EP1085481B1 - A remote control transmitter - Google Patents

A remote control transmitter Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1085481B1
EP1085481B1 EP00650129A EP00650129A EP1085481B1 EP 1085481 B1 EP1085481 B1 EP 1085481B1 EP 00650129 A EP00650129 A EP 00650129A EP 00650129 A EP00650129 A EP 00650129A EP 1085481 B1 EP1085481 B1 EP 1085481B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
code
transmitter
remote control
valid
control group
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP00650129A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1085481A3 (en
EP1085481A2 (en
Inventor
Donal Moriarty
Thomas O'connell
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
FAAC Electronics Ltd
Original Assignee
FAAC Electronics Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by FAAC Electronics Ltd filed Critical FAAC Electronics Ltd
Publication of EP1085481A2 publication Critical patent/EP1085481A2/en
Publication of EP1085481A3 publication Critical patent/EP1085481A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1085481B1 publication Critical patent/EP1085481B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C9/00Individual registration on entry or exit
    • G07C9/00174Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys
    • G07C9/00182Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with unidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08CTRANSMISSION SYSTEMS FOR MEASURED VALUES, CONTROL OR SIMILAR SIGNALS
    • G08C19/00Electric signal transmission systems
    • G08C19/16Electric signal transmission systems in which transmission is by pulses
    • G08C19/28Electric signal transmission systems in which transmission is by pulses using pulse code

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a transmitter for a remote control group for a shared function such as opening a garage door. It also relates to a receiver for such a group and to a group of a receiver and a plurality of transmitters.
  • US5661804 describes a trainable transceiver for learning and transmitting an activation signal that includes a rolling code.
  • the valid code is variable according to pre-set criteria.
  • the valid code comprises a hopping index.
  • the valid code comprises a combination of a fixed discrimination value known to the receiver and a hopping index.
  • the slave transmitter comprises means for generating the encryption key by processing a manufacturer-set key with a site code which is unique to the group.
  • the slave transmitter comprises means for receiving the site code in an encrypted teaching radiation signal and for decrypting said signal to determine the site code using a teaching decryption key.
  • the slave transmitter comprises means for storing a transmitter-specific serial number and for transmitting the serial number together with the encrypted code.
  • the master transmitter processor comprises:
  • the receiver processor comprises means for:
  • the receiver processor comprises means for determining if the serial number is valid by:
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a remote control group transmitter of the invention.
  • remote control group transmitter 1 comprises:
  • the memory capacity is adequate for four sets of data, as described above. This allows the transmitter 1 to be used for up to four different remote control groups. However, for clarity, operation for only one group is described below.
  • the microprocessor 2 is programmed to recognise a switch 7 depression as a transmit instruction. Simultaneous depression of two or more switches in various pre-set configurations are interpreted as user instructions for auxiliary functions such as a teach mode or randomisation of codes. Programming of the microprocessor 2 at manufacture determines whether the transmitter is a master or a slave. Slaves do not have a teach mode. The transmitter 1 is a slave.
  • the transmitter 1 is part of a remote control group also comprising a receiver and a master transmitter.
  • the latter is used for teaching both the receiver and the transmitters 1. It has the same hardware configuration as the transmitter 1, but is additionally programmed with a teach mode.
  • the remote control group is given a unique site code by the installer and the master transmitter teaches the site code to the receiver and to the transmitters 1. This effectively empowers the installer to set the manner in which the remote control group operates from a security viewpoint.
  • Each master transmitter is pre-programmed at manufacture with a unique (to it) site code. Therefore the installer may use the pre-programmed site code of a master transmitter as that of the group. Alternatively, he may change it by randomising the pre-set value.
  • Each new transmitter stores the following after manufacture:
  • the master transmitter teaches the site code to a (slave) transmitter 1 using a teaching encryption key.
  • the transmitter 1 decrypts it using a teaching decryption key.
  • the transmitter 1 uses the site code to generate the encryption key for use in sending signals to the receiver for control of the shared group function. After it is used to generate the encryption key, it is not necessarily stored as it is not required again.
  • the encryption key is 64 bits long.
  • the master transmitter also teaches a discrimination value to the transmitter 1. This is an agreed value that enables the receiver to determine that it has correctly decrypted the transmission. It could, for example, be part of the site code or the serial number or any other agreed number.
  • the encryption key could alternatively be generated by only the master transmitter and taught to the receiver and the transmitters 1. However this suffers from the disadvantage of involving transmission of the encryption key.
  • the microcontroller encrypts the initial hopping index and the discrimination value with the encryption key to provide a valid encrypted code.
  • the (unencrypted) serial number and the encrypted code are transmitted, and are received by the receiver.
  • the receiver decrypts the code using its stored decryption key to determine the discrimination value and the initial hopping index.
  • the receiver checks the (decrypted) discrimination value and, if valid, it stores the serial number and the initial hopping index.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Selective Calling Equipment (AREA)
  • Lock And Its Accessories (AREA)
  • Telephone Function (AREA)
  • Liquid Developers In Electrophotography (AREA)
  • Arrangements For Transmission Of Measured Signals (AREA)

