EP1243643A2 - Method of adhering coatings to substrates - Google Patents

Method of adhering coatings to substrates Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1243643A2
EP1243643A2 EP02252052A EP02252052A EP1243643A2 EP 1243643 A2 EP1243643 A2 EP 1243643A2 EP 02252052 A EP02252052 A EP 02252052A EP 02252052 A EP02252052 A EP 02252052A EP 1243643 A2 EP1243643 A2 EP 1243643A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
coating
substrate
detergent composition
substrates
adhesion
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP02252052A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1243643B1 (en
EP1243643A3 (en
Inventor
Thomas James Ennis
William Harrison Hill
William August Kirn
Joseph Martin Rokowski
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rohm and Haas Co
Original Assignee
Rohm and Haas Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rohm and Haas Co filed Critical Rohm and Haas Co
Publication of EP1243643A2 publication Critical patent/EP1243643A2/en
Publication of EP1243643A3 publication Critical patent/EP1243643A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1243643B1 publication Critical patent/EP1243643B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B05SPRAYING OR ATOMISING IN GENERAL; APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
    • B05DPROCESSES FOR APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
    • B05D3/00Pretreatment of surfaces to which liquids or other fluent materials are to be applied; After-treatment of applied coatings, e.g. intermediate treating of an applied coating preparatory to subsequent applications of liquids or other fluent materials
    • B05D3/10Pretreatment of surfaces to which liquids or other fluent materials are to be applied; After-treatment of applied coatings, e.g. intermediate treating of an applied coating preparatory to subsequent applications of liquids or other fluent materials by other chemical means
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/02Inorganic compounds ; Elemental compounds
    • C11D3/04Water-soluble compounds
    • C11D3/06Phosphates, including polyphosphates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/02Inorganic compounds ; Elemental compounds
    • C11D3/04Water-soluble compounds
    • C11D3/08Silicates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D7/00Compositions of detergents based essentially on non-surface-active compounds
    • C11D7/02Inorganic compounds
    • C11D7/04Water-soluble compounds
    • C11D7/10Salts
    • C11D7/14Silicates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D7/00Compositions of detergents based essentially on non-surface-active compounds
    • C11D7/02Inorganic compounds
    • C11D7/04Water-soluble compounds
    • C11D7/10Salts
    • C11D7/16Phosphates including polyphosphates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/05Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions
    • C23C22/06Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6
    • C23C22/48Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6 not containing phosphates, hexavalent chromium compounds, fluorides or complex fluorides, molybdates, tungstates, vanadates or oxalates
    • C23C22/53Treatment of zinc or alloys based thereon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/05Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions
    • C23C22/06Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6
    • C23C22/48Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6 not containing phosphates, hexavalent chromium compounds, fluorides or complex fluorides, molybdates, tungstates, vanadates or oxalates
    • C23C22/56Treatment of aluminium or alloys based thereon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D2111/00Cleaning compositions characterised by the objects to be cleaned; Cleaning compositions characterised by non-standard cleaning or washing processes
    • C11D2111/10Objects to be cleaned
    • C11D2111/14Hard surfaces

