EP1275060A2 - Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data - Google Patents
Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of dataInfo
- Publication number
- EP1275060A2 EP1275060A2 EP00986233A EP00986233A EP1275060A2 EP 1275060 A2 EP1275060 A2 EP 1275060A2 EP 00986233 A EP00986233 A EP 00986233A EP 00986233 A EP00986233 A EP 00986233A EP 1275060 A2 EP1275060 A2 EP 1275060A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- data
- set forth
- categories
- nbsp
- relationship
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
- G06F16/954—Navigation, e.g. using categorised browsing
Definitions
- the present invention relates to browsing data using a data browser and more particularly pertains to facilitating the navigation of application specific data with a data browser using a plurality of links.
- instructional databases have been commonly used to provide users with a plethora of information. Such information may be used to execute various tasks or enable the users to accomplish a goal. Often, such instructional databases may be stored on a centralized server and provide access to a plurality of client computers via a network. In some instances, such network is the Internet in which case the database is accessed via a web site.
- a system, method, and article of manufacture are provided for facilitating the navigation of application specific data on a data page, i.e. web page, during use of a data browser, i.e. Netscape, MS Explorer, etc.
- a data page i.e. web page
- a data browser i.e. Netscape, MS Explorer, etc.
- Included on the data page are a plurality of links each corresponding to data.
- the data may be retrieved upon selection of the corresponding link.
- the links are displayed each as a component of an indicia such as a pointer or chevron to imply a relationship between the data.
- the aforementioned relationship is a progressional relationship and the indicia implies a direction of progressional movement through the data.
- the indicia may take the form of a chevron or any other type of pointer that implies direction.
- each of the components of indicia may also be shaped as a chevron.
- a currently selected link is visually differentiated with respect to the remaining links. This may be accomplished by highlighting a currently selected link. Further, the links may be continuously displayed with the data in order to continuously imply the progressional relationship and a current location among the data.
- Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the present invention
- Figure 2 is an illustration of a Navigation Chevron in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 3 is an illustration of a knowledge database topic page in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 4 is an illustration showing the use of nested Navigation Chevrons in accordance with one embodiment
- Figure 5 is a block diagram of a Discussion Database in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 6 is an illustration of a Discussion Database Interface Page in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- a single entry point is provided for merger/acquisition participants to access related information and deliverables utilizing Intranet technology. Entry may be accomplished using a hardware implementation such as is illustrated in Figure 1. Further, various functional and user interface features of the present invention may be enabled using software programming, i.e. object oriented programming (OOP).
- OOP object oriented programming
- FIG. 1 A representative hardware environment of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is depicted in Figure 1, which illustrates a typical hardware configuration of a workstation having a central processing unit 110, such as a microprocessor, and a number of other units interconnected via a system bus 112.
- a central processing unit 110 such as a microprocessor
- the workstation shown in Figure 1 includes Random Access Memory (RAM) 114, Read Only Memory (ROM) 116, an I/O adapter 118 for connecting peripheral devices such as disk storage units 120 to the bus 112, a user interface adapter 122 for connecting a keyboard 124, a mouse 126, a speaker 128, a microphone 132, and/or other user interface devices such as a touch screen (not shown) to the bus 112, communication adapter 134 for connecting the workstation to a communication network (e.g., a data processing network) and a display adapter 136 for connecting the bus 112 to a display device 138.
- the workstation typically has resident thereon an operating system such as the Microsoft Windows NT or Windows/95 Operating System (OS), the IBM OS/2 operating system, the MAC OS, or UNIX operating system.
- OOP Object oriented programming
- OOP is a process of developing computer software using objects, including the steps of analyzing the problem, designing the system, and constructing the program.
- An object is a software package that contains both data and a collection of related structures and procedures. Since it contains both data and a collection of structures and procedures, it can be visualized as a self-sufficient component that does not require other additional structures, procedures or data to perform its specific task.
- OOP therefore, views a computer program as a collection of largely autonomous components, called objects, each of which is responsible for a specific task. This concept of packaging data, structures, and procedures together in one component or module is called encapsulation.
- OOP components are reusable software modules which present an interface that conforms to an object model and which are accessed at run-time through a component integration architecture.
- a component integration architecture is a set of architecture mechanisms which allow software modules in different process spaces to utilize each other's capabilities or functions. This is generally done by assuming a common component object model on which to build the architecture. It is worthwhile to differentiate between an object and a class of objects at this point.
- An object is a single instance of the class of objects, which is often just called a class.
- a class of objects can be viewed as a blueprint, from which many objects can be formed.
- OOP allows the programmer to create an object that is a part of another object.
- the object representing a piston engine is said to have a composition-relationship with the object representing a piston.
- a piston engine comprises a piston, valves and many other components; the fact that a piston is an element of a piston engine can be logically and semantically represented in OOP by two objects.
