EP1261941B1 - Management of permit codes - Google Patents
Management of permit codes Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1261941B1 EP1261941B1 EP01902935A EP01902935A EP1261941B1 EP 1261941 B1 EP1261941 B1 EP 1261941B1 EP 01902935 A EP01902935 A EP 01902935A EP 01902935 A EP01902935 A EP 01902935A EP 1261941 B1 EP1261941 B1 EP 1261941B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- code
- permit
- person
- permit code
- server
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/20—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass
- G07C9/21—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass having a variable access code
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/20—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass
- G07C9/215—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass the system having a variable access-code, e.g. varied as a function of time
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/20—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass
- G07C9/27—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass with central registration
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a procedure and an arrangement for management of permit codes intended to be used to give admittance to a plant/premises, for instance a house which is equipped with a code locking system.
- code locking devices are very common, for instance in block of flats or at working places.
- One problem with such code locks is that the codes normally very seldom are changed, which results in that they continuously will be known to an ever increasing group of people. For the sake of convenience, the code is frequently disclosed when casual guests shall be admitted.
- Another problem is that it can be both time-consuming and expensive for a company or a landlord to change codes at a large number of code locks.
- a specific problem is to give a person admittance to the plant/premises a limited number of times, or during a limited time.
- SE469357 discloses a method for passage control, in which a person, who is to be authorized to pass, is allocated a code which is supplied by the person to a comparison unit.
- the allocated code is calculated by a calculating unit according to an algorithm on the basis of an individual personal code for the person.
- the comparison unit is supplied with the personal code, and calculates on the basis thereof a corresponding code according to said algorithm and compares the code supplied by the person with that calculated by the comparison unit.
- US-A-4721954 discloses a conventionnel code management for hotel room access.
- the identity information can be stored in a database.
- the permit code server When the permit code server distributes the permit code to the code lock, it preferably also transmits validity information to the code lock regarding the validity of the distributed permit code. Such validity information can be about how long time the distributed permit code shall be valid, or the number of enterings in the code lock the distributed permit code shall be valid for. Just for the sake of information, said validity information is preferably also transmitted to the first person in connection with that he/she receives the generated permit code.
- the permit code is distributed to the first person in form of a text message to a mobile telephone belonging to this first person, over any mobile telephone system.
- the mobile telephone number for said mobile telephone is preferably transmitted from the second person to the permit code server in connection with the transmission of request to give the first person admittance to the plant/premises.
- the present invention also relates to an arrangement according to claim 8.
- the code lock includes code entering devices, for instance in form of a key set for entering of PIN-code or a loudspeaker and a voice detector system for detection of a pronounced code.
- the second person' s communication device connected, from a communication point of view, to the input port of the permit code server via a network.
- said distribution device is preferably arranged to distribute validity information to the code lock, regarding the validity of the distributed permit code.
- validity information includes for instance information about for how long the distributed permit code shall be valid, or the number of enterings in the code lock for which the distributed permit code shall be valid.
- said distribution devices are further arranged also to distribute said validity information to the first person's communication device.
- said distribution devices are preferably arranged to distribute the permit code to the first person in form of a text message to his/her communication device.
- the first persons's communication device is for instance a mobile telephone, at which said permit code server is arranged to, from its input port, receive information abut the first person's mobile telephone number, and where said distribution devices at that are arranged to transmit the permit code to said mobile telephone over said mobile telephone system.
- the first person's communication device a computer connected to a network, at which said permit code server is arranged to from said input port receive information about the network address of the computer, at which said distribution devices are arranged to transmit the permit code to said computer over said network.
- the second person's communication device is, for instance, a mobile telephone, arranged to communicate with the input port of the permit code server over a mobile telephone system.
- the second person's communication device is a computer, arranged to communicate with the input port of the permit code server over a data communication network.
- the present invention is suited, for instance, for code locks/code locking systems in apartment houses, and makes possible for a tenant to, in a simple way, give a visitor admittance to the house without risking that the ordinary permit code, i.e. entry code number, is disclosed.
