EP1007167A1 - Ergonomisches sportbrett - Google Patents

Ergonomisches sportbrett

Info

Publication number
EP1007167A1
EP1007167A1 EP98946646A EP98946646A EP1007167A1 EP 1007167 A1 EP1007167 A1 EP 1007167A1 EP 98946646 A EP98946646 A EP 98946646A EP 98946646 A EP98946646 A EP 98946646A EP 1007167 A1 EP1007167 A1 EP 1007167A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sportsboard
extremity
ergonomic
contacting section
rider
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP98946646A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1007167B1 (de
Inventor
Louis Fournier
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/044,880 external-priority patent/US6499758B1/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP1007167A1 publication Critical patent/EP1007167A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1007167B1 publication Critical patent/EP1007167B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63CSKATES; SKIS; ROLLER SKATES; DESIGN OR LAYOUT OF COURTS, RINKS OR THE LIKE
    • A63C5/00Skis or snowboards
    • A63C5/03Mono skis; Snowboards

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of sporting equipment. More particularly, it relates to a sportsboard used in an upright standing or kneeling position which has an ergonomic upper surface that reduces strain and wear on human joints.
  • Skateboards are ridden by planting a rider's feet (typically wearing sneakers or other street footwear) at two points on the upper surface of the skateboard, the feet being typically placed non-parallel to the length of the skateboard.
  • snowboards have become particularly popular, by some estimates soon to be more popular than skis.
  • Snowboarding is performed on snow covered slopes which were typically originally designed to accommodate skiers. As is well known, each foot of a skier is mounted with a binding to a respective ski, the feet being mounted parallel to the length of the skis.
  • skiing and snowboarding are performed on snow, snowboarding differs significantly from skiing in that rather than having separate sportsboards (i.e., skis) for each foot, only a single sportsboard is used.
  • both feet of the snowboarder are fixedly mounted with a binding to the single sportsboard, one in front of the other, and transversely or at an angle to the length of the snowboard. Also, unlike skiing, no poles are used in snowboarding.
  • Strap bindings allow a user of the snowboard to wear relatively soft boots, which are mounted at a non-parallel angle to the length of the snowboard. The tops of the soft boots and often the upper portions are strapped or clamped onto the snowboard.
  • Step-in bindings are attached to the snowboard at or near the soles of a stiffer boots. Step-in bindings provide added convenience to the user over strap bindings, but come at the cost of less comfortable boots and differing contact pressures between the snowboard and the user's feet.
  • Fig. 20 shows a conventional upright standing position of a user on a sportsboard, e.g., a snowboard.
  • the left foot 1102 and right foot 1104 of a user are mounted transversely or otherwise at a non-parallel angle to the length of the sportsboard 1100.
  • the user may typically place or mount their left and right feet 1102, 1104 at any position along the upper surface 1110 of the sportsboard.
  • the left and right feet 1102, 1104 are rested or mounted directly below the hips 1112, 1114, poor control of the sportsboard 1100 would result.
  • the left and right feet 1102, 1104 are rested or mounted at too wide a distance apart on the upper surface of the sportsboard 1100, although greater control of the sportsboard 1100 may result, a greater amount of strain may be placed on the human body.
  • the ankles and knees may be over-strained in maintaining an upright position of the human body, and too large a torque may be required to turn the lager radius formed by the wide distance between the left and right feet 1102, 1104.
  • a balance is usually made for lateral stability between the amount of control provided by separated placement of the left and right feet 1102, 1104 on the sportsboard, and the strain on the human body, particularly the ankles, knees and torso, based on the feel of the particular rider.
  • a snowboarder is typically forced to assume a wider stance, creating a severe shear effect in the ankle joints of the rider, a loss of aligned momentum to the bindings, asymmetric muscle stress, and generally excessive wear on the joints of the extremity.
  • the rider of a surfboard has unlimited ankle movement to maintain his or her balance on the surfboard while riding waves, while the ankles of the rider of a snowboard are restricted somewhat by the boots which must be worn, and thus movements of the sportsboard are performed by movement of other elements of the human body.
