BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a process for removal of
sulphur and polyaromatic compounds in vacuum gas oil by hydrotreatment
of FCC hydrocarbon feed stock.
Many countries are tightening specifications for the sulphur
content in diesel and gasoline fuels. The fluid catalytic
cracking (FCC) units are a major source of gasoline,
but also the major source of sulphur in gasoline and diesel
fuels. Lower sulphur content in fuel requests either treating
the FCC feed or treating its products.
Treating the FCC products involves multiple process solutions:
naphtha treating, light-cycle oil (LCO) treating and
flue gas treating to control the SOx emissions. Treating
feed to the FCC unit can increase yields and at the same
time lower sulphur levels in gasoline, and diesel fuels and
reduces SOx emissions. The increased conversion in the FCC
unit resulting from feed treatment may improve refinery
margins. Product treatment, however, offers no yield benefits.
It is, thus, a general object of the invention to improve
production of a FCC feed being substantially reduced in
content of sulphur and nitrogen compounds and in particular
having a low content of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and
thereby improved crackability and conversion and selectivity
in the FCC unit.
Description of Prior Art
Hydrotreatment of FCC feed substantially reduces sulphur
content of gasoline, light (LCO), and decant oil. It also
lowers the amount of sulphur in spent catalyst coke, which
results in the reduction of SOx emissions from the regenerator.
For most feedstocks moderate to high severity hydrotreating
can be used to achieve a high level of desulphurization
(>90%) and greatly reduce the sulphur content
of the FCC products. High severity desulphurization would
be needed to reduce coke sulphur to the near zero level.
It is well known that removal of nitrogen from FCC feed
yields the benefits of increasing conversion and product
yields. Nitrogen compounds poison the active sites in the
FCC catalyst and increase coke-making propensity of the
catalyst and reduce the yield of valuable products. Nitrogen
removal by hydrotreatment is much harder than sulphur
removal. Moderate to high severity is generally required to
achieve a high denitrogenation level (>70%).
Poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) do not crack in a FCC
unit, but instead undergo condensation reactions to form
coke. PAH are defined as fused multiring aromatic compounds
containing two or more aromatic rings. The concentration of
PAH can be measured by the analysis method IP 391. Hydrotreating
can saturate PAH and form naphthenes and paraffin
compounds, which are more easily cracked in the FCC.
This improves conversion and product yields. Mono-aromatics
another product of PAH hydrogenation resist cracking in a
FCC unit, but lose side chains and produce high-octane components
in the FCC gasoline.
Di-aromatic species distribute in all liquid products from
the FCC and also convert to coke on the FCC catalyst. Triaromatic
and tetra-aromatic species either convert to coke
on the catalyst or distribute in the light cycle oil or
heavier fraction from the FCC. Maximising FCC gasoline and
lighter valuable products requires an understanding of how
to maximise the conversion of multiple ring aromatic species
(di+) to single (mono) aromatic or saturated ring species
in the FCC feed hydrotreater.
The degree of aromatic saturation is highly dependent on
hydrogen partial pressure, catalyst type and the space velocity
of the hydrotreater. The kinetic and thermodynamic
responses of sulphur, nitrogen and other contaminant removal
are such that an increase in temperature results in
conversion of these contaminants. The kinetic responses for
these contaminants represent irreversible reactions.
Typical conditions for a FCC pre-treatment reactor are hydrogen
pressure of 40-120 bar; average reactor temperature
350-410°C; liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 0.5-2.5
m3oil/m3catalyst/h. The exact conditions will depend on the
type of the feedstock, the required degree of desulphurisation
and the desired run length. The reactor temperature on
fresh catalyst (start of run) is normally at the lower end
of the above range and as the catalyst deactivates the reactor
temperature is raised to compensate for loss of catalyst
activity.
The end of the run is normally reached when the design temperature
for the reactor is reached, which is decided by
the metallurgy of the reactor. The lower the start of run
temperature and the higher the end of run temperature the
longer the catalyst run length for a given rate of deactivation.