Abstract

A remote control group transmitter (1) stores an encryption key uniquely associated with the remote control group. The transmitter decrypts an encrypted group-specific site code in a teaching radiation signal. The site code is then used to generate the encryption key for operation of a shared group function. The transmitter, in use, encrypts the discrimination value and the hopping index with the encryption key. The serial number is transmitted, but is not encrypted A receiver of the group decrypts the encrypted code to determine the discrimination value and hopping index. The receiver validates a new transmitter by receiving and decrypting two encrypted codes in quick succession and checking that the serial numbers are the same and the second hopping index is valid with reference to the first hopping index.

Description

  • The invention relates to a transmitter for a remote control group for a shared function such as opening a garage door. It also relates to a receiver for such a group and to a group of a receiver and a plurality of transmitters.
  • Our prior European Patent No. EP0651119B1 describes a transmitter having a capability of learning a code so that it can be used in a remote control group. An embedded instruction allows versatility as to how learning takes place. Also, there is automatic "listening" every time the transmit button is pressed.
  • Such features in a transmitter are very helpful for learning. However, there remains a need for improving security in the transmitter-receiver link. One approach to achieving improved security is to encrypt using an encryption key. However, this means that the installation engineer needs to access the receiver to program it to allow introduction of each new transmitter of the group. This is time-consuming and expensive.
  • It is therefore an object of the invention to provide:
    1. (a) improved security in the transmitter-receiver link, with
    2. (b) automatic introduction of a new transmitter to the receiver with out the need for installation engineer to be involved.
  • US5661804 describes a trainable transceiver for learning and transmitting an activation signal that includes a rolling code.
  • According to the invention, there is provided a remote control group as set out in claim 1.
  • In one embodiment, the valid code is variable according to pre-set criteria.
  • In one embodiment, the valid code comprises a hopping index.
  • In another embodiment, the valid code comprises a combination of a fixed discrimination value known to the receiver and a hopping index.
  • In one embodiment, the slave transmitter comprises means for generating the encryption key by processing a manufacturer-set key with a site code which is unique to the group.
  • In one embodiment, the slave transmitter comprises means for receiving the site code in an encrypted teaching radiation signal and for decrypting said signal to determine the site code using a teaching decryption key.
  • In one embodiment, the slave transmitter comprises means for storing a transmitter-specific serial number and for transmitting the serial number together with the encrypted code.
  • According to another aspect, the master transmitter processor comprises:
    • means for storing a site code which is unique to the remote control group,
    • means for encrypting the site code with a teaching encryption key for teaching; and
    • means for directing transmission of the encrypted site code in a teaching radiation signal.
  • In one embodiment, the receiver processor comprises means for:
    • identifying a transmitter serial number in a received transmission and determining if it is valid,
    • identifying a hopping index and a discrimination value in the decrypted code, and
    • determining if the discrimination value and the hopping index are valid.
  • In another embodiment, the receiver processor comprises means for determining if the serial number is valid by:
    • comparing the serial number with a stored list of valid serial numbers,
    • determining that the serial number is valid if it is the same as a stored valid serial number or if it subsequently receives a fresh encrypted code containing the same serial number and a valid hopping index.
  • The invention will be more clearly understood from the following description of some embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a remote control group transmitter of the invention.
  • Referring to Fig. 1, remote control group transmitter 1 comprises:
    • 2: a microprocessor,
    • 3: a memory having a capacity for four site (group) codes, four serial numbers, four hopping indexes, four encryption keys, and four discrimination values,
    • 4: a radiation receiver connected to the microprocessor 2,
    • 5: a transmitter antenna, connected to an oscillator circuit 6,
    • 7: four switches,
    • 8: a battery pack, and
    • 9: a regulator providing + Vreg for all of the circuit.
  • The memory capacity is adequate for four sets of data, as described above. This allows the transmitter 1 to be used for up to four different remote control groups. However, for clarity, operation for only one group is described below.
  • The microprocessor 2 is programmed to recognise a switch 7 depression as a transmit instruction. Simultaneous depression of two or more switches in various pre-set configurations are interpreted as user instructions for auxiliary functions such as a teach mode or randomisation of codes. Programming of the microprocessor 2 at manufacture determines whether the transmitter is a master or a slave. Slaves do not have a teach mode. The transmitter 1 is a slave.
