EP1240389A1 - Method for modifying cellulose-based fiber material - Google Patents

Method for modifying cellulose-based fiber material

Info

Publication number
EP1240389A1
EP1240389A1 EP00966646A EP00966646A EP1240389A1 EP 1240389 A1 EP1240389 A1 EP 1240389A1 EP 00966646 A EP00966646 A EP 00966646A EP 00966646 A EP00966646 A EP 00966646A EP 1240389 A1 EP1240389 A1 EP 1240389A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
approximately
electrolyte
cellulose fibers
cmc
aqueous solution
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP00966646A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1240389B1 (en
Inventor
Tom Lindström
Gunborg Glad-Nordmark
Gunnel Risinger
Janne Laine
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Svenska Traforskningsinstitutet
STFI Skogsindustrins Tekniska Forskningsinstitut AB
Original Assignee
Svenska Traforskningsinstitutet
STFI Skogsindustrins Tekniska Forskningsinstitut AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Svenska Traforskningsinstitutet, STFI Skogsindustrins Tekniska Forskningsinstitut AB filed Critical Svenska Traforskningsinstitutet
Publication of EP1240389A1 publication Critical patent/EP1240389A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1240389B1 publication Critical patent/EP1240389B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21C—PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C9/00—After-treatment of cellulose pulp, e.g. of wood pulp, or cotton linters ; Treatment of dilute or dewatered pulp or process improvement taking place after obtaining the raw cellulosic material and not provided for elsewhere
    • D21C9/001—Modification of pulp properties
    • D21C9/002—Modification of pulp properties by chemical means; preparation of dewatered pulp, e.g. in sheet or bulk form, containing special additives
    • D21C9/005—Modification of pulp properties by chemical means; preparation of dewatered pulp, e.g. in sheet or bulk form, containing special additives organic compounds
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H11/00—Pulp or paper, comprising cellulose or lignocellulose fibres of natural origin only
    • D21H11/16—Pulp or paper, comprising cellulose or lignocellulose fibres of natural origin only modified by a particular after-treatment
    • D21H11/20—Chemically or biochemically modified fibres
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H21/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
    • D21H21/14—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties characterised by function or properties in or on the paper
    • D21H21/18—Reinforcing agents
    • D21H21/20—Wet strength agents

