EP1183572A1 - Abberation control of images from computer generated holograms - Google Patents

Abberation control of images from computer generated holograms

Info

Publication number
EP1183572A1
EP1183572A1 EP00927598A EP00927598A EP1183572A1 EP 1183572 A1 EP1183572 A1 EP 1183572A1 EP 00927598 A EP00927598 A EP 00927598A EP 00927598 A EP00927598 A EP 00927598A EP 1183572 A1 EP1183572 A1 EP 1183572A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cgh
optical components
data
light
aberration
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00927598A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Douglas Payne
Christopher W. Slinger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Holographic Imaging LLC
Original Assignee
Holographic Imaging LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Holographic Imaging LLC filed Critical Holographic Imaging LLC
Publication of EP1183572A1 publication Critical patent/EP1183572A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03HHOLOGRAPHIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS
    • G03H1/00Holographic processes or apparatus using light, infrared or ultraviolet waves for obtaining holograms or for obtaining an image from them; Details peculiar thereto
    • G03H1/22Processes or apparatus for obtaining an optical image from holograms
    • G03H1/2294Addressing the hologram to an active spatial light modulator
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03HHOLOGRAPHIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS
    • G03H1/00Holographic processes or apparatus using light, infrared or ultraviolet waves for obtaining holograms or for obtaining an image from them; Details peculiar thereto
    • G03H1/04Processes or apparatus for producing holograms
    • G03H1/08Synthesising holograms, i.e. holograms synthesized from objects or objects from holograms
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03HHOLOGRAPHIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS
    • G03H1/00Holographic processes or apparatus using light, infrared or ultraviolet waves for obtaining holograms or for obtaining an image from them; Details peculiar thereto
    • G03H1/04Processes or apparatus for producing holograms
    • G03H1/08Synthesising holograms, i.e. holograms synthesized from objects or objects from holograms
    • G03H1/0808Methods of numerical synthesis, e.g. coherent ray tracing [CRT], diffraction specific
    • G03H2001/0833Look up table
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03HHOLOGRAPHIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS
    • G03H1/00Holographic processes or apparatus using light, infrared or ultraviolet waves for obtaining holograms or for obtaining an image from them; Details peculiar thereto
    • G03H1/22Processes or apparatus for obtaining an optical image from holograms
    • G03H1/2202Reconstruction geometries or arrangements
    • G03H1/2205Reconstruction geometries or arrangements using downstream optical component
    • G03H2001/221Element having optical power, e.g. field lens
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03HHOLOGRAPHIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS
    • G03H1/00Holographic processes or apparatus using light, infrared or ultraviolet waves for obtaining holograms or for obtaining an image from them; Details peculiar thereto
    • G03H1/22Processes or apparatus for obtaining an optical image from holograms
    • G03H1/2202Reconstruction geometries or arrangements
    • G03H2001/2236Details of the viewing window
    • G03H2001/2239Enlarging the viewing window
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03HHOLOGRAPHIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS
    • G03H1/00Holographic processes or apparatus using light, infrared or ultraviolet waves for obtaining holograms or for obtaining an image from them; Details peculiar thereto
    • G03H1/22Processes or apparatus for obtaining an optical image from holograms
    • G03H1/2249Holobject properties
    • G03H2001/2273Pseudo-dynamic holobject, e.g. due to angle multiplexing and viewer motion
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03HHOLOGRAPHIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS
    • G03H2210/00Object characteristics
    • G03H2210/303D object
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03HHOLOGRAPHIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS
    • G03H2223/00Optical components
    • G03H2223/24Reflector; Mirror