- the invention consequently is based on that a tenant A via a mobile telephone or a computer connected to Internet can request that a temporary code is transmitted parallel to the person B, i.e. the visitor, who shall pass by a code lock, and to the electronic code lock.
- the visitor B enters the code by one at the code lock arranged code entering device, the code will be known by the code lock and the front-door can be opened.
- the invention implies that the security is improved by the code being only temporary, i.e.
- the validity information i.e. how long time, or how many times, the code shall be valid for can either be determined by the person A when he/she requests that the momentary permit code shall be distributed, or by the permit code generator which generates the permit codes and distributes them to the code lock and the visiting person B.
- Figure 1 is shown schematically a preferred embodiment of the arrangement according to the present invention.
- the person B wants admittance to the house 1, and then has to pass a front-door which is equipped with a code lock 2.
- the plant/premises 1 can also be an enclosed zone where the front-door that is protected by the code lock 2 is a gate.
- the code lock 2 can be a code lock equipped with keys according to known technology, or a device with microphone and speech recognition means, arranged to detect a pronounced code.
- the code lock 2 differs from ordinary locks in that it includes a connection to a permit code server 3.
- the code locks 2 are preferably connected to the permit code server 3 via cables. If there instead is a permit code server arranged for a plurality of different houses, it may be suitable to arrange the connection between the permit code server and the code lock, or the locks, via a communication network. For instance can the connection be arranged via radio over a mobile telephone system, such as GSM. In one embodiment, the connection is arranged over Internet, where each code lock has a given IP-address. In addition to that the code lock 2 is arranged to communicate with the permit code server 3, it includes device to receive information from the permit code server 3 and act on basis of this information.
- the permit code server is preferably arranged to transmit permit codes to the code locks 2, at which the code locks includes means to store the transmitted permit codes an to open the front-door the code lock refers to, at entering of a stored code.
- the code lock is also arranged to receive validity information and to store this validity information. If a code lock receives information abut that a transmitted permit code only shall be valid for instance for an hour, the code lock is arranged to after the expiration of this hour delete the stored permit code and at that refuse admission through the port in question at entering of said deleted permit code.
- the code lock 2 can also be arranged to communicate to the permit code server 3.
- the code lock consequently can report to the permit code server when a permit code has been entered via the code entering device, and a person B is admitted into the house 1, or when anybody has entered a wrong or expired code.
- Alternative channels for communication between the permit code server 3 and the code lock 2 can, for instance, be a PSTN-modem, SMS or MiniCall.
- the visiting person B has a communication device 4, in the figure illustrated as a mobile telephone. Consequently the permit code server 3 is arranged to transmit the temporary permit code to the communication device 4, parallel with that the permit code is distributed to the code lock 2.
- the code is preferably distributed over a mobile telephone network. It is of course also possible that the visiting person B can have the code transmitted to his/her home, or in another place, to a computer connected to Internet.
- the permit code is preferably transmitted via a text message, such as SMS, and is preferably accompanied by the validity information that has been transmitted to the code lock. This informs the person B about when he/she at the latest has a chance to be admitted into the house 1, or how many times the person B can get admittance with the same code.
- this communication device 5 is a computer connected to the permit code server 3 via any communication network.
- the communication between the communication device 5 and the permit code server 3 can be made over an internal, local network. It is of course also possible to arrange the communication over Internet or over the fixed telephone network.
- the communication between the person A and the permit code server 3 can be made by a communication device 5 in form of a mobile telephone, over any mobile telephone system.
- the person A is a tenant who is living in the house 1.
- the person A has a communication device 5, which is connected, or can be connected/set up, to a permit code server 3 which controls the code lock 2 of the house 1.
- the code lock 2 is in known way programmed with at least one valid permit code which is known to the tenant A.
- the tenant A shall have a visit from a visitor B, it may be inadvisable to disclose the programmed permit code, especially if it is used by a plurality of tenants in the same house.
- the person A transmits a message via his/her communication device 5 to the permit code server 3 about distributing a temporary code to the person B.