  • The transmitter 1 is part of a remote control group also comprising a receiver and a master transmitter. The latter is used for teaching both the receiver and the transmitters 1. It has the same hardware configuration as the transmitter 1, but is additionally programmed with a teach mode.
  • The remote control group is given a unique site code by the installer and the master transmitter teaches the site code to the receiver and to the transmitters 1. This effectively empowers the installer to set the manner in which the remote control group operates from a security viewpoint. Each master transmitter is pre-programmed at manufacture with a unique (to it) site code. Therefore the installer may use the pre-programmed site code of a master transmitter as that of the group. Alternatively, he may change it by randomising the pre-set value.
  • Each new transmitter stores the following after manufacture:
    • a 24-bit serial number (pre-programmed at manufacture) which is unique to the new transmitter,
    • an initial 20-bit hopping index which will subsequently be incremented every time the new transmitter is used,
    • a manufacturer-set encryption key, and
    • a decryption key for decrypting a site code in a teaching session.
  • The master transmitter teaches the site code to a (slave) transmitter 1 using a teaching encryption key. The transmitter 1 decrypts it using a teaching decryption key. After decryption, the transmitter 1 uses the site code to generate the encryption key for use in sending signals to the receiver for control of the shared group function. After it is used to generate the encryption key, it is not necessarily stored as it is not required again. The encryption key is 64 bits long. The master transmitter also teaches a discrimination value to the transmitter 1. This is an agreed value that enables the receiver to determine that it has correctly decrypted the transmission. It could, for example, be part of the site code or the serial number or any other agreed number.
  • The encryption key could alternatively be generated by only the master transmitter and taught to the receiver and the transmitters 1. However this suffers from the disadvantage of involving transmission of the encryption key.
  • When the user is given the new transmitter, he or she can immediately use it without the need for an installation engineer to access the receiver. There are two stages to the introduction of the new transmitter to the receiver by the user as follows.
  • (a) Initial Acceptance
  • The user presses the "transmit" button. The microcontroller encrypts the initial hopping index and the discrimination value with the encryption key to provide a valid encrypted code. The (unencrypted) serial number and the encrypted code are transmitted, and are received by the receiver. The receiver decrypts the code using its stored decryption key to determine the discrimination value and the initial hopping index. The receiver then checks the (decrypted) discrimination value and, if valid, it stores the serial number and the initial hopping index.
  • (b) Acceptance and Activation
  • The user presses the "transmit" button again and the transmitter increments the hopping index and then encrypts the discrimination value and the incremented hopping index to provide a new encrypted code. Although there may only be a one-digit difference between this incremented hopping index and the initial hopping index, the encrypted code is very different due to the complex nature of the encryption. The receiver decrypts the new encrypted code to determine the discrimination value and the incremented hopping index, and reads the serial number. If the following criteria are met the receiver activates the shared group function (e.g. opens a gate) and stores the incremented hopping index:
    • the serial number is the same as the first one,
    • the decrypted incremented hopping index matches the hopping criterion (greater than the first one), and
    • the discrimination value is correct.
  • Thereafter, the user only needs to press the transmit button once to activate the shared group function. This two-stage acceptance process prevents a spuriously "acceptable" noise signal from being able to activate the group function.
  • It will be appreciated that there is no need for the installation engineer to program the receiver to introduce (validate) a new transmitter. However, this is not achieved at the expense of reduced security as there is comprehensive encryption. Thus, for example, an installer organisation may teach a new transmitter and send it to the user in the post, with considerable savings in time and money. Another aspect contributing to security is the fact that "breaking" of encryption in one group will have no effect on security at another group having the same or another manufacturer's equipment. This is because the encryption key is unique to each group. Also, unauthorised copying of the transmitted encrypted code is of no benefit to a thief as it changes from one transmission to the next in an unpredictable manner due to encryption of the combined discrimination value and incrementing hopping index. It is envisaged that where particularly strong security is required (such as at a bank) the user may safely store the (single) master transmitter thus preventing any unauthorised teaching of new transmitters.
  • The invention is not limited to the embodiments described but may be varied in construction and detail.