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to computer generated holographic images.
  • Holography is a technique for generating 3D images having all the depth cues present.
  • Computer generated holograms are an important method for creating images of non-existent (or synthetic) objects. Provided the synthetic image can be described by some form of data structure, a computer can then calculate the holographic pattern in some design plane. This is equivalent to the interference pattern recorded by a photosensitive material in conventional (interferometric) hologram formation. The calculated CGH pattern is then applied to a spatial light modulator (SLM) which modulates readout light incident upon it. This modulated light propagates to yield the desired 3D image which can be viewed by a human observer.
  • SLM spatial light modulator
  • the inherent resolution limitations of the CGH SLM displays necessitate that the light diffracted by the CGH is magnified by scaling optics to generate images of the required size / and field of view EOF (the EOF is a quantity defining the region in which an observer's eyes have to be positioned to see all of the image generated by the hologram). If a conventional approach is taken, these optics invariably introduce distortions and aberrations in to the scaled images. For high-end applications, such degradations in image quality may be unacceptable.
  • phase screen multiplier involves the multiplication of a hologram by a two dimensional phase distribution which is independent of the image being reconstructed. Unfortunately, this technique relies on a paraxial approximation, so large images of significant FOV can only be corrected with limited success.
  • a method of generating computer generated hologram (CGH) data for application to a spatial light modulator of a holographic display to display a three dimensional holographic image comprising: determining the aberration of light at optical components of the holographic display; and defining said CGH data to compensate for the effects of the determined aberration.
  • CGH computer generated hologram
  • a CGH can be designed to fully or partially compensate for the effects of the optical components.
  • the pattern applied to the SLM can be generated so that a perfect or nearly perfect holographic image is formed by the display.
  • the determination of the aberration caused by the optical components may be performed by a number of techniques, but preferably comprises determining the path length of light rays introduced by the optical components.
  • the path length of light rays between the spatial light modulator and the three dimensional holographic image may therefore be used in the definition of said CGH data.
  • the CGH data may be defined so that light emitted from the spatial light modulator compensates for the aberrations introduced by the optical components.
  • an interpolation function may preferably be used to determine the path length of the light rays between the spatial light modulator and the three dimensional holographic image.
  • the results of the determination of the aberration of light introduced by the optical components of the display may be saved in a look-up table. This is particularly useful for applications where reconfigurable or dynamic images are required to be generated.
  • the optical system may be designed to exhibit particular aberrations such that, when aberration compensation is carried out in the definition of the CGH data, increased field of view in the three dimensional holographic image is achieved.
  • the optical components may comprise one or more curved mirrors.
  • the compensation for the effects of aberration may be effected by determining the position and orientation of an image generated by the spatial light modulator on the basis of the viewing angle of an observer, so as to generate a three dimensional holographic image behind the convex mirror which appears stationary as the observer moves.
  • a holographic display comprising: a computer arranged to generate and / or store computer generated hologram (CGH) data; a spatial light modulator coupled to the computer for receiving the CGH data; optical components arranged in the light path of the spatial light modulator for causing a three dimensional holographic image to be displayed; wherein the CGH data is defined to compensate for the effects of the aberration of light caused by said optical components.
  • CGH computer generated hologram
  • a computer storage medium having stored thereon computer generated hologram (CGH) data intended to form a light modulation pattern at a spatial light modulator of a holographic display, said CGH data including compensation for the effects of aberrations occurring at optical components of the display.
  • CGH computer generated hologram
  • aberration is intended to refer to distortions, rotations, translations etc. which would otherwise cause the displayed image to deviate from the intended holographic image. Aberrations may result from the use of either perfect or non-perfect optical components.
  • Figure 1 illustrates the coherent raytrace method for generating a computer generated hologram
  • Figure 2 A illustrates imperfect monochromatic imaging of 3 collinear points in an off- axis parabolic mirror system
  • Figure 2B illustrates the imperfect imaging of the three points of Figure 2 A in more detail
  • Figure 3 shows a corrected CGH producing 4 collinear diffraction limited points
  • Figure 4 illustrates the calculation of the optical path from points on the image to respective CGH sample points
  • Figure 5 shows three different views of an image
  • Figure 6 shows an increase in viewing angle obtainable with a curved mirror.
  • the fundamental task of holographic generation is to generate a pattern which will diffract light to produce a required 3D image.
  • an object is illuminated with coherent light.
  • the light from the object propagates to a design plane. From a knowledge of the light field at the design plane, it is possible to generate a reversed light field which, when created, will allow reproduction of the required 3D image in space.
  • Holography is the technique which makes this process possible, as it stores and allows replay of the complex light field pattern in the design plane.
  • Computer generated holography allows this process to be done for synthetic (non-existent) objects.
  • the first stage in determining the required CGH pattern is to calculate the electric field distribution which would be generated by the synthetic object.
  • the required pattern to be applied to a spatial light modulator (SLM) is determined from this electric field distribution at the design plane.