  • the acceleration and deceleration forces encountered by a snowboarder are typically greater than those encountered by a water surfboarder.
  • the present invention provides improvements to any type of sportsboard ridden in an upright position, including snowboards and surfboards.
  • conventional sportsboard construction includes a relatively flat upper surface 1110 on which the feet 1102, 1104 of the user are rested or mounted during a normal riding stance. It has been discovered by the present inventor that this relatively flat riding surface proves to be a disadvantage in conventional sportsboards.
  • the right foot supinates and the left foot pronates.
  • the right forefoot inverts from the ground and vertical ground reaction forces are greater against the lateral side of the forefoot and less against the medial side of the forefoot.
  • the left forefoot remains flat on the ground and vertical ground reaction forces are distributed evenly against the forefoot.
  • ground reaction exerts unusual forces against the left forefoot and even forces against the right forefoot.
  • Patent 5,172,924 issued to Robert S. Barci on December 22, 1992 discloses a snowboard binding system using wedge-shaped base members inserted between the upper surface of the snowboard and the lower surface of the rider's boots.
  • the upper surface of each wedge-shaped base member supports the sole of a boot.
  • the wedge-shaped base member provides a more ergonomic connection between the rider's feet and the sportsboard
  • the binding system disclosed in the '924 patent has several disadvantages.
  • the wedge-shaped base members separates the rider's feet from the upper surface of the sportsboard and thus adds increased height to the center of gravity of the intended user.
  • the separation of the feet from the upper surface of the sportsboard and the increased center of gravity both degrade control of the sportsboard.
  • the physical separation between the soles of the boots and the upper surface of the sportsboard reduces the transmission of some sensorial information from the sportsboard to the feet of the rider when riding on a medium such as snow or water.
  • the wedge-shaped base member creates concentrated areas of stress on the sportsboard that may eventually lead to damage and/or breakage of the sportsboard at or near the point of contact between the wedge-shaped base members and the upper surface of the sportsboard.
  • an ergonomic sportsboard comprises a lower surface for contacting a medium to be ridden.
  • An upper surface of the ergonomic sportsboard has a first extremity contacting section and a second extremity contacting section.
  • the first extremity contacting section is adapted to receive a first extremity of a rider in a riding position
  • the second extremity contacting section is adapted to receive a second extremity of the rider in the riding position.
  • At least one of the first extremity contacting section and the second extremity contacting section form an upward angle of between 1 ° and 20°.
  • a snowboard in another aspect of the present invention particularly relating to a sportsboard for riding on snow, comprises a lower surface adapted for contact with snow when the snowboard is ridden.
  • the snowboard also includes an ergonomic upper surface.
  • the ergonomic upper surface includes at least one upwardly angled extremity contacting section corresponding to a generally unstrained extremity of a rider in a riding position.
  • a method of providing an ergonomic sportsboard in accordance with the principles of the present invention comprises providing a sportsboard with a lower surface adapted for contact with a medium to be ridden.
  • An upper surface is provided on the sportsboard.
  • the upper surface includes at least one upwardly angled extremity contacting section adapted to receive a corresponding extremity of a rider in a riding position.
  • the extremity contacting section forms an angle of between about 1 ° and 20°.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic elevation view of a snowboard in accordance with the first embodiment of the present invention, the snowboard being shown with a rider mounted thereon.
  • Fig. 2 is an elevation view illustrating an insert component part of the snowboard shown in Fig. 1.
  • Fig. 3 shows the positioning of an upwardly angled extremity contacting section with respect to an x-y-z plane.
  • Fig. 4 is a perspective view illustrating a section of the snowboard illustrated in Fig. 1 , taken along section Ill-Ill of Fig. 1.
  • Fig. 5 is an elevation view with sections taken out, illustrating a section of a conventional sportsboard, as it is subjected to a bending stress.
