EP1021637B1 - Slimbore subsea completion system and method - Google Patents

Slimbore subsea completion system and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1021637B1
EP1021637B1 EP98952151A EP98952151A EP1021637B1 EP 1021637 B1 EP1021637 B1 EP 1021637B1 EP 98952151 A EP98952151 A EP 98952151A EP 98952151 A EP98952151 A EP 98952151A EP 1021637 B1 EP1021637 B1 EP 1021637B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
tubing
bore
bop
tubing hanger
subsea well
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP98952151A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1021637A4 (en
EP1021637A1 (en
Inventor
Christopher E. Cunningham
Christopher D. Bartlett
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
FMC Technologies Inc
Original Assignee
FMC Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=22034846&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1021637(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by FMC Technologies Inc filed Critical FMC Technologies Inc
Priority to EP03014704A priority Critical patent/EP1350918B1/en
Priority to EP03014705A priority patent/EP1350919B1/en
Publication of EP1021637A1 publication Critical patent/EP1021637A1/en
Publication of EP1021637A4 publication Critical patent/EP1021637A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1021637B1 publication Critical patent/EP1021637B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B33/00Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
    • E21B33/02Surface sealing or packing
    • E21B33/03Well heads; Setting-up thereof
    • E21B33/035Well heads; Setting-up thereof specially adapted for underwater installations
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B33/00Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
    • E21B33/02Surface sealing or packing
    • E21B33/03Well heads; Setting-up thereof
    • E21B33/04Casing heads; Suspending casings or tubings in well heads
    • E21B33/047Casing heads; Suspending casings or tubings in well heads for plural tubing strings

