 and sampled and digitised in the analogue to digital converter E5 and fed to the processing unit E3.
  • a desired digital signal DS is generated in the processing unit E3.
  • This signal DS is converted to analogue form in the digital to analogue converter E7 and fed to the analogue output amplifier E6 that drives the loudspeaker SG.
  • the sound signal produced by the loudspeaker SG is fed to the tympanum 4 via the channel T2 into the meatus 3 as described above.
  • the processing unit E3 is connected to memory elements RAM (Random access memory) E8, ROM (read only memory) E9, and EEPROM (electrically erasable programmable read only memory) E10.
  • RAM Random access memory
  • ROM read only memory
  • EEPROM electrically erasable programmable read only memory
  • the memories E8,E9, and E10 are in a preferred embodiment of the invention used for storing computer programs, filter coefficients, analysis data and other relevant data.
  • the electronic circuitry 11 may be connected to other electrical units by a bi-directional digital interface E12.
  • the communication with other electrical units may be performed via a cable or wireless through a digital' radio link.
  • the Bluetooth standard for digital short-range radio (Specification of the Bluetooth System, Version 1.0 B, 01 Dec 1999, Wegmanaget LM Ericsson) is one possible candidate for wireless communication for this digital interface E12.
  • signals that may be transmitted through this interface are:
  • a manual control signal may be generated in E11 and fed to the processing unit E3.
  • the control signal may be generated by operating buttons, switches, etc, and may be used to turn the unit on and off, to change operation mode, etc.
  • a predetermined voice signal may constitute control signals to the processing unit E3.
  • the electric circuitry is powered by the power supply 12a that may be a primary or rechargeable battery arranged in the earplug or in a separate unit, or it may be powered via a connection to another equipment, e.g. a communication radio.
  • the power supply 12a may be a primary or rechargeable battery arranged in the earplug or in a separate unit, or it may be powered via a connection to another equipment, e.g. a communication radio.
  • the ear terminal as an "in-the-ear voice pick-up".
  • the sound of a person's own voice as heard in the meatus is not identical to the sound of the same person's voice as heard by an external listener.
  • the present device remedies this problem.
  • the microphone M2 illustrated in Fig. 3 picks up the sound in the inner portion of the meatus 3 sealed off by a sealing section 2 in an ear protecting communications device of the earplug type.
  • the signal is amplified by the amplifier E4 illustrated in Fig. 2 , A/D converted by the A/D converter E5, and processed in the digital signal processing (DSP) or microcomputer unit E3.
  • DSP digital signal processing
  • the processing may be viewed as a signal dependent filtering taking into account the speech signal properties as well as computed estimates of the location of sound generation for the different speech sounds. Thereby the speech intelligibility and naturalness may be improved.
  • Figs. 1 and 3 show examples of devices, with the microphone M2 being integrated in a hearing protective communications earplug.
  • the acoustic transmission channel T1 connects microphone M2 to the inner portion of the meatus 3.
  • Microphone M2 picks up the sound field produced by the person's own voice.
  • the signal may be amplified in amplifier E4, A/D converted in A/D converter E5 and processed in the digital signal processing (DSP) or microcomputer unit E3.
  • DSP digital signal processing
  • a processed signal from E3 may be transmitted in digital form through a digital interface E12 to other electrical units.
  • the processed signal from E3 may be D/A converted and transmitted in analogue form to other electrical units.
  • Fig. 4 illustrates one possible signal processing arrangement. It illustrates an example of the type of signal dependent filtering which may be applied to the signal from microphone M2 in order to obtain a good reconstruction of the speech signal, making it highly intelligible, even in extremely noisy environments.
  • the microphone M2 signal is analysed in the DSP/uP processing unit E3.
  • the analysis represented by block 21 in Fig. 4 may comprise a short term estimate of the spectral power in the microphone signal, a short term auto-correlation estimate of the microphone signal, or a combination of both.
  • a running classification with corresponding decision represented by block 22 may be made in the processing unit E3 for the selection of the most suitable conditioning filter for:the signal from microphone M2.