  • Fig. 6 is a schematic view illustrating a curve representing the internal stress generated inside the sportsboard illustrated in Fig. 5.
  • Fig. 7 is an elevation view with sections taken out, illustrating a snowboard in accordance with an embodiment of the present Invention, as it is subjected to a bending stress.
  • Fig. 8 is a schematic view illustrating a curve corresponding to the internal stress generated inside the board illustrated in Fig. 7.
  • Fig. 9 is a schematic elevation view illustrating a snowboard in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 10 is an elevation view illustrating an insert component part of the snowboard illustrated in Fig. 9.
  • Fig. 11 is a perspective view with sections taken out, illustrating a section of the snowboard illustrated in Fig. 9, taken along section X-X of Fig. 9.
  • Fig. 12 shows a wakeboard in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Figs. 13A to 13C show three embodiments of added flexibility in the upper surface of a sportsboard in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
  • Figs. 14A and 14B show the compression of the upper surface of a sportsboard having added flexibility in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
  • Figs. 15A to 15C show three views of a snowboard having an ergonomic upper surface in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 16 depicts the posture of a human body in a typical position when riding a sportsboard having an ergonomic upper surface in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 17 shows one end of another embodiment of a snowboard having an ergonomic extremity contacting portion in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 18 shows one end of yet another embodiment of a snowboard having an ergonomic extremity contacting portion in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 19 shows another embodiment of a snowboard having an ergonomic upper surface in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 20 is a schematic view of an upright standing rider mounted to a conventional sportsboard having a relatively flat upper surface.
  • a sportsboard in accordance with the present invention has an ergonomic upper surface (e.g., INTRACANT TM) which provides several advantages over conventional sportsboards having a relatively flat riding surface.
  • INTRACANT TM ergonomic upper surface
  • Fig. 1 shows a sportsboard 10 having an ergonomic upper surface 18 in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention.
  • a sportsboard 10 has a generally elongated configuration.
  • the sportsboard 10 may be a snowboard, a wakeboard, a surfboard, a sailboard, a skateboard, etc.
  • the present invention provides significant advantages for all types of sportsboards, particularly for snowboards and for sailboards wherein a significant amount of downward pressure is placed on the contacting extremities, e.g., the feet, even in excess of the weight of the rider.
  • the sportsboard 10 has a first end section 12 and a longitudinally opposed second end section 14.
  • An under or lower surface 16 of the sportsboard 10 defines a medium contacting surface which is generally in contact with a medium S (e.g., snow or water) when the sportsboard 10 is ridden, and the ergonomic upper surface 18 forms an efficient interface between the rider's feet and the sportsboard 10.
  • a medium S e.g., snow or water
  • the present invention provides a curved, ergonomic upper surface 18 in a portion of the sportsboard 10 wherein the rider's feet are rested or mounted.
  • a pair of longitudinally spaced apart extremity contacting sections 20 and 22 are configured, positioned and sized so as to respectively receive a first extremity (e.g., foot) 24, and a second extremity (e.g., foot) 26 of a rider 28.
  • the extremity contacting sections 20 and 22 are angled upwardly with respect to a center of the sportsboard 10 such that the extremities (e.g., feet) 24 and 26 pivot inwardly toward the center of the sportsboard 10, as indicated by arrows B in Fig. 1.
  • the extremity contacting sections 20 and 22 illustrated in Fig. 1 are angled substantially symmetrical relative to one another, only one extremity contacting section need be angled. Alternatively, the extremity contacting sections 20 and 22 may be angled unsymmetrical relative to one another without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • the spacing between the extremity contacting sections 20 and 22 may be any suitable distance.
  • the extremity contacting sections 20 and 22 may be two ends of a single continuous extremity receiving section, and thus the spacing would be zero.
