EP1120454A2 - Process for reducting content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon feed - Google Patents

Process for reducting content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon feed Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1120454A2
EP1120454A2 EP01100726A EP01100726A EP1120454A2 EP 1120454 A2 EP1120454 A2 EP 1120454A2 EP 01100726 A EP01100726 A EP 01100726A EP 01100726 A EP01100726 A EP 01100726A EP 1120454 A2 EP1120454 A2 EP 1120454A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
hydrotreating
catalyst
fcc
reactor
temperature
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP01100726A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1120454A3 (en
Inventor
Per Zeuthen
Barry H. Cooper
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Topsoe AS
Original Assignee
Haldor Topsoe AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Haldor Topsoe AS filed Critical Haldor Topsoe AS
Publication of EP1120454A2 publication Critical patent/EP1120454A2/en
Publication of EP1120454A3 publication Critical patent/EP1120454A3/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G65/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only
    • C10G65/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only
    • C10G65/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps
    • C10G65/08Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps at least one step being a hydrogenation of the aromatic hydrocarbons
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G65/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only
    • C10G65/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only
    • C10G65/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps
    • C10G65/043Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps at least one step being a change in the structural skeleton

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for removal of sulphur and polyaromatic compounds in vacuum gas oil by hydrotreatment of FCC hydrocarbon feed stock.
  • FCC fluid catalytic cracking
  • Treating the FCC products involves multiple process solutions: naphtha treating, light-cycle oil (LCO) treating and flue gas treating to control the SO x emissions.
  • Treating feed to the FCC unit can increase yields and at the same time lower sulphur levels in gasoline, and diesel fuels and reduces SO x emissions.
  • the increased conversion in the FCC unit resulting from feed treatment may improve refinery margins.
  • Product treatment offers no yield benefits.
  • a general object of the invention to improve production of a FCC feed being substantially reduced in content of sulphur and nitrogen compounds and in particular having a low content of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and thereby improved crackability and conversion and selectivity in the FCC unit.
  • Hydrotreatment of FCC feed substantially reduces sulphur content of gasoline, light (LCO), and decant oil. It also lowers the amount of sulphur in spent catalyst coke, which results in the reduction of SO x emissions from the regenerator.
  • LCO light
  • hydrotreating can be used to achieve a high level of desulphurization (>90%) and greatly reduce the sulphur content of the FCC products. High severity desulphurization would be needed to reduce coke sulphur to the near zero level.
  • Nitrogen compounds poison the active sites in the FCC catalyst and increase coke-making propensity of the catalyst and reduce the yield of valuable products. Nitrogen removal by hydrotreatment is much harder than sulphur removal. Moderate to high severity is generally required to achieve a high denitrogenation level (>70%).
  • PAH Poly-aromatic hydrocarbons
  • Di-aromatic species distribute in all liquid products from the FCC and also convert to coke on the FCC catalyst. Triaromatic and tetra-aromatic species either convert to coke on the catalyst or distribute in the light cycle oil or heavier fraction from the FCC. Maximising FCC gasoline and lighter valuable products requires an understanding of how to maximise the conversion of multiple ring aromatic species (di+) to single (mono) aromatic or saturated ring species in the FCC feed hydrotreater.
  • the degree of aromatic saturation is highly dependent on hydrogen partial pressure, catalyst type and the space velocity of the hydrotreater.
  • the kinetic and thermodynamic responses of sulphur, nitrogen and other contaminant removal are such that an increase in temperature results in conversion of these contaminants.
  • the kinetic responses for these contaminants represent irreversible reactions.
  • Typical conditions for a FCC pre-treatment reactor are hydrogen pressure of 40-120 bar; average reactor temperature 350-410°C; liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 0.5-2.5 m 3 oil/m 3 catalyst/h.
  • LHSV liquid hourly space velocity
  • the end of the run is normally reached when the design temperature for the reactor is reached, which is decided by the metallurgy of the reactor.
  • the run length is a very important consideration.
  • a shorter run length means high costs due to a higher rate of catalyst replacement, and relative more downtime (i.e. time off-stream) for catalyst change-out with a resultant loss of revenue due to reduced production of high quality FCC gasoline products.
  • the aromatic saturation will pass through a maximum as the reaction temperature is increased.
  • the maximum is identified as the point, where the net rate of aromatic saturation is zero due to the effects of the forward and reverse reactions.
  • the temperature at which the PAH equilibrium is met will depend on a number of factors including hydrogen pressure, feed PAH content and composition and LHSV.
  • the general object of the invention to provide a process for the production of a low sulphur and nitrogen FCC feed with a low content of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and thereby increase the FCC yields and in particular the FCC gasoline production.