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to subsea completion systems.
  • the invention concerns a subsea completion system which may be considered a hybrid of conventional xmas tree (CXT) and horizontal xmas tree (HXT) arrangements.
  • this invention relates to a marine riser/ tubing hanger/ tubing spool arrangement with the capability of passing production tubing and a large number of electric and hydraulic lines within a relatively small diameter.
  • This invention also relates to a method and arrangement whereby both "reduced bore” (“slimbore”) and conventional BOP/marine riser systems may be interfaced both to the tubing spool and the xmas tree, such that the BOP stack need not be retrieved in order that the xmas tree may be installed, and so that the xmas tree need not be deployed with or interfaced at all by a conventional workover/intervention riser, if this is not desired.
  • slimbore reduced bore
  • BOP/marine riser systems may be interfaced both to the tubing spool and the xmas tree, such that the BOP stack need not be retrieved in order that the xmas tree may be installed, and so that the xmas tree need not be deployed with or interfaced at all by a conventional workover/intervention riser, if this is not desired.
  • the invention described below originates from an objective to provide a subsea completion system that is capable of being installed and serviced using a marine riser and BOP stack, especially those of substantially reduced size and weight as compared to conventional systems.
  • One objective is to replace a conventional 19" (483 mm) nominal bore marine riser and associated 18-3/4" (476 mm) nominal bore BOP stack with a smaller bore diameter system, for example in the range between 14" and 11" (279 mm) for the marine riser and BOP stack.
  • the internal diameter of the BOP stack is under 12" (304 mm). If the riser bore diameter is under 12" (304 mm), it will require only 40% of the volume of fluids to fill in comparison to 19" (483 mm) nominal conventional systems.
  • a currently available tubing hanger typical of those provided throughout the subsea completion industry can accommodate a production bore, an annulus bore, and up to one electric (1E) plus five hydraulic (5H) conduits.
  • An important objective of the invention is to provide a new system to accommodate production tubing and provide annulus communication, and to provide a tubing hanger that can accommodate (ideally) as many as 2E plus 7H independent conduits.
  • the object is to provide a system which allows well access via a BOP stack/marine riser system on top of a subsea xmas tree. Such a system is advantageous, especially for deep water applications, where the xmas tree can be installed without first having to retrieve and subsequently re-run the BOP stack.
  • Another important object of the invention is to provide a system which allows future intervention using a BOP stack/marine riser or a more conventional workover/intervention riser.
  • US-A-5,544,707 (Cooper Cameron Corporation) describes a well completion arrangement using a spool tree instead of a conventional christmas tree in which a tubing hanger is landed at a predetermined angular orientation with lateral outlet ports in the tubing hanger and the spool tree in alignment. The tubing string can then be pulled without disturbing the tree and access may be had to the production casing hanger for monitoring production casing annulus pressure.
  • the spool tree is provided with a production casing annulus monitoring port and lateral production ports.
  • GB-A-2,166,775 (Britoil PLC) describes an arrangement in which a tubing hanger with a vertical through passage is seated in the tree body, which provides in line access to the wellhead during completion. Production is via lateral production ports in the tree body. A tree cap with multiple electric and hydraulic connectors interfaces with the tubing hanger.
  • the new arrangement provides a tubing spool for connection to a subsea wellhead below, and for a first connection above to a slimbore or conventional BOP stack for tubing hanging operations and subsequently to a xmas tree for production operations.
  • the tubing hanger is sized to pass through the bore of a slimbore blowout preventer stack and a siimbore riser to a surface vessel.
  • the tubing hanger is arranged and designed to land and to be sealed in an internal profile of the tubing spool.
  • the tubing hanger has a central bore for production tubing and up to at least nine conduits and associated vertically facing couplers for electric cables and hydraulic fluid passages.
  • the tubing spool has a passage in its body which can route fluids around the tubing hanger sealed landing position so that annulus communication between the well bore (below) and the BOP stack or xmas tree (above) is obtained.
  • a remotely operable valve in the annulus passage provides control over the annulus fluid flow.
  • a method is described herein which includes slimbore marine riser and slimbore BOP stack operations for landing the reduced diameter tubing hanger in the tubing spool using a landing string.
  • Conventional sized BOP stacks and marine risers may also be used for the various operations.
  • the slimbore BOP stack and completion landing string is set aside of the tubing spool, and a xmas tree is connected to the top of the tubing spool.
  • the xmas tree may be deployed to the tubing spool independently of the riser(s) connected to and/or deployed inside of the BOP stack.
  • a BOP adaptor is provided to connect the top of the conventional sized xmas tree to the bottom of the slimbore or conventional sized BOP stack and marine riser.
  • the landing string with tubing hanger running tool at its bottom end, is used along with other equipment to provide a high pressure conduit to the surface for production fluids, and to serve as a mandrel around which BOP rams and/or annular BOPs may be closed to create a fluid path for the borehole annulus which is accessed and controlled by the BOP choke and kill conduits.
  • the xmas tree may be capped.
  • the tree cap can be removed later to allow well intervention operations, and the slimbore or a conventional sized BOP and marine riser along with the BOP adaptor, can be run onto the xmas tree.
  • a conventional workover/intervention riser may be used to interface the top of the xmas tree.
  • Figures 1A and 1B schematically illustrate a possible tubing hanger (TH) and xmas tree (XT) arrangement for meeting the objectives as described above.
  • Figure 1A illustrates a tubing spool TS to which a conventional xmas tree XT is attached by means of a connector C.
  • the tubing spool TS is secured to a wellhead housing WH.
  • the outer profile of tubing spool TS shown is referred to as an 18-3/4" (476 MM) mandrel style (the 18-3/4" (476 mm) designation referring to the nominal bore of the BOP stack normally associated with the subject profile) but with an internal diameter of under 11" (279 mm) or 13-5/8" (346 mm) depending on the BOP or marine riser internal diameter dimension.
  • a tubing hanger TH is landed in the internal bore of tubing spool TS, and the tubing hanger TH has an annulus conduit A, a production conduit P, and several E and H ports or conduits through it. Couplers 10 are illustrated schematically at the top of hanger H.
  • Figure 1B is a cross section (taken along lines 1B-1B of Figure 1 A) of the tubing hanger TH of Figure 1 A and illustrates that for a tubing hanger TH with specified diameters for the production bore P and the annulus bore A, only a few electric and hydraulic bores of predetermined diameters can be provided.
  • FIG. 2 schematically illustrates another arrangement for possibly meeting the objectives of the invention.
  • a tubing spool TS2 is provided which includes an annulus bore bypass ABP2 with valves V2.
  • a tubing hanger TH2 has a production bore P2 and electric and hydraulic conduits E2, H2. Such conduits are bores through the body of the hanger which communicate with vertical and horizontal couplers 12, 14.
  • the tubing spool TS2 can accept either a conventional vertical xmas tree CXT or a horizontal christmas tree HXT.
  • FIG 3 is another schematic illustration, which is similar to that of Figure 2. However, only horizontal couplers 16 for the E and H channels are provided. Such an arrangement is disadvantageous in that continuous vertical communication between the equipment installation vessel and downhole electric and hydraulic functions is not accommodated.
  • Figure 4 is another schematic illustration of a possible tubing hanger TH4/conventional vertical bore xmas tree combination where a xmas tree XT4 is secured to a tubing spool TS4.
  • a concentric tubing hanger TH4 is provided in tubing spool TS4 and has annulus bore or bores A4 and production bore P4 through it.
  • Valve or valves V A are provided in bore or bores A4. The arrangement of Figure 4 provides only vertical controls access.
  • Figures 5A and 5B schematically show the preferred embodiment of an arrangement to meet the objectives stated above.
  • the arrangement of Figures 5A and 5B provide the best features of a CXT and an HXT in a hybrid arrangement, where a valved annulus bypass A5 is provided in the tubing spool TS5, and with a production bore P5 and an increased number of E and H conduits 18 provided therein.
  • the tubing spool TS5 is arranged and designed to pass an 81 ⁇ 2" (216 mm) bit. Its top outer profile should be compatible with a standard 18-3 ⁇ 4" (476 mm) system so as to accept a conventional sized CXT and standard sized BOP, as well as a slimbore BOP.
  • ID internal profile
  • 12-to-14 ports or conduits 18 of 1.50" (38 mm) nominal diameter can be provided in tubing hanger TH5. Of these ports, some may be required for alignment purposes, depending on the alignment method adopted.
  • FIGS. I through 5 provide alternative tubing hanger (TH) and xmas tree (XT) combinations which are examined for their capability to meet the objectives as described above.
  • the arrangement of Figures 5A and 5B offer certain advantages regarding the desired specific objectives.
  • the annulus communication path or passage A5 is routed via the body of the tubing spool TS5 and passes "around" rather than "through” the tubing hanger, as is the case for Figures 1A, 1B and 4.
  • a passage is provided around the sealed landing position between the tubing spool TS5 and the tubing hanger TH5.
  • This feature provides more space to accommodate a relatively large number of E and H conduits.
  • the annulus passage A5 whether integrated with the body of the TS or attached externally by some means, is typically fitted with one or more valves VA5, VA6 in order to enable remote isolation/ sealing of the annulus flow path.
  • valved annulus bypass port achieves savings in time and money associated with installing/ retrieving such a plug.
  • valves VA5, VA6 of Figure 5A are preferably (but not limited to) gate valves, the reliability of the annulus pressure barrier is also improved with the arrangement of Figure 5A as compared to a wireline plug.
  • the annulus bypass conduit A5 is contained as part of a tubing spool assembly TS5 and not in the body of the tree as would be the case for HXTs.
  • Tubing spools also called tubing heads, offer advantages and disadvantages.
  • Some of the more common characteristics associated with tubing spools include:
  • FIG. 5A and 5B An important advantage of the arrangement of Figures 5A and 5B is its capability to pass a very large number of E and H lines 18 through the tubing hanger TH5 white requiring only a very small bore subsea BOP and marine riser.
  • a tubing hanger TH5 capable of suspending 4-1/2" (114 mm) production tubing and providing on the order of 10 (combined total) E and H passages 18 of 11 ⁇ 2" (38 mm) diameter can be passed through a roughly 11" (279 mm) bore (drift) BOP stack and an associated "slimbore" marine riser (12" (304 mm) ID).
  • a comparably capable HXT tubing hanger system would likely require a 13-5/8" (346 mm) nominal bore BOP and a 14" (355 mm) ID (approximate) bore marine riser.
  • the cross sectional area of a 19" (483 mm) bore marine riser (typically used with 18-3/4" (476 mm) bore BOP stacks) is 283.5 in. 2 (1829 cm 2 )
  • Cross sectional areas for 14" (355 mm) and 12" (304 mm) risers are 153.9 in. 2 (993 cm 2 ) and 113.1 in. 2 (730 cm 2 ), respectively.
  • the volume of fluids required to fill these risers are 100%, 54.3% and 39.9% respectively, using the 19" (483 mm) riser as the base case.
  • variable deck loading is improved since smaller risers, less fluid, less fluid storage, etc., all weigh less.
  • a 12" bore riser requires only 73.5% as much fluid volume as a 14" (355 mm) riser (a significant advantage for the system of this invention when compared even to reduced bore HXT systems).
  • the issue of variable deck loading becomes more important.
  • Figures 5A and 5B has characteristics of a conventional xmas tree completion system and an HXT (horizontal xmas tree) completion system. It is a hybrid of features of a CXT and an HXT connected to a well head, but it most closely resembles a CXT with a tubing spool.
  • the electric conduits are typically routed through a variety of components (possibly ram and/or annular BOP seal spools, subsea test tree (SSTT)/ emergency disconnect (EDC) latch device, E/H control module, etc.) until they are ultimately combined into a bundle of lines (E and H) typically referred to as an umbilical.
  • the umbilical conveniently can be reeled in or out for re-use in a variety of applications.
  • one completion scenario associated with the invention is for the landing string (LS, i.e., THRT on "up") to be retrieved, the BOP stack/marine riser disconnected and retrieved, and the xmas tree installed using typically a workover/intervention riser system.
  • the xmas tree engages the same E and H control line (wet mateable) couplers at the top of the TH as previously interfaced by the THRT.
  • the THRT need only be unlatched from the TH and the LS lifted up into or just above the BOP stack, and the BOP stack need only be removed from the wellhead a sufficient lateral distance to facilitate installation of the xmas tree onto the TS.
  • the XT may be lowered by an independent hoisting unit and installed onto the wellhead using a cable or tubing string with ROV assistance, etc., or the xmas tree may previously have been "parked" at a laterally displaced seabed staging position for movement onto the wellhead using the LS and/or BOP stack/ marine riser, for example.
  • the procedure for installation of an HXT is different in that it is often preferred that no umbilical be used as part of the TH deployment process.
  • the SCSSV(s) are typically locked “open” prior to deployment of the TH, a purely mechanical or “external pressure" (possibly “staged”) operated THRT/TH is employed, and no communication with downhole components is provided.
  • a remotely operated vehicle is typically used to engage the various couplers in a radial direction (not a vertical direction) into the TH from the HXT body (horizontal plane of motion).
  • ROV remotely operated vehicle
  • One supplier also employs "angled" interfacing devices for the hydraulic conduits (i.e., between a tapered lower surface of the TH and a shoulder in the HXT bore) which are engaged passively as part of the TH landing/locking operation.
  • the VDB TH schematic of Figure 6 shows a conventional tubing hanger TH6 for a VDB completion system. It shows a production bore P and an annulus bore A and shows that the E and H conduits 18 are routed in a generally vertical manner from the top to the bottom of the tubing hanger TH6.
  • a hydraulic coupler 20 and an electric coupler 22 are schematically illustrated.
  • the HXT TH schematic of Figure 7 illustrates a tubing hanger TH7 for an HXT with the vertical interface of electric and hydraulic conduits 18' at the bottom of the TH and the generally horizontal or radial couplers 20', 22' interface at the side of the TH.
  • FIG. 8 shows such an arrangement with vertical and radial couplers 20"V, 20"H for an electric lead coupler and vertical and radial hydraulic couplers 22"V, 22"H schematically illustrated.
  • the arrangement of Figure 8 adds complexity to the system and greatly increases the risk of failure.
  • one conduit access point vertical or horizontal
  • one conduit access point must be positively de-activated whenever the alternative access point (horizontal or vertical) is active.
  • HXT TH8 schematically illustrated in Figure 8 having both vertical and horizontal interfaces is typical of a system actually provided for a subsea application in the Mediterranean Sea.
  • HXTs used on natural drive wells have typically required tree caps that can be installed and retrieved through the bore of a BOP stack.
  • Electric submersible pump (ESP) equipped HXT wells that cannot produce without artificial lift have been accepted with an "external" tree cap (which also facilitates passage for E and H lines between the TH and HXT mounted control system).
  • ESP Electric submersible pump
  • External tree cap which also facilitates passage for E and H lines between the TH and HXT mounted control system.
  • Great complexity number of functions, orientation, leak paths, etc.
  • risk would be added if an "internal" tree cap were required also to conduit E and H controls.
  • two caps would likely be required, one through-BOP installable; a second to route the control functions over to the HXT.
  • conduits between the external tree cap and the HXT would also be limited regarding the depth of water in which they can be operated, assuming they were to be comprised of flexible hoses. Conduits exposed externally to sea water pressure have a limited "collapse" resistance capability.
  • HXTs used on natural drive wells currently require an internal (through-BOP deployed) tree cap further increases the size penalty of HXT systems. This is because the tree cap needs a landing shoulder, seal bores, locking profiles, etc., all of which are generally larger than the diameter of the TH it will ultimately be positioned above.
  • the slimbore system of this invention needs to pass nothing larger than the TH, THRT and landing string (LS) through the subsea BOP stack.
  • a more or less conventional VDB or alternatively a "monobore" xmas tree can be installed on top of the "slimbore" TS/TH like that of Figures 5A, 5B, because the outer profile of the "slimbore" tubing spool is a conventional 183 ⁇ 4" (476 mm) configuration.
  • An associated tree cap for the CXT can be ROV deployed, which saves a trip between the surface and subsea tree, which would normally be required for CXT systems.
  • Some advantages of using a subsea completion arrangement that does not include an HXT tree concern relative smaller size and lower weight. These advantages are important for deployment from some deepwater capable rigs. Furthermore, CXTs can be "intervened” using simpler tooting packages deployed from lower cost vessels.
  • FIGS 5A, 5B Associated with the slimbore completion system permanently installed hardware (TS, TH, XT, etc.) of this invention as schematically illustrated in Figures 5A, 5B, are a suite of tools that make its installation and subsequent interface effective.
  • the installation sequence of Figures 9 to 18 illustrate completion/intervention systems and running tools and methods for these activities.
  • Figure 9 shows a conventional subsea wellhead system 100, comprising a high pressure wellhead housing 102 and associated conductor housing and well conductor 104, installed at the subsea mudline 106.
  • the internal components of the system 100 including casing hangers/ casing strings and seal assemblies, etc., (not illustrated) are conventional in the art of subsea wellhead systems.
  • Figure 10 shows a tubing spool TS10 (also known as a tubing "head”), secured on top of the high pressure wellhead housing 102 by means of a connector C1.
  • the connector C1 is preferably a hydraulic wellhead connector which establishes a seal and locks the interface of the tubing spool TS10 to the wellhead housing 102.
  • Other securing means can be used in place of the connector C1.
  • the tubing spool TS10 provides an upward-facing profile which typically, but not necessarily, matches the profile of the wellhead housing 102.
  • the tubing spool TS10 is constructed according to the arrangement illustrated in Figures 5A and 5B. It contains internal profiles and flow paths that are discussed below.
  • FIG 11 shows a slimbore BOP stack 120 landed, locked and sealed (by means of hydraulic connector C2) on top of the tubing spool TS10 of Figure 10.
  • Slimbore in this context means that the I.D. of the BOP is about 13-5/8" (346 mm).
  • Connector C2 is arranged and designed to connect the 13-5/8" (346 mm) nominal slimbore BOP stack to the (typically) 183 ⁇ 4" (476 mm) nominal configuration outer profile of tubing spool TS10.
  • the purpose of the BOP stack 120 is primarily to provide well control capability local to the wellhead system components.
  • An integral but independently separable part of the slimbore BOP stack is the lower marine riser package (LMRP) 122.
  • LMRP lower marine riser package
  • LMRP 122 provides for quick release of the marine riser 124 from the slimbore BOP stack 120 in an emergency, such as would be required if the surface vessel to which the marine riser is connected were to move off location unexpectedly.
  • LMRP 122 Within the LMRP 122 is a "flex-joint" 123 that eases riser bending loads and the transition angle associated with the interface of the marine riser 124 with the substantially stiffer LMRP 122 and BOP stack 120 components.
  • the LMRP 122 also contains redundant control modules, choke and kill line terminations and, typically, a redundant annular blow-out preventer. By retrieving the LMRP 122, any of these items can be repaired or replaced, if the need were to arise, without requiring that the BOP stack 120 be disturbed. This feature is important, because the BOP stack could be required to maintain well control.
  • the marine riser 124 itself is the component of the system that enables the BOP stack 120 to be lowered to and retrieved from the high pressure wellhead housing 102 (drilling mode) and tubing spool TS10 at sea floor 106. It is also, however, the conduit through which drilling and completion fluids are circulated, and through which all wellbore tools are deployed.
  • the internal diameter of the marine riser defines to a significant extent (especially in deep water) the volume of fluids that must be handled by the associated deployment vessel, and also defines the maximum size of any elements that can pass through the riser.
  • the internal diameters of the riser 124, the lower marine riser package 122 and the BOP stack 120 must be sufficient to pass the equipment and tooling that will be run into the bore of the tubing spool TS10 which is designed like the tubing spool TS5 of Figures 5A and 5B.
  • the small internal bore diameter of tubing spool TS10 enabled by its arrangement with a tubing hanger having a production bore (but no annulus bore) and an increased number of E and H conduits, determines the minimum size acceptable for the inner diameter of BOP stack 120 :and Lower Marine Riser Package 122 and marine riser 124.
  • tubing hanger TH12 (see Figure 12 and Figure 12A) have a maximum external diameter of slightly less than 11" (279 mm) and that the internal bore of BOP stack 120 and LMRP 122 be slightly greater, e.g., 11" (279 mm) drift so as to be able to pass tubing hanger TH12 through them.
  • the internal diameter of marine completion riser 124 is preferably about 12" (304 mm).
  • tubing hanger TH12 may have a maximum external diameter of slightly less than 13-5/8" (346 mm), with the internal bore of BOP stack 120 and LMRP of slightly greater dimension, 13-5/8" (346 mm) drift, and with the internal diameter of marine completion riser 124 about 14" (355 mm).
  • Figure 12 shows a sectional view of Figure 11.
  • Figure 12A shows an enlarged sectional view of Figure 12.
  • the tubing hanger, TH12 has been landed, locked and sealed to the bore of the tubing spool TS10.
  • the arrangement of tubing hanger/tubing spool TH12/TS10 is like that of TH5/TS5 of the schematic illustrations of Figures 5A, 5B.
  • the orientation of the tubing hanger TH12 within the tubing spool TS10 is achieved passively by engagement typically of a tubing hanger - integral key into a tubing spool - fixed cam/ vertical slot device (not shown).
  • Alternative passive alignment arrangements are also known to those skilled in the art of well completions.
  • the key is preferably located below the tubing hanger TH12 landing shoulder, but another location for such a key may be provided.
  • Figure 12 and enlarged portion Fig. 12A further show an annulus path or passage A12 that allows communication of fluids around the tubing hanger TH12 (i.e., from above to below the sealed landing location of TH12/TS10, and vice-versa).
  • This "bypass" path A12 is equipped with a remotely operable valve V12 that permits remote control closure of the passage A12 whenever desired, without the need for an associated wireline operation.
  • Figure 12A most clearly shows the completion landing string LS made up to the top of the tubing hanger TH12.
  • the landing string LS is typically defined as everything above the tubing hanger TH12 as illustrated in Figure 12.
  • the subsea test tree SSTT and associated emergency disconnect latch EDCL are positioned above the lowermost BOP stack 120 ram 128 and below the BOP blind/ shear ram 130.
  • Such an arrangement is conventional.
  • the well annulus can be accessed via port A12 using the BOP stack choke and kill system flow paths 132.
  • the communication path is illustrated by arrows AP in Figure 12A. All of these system characteristics cooperate to enable use of a simple, tubing-based slimbore monobore landing string LS and a very small outside diameter (OD) tubing hanger TH12.
  • FIG 12B is a perspective view of tubing spool TS10 which shows that the annulus path A12 may include an external piping loop A12' as an alternative to the internal conduit illustrated in Figure 5A.
  • the annulus bypass conduit may also reside fully within either a bolt-on or flange-on block attached to the side of the tubing spool TS10.
  • Valve V12 is remotely controllable.
  • Figure 13 illustrates the state of the subsea system with the slimbore BOP stack 120/122 removed from the tubing spool TS10 (with the bottom of the landing string LS suspended therein) and offset laterally a relatively small distance from the top of the tubing spool TS10.
  • Figure 13 also shows that a subsea xmas tree 150 and BOP adaptor 152 have been installed in place of BOP 120 with connector C3 securing xmas tree 150 to tubing spool TS10.
  • Connector C3 connects the xmas tree 150 to the typically 183 ⁇ 4" (476 mm) configuration nominal profile of the tubing spool TS10.
  • the xmas tree 150 may be deployed to the tubing spool TS10 by means of a cable in coordination with a ROV, or on drill pipe or tubing, or even using the BOP stack 120 and/or landing string LS themselves as the transport devices. Note that for the case where a conventional size BOP stack is used in place of the slimbore system, it is also conceivable that the BOP stack could be "parked" on top of an appropriate seabed facility (typically a preset pile or another wellhead arrangement) and the LMRP used as the transport tool.
  • an appropriate seabed facility typically a preset pile or another wellhead arrangement
  • FIG 13 further shows a BOP adaptor 152 removably secured to the top of the conventional xmas tree 150, preferably installed to the top of xmas tree 150 while it was on the vessel prior to deployment. Its purpose is to adapt the upper profile 300 of an otherwise conventional xmas tree (e.g., a 13-5/8" (346 mm) clamp hub or similar profile as compared to a standard 183 ⁇ 4" (476 mm) configuration top interface) for an interface 302 with the larger connector C2, typically 183 ⁇ 4" (476 mm), on the bottom of the slimbore BOP stack 120, or the BOP stack LMRP 122 (with connector C2', for example) or a standard BOP stack 160 or its LMRP 170 (see Figure 17).
  • BOP adaptor 152 has a bottom profile of typically 13-5/8" (346 mm) nominal configuration and a top profile 302 of 183 ⁇ 4" (476 mm) nominal configuration.
  • FIG 13 illustrates the slimbore BOP stack 120 prior to its connection to the conventional xmas tree 150 by means of the BOP adaptor 152.
  • the BOP adaptor 152 has an internal profile that emulates the upper internal profile of the tubing hanger TH12 so that the tubing hanger running tool THRT of landing string LS may be used to "tieback" the production bore of the xmas tree 150.
  • the inner profile of the BOP adaptor 152 includes a central production bore and at least "dummy" plural E and H receptacles which match those of the tubing hanger, and also includes an annulus passage.
  • the BOP adaptor 152 is arranged and designed to provide all interface/guidance facilities required, such as a guidelineless (GLL) re-entry funnel, if required (not shown).
  • GLL guidelineless
  • Figure 14 and the enlarged sectional views of Figures 14A, 14B show the slimbore BOP stack 120 and landing string LS after engagement of connector C2 to the top of the BOP adaptor 152 and thereby to the 13-5/8" (346 mm) re-entry hub 151 of xmas tree 150.
  • the physical relationship between the landing string LS components and BOP stack 120 are identical to such relationship in Figure 12 (orientation, elevation, etc.).
  • Control of the annulus bore is by means of the choke and kill lines 132 of the BOP stack 120 via the annulus port A12 of Figure 12A and of Figures 14 and 14B.
  • FIG 15 shows the condition of the subsea well after the landing string LS, BOP stack 120, marine riser 124, and BOP adaptor 152 have been retrieved from the top of the xmas tree 150.
  • the BOP adaptor 152 is retrieved during the same trip as retrieval of the BOP stack 120 in order to save a trip. Specifically, there are no dedicated trips (or tools) required for the BOP adaptor 152. It is installed already made up to the xmas tree 150, yet it can be retrieved at the same time as the BOP stack 120 or 160 (see Figure 17 and discussion below) leaving the xmas tree 150 connected to tubing spool TS10. Retrieval of the xmas tree 150 by one approach is simply the reverse of the installation process.
  • the BOP adaptor 152 may be secured to the bottom of an appropriate BOP stack 120 or LMRP 122, and the BOP adaptor 152 subsequently connected to xmas tree 150. After appropriate pressure barriers have been established in the wellbore, the xmas tree 50 may be retrieved. A variety of other means may also be employed to achieve securing the well and retrieving the tree (including use of a conventional completion/intervention riser system).
  • Figure 16 shows a tree cap 158 installed to the top of the xmas tree 150 re-entry profile 300 as a conventional redundant barrier to the xmas tree swab valves and as a "critical surfaces" protector.
  • FIG 17 is essentially the same as Figure 14, with the significant difference that the BOP stack 160 shown is a conventional deepwater 18-3/4" (476 mm) nominal size version.
  • the BOP adaptor 152 is connected to the larger BOP stack 160 via the connector C4 attached to the 183 ⁇ 4" (476 mm) configuration profile at the top of the adaptor.
  • the BOP adaptor 152 provides a common top profile for interface of both slimbore and conventional BOP stacks.
  • Figure 18 is an alternative arrangement for the xmas tree 150 secured to a slimbore tubing spool TS10/tubing hanger TH12 without the BOP adaptor being secured thereto for interface with a traditional approach open-sea completion/intervention riser.
  • a tree running tool TRT secures a Lower Workover Riser Package (LWRP) and emergency disconnect package EDP to xmas tree 150.
  • LWRP Lower Workover Riser Package