  • the spacing may be large with respect to a typical stance by the rider, e.g., larger than that relatively shown in Fig. 1 , without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • the distance between the first end section 14 and the first extremity contacting section 22, and the distance between the second end section 12 and the second extremity contacting section 20 may be any suitable distance other than that relatively shown in Fig. 1 , without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • the upper surface of the upwardly angled extremity contacting sections 20 and 22 can be relatively flat or upwardly arcuate.
  • An angle C is formed between the upwardly angled extremity contacting sections 20 and/or 22 at a contact point with the extremity, and a theoretical horizontal plane A including the contact points at each extremity contacting section 20 and/or 22.
  • the theoretical horizontal plane A is referred to herein as a 'major horizontal plane'.
  • a relatively flat upwardly angled extremity contacting section 20, 22 will have a relatively constant angle C throughout its area, whereas an upwardly arcuate contacting section 20, 22 will have a range in the value of the angle C depending upon the point of contact between the extremity and the extremity contacting section 20, 22.
  • the preformed, unflexed angle C is preferably in a range between 1 ° and 20° with respect to the point of contact of the extremity and the theoretical horizontal plane A, more preferably in a range between 4° and 14°, and most preferably in a range between 5° and 12°.
  • the angle C should also take into account an amount of flex in the sportsboard 10.
  • snowboards are determined to normally flex or deform about 5° to 7° with respect to the point of contact of the extremities.
  • the angle C for such a sportsboard is preferably in a range between 4° and 7°, which, together with the added angle due to the flex when the sportsboard is ridden, will provide a total angle of between 9° and 14°.
  • the preformed, unflexed angle C is preferably at least 4°, more preferably at least 5°, and most preferably at least 6°.
  • the upwardly angled extremity contacting sections 20 and/or 22 may be additionally laterally rotated an angle R about the center of the sportsboard 10, i.e., about the y-axis as shown in Fig. 3, to optimize the ergonomic benefits to contact with an extremity at an angle other than perpendicular to the lengthwise axis of the sportsboard 10.
  • the angle R may be any appropriate value from 0° to 180° with respect to the lengthwise x-axis of the sportsboard 10 as shown in Fig. 3.
  • the upwardly angled extremity contacting sections 20, 22 may be tilted an angle T about the lengthwise x-axis as shown in Fig. 3, to accommodate a more comfortable position of the sportsboard 10 with respect to the extremities of the rider. It is preferred that the tilt angle T be within about +/- 5° with respect to the x-z plane as shown in Fig. 3. Moreover, as shown in Fig. 1 , at the upper ends of the extremity contacting sections 20 and 22, the sportsboard 10 has a thickest cross-sectional width W between the lower surface 16 and the upper surface 18 of the sportsboard 10.
  • a first radius of curvature D 1 may be defined between an intermediate or center section 30 of the ergonomic upper surface 18 of the sportsboard 10 and the upper end of the first extremity contacting section 22, and a second radius of curvature D 2 may be defined between the center section 30 of the ergonomic upper surface 18 of the sportsboard 10 and the upper end of the second extremity contacting section 20.
  • the first radius of curvature D 1 is defined by a lateral movement of the first leg
  • the second radius of curvature D 2 is defined by a lateral movement of the second leg
  • the first and second radius' of curvature D 1 and D 2 will be substantially equal, and collectively referred to herein as "the radius of curvature D".
  • the larger the radius of curvature D, the generally wider apart will be the range of the extremity contacting sections 20 and 22.
  • the radius of curvature D can be customized for specific hip configurations.
  • the ergonomic upper surface 18 may have a relatively small radius of curvature D for shorter riders, while the ergonomic upper surface 18 may have a relatively large radius of curvature D for taller riders.
  • an entire line of snowboards may be manufactured each having a particular radius of curvature corresponding to a typical stance of a person of a particular height.
  • a line of sportsboards such as snowboards can be focused on the typical height of women, and a separate line of similar sportsboards can be focused on the typical height of men.
  • the body of the sportsboard 10 is provided with a singular core 36 illustrated more specifically in Fig. 2.
  • the core 36 typically extends integrally from the first end section 14 to the second end section 12.
