EP1282491A1 - Preserving compositions - Google Patents

Preserving compositions

Info

Publication number
EP1282491A1
EP1282491A1 EP01914823A EP01914823A EP1282491A1 EP 1282491 A1 EP1282491 A1 EP 1282491A1 EP 01914823 A EP01914823 A EP 01914823A EP 01914823 A EP01914823 A EP 01914823A EP 1282491 A1 EP1282491 A1 EP 1282491A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
blocks
vacuum
zinc
solution
digestion
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP01914823A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1282491A4 (en
Inventor
John Bernard Watkins
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Monash University
Original Assignee
Monash University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Monash University filed Critical Monash University
Publication of EP1282491A1 publication Critical patent/EP1282491A1/en
Publication of EP1282491A4 publication Critical patent/EP1282491A4/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N59/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing elements or inorganic compounds
    • A01N59/14—Boron; Compounds thereof
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B27—WORKING OR PRESERVING WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; NAILING OR STAPLING MACHINES IN GENERAL
    • B27K—PROCESSES, APPARATUS OR SELECTION OF SUBSTANCES FOR IMPREGNATING, STAINING, DYEING, BLEACHING OF WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIALS, OR TREATING OF WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIALS WITH PERMEANT LIQUIDS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL TREATMENT OF CORK, CANE, REED, STRAW OR SIMILAR MATERIALS
    • B27K3/00—Impregnating wood, e.g. impregnation pretreatment, for example puncturing; Wood impregnation aids not directly involved in the impregnation process
    • B27K3/16—Inorganic impregnating agents
    • B27K3/163—Compounds of boron
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B27—WORKING OR PRESERVING WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; NAILING OR STAPLING MACHINES IN GENERAL
    • B27K—PROCESSES, APPARATUS OR SELECTION OF SUBSTANCES FOR IMPREGNATING, STAINING, DYEING, BLEACHING OF WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIALS, OR TREATING OF WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIALS WITH PERMEANT LIQUIDS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL TREATMENT OF CORK, CANE, REED, STRAW OR SIMILAR MATERIALS
    • B27K3/00—Impregnating wood, e.g. impregnation pretreatment, for example puncturing; Wood impregnation aids not directly involved in the impregnation process
    • B27K3/16—Inorganic impregnating agents
    • B27K3/22—Compounds of zinc or copper
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B27—WORKING OR PRESERVING WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; NAILING OR STAPLING MACHINES IN GENERAL
    • B27K—PROCESSES, APPARATUS OR SELECTION OF SUBSTANCES FOR IMPREGNATING, STAINING, DYEING, BLEACHING OF WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIALS, OR TREATING OF WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIALS WITH PERMEANT LIQUIDS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL TREATMENT OF CORK, CANE, REED, STRAW OR SIMILAR MATERIALS
    • B27K3/00—Impregnating wood, e.g. impregnation pretreatment, for example puncturing; Wood impregnation aids not directly involved in the impregnation process
    • B27K3/16—Inorganic impregnating agents
    • B27K3/32—Mixtures of different inorganic impregnating agents