Definitions

  • This invention concerns the technical field of paper manufacture, in particular chemical additives during paper manufacture.
  • CMC carboxymethyl cellulose
  • the present invention concerns a method whereby cellulose fibers are treated for at least 5 minutes with an aqueous electrolyte-containing solution of CMC or a derivative of CMC, whereby the temperature during the treatment is at least 100 °C and at least one of the following conditions applies: A) the pH of the aqueous solution du ⁇ ng the treatment lies in the interval of approximately 1.5 - 4 5, or B) the pH of the aqueous solution du ⁇ ng the treatment is higher than approximately 11; or
  • the concentration of the electrolyte in the aqueous solution lies in the interval of approximately 0.001 - 0.5 M if the electrolyte has monovalent cations, or in the range approximately 0.0002 - 0.25 M if the electrolyte has divalent cations
  • condition C applies together with either condition A or condition B.
  • a method for modifying cellulose fibers with a cellulose de ⁇ vative such as CMC is desc ⁇ bed in the published international patent application WO 99/57370. This method is performed at a pH of 6 - 13 and a temperature of up to 100 °C, preferably m the approximate range of 20 - 80 °C. It is specified (on page 7, lines 29-30) that the temperature does not constitute a c ⁇ tical factor. There is nothing specified or even implied that a temperature over 100 °C would involve significant advantages for the adsorption.
  • the cellulose fibers that are used with the present invention include all types of wood-based fibers, such as bleached, half-bleached and unbleached sulfite, sulfate and soda pulps, together with unbleached, half-bleached and bleached mechanical, thermomechanical, chemo-mechanical and chemo-thermomechamcal pulps, and mixtures of these. Both new fibers and recycled fibers can be used with the present invention, as can mixtures of these. Pulps from both softwood and hardwood trees can be used, as can mixtures of such pulps. Pulps that are not based on wood, such as cotton hnters, regenerated cellulose, kenaf and grass fibers can also be used with the present invention.
  • the preferred concentration of CMC is approximately 0.02 - 4 % w/w, calculated on the dry weight of the fiber material. A more preferred concentration is approximately 0 04 - 2 % w/w, and the most preferred concentration of additive is approximately 0.08 - 1% w/w.
  • the concept "CMC" is used here to include, in addition to carboxymethyl cellulose, vanous derivatives thereof.
  • the preferred molar degree of substitution is approximately 0.3 - 1.2 and the preferred viscosity is approximately 25 - 8,000 mPa at a concentration of 4%. A higher viscosity is preferred, since it has become clear that the irreversibility of the adsorption is higher for higher molecular weights.
  • a high concentration of pulp is particularly desirable if the adsorption is not quantitative, since the loss of CMC can thus be reduced and CMC solution can easily be reintroduced into the reaction vessel.
  • Treatment of pulp preferably takes place as a separate treatment step at high pulp concentration, but it can naturally also be earned out at the same time as, for example, digesting, or du ⁇ ng a bleaching step. As high a concentration of pulp as possible is thus desired, but this is naturally limited by practical conditions du ⁇ ng the conduct of the method.
  • the preferred concentration of pulp is approximately 3 - 50%, a more preferred concentration interval is approximately 5 - 50%, and the most preferred concentration interval is approximately 10 - 30%.
  • Such high concentration mixes are known to one skilled in the arts withm the relevant technical field, and are suitable for use m association with the present invention.
  • a preferred range of pH is approximately 2 - 4, in particular approximately 2.5 - 3.5.
  • the preferred concentration interval for salts with monovalent cations is approximately 0.002 - 0.25 M, in particular within the range approximately 0.005 - 0.1 M
  • the preferred concentration interval for salts with divalent cations, such as CaCl 2 is between approximately 0.0005 - 0.1 M, m particular approximately 0.02 - 0.05 M.
  • the preferred adsorption pe ⁇ od is approximately 5 - 180 mm, a more preferred adsorption pe ⁇ od is approximately 10 - 120 mm and the most preferred adsorption pe ⁇ od is approximately 15 - 60 min.
  • the preferred temperature is m excess of approximately 100 °C, a more preferred temperature is in excess of approximately 120 °C and the most preferred adsorption temperature is up to approximately 150 °C.
  • the method according to the invention is thus earned out at a pressure m excess of atmosphe ⁇ c pressure. Suitable equipment and working conditions for this will be obvious for one skilled in the arts.
  • the pulp can be washed or diluted directly after the treatment, or it can be dned m the normal manner.
  • the present invention also concerns a method for production of paper with a high wet strength, whereby
  • the cellulose fibers are modified by treatment for at least 5 minutes with an aqueous solution of CMC or a CMC derivative containing electrolyte, whereby
  • the temperature du ⁇ ng the treatment is at least approximately 100 °C and at least one of the following conditions apply:
  • the concentration of the electrolyte in the aqueous solution lies in the interval of approximately 0.001 - 0.5 M if the electrolyte has monovalent cations, or m the range of approximately 0.0002 - 0.25 M if the electrolyte has divalent cations;
  • cellulose fibers treated according to the present invention when treated with wet-strength agent, provide a much higher wet strength than the strength that can be explained by the higher adsorption of wet-strength agent to the fibers.