Claims (10)

  1. A remote control group for a site, the group comprising:
    at least one slave transmitter comprising a transmitting device, a user transmit button, a processor, a radiation receiver and a memory,
    a master transmitter for teaching the slave transmitter, the master transmitter comprising a memory, a processor, and a transmit device, and
    a receiver comprising a memory, an interface to a shared function, and a processor comprising means for controlling the shared function via said interface,
    wherein each slave transmitter processor comprises means for encrypting a valid code with an encryption key to generate an encrypted code, and directing transmission of the encrypted code, and
    wherein the receiver processor comprises means for decrypting a received encrypted code to generate a decrypted code, and for determining if the decrypted code is valid,
    characterised in that,
    the encryption key used by each slave transmitter processor to encrypt the valid code is uniquely associated with the remote control group, and each slave transmitter comprises means for learning the encryption key in response to a teaching radiation signal transmitted by the master transmitter;
    the master transmitter processor comprises means for teaching the encryption key to the slave transmitter and to the receiver; and
    the receiver processor comprises means for storing a decryption key uniquely associated with the remote control group, and using said decryption key to decrypt a received encrypted code.
  2. A remote control group as claimed in claim 1, wherein the valid code is variable according to pre-set criteria.
  3. A remote control group as claimed in claim 2, wherein the valid code comprises a hopping index.
  4. A remote control group as claimed in claim 2 or 3, wherein the valid code comprises a combination of a fixed discrimination value known to the receiver and a hopping index.
  5. A remote control group as claimed in claim 1, wherein the slave transmitter comprises means for generating the encryption key by processing a manufacturer-set key with a site code which is unique to the group.
  6. A remote control group as claimed in claim 5, wherein the slave transmitter comprises means for receiving the site code in an encrypted teaching radiation signal and for decrypting said signal to determine the site code using a teaching decryption key.
  7. A remote control group as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the slave transmitter comprises means for storing a transmitter-specific serial number and for transmitting the serial number together with the encrypted code.
  8. A remote control group as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the master transmitter processor comprises:
    means for storing a site code which is unique to the remote control group,
    means for encrypting the site code with a teaching encryption key for teaching; and
    means for directing transmission of the encrypted site code in a teaching radiation signal.
  9. A remote control group as claimed in any of claims 4 to 8, wherein the receiver processor comprises means for:
    identifying a transmitter serial number in a received transmission and determining if it is valid,
    identifying a hopping index and a discrimination value in the decrypted code, and
    determining if the discrimination value and the hopping index are valid.
  10. A remote control group as claimed in claim 9, wherein the receiver processor comprises means for determining if the serial number is valid by:
    comparing the serial number with a stored list of valid serial numbers,
    determining that the serial number is valid if it is the same as a stored valid serial number or if it subsequently receives a fresh encrypted code containing the same serial number and a valid hopping index.
EP00650129A 1999-09-13 2000-09-13 A remote control transmitter Expired - Lifetime EP1085481B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IE990766 1999-09-13
IE990766 1999-09-13

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1085481A2 EP1085481A2 (en) 2001-03-21
EP1085481A3 EP1085481A3 (en) 2008-05-28
EP1085481B1 true EP1085481B1 (en) 2012-02-08

Family

ID=11042121

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00650129A Expired - Lifetime EP1085481B1 (en) 1999-09-13 2000-09-13 A remote control transmitter

