EP1064846A1 - Bacteriocide compositions for agricultural and horticultural use - Google Patents

Bacteriocide compositions for agricultural and horticultural use Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1064846A1
EP1064846A1 EP99951182A EP99951182A EP1064846A1 EP 1064846 A1 EP1064846 A1 EP 1064846A1 EP 99951182 A EP99951182 A EP 99951182A EP 99951182 A EP99951182 A EP 99951182A EP 1064846 A1 EP1064846 A1 EP 1064846A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
ppm
parts
gray mold
agricultural
formula
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP99951182A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1064846A4 (en
EP1064846B1 (en
Inventor
Ichirou Urihara
Hiroyuki Tsuboi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bayer CropScience AG
Original Assignee
Bayer AG
Nihon Bayer Agrochem KK
Dainippon Ink and Chemicals Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bayer AG, Nihon Bayer Agrochem KK, Dainippon Ink and Chemicals Co Ltd filed Critical Bayer AG
Publication of EP1064846A1 publication Critical patent/EP1064846A1/en
Publication of EP1064846A4 publication Critical patent/EP1064846A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1064846B1 publication Critical patent/EP1064846B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01NPRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N47/00Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom not being member of a ring and having no bond to a carbon or hydrogen atom, e.g. derivatives of carbonic acid
    • A01N47/40Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom not being member of a ring and having no bond to a carbon or hydrogen atom, e.g. derivatives of carbonic acid the carbon atom having a double or triple bond to nitrogen, e.g. cyanates, cyanamides
    • A01N47/42Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom not being member of a ring and having no bond to a carbon or hydrogen atom, e.g. derivatives of carbonic acid the carbon atom having a double or triple bond to nitrogen, e.g. cyanates, cyanamides containing —N=CX2 groups, e.g. isothiourea
    • A01N47/44Guanidine; Derivatives thereof

