EP1271282A2 - Divers environnements d'ordinateur sécurisés - Google Patents
Divers environnements d'ordinateur sécurisés Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1271282A2 EP1271282A2 EP02254079A EP02254079A EP1271282A2 EP 1271282 A2 EP1271282 A2 EP 1271282A2 EP 02254079 A EP02254079 A EP 02254079A EP 02254079 A EP02254079 A EP 02254079A EP 1271282 A2 EP1271282 A2 EP 1271282A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- operating system
- computing environment
- integrity metric
- host operating
- computing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/60—Protecting data
- G06F21/64—Protecting data integrity, e.g. using checksums, certificates or signatures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/57—Certifying or maintaining trusted computer platforms, e.g. secure boots or power-downs, version controls, system software checks, secure updates or assessing vulnerabilities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2211/00—Indexing scheme relating to details of data-processing equipment not covered by groups G06F3/00 - G06F13/00
- G06F2211/009—Trust
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2211/00—Indexing scheme relating to details of data-processing equipment not covered by groups G06F3/00 - G06F13/00
- G06F2211/1097—Boot, Start, Initialise, Power
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2221/00—Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/21—Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/00 and subgroups addressing additional information or applications relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/2101—Auditing as a secondary aspect
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2221/00—Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/21—Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/00 and subgroups addressing additional information or applications relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/2103—Challenge-response
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2221/00—Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/21—Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/00 and subgroups addressing additional information or applications relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/2129—Authenticate client device independently of the user
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2221/00—Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/21—Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/00 and subgroups addressing additional information or applications relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/2141—Access rights, e.g. capability lists, access control lists, access tables, access matrices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2221/00—Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/21—Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/00 and subgroups addressing additional information or applications relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/2149—Restricted operating environment
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2221/00—Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/21—Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/00 and subgroups addressing additional information or applications relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F2221/2153—Using hardware token as a secondary aspect
Definitions
- the present invention relates in general to a method for providing multiple computing environments running on a single host computing platform, and relates to a method for verifying integrity of the computing environments.
- An aim of the present invention is to provide a method that allows multiple computing environments to be provided on a single host computing platform.
- a preferred aim is to provide a high degree of isolation between the multiple computing environments.
- Another preferred aim is to provide a method for verifying integrity of one computing environment independently of any other of the computing environments, such that each environment is independently trustworthy.
- a method for providing a trusted computing environment comprising the steps of: (a) providing a host operating system; (b) obtaining an integrity metric for the host operating system; (c) providing a computing environment including a guest operating system; and (d) obtaining an integrity metric for the computing environment.
- the step (b) includes obtaining the integrity metric during boot of the host operating system.
- the step (b) includes obtaining an integrity metric for a BIOS and/or an OS loader and/or an operating system software of the host operating system.
- the step (b) includes obtaining the integrity metric by performing data event logging, and/or by performing a hash function to all or selected data files associated with the host operating system.
- the step (b) comprises updating at least part of the integrity metric for the host operating system.
- the step (d) comprises obtaining an integrity metric of the guest operating system.
- the step (c) comprises providing a virtual machine application running on the host operating system for providing the guest operating system.
- the step (d) comprises obtaining an integrity metric of the virtual machine application.
- the step (c) comprises providing a process running on the guest operating system.
- the step (d) comprises obtaining an integrity metric of the process.
- the step (c) comprises providing the computing environment in a compartment of the host operating system.
- the host operating system is a compartmented operating system.
- the compartment confines the guest operating system. It is preferred that the step (d) comprises obtaining an integrity metric from a history of all processes launched in the compartment.
- the step (d) comprises updating at least part of the integrity metric for the computing environment.
- the step (b) comprises storing the integrity metric for the host operating system, and/or the step (d) comprises storing the integrity metric for the computing environment.
- the integrity metric for the computing environment is stored associated with an identity of the computing environment.
- the step (b) and/or the step (d) comprises obtaining the integrity metric using a trusted device, and storing the integrity metric in a platform configuration register of the trusted device.
- the integrity metric for the computing environment is stored in a platform configuration register or group of platform configuration registers associated with the computing environment.
- the method preferably comprises the step of verifying the trusted computing environment including the steps of: (e) identifying the computing environment; (f) supplying the integrity metric for the host operating system; and (g) supplying the integrity metric for the computing environment.
- the step (c) comprises providing a plurality of computing environments each including a guest operating system
- the step (d) comprises obtaining an integrity metric of each computing environment.
- a method for verifying integrity of a trusted computing environment amongst many on a single host computing platform running a host operating system, each computing environment comprising a guest operating system running on the host operating system comprising the steps of: (a) identifying the computing environment; (b) supplying an integrity metric of the host operating system; and (c) supplying an integrity metric associated with the identified computing environment.
- the step (a) comprises receiving identity information associated with the computing environment, such as receiving information about a process running in a computing environment, and determining the computing environment which contains that process.
- a computing platform comprising: a host operating system; a plurality of computing environments each comprising a guest operating system running on the host operating system; and a trusted device for obtaining an integrity metric of the host operating system and an integrity metric of each computing environment.
- the trusted device stores the integrity metric for the host operating system and the integrity metric for each guest operating system.
- the trusted device stores each integrity metric in a platform configuration register or a group of platform configuration registers.
- the trusted device allocates a platform configuration register or group of platform configuration registers to each computing environment.
- FIG. 1 shows a computing platform 20 employed in preferred embodiments of the present invention.
- the computing platform 20 comprises hardware 21 operating under the control of a host operating system 22.
- the hardware 21 may include standard features such as a keyboard, a mouse and a visual display unit which provide a physical user interface 211 to a local user of the computing platform.
- the hardware 21 also suitably comprises a computing unit 212 comprising a main processor, a main memory, an input/output device and a file storage device which together allow the performance of computing operations.
- Other parts of the computing platform are not shown, such as connections to a local or global network. This is merely one example form of computing platform and many other specific forms of hardware are applicable to the present invention.
- the hardware 21 includes a trusted device 213.
- the trusted device 213 is suitably a physical component such as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC).
- ASIC application specific integrated circuit
- the trusted device is mounted within a tamper-resistant housing.
- the trusted device 213 is coupled to the computing unit 212, and ideally to the local user interface unit 211.
- the trusted device 213 is preferably mounted on a motherboard of the computing unit 212.
- the trusted device 213 functions to bind the identity of the computing platform 20 to reliably measured data that provides an integrity metric of the platform.
- the trusted device 213 performs a secure boot process when the computing platform 20 is reset to ensure that the host operating system 22 of the platform 20 is running properly and in a secure manner.
- the trusted device 213 acquires an integrity metric (or a group of integrity metrics) of the computing platform 20, such as by examining operation of the computing unit 212 and the local user interface unit 211.
- the integrity metrics are then available for a user to determine whether to trust the computing platform to operate is a predicted manner.
- a trusted computing platform is expected not to be subject to subversion such as by a virus or by unauthorised access.
- the user includes a local user of the computing platform, or a remote user communicating with the computing platform by networking (including LAN, WAN, internet and other forms of networking).
- WO 00/48063 discloses an example computing platform suitable for use in preferred embodiments of the present invention.
- the trusted device 213 acquires a hash of a BIOS memory of the computing unit 212 after reset.
- the trusted device 213 receives memory read signals from the main processor and returns instructions for the main processor to form the hash.
- the hash is stored in the trusted device 213, which then returns an instruction that calls the BIOS program and a boot procedure continues as normal.
- the trusted device 213 controls the local user interface 211 such that a local user can trust the display of data provided on a visual display unit.
- WO 00/73913 Hewlett-Packard discloses an example system for providing a trustworthy user interface by locating a driver for the visual display unit within the trusted device 213.
- the hardware 21 may also comprise a trusted user interface for performing secure communication with a user device such as a smart card held by the user.
- the trusted user interface allows the user to perform trusted communications with the trusted device 213 .in order to verify the integrity of the computing platform 20.
