EP0980460A1 - Window/door for a building - Google Patents
Window/door for a buildingInfo
- Publication number
- EP0980460A1 EP0980460A1 EP98925551A EP98925551A EP0980460A1 EP 0980460 A1 EP0980460 A1 EP 0980460A1 EP 98925551 A EP98925551 A EP 98925551A EP 98925551 A EP98925551 A EP 98925551A EP 0980460 A1 EP0980460 A1 EP 0980460A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- window
- frame
- door according
- detection area
- intrusion
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/02—Mechanical actuation
- G08B13/06—Mechanical actuation by tampering with fastening
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E06—DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
- E06B—FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
- E06B5/00—Doors, windows, or like closures for special purposes; Border constructions therefor
- E06B5/10—Doors, windows, or like closures for special purposes; Border constructions therefor for protection against air-raid or other war-like action; for other protective purposes
- E06B5/11—Doors, windows, or like closures for special purposes; Border constructions therefor for protection against air-raid or other war-like action; for other protective purposes against burglary
- E06B5/113—Arrangements at the edges of the wings, e.g. with door guards to prevent the insertion of prying tools
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a window / door for a building according to the preamble of claim 1.
- Such windows / doors are generally known (see catalog PaX).
- a sealing strip sits between the outer fold overlap and the outer surface of the casement, which lies with an elastic sealing area between the outer fold overlap and the casement. This is done by compressing the elastic portion, so that the penetration of water or the like is prevented.
- the elastic area is directly connected to the outside environment.
- the elastic portion has a ge ⁇ know to transverse extent, as it were, pretends a distance in the millimeter range between the outer Falzüberschlag and the window frame. A break-in tool can be driven into this distance while overcoming the outer rebate seal.
- attack detectors which always generate an intrusion signal when the casement is to be forcibly separated from the frame by means of an intrusion tool.
- One principle of generating an intrusion signal via the attack detector is based on a relative displacement between the sash frame and the frame.
- BEST ⁇ 'TIGUNSKOPIE exercise affects a sensor or the like.
- the intrusion signal is then generated from this.
- attack detectors are known from CH-PS 664 840, but are not suitable for the outside of windows / doors.
- a rebate air space is stretched between the outer rebate overlap of the window frame and the inner rebate overlap of the sash frame, in which fitting grooves are provided which serve to accommodate connecting rod fittings.
- fitting grooves are provided which serve to accommodate connecting rod fittings.
- These espagnolette fittings interact with locking parts on the frame side.
- the sash frame is also pressed against the outer rebate overlap to preload the outer rebate seal located there accordingly.
- a so-called door and window seal is also known from DE-OS 34 19 526, which is to accommodate a strain gauge or a pair of conductors or a glass fiber in a longitudinal recess.
- the conductor is protected within the seal, but if one takes into account that such sealing strips run all around, the conductor should be continuous at the miter points.
- the advantage of the invention is that even without force application to the sash frame or frame, that is to say in the run-up to the violent overcoming of the locking points, a break-in signal is generated which scares the burglar off before he breaks into the favorable leverage with his break-in tool device with which the locking points can be overcome between casement and frame.
- attack detector already monitors the penetration path of the intrusion tool when it is driven into the first parting line between the sash frame and the frame, overcoming the elastically compressed outer rebate seal.
- the detection range of the attack detector ends at a predetermined distance more or less closely adjacent to the penetration points, which are always available between the movable casement and the fixed frame.
- the penetration points ??? are defined by the dividing line between the outer surface to be attacked by the outer sealing lip of the outer rebate seal and the outer surface of the casement.
- attack detector is also shielded from environmental influences by the outer sealing lip of the outer rebate seal. Since the attack detector itself is not visible from the outside, such windows offer a high level of passive protection. The potential burglar cannot be sure whether or not an attack detector is activated by him.
- the intrusion signal is triggered independently of a relative movement between the sash frame and the frame only by the intrusion tool entering the detection area.
- the area between the first parting line and the last parting line and the area between the rebate air between the casement and window frame is monitored.
- the intrusion detector registers a relative movement of the intrusion tool relative to the intruder, which is not recognizable to the intruder.
- the principle of the invention is therefore based on "room monitoring” with regard to undisturbed / non-manipulated conditions in the rebate area by monitoring the zone in front of the rebate area.