  • the selection may made between e.g. three filters H1(f), H2(f) and H3(f) represented by blocks 23, 24 and 25, appropriate for vowel sounds, nasal sounds and fricative sounds respectively.
  • the processed signal is present at output 26 of block 22.
  • Other sound classifications using more sophisticated subdivisions between sound classifications and corresponding sound filters and analysis algorithms may be applied.
  • the selection algorithm may comprise gradual transitions between the filter outputs in order to avoid audible artefacts. Filtering and selection is carried out in the processing unit E3 concurrently with the sound analysis and classification.
  • the basis for the filter characteristics and the corresponding analysis and classification in the processing unit E3 may be derived from an experiment of the form shown in Fig. 3 .
  • An ear plug with a microphone M2 with the same properties as the one used for the voice pickup is used to pick up the voice of a test subject from the meatus 3 illustrated in the upper part of Fig. 3 .
  • the voice is recorded by a high quality microphone M3 in front of the subject, at a nominal distance of 1 meter, under an-echoic conditions.
  • Estimates of the power spectral densities may be computed for the two signals by the analyses represented by blocks 27 and 28 respectively, and the corresponding levels L1(f) and L2(f) are compared in comparator 29.
  • the output from the comparator is represented by the transfer function H(f).
  • the analyses may be short time spectral estimates, e.g. 1/9 octave spectra in the frequency range 100 Hz to 14000 Hz.
  • the test sequences which the subject utters may comprise speech sounds held constant for approximately 1 second. For voiced sounds, the subject person may make the pitch vary during the analysis period.
  • the transfer functions of the filters described in connection with Fig. 4 may be based on diagrams of H(f), the spectral density levels of the free field microphone M3 subtracted from the corresponding levels of the in-the-ear microphone M2.
  • a simplest implementation may reduce the system in Fig. 4 to one single time invariant filter.
  • the analysis and selection processing may then be omitted.
  • the transfer function of the single filter is still based on diagrams of the spectral density levels of the free field microphone subtracted from the corresponding levels of the in-the-ear microphone, described in connection with Fig. 3 .
  • the transfer function may be a combination of the results for the various speech sounds, weighted in accordance with their importance for the intelligibility and naturalness of the processed speech.
  • the inner microphone M2 or the outer microphone M1, or a combination of both picks up the sound signal representing the users voice signal.
  • the signal is amplified, A/D converted, and analysed in the digital signal processor E3. Based on previously measured transfer functions from the user's speech to the microphone M2 (and/or M1), the microphone signal may be filtered to regain the naturalness of the user's speech.
  • the signal is then D/A-converted, amplified and reproduced at an internal loudspeaker SG.
  • the internal loudspeaker SG may be arranged in a similar ear terminal 1,2 in the wearer's other ear to prevent local feedback in the earplug.
  • the loudspeaker SG arranged in the same meatus 3 as the inner pickup microphone M2 is situated, may be used, thus demanding feedback cancellation.
  • the desired signal to the loudspeaker SG in the other ear may be transmitted via electric conductors outside of the wearer's head, or via radio signals.
  • Fig. 6 shows one example of a device with the natural own voice feature being integrated in two active hearing protective communications earplugs.
  • Each earplug may comprise a main section 1 containing two microphones, an outer microphone M1 and an inner microphone M2, and a sound generator SG.
  • the right and left earplugs are generally symmetrical, otherwise identical for both ears.
  • Section 2 is the acoustic sealing of the hearing protector.
  • An acoustic transmission channel T1 connects microphone M2 to the inner portion of meatus 3.
  • Microphone M2 picks up the sound from the meatus 3. When the user is speaking and the ear canal is sealed, this signal is mainly the user's own voice signal. This signal is filtered and reproduced at the loudspeaker SG at the other ear.
  • An acoustic transmission channel T2 connects sound generator SG to the inner portion of meatus 3.
