EP1023570A1 - Simulator - Google Patents

Simulator

Info

Publication number
EP1023570A1
EP1023570A1 EP98942919A EP98942919A EP1023570A1 EP 1023570 A1 EP1023570 A1 EP 1023570A1 EP 98942919 A EP98942919 A EP 98942919A EP 98942919 A EP98942919 A EP 98942919A EP 1023570 A1 EP1023570 A1 EP 1023570A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
mirror
image
station
simulator
scene
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP98942919A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1023570B1 (en
Inventor
Lewis Evan Treharne
Anthony Nordberg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Thales Training and Simulation Ltd
Original Assignee
Thales Training and Simulation Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Thales Training and Simulation Ltd filed Critical Thales Training and Simulation Ltd
Publication of EP1023570A1 publication Critical patent/EP1023570A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1023570B1 publication Critical patent/EP1023570B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/26Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying
    • F41G3/2616Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device
    • F41G3/2622Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile
    • F41G3/2627Cooperating with a motion picture projector
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41JTARGETS; TARGET RANGES; BULLET CATCHERS
    • F41J9/00Moving targets, i.e. moving when fired at
    • F41J9/14Cinematographic targets, e.g. moving-picture targets

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a simulator for simulating the view of a scene from a pre-determined observer station.
  • Simulators are well known in which an image of l he scene lo be simulated is viewed from a pre-determined viewing station via a mirror, the mirror, image and viewing station being positioned such that light reilected by the mirror to the viewing station from the image is substantially c ⁇ llimated.
  • Such displays may be used for example in infantry weapons training simulators.
  • back projection screens are positioned behind a fixed structure in front of which the trainee stands.
  • Image projectors also located behind the fixed structure project images onto the screens.
  • a concave mirror is located such that the image presented on the screens can be viewed via the mirror by the trainee.
  • the mirror can be of large dimension, for example ing a height f the order of two metres and breadth of the order of six metres, such that the mirror subtends an angle in the horizontal direction of the order of 50° when viewed from the trainee viewing station.
  • Mirrors of such dimensions can be fabricated from a single film of reflective plastics material the edges of which are secured to an appropriately shaped frame, the space behind the film of plastics material being evacuated to suck the mirror into the desired geometrical shape. Unfortunateh such a structure is so large that il cannot be manoeuvred into position in many buildings in which displays are required.
  • a simulator for simulating the view of a scene from a pre-determined observer station comprising at least one image source for presenting at least one image representing the scene, and a mirror positioned such that a reflection of the or each presented image can be viewed from a pre-determined view ing station, ihe mirror, the ⁇ r each image source and viewing the station being arranged such that light rellected by the mirror to the viewing station from the or each image source is substantially collimated and represents the appearance of the scene from the observer station, u herein at least one opaque object is positioned on or immediately in front of the mirror, the object being non-reflective and having an appearance appropriate to the presented image.
  • the present invention relies upon ihe realisation that lor certain scenes it is acceptable for objects to be relatively close lo the viewing station. Providing those objects are positioned such that relleclions ⁇ lhem cannot be perceived in the mirror, the overall perceived quality of the image is not significantly reduced. By positioning such objects so as to overlie portions of the mirror which do not have the optical characteristics necessary to relied lighl in a manner consisieni w ith the rest of the mirror surface, the perceived degradation of image quality resulting I mm edge effects between adjacent mirrors can be avoided.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic perspective representation of components used in a known infantry weapons training simulator.
  • Figure 2 is a vertical section through the components showed in Figure 1 :
  • Figure 3 shows the positioning of an object on the surface of the mirror of Figures 1 and 2 so as to cover a portion of that mirror which is defined abutting edges of two mirror sections.
  • the illustrated arrangement comprises a mirror 1 made up from four substantially identical mirror sections the abutting edges of which are represented by lines 2.
  • Each of the mirror sections comprises a frame defining four curved edges to w hich a film of reflective plastics material is attached.
  • the frame and film together define an enclosure which is evacuated so as to stretch the plastics film which is sucked into a shape determined by the shape of the edges of the frame and the differential pressure across the plastics film.
  • the optical quality of sucked film mirrors of this type is relatively high except immediately adjacent the peripheral edges of the frame.
  • the mirror 1 is viewed from a viewing station in I onl a fixed structure 4 which supports four projections screens 5. Images are projected onto the screens 5 from four projectors 6. The projectors 6, screens 5 and mirror 1 are located such that light reaching an observer at the viewing station appears to come from infinity.
  • figure 3 represents one such object 7 having the appearance of a tree trunk.
  • the side of ihe object remote from ihe observer is either adhered to or very close to the surface of the mirror so that no reflection of that side of the object can be perceived by the viewing station.
  • the objecl is clearly very close to the observer but does not impair the perceived quality of the image providing its appearance as appropriate to that image.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Optical Elements Other Than Lenses (AREA)
  • Toys (AREA)
  • Projection Apparatus (AREA)
  • Transforming Electric Information Into Light Information (AREA)

Abstract

A simulator for simulating the view of a scene from a predetermined observer station. An image is projected onto an array of back projection screens which are viewed through a concave mirror positioned such that light reflected by the mirror to a predetermined viewing station is collimated. An opaque object is positioned on or immediately in front of the mirror so as to cover a portion of the mirror. This enables portions of a mirror with poor optical qualities, such as occurs adjacent abutting edges of separate sections of the mirror, to be obscured from view so that they do not adversely affect the perceived quality of the viewed image.