- the person A encloses information about where the permit code shall be distributed. In a house with a plurality of front-doors equipped with code locks, this information can include which code lock (and front-door) that is intended, and an address for the person B. This address is preferably a GSM-number or an IP-address.
- the tenant A in this case wants to give admittance to a deliveryman, the person A in addition encloses validity information to the permit code server 3 that the permit code only shall be valid for one entering of code.
- a permit code generator preferably a random number generator, in the permit code server after that generates a temporary permit code.
- Distribution devices arranged in the permit code server, after that attends to that the generated permit code is distributed to the code lock 2 and the communication device 4 which have been identified in the information from the person A's communication device 5. It is realized here that the person A in said information can identify a plurality of code locks 2 and/or a plurality of persons B to whom the permit code shall be distributed.
- the code lock 2 receives the generated permit code and stores it in a memory. Also the validity information is transmitted from the permit code server 3 and is stored in memory in the code lock 2.
- the permit code is transmitted to the person B to his/her communication device 4, and is presented to the person B in a suitable way, for instance on a display in form of a text message. Preferably is also the validity information that is transmitted from the permit code server 3 presented.
- the person B is by that informed about which permit code he/she has to enter at the code lock 2 to be admitted into the house 1.
- the person B consequently is admitted at the same time as the code lock 2 detects that the permit code after that shall be invalid. Consequently, the generated permit code is deleted from the code lock 2, at which the risk is minimized that unauthorized persons shall be admitted into the house 1.
- the permit code which is generated in the permit code server 3 need not be temporary. It is also possible to conceive that a landlord A distributes new semi-stationary permit codes in the same way to both his/her tenants B and the code lock 2 of the house 1.
- One advantage with the arrangement according to the present invention where tenants A are given possibility to via communication devices 5, give temporary visitors B a temporary permit code, is that the permit code server 3 can be arranged also to log who has requested that a temporary code shall be distributed. At abuse, the permit code server 3 consequently can deny tenants A to supply temporary permit codes.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Rotational Drive Of Disk (AREA)
- Sewing Machines And Sewing (AREA)
- Lock And Its Accessories (AREA)
- Radio Relay Systems (AREA)
- Devices For Executing Special Programs (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
- Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
- Electrophonic Musical Instruments (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Multi Processors (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a procedure and an arrangement for management of permit codes intended to be used to give admittance to a plant/premises, for instance a house which is equipped with a code locking system.
- Nowadays code locking devices are very common, for instance in block of flats or at working places. One problem with such code locks is that the codes normally very seldom are changed, which results in that they continuously will be known to an ever increasing group of people. For the sake of convenience, the code is frequently disclosed when casual guests shall be admitted. Another problem is that it can be both time-consuming and expensive for a company or a landlord to change codes at a large number of code locks. A specific problem is to give a person admittance to the plant/premises a limited number of times, or during a limited time.
-
SE469357 -
US-A-4721954 discloses a conventionnel code management for hotel room access. - With the aim to overcome the above described problems, the present invention consequently relates to a procedure according to claim 1. The identity information can be stored in a database.
- When the permit code server distributes the permit code to the code lock, it preferably also transmits validity information to the code lock regarding the validity of the distributed permit code. Such validity information can be about how long time the distributed permit code shall be valid, or the number of enterings in the code lock the distributed permit code shall be valid for. Just for the sake of information, said validity information is preferably also transmitted to the first person in connection with that he/she receives the generated permit code.
- Preferably the permit code is distributed to the first person in form of a text message to a mobile telephone belonging to this first person, over any mobile telephone system. The mobile telephone number for said mobile telephone is preferably transmitted from the second person to the permit code server in connection with the transmission of request to give the first person admittance to the plant/premises.
- With the aim to overcome said problems, the present invention also relates to an arrangement according to claim 8. The code lock includes code entering devices, for instance in form of a key set for entering of PIN-code or a loudspeaker and a voice detector system for detection of a pronounced code.
