EP1297520A2 - Method for representing and image on a stepped surface and staircase - Google Patents
Method for representing and image on a stepped surface and staircaseInfo
- Publication number
- EP1297520A2 EP1297520A2 EP02712771A EP02712771A EP1297520A2 EP 1297520 A2 EP1297520 A2 EP 1297520A2 EP 02712771 A EP02712771 A EP 02712771A EP 02712771 A EP02712771 A EP 02712771A EP 1297520 A2 EP1297520 A2 EP 1297520A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- partial
- image
- eye point
- assigned
- staircase
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 31
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 claims description 36
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000009194 climbing Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 2
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09F—DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; LABELS OR NAME-PLATES; SEALS
- G09F19/00—Advertising or display means not otherwise provided for
- G09F19/22—Advertising or display means on roads, walls or similar surfaces, e.g. illuminated
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for imaging an image on a staircase-like surface with at least two partial surfaces which run transversely to a visual axis and are offset relative to one another along the visual axis, and to a staircase on which an image is depicted.
- Such a method and such a staircase are known, for example, from department stores and sports stadiums.
- a picture is put up on each seating surface, which in a department store can be a lettering with the name of the department store or a reference such as “To the children's department” and in a sports stadium the specification of the row of seats in a grandstand the partial surfaces of the set surfaces of the stairs and the line of sight runs essentially horizontally through the eyes of a person standing in front of the stairs leading upwards.
- a disadvantage of these known methods and stairs is that the maximum size of the image is defined by the size and shape of a single seating area, so that the height of the image is limited to the step height of the stairs, which is usually approximately 18 cm.
- this object is achieved by the steps that: an eye point is selected which lies on the visual axis in front of the partial surfaces; the image is divided into partial images that are assigned to the partial areas by projecting it onto the partial areas starting from the eye point; and each drawing image is mapped onto its assigned area.
- this object is achieved by the steps that: an eye point is selected which lies on the visual axis in front of the partial surfaces; the image is subdivided into partial images which are assigned to the partial areas in such a way that the first partial image which is assigned to the first partial area closest to the eye point is changed according to a predetermined scale, and that each further partial image is relative to the first Partial image is enlarged in accordance with the distance of its partial area assigned to it from the eye point; and each drawing image is mapped onto its assigned area.
- the set areas are available for the illustration in these two variants, which together form a total area, the height of which corresponds to the sum of the individual set area heights.
- the image can therefore be displayed on a larger scale relative to the known method.
- the perspective distortion, more precisely reduction, which is noticeable to the eye of a viewer is compensated for.
- the result is that the set surfaces are offset relative to one another along the line of sight and are therefore at different distances from the eye point.
- the seating area of the lowest, first step is closer to the eye point than the seating area of the second step by the step depth, which is usually about 27 cm, which in turn is closer to the eye point than the seating area of the third step by the step depth Level, etc.
- the eye point is the starting point for the image of the image on the stair-like surface or on the partial surfaces, and thus defines the position from which a viewer perceives the image with the least perspective distortions. It is chosen according to the respective circumstances, and can, if the partial areas are the setting areas of a staircase in a department store, for example at eye level of an average customer, ie at about 1.70 m high, and in a horizontal one Distance to the seating area at this height of about 3 m.
- the image is subdivided into the partial areas with the aid of a central projection.
- the image is subdivided into the partial areas with the aid of enlargement scales, which result from the geometric relationships of the individual case, in particular the different distances of the partial areas from the eye point.
- magnification scale of a partial image relative to the first partial image is equal to the quotient from the distance of its assigned partial area from the eye point and the distance of the first partial area from the eye point.
- the surface is formed by the surface of a staircase.
- the staircase is an escalator, or that the staircase lies in a grandstand of a sports stadium or an event hall.
- the partial surfaces are formed by the setting surfaces of the steps, or that the partial surfaces are formed by the tread surfaces of the steps.
- the eye point is defined by the position of a camera.
- the partial images are preferably generated by subdividing the image with the aid of a computing device.
- the above-mentioned object is achieved in the staircase according to a first variant in that: the image is subdivided into partial images which are assigned to the setting surfaces and are depicted on the setting surfaces assigned to them; and each partial image is enlarged relative to the lowermost partial image in accordance with the horizontal distance of its associated setting surface from the lowest setting surface.
- this task is solved in the case of the stairs in that: the image is subdivided into partial images which are assigned to the step surfaces and are depicted on the step surfaces assigned to them; and each partial image is enlarged relative to the uppermost partial image in accordance with the vertical distance of its tread surface assigned to it from the uppermost tread surface.