  • Figure 1 shows a technique used to determine the pattern applied to a SLM at the design plane for a typical CGH.
  • a data field is generated for the coordinates in space of an imaginary object 2, relative to a design plane 4.
  • the design plane is pixellated, and light rays are traced coherently to each pixel from each point on the object 'visible' from that pixel.
  • the complex electric fields caused by each light ray are coherently summed at each pixel.
  • Sophisticated radiosity models can be incorporated to determine accurately the strength of light rays (specular and diffuse reflection from the object surfaces, multiple light sources and reflections).
  • CTR Coherent Raytrace Technique
  • this information must be stored in some modulating structure, prior to being replayed by a light wave to generate the required 3D image.
  • the technique of holography with its concept of a reference wave, allows complex electric field distributions to be stored as real quantities. This permits the use of amplitude or phase modulated systems to generate the required 3D images.
  • Figure 2A shows a simple ray trace analysis of a CGH 6 designed in the usual way to generate three collinear points 8, equidistant from the eyes of an observer 10, using an off-axis parabolic mirror 12.
  • the raytrace analysis shown in more detail in Figure 2B, shows that blurred points are generally reconstructed.
  • the central point 14 is sharp and in the desired position, the two points 16, 18 on either side are both blurred and no longer in the plane required - the light rays 20 do not all cross at the required points in space, or indeed at any single location.
  • the images 16, 18 of these outer points would therefore appear to an observer to be in incorrect positions and blurred, and their apparent positions would shift with the location of the observer.
  • the correction technique can be regarded as a backward raytrace.
  • the path length information determines the corrected CGH pattern at the design plane 6, such that, if the CGH is constructed and replayed, the images of the three points will be properly generated as diffraction limited points in the correct (i.e. design) locations.
  • the correction in the CGH pattern at the design plane 6 due to the different path lengths is performed when the coherent summing of complex electric fields takes place as described above. In other words, the behaviour of the light through the optics after it has left the SLM is used when calculating the CGH pattern applied to the SLM.
  • Figure 3 shows such a system in operation.
  • the technique is, in principle, applicable to the generation of near arbitrary 3D images through a variety of imperfect optical elements, provided the characteristics of the optical elements are known a priori.
  • the ability to compensate for a wide range of optical elements is important.
  • the use of spherical optical forms (as opposed to aspherics used in the figures above) can allow cost savings, these being particularly significant for the large aperture optics sometimes required for systems containing high complexity CGH.
  • An important consideration is the computational requirements in the above approach. Determination of the required optical paths, for images having significant volume through multielement systems, is non-trivial. Even for the single element system shown in Figure 2, no general analytic solutions for the optical paths can be determined - typically numerical solutions using Fermat's principle have to be used.
  • Figure 4 shows a representation of the optical path calculation from a point 30 on an image with co-ordinates ⁇ x p ,y p z p ⁇ , to the CGH sample point 32 with co-ordinates ⁇ xc,y c .Zc ⁇ for a specific optical element shape ⁇ .
  • a mirror surface is assumed and the ray path calculation requires determination of the position 34 at which the ray strikes the mirror, with co-ordinates
  • a CGH can be thought of as providing different images according to the observer's angle of view. Typically these images would be the appropriate perspective views as expected for a real object, but this need not be the case.
  • the limited range of viewing angles inherent in the CGH replay means that the observer would normally only be able to see a small way round the sides of the cube.
  • Figure 5 demonstrates this technique, and shows how, by rotating the image as the viewing angle changes, an observer can see further round the image of a cube.
  • an observer 36 views the image of a cube 40 from nearly straight onto one of its faces, i.e. substantially along the axis 38.
  • the observer 36 has increased the viewing angle by moving away from the axis 38, and the image of the cube 40 has rotated in the opposite direction, allowing him to see more of the top face.
  • the observer 36 has moved even further, and the image of the cube 40 has rotated so far that he is almost looking directly at the top face. This means, of course, that the image no longer behaves like a real object (which may be undesirable) and it is necessary to identify an aberrating or non-imaging optic that makes the image appear stationary whilst still permitting a wide viewing angle.
  • an observer 42 views the system along the axis 48 of a convex mirror 44, an image 46 generated by the CGH (not shown) is located on the axis 48 , so that the reflection 50 (and thus the image seen by the observer) is located on the axis behind the mirror 44.
  • the phase information in the CGH can be arranged so that the image 46 generated by the CGH has moved and rotated to a new position 54.
  • the data encoded at the SLM uses information about the behaviour of the light after it has left the SLM to provide a different image when the observer looks at a different part of the CGH.
  • the reflection 50 of the image 54 will appear to be in the same position as when the system was viewed along the axis. However, the diffraction angle relative to the axis of the image is still small.
  • a beam splitter (not shown) is required to allow viewing of the reflected image without it being obscured by the CGH display system.
  • the invention is not limited by the embodiments described above.
  • the technique has been described for CGHs calculated by the coherent raytrace technique (CRT), whereas the invention will work for a CGH calculated by any technique.
  • a coherent raytrace could be used to determine the aberration correction required even if the eventual CGH is not designed by the CRT method.
  • the aberration compensation could also be achieved by examination of test images produced by the CGH in an actual system, altering the CGH iteratively until the required image is produced.