  • a block diagram of the electronic system is shown in Fig. 2 .
  • Fig. 4 shows an example of the type of signal dependent filtering which may be applied to the microphone signal in order to obtain a good reconstruction of the voice.
  • the microphone M2 signal is analysed in the DSP/uP processing unit E3.
  • the analysis represented by block 21 in Fig. 4 may comprise a short term estimate of the spectral power in the microphone signal, a short term auto-correlation estimate of the microphone signal, or a combination of both.
  • a running classification with corresponding decision represented by block 22 may be made in the processing unit E3 for the selection of the most suitable conditioning filter for the signal from microphone M2.
  • the selection may made between e.g. three filters H1(f), H2(f) and H3(f) represented by blocks 23, 24 and 25, appropriate for vowel sounds, nasal sounds and fricative sounds respectively.
  • the processed signal is present at output 26 of block 22.
  • Other sound classifications using more sophisticated subdivisions between sound classifications and corresponding sound filters and analysis algorithms may be applied.
  • the selection algorithm may comprise gradual transitions between the filter outputs in order to avoid audible artefacts. Filtering and selection is carried out in the processing unit E3 concurrently with the sound analysis and classification.
  • the basis for the filter characteristics and the corresponding analysis and classification in the processing unit E3 may be derived from an experiment of the form shown in Fig. 5 .
  • An ear plug with a microphone M2 with generally the same properties as the one used for the voice pickup is used to pick up the voice of a test subject from the meatus 3 illustrated in the upper part of Fig. 5 .
  • the voice is recorded by a high quality microphone M4 close to the subject's ear, under an-echoic conditions.
  • Estimates of the power spectral densities may be computed for the two signals by the analyses represented by blocks 37 and 38 respectively, and the corresponding levels L1(f) and L2(f) are compared in comparator 39.
  • the output from the comparator is represented by the transfer function H(f).
  • the analyses may be short time spectral estimates, e.g. 1/9 octave spectra in the frequency range 100 Hz to 14000 Hz.
  • the test sequences which the subject utters may comprise speech sounds held constant for approximately 1 second. For voiced sounds, the subject may make the pitch vary during the analysis period.
  • the transfer functions of the filters described in connection with Fig. 4 may be based on diagrams of H(f), the spectral density levels of the free field microphone M4 subtracted from the corresponding levels of the in-the-ear microphone M2.
  • a simplest implementation may reduce the system in Fig. 4 to one single time invariant filter.
  • the analysis and selection processing may then be omitted.
  • the transfer function of the single filter is still based on diagrams of the spectral density levels of the free field microphone subtracted from the corresponding levels of the in-the-ear microphone, described in connection with Fig. 5 .
  • the transfer function may be a combination of the results for the various speech sounds, weighted in accordance with their importance for the naturalness of the processed speech.
  • An embodiment of the invention is called a "Personal Noise Exposure Dose Meter". Similar to the above examples, a microphone M2 picks up the sound in the meatus 3. One of the novel features is that this noise exposure is measured in the meatus, even while the ear is already noise protected.
  • the signal from the microphone M2 is amplified, A/D converted, and analysed in a digital signal processing (DSP) or microcomputer unit E3 in the same way as described above.
  • DSP digital signal processing
  • microcomputer unit E3 microcomputer unit
  • the analysis covers both stationary or semistationary noise, and impulsive noise.
  • the result of the analysis is compared to damage risk criteria and the user gets an audible or other form of warning signal when certain limits are about to be exceeded and actions have to be made.
  • the warning signal may also be transmitted to other parties, e.g. industrial health care monitoring devices.
  • the time record of the analysis may according to a preferred embodiment be stored in a memory, e.g. in the RAM E8 for later read-
  • Fig. 1 shows a preferred embodiment of the invention with the personal noise exposure dose meter integrated in an active hearing protective communications earplug, comprising a main section 1 containing two microphones, an outer microphone M1 and an inner microphone M2, and a sound generator SG. Since this embodiment is part of a hearing-protecting earplug, a sealing section 2 is attached to the main section.