- the first variant concerns the use of the seating area of a staircase. This can be in the field of view of a viewer who, for example, is climbing the stairs, or a television camera, which is attached to the ceiling of an event hall, for example.
- the second variant concerns the use of the steps of a staircase. This can be in the field of view of a viewer who is, for example, climbing the stairs, or a television camera, which is attached, for example, to a grandstand in a sports stadium and is directed towards the opposite grandstand.
- the magnification scale of a partial image is equal to the quotient of the sum of the horizontal distance of its associated setting area from the lowest setting area and the horizontal distance of the lowest setting area from a predetermined eye point lying in front of the stairs and the horizontal distance the lowest setting area from the eye point.
- magnification scale of a partial image is equal to the quotient of the sum of the vertical distance of its associated step surface from the top step surface and the vertical distance of the top step surface from a predetermined eye point lying above the stairs and the vertical distance the top step from the eye point.
- the staircase is an escalator, or that the staircase lies in a grandstand of a sports stadium or an event hall.
- the eye point is defined by the position of a camera.
- the step-like surface has at least one rear partial surface, which from the point of view of the eye is offset behind a front partial surface in such a way that a region of the rear partial surface is covered by the front partial surface, and that this covered region of the rear partial area is not used for imaging the partial image assigned to the rear partial area.
- the step-like surface has at least one rear partial surface, which from the point of view of the eye is offset behind a front partial surface in such a way that a region of the rear partial surface is covered by the front partial surface, and that this covered region of the rear partial area is not used for imaging the partial image assigned to the rear partial area.
- the vertical distance Gj_! is determined by the following formula: where: h is the height of the seating surface of the stairs, and
- H is the vertical distance between the line of sight and the lower landing; and the horizontal distance Wj.j is determined by the following formula: where: X A is the horizontal distance between the top of the first stage seating surface and the eye point.
- the staircase has at least one rear partial surface which, from the point of view of the eye, is offset behind a front partial surface in such a way that a region of the rear partial surface is covered by the front partial surface, and that this covered region of the rear Partial area is not used for mapping the partial image assigned to the rear partial area.
- - the vertical distance G ⁇ i is determined by the following formula: where: h is the height of the seating surface of the stairs, and
- H is the vertical distance between the line of sight and the lower landing; and - the horizontal distance ⁇ N ⁇ -i is determined by the following formula: where: X A is the horizontal distance between the top of the first stage seating surface and the eye point.
- FIG. 1 shows an image in the original state which is to be imaged on the steps of a staircase
- FIG. 2 is a side view of a staircase on the steps of which the image of FIG. 1 is shown;
- FIG. 3 shows the partial images which are arranged one above the other in a plane
- FIG. 4 is a central perspective front view of the stairs of FIG. 2, as it appears to an eye in the eye point; and
- FIG. Fig. 5 is a side view of a staircase, on the steps of which an image is imaged according to another method.
- FIG. 1 is an image 10, which here is simply a square with its two diagonals, in its original state, which is to be mapped onto the setting surfaces 11 of three adjacent steps 12, 13, 14 of a conventional staircase.
- the previously selected eye point AP is only to be regarded as an example and can be changed as required.
- the image 10 as shown in FIG. 2 can be seen, arranged at right angles to the visual axis A, which here corresponds to the horizontal connecting line between the eye point AP and the center M of the tenth setting surface 11.10, in such a way that the visual rays S und t en emanating from the eye point AP point to the lower one
- the individual image points can be projected onto the stair-like total area starting from the eye point AP, whereby the image 10 is divided into three partial images 10.1, 10.2, 10.3: the first partial image 10.1 is created by those visual rays that both the image 10 and the ninth setting surface 11.9 cut, the second partial image 10.2 is created by those lines of sight that intersect both the image 10 and the tenth setting surface 11.10, and the third partial image 10.3 results from those lines of sight that intersect both the image 10 and the eleventh setting surface 11.11.
- these three partial images 10.1-10.3 are arranged one above the other for better comparison, so that they match well with the one shown in FIG. 1 shown image 10 can be compared in the original state.
- all three partial images 10.1-10.3 have the same height, which is determined by the height h of the three setting surfaces 11.9-11.11, but have different widths. This is due to the different horizontal distances of the three setting surfaces from the eye point AP (hereinafter also referred to as “eye point distances”), so that in the previously described projection the beam set applies, after which the magnification scale with which the image 10 is projected onto a setting surface 11 is equal to the quotient from the eye point distance of this set area 11 and the eye point distance X Q of the image 10.
- the relative scale of a partial image to the first is equal to the quotient from the eye point distance of this partial image and the eye point distance of the first partial image 10.1.