  • Fig. 4 shows the increased width W of the core 36 of the sportsboard 10, particularly at the outer portions of the extremity contacting sections 20, 22.
  • some prior art devices position a separate wedge-shaped block between the rider's extremity and a localized area of the upper surface of a relatively flat conventional sportsboard.
  • wedge-shaped blocks can cause localized stress in the sportsboard, particularly at a point of contact between the wedge-shaped block and the upper surface of the sportsboard.
  • the sportsboard 10 in accordance with the principles of the present invention includes structure to angle the extremity contacting sections 20, 22 (i.e., core 36).
  • the structure either includes the ergonomic upper surface 18, and/or is positioned between the ergonomic upper surface 18 and the medium-contacting lower surface 16.
  • the core 36 of a sportsboard 10 in accordance with the present invention is in more direct contact with the rider's feet, via the upper surface 18, than with prior art sportsboards.
  • Figs. 4 to 7 illustrate more clearly the advantages of the angled extremity contacting sections 20, 22 of the ergonomic upper surface 18 of a sportsboard in accordance with the present invention.
  • Figs. 4 and 5 show the conventional sportsboard 1100 shown in Fig.
  • FIGs. 6 and 7 show a sportsboard 10 having angled extremity contacting sections in accordance with the principles of the present invention, while subjected to a similar bending stress.
  • FIG. 5 shows a conventional sportsboard 1100 with a conventional wedge-shaped or angled block 40 mounted on an extremity contacting section of a relatively flat upper surface 1110 thereof.
  • extremity in this case a foot of the rider
  • the invention is equally applicable to a sportsboard accepting a boot or other apparatus worn on the foot or other extremity of the rider.
  • the foot is shown barefoot merely for clarity of explanation.
  • Fig. 6 illustrates a strain curve 44 corresponding to the bending stress 42 (Fig. 5) applied to one end of the sportsboard 1100.
  • the relative strain caused in the length of the conventional sportsboard 1100 is shown, in pounds per square inch (PSI).
  • PSI pounds per square inch
  • a local peak or significantly excessive amount of strain 46 is caused in the conventional sportsboard 1100 at a portion corresponding to an extremity contacting section having a wedge-shaped block 40 in contact therewith.
  • the significantly excessive amount of stress, particularly at the local peak 46, causes decreased control of the sportsboard 1100, decreased response of the sportsboard, and increased possibility of the structure of the sportsboard 1100 failing in the area corresponding to the peak stress 46, i.e., below the wedge-shaped block 40.
  • FIGs. 6 and 7 illustrate a bending stress indicated by the arrow 42 similar to that shown with respect to the conventional sportsboard 1100 shown in Figs. 4 and 5, but as applied to a sportsboard 10 having angled extremity contacting sections and ergonomic upper surface 18 in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 7 shows a sportsboard 10 including a core
  • Fig. 8 shows a strain curve 44' corresponding to the bending stress applied along the length of the sportsboard 10 during application of the same bending stress 42 shown in Fig. 7.
  • the strain curve 44' defines a relatively smooth distribution of the stress along the length of the sportsboard 10. Note that the present invention reduces or eliminates the peak or significantly excessive stress in the extremity contacting portion of the sportsboard 10.
  • the conventional wedge-shaped blocks 40 are not embedded within the body of the sportsboard 10, e.g., under the upper surface 18, and thus control forces are not transmitted directly from the rider, via the wedge-shaped block 40, to the sportsboard 10. Hence. reaction time of the sportsboard 10 after control forces are initiated by the rider, and the predictability of the sportsboard 10, suffers.
  • the geometry of the internal and/or upper structure of the sportsboard 10, particularly in the region(s) corresponding to the extremity contacting section(s) is determined by a structural component positioned within the board, as opposed to a structure mounted on top of a relatively flat upper surface as in conventional sportsboards.
  • the resulting smooth distribution of the bending stress provides a sportsboard 10 with better control, better response, and better reliability as compared with conventional sportsboards, e.g., having a wedge-shaped block 40.
  • wedge-shaped blocks 40 increase the distance between the sole of the extremity, e.g., foot, and the upper surface of the sportsboard, thus raising the center of gravity of the rider with respect to the sportsboard.