  • An acoustic transmission channel T1 connects microphone M2 to the inner portion of the meatus 3. Microphone M2 therefore picks up the sound present in the meatus 3, just outside the eardrum (tympanum) 4.
  • An acoustic transmission channel T2 connects sound generator SG to the inner portion of the meatus 3.
  • the sound generator SG may provide audible information to the user, in form of warning signals or synthetic speech.
  • FIG. 2 A block diagram of one possible implementation of this embodiment is shown in Fig. 2 .
  • the sound is picked up by the microphone M2, amplified, and AD-converted before it is fed to the processing unit E3 with DSP or uP (or both) as central processing units.
  • the memory units E8 with RAM, E9 with ROM, and E10 with EEPROM may store programs, configuration data, and analysis results.
  • Information to the user is generated in the central processing unit E3, DA-converted, amplified, and may be presented as audible information via the loudspeaker SG.
  • the digital interface is used for programming, control, and readout of results.
  • the signal processing for the computation of noise exposure is shown in the flow diagram in Fig. 7 .
  • the signal from microphone M2 is amplified, converted to digital form and analysed by algorithms in processing unit E3.
  • sample-by-sample equalization represented by block 41 is applied to compensate for irregularities in the microphone response, the transmission channel T1 and the missing ear canal response due to the blocking of the canal by the earplug.
  • the processed samples may according to the invention be evaluated in at least two ways.
  • an A-weighting represented by block 42 is applied to obtain the stationary or semistationary noise dose. Standards for this A-weighting exists: IEC 179, and the samples values are squared and accumulated in blocks 43 and 44 respectively.
  • a C-weighting represented by block 45 is applied according to internationally accepted standards, also IEC 179, and the peak value (regardless of sign) is saved in block 46.
  • the noise dose and peak values are finally compared to predetermined limits in a decision algorithm represented by block 47 so that a warning may be given.
  • the audible information to the user may be provided in form of warning signals or synthetic speech.
  • the warning signal may also be transmitted to other parties, e.g. industrial health care monitoring devices.
  • the time record of the two may also be stored in the memory of the processing unit E3 for later readout and further evaluation.
  • this embodiment of the invention may be used as ear protection when the terminal is used as a headphone coupled to CD players for similar, monitoring the noise dose submitted from the headphones to the ear over time, or in peaks.
  • a small electro-acoustic transducer (sound source) SG and a microphone M2 are arranged in a sealing section 2 arranged for attenuating sounds entering the meatus cavity 3.
  • a digital signal processing (DSP) or microcomputer unit E3 in the main section 1 or in the sealing section 2 is used to generate a predetermined signal which is D/A converted by the D/A converter E7, amplified by amplifier E6 and applied to the sound source SG, which generates a sound field in the closed part of the meatus 3.
  • the microphone M2 picks up the sound in the meatus cavity 3.
  • This signal is amplified by amplifier E4, A/D converted by A/D converter E5, and analysed in the digital signal processor or microprocessor E3. The result of the analysis is compared to stored results from previous measurements of the same type in a situation with good sealing conditions.
  • the user may get audible or other messaged confirmation if the leakage is acceptably low, or a warning signal if leakage is unacceptably high.
  • a signal may be transmitted to other instances, e.g. an external industrial health monitoring unit, with information about the leakage.
  • an ear terminal according to the invention is used for checking for leakage in the hearing protection while the wearer is at a gate controlling admittance to a noise exposed area. If leakage occurs, a signal may be transmitted from the ear terminal to a corresponding signal receiver at the gate, having means to block the gate for entrance until the leakage condition is remedied and verified.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates an embodiment of the invention where the verification device is integrated in a hearing protective earplug.