- the use of a smart card or other token for trusted user interaction is described in more detail in WO 00/54125 (Hewlett-Packard) and WO 00/54126 (Hewlett-Packard).
- Figure 1 shows a user 10 such as a remote client which is arranged to communicate with the computing platform 20, preferably over a secure channel 30.
- the secure channel 30 is protected, for example, using a shared session key, which is a secret which is known only to the computing platform 20 and the user 10.
- Providing a secure channel including generation of a shared session key will be familiar to the person skilled in the art.
- the user 10 performs an integrity challenge to confirm that communication is made with an expected computing platform 20, using a signature provided by the trusted device 213.
- any suitable authentication can be employed.
- the computing platform 20 provides a computing environment 24 which gives access to resources of the computing platform, such as processor time, memory area, and filespace.
- resources of the computing platform such as processor time, memory area, and filespace.
- a plurality of discrete computing environments 24 are provided.
- Each computing environment is logically distinct, but shares access to at least some of the resources of the computing platform with other computing environments.
- the computing environment 24 comprises a compartment.
- the actions or privileges within a compartment are constrained, particularly to restrict the ability of a process to execute methods and operations which have effect outside the compartment, such as methods that request network access or access to files outside of the compartment. Also, operation of the process within the compartment is performed with a high level of isolation from interference and prying by outside influences.
- the compartment is an operating system compartment controlled by a kernel of the host operating system 22. This is also referred to as a compartmented operating system or a trusted operating system.
- Compartmented operating systems have been available for several years in a form designed for handling and processing classified (military) information, using a containment mechanism enforced by a kernel of the operating system with mandatory access controls to resources of the computing platform such as files, processes and network connections.
- the operating system attaches labels to the resources and enforces a policy which governs the allowed interaction between these resources based on their label values.
- Most compartmented operating systems apply a policy based on the Bell-LaPadula model discussed in the paper "Applying Military Grade Security to the Internet” by C I Dalton and J F Griffin published in Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 29 (1997) 1799-1808.
- the preferred embodiment of the present invention adopts a simple and convenient form of operating system compartment.
- Each resource of the computing platform which it is desired to protect is given a label indicating the compartment to which that resource belongs.
- Mandatory access controls are performed by the kernel of the host operating system to ensure that resources from one compartment cannot interfere with resources from another compartment. Access controls can follow relatively simple rules, such as requiring an exact match of the label.
- Examples of resources include data structures describing individual processes, shared memory segments, semaphores, message queues, sockets, network packets, network interfaces and routing table entries.
- Communication between compartments is provided using narrow kernel level controlled interfaces to a transport mechanism such as TCP/UDP. Access to these communication interfaces is governed by rules specified on a compartment by compartment basis. At appropriate points in the kernel, access control checks are performed such as through the use of hooks to a dynamically loadable security module that consults a table of rules indicating which compartments are allowed to access the resources of another compartment. In the absence of a rule explicitly allowing a cross compartment access to take place, an access attempt is denied by the kernel. The rules enforce mandatory segmentation across individual compartments, except for those compartments that have been explicitly allowed to access another compartment's resources. Communication between a compartment and a network resource is provided in a similar manner. In the absence of an explicit rule, access between a compartment and a network resource is denied.
- each compartment is allocated an individual section of a file system of the computing platform.
- the section is a chroot of the main file system.
- Processes running within a particular compartment only have access to that section of the file system. Through kernel controls, the process is restricted to the predetermined section of file system and cannot escape. In particular, access to the root of the file system is denied.
- a compartment provides a high level of containment, whilst reducing implementation costs and changes required in order to implement an existing application within the compartment.
- Figure 2 shows a logical structure for a preferred computing environment 24 provided by the computing platform for running the process 23.
- the process 23 runs on a guest operating system 25.
- the guest operating system 25 is suitably provided by a virtual machine application 26.
- the virtual machine application 26 runs on the host operating system 22 and provides an image of a computing platform, or at least appropriate parts thereof.
- the virtual machine application 26 provides the virtual guest operating system 25 such that, as far as the process 23 is concerned, the process 23 runs on the guest operating system 25 equivalent to running on a host operating system 22.
- the guest operating system 25 is preferably a replica of the host operating system, or at least necessary parts thereof.
- the virtual machine application 26 to provide a different emulated software or hardware environment, such as a different operating system type or version.
- An example virtual machine application is sold under the trade mark VMware by VMware, Inc of Palo Alto, California, USA.
- the virtual machine application 26 assists security by isolating the process 23 from the remainder of the computing platform. Should problems occur during running of the process 23 or as a result thereof, the host operating system 22 can safely shut down the guest operating system 25 provided by the virtual machine application 26. Also, the virtual machine application 26 protects the host operating system 22 and hardware resources 21 from direct access by the process 23. Therefore, it is very difficult for the process 23 to subvert the host operating system 22. Further, the process 23 accesses resources of the computing platform made available through the virtual machine application 26. Each process 23 only sees resources of the computing platform allocated through the virtual machine application 26, such that a process 23 can be restricted to an appropriate share of the resource of the computing platform and cannot stop other processes having their allocated share.
- the virtual machine application 26 providing the guest operating system 25 runs in a compartment 220 of the host operating system 22.
- the compartment confines communications and data access of the virtual machine application.
- the compartment 220 provides secure separation between applications, such that processes are inhibited from communicating with each other, accessing each others status, or interfering with each other, except in accordance with strictly enforced access controls.
- a compartment assists the virtual machine application in resisting subversion by a process running in that computing environment.
- the process 23 runs in the computing environment 24. It is desired to confirm the integrity of this computing environment. Also, many similar computing environments can be provided on the computing platform simultaneously, and it is desired to confirm the integrity of one selected computing environment independently of the integrity of any other computing environment. That is, it is desired that the multiple computing environments are independently trustworthy.
- the use of a guest operating system 25, preferably in combination with a compartment 220 provides a high degree of isolation between computing environments, such that the integrity of one computing environment is not affected by activity in any other computing environment.
- the trusted device 213 is arranged to form an integrity metric (or a group of integrity metrics) of the host operating system 22. Also, in the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the trusted device 213 is arranged to obtain an integrity metric (or a group of integrity metrics) for each computing environment 24. Preferably, the trusted device 213 obtains an integrity metric of the guest operating system 25. Further, the trusted device preferably obtains an integrity metric of the virtual machine application 26. Each integrity metric suitably comprises one or more separate integrity metric values.
- the host operating system 22 has direct access to the trusted device 213.
- processes i.e. applications
- a trusted device driver 221 is provided, suitably as part of the host operating system 22.
- the trusted device driver 221 provides an interface available to applications running on the host operating system 22, including allowing results to be reported to the trusted device 213, and allowing stored integrity metric values to be obtained from the trusted device 213.
- FIG 3 shows a simplified example of the preferred trusted device 213.
- the trusted device 213 comprises an addressable storage such as a plurality of platform configuration registers (PCRs).
- PCRs platform configuration registers
- eight PCRs are shown, namely PCR_0 to PCR_7 although in practice many more PCRs are available.
- each PCR stores a digest such as a 160 bit hash value representing an integrity metric 231.
- a group of PCRs form a group of integrity metrics 230.
- the trusted device driver 221 allocates a PCR, or a group of PCRs, to the or each computing environment 24. Therefore, information concerning the integrity of each computing environment is independently available from the trusted device 213.
- the stored integrity metric value 231 preferably represents a sequence of integrity metric values obtained, for example, by examination of the host platform 20 periodically or in response to relevant events.
- the old stored integrity metric value is combined with a new integrity metric value to produce a new updated digest of the sequence of values.
- Figure 4 shows a preferred method for obtaining integrity metrics of a computing platform for providing multiple trusted computing environments.
- step 401 the host operating system 22 is provided.
- this includes the steps of starting a BIOS, starting an OS loader, and starting the host operating system as will be familiar to the skilled person.
