EP1281827B1 - Electronic closing system for access control - Google Patents
Electronic closing system for access control Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1281827B1 EP1281827B1 EP02017030A EP02017030A EP1281827B1 EP 1281827 B1 EP1281827 B1 EP 1281827B1 EP 02017030 A EP02017030 A EP 02017030A EP 02017030 A EP02017030 A EP 02017030A EP 1281827 B1 EP1281827 B1 EP 1281827B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- bearer
- electronic
- code
- user
- locking system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/00174—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys
- G07C9/00571—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated by interacting with a central unit
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/00174—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys
- G07C9/00309—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with bidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/20—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass
- G07C9/21—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass having a variable access code
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/20—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass
- G07C9/27—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass with central registration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/00174—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys
- G07C9/00309—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with bidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks
- G07C2009/00412—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with bidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks the transmitted data signal being encrypted
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/00174—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys
- G07C9/00309—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with bidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks
- G07C2009/0042—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with bidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks the transmitted data signal containing a code which is changed
- G07C2009/00476—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with bidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks the transmitted data signal containing a code which is changed dynamically
- G07C2009/00492—Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with bidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks the transmitted data signal containing a code which is changed dynamically whereby the code is a rolling code
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an electronic locking system for Access control of the type mentioned in the preamble of claim 1.
- Electronic locking systems are widely used for access control of closed rooms used for a limited number of people.
- U.S. Patent 3,906,447 (Security system for lock and key protected secured areas") by Crafton describes a locking system of the type mentioned for controlled Rooms with the help of electronic locks, where each user has a carrier (Punched card, magnetic card, etc.). To gain access to a restricted area the lock must read the user's vehicle. Every castle and every one Carrier of the user stores a code. If the code of the carrier, of a Lock is read, matches the code stored in the lock, this allows access to the area to which the access through the castle is limited. On each carrier of the user is additionally an episode or Operation code stored representing a time. This time coincides with the time together, in which each carrier is issued.
- the castle compares the Operation code of the carrier with the in the lock at the time of reading the User's stored time. If the operation code of the carrier is larger when the time stored in the lock is at the time of reading the wearer, the lock stores the code of the carrier as a new code, the previous one Carrier code is invalidated.
- the system described in this patent exists from a device intended to encode the user carrier. These Device has means for storing a counter representing a time and means for indexing this counter at regular intervals.
- the lock has means for storing a counter similar in form represents a time.
- the wearer of a user also stores a code containing the Time at which his access to the door expires.
- the lock will automatically do that Carrier code invalid if the time stored by the lock coincides with the expiration time of the Carrier agrees.
- the fundamental disadvantage of this system is that it required is a permanent synchronization between the internal time of the locks and to maintain the time in the dispenser for the wearers. When out For some reason these two times are desynchronized, the system stops do not work or work correctly anymore.
- Another disadvantage is that it it is only possible to store one carrier code per lock, with access to the door by two users with different carriers is not possible.
- EP-A1-1 083 277 is still a locking system with a transponder having known keys, in which the transponder one in several Code areas have divided code, the code areas of respective zones are assigned, which are accessible with this transponder.
- ES Patent 532,333 (“Nueva cerradura electronica programable” (“Novel programmable electronic lock ”) by Juan Imedio, describes one electronic lock having a card storing a code consisting of a Card code and a sequential code exists. When the one read from a castle Card code matches the stored by the lock code allows this access to the limited by the castle area. If the card code one unit greater than the code stored in the lock, it does so invalidated earlier code and saved the new map code.
- the ES patent 9202223 (“Nueva cerradura electronica programable” ("Novel programmable electronic lock ”)) by Juan Imedio, describes one electronic lock with cards based on ES patent 532,333 of the same Author.
- the basic difference from the earlier patent is that when the card code is one or more units larger than the one in the lock is stored code, the previous code is invalidated, and the new map code is stored.
- Another disadvantage of this system is the complexity of manufacturing pre-dated user carriers. Occasionally, it is necessary to issue carriers that become valid at a time after the date of issue of the carrier.
- One in these Cases used method is to assign a sequential code to several units is larger, instead of assigning the sequential sequential code. This method is not satisfactory in the case where it can not be foreseen how many carriers are issued before the previously issued and predicted carrier is read from the castle. In the case where the number of issued carriers exceeds the number of carriers previously present in the output of the predicted carrier is not valid, because its sequential code is smaller than the currently stored in the lock, so that its resynchronization with a Facility outside the castle is required.
- Another disadvantage of this system is the difficulty of user-carrier output from each other. Because it is necessary at any time the sequential code stored in the locks at the time of issue Knowing a new carrier, it is essential that you have a Has facility over which this code can be derived, or it must have a synchronized copy of these codes are carried at each output station for carriers. This requires the need for frequent information exchange by means of any Data transmission system, resulting in greater costs and greater complexity conditionally.
- the present invention is based on the object, a locking system of the above in which it is not necessary to have any kind of synchronism between the time counter of the lock and the output device of the carrier maintain, so that the need some kind of communication between Output devices for carriers, which are arranged remote from each other, and / or with the locks are omitted.
- the system according to the invention makes it possible to control an access control installation, in the frequently changing users and rarely changing users exist side by side.
- Each user is in possession of one of the carriers who stores the information about that user.
- the user desires access to a zone, he presents his carrier to the reader of the blocking system associated with a restricted zone.
- the reader of the blocking system reads the information of the carrier and transmits it to the electronic blocking module.
- This electronic module checks the validity of the carrier. If access of the carrier to this zone is permitted, the electronic module sends an electrical signal to the blocking device, thereby releasing access to the zone.
- Carrier of the user user code opcode Code Zone A Code Zone B ........ Code Zone Z Memory of the electronic module unit Zone Code User code 1 Operation code 1 User's code 2 Operation code 2 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Each bearer stores a code of the user who identifies it.
- each Electronic circuitry associated with a zone stores a list of codes the user who has access to this zone.
- the electronic Circuit compares the user code stored on the carrier with the User codes stored in the memory of the circuit. If one of these User codes match the user code of the read carrier goes electronic module unit for comparing the operation code via.