Definitions

  • This invention is concerned with improving the adhesion of coatings to substrates. More particularly, though not exclusively, this invention is concerned with a method for improving the adhesion of a coating to aluminum, galvinized steel, vinyl, PVC, TPO, Hypalon®, pressure treated wood, plywood and bitumenous substrates, as well as chalky acrylic coated surfaces of such substrates.
  • EPDM and asphalt membranes encompass about 70% of the total roofing market.
  • a large portion of the remaining market consists of various metal substrates, such as aluminum and galvanized steel.
  • Other substrates used comprise single ply substrates made from PVC (polyvinyl chloride), TPO (thermoplastic polyolefin) and Hypalon®.
  • Hypalon is a trade name for a sysnthetic rubber produced by DuPont Dow. It is described as a chlorosulfonated polyethylene and is produced as white chips. It can be used for the production of many products, including sheet roofing substrates and protective / decorative coatings.
  • Still other substrates used comprise spray applied polyurethane foam. All of these substrates can benefit from the use of a coating to improve aesthetics, reduce energy costs, and improve durability.
  • the architectural coatings industry use paints to coat similar substrates used in the roofing market.
  • the paint market has somewhat different performance criteria than coatings used in roofing; i.e. paints are applied thinner (3 to 8 dry mls versus 20 to 25 dry mls for roof mastics) and paints are not expected to perform in areas where water ponding is prevalent.
  • Many of the metals used in the roofing market are used for applications in the architectural markets. Metal used in both the architectural and roofing markets can be factory applied as well as painted at the job site.
  • the architectural coatings industry utilize many other substrates, not prevalent in the roofing market. Pressure treated wood, chalky acrylic and factory applied coatings to aluminum and vinyl substrates are examples of commonly used materials that can be painted. Coating these substrates is necessary because of degradation and weathering. Weathered substrates that have been previously painted frequently have chalky surfaces that are difficult to adhere to, yet need to be re-coated to prevent degradation of the substrate.
  • the key criteria for the coating is the ability of this coating to adhere well to the substrate. Cleaning with water before coating may improve adhesion of the coating as compared to not rinsing the substrate surface and cleaning with detergents has also shown to help.
  • the detergent of the present invention exhibits an ability to significantly improve adhesion properties of substrates to coatings. Several substrates have shown to be difficult to adhere to, such as aluminum, galvanized steel, pressure treated wood and weather treated pine. The use of the aqueous detergent composition and method of the present invention has improved adhesion to such substrates.
  • a coating system which displays good adhesion and superior resistance to blistering, especially when exposed to ponded water is disclosed in US-A-5059456.
  • the tiecoat consists of a water-insoluble latex polymer and multivalent metal ion, wherein the latex polymer comprises units such as would result from preparation from a monomer mixture comprising at least 20 weight %, based on the weight of the monomer mixture, of at least one hydrophobic monomer selected from the group consisting of (C 4 -C 20 )-alkyl methacrylates and (C 8 -C 20 )-alkyl acrylates, and from 3.0 weight % to 7.5 weight % of methacrylic acid, based on the weight of the monomer mixture, and where the latex polymer has a glass transition temperature of from -20°C to 5°C, and where the molar ratio of the multivalent metal ion to the methacrylic acid in the latex
  • the tiecoat is applied to a membrane before subsequent application of a coating.
  • This system offers properties of adhesion and resistance to blistering which are superior to conventional mastic systems on bituminous membranes, there is no disclosure of coating aluminum, galvinized steel or pressure treated wood substrates.
  • a method for improving the adhesion between a coating and a substrate which method comprises:
  • the substrate for application of the invention is aluminum, galvinized steel, vinyl, PVC, Hypalon®, pressure treated wood or plywood.
  • the aqueous detergent composition of the present invention is allowed to sit for five (5) minutes, followed by the rinsing step.
  • the rinsing step includes both a power wash at a pressure of 193 x 10 5 N/m 2 (2500 psi) and a non-presured rinse.
  • the coating composition may be any composition traditionally used in coating such sunbstrates, preferably comprising a water-insoluble latex polymer binder, having a glass transition temperature of from -45°C to 50°C (as measured by the Fox equation), which is preferably acrylic or styrene/acrylic.
  • the composition will comprise at least one or more of the following components: pigments, extenders, dispersants, surfactants, coalescents, wetting agents, thickeners, rheology modifiers, drying retarders, plasticizers, biocides, mildewicides, defoamers, colorants, waxes, dirt pick-up retarders, adhesion promoters, zinc oxide and solid silica.
  • the coating composition is preferably an architectural roof coating composition or mastic coating composition.
  • the binder used in the coating composition is preferably a commercially available binder useful for such applications, such as a binder selected from the group including Rhoplex AC-261, Rhoplex EC-1791, Rhoplex 2019R and Rhoplex EC-2885 available from Rohm and Haas Company; Acronal NX 3250 available from BASF AG and DA26NA available from Dow. More preferably, the binder is selected from the group including Rhoplex AC-261, Rhoplex EC-1791, Rhoplex EC-2885 and Acronal NX 3250. Rhoplex AC-261 and Rhoplex EC-1791 are the most preferred coating compositions.
  • the aqueous detergent composition comprises from 1 to 10%, preferably 2 to 8 %, more preferably 3 to 6%, by weight of said composition of a mono- or polyphosphate or a mixture of such phosphates, preferably selected from the group consisting of trisodium phosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate and tripotassium phosphate. Trisodium phosphate is the most preferred.
  • the aqueous detergent composition comprises from 1 to 10%, preferably 2to 8 %, more preferably 3 to 6%, by weight of said composition of a meta-, ortho- or para-silicate or a mixture of such silicates, preferably selected from the group consisting of sodium metasilicate and potassium metasilicate. Sodium metasilicate is the most preferred.
  • the phosphates and silicates useful in the detergent composition are those commonly used in conventional detergent compositions, such as in dishwashing and clothes-washing detergents.
  • the aqueous detergent composition may also comprise other components typically found in aqueous detergent composition.
  • the composition may comprise up to 5%, preferably up to 2%, by weight of at least one compound selected from the group consisting of octylphenoxy polyethoxy ethanol, octyphenoxy polyethoxy ethylphosphate, polyethylene glycol and phosphoric acid.
  • the aqueous detergent composition has a pH of above 8, preferably a pH from 9 to 14, and most preferably a pH from 12 to 14.
  • the detergent composition may be spread over the surface by spray application methods or with the aid of a stiff brush.
  • the detergent composition should preferably be left to stand in contact with the surface of the membrane for a minimum of five (5) minutes. For example, though an improvement in adhesion of a coating may be measured when the detergent composition is left to treat the surface for less than 30 seconds, the best results are achieved when the detergent composition is allowed to contact the surface for at least 5 minutes. A contact time significantly over 5 minutes will tend not to lead to any significant further improvements in adhesion, though in practice contact times may be 10 to 30 minutes depending on the size of the substrate and the speed of the operator. Permitting the detergent to dry on the surface before rinsing may not be detrimental to the method of the present invention, provided the surface is rinsed well afterwards to remove the detergent.
  • High efficiency rinsing may involve the use of a stiff brush and/or the use of a high pressure hose.
  • the high pressure hose will release rinse water at 193 x 10 5 N/m 2 (2500 psi).
  • the coatings are subjected to dry and wet adhesion tests. These are performed in accordance with ASTM Protocol D903.
  • An aqueous detergent composition with the formulation indicated in Table 1, was prepared by mixing the components in the prescribed amounts in a pail. The composition was mixed in the pail until all components appeared to have dissolved.
  • the aqueous detergent composition was prepared in in accordance with the present invention and has a pH above 13.
  • Aqueous Detergent Composition Detergent Components Parts by Weight Sodium Metasilicate 5 Soap 2.4 Trisodium phosphate 5 Water 87.8
  • Example 3 Various substrates, as shown in Example 3, were laid flat on a surface. The upper surface of each substrate was then washed with tap water using a high pressure hose. After washing with water, 30 cm 2 sections of each substrate was then treated with the detergent composition of Example 1, by spray application of about 100 cm 3 of detergent composition over the surface to be treated and brushing the composition over the surface and allowing it to stand for 5 minutes. Then the detergent composition was washed away with tap water from a high pressure hose at 193 x 10 5 N/m 2 (2500 psi).
  • Premix B Premix the following ingredients and add slowly while stirring. Water 5.76 (12.7) Texanol 2.72 (6.0) Skane M-8 1.36 (3.0) D.
  • Premix C Premix the following ingredients and add slowly while string. Mix for a minimum of 15 minutes or until consistency is smooth. Propylene Glycol 4.53 (10.0) Natrosol®250HR 1.81 (4.0) E.
  • the tape is rubbed with an eraser to assure good contact over the test area, and then using the overlap for grip, the tape is pulled quickly at a 180° angle from the substrate. Then immediately determine knife peel adhesion. These tests should be performed as quickly as possible because adhesion improves with drying exposure in air.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Paints Or Removers (AREA)
  • Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)

