EP1275060A2 - Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data - Google Patents

Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data

Info

Publication number
EP1275060A2
EP1275060A2 EP00986233A EP00986233A EP1275060A2 EP 1275060 A2 EP1275060 A2 EP 1275060A2 EP 00986233 A EP00986233 A EP 00986233A EP 00986233 A EP00986233 A EP 00986233A EP 1275060 A2 EP1275060 A2 EP 1275060A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
data
set forth
categories
lt
gt
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00986233A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Scott R. Adler
Karen L. Backes
Gregory P. Chestnut
Alan R. Christensen
David W. Coyle
John F. Durocher
Laura L. Farner
Suzanne M. Gouzie
Bruce P. Kiene
James M. Marpe
Christopher A. Rininger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Accenture LLP
Original Assignee
Accenture LLP
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US449421 priority Critical
Priority to US09/447,941 priority patent/US6671692B1/en
Priority to US447941 priority
Priority to US09/449,421 priority patent/US6571235B1/en
Priority to US09/448,624 priority patent/US6671693B1/en
Priority to US448624 priority
Application filed by Accenture LLP filed Critical Accenture LLP
Priority to PCT/US2000/032248 priority patent/WO2001039047A2/en
Publication of EP1275060A2 publication Critical patent/EP1275060A2/en
Application status is Withdrawn legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/954Navigation, e.g. using categorised browsing

Abstract

A system, method, and article of manufacture are provided for facilitating the navigation of application specific data on a data page, i.e. web page, during use of a data browser, i.e. Netscape, MS Explorer, etc. Included on the data page are a plurality of links each corresponding to data. In use, the data may be retrieved upon selection of the corresponding link. To facilitate the navigation of the data, the links are displayed each as a component of an indicia such as a pointer or chevron to imply a relationship between the data.

Description

METHOD FOR NAVIGATION, INTERFACE, COLLECTION AND

DISSEMINATION OF DATA

Field of Invention

The present invention relates to browsing data using a data browser and more particularly pertains to facilitating the navigation of application specific data with a data browser using a plurality of links.

Background of the Invention

In the past, instructional databases have been commonly used to provide users with a plethora of information. Such information may be used to execute various tasks or enable the users to accomplish a goal. Often, such instructional databases may be stored on a centralized server and provide access to a plurality of client computers via a network. In some instances, such network is the Internet in which case the database is accessed via a web site.

Such prior art instructional databases, however, often utilize a conventional hypertext system which makes it particularly difficult to navigate the information in a progression that the original designers intended without sacrificing the ability of the user to freely navigate the information.

Further, none of such prior art instructional databases allow an effective exchange of ideas in order to achieve a goal at hand.

Still yet another feature that the prior art instructional databases lack is the ability to track a progression of an effort to achieve an intended goal. Finally, the prior art instructional databases have never been used to facilitate a merger and acquisition situation. Summary of Invention

A system, method, and article of manufacture are provided for facilitating the navigation of application specific data on a data page, i.e. web page, during use of a data browser, i.e. Netscape, MS Explorer, etc. Included on the data page are a plurality of links each corresponding to data. In use, the data may be retrieved upon selection of the corresponding link. To facilitate the navigation of the data, the links are displayed each as a component of an indicia such as a pointer or chevron to imply a relationship between the data.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the aforementioned relationship is a progressional relationship and the indicia implies a direction of progressional movement through the data. In order to imply direction, the indicia may take the form of a chevron or any other type of pointer that implies direction. As an option, each of the components of indicia may also be shaped as a chevron.

In yet another embodiment of the present invention, a currently selected link is visually differentiated with respect to the remaining links. This may be accomplished by highlighting a currently selected link. Further, the links may be continuously displayed with the data in order to continuously imply the progressional relationship and a current location among the data.

Description of Drawings

The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages are better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:

Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the present invention;

Figure 2 is an illustration of a Navigation Chevron in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

Figure 3 is an illustration of a knowledge database topic page in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

Figure 4 is an illustration showing the use of nested Navigation Chevrons in accordance with one embodiment;

Figure 5 is a block diagram of a Discussion Database in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention; and

Figure 6 is an illustration of a Discussion Database Interface Page in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed Description

In accordance with at least one embodiment of the present invention, a single entry point is provided for merger/acquisition participants to access related information and deliverables utilizing Intranet technology. Entry may be accomplished using a hardware implementation such as is illustrated in Figure 1. Further, various functional and user interface features of the present invention may be enabled using software programming, i.e. object oriented programming (OOP).

Hardware Overview

A representative hardware environment of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is depicted in Figure 1, which illustrates a typical hardware configuration of a workstation having a central processing unit 110, such as a microprocessor, and a number of other units interconnected via a system bus 112. The workstation shown in Figure 1 includes Random Access Memory (RAM) 114, Read Only Memory (ROM) 116, an I/O adapter 118 for connecting peripheral devices such as disk storage units 120 to the bus 112, a user interface adapter 122 for connecting a keyboard 124, a mouse 126, a speaker 128, a microphone 132, and/or other user interface devices such as a touch screen (not shown) to the bus 112, communication adapter 134 for connecting the workstation to a communication network (e.g., a data processing network) and a display adapter 136 for connecting the bus 112 to a display device 138. The workstation typically has resident thereon an operating system such as the Microsoft Windows NT or Windows/95 Operating System (OS), the IBM OS/2 operating system, the MAC OS, or UNIX operating system.

Software Overview

Object oriented programming (OOP) has become increasingly used to develop complex applications. As OOP moves toward the mainstream of software design and development, various software solutions require adaptation to make use of the benefits of OOP. A need exists for the principles of OOP to be applied to a messaging interface of an electronic messaging system such that a set of OOP classes and objects for the messaging interface can be provided. OOP is a process of developing computer software using objects, including the steps of analyzing the problem, designing the system, and constructing the program. An object is a software package that contains both data and a collection of related structures and procedures. Since it contains both data and a collection of structures and procedures, it can be visualized as a self-sufficient component that does not require other additional structures, procedures or data to perform its specific task. OOP, therefore, views a computer program as a collection of largely autonomous components, called objects, each of which is responsible for a specific task. This concept of packaging data, structures, and procedures together in one component or module is called encapsulation.

In general, OOP components are reusable software modules which present an interface that conforms to an object model and which are accessed at run-time through a component integration architecture. A component integration architecture is a set of architecture mechanisms which allow software modules in different process spaces to utilize each other's capabilities or functions. This is generally done by assuming a common component object model on which to build the architecture. It is worthwhile to differentiate between an object and a class of objects at this point. An object is a single instance of the class of objects, which is often just called a class. A class of objects can be viewed as a blueprint, from which many objects can be formed.

OOP allows the programmer to create an object that is a part of another object. For example, the object representing a piston engine is said to have a composition-relationship with the object representing a piston. In reality, a piston engine comprises a piston, valves and many other components; the fact that a piston is an element of a piston engine can be logically and semantically represented in OOP by two objects.

OOP also allows creation of an object that "depends from" another object. If there are two objects, one representing a piston engine and the other representing a piston engine wherein the piston is made of ceramic, then the relationship between the two objects is not that of composition. A ceramic piston engine does not make up a piston engine. Rather it is merely one kind of piston engine that has one more limitation than the piston engine; its piston is made of ceramic. In this case, the object representing the ceramic piston engine is called a derived object, and it inherits all of the aspects of the object representing the piston engine and adds further limitation or detail to it. The object representing the ceramic piston engine "depends from" the object representing the piston engine. The relationship between these objects is called inheritance.

When the object or class representing the ceramic piston engine inherits all of the aspects of the objects representing the piston engine, it inherits the thermal characteristics of a standard piston defined in the piston engine class. However, the ceramic piston engine object overrides these ceramic specific thermal characteristics, which are typically different from those associated with a metal piston. It skips over the original and uses new functions related to ceramic pistons. Different kinds of piston engines have different characteristics, but may have the same underlying functions associated with them (e.g., how many pistons in the engine, ignition sequences, lubrication, etc.). To access each of these functions in any piston engine object, a programmer would call the same functions with the same names, but each type of piston engine may have different/overriding implementations of functions behind the same name. This ability to hide different implementations of a function behind the same name is called polymorphism and it greatly simplifies communication among objects.

With the concepts of composition-relationship, encapsulation, inheritance and polymoφhism, an object can represent just about anything in the real world. In fact, the logical perception of the reality is the only limit on determining the kinds of things that can become objects in object- oriented software. Some typical categories are as follows:

• Objects can represent physical objects, such as automobiles in a traffic-flow simulation, electrical components in a circuit-design program, countries in an economics model, or aircraft in an air-traffic-control system.