- the list of users stored in the electronic control module units also stores the operation code of each carrier. Once the carrier has been read and the user code has been verified, the operation code stored on the carrier is compared with the operation code corresponding to that carrier which is stored in the electronic module unit. If the operation code of this carrier is equal to the operation code corresponding to that carrier stored in the electronic module unit, the electronic module unit allows access to the restricted zone and the electromechanical lock system is released. If the operation code of this carrier is after the operation code corresponding to that carrier stored in the electronic module, the latter is replaced by the new operation code of the read carrier, thereby invalidating the carriers output before the read carrier.
- This system makes it possible to remove a carrier's access to a zone simply by issuing a new bearer for that user and presenting it to the associated reader associated with that zone.
- the information about the user is on the carrier in accordance with one Encryption algorithm stored in encrypted form, which is a random sequence in Dependence on the information stored on the carrier as well as a secret Key generated by each installation.
- the encrypted in the carrier Form contained information can only be interpreted, if one the Encryption algorithm and the secret key knows. This way will avoided the possibility of carriers issued by an installation of Readers of another installation can be read.
- the encryption algorithm can be any of the commonly used in communication systems Encryption algorithms (DES, 3DES, RSA, etc.).
- the fundamental improvement of the present system over Crafton exists in that the electronic circuit controlling access to a zone various user codes with their respective operation codes stores what the Access with different carriers to this zone allows.
- Another improvement in contrast to Crafton's patent the one received by the carrier Operation code is stored in the electronic circuit.
- the opcodes of the carriers are not compared to the time the reader came to reads the information contained on the carrier, but this operation code is with compared to the last operation code for this carrier in the electronic Module unit was saved.
- This method is not perfect Synchronization between the time counter of the carrier output device and the Time counter of the electronic circuit required. In fact, it is not necessary to provide a time counter in the electronic circuits that provide access to them Control zones, resulting in lower costs and a reduction in the space requirements of these Circuits conditioned.
- the carrier optionally stores a list of zones for the user is accessible. This list is created at the time when the carrier is output, so that it is in this way at the time of issue of this carrier it is possible to determine the zones to which the user has access.
- This Procedure is for users of installation with high frequency of change used. The modification of the access conditions for these users is by Output of a new carrier and storage of this information on the carrier realized, rather than by reprogramming the electronic module units.
- the user codes remain unchanged during the release of new media, and they are used to register the operations performed by the carriers. Because it is not necessary to change the user codes are not combinations necessary to prevent these codes from repeating, causing the memory which is required to store these codes.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Lock And Its Accessories (AREA)
Description
Die vorliegende Erfindung bezieht sich auf ein elektronisches Schließsystem zur Zugangskontrolle der im Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 1 genannten Art.The present invention relates to an electronic locking system for Access control of the type mentioned in the preamble of claim 1.
Elektronischen Schließsysteme werden in weitem Umfang zur Zugangskontrolle von geschlossenen Räumen für eine begrenzte Anzahl von Personen verwendet.Electronic locking systems are widely used for access control of closed rooms used for a limited number of people.
Die üblichen mechanischen Schlösser lösen nicht das Problem des Verlustes des Schlüssels und das Ungültigmachen der Schlüssel in einfacher und vielseitiger Weise.The usual mechanical locks do not solve the problem of loss of Key and invalidating the keys in a simple and versatile way.
Auf dem Markt gibt es vielfältige elektronische Schließsysteme, die unterschiedliche Träger (Karten oder elektronische Schlüssel, usw.) verwenden, bei denen der von einem Benutzer verlorene Träger in einfacher Weise ungültig gemacht wird, wobei ein neuer Träger für diesen Benutzer ausgegeben wird. Wenn das Schloß diesen Träger liest, macht es automatisch den früheren Träger ungültig und akzeptiert den neuen Träger als gültig.There are many different types of electronic locking systems on the market Use carriers (cards or electronic keys, etc.) where one of User lost carrier is invalidated in a simple way, with a new one Carrier is spent for this user. When the lock reads this vehicle, does it automatically invalidates the previous bearer and accepts the new bearer as valid.
Das US-Patent 4,519,228 ("Electronic recodeable lock") von Tor Sornes beschreibt ein elektronisches Schloß mit einer Lochkarte mit einem Magnetstreifen. In dem Magnetstreifen ist ein Decodierbefehl gespeichert, der anzeigt, daß der Zugangscode des Schlosses durch die Codierung der Lochkarte gewechselt werden muß.The US Patent 4,519,228 ("Electronic Recodeable Lock") by Tor Sornes describes electronic lock with a punched card with a magnetic strip. By doing Magnetic strip is stored a decoding command indicating that the access code of the Lock must be changed by the coding of the punched card.
Der Nachteil dieser Lösung sind die hohen Kosten der Verbundkarte (perforiert und magnetisch) gegenüber den Lösungen, die eine übliche Magnetkarte verwenden.The disadvantage of this solution is the high cost of the composite card (perforated and magnetic) over the solutions using a conventional magnetic card.