- a group of integrity metrics 230 for the host operating system 22 are measured and reported to the trusted device 213.
- the trusted device 213 obtains an integrity metric for the BIOS, and preferably also obtains an integrity metric for the OS loader and the operating system software.
- integrity metric values relevant to the host operating system are stored in a group of PCRs (or other addressable storage) such that the integrity metrics 230 for the host operating system are available later. Steps 401 and 402 are shown separately for clarity. In practical embodiments of the invention it will be appreciated that the integrity metrics 230 are obtained concurrently with providing the host OS 22.
- step 403 additional integrity metrics are obtained relevant to other selected elements of the computing platform.
- the trusted device 213 performs data event logging as described in WO 00/73880 (Hewlett-Packard).
- the trusted device 213 may produce a digest by applying a hash function to all or selected data files stored on the computing platform, as described in WO 00/73904 (Hewlett-Packard).
- at least some of the integrity metrics obtained in step 402 or step 403 are updated periodically or in response to relevant events to confirm the current integrity status of the host operating system and related components of the computing platform.
- step 404 a guest operating system 25 is provided, to form a new computing environment 24.
- step 404 includes providing a virtual machine application 26 which provides the guest operating system 25.
- the step 404 includes providing the guest operating system 25 in a compartment 220 of the host operating system 22. Also, the step 404 preferably includes providing a history of all processes (applications) launched in the compartment. Here, it is desired to record whether any other applications have been launched alongside the virtual machine application 26 which provides the guest operating system 25.
- the trusted device 213 obtains an integrity metric for the computing environment 24.
- the trusted device 213 obtains an integrity metric or group of integrity metrics 230 for the guest operating system 25, and preferably the virtual machine application 26.
- the corresponding integrity metric values 231 are stored in a PCR or group of PCRs allocated to that computing environment.
- the step 405 preferably includes obtaining an integrity metric for the or each process 23 in the computing environment.
- each integrity metric is obtained by forming a digest (hash value) of program code of a process.
- the term integrity metric can refer to a single data item, or can refer to a metric formed from two or more parts each of which themselves can be considered an integrity metric.
- step 405 is repeated such that a current integrity status of the computing environment is available and history information is updated, periodically or in response to a relevant event.
- a result is reported to the trusted device driver 221 along with information identifying that particular computing environment, such as an arbitrary label.
- a process ID of the virtual machine application 26 is used to identify the computing environment.
- each logical computing environment is supplied with a secret, e.g. a secret is supplied to the virtual machine application 26 by the trusted device driver 221, and then the secret is subsequently used to identify the computing environment.
- the computing environment label such as a secret, is supplied by the host OS 22 when the virtual machine application 26 is launched.
- a secure channel is established for communicating with the computing platform 20.
- a secure channel is provided such as by using a trustworthy user interface and/or by using a token such as a smart card.
- a remote user 10 establishes a secure channel 30 such as by performing authentication of the computing platform, ideally using a signature from the trusted device 213.
- the user optionally employs trusted hardware, such as the user's own client platform, a PDA, mobile phone or other device, optionally in co-operation with a smart card or other token.
- the step 501 includes establishing the authentication and authorisation of the user.
- step 502 the user 10 requests demonstration of the integrity of a computing environment 24.
- the user 10 issues an integrity challenge.
- the challenge suitably includes a random number sequence (nonce). More detailed background information is provided in "TCPA Specification Version 1.0" published by the Trusted Computing Platform Alliance.
- the trusted device 213 supplies integrity metrics associated with the host operating system 22.
- these integrity metrics include integrity metrics for the BIOS, operating system loader and host operating system, and integrity metrics formed by periodic or event-driven checks on the host operating system and related components of the computing platform.
- the trusted device 213 supplies an integrity metric associated with the selected computing environment.
- the step 504 includes supplying integrity metrics associated with the virtual machine application 26, the guest operating system 25, the process 23, and a history of periodic or event-driven checks made on the integrity status of the computing environment 24.
- the step 504 preferably includes supplying a history of any applications launched by the host operating system in the same compartment as the guest operating system, i.e. alongside the virtual machine application 26.
- the integrity metric for the host operating system 22 and the computing environment 24 are compared against expected values, such as by using a certificate issued by a trusted party that is prepared to vouch for the integrity of the computing platform. If the comparison is successful, the computing environment is considered to be a trusted computing environment.
- Figure 6 shows the preferred computing platform of Figure 2 communicating with a user 10, to perform the method of Figure 5.
- the user 10 issues a request for verification of the integrity of a computing environment 24, suitably in the form of an integrity challenge.
- the integrity challenge is issued direct to a component of the host operating system 22, such as the trusted device driver 221.
- the integrity challenge includes information previously given to the user 10, such as an arbitrary label, which allows the trusted device driver 221 to establish the relevant computing environment 24.
- the external computing environment identity label given to the user 10 may be the same as, or complementary to, any information held internally identifying the computing environment.
- the external identity information supplied as part of the integrity challenge is matched against a list of computing environments currently provided on the host operating system, this step ideally being performed by the trusted device driver 221.
- the trusted device 213 supplies an integrity metric or group of integrity metrics 230 associated with the identified computing environment 24.
- the integrity challenge is issued from the user 10 and is received by a component of the relevant computing environment 24, such as the process 23 which suitably forms part of an application running in that computing environment 24.
- the integrity challenge is passed from the computing environment 24 to the trusted device driver 221.
- the trusted device driver 221 can readily establish the identity of the computing environment 214 passing the integrity challenge.
- the computing environment 24 supplies an internal computing environment identity label such as a process ID of the virtual machine application 26, or a secret previously given to the virtual machine application 26 by the host operating system 22.
- the trusted device 213 supplies integrity metrics associated with that computing environment 24.
- the guest operating system 25 is itself a compartmented operating system. Multiple applications can be run on the guest operating system 25, each within a separate compartment of the guest operating system. This embodiment enables each computing environment 24 to be subdivided, and the method described above is applied to the subdivided computing environments.
- a trusted computing environment is provided by using a trusted device to verify that a guest operating system has booted in a trusted manner.
- multiple trusted computing environments are provided.
- a first application can run in a first of the computing environments, whilst a second application can run in a second of the computing environments, where the first and second applications are mutually incompatible or one does not trust the other.
- the preferred implementation using a virtual machine application in combination with a compartment allows each computing environment to be independently trusted.