• Objects can represent elements of the computer-user environment such as windows, menus or graphics objects.

• An object can represent an inventory, such as a personnel file or a table of the latitudes and longitudes of cities.

• An object can represent user-defined data types such as time, angles, and complex numbers, or points on the plane.

With this enormous capability of an object to represent just about any logically separable matters, OOP allows the software developer to design and implement a computer program that is a model of some aspects of reality, whether that reality is a physical entity, a process, a system, or a composition of matter. Since the object can represent anything, the software developer can create an object which can be used as a component in a larger software project in the future.

If 90% of a new OOP software program consists of proven, existing components made from preexisting reusable objects, then only the remaining 10% of the new software project has to be written and tested from scratch. Since 90% already came from an inventory of extensively tested reusable objects, the potential domain from which an error could originate is 10% of the program. As a result, OOP enables software developers to build objects out of other, previously built objects.

This process closely resembles complex machinery being built out of assemblies and sub- assemblies. OOP technology, therefore, makes software engineering more like hardware engineering in that software is built from existing components, which are available to the developer as objects. All this adds up to an improved quality of the software as well as an increase in the speed of its development.

Programming languages are beginning to fully support the OOP principles, such as encapsulation, inheritance, polymoφhism, and composition-relationship. With the advent of the C++ language, many commercial software developers have embraced OOP. C++ is an OOP language that offers a fast, machine-executable code. Furthermore, C++ is suitable for both commercial-application and systems-programming projects. For now, C++ appears to be the most popular choice among many OOP programmers, but there is a host of other OOP languages, such as Smalltalk, Common Lisp Object System (CLOS), and Eiffel. Additionally, OOP capabilities are being added to more traditional popular computer programming languages such as Pascal.

The benefits of object classes can be summarized, as follows:

• Objects and their corresponding classes break down complex programming problems into many smaller, simpler problems. • Encapsulation enforces data abstraction through the organization of data into small, independent objects that can communicate with each other. Encapsulation protects the data in an object from accidental damage, but allows other objects to interact with that data by calling the object's member functions and structures. • Subclassing and inheritance make it possible to extend and modify objects through deriving new kinds of objects from the standard classes available in the system. Thus, new capabilities are created without having to start from scratch.

• Polymoφhism and multiple inheritance make it possible for different programmers to mix and match characteristics of many different classes and create specialized objects that can still work with related objects in predictable ways.

• Class hierarchies and containment hierarchies provide a flexible mechanism for modeling real-world objects and the relationships among them.

• Libraries of reusable classes are useful in many situations, but they also have some limitations. For example:

• Complexity. In a complex system, the class hierarchies for related classes can become extremely confusing, with many dozens or even hundreds of classes.

• Flow of control. A program written with the aid of class libraries is still responsible for the flow of control (i.e., it must control the interactions among all the objects created from a particular library). The programmer has to decide which functions to call at what times for which kinds of objects.

• Duplication of effort. Although class libraries allow programmers to use and reuse many small pieces of code, each programmer puts those pieces together in a different way. Two different programmers can use the same set of class libraries to write two programs that do exactly the same thing but whose internal structure (i.e., design) may be quite different, depending on hundreds of small decisions each programmer makes along the way. Inevitably, similar pieces of code end up doing similar things in slightly different ways and do not work as well together as they should.

Class libraries are very flexible. As programs grow more complex, more programmers are forced to reinvent basic solutions to basic problems over and over again. A relatively new extension of the class library concept is to have a framework of class libraries. This framework is more complex and consists of significant collections of collaborating classes that capture both the small scale patterns and major mechanisms that implement the common requirements and design in a specific application domain. They were first developed to free application programmers from the chores involved in displaying menus, windows, dialog boxes, and other standard user interface elements for personal computers. Frameworks also represent a change in the way programmers think about the interaction between the code they wπte and code wπtten by others In the early days of procedural programming, the programmer called hbraπes provided by the operating system to perform certain tasks, but basically the program executed down the page from start to finish, and the programmer was solely responsible for the flow of control This was appropπate for pπntmg out paychecks, calculating a mathematical table, or solving other problems with a program that executed in just one way

The development of graphical user interfaces began to turn this procedural programming arrangement inside out These interfaces allow the user, rather than program logic, to dπve the program and decide when certain actions should be performed Today, most personal computer software accomplishes this by means of an event loop which monitors the mouse, keyboard, and other sources of external events and calls the appropπate parts of the programmer's code according to actions that the user performs The programmer no longer determines the order in which events occur Instead, a program is divided into separate pieces that are called at unpredictable times and in an unpredictable order By relinquishing control in this way to users, the developer creates a program that is much easier to use Nevertheless, individual pieces of the program wπtten by the developer still call hbraπes provided by the operating system to accomplish certain tasks, and the programmer must still determine the flow of control within each piece after it's called by the event loop Application code still "sits on top of the system

Even event loop programs require programmers to wπte a lot of code that should not need to be wπtten separately for every application The concept of an application framework carπes the event loop concept further Instead of dealing with all the nuts and bolts of constructing basic menus, windows, and dialog boxes and then making all these things work together, programmers using application frameworks start with working application code and basic user interface elements m place Subsequently, they build from there by replacing some of the geneπc capabilities of the framework with the specific capabilities of the intended application

Application frameworks reduce the total amount of code that a programmer has to wπte from scratch However, because the framework is really a geneπc application that displays windows, supports copy and paste, and so on, the programmer can also relinquish control to a greater degree than event loop programs permit The framework code takes care of almost all event handling and flow of control, and the programmer's code is called only when the framework needs it (e g , to create or manipulate a propπetary data structure) A programmer writing a framework program not only relinquishes control to the user (as is also true for event loop programs), but also relinquishes the detailed flow of control within the program to the framework. This approach allows the creation of more complex systems that work together in interesting ways, as opposed to isolated programs, having custom code, being created over and over again for similar problems.

Thus, as is explained above, a framework basically is a collection of cooperating classes that make up a reusable design solution for a given problem domain. It typically includes objects that provide default behavior (e.g., for menus and windows), and programmers use it by inheriting some of that default behavior and overriding other behavior so that the framework calls application code at the appropriate times.

There are three main differences between frameworks and class libraries: • Behavior versus protocol. Class libraries are essentially collections of behaviors that you can call when you want those individual behaviors in your program. A framework, on the other hand, provides not only behavior but also the protocol or set of rules that govern the ways in which behaviors can be combined, including rules for what a programmer is supposed to provide versus what the framework provides. • Call versus override. With a class library, the code the programmer instantiates objects and calls their member functions. It's possible to instantiate and call objects in the same way with a framework (i.e., to treat the framework as a class library), but to take full advantage of a framework's reusable design, a programmer typically writes code that overrides and is called by the framework. The framework manages the flow of control among its objects. Writing a program involves dividing responsibilities among the various pieces of software that are called by the framework rather than specifying how the different pieces should work together. • Implementation versus design. With class libraries, programmers reuse only implementations, whereas with frameworks, they reuse design. A framework embodies the way a family of related programs or pieces of software work. It represents a generic design solution that can be adapted to a variety of specific problems in a given domain. For example, a single framework can embody the way a user interface works, even though two different user interfaces created with the same framework might solve quite different interface problems. Thus, through the development of frameworks for solutions to various problems and programming tasks, significant reductions in the design and development effort for software can be achieved. A preferred embodiment of the invention utilizes HyperText Markup Language (HTML) to implement documents on the Internet together with a general-puφose secure communication protocol for a transport medium between the client and a company. HTTP or other protocols could be readily substituted for HTML without undue experimentation. Information on these products is available in T. Berners-Lee, D. Connoly, "RFC 1866: Hypertext Markup Language - 2.0" (Nov. 1995); and R. Fielding, H, Frystyk, T. Berners-Lee, J. Gettys and J.C. Mogul, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1 : HTTP Working Group Internet Draft"

(May 2, 1996). HTML is a simple data format used to create hypertext documents that are portable from one platform to another. HTML documents are SGML documents with generic semantics that are appropriate for representing information from a wide range of domains. HTML has been in use by the World-Wide Web global information initiative since 1990. HTML is an application of ISO Standard 8879; 1986 Information Processing Text and Office

Systems; Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML).

To date, Web development tools have been limited in their ability to create dynamic Web applications which span from client to server and interoperate with existing computing resources. Until recently, HTML has been the dominant technology used in development of Web-based solutions. However, HTML has proven to be inadequate in the following areas:

• Poor performance;

• Restricted user interface capabilities;

• Can only produce static Web pages; • Lack of interoperability with existing applications and data; and

• Inability to scale.

Sun Microsystem's Java language solves many of the client-side problems by:

• Improving performance on the client side; • Enabling the creation of dynamic, real-time Web applications; and

• Providing the ability to create a wide variety of user interface components.