  • Most riders find this disadvantageous because it reduces response of the sportsboard and the level of control which the rider has over the sportsboard.
  • the angling of the core 36 and/or upper surface 18 of the sportsboard 10 allows for more direct contact between the rider's extremities (e.g., feet) and the core 36 of the sportsboard 10.
  • the center of gravity of the rider is generally lowered, allowing better control and response of the sportsboard 10.
  • the extremity contacting sections 20 and 22 may be angled above the main level of the upper surface 18, or they may be countersunk with respect to the other portions of the upper surface 18 of the sportsboard 10. Countersunk extremity contacting sections 20 and 22 can lower the center of gravity of the rider with respect to the sportsboard 10.
  • Figs. 8 to 10 illustrate another embodiment of a sportsboard in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • the sportsboard 10' shown in Figs. 8 to 10 is substantially the same as the sportsboard 10 illustrated in Figs. 1-3, with the exception of the core.
  • the core 36 was of a generally singular construction.
  • the core 36' of the sportsboard 10' shown in Figs. 8 to 10 is a laminate composite.
  • the laminate composite core 36' includes a conventional core component 38 extending substantially from the first end section 14 to the second end section 12, and an insert core component 40 extending substantially between both extremity contacting sections 20 and 22.
  • more than two core layers may be implemented to form a core structure forming at least one upwardly angled extremity contacting section, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 12 shows a wakeboard 10w ridden on a medium W such as water, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • the wakeboard 10w includes two extremity contacting sections 20, 22 in an upper surface 18 thereof.
  • the positioning of the upwardly angling extremity contacting sections 20, 22 are as described with respect to the embodiment shown in Figs. 1 to 4, including the angles C, R and T.
  • the wakeboard 10w typically has one or more fins 1217 and an upwardly curving lower surface 16 from the perspective of the rider. Nevertheless, the angling of the extremity contacting sections 20, 22, particularly the upward angle C, is unaffected by the curvature of the lower surface 16.
  • the extremity contacting portions 20, 22 of the sportsboard 10 present a greater thickness as they angle upwardly, the extremity contacting portions 20, 22 increase the torsional rigidity of the sportsboard 10 at respective locations where torsional rigidity is most suitable. However, if increased torsional rigidity is not desired, flexibility can be added to the sportsboard 10, particularly but not exclusively in the extremity contacting portions 20, 22.
  • FIGs. 13A to 13C show three embodiments of a sportsboard 10 having added flexibility in accordance with an aspect of the present invention.
  • Fig. 13A shows a plurality of angled grooves 990 cut in linear paths widthwise across the upper surface 18 of a sportsboard 10.
  • the angled grooves 990 result in a serrated portion of the upper surface.
  • Fig. 13B shows the formation of grooves normal or orthogonal to the lower surface 16 of the sportsboard 10 in a widthwise direction across the upper surface 18 of the sportsboard 10.
  • Fig. 13C shows the formation of U-shaped grooves 994 in the upper surface 18 of the sportsboard 10.
  • the grooves 990-994 increase the flexibility of the sportsboard 10 by decreasing the amount of compression forces necessary to bend or deflect the sportsboard 10.
  • grooves 990-994 shown in Figs. 13A to 13C are shown normal to the lower surface 16 of the sportsboard 10, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the grooves 990-994 may alternatively be formed or cut at any appropriate angle, e.g., normal to the upper surface 18 and/or normal to the lower surface 16, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • the boot bindings should be mounted so as to allow sufficient lateral movement of the upper surface 18 of the sportsboard 10 in a widthwise direction to allow the maximum desired amount of compression of the upper surface 18 of the sportsboard 10.
  • the flexibility can be added in portions of the sportsboard 10 other than directly under the location of contact with the extremity.
  • the grooves 990-994 may be cut after appropriate bindings or other apparatus is mounted to the upper surface 18 of the sportsboard. In this way, the grooves 990-994 may be placed on either side of the binding and not under the binding.
  • Fig. 14A depicts an ergonomic sportsboard having angled grooves 990 formed in an upper surface 18 thereof before flexion
  • Fig. 14B shows the compression of the upper surface 18 of the ergonomic sportsboard shown in Fig. 14A when flexed.