- each computing environment has an associated set of one or more integrity metrics which do not include or depend on information about any other computing environment.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Bioethics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Storage Device Security (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0114891 | 2001-06-19 | ||
GB0114891A GB2376764B (en) | 2001-06-19 | 2001-06-19 | Multiple trusted computing environments |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1271282A2 true EP1271282A2 (fr) | 2003-01-02 |
EP1271282A3 EP1271282A3 (fr) | 2007-10-03 |
Family
ID=9916868
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02254079A Withdrawn EP1271282A3 (fr) | 2001-06-19 | 2002-06-12 | Divers environnements d'ordinateur sécurisés |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7865876B2 (fr) |
EP (1) | EP1271282A3 (fr) |
GB (1) | GB2376764B (fr) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1645069A2 (fr) * | 2003-06-17 | 2006-04-12 | Digitalnet Government Solutions, Llc | Systeme informatique de confiance |
CN101820449A (zh) * | 2010-04-20 | 2010-09-01 | 江苏电力调度通信中心 | 跨安全区应用服务隔离平台 |
WO2011152910A1 (fr) * | 2010-06-02 | 2011-12-08 | Vmware, Inc. | Sécurisation de machines virtuelles de clients dans un nuage multi-locataires |
WO2016081867A1 (fr) * | 2014-11-20 | 2016-05-26 | Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. | Fourniture de sécurité pour systèmes informatiques |
Families Citing this family (107)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2376763B (en) * | 2001-06-19 | 2004-12-15 | Hewlett Packard Co | Demonstrating integrity of a compartment of a compartmented operating system |
GB2372592B (en) | 2001-02-23 | 2005-03-30 | Hewlett Packard Co | Information system |
GB2372595A (en) * | 2001-02-23 | 2002-08-28 | Hewlett Packard Co | Method of and apparatus for ascertaining the status of a data processing environment. |
GB2415530B (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2006-02-15 | Hewlett Packard Co | System and method for file system mandatory access control |
GB2382419B (en) * | 2001-11-22 | 2005-12-14 | Hewlett Packard Co | Apparatus and method for creating a trusted environment |
US7210169B2 (en) * | 2002-08-20 | 2007-04-24 | Intel Corporation | Originator authentication using platform attestation |
JP4777651B2 (ja) * | 2002-08-23 | 2011-09-21 | イグジット−キューブ,インク. | コンピュータシステム及びデータ保存方法 |
US6895491B2 (en) | 2002-09-26 | 2005-05-17 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Memory addressing for a virtual machine implementation on a computer processor supporting virtual hash-page-table searching |
US20050160423A1 (en) * | 2002-12-16 | 2005-07-21 | Bantz David F. | Enabling a guest virtual machine in a windows environment for policy-based participation in grid computations |
US7188062B1 (en) * | 2002-12-27 | 2007-03-06 | Unisys Corporation | Configuration management for an emulator operating system |
GB2399902A (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-29 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Security in trusted computing systems |
GB2399903A (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-29 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Security attributes of nodes in trusted computing systems |
GB2403820A (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2005-01-12 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Security policy in trusted computing systems |
DE602004001293T2 (de) * | 2003-06-26 | 2007-05-31 | St Microelectronics S.A. | Programmintegritätsprüfung mittels Statistiken |
US7464412B2 (en) | 2003-10-24 | 2008-12-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Providing secure input to a system with a high-assurance execution environment |
US7437613B2 (en) * | 2004-01-30 | 2008-10-14 | Intel Corporation | Protecting an operating system kernel from third party drivers |
US7877747B2 (en) | 2004-02-20 | 2011-01-25 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Flexible operating system operable as either native or as virtualized |
US7464406B2 (en) * | 2004-04-22 | 2008-12-09 | Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | System and method for user determination of secure software |
US7565522B2 (en) * | 2004-05-10 | 2009-07-21 | Intel Corporation | Methods and apparatus for integrity measurement of virtual machine monitor and operating system via secure launch |
US7784088B2 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2010-08-24 | Research In Motion Limited | Method and system for managing delayed user authentication |
US8219823B2 (en) * | 2005-03-04 | 2012-07-10 | Carter Ernst B | System for and method of managing access to a system using combinations of user information |
US7836299B2 (en) * | 2005-03-15 | 2010-11-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Virtualization of software configuration registers of the TPM cryptographic processor |
US20070056033A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2007-03-08 | Grawrock David W | Platform configuration apparatus, systems, and methods |
US7707629B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2010-04-27 | Intel Corporation | Platform configuration register virtualization apparatus, systems, and methods |
US9363481B2 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2016-06-07 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Protected media pipeline |
US20060294380A1 (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2006-12-28 | Selim Aissi | Mechanism to evaluate a token enabled computer system |
US7870565B2 (en) * | 2005-06-30 | 2011-01-11 | Intel Corporation | Systems and methods for secure host resource management |
JP4889638B2 (ja) * | 2005-07-14 | 2012-03-07 | パナソニック株式会社 | 検証方法、検証プログラム、記録媒体、情報処理装置、集積回路 |
CN100547515C (zh) * | 2005-07-15 | 2009-10-07 | 联想(北京)有限公司 | 支持可信计算的虚拟机系统及在其上实现可信计算的方法 |
US20070204266A1 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2007-08-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for dynamically managing virtual machines |
GB0615015D0 (en) | 2006-07-28 | 2006-09-06 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Secure use of user secrets on a computing platform |
WO2008018055A2 (fr) * | 2006-08-09 | 2008-02-14 | Neocleus Ltd | Sécurité extranet |
US8024815B2 (en) * | 2006-09-15 | 2011-09-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Isolation environment-based information access |
US9171161B2 (en) * | 2006-11-09 | 2015-10-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Trusted device having virtualized registers |
EP2130322B1 (fr) * | 2007-03-21 | 2014-06-25 | Intel Corporation | Protection contre des attaques d'usurpation d'identité |
WO2008114256A2 (fr) * | 2007-03-22 | 2008-09-25 | Neocleus Ltd. | Ouverture de session locale unique sécurisée |
US8209684B2 (en) * | 2007-07-20 | 2012-06-26 | Eg Innovations Pte. Ltd. | Monitoring system for virtual application environments |
US8959516B2 (en) | 2007-07-30 | 2015-02-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods and systems for coordinated financial transactions in distributed and parallel environments |
US8763115B2 (en) * | 2007-08-08 | 2014-06-24 | Vmware, Inc. | Impeding progress of malicious guest software |
US8205248B2 (en) * | 2007-09-30 | 2012-06-19 | Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Local verification of trusted display based on remote server verification |
US20090158299A1 (en) * | 2007-10-31 | 2009-06-18 | Carter Ernst B | System for and method of uniform synchronization between multiple kernels running on single computer systems with multiple CPUs installed |
US8584229B2 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2013-11-12 | Intel Corporation | Methods and apparatus supporting access to physical and virtual trusted platform modules |
US8474037B2 (en) * | 2008-01-07 | 2013-06-25 | Intel Corporation | Stateless attestation system |
US9164925B2 (en) * | 2008-01-15 | 2015-10-20 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for authorizing host to access portable storage device |
US20090222880A1 (en) * | 2008-03-03 | 2009-09-03 | Tresys Technology, Llc | Configurable access control security for virtualization |
EP2286333A4 (fr) * | 2008-06-05 | 2012-08-08 | Neocleus Israel Ltd | Client informatique multifonction sécurisé |
US8954897B2 (en) * | 2008-08-28 | 2015-02-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Protecting a virtual guest machine from attacks by an infected host |
US8989705B1 (en) | 2009-06-18 | 2015-03-24 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Secure placement of centralized media controller application in mobile access terminal |
US8869264B2 (en) | 2010-10-01 | 2014-10-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Attesting a component of a system during a boot process |
GB2521101B (en) * | 2010-11-18 | 2019-01-30 | Ibm | A method for attesting a plurality of data processing systems |
US8677115B2 (en) * | 2010-12-09 | 2014-03-18 | Red Hat, Inc. | Methods for verifying system integrity |
WO2012093924A1 (fr) * | 2011-01-07 | 2012-07-12 | Mimos Berhad | Système et procédé pour fournir des fonctionnalités de module de plate-forme de confiance (tpm) sur serveur à distance pour multiples utilisateurs |
US8412945B2 (en) | 2011-08-09 | 2013-04-02 | CloudPassage, Inc. | Systems and methods for implementing security in a cloud computing environment |
CN102289631B (zh) * | 2011-08-12 | 2014-12-10 | 无锡城市云计算中心有限公司 | 一种虚拟安全计算环境的实现方法 |