With Java, developers can create robust User Interface (UI) components. Custom "widgets" (e.g., real-time stock tickers, animated icons, etc.) can be created, and client-side performance is improved Unlike HTML, Java supports the notion of client-side validation, offloading appropπate processing onto the client for improved performance Dynamic, real-time Web pages can be created Using the above-mentioned custom UI components, dynamic Web pages can also be created

Sun's Java language has emerged as an industry-recognized language for "programming the Internet " Sun defines Java as "a simple, object-oπented, distπbuted, inteφreted, robust, secure, architecture-neutral, portable, high-performance, multithreaded, dynamic, buzzword-compliant, general-puφose programming language Java supports programming for the Internet in the form of platform-independent Java applets " Java applets are small, specialized applications that comply with Sun's Java Application Programming Interface (API) allowing developers to add "interactive content" to Web documents (e g , simple animations, page adornments, basic games, etc ) Applets execute within a Java-compatible browser (e g , Netscape Navigator) by copying code from the server to client From a language standpoint, Java's core feature set is based on C++ Sun's Java literature states that Java is basically, "C++ with extensions from Objective C for more dynamic method resolution "

Another technology that provides similar function to JAVA is provided by Microsoft and ActiveX Technologies, to give developers and Web designers wherewithal to build dynamic content for the Internet and personal computers ActiveX includes tools for developing animation, 3-D virtual reality, video and other multimedia content The tools use Internet standards, work on multiple platforms, and are being supported by over 100 companies The group's building blocks are called ActiveX Controls, which are fast components that enable developers to embed parts of software in hypertext markup language (HTML) pages ActiveX Controls work with a vaπety of programming languages including Microsoft Visual C++,

Borland Delphi, Microsoft Visual Basic programming system and, in the future, Microsoft's development tool for Java, code named "Jakarta " ActiveX Technologies also includes ActiveX Server Framework, allowing developers to create server applications One of ordinary skill in the art readily recognizes that ActiveX could be substituted for JAVA without undue expeπmentation to practice the invention

Merger and Acquisition Engine System Overview The Merger and Acquisition (M&A) Engine provides knowledge management and delivery capabilities to facilitate the learning and execution of merger-related work In one embodiment, this is accomplished by stoπng the M&A Engine on a centralized server which may be accessed over a network, 1 e the Internet, via a web site using a hardware implementation set forth hereinabove and shown in Figure 1

Duπng operation, the M&A Engine facilitates user work, manages and delivers reusable knowledge, improves the ability to manage change resulting from mergers and acquisitions, and expedites the learning process for new merger resources The M&A Engine streamlines communication between merger participants, and assists in the consolidation of projects The

M&A Engine can also be used as a marketing tool In addition, the M&A Engine promotes standardization of processes that are applicable to individual areas such as status reporting, business case development, and budget and benefits momtoπng

Using the M&A Engine, productivity is improved duπng the transition by increased communication Merger/acquisition participants are given a common entry point to effectively access information and deliverables, leverage existing knowledge, contπbute knowledge, conduct informal conversations, document meeting outcomes and issues, etc

The M&A Engine improves documentation and outcomes by providing users access to the entire history of an on-line discussion This functionality improves the understanding of issues and/or topics, e g conversion schedule, DARTs, etc , as well as what decisions or progress has been made towards a resolution The M&A Engine improves issue resolution duπng the transition by utilizing discussion databases to submit and/or answer issues, questions, topics, etc This gives key stakeholders an improved understanding of the most current status of key deliverables

The M&A Engine's streamlined communication throughout the transition yields benefits such as

• Improved creativity through more frequent communication with subject matter experts and on-line brainstorming sessions or idea shaπng, • Reduced project completion cycles due to increased communication and collaboration of ideas, e g shaπng of best practices, discussion databases, etc ,

• Reduced costs due to fewer printed pages to distπbute mass communications, e g administrative memos, phone directories, newsletters, etc , and key deliverables by providing information on-line, and • Reduced telephone, video conferencing, and travel costs, as users are able to conduct "virtual meetings" via the M&A Engine discussion databases.

The M&A Engine supports standardization of consolidation activities and deliverables. Users are consistently guided through the steps to complete merger/acquisition activities, and are provided samples and templates to facilitate the completion of deliverables associated with those activities. The M&A Engine also develops and retains institutional knowledge related to consolidation, thus reducing costs related to training and use of outside consultants.

The M&A Engine also supports the evolution of process-driven methods for the transition by utilizing the Intranet as its delivery vehicle. Through the M&A Engine, users are able to "drill- down" from a merger activity to specific task packages and deliverables. This capability improves the understanding throughout the organization of the complete range of activities that are involved with the consolidation of two or more organizations.

One embodiment of the M&A Engine includes a plurality of features for accomplishing the foregoing goals. For example, the present invention includes Navigation Chevron, a Discussion Database, a Discussion Database Interface Page, a 30/60/90 Plan, and a Merger Site Map. The Navigation Chevron is used to navigate the user through the M&A Engine environment. The Discussion Database is used to discuss concepts and serve as an audit trial of topics. The

Discussion Database Interface Page describes the various discussion groups available to the user, and subscribes the user to individual discussion groups when selected. The 30/60/90 Plan is used to account for all actions taken during the first 90 days of consolidation. Finally, the Merger Site Map tracks activities and duration of these activities throughout the consolidation.

Navigation Chevron

The Navigation Chevron of the present invention is a form of hypertext that facilitates the navigation of data during use of the M&A Engine. Hypertext systems are a class of complex information management systems. These systems allow people to create, annotate, link together, and share information from a variety of media such as text, graphics, audio, video, animation, and programs. They also provide flexible access to information by incoφorating the notions of navigation, annotation, and tailored presentation. Hypertext is defined as an approach to information management m which data is stored in a network of nodes connected by links Nodes can contain text, graphics, audio, video as well as source code or other forms of data Hypertext with multimedia is called "hypermedia" The utility of hypermedia lies in its ability to produce large, complex, πchly connected, and cross- referenced bodies of information

Outside the academic world, due to the implementation of hypertext-like features in products such as MS Windows Help, information systems professionals are of the opinion that hypertext is just another user interface approach However, hypertext is a hybπd that spans across traditional boundaπes It is a database method providing a novel way of directly accessing and managing data It is also a representation scheme, a kind of semantic network, which mixes informal textual mateπal with more formal and mechanized processes It is an interface modality that features link icons or markers that can be arbitraπly embedded with the contents and can be used for navigational puφoses In short, a hypertext system is a database system which provides a totally different and unique method of accessing information Whereas traditional databases have some structure around them, a hypertext database has no regular structure The user is free to explore and assimilate information in different ways

A hypertext system is made of nodes, or concepts, and links, or relationships A node usually represents a single concept or idea It can contain text, graphics, animation, audio, video, images or programs It can be typed and can include detail, proposition, collection, summary, observation, and issue, thereby carrying semantic information Nodes are connected to other nodes by links The node from which a link oπginates is called the reference and the node at which a link ends is called the referent They are also refeπed to as anchors The contents of a node are displayed by activating links

Links connect related concepts or nodes They can be bidirectional thus facilitating backward traversals Links can also be typed, l e specification link, elaboration link, membership link, opposition link and others, specifying the nature of relationship Links can be either referential for cross-referencing puφoses or hierarchical for showing parent-child relationships Activation of a link marker displays a node

Hypertext parallels human cognition and facilitates exploration People think in nonlinear chunks which they try to associate with each other, thus building a network of concepts When a person reads a book, they go back and forth a number of times to refer to previously read material, to make notes, and to jump to topics using the table of contents or the index. When they set out to write a document, they first develop an outline of ideas. Then, a person brainstorms, writes down on paper, organizes, revises, reorganizes and repeats the cycle until they are satisfied with the outcome — a coherent document. In fact, people have been forced to adapt to traditional, linear text because of representation on paper.

In order to understand hypertext, it is very essential to understand how people read and write documents. Reading and writing models have been developed by cognitive psychologists that can be used to understand non-linear thinking by human beings.

The theory of semiotics or the study of symbols shows that the understanding of knowledge takes place at four levels: lexical, syntactic, semantic and pragmatic. At the lexical level, the user determines the definition for each word encountered. At the syntactic level, the subject, action and object of a sentence are determined. The meaning of a sentence is determined at the semantic level. The pragmatic inteφretation of text depends on the integration of semantic meaning of text with the reader's knowledge of self and of the world.