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to novel agricultural and horticultural compositions having fungicidal properties.
  • the compositions contain the known iminoctadine and acid addition salts thereof on the one hand and the known N-(2,3-dichloro-4-hydroxy-phenyl)-1-methyl-cyclohexane carboxamide on the other hand.
  • the present invention provides new compositions, which are excellently suitable for the control of phytopathogenic fungi, such as not only gray mold, but also fungal strains which are resistant to the above-mentioned agents. Furthermore, the compositions according to the invention are effective against a broad range of plant diseases even if the infection is severe.
  • compositions containing iminoctadine or acid addition salts thereof and N-(2,3-dichloro-4-hydroxy-phenyl)-1-methyl-cyclohexane carboxamide are very effective against fungi causing disease in plants, including not only gray mold, but also strains, which are resistant to the above-mentioned agents. It has also been found that the compositions according to the invention exert an excellent control effect even if the infection is severe.
  • the fungicidal effect of the active compound combinations according to the invention is substantially greater than the sum of the effects of the individual active compounds. It is, therefore, a matter of an unforeseeable, genuine synergistic effect and not simply of an addition to the effect.
  • the 1,1'-iminiodi(octamethylene)diguanidine is characterized by the formula (I) and is known under the common name iminoctadine.
  • Acid addition salts of iminoctadine include carboxylates, sulfonates, hydrochloride, carbonate, lauryl sulfate, sulfate, phosphate and the like.
  • carboxylates include acetate, oxalate, laurylate, oleate, citrate and the like.
  • sulfonates include alkyl sulfonate, alkyl benzene sulfonate, and the like.
  • alkyl sulfonates include lauryl sulfonate, dodecyl sulfonate and the like.
  • alkyl benzene sulfonates examples include dodecyl benzene sulfonate, p-toluene sulfonate and the like.
  • Preferred acid addition salts are carboxylates and sulfonates, such as alkyl benzene sulfonates.
  • Particularly preferred are alkyl benzene sulfonates having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, specifically 10 to 13 carbon atoms, in the alkyl group.
  • the 1,1'-iminiodi(octamethylene)diguanidinium tris(alkyl-benzenesulfonate) [iminoctadine-tris(albesilate)] may be mentioned as an example of an acid addition salt of iminoctadine.
  • This compound can be represented by the following formula
  • N-(2,3-dichloro-4-hydroxy-phenyl)-1-methyl-cyclohexane carboxamide of the formula (II) is also a known compound (see JP-A Hei 2-11551 and EP-A 0339418).
  • the synergistic effect is particularly clear when the active compounds are present in the compositions according to the invention in particular weight ratios.
  • the weight ratios of the active compounds can be varied within a relatively wide range. In general, from 0.5 to 10 parts by weight, preferably from 1 to 5 parts by weight, of the compound of the formula (II) are allotted to 1 part by weight of a compound of group (A).
  • the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions according to the invention possess very good fungicidal properties and can be used for the control of phytopathogenic fungi in agriculture and horticulture. They are suitable for the control of fungi, which are resistant to some other chemical compounds, and against fungi causing plant diseases, such as late blight, gray mold, leaf mold, leaf spot, anthracnose, and early blight in tomatoes; downy mildew, powdery mildew, gray mold anthracnose, gummy stem blight, phytophthora rot, scab, and Corynespora leaf spot in cucumbers; stem blight, leaf spot and gray mold in asparagus; anthracnose and gray mold in strawberries; powdery mildew, anthracnose, and gummy stem blight in pumpkins; Sclerotinia rot in cabbages; anthracnose in garland chrysanthemums; powdery mildew, Sclerotinia rot, anthracnose and
  • the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions according to the invention are suitable for the control of fungi, which are resistant to some other chemical compounds, and against fungi causing plant diseases, such as gray mold in tomatoes, cucumbers, eggplants, and strawberries, or gray mold in fruits such as grapes, peaches, and citrus fruits.
  • the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions can be used during the growing period of crops such as asparagus, strawberries, pumpkins, cabbages, cucumbers, garland chrysanthemums, watermelons, onions, tomatoes, eggplants, green onion, Chinese cabbages, peppers, spinach, Oriental melons, melons, lettuces, Japanese apricots, Japanese persimmons, citrus fruits, Japanese pears, grapes peaches, apples, Azuki beans, kidney beans, broad beans, soybeans, tobacco, sugar beets, tea, and flowers (i.e., roses, chrysanthemums, carnations, cyclamen, gentian, etc.).
  • crops such as asparagus, strawberries, pumpkins, cabbages, cucumbers, garland chrysanthemums, watermelons, onions, tomatoes, eggplants, green onion, Chinese cabbages, peppers, spinach, Oriental melons, melons, lettuces, Japanese apricots, Japanese persimmons, citrus fruits, Japanese pears, grape
  • the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions according to the invention can be used as such or in the form of customary formulations, such as wettable powders, suspension concentrates, dustable powders, emulsifiable concentrates, oil miscible liquids, tablets, granules, aerosols and the like.
  • the formulations can be prepared by customary methods, for instance by mixing the active compounds with other components, such as extenders, surfactant agents, other additives, or suitable carriers, including water.
  • the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions according to the invention are preferably used in the form of wettable powders or suspension concentrates.
  • extenders examples include kaolins, clays, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, montmorrillonite, diatomaceous earth, calcium carbonate, hydrated lime, quartz sand, ammonium sulfate, carbamide, vermiculite, wood chips, starch, clay, talc, bentonite, white carbon, etc., in the case of solid carriers, arid alcohols, kerosene, naphtha, aromatic compounds (xylene, toluene, phenol, etc.), alkyl naphthalene, cyclohexane, benzene, acetone, N-methyl pyrrolidone and the like in the case of liquid carriers.
  • surfactant agents include polyoxysorbitan monooleate, ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymers, lignin sulfonate, sorbitan ester, soaps, alkyl benzene sulfonate, fatty acid amine salts, quaternary ammonium salts, alkyl pyridinium salts, alkyl aminoethyl glucine, alkyl dimethyl betaine, polyglycol sulfate ester, alkyl amino sulfonate, isopropyl phosphate, carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, xanthane gum, diaryl alkyl disulfonate, alcohol sulfate, alkyl aryl sulfonate, polyoxyethylene alkyl aryl ether, polyoxyethylene glycol ether, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monoalkylate, and the like.
