EP1227930A1 - Non-abrasive composite doctor blade - Google Patents

Non-abrasive composite doctor blade

Info

Publication number
EP1227930A1
EP1227930A1 EP99953199A EP99953199A EP1227930A1 EP 1227930 A1 EP1227930 A1 EP 1227930A1 EP 99953199 A EP99953199 A EP 99953199A EP 99953199 A EP99953199 A EP 99953199A EP 1227930 A1 EP1227930 A1 EP 1227930A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
doctor blade
layers
blade
inner core
core
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP99953199A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1227930B1 (en
EP1227930A4 (en
Inventor
Allen J. Brauns
Stacey L. Jackson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kadant Web Systems Inc
Original Assignee
Brauns Allen J
Thermo Web Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Brauns Allen J, Thermo Web Systems Inc filed Critical Brauns Allen J
Publication of EP1227930A1 publication Critical patent/EP1227930A1/en
Publication of EP1227930A4 publication Critical patent/EP1227930A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1227930B1 publication Critical patent/EP1227930B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B5/00Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts
    • B32B5/22Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts characterised by the presence of two or more layers which are next to each other and are fibrous, filamentary, formed of particles or foamed
    • B32B5/24Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts characterised by the presence of two or more layers which are next to each other and are fibrous, filamentary, formed of particles or foamed one layer being a fibrous or filamentary layer
    • B32B5/26Layered products characterised by the non- homogeneity or physical structure, i.e. comprising a fibrous, filamentary, particulate or foam layer; Layered products characterised by having a layer differing constitutionally or physically in different parts characterised by the presence of two or more layers which are next to each other and are fibrous, filamentary, formed of particles or foamed one layer being a fibrous or filamentary layer another layer next to it also being fibrous or filamentary
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21GCALENDERS; ACCESSORIES FOR PAPER-MAKING MACHINES
    • D21G3/00Doctors
    • D21G3/005Doctor knifes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2262/00Composition or structural features of fibres which form a fibrous or filamentary layer or are present as additives
    • B32B2262/02Synthetic macromolecular fibres
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2305/00Condition, form or state of the layers or laminate
    • B32B2305/08Reinforcements
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2307/00Properties of the layers or laminate
    • B32B2307/50Properties of the layers or laminate having particular mechanical properties
    • B32B2307/514Oriented
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B32LAYERED PRODUCTS
    • B32BLAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM
    • B32B2603/00Vanes, blades, propellers, rotors with blades