While reading text, people proceed from a lexical level to the syntactic level, to the semantic and to the pragmatic levels in that order. All these levels interact continuously and they cannot be truly separated. The reader might have to have knowledge of the world in order to understand the meaning of a word. The correct syntactic and semantic inteφretation of text may depend on the reader's knowledge of the world. Hence, though readers may proceed from words to sentences, to paragraphs and to the overall document, the progress is more forward and backward.

A mental representation of the meaning of text is then constructed which is in the form of propositions or relationships. While reading text, readers establish local coherence in short-term memory — small scale inferences from few small units of information, i.e. relationships between words, sentences and so on. The reader makes preliminary hypotheses based on titles, words, propositions, and knowledge about the real world. A reading control system retrieves knowledge from the real world, present in long-term memory, in order to filter out information present in short-term memory. These hypotheses are refined as the reading of the text proceeds, with the reading control system being invoked continuously. These propositions are combined into larger structures, also called global This hypothesized macroproposition or superstructure is used to understand the overall content of the text. The construction of a coherent mental representation has important consequences for navigation In addition to generating forward references, we accumulate cues for backward navigation

The reading control system uses the spreading activation model to access propositions or concepts In semantic memory, each concept is connected to a number of other concepts

Activating one concept activates its adjacent concepts which in turn activate their adjacent concepts Thus, activation spreads through the memory structure, determining what is to be added and what is to be removed from the inteφretation of text This process continues until further activation of adjacent propositions does not change the propositions used to inteφret the text That is, spreading activation decreases over time and semantic distance

Wntmg is constrained by goal and audience The author is guided by a goal but constrained by what the audience is prepared to accept Different people approach wntmg in different ways Some are good at making an outline first and then brainstorming Some do the opposite An expert author would always keep the reading model in mind so that the wnting clearly reaches the target audience

Wntmg involves the following three phases exploπng, organizing, and encoding In the Cognitive Framework for Wπtten Communication, Smith et al call these three phases prewntmg, organizing, and wnting

Exploπng or pre- wntmg is the process of brainstorming and taking unstructured notes The wπter retπeves potential content from long-term memory or external sources, considers possible relations among ideas, groups related ideas and constructs small hierarchical structures Thus, the product of exploration is a network or directed graph of ideas

Organizing is the process of putting these notes or ideas in order, in the form of an outline or a hierarchy This process involves abstract construction that involves perceiving subordinate/superordinate relations, compaπng abstractions, sequencing, proportion, and balance Thus, the product of organization is a hierarchy of related concepts

Encoding or wnting is the final phase of completing the document The pnmary task is translating the abstractions of content and the relations of a hierarchical structure into a sequence of words, sentences, paragraphs, sections, chapters, and illustrations The structure of the encoded text is linear and represents a path through the hierarchy Reading employs processes in the reverse order. That is, a linear sequence of words is transformed into a hierarchy which is later integrated into a network in long-term memory.

The writing model can be extended by considering unstructured and structured representation at each phase. Whereas an unstructured item is isolated, a structured item shows coherence.

Exploring can be split into unstructured brainstorming followed by structured note-taking.

Organizing can be classified as unstructured argumentation where relationships are established between ideas and structured organization of notes where notes are grouped together to make coherent sense. Encoding has an unstructured phase of linear planning which involves viewing groups of notes as sequences and a structured phase of drafting and revising in order to produce a final document which is a linear sequence of notes.

Just as the reader of a linear document constructs a local and global mental representation of the document, the author of a linear document uses cues both at the local and at the global levels, dividing the document into chapters, sections, paragraphs, sentences, words etc. This facilitates comprehension and navigation.

Thus, both reading and writing processes emphasize a lot on the non-linear nature of thinking, a natural process in human beings. Human cognition is essentially organized as a semantic network in which concepts are linked together by associations. Hypertext systems try to exploit this basic nature of cognition.

One aspect of the present invention utilizes a unique hypertext feature, a Navigation Chevron 200, to navigate the user through the data in the M&A engine environment. Figure 2 is an illustration of the Navigation Chevron 200. The Navigation Chevron 200 is generally shaped as an indicia similar to a pointer, and may be arranged in any orientation, such as horizontally, diagonally, or vertically.

The Navigation Chevron 200 is made up of components, or discrete phase chevrons 202, which are generally shaped similar to the Navigation Chevron 200. Displayed on each discrete phase chevron 202 is an indication of the topic relating to that particular discrete phase chevron 202. The indication may be a color, or some other identifying mark. A preferred indication is the title or general description of the topic area related to the particular discrete phase chevron 202. The description allows the user to easily determine which discrete phase chevron 202 relates to the particular topic needed to complete a particular task.

The Navigation Chevron 200 is used to navigate a database of knowledge utilizing a progression of ideas or phases. Each idea or phase of the knowledge database is represented by a discrete phase chevron 202 in the Navigation Chevron 200. The discrete phase chevrons 202 are organized in a logical progression of the topics covered by the Navigation Chevron's 200 related knowledge database.

The topic pages in the related knowledge database generally include a Navigation Chevron 200 as part of their display. The Navigation Chevron 200 may be located anywhere on the display, preferably away from the data provided by the knowledge database, such as at the top or to the side of the display. In addition, the Navigation Chevron 200 may be of any size. A preferred embodiment uses an initially large Navigation Chevron 200. However, with each subsequent progression, the Navigation Chevron 200 becomes smaller in size. Note Figure 4.

Figure 3 is an illustration of a knowledge database topic page 300. The knowledge database topic page 300 includes a Navigation Chevron 200 having discrete phase chevrons 202. The discrete phase chevron 202 that is related to the current knowledge database topic page 300 is highlighted.

As the user decides on an area of knowledge to explore, the user picks a discrete phase chevron 202 utilizing a computer input device, such as the mouse 126. Once a discrete phase chevron 202 is chosen, the related knowledge database topic page 300 is displayed along with a Navigation Chevron 200 including a highlighted discrete phase chevron 202 related to the current knowledge database topic page 300. The Navigation Chevron 200 thus allows the user to navigate an extensive knowledge database in an easy and intuitive manner.

The user is able to explore the knowledge database in the order presented on the Navigation Chevron 200, or in an order more pertinent to the task at hand. By selecting the topic to explore in the Navigation Chevron 200 the user can go directly to the topic needed for a particular task.

In addition, the Navigation Chevron 200 allows the user to visualize the knowledge database as a whole, and determine how the cuπent knowledge database topic page 300 relates to other topics in the knowledge database. As such, the Navigation Chevron 200 indicates a relationship, i.e. progression or sequence, that is inherently not present in conventional hypertext systems. Navigation Chevrons 200 may be nested, allowing a more detailed navigation through a knowledge database. Figure 4 is an illustration showing the use of nested Navigation Chevrons 200, 402, and 406. In this embodiment, a large Navigation Chevron 200 is used to allow access to broad topic areas covered by discrete phase chevrons 202. Each topic covered by a discrete phase chevron 202 has a further Navigation Chevron 402 related to the particular broad topic covered by the discrete phase chevron 202. The Navigation Chevron 402 includes further discrete phase chevrons 404 which relate to more detailed information associated with the broad topic of the discrete phase chevron 202. The nesting of Navigation Chevrons 200 may continue, including further nested Navigation Chevrons 406, as much as needed to allow easier navigation of a large knowledge databases. As discussed above, the nested Navigation Chevrons 200 allow the user to visualize the knowledge database as a whole, and determine how a knowledge database topic page 300 relates to the knowledge database as a whole.

It should be noted that Navigation Chevrons 200 may be employed to navigate data within any type of database including, but not limited to the M&A Engine. Below is an html code segment for displaying and using a Navigation Chevron 200:

<tr ahgn="left" valιgn="top"> <tdxb><ιmg ismap usemap="#ChevronMap4" border="0" heιght="54" src="ιmages/MaιnChevron.gιf ' width="456"x bx/td> </ r>

<map na e="ChevronMap4"> <area shape="poly" coords="347,0,435,l,454,25,435,53,347,53,365,28,345,0" href="Post- mtegratιon.htm"> <area shape="poly" coords="258,0,343,0,361,27,345,53,256,52,271,23,259,0" href="Consohd.htm"> <area shape="poly" coords="171,0,255,0,271,25,253,52,173,52,188,26,173,2" href="AssessAndStabιlιz.htm">

<area shape="poly" coords="91 ,0, 168,0, 186,26, 173,49,89,52, 105,27,89,2" href="Orgamze.htm"> <area shape="poly" coords=" 1,0,88,0, 101,23,88,51,5,51, 17,27,3,0" href="MergerEng_Maιn htm"> </map> <map name="MapFeed">

<area shape- 'rect" coords="2, 0,173, 120" href=" feedback htm"> </map> Discussion Database