For a refiner, the run length is a very important
consideration. A shorter run length means high costs due to
a higher rate of catalyst replacement, and relative more
downtime (i.e. time off-stream) for catalyst change-out
with a resultant loss of revenue due to reduced production
of high quality FCC gasoline products.
Further restriction on run length may be imposed, if the
FCC unit operations need a reduction in poly-aromatic hydrocarbon
content in addition to the reduction in sulphur
and nitrogen. PAH compounds reacts readily at hydrotreating
conditions. Tetra-aromatic and tree-ring aromatic compounds
are hydrogenated to mono-aromatic compounds. The mono-aromatic
compounds react slowly at typical FCC pre-treatment
conditions to form naphthenes.
The reactions are reversible and at high reaction temperatures
and low hydrogen pressure the conversion of the PAH
compounds is thermodynamically limited by equilibrium. Consequently,
the conversion of PAH compounds in a FCC pre-treatment
unit producing low sulphur and nitrogen feed to
the FCC unit might at first increase as reaction temperature
is increased, and then decrease as temperature is increased
further owing to equilibrium constraints at the
high temperature.
The aromatic saturation will pass through a maximum as the
reaction temperature is increased. The maximum is identified
as the point, where the net rate of aromatic saturation
is zero due to the effects of the forward and reverse
reactions.
The temperature at which the PAH equilibrium is met will
depend on a number of factors including hydrogen pressure,
feed PAH content and composition and LHSV.
It is, thus, the general object of the invention to provide
a process for the production of a low sulphur and nitrogen
FCC feed with a low content of polyaromatic hydrocarbons
and thereby increase the FCC yields and in particular the
FCC gasoline production.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a process for reducing content of
sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon
feed stock having a boiling range between 200°C
and 600°C, which process comprises the steps of:
(a) contacting the feed stock with hydrogen over a
hydrotreating catalyst at conditions being effective in hydrotreating
and obtaining a hydrotreated effluent with the
hydrotreated feed stock, hydrogen sulphide and hydrogen; (b) cooling the effluent; and (c) contacting the effluent with a hydrotreating
catalyst at conditions being effective in hydrogenation of
polyaromatic hydrocarbons.
By the inventive process, a low PAH content is achieved in
FCC feeds with only slight additional investment in reactor
volume and without reduction in run length. The essences of
the inventive process consists of cooling the effluent exiting
the hydrotreating reactor and passing the cooled
product through a small posttreat reactor containing a
suitable catalyst. The PAH content of the product existing
in the hydrotreating reactor is reduced in the posttreatment
reactor owing to the more favourable equilibrium conditions
at the lower temperature. Consequently, the end of
run temperature in the main hydrotreating reactor is not
limited by the PAH content of the product exiting the main
reactor, and a small overall reactor volume (main hydrotreater
plus post treat reactor) is required for a given
run length. In another embodiment of the process, the final
bed of the main hydrotreating reactor is operated at lower
temperature instead of using a post treatment reactor. The
process can be used to lower the content of poly-aromatic
hydrocarbons and thereby improve the performance of the FCC
unit because of improved crackability of the FCC feed as
well as the FCC product qualities.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The petroleum vacuum distillates used in the present invention
boil in the range 400-650°C and have a PAH content in
the range 5-50 wt%. Examples of petroleum fractions include
straight run vacuum gas oils from a vacuum crude distillation
and vacuum fractions of the product from fluid catalytic
cracking and thermal cracking processes including
cooking and mixtures thereof. The process is particularly
suitable for blends of vacuum distillates containing thermal
cracked oils and FCC products because these oils generally
have a high PAH content.