  • the present invention is a process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed stock having a boiling range between 200°C and 600°C, which process comprises the steps of:
  • the inventive process a low PAH content is achieved in FCC feeds with only slight additional investment in reactor volume and without reduction in run length.
  • the essences of the inventive process consists of cooling the effluent exiting the hydrotreating reactor and passing the cooled product through a small posttreat reactor containing a suitable catalyst.
  • the PAH content of the product existing in the hydrotreating reactor is reduced in the posttreatment reactor owing to the more favourable equilibrium conditions at the lower temperature. Consequently, the end of run temperature in the main hydrotreating reactor is not limited by the PAH content of the product exiting the main reactor, and a small overall reactor volume (main hydrotreater plus post treat reactor) is required for a given run length.
  • the final bed of the main hydrotreating reactor is operated at lower temperature instead of using a post treatment reactor.
  • the process can be used to lower the content of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons and thereby improve the performance of the FCC unit because of improved crackability of the FCC feed as well as the FCC product qualities.
  • the petroleum vacuum distillates used in the present invention boil in the range 400-650°C and have a PAH content in the range 5-50 wt%.
  • Examples of petroleum fractions include straight run vacuum gas oils from a vacuum crude distillation and vacuum fractions of the product from fluid catalytic cracking and thermal cracking processes including cooking and mixtures thereof. The process is particularly suitable for blends of vacuum distillates containing thermal cracked oils and FCC products because these oils generally have a high PAH content.
  • Feedstock is mixed with hydrogen, heated in the furnace 1 and passed through the hydrotreating reactor 2.
  • the effluent from the hydrotreater is cooled to a suitable temperature by heat exchange with the feed to hydrotreater 3 or by other means before passing to post-treatment reactor 4.
  • the temperature employed in the post-treatment reactor will typically be in the range of 300°C to 375°C, and will typically be at least 50°C lower than the outlet temperature of the hydrotreater.
  • the LHSV in the posttreatment reactor will typically be in the range 2-20 m 3 oil/m 3 catalyst/h and the total pressure will be at the same level as that in the hydrotreating reactor.
  • the catalyst used in the hydrotreating reactor may be any catalyst used for hydrotreating petroleum fractions and known in the art.
  • the catalyst contains at least one metal on a porous refractory inorganic oxide support. Examples of metals having hydrotreating activity include metals from groups VI-B and VIII e.g. Co, Mo, Ni, W, Fe with mixtures of Co-Mo, Ni-Mo and Ni-W preferred.
  • the metals are employed as oxides or sulphides.
  • porous material suitable as support include alumina, silica-alumina, alumina-titania, natural and synthetic molecular sieves and mixtures hereof with the alumina and silica-alumina being preferred.
  • the catalyst used in the posttreatment reactor may be any catalyst used for hydrotreating vacuum distillate streams.
  • Preferred catalysts are Ni-Mo, Co-Mo and Ni-W on alumina.
  • the active metal on the catalyst may be either presulphided or in-situ sulphide prior to use by conventional means.
  • the hydrotreating reactor section may consist of one or more reactors. Each reactor may have one or more catalyst beds.
  • the function of the hydrotreating reactor is primarily to reduce product sulphur, nitrogen, CCR and metals. Owing to the exothermic nature of the desulphurisation reaction, the outlet temperature is generally higher than the inlet temperature. Some reduction of PAH may be achieved in the hydrotreating reactor especially at start of run conditions. As the catalyst activity declines due to the deactivation by carbonaceous deposits, sintering of the active phase and other mechanisms, the inlet temperature to the hydrotreating reactor is raised, resulting in an increased outlet temperature.
  • the function of the post-treatment reactor is primarily to reduce the PAH content, but also to lower the sulphur and nitrogen.
  • the reduction in PAH will result in a reduction in the product oil density and refractive index (RI) both of which are desirable. Also reduction in the sulphur and nitrogen content will be achieved at the conditions in the post-treatment reactor.
  • RI refractive index
  • Feedstock A (Table 1) was hydrotreated in a semi-adiabatic pilot plant unit running with an outlet temperature of 405°C - a temperature, which normally is considered as end of run temperature (EOR) conditions and LHSV at 1 (hr -1 ). The pressure was 50 bar. Pure hydrogen was used as gas.
  • Feedstock A is a mixture of 50% cooker gas oil and 50% straight run vacuum gas oil (SR VGO).
  • Feedstock B (Table 1) was hydrotreated at typical FCC pretreatment conditions in a pilot plant unit at temperature at 400°C (inlet) - 420°C (outlet) temperature, which normally is considered as end of run conditions at LHSV at 1.7 (h -1 ). The pressure was 50 bar.
  • the feedstock was a pure cracked VGO.
  • Product A contains 14,5 wt% PAH, which would be typical for a product obtained at EOR conditions in a unit where the hydrogen partial inlet pressure is 50 bar, if the feedstock contains more cracked feedstock or DAO (De-Asphalt Oil) the contents will be higher.
  • DAO De-Asphalt Oil
  • Product B contains 35,2 wt% PAH, which is rather high, but typical for cracked feedstocks.
  • Product A from Example 1 is further hydrotreated at lower temperatures at high LHSV.
  • the pressure is 50 bar, which is identical to the pressure at which product A was obtained.
  • Example 2 Temperature (°C) LHSV (h -1 ) SG 60/60 S (wt%) N (wt ppm) Di-aromatics (wt%) Triaromatics (wt%) PAH (wt%) 325 6 0,8914 0,0038 505 4,6 5,0 9,6 350 6 0,8911 0,0029 468 4,9 4,9 9,5