Das US-Patent 3,906,447 ("Security system for lock and key protected secured areas") von Crafton beschreibt ein Schließsystem der eingangs genannten Art für kontrollierte Räume mit Hilfe von elektronischen Schlössern, bei dem jeder Benutzer über einen Träger (Lochkarte, Magnetkarte, usw.) verfügt. Um Zugang an einen beschränkten Bereich zu erhalten, muß das Schloß den Träger des Benutzers lesen. Jedes Schloß und jeder Träger des Benutzers speichert einen Code. Wenn der Code des Trägers, der von einem Schloß gelesen wird, mit dem in dem Schloß gespeicherten Code übereinstimmt, ermöglicht dieses den Zugang an den Bereich, an den der Zugang durch das Schloß beschränkt ist. Auf jedem Träger des Benutzers wird zusätzlich ein Folgen- oder Operationscode gespeichert, der eine Zeit darstellt. Diese Zeit fällt mit dem Zeitpunkt zusammen, in dem jeder Träger ausgegeben wird. Das Schloß vergleicht den Operationscode des Trägers mit der in dem Schloß zum Zeitpunkt des Lesens des Trägers des Benutzers gespeicherten Zeit. Wenn der Operationscode des Trägers größer als die in dem Schloß gespeicherte Zeit zum Zeitpunkt des Lesens des Trägers ist, speichert das Schloß den Code des Trägers als neuen Code, wobei der vorhergehende Trägercode ungültig gemacht wird. Das in diesem Patent beschriebene System besteht aus einer Vorrichtung, die zum Codieren der Benutzer-Träger bestimmt ist. Diese Vorrichtung weist Einrichtungen zum Speichern eines Zählers auf, der eine Zeit darstellt, sowie Einrichtungen zum Weiterschalten dieses Zählers unter regelmäßigen Intervallen. Das Schloß weist Einrichtungen zur Speicherung eines Zählers auf, der in ähnlicher Form eine Zeit darstellt. Der Träger eines Benutzers speichert außerdem einen Code, der die Zeit darstellt, zu dem sein Zugang an die Tür verfällt. Das Schloß macht automatisch den Trägercode ungültig, wenn die von dem Schloß gespeicherte Zeit mit der Verfallszeit des Trägers übereinstimmt. Der grundlegende Nachteil dieses Systems besteht darin, daß es erforderlich ist, eine dauernde Synchronisation zwischen der internen Zeit der Schlösser und der Zeit in der Ausgabevorrichtung für die Träger aufrechtzuerhalten. Wenn aus irgendeinem Grund diese beiden Zeiten desynchronisiert werden, hört das System auf zu funktionieren oder arbeitet nicht mehr korrekt. Ein weiterer Nachteil besteht darin, daß es nur möglich ist, einen Trägercode pro Schloß zu speichern, wobei der Zugang an die Tür durch zwei Benutzer mit unterschiedlichen Trägern nicht möglich ist.U.S. Patent 3,906,447 ("Security system for lock and key protected secured areas") by Crafton describes a locking system of the type mentioned for controlled Rooms with the help of electronic locks, where each user has a carrier (Punched card, magnetic card, etc.). To gain access to a restricted area the lock must read the user's vehicle. Every castle and every one Carrier of the user stores a code. If the code of the carrier, of a Lock is read, matches the code stored in the lock, this allows access to the area to which the access through the castle is limited. On each carrier of the user is additionally an episode or Operation code stored representing a time. This time coincides with the time together, in which each carrier is issued. The castle compares the Operation code of the carrier with the in the lock at the time of reading the User's stored time. If the operation code of the carrier is larger when the time stored in the lock is at the time of reading the wearer, the lock stores the code of the carrier as a new code, the previous one Carrier code is invalidated. The system described in this patent exists from a device intended to encode the user carrier. These Device has means for storing a counter representing a time and means for indexing this counter at regular intervals. The lock has means for storing a counter similar in form represents a time. The wearer of a user also stores a code containing the Time at which his access to the door expires. The lock will automatically do that Carrier code invalid if the time stored by the lock coincides with the expiration time of the Carrier agrees. The fundamental disadvantage of this system is that it required is a permanent synchronization between the internal time of the locks and to maintain the time in the dispenser for the wearers. When out For some reason these two times are desynchronized, the system stops do not work or work correctly anymore. Another disadvantage is that it it is only possible to store one carrier code per lock, with access to the door by two users with different carriers is not possible.
Aus der EP-A1-1 083 277 ist weiterhin eine Schliessanlage mit einen Transponder aufweisenden Schlüsseln bekannt, bei der die Transponder einen in mehrere Codebereiche unterteilten Code aufweisen, wobei die Codebereiche jeweiligen Zonen zugeordnet sind, die mit diesem Transponder zugänglich sind. From EP-A1-1 083 277 is still a locking system with a transponder having known keys, in which the transponder one in several Code areas have divided code, the code areas of respective zones are assigned, which are accessible with this transponder.
Das ES-Patent 532,333 ("Nueva cerradura electronica programable" ("Neuartiges programmierbares elektronisches Schloß")) von Juan Imedio, beschreibt ein elektronisches Schloß, das eine Karte aufweist, die einen Code speichert, der aus einem Kartencode und einem sequentiellen Code besteht. Wenn der von einem Schloß gelesene Kartencode mit dem durch das Schloß gespeicherten Code übereinstimmt, ermöglicht dieses den Zugang an den durch das Schloß beschränkten Bereich. Wenn der Kartencode um eine Einheit größer ist als der in dem Schloß gespeicherte Code, so macht dieses den früheren Code ungültig und speichert den neuen Kartencode.ES Patent 532,333 ("Nueva cerradura electronica programable" ("Novel programmable electronic lock ")) by Juan Imedio, describes one electronic lock having a card storing a code consisting of a Card code and a sequential code exists. When the one read from a castle Card code matches the stored by the lock code allows this access to the limited by the castle area. If the card code one unit greater than the code stored in the lock, it does so invalidated earlier code and saved the new map code.
Das ES-Patent 9202223 ("Nueva cerradura electronica programable" ("Neuartiges programmierbares elektronisches Schloß")) von Juan Imedio, beschreibt ein elektronisches Schloß mit Karten ausgehend von dem ES-Patent 532,333 des gleichen Urhebers. Der grundlegende Unterschied zu dem früheren Patent besteht darin, daß wenn der Kartencode um eine oder mehrere Einheiten größer als der in dem Schloß gespeicherte Code ist, der frühere Code ungültig gemacht wird, und der neue Kartencode gespeichert wird.The ES patent 9202223 ("Nueva cerradura electronica programable" ("Novel programmable electronic lock ")) by Juan Imedio, describes one electronic lock with cards based on ES patent 532,333 of the same Author. The basic difference from the earlier patent is that when the card code is one or more units larger than the one in the lock is stored code, the previous code is invalidated, and the new map code is stored.
Der grundlegende Nachteil dieser Art von Systemen besteht darin, daß der sequentielle Code dieser Schlösser nur dann weitergeschaltet wird, wenn die neuen Benutzer ihren Träger in die Schlösser einstecken. Häufig wird die Weiterschaltung der sequentiellen Codes der Schlösser nur dann zugelassen, wenn die Differenz zwischen dem Kartencode und dem gespeicherten sequentiellen Code in dem Schloß einen Maximalwert nicht übersteigt. Andernfalls wird der Zugang an das Schloß nicht erlaubt. Wenn andererseits neue Träger ausgegeben werden, und mit diesen zunächst kein Zugang an ein Schloß durchgeführt wird (beispielsweise an einem Zugang mit geringem Verkehr, wie dies für einen Notausgang der Fall sein kann), so schaltet das Schloß seine gespeicherten sequentiellen Codes nicht weiter und wird gegenüber den Codes von neu ausgegebenen Trägem desynchronisiert, so daß seine Neusynchronisation mit Hilfe einer außerhalb des Schlosses angeordneten Einrichtung erforderlich wird, wenn die neuen Träger mit einem Code ausgegeben werden, der den in dem Schloß gespeicherten Code um diesen Maximalwert übersteigt. The basic disadvantage of this type of system is that the sequential Code of these locks is only forwarded when the new users their Insert the carrier into the locks. Frequently, the sequencing of the sequential Codes of locks are only allowed if the difference between the card code and the stored sequential code in the lock is not a maximum value exceeds. Otherwise access to the lock will not be allowed. On the other hand new carriers are issued, and with these initially no access to a lock carried out (for example, on a low traffic access road, as for an emergency exit may be the case), so the lock switches its stored sequential codes do not continue and will be reissued compared to the codes Trägem desynchronizes, so that its resynchronization using an outside of the Lock arranged arrangement is required when the new carrier with a Code are output, the code stored in the lock to this Maximum value exceeds.