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to doctors used in papermaking and web converting machines and is concerned in particular with the provision of a composite doctor blade.
  • Doctor blades contact the surface of rolls in papermaking and web converting machines for the purpose of cleaning or sheet removal.
  • Conventional doctor blade materials include metals, homogeneous plastics, and cotton, glass and carbon thermoset laminates. Metal blades, although inexpensive, can cause damage or premature wear with some roll surfaces. Many of the water removal rolls on the wet end have a relatively soft rubber cover measured at 10 P&J and softer. Typically, these rolls are doctored with homogeneous plastic doctor blades, such as ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (“UHMW polyethylene").
  • UHMW polyethylene ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene
  • Plastic blades are generally thick, 1/8 to 1/4 , compared to metals and glass and carbon thermoset laminates which are typically 0.050 to 0.080 thick.
  • the additional thickness of the homogeneous plastics is required to achieve sufficient machine-direction rigidity for reliable doctoring.
  • a thick doctor blade suffers a loss in doctoring performance due to the decreased contact pressure between the blade and the roll.
  • Cotton laminates like homogeneous plastics, are relatively thick and have the associated disadvantages. To eliminate some of the problems associated with thick plastic or cotton blades, glass and carbon laminates are often used. Glass laminates are rigid and can therefore be made thin for efficient doctoring.
  • glass laminates have the advantage of being very rigid and non-abrasive.
  • carbon laminates are expensive and not always economical for widespread use in the wet end of the paper machine. Therefore, it was necessary to develop a thin and non-abrasive composite doctor blade to efficiently doctor soft wet end rolls on the paper machine.
  • Coater blades may be in contact with a moving sheet of paper or other material. At the point of blade contact, the sheet is supported by a rotating coater backing roll.
  • the coater blade is used in a wiping mode to meter a layer of liquid on to a sheet of paper or other material. With some coating machines, the coater blade meters a layer of liquid directly on a roll surface and then the coating is transferred to the sheet of material at a later point.
  • the coater blade is held in a holder similar to a doctor blade.
  • the metered liquid or coating thickness is dependent on the amount of pressure applied to the trailing edge of the coater blade. An increased amount of pressure will decrease the coating thickness. Similarly, a decreased amount of pressure will increase the coating thickness.
  • Conventional coater blade materials include steel, stainless steel and steel with a treated edge for prolonging the useful life.
  • U.S. Patent No. 4,549,933 shows a doctor blade having non-homogeneous stiffness properties.
  • U.S. Patent No. 2,767,529 shows a polishing doctor blade composed of alternate frangible and wear resisting laminations of mildly abrasive and non-abrasive materials, respectively.
  • a doctor blade is configured for application to the surface of a rotating roll in a paper making machine.
  • the doctor blade is a multilayer composite having an inner core and intermediate layers on opposite sides of the core.
  • the doctor blade may also include outer layers overlying the intermediate layers.
  • the inner core is predominantly polymeric material which lies on the neutral axis of the blade.
  • the intermediate layers include reinforcing fibers.
  • the side edge of said doctor blade has an abrasiveness as measured by ASTM test method D5181-91 of between about 4.0 to 5.0.
  • thermoset resin in a sandwich type construction.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide a doctor blade which is relatively thin yet has sufficient machine-direction rigidity for efficient doctoring or coating application.
  • Still yet another objective of the present invention is to provide a non-abrasive blade which is beneficial for both maintaining the roll surface roughness in its original condition and prolonging the roll life.
  • Fig. 1 is a side view of a doctor blade assembly in contact with a rotating roll in accordance with the present invention
  • Fig. 2 is a side view of the doctor blade in contact with the rotating roll
  • Fig. 3 is a sectional view of a blade in contact with a roll in a wiping mode in a coater application
  • Fig. 4 is an enlarged exploded perspective view of the components of a doctor blade in accordance with the present invention.
  • Fig. 5 is a perspective view of the doctor blade of Fig. 4;
  • Fig. 6 is an exploded perspective view of an alternative embodiment;
  • Fig. 7 is an exploded perspective view of another alternative embodiment.
  • a doctor blade 10 is shown in contact with a rotating roll 12 for the purpose of cleaning, sheet removal or other similar operations.
  • a leading beveled edge 14 of the doctor blade 10 contacts the surface of the rotating roll 12.
  • the "machine direction” denoted by the arrow 16 is the direction that is perpendicular to the roll axis.
  • the "cross machine direction” denoted by the arrow 18, is the direction parallel to the roll axis.
  • Fig. 2 shows a side view of a doctor assembly which includes an elongated blade 10 and a doctor blade holder 20 attached to a rigid doctor structure 17.
  • Fig. 3 shows a coater blade 22 in contact with a moving sheet of paper or other material 24. At the point of blade contact, the sheet 24 is supported by a rotating coater backing roll 26.
  • the coater blade 22 is used in a wiping mode to meter a layer of liquid on to a sheet of paper or other material 24.
  • the appearance of the coater blade 22 is similar to that of the doctor blade.