Bulletin board systems, or BBS's, refer to computer systems equipped with one or more modems or other means of network access that serves as an information and message-passing center for remote users Often BBS's are focused on special interests, such as science fiction, movies,

Windows software, or Macintosh systems, and can have free or fee-based access, or a combination Users dial into a BBS with their modems and post messages to other BBS users in special areas devoted to a particular topic, in a manner reminiscent to posting notes on a cork bulletin board Many BBS's also allow users to chat online with other users, send e-mail, download and upload files that include freeware and shareware software, and access the Internet

Many software and hardware companies run propnetary BBS's for customers that includes sales information, technical support, and software upgrades and patches

In other words, a BBS acts as a storage facility, where people calling from their computers can post or receive messages and send or receive program files A BBS is usually subdivided by topics so that users with similar interests can send information to other users of similar interests These related groups of messages are refeπed to as topics, message areas, forum(s), or conferences, l e a particular BBS may contain numerous related groups of messages such as on the subjects of travel, sports, stamp collecting, etc

BBS's are distinguishable from electronic mail in that BBS's are used for posting messages of a particular group of computer users who have similar interests, but these posted messages are not ordinaπly addressed to any particular user BBS's are also used by some computer users who wish just to read posted messages and other information, without having to post a reply message For example, a person in Columbus, Ohio, who is prepaπng for a vacation, may access a BBS on travel through his home computer and post a message asking for the best places to go skiing in the United States Other network users with an interest m travel may read the message from the person from Columbus, and then reply with their opinion about where the best place is for skiing There are thousands of BBS's available to computer network users on a wide vaπety of subject areas

Another component of the M&A Engine of the present invention is the Discussion Database

The Discussion Database, in some limited respects, is similar to a BBS in that it is a repository of knowledge on vaπous topics compiled from the input of vanous users of the Discussion Database Figure 5 is a block diagram of a Discussion Database 500 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

A Discussion Database 500 includes a broad topic field 502 having Discussion Groups 504 relating to specific subject areas of the broad topic 502. The Discussion Groups 504 include User Posts 506 which are documents contributed by users of the Discussion Database 500.

Preferably, the User Posts 506 are contributed by users of the particular broad topic field 502, and most preferably, the User Posts 506 are contributed by users of the particular discussion group in which the User Post 506 is located. Generally, many broad topic fields 502 are used to create the Discussion Database 500 to increase ease of navigation. Typically, the more broad topic fields 502 that are used to create the Discussion Database 500, the easier it is for a user to find the particular Discussion Group 502 related to the information they need. However, a broad topic field 502 may itself be a Discussion Group 504, and thus contain User Posts 506.

Utilizing the broad topic fields 502, users locate an area of knowledge they need. As discussed above, within each broad topic field 502 are related Discussion Groups 504. The Discussion

Groups 504 are further refinements of the broad topic field 502 to which they relate. Users search through a list of Discussion Groups 504 within the broad topic field 502 to determine which Discussion Group 504 most closely relates to the information they need. Once a Discussion Group 504 is found relating to the information needed, the user searches through a list of User Posts 506 located in the chosen Discussion Group 504.

In addition to obtaining information from the User Posts 506 previously located in the Discussion Group 504, users may contribute their own documents to the Discussion Group 504, thereby increasing the knowledge base available in the Discussion Database 500. To contribute documents, users select the document they want to contribute and inform the system utilizing the

Discussion Database Interface Page, discussed below. The system then adds the document to the list of available documents contained in the Discussion Group 504 and makes the corresponding document available to other users of the Discussion Database 500.

The Discussion Database 500 is a dynamic continuously growing entity. The more the

Discussion Database 500 is used, the more it grows. The Discussion Database 500 as a whole increases as users continue to contribute documents relating to the various Discussion Groups 504. For example, in Figure 5, Joe decides he needs information about transition management projects on mergers of Nuclear Reactor companies. Joe first searches a list of broad topic fields 502 and determines that the Transition Management topic is the best topic to search in more

7? detail. He then searches through a list of Discussion Groups 504 associated with the Transition Management topic field 502, and determines that TMGT Special Projects Discussion Group 504 is the most closely related to the information he needs. Joe then reads through the User Post 506 contained in the TMGT Special Projects Discussion Group 504 and finds the information he needs. Joe then decides to contribute a document he wrote concerning other TMGT Special

Projects, and proceeds to post it to the system. In the end, a user acquired the knowledge he needed, and as a result, the Discussion Database 500 increased its available knowledge base. Thus, it can be seen that the use of a continuously growing knowledge database dramatically increases productivity and organizational knowledge without having to continuously rely on outside sources.

Discussion Database Interface Page

The Discussion Database Interface Page describes the various Discussion Groups which are available to the user of the M&A Engine of the present invention. The Discussion Database

Interface Page also subscribes the user to the individual Discussion Groups 504 used most often by the user.

Figure 6 is an illustration of a Discussion Database Interface Page 600. The Discussion Database Interface Page 600 includes a Discussion Group List 602 having a list of broad topic fields 502 and Discussion Groups 504. As discussed above, a broad topic field 502 may itself be a Discussion Group 504.

Each Discussion Group 504 has a Description 604 associated with it. Each Description 604 includes a string of descriptive data, or summary, of what type of information is contained in the related Discussion Group 504. The Description 604 is preferably kept short to decrease the overall size of the Discussion Group List 602. However, the Description 604 may be as long as needed to adequately inform users as to the contents of a particular Discussion Group 504.

By describing the categories of information within the Discussion Groups 504, a user may effectively select the categories on the Discussion Database Interface Page 600 which are most relevant. As an option, the aforementioned string of descriptive data may constitute a link to the data. Also, a user may subscribe and access the categories of data by executing only one user action, namely clicking on the appropriate Discussion Groups 504 on the Discussion Database Interface Page 600. As such, the Discussion Database Interface Page 600 is utilized by the user to subscribe to and access individual Discussion Groups 504. When a user wishes to join a Discussion Group 504, the user selects the appropriate Discussion Group 504 from the Discussion Group List 602. The corresponding Discussion Group 504 is then added to the Discussion Groups 504 the user can utilize. By subscribing only to Discussion Groups 504 pertinent to the particular user's interest and needs, the user can more quickly obtain needed information. Since the number of Discussion Groups 504 subscribed to by a particular user is generally much less than the total number of Discussion Groups 504 available, the user does not need to search through a large list of Discussion Groups 504 every time he or she needs information. Instead, the user selects only those Discussion Groups 504 that he or she will need most often. Thereafter, when the user desires information, he or she will generally only need to search through the Discussion Groups 504 the user has subscribed to. Thus, the search time is drastically reduced after the first use of the system.

The use of the Discussion Database 500 in combination with the Discussion Database Interface Page 600 creates a wealth of information useful for the entire organization utilizing the system. The Discussion Database 500 contains not only information provided by the organization that sets up the Discussion Database 500, but also information provided by users of the system. The Discussion Database coupled with the Discussion Database Interface Page 600 creates a "living library" which grows with each use, and grows with the knowledge of its users. As users acquire more knowledge from experience and other outside sources, they transfer that knowledge to the Discussion Database 500 utilizing the Discussion Database Interface Page 600. The transfer of knowledge to the Discussion Database 500 increases the knowledge contained in the Discussion Database 500, and helps keep the information contained in the Discussion Database 500 updated as new developments arise in various fields.

It should be noted that the Discussion Database Interface Page 600 may be employed to provide effective access to any type of database including, but not limited to, the database associated with the M&A Engine. Below is a code segment for creating a Discussion Database Interface

Page 600:

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transιtιonal//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Mozdla/4.06 [en] (Wιn95; U) [ etscape]">

<TITLE>Dιscussιon Database Ne sgroups</TITLE> <STYLE type="text/css"> </STYLE> <LINK rel="stylesheet" href=" ./style.css">

</HEAD> <BODY> &nbsp;

<TABLE BORDER=0 CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 WIDTH="670" > <TR ALIGN=LEFT VALIGN=TOP>

<TDXIMG SRC="../ιmages/blank.gιf" HEIGHT=1 WIDTH=lx/TD>

<TDXIMG SRC="../ιmages/blank.gιf HEIGHT=1 WIDTH=18x/TD>

<TDxIMG SRC=" . /images/blank gif ' HEIGHT= 1 WIDTH=6x/TD>

<TDXIMG SRC="../ιmages blank.gιf HEIGHT=1 WIDTH=18x/TD>

<TDXIMG SRC="../ιmages/blank.gιf ' HEIGHT=1 WIDTH=352x/TD>

<TDxIMG SRC="../ιmages/blank.gιf ' HEIGHT=1 WIDTH=200x/TD>

<TDxIMG SRC="../ιmages/blank.gιf HEIGHT=1 WIDTH=18x/TD>

<TDxIMG SRC="../ιmages/blank.gιf HEIGHT=1 WIDTH=59x/TD>

</TR>

<TR ALIGN=LEFT VALIGN=TOP>

<TDxIMG SRC=".. /images/blank gif HEIGHT=7 WIDTH=lx/TD>

<TD ROWSPAN="4"xIMG SRC="../ιmages/tιtleendcap.gιf HEIGHT=56 WIDTH= 18x/TD>

<TD COLSPAN="3" BGCOLOR="#0033CC" BACKGROU D="../ιmages/textblueback.gιf 'xIMG SRC="../ιmages/tιtletop.gιf ' HEIGHT=7 WIDTH=377x/TD>