- the detection area will run over the entire length of the profile bar.
- ⁇ extend at least in the preferred case with throughout the coverage areas can be a complete room monitoring.
- the detection range at least ⁇ extend there too.
- Window installation heights also make sense to let the detection area run around the window / door, so that even the smallest attempt at penetration at any point of the first
- Parting line can be recognized.
- the invention can be used on frame bars of different materials, in particular both on frame bars made of hollow profiles and on frame bars made of solid wood.
- attack detector is drawn into a cavity of a frame member designed as a hollow profile, this offers the advantage that the attack detector is practically impossible to manipulate from the outside and, in particular, cannot be made out.
- the attack detector can also sit in the rebate air space. In this case, a sufficiently large installation space is available.
- a major advantage of the invention is that the detection area already begins a few millimeters behind the penetration points. In this way it is ensured that intruding intrusion tools can be recognized early and the intrusion signal can be generated therefrom. However, false alarms are excluded because the upstream rebate seal must first be completely overcome before the intrusion tool can reach the detection area.
- the invention also has a preventive effect in particular because the intrusion signal is generated very early without the otherwise necessary destruction of the sash frame and / or frame.
- the intrusion signal can be generated just a few millimeters behind the start of the penetration points after the rebate seal has been overcome.
- the attack detector can even be integrated into the sealing strip itself, provided that it sits outside the elastically stressed zones.
- the attack sensor is arranged directly adjacent to the sealing strip, for example is drawn into the material of the profile spars.
- Attack detectors provided in pairs, one of which is arranged on one side of the first joint between the rebate overlap and the sash frame, can be expedient especially for this application, the intrusion monitoring in the area of the sealing strip of the fold overlap of the window frame.
- the present invention is also to be used on frame spars made of hollow plastic profiles, for example, it makes sense to expose the attack detector to local deformation when driving in the intrusion tool and to generate the intrusion signal from this local deformation.
- the local deformation can be caused by crushing, compressing, compressing, overstretching ... the attack detector by the driven burglar tool.
- the attack detector can also consist of a tear-off wire are made, which is in the penetration distance of the intrusion detection tool behind the elastic barrier, which provides the outer rebate seal.
- the intrusion signal can therefore be generated from the change in the electrical resistance of an electrical conductor, the resistance either becoming infinitely large, as is the case with a tear-off wire, or infinitely small, such as when a short circuit is generated, or by one finite measure changed, as for the Compression of a compressible, electrically conductive material.
- attack detectors whose detection area has a mechanical actuation switch that extends longitudinally to the frame profile spar.
- This is, for example, a rocker switch that is brought into the signal switching position from the predetermined rest position when the burglary tool hits. If necessary, a dead center spring is helpful because the rocker switch then remains in the signal switching position after the dead center has been exceeded. A break-in attempt can clearly be diagnosed from this.
- attack detectors are used that offer a non-contact detection area. This can be achieved by means of electrical or electromagnetic fields, which change their field sizes when the intrusion tool penetrates so that the change can be converted into a signal.
- the detection area is formed by an optical beam which is arranged where an intrusion tool at least partially interrupts the beam path of the beam when it penetrates. If a photoelectric sensor is subjected to the emitted beam, a partial change in the current flow would result in a partial interruption of the beam, which would be converted into the intrusion signal.
- All-round monitoring of the window / door is also possible with this variant.
- the radiation beam is to be emitted in the area of the air gap.
- a mirror is then provided in each corner area of the window / door, for example, in order to deflect the incident beam in the direction of the frame spar that now follows.
- it may then make sense to arrange optical converging lenses in the beam path in order to reduce the scatter.
- infrared light also has the advantage that the type of monitoring remains invisible even with a sufficiently large relative shift between the sash and the frame.
- Fig.l a first embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 2 shows a detailed view of the exemplary embodiment according to FIG.
- Fig.4a an embodiment with rocker switch, attached to the casement Fig.4b a rocker switch, attached to the frame
- Such a window / door has a frame 1 fixed to the building and a sash frame 2 movably mounted thereon. Casement 2 and frame 1 can be pivoted to one another via known hinge connections.
- the frame 1 is applied from the outside to the outside of the casement 2 with an outer foldover fold 3.
- the sash frame 2 has an inner fold-over flap 4 which bears against the frame 1 from the inside.