Abstract

Adhesion between a coating and a substrate may be improved by pre-treating the surface of the substrate with an aqueous detergent composition having a pH above 8 and comprising from 1 to 10 % by weight phosphate and from 1 to 10 % by weight silicate, before application of the coating.

Description

This invention is concerned with improving the adhesion of coatings to substrates. More particularly, though not exclusively, this invention is concerned with a method for improving the adhesion of a coating to aluminum, galvinized steel, vinyl, PVC, TPO, Hypalon®, pressure treated wood, plywood and bitumenous substrates, as well as chalky acrylic coated surfaces of such substrates.
EPDM and asphalt membranes encompass about 70% of the total roofing market. A large portion of the remaining market consists of various metal substrates, such as aluminum and galvanized steel. Other substrates used comprise single ply substrates made from PVC (polyvinyl chloride), TPO (thermoplastic polyolefin) and Hypalon®. Hypalon is a trade name for a sysnthetic rubber produced by DuPont Dow. It is described as a chlorosulfonated polyethylene and is produced as white chips. It can be used for the production of many products, including sheet roofing substrates and protective / decorative coatings. Still other substrates used comprise spray applied polyurethane foam. All of these substrates can benefit from the use of a coating to improve aesthetics, reduce energy costs, and improve durability.
The architectural coatings industry use paints to coat similar substrates used in the roofing market. The paint market has somewhat different performance criteria than coatings used in roofing; i.e. paints are applied thinner (3 to 8 dry mls versus 20 to 25 dry mls for roof mastics) and paints are not expected to perform in areas where water ponding is prevalent. Many of the metals used in the roofing market are used for applications in the architectural markets. Metal used in both the architectural and roofing markets can be factory applied as well as painted at the job site. The architectural coatings industry utilize many other substrates, not prevalent in the roofing market. Pressure treated wood, chalky acrylic and factory applied coatings to aluminum and vinyl substrates are examples of commonly used materials that can be painted. Coating these substrates is necessary because of degradation and weathering. Weathered substrates that have been previously painted frequently have chalky surfaces that are difficult to adhere to, yet need to be re-coated to prevent degradation of the substrate.
In either the roofing or architectural industry the key criteria for the coating is the ability of this coating to adhere well to the substrate. Cleaning with water before coating may improve adhesion of the coating as compared to not rinsing the substrate surface and cleaning with detergents has also shown to help. The detergent of the present invention exhibits an ability to significantly improve adhesion properties of substrates to coatings. Several substrates have shown to be difficult to adhere to, such as aluminum, galvanized steel, pressure treated wood and weather treated pine. The use of the aqueous detergent composition and method of the present invention has improved adhesion to such substrates.
A coating system which displays good adhesion and superior resistance to blistering, especially when exposed to ponded water is disclosed in US-A-5059456. This system relies upon the use of a water-based tiecoat between the membrane and the coating. The tiecoat consists of a water-insoluble latex polymer and multivalent metal ion, wherein the latex polymer comprises units such as would result from preparation from a monomer mixture comprising at least 20 weight %, based on the weight of the monomer mixture, of at least one hydrophobic monomer selected from the group consisting of (C4-C20 )-alkyl methacrylates and (C8-C20)-alkyl acrylates, and from 3.0 weight % to 7.5 weight % of methacrylic acid, based on the weight of the monomer mixture, and where the latex polymer has a glass transition temperature of from -20°C to 5°C, and where the molar ratio of the multivalent metal ion to the methacrylic acid in the latex polymer is from about 1:1 to about 0.375:1. The tiecoat is applied to a membrane before subsequent application of a coating. Though this system offers properties of adhesion and resistance to blistering which are superior to conventional mastic systems on bituminous membranes, there is no disclosure of coating aluminum, galvinized steel or pressure treated wood substrates.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a coating system that offers improved adhesion on aluminum, galvinized steel, vinyl, PVC, TPO, Hypalon®, pressure treated wood, plywood and bitumenous substrates, as well as chalky acrylic coated surfaces of such substrates.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method for improving the adhesion between a coating and a substrate, which method comprises:
  • (A) selecting a substrate from the group consisting of aluminum, galvinized steel, vinyl, polyvinyl chloride, thermoplastic polyolefin, chlorosulfonated polyethylene, pressure treated wood, plywood and chalky acrylic coated surfaces thereof;
  • (B) treating a surface of the substrate with an aqueous detergent composition; then
  • (C) rinsing said surface of the substrate with water to remove said detergent composition; and then
  • (D) applying a coating composition to said rinsed surface of the substrate, wherein said aqueous detergent composition has a pH greater than 8 and comprises from 1 to 10 % by weight phosphate and from 1 to 10 % by weight silicate.
  • Surprisingly, it has been found that by pre-treating a substrate with said detergent composition before applying a conventional coating composition, a synergistic improvement in adhesion between the substrate and coating can be achieved. The surprising advantages of the present invention may be measured for both coatings applied on newly laid substrates and coatings applied on old substrates that have been previously coated and left for an extended period of time.
    Preferably, the substrate for application of the invention is aluminum, galvinized steel, vinyl, PVC, Hypalon®, pressure treated wood or plywood. Preferably, the aqueous detergent composition of the present invention is allowed to sit for five (5) minutes, followed by the rinsing step. Preferably the rinsing step includes both a power wash at a pressure of 193 x 105 N/m2 (2500 psi) and a non-presured rinse.
    The coating composition may be any composition traditionally used in coating such sunbstrates, preferably comprising a water-insoluble latex polymer binder, having a glass transition temperature of from -45°C to 50°C (as measured by the Fox equation), which is preferably acrylic or styrene/acrylic. In addition to the latex polymer, the composition will comprise at least one or more of the following components: pigments, extenders, dispersants, surfactants, coalescents, wetting agents, thickeners, rheology modifiers, drying retarders, plasticizers, biocides, mildewicides, defoamers, colorants, waxes, dirt pick-up retarders, adhesion promoters, zinc oxide and solid silica. The coating composition is preferably an architectural roof coating composition or mastic coating composition. The binder used in the coating composition is preferably a commercially available binder useful for such applications, such as a binder selected from the group including Rhoplex AC-261, Rhoplex EC-1791, Rhoplex 2019R and Rhoplex EC-2885 available from Rohm and Haas Company; Acronal NX 3250 available from BASF AG and DA26NA available from Dow. More preferably, the binder is selected from the group including Rhoplex AC-261, Rhoplex EC-1791, Rhoplex EC-2885 and Acronal NX 3250. Rhoplex AC-261 and Rhoplex EC-1791 are the most preferred coating compositions.
    The aqueous detergent composition comprises from 1 to 10%, preferably 2 to 8 %, more preferably 3 to 6%, by weight of said composition of a mono- or polyphosphate or a mixture of such phosphates, preferably selected from the group consisting of trisodium phosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate and tripotassium phosphate. Trisodium phosphate is the most preferred. The aqueous detergent composition comprises from 1 to 10%, preferably 2to 8 %, more preferably 3 to 6%, by weight of said composition of a meta-, ortho- or para-silicate or a mixture of such silicates, preferably selected from the group consisting of sodium metasilicate and potassium metasilicate. Sodium metasilicate is the most preferred. The phosphates and silicates useful in the detergent composition are those commonly used in conventional detergent compositions, such as in dishwashing and clothes-washing detergents.
    The aqueous detergent composition may also comprise other components typically found in aqueous detergent composition. For example, the composition may comprise up to 5%, preferably up to 2%, by weight of at least one compound selected from the group consisting of octylphenoxy polyethoxy ethanol, octyphenoxy polyethoxy ethylphosphate, polyethylene glycol and phosphoric acid.
    The aqueous detergent composition has a pH of above 8, preferably a pH from 9 to 14, and most preferably a pH from 12 to 14.
    The best results are obtained from the present invention when all the surface of the substrate is contacted with the detergent composition. The detergent composition may be spread over the surface by spray application methods or with the aid of a stiff brush. The detergent composition should preferably be left to stand in contact with the surface of the membrane for a minimum of five (5) minutes. For example, though an improvement in adhesion of a coating may be measured when the detergent composition is left to treat the surface for less than 30 seconds, the best results are achieved when the detergent composition is allowed to contact the surface for at least 5 minutes. A contact time significantly over 5 minutes will tend not to lead to any significant further improvements in adhesion, though in practice contact times may be 10 to 30 minutes depending on the size of the substrate and the speed of the operator. Permitting the detergent to dry on the surface before rinsing may not be detrimental to the method of the present invention, provided the surface is rinsed well afterwards to remove the detergent.