  • a paper can be defined as wet-strengthened m this context when the geometric mean value of the wet strength divided by the dry strength exceeds 0.15.
  • wet-strength agent used as additive to the stock is up to approximately 2% w/w, calculated on the [weight of ] dry fibers, a more preferred concentration is approximately 0.02 - 1.5 % and the most preferred concentration is 0.05 - 0.8 %.
  • wet-strength agents that can be used include all cationic polymenc resms. These include, for example, those wet-strength agents that give permanent wet strength: urea-formaldehyde resms, melamine-formaldehyde resms and polyamide-amme resms. Examples of wet-strength agents that give temporary wet strength are polyethylene lmme, dialdehyde starch, polyvmyl amme and glyoxal polyacrylamide resins.
  • a method for making paper with a high wet strength but low dry strength, a method that can be used, for example, for producing paper structures that are strong when wet and absorbent.
  • debonding agents are used in this embodiment, and preferred debonding agents are quaternary ammonium salts with fatty acid chains that can be retained by electrostatic attraction to the negatively charged groups on the surfaces of the fibers.
  • the result is a paper with a wet strength /dry strength ratio that preferably exceeds 0.1, a more preferred value exceeds 0.2 and the most preferred value exceeds 0.3.
  • Example 1 This example according to known technology demonstrates how the conditions in the chemical environment affect the amounts of different types of CMC that are irreversibly adsorbed.
  • the CMC preparations that were used were commercially available preparations from Metsa-Serla:
  • the pulp was a bleached, long-fibered, und ⁇ ed softwood sulfate pulp from Metsa-Serla/Husum's facto ⁇ es. The adsorption t ⁇ als were conducted at a pulp concentration of 2%. The pulp was washed with 0.01 M HC1 after the treatment and then transferred to its Na-form in de-iomsed water. The pulp was washed after 2 hours with de-ionised water. The amount of CMC adsorbed was determined by conductomet ⁇ c titration.
  • the amount of CMC that was added was 40 mg/g. "DS" is used to denote the degree of molar substitution for the CMC used.
  • Table 1 shows that the presence of electrolyte is necessary to obtain adsorption. It is also clear that the adsorption is higher at higher temperatures. Higher alkalinity is also advantageous for the adsorption.
  • the degree of molar substitution or the molecular weight of CMC is not c ⁇ tical, but the adsorption increases when the degree of substitution decreases.
  • Example 2 This example shows that a very high relative amount of CMC can be irreversibly bound to a bleached und ⁇ ed softwood sulfate pulp (Metsa-Serla/Husum factones) by the selection of a high temperature and a high electrolyte concentration.
  • the expe ⁇ ment was performed by treating the pulp at 120 °C or at 150 °C for 2 hours m 0.05 M CaCl 2 buffered with 0001 M NaHCOj.
  • the amounts of CMC adsorbed were measured both after washing the pulp with de-ionised water (Ca-form) and after washing the pulp with 0 01 M HC1, de-ionised water, adjusting its pH value using NaOH to a pH of 8 and equilibrating it with an 0 001 M NaHC0 3 buffer for 2 hours (Na-form)
  • WRV is an abbreviation for "Water Retention Value” and is a measure of the ability of the pulp to retain water (here the Na-form was measured at 3,000 g and 15 minutes in de-ionised water)
  • Example 3 CMC (Fmnfix WRH) was adsorbed onto a bleached undned softwood sulfate pulp (Metsa-Serla/Husum facto ⁇ es) at different pH values in de-ionised water at 120 °C. The pulp had been transferred to its Na-form before the pH was adjusted. The amount of CMC added was 20 mg/g. The results in Table 3 show that a certain amount is adsorbed at 120 °C, but better adsorption is achieved if electrolyte is present during the treatment (compare with Table 2).
  • Example 4 This example shows that the adsorbed amount of CMC is adsorbed to the cellulose fibers so strongly that it remains on the fibers even after a prolonged pe ⁇ od of leachmg.
  • the bleached sulfate pulp from Example 2 was treated with 40 mg/g Fmnfix WRH for 2 hours at 120 °C in 0.1 M NaCl. The amount adsorbed after this treatment was 7.7 mg/g. After leachmg the pulp in de- lomsed water for 19 hours, the adsorbed amount was 7.4 mg/g.
  • Example 5 This example shows that selecting a high temperature and a high concentration of electrolyte at the adsorption step gives a pulp that has a lower water retention ability than that obtained if the CMC is adsorbed onto the pulp at a lower temperature.
  • the expe ⁇ ment was performed by treating an undned softwood sulfate pulp (Metsa- Serla/Husum factories) at 23 °C, 80 °C and 120 °C for 12 hours m 0.05 M CaCl 2 buffered by 0.001 M NaHC0 3 .
  • the amount of adsorbed CMC (Fmnfix WRH, 20 mg/g) was measured after washing the pulp with 0.01 M HCl, de-iomsed water, adjusting its pH with NaOH to a pH of 8 and equilibrating it with 0.001 M NaHC0 3 buffer for 2 hours (Na-form).
  • WRV is an abbreviation for "Water Retention Value" according to the definition given earlier.
  • Table 10 shows that the increase in WRV per mg/g of adsorbed CMC is considerably lower if the CMC has been adsorbed at a higher temperature (120 °C) than if it has been adsorbed at a lower temperature This is particularly advantageous if it is to be easy to de-water the pulp on the paper machine. The ability of the pulp to retain water, however, does not reflect the strength of the paper that is manufactured from the pulp under consideration.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Polysaccharides And Polysaccharide Derivatives (AREA)