- a folding air space 5 is formed between the outer folding overlap 3 and the inner folding overlap 4 between the frame 1 and the sash 2.
- the rebate air space 5 offers, among other things, space for attaching a drive for the locking pairings not shown here, on the one hand on the sash frame 2 and on the other hand on the frame 1.
- an outer rebate seal 6 which is elastically stressed, sits between the outer rebate fold and the outside 38 of the sash frame , which bridges the distance between the surface of the outer fold-over flap 3 facing the inside of the room and the outer surface 38 of the casement.
- this outer rebate seal 6 is compressed by a certain amount. Here, it deforms elastically to produce the sealing effect.
- an outer sealing lip is used, which extends obliquely between the tip of the outer foldover flap and the outer surface 38 of the frame.
- This outer sealing lip is, as it were, clamped elastically between the outer rebate and the sash when the sash is closed.
- the entire head of the outer rebate seal beginning with the outer sealing lip up to the U-shaped area, is elastically pretensioned when the sash is pressed against the frame.
- a break-in tool 10 can therefore only be driven into the first parting line 8 by overcoming this head region of the outer rebate seal 6.
- the elastically prestressed entry area of the outer rebate seal 6 is in practice subject to local influences, such as Leaves or dirt. These local influences have to be absorbed by the elastic region without a break-in signal being allowed to occur.
- the attack detector is only arranged behind the outer sealing zone, which is formed by the outer sealing lip 39. Further inward, an arrow-shaped base connects to the one leg of the U-shaped region 40. The arrow-shaped base 41 is drawn into a corresponding recess in the outer fold-over.
- the base 41 belongs to the so-called static zone of the outer rebate seal 6, which remains practically unstressed when the sash frame is opened and closed.
- a corresponding attack detector can easily move into this static zone, e.g. in the form of a longitudinal wire or the like.
- an attack detector is arranged between the frame 1 and sash 2, which is to generate an intrusion signal when the sash 2 is to be violently separated from the frame 1 by means of an intrusion tool 10.
- the penetration point 9, which practically coincides with the first parting line 8, serves this purpose.
- the first parting line 8 is delimited by the outer fold overlap 3 on the one hand and by the outer surface of the casement 2 on the other hand.
- the attack detector 11 has at least a section along the frame spars which form the sash 1 or the sash 2 , extending detection area, the detection area being spaced apart from the penetration points 9 by a predetermined distance 14 and, moreover, being in any case in the possible penetration path of an intrusion tool 10 driven into the first parting line 8, but is only reached after the elastic sealing zone has been overcome.
- the predetermined penetration path begins practically at the penetration point 9 and continues in the joint between the frame 1 and the sash 2 into the rebate air space 5.
- the further joint between the inner rebate 4 and frame 1 then results in the end of the penetration path. If the burglar has penetrated the burglary tool 10 so far, he finds lever ratios so favorable that any technically feasible closing intervention between the sash 2 and the frame 1 can be overcome by force.
- the attack detector 11 runs at least in sections along the frame bars. In the exemplary embodiment according to FIG. 1, the attack detector 11 thus extends perpendicular to the plane of the drawing and runs parallel to its frame spar.
- the detection range of the attack detector 11 can extend continuously over the entire length of the lower frame spar 35 (see FIG. 7). Further, pre ⁇ is still beating, and to provide at least the detection region a lower piece along the vertical adjoining on both sides to profile rails. This consideration takes into account the fact that in particular the lower frame corners of a window / door are the most vulnerable places for attempted break-ins. In a special embodiment of the invention, it is provided that the detection area runs around the window / door in order to achieve continuous monitoring of all frame bars in addition to monitoring at the corner areas.
- Fig.l to 4a also show that the frame spars are designed as hollow profiles.
- Each of the hollow profiles has a cavity 12, 13.
- a longitudinal attack detector is drawn into each cavity.
- the cavities 12, 13 are preferably located directly in the area of the outer rebate seal 6 in the adjacent frame spar of the frame 1 or sash 2.
- attack detector 11 part of the outer rebate seal 6.
- This variant offers the advantage that the attack on the outer rebate seal 6 can already be reliably detected without the deep penetration of the break-in tool 10 into the rebate air space 5 being important.