  • the core components 36 may be inserted within the body of the sportsboard 10 by any one or more of a plurality of manufacturing processes.
  • the cores 36 or 36' may be formed integrally within the sportsboard 10 during an injection process.
  • the cores 36 or 36' may be inserted between the upper surface 16 and the lower surface 18 during a pressure mold manufacturing process.
  • Other suitable manufacturing processes include plastic injection molding, foam molding, and/or a formed wood core.
  • Figs. 1 to 3 and 8 to 10 include first and second end sections 12 and 14 that curve upwardly, it should be understood that the rider's feet are not generally rested or mounted on the upwardly curving first and second end sections 12 and 14 during riding, i.e., the first and second end sections 12 and 14 are not general riding surfaces.
  • the present invention may be implemented in a sportsboard with or without upwardly curving first and second end sections 12 and 14 without departing from the scope of the invention.
  • Figs. 15A to 17 show various embodiments of a snowboard having an ergonomic upper surface, e.g., an INTRACANT TM upper surface, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Figs. 15A to 15C show three views of a snowboard 1200 having an ergonomic upper surface in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 16 depicts the posture of a human body in a typical position when riding the snowboard 1200 shown in Figs. 15A to 15C.
  • Fig. 17 shows one end of another embodiment of a snowboard 1300 having an ergonomic extremity contacting portion 1302 in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • the extremity contacting portion 1302 is arcuate with respect to the upper surface of the snowboard 1300, to provide similar ergonomic benefits through a range of non-parallel angles of the extremity, e.g., a foot, with respect to the snowboard 1300.
  • Fig. 18 shows one end of yet another embodiment of a snowboard 1400 having an ergonomic extremity contacting portion 1402 in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • the extremity contacting portion 1402 in this embodiment is pointed in the region 1404, recognizing that the extremity on a snowboard is not mounted parallel to the length of the snowboard 1400.
  • Fig. 19 shows another embodiment of a snowboard 1500 having integral ergonomic pads 1502, 1504 on the upper surface of the snowboard 1500, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • the present invention provides a rider of a sportsboard with a healthier and more controlled stance without requiring added components between, e.g., a snowboard binding and the snowboard, thus saving weight and structural integrity of the overall sportsboard.
  • the INTRACANT TM ergonomic upper surface in accordance with the principles of the present invention provides a rider increased comfort, endurance, stability, momentum at the contacting extremity, and more power.
  • the INTRACANT TM ergonomic upper surface in accordance with the principles of the present invention reduces torsional stress, and provides a more rapid impulse transmission from 'brain to sportsboard'.
  • the sportsboard being slightly thicker around the point of contact with the rider's extremities, is stronger with respect to downward impact, distributes forces more evenly along the edge of the sportsboard, and significantly reduces asymmetric forces.
  • This increases the reliability of, e.g., the lamination and shear strength of snowboard edges, which commonly delaminate and/or shear in thinner snowboards.
  • the unibody type construction of the upper surface and the ergonomic shape of the upper surface do not add significant weight to the sportsboard.
  • the thicker extremity contacting sections allow for higher inserts having more threads inserted into the sportsboard, increasing the strength of the bond between the bindings and sportsboard significantly.
  • the present invention is equally applicable to upper surface platforms which may be attached to substantially the entire upper surface of a sportsboard.
  • a platform forming the upper surface 18 may be mated with a relatively flat upper surface of a conventional sportsboard to form a new upper surface 18 including the extremity contacting sections 20, 22.
  • an ergonomic upper surface 18 may be formed in a unibody-type construction and adhered to a conventional snowboard with, e.g., highly resistant two-sided foam urethane or neoprene tape. This semi-dense two-sided tape is known, and is typically about 1/64" thick.
  • the platform would be further adhered to the conventional upper surface of the snowboard with the mounting screws which pass through the platform and mount into the core of the conventional snowboard.