  • This embodiment comprises an outer section 1 containing a microphone M2 and a sound generator SG.
  • An inner sealing section 2 is attached to the outer section, but may be made in one integrated outer section/sealing section 1,2.
  • An acoustic transmission channel T2 connects sound generator SG to the inner portion of the meatus 3.
  • the sound generator SG produces a predetermined acoustic signal, which generates a sound field in the meatus 3.
  • An acoustic transmission channel T1 connects microphone M2 to the inner portion of the meatus 3.
  • Microphone M2 picks up the sound field being set up by the sound generator SG.
  • the signal generation and analysis is carried out in a digital signal processing (DSP) or microcomputer unit E3 with appropriate amplifiers and converters as described in the previous paragraphs. All the electronics 11 as well as the power supply 12 are provided in the outer section 1.
  • DSP digital signal processing
  • Fig. 8 illustrates a possible signal processing arrangement.
  • This arrangement utilises a signal which produces reliable characterisation of the sound field in the cavity, preferably while not being annoying to the user.
  • the signal may comprise one or more sinusoidal components presented simultaneously, or in sequence. Alternatively, a pseudorandom sequence may be employed. In both cases, preferrably both the in-phase and the out-of-phase portions of the sound field are analysed and used in the verification algorithm.
  • FIG. 8 An example of the signal processing is shown in the flow diagram in Fig. 8 .
  • the generators are represented by blocks 81 and 82 respectively.
  • the generators generate both the in-phase (sin) and out-of-phase (cos) components.
  • the in-phase components are added together in block 83, converted to analogue form, amplified and applied to the sound generator SG.
  • the resulting sound field is picked up by the microphone M2, amplified, converted to digital form and analysed by algorithms in the processing unit E3 for a series of detectors represented by blocks 84, 85, 86 and 87.
  • the in-phase and out-of-phase components of the microphone M2 signal are analysed for each of the two frequencies.
  • the detector algorithm performs a sample-by-sample multiplication of the two input signals and smoothes the result with a low-pass filter.
  • the four detector outputs are applied to a decision algorithm represented by block 88 where they are compared to stored values.
  • the decision result may be a digital "go" / "no go” real time signal indicating acceptable noise protection attenuation or unacceptable protection conditions.
  • the result of the analysis is compared to stored results from previous measurements of the same type in a situation with good sealing conditions.
  • the stored values for the decision algorithm may according to a preferred embodiment be based on previous laboratory experiments, but values for the decision algorithm may also be determined, e.g. making an average and setting a lower acceptance limit for a general-purpose embodiment of the invention.
  • the number and values of frequencies and the smoothing characteristics of the detectors are chosen as a compromise between audibility and response time. If a continuously running verification should be necessary, low frequencies, e.g. in the range of 10-20 Hz, of sufficiently low levels may be utilised in order to avoid annoyance. The pure tones may then be partially or fully aurally masked by the residual noise transmitted by the hearing protector.
  • the acoustic phenomenon on which the embodiment of the invention is based is illustrated by the electric analogy diagram in Fig. 9 .
  • the sound generator SG is modelled by its acoustic Thevenin equivalent represented by blocks 91 and 92.
  • the sound pressure p1 is generated by the Thevenin generator 91, resulting in a volume velocity through the Thevenin impedance Z1(f) 92.
  • the microphone M2 is modelled by its acoustic impedance Z3(f) represented by block 93.
  • the sound pressure p2 at the microphone entrance is converted to an electric signal by the microphone.
  • acouostic elements exposed to the sound pressure generated by the sound generator SG are lumped together in the acoustic impedance Z2(f) represented by block 95.
  • a leakage in the hearing protector may be modelled by a change in the variable acoustic impedance Z2(f). The change will usually affect both the frequency dependent modulus and the frequency dependent phase of Z2(f). This change leads to a change in the relationship between the sound pressures p2 and p1, which is analysed as described in connection with Fig. 8 .