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to preserving compositions for porous products, especially wood.
  • Compounds of boron have been used in the preservation of wood for a number of years. However, one of the difficulties experienced in use of these compounds is their propensity to leach from the substrate into which they have been impregnated. Consequently, compounds of boron have not been particularly useful in preserving timber exposed to water, for example, pylons embedded in a sea bed.
  • Basic zinc compounds also have toxic efficacy with respect to wood destroying organisms, both in the marine and land environments. However, despite this efficacy having been known, basic zinc compounds have not been used commercially.
  • the present invention is based on the discovery that a composition comprising a basic zinc compound and a compound of boron has a toxic efficacy to wood destroying organisms, both in the marine and land environments with the added benefit of a reduction in the rate at which the boron compound leaches from the impregnated substrate.
  • the present invention provides a preserving composition which includes a basic zinc compound and a compound of boron.
  • a preferred composition comprises zinc ions and borate ions in an aqueous solution of ammonia.
  • the zinc ions may be derived from any soluble zinc compound and the borate ions may be derived from any soluble borate but zinc borate is preferred.
  • Examples of soluble zinc compounds include zinc sulfate and zinc chloride and examples of soluble borates include sodium borate and potassium borate.
  • a solution of zinc ions and borate ions in aqueous ammonia may be prepared by dissolving zinc borate in an aqueous solution of ammonia at a temperature of about 66°C.
  • a soluble zinc salt may be combined with a soluble borate salt in an aqueous ammonia solution at a temperature of about 66°C.
  • the preserving composition of the present invention may be combined with other additives having efficacy as preservatives. These include copper sulfate, fluorides such as potassium fluoride and quaternary ammonium compounds .
  • Porous compounds especially porous cellulosic compounds, may be impregnated with the preserving composition of the present invention by flooding the porous compound at reduced pressure .
  • the pressure is reduced to a level in the range between 0.5 kPa and 0.9 kPa.
  • the present invention provides a means of impregnating a substrate with a preserving composition by means of coacervation.
  • Coacervation occurs when a liquid compound separates into two phases below a particular temperature. One phase is rich in one compound and the other is leaner. Coacervation is similar to crystallisation from a mother liquor.
  • the amount of water used was 50 ml per block, and the total amount of water used was 300 ml. The loss of water to the uptake was re-added.
  • AES Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
  • the four blocks were quantitatively powdered, homogenised and dried at 100°C for 2 hours before analysis .
  • Example 2 The impregnant used in Example 2 was prepared in the same way as in Example 1.
  • Impregnation While the impregnation was conducted in a similar way to that in Example 1, different vacuums were used.
  • Vacuum was applied to the pressure vessel containing the treated blocks . • After a vacuum of 2.5 kPa was reached, the vacuum was run for 30 minutes.
  • the leaching was carried out in a similar way to that in Example 1 except different vacuums were used. • The leaching was conducted as detailed in the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard Ell-8.
  • the impregnant was diluted to an appropriate concentration that is within the working range of the analytical instrument.
  • the diluted impregnant was determined and the concentrations of boron and zinc are 11.30g/L and 28.28g/L respectively. • The determined concentration of the impregnant was used to calculate the mass balance.
  • the boron concentrations in the leachates are as follows .
  • the four blocks were quantitatively powdered, homogenised and dried at 100°C for 2 hours before analysis .
  • the leaching was carried out in a similar way to that in Examples 1 and 2 although different vacuums were used.
  • the amount of water used was 50 ml per block, and the total amount of water used was 300 ml. The loss of water to the uptake was re-added.
  • the impregnant was diluted to an appropriate concentration that is within the working range of the analytical instrument.
  • the diluted impregnant was determined and the concentrations of boron, zinc and copper were 10.80g/L, 26.94g/L and 36.52g/L respectively.
  • Impregnation While the impregnation was conducted in a similar way to that in Examples 1 and 2, different vacuums were used.
  • the leaching was carried out in a similar way to that used in Example 1 although different vacuums were used.
  • Impregnant, Leachates and Digested Blocks after Leaching All the analyses were carried out using techniques of AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry) and ICP- AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry) with the final results based on ICP analysis.
  • AAS Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
  • ICP- AES Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
  • the diluted impregnant was determined and the concentrations of boron, zinc and copper were 10.63g/L, 27.11g/L and 36.55g/L respectively. • The determined concentration of the impregnant was used to calculate the mass balance.
  • the four blocks were quantitatively powdered, homogenised and dried at 100°C for 2 hours before analysis .
  • the leaching was carried out in a similar way to that in the other examples although different vacuums were used.
  • the amount of water used was 50 ml per block, and the total amount of water used was 500 ml. The loss of water to the uptake was re-added.
  • Impregnant, Leachates and Digested Blocks after Leaching All the analyses were carried out using techniques of AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry) and ICP- AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry) with the final results based on ICP analysis.
  • AAS Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
  • ICP- AES Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
  • the impregnant was diluted to an appropriate concentration that is within the working range of the analytical instrument.
  • the diluted impregnant was determined and the concentrations of boron, zinc and copper are 5.61g/L, 21.25g/L and 48.07g/L respectively.
  • Example 5 Fluorine is an important component of Example 4 in which it contributes additional synergistic efficacy.
  • the formulation utilised in Example 5 was prepared with a lower boron concentration. This constitutes one of several preservative compositions purposely formulated to result in a lower boron retention in timber and other treated commodities which are to be used above ground and especially in building, walkway, bush tracks and numerous other constructions . Especially useful in indoor environments, such compositions will constitute economic protection without any less or reduction in efficacy.
  • the preservative composition was first prepared as detailed in Example 1. 1551 grams of this solution were slowly combined with 30 grams of N-alkyl tallow N dimethyl amino propyl N trimethyl ammonium dichloride in isopropanol water solution. This composition was agitated for several hours until a clear solution was produced. The solution was made up to 2000 grams, by addition of double distilled water. The pH of this composition was determined as 12.6.
  • Quaternary ammonium salts have long been known to exhibit high surface activity coupled with biological and fungicidal efficacy. Such complex compositions have usually been used to formulate emulsions of cationic nature at low pH. These unique properties have been retained in this complex wood preservative composition. Penetration and distribution in treated timber have been enhanced and complemented by additional efficacy and boron fixation. However, boron diffusion and movement within the treated commodity has not been hindered, nor fixation rendered so efficient as to hinder efficacy. More surprising and wholly unexpected is the enhanced biocidal efficacy and composition stability in an alkaline environment.
  • Vacuum was applied to the pressure vessel containing the treated blocks for 30 minutes, and a vacuum of 1.9 kPa was reached before the vacuum was released.
  • the amount of water used was 50 ml per block, and the total amount of water used was 500 ml. The loss of water to the uptake was re-added. • Once the leaching was commenced, the leachant was changed at the intervals of 6 hours, 24 hours and every 48 hours afterwards, and the leachates were collected for analysis.
  • the impregnant was diluted to an appropriate concentration that is within the working range of the analytical instrument.
  • the diluted impregnant was determined and the concentrations of boron, zinc and copper are 4.43g/L, 17.07g/L and 42.32g/L respectively.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical And Physical Treatments For Wood And The Like (AREA)

Abstract

The specification describes wood preserving compositions comprising basic aqueous solutions of zinc and boron compounds. In particular the specification describes wood preserving compositions comprising zinc borate dissolved in aqueous ammonia. Other preservatives such as copper and quaternary ammonium compounds may also be included. Wood impregnated with the preservative composition is resistant to leaching.