- OOP also allows creation of an object that "depends from” another object. If there are two objects, one representing a piston engine and the other representing a piston engine wherein the piston is made of ceramic, then the relationship between the two objects is not that of composition.
- a ceramic piston engine does not make up a piston engine. Rather it is merely one kind of piston engine that has one more limitation than the piston engine; its piston is made of ceramic.
- the object representing the ceramic piston engine is called a derived object, and it inherits all of the aspects of the object representing the piston engine and adds further limitation or detail to it.
- the object representing the ceramic piston engine "depends from" the object representing the piston engine. The relationship between these objects is called inheritance.
- the object or class representing the ceramic piston engine inherits all of the aspects of the objects representing the piston engine, it inherits the thermal characteristics of a standard piston defined in the piston engine class.
- the ceramic piston engine object overrides these ceramic specific thermal characteristics, which are typically different from those associated with a metal piston. It skips over the original and uses new functions related to ceramic pistons.
- Different kinds of piston engines have different characteristics, but may have the same underlying functions associated with them (e.g., how many pistons in the engine, ignition sequences, lubrication, etc.).
- a programmer would call the same functions with the same names, but each type of piston engine may have different/overriding implementations of functions behind the same name. This ability to hide different implementations of a function behind the same name is called polymorphism and it greatly simplifies communication among objects.
- composition-relationship With the concepts of composition-relationship, encapsulation, inheritance and polymo ⁇ hism, an object can represent just about anything in the real world. In fact, the logical perception of the reality is the only limit on determining the kinds of things that can become objects in object- oriented software. Some typical categories are as follows:
- Objects can represent physical objects, such as automobiles in a traffic-flow simulation, electrical components in a circuit-design program, countries in an economics model, or aircraft in an air-traffic-control system.
- Objects can represent elements of the computer-user environment such as windows, menus or graphics objects.
- An object can represent an inventory, such as a personnel file or a table of the latitudes and longitudes of cities.
- An object can represent user-defined data types such as time, angles, and complex numbers, or points on the plane.
- OOP allows the software developer to design and implement a computer program that is a model of some aspects of reality, whether that reality is a physical entity, a process, a system, or a composition of matter. Since the object can represent anything, the software developer can create an object which can be used as a component in a larger software project in the future.
- OOP enables software developers to build objects out of other, previously built objects.
- C++ is an OOP language that offers a fast, machine-executable code.
- C++ is suitable for both commercial-application and systems-programming projects.
- C++ appears to be the most popular choice among many OOP programmers, but there is a host of other OOP languages, such as Smalltalk, Common Lisp Object System (CLOS), and Eiffel. Additionally, OOP capabilities are being added to more traditional popular computer programming languages such as Pascal.
- Class hierarchies and containment hierarchies provide a flexible mechanism for modeling real-world objects and the relationships among them.
- class libraries allow programmers to use and reuse many small pieces of code, each programmer puts those pieces together in a different way.
- Two different programmers can use the same set of class libraries to write two programs that do exactly the same thing but whose internal structure (i.e., design) may be quite different, depending on hundreds of small decisions each programmer makes along the way.
- similar pieces of code end up doing similar things in slightly different ways and do not work as well together as they should.
- Class libraries are very flexible. As programs grow more complex, more programmers are forced to adopt basic solutions to basic problems over and over again.
- a relatively new extension of the class library concept is to have a framework of class libraries. This framework is more complex and consists of significant collections of collaborating classes that capture both the small scale patterns and major mechanisms that implement the common requirements and design in a specific application domain. They were first developed to free application programmers from the chores involved in displaying menus, windows, dialog boxes, and other standard user interface elements for personal computers.
- Frameworks also represent a change in the way programmers think about the interaction between the code they w ⁇ te and code w ⁇ tten by others
- the programmer called hbra ⁇ es provided by the operating system to perform certain tasks, but basically the program executed down the page from start to finish, and the programmer was solely responsible for the flow of control This was approp ⁇ ate for p ⁇ ntmg out paychecks, calculating a mathematical table, or solving other problems with a program that executed in just one way
- Application frameworks reduce the total amount of code that a programmer has to w ⁇ te from scratch
- the framework is really a gene ⁇ c application that displays windows, supports copy and paste, and so on
- the programmer can also relinquish control to a greater degree than event loop programs permit
- the framework code takes care of almost all event handling and flow of control, and the programmer's code is called only when the framework needs it (e g , to create or manipulate a prop ⁇ etary data structure)
- a programmer writing a framework program not only relinquishes control to the user (as is also true for event loop programs), but also relinquishes the detailed flow of control within the program to the framework. This approach allows the creation of more complex systems that work together in interesting ways, as opposed to isolated programs, having custom code, being created over and over again for similar problems.