Abstract

A method of generating data for application to a spatial light modulator (6) of a holographic display to display a three-dimensional holographic image (8). The method comprises determining the aberration of light at optical components (12) of the holographic display, and defining said data to compensate for the effects of the determined aberration.

Description

Aberration Control of Images from Computer Generated Holograms
The present invention relates to computer generated holographic images.
Holography is a technique for generating 3D images having all the depth cues present. Computer generated holograms (CGH) are an important method for creating images of non-existent (or synthetic) objects. Provided the synthetic image can be described by some form of data structure, a computer can then calculate the holographic pattern in some design plane. This is equivalent to the interference pattern recorded by a photosensitive material in conventional (interferometric) hologram formation. The calculated CGH pattern is then applied to a spatial light modulator (SLM) which modulates readout light incident upon it. This modulated light propagates to yield the desired 3D image which can be viewed by a human observer.
A concern with holographic displays is maximising both image size / and the associated field of view FOV. As one might expect from the brightness theorem, for a given CGH, increasing / generally results in a corresponding decrease in FOV. To a good approximation
I. FOV∞ constant
Techniques which can increase the value of this product are important, as invariably it is the /and/or EOF constraints which determine the complexity of the CGH process, rather than image resolution concerns.
The inherent resolution limitations of the CGH SLM displays necessitate that the light diffracted by the CGH is magnified by scaling optics to generate images of the required size / and field of view EOF (the EOF is a quantity defining the region in which an observer's eyes have to be positioned to see all of the image generated by the hologram). If a conventional approach is taken, these optics invariably introduce distortions and aberrations in to the scaled images. For high-end applications, such degradations in image quality may be unacceptable. Previous attempts to correct for aberrations introduced by scaling optics have included the concept of a phase screen multiplier, as described for example in Maeno K, Fukaya N, Nishikawa O, Sato K, Honda T, "Electro-holographic display using 15Mega pixels LCD ", Proc SPIE, vol. 2652, p.15-23 (1996). The phase screen multiplier involves the multiplication of a hologram by a two dimensional phase distribution which is independent of the image being reconstructed. Unfortunately, this technique relies on a paraxial approximation, so large images of significant FOV can only be corrected with limited success.
According to the present invention there is provided a method of generating computer generated hologram (CGH) data for application to a spatial light modulator of a holographic display to display a three dimensional holographic image, the method comprising: determining the aberration of light at optical components of the holographic display; and defining said CGH data to compensate for the effects of the determined aberration.
Thus a CGH can be designed to fully or partially compensate for the effects of the optical components. The pattern applied to the SLM can be generated so that a perfect or nearly perfect holographic image is formed by the display.
The determination of the aberration caused by the optical components may be performed by a number of techniques, but preferably comprises determining the path length of light rays introduced by the optical components.
The path length of light rays between the spatial light modulator and the three dimensional holographic image may therefore be used in the definition of said CGH data.
The CGH data may be defined so that light emitted from the spatial light modulator compensates for the aberrations introduced by the optical components. In order to minimise computer memory requirements without introducing excessive computing time overheads, an interpolation function may preferably be used to determine the path length of the light rays between the spatial light modulator and the three dimensional holographic image.
Alternatively or as well, the results of the determination of the aberration of light introduced by the optical components of the display may be saved in a look-up table. This is particularly useful for applications where reconfigurable or dynamic images are required to be generated.
The optical system may be designed to exhibit particular aberrations such that, when aberration compensation is carried out in the definition of the CGH data, increased field of view in the three dimensional holographic image is achieved.
The optical components may comprise one or more curved mirrors. In such a case, the compensation for the effects of aberration may be effected by determining the position and orientation of an image generated by the spatial light modulator on the basis of the viewing angle of an observer, so as to generate a three dimensional holographic image behind the convex mirror which appears stationary as the observer moves.