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Liquid Carbonaceous Fuels (AREA)

Abstract

A process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and polyaromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed having a boiling range between 200°C and 600°C, which process comprises in combination contacting the feed and hydrogen over a hydrotreating catalyst and hydrotreating feed at hydrotreating conditions, cooling the hydrotreated effluent and hydrogen-rich gas from the hydrotreating reactor contacting said effluent and hydrogen gas over a hydrotreating catalyst in a post-pretreatment reactor at a temperature sufficient to lower the polyaromatic hydrocarbon content.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a process for removal of sulphur and polyaromatic compounds in vacuum gas oil by hydrotreatment of FCC hydrocarbon feed stock.
Many countries are tightening specifications for the sulphur content in diesel and gasoline fuels. The fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units are a major source of gasoline, but also the major source of sulphur in gasoline and diesel fuels. Lower sulphur content in fuel requests either treating the FCC feed or treating its products.
Treating the FCC products involves multiple process solutions: naphtha treating, light-cycle oil (LCO) treating and flue gas treating to control the SOx emissions. Treating feed to the FCC unit can increase yields and at the same time lower sulphur levels in gasoline, and diesel fuels and reduces SOx emissions. The increased conversion in the FCC unit resulting from feed treatment may improve refinery margins. Product treatment, however, offers no yield benefits.
It is, thus, a general object of the invention to improve production of a FCC feed being substantially reduced in content of sulphur and nitrogen compounds and in particular having a low content of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and thereby improved crackability and conversion and selectivity in the FCC unit.
Description of Prior Art
Hydrotreatment of FCC feed substantially reduces sulphur content of gasoline, light (LCO), and decant oil. It also lowers the amount of sulphur in spent catalyst coke, which results in the reduction of SOx emissions from the regenerator. For most feedstocks moderate to high severity hydrotreating can be used to achieve a high level of desulphurization (>90%) and greatly reduce the sulphur content of the FCC products. High severity desulphurization would be needed to reduce coke sulphur to the near zero level.
It is well known that removal of nitrogen from FCC feed yields the benefits of increasing conversion and product yields. Nitrogen compounds poison the active sites in the FCC catalyst and increase coke-making propensity of the catalyst and reduce the yield of valuable products. Nitrogen removal by hydrotreatment is much harder than sulphur removal. Moderate to high severity is generally required to achieve a high denitrogenation level (>70%).
Poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) do not crack in a FCC unit, but instead undergo condensation reactions to form coke. PAH are defined as fused multiring aromatic compounds containing two or more aromatic rings. The concentration of PAH can be measured by the analysis method IP 391. Hydrotreating can saturate PAH and form naphthenes and paraffin compounds, which are more easily cracked in the FCC.
This improves conversion and product yields. Mono-aromatics another product of PAH hydrogenation resist cracking in a FCC unit, but lose side chains and produce high-octane components in the FCC gasoline.
Di-aromatic species distribute in all liquid products from the FCC and also convert to coke on the FCC catalyst. Triaromatic and tetra-aromatic species either convert to coke on the catalyst or distribute in the light cycle oil or heavier fraction from the FCC. Maximising FCC gasoline and lighter valuable products requires an understanding of how to maximise the conversion of multiple ring aromatic species (di+) to single (mono) aromatic or saturated ring species in the FCC feed hydrotreater.
The degree of aromatic saturation is highly dependent on hydrogen partial pressure, catalyst type and the space velocity of the hydrotreater. The kinetic and thermodynamic responses of sulphur, nitrogen and other contaminant removal are such that an increase in temperature results in conversion of these contaminants. The kinetic responses for these contaminants represent irreversible reactions.
Typical conditions for a FCC pre-treatment reactor are hydrogen pressure of 40-120 bar; average reactor temperature 350-410°C; liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 0.5-2.5 m3oil/m3catalyst/h. The exact conditions will depend on the type of the feedstock, the required degree of desulphurisation and the desired run length. The reactor temperature on fresh catalyst (start of run) is normally at the lower end of the above range and as the catalyst deactivates the reactor temperature is raised to compensate for loss of catalyst activity.
The end of the run is normally reached when the design temperature for the reactor is reached, which is decided by the metallurgy of the reactor. The lower the start of run temperature and the higher the end of run temperature the longer the catalyst run length for a given rate of deactivation. For a refiner, the run length is a very important consideration. A shorter run length means high costs due to a higher rate of catalyst replacement, and relative more downtime (i.e. time off-stream) for catalyst change-out with a resultant loss of revenue due to reduced production of high quality FCC gasoline products.