- a framework basically is a collection of cooperating classes that make up a reusable design solution for a given problem domain. It typically includes objects that provide default behavior (e.g., for menus and windows), and programmers use it by inheriting some of that default behavior and overriding other behavior so that the framework calls application code at the appropriate times.
- default behavior e.g., for menus and windows
- Class libraries are essentially collections of behaviors that you can call when you want those individual behaviors in your program.
- a framework provides not only behavior but also the protocol or set of rules that govern the ways in which behaviors can be combined, including rules for what a programmer is supposed to provide versus what the framework provides.
- • Call versus override With a class library, the code the programmer instantiates objects and calls their member functions. It's possible to instantiate and call objects in the same way with a framework (i.e., to treat the framework as a class library), but to take full advantage of a framework's reusable design, a programmer typically writes code that overrides and is called by the framework.
- the framework manages the flow of control among its objects. Writing a program involves dividing responsibilities among the various pieces of software that are called by the framework rather than specifying how the different pieces should work together. • Implementation versus design. With class libraries, programmers reuse only implementations, whereas with frameworks, they reuse design.
- a framework embodies the way a family of related programs or pieces of software work. It represents a generic design solution that can be adapted to a variety of specific problems in a given domain. For example, a single framework can embody the way a user interface works, even though two different user interfaces created with the same framework might solve quite different interface problems. Thus, through the development of frameworks for solutions to various problems and programming tasks, significant reductions in the design and development effort for software can be achieved.
- a preferred embodiment of the invention utilizes HyperText Markup Language (HTML) to implement documents on the Internet together with a general-pu ⁇ ose secure communication protocol for a transport medium between the client and a company.
- HTTP or other protocols could be readily substituted for HTML without undue experimentation.
- Information on these products is available in T. Berners-Lee, D. Connoly, "RFC 1866: Hypertext Markup Language - 2.0" (Nov. 1995); and R. Fielding, H, Frystyk, T. Berners-Lee, J. Gettys and J.C. Mogul, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1 : HTTP Working Group Internet Draft"
- HTML is a simple data format used to create hypertext documents that are portable from one platform to another.
- HTML documents are SGML documents with generic semantics that are appropriate for representing information from a wide range of domains. HTML has been in use by the World-Wide Web global information initiative since 1990. HTML is an application of ISO Standard 8879; 1986 Information Processing Text and Office
- HTML has been the dominant technology used in development of Web-based solutions.
- HTML has proven to be inadequate in the following areas:
- Custom "widgets” e.g., real-time stock tickers, animated icons, etc.
- client-side performance is improved
- Java supports the notion of client-side validation, offloading approp ⁇ ate processing onto the client for improved performance
- Dynamic, real-time Web pages can be created Using the above-mentioned custom UI components, dynamic Web pages can also be created
- Sun's Java language has emerged as an industry-recognized language for "programming the Internet " Sun defines Java as "a simple, object-o ⁇ ented, dist ⁇ ubbed, inte ⁇ reted, robust, secure, architecture-neutral, portable, high-performance, multithreaded, dynamic, buzzword-compliant, general-pu ⁇ ose programming language Java supports programming for the Internet in the form of platform-independent Java applets " Java applets are small, specialized applications that comply with Sun's Java Application Programming Interface (API) allowing developers to add "interactive content” to Web documents (e g , simple animations, page adornments, basic games, etc ) Applets execute within a Java-compatible browser (e g , Netscape Navigator) by copying code from the server to client From a language standpoint, Java's core feature set is based on C++ Sun's Java literature states that Java is basically, "C++ with extensions from Objective C for more dynamic method resolution "
- ActiveX includes tools for developing animation, 3-D virtual reality, video and other multimedia content
- the tools use Internet standards, work on multiple platforms, and are being supported by over 100 companies
- the group's building blocks are called ActiveX Controls, which are fast components that enable developers to embed parts of software in hypertext markup language (HTML) pages
- ActiveX Controls work with a va ⁇ ety of programming languages including Microsoft Visual C++,
- Borland Delphi Microsoft Visual Basic programming system and, in the future, Microsoft's development tool for Java, code named “Jakarta " ActiveX Technologies also includes ActiveX Server Framework, allowing developers to create server applications
- ActiveX could be substituted for JAVA without undue expe ⁇ mentation to practice the invention
- the Merger and Acquisition Engine provides knowledge management and delivery capabilities to facilitate the learning and execution of merger-related work In one embodiment, this is accomplished by sto ⁇ ng the M&A Engine on a centralized server which may be accessed over a network, 1 e the Internet, via a web site using a hardware implementation set forth hereinabove and shown in Figure 1
- the M&A Engine facilitates user work, manages and delivers reusable knowledge, improves the ability to manage change resulting from mergers and acquisitions, and expedites the learning process for new merger resources
- the M&A Engine streamlines communication between merger participants, and assists in the consolidation of projects
- M&A Engine can also be used as a marketing tool
- the M&A Engine promotes standardization of processes that are applicable to individual areas such as status reporting, business case development, and budget and benefits momto ⁇ ng
- productivity is improved du ⁇ ng the transition by increased communication Merger/acquisition participants are given a common entry point to effectively access information and deliverables, leverage existing knowledge, cont ⁇ bute knowledge, conduct informal conversations, document meeting outcomes and issues, etc
- the M&A Engine improves documentation and outcomes by providing users access to the entire history of an on-line discussion This functionality improves the understanding of issues and/or topics, e g conversion schedule, DARTs, etc , as well as what decisions or progress has been made towards a resolution
- the M&A Engine improves issue resolution du ⁇ ng the transition by utilizing discussion databases to submit and/or answer issues, questions, topics, etc This gives key stakeholders an improved understanding of the most current status of key deliverables
- the M&A Engine supports standardization of consolidation activities and deliverables. Users are consistently guided through the steps to complete merger/acquisition activities, and are provided samples and templates to facilitate the completion of deliverables associated with those activities.