Description

SIMULATOR
The present invention relates to a simulator for simulating the view of a scene from a pre-determined observer station.
Simulators are well known in which an image of l he scene lo be simulated is viewed from a pre-determined viewing station via a mirror, the mirror, image and viewing station being positioned such that light reilected by the mirror to the viewing station from the image is substantially cυllimated. Such displays may be used for example in infantry weapons training simulators. Typically, back projection screens are positioned behind a fixed structure in front of which the trainee stands. Image projectors also located behind the fixed structure project images onto the screens. A concave mirror is located such that the image presented on the screens can be viewed via the mirror by the trainee.
It is often desirable to be able to train a group of trainees using a single simulator. In such circumstances it is highly advantageous if the mirror can be of large dimension, for example ing a height f the order of two metres and breadth of the order of six metres, such that the mirror subtends an angle in the horizontal direction of the order of 50° when viewed from the trainee viewing station. Mirrors of such dimensions can be fabricated from a single film of reflective plastics material the edges of which are secured to an appropriately shaped frame, the space behind the film of plastics material being evacuated to suck the mirror into the desired geometrical shape. Unfortunateh such a structure is so large that il cannot be manoeuvred into position in many buildings in which displays are required. Furthermore, it is relatively difficult to build mirrors of such dimensions with the necessary tight geometrical tolerances. Accordingly, large mirrors are usually assembled by abutting a series of relatively small mirrors edge to edge. With available sucked mirror structures, it is not possible to maintain the necessary geometry of the rellccth c material right up lo Ihe mirror edge and therefore there is a very perceptible edge ellecl al ihe joint belvveen two adjacent mirrors. This significantly reduces the perceived realism oi'a single image projected so as to overlap the abutting edges of two mirrors.
It is accepted wisdom in the simulator industry that the last thing one wants to consider is positioning anything between the trainee and the mirror surface. Λn object so positioned is visually very distinct from the image perceived via the mirror and can be expected to dramatically reduce the perceived realism of the viewed image.
It is an object of the present invention to obviate υr mitigate the problems outlined above.
According to the present invention, there is provided a simulator for simulating the view of a scene from a pre-determined observer station, comprising at least one image source for presenting at least one image representing the scene, and a mirror positioned such that a reflection of the or each presented image can be viewed from a pre-determined view ing station, ihe mirror, the υr each image source and viewing the station being arranged such that light rellected by the mirror to the viewing station from the or each image source is substantially collimated and represents the appearance of the scene from the observer station, u herein at least one opaque object is positioned on or immediately in front of the mirror, the object being non-reflective and having an appearance appropriate to the presented image. The present invention relies upon ihe realisation that lor certain scenes it is acceptable for objects to be relatively close lo the viewing station. Providing those objects are positioned such that relleclions υ lhem cannot be perceived in the mirror, the overall perceived quality of the image is not significantly reduced. By positioning such objects so as to overlie portions of the mirror which do not have the optical characteristics necessary to relied lighl in a manner consisieni w ith the rest of the mirror surface, the perceived degradation of image quality resulting I mm edge effects between adjacent mirrors can be avoided.
An embodiment of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic perspective representation of components used in a known infantry weapons training simulator.
Figure 2 is a vertical section through the components showed in Figure 1 : and
Figure 3 shows the positioning of an object on the surface of the mirror of Figures 1 and 2 so as to cover a portion of that mirror which is defined abutting edges of two mirror sections.
Referring to Figures 1 and 2. the illustrated arrangement comprises a mirror 1 made up from four substantially identical mirror sections the abutting edges of which are represented by lines 2. Each of the mirror sections comprises a frame defining four curved edges to w hich a film of reflective plastics material is attached. The frame and film together define an enclosure which is evacuated so as to stretch the plastics film which is sucked into a shape determined by the shape of the edges of the frame and the differential pressure across the plastics film. The optical quality of sucked film mirrors of this type is relatively high except immediately adjacent the peripheral edges of the frame.
The mirror 1 is viewed from a viewing station in I onl a fixed structure 4 which supports four projections screens 5. Images are projected onto the screens 5 from four projectors 6. The projectors 6, screens 5 and mirror 1 are located such that light reaching an observer at the viewing station appears to come from infinity.
Highly realistic images can be viewed with the structure shown in Figures 1 and 2 except when the light reaching the viewer comes from a portion of the mirror immediately adjacent the abutting edges 2. The presented images are as a result perceived as being made up from four separate sections of high quality separated by regions of relatively low quality adjacent the abutting edges 2. These regions of low quality significantly reduce the perceived quality of the overall image.
In accordance with the present invention, the problem described above resulting from the optical inaccuracies of the mirror adjacent the abutting edges 2 can be overcome by the simple expedient of placing an opaque object over the abutting edges of the four mirror sections, figure 3 represents one such object 7 having the appearance of a tree trunk. The side of ihe object remote from ihe observer is either adhered to or very close to the surface of the mirror so that no reflection of that side of the object can be perceived by the viewing station. The objecl is clearly very close to the observer but does not impair the perceived quality of the image providing its appearance as appropriate to that image. For example, in an infantry weapons training simulator it is possible for it lo be reasonable in a simulated scene for an object such as a tree to be close to the observ er siaiion the view from which is lo be simulated. Movement of the observer within the area of the viewing station will of course result in perceived movement between the object and ihc represented scene but this of course is consistent with what happens in reality when an observ er moves his head to look behind an object placed in front of him. I'hus the overall realism of the image is maintained.