Ein weiterer Nachteil dieses Systems ist die Kompliziertheit der Herstellung von vorausdatierten Benutzer-Trägem. Gelegentlich ist es erforderlich, Träger auszugeben, die zu einer Zeit gültig werden, die nach dem Ausgabedatum des Trägers liegt. Ein in diesen Fällen verwendetes Verfahren besteht darin einen sequentiellen Code zuzuordnen, der um mehrere Einheiten größer ist, statt den nachfolgenden sequentiellen Code zuzuordnen. Dieses Verfahren ist in dem Fall nicht befriedigend in dem nicht vorauszusehen ist, wie viele Träger ausgegeben werden bevor der früher ausgegebene und vorausdatierte Träger von dem Schloß gelesen wird. In dem Fall, in dem die Anzahl der ausgegebenen Träger die Anzahl der Träger übersteigt, die vorher bei der Ausgabe des vorausdatierten Trägers vorgesehen wurden, ist dieser nicht gültig, weil sein sequentieller Code kleiner als der aktuell in dem Schloß gespeicherte ist, so daß dessen Neusynchronisation mit einer Einrichtung außerhalb des Schlosses erforderlich wird.Another disadvantage of this system is the complexity of manufacturing pre-dated user carriers. Occasionally, it is necessary to issue carriers that become valid at a time after the date of issue of the carrier. One in these Cases used method is to assign a sequential code to several units is larger, instead of assigning the sequential sequential code. This method is not satisfactory in the case where it can not be foreseen how many carriers are issued before the previously issued and predicted carrier is read from the castle. In the case where the number of issued carriers exceeds the number of carriers previously present in the output of the predicted carrier is not valid, because its sequential code is smaller than the currently stored in the lock, so that its resynchronization with a Facility outside the castle is required.
Ein weiterer Nachteil dieses Systems ist die Schwierigkeit, Benutzer-Träger an voneinander entfernten Stellen auszugeben. Weil es erforderlich ist, zu jedem Zeitpunkt den in den Schlössern gespeicherten sequentiellen Code zu dem Zeitpunkt der Ausgabe eines neuen Trägers zu kennen, ist es unbedingt erforderlich, daß man über eine Einrichtung verfügt, über die dieser Code abgeleitet werden kann, oder es muß eine synchronisierte Kopie dieser Codes an jeder Ausgabestation für Träger geführt werden. Dies bedingt die Notwendigkeit eines häufigen Informationsaustauschs mittels irgendeines Datenübertragungssystems, was größere Kosten und eine größere Kompliziertheit bedingt.Another disadvantage of this system is the difficulty of user-carrier output from each other. Because it is necessary at any time the sequential code stored in the locks at the time of issue Knowing a new carrier, it is essential that you have a Has facility over which this code can be derived, or it must have a synchronized copy of these codes are carried at each output station for carriers. This requires the need for frequent information exchange by means of any Data transmission system, resulting in greater costs and greater complexity conditionally.
Der vorliegenden Erfindung liegt die Aufgabe zugrunde, ein Schließsystem der eingangs genannten Art zu schaffen, bei dem es nicht erforderlich ist, irgendeinen Synchronismus zwischen dem Zeitzähler des Schlosses und der Ausgabeeinrichtung der Träger aufrechtzuerhalten, so daß die Notwendigkeit irgendeine Art von Kommunikation zwischen Ausgabeeinrichtungen für Träger, die entfernt voneinander angeordnet sind, und/oder mit den Schlössern entfällt.The present invention is based on the object, a locking system of the above in which it is not necessary to have any kind of synchronism between the time counter of the lock and the output device of the carrier maintain, so that the need some kind of communication between Output devices for carriers, which are arranged remote from each other, and / or with the locks are omitted.
Diese Aufgabe wird durch die im Anspruch 1 angegebenen Merkmale gelöst. This object is achieved by the features specified in claim 1.
Vorteilhafte Ausgestaltungen und Weiterbildungen der Erfindung ergeben sich aus den Unteransprüchen.Advantageous embodiments and developments of the invention will become apparent from the Dependent claims.
Das erfindungsgemäße System ermöglicht die Zugangskontrolle von Benutzern einer Einrichtung zu vorgegebenen Zonen und besteht aus den folgenden Elementen:
- einem mechanischen Träger, der einen Benutzercode und einen Ordnungs- oder Operationscode speichern kann, der die Zeit darstellt, zu der der Träger ausgegeben wird, und der wahlweise irgendwelche Zonen-Codes speichern kann, die die Zonen darstellen, die mit diesem Träger zugänglich sind, sowie einem mechanischen Träger, auf dem die enthaltene Information in entsprechend einem Verschlüsselungsalgorithmus und einem geheimen Schlüssel, der für jede Einrichtung unterschiedlich ist, verschlüsselter Form gespeichert ist
- einem elektromechanisches Schließsystem, das den Zugang an diese Zonen kontrolliert,
- Ausgabeeinrichtungen für Träger, die in der Lage sind Informationen auf den Trägem der Benutzer zu speichern, wobei diese Informationen in gemäß einem Verschlüsselungsalgorithmus und einem geheimen Schlüssel, der für jede Einrichtung unterschiedlich ist, verschlüsselter Form gespeichert sind,
- Programmiereinrichtungen, die Informationen an die elektronischen Schaltungen der Türen übertragen können,
- einem Rechner, der die gesamte Einrichtung verwaltet und die Aufgabe hat, Informationen an die Ausgabeeinrichtungen für die Karten der Benutzer und an die Programmiereinrichtungen der Moduleinheiten der Türen zu senden.