US8694995B2 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2014-04-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Application initiated negotiations for resources meeting a performance parameter in a virtualized computing environment |
US8863141B2 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2014-10-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Estimating migration costs for migrating logical partitions within a virtualized computing environment based on a migration cost history |
US8712407B1 (en) | 2012-04-05 | 2014-04-29 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Multiple secure elements in mobile electronic device with near field communication capability |
US9027102B2 (en) | 2012-05-11 | 2015-05-05 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Web server bypass of backend process on near field communications and secure element chips |
US8862181B1 (en) | 2012-05-29 | 2014-10-14 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Electronic purchase transaction trust infrastructure |
US9282898B2 (en) | 2012-06-25 | 2016-03-15 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | End-to-end trusted communications infrastructure |
US9066230B1 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2015-06-23 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted policy and charging enforcement function |
US8649770B1 (en) | 2012-07-02 | 2014-02-11 | Sprint Communications Company, L.P. | Extended trusted security zone radio modem |
US8667607B2 (en) | 2012-07-24 | 2014-03-04 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted security zone access to peripheral devices |
US8863252B1 (en) | 2012-07-25 | 2014-10-14 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted access to third party applications systems and methods |
US9183412B2 (en) * | 2012-08-10 | 2015-11-10 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Systems and methods for provisioning and using multiple trusted security zones on an electronic device |
US9015068B1 (en) | 2012-08-25 | 2015-04-21 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Framework for real-time brokering of digital content delivery |
US9215180B1 (en) | 2012-08-25 | 2015-12-15 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | File retrieval in real-time brokering of digital content |
US8954588B1 (en) | 2012-08-25 | 2015-02-10 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Reservations in real-time brokering of digital content delivery |
US8752140B1 (en) | 2012-09-11 | 2014-06-10 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | System and methods for trusted internet domain networking |
US8938796B2 (en) | 2012-09-20 | 2015-01-20 | Paul Case, SR. | Case secure computer architecture |
US9578664B1 (en) | 2013-02-07 | 2017-02-21 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted signaling in 3GPP interfaces in a network function virtualization wireless communication system |
US9161227B1 (en) | 2013-02-07 | 2015-10-13 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted signaling in long term evolution (LTE) 4G wireless communication |
US9104840B1 (en) | 2013-03-05 | 2015-08-11 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted security zone watermark |
US9230081B2 (en) | 2013-03-05 | 2016-01-05 | Intel Corporation | User authorization and presence detection in isolation from interference from and control by host central processing unit and operating system |
US8881977B1 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2014-11-11 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Point-of-sale and automated teller machine transactions using trusted mobile access device |
US9613208B1 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2017-04-04 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted security zone enhanced with trusted hardware drivers |
US9049013B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-06-02 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted security zone containers for the protection and confidentiality of trusted service manager data |
US9049186B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-06-02 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted security zone re-provisioning and re-use capability for refurbished mobile devices |
US9191388B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-11-17 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted security zone communication addressing on an electronic device |
US9021585B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-04-28 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | JTAG fuse vulnerability determination and protection using a trusted execution environment |
US9374363B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-06-21 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Restricting access of a portable communication device to confidential data or applications via a remote network based on event triggers generated by the portable communication device |
US8984592B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-03-17 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Enablement of a trusted security zone authentication for remote mobile device management systems and methods |
US9454723B1 (en) | 2013-04-04 | 2016-09-27 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Radio frequency identity (RFID) chip electrically and communicatively coupled to motherboard of mobile communication device |
US9171243B1 (en) | 2013-04-04 | 2015-10-27 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | System for managing a digest of biographical information stored in a radio frequency identity chip coupled to a mobile communication device |
US9324016B1 (en) | 2013-04-04 | 2016-04-26 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Digest of biographical information for an electronic device with static and dynamic portions |
US9838869B1 (en) | 2013-04-10 | 2017-12-05 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Delivering digital content to a mobile device via a digital rights clearing house |
US9443088B1 (en) | 2013-04-15 | 2016-09-13 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Protection for multimedia files pre-downloaded to a mobile device |
US9069952B1 (en) | 2013-05-20 | 2015-06-30 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Method for enabling hardware assisted operating system region for safe execution of untrusted code using trusted transitional memory |
US9560519B1 (en) | 2013-06-06 | 2017-01-31 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Mobile communication device profound identity brokering framework |
US9705869B2 (en) | 2013-06-27 | 2017-07-11 | Intel Corporation | Continuous multi-factor authentication |
US9183606B1 (en) | 2013-07-10 | 2015-11-10 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted processing location within a graphics processing unit |
US9208339B1 (en) | 2013-08-12 | 2015-12-08 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Verifying Applications in Virtual Environments Using a Trusted Security Zone |
US9185626B1 (en) | 2013-10-29 | 2015-11-10 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Secure peer-to-peer call forking facilitated by trusted 3rd party voice server provisioning |
US9191522B1 (en) | 2013-11-08 | 2015-11-17 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Billing varied service based on tier |
US9161325B1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2015-10-13 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Subscriber identity module virtualization |
US9118655B1 (en) | 2014-01-24 | 2015-08-25 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted display and transmission of digital ticket documentation |
US9226145B1 (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2015-12-29 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Verification of mobile device integrity during activation |
US9230085B1 (en) | 2014-07-29 | 2016-01-05 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Network based temporary trust extension to a remote or mobile device enabled via specialized cloud services |
US9779232B1 (en) | 2015-01-14 | 2017-10-03 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Trusted code generation and verification to prevent fraud from maleficent external devices that capture data |
US9830295B2 (en) | 2015-01-15 | 2017-11-28 | Nxp Usa, Inc. | Resource domain partioning in a data processing system |
US9838868B1 (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2017-12-05 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Mated universal serial bus (USB) wireless dongles configured with destination addresses |
US9473945B1 (en) | 2015-04-07 | 2016-10-18 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Infrastructure for secure short message transmission |
US9819679B1 (en) | 2015-09-14 | 2017-11-14 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Hardware assisted provenance proof of named data networking associated to device data, addresses, services, and servers |
US10073964B2 (en) | 2015-09-25 | 2018-09-11 | Intel Corporation | Secure authentication protocol systems and methods |
US10282719B1 (en) | 2015-11-12 | 2019-05-07 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Secure and trusted device-based billing and charging process using privilege for network proxy authentication and audit |
US9817992B1 (en) | 2015-11-20 | 2017-11-14 | Sprint Communications Company Lp. | System and method for secure USIM wireless network access |