  • the invention described throughout relates to both doctor and coater blades. In the description that follows, it is intended that the wording "doctor blade" apply to both doctor and coater blades.
  • a composite doctor blade 10 in accordance with the present invention is shown in Figs. 4-7 as comprising multiple layers in a sandwich type construction.
  • the doctor blade 10 consists of an inner core 28 and intermediate layers 30, 32 on opposite sides of the core.
  • the doctor blade 10 may alternatively include outer layers 34, 36 overlying the intermediate layers 30, 32.
  • the layers are mechanically bonded to each other with a resin.
  • the resin may be a thermoset resin such as an epoxy, phenolic, polyester or a polyimide.
  • the core 28 can consist of multiple layers indicated by layers 38, 40, 42 and 44, or as a single homogeneous layer 46 as shown in Fig. 6.
  • the core 28 is centered on the neutral axis.
  • the core 28 may consist of individual layers of a woven or non- woven plastic or homogeneous layers of plastic bound together.
  • one or more layers of a reinforcing or high strength material such as carbon may be placed within the core for added strength, stability or wear performance.
  • the core thickness is in the range of 0.005" to 0.140".
  • the total core thickness required is dependent on the desired total thickness, flexural strength and flexural modulus or rigidity of the desired doctor blade 10.
  • Polymeric materials, specifically thermoset or thermoplastic materials such as polyester, UHMW polyethylene, nylon, Teflon ® (tetrafluoroethylene fluorocarbon or "TFE"), aromatic polyamides and other such materials can be used as the core material 28.
  • the core material 28 is chosen such that it is compatible with the roll surface to be doctored. When selecting the core material 28, the degree to which the core material resists wear and the capability of the core material to wear with a clean sharp edge are important considerations.
  • the core material 28 must also be resistant to attack from any chemicals present, temperature, humidity and the general operating environment.
  • Intermediate layers 30 and 32 are comprised of reinforcing or high strength fibers and are spaced away from the neutral axis by the core 28.
  • the flexural properties of the finished doctor blade 10 are a function of the distance between layers 30 and 32 and the neutral axis.
  • Intermediate layers 30 and 32 can utilize unidirectional or multi-directional fibers.
  • the thickness and fiber orientation are selected to achieve the desired flexural properties. In the majority of doctoring applications, the machine-direction strength and rigidity of the doctor blade are critical for efficient cleaning of the roll surface and sheet removal. Therefore, the preferred fiber orientation is biased in the machine direction.
  • Carbon is the preferred fiber, however, other fibrous, high strength materials such as Kevlar ® an aromatic polyamide fiber, could be utilized.
  • the outer layers 34, 36 are adjacent to the intermediate layers 30, 32.
  • the outer layers provide a finished appearance on the exposed doctor blade surfaces.
  • the outer layers 34, 36 also serve to keep the intermediate layers 30, 32 bound securely to the core 28. It is preferred that the outer layers 34, 36 be of the same material as the core 28 although a material different than that of the core could also be used. As with the core 28 and the intermediate layers 30, 32, it is important that the outer layer material be compatible with the operating environment.
  • Fig. 7 An alternative embodiment is shown in Fig. 7 wherein the doctor blade is constructed without the outer layers 34 and 36 so that the intermediate layers of reinforcing or high strength layers 30 and 32 would be the exposed blade surfaces.
  • the doctor blade 10 has a thickness ranging from 0.015 to 0.150" and a flexural modulus of between about 40-150 x 10 5 psi (tested according to ASTM test method D-790).
  • a preferred thickness of the blade 10 is 0.050" with a flexural modulus of between 75-100 x 10 5 psi.
  • the abrasiveness of the doctor blade was tested according to ASTM test method D5181-91. The test is based on a scale of 1-10, 1 being the least abrasive.
  • the doctor blade 10 has an abrasiveness between about 4.0 and 5.0.
  • Each sample was prepared by aligning and clamping together seven doctor blades of the same material.
  • Sample 1 was GraflexTM, prepared according to U.S. Patent No. 4,549,933 and including outer layers of woven glass, intermediate layers of unidirectional carbon in the machine direction and a core of woven glass.
  • Sample 2 was prepared in accordance with the invention and including outer layers of non- woven polyester fibers, intermediate layers of unidirectional carbon in the machine direction, and a core of woven polyester fibers surrounding unidirectional carbon in the cross machine direction
  • Sample 3 was Fiberflex ® wherein all layers were woven fiberglass. In all three samples the materials were bonded with epoxy resin. The blades were approximately 0.050" thick and thus the bundles were approximately 0.350" thick. The blades were tested as bundles to have a larger surface area to test. The abrasiveness of the blades were tested using standard receptors B-2-2(tan) and B-3-2 (blue) with the following results:
  • the blade prepared according to the invention, Sample 2 was the least abrasive.
  • the doctor blades are relatively thin yet have sufficient machine-direction rigidity for efficient doctoring or coating application.
  • the materials used in the construction of the blade are non-abrasive in nature.
  • the non-abrasive characteristic is beneficial for both maintaining the roll surface roughness in its original condition and prolonging roll life when the roll surface to be doctored is relatively soft.
  • the use of plastic combined with carbon helps to lengthen the useful life of the blade by reducing the wear rate.