Description

PRESERVING COMPOSITIONS
The present invention relates to preserving compositions for porous products, especially wood. Compounds of boron have been used in the preservation of wood for a number of years. However, one of the difficulties experienced in use of these compounds is their propensity to leach from the substrate into which they have been impregnated. Consequently, compounds of boron have not been particularly useful in preserving timber exposed to water, for example, pylons embedded in a sea bed.
Basic zinc compounds also have toxic efficacy with respect to wood destroying organisms, both in the marine and land environments. However, despite this efficacy having been known, basic zinc compounds have not been used commercially.
The present invention is based on the discovery that a composition comprising a basic zinc compound and a compound of boron has a toxic efficacy to wood destroying organisms, both in the marine and land environments with the added benefit of a reduction in the rate at which the boron compound leaches from the impregnated substrate.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a preserving composition which includes a basic zinc compound and a compound of boron.
A preferred composition comprises zinc ions and borate ions in an aqueous solution of ammonia. The zinc ions may be derived from any soluble zinc compound and the borate ions may be derived from any soluble borate but zinc borate is preferred. Examples of soluble zinc compounds include zinc sulfate and zinc chloride and examples of soluble borates include sodium borate and potassium borate. A solution of zinc ions and borate ions in aqueous ammonia may be prepared by dissolving zinc borate in an aqueous solution of ammonia at a temperature of about 66°C. Alternatively, a soluble zinc salt may be combined with a soluble borate salt in an aqueous ammonia solution at a temperature of about 66°C.
The preserving composition of the present invention may be combined with other additives having efficacy as preservatives. These include copper sulfate, fluorides such as potassium fluoride and quaternary ammonium compounds .
Porous compounds, especially porous cellulosic compounds, may be impregnated with the preserving composition of the present invention by flooding the porous compound at reduced pressure . Preferably, the pressure is reduced to a level in the range between 0.5 kPa and 0.9 kPa.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides a means of impregnating a substrate with a preserving composition by means of coacervation. Coacervation occurs when a liquid compound separates into two phases below a particular temperature. One phase is rich in one compound and the other is leaner. Coacervation is similar to crystallisation from a mother liquor.
The following examples illustrate the invention.
EXAMPLE 1
Preparation of Impregnant
• 1000 grams of ammonia solution (28%) was added to 1000 grams of water.
• ith constant agitation using a magnetic stirrer, 222.5 grams of zinc borate were added to the diluted ammonia solution.
• The solution was heated gently at 66°C to form a clear solution.
Preparation of Wood Blocks • Pinus radiata clear sapwood was used for the impregnation, and all the wood blocks were conditioned to less than 15% moisture level.
• The numbered blocks prepared for the impregnation were: 028, 107, 147, 282 and 307.
• The volume of the blocks was measured and the results are given below. Although the volume of each block varies slightly, the volume of every individual block was measured to ensure the accuracy of retention calculated.
Block No. 028 107 147 282 307 Volume (m3xl0~6) 12.675 12.521 12.649 12.684 12.848
• The weight of the blocks was determined
Impregnation
• Once a vacuum of 0.9 kPa was reached, the vacuum pump was kept running for 30 minutes, and the lowest vacuum achieved before flooding was 0.65 kPa.
• Flooding was commenced under vacuum.
• Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure.
• Atmospheric pressure was employed for 60 minutes. • The solution was sucked back to the work vessel under vacuum at the end of the pressure period.
• Vacuum was applied to the pressure vessel containing the treated blocks .
• After a vacuum of 2.5 kPa was reached, the vacuum was run for 30 minutes.
• The lowest vacuum reached was 2.1 kPa before the vacuum was released .
• The weight of blocks was determined, and the uptake and retention of chemicals calculated. The results are as follows.
Block No. 107 307 028 282 147
Uptake (g) 7.7165 9.0291 8.3166 8.084 7.8495
Retention 616.28 702.76 656.14 637.34 620.56 (kg/m3) β Blocks were dried naturally in the open air,
Leaching
• The leaching was conducted as detailed in the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard Ell-8.
• The blocks were impregnated with distilled water in exactly the same way as in the impregnation with preservatives .
• Once a vacuum of 1.5 kPa was reached, the vacuum pump was kept running for 30 minutes, and the lowest vacuum achieved before flooding was 1.3 kPa.
• Distilled water was used for the flooding.
• Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure.
• The amount of water used was 50 ml per block, and the total amount of water used was 300 ml. The loss of water to the uptake was re-added.
• Once the leaching was commenced, the leachant was changed at intervals of 6 hours, 24 hours and every 48 hours afterwards, and the leachates were collected for analysis.
Analysis of Impregnant, Leachates and Digested Blocks after Leaching
All the analyses were carried out using techniques of AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry) and ICP-
AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry) with the final results based on ICP analysis.
1. Analysis of impregnant • The impregnant was diluted to an appropriate concentration that is within the working range of the analytical instrument.
• The diluted impregnant was determined and the concentrations of boron and zinc are 12.07g/L and 27.89g/L respectively.
• The determined concentration of the impregnant was used to calculate the mass balance.
2. Analysis of leachates
• The leachates were analysed directly without any further sample preparation.
• The concentrations of boron and zinc in the leachates are as follows.
Sample Ll L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9
B (ppn) 204 192 202 107 62.5 48.3 37.4 29.7 26.6 Zn (ppm) 113 90.7 93.9 16.5 16.9 14.0 13.4 9.80 9.35
3 . Analysis of digested wood blocks
• Four out of five blocks were used for the digestion and analysis, and the other one was used for penetration test.
• The four blocks were quantitatively powdered, homogenised and dried at 100°C for 2 hours before analysis .
• 3.0000 grams of wood powder were taken for the digestion.
• The digestion was carried out based on the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard A7-93 using nitric acid, sulfuric acid and perchloric acid.
• The solutions obtained from the digestion were analysed for boron and zinc and the results are as follows.
Block No. 028 107 147 307
B in digestion 197 153 147 219 solution (ppm) Total B in each 55.23 44.66 43.74 57.13 block (mg) Zn in digestion 770 729 744 858 solution (ppm) Total Zn in each 215.7 212.7 217.2 224.1 block (mg)