According to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a holographic display comprising: a computer arranged to generate and / or store computer generated hologram (CGH) data; a spatial light modulator coupled to the computer for receiving the CGH data; optical components arranged in the light path of the spatial light modulator for causing a three dimensional holographic image to be displayed; wherein the CGH data is defined to compensate for the effects of the aberration of light caused by said optical components.
According to a third aspect of the invention, there is provided a computer storage medium having stored thereon computer generated hologram (CGH) data intended to form a light modulation pattern at a spatial light modulator of a holographic display, said CGH data including compensation for the effects of aberrations occurring at optical components of the display.
It will be appreciated that the use of the term "aberration" is intended to refer to distortions, rotations, translations etc. which would otherwise cause the displayed image to deviate from the intended holographic image. Aberrations may result from the use of either perfect or non-perfect optical components.
For a better understanding of the present invention and in order to show how the same may be carried into effect reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 illustrates the coherent raytrace method for generating a computer generated hologram;
Figure 2 A illustrates imperfect monochromatic imaging of 3 collinear points in an off- axis parabolic mirror system;
Figure 2B illustrates the imperfect imaging of the three points of Figure 2 A in more detail;
Figure 3 shows a corrected CGH producing 4 collinear diffraction limited points;
Figure 4 illustrates the calculation of the optical path from points on the image to respective CGH sample points;
Figure 5 shows three different views of an image; and
Figure 6 shows an increase in viewing angle obtainable with a curved mirror.
The fundamental task of holographic generation is to generate a pattern which will diffract light to produce a required 3D image. Conventionally, in order to achieve this, first an object is illuminated with coherent light. The light from the object propagates to a design plane. From a knowledge of the light field at the design plane, it is possible to generate a reversed light field which, when created, will allow reproduction of the required 3D image in space. Holography is the technique which makes this process possible, as it stores and allows replay of the complex light field pattern in the design plane.
Computer generated holography (CGH) allows this process to be done for synthetic (non-existent) objects. The first stage in determining the required CGH pattern is to calculate the electric field distribution which would be generated by the synthetic object. The required pattern to be applied to a spatial light modulator (SLM) is determined from this electric field distribution at the design plane.
Figure 1 shows a technique used to determine the pattern applied to a SLM at the design plane for a typical CGH. A data field is generated for the coordinates in space of an imaginary object 2, relative to a design plane 4. The design plane is pixellated, and light rays are traced coherently to each pixel from each point on the object 'visible' from that pixel. The complex electric fields caused by each light ray are coherently summed at each pixel. Sophisticated radiosity models can be incorporated to determine accurately the strength of light rays (specular and diffuse reflection from the object surfaces, multiple light sources and reflections). Occlusion effects are automatically included, as only light rays from the part of the object 'visible' at a particular pixel are 'traced' and contribute to that pixel's electric field strength. This technique is known as Coherent Raytrace Technique (CRT)
Having calculated the complex electric field at the design plane, this information must be stored in some modulating structure, prior to being replayed by a light wave to generate the required 3D image. The technique of holography, with its concept of a reference wave, allows complex electric field distributions to be stored as real quantities. This permits the use of amplitude or phase modulated systems to generate the required 3D images. o
In order to generate an image of the required size, scaling optics are normally provided. Figure 2A shows a simple ray trace analysis of a CGH 6 designed in the usual way to generate three collinear points 8, equidistant from the eyes of an observer 10, using an off-axis parabolic mirror 12. The raytrace analysis, shown in more detail in Figure 2B, shows that blurred points are generally reconstructed. Although the central point 14 is sharp and in the desired position, the two points 16, 18 on either side are both blurred and no longer in the plane required - the light rays 20 do not all cross at the required points in space, or indeed at any single location. The images 16, 18 of these outer points would therefore appear to an observer to be in incorrect positions and blurred, and their apparent positions would shift with the location of the observer.