Abstract

A method for modifying cellulose fibers; which are treated for at least 5 minutes with an aqueous solution of CMC or CMC-derivative containing electrolyte at a temperature of at least approximately 100 DEG C, and the pH during the treatment is approximately 1.5-4.5, or higher than 11; or the concentration of electrolyte is approximately 0.001 - 0.5 M, if the electrolyte has monovalent cations, or approximately 0.0002 - 0.5 M, if the electrolyte has divalent cations, and cellulose fibers that have been modified according to this method, and use of the modified cellulose fibers for the manufacture of rayon fibers. A method for the manufacture of paper with a high wet strength, whereby an aqueous suspension of cellulose fibers is produced, and the cellulose fibers are modified as described above, and wet-strength agent is added to the aqueous suspension; and paper with a high wet strength manufactured according to this method.

Description

Method for modifying cellulose-based fiber material
This invention concerns the technical field of paper manufacture, in particular chemical additives during paper manufacture.
The use of carboxymethyl cellulose, hereafter referred to as "CMC", as dry-strength agent or as an additive during the grinding of paper pulp is descπbed by, for example, B.T. Hofreiter m "Pulp and Paper Chemistry and Chemical Technology", Chapter 14, Volume III, 3rd. edition, New York, 1981; W.F. Reynolds in "Dry strength additives", Atlanta 1980; D. Eklund and T. Lmdstrom in "Paper Chemistry - an introduction", Grankulla, Finland 1991; J.C. Roberts in "Paper Chemistry"; Glasgow and London 1991. CMC is anionic and thus has a low affinity for cellulose fibers, since these are anionically charged. Aluminium salts can be used to retain these additives, as has been descπbed by, for example, L. Laurell in "Svensk Papperstidnmg", 55th. annual edition, 1952, no. 10, page 366.
J W Hensley and C G. Inks (Text Res. Journal, June 1959, page 505) have descπbed the failure of CMC to be adsorbed to cellulose fibers in electrolyte-free environments and the consequent limitation of its use to what are known as "acidic" paper manufactuπng methods in which aluminium salts are used. Adsorption to the fiber mateπal becomes extremely poor when CMC is used in systems that are free of aluminium salts, something that is not compatible with modern paper manufacture. The reason for this is that the presence of anionic polymers, such as CMC, m the stock system interferes with cationic additives of functional or process chemicals by forming what are known as polyelectrolyte complexes. This is a well known phenomenon, and paper manufacturers often refer to such substances as "anionic trash".
Modern paper manufactunng processes in which extremely closed process water systems are used are particularly sensitive for disturbing anionic substances, since a build-up of such substances occurs in the system These facts have resulted m the development of cationic additives that have a significantly better affinity for the anionically charged cellulose fibers. Such additives currently have what is essentially a monopoly in the market for dry-strength agents.
In addition to its use as a dry-strength agent, the use of CMC together with wet-strength resin has been descπbed m US-A-3 058 873. This document specifies a synergistic action between the addition of CMC and wet-strength resin when these additives are used at the same time duπng paper manufacture. This depends on the fact that CMC can be precipitated on the fibers in the same way as what is known as "anionic trash" can be retained on fibers with the aid of cationic chemical additives. The wet-strength agent is retained through colloidal precipitation. Optimal precipitation of CMC occurs when a stochiometπcally neutral complex of CMC and the wet-strength agent is obtained, something that makes the process sensitive to disturbances in the chemistry of the stock. This leads to an unstable process, since the retention of the wet-strength agent will depend on the vaπabihty m the incoming raw mateπal and the concentrations of dissolved and colloidal mateπal m the process water
It would be desirable to be able to achieve a method by which adsorption of CMC to the cellulose fibers could be significantly improved. In this way, the effect of CMC as dry-strength agent during paper manufacture could be improved, among other things. Improved adsorption of CMC to the cellulose fibers would also improve the retention of, and thus the effect of, wet-strength agents One problem that is considered to be solved with the present invention is that of achieving such a method.
This problem is solved by the method according to claim 1 presented here. In more detail, the present invention concerns a method whereby cellulose fibers are treated for at least 5 minutes with an aqueous electrolyte-containing solution of CMC or a derivative of CMC, whereby the temperature during the treatment is at least 100 °C and at least one of the following conditions applies: A) the pH of the aqueous solution duπng the treatment lies in the interval of approximately 1.5 - 4 5, or B) the pH of the aqueous solution duπng the treatment is higher than approximately 11; or
C) the concentration of the electrolyte in the aqueous solution lies in the interval of approximately 0.001 - 0.5 M if the electrolyte has monovalent cations, or in the range approximately 0.0002 - 0.25 M if the electrolyte has divalent cations
It is preferable if condition C applies together with either condition A or condition B. A method for modifying cellulose fibers with a cellulose deπvative such as CMC is descπbed in the published international patent application WO 99/57370. This method is performed at a pH of 6 - 13 and a temperature of up to 100 °C, preferably m the approximate range of 20 - 80 °C. It is specified (on page 7, lines 29-30) that the temperature does not constitute a cπtical factor. There is nothing specified or even implied that a temperature over 100 °C would involve significant advantages for the adsorption.