- the image 10 is not to be displayed on the seating surfaces 11, but on the tread surfaces 19 of the steps, then an eye point can be selected which lies above these tread surfaces 19 and corresponds, for example, to the position of the lens of a television camera.
- FIG. 5 shows a staircase in which the image 10 is shown on the setting surfaces 11.2, 11.3, 11.4 and 11.5 of the second to fifth stages, counted from the first, lowest stage 16.
- the method used here for the illustration builds on the methods described above in connection with the staircase of FIG. 2 have been described.
- the starting point for this supplementary method is the knowledge that, in the case of stair-like surfaces, an at least partial concealment of a partial surface can occur due to a partial surface closer to the eye point AP.
- This concealment effect which can also be referred to as a shading effect, is easy, for example, in the case of the stairs in FIG. 5:
- the total stair-like area used for the illustration consists of the second to fifth seating area 11.2-11.5, of which the second seating area 11.2 lies completely below the visual axis A, the third seating area 11.3 lies on the visual axis A and is cut by it and the fourth and fifth seating areas 11.4 and 11.5 lie completely above the visual axis A.
- the total area has at least one rear partial area - namely the two setting areas 11.4 and 11.5 - which, from the perspective of the eye point AP, is offset behind a front partial area - namely the setting areas 11.3 and 11.4 - in such a way that an area 20 of the rear partial area 11.4 / 11.5 is covered by the respective front partial surface 11.3 / 11.4. Since the hidden areas 20 cannot be seen from the eye point AP, it is provided in accordance with the supplemented method that they are not used for imaging the partial images 10.3, 10.4 assigned to the respective rear partial surface 11.4, 11.5.
- FIG. 5 also clearly shows that the concealed areas 20 of the rear setting surfaces 11.4 and 11.5 are each delimited at their upper edge by visual rays which intersect the upper edge of the respectively next front setting surface 11.3 and 11.4.
- the stairs here have steps with straight front edges, which are also the upper edges of the setting surfaces 11, so that the hidden areas 20 are horizontal, right-angled strips at the lower edge of the rear setting surfaces 11.4, 11.5.
- G3 is the vertical distance between the upper edge of the third seating surface 11.3 and the visual axis A
- W3 is the horizontal distance between the upper edge of the third seating surface 11.3 and the eye point AP.
- Gj_ ⁇ the vertical distance between the upper edge of the next front seating surface ll. (I-l) and the visual axis
- A is, and
- Wj_ ⁇ is the horizontal distance between the upper edge of the next front setting surface ll. (I-l) and the eye point AP.
- H is the vertical distance between the line of sight A and the lower landing 15; and for the horizontal distance W3 of the third setting surface 11.3: where: X A is the horizontal distance between the top edge of the seating surface of the first step 16 and the eye point A.
- the formulas explained above can thus be used to calculate the size of the hidden areas 20, which can preferably be done with the aid of a computing device. From the hidden areas 20, the size of the areas required for the imaging of the partial images 10.3, 10.4 on the rear setting surfaces 11.4, 11.5 can also be calculated in a simple manner, which can preferably be done with the aid of a computing device.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Image Processing (AREA)
- Processing Or Creating Images (AREA)
- Escalators And Moving Walkways (AREA)
- Steps, Ramps, And Handrails (AREA)
- Stereoscopic And Panoramic Photography (AREA)
- Reduction Rolling/Reduction Stand/Operation Of Reduction Machine (AREA)
- Road Signs Or Road Markings (AREA)
- Forklifts And Lifting Vehicles (AREA)
- Sanitary Device For Flush Toilet (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
- Ladders (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10106658A DE10106658C2 (en) | 2001-02-12 | 2001-02-12 | Process for displaying an image on a step-like surface and stairs |
DE10106658 | 2001-02-12 | ||
PCT/DE2002/000497 WO2002065438A2 (en) | 2001-02-12 | 2002-02-12 | Method for representing an image on a stepped surface and staircase |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1297520A2 true EP1297520A2 (en) | 2003-04-02 |
EP1297520B1 EP1297520B1 (en) | 2004-10-27 |
Family
ID=7673895
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02712771A Revoked EP1297520B1 (en) | 2001-02-12 | 2002-02-12 | Method for representing and image on a stepped surface and staircase |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7155849B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1297520B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4261909B2 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE280988T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002244622A1 (en) |
DE (3) | DE10106658C2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2231674T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002065438A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060026875A1 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2006-02-09 | Joost Elffers | Apparatus for generating shadow display images and design methodology therefor |
US7086187B2 (en) * | 2004-11-03 | 2006-08-08 | Husam Yousef Bandak | Advertising display system and method |