Further restriction on run length may be imposed, if the FCC unit operations need a reduction in poly-aromatic hydrocarbon content in addition to the reduction in sulphur and nitrogen. PAH compounds reacts readily at hydrotreating conditions. Tetra-aromatic and tree-ring aromatic compounds are hydrogenated to mono-aromatic compounds. The mono-aromatic compounds react slowly at typical FCC pre-treatment conditions to form naphthenes.
The reactions are reversible and at high reaction temperatures and low hydrogen pressure the conversion of the PAH compounds is thermodynamically limited by equilibrium. Consequently, the conversion of PAH compounds in a FCC pre-treatment unit producing low sulphur and nitrogen feed to the FCC unit might at first increase as reaction temperature is increased, and then decrease as temperature is increased further owing to equilibrium constraints at the high temperature.
The aromatic saturation will pass through a maximum as the reaction temperature is increased. The maximum is identified as the point, where the net rate of aromatic saturation is zero due to the effects of the forward and reverse reactions.
The temperature at which the PAH equilibrium is met will depend on a number of factors including hydrogen pressure, feed PAH content and composition and LHSV.
It is, thus, the general object of the invention to provide a process for the production of a low sulphur and nitrogen FCC feed with a low content of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and thereby increase the FCC yields and in particular the FCC gasoline production.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed stock having a boiling range between 200°C and 600°C, which process comprises the steps of:
  • (a) contacting the feed stock with hydrogen over a hydrotreating catalyst at conditions being effective in hydrotreating and obtaining a hydrotreated effluent with the hydrotreated feed stock, hydrogen sulphide and hydrogen;
  • (b) cooling the effluent; and
  • (c) contacting the effluent with a hydrotreating catalyst at conditions being effective in hydrogenation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons.
  • By the inventive process, a low PAH content is achieved in FCC feeds with only slight additional investment in reactor volume and without reduction in run length. The essences of the inventive process consists of cooling the effluent exiting the hydrotreating reactor and passing the cooled product through a small posttreat reactor containing a suitable catalyst. The PAH content of the product existing in the hydrotreating reactor is reduced in the posttreatment reactor owing to the more favourable equilibrium conditions at the lower temperature. Consequently, the end of run temperature in the main hydrotreating reactor is not limited by the PAH content of the product exiting the main reactor, and a small overall reactor volume (main hydrotreater plus post treat reactor) is required for a given run length. In another embodiment of the process, the final bed of the main hydrotreating reactor is operated at lower temperature instead of using a post treatment reactor. The process can be used to lower the content of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons and thereby improve the performance of the FCC unit because of improved crackability of the FCC feed as well as the FCC product qualities.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
    The petroleum vacuum distillates used in the present invention boil in the range 400-650°C and have a PAH content in the range 5-50 wt%. Examples of petroleum fractions include straight run vacuum gas oils from a vacuum crude distillation and vacuum fractions of the product from fluid catalytic cracking and thermal cracking processes including cooking and mixtures thereof. The process is particularly suitable for blends of vacuum distillates containing thermal cracked oils and FCC products because these oils generally have a high PAH content.
    The process layout is illustrated in Fig. 1. Feedstock is mixed with hydrogen, heated in the furnace 1 and passed through the hydrotreating reactor 2. The conditions used in the hydrotreating reactor are the same as those normally used for hydrotreatment of FCC feeds, i.e. typical hydrogen pressure=40-120 bar; typical average reactor temperature =340-410°C; typical LHSV=0.5-2.0 m3oil/m3catalyst/h and typical hydrogen gas to oil ratio=100-1000Nm3/m3.
    The effluent from the hydrotreater is cooled to a suitable temperature by heat exchange with the feed to hydrotreater 3 or by other means before passing to post-treatment reactor 4. The temperature employed in the post-treatment reactor will typically be in the range of 300°C to 375°C, and will typically be at least 50°C lower than the outlet temperature of the hydrotreater. The LHSV in the posttreatment reactor will typically be in the range 2-20 m3oil/m3catalyst/h and the total pressure will be at the same level as that in the hydrotreating reactor. The catalyst used in the hydrotreating reactor may be any catalyst used for hydrotreating petroleum fractions and known in the art. The catalyst contains at least one metal on a porous refractory inorganic oxide support. Examples of metals having hydrotreating activity include metals from groups VI-B and VIII e.g. Co, Mo, Ni, W, Fe with mixtures of Co-Mo, Ni-Mo and Ni-W preferred.