- the M&A Engine also develops and retains institutional knowledge related to consolidation, thus reducing costs related to training and use of outside consultants.
- the M&A Engine also supports the evolution of process-driven methods for the transition by utilizing the Intranet as its delivery vehicle. Through the M&A Engine, users are able to "drill- down" from a merger activity to specific task packages and deliverables. This capability improves the understanding throughout the organization of the complete range of activities that are involved with the consolidation of two or more organizations.
- the M&A Engine includes a plurality of features for accomplishing the foregoing goals.
- the present invention includes Navigation Chevron, a Discussion Database, a Discussion Database Interface Page, a 30/60/90 Plan, and a Merger Site Map.
- the Navigation Chevron is used to navigate the user through the M&A Engine environment.
- the Discussion Database is used to discuss concepts and serve as an audit trial of topics.
- Discussion Database Interface Page describes the various discussion groups available to the user, and subscribes the user to individual discussion groups when selected.
- the 30/60/90 Plan is used to account for all actions taken during the first 90 days of consolidation.
- the Merger Site Map tracks activities and duration of these activities throughout the consolidation.
- the Navigation Chevron of the present invention is a form of hypertext that facilitates the navigation of data during use of the M&A Engine.
- Hypertext systems are a class of complex information management systems. These systems allow people to create, annotate, link together, and share information from a variety of media such as text, graphics, audio, video, animation, and programs. They also provide flexible access to information by inco ⁇ orating the notions of navigation, annotation, and tailored presentation.
- Hypertext is defined as an approach to information management m which data is stored in a network of nodes connected by links Nodes can contain text, graphics, audio, video as well as source code or other forms of data Hypertext with multimedia is called "hypermedia"
- hypermedia The utility of hypermedia lies in its ability to produce large, complex, ⁇ chly connected, and cross- referenced bodies of information
- hypertext is a hyb ⁇ d that spans across traditional bounda ⁇ es It is a database method providing a novel way of directly accessing and managing data It is also a representation scheme, a kind of semantic network, which mixes informal textual mate ⁇ al with more formal and mechanized processes It is an interface modality that features link icons or markers that can be arbitra ⁇ ly embedded with the contents and can be used for navigational pu ⁇ oses
- a hypertext system is a database system which provides a totally different and unique method of accessing information Whereas traditional databases have some structure around them, a hypertext database has no regular structure The user is free to explore and assimilate information in different ways
- a hypertext system is made of nodes, or concepts, and links, or relationships
- a node usually represents a single concept or idea It can contain text, graphics, animation, audio, video, images or programs It can be typed and can include detail, proposition, collection, summary, observation, and issue, thereby carrying semantic information
- Nodes are connected to other nodes by links
- the node from which a link o ⁇ ginates is called the reference and the node at which a link ends is called the referent They are also refe ⁇ ed to as anchors
- the contents of a node are displayed by activating links
- Links connect related concepts or nodes They can be bidirectional thus facilitating backward traversals Links can also be typed, l e specification link, elaboration link, membership link, opposition link and others, specifying the nature of relationship Links can be either referential for cross-referencing pu ⁇ oses or hierarchical for showing parent-child relationships Activation of a link marker displays a node
- Hypertext parallels human cognition and facilitates exploration People think in nonlinear chunks which they try to associate with each other, thus building a network of concepts
- a person reads a book they go back and forth a number of times to refer to previously read material, to make notes, and to jump to topics using the table of contents or the index.
- they set out to write a document they first develop an outline of ideas. Then, a person brainstorms, writes down on paper, organizes, revises, reorganizes and repeats the cycle until they are satisfied with the outcome — a coherent document.