- a mechanical support capable of storing a user code and an order or operation code representing the time at which the support is issued, and which may optionally store any zone codes representing the zones accessible by that support; and a mechanical carrier on which the contained information is stored in encrypted form according to an encryption algorithm and a secret key different for each device
- an electromechanical locking system that controls access to these zones,
- Output means for carriers capable of storing information on the carriers of the users, this information being stored in encrypted form according to an encryption algorithm and a secret key different for each device,
- Programming devices that can transmit information to the electronic circuits of the doors,
- a computer that manages the entire device and has the task of sending information to the output devices for the cards of the users and to the programming devices of the module units of the doors.
Das elektromechanische Schließsystem ist vorzugsweise durch die folgenden Elemente gebildet:
- eine elektronische Schaltung, die ein elektronisches Signal zur Entsperrung des elektromechanischen Blockiersystems erzeugt,
- eine Lese-Moduleinheit oder Lese-Moduleinheiten, die die Informationen lesen können, die auf den Trägem der Benutzer enthalten sind,
- ein elektromechanisches Sperrsystem, das durch ein elektrisches Signal gesteuert wird das den Zugang an eine Zone sperren kann.
- an electronic circuit which generates an electronic signal for unlocking the electromechanical locking system,
- a read module unit or read module units that can read the information contained on the carriers of the users,
- an electromechanical locking system controlled by an electrical signal that can block access to a zone.
Die Hauptvorteile des beschriebenen Systems sind folgende:
Einer bevorzugte Ausführungsform des erfindungsgemäßen Schließsystems wird nachfolgend erläutert.A preferred embodiment of the locking system according to the invention is explained below.
Zugangskontroll-Installationen können in Abhängigkeit von der Art der Benutzer klassifiziert werden, die einen Zugang an diese Zonen ausführen. So gibt es drei Arten von Installationen:
- Installationen, bei denen die Benutzer, die einen Zugang an die Installation haben, häufig wechseln. In derartigen Installationen ist eine einfache Einrichtung zum Ungültigmachen früherer Benutzer zweckmäßig, ohne daß es erforderlich ist die Schlösser neu zu programmieren. Außerdem ist ein Verfahren erforderlich, das den Zugang an bestimmte Zonen zuläßt, ohne daß die Notwendigkeit einer Umprogrammierung der Schlösser besteht. Beispiele dieser Arten von Installationen sind Universitäten, Altenheime, usw.
- Installationen, bei denen die Benutzer, die einen Zugang an die Installation haben, nicht häufig wechseln. Bei derartigen Installationen ist es zweckmäßig, eine einfache Einrichtung zur Modifikation der Zugangsbedingungen an die Zonen ohne die Notwendigkeit der Umprogrammierung der Träger der Benutzer, zu haben. Beispiele dieser Art von Installationen sind Büros, Fabriken, usw.
- Installations where users who have access to the installation frequently change. In such installations, a simple means of invalidating prior users is expedient without the need to reprogram the locks. In addition, a method is required which allows access to certain zones without the need for reprogramming the locks. Examples of these types of installations are universities, retirement homes, etc.
- Installations where users who have access to the installation do not change frequently. In such installations, it is desirable to have a simple means of modifying the access conditions to the zones without the necessity of reprogramming the users' carriers. Examples of this kind of installations are offices, factories, etc.
Andererseits gibt es Installationen, bei denen beide Arten von Benutzern nebeneinander existieren, so daß ein System erforderlich ist, das beide Problematiken löst. Beispiele dieser Art von Installationen werden Hotels, Museen, usw. sein, zu denen bestimmte Benutzer vorübergehend Zugang haben (Kunden, Besucher), während andere einen dauernden Zugang haben (Reinigungspersonal, Wachpersonal, usw.).On the other hand, there are installations where both types of users side by side exist, so that a system is needed that solves both problems. Examples These types of installations will be hotels, museums, etc., to which certain Users have temporary access (customers, visitors) while others have one have permanent access (cleaning staff, security guards, etc.).
Das erfindungsgemäße System ermöglicht die Steuerung einer Zugangskontroll-Installation, in der häufig wechselnde Benutzer und selten wechselnde Benutzer nebeneinander existieren.The system according to the invention makes it possible to control an access control installation, in the frequently changing users and rarely changing users exist side by side.
Das System besteht aus den folgenden Elementen:
- Mechanische Träger, die in der Lage sind, Informationen bezüglich der Benutzer zu speichern. Jeder Benutzer besitzt einen dieser Träger. Diese Träger können von unterschiedlicher Art sein (Magnetkarten, elektronische Schlüssel, Chipkarten mit Kontakten, Hochfrequenz-Fernsteuerschaltungen, Chipkarten mit Kontakten, usw.).
- Elektromechanische Blockiersysteme, die durch ein elektrisches Signal gesteuert werden und den Zugang an eine Tür sperren können.
- Lese-Einrichtungen, die Informationen lesen können, die auf den Trägem der Benutzer enthalten sind.
- Elektronische Schaltungen, die Informationen speichern können, die auf die Träger der Benutzer bezogen sind.
- Eine elektronische Schaltung, die die Information speichert, die auf die Träger bezogen ist, die einen Zugang an die Zone haben.
- Mechanical carriers capable of storing information regarding the user. Each user owns one of these carriers. These carriers can be of different types (magnetic cards, electronic keys, chip cards with contacts, high-frequency remote control circuits, chip cards with contacts, etc.).
- Electromechanical locking systems that are controlled by an electrical signal and can block access to a door.
- Reading devices that can read information contained on the carriers of the users.
- Electronic circuits capable of storing information related to users' carriers.
- An electronic circuit that stores the information related to the carriers having access to the zone.
Jeder Benutzer ist im Besitz eines der Träger, der die Information über diesen Benutzer
speichert. Wenn der Benutzer einen Zugang an eine Zone wünscht, so bietet er seinen
Träger dem Lesegerät des Blockiersystems dar, das einer beschränkten Zone zugeordnet
ist. Das Lesegerät des Blockiersystems liest die Information des Trägers und überträgt sie
an das elektronische Blockiermodul. Dieses elektronische Modul überprüft die Gültigkeit
des Trägers. Wenn der Zugang des Trägers in diese Zone zulässig ist, sendet die
elektronische Moduleinheit ein elektrisches Signal an die Blockiereinrichtung, wodurch der
Zugang an die Zone freigegeben wird.