    The metals are employed as oxides or sulphides. Examples of porous material suitable as support include alumina, silica-alumina, alumina-titania, natural and synthetic molecular sieves and mixtures hereof with the alumina and silica-alumina being preferred.
    The catalyst used in the posttreatment reactor may be any catalyst used for hydrotreating vacuum distillate streams. Preferred catalysts are Ni-Mo, Co-Mo and Ni-W on alumina. The active metal on the catalyst may be either presulphided or in-situ sulphide prior to use by conventional means. The hydrotreating reactor section may consist of one or more reactors. Each reactor may have one or more catalyst beds.
    The function of the hydrotreating reactor is primarily to reduce product sulphur, nitrogen, CCR and metals. Owing to the exothermic nature of the desulphurisation reaction, the outlet temperature is generally higher than the inlet temperature. Some reduction of PAH may be achieved in the hydrotreating reactor especially at start of run conditions. As the catalyst activity declines due to the deactivation by carbonaceous deposits, sintering of the active phase and other mechanisms, the inlet temperature to the hydrotreating reactor is raised, resulting in an increased outlet temperature.
    This will result at some point in an increase in the PAH content in the effluent of the hydrotreater reactor due to equilibrium limitations. The temperature at which this occurs will depend on the amount and type of aromatic compounds in the oil, and the hydrogen partial pressure in the unit.
    The function of the post-treatment reactor is primarily to reduce the PAH content, but also to lower the sulphur and nitrogen. The reduction in PAH will result in a reduction in the product oil density and refractive index (RI) both of which are desirable. Also reduction in the sulphur and nitrogen content will be achieved at the conditions in the post-treatment reactor. The present invention is illustrated in the following examples of specific embodiments.
    Example 1
    Feedstock A (Table 1) was hydrotreated in a semi-adiabatic pilot plant unit running with an outlet temperature of 405°C - a temperature, which normally is considered as end of run temperature (EOR) conditions and LHSV at 1 (hr-1). The pressure was 50 bar. Pure hydrogen was used as gas. Feedstock A is a mixture of 50% cooker gas oil and 50% straight run vacuum gas oil (SR VGO). Feedstock B (Table 1) was hydrotreated at typical FCC pretreatment conditions in a pilot plant unit at temperature at 400°C (inlet) - 420°C (outlet) temperature, which normally is considered as end of run conditions at LHSV at 1.7 (h-1). The pressure was 50 bar. The feedstock was a pure cracked VGO.
    Properties of feedstock used in the following Examples:
    Properties Feedstock A Feedstock B
    SG 60/60 0,9279 0,9924
    S (wt %) 1,34 3,53
    N (wt ppm) 2677 3594
    Aromatics (wt%)
    Mono- 17,7 8,36
    Di- 9,9 7,29
    Tri- 11,4 36,5
    Product properties from both of the tests are shown in Table 2.
    Properties of products in Example 1:
    Properties Product A Product B
    SG 60/60 0,8920 0,9411
    S (wt %) 0,02 0,1905
    N (wt ppm) 526 2046
    Aromatics (wt%)
    Mono- 31,0 22,6
    Di- 7,8 11,3
    Tri- 6,7 23,9
    Distillation, D2887 (°C)
    5 236 287
    10 267 314
    30 342 360
    50 392 392
    70 437 428
    90 495 479
    95 518 503
    Product A contains 14,5 wt% PAH, which would be typical for a product obtained at EOR conditions in a unit where the hydrogen partial inlet pressure is 50 bar, if the feedstock contains more cracked feedstock or DAO (De-Asphalt Oil) the contents will be higher.
    Product B contains 35,2 wt% PAH, which is rather high, but typical for cracked feedstocks.
    Example 2
    Product A from Example 1 is further hydrotreated at lower temperatures at high LHSV. The pressure is 50 bar, which is identical to the pressure at which product A was obtained.
    A Ni-Mo on alumina catalyst is used in this test. The results are shown in Table 3.
    Properties of products in Example 2:
    Temperature (°C) LHSV (h-1) SG 60/60 S (wt%) N (wt ppm) Di-aromatics (wt%) Triaromatics (wt%) PAH (wt%)
    325 6 0,8914 0,0038 505 4,6 5,0 9,6
    350 6 0,8911 0,0029 468 4,9 4,9 9,5
    As illustrated from the Table 3 there are a remarkable sulphur and nitrogen removal in this low temperature hydrotreatment, and further it is quite obvious that a large amount of the PAH can be removed at a relatively high LHSV during this low temperature posttreatment. Both the sulphur removal and the PAH removal is due to the shift in equilibrium.
    Example 3
    Product B from Example 1 is further hydrotreated at lower temperatures at different LHSV and temperatures. The pressure is 50 bar, which is identical to the pressure at which product B was obtained. A Ni-Mo on alumina catalyst is also used in this test. The results are shown in Table 4.
    Properties of products in Example 3:
    Temperature (°C) LHSV (h-1) SG 60/60 S (wt%) N (wt ppm) Di-aromatics (wt%) Triaromatics (wt%) PAH (wt%)
    300 2 0,9369 0,1500 2058 7,7 20,1 27,8
    300 4 0,9390 0,1588 2067 10,2 21,3 31,5
    300 6 0,9406 0,1618 2080 9,9 21,4 31,6
    350 2 0,9335 0,1049 1657 6,6 17,0 23,6
    350 4 0,9365 0,1317 1870 9,2 18,1 27,3
    350 6 0,9378 0,1442 1877 9,6 19,3 28,9
    Again it is clear that a large amount of the poly-aromatic compounds can be removed at low temperature (and the same pressure) due to the shift in equilibrium. Again there is a significant and important sulphur removal at this low-temperature hydrotreatment.