- Preferably is the second person' s communication device connected, from a communication point of view, to the input port of the permit code server via a network.
- Further, said distribution device is preferably arranged to distribute validity information to the code lock, regarding the validity of the distributed permit code. Such validity information includes for instance information about for how long the distributed permit code shall be valid, or the number of enterings in the code lock for which the distributed permit code shall be valid. Preferably, said distribution devices are further arranged also to distribute said validity information to the first person's communication device.
- In the arrangement according to the invention said distribution devices are preferably arranged to distribute the permit code to the first person in form of a text message to his/her communication device. The first persons's communication device is for instance a mobile telephone, at which said permit code server is arranged to, from its input port, receive information abut the first person's mobile telephone number, and where said distribution devices at that are arranged to transmit the permit code to said mobile telephone over said mobile telephone system. In another example is the first person's communication device a computer connected to a network, at which said permit code server is arranged to from said input port receive information about the network address of the computer, at which said distribution devices are arranged to transmit the permit code to said computer over said network.
- In the arrangement according to the invention, the second person's communication device is, for instance, a mobile telephone, arranged to communicate with the input port of the permit code server over a mobile telephone system. In another embodiment, the second person's communication device is a computer, arranged to communicate with the input port of the permit code server over a data communication network.
- The invention is presented in detail below with reference to the enclosed drawing, where
- Figure 1 shows a preferred embodiment of the arrangement according to the present invention.
- The present invention is suited, for instance, for code locks/code locking systems in apartment houses, and makes possible for a tenant to, in a simple way, give a visitor admittance to the house without risking that the ordinary permit code, i.e. entry code number, is disclosed. The invention consequently is based on that a tenant A via a mobile telephone or a computer connected to Internet can request that a temporary code is transmitted parallel to the person B, i.e. the visitor, who shall pass by a code lock, and to the electronic code lock. When the visitor B then enters the code by one at the code lock arranged code entering device, the code will be known by the code lock and the front-door can be opened. The invention implies that the security is improved by the code being only temporary, i.e. it is valid during one in advance defined period of time, or that it only can be used for one in advance defined number of times, for instance one time. The validity information, i.e. how long time, or how many times, the code shall be valid for can either be determined by the person A when he/she requests that the momentary permit code shall be distributed, or by the permit code generator which generates the permit codes and distributes them to the code lock and the visiting person B.
- In Figure 1 is shown schematically a preferred embodiment of the arrangement according to the present invention. In this embodiment, the person B wants admittance to the house 1, and then has to pass a front-door which is equipped with a
code lock 2. The plant/premises 1 can also be an enclosed zone where the front-door that is protected by thecode lock 2 is a gate. Thecode lock 2 can be a code lock equipped with keys according to known technology, or a device with microphone and speech recognition means, arranged to detect a pronounced code. Thecode lock 2 differs from ordinary locks in that it includes a connection to apermit code server 3. In a bigger apartment there may be a plurality of front-doors, each equipped with a code lock, which can be programmed with different or the same codes. If the permit code server is located in the house 1, thecode locks 2 are preferably connected to thepermit code server 3 via cables. If there instead is a permit code server arranged for a plurality of different houses, it may be suitable to arrange the connection between the permit code server and the code lock, or the locks, via a communication network. For instance can the connection be arranged via radio over a mobile telephone system, such as GSM. In one embodiment, the connection is arranged over Internet, where each code lock has a given IP-address. In addition to that thecode lock 2 is arranged to communicate with thepermit code server 3, it includes device to receive information from thepermit code server 3 and act on basis of this information. The permit code server is preferably arranged to transmit permit codes to thecode locks 2, at which the code locks includes means to store the transmitted permit codes an to open the front-door the code lock refers to, at entering of a stored code. The code lock is also arranged to receive validity information and to store this validity information. If a code lock receives information abut that a transmitted permit code only shall be valid for instance for an hour, the code lock is arranged to after the expiration of this hour delete the stored permit code and at that refuse admission through the port in question at entering of said deleted permit code. Thecode lock 2 can also be arranged to communicate to thepermit code server 3. The code lock consequently can report to the permit code server when a permit code has been entered via the code entering device, and a person B is admitted into the house 1, or when anybody has entered a wrong or expired code. Alternative channels for communication between thepermit code server 3 and thecode lock 2 can, for instance, be a PSTN-modem, SMS or MiniCall. - In the figure of the preferred embodiment is also shown that the visiting person B has a