  • additives include adjuvants like carboxymethyl cellulose, ethylene glycol and propylene glycol, as well as additives typically used during formulation.
  • the formulations generally contain between 30 and 90 per cent by weight of the active compounds, preferably between 50 and 80 per cent by weight.
  • the active compounds can be present in the formulations in admixture with other known active compounds, such as fungicides, insecticides, acaricides, nematicides, fertilizers and plant-growth regulators.
  • the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal composition according to the invention are preferably used in the form of dispersions, which can be obtained by diluting the formulations with water. It is also possible to add other fungicides or pesticides to the formulations and then to disperse them.
  • concentration of the active compounds in the dispersions can be varied according to the period of use, method, site, form of the agent, targeted disease and targeted crop.
  • the range for the acid addition salt of the iminoctadine is between 25 and 24,000 ppm, preferably between 60 and 200 ppm (when using iminoctadine, between 7.8 and 7,500 ppm, preferably between 19 and 63 ppm), while the range for fenhexamid is between 100 and 40,000 ppm, preferably between 150 and 300 ppm.
  • the concentration of the active compounds in the dispersions is such that the range for the acetic acid salt of the iminoctadine is between 25 ppm and 24,000 ppm, preferably between 200 ppm and 1,000 ppm (when using iminoctadine, between 7.8 ppm and 7,500 ppm, preferably between 62 ppm and 313 ppm), while the range for the fenhexamid is between 100 ppm and 40,000 ppm, preferably between 250 ppm and 1,500 ppm.
  • the dispersing amount will vary depending on the period of use, method, site, form of the agent, target disease, target crop, etc.
  • the amount of the agent in the concentration of the effective component that is dispersed is preferably between 150 and 300 L per 10 are, while when spraying over fruits such as grapes and peaches, the amount of agent in the concentration of the effective component that is dispersed is preferably between 200 and 700 L per 10 are.
  • the above-mentioned components are placed in a ribbon mixer, mixed well, and were pulverized sufficiently in an atomizer to obtain a wettable powder.
  • iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 120 parts fenhexamid 200 parts clay 470 parts lignin sodium sulfonate 20 parts polyoxyethylene alkyl phenyl ether 50 parts polyvinyl alcohol 20 parts white carbon 120 parts 1000 parts
  • the above-mentioned components are placed in a ribbon mixer, mixed well, and were pulverized sufficiently in an atomizer to obtain a wettable powder.
  • the above-mentioned components are placed in a ribbon mixer, mixed well, and were pulverized sufficiently in an atomizer to obtain a wettable powder.
  • iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 200 parts fenhexamid 100 parts clay 310 parts lignin sodium sulfonate 20 parts polyoxyethylene alkyl phenyl ether 50 parts polyvinyl alcohol 20 parts white carbon 300 parts 1000 parts
  • the above-mentioned components are placed in a ribbon mixer, mixed well and were pulverized sufficiently in an atomizer to obtain a wettable powder.
  • A) was mixed well in a homogenizer and dispersed, while B) was wet-ground in a bead mill. A) and B) were then thoroughly mixed together to form a suspension concentrate.
  • Comparative agent 1 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) wettable powder
  • Comparative agent 2 (fenhexamid wettable powder)
  • Fenhexamid wettable powder (effective component 50% by weight) manufactured by Japan Bayer Agrochem.
  • IPRODIONE 3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-N-isopropyl 2,4-dioximidazolidine-1-carboxamide (hereinafter referred to as IPRODIONE) wettable powder (effective component 50% by weight) manufactured by Nissan Chemical Industry Co.
  • MEPANIPYRIM N-(4-methyl-6-prop-1-ynylpyrimidin-2-yl)aniline
  • Control value (disease occurence rate when untreated - disease occurence rate with single or combined agent) x 100 disease occurence rate when untreated
  • control value's expected value (m + n) - mn 100
  • n and n in the above equation indicate the control values for iminoctadine tris(albesilate) and fenhexamid respectively.
  • control value's expected values are shown inside parenthesis under the control value column in Table 1 Determination of the synergistic effect was made based on the following standards.
  • the control value for gray mold in cucumbers for wettable powder 1 was superior to comparative agent 1 and 2 which were used separately, and was also better than conventional comparative agent 4.
  • the control value for gray mold in cucumbers for wettable powder 1 was higher than the control value's expected value obtained from the control values of comparative agents 1 and 2, thus confirming the synergistic effect of the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal composition according to the invention.
  • control values for gray mold in tomatoes for wettable powder 2 and suspension concentrate 1 were superior to that of comparative agents 1 and 2 which were used separately, and was also better than conventional comparative agent.
  • the control value for gray mold in tomatoes for wettable powder 2 and suspension concentrate 1 was higher than the control value's expected value obtained from the control values of comparative agents 1 and 2, thus confirming the synergistic effect of the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal composition according to the invention.
  • the effect of the comparative agent was not very high when the infection was severe.
  • the control value of wettable powders 1, 3, and 4 on gray mold in eggplants was superior to that of comparative agents 1-3.
  • the control value of wettable powders 1, 3 and 4 on gray mold in eggplants was higher than the control value's expected value obtained from the control values of comparative agents 1 and 2, thus confirming the synergistic effect of the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions according to the invention.
  • agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions containing iminoctadine or acid addition salts thereof and fenhexamid are very effective in controlling phytopathogenic fungi, such as gray mold and fungal strains which are resistant to chemical compounds.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)