    Claims (8)

    1. A process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and polyaromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed stock having a boiling range between 200°C and 600°C, which process comprises the steps of
      (a) contacting the feed stock with hydrogen over a hydrotreating catalyst at conditions being effective in hydrotreating and obtaining an hydrotreated effluent with the hydrotreated feed stock, hydrogen sulphide and hydrogen,
      (b) cooling the effluent, and
      (c) contacting the effluent with a hydrotreating catalyst at conditions being effective in hydrogenation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons.
    2. A process of claim 1, wherein the temperature in step (c) is between 50°C and 150°C lower than outlet temperature from step (a).
    3. A process of claim 1, wherein LHSV in step (c) is between 2 and 20 times the LHSV in step (a).
    4. A process of claim 1, wherein step (c) is performed in a final catalyst bed of the hydrotreating step.
    5. A process of claim 1, wherein the feedstock is characterised by having a 50% boiling point between 300°C and 450°C.
    6. A process of claim 1, wherein the hydrotreating catalyst used in step (c) step is a composite of Group VI-B and/or Group VIII metal on a porous refractory inorganic oxide.
    7. A process of claim 6, wherein the metals are nickel and molybdenum or nickel and tungsten.
    8. A process of claim 6, wherein the porous refractory inorganic oxide is alumina or silica-alumina.
    EP01100726A 2000-01-25 2001-01-12 Process for reducting content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon feed Withdrawn EP1120454A3 (en)

    Applications Claiming Priority (2)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    DK200000118 2000-01-25
    DKPA200000118 2000-01-25

    Publications (2)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP1120454A2 true EP1120454A2 (en) 2001-08-01
    EP1120454A3 EP1120454A3 (en) 2002-01-30

    Family

    ID=8159003

    Family Applications (2)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP01100726A Withdrawn EP1120454A3 (en) 2000-01-25 2001-01-12 Process for reducting content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon feed
    EP01100722A Withdrawn EP1120453A3 (en) 2000-01-25 2001-01-12 Process for reduction of content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in distillate fuels

    Family Applications After (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP01100722A Withdrawn EP1120453A3 (en) 2000-01-25 2001-01-12 Process for reduction of content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in distillate fuels

    Country Status (8)

    Country Link
    US (3) US20010013484A1 (en)
    EP (2) EP1120454A3 (en)
    JP (2) JP2001207177A (en)
    CN (2) CN1224674C (en)
    CA (2) CA2332262A1 (en)
    NO (2) NO20010418L (en)
    RU (1) RU2250917C2 (en)
    ZA (2) ZA200100724B (en)

    Cited By (1)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    EP1925654A1 (en) * 2006-11-22 2008-05-28 Haldor Topsoe A/S Process for the catalytic hydrotreating of silicon containing hydrocarbon feedstock