<TD COLSPAN="3" ROWSPAN="2"xIMG SRC="../ιmages/tιtleπghtend gif HEIGHT=20

WIDTH=277x/TD>

</TR>

<TR ALIGN=LEFT VALIGN=TOP>

<TDxIMG SRC=" /images blank gif HEIGHT=13 WIDTH=lx/TD> <TD COLSPAN="3" ROWSPAN="2" BGCOLOR="#0033CC" BACKGROUND=" /lmages/textblueback gif ' class="tιtle">DISCUSSION GROUPS</TD> </TR>

<TR ALIGN=LEFT VALIGN=TOP>

<TDxIMG SRC=" /images/blank gif HEIGHT=17 WIDTH=lx/TD>

<TD COLSPAN="3" ROWSPAN="2"xIMG SRC=" /images/NoChevron gif HEIGHT=36 WIDTH=277x/TD> </TR>

<TR ALIGN=LEFT VALIGN=TOP>

<TDxIMG SRC=" /images/blank gif HEIGHT=19 WIDTH=1></TD>

<TDXIMG SRC=" /lmages/titlebottomleft gif HEIGHT=19 WIDTH=7x/TD>

<TD COLSPAN="2"xIMG SRC=" Λmages/titlebottom gif HEIGHT=19 WIDTH=370x/TD> </TR>

<TR ALIGN=LEFT VALIGN=TOP>

<TDxIMG SRC=" /images blank gif HEIGHT=200 WIDTH=lx/TD>

<TDXIMG SRC=" /images/blank gif HEIGHT=200 WIDTH=18x TD>

<TDXIMG SRC=" /images/blank gif HEIGHT=200 WIDTH=7x/TD>

<TD BGCOLOR="#CCCC99" BACKGROUND=" Λmages/texttanback gif 'xIMG SRC=" /images/blank gif HEIGHT=200 WIDTH=18x/TD>

<TD COLSPAN="2" BGCOLOR="#CCCC99" BACKGROUND^' /lmages/texttanback gif '>

<DIV class="black"> Welcome to the Illinois/Texas Discussion Database '</DIV>

<BR>&nbsp,

<PxIMG SRC=" /ιmages/AG00062_l gif ALT="AG00062_ gif (7566 bytes)" HEIGHT=83 WIDTH=120>&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbs p,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,

<B><I>"Two monologues do not make a dιalogue"</I></B>

<P><B>&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsρ,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nb sp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbs bsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,& nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp,&nbsp &nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp &nbsp

&nbsp,&nbsp &nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp &nbsp,&nbsp &nbsp,&nbsp &nbsp,&nbsp &nbsp,&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp,&nbs p;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp,&nbsp,&nbsp;&nbsp,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp,&nbsp;& nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp,&nbsp; -JeffDaly&nbsp;</B>

<P>Please choose from the listed discussion groups to subscribe and add your input.

<P class="black">HCSC Texas/Illinois <UL>

<LI> <A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc. mergers tx_ιl.tmgt">Transιtιon Management</A>&nbsp;</LI>

<UL> <LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc. mergers rx_ιl.tmgt status">TMGT Status Reports</A>

- document, update and monitor status report discussion topιcs</LI>

<LI> <A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc. mergers. tx il.tmgt projects">TMGT Special Projects< A>

- document and monitor unofficial transition-related projects</LI>

<BR>&nbsp;< UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc. mergers tx_ιl.bftf >Busιness Functions Task Force&nbsp;</A></LI>

<BR>&nbsp; <UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.bftf.apr">Adjudιcatιon, Pricing, and Referrals&nbsp;</Ax/LI>

<UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc. mergers tx_il.bftf.apr ιssues">APR Issues</A>

- document, update and monitor APR ιssues</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news. private hcsc mergers tx_ιl bftf apr status">APR Status Reports

</A>- document, update and monitor APR status topιcs</LI>

97 <LI>

<A HREF="news private hcsc mergers tx il bftf apr recs">APR Requirements Management </A>- document, update and monitor APR business requιrements</LI>

<BR>&nbsp,< UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news private hcsc mergers tx il bftf fin_adj">Fmance/Adjustments&nbsp,</A></LI>

<UL> <LI>

<A HREF="news private hcsc mergers tx il bftf fin adj ιssues">FIN/ADJ Issues</A> - document, update and monitor FIN/ADJ ιssues&nbsp,</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="ne s private hcsc mergers tx il bftf fιn_adj status">FIN/AD J Status Reports</A> - document, update and monitor FIN/ADJ status topιcs</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news private hcsc mergers tx il bftf fin_adj recs">FIN/ADJ Requirements Management</A> - document, update and monitor FIN/ADJ business requιrements</LI>

<BR>&nbsp,</UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news private hcsc mergers tx il bftf ops">Operatιonal Reportιng&nbsp,</A></LI>

<UL> <LI>

<A HREF="news private hcsc mergers tx_d bftf ops ιssues">OPS Issues</A>

- document, update and monitor OPS ιssues</LI>

<LI> <A HREF="news private hcsc mergers tx il bftf ops status">OPS Status Reports</A>

- document, update, and monitor OPS status topιcs</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news private hcsc mergers tx il bftf ops recs">OPS Requirements Management </A>- document, update and monitor OPS business reqmrements</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.bftf.ιmpl">Implementatιon</A>&nbsp;</LI>

<UL>

<LI>

<A HREF- 'news pπvate. hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.bftf.ιmpl.ιssues">Implementatιon Issues</A> - document, update and monitor Implementation ιssues</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="ne s pπvate. hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.bftf.ιmpl.status">Implementatιon Status Reports</A> - document, update and monitor Implementation status topιcs</LI>

<BR>&nbsp;< UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="ne s pnvate. hcsc. mergers. tx il.bftf. testιng">Testιng</A>&nbsp;</LI>

<UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news private hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.bftf.testιng.status">Testιng Status Reports</A> - document, update and monitor Testing status topιcs</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF- 'news pnvate. hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.bftf.testιng.Plog">P-Log Status</A>

- document, update and monitor P-Log ιtems</LI>

<LI> <A HREF="news pπvate.hcsc.mergers.tx_ιl.bftf.testιng.DKhelρ">DK Help Status</A>

- document, update and momtor transition-related DK Help ιtems&nbsp;</LI>

<BR>&nbsp;</UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news.pnvate hcsc. mergers. x_ιl.bftf.hιstory">Hιstory</A>&nbsp;</LI>

<UL> <LI> <A HREF="news private hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.bftf.hιstory.ιssues">Hιstory Issues</A>

- document, update and monitor History ιssues</LI> <LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate. hcsc. mergers.tx_ιl.bftf.hιstory.status">Hιstory Status Reports</A> - document, update and monitor History status topιcs</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pnvate. hcsc. mergers tx_ιl.bftf.hιstory.recs">Hιstory Requuements

Management </A>- document, update and monitor History business requιrements</LI>

<BR>&nbsp;</UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news -private hcsc mergers.tx_ιl.bftf.ITS">ITS</A>&nbsp;</LI>

<UL> <LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate. hcsc. mergers tx_ιl.bftf.ITS.ιssues">ITS Issues</A>

- document, update and monitor ITS ιssues</LI>

<LI> <A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc.mergers.tx_il.bftf.ITS.status">ITS Status Reports</A>

- document, update and monitor ITS status topιcs</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate hcsc. mergers. tx il bftf.ITS.recs">ITS Requirements Management</A> - document, update and monitor ITS business requιrements</LI>

<BR>&nbsp;< UL>

<LI> <A HREF="news:pπvate. hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.bftf.leaders">Workgroup Leaders

Dιscussιon</A> - discuss topics and issues affecting multiple WorkGroups, such as WorkGroup leader meeting agenda topιcs</LI>

<BR>&nbsp;< UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news'pπvate.hcsc mergers, tx il.tetf >Technology Task Force</A><A HREF="news.//142 160 15.53/hcsc.pπvate mergers.tx_il.tetf >&nbsp,</A></LI>

<UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="nevvs private hcsc mergers tx_ιl tetf status">TETF Status Reports</A> - document, update and monitor TETF status topιcs&nbsp;</LI>

<BR>&nbsp;< UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc.tx_ιl.bρtf >Budget &amp; Performance Task Force&nbsp;</Ax/LI>

<UL> <LI> <A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc.mergers tx_ιl.bptf.status">BPTF Status Reports</A>

- document, update and monitor BPTF status topιcs&nbsp;</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate. hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.bptf.budgets">Transιtιon Budgets</A> - document and monitor transition budgets</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate. hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.bptf.qualιty">Qualιty Management</A>

- document and monitor quality-related topιcs</LI>

<BR>&nbsp;</UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate. hcsc. mergers, tx il.dctf >Document Control Task Force</A><A HREF="news://142.160.15.53/hcsc.pπvate.mergers.tx_ιl.dctf>&nbsp,</A></LI>

<UL> <LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate. hcsc. mergers. tx il dctf status">DCTF Status Reports</A> - document, update and monitor DCTF status topιcs&nbsp;</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate. hcsc. mergers tx_ιl.dctf.ιnstalls">Image Installatιons</A> - document, update and monitor Image ιnstallatιons</LI>

<BR>&nbsp,< UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news. private. hcsc mergers. tx_ιl.ιssues">Transιtιon Issue Management/ A> - document, update and monitor Transition Management ιssues&nbsp,</LI>

<UL; <LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc.mergers.tx_ιl. issues. exec ">Executιve Issues Management</A> - document, update and monitor Transition Management issues to be addressed by Executive Management</LI>

<BR>&nbsp;</UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news pπvate.hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.benefιts">Benefιts Realιzatιon</A><A HREF="news://142.160.15.53/hcsc.pπvate.mergers tx_ιl.benefιts">&nbsp;</A></LI>

<UL> <LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.benefιts.BFTF">BPTF Benefits</A> - discuss, update and monitor BFTF benefits and models&nbsp,</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF- 'news:pnvate.hcsc. mergers. tx_ιl.benefιts.DCTF">DCTF Benefιts</A>

- discuss, update and monitor DCTF benefits and models&nbsp;</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate. hcsc. mergers tx_ιl.benefιts.TETF">TETF Benefιts</A>

- discuss, update and monitor TETF benefits and models</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate.hcsc mergers. tx il. benefits. other">Other Division Benefits</A> - discuss, update and monitor Other Division benefits and models</LI>

<BR>&nbsp;</UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news:pπvate. hcsc. mergers. tx_il.cιmp">Contιnuous Improvement</A>

- document suggestions and ideas for improving transition activities, work, deliverables, etc.</LI>

<BR>&nbsp,

<LI>

<A HREF="news private hcsc. mergers tx_il.mtergroup">Intergroup

<UL> <L1> <A HREF="news pπvate hcsc mergers tx il mtergroup market">Marketιng</A> -document, update and monitor Marketing topics related to transιtιon</LI>

<LI> <A HREF="news private hcsc mergers tx_ιl mtergroup legal">Legal</A> -document, update and monitor Legal topics related to transιtιon</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news private hcsc mergers tx il mtergroup finance">Fιnance</A> -document, update and monitor Finance topics related to transιtιon</LI>

<LI>

<A HREF="news pπvate hcsc mergers tx il mtergroup HR">HR</A> -document, update and monitor HR topics related to transιtιon</LI>

<BR>&nbsp,< UL>

<LI>

<A HREF="news pπvate hcsc mergers tx il comms">Mass Communιcatιons</A> - review and update transition-related commumcatιons</LI>

<BR>&nbsp, <LI>

<A HREF="news pπvate hcsc mergers tx il PSC">Polιcy Steering Commιttee</A> - discuss topics and issues to be addressed by PSC</LI>

<BR>&nbsp, <LI>

<A HREF="news private hcsc mergers tx_ιl LAC">Lιne Advisory Comπuttee</A> - discuss topics and issues to be addressed by LAC</LI>

< UL> </TD>

<TD BGCOLOR="#CCCC99" BACKGROUND=" /images/typeareanghtside gif xIMG SRC=" /images blank gif HEIGHT=200 WIDTH= 18></TD>

<TD BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"xIMG SRC=" /images blank gif HEIGHT=200 WIDTH=59x/TD> </TR>

<TR ALIGN=LEFT VALIGN=TOP>

<TDxIMG SRC= /images/blank gi HEIGHT= 18 WIDTH= 1 x/TD> <TDxIMG SRC=" /images/blank gif ' HEIGHT=18 WIDTH=18X/TD>

<TDxIMG SRC=" /images/blank gif HEIGHT=18 WIDTH=7x/TD>

<TDxIMG SRC=" /lmages/typearealeftcorner gif HEIGHT=18 WIDTH=18x/TD>

<TD COLSPAN="2"xIMG SRC=" /lmages/typeareabottom gif HEIGHT=18 WIDTH=552x/TD>

<TDxIMG SRC=" /lmages/typeareacomerπght gif HEIGHT=18 WIDTH=18x/TD>

<TDxIMG SRC=" /images/blank gif HEIGHT=18 WIDTH=59x/TD>

</TR>

</TABLE>

</BODY>

</HTML>

Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been descnbed in detail herein, it should be understood that the present invention may be embodied m many other specific forms without departing from the spiπt or scope of the invention Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restnctive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims

Claims

Claims/ claim
1. A method for facilitating the navigation of data comprising the steps of: (a) providing a plurality of links each corresponding to data; (b) retrieving the data upon selection of the corresponding link; and
(c) displaying the links each as a component of an indicia to imply a relationship between the data.
2. The method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the relationship is a progressional relationship.
3. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the relationship is a sequential relationship.
4. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the indicia implies a direction.
5. The method as set forth in claim 4, wherein the indicia is a pointer.
6. The method as set forth in claim 5, wherein the indicia is a chevron.
7. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein a currently selected link is visually differentiated with respect to the remaining links.
8. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein each component has a shape substantially similar to that of the indicia.
9. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the links are continuously displayed with the data to continuously imply the relationship.
10. A system for facilitating the navigation of data comprising:
(a) memory for storing a plurality of data pages;
(b) a display for depicting a plurality of links each corresponding to one of the data pages, the links each displayed as a component of an indicia to imply a relationship between the data pages; and (c) an input device for retrieving the data pages upon selection of the corresponding link.
11. The system as set forth in claim 10, wherein the relationship is a progressional relationship.
12. The system as set forth in claim 10, wherein the relationship is a sequential relationship.
13. The system as set forth in claim 10, wherein the indicia implies a direction.
14. The system as set forth in claim 13, wherein the indicia is a pointer.
15. The system as set forth in claim 14, wherein the indicia is a chevron.
16. The system as set forth in claim 10, wherein a currently selected link is visually differentiated with respect to the remaining links.
17. The system as set forth in claim 10, wherein each component has a shape substantially similar to that of the indicia.
18. The system as set forth in claim 10, wherein the links are continuously displayed with the data pages to continuously imply the relationship.
19. A computer program embodied on a computer-readable medium for facilitating the navigation of data comprising: (a) a code segment that provides a plurality of links each corresponding to data;
(b) a code segment that retrieves the data upon selection of the corresponding link; and
(c) a code segment that displays the links each as a component of an indicia to imply a relationship between the data.
20. The computer program as set forth in claim 19, wherein the relationship is a progressional relationship.
21. A method for providing effective access to data comprising the steps of:
(a) receiving data from multiple users in a plurality of categories;
(b) providing access to the data via an interface that lists the categories;
(c) subscribing to the categories of data upon the selection thereof; and (d) describing the categories on the interface.
22. The method as set forth in claim 21, wherein the data includes information related to merger and acquisition.
23. The method as set forth in claim 21, wherein the categories are listed in a hierarchy.
24. The method as set forth in claim 23, wherein the categories include a plurality of broad topics and a plurality of specific topics wherein each specific topic is encompassed by at least one of the broad topics.
25. The method as set forth in claim 21, wherein the categories are described by an accompanying string of descriptive data.
26. The method as set forth in claim 21 , wherein the categories are described by a string of descriptive data that constitutes a link to the data.
27. The method as set forth in claim 21, further comprising the step of subscribing to and accessing the categories of data in response to a single user action.
28. A system for providing effective access to data comprising:
(a) memory for storing data from multiple users in a plurality of categories; (b) a display for depicting an interface with a list of the categories thereon, the categories being described on the interface; and (c) a user input device for subscribing to the categories of data upon the selection thereof.
29. The system as set forth in claim 28, wherein the data includes information related to merger and acquisition.
30. The system as set forth in claim 28, wherein the categories are listed in a hierarchy.
31. The system as set forth in claim 30, wherein the categories include a plurality of broad topics and a plurality of specific topics wherein each specific topic is encompassed by at least one of the broad topics.
32. The system as set forth in claim 28, wherein the categories are described by an accompanying string of descriptive data.
33. The system as set forth in claim 28, wherein the categories are described by a string of descriptive data that constitutes a link to the data.
34. The system as set forth in claim 28, wherein the system is adapted for subscribing to and accessing the categories of data in response to a single user action.
35. A computer program embodied on a computer-readable medium for providing effective access to data comprising:
(a) a code segment that receives data from multiple users in a plurality of categories; (b) a code segment that provides access to the data via an interface that lists the categories;
(c) a code segment that subscribes to the categories of data upon the selection thereof; and
(d) a code segment that displays a description of the categories on the interface.
36. The computer program as set forth in claim 35, wherein the data includes information related to merger and acquisition.
37. The computer program as set forth in claim 35, wherein the categories are listed in a hierarchy.
38. The computer program as set forth in claim 37, wherein the categories include a plurality of broad topics and a plurality of specific topics wherein each specific topic is encompassed by at least one of the broad topics.
39. The computer program as set forth in claim 35, wherein the categories are described by an accompanying string of descriptive data.
40. The computer program as set forth in claim 35, wherein the categories are described by a string of descriptive data that constitutes a link to the data.
41. A method for effectively collecting and disseminating information comprising the steps of: (a) receiving data from multiple users in a plurality of categories;
(b) providing access to the data via an interface that lists the categories; and
(c) subscribing and accessing the categories of data in response to one user action.
42. The method as set forth in claim 41 , wherein the data includes information related to merger and acquisition.
43. The method as set forth in claim 41, wherein the categories are listed in hierarchy.
44. The method as set forth in claim 43, wherein the categories include a plurality of broad topics and a plurality of specific topics each encompassed by at least one of the broad topics.
45. The method as set forth in claim 41, further comprising the step of describing the categories on the interface.
46. The method as set forth in claim 45, wherein the categories are described by an accompanying string of descriptive data.
47. The method as set forth in claim 45, wherein the categories are described by a string of descriptive data that constitutes a link to the data.
48. A system for effectively collecting and disseminating information comprising:
(a) memory for storing data from multiple users in a plurality of categories;
(b) a display for depicting an interface with a list of categories of data thereon; and
(c) a user input device for subscribing to the categories and accessing the categories in response to one user action.
49. The system as set forth in claim 48, wherein the data includes information related to merger and acquisition.
50. The system as set forth in claim 48, wherein the categories are listed in hierarchy.
51. The system as set forth in claim 50, wherein the categories include a plurality of broad topics and a plurality of specific topics each encompassed by at least one of the broad topics.
52. The system as set forth in claim 48, further comprising a description of the categories on the interface.
53. The system as set forth in claim 52, wherein the categories are described by an accompanying string of descriptive data.
54. The system as set forth in claim 52, wherein the categories are described by a string of descriptive data that constitutes a link to the data.
55. A computer program embodied on a computer-readable medium for effectively collecting and disseminating information comprising:
(a) a code segment that receives data from multiple users in a plurality of categories;
(b) a code segment that provides access to the data via an interface that lists the categories; and (c) a code segment that subscribes and accesses the categories of data in response to one user action.
56. The computer program as set forth in claim 55, wherein the data includes information related to merger and acquisition.
57. The computer program as set forth in claim 55, wherein the categories are listed in hierarchy.
58. The computer program as set forth in claim 57, whereirf the categories include a plurality of broad topics and a plurality of specific topics each encompassed by at least one of the broad topics.
59. The computer program as set forth in claim 55, further comprising a description of the categories on the interface. The computer program as set forth in claim 59, wherein the categories are described by an accompanying string of descriptive data.
EP00986233A 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data Withdrawn EP1275060A2 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/447,941 US6671692B1 (en) 1999-11-23 1999-11-23 System for facilitating the navigation of data
US447941 1999-11-23
US09/449,421 US6571235B1 (en) 1999-11-23 1999-11-23 System for providing an interface for accessing data in a discussion database
US09/448,624 US6671693B1 (en) 1999-11-23 1999-11-23 System for effectively collecting and disseminating data
US448624 1999-11-23
US449421 1999-11-23
PCT/US2000/032248 WO2001039047A2 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP08162533A EP1986112A1 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for providing a summary of data
EP08162531A EP1986111A1 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for effectively collecting and disseminating information
EP08153773A EP1939769A3 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08153773A Division EP1939769A3 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1275060A2 true EP1275060A2 (en) 2003-01-15

Family

ID=27412342

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08162533A Withdrawn EP1986112A1 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for providing a summary of data
EP08153773A Withdrawn EP1939769A3 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data
EP00986233A Withdrawn EP1275060A2 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data
EP08162531A Withdrawn EP1986111A1 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for effectively collecting and disseminating information

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08162533A Withdrawn EP1986112A1 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for providing a summary of data
EP08153773A Withdrawn EP1939769A3 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08162531A Withdrawn EP1986111A1 (en) 1999-11-23 2000-11-22 Method for effectively collecting and disseminating information

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (4) EP1986112A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2251101A (en)
WO (1) WO2001039047A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1986112A1 (en) 1999-11-23 2008-10-29 Accenture LLP Method for providing a summary of data

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19841060A1 (en) 1998-09-09 2000-03-16 Bosch Gmbh Robert Rotation unit for a keyboard lid of a portable telephone, and such a telephone
AU2251101A (en) 1999-11-23 2001-06-04 Andersen Consulting Llp Method for navigation, interface, collection and dissemination of data

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0139047A2 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1986112A1 (en) 1999-11-23 2008-10-29 Accenture LLP Method for providing a summary of data
EP1986111A1 (en) 1999-11-23 2008-10-29 Accenture LLP Method for effectively collecting and disseminating information

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2001039047A9 (en) 2002-05-30
WO2001039047A3 (en) 2008-01-17
EP1939769A2 (en) 2008-07-02
EP1939769A3 (en) 2008-09-24
EP1986112A1 (en) 2008-10-29
EP1986111A1 (en) 2008-10-29
WO2001039047A2 (en) 2001-05-31
AU2251101A (en) 2001-06-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Blomberg et al. Reflections on a work-oriented design project
Puerta et al. XIML: a common representation for interaction data
Eisenstein et al. Applying model-based techniques to the development of UIs for mobile computers
US7478076B1 (en) Decision-making system, method and computer program product
US9262715B1 (en) System and method to provide a customized problem solving environment for the development of user thinking about an arbitrary problem
Engelbart et al. Working together
Rice et al. Using the Web Instead of a Window System.
US20030046345A1 (en) System and method for project management
Berners-Lee et al. WorldWideWeb: Proposal for a HyperText project
US6041303A (en) Method of assisting the conducting of a research project
Hill et al. Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning
US6546393B1 (en) System method and article of manufacture for dynamically user-generated internet search directory based on prioritized server-sided user bookmarks
US20100169233A1 (en) Software system for managing information in context
Trigg Guided tours and tabletops: tools for communicating in a hypertext environment
JP2005196504A (en) System capable of communication with tag by providing tag function to client computer
US6098061A (en) Computer system for interactive help using human-understandable knowledge and computer-understandable knowledge
Mori et al. Design and development of multidevice user interfaces through multiple logical descriptions
Cousins et al. The digital library integrated task environment (DLITE)
Loucks DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS: A CRITIQUE AND A CHALLENGE 1
Fischer Applications in computing for social anthropologists
US20050015357A1 (en) System and method for content development
Malone What makes computer games fun?
Shneiderman Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages
WO2010005780A2 (en) Book creation in an online collaborative environment
Puerta et al. XIML: A universal language for user interfaces

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated contracting states:

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent to

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020624

RIN1 Inventor (correction)

Inventor name: FARNER, LAURA, L.

Inventor name: KIENE, BRUCE, P.

Inventor name: CHESTNUT, GREGORY, P.

Inventor name: RININGER, CHRISTOPHER, A.

Inventor name: BACKES, KAREN, L.

Inventor name: ADLER, SCOTT R.

Inventor name: DUROCHER, JOHN, F.

Inventor name: CHRISTENSEN, ALAN, R.

Inventor name: COYLE, DAVID, W.

Inventor name: GOUZIE, SUZANNE M.

Inventor name: MARPE, JAMES, M.

R17D Search report (correction)

Effective date: 20080117

17Q First examination report

Effective date: 20080314

RAP1 Transfer of rights of an ep published application

Owner name: ACCENTURE LLP

18W Withdrawn

Effective date: 20090618