Description

Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to subsea completion systems. In particular, the invention concerns a subsea completion system which may be considered a hybrid of conventional xmas tree (CXT) and horizontal xmas tree (HXT) arrangements. More specifically, this invention relates to a marine riser/ tubing hanger/ tubing spool arrangement with the capability of passing production tubing and a large number of electric and hydraulic lines within a relatively small diameter.
This invention also relates to a method and arrangement whereby both "reduced bore" ("slimbore") and conventional BOP/marine riser systems may be interfaced both to the tubing spool and the xmas tree, such that the BOP stack need not be retrieved in order that the xmas tree may be installed, and so that the xmas tree need not be deployed with or interfaced at all by a conventional workover/intervention riser, if this is not desired.
Background and Objects of the Invention
The invention described below originates from an objective to provide a subsea completion system that is capable of being installed and serviced using a marine riser and BOP stack, especially those of substantially reduced size and weight as compared to conventional systems. One objective is to replace a conventional 19" (483 mm) nominal bore marine riser and associated 18-3/4" (476 mm) nominal bore BOP stack with a smaller bore diameter system, for example in the range between 14" and 11" (279 mm) for the marine riser and BOP stack. Preferably the internal diameter of the BOP stack is under 12" (304 mm). If the riser bore diameter is under 12" (304 mm), it will require only 40% of the volume of fluids to fill in comparison to 19" (483 mm) nominal conventional systems. The smaller riser/BOP stack and the resulting reduced fluids volume requirements result in a significant advantage for the operator in the form of weight and cost savings for the riser, fluids, fluid storage facilities, etc. These factors combine to increase available "deck loading" capacity and deck storage space for any rig using the arrangement of the invention and facilitates operations in deeper water as compared to arrangements currently available.
At the same time, it is desirable to accommodate a large number of electric (E) and hydraulic (H) conduits through the tubing hanger. A currently available tubing hanger typical of those provided throughout the subsea completion industry can accommodate a production bore, an annulus bore, and up to one electric (1E) plus five hydraulic (5H) conduits. An important objective of the invention is to provide a new system to accommodate production tubing and provide annulus communication, and to provide a tubing hanger that can accommodate (ideally) as many as 2E plus 7H independent conduits. The requirement for the large number of E and H conduits results from the desire to accommodate downhole "smart wells" hardware (smart wells have down-hole devices such as sliding sleeves, enhanced sensing and control systems, etc., which require conduits to the surface for their control).
It is also an object of the invention to provide a subsea system that obviates the need for a conventional, and costly, "open sea" capable workover/intervention riser. The object is to provide a system which allows well access via a BOP stack/marine riser system on top of a subsea xmas tree. Such a system is advantageous, especially for deep water applications, where the xmas tree can be installed without first having to retrieve and subsequently re-run the BOP stack. Another important object of the invention is to provide a system which allows future intervention using a BOP stack/marine riser or a more conventional workover/intervention riser.
US-A-5,544,707 (Cooper Cameron Corporation) describes a well completion arrangement using a spool tree instead of a conventional christmas tree in which a tubing hanger is landed at a predetermined angular orientation with lateral outlet ports in the tubing hanger and the spool tree in alignment. The tubing string can then be pulled without disturbing the tree and access may be had to the production casing hanger for monitoring production casing annulus pressure. The spool tree is provided with a production casing annulus monitoring port and lateral production ports.
GB-A-2,166,775 (Britoil PLC) describes an arrangement in which a tubing hanger with a vertical through passage is seated in the tree body, which provides in line access to the wellhead during completion. Production is via lateral production ports in the tree body. A tree cap with multiple electric and hydraulic connectors interfaces with the tubing hanger.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A new tubing hanger/spool subsea well completion arrangement is provided in accordance with the claims which follow.
The new arrangement provides a tubing spool for connection to a subsea wellhead below, and for a first connection above to a slimbore or conventional BOP stack for tubing hanging operations and subsequently to a xmas tree for production operations. The tubing hanger is sized to pass through the bore of a slimbore blowout preventer stack and a siimbore riser to a surface vessel. The tubing hanger is arranged and designed to land and to be sealed in an internal profile of the tubing spool. The tubing hanger has a central bore for production tubing and up to at least nine conduits and associated vertically facing couplers for electric cables and hydraulic fluid passages. The tubing spool has a passage in its body which can route fluids around the tubing hanger sealed landing position so that annulus communication between the well bore (below) and the BOP stack or xmas tree (above) is obtained. A remotely operable valve in the annulus passage provides control over the annulus fluid flow.
A method is described herein which includes slimbore marine riser and slimbore BOP stack operations for landing the reduced diameter tubing hanger in the tubing spool using a landing string. Conventional sized BOP stacks and marine risers may also be used for the various operations. The slimbore BOP stack and completion landing string is set aside of the tubing spool, and a xmas tree is connected to the top of the tubing spool. The xmas tree may be deployed to the tubing spool independently of the riser(s) connected to and/or deployed inside of the BOP stack. A BOP adaptor is provided to connect the top of the conventional sized xmas tree to the bottom of the slimbore or conventional sized BOP stack and marine riser. The landing string, with tubing hanger running tool at its bottom end, is used along with other equipment to provide a high pressure conduit to the surface for production fluids, and to serve as a mandrel around which BOP rams and/or annular BOPs may be closed to create a fluid path for the borehole annulus which is accessed and controlled by the BOP choke and kill conduits.
After the BOP stack is removed by disconnecting the BOP adaptor from the top of the xmas tree, the xmas tree may be capped. The tree cap can be removed later to allow well intervention operations, and the slimbore or a conventional sized BOP and marine riser along with the BOP adaptor, can be run onto the xmas tree. Alternatively, a conventional workover/intervention riser may be used to interface the top of the xmas tree.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The objects, advantages, and features of the invention will become more apparent by reference to the drawings which are appended hereto and wherein like numerals indicate like parts and wherein an illustrative embodiment of the invention is shown, of which:
  • Figures 1A, 1B, 2,3 and 4 are diagrammatic sketches of various arrangements for providing an annulus conduit, a production conduit, and conduits for electric (E) and hydraulic (H) communication via conductors which extend from a surface location above a subsea well to the well below;
  • Figures 5A and 5B are diagrammatic sketches of a preferred embodiment of an arrangement for providing an annulus conduit, a production conduit and electric (E) and hydraulic (H) conduits from above a subsea well to the well below in which the tubing hanger outer diameter is minimized while maximizing the number of E and H lines and providing vertical coupling of same to a conventional monobore or dual bore xmas tree;
  • Figures 6 through 8 illustrate prior art hydraulic and electric coupler arrangements possible for communication (via the tubing hanger) through the wellhead to the well below;
  • Figures 9 through 12 are schematic drawings which illustrate a preferred embodiment and installation sequence for a tubing hanger/tubing spool arrangement for a slimbore marine riser and slimbore BOP stack and with Figure 12 A showing in an enlarged view the annulus path in the tubing spool which extends around the tubing hanger landing location to form a bypass and with Figure 12B showing a perspective view of the tubing spool with an external piping loop for the annulus path ;
  • Figures 13 and 14 are schematic illustrations of xmas tree installation operations including removal of the slimbore BOP from the wellhead, installation of a xmas tree with an upwardly facing BOP adaptor, and reinstallation of the slimbore BOP on top of the XT;
  • Figure 14A presents an enlarged view of the annulus path through the xmas tree, BOP adaptor and BOP, and control of the path with the BOP choke and kill lines; Figure 14B shows the annulus path from the wellhead, through the tubing spool and into the xmas tree;
  • Figures 15 and 16 are schematic illustrations where the BOP stack and BOP adaptor have been removed from the top of the xmas tree and a tree cap has subsequently been installed in the top profile of the xmas tree respectively;
  • Figure 17 shows a conventional (standard dimensions) BOP stack and marine riser system installed to the top profile of the xmas tree via the BOP adaptor; and
  • Figure 18 illustrates the provision of a conventional workover/intervention riser secured to the top profile of the xmas tree.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
    Figures 1A and 1B schematically illustrate a possible tubing hanger (TH) and xmas tree (XT) arrangement for meeting the objectives as described above. Figure 1A illustrates a tubing spool TS to which a conventional xmas tree XT is attached by means of a connector C. The tubing spool TS is secured to a wellhead housing WH. The outer profile of tubing spool TS shown is referred to as an 18-3/4" (476 MM) mandrel style (the 18-3/4" (476 mm) designation referring to the nominal bore of the BOP stack normally associated with the subject profile) but with an internal diameter of under 11" (279 mm) or 13-5/8" (346 mm) depending on the BOP or marine riser internal diameter dimension. A tubing hanger TH is landed in the internal bore of tubing spool TS, and the tubing hanger TH has an annulus conduit A, a production conduit P, and several E and H ports or conduits through it. Couplers 10 are illustrated schematically at the top of hanger H. Figure 1B is a cross section (taken along lines 1B-1B of Figure 1 A) of the tubing hanger TH of Figure 1 A and illustrates that for a tubing hanger TH with specified diameters for the production bore P and the annulus bore A, only a few electric and hydraulic bores of predetermined diameters can be provided.
    Figure 2 schematically illustrates another arrangement for possibly meeting the objectives of the invention. A tubing spool TS2 is provided which includes an annulus bore bypass ABP2 with valves V2. A tubing hanger TH2 has a production bore P2 and electric and hydraulic conduits E2, H2. Such conduits are bores through the body of the hanger which communicate with vertical and horizontal couplers 12, 14. The tubing spool TS2 can accept either a conventional vertical xmas tree CXT or a horizontal christmas tree HXT. The advantage of the arrangement of Figure 2 over that of Figure 1A is that it includes a bypass annulus bore ABP2 in the tubing spool TS2 itself which provides room for the production bore P2 and an increased number of E and H conduits in the tubing hanger TH2 (as compared to the arrangement of Figures 1A, 1B). As mentioned above, it is assumed that the outer diameter of TH2 is the same as that of TH, i.e., under about 11 " (279 mm) or 13-5/8" (346 mm) depending on the BOP and marine riser dimensions.
    Figure 3 is another schematic illustration, which is similar to that of Figure 2. However, only horizontal couplers 16 for the E and H channels are provided. Such an arrangement is disadvantageous in that continuous vertical communication between the equipment installation vessel and downhole electric and hydraulic functions is not accommodated.
    Figure 4 is another schematic illustration of a possible tubing hanger TH4/conventional vertical bore xmas tree combination where a xmas tree XT4 is secured to a tubing spool TS4. A concentric tubing hanger TH4 is provided in tubing spool TS4 and has annulus bore or bores A4 and production bore P4 through it. Valve or valves VA are provided in bore or bores A4. The arrangement of Figure 4 provides only vertical controls access.
    Figures 5A and 5B schematically show the preferred embodiment of an arrangement to meet the objectives stated above. The arrangement of Figures 5A and 5B provide the best features of a CXT and an HXT in a hybrid arrangement, where a valved annulus bypass A5 is provided in the tubing spool TS5, and with a production bore P5 and an increased number of E and H conduits 18 provided therein. in the preferred arrangement of Figure 5A, the tubing spool TS5 is arranged and designed to pass an 8½" (216 mm) bit. Its top outer profile should be compatible with a standard 18-¾" (476 mm) system so as to accept a conventional sized CXT and standard sized BOP, as well as a slimbore BOP. Ideally it should have a bore protector and its upper internal profile (ID) diameter would be on the order of 11" (279 mm) or 13-5/8" (346 mm), depending on the bore size of the smallest BOP system to be interfaced. Ideally up to nine, but as many as 12-to-14 ports or conduits 18 of 1.50" (38 mm) nominal diameter can be provided in tubing hanger TH5. Of these ports, some may be required for alignment purposes, depending on the alignment method adopted.
    The Figures I through 5 provide alternative tubing hanger (TH) and xmas tree (XT) combinations which are examined for their capability to meet the objectives as described above.
    The arrangement of Figures 5A and 5B offer certain advantages regarding the desired specific objectives. The annulus communication path or passage A5 is routed via the body of the tubing spool TS5 and passes "around" rather than "through" the tubing hanger, as is the case for Figures 1A, 1B and 4. In other words, a passage is provided around the sealed landing position between the tubing spool TS5 and the tubing hanger TH5. This feature provides more space to accommodate a relatively large number of E and H conduits. As with horizontal tree (HXT) arrangements, the annulus passage A5, whether integrated with the body of the TS or attached externally by some means, is typically fitted with one or more valves VA5, VA6 in order to enable remote isolation/ sealing of the annulus flow path. Whereas a conventional "vertical dual bore" (VDB) xmas tree/completion system requires that a wireline plug be installed into the annulus bore of the conventional tubing hanger (or thereabouts) in order to seal it off, providing a valved annulus bypass port achieves savings in time and money associated with installing/ retrieving such a plug. Since the valves VA5, VA6 of Figure 5A are preferably (but not limited to) gate valves, the reliability of the annulus pressure barrier is also improved with the arrangement of Figure 5A as compared to a wireline plug. It is also notable that the annulus bypass conduit A5 is contained as part of a tubing spool assembly TS5 and not in the body of the tree as would be the case for HXTs.
    Tubing spools ("TS"), also called tubing heads, offer advantages and disadvantages. Some of the more common characteristics associated with tubing spools include:
  • (1) provides "clean" interfaces for a tubing hanger ("TH"),
  • (2) reduces stack-up tolerances to "machine tolerances",
  • (3) can be equipped with an orientation device, thereby minimizing TH "rotational" tolerance range and possibly removing the need to modify BOP stacks so that they can orient the TH (as is typically required for conventional vertical dual bore VDB systems),
  • (4) can incorporate flowline/umbilical interface and parking facilities,
  • (5) represent an additional capital expenditure compared to both CXT systems (where the TH is landed directly in the wellhead) and HXT systems (TH landed in the body of the HXT),
  • (6) may require an extra trip (i.e., installation of TS) as compared to CXT and HXT systems, and
  • (7) requires that the BOP be removed from the wellhead so that the TS may be installed onto the wellhead, and the BOP subsequently landed on the TS, and the downhole completion/TH then subsequently installed.
  • While the above list is by no means complete, it shows advantages and disadvantages of a tubing spool/tubing hanger (TS/TH) arrangement as compared to CXT systems and HXT systems. The last three characteristics (5,6,7), represent drawbacks for a TS completion, especially because HXT systems provide most of the benefits of a TS without most of the its disadvantages. Nevertheless, the advantages provided by the design of Figures 5A, 5B outweigh the disadvantages identified above, especially since the impact of the drawbacks are mediated in the design of the invention.