Landscapes

  • Paper (AREA)
  • Rotary Presses (AREA)
  • Polishing Bodies And Polishing Tools (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)
  • Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)
  • Coating Apparatus (AREA)

Abstract

A multilayer composite doctor blade (10) has a side edge configured for application to the surface of a rotating roll in a paper making machine. The doctor blade has an inner core (28) and intermediate layers (30, 32). The doctor blade may also include outer layers. The inner core is predominantly polymeric material. The intermediate layers on opposite sides of the core include reinforcing fibers. The side edge of the doctor blade has an abrasiveness as measured by ASTM test method D5181-91 of between about 4.0 to 5.0.

Description

NON-ABRASIVE COMPOSITE DOCTOR BLADE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to doctors used in papermaking and web converting machines and is concerned in particular with the provision of a composite doctor blade.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Doctor blades contact the surface of rolls in papermaking and web converting machines for the purpose of cleaning or sheet removal. Conventional doctor blade materials include metals, homogeneous plastics, and cotton, glass and carbon thermoset laminates. Metal blades, although inexpensive, can cause damage or premature wear with some roll surfaces. Many of the water removal rolls on the wet end have a relatively soft rubber cover measured at 10 P&J and softer. Typically, these rolls are doctored with homogeneous plastic doctor blades, such as ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene ("UHMW polyethylene").
Plastic blades are generally thick, 1/8 to 1/4 , compared to metals and glass and carbon thermoset laminates which are typically 0.050 to 0.080 thick. The additional thickness of the homogeneous plastics is required to achieve sufficient machine-direction rigidity for reliable doctoring. However, when compared to thinner blades, a thick doctor blade suffers a loss in doctoring performance due to the decreased contact pressure between the blade and the roll. Cotton laminates, like homogeneous plastics, are relatively thick and have the associated disadvantages. To eliminate some of the problems associated with thick plastic or cotton blades, glass and carbon laminates are often used. Glass laminates are rigid and can therefore be made thin for efficient doctoring. The main disadvantage with glass laminates is that the glass wear particles produced are abrasive, which can unintentionally alter or cause excessive wear with some roll surfaces, especially soft wet end rolls. Carbon laminates have the advantage of being very rigid and non-abrasive. However, carbon laminates are expensive and not always economical for widespread use in the wet end of the paper machine. Therefore, it was necessary to develop a thin and non-abrasive composite doctor blade to efficiently doctor soft wet end rolls on the paper machine.
Coater blades may be in contact with a moving sheet of paper or other material. At the point of blade contact, the sheet is supported by a rotating coater backing roll. The coater blade is used in a wiping mode to meter a layer of liquid on to a sheet of paper or other material. With some coating machines, the coater blade meters a layer of liquid directly on a roll surface and then the coating is transferred to the sheet of material at a later point. The coater blade is held in a holder similar to a doctor blade. The metered liquid or coating thickness is dependent on the amount of pressure applied to the trailing edge of the coater blade. An increased amount of pressure will decrease the coating thickness. Similarly, a decreased amount of pressure will increase the coating thickness. Conventional coater blade materials include steel, stainless steel and steel with a treated edge for prolonging the useful life. U.S. Patent No. 4,549,933 shows a doctor blade having non-homogeneous stiffness properties. U.S. Patent No. 2,767,529 shows a polishing doctor blade composed of alternate frangible and wear resisting laminations of mildly abrasive and non-abrasive materials, respectively.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Briefly, a doctor blade is configured for application to the surface of a rotating roll in a paper making machine. The doctor blade is a multilayer composite having an inner core and intermediate layers on opposite sides of the core. The doctor blade may also include outer layers overlying the intermediate layers. The inner core is predominantly polymeric material which lies on the neutral axis of the blade. The intermediate layers include reinforcing fibers. The side edge of said doctor blade has an abrasiveness as measured by ASTM test method D5181-91 of between about 4.0 to 5.0.