These effects can be corrected, provided the CGH is appropriately designed. The correction technique can be regarded as a backward raytrace. For the system shown, the paths of rays 20 from each of the object points 14, 16, 18 to the sample points on the CGH design plane 6 are calculated. The path length information determines the corrected CGH pattern at the design plane 6, such that, if the CGH is constructed and replayed, the images of the three points will be properly generated as diffraction limited points in the correct (i.e. design) locations. The correction in the CGH pattern at the design plane 6 due to the different path lengths is performed when the coherent summing of complex electric fields takes place as described above. In other words, the behaviour of the light through the optics after it has left the SLM is used when calculating the CGH pattern applied to the SLM.
Figure 3 shows such a system in operation. In the example shown there are four collinear object points 22, 24, 26, 28 and they have all been defined accurately in the same plane, i.e. without blurring or drifting.
Although the above is a simple example, the technique is, in principle, applicable to the generation of near arbitrary 3D images through a variety of imperfect optical elements, provided the characteristics of the optical elements are known a priori. The ability to compensate for a wide range of optical elements is important. For example, the use of spherical optical forms (as opposed to aspherics used in the figures above) can allow cost savings, these being particularly significant for the large aperture optics sometimes required for systems containing high complexity CGH. An important consideration is the computational requirements in the above approach. Determination of the required optical paths, for images having significant volume through multielement systems, is non-trivial. Even for the single element system shown in Figure 2, no general analytic solutions for the optical paths can be determined - typically numerical solutions using Fermat's principle have to be used.
For applications where reconfigurable or dynamic images are required to be generated, it is likely that a look-up table approach (based on pre-calculated information for the optical system in question) may be necessary, rather than real time calculation of optical path length. A further simplification is also possible by noting that the path lengths typically vary slowly through the object space and the CGH design plane. It is therefore fairly accurate to calculate the optical path length values at a few evenly spaced "sample" points, then fit a curve based on these values to allow interpolation for points other than sample values. It is therefore possible to use a simple interpolation function to minimise computer memory requirements without introducing excessive computing time overheads.
Figure 4 shows a representation of the optical path calculation from a point 30 on an image with co-ordinates {xp,ypzp}, to the CGH sample point 32 with co-ordinates {xc,yc.Zc} for a specific optical element shape φ. This requires a numerical solution. In the Figure, a mirror surface is assumed and the ray path calculation requires determination of the position 34 at which the ray strikes the mirror, with co-ordinates
A CGH can be thought of as providing different images according to the observer's angle of view. Typically these images would be the appropriate perspective views as expected for a real object, but this need not be the case. For the case of an observer viewing the image of a cube produced by a CGH, the limited range of viewing angles inherent in the CGH replay means that the observer would normally only be able to see a small way round the sides of the cube. By designing the CGH such that its replay appears to rotate as the viewing angle moves off axis, the observer can 'see' further round the sides. Figure 5 demonstrates this technique, and shows how, by rotating the image as the viewing angle changes, an observer can see further round the image of a cube. In Figure 5 A an observer 36 views the image of a cube 40 from nearly straight onto one of its faces, i.e. substantially along the axis 38. In Figure 5B the observer 36 has increased the viewing angle by moving away from the axis 38, and the image of the cube 40 has rotated in the opposite direction, allowing him to see more of the top face. In Figure 5C the observer 36 has moved even further, and the image of the cube 40 has rotated so far that he is almost looking directly at the top face. This means, of course, that the image no longer behaves like a real object (which may be undesirable) and it is necessary to identify an aberrating or non-imaging optic that makes the image appear stationary whilst still permitting a wide viewing angle.