    The best results are obtained from the present invention when rinsing the substrate's surface removes substantially all of the detergent composition. High efficiency rinsing may involve the use of a stiff brush and/or the use of a high pressure hose. Typically, the high pressure hose will release rinse water at 193 x 105 N/m2 (2500 psi).
    The following Examples, including Comparative Examples, are given solely for the purpose of illustrating the invention and are in no way to be considered limiting.
    Tests
    In the examples, the coatings are subjected to dry and wet adhesion tests. These are performed in accordance with ASTM Protocol D903.
    Example 1 - Preparation of aqueous detergent composition
    An aqueous detergent composition, with the formulation indicated in Table 1, was prepared by mixing the components in the prescribed amounts in a pail. The composition was mixed in the pail until all components appeared to have dissolved. The aqueous detergent composition was prepared in in accordance with the present invention and has a pH above 13.
    Aqueous Detergent Composition
    Detergent Components Parts by Weight
    Sodium Metasilicate 5
    Soap 2.4
    Trisodium phosphate 5
    Water 87.8
    Soap = 127 parts octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol
       58.5 parts octylphenoxypolyethoxyethylphosphate
       3.9 parts polyethylene glycol
       11.7 parts phosphoric acid
       18.9 parts water
    Example 2- Substrate preparation
    Various substrates, as shown in Example 3, were laid flat on a surface. The upper surface of each substrate was then washed with tap water using a high pressure hose. After washing with water, 30 cm2 sections of each substrate was then treated with the detergent composition of Example 1, by spray application of about 100 cm3 of detergent composition over the surface to be treated and brushing the composition over the surface and allowing it to stand for 5 minutes. Then the detergent composition was washed away with tap water from a high pressure hose at 193 x 105 N/m2 (2500 psi).
    Each of the treated sections and a section not treated with detergent on each substrate was then coated in a conventional manner with a general composition as shown below in Tables 2.1 through 2.4.
    Figure 00060001
    Figure 00070001
    Coating Formulation MB-3640
    Grind INGREDIENTS kg/378.54 liters
    (lbs/100gal)
    A Water 65.8 (145.0)
    Tamol 165A 2.59 (5.7)
    Aqueous Ammonia(28%) 1.36 (3.0)
    Nopco NXZ 1.36 (3.0)
    Duramite 178.04 (392.5)
    TiPure R-960 28.35 (62.5)
    B. Letdown Phase under mild agitation
    Nopco NXZ 1.36 (3.0)
    Lipacryl® MB-3640 222.3 (490.1)
    C. Premix B:  Premix the following ingredients and add slowly while stirring.
    Water 5.76 (12.7)
    Texanol 2.72 (6.0)
    Skane M-8 1.36 (3.0)
    D. Premix C: Premix the following ingredients and add slowly while string. Mix for a minimum of 15 minutes or until consistency is smooth.
    Propylene Glycol 4.53 (10.0)
    Natrosol®250HR 1.81 (4.0)
    E. Adjust pH to 9.0-10.0 with
    Aqueous Ammonia(28%)
    Physical Constants:
    Solids Content, %
    By weight    64.3
    By Volume    50.1
    PVC    38.8
    Density, lbs/gal    11.4
    PH    9.0-10.0
    Coating Formulation AC-261 or ML 200 Sheen
    Grind INGREDIENTS kg/378.54 liters
    (lbs/100gal)
    A Tamol 731(25%) 7.24(15.97)
    Propylene Glycol 34.8(76.72)
    Foamaster VL 0.48(1.06)
    Rozone 2000 1.18(2.60)
    Acrysol RM-825 0.53(1.19)
    Water 45.36(100.00)
    Ti-Pure R-902 120.72(266.15)
    Minex 4 48.29(106.47)
    Letdown
    B Rhoplex AC-261 or Rhoplex ML-200 205.2(452.47)
    C Texanol 10.14(22.36)
    D Foamaster VL 0.48(1.06)
    E Acrysol RM-2020 12.07(26.60)
    F Water 26.92(59.34)
    Physical Constants:
    Solids Content, %
    By weight 53.99
    By Volume 37.36
    PVC 35.00
    Density, lbs/gal 11.3
    pH 9.0-10.0
    Coating Formulation for Test Sample
    Grind INGREDIENTS kg/378.54 liters
    (lbs/100gal)
    A Natrasol 250 MHR(2.5%) 45.36 (100)
    Ethylene Glycol 9.43 (20.8)
    Propylene Glycol 13.2(29.2)
    Tamol 1124 1.7(3.8)
    Colloids 643 0.8(1.7)
    Rozone 2.6(5.7)
    Ti-Pure R-902 52.6(120.7)
    Icecap K 5.2(12.1)
    Celite 281 15.6 (36.2)
    Letdown
    B OP-96 41.5(96.67)
    C Rhoplex ML-200 131.0(288.7)
    D Texanol 4.1(9.3)
    E Colloids 643 0.7(1.7)
    F Aq Ammonia(28%) 0.2(0.5)
    G RM-2020 5.2(12.0)
    H Water 55.2(121.7)
    Physical Constants:
    Solids Content, %
    By weight
    By Volume 30.0
    PVC 45.00
    Density, lbs/gal 11.3
    Example 3 - Testing different coating compositions on various substrates