US10499249B1 (en) | 2017-07-11 | 2019-12-03 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Data link layer trust signaling in communication network |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2000016200A1 (fr) * | 1998-09-10 | 2000-03-23 | Sanctum Ltd. | Procede et systeme pour actualiser des contextes d'exploitation restreints pour programmes d'application ou systemes d'exploitation |
WO2000073904A1 (fr) * | 1999-05-28 | 2000-12-07 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Controle de l'integrite des donnees dans une unite de calcul fiable |
WO2001042889A2 (fr) * | 1999-12-10 | 2001-06-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Domaines d'amorçage et regles d'amorçages cote client |
Family Cites Families (152)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4747040A (en) * | 1985-10-09 | 1988-05-24 | American Telephone & Telegraph Company | Dual operating system computer |
US5038281A (en) | 1986-09-19 | 1991-08-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Acceleration of system interrupts between operating systems in guest-host relationship |
US4799156A (en) * | 1986-10-01 | 1989-01-17 | Strategic Processing Corporation | Interactive market management system |
EP0304033A3 (fr) | 1987-08-19 | 1990-07-04 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Procédé de diagnostic d'une installation de traitement de données atteinte par des virus d'ordinateur |
US5144660A (en) * | 1988-08-31 | 1992-09-01 | Rose Anthony M | Securing a computer against undesired write operations to or read operations from a mass storage device |
US4984272A (en) * | 1988-11-30 | 1991-01-08 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Secure file handling in a computer operating system |
US4926476A (en) * | 1989-02-03 | 1990-05-15 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for secure execution of untrusted software |
US4962533A (en) * | 1989-02-17 | 1990-10-09 | Texas Instrument Incorporated | Data protection for computer systems |
US5278973A (en) * | 1989-03-27 | 1994-01-11 | Unisys Corporation | Dual operating system computer |
US5048085A (en) | 1989-10-06 | 1991-09-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Transaction system security method and apparatus |
US5029206A (en) * | 1989-12-27 | 1991-07-02 | Motorola, Inc. | Uniform interface for cryptographic services |
US5261104A (en) * | 1990-03-22 | 1993-11-09 | International Business Machines | Flexible computer initialization |
US5325529A (en) * | 1990-05-18 | 1994-06-28 | Compaq Computer Corporation | External boot information loading of a personal computer |
US5032979A (en) | 1990-06-22 | 1991-07-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Distributed security auditing subsystem for an operating system |
US5204961A (en) | 1990-06-25 | 1993-04-20 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Computer network operating with multilevel hierarchical security with selectable common trust realms and corresponding security protocols |
US5136711A (en) * | 1990-10-17 | 1992-08-04 | Ast Research | System for multiple access hard disk partitioning |
US5414860A (en) * | 1991-01-29 | 1995-05-09 | International Business Machines Incorporated | Power management initialization for a computer operable under a plurality of operating systems |
EP0510244A1 (fr) | 1991-04-22 | 1992-10-28 | Acer Incorporated | Méthode et dispositif de protection d'un ordinateur contre les virus informatiques |
JPH06214670A (ja) * | 1991-04-29 | 1994-08-05 | Intel Corp | コンピュータ装置およびそれを初期化する方法 |
US5504814A (en) * | 1991-07-10 | 1996-04-02 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Efficient security kernel for the 80960 extended architecture |
US5694590A (en) | 1991-09-27 | 1997-12-02 | The Mitre Corporation | Apparatus and method for the detection of security violations in multilevel secure databases |
JPH0736175B2 (ja) * | 1991-10-11 | 1995-04-19 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション | データ処理システムのシステム構成設定方法、データ処理システム、及びデータ処理システム用拡張ユニット |
AU3777593A (en) * | 1992-02-26 | 1993-09-13 | Paul C. Clark | System for protecting computers via intelligent tokens or smart cards |
JP2986299B2 (ja) * | 1992-04-15 | 1999-12-06 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション | 周辺装置接続検出システム |
US5421006A (en) | 1992-05-07 | 1995-05-30 | Compaq Computer Corp. | Method and apparatus for assessing integrity of computer system software |
US5359659A (en) * | 1992-06-19 | 1994-10-25 | Doren Rosenthal | Method for securing software against corruption by computer viruses |
US5235642A (en) | 1992-07-21 | 1993-08-10 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Access control subsystem and method for distributed computer system using locally cached authentication credentials |
US5361359A (en) | 1992-08-31 | 1994-11-01 | Trusted Information Systems, Inc. | System and method for controlling the use of a computer |
WO1994011967A1 (fr) | 1992-11-16 | 1994-05-26 | Stephen Weeks | Systemes servant a donner des informations, particulierement systemes pour visites guidees |
US5379342A (en) * | 1993-01-07 | 1995-01-03 | International Business Machines Corp. | Method and apparatus for providing enhanced data verification in a computer system |
US5440723A (en) * | 1993-01-19 | 1995-08-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic immune system for computers and computer networks |
US5497494A (en) * | 1993-07-23 | 1996-03-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for saving and restoring the state of a CPU executing code in protected mode |
US5548763A (en) * | 1993-07-26 | 1996-08-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Desk top computer system having multi-level power management |
US5444850A (en) | 1993-08-04 | 1995-08-22 | Trend Micro Devices Incorporated | Method and apparatus for controlling network and workstation access prior to workstation boot |
US5680452A (en) * | 1993-10-18 | 1997-10-21 | Tecsec Inc. | Distributed cryptographic object method |
US5404532A (en) * | 1993-11-30 | 1995-04-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Persistent/impervious event forwarding discriminator |
US5504910A (en) * | 1994-02-02 | 1996-04-02 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Power management unit including software configurable state register and time-out counters for protecting against misbehaved software |
US5572590A (en) * | 1994-04-12 | 1996-11-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Discrimination of malicious changes to digital information using multiple signatures |
GB9408405D0 (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1994-06-22 | Int Computers Ltd | High availibilty computer system |
US5473692A (en) * | 1994-09-07 | 1995-12-05 | Intel Corporation | Roving software license for a hardware agent |
US5530758A (en) * | 1994-06-03 | 1996-06-25 | Motorola, Inc. | Operational methods for a secure node in a computer network |
US5483649A (en) * | 1994-07-01 | 1996-01-09 | Ybm Technologies, Inc. | Personal computer security system |
US5748964A (en) * | 1994-12-20 | 1998-05-05 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Bytecode program interpreter apparatus and method with pre-verification of data type restrictions |
US5621912A (en) * | 1994-12-29 | 1997-04-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for enabling monitoring of guests and native operating systems |
US5495569A (en) * | 1994-12-30 | 1996-02-27 | Compaq Computer Corp. | Circuit for ensuring that a local interrupt controller in a microprocessor is powered up active |
US5555373A (en) * | 1995-02-06 | 1996-09-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Inactivity monitor for trusted personal computer system |
US5892900A (en) * | 1996-08-30 | 1999-04-06 | Intertrust Technologies Corp. | Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection |
US6157719A (en) * | 1995-04-03 | 2000-12-05 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Conditional access system |
JP3262689B2 (ja) | 1995-05-19 | 2002-03-04 | 富士通株式会社 | 遠隔操作システム |
US5619571A (en) * | 1995-06-01 | 1997-04-08 | Sandstrom; Brent B. | Method for securely storing electronic records |
US5754646A (en) | 1995-07-19 | 1998-05-19 | Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. | Method for protecting publicly distributed software |
US5787175A (en) * | 1995-10-23 | 1998-07-28 | Novell, Inc. | Method and apparatus for collaborative document control |
CA2187855A1 (fr) | 1995-12-12 | 1997-06-13 | Albert Joseph Marcel Bissonnette | Methode et dispositif de protection pour ordinateurs |
JP2000503154A (ja) * | 1996-01-11 | 2000-03-14 | エムアールジェイ インコーポレイテッド | デジタル所有権のアクセスと分配を制御するためのシステム |
PT885417E (pt) | 1996-02-09 | 2002-11-29 | Digital Privacy Inc | Sistema de controlo/criptografia de acesso |
US6012080A (en) * | 1996-03-27 | 2000-01-04 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing enhanced pay per view in a video server |
US5815665A (en) | 1996-04-03 | 1998-09-29 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for providing trusted brokering services over a distributed network |
KR100198382B1 (ko) * | 1996-05-07 | 1999-06-15 | 윤종용 | 멀티-부팅 기능을 갖는 컴퓨터 장치 |
US5809145A (en) | 1996-06-28 | 1998-09-15 | Paradata Systems Inc. | System for distributing digital information |
US5903732A (en) | 1996-07-03 | 1999-05-11 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Trusted gateway agent for web server programs |