Initial considerations with simple optics indicate that the concept is not unreasonable. Inspired by 'hall of mirrors' effects, an illustration of this can be made, as shown in Figure 6. One can envisage the points in a CGH image as only 'emitting' light into a relatively small cone of angles (which results in that point being visible from only a small range of angles). If these rays impinge on a convex curved mirror one can see that on reflection, they are splayed out, effectively increasing the viewing angle. Now when viewing objects in such curved mirrors the image appears to rotate, following the observer's viewing angle. It is possible to effectively cancel this rotation in the CGH design. However, it is also apparent that the object appears to move with viewing angle. This can be compensated for as well, although the limited image volume available for the CGH replay will restrict the range of positions that can be used, and hence the size of the image.
When an observer 42 views the system along the axis 48 of a convex mirror 44, an image 46 generated by the CGH (not shown) is located on the axis 48 , so that the reflection 50 (and thus the image seen by the observer) is located on the axis behind the mirror 44. When the observer 52 moves off axis and therefore looks from a different angle, the phase information in the CGH can be arranged so that the image 46 generated by the CGH has moved and rotated to a new position 54. In other words the data encoded at the SLM uses information about the behaviour of the light after it has left the SLM to provide a different image when the observer looks at a different part of the CGH. When the off-axis observer 52 views the system, the reflection 50 of the image 54 will appear to be in the same position as when the system was viewed along the axis. However, the diffraction angle relative to the axis of the image is still small. A beam splitter (not shown) is required to allow viewing of the reflected image without it being obscured by the CGH display system.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited by the embodiments described above. For example, the technique has been described for CGHs calculated by the coherent raytrace technique (CRT), whereas the invention will work for a CGH calculated by any technique. A coherent raytrace could be used to determine the aberration correction required even if the eventual CGH is not designed by the CRT method. The aberration compensation could also be achieved by examination of test images produced by the CGH in an actual system, altering the CGH iteratively until the required image is produced.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A method of generating computer generated hologram (CGH) data for application to a spatial light modulator of a holographic display to display a three dimensional holographic image, the method comprising: determining the aberration of light at optical components of the holographic display; and defining said CGH data to compensate for the effects of the determined aberration.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the determination of the aberration of light at the optical components comprises determining the path length of light rays introduced by the optical components.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the path length of light rays between the spatial light modulator and the three dimensional holographic image is used in the definition of said CGH data.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the data is defined so that light emitted from the spatial light modulator compensates for the aberrations introduced by the optical components.
5. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein an interpolation function is used to determine the path length of the light rays between the spatial light modulator and the three dimensional holographic image.
6. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the results of the determination of the aberration of light introduced by optical components of the display are saved in a look-up table.
7. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the optical system is designed to exhibit particular aberrations such that, when aberration compensation is carried out in the definition of the CGH data, increased field of view in the three dimensional holographic image is achieved.
8. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the optical components comprise one or more curved mirrors.
9. A holographic display comprising: a computer arranged to generate and / or store computer generated hologram (CGH) data; a spatial light modulator coupled to the computer for receiving the CGH data; optical components arranged in the light path of the spatial light modulator for causing a three dimensional holographic image to be displayed; wherein the CGH data is defined to compensate for the effects of the aberration of light caused by said optical components.
10. A computer storage medium having stored thereon computer generated hologram (CGH) data intended to form a light modulation pattern at a spatial light modulator of a holographic display, said CGH data including compensation for the effects of aberrations occurring at optical components of the display.
EP00927598A 1999-06-09 2000-05-18 Abberation control of images from computer generated holograms Withdrawn EP1183572A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9913265A GB2350961A (en) 1999-06-09 1999-06-09 Determining optical aberrations and compensating therefor in computer generated holograms
GB9913265 1999-06-09
PCT/GB2000/001898 WO2000075733A1 (en) 1999-06-09 2000-05-18 Abberation control of images from computer generated holograms