- people have been forced to adapt to traditional, linear text because of representation on paper.
- Reading and writing models have been developed by cognitive psychologists that can be used to understand non-linear thinking by human beings.
- a mental representation of the meaning of text is then constructed which is in the form of propositions or relationships. While reading text, readers establish local coherence in short-term memory — small scale inferences from few small units of information, i.e. relationships between words, sentences and so on. The reader makes preliminary hypotheses based on titles, words, propositions, and knowledge about the real world. A reading control system retrieves knowledge from the real world, present in long-term memory, in order to filter out information present in short-term memory. These hypotheses are refined as the reading of the text proceeds, with the reading control system being invoked continuously. These propositions are combined into larger structures, also called global This hypothesized macroproposition or superstructure is used to understand the overall content of the text. The construction of a coherent mental representation has important consequences for navigation In addition to generating forward references, we accumulate cues for backward navigation
- the reading control system uses the spreading activation model to access propositions or concepts In semantic memory, each concept is connected to a number of other concepts
- activating one concept activates its adjacent concepts which in turn activate their adjacent concepts
- activation spreads through the memory structure, determining what is to be added and what is to be removed from the inte ⁇ retation of text This process continues until further activation of adjacent propositions does not change the propositions used to inte ⁇ ret the text That is, spreading activation decreases over time and semantic distance
- Wntmg is constrained by goal and audience
- the author is guided by a goal but constrained by what the audience is prepared to accept Different people approach wntmg in different ways Some are good at making an outline first and then brainstorming Some do the opposite An expert author would always keep the reading model in mind so that the wnting clearly reaches the target audience
- Wntmg involves the following three phases explo ⁇ ng, organizing, and encoding In the Cognitive Framework for W ⁇ tten Communication, Smith et al call these three phases prewntmg, organizing, and wnting
- Explo ⁇ ng or pre- wntmg is the process of brainstorming and taking unstructured notes
- the w ⁇ ter ret ⁇ eves potential content from long-term memory or external sources, considers possible relations among ideas, groups related ideas and constructs small hierarchical structures
- the product of exploration is a network or directed graph of ideas
- Organizing is the process of putting these notes or ideas in order, in the form of an outline or a hierarchy
- This process involves abstract construction that involves perceiving subordinate/superordinate relations, compa ⁇ ng abstractions, sequencing, proportion, and balance
- the product of organization is a hierarchy of related concepts
- Encoding or wnting is the final phase of completing the document
- the pnmary task is translating the abstractions of content and the relations of a hierarchical structure into a sequence of words, sentences, paragraphs, sections, chapters, and illustrations
- the structure of the encoded text is linear and represents a path through the hierarchy Reading employs processes in the reverse order. That is, a linear sequence of words is transformed into a hierarchy which is later integrated into a network in long-term memory.
- the writing model can be extended by considering unstructured and structured representation at each phase. Whereas an unstructured item is isolated, a structured item shows coherence.
- Exploring can be split into unstructured brainstorming followed by structured note-taking.
- Encoding can be classified as unstructured argumentation where relationships are established between ideas and structured organization of notes where notes are grouped together to make coherent sense.
- Encoding has an unstructured phase of linear planning which involves viewing groups of notes as sequences and a structured phase of drafting and revising in order to produce a final document which is a linear sequence of notes.
- FIG. 200 is an illustration of the Navigation Chevron 200.
- the Navigation Chevron 200 is generally shaped as an indicia similar to a pointer, and may be arranged in any orientation, such as horizontally, diagonally, or vertically.
- the Navigation Chevron 200 is made up of components, or discrete phase chevrons 202, which are generally shaped similar to the Navigation Chevron 200. Displayed on each discrete phase chevron 202 is an indication of the topic relating to that particular discrete phase chevron 202. The indication may be a color, or some other identifying mark. A preferred indication is the title or general description of the topic area related to the particular discrete phase chevron 202. The description allows the user to easily determine which discrete phase chevron 202 relates to the particular topic needed to complete a particular task.
- the Navigation Chevron 200 is used to navigate a database of knowledge utilizing a progression of ideas or phases.
- Each idea or phase of the knowledge database is represented by a discrete phase chevron 202 in the Navigation Chevron 200.
- the discrete phase chevrons 202 are organized in a logical progression of the topics covered by the Navigation Chevron's 200 related knowledge database.
- the topic pages in the related knowledge database generally include a Navigation Chevron 200 as part of their display.
- the Navigation Chevron 200 may be located anywhere on the display, preferably away from the data provided by the knowledge database, such as at the top or to the side of the display.
- the Navigation Chevron 200 may be of any size.
- a preferred embodiment uses an initially large Navigation Chevron 200. However, with each subsequent progression, the Navigation Chevron 200 becomes smaller in size. Note Figure 4.