Abstract

The novel agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions containing as active ingredients a combination of
  • A) 1, 1'-iminiodi(octamethylene)diguanidine of the formula
    Figure 80000001
  • or an acid addition salt thereof and
  • B) 1,1'-iminiodi(octamethylene)diguanidine of the formula
    Figure 80000002
    are outstandingly active as fungicides.
  • Description

      TECHNICAL FIELD
    • The present invention relates to novel agricultural and horticultural compositions having fungicidal properties. The compositions contain the known iminoctadine and acid addition salts thereof on the one hand and the known N-(2,3-dichloro-4-hydroxy-phenyl)-1-methyl-cyclohexane carboxamide on the other hand.
    • BACKGROUND ART
    • It has already been known that iminoctadine and acid addition salts thereof are effective against a broad range of diseases that occur in important crop plants (see JP-A Sho 62-209003). Further, it has been described already that N-(2,3-dichloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)-1-methyl-cyclohexane carboxamide has a good fungicidal activity and is effective against gray mold in grapes and citrus fruits as well as against brown rot in peaches (see JP-A Hei 2-11551). However, the activity of these compounds is not always fully satisfactory for the control of severe infections with gray mold. Moreover, the control of gray mold fungus has become an even more serious problem due to the emergence of strains which are resistant to benzimidazoles, dicarboximides and diethofencarb
    • DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
    • The present invention provides new compositions, which are excellently suitable for the control of phytopathogenic fungi, such as not only gray mold, but also fungal strains which are resistant to the above-mentioned agents. Furthermore, the compositions according to the invention are effective against a broad range of plant diseases even if the infection is severe.
    • The present invention has been completed after intensive research to resolve the above-mentioned problems. It has been found that compositions containing iminoctadine or acid addition salts thereof and N-(2,3-dichloro-4-hydroxy-phenyl)-1-methyl-cyclohexane carboxamide are very effective against fungi causing disease in plants, including not only gray mold, but also strains, which are resistant to the above-mentioned agents. It has also been found that the compositions according to the invention exert an excellent control effect even if the infection is severe.
    • It has been found now that the novel agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions containing as active ingredients a combination of
    • A) 1,1 '-iminiodi(octamethylene)diguanidine of the formula
      Figure 00030001
    • or an acid addition salt thereof and
    • B) N-(2,3-dichloro-4-hydroxy-phenyl)-1-methyl-cyclohexanecarboxamide of the formula
      Figure 00030002
      exhibit a very good fungicidal activity.
    • Surprisingly, the fungicidal effect of the active compound combinations according to the invention is substantially greater than the sum of the effects of the individual active compounds. It is, therefore, a matter of an unforeseeable, genuine synergistic effect and not simply of an addition to the effect.
    • BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
    • The 1,1'-iminiodi(octamethylene)diguanidine is characterized by the formula (I) and is known under the common name iminoctadine.
    • Acid addition salts of iminoctadine include carboxylates, sulfonates, hydrochloride, carbonate, lauryl sulfate, sulfate, phosphate and the like. Examples of carboxylates include acetate, oxalate, laurylate, oleate, citrate and the like. Examples of sulfonates include alkyl sulfonate, alkyl benzene sulfonate, and the like. Examples of alkyl sulfonates include lauryl sulfonate, dodecyl sulfonate and the like.
    • Examples of alkyl benzene sulfonates include dodecyl benzene sulfonate, p-toluene sulfonate and the like. Preferred acid addition salts are carboxylates and sulfonates, such as alkyl benzene sulfonates. Particularly preferred are alkyl benzene sulfonates having 1 to 18 carbon atoms, specifically 10 to 13 carbon atoms, in the alkyl group.
    • The 1,1'-iminiodi(octamethylene)diguanidinium tris(alkyl-benzenesulfonate) [iminoctadine-tris(albesilate)] may be mentioned as an example of an acid addition salt of iminoctadine. This compound can be represented by the following formula
      Figure 00050001
    • The iminoctadine of the formula (I) and acid addition salts thereof are known (see JP-A Sho 62-209003 and "The Pesticide Manual", 11th Edition 1997, pages 709-712).
    • The N-(2,3-dichloro-4-hydroxy-phenyl)-1-methyl-cyclohexane carboxamide of the formula (II) is also a known compound (see JP-A Hei 2-11551 and EP-A 0339418).
    • The synergistic effect is particularly clear when the active compounds are present in the compositions according to the invention in particular weight ratios. However, the weight ratios of the active compounds can be varied within a relatively wide range. In general, from 0.5 to 10 parts by weight, preferably from 1 to 5 parts by weight, of the compound of the formula (II) are allotted to 1 part by weight of a compound of group (A).
    • The agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions according to the invention possess very good fungicidal properties and can be used for the control of phytopathogenic fungi in agriculture and horticulture. They are suitable for the control of fungi, which are resistant to some other chemical compounds, and against fungi causing plant diseases, such as late blight, gray mold, leaf mold, leaf spot, anthracnose, and early blight in tomatoes; downy mildew, powdery mildew, gray mold anthracnose, gummy stem blight, phytophthora rot, scab, and Corynespora leaf spot in cucumbers; stem blight, leaf spot and gray mold in asparagus; anthracnose and gray mold in strawberries; powdery mildew, anthracnose, and gummy stem blight in pumpkins; Sclerotinia rot in cabbages; anthracnose in garland chrysanthemums; powdery mildew, Sclerotinia rot, anthracnose and gummy stem blight in watermelons; alternaria leaf spot, gray mold, and gray mold neck rot in onions; powdery mildew, gray mold and black rot in eggplants; alternaria leaf spot in welsh onions; leaf spot and alternaria leaf spot in Chinese cabbages; Sclerotinia rot and gray mold in peppers; powdery mildew, anthracnose, and gummy stem blight in melons; gray mold in lettuce; scab and gray mold in Japanese apricots; powdery mildew, anthracnose, gray mold and leaf spot in Japanese persimmons; gray mold and scab in citrus fruits; scab, black spot and physalospora canker in Japanese pears; gray mold, ripe rot, leaf spot, anthracnose, gummy stem blight, black rot, and swelling arm in grapes; scab, brown rot, Phomopsis rot, and anthracnose in peaches; scab, alternaria leaf spot/ring rot, blotch, sooty blotch, fly speck, fruit spot, and blossom blight in apples; stalk blight anthracnose, gray mold and Sclerotinia rot in Azuki beans; anthracnose, gray mold, and Sclerotinia rot in kidney beans; ring spot in broad beans; purple speck in soybeans; powdery mildew in tobacco; Romalaria leaf spot and cercospora leaf spot in sugar beets; anthracnose, gray blight, shoot blight and gray mold in tea; and black spot, anthracnose, gray mold, and powdery mildew in flowers. In particular, the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions according to the invention are suitable for the control of fungi, which are resistant to some other chemical compounds, and against fungi causing plant diseases, such as gray mold in tomatoes, cucumbers, eggplants, and strawberries, or gray mold in fruits such as grapes, peaches, and citrus fruits.
    • The agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions can be used during the growing period of crops such as asparagus, strawberries, pumpkins, cabbages, cucumbers, garland chrysanthemums, watermelons, onions, tomatoes, eggplants, green onion, Chinese cabbages, peppers, spinach, Oriental melons, melons, lettuces, Japanese apricots, Japanese persimmons, citrus fruits, Japanese pears, grapes peaches, apples, Azuki beans, kidney beans, broad beans, soybeans, tobacco, sugar beets, tea, and flowers (i.e., roses, chrysanthemums, carnations, cyclamen, gentian, etc.). For grapes in particular, the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal composition can be preferably used between the stage prior to flowering and the young fruit stage in their growing period.