    The dry and wet adhesion properties and blister properties of different commercially available coating compositions were evaluated on various substrates, as described above, with the aqueous detergent composition of Example 1. The results are shown in Tables 3, 4, 5 and 6.
    180 Degree Peel Adhesion
    For Dry Film Coating Applications of 8-10 mils
    Measured in Newtons/Meter
    7 Day Testing Time
    Dry Condition
    7 Day Testing Time
    Dry / 4 Hour Wet Condition
    Substrate
    - coating binder
    Without Detergent Treatment With Detergent Treatment Without Detergent Treatment With Detergent Treatment
    Galvanized Steel
    - Rhoplex AC-261 350 788 350 455
    - Rhoplex EC-1791 438 438 245 333
    Aluminum Panel
    - Rhoplex AC-261 140 1015 228 455
    - Rhoplex EC-1791 262 490
    Aluminum Siding with chalky acrylic coated surface
    - Rhoplex ML-200 000 350
    - Rhoplex EC-1791 403 490
    Vinyl Siding
    - Rhoplex ML-200 438 525 53 175
    - Rhoplex EC-1791 490 508 210 525
    Pressure Treated White Pine
    - Rhoplex AC-261 875 963 525 613
    Plywood;T-11
    - Rhoplex ML-200 438 613
    180 Degree Peel Adhesion
    For Dry Film Coating Applications of 18-20 mils
    Measured in Newtons/Meter
    7 Day Testing Time
    Dry Condition
    7 Day Testing Time
    Dry / 4 Hour Wet Condition
    Substrate - coating binder Without Detergent Treatment With Detergent Treatment Without Detergent Treatment With Detergent Treatment
    PVC Single Ply
    - Rhoplex EC-1791 263 298 175 438
    Hypalon® Single Ply
    - Rhoplex EC-1791 315 403 158 438
    Aged Modified Bitumen
    - MB-3640 228 350
    Hypalon is a registered trademark of DuPont Dow.
    Adhesion To Chalky Acrylic Coated Aluminum Siding
    Conditions
    Sample
    Panel #1 Panel #2
    Water Rinse Only Detergent then power wash rinse
    X Hatch Knife X Hatch Knife
    24 Hour Dry
    Behr® Premium Exterior Flat 20% 2 100% 8
    Test Sample Coating 10% 2 100% 8
    45 PVC/30VS Flat
    24 Hour Dry 4 Hours Fog
    Behr® Premium Exterior Flat 20% 4 100% 8
    Test Sample Coating 0% 2 100% 6
    45 PVC/30VS Flat
    7 Day Dry
    Behr® Premium Exterior Flat 0% 4 100% 8
    Test Sample Coating 0% 4 100% 8
    45 PVC/30VS Flat
    7 Day Dry, 4 Hours Fog
    Behr® Premium Exterior Flat 0% 2 100% 8
    Test Sample Coating 0% 2 100% 6
    45 PVC/30VS Flat
    PVC means pigment volume concentration.
    VS means volume solids.
    X Hatch or Grid Tape Adhesion
    Place a comb-like metal template on the surface of the test paint and run the Stanley Utility Knife or Excel Adhesion Knife through each slit, thus inscribing 11 parallel cuts in the paint film. Wear a leather glove on the hand holding the template to avoid cuts. The template is then rotated 90° and placed over the same area, and a second set of 11 cuts is made. The horizontal and vertical cuts form a 100 square test area (the Gardner Adhesion Knife produces similar test areas). One inch wide Permacel™ tape with a 10.16 cm (4 inch) overlap at one end to form a pull tab is applied over the test area. The tape is rubbed with an eraser to assure good contact over the test area, and then using the overlap for grip, the tape is pulled quickly at a 180° angle from the substrate. Then immediately determine knife peel adhesion. These tests should be performed as quickly as possible because adhesion improves with drying exposure in air.
    Knife Peel Test
    Make two knife cuts through the test film with the Excel Adhesion Knife, formingan X intersecting at about a 30° angle. For difficult or hard to cut substrates, the Stanley Utility Knife can be used. Using the point of the Excel Adhesion Knife, attempt to peel the latex paint from the substrate, at the point of intersection. The degree of peeling difficulty is subjectively rated according to the following chart:
    Knife Peel Rating:
  • 10 ― no peeling
  • 9 ― very difficult
  • 8 ― difficult
  • 7 ― moderately difficult
  • 6 ― slightly to mod. Difficult
  • 5 ― slightly difficult
  • 4 ― fairly easy
  • 3 ― easy
  • 2 ― very easy
  • 1 ― falls off
  • Each of the samples for Table 6 were tested in accordance with the ASTM D 714 rating scale, rated for both blister size and density.
    Blistering of Chalky Acrylic Coated Aluminum Siding
    Conditions
    Sample
    Panel #1 Panel #2
    Water Rinse Only Detergent then power wash rinse
    Size Density Size Density
    24 Hour Dry 4 Hours Fog
    Behr® Premium Exterior Flat #8 Moderate 10 10
    Test Sample Coating #8 Few 10 10
    45 PVC/30VS Flat
    7 Day Dry, 4 Hours Fog
    Behr® Premium Exterior Flat #6 Moderate 10 10
    Test Sample Coating #10 10 10 10
    45 PVC/30VS Flat
    PVC means pigment volume concentration.
    VS means volume solids.
    It is shown in Tables 3, 4, 5 and 6 that improvement in adhesion and blister ratings between a coating composition and various substrates are improved through the pre-treatment of the substrate with the aqueous detergent composition of the present invention.