    An important advantage of the arrangement of Figures 5A and 5B is its capability to pass a very large number of E and H lines 18 through the tubing hanger TH5 white requiring only a very small bore subsea BOP and marine riser. For example purposes only, a tubing hanger TH5 capable of suspending 4-1/2" (114 mm) production tubing and providing on the order of 10 (combined total) E and H passages 18 of 1½" (38 mm) diameter can be passed through a roughly 11" (279 mm) bore (drift) BOP stack and an associated "slimbore" marine riser (12" (304 mm) ID).
    A comparably capable HXT tubing hanger system would likely require a 13-5/8" (346 mm) nominal bore BOP and a 14" (355 mm) ID (approximate) bore marine riser. The cross sectional area of a 19" (483 mm) bore marine riser (typically used with 18-3/4" (476 mm) bore BOP stacks) is 283.5 in.2 (1829 cm2) Cross sectional areas for 14" (355 mm) and 12" (304 mm) risers are 153.9 in.2 (993 cm2) and 113.1 in.2 (730 cm2), respectively. The volume of fluids required to fill these risers are 100%, 54.3% and 39.9% respectively, using the 19" (483 mm) riser as the base case. Fluids savings translate into direct cost savings, and indirect savings associated with reduced storage requirements, pumping requirements, etc. Furthermore, "variable deck loading" is improved since smaller risers, less fluid, less fluid storage, etc., all weigh less. A 12" bore riser requires only 73.5% as much fluid volume as a 14" (355 mm) riser (a significant advantage for the system of this invention when compared even to reduced bore HXT systems). As the water depth for subsea completions increases, the issue of variable deck loading becomes more important.
    The arrangement of Figures 5A and 5B has characteristics of a conventional xmas tree completion system and an HXT (horizontal xmas tree) completion system. It is a hybrid of features of a CXT and an HXT connected to a well head, but it most closely resembles a CXT with a tubing spool.
    Another significant advantage of the slimbore subsea completion system of Figures 5A and 5B is the manner in which E and H conduits 18 are handled. it is generally recognized in the subsea well completion/intervention industry that whenever (especially) electric lines are required to be installed into a wellbore, the most common failure mode is that the cables and/or end terminations become damaged during the installation process. It is, therefore, highly desirable that electric circuit continuity be monitored throughout the installation activity (i.e., from the time that the downhole electric component is made up into the completion string until the time that the TH is landed and tested). Whereas there have been many cases in which a downhole electric problem has been detected (i.e., communication with a downhole pressure and temperature gauge lost), and simply ignored (i.e., deemed not worth the cost to pull the completion to replace the damaged component). This will likely not be an acceptable practice where "smart well" hardware is integrated with the completion - there is too much money and potential well productivity impact involved. It is, therefore, important that electric circuit continuity can be monitored throughout the completion installation process.
    The most efficient method traditionally employed to monitor downhole functions during the completion installation process has been to route lines from each downhole component through a series of interfaces all the way back to the surface. In the system of this invention, which is typical of CXT systems regarding electric conduit respects, lines are run from the downhole components alongside the production tubing (clamped thereto) and terminated into the bottom of the TH. The lines are routed through the TH and are equipped with "wet mateable" devices which have the capability to conduct power and data signals across the TH/TH Running Tool (THRT) interface during TH installation and related modes, and across the TH/xmas tree interface during production and intervention modes, etc. From the THRT bottom face, the electric conduits are typically routed through a variety of components (possibly ram and/or annular BOP seal spools, subsea test tree (SSTT)/ emergency disconnect (EDC) latch device, E/H control module, etc.) until they are ultimately combined into a bundle of lines (E and H) typically referred to as an umbilical. The umbilical conveniently can be reeled in or out for re-use in a variety of applications.
    After the TH has been installed and tested, one completion scenario associated with the invention (one that is typically used throughout the industry) is for the landing string (LS, i.e., THRT on "up") to be retrieved, the BOP stack/marine riser disconnected and retrieved, and the xmas tree installed using typically a workover/intervention riser system. The xmas tree engages the same E and H control line (wet mateable) couplers at the top of the TH as previously interfaced by the THRT. It is a special attribute of the system of the invention that the THRT need only be unlatched from the TH and the LS lifted up into or just above the BOP stack, and the BOP stack need only be removed from the wellhead a sufficient lateral distance to facilitate installation of the xmas tree onto the TS. Specifically, the XT may be lowered by an independent hoisting unit and installed onto the wellhead using a cable or tubing string with ROV assistance, etc., or the xmas tree may previously have been "parked" at a laterally displaced seabed staging position for movement onto the wellhead using the LS and/or BOP stack/ marine riser, for example.
    The procedure for installation of an HXT is different in that it is often preferred that no umbilical be used as part of the TH deployment process. During an HXT installation the SCSSV(s) are typically locked "open" prior to deployment of the TH, a purely mechanical or "external pressure" (possibly "staged") operated THRT/TH is employed, and no communication with downhole components is provided. Once the TH has been engaged (and typically locked) into the bore of the HXT, electric and hydraulic communication between the surface and downhole is established via the HXT using an umbilical run outside of the marine riser. A remotely operated vehicle (ROV) is typically used to engage the various couplers in a radial direction (not a vertical direction) into the TH from the HXT body (horizontal plane of motion). One supplier also employs "angled" interfacing devices for the hydraulic conduits (i.e., between a tapered lower surface of the TH and a shoulder in the HXT bore) which are engaged passively as part of the TH landing/locking operation.
    It is the generally horizontal/radial orientation of couplers of especially the electric lines typical of an HXT system that tends to drive up the required diameter of the associated TH, and hence the required bore size for the related BOP stack and marine riser used to pass it. It is, of course, conceivable that a new design HXT and/or (wet-mateable electric) controls interface could be developed that would permit HXT TH size reduction (i.e., more compact coupler, or other than horizontal arrangement, or both, etc.), but HXTs for natural drive wells at least have used the "side-porting" of the controls interfaces between TH and HXT body to avoid complexity.
    The VDB TH schematic of Figure 6 shows a conventional tubing hanger TH6 for a VDB completion system. It shows a production bore P and an annulus bore A and shows that the E and H conduits 18 are routed in a generally vertical manner from the top to the bottom of the tubing hanger TH6. A hydraulic coupler 20 and an electric coupler 22 are schematically illustrated. The HXT TH schematic of Figure 7 illustrates a tubing hanger TH7 for an HXT with the vertical interface of electric and hydraulic conduits 18' at the bottom of the TH and the generally horizontal or radial couplers 20', 22' interface at the side of the TH. If it is desired to accommodate monitoring of the electric continuity to downhole equipment throughout the completion installation process as discussed above, it is necessary to have dual remotely engageable E and H controls interfaces for an HXT system: one "facing up" for engaging the THRT and one "facing sideways" or radially for engaging the HXT body conduit transfer devices. Figure 8 shows such an arrangement with vertical and radial couplers 20"V, 20"H for an electric lead coupler and vertical and radial hydraulic couplers 22"V, 22"H schematically illustrated. The arrangement of Figure 8 adds complexity to the system and greatly increases the risk of failure. Furthermore, one conduit access point (vertical or horizontal) must be positively de-activated whenever the alternative access point (horizontal or vertical) is active. There are obviously significant cost and packaging considerations also imposed on the HXT system when enhanced to provide all desired features. The HXT TH8 schematically illustrated in Figure 8 having both vertical and horizontal interfaces is typical of a system actually provided for a subsea application in the Mediterranean Sea.
    The question arises as to why the E and H conduits need to exit sideways for a HXT system? Why can't the controls interface be presented only at the top of the TH, for interface both by the THRT and HXT tree cap? Such an arrangement has been used effectively for electrical submersible pump.(ESP) applications for which the wells have insufficient energy to produce on their own. The limitations for "natural drive" well applications have to do with (1) the number of tested pressure barriers that must be in place before the BOP stack can be removed from the top of the HXT, and (2) the ability to provide adequate well control in the event pressure comes to be trapped under an HXT tree cap. To date, HXTs used on natural drive wells have typically required tree caps that can be installed and retrieved through the bore of a BOP stack. Electric submersible pump (ESP) equipped HXT wells that cannot produce without artificial lift have been accepted with an "external" tree cap (which also facilitates passage for E and H lines between the TH and HXT mounted control system). Great complexity (number of functions, orientation, leak paths, etc.) and risk would be added if an "internal" tree cap were required also to conduit E and H controls. In fact, two caps would likely be required, one through-BOP installable; a second to route the control functions over to the HXT. The conduits between the external tree cap and the HXT would also be limited regarding the depth of water in which they can be operated, assuming they were to be comprised of flexible hoses. Conduits exposed externally to sea water pressure have a limited "collapse" resistance capability.
    The fact that HXTs used on natural drive wells currently require an internal (through-BOP deployed) tree cap further increases the size penalty of HXT systems. This is because the tree cap needs a landing shoulder, seal bores, locking profiles, etc., all of which are generally larger than the diameter of the TH it will ultimately be positioned above.
    The slimbore system of this invention, on the other hand, needs to pass nothing larger than the TH, THRT and landing string (LS) through the subsea BOP stack. A more or less conventional VDB or alternatively a "monobore" xmas tree (both of which are referred herein generically as conventional xmas trees, CXT) can be installed on top of the "slimbore" TS/TH like that of Figures 5A, 5B, because the outer profile of the "slimbore" tubing spool is a conventional 18¾" (476 mm) configuration. An associated tree cap for the CXT can be ROV deployed, which saves a trip between the surface and subsea tree, which would normally be required for CXT systems. Some advantages of using a subsea completion arrangement that does not include an HXT tree concern relative smaller size and lower weight. These advantages are important for deployment from some deepwater capable rigs. Furthermore, CXTs can be "intervened" using simpler tooting packages deployed from lower cost vessels.
    Associated with the slimbore completion system permanently installed hardware (TS, TH, XT, etc.) of this invention as schematically illustrated in Figures 5A, 5B, are a suite of tools that make its installation and subsequent interface effective. The installation sequence of Figures 9 to 18 illustrate completion/intervention systems and running tools and methods for these activities.
    Figure 9 shows a conventional subsea wellhead system 100, comprising a high pressure wellhead housing 102 and associated conductor housing and well conductor 104, installed at the subsea mudline 106. The internal components of the system 100 including casing hangers/ casing strings and seal assemblies, etc., (not illustrated) are conventional in the art of subsea wellhead systems.
    Figure 10 shows a tubing spool TS10 (also known as a tubing "head"), secured on top of the high pressure wellhead housing 102 by means of a connector C1. The connector C1 is preferably a hydraulic wellhead connector which establishes a seal and locks the interface of the tubing spool TS10 to the wellhead housing 102. Other securing means can be used in place of the connector C1. The tubing spool TS10 provides an upward-facing profile which typically, but not necessarily, matches the profile of the wellhead housing 102. The tubing spool TS10 is constructed according to the arrangement illustrated in Figures 5A and 5B. It contains internal profiles and flow paths that are discussed below.
    Figure 11 shows a slimbore BOP stack 120 landed, locked and sealed (by means of hydraulic connector C2) on top of the tubing spool TS10 of Figure 10. Slimbore in this context means that the I.D. of the BOP is about 13-5/8" (346 mm). Connector C2 is arranged and designed to connect the 13-5/8" (346 mm) nominal slimbore BOP stack to the (typically) 18¾" (476 mm) nominal configuration outer profile of tubing spool TS10. The purpose of the BOP stack 120 is primarily to provide well control capability local to the wellhead system components. An integral but independently separable part of the slimbore BOP stack is the lower marine riser package (LMRP) 122. It provides for quick release of the marine riser 124 from the slimbore BOP stack 120 in an emergency, such as would be required if the surface vessel to which the marine riser is connected were to move off location unexpectedly. Within the LMRP 122 is a "flex-joint" 123 that eases riser bending loads and the transition angle associated with the interface of the marine riser 124 with the substantially stiffer LMRP 122 and BOP stack 120 components. The LMRP 122 also contains redundant control modules, choke and kill line terminations and, typically, a redundant annular blow-out preventer. By retrieving the LMRP 122, any of these items can be repaired or replaced, if the need were to arise, without requiring that the BOP stack 120 be disturbed. This feature is important, because the BOP stack could be required to maintain well control.
    The marine riser 124 itself is the component of the system that enables the BOP stack 120 to be lowered to and retrieved from the high pressure wellhead housing 102 (drilling mode) and tubing spool TS10 at sea floor 106. It is also, however, the conduit through which drilling and completion fluids are circulated, and through which all wellbore tools are deployed. The internal diameter of the marine riser defines to a significant extent (especially in deep water) the volume of fluids that must be handled by the associated deployment vessel, and also defines the maximum size of any elements that can pass through the riser. The internal diameters of the riser 124, the lower marine riser package 122 and the BOP stack 120 must be sufficient to pass the equipment and tooling that will be run into the bore of the tubing spool TS10 which is designed like the tubing spool TS5 of Figures 5A and 5B. The small internal bore diameter of tubing spool TS10, enabled by its arrangement with a tubing hanger having a production bore (but no annulus bore) and an increased number of E and H conduits, determines the minimum size acceptable for the inner diameter of BOP stack 120 :and Lower Marine Riser Package 122 and marine riser 124. It is preferred that the tubing hanger TH12 (see Figure 12 and Figure 12A) have a maximum external diameter of slightly less than 11" (279 mm) and that the internal bore of BOP stack 120 and LMRP 122 be slightly greater, e.g., 11" (279 mm) drift so as to be able to pass tubing hanger TH12 through them. The internal diameter of marine completion riser 124 is preferably about 12" (304 mm).
    Alternatively, for a slightly larger system the tubing hanger TH12 may have a maximum external diameter of slightly less than 13-5/8" (346 mm), with the internal bore of BOP stack 120 and LMRP of slightly greater dimension, 13-5/8" (346 mm) drift, and with the internal diameter of marine completion riser 124 about 14" (355 mm).