- the figures show that the beginning 14 of the detection area should practically be in the upper third of the outer fold overlap 3, but is shielded in any case from the outer fold seal.
- the intrusion signal already then follows if the slump ⁇ tool 10 up to about 2 cm in the first separating groove 8 in has been inserted ⁇ .
- the slump ⁇ tool 10 up to about 2 cm in the first separating groove 8 in has been inserted ⁇ .
- the slump ⁇ tool 10 up to about 2 cm in the first separating groove 8 in has been inserted ⁇ .
- FAEL ⁇ len a lever Direction approach of burglary tool 10 between the frame 2 and frame 1 prevented.
- unnecessary destruction of frame 1 or sash 2 should be prevented thereby.
- FIGS. 1 to 6 also show cases in which the detection area of the attack detector 11 is closely adjacent to the outer seam seal 6 of the outer seam flap 3.
- attack detectors 11 of different types can be realized by attack detectors 11 of different types. This will be discussed later.
- FIGS. 1 to 3 show that two attack detectors 11, 111 are provided in each case.
- One of the attack detectors 11, 111 is located on one side of the first separation stage 8.
- attack detectors 11 are shown which are locally deformed when the intrusion tool 10 is driven in. The break-in signal is then generated from the deformation.
- the detection of the attack ⁇ detector 11 is formed by an electrical conductor portion which is incorporated into a not shown circuit for producing the break-in signal. Monitors one, then at a local deformation whose electrical abutment ⁇ was changed electrical resistance of the electrical conductor. The intrusion signal can be generated from the change in the electrical resistance.
- this is done, for example, by a wire 19 through which current flows, which extends along the frame spar.
- the wire is arranged so that penetrating intrusion tool 10 involuntarily cuts through this wire 19. This would reduce the current flow broken.
- the alarm signal can then be generated via a corresponding negating circuit.
- the detection area is formed by a pair of 20 conductors which are kept electrically insulated from one another.
- An insulating means 21 is provided between the pair of conductors 20.
- the insulating means 21 keeps the pair of conductors 20 electrically insulated. It can also be air.
- the conductor track spacing 22 is realized by a spacer 23 which is inserted between the outer ends of the conductor pair 20.
- the spacers 23 are made of insulating material. If one conductor of the pair of conductors is energized, it is ensured in this way that the second conductor is not acted upon by the current.
- FIGS. 4 and 6 Another variant is shown in FIGS. 4 and 6.
- the detection area of the attack detector 11 consists of an actuation switch 15 which extends longitudinally to the frame profile spar.
- the actuation switch 15 comprises a rocker switch 16 which is held spring-loaded in the rest position 17. When the break-in tool 10 strikes, the rocker switch 16 is moved from the rest position 17 into the signal switching position 18. At this moment the connected circuit is closed. The intrusion signal can be generated from the flowing current.
- the rocker switch 16 is a lever which is mounted on one side and is spring-loaded, the free end of which is immediately behind the end pointing into the rebate air space 5 the outer rebate seal 6.
- the outer rebate seal 6- After the outer rebate seal 6- is penetrated by the break-in tool 10, it bumps against the rocker switch 16, whereby the switching plunger is moved so far from the rest position that the two contacts 112, 113 touch. The current can flow and the intrusion signal is generated.
- rocker switch 16 lies on the floor of the rebate air space 5.
- This rocker switch 16 is also spring-loaded and is pivoted so far against the spring force by the hitting burglar tool that the two contacts 112, 113 allow the desired short-circuit current to flow.
- attack detector 11 is irreversibly deformed by driving in the intrusion tool 10, and where the intrusion signal is generated from the irreversible deformation.
- this can be brought about by a tear-off wire 19 according to FIG. 5, which can be attached to the static zone of the seal.
- plastic materials are also conceivable as attack detectors 11, which are plastically deformed by hitting the intrusion tool 10.
- the attack detector offers a detection area which is non-contact for the intrusion tool 10.
- the intrusion of the intrusion tool changes the physical properties of the detection area so that the intrusion signal is generated from the change.
- the detection range is determined by the electrical field of a capacitor.
- the electric field 26 is formed between a first capacitor plate 24 and a second capacitor plate 25.
- the physical variables of the electrical field depend, among other things, on the dielectric between the capacitor plates 24 and 25. Is one in this electrical field Inserted intrusion tool 10, if this is to reach the inner parting line 5 on the way from the first joint 8 via the rebate air space 5, the intrusion signal can be generated from the change in the electrical field 26.