US5867646A (en) | 1996-07-12 | 1999-02-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Providing secure access for multiple processes having separate directories |
US5819087A (en) * | 1996-07-19 | 1998-10-06 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Flash ROM sharing between processor and microcontroller during booting and handling warm-booting events |
US5841869A (en) * | 1996-08-23 | 1998-11-24 | Cheyenne Property Trust | Method and apparatus for trusted processing |
US5692124A (en) * | 1996-08-30 | 1997-11-25 | Itt Industries, Inc. | Support of limited write downs through trustworthy predictions in multilevel security of computer network communications |
US5889989A (en) * | 1996-09-16 | 1999-03-30 | The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York | Load sharing controller for optimizing monetary cost |
US5844986A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1998-12-01 | Intel Corporation | Secure BIOS |
US6006332A (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 1999-12-21 | Case Western Reserve University | Rights management system for digital media |
US6519623B1 (en) | 1996-10-31 | 2003-02-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generic semaphore for concurrent access by multiple operating systems |
US6023765A (en) * | 1996-12-06 | 2000-02-08 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce | Implementation of role-based access control in multi-level secure systems |
US6367012B1 (en) * | 1996-12-06 | 2002-04-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Embedding certifications in executable files for network transmission |
US5845068A (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 1998-12-01 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Multilevel security port methods, apparatuses, and computer program products |
GB9626241D0 (en) | 1996-12-18 | 1997-02-05 | Ncr Int Inc | Secure data processing method and system |
US6292900B1 (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 2001-09-18 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Multilevel security attribute passing methods, apparatuses, and computer program products in a stream |
DE69734968T2 (de) * | 1996-12-20 | 2006-07-27 | International Business Machines Corp. | Vermittlungssystem mit verteilten Elementen zur Verbindung mit Leitungsanpassern und mit Mehrfachübertragungsmöglichkeit |
US5922074A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1999-07-13 | Xcert Software, Inc. | Method of and apparatus for providing secure distributed directory services and public key infrastructure |
US5903721A (en) | 1997-03-13 | 1999-05-11 | cha|Technologies Services, Inc. | Method and system for secure online transaction processing |
US5887163A (en) * | 1997-04-04 | 1999-03-23 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing dual booting capabilities to a computer system |
US5987608A (en) | 1997-05-13 | 1999-11-16 | Netscape Communications Corporation | Java security mechanism |
US6275848B1 (en) * | 1997-05-21 | 2001-08-14 | International Business Machines Corp. | Method and apparatus for automated referencing of electronic information |
US6272631B1 (en) | 1997-06-30 | 2001-08-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Protected storage of core data secrets |
US6513156B2 (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2003-01-28 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Interpreting functions utilizing a hybrid of virtual and native machine instructions |
EP0893751A1 (fr) | 1997-07-18 | 1999-01-27 | Irdeto B.V. | Circuit intégré et méthode de traitement sûr de données utilisant ce circuit intégré |
DE69724946T2 (de) | 1997-07-31 | 2004-08-12 | Siemens Ag | Programmvermietungssystem und Verfahren zur Vermietung von Programmen |
US6304970B1 (en) * | 1997-09-02 | 2001-10-16 | International Business Mcahines Corporation | Hardware access control locking |
US6185678B1 (en) * | 1997-10-02 | 2001-02-06 | Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Secure and reliable bootstrap architecture |
US6081830A (en) | 1997-10-09 | 2000-06-27 | Gateway 2000, Inc. | Automatic linking to program-specific computer chat rooms |
US6081894A (en) * | 1997-10-22 | 2000-06-27 | Rvt Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for isolating an encrypted computer system upon detection of viruses and similar data |
EP0926605A1 (fr) | 1997-11-19 | 1999-06-30 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Système browser |
JP3427933B2 (ja) | 1997-11-28 | 2003-07-22 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | クライアント・サーバ・システムにおける長期トランザクションの処理 |
GB2336918A (en) | 1998-01-22 | 1999-11-03 | Yelcom Limited | Apparatus and method for allowing connection to a network |
US6078948A (en) | 1998-02-03 | 2000-06-20 | Syracuse University | Platform-independent collaboration backbone and framework for forming virtual communities having virtual rooms with collaborative sessions |
US5987605A (en) * | 1998-02-28 | 1999-11-16 | Hewlett-Packard Co. | Methods and apparatus for dual-boot memory selection, update, and recovery in a programmable device |
US6360282B1 (en) * | 1998-03-25 | 2002-03-19 | Network Appliance, Inc. | Protected control of devices by user applications in multiprogramming environments |
US6446206B1 (en) * | 1998-04-01 | 2002-09-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for access control of a message queue |
US6067559A (en) | 1998-04-23 | 2000-05-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Server architecture for segregation of dynamic content generation applications into separate process spaces |
US6175917B1 (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2001-01-16 | Vpnet Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for swapping a computer operating system |
US6408391B1 (en) | 1998-05-06 | 2002-06-18 | Prc Inc. | Dynamic system defense for information warfare |
US6496847B1 (en) | 1998-05-15 | 2002-12-17 | Vmware, Inc. | System and method for virtualizing computer systems |
US6505300B2 (en) * | 1998-06-12 | 2003-01-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for secure running of untrusted content |
AU6401999A (en) | 1998-09-28 | 2000-04-17 | Argus Systems Group, Inc. | Trusted compartmentalized computer operating system |
US6308264B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2001-10-23 | Phoenix Technologies Ltd. | Dual use master boot record |
US6591229B1 (en) | 1998-10-09 | 2003-07-08 | Schlumberger Industries, Sa | Metrology device with programmable smart card |
US7194092B1 (en) * | 1998-10-26 | 2007-03-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Key-based secure storage |
US6330670B1 (en) | 1998-10-26 | 2001-12-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Digital rights management operating system |
US6327652B1 (en) * | 1998-10-26 | 2001-12-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Loading and identifying a digital rights management operating system |
US6393556B1 (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2002-05-21 | Intel Corporation | Apparatus and method to change processor privilege without pipeline flush |
US6138239A (en) | 1998-11-13 | 2000-10-24 | N★Able Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for authenticating and utilizing secure resources in a computer system |
US6530024B1 (en) * | 1998-11-20 | 2003-03-04 | Centrax Corporation | Adaptive feedback security system and method |
US6330669B1 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2001-12-11 | Micron Technology, Inc. | OS multi boot integrator |
US6988250B1 (en) * | 1999-02-15 | 2006-01-17 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Trusted computing platform using a trusted device assembly |
EP1030237A1 (fr) * | 1999-02-15 | 2000-08-23 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Dispositif matériel de sécurité dans un ordinateur |
US20030191957A1 (en) * | 1999-02-19 | 2003-10-09 | Ari Hypponen | Distributed computer virus detection and scanning |
GB9904791D0 (en) | 1999-03-02 | 1999-04-28 | Smartport Limited | An internet interface system |
US20020012432A1 (en) | 1999-03-27 | 2002-01-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Secure video card in computing device having digital rights management (DRM) system |
US6775779B1 (en) * | 1999-04-06 | 2004-08-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Hierarchical trusted code for content protection in computers |
EP1049036A2 (fr) | 1999-04-29 | 2000-11-02 | Citibank, N.A. | Système et procédé pour le commerce de valeurs sur l'Internet |
EP1050803B1 (fr) * | 1999-05-03 | 2007-01-17 | STMicroelectronics S.A. | Exécution d' instruction d'ordinateur protégée |
US6446203B1 (en) | 1999-05-24 | 2002-09-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for selecting from multiple boot code images to be loaded in a data processing system |
US6618769B1 (en) * | 1999-05-27 | 2003-09-09 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Module-by-module verification |
EP1056014A1 (fr) | 1999-05-28 | 2000-11-29 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Système pour fournir une interface utilisateur à mérite de confiance |
EP1055990A1 (fr) | 1999-05-28 | 2000-11-29 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Enregistrement d'évènements sur une plate-forme d'ordinateur |
US6609248B1 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2003-08-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Cross module representation of heterogeneous programs |
US6948069B1 (en) * | 1999-07-02 | 2005-09-20 | Time Certain, Llc | Method and system for determining and maintaining trust in digital image files with certifiable time |