    Figure 12 shows a sectional view of Figure 11. Figure 12A shows an enlarged sectional view of Figure 12. In Figures 12A and 12B the tubing hanger, TH12 has been landed, locked and sealed to the bore of the tubing spool TS10. The arrangement of tubing hanger/tubing spool TH12/TS10 is like that of TH5/TS5 of the schematic illustrations of Figures 5A, 5B. The orientation of the tubing hanger TH12 within the tubing spool TS10 is achieved passively by engagement typically of a tubing hanger - integral key into a tubing spool - fixed cam/ vertical slot device (not shown). Alternative passive alignment arrangements are also known to those skilled in the art of well completions. For the arrangement shown in Figure 12A, the key is preferably located below the tubing hanger TH12 landing shoulder, but another location for such a key may be provided. Figure 12 and enlarged portion Fig. 12A further show an annulus path or passage A12 that allows communication of fluids around the tubing hanger TH12 (i.e., from above to below the sealed landing location of TH12/TS10, and vice-versa). This "bypass" path A12 is equipped with a remotely operable valve V12 that permits remote control closure of the passage A12 whenever desired, without the need for an associated wireline operation. Figure 12A most clearly shows the completion landing string LS made up to the top of the tubing hanger TH12. The landing string LS is typically defined as everything above the tubing hanger TH12 as illustrated in Figure 12.
    As illustrated in Figure 12, the subsea test tree SSTT and associated emergency disconnect latch EDCL (if required) are positioned above the lowermost BOP stack 120 ram 128 and below the BOP blind/ shear ram 130. Such an arrangement is conventional. By closing the lowermost ram 128 on the pipe section between the tubing hanger running tool THRT and the subsea test tree, SSTT, the well annulus can be accessed via port A12 using the BOP stack choke and kill system flow paths 132. The communication path is illustrated by arrows AP in Figure 12A. All of these system characteristics cooperate to enable use of a simple, tubing-based slimbore monobore landing string LS and a very small outside diameter (OD) tubing hanger TH12.
    Figure 12B is a perspective view of tubing spool TS10 which shows that the annulus path A12 may include an external piping loop A12' as an alternative to the internal conduit illustrated in Figure 5A. The annulus bypass conduit may also reside fully within either a bolt-on or flange-on block attached to the side of the tubing spool TS10. Valve V12 is remotely controllable.
    Figure 13 illustrates the state of the subsea system with the slimbore BOP stack 120/122 removed from the tubing spool TS10 (with the bottom of the landing string LS suspended therein) and offset laterally a relatively small distance from the top of the tubing spool TS10. Figure 13 also shows that a subsea xmas tree 150 and BOP adaptor 152 have been installed in place of BOP 120 with connector C3 securing xmas tree 150 to tubing spool TS10. Connector C3 connects the xmas tree 150 to the typically 18¾" (476 mm) configuration nominal profile of the tubing spool TS10. The xmas tree 150 may be deployed to the tubing spool TS10 by means of a cable in coordination with a ROV, or on drill pipe or tubing, or even using the BOP stack 120 and/or landing string LS themselves as the transport devices. Note that for the case where a conventional size BOP stack is used in place of the slimbore system, it is also conceivable that the BOP stack could be "parked" on top of an appropriate seabed facility (typically a preset pile or another wellhead arrangement) and the LMRP used as the transport tool.
    Figure 13 further shows a BOP adaptor 152 removably secured to the top of the conventional xmas tree 150, preferably installed to the top of xmas tree 150 while it was on the vessel prior to deployment. Its purpose is to adapt the upper profile 300 of an otherwise conventional xmas tree (e.g., a 13-5/8" (346 mm) clamp hub or similar profile as compared to a standard 18¾" (476 mm) configuration top interface) for an interface 302 with the larger connector C2, typically 18¾" (476 mm), on the bottom of the slimbore BOP stack 120, or the BOP stack LMRP 122 (with connector C2', for example) or a standard BOP stack 160 or its LMRP 170 (see Figure 17). In other words, BOP adaptor 152 has a bottom profile of typically 13-5/8" (346 mm) nominal configuration and a top profile 302 of 18¾" (476 mm) nominal configuration.
    Figure 13 illustrates the slimbore BOP stack 120 prior to its connection to the conventional xmas tree 150 by means of the BOP adaptor 152. The BOP adaptor 152 has an internal profile that emulates the upper internal profile of the tubing hanger TH12 so that the tubing hanger running tool THRT of landing string LS may be used to "tieback" the production bore of the xmas tree 150. In other words, the inner profile of the BOP adaptor 152 includes a central production bore and at least "dummy" plural E and H receptacles which match those of the tubing hanger, and also includes an annulus passage. The BOP adaptor 152 is arranged and designed to provide all interface/guidance facilities required, such as a guidelineless (GLL) re-entry funnel, if required (not shown).
    Figure 14 and the enlarged sectional views of Figures 14A, 14B show the slimbore BOP stack 120 and landing string LS after engagement of connector C2 to the top of the BOP adaptor 152 and thereby to the 13-5/8" (346 mm) re-entry hub 151 of xmas tree 150. The physical relationship between the landing string LS components and BOP stack 120 are identical to such relationship in Figure 12 (orientation, elevation, etc.). Control of the annulus bore is by means of the choke and kill lines 132 of the BOP stack 120 via the annulus port A12 of Figure 12A and of Figures 14 and 14B. Note that for the scenario where a conventional size LMRP 170 is interfaced with the BOP adaptor 152, receptacles and appropriate conduits for the choke and kill lines would have to be provided. The BOP adaptor 152 enables such identical physical arrangements along with various other advantages. Such advantages are listed below.
  • (1) The BOP stack 120 and landing string LS need not be retrieved to the surface to permit deployment/installation of the tree 150 as illustrated in Figure 13. This advantage represents substantial cost savings because of the "trip time" saved (likely >$1 million f/deep water).
  • (2) Because the BOP adaptor 152 resides between the top of the xmas tree 150 and the bottom of a BOP connector C2 (or LMRP connector C2', the packaging of the xmas tree 150 upper profile need not be modified to accommodate the larger connector of an 18-¾" (476 mm) BOP stack or LMRP to achieve the benefit of eliminating a trip of the BOP stack 120 to permit installation of the xmas tree 150.
  • (3) No special completion riser is required to install or intervene the xmas tree 150. Nevertheless, such a conventional approach could be used for the installation or any subsequent intervention or retrieval exercise simply by foregoing use of the BOP adaptor 152. In other words, the standard xmas tree top profile would not be changed.
  • (4) Standard (light weight) tubing/casing can be used to deploy the tubing hanger TH12, because the landing string LS is not required to be operated outside of the slimbore marine riser 124 (or even a conventional marine riser). This results in an advantage that tubing hanger TH12 can be installed with the benefit of "heave compensation" in deeper water, since the lighter weight landing string will not exceed the capacity of typical compensators (whereas most dedicated riser/landing string designs do).
  • (5) One and the same BOP adaptor 152 can be used to facilitate interface with a conventional (typically 18-3/4" (476 mm)) BOP stack and/or LMRP, if a slimbore BOP stack 120 is not available. This assumes that a sufficiently strong bottom connector/XT top profile interface is provided.
  • Figure 15 shows the condition of the subsea well after the landing string LS, BOP stack 120, marine riser 124, and BOP adaptor 152 have been retrieved from the top of the xmas tree 150. The BOP adaptor 152 is retrieved during the same trip as retrieval of the BOP stack 120 in order to save a trip. Specifically, there are no dedicated trips (or tools) required for the BOP adaptor 152. It is installed already made up to the xmas tree 150, yet it can be retrieved at the same time as the BOP stack 120 or 160 (see Figure 17 and discussion below) leaving the xmas tree 150 connected to tubing spool TS10. Retrieval of the xmas tree 150 by one approach is simply the reverse of the installation process. The BOP adaptor 152 may be secured to the bottom of an appropriate BOP stack 120 or LMRP 122, and the BOP adaptor 152 subsequently connected to xmas tree 150. After appropriate pressure barriers have been established in the wellbore, the xmas tree 50 may be retrieved. A variety of other means may also be employed to achieve securing the well and retrieving the tree (including use of a conventional completion/intervention riser system).
    Figure 16 shows a tree cap 158 installed to the top of the xmas tree 150 re-entry profile 300 as a conventional redundant barrier to the xmas tree swab valves and as a "critical surfaces" protector.
    Figure 17 is essentially the same as Figure 14, with the significant difference that the BOP stack 160 shown is a conventional deepwater 18-3/4" (476 mm) nominal size version. The BOP adaptor 152 is connected to the larger BOP stack 160 via the connector C4 attached to the 18¾" (476 mm) configuration profile at the top of the adaptor. Specifically, the BOP adaptor 152 provides a common top profile for interface of both slimbore and conventional BOP stacks.
    Figure 18 is an alternative arrangement for the xmas tree 150 secured to a slimbore tubing spool TS10/tubing hanger TH12 without the BOP adaptor being secured thereto for interface with a traditional approach open-sea completion/intervention riser. A tree running tool TRT secures a Lower Workover Riser Package (LWRP) and emergency disconnect package EDP to xmas tree 150. Because of the flexibility afforded by the BOP adaptor, there are few limitations as to the intervention configuration scenarios.
    Summary of Advantageous Features For The Slimbore Completion System
  • (1) The arrangement of a tubing spool TS5 - tubing hanger TH5 of Figures 5A and 5B enables use of a slimbore BOP 120 and slimbore marine riser 124 to minimize riser fluid requirements. As a result, less volume of fluids is required, which results in less storage required, less weight to be handled, more available vessel deck space and load capacity for other needs. Alternatively, it provides the capability to reduce required vessel size to carry out desired operations, etc. - all contributing to lower cost to the field operator.
  • (2) The tubing hanger TH5/tubing spool TS5 arrangement of the invention accommodates a relatively large number of electric (E) and hydraulic (H) controls conduits through a very small diameter tubing hanger, which in turn matches the small diameter limitations of the slimbore riser system. The relatively large number of conduits satisfies both current and perceived future (expanded) requirements of "smart wells".
  • (3) Because of the vertical orientation of the control conduits 18 of tubing hanger TH5, downhole functions can be monitored for integrity throughout the installation process. This arrangement allows any damage related failures to be quickly and efficiently rectified as soon as they occur, a requirement for "smart well" applications. Because the xmas tree 150 is installed on top of the tubing hanger TH12 following its installation in tubing spool TS10, the same control interfaces used during the tubing hanger installation operation can be accessed for production mode (tree) requirements. As a result, there are fewer potential failure points as compared to traditional horizontal xmas tree HXT designs, providing comparable functionality.
  • (4) The BOP adaptor 152 arrangement of the invention facilitates interface of both slimbore (11" (279 mm) or 13-5/8" (346 mm) bore) BOP stacks 120 and LMRPs 122, and conventional (18-3/4" (476 mm)) BOP stacks 160 and LWRPs 170 with the top of the xmas tree, while also eliminating the requirement to provide a large (typically 18-3/4" (476 mm) nominal configuration) re-entry profile at the top of the xmas tree. The BOP adaptor 152 removes the interface problems normally associated with providing enough space to accept a "BOP stack of convenience", particularly for guidelineless (GLL) applications. An 18-3/4" (476 mm) (typical) top interface on a xmas tree would result in a substantial increase in the footprint (and therefore weight, handling difficulties, etc.) of the tree (especially for GLL applications), if the traditional requirement were imposed that control modules and choke trim/actuator modules, etc., be vertically retrievable by GLL means.
  • (5) The tubing hanger TH5 is characterized by a concentric production bore (no annulus conduit therethrough) and by concentrically arranged conventional vertically-oriented electric (E) and hydraulic (H) couplers for interfacing control functions. Should circumstances dictate (such as the desire to provide multiple completion strings or special/non-conventional profile E/H conduit connectors), the tubing hanger characteristics described above could be altered. Because the annulus conduit is not routed through the tubing hanger TH5, several modifications of the routing of the E and H conduits and/or their couplers may be made. So long as the annulus conduit is not routed through the TH, such modifications should be considered to be anticipated by the subject invention.
  • (6) The tubing hanger THS/Tubing Spool TS5 arrangement of the invention represents a hybrid of the conventional (vertical bore) tree and horizontal tree completion systems.
  • (7) The subsea arrangement described above allows use of more or less conventional vertical dual bore or "monobore" xmas trees which have size and weight advantages compared with horizontal xmas trees, especially for guidelineless applications. The enhanced design features such as an ROV deployed tree cap (see tree cap 158 of Figure 16) and optimized installation procedures give these slimbore "conventional" trees further advantages in comparison to HXT designs. For example, a conventional xmas tree can be "intervened" using a simpler tooling package deployed from a lower cost vessel.
  • (8) The BOP adaptor depicted in Figures 13, 14 and 14A provides the capability to use the BOP stack/marine riser and completion landing string (based on standard tubing) in both the tubing hanger interface mode of Figure 12 and the xmas tree interface mode of Figures 14, 14A and 14B. This capability removes the requirement to retrieve the BOP stack 120 (or the larger BOP stack 160, if used) to permit installation of the xmas tree using a dedicated open-sea completion/intervention (C/I) riser. On the other hand, the system also retains the ability to interface a conventional C/I riser, should this be desired (see Figure 18). The flexibility of the latter feature (allowing lower cost interventions), combined with the cost savings of the first feature (trip time savings plus Capital Expense (CAPEX) savings are key advantages of the BOP adaptor 152 of the invention.
  • (9) The tubing hanger/tubing spool arrangement of Figures 5A and 5B of the invention incorporates a tubing spool to accept the tubing hanger and in which a conduit is provided for annulus communication "around", rather than "through" the tubing hanger. This feature enables a substantial size reduction for the tubing hanger. The annulus "bypass" conduit A5 is routed past one or more (but typically one) remotely operable (actuated or manual/ROV operated, etc.) valves VA5, VA6 incorporated either integral to the TS body or unitized thereto. This valve VA5 (for example) provides closure capability for the annulus conduit that does not require wireline trips for operation. This results in cost savings and reliability improvement from many perspectives - not least of which is that it permits use of a true monobore riser (that is, no "diverter" required, simple tubing possibly acceptable, etc.). In the tubing hanger intervention modes, annulus communication is achieved in cooperation with the BOP stack choke and kill conduits, without the requirement for incorporating special rams in the BOP or relying on the annular blow out preventers for high pressure sealing. In the xmas tree intervention mode, annulus communication is achieved in the same manner (unless a dedicated traditional type open-sea completion/intervention riser is employed), although in this mode there will be a xmas tree 150 placed between the tubing spool TS10 and BOP stack 120, 160 (see Figures 14A, 14B and 17). The xmas tree 150 provides an annulus flow conduit from its bottom surface to its upper re-entry profile (via one or more valves), not shown, integral to the xmas tree block or unitized to the side thereof. See conduit 200 in xmas tree 150 and associated conduit 202 of BOP adaptor 152 in Figures 13, 14, 14A, 17 and 18. The annulus bypass conduit A12 around the tubing hanger is contained completely within the tubing spool TS10, as opposed to the xmas tree body as is the case for horizontal xmas tree designs. All benefits normally associated with tubing spools are incorporated in the arrangement of the invention.
  • (10) Special handling operations as depicted in Figures 12, 12A, 13, 14, 14A and 14B can save BOP stack /marine riser, and completion riser trips between the sea floor and the surface, in comparison to conventional operations.
  • While, preferred embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and/or described in some detail, modifications and adaptions of the preferred embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. Such modifications and adaptations are within the scope of the present invention.