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Soundproofing, Sound Blocking, And Sound Damping (AREA)
  • Headphones And Earphones (AREA)
  • Noise Elimination (AREA)
  • Measuring Pulse, Heart Rate, Blood Pressure Or Blood Flow (AREA)

Claims (20)

  1. Dispositif de protection d'oreille destiné à être positionné dans le conduit auditif (3) d'un être humain et fournissant une mesure d'exposition au bruit, comprenant un microphone interne (M2) comportant une entrée de son adaptée pour être dirigée vers le méat (3), et agencé pour convertir un signal sonore capté en un signal de sortie (51) ; le dispositif de protection d'oreille comprenant également une unité électronique (11) comprenant des moyens d'analyse de son agencés pour analyser le signal de sortie (51), comprenant une analyse en relation avec une dose de bruit stationnaire ou semi-stationnaire et avec une exposition à un bruit impulsionnel ; et comparer les signaux analysés résultants avec des signaux prédéterminés correspondant à des limites d'exposition au bruit acceptables, pour activer un indicateur lors de la détection d'un dépassement desdites limites d'exposition au bruit.
  2. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, dans lequel ladite analyse comprend une pondération A (42) pour un bruit stationnaire ou semi-stationnaire, telle qu'une pondération A standard, et une pondération C (45) pour un bruit impulsionnel, telle qu'une pondération C standard.
  3. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans lequel l'analyseur de son (5) est pourvu d'un discriminateur (55) agencé pour effectuer une discrimination entre des périodes de temps ayant des niveaux sonores au-dessous ou au-dessus d'une limite de niveau sonore donnée.
  4. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon la revendication 1, 2 ou 3, dans lequel l'indicateur comprend un enregistrement temporel de niveaux sonores.
  5. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'indicateur comprend un enregistrement d'évaluation de risque.
  6. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon la revendication 5, dans lequel l'indicateur comprend un enregistrement de dose de bruit accumulée.
  7. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le dispositif d'indication est un générateur de sons (SG) comportant une sortie de son agencée pour être dirigée vers le méat.
  8. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le dispositif d'indication comprend un émetteur radio.
  9. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comprenant un canal (T1) à travers une section d'étanchéité (2) entre la partie condamnée du méat (3) et l'entrée de son du microphone (M2).
  10. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comprenant des moyens formant mémoire pour enregistrer le signal analysé.
  11. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comprenant également un microphone externe (M1) pour des mesures acoustiques de l'environnement.
  12. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comprenant un canal d'alignement de pression (T3) pour un débit d'air lent vers et à partir du méat (3) à travers une section d'étanchéité (2).
  13. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon la revendication 12, dans lequel le canal d'alignement de pression (T3) comprend un détendeur de pression (V) agencé pour s'ouvrir si la différence de pression entre le méat et l'environnement de l'utilisateur dépasse une limite prédéterminée.
  14. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon la revendication 13, comprenant un canal de dérivation (T4) dans le canal d'alignement de pression (T3).
  15. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon l'une quelconque de revendications 7 à 14, comprenant une interface de connexion (13, E12), par exemple un récepteur radio ou un couplage électrique, couplée à l'unité électronique (11), ladite unité électronique étant pourvue de moyens de conversion (E7) pour convertir les signaux reçus de ladite interface et couplés au générateur de sons (SG) pour transmettre des informations acoustiques à l'utilisateur.
  16. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 14, comprenant une interface de connexion (13, E12), par exemple un émetteur radio ou un couplage électrique, couplée à l'unité électronique (11), ladite unité électronique étant pourvue de moyens de conversion (E5) pour convertir les signaux reçus du microphone interne (M2) pour transmettre des informations électriques ou électromagnétiques de l'utilisateur.
  17. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon la revendication 7, dans lequel l'unité électronique comprend des moyens de filtrage couplés audit microphone interne pour filtrer le signal provenant dudit microphone interne, et les moyens de génération de sons sont adaptés pour générer des sons sur la base du signal filtré, lesdits moyens de filtrage étant préprogrammés pour transformer les signaux basés sur les sons reçus dans l'oreille provenant de la voix de l'utilisateur en un son reconnu par l'utilisateur en tant que sa propre voix.
  18. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon la revendication 17, dans lequel le générateur de sons est positionné dans une unité séparée placée dans l'autre oreille de l'utilisateur.
  19. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon la revendication 16, dans lequel l'unité électronique (11, E3) comprend des moyens de filtrage couplés audit microphone interne (M2) pour filtrer le signal provenant dudit microphone interne (M2), lesdits moyens de filtrage pouvant être programmés pour transformer les signaux basés sur les sons reçus dans l'oreille par ledit microphone interne (M2) en des sons ayant essentiellement les caractéristiques de sons prononcés du porteur du dispositif de protection d'oreille tels qu'entendus à l'extérieur de la bouche du porteur.
  20. Dispositif de protection d'oreille selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comprenant un microphone externe isolé acoustiquement dudit microphone interne.
EP01963616A 2000-09-01 2001-08-31 Terminal auditif pour regulation des bruits Expired - Lifetime EP1322268B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NO20004370A NO313400B1 (no) 2000-09-01 2000-09-01 Öreterminal for stöykontroll
NO20004370 2000-09-01
PCT/NO2001/000361 WO2002017839A1 (fr) 2000-09-01 2001-08-31 Terminal auditif pour regulation des bruits