In association with the present invention it has become apparent that CMC is not adsorbed onto cellulose fibers unless an electrolyte is simultaneously present, and that a higher concentration of electrolyte and high valencies of the counter-ious are advantageous for the adsorption. It has further become apparent that it is necessary to resort to elevated temperatures m order to obtain a sufficiently good adsorption. It has further become apparent not only that the adsorption is irreversible when the concentration of CMC is reduced, but also that essentially ion- free conditions can be reached, with the pulp in its Na-form, without CMC being desorbed to any significant degree. This is a very surpπsmg fact, since according to conventional techniques, essentially no CMC is adsorbed onto cellulose-based fibers under such conditions It is thus possible, according to the present invention, to achieve a pulp/paper process m which the pulp is treated for a certain time at a high temperature under such electrolytic conditions that promote the adsorption of CMC. The final pulp receives a higher number of carboxyl groups than the oπginal pulp, which gives a paper that is considerably stronger than paper made using pulp that has been produced using conventional techniques.
The cellulose fibers that are used with the present invention include all types of wood-based fibers, such as bleached, half-bleached and unbleached sulfite, sulfate and soda pulps, together with unbleached, half-bleached and bleached mechanical, thermomechanical, chemo-mechanical and chemo-thermomechamcal pulps, and mixtures of these. Both new fibers and recycled fibers can be used with the present invention, as can mixtures of these. Pulps from both softwood and hardwood trees can be used, as can mixtures of such pulps. Pulps that are not based on wood, such as cotton hnters, regenerated cellulose, kenaf and grass fibers can also be used with the present invention.
The preferred concentration of CMC is approximately 0.02 - 4 % w/w, calculated on the dry weight of the fiber material. A more preferred concentration is approximately 0 04 - 2 % w/w, and the most preferred concentration of additive is approximately 0.08 - 1% w/w. The concept "CMC" is used here to include, in addition to carboxymethyl cellulose, vanous derivatives thereof. The preferred molar degree of substitution is approximately 0.3 - 1.2 and the preferred viscosity is approximately 25 - 8,000 mPa at a concentration of 4%. A higher viscosity is preferred, since it has become clear that the irreversibility of the adsorption is higher for higher molecular weights. A high concentration of pulp is particularly desirable if the adsorption is not quantitative, since the loss of CMC can thus be reduced and CMC solution can easily be reintroduced into the reaction vessel. Treatment of pulp preferably takes place as a separate treatment step at high pulp concentration, but it can naturally also be earned out at the same time as, for example, digesting, or duπng a bleaching step. As high a concentration of pulp as possible is thus desired, but this is naturally limited by practical conditions duπng the conduct of the method. The preferred concentration of pulp is approximately 3 - 50%, a more preferred concentration interval is approximately 5 - 50%, and the most preferred concentration interval is approximately 10 - 30%. Such high concentration mixes are known to one skilled in the arts withm the relevant technical field, and are suitable for use m association with the present invention. A preferred range of pH is approximately 2 - 4, in particular approximately 2.5 - 3.5.
A higher concentration of electrolyte and a higher valence of the cation increase the affinity of CMC for the pulp. The preferred concentration interval for salts with monovalent cations, such as Na2S04, is approximately 0.002 - 0.25 M, in particular within the range approximately 0.005 - 0.1 M The preferred concentration interval for salts with divalent cations, such as CaCl2, is between approximately 0.0005 - 0.1 M, m particular approximately 0.02 - 0.05 M. The preferred adsorption peπod is approximately 5 - 180 mm, a more preferred adsorption peπod is approximately 10 - 120 mm and the most preferred adsorption peπod is approximately 15 - 60 min.
The preferred temperature is m excess of approximately 100 °C, a more preferred temperature is in excess of approximately 120 °C and the most preferred adsorption temperature is up to approximately 150 °C. The method according to the invention is thus earned out at a pressure m excess of atmospheπc pressure. Suitable equipment and working conditions for this will be obvious for one skilled in the arts.
The pulp can be washed or diluted directly after the treatment, or it can be dned m the normal manner.
The present invention also concerns a method for production of paper with a high wet strength, whereby
- an aqueous suspension of cellulose fibers is produced;
- the cellulose fibers are modified by treatment for at least 5 minutes with an aqueous solution of CMC or a CMC derivative containing electrolyte, whereby
- the temperature duπng the treatment is at least approximately 100 °C and at least one of the following conditions apply:
A) the pH of the aqueous solution duπng the treatment lies in the interval of approximately 1.5 - 4.5; or B) the pH of the aqueous solution during the treatment is higher than approximately 11; or
C) the concentration of the electrolyte in the aqueous solution lies in the interval of approximately 0.001 - 0.5 M if the electrolyte has monovalent cations, or m the range of approximately 0.0002 - 0.25 M if the electrolyte has divalent cations; and
- wet-strength agent is added to the aqueous suspension of cellulose fibers. It has actually also become clear that cellulose fibers treated according to the present invention, when treated with wet-strength agent, provide a much higher wet strength than the strength that can be explained by the higher adsorption of wet-strength agent to the fibers.
This may be due to the fact that it is more advantageous to retain the wet-strength agent evenly distributed over the fiber surfaces, as occurs according to the present invention, than it is to have it as a colloidal precipitation, as occurs according to US-A 3 058 873.
A paper can be defined as wet-strengthened m this context when the geometric mean value of the wet strength divided by the dry strength exceeds 0.15.
Mixtures of compatible wet-strength agents and other chemicals used m paper production can be used within the scope of the present invention, as can what are known as "debonding agents." The prefeπed concentration of wet-strength agent used as additive to the stock is up to approximately 2% w/w, calculated on the [weight of ] dry fibers, a more preferred concentration is approximately 0.02 - 1.5 % and the most preferred concentration is 0.05 - 0.8 %.