communication device 4, in the figure illustrated as a mobile telephone. Consequently thepermit code server 3 is arranged to transmit the temporary permit code to thecommunication device 4, parallel with that the permit code is distributed to thecode lock 2. In the case that thecommunication device 4 is a mobile telephone, the code is preferably distributed over a mobile telephone network. It is of course also possible that the visiting person B can have the code transmitted to his/her home, or in another place, to a computer connected to Internet. In the case thecommunication device 4 is a mobile telephone, the permit code is preferably transmitted via a text message, such as SMS, and is preferably accompanied by the validity information that has been transmitted to the code lock. This informs the person B about when he/she at the latest has a chance to be admitted into the house 1, or how many times the person B can get admittance with the same code. - In the figure 1 is also shown how a person A can communicate with the permit code server via a
communication device 5. In the illustrated embodiment, thiscommunication device 5 is a computer connected to thepermit code server 3 via any communication network. In the cases the permit code server is located in a house in which the person A is located, the communication between thecommunication device 5 and thepermit code server 3 can be made over an internal, local network. It is of course also possible to arrange the communication over Internet or over the fixed telephone network. In yet another alternative embodiment, the communication between the person A and thepermit code server 3 can be made by acommunication device 5 in form of a mobile telephone, over any mobile telephone system. - Below is described, by means of an example, how the invention can be utilized. Suppose that the person A is a tenant who is living in the house 1. The person A has a
communication device 5, which is connected, or can be connected/set up, to apermit code server 3 which controls thecode lock 2 of the house 1. Thecode lock 2 is in known way programmed with at least one valid permit code which is known to the tenant A. When the tenant A shall have a visit from a visitor B, it may be inadvisable to disclose the programmed permit code, especially if it is used by a plurality of tenants in the same house. If the person B, for instance, is a deliveryman who only shall be admitted one time, the person A transmits a message via his/hercommunication device 5 to thepermit code server 3 about distributing a temporary code to the person B. With this request the person A encloses information about where the permit code shall be distributed. In a house with a plurality of front-doors equipped with code locks, this information can include which code lock (and front-door) that is intended, and an address for the person B. This address is preferably a GSM-number or an IP-address. When the tenant A in this case wants to give admittance to a deliveryman, the person A in addition encloses validity information to thepermit code server 3 that the permit code only shall be valid for one entering of code. A permit code generator, preferably a random number generator, in the permit code server after that generates a temporary permit code. Distribution devices arranged in the permit code server, after that attends to that the generated permit code is distributed to thecode lock 2 and thecommunication device 4 which have been identified in the information from the person A'scommunication device 5. It is realized here that the person A in said information can identify a plurality ofcode locks 2 and/or a plurality of persons B to whom the permit code shall be distributed. - The
code lock 2 receives the generated permit code and stores it in a memory. Also the validity information is transmitted from thepermit code server 3 and is stored in memory in thecode lock 2. The permit code is transmitted to the person B to his/hercommunication device 4, and is presented to the person B in a suitable way, for instance on a display in form of a text message. Preferably is also the validity information that is transmitted from thepermit code server 3 presented. The person B is by that informed about which permit code he/she has to enter at thecode lock 2 to be admitted into the house 1. When theperson 3 enters the generated permit code at thecode lock 2, the person B consequently is admitted at the same time as thecode lock 2 detects that the permit code after that shall be invalid. Consequently, the generated permit code is deleted from thecode lock 2, at which the risk is minimized that unauthorized persons shall be admitted into the house 1. - In one alternative embodiment, A need not explicitly indicate the address for where the permit code shall be distributed to reach the person B. Instead is indicated a name or a code at the
communication device 5 and is transmitted to thepermit code server 3. This will in its turn, by means said name or code, derive the correct address from adatabase 6, connected to thepermit code server 3. Such a procedure can be suitable where anybody, for instance a receptionist, manages a large number of admittances to the domains 1 of a company. In one embodiment is also the validity information preselected and stored in thedatabase 6, together with the address for the communication device to which the permit code shall be distributed. - It should also be realized that the permit code which is generated in the
permit code server 3 need not be temporary. It is also possible to conceive that a landlord A distributes new semi-stationary permit codes in the same way to both his/her tenants B and thecode lock 2 of the house 1. - One advantage with the arrangement according to the present invention, where tenants A are given possibility to via
communication devices 5, give temporary visitors B a temporary permit code, is that thepermit code server 3 can be arranged also to log who has requested that a temporary code shall be distributed. At abuse, thepermit code server 3 consequently can deny tenants A to supply temporary permit codes. - A large number of embodiments are obvious for the arrangement according to the present invention. The invention, however, is only limited by the enclosed patent claims.