The process layout is illustrated in Fig. 1. Feedstock is
mixed with hydrogen, heated in the furnace 1 and passed
through the hydrotreating reactor 2. The conditions used in
the hydrotreating reactor are the same as those normally
used for hydrotreatment of FCC feeds, i.e. typical hydrogen
pressure=40-120 bar; typical average reactor temperature
=340-410°C; typical LHSV=0.5-2.0 m3oil/m3catalyst/h and
typical hydrogen gas to oil ratio=100-1000Nm3/m3.
The effluent from the hydrotreater is cooled to a suitable
temperature by heat exchange with the feed to hydrotreater
3 or by other means before passing to post-treatment reactor
4. The temperature employed in the post-treatment reactor
will typically be in the range of 300°C to 375°C, and
will typically be at least 50°C lower than the outlet temperature
of the hydrotreater. The LHSV in the posttreatment
reactor will typically be in the range 2-20
m3oil/m3catalyst/h and the total pressure will be at the
same level as that in the hydrotreating reactor. The catalyst
used in the hydrotreating reactor may be any catalyst
used for hydrotreating petroleum fractions and known in the
art. The catalyst contains at least one metal on a porous
refractory inorganic oxide support. Examples of metals having
hydrotreating activity include metals from groups VI-B
and VIII e.g. Co, Mo, Ni, W, Fe with mixtures of Co-Mo, Ni-Mo
and Ni-W preferred.
The metals are employed as oxides or sulphides. Examples of
porous material suitable as support include alumina, silica-alumina,
alumina-titania, natural and synthetic molecular
sieves and mixtures hereof with the alumina and silica-alumina
being preferred.
The catalyst used in the posttreatment reactor may be any
catalyst used for hydrotreating vacuum distillate streams.
Preferred catalysts are Ni-Mo, Co-Mo and Ni-W on alumina.
The active metal on the catalyst may be either presulphided
or in-situ sulphide prior to use by conventional means. The
hydrotreating reactor section may consist of one or more
reactors. Each reactor may have one or more catalyst beds.
The function of the hydrotreating reactor is primarily to
reduce product sulphur, nitrogen, CCR and metals. Owing to
the exothermic nature of the desulphurisation reaction, the
outlet temperature is generally higher than the inlet temperature.
Some reduction of PAH may be achieved in the hydrotreating
reactor especially at start of run conditions.
As the catalyst activity declines due to the deactivation
by carbonaceous deposits, sintering of the active phase and
other mechanisms, the inlet temperature to the hydrotreating
reactor is raised, resulting in an increased outlet
temperature.
This will result at some point in an increase in the PAH
content in the effluent of the hydrotreater reactor due to
equilibrium limitations. The temperature at which this occurs
will depend on the amount and type of aromatic compounds
in the oil, and the hydrogen partial pressure in the
unit.
The function of the post-treatment reactor is primarily to
reduce the PAH content, but also to lower the sulphur and
nitrogen. The reduction in PAH will result in a reduction
in the product oil density and refractive index (RI) both
of which are desirable. Also reduction in the sulphur and
nitrogen content will be achieved at the conditions in the
post-treatment reactor. The present invention is illustrated
in the following examples of specific embodiments.
Example 1
Feedstock A (Table 1) was hydrotreated in a semi-adiabatic
pilot plant unit running with an outlet temperature of
405°C - a temperature, which normally is considered as end
of run temperature (EOR) conditions and LHSV at 1 (hr
-1).
The pressure was 50 bar. Pure hydrogen was used as gas.