    Claims (8)

    1. A method for improving the adhesion between a coating and a substrate, which method comprises:
      (A) selecting a substrate from the group consisting of aluminum, galvinized steel, vinyl, polyvinyl chloride, thermoplastic polyolefin, chlorosulfonated polyethylene, pressure treated wood, plywood and chalky acrylic coated surfaces thereof
      (B) treating a surface of the substrate with an aqueous detergent composition; then
      (C) rinsing said surface of the substrate with water to remove said detergent composition; and then
      (D) applying a coating composition to said rinsed surface of the substrate, wherein said aqueous detergent composition has a pH greater than 8 and comprises from 1 to 10 % by weight phosphate and from 1 to 10 % by weight silicate.
    2. The method of claim 1 wherein the phosphate is a monophosphate.
    3. The method of claim 2, wherein the monophosphate is trisodium phosphate.
    4. The method of claim 1, wherein the silicate is a metasilicate.
    5. The method of claim 4, wherein the metasilicate is sodium metasilicate.
    6. The method of claim 1, wherein the pH of the detergent composition is in the range of 9 to 14.
    7. The method of claim 1, wherein the coating is a mastic or paint coating.
    8. The method of claim 1, wherein the rinsing comprises a power wash at a pressure of at least 193 x 105 N/m2 (2500 psi).
    EP02252052A 2001-03-22 2002-03-21 Method of adhering coatings to substrates Expired - Lifetime EP1243643B1 (en)

    Applications Claiming Priority (2)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    US27774401P 2001-03-22 2001-03-22
    US277744P 2001-03-22

    Publications (3)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP1243643A2 true EP1243643A2 (en) 2002-09-25
    EP1243643A3 EP1243643A3 (en) 2002-10-02
    EP1243643B1 EP1243643B1 (en) 2006-07-05

    Family

    ID=23062173

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP02252052A Expired - Lifetime EP1243643B1 (en) 2001-03-22 2002-03-21 Method of adhering coatings to substrates

    Country Status (9)

    Country Link
    EP (1) EP1243643B1 (en)
    JP (1) JP4349554B2 (en)
    AR (1) AR033193A1 (en)
    AT (1) ATE332353T1 (en)
    AU (1) AU785296B2 (en)
    BR (1) BR0200901A (en)
    DE (1) DE60212891T2 (en)
    MX (1) MXPA02003050A (en)
    ZA (1) ZA200202262B (en)

    Cited By (3)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    GB2395921A (en) * 2002-12-03 2004-06-09 John Joseph Burke Production of flame-retardent panels
    US7642314B2 (en) 2005-12-30 2010-01-05 Columbia Insurance Company Emulsion polymers having multimodal molecular weight distributions
    EP2921270B1 (en) 2014-03-21 2018-10-24 F. List GmbH Veneer element

    Families Citing this family (1)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    CN101089060B (en) * 2007-07-12 2010-06-16 上海富顺单向透视材料有限公司 Green black paint and its prepn and use

    Family Cites Families (6)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    GB916203A (en) * 1960-11-03 1963-01-23 Pyrene Co Ltd Improvements relating to the treatment of metallic surfaces
    JPS6017831B2 (en) * 1976-12-30 1985-05-07 アムケム プロダクツ インコ−ポレ−テツド Composition and cleaning method for cleaning metal surfaces
    US4581996A (en) * 1982-03-15 1986-04-15 American Hoechst Corporation Aluminum support useful for lithography
    CA2250131C (en) * 1996-03-27 2005-06-28 Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. Thermoplastic resin coated aluminum alloy sheet, and method and apparatus for production thereof
    DE19908564A1 (en) * 1998-03-12 1999-09-16 Dorus Klebetechnik Gmbh & Co K Aqueous alkaline cleaner for cleaning polyvinyl chloride especially profile before bonding to film
    EP1090948B1 (en) * 1999-09-23 2003-04-02 Rohm And Haas Company Coating EPDM rubber membranes