    Claims (21)

    1. A subsea well completion arrangement comprising;
         a tubing spool (TS) having a main body with upper and lower ends which are arranged and designed for securement to a wellhead housing (WH,102) at the lower end and to a subsea well drilling or completion device at the upper end,
         said tubing spool main body having a bore which defines an internal profile for supporting and restraining a tubing hanger (TH), said profile including a sealing profile, said bore arranged and designed to communicate at an upper end with a bore of said subsea well drilling or completion device and to communicate at a lower end with a bore of said wellhead housing, and
         an annulus conduit (A5,A12) which communicates with said tubing spool bore at positions above and below said sealing profile,
         characterized by
         said tubing spool bore lacking any sideways facing conduits for facilitating production (P) couplings, and
         said annulus conduit being independent of the tubing hanger and bypassing the tubing hanger.
    2. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 1 wherein,
      said annulus conduit is fully integral with said main body.
    3. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 1 wherein,
      said annulus conduit includes an external piping loop (A12').
    4. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 1 wherein,
      said annulus conduit (A12) is disposed at least partially in a block fastened to said main body.
    5. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 1 wherein,
      said internal profile is a slimbore of a diameter suitable to interface a tubing hanger having an outside diameter smaller than 11 inches (279 mm).
    6. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 1 wherein,
      said upper end of said main body has a top connection profile suitable for interfacing a subsea well drilling or completion device of 18¾" (476 mm) nominal bore configuration.
    7. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 1 wherein,
      subsea well drilling or completion device is a BOP stack (120,160), a lower marine riser package (LMRP), or a subsea xmas tree (100).
    8. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 1, further comprising;
      a valve (V2, VA5, VA6, VA12) in said annulus conduit for controlling a flow through said annulus conduit.
    9. The subsea well completion arrangement of any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein,
      said tubing hanger (TH) has an external profile which is arranged and designed for being supported by, and oriented , locked, and sealed within said internal profile,
      said tubing hanger having an cylindrical body, a bore therein for supporting production or injection tubing to extend downwardly into a bore of said wellhead housing (WH,102), and a plurality of electric (E) and hydraulic (H) bores (18) in said cylindrical body which extend from a top end of said tubing hanger to openings at a bottom end of said tubing hanger for interface with electric cables and hydraulic tubes which extend down into the well.
    10. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 9, further comprising;
      a plurality of vertically oriented electric and hydraulic couplers disposed at a top end of said tubing hanger designed and arranged to couple to said plurality of electric and hydraulic bores (18).
    11. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 9, wherein said tubing hanger (TH) has no passage for annular fluids provided therein.
    12. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 9, wherein said tubing hanger (TH) has only one bore (P,P5) for supporting production or injection tubing therein.
    13. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 12, wherein said only one bore (P5) for supporting production or injection tubing is coaxially disposed in said cylindrical body and said plurality of electric and hydraulic bores (18) is disposed in a concentric ring about said only one bore (P5) for supporting production or injection tubing.
    14. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 12, wherein said only one bore (P) for supporting production or injection tubing is eccentrically disposed in said cylindrical body and said plurality of electric and hydraulic bores (18) is disposed in a concentric ring about said only one bore (P) for supporting production or injection tubing.
    15. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 9, wherein
         said lower end of said tubing spool is fastened to said wellhead housing (WH,102), and
         said upper end of said tubing spool is fastened to a blow out preventer (BOP) stack (120,160),
         said BOP stack is a slimbore BOP stack characterized by a BOP bore that is of substantially smaller diameter than a standard bore of a 18¾" (476 mm) BOP stack, and
         said tubing hanger (TH) is characterized by an outer diameter dimensioned to pass through said slimbore BOP stack bore.
    16. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 15 wherein,
      the diameter of said bore of said slimbore BOP stack is about 11 inches (279 mm).
    17. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 15 wherein,
      the diameter of said bore of said slimbore BOP stack is about 13 ⅝ inches (346 mm).
    18. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 15 further comprising,
      a marine riser (124) coupled between said BOP stack (120,160) and a surface vessel, said riser having a slimbore internal diameter which is of substantially smaller diameter than a standard bore of a 19" (483 mm).
    19. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 15 further comprising,
         a ram BOP (128,130),
         a choke and kill line (132) below said ram BOP which communicates with said bore of said slimbore BOP stack (120,160),
         a marine riser (124) coupled between a surface vessel and said slimbore BOP stack, and a landing string (LS) extending through said marine riser and said bore of said slimbore BOP stack to said tubing hanger,
         said tubing spool, said tubing hanger (TH), said BOP stack and said landing string arranged and designed for said ram BOP to close about said landing string, whereby an annulus flow is controlled by said choke and kill line via said annulus conduit in said main body of said tubing spool.
    20. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 15 further comprising,
         a marine riser (124) coupled between a surface vessel and said slimbore BOP stack (120,160),
         a landing string (LS) having a bottom end, said landing string extending through said marine riser and said bore of said slimbore BOP stack,
         a tubing hanger running tool secured to said bottom end of said landing string, wherein,
         said tubing hanger running tool is dimensioned and arranged to pass through said tubing spool for landing said tubing hanger (TH) in said internal profile.
    21. The subsea well completion arrangement of claim 15 wherein,
         said lower end of said tubing spool is fastened to said wellhead, and said upper end of said tubing spool is fastened to an xmas tree (XT), said xmas tree having a top standard re-entry profile and having production or injection fluid and annulus fluid paths which communicate with said production or injection tubing and said annulus conduit of said tubing spool,
         said arrangement further including,
         a BOP adapter (152) having a bottom end secured to said top standard re-entry profile of said xmas tree and an internal profile which includes production or injection fluid and annulus fluid paths which communicate with said production or injection fluid and annulus fluid paths of said xmas tree,
         a BOP stack (120,160) secured to a top end of said BOP adapter having a central bore, a ram BOP (128,130), and a choke and kill line (132) disposed below said ram BOP which communicates with said bore of said BOP stack,
         a marine riser (124) coupled between said BOP stack and a surface vessel,
         a landing string (LS) having a conduit, and a bottom end disposed through said marine riser and said BOP stack, and
         a tubing hanger running tool (THRT) coupled to said bottom end of said landing string, having a bottom end designed and arranged to be accepted within said internal profile of said BOP adapter, said tubing hanger running tool establishing a communication path between said conduit of said landing string and said production or injection fluid path of said BOP adapter, wherein
         said tubing spool (TS), said tubing hanger (TH), said xmas tree, said BOP adapter, said BOP stack, said landing string and said tubing hanger running tool are arranged and designed for said ram BOP to close about said landing string , whereby an annulus flow is controlled by said choke and kill line.
    EP98952151A 1997-10-07 1998-10-07 Slimbore subsea completion system and method Expired - Lifetime EP1021637B1 (en)