    Families Citing this family (26)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US7776205B2 (en) * 2004-04-22 2010-08-17 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Process to upgrade hydrocarbonaceous feedstreams
    US7780845B2 (en) * 2004-04-22 2010-08-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Process to manufacture low sulfur distillates
    US8163171B2 (en) * 2005-01-14 2012-04-24 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Ultra pure fluids
    FR2917423B1 (en) * 2007-06-12 2012-11-30 Inst Francais Du Petrole TWO STEP HYDROPROCESSING OF A RENEWABLE SOURCE LOAD USING A FIRST METAL CATALYST AND A SECOND SULFIDE CATALYST
    CN101250435B (en) * 2008-03-31 2011-07-20 中国石油化工集团公司 Hydrocarbons hydrogenation conversion method
    RU2362797C1 (en) * 2008-05-22 2009-07-27 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Объединенный центр исследований и разработок" Method of producing sweetened diesel fuel with super low contents of sulphur
    KR101503069B1 (en) * 2008-10-17 2015-03-17 에스케이이노베이션 주식회사 Process for preparing high-valued aromatics and olefins from light cycle oil in a fluid bed catalytic cracking process
    EP2199371A1 (en) 2008-12-15 2010-06-23 Total Raffinage Marketing Process for aromatic hydrogenation and cetane value increase of middle distillate feedstocks
    IT1396948B1 (en) 2009-12-16 2012-12-20 Italghisa S P A ELECTRODIC PASTE FOR GRAPHITE ELECTRODES WITHOUT "BINDER" WITH HYDROCARBURIC BASIS
    JP5535845B2 (en) 2010-09-14 2014-07-02 Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 Process for producing aromatic hydrocarbons
    CN102757819B (en) * 2011-04-29 2015-02-25 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method of using catalytic cracking heavy oil to produce high-octane gasoline
    CN103827268B (en) 2011-07-29 2016-05-18 沙特阿拉伯石油公司 Selective midbarrel hydrotreating method
    EP2737030A1 (en) * 2011-07-29 2014-06-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Integrated selective hydrocracking and fluid catalytic cracking process
    US8911514B2 (en) * 2011-12-15 2014-12-16 Uop Llc Hydrotreating methods and hydrotreating systems
    US10273420B2 (en) 2014-10-27 2019-04-30 Uop Llc Process for hydrotreating a hydrocarbons stream
    WO2017200640A1 (en) * 2016-05-17 2017-11-23 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Jet and diesel selective hydrocracking
    CN106221785B (en) * 2016-09-30 2017-12-19 中国石油大学(华东) A kind of method using viscous crude primary metal porphyrin catalysis polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon hydrogenation
    US12281266B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2025-04-22 Magẽmã Technology LLC Heavy marine fuel oil composition
    US10655074B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-05-19 Mag{hacek over (e)}m{hacek over (a)} Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for reducing environmental contaminates in heavy marine fuel oil
    US12559689B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2026-02-24 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for treatment heavy marine fuel and resultant composition and the removal of detrimental solids
    US12025435B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2024-07-02 Magēmã Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil
    US10604709B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-03-31 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials
    US12071592B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2024-08-27 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device utilizing structured catalyst beds and reactive distillation for the production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil
    US11788017B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2023-10-17 Magëmã Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for reducing environmental contaminants in heavy marine fuel oil
    KR102382225B1 (en) * 2017-07-04 2022-04-08 미쯔비시 케미컬 주식회사 Method for producing aromatic hydrocarbons
    WO2025078612A1 (en) 2023-10-13 2025-04-17 Topsoe A/S Method for producing colorless hydrocarbon product with low carbon intensity

    Family Cites Families (29)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US2671754A (en) * 1951-07-21 1954-03-09 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrocarbon conversion process providing for the two-stage hydrogenation of sulfur containing oils
    DE938613C (en) * 1952-09-26 1956-02-02 Bayer Ag Process for the preparation of hydrocarbon mixtures suitable for sulfochlorination
    GB824635A (en) * 1958-07-08 1959-12-02 Exxon Research Engineering Co Process for improving kerosenes and diesel fuels
    GB940290A (en) * 1961-04-28 1963-10-30 Universal Oil Prod Co Process for the hydrorefining of aromatic hydrocarbon distillates
    FR1359910A (en) * 1963-03-22 1964-04-30 Charbonnages De France Cyclanic hydrocarbons and their production process
    NL144659B (en) * 1964-04-28 1975-01-15 Shell Int Research PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF A KEROSINE WITH AN INCREASED SOOT POINT.
    US4040944A (en) * 1968-04-11 1977-08-09 Union Oil Company Of California Manufacture of catalytic cracking charge stocks by hydrocracking
    US3491019A (en) * 1968-08-30 1970-01-20 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrotreating of light cycle oils
    DE2107549A1 (en) * 1970-02-19 1971-09-02 Texas Instruments Inc Carrier of an electronic circuit with a collecting system with heat conduction properties for all directions
    US3728249A (en) * 1971-02-05 1973-04-17 Exxon Research Engineering Co Selective hydrotreating of different hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks in temperature regulated hydrotreating zones
    FR2197967B1 (en) * 1972-09-01 1975-01-03 Inst Francais Du Petrole
    US3915841A (en) * 1974-04-12 1975-10-28 Gulf Research Development Co Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock
    FR2268860B1 (en) * 1974-04-24 1977-06-24 Inst Francais Du Petrole
    US4021330A (en) * 1975-09-08 1977-05-03 Continental Oil Company Hydrotreating a high sulfur, aromatic liquid hydrocarbon
    DE2935191A1 (en) * 1979-08-31 1981-04-02 Metallgesellschaft Ag, 6000 Frankfurt Obtaining diesel oil esp. from coal-processing prods. - by two=stage catalytic hydrogenation
    US5419830A (en) * 1985-07-26 1995-05-30 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for controlling hydrocracking and isomerization dewaxing
    US4801373A (en) * 1986-03-18 1989-01-31 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Process oil manufacturing process
    US4849093A (en) * 1987-02-02 1989-07-18 Union Oil Company Of California Catalytic aromatic saturation of hydrocarbons
    US4973396A (en) * 1989-07-10 1990-11-27 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Method of producing sweet feed in low pressure hydrotreaters
    CA2025466A1 (en) * 1989-09-28 1991-03-29 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Slurry hydroprocessing staged process
    US5114562A (en) * 1990-08-03 1992-05-19 Uop Two-stage hydrodesulfurization and hydrogenation process for distillate hydrocarbons
    US5183556A (en) * 1991-03-13 1993-02-02 Abb Lummus Crest Inc. Production of diesel fuel by hydrogenation of a diesel feed
    US5147526A (en) * 1991-10-01 1992-09-15 Amoco Corporation Distillate hydrogenation
    JP3424053B2 (en) * 1994-09-02 2003-07-07 新日本石油株式会社 Method for producing low sulfur low aromatic gas oil
    RU2079540C1 (en) * 1994-12-27 1997-05-20 Институт проблем нефтехимпереработки АН Республики Башкортостан Method of producing starting material for catalytic cracking
    US5925239A (en) * 1996-08-23 1999-07-20 Exxon Research And Engineering Co. Desulfurization and aromatic saturation of feedstreams containing refractory organosulfur heterocycles and aromatics
    FR2757532B1 (en) * 1996-12-20 1999-02-19 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR THE CONVERSION OF A GAS CUT TO PRODUCE FUEL WITH A HIGH INDEX OF CETANE, DESAROMATISED AND DESULPHURIZED
    DK29598A (en) * 1998-03-04 1999-09-05 Haldor Topsoe As Process for desulphurizing FCC heavy gasoline
    JP4036352B2 (en) * 1998-08-31 2008-01-23 新日本石油株式会社 Method for producing high cetane number low sulfur diesel diesel oil