Jeder Träger speichert einen Code des Benutzers, der diesen identifiziert. Jede elektronische Schaltung, die einer Zone zugeordnet ist, speichert eine Liste mit den Codes der Benutzer, die eine Zugangsberechtigung an diese Zone haben. Die elektronische Schaltung vergleicht den Benutzercode, der auf dem Träger gespeichert ist mit den Benutzercodes, die in dem Speicher der Schaltung gespeichert sind. Wenn einer dieser Benutzercodes mit dem Benutzercode des gelesenen Trägers übereinstimmt, geht die elektronische Moduleinheit zum Vergleich des Operationscodes über.Each bearer stores a code of the user who identifies it. each Electronic circuitry associated with a zone stores a list of codes the user who has access to this zone. The electronic Circuit compares the user code stored on the carrier with the User codes stored in the memory of the circuit. If one of these User codes match the user code of the read carrier goes electronic module unit for comparing the operation code via.
Auf jedem Träger wurde ein Operationscode gespeichert, der den Zeitpunkt der Ausgabe
dieses Trägers darstellt. Die Liste der Benutzer die in den elektronischen Steuer-Moduleinheiten
gespeichert ist, speichert außerdem den Operationscode jedes Trägers.
Sobald der Träger gelesen und der Benutzercode überprüft wurde, wird der auf dem
Träger gespeicherte Operationscode mit dem diesem Träger entsprechenden
Operationscode verglichen, der in der elektronischen Moduleinheit gespeichert ist. Wenn
der Operationscode dieses Trägers gleich dem diesen Träger entsprechenden
Operationscode ist, der in der elektronischen Moduleinheit gespeichert ist, erlaubt die
elektronische Moduleinheit den Zugang an die beschränkte Zone, wobei das
elektromechanische Blockiersystem freigegeben wird. Wenn der Operationscode dieses
Trägers nach dem diesem Träger entsprechenden Operationscode liegt, der in der
elektronischen Moduleinheit gespeichert ist, so wird der letztere durch den neuen
Operationscode des gelesenen Trägers ersetzt, wobei auf diese Weise die vor dem
gelesenen Träger ausgegebenen Träger ungültig gemacht werden.
Dieses System ermöglicht es, den Zugang eines Trägers zu einer Zone dadurch
aufzuheben, daß einfach ein neuer Träger für diesen Benutzer ausgegeben wird und dem
zugeordneten Leser, der dieser Zone zugeordnet ist, dargeboten wird.On each carrier an opcode was stored representing the time of issue of that carrier. The list of users stored in the electronic control module units also stores the operation code of each carrier. Once the carrier has been read and the user code has been verified, the operation code stored on the carrier is compared with the operation code corresponding to that carrier which is stored in the electronic module unit. If the operation code of this carrier is equal to the operation code corresponding to that carrier stored in the electronic module unit, the electronic module unit allows access to the restricted zone and the electromechanical lock system is released. If the operation code of this carrier is after the operation code corresponding to that carrier stored in the electronic module, the latter is replaced by the new operation code of the read carrier, thereby invalidating the carriers output before the read carrier.
This system makes it possible to remove a carrier's access to a zone simply by issuing a new bearer for that user and presenting it to the associated reader associated with that zone.
Die Information über den Benutzer ist auf dem Träger in entsprechend einem Verschlüsselungsalgorithmus verschlüsselter Form gespeichert, der eine zufällige Folge in Abhängigkeit von der auf dem Träger gespeicherten Information sowie einen geheimen Schlüssel erzeugt der von jeder Installation abhängt. Die in dem Träger in verschlüsselter Form enthaltene Information kann ausschließlich dann interpretiert werden, wenn man den Verschlüsselungsalgorithmus und den geheimen Schlüssel kennt. Auf diese Weise wird die Möglichkeit vermieden, daß von einer Installation ausgegebene Träger von Lesegeräten einer anderen Installation gelesen werden. Der Verschlüsselungsalgorithmus kann irgendeiner der häufig bei Kommunikationssystemen verwendeten Verschlüsselungsalgorithmen sein (DES, 3DES, RSA, etc.).The information about the user is on the carrier in accordance with one Encryption algorithm stored in encrypted form, which is a random sequence in Dependence on the information stored on the carrier as well as a secret Key generated by each installation. The encrypted in the carrier Form contained information can only be interpreted, if one the Encryption algorithm and the secret key knows. This way will avoided the possibility of carriers issued by an installation of Readers of another installation can be read. The encryption algorithm can be any of the commonly used in communication systems Encryption algorithms (DES, 3DES, RSA, etc.).
Die grundlegende Verbesserung des vorliegenden Systems gegenüber Crafton besteht darin, daß die elektronische Schaltung, die den Zugang an eine Zone kontrolliert, verschiedene Benutzercodes mit ihren jeweiligen Operationscodes speichert, was den Zugang mit verschiedenen Trägem an diese Zone ermöglicht. Eine weitere Verbesserung gegenüber dem Patent von Crafton besteht darin, daß der von dem Träger empfangene Operationscode in der elektronischen Schaltung gespeichert wird. Auf diese Weise werden die Operationscodes der Träger nicht mit der Zeit verglichen, zu der das Lesegerät die auf dem Träger enthaltene Information liest, sondern dieser Operationscode wird mit dem letzten Operationscode verglichen, der für diesen Träger in der elektronischen Moduleinheit gespeichert wurde. Mittels dieses Verfahrens ist keine perfekte Synchronisation zwischen dem Zeitzähler der Ausgabevorrichtung für Träger und dem Zeitzähler der elektronischen Schaltung erforderlich. Tatsächlich ist es nicht erforderlich, einen Zeitzähler in den elektronischen Schaltungen vorzusehen, die den Zugang an diese Zonen kontrollieren, was geringere Kosten und eine Verringerung des Raumbedarfs dieser Schaltungen bedingt.The fundamental improvement of the present system over Crafton exists in that the electronic circuit controlling access to a zone various user codes with their respective operation codes stores what the Access with different carriers to this zone allows. Another improvement in contrast to Crafton's patent, the one received by the carrier Operation code is stored in the electronic circuit. In this way For example, the opcodes of the carriers are not compared to the time the reader came to reads the information contained on the carrier, but this operation code is with compared to the last operation code for this carrier in the electronic Module unit was saved. This method is not perfect Synchronization between the time counter of the carrier output device and the Time counter of the electronic circuit required. In fact, it is not necessary to provide a time counter in the electronic circuits that provide access to them Control zones, resulting in lower costs and a reduction in the space requirements of these Circuits conditioned.