- Figure 3 is an illustration of a knowledge database topic page 300.
- the knowledge database topic page 300 includes a Navigation Chevron 200 having discrete phase chevrons 202.
- the discrete phase chevron 202 that is related to the current knowledge database topic page 300 is highlighted.
- the user picks a discrete phase chevron 202 utilizing a computer input device, such as the mouse 126.
- a discrete phase chevron 202 is chosen, the related knowledge database topic page 300 is displayed along with a Navigation Chevron 200 including a highlighted discrete phase chevron 202 related to the current knowledge database topic page 300.
- the Navigation Chevron 200 thus allows the user to navigate an extensive knowledge database in an easy and intuitive manner.
- the user is able to explore the knowledge database in the order presented on the Navigation Chevron 200, or in an order more pertinent to the task at hand.
- the topic to explore in the Navigation Chevron 200 the user can go directly to the topic needed for a particular task.
- the Navigation Chevron 200 allows the user to visualize the knowledge database as a whole, and determine how the cu ⁇ ent knowledge database topic page 300 relates to other topics in the knowledge database.
- the Navigation Chevron 200 indicates a relationship, i.e. progression or sequence, that is inherently not present in conventional hypertext systems.
- Navigation Chevrons 200 may be nested, allowing a more detailed navigation through a knowledge database.
- Figure 4 is an illustration showing the use of nested Navigation Chevrons 200, 402, and 406. In this embodiment, a large Navigation Chevron 200 is used to allow access to broad topic areas covered by discrete phase chevrons 202.
- Each topic covered by a discrete phase chevron 202 has a further Navigation Chevron 402 related to the particular broad topic covered by the discrete phase chevron 202.
- the Navigation Chevron 402 includes further discrete phase chevrons 404 which relate to more detailed information associated with the broad topic of the discrete phase chevron 202.
- the nesting of Navigation Chevrons 200 may continue, including further nested Navigation Chevrons 406, as much as needed to allow easier navigation of a large knowledge databases. As discussed above, the nested Navigation Chevrons 200 allow the user to visualize the knowledge database as a whole, and determine how a knowledge database topic page 300 relates to the knowledge database as a whole.
- Navigation Chevrons 200 may be employed to navigate data within any type of database including, but not limited to the M&A Engine. Below is an html code segment for displaying and using a Navigation Chevron 200:
- BBS's refer to computer systems equipped with one or more modems or other means of network access that serves as an information and message-passing center for remote users Often BBS's are focused on special interests, such as science fiction, movies,
- a BBS acts as a storage facility, where people calling from their computers can post or receive messages and send or receive program files
- a BBS is usually subdivided by topics so that users with similar interests can send information to other users of similar interests
- These related groups of messages are refe ⁇ ed to as topics, message areas, forum(s), or conferences, l e a particular BBS may contain numerous related groups of messages such as on the subjects of travel, sports, stamp collecting, etc
- BBS's are distinguishable from electronic mail in that BBS's are used for posting messages of a particular group of computer users who have similar interests, but these posted messages are not ordina ⁇ ly addressed to any particular user BBS's are also used by some computer users who wish just to read posted messages and other information, without having to post a reply message
- BBS's are also used by some computer users who wish just to read posted messages and other information, without having to post a reply message
- a person in Columbus, Ohio who is prepa ⁇ ng for a vacation, may access a BBS on travel through his home computer and post a message asking for the best places to go skiing in the United States
- Other network users with an interest m travel may read the message from the person from Columbus, and then reply with their opinion about where the best place is for skiing
- BBS's available to computer network users on a wide va ⁇ ety of subject areas
- the Discussion Database in some limited respects, is similar to a BBS in that it is a repository of knowledge on va ⁇ ous topics compiled from the input of vanous users of the Discussion Database
- Figure 5 is a block diagram of a Discussion Database 500 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- a Discussion Database 500 includes a broad topic field 502 having Discussion Groups 504 relating to specific subject areas of the broad topic 502.
- the Discussion Groups 504 include User Posts 506 which are documents contributed by users of the Discussion Database 500.
- the User Posts 506 are contributed by users of the particular broad topic field 502, and most preferably, the User Posts 506 are contributed by users of the particular discussion group in which the User Post 506 is located.
- many broad topic fields 502 are used to create the Discussion Database 500 to increase ease of navigation.
- the more broad topic fields 502 that are used to create the Discussion Database 500 the easier it is for a user to find the particular Discussion Group 502 related to the information they need.
- a broad topic field 502 may itself be a Discussion Group 504, and thus contain User Posts 506.
- Groups 504 are further refinements of the broad topic field 502 to which they relate. Users search through a list of Discussion Groups 504 within the broad topic field 502 to determine which Discussion Group 504 most closely relates to the information they need. Once a Discussion Group 504 is found relating to the information needed, the user searches through a list of User Posts 506 located in the chosen Discussion Group 504.