It is the object of the invention to provide a thin, multi-layered doctor or coater blade utilizing both layers of thermoset or thermoplastic material and reinforcing material, bound together with thermoset resin in a sandwich type construction.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a doctor blade which is relatively thin yet has sufficient machine-direction rigidity for efficient doctoring or coating application.
Still yet another objective of the present invention is to provide a non-abrasive blade which is beneficial for both maintaining the roll surface roughness in its original condition and prolonging the roll life.
These and other objectives, features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent in light of the following detailed description of preferred embodiments thereof, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a side view of a doctor blade assembly in contact with a rotating roll in accordance with the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a side view of the doctor blade in contact with the rotating roll; Fig. 3 is a sectional view of a blade in contact with a roll in a wiping mode in a coater application;
Fig. 4 is an enlarged exploded perspective view of the components of a doctor blade in accordance with the present invention;
Fig. 5 is a perspective view of the doctor blade of Fig. 4; Fig. 6 is an exploded perspective view of an alternative embodiment; and
Fig. 7 is an exploded perspective view of another alternative embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
With reference initially to Fig. 1, a doctor blade 10 is shown in contact with a rotating roll 12 for the purpose of cleaning, sheet removal or other similar operations. A leading beveled edge 14 of the doctor blade 10 contacts the surface of the rotating roll 12. The "machine direction" denoted by the arrow 16, is the direction that is perpendicular to the roll axis. The "cross machine direction" denoted by the arrow 18, is the direction parallel to the roll axis. Fig. 2 shows a side view of a doctor assembly which includes an elongated blade 10 and a doctor blade holder 20 attached to a rigid doctor structure 17.
Fig. 3 shows a coater blade 22 in contact with a moving sheet of paper or other material 24. At the point of blade contact, the sheet 24 is supported by a rotating coater backing roll 26. The coater blade 22 is used in a wiping mode to meter a layer of liquid on to a sheet of paper or other material 24. The appearance of the coater blade 22 is similar to that of the doctor blade. The invention described throughout relates to both doctor and coater blades. In the description that follows, it is intended that the wording "doctor blade" apply to both doctor and coater blades.
A composite doctor blade 10 in accordance with the present invention is shown in Figs. 4-7 as comprising multiple layers in a sandwich type construction. The doctor blade 10 consists of an inner core 28 and intermediate layers 30, 32 on opposite sides of the core. The doctor blade 10 may alternatively include outer layers 34, 36 overlying the intermediate layers 30, 32. The layers are mechanically bonded to each other with a resin. The resin may be a thermoset resin such as an epoxy, phenolic, polyester or a polyimide.
The core 28 can consist of multiple layers indicated by layers 38, 40, 42 and 44, or as a single homogeneous layer 46 as shown in Fig. 6. The core 28 is centered on the neutral axis. The core 28 may consist of individual layers of a woven or non- woven plastic or homogeneous layers of plastic bound together. As an alternative, one or more layers of a reinforcing or high strength material such as carbon may be placed within the core for added strength, stability or wear performance.
The core thickness is in the range of 0.005" to 0.140". The total core thickness required is dependent on the desired total thickness, flexural strength and flexural modulus or rigidity of the desired doctor blade 10. Polymeric materials, specifically thermoset or thermoplastic materials such as polyester, UHMW polyethylene, nylon, Teflon® (tetrafluoroethylene fluorocarbon or "TFE"), aromatic polyamides and other such materials can be used as the core material 28. The core material 28 is chosen such that it is compatible with the roll surface to be doctored. When selecting the core material 28, the degree to which the core material resists wear and the capability of the core material to wear with a clean sharp edge are important considerations. The core material 28 must also be resistant to attack from any chemicals present, temperature, humidity and the general operating environment.