Wet-strength agents that can be used include all cationic polymenc resms. These include, for example, those wet-strength agents that give permanent wet strength: urea-formaldehyde resms, melamine-formaldehyde resms and polyamide-amme resms. Examples of wet-strength agents that give temporary wet strength are polyethylene lmme, dialdehyde starch, polyvmyl amme and glyoxal polyacrylamide resins.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method is also provided for making paper with a high wet strength but low dry strength, a method that can be used, for example, for producing paper structures that are strong when wet and absorbent. What are known as "debonding agents" are used in this embodiment, and preferred debonding agents are quaternary ammonium salts with fatty acid chains that can be retained by electrostatic attraction to the negatively charged groups on the surfaces of the fibers. The result is a paper with a wet strength /dry strength ratio that preferably exceeds 0.1, a more preferred value exceeds 0.2 and the most preferred value exceeds 0.3. It has also become clear that if fibers treated according to the present invention are dπed, a pulp is produced that when repulped gives fibers with a higher water retention ability. In other words, the treatment of this nature has given a fiber that has been keratmized to a lesser degree during drying. Such fibers demonstrate also a higher reactivity duπng subsequent chemical treatments, for example, when manufactuπng rayon fibers.
Other embodiments of the present invention are descπbed m more detail with the aid of examples of embodiments, the only purpose of which are to illustrate the invention and are in no way intended to limit its scope.
Examples Example 1. This example according to known technology demonstrates how the conditions in the chemical environment affect the amounts of different types of CMC that are irreversibly adsorbed.
The CMC preparations that were used were commercially available preparations from Metsa-Serla:
Finnfix WRH with a DS of 0.56 and a viscosity of 530 mPa at a concentration of 2%, and Cekol FF2 with a DS of 0.7 - 0.85 and a viscosity of 25 mPa at a concentration of 4%. The pulp was a bleached, long-fibered, undπed softwood sulfate pulp from Metsa-Serla/Husum's factoπes. The adsorption tπals were conducted at a pulp concentration of 2%. The pulp was washed with 0.01 M HC1 after the treatment and then transferred to its Na-form in de-iomsed water. The pulp was washed after 2 hours with de-ionised water. The amount of CMC adsorbed was determined by conductometπc titration.
The amount of CMC that was added was 40 mg/g. "DS" is used to denote the degree of molar substitution for the CMC used.
Table 1 shows that the presence of electrolyte is necessary to obtain adsorption. It is also clear that the adsorption is higher at higher temperatures. Higher alkalinity is also advantageous for the adsorption. The degree of molar substitution or the molecular weight of CMC is not cπtical, but the adsorption increases when the degree of substitution decreases.
Example 2: This example shows that a very high relative amount of CMC can be irreversibly bound to a bleached undπed softwood sulfate pulp (Metsa-Serla/Husum factones) by the selection of a high temperature and a high electrolyte concentration. The expeπment was performed by treating the pulp at 120 °C or at 150 °C for 2 hours m 0.05 M CaCl2 buffered with 0001 M NaHCOj. The amounts of CMC adsorbed (FinnFix WRH and Cekol FF2) were measured both after washing the pulp with de-ionised water (Ca-form) and after washing the pulp with 0 01 M HC1, de-ionised water, adjusting its pH value using NaOH to a pH of 8 and equilibrating it with an 0 001 M NaHC03 buffer for 2 hours (Na-form) As the table shows, a smaller amount of CMC is desorbed when the pulp has been transferred into its Na-form. "WRV" is an abbreviation for "Water Retention Value" and is a measure of the ability of the pulp to retain water (here the Na-form was measured at 3,000 g and 15 minutes in de-ionised water)
Example 3: CMC (Fmnfix WRH) was adsorbed onto a bleached undned softwood sulfate pulp (Metsa-Serla/Husum factoπes) at different pH values in de-ionised water at 120 °C. The pulp had been transferred to its Na-form before the pH was adjusted. The amount of CMC added was 20 mg/g. The results in Table 3 show that a certain amount is adsorbed at 120 °C, but better adsorption is achieved if electrolyte is present during the treatment (compare with Table 2).
Example 4: This example shows that the adsorbed amount of CMC is adsorbed to the cellulose fibers so strongly that it remains on the fibers even after a prolonged peπod of leachmg. The bleached sulfate pulp from Example 2 was treated with 40 mg/g Fmnfix WRH for 2 hours at 120 °C in 0.1 M NaCl. The amount adsorbed after this treatment was 7.7 mg/g. After leachmg the pulp in de- lomsed water for 19 hours, the adsorbed amount was 7.4 mg/g. Example 5 : This example shows that selecting a high temperature and a high concentration of electrolyte at the adsorption step gives a pulp that has a lower water retention ability than that obtained if the CMC is adsorbed onto the pulp at a lower temperature.
The expeπment was performed by treating an undned softwood sulfate pulp (Metsa- Serla/Husum factories) at 23 °C, 80 °C and 120 °C for 12 hours m 0.05 M CaCl2 buffered by 0.001 M NaHC03. The amount of adsorbed CMC (Fmnfix WRH, 20 mg/g) was measured after washing the pulp with 0.01 M HCl, de-iomsed water, adjusting its pH with NaOH to a pH of 8 and equilibrating it with 0.001 M NaHC03 buffer for 2 hours (Na-form). WRV is an abbreviation for "Water Retention Value" according to the definition given earlier.
Table 10 shows that the increase in WRV per mg/g of adsorbed CMC is considerably lower if the CMC has been adsorbed at a higher temperature (120 °C) than if it has been adsorbed at a lower temperature This is particularly advantageous if it is to be easy to de-water the pulp on the paper machine. The ability of the pulp to retain water, however, does not reflect the strength of the paper that is manufactured from the pulp under consideration.
Table 10