- users may contribute their own documents to the Discussion Group 504, thereby increasing the knowledge base available in the Discussion Database 500.
- users select the document they want to contribute and inform the system utilizing the
- Discussion Database Interface Page discussed below.
- the system then adds the document to the list of available documents contained in the Discussion Group 504 and makes the corresponding document available to other users of the Discussion Database 500.
- the Discussion Database 500 is a dynamic continuously growing entity. The more the
- Discussion Database 500 is used, the more it grows.
- the Discussion Database 500 as a whole increases as users continue to contribute documents relating to the various Discussion Groups 504.
- Joe decides he needs information about transition management projects on mergers of Nuclear Reactor companies. Joe first searches a list of broad topic fields 502 and determines that the Transition Management topic is the best topic to search in more
- the Discussion Database Interface Page describes the various Discussion Groups which are available to the user of the M&A Engine of the present invention.
- Interface Page also subscribes the user to the individual Discussion Groups 504 used most often by the user.
- FIG 6 is an illustration of a Discussion Database Interface Page 600.
- the Discussion Database Interface Page 600 includes a Discussion Group List 602 having a list of broad topic fields 502 and Discussion Groups 504. As discussed above, a broad topic field 502 may itself be a Discussion Group 504.
- Each Discussion Group 504 has a Description 604 associated with it.
- Each Description 604 includes a string of descriptive data, or summary, of what type of information is contained in the related Discussion Group 504.
- the Description 604 is preferably kept short to decrease the overall size of the Discussion Group List 602. However, the Description 604 may be as long as needed to adequately inform users as to the contents of a particular Discussion Group 504.
- a user may effectively select the categories on the Discussion Database Interface Page 600 which are most relevant.
- the aforementioned string of descriptive data may constitute a link to the data.
- a user may subscribe and access the categories of data by executing only one user action, namely clicking on the appropriate Discussion Groups 504 on the Discussion Database Interface Page 600.
- the Discussion Database Interface Page 600 is utilized by the user to subscribe to and access individual Discussion Groups 504.
- the user selects the appropriate Discussion Group 504 from the Discussion Group List 602.
- the corresponding Discussion Group 504 is then added to the Discussion Groups 504 the user can utilize.
- the user can more quickly obtain needed information. Since the number of Discussion Groups 504 subscribed to by a particular user is generally much less than the total number of Discussion Groups 504 available, the user does not need to search through a large list of Discussion Groups 504 every time he or she needs information. Instead, the user selects only those Discussion Groups 504 that he or she will need most often. Thereafter, when the user desires information, he or she will generally only need to search through the Discussion Groups 504 the user has subscribed to. Thus, the search time is drastically reduced after the first use of the system.
- the use of the Discussion Database 500 in combination with the Discussion Database Interface Page 600 creates a wealth of information useful for the entire organization utilizing the system.
- the Discussion Database 500 contains not only information provided by the organization that sets up the Discussion Database 500, but also information provided by users of the system.
- the Discussion Database coupled with the Discussion Database Interface Page 600 creates a "living library" which grows with each use, and grows with the knowledge of its users. As users acquire more knowledge from experience and other outside sources, they transfer that knowledge to the Discussion Database 500 utilizing the Discussion Database Interface Page 600.
- the transfer of knowledge to the Discussion Database 500 increases the knowledge contained in the Discussion Database 500, and helps keep the information contained in the Discussion Database 500 updated as new developments arise in various fields.
- Discussion Database Interface Page 600 may be employed to provide effective access to any type of database including, but not limited to, the database associated with the M&A Engine.