Claims (17)
- Procedure to give a first person (B) admittance to a plant/premises (1) equipped with code lock (2), including the steps that:- a permit code server (3) generates a permit code;- the permit code server (3) parallel distributes the permit code to the first person (B) and to the code lock (2) of the plant/premises, at which;- the code lock (2) is arranged to give admittance to the plant/premises (1) at entering of said permit code, where a second person (A), who has admittance to the plant/premises (1), in a first phase transmits a request to the permit code server (3) about giving the first person (B) admittance to the plant/premises (1),where said second person (A), together with said request, transmits information about to where the permit code shall be distributed, or
where said second person (A), together with said request, transmits identity information regarding the first person (B), by means of which identity information the permit code server (3) derives information about to where the permit code shall be distributed. - Procedure as claimed in patent claim 1, where the permit code server (3) transmits validity information to the code lock (2) regarding the validity of the distributed permit code.
- Procedure as claimed in patent claim 2, where said validity information includes information about how long time the distributed permit code shall be valid for
- Procedure as claimed in patent claim 2, where said validity information includes information about the number of enterings in the code lock (2) which the distributed permit code shall be valid for.
- Procedure as claimed in any of the patent claims 2-4. where said validity information also is distributed to the first person (B).
- Procedure as claimed in any of the previous patent claims, where the permit code server's distribution of the permit code to the first person (B) is made in form of a text message to a mobile telephone (4) belonging to the first person (B).
- Procedure as claimed in patent claim 6 in combination with patent claim 3, where the second person's (A) request to the permit code server (3) is transmitted together with the first person's (8) mobile telephone number.
- Arrangement for management of a person's (B) admittance to a plant/premises (1) which is equipped with code lock (2), in which arrangement a permit code server (3) is, from a communication point of view, connected to said code lock (2), which permit code server (3) includes a permit code generator and distribution devices arranged to distribute one by the permit code generator generated permit code to a communication device (4) belonging to a first person (8), and to said code lock (2), which code lock (2) includes code input device and is arranged to allow admittance to the plant/premises (1) at input by the code input device of a permit code generated and transmitted to the code lock (2) by said permit code server (3), where said permit code server (3) further includes an input port arranged to, from a second persons (A) communication device (5), receive a request to the permit code server (3) about giving the first person (B) admittance to the plant/premises (1),
where said permit code server (3) is arranged to, from said input port, receive information about to where a permit code shall be distributed, and where said distribution devices are arranged to transmit the permit code to a communication device (4) which is identified in said received information, or
where said permit code server (3) is arranged to, from said input port, receive identity information regarding the first person (B), where said permit code server includes devices arranged to, by means of said identity information, derive information in a database (6) which, from a communication point of view, is connected to the permit code server (3), about to where a permit code shall be distributed, and where said distribution devices are arranged to transmit the permit code to a communication device (4) which is identified in said derived information. - The arrangement as claimed in patent claim 8, where said distribution devices are arranged to transmit validity information to the code lock (2) regarding the validity of the distributed permit code.