    • The agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions according to the invention can be used as such or in the form of customary formulations, such as wettable powders, suspension concentrates, dustable powders, emulsifiable concentrates, oil miscible liquids, tablets, granules, aerosols and the like. The formulations can be prepared by customary methods, for instance by mixing the active compounds with other components, such as extenders, surfactant agents, other additives, or suitable carriers, including water. The agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions according to the invention are preferably used in the form of wettable powders or suspension concentrates.
    • Examples of extenders include kaolins, clays, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, montmorrillonite, diatomaceous earth, calcium carbonate, hydrated lime, quartz sand, ammonium sulfate, carbamide, vermiculite, wood chips, starch, clay, talc, bentonite, white carbon, etc., in the case of solid carriers, arid alcohols, kerosene, naphtha, aromatic compounds (xylene, toluene, phenol, etc.), alkyl naphthalene, cyclohexane, benzene, acetone, N-methyl pyrrolidone and the like in the case of liquid carriers.
    • Examples of surfactant agents include polyoxysorbitan monooleate, ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymers, lignin sulfonate, sorbitan ester, soaps, alkyl benzene sulfonate, fatty acid amine salts, quaternary ammonium salts, alkyl pyridinium salts, alkyl aminoethyl glucine, alkyl dimethyl betaine, polyglycol sulfate ester, alkyl amino sulfonate, isopropyl phosphate, carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, xanthane gum, diaryl alkyl disulfonate, alcohol sulfate, alkyl aryl sulfonate, polyoxyethylene alkyl aryl ether, polyoxyethylene glycol ether, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monoalkylate, and the like.
    • Other additives include adjuvants like carboxymethyl cellulose, ethylene glycol and propylene glycol, as well as additives typically used during formulation.
    • The formulations generally contain between 30 and 90 per cent by weight of the active compounds, preferably between 50 and 80 per cent by weight. The active compounds can be present in the formulations in admixture with other known active compounds, such as fungicides, insecticides, acaricides, nematicides, fertilizers and plant-growth regulators.
    • The agricultural and horticultural fungicidal composition according to the invention are preferably used in the form of dispersions, which can be obtained by diluting the formulations with water. It is also possible to add other fungicides or pesticides to the formulations and then to disperse them. The concentration of the active compounds in the dispersions can be varied according to the period of use, method, site, form of the agent, targeted disease and targeted crop. However, the range for the acid addition salt of the iminoctadine is between 25 and 24,000 ppm, preferably between 60 and 200 ppm (when using iminoctadine, between 7.8 and 7,500 ppm, preferably between 19 and 63 ppm), while the range for fenhexamid is between 100 and 40,000 ppm, preferably between 150 and 300 ppm. In particular, in the case where the composition is used for fruits such as grapes and peaches, the concentration of the active compounds in the dispersions is such that the range for the acetic acid salt of the iminoctadine is between 25 ppm and 24,000 ppm, preferably between 200 ppm and 1,000 ppm (when using iminoctadine, between 7.8 ppm and 7,500 ppm, preferably between 62 ppm and 313 ppm), while the range for the fenhexamid is between 100 ppm and 40,000 ppm, preferably between 250 ppm and 1,500 ppm.
    • The dispersing amount will vary depending on the period of use, method, site, form of the agent, target disease, target crop, etc. For example, when spraying over vegetables such as tomatoes and cucumbers, the amount of the agent in the concentration of the effective component that is dispersed is preferably between 150 and 300 L per 10 are, while when spraying over fruits such as grapes and peaches, the amount of agent in the concentration of the effective component that is dispersed is preferably between 200 and 700 L per 10 are.
    • Examples
    • The present invention is illustrated by the following examples and use examples without being limited thereto. The term "part", as used below, means "parts by weight".
    • Example 1 (Wettable powder 1)
    • iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 200 parts
      fenhexamid 300 parts
      clay 210 parts
      lignin sodium sulfonate 20 parts
      polyoxyethylene alkyl phenyl ether 50 parts
      polyvinyl alcohol 20 parts
      white carbon 200 parts
      1000 parts
    • The above-mentioned components are placed in a ribbon mixer, mixed well, and were pulverized sufficiently in an atomizer to obtain a wettable powder.
    • Example 2 (Wettable powder 2)
    • iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 120 parts
      fenhexamid 200 parts
      clay 470 parts
      lignin sodium sulfonate 20 parts
      polyoxyethylene alkyl phenyl ether 50 parts
      polyvinyl alcohol 20 parts
      white carbon 120 parts
      1000 parts
    • The above-mentioned components are placed in a ribbon mixer, mixed well, and were pulverized sufficiently in an atomizer to obtain a wettable powder.
    • Example 3 (Wettable powder 3)
    • iminoctadine tris (albesilate) 40 parts
      fenhexamid 400 parts
      clay 430 parts
      lignin sodium sulfonate 20 parts
      polyoxyethylene alkyl phenyl ether 50 parts
      polyvinyl alcohol 20 parts
      white carbon 40 parts
      1000 parts
    • The above-mentioned components are placed in a ribbon mixer, mixed well, and were pulverized sufficiently in an atomizer to obtain a wettable powder.
    • Example 4 (Wettable powder 4)
    • iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 200 parts
      fenhexamid 100 parts
      clay 310 parts
      lignin sodium sulfonate 20 parts
      polyoxyethylene alkyl phenyl ether 50 parts
      polyvinyl alcohol 20 parts
      white carbon 300 parts
      1000 parts
    • The above-mentioned components are placed in a ribbon mixer, mixed well and were pulverized sufficiently in an atomizer to obtain a wettable powder.
    • Example 5 (Suspension concentrate 1)
    • A) iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 120 parts
      polyoxyethylene lauryl ether 30 parts
      sorbitan oleic acid ester 30 parts
      propylene glycol 50 parts
      water 290 parts
      520 parts
      B) fenhexamid 200 parts
      polyoxyethylene styryl phenyl ether 30 parts
      water 250 parts
      480 parts
    • A) was mixed well in a homogenizer and dispersed, while B) was wet-ground in a bead mill. A) and B) were then thoroughly mixed together to form a suspension concentrate.
    • Comparative agent 1 (iminoctadine tris(albesilate) wettable powder)
    • iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 400 parts
      polyoxyethylene lauryl ether 50 parts
      clay 150 parts
      white carbon 400 parts
      1000 parts
    • The above-mentioned components were placed in a ribbon mixer, mixed well, and were pulverized thoroughly with an atomizer to obtain a wettable powder.
    • Comparative agent 2 (fenhexamid wettable powder)
    • Fenhexamid wettable powder (effective component 50% by weight) manufactured by Japan Bayer Agrochem.
    • Comparative agent 3
    • 3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-N-isopropyl 2,4-dioximidazolidine-1-carboxamide (hereinafter referred to as IPRODIONE) wettable powder (effective component 50% by weight) manufactured by Nissan Chemical Industry Co.
    • Comparative agent 4
    • N-(4-methyl-6-prop-1-ynylpyrimidin-2-yl)aniline (hereinafter referred to as MEPANIPYRIM) wettable powder (effective component 40% by weight) manufactured by Kumiai Chemical Industry Co.
    • Use Examples Example A Test of control effect on gray mold in cucumbers