Summary of Results
Comment
Overloading could have been committed resulting in a relatively high mass fraction of boron being leached out. The impregnation procedure followed the Bethell full- cell schedule. The severe overloading occurred and some boron leached as a consequence of excess preservative compound being present within the vessels .
The boron retention after leaching, however, is still very high, 3.66 kg/m3, compared with 1 kg/m3 required by an American company.
EXAMPLE 2
Preparation of Impregnant
The impregnant used in Example 2 was prepared in the same way as in Example 1.
• 1000 grams of ammonia solution (28%) was added to 1000 grams of water. • With constant agitation using a magnetic stirrer, 222.5 grams of zinc borate were added to the diluted ammonia solution.
• The solution was heated gently at 66°C to form a clear solution.
Preparation of Wood Blocks
• Very similar procedure to that in Example 1 was used to prepare the blocks .
• The numbered blocks prepared for the impregnation were: 062, 100, 206, 223 and 239.
• The volume and the moisture of the blocks were measured.
• The weight of the blocks was determined.
Impregnation While the impregnation was conducted in a similar way to that in Example 1, different vacuums were used.
• Once a vacuum of 2.1 kPa was reached, the vacuum pump was kept running for 30 minutes, and the lowest vacuum achieved before flooding was 1.9 kPa. • Flooding was commenced under vacuum.
• Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure after flooding completed.
• Atmospheric pressure was employed for 60 minutes.
• The solution was sucked back to the work vessel under vacuum at the end of the pressure period.
• Vacuum was applied to the pressure vessel containing the treated blocks . • After a vacuum of 2.5 kPa was reached, the vacuum was run for 30 minutes.
• The lowest vacuum reached was 2.3 kPa before the vacuum was released. • The weight of blocks was determined, and the uptake and retention of chemicals calculated. The results are as follows .
Block No. 062 100 206 223 239
Uptake (g) 8.8483 5.4833 8.0169 6.9345 8.2680 Retention 702.86 433.94 629.96 553.03 663.35
(kg/m3) • Blocks were dried naturally in the open air.
Leaching
The leaching was carried out in a similar way to that in Example 1 except different vacuums were used. • The leaching was conducted as detailed in the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard Ell-8.
• The blocks were impregnated with distilled water in exactly the same way as in the impregnation with preservatives . • Once a vacuum of 1.6 kPa was reached, the vacuum pump was kept running for 30 minutes, and the lowest vacuum achieved before flooding was 1.4 kPa.
• Distilled water was used for the flooding.
• Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure. • The amount of water used was 50 ml per block, and the total amount of water used was 300 ml. The loss of water to the uptake was re-added.
• Once the leaching was commenced, the leachant was changed at intervals of 6 hours, 24 hours and every 48 hours afterwards, and the leachates were collected for analysis . Analysis of Impregnant, Leachates and Digested Blocks after Leaching
All the analyses were carried out using techniques of AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry) and ICP- AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission
Spectrometry) with the final results based on ICP analysis.
1. Analysis of impregnant
• The impregnant was diluted to an appropriate concentration that is within the working range of the analytical instrument.
• The diluted impregnant was determined and the concentrations of boron and zinc are 11.30g/L and 28.28g/L respectively. • The determined concentration of the impregnant was used to calculate the mass balance.
2. Analysis of leachates
• The leachates were analysed directly without any further sample preparation.
• The boron concentrations in the leachates are as follows .
Sample Ll L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9
B (ppm) 236 170 68.1 40.4 29.4 25.3 21.9 20.6 17.3
3. Analysis of digested wood blocks
• Four out of five blocks were used for the digestion and analysis, and the other one was used for penetration test.
• The four blocks were quantitatively powdered, homogenised and dried at 100°C for 2 hours before analysis .
• 3.0000 grams of wood powder were taken for the digestion.
• The digestion was carried out based on the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard A7-93 using nitric acid, sulfuric acid and perchloric acid. • The solutions obtained from the digestion were analysed for boron and zinc and the results are as follows.
Block No 100 206 223 239
B in digestion S5.3 166 118 165 solution (ppm) Total B in each 24.14 47.42 34.16 47.31 block (mg) Zn in digestion 556 724 672 741 solution (ppm) Total Zn in each 157.5 206.3 193.9 212.9 block (mg)
Summary of Results
Comment Overloading could have been committed resulting in a relatively high mass fraction of boron being leached out. The impregnation procedure followed the Bethell full- cell schedule. The severe overloading occurred and some boron leached as a consequence of excess preservative compound being present within the vessels .
The boron retention after leaching, however, is still very high, 3.04 kg/m5, compared with 1 kg/m3 required by an American company.
EXAMPLE 3
Preparation of Impregnant
While the formulation used in this example is different from that used in Examples 1 and 2, the preparation of the impregnant was commenced in the similar way to that in Examples 1 and 2.
• 1000 grams of ammonia solution (28%) was added to 1000 grams of water. • With constant agitation using a magnetic stirrer, 222.5 grams of zinc borate were added to the diluted ammonia solution.
• The solution was heated gently at 66°C to form a clear solution. • 200 grams of copper sulfate were added gradually and then the solution was cooled to room temperature.
Preparation of Wood Blocks
Same procedures were used to prepare blocks as that used in Examples 1 and 2.
• The numbered blocks prepared for the impregnation were: 043, 044, 190, 211 and 245.
• The volume and the moisture of the blocks were measured.
• The weight of the blocks was determined.
Impregnation
While the impregnation was conducted in a similar way to that in Examples 1 and 2, different vacuums were used.
• Once a vacuum of 1.9 kPa was reached, the vacuum was maintained for 30 minutes, and the vacuum before flooding was also 1.7 kPa.
• Flooding was commenced under vacuum. • Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure after flooding completed.
• Atmospheric pressure was employed for 60 minutes.
• The solution was sucked back to the work vessel under vacuum at the end of the pressure period.
• Vacuum was applied to the pressure vessel containing the treated blocks .
• After a vacuum of 2.4 kPa was reached, the vacuum was run for 30 minutes. β The lowest vacuum reached was 2.3 kPa before the vacuum was released.
• The mass of blocks was determined straight after the pressure treatment, and the uptake and retention of chemicals calculated. The results are as follows.
Block No. 043 044 190 211 245