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1322268A1 EP1322268A1 (fr) 2003-07-02
EP1322268B1 true EP1322268B1 (fr) 2009-01-07

Family

ID=19911520

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01963616A Expired - Lifetime EP1322268B1 (fr) 2000-09-01 2001-08-31 Terminal auditif pour regulation des bruits

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1322268B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE419819T1 (fr)
AU (1) AU2001284548A1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2418031C (fr)
DE (1) DE60137349D1 (fr)
DK (1) DK1322268T3 (fr)
ES (1) ES2319734T3 (fr)
NO (1) NO313400B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2002017839A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013075744A1 (fr) 2011-11-23 2013-05-30 Phonak Ag Elément de protection auditive
US8616214B2 (en) 2011-04-06 2013-12-31 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Earplug having a resilient core structure
US20220159368A1 (en) * 2019-01-24 2022-05-19 Sandra Maria FREY Hearing protection device

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2003226937A1 (en) * 2002-04-10 2003-10-27 Sonion A/S Microphone assembly with auxiliary analog input
US7024010B2 (en) * 2003-05-19 2006-04-04 Adaptive Technologies, Inc. Electronic earplug for monitoring and reducing wideband noise at the tympanic membrane
US7369670B2 (en) 2004-08-25 2008-05-06 Phonak Ag Earplug and method for manufacturing the same
EP1880699B1 (fr) * 2004-08-25 2015-10-07 Sonova AG Procédé de fabrication d'un bouchon d'oreille
EP1674057B1 (fr) * 2004-12-23 2008-08-20 Phonak Ag Dispositif de protection auditive et l'utilisation d'un tel dispositif
WO2008008730A2 (fr) * 2006-07-08 2008-01-17 Personics Holdings Inc. Dispositif d'aide auditive personnelle et procédé
ITTV20090168A1 (it) * 2009-08-28 2011-02-28 Stefano Scopel Tappo otoprotettore anatomico attivo.
US9401158B1 (en) 2015-09-14 2016-07-26 Knowles Electronics, Llc Microphone signal fusion
US9779716B2 (en) 2015-12-30 2017-10-03 Knowles Electronics, Llc Occlusion reduction and active noise reduction based on seal quality
US9830930B2 (en) 2015-12-30 2017-11-28 Knowles Electronics, Llc Voice-enhanced awareness mode
US9812149B2 (en) 2016-01-28 2017-11-07 Knowles Electronics, Llc Methods and systems for providing consistency in noise reduction during speech and non-speech periods

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5317273A (en) * 1992-10-22 1994-05-31 Liberty Mutual Hearing protection device evaluation apparatus

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4985925A (en) * 1988-06-24 1991-01-15 Sensor Electronics, Inc. Active noise reduction system
NO169689C (no) * 1989-11-30 1992-07-22 Nha As Programmerbart hybrid hoereapparat med digital signalbehandling samt fremgangsmaate ved deteksjon og signalbehandlingi samme.
WO1994025957A1 (fr) * 1990-04-05 1994-11-10 Intelex, Inc., Dba Race Link Communications Systems, Inc. Transducteur vocal pour ambiance tres bruyante et procede associe
US5426719A (en) * 1992-08-31 1995-06-20 The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human Services Ear based hearing protector/communication system
US5757930A (en) * 1994-11-14 1998-05-26 Sound Tehcnologies, Inc. Apparatus and method for testing attenuation of in-use insert hearing protectors
US5577511A (en) * 1995-03-29 1996-11-26 Etymotic Research, Inc. Occlusion meter and associated method for measuring the occlusion of an occluding object in the ear canal of a subject

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5317273A (en) * 1992-10-22 1994-05-31 Liberty Mutual Hearing protection device evaluation apparatus