US20090145059A1 (en) * | 2007-12-07 | 2009-06-11 | Kay Ronald J | Safety nosing components and manufacturing methods |
US8534009B2 (en) * | 2007-12-07 | 2013-09-17 | Ronald J. Kay | Safety nosing components and manufacturing methods |
EP2682933A1 (en) | 2012-07-03 | 2014-01-08 | LP Sports Group A/S | An advertisement element, a method of creating an advertisement element and a method of capturing advertisement images on an advertisement element |
EP2806404B1 (en) | 2013-05-23 | 2018-10-10 | AIM Sport AG | Image conversion for signage |
US9346654B2 (en) * | 2014-05-29 | 2016-05-24 | Goldstein Biomedical Consultants Llc | Regenerative power capture system for endless track escalators and moving walkways |
CN105565135A (en) * | 2014-06-04 | 2016-05-11 | 魏国营 | Elevator/escalator applying LED dynamic display technology |
US11011082B2 (en) * | 2017-05-16 | 2021-05-18 | Promedica Health System, Inc. | Stairway safety device |
HRP20231140T1 (en) * | 2020-06-17 | 2024-01-05 | Stairmedia Bcn, S.L. | Method of distorting an image displayed on a stand or stairway |
US11120557B1 (en) * | 2020-10-02 | 2021-09-14 | Shelly Klose | System and method for detecting objects in images |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH10282920A (en) | 1997-04-02 | 1998-10-23 | Fuji Seiko Kk | Display device for staircase |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE852200C (en) * | 1950-03-22 | 1952-10-13 | Carl Paganini | Board for advertising and other representations |
DE3440468A1 (en) * | 1984-11-06 | 1986-08-21 | Ernst Ing.(grad.) 7060 Schorndorf Roethke | Optical signalling and/or information unit |
NZ238537A (en) * | 1991-06-13 | 1994-05-26 | Escalator Advertising Ltd | Escalator step with advertising sign |
DE4314772A1 (en) * | 1992-05-07 | 1993-11-25 | Hans Tuchlinski | Moving escalator with advertising facility - has recess in front face of step with placard of information set in it, inserted through slot in transparent cover plate |
NZ248337A (en) * | 1993-08-05 | 1995-11-27 | Escalator Advertising Ltd | Escalator step with transparent cleated cover plate engageable on step riser mounting plate |
DE9414565U1 (en) * | 1994-09-08 | 1994-12-08 | Escalator Advertising Ltd., Auckland | Passenger transportation system |
US5685412A (en) * | 1995-04-28 | 1997-11-11 | Findlay; Alexander | Escalator advertising |
US6041533A (en) * | 1998-01-26 | 2000-03-28 | Lemmond, Jr.; R. Nelson | Advertising step systems |
DE29915039U1 (en) * | 1999-08-05 | 1999-12-02 | APA Adelfang & Parbel GmbH & Co. KG, 53545 Linz | Billboard |
-
2001
- 2001-02-12 DE DE10106658A patent/DE10106658C2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2002
- 2002-02-12 AU AU2002244622A patent/AU2002244622A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-02-12 US US10/467,786 patent/US7155849B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-12 EP EP02712771A patent/EP1297520B1/en not_active Revoked
- 2002-02-12 DE DE50201395T patent/DE50201395D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-12 ES ES02712771T patent/ES2231674T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-02-12 WO PCT/DE2002/000497 patent/WO2002065438A2/en active IP Right Grant
- 2002-02-12 DE DE10290544T patent/DE10290544D2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-02-12 JP JP2002565286A patent/JP4261909B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-02-12 AT AT02712771T patent/ATE280988T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH10282920A (en) | 1997-04-02 | 1998-10-23 | Fuji Seiko Kk | Display device for staircase |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
"ADOBE PHOTOSHOP 5.0 USER GUIDE", 1998, ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, pages: 185 - 186, XP002970933 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4261909B2 (en) | 2009-05-13 |
EP1297520B1 (en) | 2004-10-27 |
WO2002065438A2 (en) | 2002-08-22 |
ATE280988T1 (en) | 2004-11-15 |
DE10290544D2 (en) | 2004-04-15 |
WO2002065438A3 (en) | 2002-11-21 |
AU2002244622A1 (en) | 2002-08-28 |
JP2004523043A (en) | 2004-07-29 |
US7155849B2 (en) | 2007-01-02 |
US20040134107A1 (en) | 2004-07-15 |
ES2231674T3 (en) | 2005-05-16 |
DE50201395D1 (en) | 2004-12-02 |
DE10106658C2 (en) | 2003-03-20 |
DE10106658A1 (en) | 2002-08-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE10309194B4 (en) | Method and arrangement for spatial representation | |
DE69518907T2 (en) | COMPOSITION WITH SEVERAL IMAGES | |
DE10145133C1 (en) | Spatial representation method | |
EP1297520B1 (en) | Method for representing and image on a stepped surface and staircase | |
EP2153269A1 (en) | Method for the orientation of a parallax barrier screen on a display screen | |
EP0026378A1 (en) | Method of accentuating an area of an image displayed on a picture screen | |
DE69620098T2 (en) | Product showing two image views | |
WO2008122256A1 (en) | Method and arrangement for three-dimensional representation | |
DE4312918A1 (en) | Playback device | |
DE69735106T2 (en) | COMPENSATION OF BACKGROUND LUMINUM DIFFERENCE IN PICTURE COMPOSITION SYSTEMS WITH REAL-TIME OPERATION | |
DE202006013777U1 (en) | Auto-stereoscopic display device especially for flat-surface image display systems, has parallax-barrier with structural elements distributed over barrier surface | |
EP3170307B1 (en) | Method for displaying three dimensional scene on an autostereoscopic display | |
DE102010028668A1 (en) | Method for spatial representation | |
DE2255269A1 (en) | INCREASING THE SPACIAL EFFECT OF PICTURAL REPRESENTATIONS | |