Uptake (g) 7.8235 8.2008 8.3631 7.2498 7.3124 Retention 617.58 638.19 659.65 576.98 579.43 (kg/m3)
• Blocks were dried naturally in the open air and conditioned for two weeks.
NOTE: The vacuum utilised in this modified Bethell schedule is very important and we have discovered this to be a significant part of this process, ultimately aimed at reduced boron leaching.
Leaching
The leaching was carried out in a similar way to that in Examples 1 and 2 although different vacuums were used.
• The leaching was conducted as detailed in the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard Ell-8.
• The blocks were impregnated with distilled water in exactly the same way as in the impregnation with preservatives .
• Once a vacuum of 1.5 kPa was reached, the vacuum pump was kept running for 30 minutes. • Distilled water was used for the flooding.
• Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure.
• The amount of water used was 50 ml per block, and the total amount of water used was 300 ml. The loss of water to the uptake was re-added.
• Once the leaching was commenced, the leachant was changed at intervals of 6 hours, 24 hours and every 48 hours afterwards, and the leachates were collected for analysis .
Analysis of Impregnant, Leachates and Digested Blocks after
Leaching
All the analyses were carried out using techniques of AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry) and ICP- AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission
Spectrometry) with the final results based on ICP analysis.
1. Analysis of impregnant
• The impregnant was diluted to an appropriate concentration that is within the working range of the analytical instrument.
• The diluted impregnant was determined and the concentrations of boron, zinc and copper were 10.80g/L, 26.94g/L and 36.52g/L respectively.
• The determined concentration of the impregnant was used to calculate the mass balance.
2. Analysis of leachates
• The leachates were analysed directly without any further sample preparation.
• The concentrations of boron and copper in the leachates were as follows.
Sample Ll L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 B (ppm) 377 221 92.0 53.0 37.3 5.37 13.1 9.66 8.50 5.25 Cu (ppm) 32.9 14.2 6.61 5.11 5.17 1.66 2.26 1.86 1.60 1.97 3. Analysis of digested wood blocks
» Four out of five blocks were used for the digestion and analysis, and the other one was used for a penetration test . • The four blocks were quantitatively powdered, homogenised and dried at 100°C for 2 hours before analysis . • 3.0000 grams of wood powder were taken for the digestion. • The digestion was carried out based on the American Wood
Preserver's Association Standard A7-93 using nitric acid, sulfuric acid and perchloric acid, β The solutions obtained from the digestion were analysed for boron, zinc and copper and the results are as follows.
Block No. 043 044 190 211
B in digestion 63.9 52.5 50.2 43.7 solution (ppm)
Total B in each 18.22 16.89 16.00 14.28 block (mg)
Zn in digestion 475 542 540 414 solution (ppm)
Total Zn in each 135.4 174.3 172.2 135.3 block (mg)
Cu in digestion ? 1092 1144 920 solution (ppm)
Total Cu in each 108.6 351.3 364.9 300.5 block (mg)
Summary of Results
EXAMPLE 4
Preparation of Impregnant
While the formulation used in this example is different from that used in Examples 1, 2 and 3, the impregnant was first prepared as that in Example 3 and then 8.9 grams of potassium fluoride were added.
• 1000 grams of ammonia solution (28%) was added to 1000 grams of water.
• With constant agitation using a magnetic stirrer, 222.5 grams of zinc borate were added to the diluted ammonia solution.
• The solution was heated gently at 66°C to form a clear solution, β 200 grams of copper sulfate were added gradually and then the solution was cooled to room temperature.
• 8.9 grams of potassium fluoride were added.
Preparation of Wood Blocks
The procedure used to prepare blocks is very similar to that in Examples 1 and 2.
• The numbered blocks prepared for the impregnation were: 066, 143, 200, 205 and 261.
• The volume and the moisture of the blocks were measured.
• The weight of the blocks was determined.
Impregnation While the impregnation was conducted in a similar way to that in Examples 1 and 2, different vacuums were used.
• Once a vacuum of 1.9 kPa was reached, the vacuum pump was kept running for 30 minutes, and the vacuum before flooding was also 1.9 kPa. • Flooding was commenced under vacuum.
• Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure after flooding was completed.
• Atmospheric pressure was employed for 60 minutes.
• The solution was sucked back to the work vessel under vacuum at the end of the pressure period.
• Vacuum was applied to the pressure vessel containing the treated blocks .
• After a vacuum of 2.5 kPa was reached, the vacuum was run for 30 minutes. • The lowest vacuum reached was 2.3 kPa before the vacuum was released.
• The weight of blocks was determined straight after the pressure treatment, and the uptake and retention of chemicals calculated. The results are as follows. Block No. 066 143 200 205 261
Uptake (g) 7.2259 7.4066 7.2929 7.1257 7.6352 Retention 573.03 593.29 580.64 567.38 612.88 (kg/m3)
• Blocks were dried naturally in the open air.
Leaching
The leaching was carried out in a similar way to that used in Example 1 although different vacuums were used.
• The leaching was conducted as detailed in the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard Ell-8.
• The blocks were impregnated with distilled water in exactly the same way as in the impregnation with preservatives.
• Once a vacuum of 0.5 kPa was reached, the vacuum pump was kept running for 30 minutes.
• Distilled water was used for the flooding.
• Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure. • The amount of water used was 50 ml per block, and the total amount of water used was 300 ml. The loss of water to the uptake was re-added.
• Once the leaching was commenced, the leachant was changed at intervals of 6 hours, 24 hours and every 48 hours afterwards, and the leachates were collected for analysis.
Analysis of Impregnant, Leachates and Digested Blocks after Leaching All the analyses were carried out using techniques of AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry) and ICP- AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry) with the final results based on ICP analysis.
1. Analysis of impregnant
• The impregnant was diluted to an appropriate concentration that is within the working range of the analytica1 instrument „
• The diluted impregnant was determined and the concentrations of boron, zinc and copper were 10.63g/L, 27.11g/L and 36.55g/L respectively. • The determined concentration of the impregnant was used to calculate the mass balance.
2. Analysis of leachates
• The leachates were analysed directly without any further sample preparation.
• The concentrations of boron and copper in the leachates were as follows.
Sample LI L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9
B (ppm) 46S 501 48.4 20.0 20.7 13.7 7.45 5.82 6.13
Cu (ppm) 57.0 46.2 4.32 2.78 3.61 2.87 1.99 2.20 1.69
3 . Analysis of digested wood blocks