Claims

Claims
1. Method for modifying cellulose fibers, characterized in that the cellulose fibers are treated for at least 5 minutes with an aqueous electrolyte-containing solution of CMC or a CMC derivative, whereby - the temperature during the treatment is at least 100 °C, and at least one of the following conditions apply:
A) the pH of the aqueous solution duπng the treatment lies m the interval of approximately 1.5 - 4.5, preferably in the region 2 - 4; or
B) the pH of the aqueous solution duπng the treatment is higher than approximately 11 ; or C) the concentration of the electrolyte m the aqueous solution lies m the interval of approximately 0.001 - 0.5 M, preferably 0.005 - 01 M, if the electrolyte has monovalent canons, or in the range of approximately 0.0002 - 0.25 M, preferably 0.0005 - 0.1 M, if the electrolyte has divalent cations.
2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pH of the aqueous solution dunng the treatment lies in the interval of approximately 1.5 - 4.5 and the concentration of the electrolyte m the aqueous solution lies within the interval of approximately 0.001 - 0.5 M if the electrolyte has monovalent cations, or approximately 0.0002 - 0.25 M if the electrolyte has divalent cations.
3. Method according to claim 1, characterized m that the pH of the aqueous solution is higher than 11 and the concentration of the electrolyte in the aqueous solution lies within the interval of approximately 0.001 - 0.5 [M] if the electrolyte has monovalent cations, or approximately 0.0002 - 0.25 M if the electrolyte has divalent cations.
4. Method accordmg to claim 1, characterized in that the cellulose fibers are treated for approximately 5-180 minutes.
5. Method according to claim 1, characterized m that the temperature duπng the treatment is at least approximately 120 °C, and preferably up to approximately 150 °C.
6. Method for manufactuπng paper with a high wet strength, characterized in that
- an aqueous suspension of cellulose fibers is produced;
- the cellulose fibers are modified according to any one of the preceding claims; and
- wet-strength agent is added to the aqueous suspension of cellulose fibers.
7. Method according to claim 6, characterized in that a debonding agent is also added to the aqueous suspension of cellulose fibers.
8. Cellulose fibers that have been modified according to the procedure according to any of claims 1-5.
9. Paper with a high wet strength that can be manufactured according to either one of claims 6 or 7.
10. Use of modified cellulose fibers according to claim 8 for the manufacture of rayon fibers
EP00966646A 1999-09-22 2000-09-20 Method for modifying cellulose-based fiber material Expired - Lifetime EP1240389B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE9903418 1999-09-22
SE9903418A SE9903418D0 (en) 1999-09-22 1999-09-22 Method for modifying cellulose-based fiber materials
PCT/SE2000/001823 WO2001021890A1 (en) 1999-09-22 2000-09-20 Method for modifying cellulose-based fiber material

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1240389A1 true EP1240389A1 (en) 2002-09-18
EP1240389B1 EP1240389B1 (en) 2010-06-02

Family

ID=20417102

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00966646A Expired - Lifetime EP1240389B1 (en) 1999-09-22 2000-09-20 Method for modifying cellulose-based fiber material