    Priority Applications (2)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    EP03014704A EP1350918B1 (en) 1997-10-07 1998-10-07 A method of completing a subsea well
    EP03014705A EP1350919B1 (en) 1997-10-07 1998-10-07 A blow out preventer adapter for subsea well completion

    Applications Claiming Priority (3)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    US6129397P 1997-10-07 1997-10-07
    US61293P 1997-10-07
    PCT/US1998/021192 WO1999018329A1 (en) 1997-10-07 1998-10-07 Slimbore subsea completion system and method

    Related Child Applications (2)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP03014705A Division EP1350919B1 (en) 1997-10-07 1998-10-07 A blow out preventer adapter for subsea well completion
    EP03014704A Division EP1350918B1 (en) 1997-10-07 1998-10-07 A method of completing a subsea well

    Publications (3)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP1021637A1 EP1021637A1 (en) 2000-07-26
    EP1021637A4 EP1021637A4 (en) 2002-07-24
    EP1021637B1 true EP1021637B1 (en) 2004-02-11

    Family

    ID=22034846

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP98952151A Expired - Lifetime EP1021637B1 (en) 1997-10-07 1998-10-07 Slimbore subsea completion system and method

    Country Status (6)

    Country Link
    US (3) US6227300B1 (en)
    EP (1) EP1021637B1 (en)
    AU (1) AU9791898A (en)
    BR (1) BR9812854A (en)
    NO (5) NO331355B1 (en)
    WO (1) WO1999018329A1 (en)

    Families Citing this family (131)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    DE69226630T2 (en) * 1992-06-01 1998-12-24 Cooper Cameron Corp Wellhead
    GB2345927B (en) * 1999-02-11 2000-12-13 Fmc Corp Subsea completion system with integral valves
    US6394194B1 (en) * 1999-04-26 2002-05-28 Abb Vetco Gray Inc. Method and apparatus for a drill cutting injection system
    US7111687B2 (en) * 1999-05-14 2006-09-26 Des Enhanced Recovery Limited Recovery of production fluids from an oil or gas well
    GB9911146D0 (en) * 1999-05-14 1999-07-14 Enhanced Recovery Limited Des Method
    GB2348655B (en) * 1999-08-24 2001-05-09 Fmc Corp Subsea tree coupling for mudline suspension system
    GB2358204B (en) * 2000-01-14 2002-09-18 Fmc Corp Subsea completion annulus monitoring and bleed down system
    EP1278936B1 (en) 2000-03-24 2005-06-08 FMC Technologies, Inc. Tubing hanger with annulus bore
    US7025132B2 (en) * 2000-03-24 2006-04-11 Fmc Technologies, Inc. Flow completion apparatus
    GB2361725B (en) 2000-04-27 2002-07-03 Fmc Corp Central circulation completion system
    GB2362398B (en) * 2000-05-16 2002-11-13 Fmc Corp Device for installation and flow test of subsea completions
    US6488093B2 (en) 2000-08-11 2002-12-03 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Deep water intervention system
    GB0027269D0 (en) * 2000-11-08 2000-12-27 Donald Ian Recovery of production fluids from an oil or gas well
    US6516861B2 (en) * 2000-11-29 2003-02-11 Cooper Cameron Corporation Method and apparatus for injecting a fluid into a well
    GB0100565D0 (en) * 2001-01-10 2001-02-21 2H Offshore Engineering Ltd Operating a subsea well
    US20020117305A1 (en) * 2001-02-23 2002-08-29 Calder Ian Douglas Cuttings injection and annulus remediation systems for wellheads
    GB2376487B (en) 2001-06-15 2004-03-31 Schlumberger Holdings Power system for a well
    US6805200B2 (en) * 2001-08-20 2004-10-19 Dril-Quip, Inc. Horizontal spool tree wellhead system and method
    US6659181B2 (en) * 2001-11-13 2003-12-09 Cooper Cameron Corporation Tubing hanger with annulus bore
    US7044227B2 (en) * 2001-12-10 2006-05-16 Vetco Gray Inc. Subsea well injection and monitoring system
    US20030121667A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-03 Alfred Massie Casing hanger annulus monitoring system
    NO332026B1 (en) * 2002-01-30 2012-05-29 Vetco Gray Inc Underwater wellhead assembly and method of completion and production of a subsea well.
    AU2003263874A1 (en) * 2002-08-16 2004-03-03 Dril-Quip, Inc. Horizontal spool tree wellhead system and method
    WO2004025074A1 (en) * 2002-08-22 2004-03-25 Fmc Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and method for installation of subsea well completion systems
    US7395866B2 (en) * 2002-09-13 2008-07-08 Dril-Quip, Inc. Method and apparatus for blow-out prevention in subsea drilling/completion systems
    US7028777B2 (en) * 2002-10-18 2006-04-18 Dril-Quip, Inc. Open water running tool and lockdown sleeve assembly
    US6966383B2 (en) * 2002-12-12 2005-11-22 Dril-Quip, Inc. Horizontal spool tree with improved porting
    US6955223B2 (en) * 2003-01-13 2005-10-18 Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Blow out preventer handling system
    US6966381B2 (en) 2003-04-09 2005-11-22 Cooper Cameron Corporation Drill-through spool body sleeve assembly
    NO322829B1 (en) * 2003-05-22 2006-12-11 Fmc Kongsberg Subsea As Resealable plug, valve tree with plug and well intervention procedure in wells with at least one plug
    EP2216503B1 (en) * 2003-05-31 2013-12-11 Cameron Systems (Ireland) Limited Apparatus and method for recovering fluids from a well and/or injecting fluids into a well
    US20040262010A1 (en) * 2003-06-26 2004-12-30 Milberger Lionel J. Horizontal tree assembly
    AU2004257301A1 (en) * 2003-07-17 2005-01-27 Bhp Billiton Petroleum Pty Ltd Subsea tubing hanger assembly for an oil or gas well
    AU2003904183A0 (en) * 2003-08-08 2003-08-21 Woodside Energy Limited Method for completion or work-over of a sub-sea well using a horizontal christmas tree
    US7011159B2 (en) * 2003-09-16 2006-03-14 Hydril Company, L.P. Compact mid-grip fastener
    US7296629B2 (en) * 2003-10-20 2007-11-20 Fmc Technologies, Inc. Subsea completion system, and methods of using same
    US7121346B2 (en) 2003-11-18 2006-10-17 Cameron International Corporation Intervention spool for subsea use
    CA2555403C (en) 2004-02-26 2012-08-21 Des Enhanced Recovery Limited Connection system for subsea flow interface equipment
    BRPI0400926B1 (en) * 2004-04-01 2015-05-26 Petroleo Brasileiro Sa Subsea pumping module system and method of installation
    SG120314A1 (en) * 2004-09-02 2006-03-28 Vetco Gray Inc Tubing running equipment for offshore rig with surface blowout preventer
    US7490673B2 (en) * 2004-10-06 2009-02-17 Fmc Technologies, Inc. Universal connection interface for subsea completion systems
    US7823648B2 (en) * 2004-10-07 2010-11-02 Bj Services Company, U.S.A. Downhole safety valve apparatus and method
    WO2006069372A2 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-29 Bj Services Company Method and apparatus to hydraulically bypass a well tool
    GB2421525B (en) * 2004-12-23 2007-07-11 Remote Marine Systems Ltd Improvements in or relating to sub-sea control and monitoring
    US7424917B2 (en) * 2005-03-23 2008-09-16 Varco I/P, Inc. Subsea pressure compensation system
    US7225877B2 (en) * 2005-04-05 2007-06-05 Varco I/P, Inc. Subsea intervention fluid transfer system
    NO324579B1 (en) * 2005-12-08 2007-11-26 Fmc Kongsberg Subsea As Plug pulling tool
    US7975770B2 (en) * 2005-12-22 2011-07-12 Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. Dual-BOP and common riser system
    US9234393B2 (en) * 2006-01-24 2016-01-12 Helix Well Ops (U.K.) Limited Bore selector
    US7607485B2 (en) * 2006-01-26 2009-10-27 Vetco Gray Inc. Tubing hanger and wellhead housing with mating tubing annulus passages
    WO2007103707A2 (en) * 2006-03-02 2007-09-13 Shell Oil Company Systems and methods for using an umbilical
    US7699110B2 (en) * 2006-07-19 2010-04-20 Baker Hughes Incorporated Flow diverter tool assembly and methods of using same
    US7699099B2 (en) * 2006-08-02 2010-04-20 B.J. Services Company, U.S.A. Modified Christmas tree components and associated methods for using coiled tubing in a well
    GB2440940B (en) * 2006-08-18 2009-12-16 Cameron Internat Corp Us Wellhead assembly
    GB0618001D0 (en) 2006-09-13 2006-10-18 Des Enhanced Recovery Ltd Method
    GB0625526D0 (en) 2006-12-18 2007-01-31 Des Enhanced Recovery Ltd Apparatus and method
    GB0625191D0 (en) 2006-12-18 2007-01-24 Des Enhanced Recovery Ltd Apparatus and method
    DK2102446T3 (en) * 2007-01-12 2019-01-28 Baker Hughes A Ge Co Llc Wellhead arrangement and method for an injection tube string
    US7913754B2 (en) * 2007-01-12 2011-03-29 Bj Services Company, U.S.A. Wellhead assembly and method for an injection tubing string
    US20090071656A1 (en) * 2007-03-23 2009-03-19 Vetco Gray Inc. Method of running a tubing hanger and internal tree cap simultaneously
    US7743832B2 (en) * 2007-03-23 2010-06-29 Vetco Gray Inc. Method of running a tubing hanger and internal tree cap simultaneously
    US8011436B2 (en) * 2007-04-05 2011-09-06 Vetco Gray Inc. Through riser installation of tree block
    US7921917B2 (en) * 2007-06-08 2011-04-12 Cameron International Corporation Multi-deployable subsea stack system
    US20090038804A1 (en) * 2007-08-09 2009-02-12 Going Iii Walter S Subsurface Safety Valve for Electric Subsea Tree
    BRPI0820743A2 (en) * 2007-12-12 2015-06-16 Cameron Int Corp Function reel
    WO2009120935A2 (en) * 2008-03-28 2009-10-01 Cameron International Corporation Wellhead hanger shoulder
    CA2660219C (en) * 2008-04-10 2012-08-28 Bj Services Company System and method for thru tubing deepening of gas lift
    US8322429B2 (en) * 2008-05-29 2012-12-04 Hydril Usa Manufacturing Llc Interchangeable subsea wellhead devices and methods
    US8100181B2 (en) 2008-05-29 2012-01-24 Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. Surface controlled subsurface safety valve having integral pack-off
    US8122964B2 (en) * 2008-05-29 2012-02-28 Hydril Usa Manufacturing Llc Subsea stack alignment method
    DK178357B1 (en) * 2008-06-02 2016-01-11 Mærsk Olie Og Gas As Christmas tree for use in a well
    US9080425B2 (en) 2008-10-17 2015-07-14 Foro Energy, Inc. High power laser photo-conversion assemblies, apparatuses and methods of use
    US9138786B2 (en) 2008-10-17 2015-09-22 Foro Energy, Inc. High power laser pipeline tool and methods of use
    US9347271B2 (en) 2008-10-17 2016-05-24 Foro Energy, Inc. Optical fiber cable for transmission of high power laser energy over great distances
    US9027668B2 (en) 2008-08-20 2015-05-12 Foro Energy, Inc. Control system for high power laser drilling workover and completion unit
    US9669492B2 (en) 2008-08-20 2017-06-06 Foro Energy, Inc. High power laser offshore decommissioning tool, system and methods of use
    US9244235B2 (en) 2008-10-17 2016-01-26 Foro Energy, Inc. Systems and assemblies for transferring high power laser energy through a rotating junction
    US8571368B2 (en) 2010-07-21 2013-10-29 Foro Energy, Inc. Optical fiber configurations for transmission of laser energy over great distances
    US9242309B2 (en) 2012-03-01 2016-01-26 Foro Energy Inc. Total internal reflection laser tools and methods
    US9074422B2 (en) 2011-02-24 2015-07-07 Foro Energy, Inc. Electric motor for laser-mechanical drilling
    BRPI0918403A2 (en) 2008-08-20 2015-11-24 Foro Energy Inc method and system for advancing a wellbore using a high power laser
    US9562395B2 (en) 2008-08-20 2017-02-07 Foro Energy, Inc. High power laser-mechanical drilling bit and methods of use
    US9089928B2 (en) 2008-08-20 2015-07-28 Foro Energy, Inc. Laser systems and methods for the removal of structures
    US9664012B2 (en) 2008-08-20 2017-05-30 Foro Energy, Inc. High power laser decomissioning of multistring and damaged wells
    BRPI0919913A2 (en) * 2008-10-28 2016-02-16 Cameron Int Corp underwater completion with a wellhead annular space access adapter
    US8240387B2 (en) * 2008-11-11 2012-08-14 Wild Well Control, Inc. Casing annulus tester for diagnostics and testing of a wellbore
    US8826994B2 (en) 2008-12-18 2014-09-09 Cameron International Corporation Full bore system without stop shoulder
    US8127852B2 (en) * 2008-12-23 2012-03-06 Hydril Usa Manufacturing Llc Interchangeable subsea wellhead devices and methods
    GB0901807D0 (en) * 2009-02-04 2009-03-11 Expro North Sea Ltd Landing string assembly
    US9845652B2 (en) 2011-02-24 2017-12-19 Foro Energy, Inc. Reduced mechanical energy well control systems and methods of use
    US8720584B2 (en) 2011-02-24 2014-05-13 Foro Energy, Inc. Laser assisted system for controlling deep water drilling emergency situations
    US8684088B2 (en) 2011-02-24 2014-04-01 Foro Energy, Inc. Shear laser module and method of retrofitting and use
    US8783360B2 (en) * 2011-02-24 2014-07-22 Foro Energy, Inc. Laser assisted riser disconnect and method of use
    US8783361B2 (en) 2011-02-24 2014-07-22 Foro Energy, Inc. Laser assisted blowout preventer and methods of use
    CN102713141B (en) 2009-12-24 2017-07-28 普拉德研究及开发股份有限公司 Electric hydraulic interface for Modular downhole tool
    GB2479552B (en) * 2010-04-14 2015-07-08 Aker Subsea Ltd Subsea wellhead providing controlled access to a casing annulus
    US8479828B2 (en) 2010-05-13 2013-07-09 Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. Wellhead control line deployment
    US8807223B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2014-08-19 David Randolph Smith Method and apparatus to control fluid flow from subsea wells
    CA2808214C (en) 2010-08-17 2016-02-23 Foro Energy Inc. Systems and conveyance structures for high power long distance laser transmission
    US8881829B2 (en) * 2010-10-07 2014-11-11 David B. Redden Backup wellhead blowout prevention system and method
    US8657012B2 (en) * 2010-11-01 2014-02-25 Vetco Gray Inc. Efficient open water riser deployment
    WO2012064380A2 (en) * 2010-11-08 2012-05-18 Cameron International Corporation Gasket test protector sleeve for subsea mineral extraction equipment
    NO334106B1 (en) * 2011-01-11 2013-12-09 Aker Subsea As Drill protector for a pipe hanger and its use
    US8857520B2 (en) * 2011-04-27 2014-10-14 Wild Well Control, Inc. Emergency disconnect system for riserless subsea well intervention system
    NO334816B1 (en) * 2011-04-28 2014-06-02 Aker Subsea As The subsea well assembly
    US8631875B2 (en) 2011-06-07 2014-01-21 Baker Hughes Incorporated Insert gas lift injection assembly for retrofitting string for alternative injection location
    US9670755B1 (en) * 2011-06-14 2017-06-06 Trendsetter Engineering, Inc. Pump module systems for preventing or reducing release of hydrocarbons from a subsea formation
    US20130000918A1 (en) * 2011-06-29 2013-01-03 Vetco Gray Inc. Flow module placement between a subsea tree and a tubing hanger spool
    US9376881B2 (en) * 2012-03-23 2016-06-28 Vetco Gray Inc. High-capacity single-trip lockdown bushing and a method to operate the same
    US8960306B2 (en) * 2012-12-21 2015-02-24 Hydril Usa Manufacturing Llc Annular blowout preventer and lower marine riser package connector unit
    US9650855B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2017-05-16 Safestack Technology L.L.C. Riser disconnect package for lower marine riser package, and annular-release flex-joint assemblies
    US11156053B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2021-10-26 Safestack Technology L.L.C. Riser disconnect package for lower marine riser package, and annular-release flex-joint assemblies
    US9631446B2 (en) 2013-06-26 2017-04-25 Impact Selector International, Llc Impact sensing during jarring operations
    US9279308B2 (en) 2013-08-20 2016-03-08 Onesubsea Llc Vertical completion system including tubing hanger with valve
    US9140091B1 (en) * 2013-10-30 2015-09-22 Trendsetter Engineering, Inc. Apparatus and method for adjusting an angular orientation of a subsea structure
    US9611717B2 (en) 2014-07-14 2017-04-04 Ge Oil & Gas Uk Limited Wellhead assembly with an annulus access valve
    US10309190B2 (en) 2014-07-23 2019-06-04 Onesubsea Ip Uk Limited System and method for accessing a well
    USD749644S1 (en) * 2014-10-28 2016-02-16 David B. Redden Subsea dual housing assembly
    US9765593B2 (en) 2014-12-03 2017-09-19 Ge Oil & Gas Uk Limited Configurable subsea tree master valve block
    NO341605B1 (en) * 2014-12-05 2017-12-11 Vetco Gray Scandinavia As Landing string for landing a production hanger in a production run in a wellhead
    US9951602B2 (en) 2015-03-05 2018-04-24 Impact Selector International, Llc Impact sensing during jarring operations
    US9828824B2 (en) * 2015-05-01 2017-11-28 Hydril Usa Distribution, Llc Hydraulic re-configurable and subsea repairable control system for deepwater blow-out preventers
    US10132135B2 (en) * 2015-08-05 2018-11-20 Cameron International Corporation Subsea drilling system with intensifier
    US10221687B2 (en) 2015-11-26 2019-03-05 Merger Mines Corporation Method of mining using a laser
    US11187052B2 (en) * 2016-12-08 2021-11-30 Kinetic Pressure Control Ltd. Explosive disconnect
    WO2018106347A1 (en) * 2016-12-08 2018-06-14 Kinetic Pressure Control, Ltd. Explosive disconnect
    US9945202B1 (en) 2017-03-27 2018-04-17 Onesubsea Ip Uk Limited Protected annulus flow arrangement for subsea completion system
    GB202011951D0 (en) 2020-07-31 2020-09-16 Baker Hughes Energy Tech Uk Limited Tubing head spool and method of drilling a well using the tubing head spool
    US11719065B2 (en) * 2020-11-13 2023-08-08 Onesubsea Ip Uk Limited Configurable coupling assembly
    BR102020026776A2 (en) 2020-12-28 2022-07-12 Aker Solutions Do Brasil Ltda ADAPTER TO CONNECT CONCENTRIC CHRISTMAS TREE WITH ECCENTRIC PRODUCTION BASE
    RU2756756C1 (en) * 2020-12-30 2021-10-05 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Газпром 335" Combined underwater wellhead equipment