    • 18 cucumber plants (commercial name: ANKORU 8) cultivated under ordinary conditions at room temperature were assigned for each agent. Tangerines inoculated with gray mold fungi (resistant/sensitive strain: benzimidazole resistant, dicarboximide sensitive) provided by Japan Plant Protection Association were suspended to serve as inoculation sources. Each of the agents was diluted with water so that the active compounds reached the values shown in the table. Cucumbers at the 10-leaf stage at the start of the experiment were sprayed a total of 4 times at one week intervals using a compressed air sprayer to disperse a sufficient amount (300L/10a) of the diluted solutions of each of the agents. Prior to each spraying, the number of harvested fruit and the number of infected fruit were noted. One week after the last spraying, all fruit was assessed for the infected fruit, and a value was obtained for the occurrence rate of diseased fruit. Control values (%) were calculated using Equation 1 below. These results are shown in Table 1. Control value = (disease occurence rate when untreated - disease occurence rate with single or combined agent) x 100disease occurence rate when untreated
    • The additive effect obtained when two types of agents are mixed together can be expressed as the control value's expected value (%) (hereinafter, referred to as PE) indicated in Equation 2. Therefore, it is possible to determine the presence or absence of a "synergistic effect" from the relationship with the actual control value for the mixed agent. Control value's expected value = (m + n) - mn100
    • m and n in the above equation indicate the control values for iminoctadine tris(albesilate) and fenhexamid respectively.
    • The control value's expected values are shown inside parenthesis under the control value column in Table 1 Determination of the synergistic effect was made based on the following standards.
    • PC > PE :
      synergistic effect
      PC = PE :
      additive effect
      PC < PE :
      antagonistic effect.
      Sample Agent Effective component and its concentration (ppm) Disease occurrence rate (%) Control value
      wettable powder 1 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 200 ppm 1.3 94.6
      fenhexamid 300 ppm (84.5)
      comparative agent 1 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 200 ppm 7.9 67.1
      comparative agent 2 fenhexamid 300 ppm 11.3 52.9
      comparative agent 4 MEPANIPYRIM 200 ppm 10.7 55.4
      untreated 24.0
    • The control value for gray mold in cucumbers for wettable powder 1 was superior to comparative agent 1 and 2 which were used separately, and was also better than conventional comparative agent 4. The control value for gray mold in cucumbers for wettable powder 1 was higher than the control value's expected value obtained from the control values of comparative agents 1 and 2, thus confirming the synergistic effect of the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal composition according to the invention.
    • Example B Test of control effect on gray mold in tomatoes
    • 18 tomato plants (commercial name: MOMOTARO) cultivated under ordinary conditions at room temperature were assigned to each agent. Tangerines inoculated with the same gray mold fungi as in Example A (R/S Strain) were suspended to serve as inoculation sources. Each of the agents was diluted with water so that the active compounds achieved the values shown in the table. Tomatoes at the 10 leaf stage at the start of the experiment were sprayed a total of 5 times at one week intervals using a shoulder-mounted compressed air sprayer to disperse a sufficient amount (476L/10a) of the diluted solutions of each of the agent. Prior to each spraying, the number of harvested fruit and the number of infected fruit was noted. One week after the last spraying, the total number of fruit was assessed for the infected fruit, and a value was obtained for disease occurrence rate. Control values were calculated using Equation 1 above. The results are shown in Table 2. The control value's expected values were determined using Equation 2, and are shown inside parenthesis under the control value column in Table 2.
      Sample Agent Effective component and its concentration (ppm) Disease occurrence rate(%) Control value
      wettable powder 2 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 120 ppm 1.5 93.7
      fenhexamid 200 ppm (84.5)
      Suspension concentrate 1 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 120 ppm 1.1 95.5
      fenhexamid 200 ppm (84.5)
      comparative agent 1 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 120 ppm 8.5 64.4
      comparative agent 2 fenhexamid 200 ppm 10.4 56.5
      comparative agent 3 IPRODIONE 333 ppm 14.4 39.7
      untreated 23.9
    • The control values for gray mold in tomatoes for wettable powder 2 and suspension concentrate 1 were superior to that of comparative agents 1 and 2 which were used separately, and was also better than conventional comparative agent. The control value for gray mold in tomatoes for wettable powder 2 and suspension concentrate 1 was higher than the control value's expected value obtained from the control values of comparative agents 1 and 2, thus confirming the synergistic effect of the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal composition according to the invention.
    • Example C Test of control effect on gray mold in eggplants
    • 9 eggplants (commercial name: SENRYO No. 2) cultivated under ordinary conditions at room temperature were assigned to each agent. Tangerines inoculated with the same gray mold fungi as in Example A (R/S stain) were suspended to serve as inoculation sources. Each of the agents was diluted with water so that the active compounds achieved the values shown in the table. Eggplants at the 8-leaf stage at the start of the experiment were sprayed of a total of 5 times at one week intervals using a compressed air sprayer to disperse a sufficient amount (300L/10a) of the diluted solutions of each of the agents. Prior to each spraying, the number of harvested fruit and the number of infected fruit was noted. One week after the last spraying, the total number of fruit was assessed for the infected fruit, and a value was obtained for disease occurrence rate. Control values were calculated using Equation 1 below. The results are shown in Table 3. The control value's expected values were determined using Equation 2, and are shown inside parenthesis under the control value column in Table 3.
      Sample Agent Effective component and its concentration (ppm) Disease occurrence rate(%) Control value
      wettable powder 1 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 133 ppm 12.5 80.5
      fenhexamid 200 ppm (67.3)
      comparative agent 1 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 133 ppm 33.6 47.6
      comparative agent 2 fenhexamid 200 ppm 40.0 37.6
      wettable powder 3 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 27 ppm 18.5 71.1
      fenhexamid 267 ppm (64.8)
      comparative agent 1 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 27 ppm 44.8 30.1
      comparative agent 2 fenhexamid 267 ppm 32.3 49.6
      wettable powder 4 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 200 ppm 16.8 73.8
      fenhexamid 100 ppm (68.1)
      comparative agent 1 iminoctadine tris(albesilate) 200 ppm 25.6 60.1
      comparative agent 2 fenhexamid 100 ppm 51.2 20.1
      comparative agent 3 IPRODIONE 333 ppm 35.0 45.4
      untreated 64.1
    • The effect of the comparative agent was not very high when the infection was severe. In contrast, the control value of wettable powders 1, 3, and 4 on gray mold in eggplants was superior to that of comparative agents 1-3. The control value of wettable powders 1, 3 and 4 on gray mold in eggplants was higher than the control value's expected value obtained from the control values of comparative agents 1 and 2, thus confirming the synergistic effect of the agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions according to the invention.
    • INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
    • As explained above, agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions containing iminoctadine or acid addition salts thereof and fenhexamid are very effective in controlling phytopathogenic fungi, such as gray mold and fungal strains which are resistant to chemical compounds.