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1240389B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE470011T1 (en)
AU (1) AU7696000A (en)
DE (1) DE60044504D1 (en)
ES (1) ES2346634T3 (en)
SE (1) SE9903418D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2001021890A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE519032C2 (en) * 2002-03-25 2002-12-23 Kvaerner Pulping Tech Method for modifying cellulose fibers in connection with cooking
SE0202652D0 (en) * 2002-09-09 2002-09-09 Skogsind Tekn Foskningsinst Method for sizing paper or paperboard
SE0400396D0 (en) 2004-02-20 2004-02-20 Skogsind Tekn Foskningsinst Method of modifying lignocellulosic material
SE0401600D0 (en) * 2004-06-18 2004-06-18 Stfi Packforsk Ab Method of manufacturing paper or similar
RU2341603C1 (en) * 2004-11-05 2008-12-20 Акцо Нобель Н.В. Method for processing of cellulose fiber
US8007636B2 (en) 2004-11-05 2011-08-30 Akzo Nobel N.V. Method of treating cellulose fibres with chlorine dioxide and an alkyl cellulose derivative
SE0800807L (en) * 2008-04-10 2009-10-11 Stfi Packforsk Ab New procedure
FI124724B (en) 2009-02-13 2014-12-31 Upm Kymmene Oyj A process for preparing modified cellulose
FI125829B (en) 2011-03-07 2016-02-29 Aalto Korkeakoulusã Ã Tiã Double click technology
SE538863C2 (en) * 2015-05-22 2017-01-10 Innventia Ab Process for the production of paper or paperboard, paper or paperboard product obtained and uses thereof

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3468696A (en) * 1965-04-05 1969-09-23 C H Dexter & Sons Inc Method of producing a fibrous web material having retained wet strength at high humidity and the fibrous material produced thereby
US4199367A (en) * 1975-11-07 1980-04-22 Avtex Fibers Inc. Alloy rayon
EP0337310A1 (en) * 1988-04-15 1989-10-18 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Poly(vinyl alcohol-vinylamine)copolymers for improved moist compressive strength of paper products
US5354424A (en) * 1989-02-10 1994-10-11 Rha Chokyun Paper composition and methods therefor
US5318669A (en) * 1991-12-23 1994-06-07 Hercules Incorporated Enhancement of paper dry strength by anionic and cationic polymer combination
US6228217B1 (en) * 1995-01-13 2001-05-08 Hercules Incorporated Strength of paper made from pulp containing surface active, carboxyl compounds
EP0802282A1 (en) * 1995-11-02 1997-10-22 Uni-Charm Company Limited Process for preparing hydrolyzable sheet
JP3296989B2 (en) * 1997-03-31 2002-07-02 ユニ・チャーム株式会社 Water disintegrable sheet and method for producing the same
FI106273B (en) * 1998-04-30 2000-12-29 Metsae Serla Oyj Process for the manufacture of a fiber product

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0121890A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE470011T1 (en) 2010-06-15
ES2346634T3 (en) 2010-10-19
AU7696000A (en) 2001-04-24
WO2001021890A1 (en) 2001-03-29
SE9903418D0 (en) 1999-09-22
DE60044504D1 (en) 2010-07-15
EP1240389B1 (en) 2010-06-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2721056C (en) Method for providing a nanocellulose involving modifying cellulose fibers
JP5921428B2 (en) Method for producing paper furnish and method for producing paper or paperboard
Laine et al. Characterization of unbleached kraft pulps by enzymatic treatment, potentiometric titration and polyelectrolyte adsorption
US6379494B1 (en) Method of making carboxylated cellulose fibers and products of the method
KR0159921B1 (en) A composition comprising cathionic and anionic polymer process thereof
EP0723047B1 (en) Improving the strength of paper made from pulp containing surface active carboxyl compounds
Laleg et al. Wet-web strength increase by chitosan
JPH026683A (en) Production of paper and cardboard
EP1240389A1 (en) Method for modifying cellulose-based fiber material
NO175321B (en) Process for the production of neutral paper
HU225401B1 (en) Method of producing a fiber or group of fibers having a coating of polymers interacting with each other
KR100915419B1 (en) Method of treating cellulose fibres
US4102738A (en) Use of chitosan in corrugating medium
JP2006241601A (en) High wet paper strength paper and method for producing the same
Hannuksela et al. Sorption of spruce O-acetylated galactoglucomannans onto different pulp fibres
US20040140074A1 (en) Cellulosic product and process for its production
EP1716288B1 (en) Modifying cellulose fibres by using amphoteric cellulose derivative
Duker et al. The use of CMC as a dry strength agent–the interplay between CMC attachment and drying
Korhonen et al. Strengthening wood fiber networks by adsorption of complexes of chitosan with dialdehyde starch
JPH07502791A (en) Paper manufacturing method
JP2000027092A (en) Neutralized paper
US8007636B2 (en) Method of treating cellulose fibres with chlorine dioxide and an alkyl cellulose derivative
US4161423A (en) Use of a dissolved cellulose as a dry strength agent and drainage aid for paper
WO2019244454A1 (en) Paper production method
JP2020165022A (en) Pulp mold

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020313

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20080307

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60044504

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20100715

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20100602

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2346634

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100903

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100602

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100602

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101004

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100602

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100602

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100930

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20110303

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20100920

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 60044504

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110302

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100920

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100920

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100920

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 17

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20190909

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20190917

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190910

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20190829

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20190910

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20190827

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20190913

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20191001

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 60044504

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FI

Ref legal event code: MAE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK07

Ref document number: 470011

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200920

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20210108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20200921