In dem Träger ist wahlweise eine Liste von Zonen gespeichert, die für den Benutzer zugänglich ist. Diese Liste wird zu dem Zeitpunkt geschaffen, zu dem der Träger ausgegeben wird, so daß es auf diese Weise zum Zeitpunkt der Ausgabe dieses Trägers möglich ist die Zonen zu bestimmen, zu denen der Benutzer Zugang hat. Dieses Verfahren wird für Benutzer der Installation mit großer Häufigkeit des Wechsels verwendet. Die Modifikation der Zugangsbedingungen für diese Benutzer wird durch Ausgabe eines neuen Trägers und die Speicherung dieser Information auf dem Träger verwirklicht, statt durch eine Umprogrammierung der elektronischen Moduleinheiten.The carrier optionally stores a list of zones for the user is accessible. This list is created at the time when the carrier is output, so that it is in this way at the time of issue of this carrier it is possible to determine the zones to which the user has access. This Procedure is for users of installation with high frequency of change used. The modification of the access conditions for these users is by Output of a new carrier and storage of this information on the carrier realized, rather than by reprogramming the electronic module units.
Die Benutzercodes bleiben während der Ausgabe von neuen Trägem unverändert, und sie werden zur Registrierung der von den Trägem ausgeführten Operationen verwendet. Weil es nicht erforderlich ist, die Benutzercodes zu wechseln, sind auch keine Kombinationen erforderlich die verhindern, daß sich diese Codes wiederholen, wodurch der Speicher verkleinert wird, der zum Speichern dieser Codes erforderlich ist.The user codes remain unchanged during the release of new media, and they are used to register the operations performed by the carriers. Because it is not necessary to change the user codes are not combinations necessary to prevent these codes from repeating, causing the memory which is required to store these codes.
Die Benutzung der Zeit, zu der die Träger ausgegeben werden, als Maßnahme zum Ungültigmachen der früheren Träger bedingt, daß immer dann, wenn ein neuer Träger mit einem zulässigen Zugang an eine Zone ausgegeben wird, sich die Sicherheit ergibt, daß wenn dieser gültig ist, die anderen ungültig gemacht werden. Es existieren keine Probleme der Synchronisation zwischen dem Operationscode, der auf einen neu ausgegebenen Träger gespeichert ist, und den Codes, die in den elektronischen Moduleinheiten gespeichert sind, die den Zugang an diese Zonen kontrollieren, und zwar unabhängig von der Anzahl der vorher ausgegebenen Träger.The use of the time to which the carriers are issued as a measure of Invalidate the previous carrier conditional that whenever a new carrier with If a permissible access to a zone is output, the security results that if it is valid, the others will be invalidated. There are no problems the synchronization between the opcode, which is on a newly issued Carrier is stored, and the codes that are in the electronic module units that control access to these zones, regardless of the number of previously issued carriers.
Claims (5)
- An electronic locking system for access control, which permits control of the access of the user of an installation to certain areas, comprising:a mechanical bearer which can store a user code and an operation code which represents the time at which the bearer is issued and which can selectively store any area codes representing the areas which are accessible with the bearer,an electromechanical locking system which controls access to those zones and has an electronic circuit for producing an electronic signal for unlocking the electromechanical locking system, wherein the electronic circuit has a memory for storing a list of user codes and operation codes associated therewith and a comparison device which is operable to compare the operation code of a bearer to the operation code which is stored for said bearer in the memory of said circuit and to store the operation code of the read bearer as a new operation code for said bearer in the case where the operation code of the bearer is after the operation code for said memory, which is stored in the memory of said circuit;issuing devices for bearers, which are capable of storing information on the bearers of the users, wherein said information is stored on the bearer in a form which is encrypted in accordance with an encryption algorithm and a private key which is different for each installation,programming devices which can transfer information to the electronic circuits of the doors, anda computer which manages the entire installation and sends information to the issuing devices for the bearers of the users and to the programming devices of the module units of the doors.
- An electronic locking system for access control according to the preceding claim characterised in that the electromechanical locking system is formed by the following elements:said electronic circuit which produces an electronic signal for unlocking the electromechanical blocking system,a reading module unit or reading module units which can read the information contained on the bearers of the users, andan electromechanical lock system which is controlled by an electrical signal which can block access to an area.
- An electronic locking system for access control according to the preceding claim characterised in that the electronic circuit of the electromechanical locking system is formed by the following elements:a device for storing data, anda counter which is advanced at regular predetermined intervals of time and a device for comparing data received from the bearers to the data stored in the electronic circuit.
- An electronic locking system for access control according to claim 3 characterised in that the electronic circuit uses the device for storing data for storing the area codes thereof, a list of user codes and their corresponding operation codes.