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1085481B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE545122T1 (en)
DK (1) DK1085481T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2382778T3 (en)
IE (2) IES20000729A2 (en)
PT (1) PT1085481E (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2837939B1 (en) 2002-03-26 2004-09-17 Somfy METHOD FOR REPROGRAMMING BIDIRECTIONAL OBJECTS
FR2842376B1 (en) * 2002-07-10 2004-09-24 Somfy SELECTIVE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OBJECTS
FR2843463B1 (en) * 2002-08-06 2005-03-11 Somfy METHOD FOR MATCHING BETWEEN AN ORDER TRANSMITTER AND AN ORDER RECEIVER PILOTING AN EQUIPMENT COMPRISING A MOBILE ELEMENT
FR2869134B1 (en) 2004-04-16 2008-10-03 Somfy Soc Par Actions Simplifiee METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING INFORMATION BETWEEN BIDIRECTIONAL OBJECTS

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0651119B1 (en) 1993-11-01 1996-11-06 Phisilog Research Limited A transmitter for a remote control group
US5767784A (en) * 1994-06-10 1998-06-16 Delco Electronics Corporation Initialization method for keyless entry system
AU710682B2 (en) * 1995-05-17 1999-09-30 Chamberlain Group, Inc., The Rolling code security system
US5661804A (en) * 1995-06-27 1997-08-26 Prince Corporation Trainable transceiver capable of learning variable codes
TW302588B (en) * 1996-03-05 1997-04-11 Microchip Tech Inc Method and apparatus for electronic encoding and decoding

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE545122T1 (en) 2012-02-15
EP1085481A3 (en) 2008-05-28
IES20000729A2 (en) 2001-04-04
IE20000728A1 (en) 2001-04-04
EP1085481A2 (en) 2001-03-21
ES2382778T3 (en) 2012-06-13
PT1085481E (en) 2012-04-13
DK1085481T3 (en) 2012-05-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9512659B2 (en) Code hopping based system with increased security
US6829357B1 (en) Communication system having a transmitter and a receiver that engage in reduced size encrypted data communication
US6026165A (en) Secure communications in a wireless system
US6067028A (en) Identification signal registering method and identification signal registering apparatus
US5146498A (en) Remote key manipulations for over-the-air re-keying
EP0923663B1 (en) Garage door opening system
US5940002A (en) Security system with random number remote communication
US20090136035A1 (en) Public key infrastructure-based bluetooth smart-key system and operating method thereof
CA3236659A1 (en) Security system for a moveable barrier operator
AP2000002000A0 (en) Mechanism for matching a receiver with a security module.
JPH08171404A (en) Safety remote control device
EP1085481B1 (en) A remote control transmitter
EP0970287B9 (en) Automatic resynchronization for remote keyless entry systems
EP2756486B1 (en) Code hopping based system with increased security
US10681539B2 (en) Multi-band channel encrypting switch control device and control method
EP0807732B1 (en) Checking of identification signals
JPH07226979A (en) Remote controller
KR100414713B1 (en) Multi Used Electronic Key And Apparatus For Control Using It And Method For Control It
JPH1030367A (en) Identification signal checking device and identification signal checking method
KR200289401Y1 (en) Electronic key system using interactive authentication
JPH1088879A (en) Identification signal reference device and identification signal reference method
JPH08114050A (en) Remote control device
KR20030046276A (en) Electronic Key For An Authentication And Apparatus For Control Using It And Method For Opening And Closing A Door Using It
KR20030052645A (en) Method for Eliminating Cryptograph Key in Security Device
JPH09137650A (en) Wireless lock system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G07C 9/00 20060101ALI20080424BHEP

Ipc: G08C 19/28 20060101AFI20001220BHEP

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080630

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20080728

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: FAAC ELECTRONICS LIMITED

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 545122

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120215

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: ISLER & PEDRAZZINI AG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 60046910

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120405

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20120404

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2382778

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20120613

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20120400791

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20120518

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120208

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20121109

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 60046910

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20121109

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 17

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20190730

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20190925

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20190726

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190910

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20190729

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20190917

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20190729

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20190801

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20190917

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20190801

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20190730

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20190729

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20190828

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20190812

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20190726

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20191001

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 60046910

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EUP

Expiry date: 20200913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MK

Effective date: 20200912

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20200912

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FI

Ref legal event code: MAE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MK

Effective date: 20200913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MK9A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20200912

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20200923

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK07

Ref document number: 545122

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20200913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20220126

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20200914