    Cited By (4)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    GB2395921A (en) * 2002-12-03 2004-06-09 John Joseph Burke Production of flame-retardent panels
    GB2395921B (en) * 2002-12-03 2005-11-23 John Joseph Burke Production of flame-retardent panels
    US7642314B2 (en) 2005-12-30 2010-01-05 Columbia Insurance Company Emulsion polymers having multimodal molecular weight distributions
    EP2921270B1 (en) 2014-03-21 2018-10-24 F. List GmbH Veneer element

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    AU785296B2 (en) 2007-01-04
    DE60212891D1 (en) 2006-08-17
    DE60212891T2 (en) 2007-02-01
    JP2002355606A (en) 2002-12-10
    EP1243643B1 (en) 2006-07-05
    BR0200901A (en) 2002-11-05
    EP1243643A3 (en) 2002-10-02
    AR033193A1 (en) 2003-12-10
    MXPA02003050A (en) 2003-07-14
    AU2615802A (en) 2002-09-26
    ATE332353T1 (en) 2006-07-15
    ZA200202262B (en) 2002-10-11
    JP4349554B2 (en) 2009-10-21

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    KR20080000604A (en) Floor Finisher Stripper Compositions and Stripping Methods Thickened After Dilution with Water
    US11542405B2 (en) Aqueous coating composition
    US6982242B2 (en) Aqueous detergent composition and method of use
    US6969734B1 (en) Aqueous polymer dispersion and method of use
    WO2005070563A1 (en) Jobsite-renewable multilayer floor finish with enhanced hardening rate
    EP3720916B1 (en) Latex polymer with improved washability and block resistance
    AU785296B2 (en) Method of adhering coatings to substrates
    US20020164426A1 (en) Method of adhering coatings to substrates
    AU627236B2 (en) Tiecoat compositions, mastic coating systems and methods and uses involving tiecoat compositions
    EP1664210B1 (en) Styrene acrylic copolymer based waterborne coatings
    EP1090948B1 (en) Coating EPDM rubber membranes
    CA2270318C (en) Coating bituminous substrates
    US7655718B2 (en) Polyurethane coating cure enhancement using zinc carbonate initiators
    JP2001288415A (en) Water-based matte coating composition and matte coating method
    JP2596749B2 (en) Reinforced makeup method for old deteriorated surface
    KR102080693B1 (en) Eco-friendly Slice Epoxy Lining Composition and Construction Methods for Parking Lot Using thereof by pre-approval system of building materials
    JP7484005B1 (en) Multi-purpose aqueous solvent composition and repainting method
    US3822142A (en) Etching primer for concrete floor surfaces containing sulfuric acid
    US9249311B2 (en) Easily removable indoor/outdoor concrete curing compound
    AU2004226924B2 (en) Aqueous polymer dispersion and method of use
    EP4025644B1 (en) Aqueous polymer dispersion
    JP2826575B2 (en) Stone surface back and side treatment
    CN1096526A (en) Building interior wall coating (putty) with waterproof performance and preparation method thereof
    WO1998034989A1 (en) Material and process for surface treatment
    CN1089633A (en) Coating composition

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    PUAL Search report despatched

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 20020416

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A2

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

    AX Request for extension of the european patent

    Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A3

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

    AX Request for extension of the european patent

    Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

    AKX Designation fees paid

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

    GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

    GRAS Grant fee paid

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: B1

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: NL

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060705

    Ref country code: LI

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060705

    Ref country code: BE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060705

    Ref country code: FI

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060705

    Ref country code: CH

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060705

    Ref country code: AT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060705

    Ref country code: IT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

    Effective date: 20060705

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: CH

    Ref legal event code: EP

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REF Corresponds to:

    Ref document number: 60212891

    Country of ref document: DE

    Date of ref document: 20060817

    Kind code of ref document: P

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: SE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20061005

    Ref country code: DK

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20061005

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: ES

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20061016

    NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: PT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20061205

    ET Fr: translation filed
    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    26N No opposition filed

    Effective date: 20070410

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: MC

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20070331

    Ref country code: IE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20070321

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20061006

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: CY

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060705

    Ref country code: LU

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20070321

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: TR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060705

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Payment date: 20100326

    Year of fee payment: 9

    GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

    Effective date: 20110321

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20110321

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: PLFP

    Year of fee payment: 15

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: PLFP

    Year of fee payment: 16

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: PLFP

    Year of fee payment: 17

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Payment date: 20210210

    Year of fee payment: 20

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Payment date: 20210310

    Year of fee payment: 20

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R071

    Ref document number: 60212891

    Country of ref document: DE