    Claims (6)

    1. Agricultural and horticultural fungicidal compositions, characterized in that they contain as active ingredients a combination of
      A) 1,1'-iminiodi(octamethylene)diguanidine of the formula
      Figure 00240001
      or an acid addition salt thereof and
      B) N-(2,3-dichloro-4-hydroxy-phenyl)-1-methyl-cyclohexane carboxamide of the formula
      Figure 00240002
    2. Compositions according to claim 1, wherein the compound of group (A) is 1,1'-iminiodi(octamethylene)diguanidinium ris(alkyl-benzenesulfonate) of the formula
      Figure 00240003
      Figure 00250001
    3. Compositions according to claim 1 characterized in that the weight ratio of active compounds of group (A) to the active compound of the formula (II) is between 1:0.5 and 1:10.
    4. Method for the control of fungi, characterized in that active compound compositions according to claim 1 are applied to the fungi and/or to their habitat.
    5. Use of compositions according to claim 1 for the control of fungi.
    6. Process for the preparation of fungicidal compositions, characterized in that active compound combinations according to claim 1 are mixed with extenders and or surface-active agents.
    EP99951182A 1998-11-02 1999-11-01 Fungicide compositions for agricultural and horticultural use Expired - Lifetime EP1064846B1 (en)

    Applications Claiming Priority (3)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    JP31240698 1998-11-02
    JP31240698 1998-11-02
    PCT/JP1999/006070 WO2000025587A1 (en) 1998-11-02 1999-11-01 Bacteriocide compositions for agricultural and horticultural use

    Publications (3)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP1064846A1 true EP1064846A1 (en) 2001-01-03
    EP1064846A4 EP1064846A4 (en) 2001-04-18
    EP1064846B1 EP1064846B1 (en) 2003-06-18

    Family

    ID=18028858

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP99951182A Expired - Lifetime EP1064846B1 (en) 1998-11-02 1999-11-01 Fungicide compositions for agricultural and horticultural use

    Country Status (14)

    Country Link
    US (1) US6372789B1 (en)
    EP (1) EP1064846B1 (en)
    JP (1) JP3519054B2 (en)
    KR (1) KR100392877B1 (en)
    CN (1) CN1139324C (en)
    AU (1) AU735932B2 (en)
    DE (1) DE69908920T2 (en)
    ES (1) ES2201786T3 (en)
    HK (1) HK1035641A1 (en)
    IL (2) IL136798A0 (en)
    NZ (1) NZ505416A (en)
    TW (1) TW510781B (en)
    WO (1) WO2000025587A1 (en)
    ZA (1) ZA200002968B (en)

    Cited By (3)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    WO2005034629A1 (en) * 2003-10-09 2005-04-21 Basf Aktiengesellschaft Fungicidal mixtures for combating rice pathogens
    EP1856977A3 (en) * 2004-02-04 2008-02-13 Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. Synergistic antifungal DDAC compostions
    US20150376336A1 (en) * 2014-06-26 2015-12-31 John L. Lombardi Borate esters

    Families Citing this family (4)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    KR101035558B1 (en) 2008-08-29 2011-05-23 한국화학연구원 Carboxamide derivatives, preparation thereof and antibacterial composition containing the same
    CN102715181B (en) * 2012-06-05 2014-05-07 江苏龙灯化学有限公司 Sterilization composition with synergetic effect
    CN103098817B (en) * 2012-12-30 2016-01-06 湖南农大海特农化有限公司 The composition pesticide of biguanides three octyl benzene sulfonate and tpn
    CN106561698A (en) * 2015-09-02 2017-04-19 陕西上格之路生物科学有限公司 Sterilization composition containing fenhexamid

    Citations (1)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US4675134A (en) * 1985-07-23 1987-06-23 Dainippon Ink And Chemicals, Inc. Process for producing iminoctadine 3-alkylbenzenesulfonates

    Family Cites Families (4)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    DE4313867A1 (en) 1993-04-28 1994-11-03 Bayer Ag Fungicidal active ingredient combinations
    JPH08113505A (en) 1994-10-14 1996-05-07 Dainippon Ink & Chem Inc Antimicrobial agent composition for agriculture and horticulture
    DE4437048A1 (en) 1994-10-17 1996-04-18 Bayer Ag Fungicidal active ingredient combinations
    JP3233251B2 (en) 1995-02-23 2001-11-26 大日本インキ化学工業株式会社 Aqueous suspension type pesticide formulation

    Patent Citations (1)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US4675134A (en) * 1985-07-23 1987-06-23 Dainippon Ink And Chemicals, Inc. Process for producing iminoctadine 3-alkylbenzenesulfonates