EP2122415B1 (en) | Autostereoscopic image display appliance for producing a floating real stereo image | |
DE102007054011B4 (en) | Method and arrangement for spatial representation | |
DE1772234A1 (en) | Process for electronic color correction | |
DE102005013822A1 (en) | Method for generating image data for the stereoscopic display of an object | |
DE102004051355A1 (en) | Arrangement for spatially perceptible representation | |
DE3331481A1 (en) | Furniture fitting for video conference studios | |
WO2005032152A1 (en) | Method and arrangement for three-dimensionally recognizable representation | |
WO2022261687A1 (en) | Movie theater | |
EP0578841A1 (en) | Method for generating contour lines with a computer system | |
DE102021105285A1 (en) | Method for superimposed display of a 3-dimensional image, screen and display system with a screen | |
DE19526529A1 (en) | Process to improve the visibility of linear structures in a digital image |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20030912 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
TPAC | Observations filed by third parties |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20041027 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20041027 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50201395 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20041202 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050127 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050127 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050127 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20050212 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050212 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050228 |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20050228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: BRAUNPAT BRAUN EDER AG |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20041027 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2231674 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: ADTENSION GMBH Effective date: 20050727 Opponent name: DEUTSCHE EISENBAHNREKLAME GMBH Effective date: 20050727 Opponent name: MEDIA STEPS GROUP PLC Effective date: 20050727 |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: HINTERKEUSER, JOSEF |
|
RIN2 | Information on inventor provided after grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: HINTERKEUSER, JOSEF |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: ADTENSION GMBH Opponent name: MEDIA STEPS GROUP PLC Opponent name: DEUTSCHE EISENBAHNREKLAME GMBH |
|
NLT2 | Nl: modifications (of names), taken from the european patent patent bulletin |
Owner name: HINTERKEUSER, JOSEF Effective date: 20051019 |
|
PLAF | Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: ADTENSION GMBH Effective date: 20050727 Opponent name: DEUTSCHE EISENBAHNREKLAME GMBH Effective date: 20050727 Opponent name: MEDIA STEPS GROUP PLC Effective date: 20050727 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: MEDIA STEPS GROUP PLC Opponent name: DEUTSCHE EISENBAHNREKLAME GMBH Opponent name: ADTENSION GMBH |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050327 |
|
PLAY | Examination report in opposition despatched + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE2 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
PLBC | Reply to examination report in opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE3 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20090219 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20090223 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20090223 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20090224 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20090225 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20090217 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20100219 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20100219 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20100204 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PLAY | Examination report in opposition despatched + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNORE2 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *HINTERKEUSER JOSEF Effective date: 20100228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V1 Effective date: 20100901 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100228 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20101029 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100212 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20100506 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100301 |
|
RDAE | Information deleted related to despatch of communication that patent is revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDREV1 |
|
RDAF | Communication despatched that patent is revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R103 Ref document number: 50201395 Country of ref document: DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R064 Ref document number: 50201395 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100212 |
|
RDAG | Patent revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED |
|
27W | Patent revoked |
Effective date: 20110228 |
|
GBPR | Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state |
Effective date: 20110228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R107 Ref document number: 50201395 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110908 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110212 |