Intermediate layers 30 and 32 are comprised of reinforcing or high strength fibers and are spaced away from the neutral axis by the core 28. The flexural properties of the finished doctor blade 10 are a function of the distance between layers 30 and 32 and the neutral axis. Intermediate layers 30 and 32 can utilize unidirectional or multi-directional fibers. The thickness and fiber orientation are selected to achieve the desired flexural properties. In the majority of doctoring applications, the machine-direction strength and rigidity of the doctor blade are critical for efficient cleaning of the roll surface and sheet removal. Therefore, the preferred fiber orientation is biased in the machine direction. Carbon is the preferred fiber, however, other fibrous, high strength materials such as Kevlar® an aromatic polyamide fiber, could be utilized. As with the core 28, the intermediate materials must be compatible with the roll surface and the general operating environment. The outer layers 34, 36 are adjacent to the intermediate layers 30, 32. The outer layers provide a finished appearance on the exposed doctor blade surfaces. The outer layers 34, 36 also serve to keep the intermediate layers 30, 32 bound securely to the core 28. It is preferred that the outer layers 34, 36 be of the same material as the core 28 although a material different than that of the core could also be used. As with the core 28 and the intermediate layers 30, 32, it is important that the outer layer material be compatible with the operating environment.
An alternative embodiment is shown in Fig. 7 wherein the doctor blade is constructed without the outer layers 34 and 36 so that the intermediate layers of reinforcing or high strength layers 30 and 32 would be the exposed blade surfaces. The doctor blade 10 has a thickness ranging from 0.015 to 0.150" and a flexural modulus of between about 40-150 x 105 psi (tested according to ASTM test method D-790). A preferred thickness of the blade 10 is 0.050" with a flexural modulus of between 75-100 x 105 psi.
The abrasiveness of the doctor blade was tested according to ASTM test method D5181-91. The test is based on a scale of 1-10, 1 being the least abrasive. The doctor blade 10 has an abrasiveness between about 4.0 and 5.0.
Example 1
Three different doctor blades were to be tested and compared for abrasivity. Each sample was prepared by aligning and clamping together seven doctor blades of the same material.
Sample 1 was Graflex™, prepared according to U.S. Patent No. 4,549,933 and including outer layers of woven glass, intermediate layers of unidirectional carbon in the machine direction and a core of woven glass. Sample 2 was prepared in accordance with the invention and including outer layers of non- woven polyester fibers, intermediate layers of unidirectional carbon in the machine direction, and a core of woven polyester fibers surrounding unidirectional carbon in the cross machine direction
Sample 3 was Fiberflex® wherein all layers were woven fiberglass. In all three samples the materials were bonded with epoxy resin. The blades were approximately 0.050" thick and thus the bundles were approximately 0.350" thick. The blades were tested as bundles to have a larger surface area to test. The abrasiveness of the blades were tested using standard receptors B-2-2(tan) and B-3-2 (blue) with the following results:
Sample 2 - 4.6 Sample 1 - 5.3 Sample 3 - 6.0
The blade prepared according to the invention, Sample 2 was the least abrasive. The doctor blades are relatively thin yet have sufficient machine-direction rigidity for efficient doctoring or coating application. The materials used in the construction of the blade are non-abrasive in nature. The non-abrasive characteristic is beneficial for both maintaining the roll surface roughness in its original condition and prolonging roll life when the roll surface to be doctored is relatively soft. Also, in doctoring or coating applications with a lubricating liquid present, the use of plastic combined with carbon helps to lengthen the useful life of the blade by reducing the wear rate.
Although the present invention has been shown and described with respect to several preferred embodiments thereof, various changes, omissions and additions to the form and detail thereof, may be made therein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
We claim:

Claims

1. An elongated doctor blade having a side edge configured for application to the surface of a rotating roll in a paper making machine, said doctor blade being a multilayer composite comprising: a) an inner core of predominantly polymeric material lying on the neutral axis of said blade; and b) intermediate layers on opposite sides of said core, said intermediate layers including reinforcing fibers, the side edge of said doctor blade having an abrasiveness as measured by ASTM test method D5181-91 of between about 4.0 to 5.0.
2. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 further characterized by a machine direction flexural modulus of between about 40-150 x 105 psi.
3. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 2 wherein the machine direction flexural modulus is between about 75-100 x 105 psi and the thickness of said doctor blade is approximately 0.050".
4. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein said inner core comprises a single homogeneous layer.
5. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein said inner core comprises a plurality layers.
6. The doctor blade as claimed in claims 4 or 5 wherein said plastic material is a woven fabric.
7. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein said polymeric material is thermoplastic or thermoset.
8. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 7 wherein said polymeric material is selected from the group comprising polyester, UHMW polyethylene, nylon, polytetrafluoroethylene, or aromatic polyamides.
9. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 5 wherein said inner core includes layers reinforced with a high strength material.
10. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 9 wherein said high strength material is selected from the group consisting of carbon or aromatic polyamides.
11. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein said inner core has a thickness ranging from about 0.005 to 0.140 inches.
12. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein said doctor blade has a thickness ranging from about 0.015 to 0.150 inches.
13. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein said doctor blade preferably has a thickness of approximately 0.050 inches.
14. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein said layers are mechanically bonded to each other with a resin.
15. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein said resin is a thermoset resin.
16. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 15 wherein said thermoset resin is selected from the group consisting of epoxy, phenolic, polyester and polyimides.
17. The doctor blade as claimed in claim 1 wherein said reinforcing fibers are oriented in the machine direction.
18. An elongated doctor blade having a side edge configured for application to the surface of a rotating roll in a paper making machine, said doctor blade being a multilayer composite comprising: a) an inner core of predominantly plastic material lying on the neutral axis of said blade; b) intermediate layers on opposite sides of said core, said intermediate layers including reinforcing fibers; and c) outer layers overlying said intermediate layers, the side edge of said doctor blade having an abrasiveness as measured by ASTM test method D5181-91 of between about 4.0 to 5.0.
19. The elongated doctor blade as claimed in claim 18 wherein said outer layers are the same material as the core layers.
20. The elongated doctor blade as claimed in claim 18 wherein said outer layers are selected from the group comprising polyester, UHMW polyethylene, nylon, polytetrafluoroethylene, or aromatic polyamides.
EP99953199A 1999-10-15 1999-10-15 Non-abrasive composite doctor blade Expired - Lifetime EP1227930B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US1999/024166 WO2001028766A1 (en) 1999-10-15 1999-10-15 Non-abrasive composite doctor blade

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1227930A1 true EP1227930A1 (en) 2002-08-07
EP1227930A4 EP1227930A4 (en) 2003-01-08
EP1227930B1 EP1227930B1 (en) 2004-06-16

Family

ID=22273832

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99953199A Expired - Lifetime EP1227930B1 (en) 1999-10-15 1999-10-15 Non-abrasive composite doctor blade

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1227930B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3742342B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE269211T1 (en)
CA (1) CA2386738C (en)
DE (1) DE69918187T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2222739T3 (en)
MX (1) MXPA02003787A (en)
NO (1) NO20021740L (en)
WO (1) WO2001028766A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6565712B2 (en) 2001-05-17 2003-05-20 Lingol Corporation Composite
JP2003089993A (en) * 2001-09-19 2003-03-28 Ichikawa Woolen Textile Co Ltd Doctor blade for drainage
JP3826058B2 (en) * 2002-03-25 2006-09-27 イチカワ株式会社 Draining doctor blade
US7854046B2 (en) 2006-01-06 2010-12-21 Micrex Corporation Microcreping traveling sheet material
ES2344425T3 (en) * 2006-08-29 2010-08-26 Daetwyler Swisstec Ag CONTROL SCRAPER.
JP6521713B2 (en) * 2015-04-21 2019-05-29 株式会社カネカ Method of manufacturing optical film and roll apparatus
IT201900025453A1 (en) * 2019-12-24 2021-06-24 Fibercompositi S R L Improved doctor blade body, especially for printing machines.