Feedstock A is a mixture of 50% cooker gas oil and 50%
straight run vacuum gas oil (SR VGO). Feedstock B (Table 1)
was hydrotreated at typical FCC pretreatment conditions in
a pilot plant unit at temperature at 400°C (inlet) - 420°C
(outlet) temperature, which normally is considered as end
of run conditions at LHSV at 1.7 (h
-1). The pressure was 50
bar. The feedstock was a pure cracked VGO.
| Properties of feedstock used in the following Examples: |
| Properties | Feedstock A | Feedstock B |
| SG 60/60 | 0,9279 | 0,9924 |
| S (wt %) | 1,34 | 3,53 |
| N (wt ppm) | 2677 | 3594 |
| Aromatics (wt%) |
| Mono- | 17,7 | 8,36 |
| Di- | 9,9 | 7,29 |
| Tri- | 11,4 | 36,5 |
Product properties from both of the tests are shown in Table
2.
| Properties of products in Example 1: |
| Properties | Product A | Product B |
| SG 60/60 | 0,8920 | 0,9411 |
| S (wt %) | 0,02 | 0,1905 |
| N (wt ppm) | 526 | 2046 |
| Aromatics (wt%) |
| Mono- | 31,0 | 22,6 |
| Di- | 7,8 | 11,3 |
| Tri- | 6,7 | 23,9 |
| Distillation, D2887 (°C) |
| 5 | 236 | 287 |
| 10 | 267 | 314 |
| 30 | 342 | 360 |
| 50 | 392 | 392 |
| 70 | 437 | 428 |
| 90 | 495 | 479 |
| 95 | 518 | 503 |
Product A contains 14,5 wt% PAH, which would be typical for
a product obtained at EOR conditions in a unit where the
hydrogen partial inlet pressure is 50 bar, if the feedstock
contains more cracked feedstock or DAO (De-Asphalt Oil) the
contents will be higher.
Product B contains 35,2 wt% PAH, which is rather high, but
typical for cracked feedstocks.
Example 2
Product A from Example 1 is further hydrotreated at lower
temperatures at high LHSV. The pressure is 50 bar, which is
identical to the pressure at which product A was obtained.
A Ni-Mo on alumina catalyst is used in this test. The results
are shown in Table 3.
| Properties of products in Example 2: |
| Temperature (°C) | LHSV (h-1) | SG 60/60 | S (wt%) | N (wt ppm) | Di-aromatics (wt%) | Triaromatics (wt%) | PAH (wt%) |
| 325 | 6 | 0,8914 | 0,0038 | 505 | 4,6 | 5,0 | 9,6 |
| 350 | 6 | 0,8911 | 0,0029 | 468 | 4,9 | 4,9 | 9,5 |
As illustrated from the Table 3 there are a remarkable sulphur
and nitrogen removal in this low temperature hydrotreatment,
and further it is quite obvious that a large
amount of the PAH can be removed at a relatively high LHSV
during this low temperature posttreatment. Both the sulphur
removal and the PAH removal is due to the shift in equilibrium.
Example 3
Product B from Example 1 is further hydrotreated at lower
temperatures at different LHSV and temperatures. The pressure
is 50 bar, which is identical to the pressure at which
product B was obtained. A Ni-Mo on alumina catalyst is also
used in this test. The results are shown in Table 4.
| Properties of products in Example 3: |
| Temperature (°C) | LHSV (h-1) | SG 60/60 | S (wt%) | N (wt ppm) | Di-aromatics (wt%) | Triaromatics (wt%) | PAH (wt%) |
| 300 | 2 | 0,9369 | 0,1500 | 2058 | 7,7 | 20,1 | 27,8 |
| 300 | 4 | 0,9390 | 0,1588 | 2067 | 10,2 | 21,3 | 31,5 |
| 300 | 6 | 0,9406 | 0,1618 | 2080 | 9,9 | 21,4 | 31,6 |
| 350 | 2 | 0,9335 | 0,1049 | 1657 | 6,6 | 17,0 | 23,6 |
| 350 | 4 | 0,9365 | 0,1317 | 1870 | 9,2 | 18,1 | 27,3 |
| 350 | 6 | 0,9378 | 0,1442 | 1877 | 9,6 | 19,3 | 28,9 |
Again it is clear that a large amount of the poly-aromatic
compounds can be removed at low temperature (and the same
pressure) due to the shift in equilibrium. Again there is a
significant and important sulphur removal at this low-temperature
hydrotreatment.