    Citations (1)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    GB2166775A (en) * 1984-09-12 1986-05-14 Britoil Plc Underwater well equipment

    Family Cites Families (17)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US3635435A (en) 1970-03-16 1972-01-18 Lamson & Sessions Co Breakaway support for rear vision mirror
    US3653435A (en) * 1970-08-14 1972-04-04 Exxon Production Research Co Multi-string tubingless completion technique
    US4147221A (en) 1976-10-15 1979-04-03 Exxon Production Research Company Riser set-aside system
    US4491176A (en) * 1982-10-01 1985-01-01 Reed Lehman T Electric power supplying well head assembly
    US4607691A (en) 1984-07-06 1986-08-26 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Non-orienting, multiple ported, cylindrical pressure transfer device
    GB8801850D0 (en) 1988-01-28 1988-02-24 British Petroleum Co Plc Tubing hanger shut-off mechanism
    GB9014237D0 (en) * 1990-06-26 1990-08-15 Framo Dev Ltd Subsea pump system
    FR2672935B1 (en) 1991-02-14 1999-02-26 Elf Aquitaine UNDERWATER WELL HEAD.
    DE69226630T2 (en) 1992-06-01 1998-12-24 Cooper Cameron Corp Wellhead
    US5372199A (en) 1993-02-16 1994-12-13 Cooper Industries, Inc. Subsea wellhead
    GB2286840B (en) 1994-02-10 1997-09-03 Fmc Corp Safety valve for horizontal tree
    US5503230A (en) 1994-11-17 1996-04-02 Vetco Gray Inc. Concentric tubing hanger
    US5671812A (en) * 1995-05-25 1997-09-30 Abb Vetco Gray Inc. Hydraulic pressure assisted casing tensioning system
    US5566758A (en) * 1995-06-07 1996-10-22 Forester; Buford G. Method and apparatus for drilling wells in to geothermal formations
    GB9514526D0 (en) * 1995-07-15 1995-09-13 Expro North Sea Ltd Lightweight intervention system for use with horizontal tree with internal ball valve
    US5971077A (en) * 1996-11-22 1999-10-26 Abb Vetco Gray Inc. Insert tree
    US5868204A (en) 1997-05-08 1999-02-09 Abb Vetco Gray Inc. Tubing hanger vent

    Patent Citations (1)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    GB2166775A (en) * 1984-09-12 1986-05-14 Britoil Plc Underwater well equipment

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    NO20003665D0 (en) 2000-07-17
    EP1021637A4 (en) 2002-07-24
    NO318459B1 (en) 2005-03-21
    NO319931B1 (en) 2005-10-03
    US6227300B1 (en) 2001-05-08
    NO322545B1 (en) 2006-10-23
    NO20001035D0 (en) 2000-03-01
    NO20003664D0 (en) 2000-07-17
    NO20003663D0 (en) 2000-07-17
    NO20003666D0 (en) 2000-07-17
    WO1999018329A1 (en) 1999-04-15
    EP1021637A1 (en) 2000-07-26
    US6408947B1 (en) 2002-06-25
    BR9812854A (en) 2000-08-08
    NO20003663L (en) 2000-06-05
    AU9791898A (en) 1999-04-27
    NO20003666L (en) 2000-06-05
    NO20003665L (en) 2000-06-05
    NO20003664L (en) 2000-06-05
    NO20001035L (en) 2000-06-05
    NO331355B1 (en) 2011-12-05
    US6715554B1 (en) 2004-04-06

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    EP1021637B1 (en) Slimbore subsea completion system and method
    US5819852A (en) Monobore completion/intervention riser system
    US6810954B2 (en) Production flow tree cap
    EP0907821B1 (en) Christmas tree
    US7013970B2 (en) Central circulation completion system
    CA2632812C (en) Apparatus and method for installation of subsea well completion systems
    US9976375B2 (en) Blowout preventer shut-in assembly of last resort
    US8297359B2 (en) Subsea well intervention systems and methods
    US6053252A (en) Lightweight intervention system
    US6497286B1 (en) Method and apparatus for drilling a plurality of offshore underwater wells
    EP2917459B1 (en) Horizontal vertical deepwater tree
    US20070034379A1 (en) Plug installation system for deep water subsea wells
    US20130168101A1 (en) Vertical subsea tree assembly control
    US20050121198A1 (en) Subsea completion system and method of using same
    GB2397312A (en) Well completion system
    WO2006061645A1 (en) Plug installation and retrieval tool for subsea wells
    EP1350919B1 (en) A blow out preventer adapter for subsea well completion
    NO343789B1 (en) Device for enabling removal or installation of a horizontal Christmas tree and methods thereof

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 20000327

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): GB IT

    RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

    Free format text: 7E 21B 33/035 A, 7E 21B 33/038 B, 7E 21B 33/043 B, 7E 21B 33/06 B, 7E 21B 33/047 B

    A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

    Effective date: 20020607

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A4

    Designated state(s): GB IT

    RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

    Owner name: FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

    17Q First examination report despatched

    Effective date: 20021118

    GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

    GRAS Grant fee paid

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: B1

    Designated state(s): GB IT

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

    Effective date: 20040211

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    26N No opposition filed

    Effective date: 20041112

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Payment date: 20171004

    Year of fee payment: 20

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: PE20

    Expiry date: 20181006

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

    Effective date: 20181006