• Four out of five blocks were used for the digestion and analysis, and the other one was used for a penetration test.
• The four blocks were quantitatively powdered, homogenised and dried at 100°C for 2 hours before analysis .
• 3.0000 grams of wood powder were taken for the digestion.
• The digestion was carried out based on the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard A7-93 using nitric acid, sulfuric acid and perchloric acid.
• The solutions obtained from the digestion were analysed for boron, zinc and copper and the results are as follows . Block No. 143 200 205 261
B in digestion 61.0 40.0 47.6 53.4 solution (ppm) Total B in each 19.39 13.60 15.51 17.59 block (mg) Zn in digestion 410 333 370 467 solution (ppm) Total Zn in each 130.2 113.3 120.6 153.8 block (mg) Cu in digestion 45.0 29.7 646 1048 solution (ppm) Total Cu in each 134.0 86.80 252.7 345.3 block (mg)
Summary of Results
EXAMPLE 5
Preparation of Impregnant
The formulation used in this example is the same as that in Example 3.
• 1000 grams of ammonia solution (28%) was added to 1000 grams of water .
• With constant agitation using a magnetic stirrer, 222.5 grams of zinc borate were added to the diluted ammonia solution.
• The solution was heated gently at 66°C to form a clear solution.
• 200 grams of copper sulfate were added gradually and then the solution was cooled to room temperature.
Preparation of Wood Blocks
The procedure used to prepare blocks is very similar to that in the other examples . Ten blocks were used in this example rather than five blocks as in the previous examples .
• The numbered blocks prepared for the impregnation were: 168, 039, 212, 125, 313, 080, 238, 299, 195 and 051.
• The volume and the moisture of the blocks were measured.
• The weight of the blocks was determined.
Impregnation
While the impregnation was conducted in a similar way to that used in the other examples, different vacuums were used. • Once a vacuum of 1.0 kPa was reached, the vacuum pump was kept running for 30 minutes, and the vacuum before flooding was 0.6 kPa.
• Flooding was commenced under vacuum.
• Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure after flooding completed.
• Atmospheric pressure was employed for 90 minutes.
• The solution was sucked back to the work vessel under vacuum at the end of the pressure period.
• Vacuum was applied to the pressure vessel containing the treated blocks.
• After a vacuum of 1.3 kPa was reached, the vacuum was run for 30 minutes,
• The lowest vacuum reached was 1.2 kPa before the vacuum was released.
• The weight of blocks was determined straight after the pressure treatment, and the uptake and retention of chemicals calculated. The results are as follows.
Block No. 168 039 212 125 313
Uptake (g) 7.8782 8.6661 8.1115 9.0619 7.8899 Retention 631.92 701.65 644.38 720.57 622.53
(kg/m3)
Block No. 080 238 299 195 051
Uptake (g) 7.9759 9.4277 8.8812 9.3488 8.9464 Retention 639.15 739.31 696.62 738.04 695.30 (kg/m3)
• Blocks were dried naturally in the open air.
Leaching
The leaching was carried out in a similar way to that in the other examples although different vacuums were used.
• The leaching was conducted as detailed in the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard Ell-8.
• The blocks were impregnated with distilled water in exactly the same way as in the impregnation with preservatives .
• Once a vacuum of 0.9 kPa was reached, the vacuum pump was kept running for 30 minutes. A vacuum of 0.6 kPa was achieved before flooding. • Distilled water was used for the flooding.
• Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure.
• The amount of water used was 50 ml per block, and the total amount of water used was 500 ml. The loss of water to the uptake was re-added.
• Once the leaching was commenced, the leachant was changed at intervals of 6 hours, 24 hours and every 48 hours afterwards, and the leachates were collected for analysis .
Analysis of Impregnant, Leachates and Digested Blocks after Leaching All the analyses were carried out using techniques of AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry) and ICP- AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry) with the final results based on ICP analysis.
1. Analysis of impregnant
• The impregnant was diluted to an appropriate concentration that is within the working range of the analytical instrument.
• The diluted impregnant was determined and the concentrations of boron, zinc and copper are 5.61g/L, 21.25g/L and 48.07g/L respectively.
• The determined concentration of the impregnant was used to calculate the mass balance.
2 . Analysis of leachates
• The leachates were analysed directly without any further sample preparation.
• The concentrations of boron, zinc and copper in the leachates are as follows.
Sample Ll L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 Lll
B (ppm) 174 186 157 80.1 48.5 32.0 22.4 15.6 11.9 9.62 7.59
Zn (ppm) 86.5 47.4 28.2 10.9 4.07 4.49 1.26 1.38 1.04 1.51 1.14
Cu (ppm) 131 113 110 59.3 26.8 18.9 5.14 2.88 1.75 2.17 1.52
3 . Analysis of digested wood blocks
• After the penetration test , all the ten blocks were quantitatively powdered, homogenised and dried at 100°C for 2 hours before analysis.
• 3.0000 grams of wood powder were taken for the digestion. • The digestion was carried out based on the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard A7-93 using nitric acid, sulfuric acid and perchloric acid.
• The solutions obtained from the digestion were analysed for boron, zinc and copper and the results are as follows.
Block No. 168 039 212 125 313
B in digestion 38.9 40.5 39.7 50.0 35.1 solution (ppm)
Total B in each 9.733 9.866 9.387 11.91 8.326 block (mg)
Zn in digestion 539 593 595 632 579 solution (ppm)
Total Zn in each 134.8 144.5 140.6 150.5 137.1 block (mg)
Cu in digestion 1644 1813 1898 1997 1794 solution (ppm)
Total Cu in each 411.3 441.5 448.3 475.8 425.0 block (mg)
Block No. 080 238 299 195 051
B in digestion 40.5 43.4 41.4 52.5 49.0 solution (ppm)
Total B in each 9.402 10.68 10.62 12.80 12.26 block (mg)
Zn in digestion 588 626 590 635 611 solution (ppm)
Total Zn in each 136.5 154.1 151.5 154.8 152.6 block (mg)
Cu in digestion 1728 1807 1647 1770 1757 solution (ppm)
Total Cu in each 401.1 444.5 422.6 431.7 439.2 block (mg) Summary of Results
Comment • The formulation prepared and utilised as detailed in Examples 3, 4 and 5 all contain copper. Each formulation detailed in every example to date contains zinc. Of great importance is the fact that basic (alkaline) zinc containing compounds have been found to exhibit a high degree of toxic efficacy to wood destroying organisms both in the marine and land environments . We have discovered a way of combining the efficacy of boron within a complex basic polyborate-zinc system which reduces the leaching of boron from commodities treated with this preservative composition. The efficacy of basic zinc containing compositions was never researched beyond its initial discovery. We have discovered a successful way of complementing the efficacy of boron with that of basic zinc compounds with the unexpected, unique reduction of the leaching of boron, resulting from the interaction of the preservative composition and its impregnated, soaked, brushed, sprayed or diffusion treated substrate. • Fluorine is an important component of Example 4 in which it contributes additional synergistic efficacy. • The formulation utilised in Example 5 was prepared with a lower boron concentration. This constitutes one of several preservative compositions purposely formulated to result in a lower boron retention in timber and other treated commodities which are to be used above ground and especially in building, walkway, bush tracks and numerous other constructions . Especially useful in indoor environments, such compositions will constitute economic protection without any less or reduction in efficacy.