WO2001009781A2 (fr) | 1999-07-28 | 2001-02-08 | Lovig Brian L | Procede et systeme de prestation de services juridiques par internet |
US6892307B1 (en) * | 1999-08-05 | 2005-05-10 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Single sign-on framework with trust-level mapping to authentication requirements |
EP1076279A1 (fr) | 1999-08-13 | 2001-02-14 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Plate-formes d'ordinateurs et leurs procédés d'opération |
EP1085396A1 (fr) | 1999-09-17 | 2001-03-21 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Fonctionnement de l'état sécurisé sur une plate-forme d'ordinateur |
US6393412B1 (en) * | 1999-09-23 | 2002-05-21 | Peter Deep | Method for allowing users to purchase professional services in a private chat room through a service brokerage via the internet |
GB9922665D0 (en) | 1999-09-25 | 1999-11-24 | Hewlett Packard Co | A method of enforcing trusted functionality in a full function platform |
US6487601B1 (en) * | 1999-09-30 | 2002-11-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic mac allocation and configuration |
US6854114B1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2005-02-08 | Oracle International Corp. | Using a virtual machine instance as the basic unit of user execution in a server environment |
US7213005B2 (en) | 1999-12-09 | 2007-05-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Digital content distribution using web broadcasting services |
US6701440B1 (en) * | 2000-01-06 | 2004-03-02 | Networks Associates Technology, Inc. | Method and system for protecting a computer using a remote e-mail scanning device |
US20010047473A1 (en) * | 2000-02-03 | 2001-11-29 | Realtime Data, Llc | Systems and methods for computer initialization |
AU4327501A (en) | 2000-02-29 | 2001-09-12 | Benjamin D Baker | Intelligence driven paging process for a chat room |
AU2001243365A1 (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2001-09-12 | Alarity Corporation | System and method for process protection |
GB2361153A (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2001-10-10 | Global Knowledge Network Ltd | User security, privacy and anonymity on the Internet |
US6622018B1 (en) * | 2000-04-24 | 2003-09-16 | 3Com Corporation | Portable device control console with wireless connection |
US7669238B2 (en) * | 2000-06-21 | 2010-02-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Evidence-based application security |
US6681304B1 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2004-01-20 | Intel Corporation | Method and device for providing hidden storage in non-volatile memory |
GB0020441D0 (en) * | 2000-08-18 | 2000-10-04 | Hewlett Packard Co | Performance of a service on a computing platform |
US6931545B1 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2005-08-16 | Contentguard Holdings, Inc. | Systems and methods for integrity certification and verification of content consumption environments |
GB0102515D0 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2001-03-21 | Hewlett Packard Co | Network adapter management |
GB2372595A (en) * | 2001-02-23 | 2002-08-28 | Hewlett Packard Co | Method of and apparatus for ascertaining the status of a data processing environment. |
US7076804B2 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2006-07-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated program resource identification and association |
US20020184520A1 (en) * | 2001-05-30 | 2002-12-05 | Bush William R. | Method and apparatus for a secure virtual machine |
US8205193B2 (en) * | 2001-06-11 | 2012-06-19 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Runtime updating of virtual machine class files |
WO2003029922A2 (fr) * | 2001-10-01 | 2003-04-10 | Kline & Walker, Llc | Perfectionnements faa au systeme pfn/tracmd pour le controle responsable a distance et robotique pour l'elimination de l'utilisation non autorisee d'aeronefs et pour l'amelioration de la gestion d'equipement et de la securite publique dans le domaine du transport |
US20030084436A1 (en) * | 2001-10-30 | 2003-05-01 | Joubert Berger | System and method for installing applications in a trusted environment |
US7058807B2 (en) * | 2002-04-15 | 2006-06-06 | Intel Corporation | Validation of inclusion of a platform within a data center |
EP1738321A4 (fr) | 2004-04-01 | 2009-01-21 | Waverules Llc | Systemes et procedes de transaction electronique au moyen de mises a jour automatiques de livres |
US20050258799A1 (en) * | 2004-05-24 | 2005-11-24 | Hugo Escobar | Universal mobile power pack |
-
2001
- 2001-06-19 GB GB0114891A patent/GB2376764B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-06-12 EP EP02254079A patent/EP1271282A3/fr not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-06-18 US US10/175,542 patent/US7865876B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2000016200A1 (fr) * | 1998-09-10 | 2000-03-23 | Sanctum Ltd. | Procede et systeme pour actualiser des contextes d'exploitation restreints pour programmes d'application ou systemes d'exploitation |
WO2000073904A1 (fr) * | 1999-05-28 | 2000-12-07 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Controle de l'integrite des donnees dans une unite de calcul fiable |
WO2001042889A2 (fr) * | 1999-12-10 | 2001-06-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Domaines d'amorçage et regles d'amorçages cote client |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
SPALKA A ET AL: "PROTECTING THE CREATION OF DIGITAL SIGNATURES WITH TRUSTED COMPUTING PLATFORM TECHNOLOGY AGAINST ATTACKS BY TROJAN HORSE PROGRAMS" INFORMATION SECURITY. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: PROCEEDINGS ISC, 11 June 2001 (2001-06-11), pages 403-419, XP001126260 * |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7937757B2 (en) | 2002-06-17 | 2011-05-03 | BAE Systems Information Solutions, Inc. | Multi-domain architecture for process isolation with processor supporting multi-domain architecture |
EP1645069A2 (fr) * | 2003-06-17 | 2006-04-12 | Digitalnet Government Solutions, Llc | Systeme informatique de confiance |
EP1645069A4 (fr) * | 2003-06-17 | 2010-09-08 | Bae Systems Information Soluti | Systeme informatique de confiance |
CN101820449A (zh) * | 2010-04-20 | 2010-09-01 | 江苏电力调度通信中心 | 跨安全区应用服务隔离平台 |
CN101820449B (zh) * | 2010-04-20 | 2012-12-05 | 江苏方天电力技术有限公司 | 跨安全区应用服务隔离平台 |
WO2011152910A1 (fr) * | 2010-06-02 | 2011-12-08 | Vmware, Inc. | Sécurisation de machines virtuelles de clients dans un nuage multi-locataires |
JP2013528872A (ja) * | 2010-06-02 | 2013-07-11 | ヴイエムウェア インク | マルチ・テナント・クラウドにおける顧客仮想計算機の保護 |
US8909928B2 (en) | 2010-06-02 | 2014-12-09 | Vmware, Inc. | Securing customer virtual machines in a multi-tenant cloud |
JP2015181045A (ja) * | 2010-06-02 | 2015-10-15 | ヴイエムウェア インクVMware, Inc. | マルチ・テナント・クラウドにおける顧客仮想計算機の保護 |
WO2016081867A1 (fr) * | 2014-11-20 | 2016-05-26 | Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. | Fourniture de sécurité pour systèmes informatiques |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1271282A3 (fr) | 2007-10-03 |
US20020194496A1 (en) | 2002-12-19 |
US7865876B2 (en) | 2011-01-04 |
GB2376764B (en) | 2004-12-29 |
GB0114891D0 (en) | 2001-08-08 |
GB2376764A (en) | 2002-12-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7865876B2 (en) | Multiple trusted computing environments | |
US7076655B2 (en) | Multiple trusted computing environments with verifiable environment identities | |
US9575790B2 (en) | Secure communication using a trusted virtual machine | |
US7313679B2 (en) | Extended trusted computing base | |
US7478246B2 (en) | Method for providing a scalable trusted platform module in a hypervisor environment | |
US7509639B2 (en) | Customized execution environment | |
US8074262B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for migrating virtual trusted platform modules | |
US7159210B2 (en) | Performing secure and insecure computing operations in a compartmented operating system | |
US20090319806A1 (en) | Extensible pre-boot authentication | |
CN105184147B (zh) | 云计算平台中的用户安全管理方法 | |
US8627069B2 (en) | System and method for securing a computer comprising a microkernel | |
JP2008500651A (ja) | トラステッドプラットフォームモジュールのセキュアな仮想化を提供する方法および装置 | |
US20020194132A1 (en) | Renting a computing environment on a trusted computing platform | |
US9633206B2 (en) | Demonstrating integrity of a compartment of a compartmented operating system | |
US8601544B1 (en) | Computer system employing dual-band authentication using file operations by trusted and untrusted mechanisms | |
Kamp et al. | Building Systems to Be Shared, Securely: Want to securely partition VMs? One option is to put’em in Jail. | |
Ushakov et al. | Trusted hart for mobile RISC-V security | |
CN115828249A (zh) | 基于云技术的计算节点及基于云技术的实例管理方法 | |
Sisinni | Verification of software integrity in distributed systems | |
US9240988B1 (en) | Computer system employing dual-band authentication | |
US20020194086A1 (en) | Interaction with electronic services and markets | |
Tenev et al. | Enhancing security in Microservice environments | |
Brenner | Enhancing Cloud Security with Trusted Execution | |
Cooper | Towards a trusted grid architecture | |
Weiß | System Architectures to Improve Trust, Integrity and Resilience of Embedded Systems |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080328 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20080610 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20081021 |