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8616214B2 (en) 2011-04-06 2013-12-31 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Earplug having a resilient core structure
WO2013075744A1 (fr) 2011-11-23 2013-05-30 Phonak Ag Elément de protection auditive
US9216113B2 (en) 2011-11-23 2015-12-22 Sonova Ag Hearing protection earpiece
US20220159368A1 (en) * 2019-01-24 2022-05-19 Sandra Maria FREY Hearing protection device
US12010480B2 (en) * 2019-01-24 2024-06-11 Sandra Frey Hearing protection device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO20004370L (no) 2002-03-04
DK1322268T3 (da) 2009-04-20
NO20004370D0 (no) 2000-09-01
NO313400B1 (no) 2002-09-23
EP1322268A1 (fr) 2003-07-02
WO2002017839A1 (fr) 2002-03-07
CA2418031A1 (fr) 2002-03-07
DE60137349D1 (de) 2009-02-26
CA2418031C (fr) 2010-03-02
ATE419819T1 (de) 2009-01-15
AU2001284548A1 (en) 2002-03-13
ES2319734T3 (es) 2009-05-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1313419B1 (fr) Protection d'oreille pourvu d'un dispositif de verification
US6661901B1 (en) Ear terminal with microphone for natural voice rendition
US7039195B1 (en) Ear terminal
US6754359B1 (en) Ear terminal with microphone for voice pickup
EP1313417B1 (fr) Oreillette pourvue d'un microphone dirige vers le meat
US5426719A (en) Ear based hearing protector/communication system
US6728385B2 (en) Voice detection and discrimination apparatus and method
US6801629B2 (en) Protective hearing devices with multi-band automatic amplitude control and active noise attenuation
EP1969335B1 (fr) Système et procédé pour la séparation de la voix d'un utilisateur du son ambiant
EP1322268B1 (fr) Terminal auditif pour regulation des bruits
US20070160243A1 (en) System and method for separation of a user's voice from ambient sound
US20130094658A1 (en) Sound exposure monitor for hearing protection device
WO1994005231A9 (fr) Systeme auditif de protection/communication place sur les oreilles
CN107005757B (zh) 用于减轻耳机中的自身话音阻塞的设备和方法
WO2007131511A2 (fr) Appareil pour réduire le risque de perte auditive induite par le bruit
US20120243699A1 (en) Ear canal transducer mounting system
EP1313418B1 (fr) Oreillette pourvu d'un microphone place dans le meat, et d'un moyen de filtration conferant les caracteristiques d'un son parle aux signaux transmis
CN112534221A (zh) 用于测量戴耳塞或不戴耳塞的耳内有效声音暴露，以及用于确定穿戴者引起的干扰的方法和系统
WO2002017835A1 (fr) Oreillette permettant le rendu naturel de la propre voix d'une personne
ES2295313T3 (es) Aparato y metodo para deteccion y discriminacion de voz.
US20240148557A1 (en) Hearing protection device testing system and method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20030128

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20041025

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NACRE AS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04R 25/00 20060101ALI20080515BHEP

Ipc: H04R 25/02 20060101ALI20080515BHEP

Ipc: A61F 11/08 20060101AFI20080515BHEP

Ipc: A61F 11/06 20060101ALI20080515BHEP

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60137349

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20090226

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: NACRE AS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2319734

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20090400991

Country of ref document: GR

NLT2 Nl: modifications (of names), taken from the european patent patent bulletin

Owner name: NACRE AS

Effective date: 20090422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090107

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090608

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090107

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20091008

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090107

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20120727

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20120727

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20120809

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20120814

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

Owner name: HONEYWELL HEARING TECHNOLOGIES AS

Effective date: 20130910

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: TD

Effective date: 20131010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20131024 AND 20131030

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 60137349

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE QUERMANN, STURM, WEILNAU, DE

Effective date: 20131017

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 60137349

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE QUERMANN, STURM, WEILNAU, DE

Effective date: 20130226

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 60137349

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: HONEYWELL HEARING TECHNOLOGIES AS, NO

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: NACRE A/S, TRONDHEIM, NO

Effective date: 20131017

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 60137349

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: QUERMANN STURM WEILNAU PATENTANWAELTE PARTNERS, DE

Effective date: 20131017

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 60137349

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: QUERMANN STURM WEILNAU PATENTANWAELTE PARTNERS, DE

Effective date: 20130226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: ML

Ref document number: 20090400991

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20140305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130831

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140305

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20140911

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20170824

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20170828

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20170828

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20170828

Year of fee payment: 17

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20180824

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20180831

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20181031

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20180831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60137349

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20190831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190831

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200303

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190831