- The arrangement as claimed in patent claim 9, where said validity information includes information about how long time the distributed permit code shall be valid for.
- The arrangement, as claimed in patent claim 9, where said validity information includes information about the number of enterings in the code lock (2) which the distributed permit code shall I be valid for.
- The arrangement as claimed in any of the patent claims 9-11 where said distribution devices are arranged to also distribute said validity information to the first persons's (B) communication device (4).
- The arrangement as claimed in any of the patent claims 8-12, where said distribution devices are arranged also to distribute the permit code to the first person (B) in form of a text message to the first person's (B) communication device (4).
- The arrangement as claimed in parent claim 8, where the first person's (B) communication device (4) is a mobile telephone, at which said permit code server (3) is arranged to, from said input port, receive information about the first person's (B) mobile telephone number, and where said distribution devices at that are arranged to transmit the permit code to said mobile telephone (4) over a mobile telephone system.
- The arrangement as claimed in patent claim 8, where the first person's (B) communication device (4) is a computer connected to a network, at which said permit code server (3) is arranged to, from said input port, receive information about the network address of said computer, and where said distribution devices at that are arranged to transmit the permit code to said computer over said network.
- The arrangement as claimed in any of the patent claim 14 and 15, where the second person's (A) communication device (5) is a mobile telephone, arranged to communicate with the input port of the permit code server (3) over a mobile telephone system.
- The arrangement as claimed in any of the patent claims 14 and 15, where the second person's (A) communication device (5) is a computer, arranged to communicate with the input port of the permit code server over a data communication network.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
SE0000359 | 2000-02-04 | ||
SE0000359A SE518554C2 (en) | 2000-02-04 | 2000-02-04 | Handling of access codes |
PCT/SE2001/000186 WO2001057806A1 (en) | 2000-02-04 | 2001-01-31 | Management of permit codes |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1261941A1 EP1261941A1 (en) | 2002-12-04 |
EP1261941B1 true EP1261941B1 (en) | 2008-01-23 |
Family
ID=20278340
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP01902935A Expired - Lifetime EP1261941B1 (en) | 2000-02-04 | 2001-01-31 | Management of permit codes |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1261941B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE385008T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE60132565D1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1261941T3 (en) |
EE (1) | EE200200434A (en) |
ES (1) | ES2300316T3 (en) |
NO (1) | NO325240B1 (en) |
SE (1) | SE518554C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001057806A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7200755B2 (en) | 2001-05-24 | 2007-04-03 | Larry Hamid | Method and system for providing gated access for a third party to a secure entity or service |
JP4890248B2 (en) * | 2003-07-18 | 2012-03-07 | コアストリート、 リミテッド | Control access to a given area |
FR2860115B1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2006-02-24 | Cit Alcatel | EVOLUTIVE LOCAL NETWORK ASSOCIATED WITH A BUILDING |
SE0401035L (en) | 2004-04-21 | 2005-10-22 | Anders Trell Trust | Method and device for communication / control at access |
FI20070416L (en) * | 2007-05-25 | 2008-11-26 | Kone Corp | Management system |
ITVE20070099A1 (en) * | 2007-12-28 | 2009-06-29 | Teleco Automation Srl | MULTI-UTILITY DEVICE FOR RADIO-CONTROLLED ACCESS CONTROL. |
CN103679884B (en) * | 2013-12-02 | 2016-07-06 | 大连智慧城科技有限公司 | The Internet gate inhibition casual user's authorization device and method |
CN105869254B (en) * | 2016-06-08 | 2018-06-26 | 南京万鸿威视信息技术有限公司 | A kind of image identification association algorithm management system and its application |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4721954A (en) * | 1985-12-18 | 1988-01-26 | Marlee Electronics Corporation | Keypad security system |
GB9018531D0 (en) * | 1990-08-23 | 1990-10-10 | Taylor Michael R | Programmable security locks |
SE469357B (en) * | 1991-11-20 | 1993-06-21 | Lennart Eriksson | Method for passage control for people and a system for passage control for people |
DE69221165T2 (en) * | 1992-01-09 | 1997-11-27 | Supra Products, Inc., Salem, Oreg. | SECURE ACCESS SYSTEM WITH RADIO CONNECTION |
-
2000
- 2000-02-04 SE SE0000359A patent/SE518554C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2001
- 2001-01-31 DK DK01902935T patent/DK1261941T3/en active