    Non-Patent Citations (1)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Title
    See also references of WO0025587A1 *

    Cited By (6)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    WO2005034629A1 (en) * 2003-10-09 2005-04-21 Basf Aktiengesellschaft Fungicidal mixtures for combating rice pathogens
    EA009086B1 (en) * 2003-10-09 2007-10-26 Басф Акциенгезельшафт Fungicidal mixtures for combating phytopathogenic fungi, in particular, rice pathogens
    EP1856977A3 (en) * 2004-02-04 2008-02-13 Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. Synergistic antifungal DDAC compostions
    US20150376336A1 (en) * 2014-06-26 2015-12-31 John L. Lombardi Borate esters
    US9631052B2 (en) * 2014-06-26 2017-04-25 John L. Lombardi Borate esters
    US10364325B2 (en) 2014-06-26 2019-07-30 John L. Lombardi Borate esters

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    DE69908920D1 (en) 2003-07-24
    HK1035641A1 (en) 2001-12-07
    DE69908920T2 (en) 2004-01-15
    JP3519054B2 (en) 2004-04-12
    US6372789B1 (en) 2002-04-16
    TW510781B (en) 2002-11-21
    AU6368799A (en) 2000-05-22
    IL136798A0 (en) 2001-06-14
    CN1139324C (en) 2004-02-25
    WO2000025587A1 (en) 2000-05-11
    EP1064846A4 (en) 2001-04-18
    CN1287473A (en) 2001-03-14
    KR100392877B1 (en) 2003-07-28
    EP1064846B1 (en) 2003-06-18
    ZA200002968B (en) 2000-12-12
    NZ505416A (en) 2002-03-28
    IL136798A (en) 2006-10-05
    ES2201786T3 (en) 2004-03-16
    KR20010024821A (en) 2001-03-26
    AU735932B2 (en) 2001-07-19

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    KR970001472B1 (en) 3-difluoromethylpyrazolecarboxyamide fungicides
    US4659739A (en) Agricultural and horticultural guanidine-type fungicide and process for production thereof
    RU2310328C2 (en) Fungicidal combinations of biologically active substances
    US5554619A (en) Microbicides
    UA120913C2 (en) Fungicidal compositions
    KR910007358B1 (en) Fungicidal composition
    KR100334348B1 (en) Fungicide Composition
    EP1064846B1 (en) Fungicide compositions for agricultural and horticultural use
    RU2270564C2 (en) Method for controlling of cultural plant phytopathogenic diseases and fungicide composition
    SK283615B6 (en) Microbicides
    SK280213B6 (en) Microbicidal composition for protecting plants, its use for this purpose, method of fighting plant diseases and plant propagation material
    JPH07277909A (en) Antibacterial agent composition
    EP1419693B1 (en) Composition for controlling plant pathogenic bacterium and method of controlling plant pathogenic bacterium
    KR880002613B1 (en) Fungicidal composition and method controlling fungi
    AU2018327734B2 (en) Fungicide composition and method for controlling disease of crop
    HU206963B (en) Synergetic fungicidal composition comprising triazolylpentanol derivative and guanidated aliphatic polyamine
    CN114097800B (en) Fungicidal composition of prothioconazole and wuyiencin and application thereof
    KR880002612B1 (en) Fugicidal composition and method for controlling fungi
    JPH0481961B2 (en)
    JPH08113505A (en) Antimicrobial agent composition for agriculture and horticulture
    JP4259033B2 (en) Agricultural and horticultural plant disease control composition and agricultural and horticultural plant disease control method
    CN103563947B (en) A kind of Fungicidal composition and application thereof
    CN116349682A (en) Fungicidal composition containing cell wall synthesis inhibitor bactericides and application thereof
    JPS60197606A (en) Fungicidal composition for agricultural and horticultural purposes
    JPH03157306A (en) Agricultural and horticultural germicidal composition

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 20000615

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR IT NL

    A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

    Effective date: 20010306

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A4

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

    17Q First examination report despatched

    Effective date: 20020711

    GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

    RTI1 Title (correction)

    Free format text: FUNGICIDE COMPOSITIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL USE

    GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR IT NL

    RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

    Owner name: BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REF Corresponds to:

    Ref document number: 69908920

    Country of ref document: DE

    Date of ref document: 20030724

    Kind code of ref document: P

    NLT2 Nl: modifications (of names), taken from the european patent patent bulletin

    Owner name: BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: ES

    Ref legal event code: FG2A

    Ref document number: 2201786

    Country of ref document: ES

    Kind code of ref document: T3

    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    ET Fr: translation filed
    26N No opposition filed

    Effective date: 20040319

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: MM4A

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: ES

    Payment date: 20091201

    Year of fee payment: 11

    Ref country code: DE

    Payment date: 20091106

    Year of fee payment: 11

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: NL

    Payment date: 20091126

    Year of fee payment: 11

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IT

    Payment date: 20091112

    Year of fee payment: 11

    Ref country code: FR

    Payment date: 20091123

    Year of fee payment: 11

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: BE

    Payment date: 20091130

    Year of fee payment: 11

    BERE Be: lapsed

    Owner name: *BAYER CROPSCIENCE A.G.

    Effective date: 20101130

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: NL

    Ref legal event code: V1

    Effective date: 20110601

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: ST

    Effective date: 20110801

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: NL

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20110601

    Ref country code: BE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20101130

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R119

    Ref document number: 69908920

    Country of ref document: DE

    Effective date: 20110601

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R119

    Ref document number: 69908920

    Country of ref document: DE

    Effective date: 20110531

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20110531

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20101130

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20101101

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: ES

    Ref legal event code: FD2A

    Effective date: 20120110

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: ES

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20101102