EP1208516A1 - System and method for configuring a product - Google Patents
System and method for configuring a productInfo
- Publication number
- EP1208516A1 EP1208516A1 EP99968500A EP99968500A EP1208516A1 EP 1208516 A1 EP1208516 A1 EP 1208516A1 EP 99968500 A EP99968500 A EP 99968500A EP 99968500 A EP99968500 A EP 99968500A EP 1208516 A1 EP1208516 A1 EP 1208516A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- user
- product
- configuration
- profile
- computer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/087—Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to a system and method for selecting a product
- microprocessors different amounts of memory, different size hard drives, different
- WWW World Wide Web
- Another conventional system may permit the consumer to
- the consumer receives the product configuration, the consumer may modify it as
- the consumer is selecting the configuration, to ensure that the selected configuration
- CD-ROM drive has a CD-ROM drive, a typical hard drive and a removable-media optical drive in a
- the configuration selected by the consumer can not be built. Even worse, the
- the late detection of an incompatibility may also cause the delivery of
- each different type of person may be easily ordered by the large corporation with a
- a software programmer may require a faster
- microprocessor and more memory in a computer than a receptionist so that the client
- the user profile may still be able to recommend an appropriate computer
- a configuration system and method are provided in which the configuration of
- a product may be recommended based on user input (need based). The recommended
- the final configuration recommended to the user may be manufactured by the
- the system may also store a user profile generated based on the user
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a World Wide Web (WWW) based configuration system
- Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating a screen shot of the user interface of a
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating more details about the configuration
- Figure 4 is a flowchart illustrating a method for automatically configuring a
- Figure 5 is a flowchart illustrating more details about the interaction of the
- Figure 6 is a flowchart illustrating a more details of the profile development
- Figures 7A and 7B are diagrams illustrating a base profile and a modified
- Figure 8 is a flowchart illustrating a method for ranking the attributes of parts
- Figure 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of parts being ranked in
- Figure 10 is a flowchart illustrating a method for rule checking in accordance
- Figure 11 is a flowchart illustrating the interactions of the user with the
- the invention is particularly applicable to a WWW-based system for
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a World Wide Web (WWW) based
- a computer system 22 such as a web server, may
- server 22 may be connected to a communications network 26, such as the Internet and
- the communications network More particularly, the World Wide Web (WWW).
- WWW World Wide Web
- the computer system 28 of the consumer which may be a personal computer
- a display device 30 may include a display device 30, a chassis 32, and one or more user input devices, such
- the chassis 32 may house a permanent storage
- a hard disk drive such as a hard disk drive, an optical drive, a tape drive or the like which may store a software application 38 which may be a browser application.
- the consumer may connect to the web server 22 over the
- communications network 26 and receive graphical data, known as a web page, which
- the browser application 38 may be displayed on the display device 30.
- the browser application 38 may also be displayed on the display device 30.
- the browser application 38 may also be displayed on the display device 30.
- configuration system may also require a password so that only individuals with an
- Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating a screen shot of the user interface of a
- the web page 50 may include a profile input region 52, a
- input region 52 requests various information about the computer needs of the user from
- the recommendation region 54 displays various information about a
- the configuration modification region 56 permits the user of the configuration system to
- the profile input region 52 may include a drop-down menu region 58 and a
- slider region 60 which permit the user to interact with the configuration system
- a user profile which may be stored for later retrieval. For example, a
- job titles such as an accountant, a programmer and a sales manager so that each type
- an engineer may require a more expensive, faster computer system than a
- the corporate client may submit the user profile for the type of
- the drop-down menu region 58 may
- responses in the drop-down menu may include, for example, "Graphics and Video
- a base user profile may then be
- the slider region 60 may include one or more sliders 64 which permit the user
- drop-down menus and the sliders may include any techniques for gathering information from the user about his requirements and needs for the
- configuration system may modify the user profile, as described below.
- the final user may modify the user profile, as described below.
- the user profile may be stored for future use.
- the user profile may also be modified by the user
- the recommendation region 54 displays the computer system selected by the user
- the user of the configuration system may modify the
- the modification region 56 may include one or more attributes of the
- the modification region 56 are set to the positions representing the current attributes of
- a rule checker in the configuration system may check to ensure that
- the user may desire a hard disk, a tape
- Figure 3 is a block diagram illustrating more details about a configuration
- the configuration system may receive
- the configuration system 70 may include an input receiver 72 which
- the user profile generated may be stored in a user profile database 76 so that the
- user profile may be later used to produce a recommended computer system.
- generated user profile may also be fed into a recommender 78 which uses the user
- the parts database 80 may contain a list of
- the rule engine 82 using rules stored in a rules database
- 84 may determine if a particular configuration can be actually manufactured. In other words,
- the rule engine ensures that various limitations are not exceeded. For example,
- a particular type of chassis may be only able to house a particular type of microprocessor due to overheating concerns.