- 2001-01-31 AT AT01902935T patent/ATE385008T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2001-01-31 ES ES01902935T patent/ES2300316T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-01-31 EE EEP200200434A patent/EE200200434A/en unknown
- 2001-01-31 DE DE60132565T patent/DE60132565D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-01-31 WO PCT/SE2001/000186 patent/WO2001057806A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2001-01-31 EP EP01902935A patent/EP1261941B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-07-26 NO NO20023559A patent/NO325240B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1261941A1 (en) | 2002-12-04 |
SE0000359L (en) | 2001-08-05 |
NO325240B1 (en) | 2008-03-03 |
EE200200434A (en) | 2003-12-15 |
NO20023559D0 (en) | 2002-07-26 |
DE60132565D1 (en) | 2008-03-13 |
NO20023559L (en) | 2002-10-04 |
SE518554C2 (en) | 2002-10-22 |
SE0000359D0 (en) | 2000-02-04 |
WO2001057806A1 (en) | 2001-08-09 |
ES2300316T3 (en) | 2008-06-16 |
ATE385008T1 (en) | 2008-02-15 |
DK1261941T3 (en) | 2008-05-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7170998B2 (en) | Door access control and key management system and the method thereof | |
US7012503B2 (en) | Electronic key device a system and a method of managing electronic key information | |
US6972660B1 (en) | System and method for using biometric data for providing identification, security, access and access records | |
EP1810093B1 (en) | Actuating a security system using a wireless device | |
US6747564B1 (en) | Security guarantee method and system | |
US20020053975A1 (en) | Entry control system | |
US10964145B2 (en) | Access control system using blockchain ledger | |
WO2006136662A1 (en) | Communication method of access control system | |
US20160371904A1 (en) | Security device with offline credential analysis | |
US10015637B2 (en) | Presence monitoring | |
EP1261941B1 (en) | Management of permit codes | |
US7219235B2 (en) | Locked portal unlocking control apparatus and method | |
US12015500B2 (en) | System and method for a control system for managing smart devices in a multiple unit property environment | |
KR102139871B1 (en) | Server for providing baggage storage service of utilizing idel space, and electronic lock for the same, and method for providing service using thereof | |
WO2002008551A1 (en) | Access method and system | |
CA2360120C (en) | Door access control and key management system and the method thereof | |
JP2005232754A (en) | Security management system | |
KR100756439B1 (en) | System for coming and going management using fingerprint recognition | |
KR102653034B1 (en) | Door management system and method | |
JP2015064820A (en) | Entry-exit management system | |
EP4217978A1 (en) | Access system with an electronical lock | |
DK201200065U3 (en) | Controlling access to a place |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20020904 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT PAYMENT 20020904;LV PAYMENT 20020904;MK;RO;SI |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070619 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: GUSTAFSSON, JAN Inventor name: EMILSSON, STELLAN Inventor name: BLOMKVIST, HAKAN Inventor name: ERIKSSON, JONAS Inventor name: ANDERSIN, MIKAEL |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: TELIASONERA AB |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: LT LV |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: EMILSSON, STELLAN Inventor name: BLOMKVIST, HAKAN Inventor name: ANDERSIN, MIKAEL Inventor name: GUSTAFSSON, JAN Inventor name: ERIKSSON, JONAS |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 60132565 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20080313 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2300316 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080123 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080424 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080123 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080123 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080123 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080623 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080123 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080423 |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20080423 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20081024 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081114 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20090122 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20090123 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20090123 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080423 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080123 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080424 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100131 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20110225 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110224 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100201 |