Landscapes

  • Footwear And Its Accessory, Manufacturing Method And Apparatuses (AREA)
  • Professional, Industrial, Or Sporting Protective Garments (AREA)
  • Switches With Compound Operations (AREA)
  • Mechanical Control Devices (AREA)
  • Control Of Throttle Valves Provided In The Intake System Or In The Exhaust System (AREA)
  • Vehicle Step Arrangements And Article Storage (AREA)
EP98946646A 1997-09-05 1998-09-03 Ergonomisches sportbrett Expired - Lifetime EP1007167B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US5763797P 1997-09-05 1997-09-05
US57637P 1997-09-05
US44880 1998-03-20
US09/044,880 US6499758B1 (en) 1998-03-20 1998-03-20 Egonomic sportsboard
PCT/IB1998/001633 WO1999012616A1 (en) 1997-09-05 1998-09-03 Ergonomic sportsboard

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1007167A1 true EP1007167A1 (de) 2000-06-14
EP1007167B1 EP1007167B1 (de) 2004-06-02

Family

ID=26722106

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98946646A Expired - Lifetime EP1007167B1 (de) 1997-09-05 1998-09-03 Ergonomisches sportbrett

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US20030094777A1 (de)
EP (1) EP1007167B1 (de)
AT (1) ATE268197T1 (de)
AU (1) AU9363598A (de)
CA (1) CA2302614C (de)
DE (1) DE69824297D1 (de)
WO (1) WO1999012616A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6234513B1 (en) * 1997-01-31 2001-05-22 James S. Busby, Jr. Snowboard drive system
FR2816219A1 (fr) * 2000-11-06 2002-05-10 Chronic Plateau pour planche de glisse pouvant comporter des roulettes ou une surface de glissement
FR2838062B1 (fr) * 2002-04-03 2004-07-09 Salomon Sa Engin de glisse ou de roulage comprenant une planche
US7703794B2 (en) * 2005-08-03 2010-04-27 O'hara Steve Canting device for a snowboard binding and methods
FR2896424B1 (fr) * 2006-01-25 2008-04-18 Salomon Sa Planche de glisse ou de roulage
US8419043B2 (en) 2007-10-22 2013-04-16 William H. Bollman Flexible ergonomic sportsboard wedges
US7832742B1 (en) * 2008-02-15 2010-11-16 Duggan John C Ergonomically advanced rotating boot and foot mounting system for sportboards
FR2939323B1 (fr) * 2008-12-08 2011-03-25 Salomon Sas Ski alpin avec flexion controlee

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3628804A (en) * 1969-10-09 1971-12-21 Ronald Carreiro Snow surfboard
US3689092A (en) * 1970-10-01 1972-09-05 Gary F Lake Snow and water skimming device
DE2936368A1 (de) * 1979-09-08 1981-04-02 Müller + Müller, Basel Schneegleiter
WO1983000311A1 (en) * 1981-07-17 1983-02-03 ÖRDÖGH, László Multi-purpose catamaran hull and accessories thereof
US4568296A (en) * 1984-03-08 1986-02-04 Newell Stanley G Single and multiple plane contoured water ski corrective wedges secured or formed between water ski bindings and water skis
DE3607808A1 (de) * 1986-03-08 1987-09-10 Peter Florjancic Schneegleitbrett
FR2612792A1 (fr) * 1987-03-23 1988-09-30 Bossois Philippe Surf des neiges polyvalent avec dispositifs directionnels
US5766051A (en) * 1996-12-31 1998-06-16 Messer; Jason Wakeboard traction pad

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9912616A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2302614C (en) 2007-02-20
CA2302614A1 (en) 1999-03-18
ATE268197T1 (de) 2004-06-15
US20030094777A1 (en) 2003-05-22
DE69824297D1 (de) 2004-07-08
AU9363598A (en) 1999-03-29
EP1007167B1 (de) 2004-06-02
WO1999012616A1 (en) 1999-03-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6499758B1 (en) Egonomic sportsboard
US6923455B2 (en) Two-handled snow scooter
US7823905B2 (en) Splitboard bindings
US8226109B2 (en) Splitboard bindings
US5312258A (en) Dry land snowboard training device
US20120256395A1 (en) Splitboard Bindings
US5971419A (en) Rotational binding for a free style snowboard
EP0808199B1 (de) Tragvorrichtung für den benutzer auf einem snowboard
US20140217702A1 (en) Snowboard
US5320378A (en) Snowboard
JPS63226381A (ja) スノーボードのための締め具
US5901975A (en) Vertically flexible snowboard binding
EP2787851B1 (de) Skischuh
US5984343A (en) Sliding apparatus having adjustable flexion and torsion characteristics
US8226108B2 (en) Snowboard binding
EP1007167B1 (de) Ergonomisches sportbrett
US4902256A (en) Water ski wedge
JPS63226379A (ja) 雪上用1本スキー
US20060175802A1 (en) Snowboard impact plate and binding release mechanism
US20050144811A1 (en) Ski boot insert
US20060027982A1 (en) Kneeboard device and method of attaching a person to a snowboard deck
US6412793B2 (en) Interface element used in snowboarding
US6217967B1 (en) Core for snowboard
US6193245B1 (en) Snowboard releasable and reattachable binding system
WO2003086554A1 (en) Non-metallic edge gliding board

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000404

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030217

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040602

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040602

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20040602

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040602

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040602

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040602

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040602

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040602

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69824297

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040708

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040902

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040902

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040902

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040903

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040903

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040903

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040903

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20040903

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20050303

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20160919

Year of fee payment: 19

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171002