- the rule checking process will be
- the configuration system combines typical need-based
- the configuration system also permits the profile
- Figure 4 is a flowchart illustrating a method 100 for recommending a
- the part ranking process 104 be a profile generation process 102 and a part ranking process 104.
- process may occur constantly as new parts data is received so that the parts data is
- step 106 may provide the configuration system in step 106 with information about the user's needs in connection with the product to be purchased
- step 108 may generate a user profile in step 108.
- each part of the product is assigned an
- step 112 the
- configuration system ranks the available parts for each part of the product on a
- step 114 the configuration system
- based on the user profile and the percentages assigned to each part, may recommend a
- the configuration system may
- Figure 5 is a flowchart 120 illustrating more details about the interaction of the
- step 122 the user answers questions
- step 124 based on the needs of the user
- the configuration system recommends a configuration to
- step 126 the user reviews the configuration and determines if the
- the method may loop back to
- step 122 so that the user may redefine his needs or the method may go to step 130 in
- Figure 6 is a flowchart illustrating more details of the profile development
- FIGS. 7A and 7B are diagrams illustrating a base profile and a modified
- step 142 the user makes choices using the
- step 144 the configuration system selects a base profile
- a base profile 146 shown in Figure 7 A may be
- the base profile 146 may contain a plurality of attributes of the computer
- This base profile may then be modified based on the user's responses
- step 148 the user may make choice via the sliders and in step 150, the configuration system may modify the base profile.
- the configuration system may modify the base profile. For example, the
- each percentage associated with each attribute is multiplied by 1.1 to
- the modified profile is generated. Then in step 154, the modified profile may be used for the
- the user profile As described above, the user profile
- Figure 8 is a flowchart illustrating a method for ranking the attributes of parts
- Figure 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of
- step 162 the attributes for one
- step 164 for
- a percentage rank is calculated. In particular, for each part, a
- the max- min values calculated for the hard drives may be 0%, 0% and 100%.
- step 166 the ranks of each part may be compared to
- Figure 10 is a flowchart illustrating a method 170 for rule checking in
- This rule checking process may occur automatically
- step 172 the configuration to ensure it does not violate any of the rules.
- configuration system may select parts whose values most closely match the user
- step 174 the configuration system may check the proposed
- card may be incompatible with a specific version of an operating system so the rule
- one part may require another part to function properly.
- Part Number Part there may be three parts such as Part Number Part
- a rule may define a compatibility problem between parts 11111 and 22222
- proposed configuration contains parts 11111 and 22222, the configuration system may
- the configuration system may also be implemented using the SCSI controller card in this example.
- the configuration system may also be implemented using the SCSI controller card in this example.
- number of spaces in the chassis may limit the number of a particular type of devices
- step 176 the rule engine determines if any rule has been violated. If no rule
- step 178 the configuration of the computer system is optimal
- step 180 the rule checking method is completed. If a rule is violated, then in step 180, the rule checking method is completed. If a rule is violated, then in step 180, the rule checking method is completed. If a rule is violated, then in step 180, the rule checking method is completed. If a rule is violated, then in step 180, the rule checking method is completed. If a rule is violated, then in step 180, the rule checking method is completed. If a rule is violated, then in step 180, the
- rule engine may identify the conflicting parts and in step 182, may adjust the
- the configuration system may
- Figure 11 is a flowchart 190 illustrating the interactions of the user with the
- step 192 the system checks
- step 194 checks for any rules
- step 196 the user may wish to further change the configuration by
- step 198 moving a slider to change a part in step 198. If the user changes a part, the rule
- step 200 If a rule has been violated at any time, in step 200, the
- step 202 the configuration system may move the slider back to
- configuration system may base a recommendation on a user's needs, but may also
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11269298P | 1998-12-18 | 1998-12-18 | |
US112692P | 1998-12-18 | ||
US46541299A | 1999-12-16 | 1999-12-16 | |
US465412 | 1999-12-16 | ||
PCT/US1999/030176 WO2000036544A1 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 1999-12-17 | System and method for configuring a product |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1208516A1 true EP1208516A1 (en) | 2002-05-29 |
EP1208516A4 EP1208516A4 (en) | 2002-05-29 |
Family
ID=26810242
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP99968500A Withdrawn EP1208516A4 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 1999-12-17 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURING A PRODUCT |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1208516A4 (ja) |
JP (1) | JP2003535381A (ja) |
WO (1) | WO2000036544A1 (ja) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7526450B2 (en) | 2000-04-19 | 2009-04-28 | Sony Corporation | Interface for presenting downloadable digital data content format options |