- a code segment for creating a Discussion Database Interface is a code segment for creating a Discussion Database Interface
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP08162531A EP1986111A1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for effectively collecting and disseminating information |
EP08162533A EP1986112A1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for providing a summary of data |
EP08153773A EP1939769A3 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data |
Applications Claiming Priority (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US449421 | 1982-12-13 | ||
US447941 | 1989-12-08 | ||
US09/448,624 US6671693B1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 1999-11-23 | System for effectively collecting and disseminating data |
US09/449,421 US6571235B1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 1999-11-23 | System for providing an interface for accessing data in a discussion database |
US448624 | 1999-11-23 | ||
US09/447,941 US6671692B1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 1999-11-23 | System for facilitating the navigation of data |
PCT/US2000/032248 WO2001039047A2 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08153773A Division EP1939769A3 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1275060A2 true EP1275060A2 (en) | 2003-01-15 |
Family
ID=27412342
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08162533A Withdrawn EP1986112A1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for providing a summary of data |
EP08153773A Withdrawn EP1939769A3 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data |
EP00986233A Withdrawn EP1275060A2 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data |
EP08162531A Withdrawn EP1986111A1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for effectively collecting and disseminating information |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08162533A Withdrawn EP1986112A1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for providing a summary of data |
EP08153773A Withdrawn EP1939769A3 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08162531A Withdrawn EP1986111A1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2000-11-22 | Method for effectively collecting and disseminating information |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (4) | EP1986112A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2251101A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001039047A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1986111A1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2008-10-29 | Accenture LLP | Method for effectively collecting and disseminating information |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11568339B2 (en) | 2020-08-18 | 2023-01-31 | Asana, Inc. | Systems and methods to characterize units of work based on business objectives |
US11803814B1 (en) * | 2021-05-07 | 2023-10-31 | Asana, Inc. | Systems and methods to facilitate nesting of portfolios within a collaboration environment |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE19841060A1 (en) | 1998-09-09 | 2000-03-16 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Rotation unit for a keyboard cover of a portable telephone and such a telephone |
AU2251101A (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2001-06-04 | Andersen Consulting Llp | Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data |
-
2000
- 2000-11-22 AU AU22511/01A patent/AU2251101A/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-11-22 WO PCT/US2000/032248 patent/WO2001039047A2/en active Application Filing
- 2000-11-22 EP EP08162533A patent/EP1986112A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2000-11-22 EP EP08153773A patent/EP1939769A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2000-11-22 EP EP00986233A patent/EP1275060A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2000-11-22 EP EP08162531A patent/EP1986111A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO0139047A2 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1986111A1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2008-10-29 | Accenture LLP | Method for effectively collecting and disseminating information |
EP1986112A1 (en) | 1999-11-23 | 2008-10-29 | Accenture LLP | Method for providing a summary of data |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2001039047A9 (en) | 2002-05-30 |
EP1939769A2 (en) | 2008-07-02 |
EP1939769A3 (en) | 2008-09-24 |
EP1986111A1 (en) | 2008-10-29 |
WO2001039047A3 (en) | 2008-01-17 |
EP1986112A1 (en) | 2008-10-29 |
WO2001039047A2 (en) | 2001-05-31 |
AU2251101A (en) | 2001-06-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6571235B1 (en) | System for providing an interface for accessing data in a discussion database | |
US6671693B1 (en) | System for effectively collecting and disseminating data | |
US6671692B1 (en) | System for facilitating the navigation of data | |
US6581039B2 (en) | Report searching in a merger and acquisition environment | |
Fox et al. | Theoretical foundations for digital libraries: The 5S (societies, scenarios, spaces, structures, streams) approach | |
US9123011B2 (en) | System, method, and article of manufacture for a merger and acquisition knowledgebase | |
Goguen | Social and semiotic analyses for theorem prover user interface design 1 | |
Milam Jr et al. | Concept Maps for Web-Based Applications. ERIC Technical Report. | |
Völkel | Personal knowledge models with semantic technologies | |
Shum | A cognitive analysis of design rationale representation | |
Zhu | 5SGraph: A modeling tool for digital libraries | |
Ketamo | xTask-adaptable working environment | |
KR100261265B1 (en) | Apparatus for making a web document and method of operating it | |
Weber et al. | Live documents with contextual, data-driven information components | |
EP1986111A1 (en) | Method for effectively collecting and disseminating information | |
Wang et al. | Hypermedia-based support for cooperative learning of process knowledge | |
Covi et al. | Such easy-to-use systems! How organizations shape the design and use of online help systems | |
WO2001039083A1 (en) | Reporting and tracking in a merger and acquisition environment | |
EP1236152A2 (en) | Decision management in a merger and acquisition environment | |
Barricelli | An architecture for End-User Development supporting global communities | |
Stahl | Supporting Personalizable Learning; CU | |
Tweed | An information system to support environmental decision making and debate | |
Lin et al. | Lead-in Study 1: The Macro-structure of Contemporary ERAs | |
Hendrikx et al. | Hypermedia for open and flexible learning | |
WO2002084532A1 (en) | System, method, and computer program product for accessing and customizing personal portals |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20020624 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: FARNER, LAURA, L. Inventor name: KIENE, BRUCE, P. Inventor name: CHESTNUT, GREGORY, P. Inventor name: RININGER, CHRISTOPHER, A. Inventor name: BACKES, KAREN, L. Inventor name: ADLER, SCOTT R. Inventor name: DUROCHER, JOHN, F. Inventor name: CHRISTENSEN, ALAN, R. Inventor name: COYLE, DAVID, W. Inventor name: GOUZIE, SUZANNE M. Inventor name: MARPE, JAMES, M. |
|
R17D | Deferred search report published (corrected) |
Effective date: 20080117 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20080314 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ACCENTURE LLP |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN |
|
18W | Application withdrawn |
Effective date: 20090618 |