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2767529A (en) * 1954-12-14 1956-10-23 Scott Harold Eric Baliol Doctors
JPS54149787A (en) * 1978-05-17 1979-11-24 Ichikawa Woolen Textile Doctor plate
US4549933A (en) * 1983-07-05 1985-10-29 Thermo Electron Corporation Doctor blade with non-homogeneous stiffness properties
JPH05338048A (en) * 1992-06-08 1993-12-21 Teijin Ltd Thermoplastic composite material

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DATABASE WPI Section Ch, Week 198002 Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A88, AN 1980-02479C XP002220133 & JP 54 149787 A (ICHIKAWA KEORI KK), 24 November 1979 (1979-11-24) *
DATABASE WPI Section Ch, Week 199404 Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A32, AN 1994-031397 XP002220132 & JP 05 338048 A (TEIJIN LTD), 21 December 1993 (1993-12-21) *
See also references of WO0128766A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2386738A1 (en) 2001-04-26
WO2001028766A1 (en) 2001-04-26
DE69918187T2 (en) 2005-07-07
ES2222739T3 (en) 2005-02-01
JP3742342B2 (en) 2006-02-01
JP2003512537A (en) 2003-04-02
ATE269211T1 (en) 2004-07-15
EP1227930B1 (en) 2004-06-16
CA2386738C (en) 2007-03-13
EP1227930A4 (en) 2003-01-08
MXPA02003787A (en) 2004-09-06
NO20021740D0 (en) 2002-04-12
DE69918187D1 (en) 2004-07-22
NO20021740L (en) 2002-04-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6867155B2 (en) Non-abrasive composite doctor blade
EP1776503B1 (en) Planar elements for use in papermaking machines
US6643890B2 (en) Composite doctor blades
US6416843B1 (en) Caring doctor blade and method for manufacture of same
US4549933A (en) Doctor blade with non-homogeneous stiffness properties
US7582345B2 (en) Hinge apparatus
EP1159485B1 (en) Supercalender roll with composite cover
CA2447505C (en) Composite for doctor blade and doctor blade
CA2386738C (en) Non-abrasive composite doctor blade
KR930006253A (en) LNP Belt Coating Name Reinforcement
TW591146B (en) Nonwoven material for low friction bearing surfaces
WO2003104555A1 (en) Serrated doctor blades
WO2003060231A1 (en) Composite doctor blades
EP1960597A1 (en) Doctor blade for the roll of a paper or board machine and method for manufacturing the doctor blade
JP2630396B2 (en) Doctor knife blade
JP2002173887A (en) Doctor blade
JP2006022892A (en) Sliding member
JP2630396C (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020311

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Free format text: 7B 32B 5/26 A, 7B 32B 27/04 B, 7B 32B 27/38 B, 7B 32B 27/42 B, 7B 21B 45/02 B, 7B 60S 1/28 B, 7D 21G 3/00 B

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20021121

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: JACKSON, STACEY L.

Owner name: BRAUNS, ALLEN J.

Owner name: KADANT WEB SYSTEMS INC.

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030214

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: KADANT WEB SYSTEMS INC.

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040616

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040616

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040616

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040616

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040616

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040616

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69918187

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040722

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040916

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040916

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041015

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041015

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041031

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2222739

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20050317

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041116

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20091028

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20091026

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20091026

Year of fee payment: 11

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20101015

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101015

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20111121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101016

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20131031

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20131018

Year of fee payment: 15

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20150630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141031

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20151028

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20151026

Year of fee payment: 17

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69918187

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161015