CA2414587C (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2013-12-31 | Computer Sciences Corporation | System and method for processing insurance claims |
FR2827055B1 (fr) * | 2001-07-05 | 2005-02-04 | Airbus Ind | Procede pour struturer et gerer la configuration de produits industriels, notamment d'avions |
US7386832B2 (en) | 2001-08-31 | 2008-06-10 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Configurator using structure to provide a user interface |
US7580871B2 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2009-08-25 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method to generate a customizable product configurator |
US7650296B1 (en) | 2001-08-31 | 2010-01-19 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Configurator using structure and rules to provide a user interface |
US7640548B1 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2009-12-29 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Task based user interface |
JP2004246396A (ja) * | 2002-12-27 | 2004-09-02 | Casio Comput Co Ltd | 電子機器製造支援装置、製造依頼元端末装置、電子機器製造支援プログラム及び製造依頼元端末プログラム |
KR101060487B1 (ko) * | 2007-11-19 | 2011-08-30 | 서울대학교산학협력단 | 태그 클라우드를 이용한 콘텐츠 추천 장치 및 방법 |
JP6066791B2 (ja) * | 2013-03-19 | 2017-01-25 | 日本ユニシス株式会社 | 商品情報提供システムおよび商品情報提供用プログラム |
US10318702B2 (en) | 2016-01-19 | 2019-06-11 | Ford Motor Company | Multi-valued decision diagram reversible restriction |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4873643A (en) * | 1987-10-22 | 1989-10-10 | Andrew S. Crawford | Interactive design terminal for custom imprinted articles |
US5119307A (en) * | 1989-12-22 | 1992-06-02 | General Electric Company | Method and system for automated bill-of-material generation |
US5493490A (en) * | 1992-05-05 | 1996-02-20 | Clear With Computers, Inc. | Electronic proposal preparation system for selling vehicles |
US6041311A (en) * | 1995-06-30 | 2000-03-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering |
US5825651A (en) * | 1996-09-03 | 1998-10-20 | Trilogy Development Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for maintaining and configuring systems |
US6035305A (en) * | 1997-08-29 | 2000-03-07 | The Boeing Company | Computer-based method of structuring product configuration information and configuring a product |
US5963939A (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 1999-10-05 | Compaq Computer Corp. | Method and apparatus for an incremental editor technology |
-
1999
- 1999-12-17 WO PCT/US1999/030176 patent/WO2000036544A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-12-17 JP JP2000588715A patent/JP2003535381A/ja not_active Withdrawn
- 1999-12-17 EP EP99968500A patent/EP1208516A4/en not_active Withdrawn
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
No Search * |
See also references of WO0036544A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2003535381A (ja) | 2003-11-25 |
WO2000036544A1 (en) | 2000-06-22 |
WO2000036544A8 (en) | 2001-02-08 |
WO2000036544A9 (en) | 2001-11-01 |
EP1208516A4 (en) | 2002-05-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11501220B2 (en) | Automatic generation of narratives from data using communication goals and narrative analytics | |
US6236990B1 (en) | Method and system for ranking multiple products according to user's preferences | |
US7006990B2 (en) | Electronic product catalog systems | |
US9576009B1 (en) | Automatic generation of narratives from data using communication goals and narrative analytics | |
US9697197B1 (en) | Automatic generation of narratives from data using communication goals and narrative analytics | |
US8195531B2 (en) | Modular E-commerce web site development system | |
US6199099B1 (en) | System, method and article of manufacture for a mobile communication network utilizing a distributed communication network | |
US7788212B2 (en) | System and method for personalization implemented on multiple networks and multiple interfaces | |
US7574659B2 (en) | Computer graphic display visualization system and method | |
US8145544B2 (en) | Method and system for demand and supply map/shopping path model graphical platform and supplying offers based on purchase intentions | |
US6356905B1 (en) | System, method and article of manufacture for mobile communication utilizing an interface support framework | |
US9842092B1 (en) | Multi-page website optimization | |
US20030167222A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for marketing within a complex product space | |
US9268534B1 (en) | Managing the release of electronic content using a template without version logic | |
US20080077471A1 (en) | Controllable automated generator of optimized allied product content | |
WO2001075737A1 (en) | Efficient interface for configuring an electronic market | |
US20080091551A1 (en) | Knowledge-based customizable product design system | |
US20140195463A1 (en) | System and methods for generating and displaying optimized solutions to complex problems | |
WO2000036544A1 (en) | System and method for configuring a product | |
CA2366300A1 (en) | A system, method and article of manufacture for advanced mobile health care processing | |
WO2000054206A2 (en) | Method and system for access to health care information | |
JP2020194284A (ja) | レコメンド装置、レコメンド方法、及びレコメンドプログラム | |
US20020091589A1 (en) | System and method for customizing a product | |
US20140279170A1 (en) | Systems and methods for an online fashion design marketplace | |
JP7122286B2 (ja) | 決定装置、決定方法及び決定プログラム |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20010718 |
|
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20020204 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A4 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20030701 |