EXAMPLE 6
Preparation of Impregnant
The preservative composition was first prepared as detailed in Example 1. 1551 grams of this solution were slowly combined with 30 grams of N-alkyl tallow N dimethyl amino propyl N trimethyl ammonium dichloride in isopropanol water solution. This composition was agitated for several hours until a clear solution was produced. The solution was made up to 2000 grams, by addition of double distilled water. The pH of this composition was determined as 12.6.
Quaternary ammonium salts have long been known to exhibit high surface activity coupled with biological and fungicidal efficacy. Such complex compositions have usually been used to formulate emulsions of cationic nature at low pH. These unique properties have been retained in this complex wood preservative composition. Penetration and distribution in treated timber have been enhanced and complemented by additional efficacy and boron fixation. However, boron diffusion and movement within the treated commodity has not been hindered, nor fixation rendered so efficient as to hinder efficacy. More surprising and wholly unexpected is the enhanced biocidal efficacy and composition stability in an alkaline environment.
A further very important development, relevant to this composition and previous surface activated compositions such as detailed in Example 7, is their inherent property of self-emulsification with a wide variety of oils which include, but are not limited to, petroleum derived oils, mineral oils, vegetable oils and more especially creosote oils, the latter having great wood preservation significance and limited potential for diversity of formulation and application.
Preparation of Wood Blocks
The procedure used to prepare blocks is very similar to that in the other examples. Totally ten blocks were used in this example.
• The numbered blocks prepared for the impregnation were: 218, 144, 250, 217, 258, 001, 132, 303, 274 and 226.
• The volume and the moisture of the blocks were measured. • The weight of the blocks was determined.
Impregnation
While the impregnation was conducted in a similar way to that used in the other examples, different vacuums were used.
• Once a vacuum of 0.9 kPa was reached, the vacuum pump was kept running for 30 minutes, and the vacuum before flooding was also 0.9 kPa.
• Flooding was commenced under vacuum. • Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure after flooding completed. » Atmospheric pressure was employed for 90 minutes. • The solution was sucked back to the work vessel under vacuum at the end of the pressure period.
• Vacuum was applied to the pressure vessel containing the treated blocks for 30 minutes, and a vacuum of 1.9 kPa was reached before the vacuum was released.
• The weight of blocks was determined straight after the pressure treatment, and the uptake and retention of chemicals calculated. The results are as follows.
Block No. 218 144 250 217 258
Uptake (g) 9.6596 9.4843 9.6391 10.1950 8.7983 Retention 757.97 755.66 758.86 799.99 699.50
(kg/m3)
Block No. 001 132 303 274 226
Uptake (g) 9.6670 9.9522 9.2082 9.6967 10.0360 Retention 774.17 785.43 725.00 764.24 785.34
(kg/m3) • Blocks were dried naturally in the open air.
Leaching
All blocks were dried at 108°C for 24 hours before leaching, and the leaching was carried out in a similar way to that in the other examples although different vacuums were used.
• The leaching was conducted as detailed in the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard Ell-8.
• The blocks were impregnated with distilled water in the exactly same way as in the impregnation with preservatives .
• Once a vacuum of 1.5 mmHg was reached, the vacuum pump was kept running for 35 minutes. The final vacuum achieved before flooding was also 1.5 mmHg. • The flooding was conducted under vacuum, and distilled water was used for the flooding.
• Vacuum was released to atmospheric pressure after the flooding was completed.
• The amount of water used was 50 ml per block, and the total amount of water used was 500 ml. The loss of water to the uptake was re-added. • Once the leaching was commenced, the leachant was changed at the intervals of 6 hours, 24 hours and every 48 hours afterwards, and the leachates were collected for analysis.
Analysis of Impregnant, Leachates and Digested Blocks after Leaching
All the analyses were carried out using techniques of AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry) and ICP- AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry) with the final results based on ICP analysis.
2. Analysis of impregnant
• The impregnant was diluted to an appropriate concentration that is within the working range of the analytical instrument.
• The diluted impregnant was determined and the concentrations of boron, zinc and copper are 4.43g/L, 17.07g/L and 42.32g/L respectively.
• The determined concentration of the impregnant was used to calculate the mass balance.
2. Analysis of leachates
• The leachates were analysed directly without any further sample preparation. • The concentrations of boron, zinc and copper in the leachates are as follows.
Sample LI L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9
B (ppm) 208 195 134 80.3 42.0 27.3 20.5 16.2 11.4
Zn (ppm) 85.3 62.1 38.9 18.2 7.09 5.10 2.51 2.47 2.43
Cu (ppm) 97.9 110 85.9 50.6 19.5 11.1 1.91 1.43 1.58 3. Analysis of digested wood blocks
• After the penetration test, all the ten blocks were quantitatively powdered, homogenised and dried at 100°C for 2 hours before analysis. • 3.0000 grams of wood powder were taken for the digestion.
• The digestion was carried out based on the American Wood Preserver's Association Standard A7-93 using nitric acid, sulfuric acid and perchloric acid. • The solutions obtained from the digestion were analysed for boron, zinc and copper and the results are as follows .
Block No. 218 144 250 217 258
B in digestion 31.4 19.5 23.0 29.3 15.9 solution (ppm)
Total B in each 7.487 4.789 5.683 6.942 4.266 block (mg)
Zn in digestion 623 584 593 636 488 solution (ppm)
Total Zn in each 149.7 143.8 146.2 156.3 131.1 block (mg)
Cu in digestion 1647 1726 1692 1740 1465 solution (ppm)
Total Cu in each 392.1 424.8 417.6 427.4 393.6 block (mg)
Block No. 001 132 303 2741 226
B in digestion 25.5 26.2 19.0 22.7 24.1 solution (ppm)
Total B in each 6.059 6.588 5.121 5.799 6.074 block (mg)
Zn in digestion 607 601 535 593 625 solution (ppm)
Total Zn in each 144.5 151.4 144.2 151.7 157.4 block (mg) Cu in digestion 1664 1598 1455 1503 1606 solution (ppm)
Total Cu in each 395.9 402.3 392.2 384.6 404.4 block (mg)
Summary of Results