Claims

1. A simulator for simulating the view of a scene from a pre-determined observer station, comprising at least one image source for presenting at least one image representing the scene, and a mirror positioned such that a reπection of the or each presented image can be viewed from a pre-determined viewing station, the mirror, the or each image source and the vie ing station being arranged such that light reflected by the mirror to the viewing station from the or each image source is substantially collimated and represents the appearance of the scene from the observer station, wherein at least one opaque object is positioned on or immediately in front of the mirror, the object being non-reflective and having an appearance appropriate to the presented image.
2. A simulator according to claim I . wherein the mirror is formed from at least two segments edges of which abut, the object being positioned to cover the abutting edges.
3. A simulator according to claim 1 or 2. wherein the image source is a back projection screen onto which the image is projected.
4. A simulator substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
EP98942919A 1997-09-16 1998-09-14 Simulator Expired - Lifetime EP1023570B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9719590 1997-09-16
GBGB9719590.3A GB9719590D0 (en) 1997-09-16 1997-09-16 Simulator
PCT/GB1998/002783 WO1999014549A1 (en) 1997-09-16 1998-09-14 Simulator

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1023570A1 true EP1023570A1 (en) 2000-08-02
EP1023570B1 EP1023570B1 (en) 2003-03-05

Family

ID=10819084

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98942919A Expired - Lifetime EP1023570B1 (en) 1997-09-16 1998-09-14 Simulator

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1023570B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2304190A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69811922T2 (en)
GB (1) GB9719590D0 (en)
IL (1) IL135094A (en)
WO (1) WO1999014549A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102013225967A1 (en) * 2013-12-13 2015-06-18 Thales Deutschland Gmbh Method and weapon simulator for training the use and the use of firearms, central control unit of a weapon simulator and computer program for implementing the method

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2537735A1 (en) * 1982-12-10 1984-06-15 Matra Wide-angle collimator for optical apparatus or simulator
DE3637000A1 (en) * 1986-10-31 1988-05-05 Diehl Gmbh & Co TEST DEVICE, ESPECIALLY FOR THE SEARCH HEAD OF INTELLIGENT STEERING AMMUNITION
GB9308663D0 (en) * 1993-04-27 1993-06-16 Link Miles Ltd Point of incidence detection

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9914549A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB9719590D0 (en) 1997-11-19
CA2304190A1 (en) 1999-03-25
EP1023570B1 (en) 2003-03-05
IL135094A (en) 2005-12-18
IL135094A0 (en) 2001-05-20
DE69811922D1 (en) 2003-04-10
DE69811922T2 (en) 2003-12-18
WO1999014549A1 (en) 1999-03-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5257130A (en) Apparatus and method for creating a real image illusion
US6176584B1 (en) Curved surface, real image dome display system, using laser-based rear projection
US5685625A (en) Apparatus and method for creating optical illusion effects
US5582518A (en) System for restoring the visual environment of a pilot in a simulator
US5720123A (en) Depth image object/picture frame
EP0066998B1 (en) Display system
US3807849A (en) Visual display arrangements
CA1119852A (en) Optical illumination and distortion compensator
US6341439B1 (en) Information surface
US4348187A (en) Aerial image visual display
US6353500B1 (en) Static screen for animated images
US3832046A (en) Panoramic projector and camera
US5828495A (en) Lenticular image displays with extended depth
US6735015B1 (en) Display apparatus
US3895861A (en) Rear-screen wide-angle on-axis projection system
JP2006135378A (en) Three-dimensional image display apparatus
US4167311A (en) Projection system and process
US5418579A (en) Multiplanar image display system with plural display units
CA2592485A1 (en) Faux-transparency method and device
EP1202079A2 (en) Projection system
US4500088A (en) 3D Display
US5993005A (en) Video wall
US4613128A (en) 3D display
EP1023570B1 (en) Simulator
US7218328B2 (en) Image display apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000403

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20010111

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: THALES TRAINING AND SIMULATION LIMITED

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030305

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030305

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69811922

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20030410

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20031208

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20040908

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20040908

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20040909

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050914

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060401

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20050914

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20060531