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1183572A1 true EP1183572A1 (en) 2002-03-06

Family

ID=10854920

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00927598A Withdrawn EP1183572A1 (en) 1999-06-09 2000-05-18 Abberation control of images from computer generated holograms

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1183572A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2003501697A (en)
AU (1) AU4598900A (en)
CA (1) CA2375514A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2350961A (en)
TW (1) TW516005B (en)
WO (1) WO2000075733A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4412576B2 (en) * 2002-10-16 2010-02-10 大日本印刷株式会社 3D micro pattern display
EP1963928A2 (en) 2005-12-22 2008-09-03 SeeReal Technologies S.A. Method for the compensation of an inhomogeneous brightness perception in holographically reconstructed scenes
DE102006031942B4 (en) * 2006-07-11 2016-03-24 Seereal Technologies S.A. Method for eliminating inhomogeneous perception of brightness in a holographic reconstruction of scenes
DE102006042467A1 (en) * 2006-09-09 2008-03-27 Seereal Technologies S.A. Method and device for coding computer-generated holograms in pixelated light modulators
DE102007005823A1 (en) * 2007-01-31 2008-08-07 Seereal Technologies S.A. Optical wavefront correction for a holographic projection system
GB2448132B (en) * 2007-03-30 2012-10-10 Light Blue Optics Ltd Optical Systems
DE102007024235B4 (en) * 2007-05-21 2009-04-30 Seereal Technologies S.A. Holographic reconstruction system and method with extended visibility range
JP4963467B2 (en) * 2007-12-14 2012-06-27 独立行政法人情報通信研究機構 Hologram pattern generator, electronic holography astigmatism correction method, and hologram pattern generation program
GB201104235D0 (en) 2011-03-14 2011-04-27 Cambridge Entpr Ltd Optical beam routing apparatus and methods
KR102607175B1 (en) * 2016-09-05 2023-11-28 주식회사 케이티 Method for removing chromatic aberration and system in hologram apparatus
GB201620744D0 (en) 2016-12-06 2017-01-18 Roadmap Systems Ltd Multimode fibre optical switching systems
RU184830U1 (en) * 2018-07-31 2018-11-12 федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Московский государственный технический университет имени Н.Э. Баумана (национальный исследовательский университет)" (МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана) OPTICAL DIAGRAM OF A PHASE DISTORTION METER OF OPTICAL WAVE FIELDS BASED ON A F light guide PLATFORM AND A SPATIAL LIGHT MODULATOR

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5194971A (en) * 1986-10-14 1993-03-16 American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. Computer aided holography and holographic computer graphics
US4778262A (en) * 1986-10-14 1988-10-18 American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. Computer aided holography and holographic computer graphics
JP2785427B2 (en) * 1990-03-26 1998-08-13 松下電器産業株式会社 How to create computer hologram
JPH09134112A (en) * 1995-11-09 1997-05-20 Victor Co Of Japan Ltd Correction method of computer-generated hologram

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0075733A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU4598900A (en) 2000-12-28
GB2350961A (en) 2000-12-13
TW516005B (en) 2003-01-01
JP2003501697A (en) 2003-01-14
CA2375514A1 (en) 2000-12-14
GB9913265D0 (en) 1999-08-04
WO2000075733A1 (en) 2000-12-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0407497B1 (en) Computer aided holography and holographic computer graphics
JP5265546B2 (en) Method for generating video holograms in real time using sub-holograms
US5194971A (en) Computer aided holography and holographic computer graphics
JP5468537B2 (en) Method for generating video holograms in real time to improve 3D rendering graphics pipeline
Lucente et al. Rendering interactive holographic images
AU654500B2 (en) Holocomposer
US8072488B2 (en) Holographic apparatus and method
US7230746B2 (en) 3D display
US7317564B2 (en) Replay optics for holographic displays
US20050122549A1 (en) Computer assisted hologram forming method and apparatus
US8049941B2 (en) Method for the compensation of an inhomogeneous brightness perception in holographically reconstructed scenes
EP1183572A1 (en) Abberation control of images from computer generated holograms
US20230205133A1 (en) Real-time Photorealistic 3D Holography With Deep Neural Networks
Kang et al. Holographic printing of white-light viewable holograms and stereograms
US9829860B2 (en) Analytic method for computing video holograms in real time
Kelly et al. Digital holographic capture and optoelectronic reconstruction for 3D displays
Kreis Applications of digital holography: from microscopy to 3D-television
Oi et al. Three-dimensional reflection screens fabricated by holographic wavefront printer
CN111830811A (en) High-definition three-dimensional holographic display method based on diffraction field superposition and implementation device thereof
Tanaka et al. Wide-angle wavefront reconstruction near display plane in three-dimensional display system
Choi et al. High-quality holographic displays using double SLMs and camera-in-the-loop optimization
Yoshikawa et al. Recent progress on digital holography for 3D display
Zaperty et al. Multi SLMs holographic display with inclined plane wave illumination
Rhisheekesan et al. Review on digital holography techniques using digital micromirror device
Kreis Referenceless Phase Holography for 3D Imaging

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20011121

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030304

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20030715