Claims

CLAIMS :
1. A preserving composition which includes a basic zinc compound and a compound of boron.
2. A preserving composition according to claim 1 wherein the composition includes zinc ions and borate ions in an aqueous solution of ammonia.
3. A preserving composition according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the composition includes ions of copper.
4. A preserving composition according to claim 3 wherein the ions of copper are cupric ions .
5. A preserving composition according to claim 4 wherein the cupric ions are derived from copper sulfate.
6. A preserving composition according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the composition includes fluoride ions.
7. A preserving composition according to claim 6 wherein the fluoride ions are derived from potassium fluoride.
8. A preserving composition according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the composition includes a quaternary ammonium compound.
9. A preserving composition according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the composition comprises an aqueous solution containing from 5gms per litre to saturation of borate ions and from lOgms per litre to saturation of zinc ions.
10. A method of preserving a cellulosic compound by impregnating the cellulosic compound with a preserving composition according to any one of claims 1 to 9.
11. A method according to claim 10 wherein the cellulosic compound is flooded with the preserving composition under vacuum.
EP01914823A 2000-03-24 2001-03-23 PRESERVATION COMPOSITIONS Withdrawn EP1282491A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPQ6449A AUPQ644900A0 (en) 2000-03-24 2000-03-24 Preserving compositions
AUPP644900 2000-03-24
PCT/AU2001/000325 WO2001070472A1 (en) 2000-03-24 2001-03-23 Preserving compositions

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1282491A1 true EP1282491A1 (en) 2003-02-12
EP1282491A4 EP1282491A4 (en) 2004-12-29

Family

ID=3820546

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01914823A Withdrawn EP1282491A4 (en) 2000-03-24 2001-03-23 PRESERVATION COMPOSITIONS

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1282491A4 (en)
AU (2) AUPQ644900A0 (en)
CA (1) CA2417670A1 (en)
NZ (1) NZ522185A (en)
WO (1) WO2001070472A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA200208584B (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6896908B2 (en) 2001-01-30 2005-05-24 U.S. Borax Inc. Wood preservative concentrate
CA2563083A1 (en) 2004-04-03 2005-10-20 U.S. Borax Inc. Ammoniacal borate and zinc compositions, and methods for treating wood products
CA2563020A1 (en) 2004-04-03 2005-10-13 U.S. Borax Inc. Amino acid-solubilized borate, silicate and zinc compositions, and methods for treating wood products
US7497900B2 (en) 2004-04-03 2009-03-03 Pq Corporation Two-part borate, silicate and zinc compositions, and methods for treating wood products
CN105196381A (en) * 2015-08-27 2015-12-30 福建省漳平木村林产有限公司 Zinc borate corrosion preventing and flame retarding agent
WO2022198054A1 (en) * 2021-03-19 2022-09-22 Arxada, LLC Zinc and boron containing enhanced wood preservative
CN116997449A (en) * 2021-03-19 2023-11-03 阿萨达有限责任公司 Enhanced wood preservative containing zinc and boron
CN114474267A (en) * 2022-02-26 2022-05-13 漳州市桥头木业有限公司 Corrosion-resistant plywood and preparation method thereof

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB139974A (en) * 1919-06-11 1920-03-18 Alphonse Lambert Process for hardening and preserving permeable soft woods
US2194827A (en) * 1936-06-29 1940-03-26 Gordon Aaron Impregnating material for preserving wood
DE3742834A1 (en) * 1987-12-17 1989-07-13 Wolman Gmbh Dr WOOD PRESERVATIVES
US5207823A (en) * 1990-04-03 1993-05-04 Kabushiki Kaisha Koshii Preserving Wood preservative composition and process for treating wood with the same
WO1992018007A1 (en) * 1991-04-12 1992-10-29 Saneish Pty. Ltd. Production of shaped bodies which have fungicidal and insecticidal properties
US5478598A (en) * 1993-07-28 1995-12-26 Kabushiki Kaisha Koshii Preserving Wood preservative composition, process for treating wood with the same, wood treated with the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ZA200208584B (en) 2003-10-23
NZ522185A (en) 2004-07-30
AU4209401A (en) 2001-10-03
WO2001070472A1 (en) 2001-09-27
EP1282491A4 (en) 2004-12-29
AUPQ644900A0 (en) 2000-04-20
CA2417670A1 (en) 2001-09-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6896908B2 (en) Wood preservative concentrate
AU2009220030B2 (en) Micronized Wood Preservative Formulations
EP0058142B1 (en) Wood treatment compositions
US5185214A (en) One step process for imparting decay resistance and fire retardancy to wood products
USRE40589E1 (en) Wood preservative composition
WO2001070472A1 (en) Preserving compositions
SE532566C2 (en) Long chain quaternary ammonium compounds as wood treatment agents
WO2003002318A1 (en) Wood treatment solution and process for improving the preservation of wood
US4288249A (en) Water soluble pentachlorophenol and tetrachlorophenol wood treating systems
AU2001242094B2 (en) Preserving compositions
DK170980B1 (en) Wood impregnation agent, ready-to-use impregnation solution and use of the agent
AU2001242094A1 (en) Preserving compositions
Hwang et al. Evaluation of new quaternary ammonium compound, didecyldimethylammonium tetrafluoroborate (DBF) in comparison with DDAC: Leachability and termite resistance tests
Humar et al. Improvement of fungicidal properties and copper fixation of copper-ethanolamine wood preservatives using octanoic acid and boron compounds
WO1991011306A1 (en) Preservatives and method of treating wood therewith
US7547354B2 (en) Ammoniacal borate and zinc compositions, and methods for treating wood products
US20080131666A1 (en) Penetration improvement of copper amine solutions into dried wood by addition of carbon dioxide
NO170718B (en) wood preservative
CA1099853A (en) Water soluble pentachlorophenol and tetrachlorophenol wood treating systems
PL208336B1 (en) The manner of surface and deep-seated protection of wood with hydrophobic nitrate (V) ionic liquids and agent for protection of wood based on hydrophobic nitrate (V) ionic liquids
Pankras et al. Effect of Copper to Quat Ratio on Fixation and Leaching of Preservative Components in Alkaline Copper Quat–Treated Wood
AU700524B2 (en) Diffusible wood preservatives
AU2251499A (en) Diffusible wood preservatives

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20021024

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20041116

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20050323

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20070801