- An electronic locking system for access control according to claim 3 characterised in that in the electronic circuit the comparison device is used for comparing the code of the user which is contained in a bearer to each of the user codes which are stored in the memory of said circuit and for delivering an electrical signal in the case where the code of the bearer and the operation code which corresponds to said bearer are identical to one of the carrier codes and its operation code which are stored in the memory.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
ES200101832A ES2183739B1 (en) | 2001-08-03 | 2001-08-03 | ELECTRONIC LOCK SYSTEM FOR ACCESS CONTROL. |
ES200101832 | 2001-08-03 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1281827A1 EP1281827A1 (en) | 2003-02-05 |
EP1281827B1 true EP1281827B1 (en) | 2005-08-31 |
Family
ID=8498638
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02017030A Expired - Lifetime EP1281827B1 (en) | 2001-08-03 | 2002-07-27 | Electronic closing system for access control |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6622912B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1281827B1 (en) |
BR (1) | BR0202877A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2396637A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE50204063D1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2183739B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7634930B2 (en) | 2002-01-03 | 2009-12-22 | Strattec Security Corporation | Lock apparatus and method |
WO2007114716A1 (en) * | 2006-04-03 | 2007-10-11 | Resonance Holdings Limited | Methods for determining proximity between radio frequency devices and controlling switches |
US7965171B2 (en) * | 2006-05-04 | 2011-06-21 | Shmuel Hershkovitz | Security system entry control |
US20080028213A1 (en) * | 2006-07-31 | 2008-01-31 | Michael Hall | Apparatus and system for improving computer system security |
ES2323213B1 (en) | 2007-10-03 | 2010-03-16 | Talleres De Escoriaza S.A. | PROGRAMMABLE ELECTRONIC ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM. |
NZ564196A (en) * | 2007-12-10 | 2010-08-27 | Resonance Holdings Ltd | Electronic lock for security system and key on a wireless device including methods of encoding data |
US8706083B2 (en) | 2009-01-07 | 2014-04-22 | Eckey Corporation | Bluetooth authentication system and method |
ES2387715B1 (en) | 2011-03-03 | 2013-06-24 | Ojmar, S.A. | CLOSURE SYSTEM WITH INFRARED COMMUNICATION. |
US11639617B1 (en) | 2019-04-03 | 2023-05-02 | The Chamberlain Group Llc | Access control system and method |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3906447A (en) * | 1973-01-31 | 1975-09-16 | Paul A Crafton | Security system for lock and key protected secured areas |
CA1101513A (en) * | 1976-11-08 | 1981-05-19 | Leonard J. Genest | Security system |
US4519228A (en) * | 1981-04-01 | 1985-05-28 | Trioving A/S | Electronic recodeable lock |
US4837822A (en) * | 1986-04-08 | 1989-06-06 | Schlage Lock Company | Cryptographic based electronic lock system and method of operation |
US4811012A (en) * | 1987-01-28 | 1989-03-07 | Emhart Industries, Inc. | Electronic locking system |
US4868914A (en) * | 1987-12-21 | 1989-09-19 | Unisafe Limited | Method for clearing unlocking key codes in an electronic locking device |
EP0410024B1 (en) * | 1989-07-24 | 1994-09-21 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Electronic locking system |
NO300045B1 (en) * | 1990-12-03 | 1997-03-24 | Trioving As | Time controlled electrically controlled locking system |
US5933086A (en) * | 1991-09-19 | 1999-08-03 | Schlage Lock Company | Remotely-operated self-contained electronic lock security system assembly |
ATE155912T1 (en) * | 1992-01-09 | 1997-08-15 | Supra Prod Inc | SECURE ACCESS SYSTEM WITH RADIO CONNECTION |
US5508691A (en) * | 1992-06-22 | 1996-04-16 | Lynx Systems, Inc. | Self-contained electronic lock with changeable master and slave codes |
US5673034A (en) * | 1993-10-12 | 1997-09-30 | Saliga; Thomas V. | Security system comprising three apparatuses sharing a time-varying code |
CN2217077Y (en) * | 1995-07-21 | 1996-01-10 | 北京亿鑫企业发展总公司 | Electronic puzzle lock |
US5923264A (en) * | 1995-12-22 | 1999-07-13 | Harrow Products, Inc. | Multiple access electronic lock system |
WO2001008107A1 (en) * | 1999-07-22 | 2001-02-01 | Mas-Hamilton Group, Inc. | Computer software for issuing one-time combinations to electronic locks with lock group control |
DE19942788A1 (en) * | 1999-09-08 | 2001-03-15 | Winkhaus Fa August | Locking system and method for operating a locking system |
-
2001
- 2001-08-03 ES ES200101832A patent/ES2183739B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2002
- 2002-07-26 BR BR0202877-8A patent/BR0202877A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-07-27 DE DE50204063T patent/DE50204063D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-07-27 EP EP02017030A patent/EP1281827B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-07-29 US US10/207,561 patent/US6622912B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-07-31 CA CA002396637A patent/CA2396637A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6622912B2 (en) | 2003-09-23 |
ES2183739B1 (en) | 2004-01-01 |
US20030102372A1 (en) | 2003-06-05 |
BR0202877A (en) | 2003-06-03 |
DE50204063D1 (en) | 2005-10-06 |
CA2396637A1 (en) | 2003-02-03 |
ES2183739A1 (en) | 2003-03-16 |
EP1281827A1 (en) | 2003-02-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE3811378C3 (en) | Information recording system | |
DE69320900T3 (en) | IC card with hierarchical file structure | |
EP0842500B1 (en) | Locking device for systems access to which is time-restricted | |
DE3044463C2 (en) | ||
DE3327720A1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPERATING AN ELECTRONIC SAFETY DEVICE | |
DE2949351C2 (en) | Method and device for generating and checking documents and the document used therewith | |
EP1876571A2 (en) | Scaleable method for access control | |
DE2058623A1 (en) | Electronic security system for buildings with several rooms | |
EP0811739B1 (en) | Device and method for checking the user authorization of an access control system,in particular locking device for vehicles | |
DE3018945A1 (en) | DATA TREATMENT DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SECURING THE TRANSMISSION OF DATA | |
EP0410024B1 (en) | Electronic locking system | |
DE3503177A1 (en) | PROGRAMMABLE ELECTRONIC LOCK | |
EP1281827B1 (en) | Electronic closing system for access control | |
DE2851396A1 (en) | Electronic lock for hotel rooms - has coded key card to control electrically activated clutch for bolt | |
EP3009992B1 (en) | Method and device for managing access rights | |
EP0489091B1 (en) | Process for coding and availability of a chip card | |
EP0911466A2 (en) | Wearfree programmable electronic locking device | |
DE3736190A1 (en) | Access control system and method for smart cards | |
AT503783B1 (en) | SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING PERSONS 'AUTHORIZATION TO DO AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES | |
AT400605B (en) | IDENTIFIER FOR A LOCKING SYSTEM | |
DE3514660C2 (en) | ||
DE2635180C3 (en) | Process for the electronically controlled release of door, safe and function locks using electronically coded keys and a circuit arrangement for carrying out the process | |
EP1828993A1 (en) | Access control system with a number of closing devices | |
DE4436605A1 (en) | Method for the safe locking and unlocking of locks with authentication | |
DE2917039A1 (en) | Centralised door locking system esp. for hotel use - with each door lock individually operated via central processor after verification of code |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20030805 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20040728 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50204063 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20051006 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) | ||
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20060601 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20110727 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 50204063 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20180625 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20180713 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20180725 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20190727 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190727 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190727 |