    Cited By (3)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    EP1925654A1 (en) * 2006-11-22 2008-05-28 Haldor Topsoe A/S Process for the catalytic hydrotreating of silicon containing hydrocarbon feedstock
    US7713408B2 (en) * 2006-11-22 2010-05-11 Haldor Topsoe A/S Process for the catalytic hydrotreating of silicon containing hydrocarbon feed stock
    RU2459858C2 (en) * 2006-11-22 2012-08-27 Хальдор Топсеэ А/С Method for catalytic hydrofining of silicon-containing hydrocarbon material

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    NO20010418D0 (en) 2001-01-24
    US20020117425A1 (en) 2002-08-29
    EP1120454A3 (en) 2002-01-30
    NO20010419D0 (en) 2001-01-24
    EP1120453A3 (en) 2002-01-30
    US20050133411A1 (en) 2005-06-23
    RU2250917C2 (en) 2005-04-27
    NO20010419L (en) 2001-07-26
    ZA200100725B (en) 2001-11-06
    CA2332262A1 (en) 2001-07-25
    ZA200100724B (en) 2001-11-06
    CN1309163A (en) 2001-08-22
    NO20010418L (en) 2001-07-26
    US20010013484A1 (en) 2001-08-16
    CN1311289A (en) 2001-09-05
    CN1224674C (en) 2005-10-26
    JP2001207177A (en) 2001-07-31
    EP1120453A2 (en) 2001-08-01
    CA2332157A1 (en) 2001-07-25
    JP2001207178A (en) 2001-07-31

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    EP1120454A2 (en) Process for reducting content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon feed
    CA2414441C (en) Process for the production of high quality middle distillates from mild hydrocrackers and vacuum gas oil hydrotreaters in combination with external feeds in the middle distillate boiling range
    EP0944693B1 (en) Process for increased olefin yields from heavy feedstocks
    CA2403999C (en) Staged hydrotreating method for naphtha desulfurization
    EP0093552B1 (en) Hydrocracking process
    AU2003241412B2 (en) Multi-stage hydrodesulfurization of cracked naphtha streams with a stacked bed reactor
    EP1831334B1 (en) Selective hydrodesulfurization and mercaptan decomposition process with interstage separation
    AU2001249836A1 (en) Staged hydrotreating method for naphtha desulfurization
    US3308055A (en) Hydrocracking process producing lubricating oil
    AU3615600A (en) Improved catalyst activation method for selective cat naphtha hydrodesulfurization
    CN109694732A (en) The method for processing heavy diesel
    JPS61296089A (en) Hydrogen cracking method using zeolite beta
    CA2423946A1 (en) Hydrocracking process
    CN110408429B (en) Method for treating heavy oil by combined process
    JP4217336B2 (en) Fuel oil desulfurization method and fuel oil desulfurization system
    AU2001251658B2 (en) Production of low sulfur/low aromatics distillates
    CN110408428B (en) Method for treating residual oil by combined process
    CN110408430B (en) Method for treating heavy hydrocarbon by combined process
    Zamfirache et al. Environmentally friendly diesel fuels produced from middle distillates generated by conversion processes
    CN100523143C (en) Method for desulfurizing and reducing olefine for gasoline
    Absi-Halabi Research Institute for Petroleum Processing and Petrochemistry, B-dul Republicii nr. 291 A, 2000 Ploiesti, Romania
    JPH0241391A (en) Hydrotreating catalytic cracking method for feedstock oil

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A2

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

    AX Request for extension of the european patent

    Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

    PUAL Search report despatched

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A3

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

    AX Request for extension of the european patent

    Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 20020730

    AKX Designation fees paid

    Free format text: AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

    17Q First examination report despatched

    Effective date: 20020916

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

    18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

    Effective date: 20030128