- the capacitor is arranged in the rebate air space and in the case of FIG. 10a directly adjacent to the rebate seal 6 of the outer rebate flap 3.
- One capacitor plate sits on the casement and the other on the frame.
- Each capacitor plate consists of a metal strip running lengthwise to the frame spar.
- 11 also shows an exemplary embodiment with an electromagnetic field 28 which surrounds an electrical coil 27.
- the intrusion signal can be generated from its change.
- the 7 to 9 also show a development of the invention in which the detection area is formed by an optical beam 29.
- the optical beams ⁇ beam 29 is generated by a stationary light source 30 and transmitted to a receiver 31st
- the optical beam 29 runs in the rebate air space 5 between the sash 2 and the frame 1.
- the dashed line indicates the outer end of the inner rebate 4, with which it rests on the inside of the frame 1. For clarification, however, the inner fold overlap 4 has been left out. In this way, it is possible to look directly into the rebate air space 5, in which the optical beam 29 runs around the window / door.
- deflection mirrors 32 are provided in the frame corners in the rebate air space 5, which are practically perpendicular to the miter cuts of the individual profile spars. With exact alignment of the deflecting mirror 32, the beam 29 can be aligned in such a way that it runs exactly parallel to the frame bars. However, as shown in FIG. 8, the deflecting mirrors 32 do not require the entire width of the rebate air space 5. The remaining width can therefore still be used to accommodate fitting rails, locking partners (locking bolts, locking parts). In this way, the invention can be integrated into existing frame profiles with practically no problem.
- Such a lens combination 33 consists of a convex lens on the input side and a concave lens on the output side. In this way, the incoming beam is first converged in the convex lens before it hits the convex lens. There, the initially converging individual beams are parallelized again before they then strike the next deflecting mirror 32.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
- Glass Compositions (AREA)
- Liquid Crystal (AREA)
- Special Wing (AREA)
- Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19719231 | 1997-05-07 | ||
DE19719231A DE19719231B4 (en) | 1997-05-07 | 1997-05-07 | Window / door for a building |
PCT/EP1998/002683 WO1998050666A1 (en) | 1997-05-07 | 1998-05-07 | Window/door for a building |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0980460A1 true EP0980460A1 (en) | 2000-02-23 |
EP0980460B1 EP0980460B1 (en) | 2004-09-22 |
Family
ID=7828847
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP98925551A Expired - Lifetime EP0980460B1 (en) | 1997-05-07 | 1998-05-07 | Window/door for a building |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0980460B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE277264T1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE19719231B4 (en) |
PL (1) | PL336522A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1998050666A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE20200102U1 (en) | 2002-01-04 | 2002-03-28 | Oskar D. Biffar GmbH & Co KG, 67480 Edenkoben | door |
DE10211989A1 (en) * | 2002-03-18 | 2003-10-09 | Pax Ag | Combination of the border of an opening, a closure element for the opening and an attack detector as well as an electrically conductive long prismatic body for use as an attack detector |
DE10241907A1 (en) * | 2002-09-06 | 2004-03-11 | Bircher Reglomat Ag | Burglary protection for windows, doors and gates |
DE20213966U1 (en) * | 2002-09-06 | 2002-11-07 | Bircher Reglomat Ag, Speicher | Burglary protection for windows, doors and gates |
DE10301013A1 (en) * | 2003-01-13 | 2004-07-22 | Mawa Innovative Technik Gmbh | Pressure-sensitive alarm sensor for windows/doors has conductor with insulating casing, conducting elements/conductor harder than insulation; conductors are forced together when defined force exceeded |
ITMI20031340A1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2005-01-01 | Stefano Colombo | DEVICE TO INCREASE THE SAFETY OF DOORS OR WINDOWS IN genre AGAINST BREATHING ATTEMPTS. |
DE102010024486B4 (en) * | 2010-06-21 | 2016-01-28 | Profiinstand Spezialsanierungen Gmbh | Entrance and opening protection for windows and doors |
DE202012001876U1 (en) * | 2012-02-27 | 2012-06-12 | Geka Exklusiv Gmbh | Building closure with at least one frame |
EP2704117A2 (en) | 2012-08-28 | 2014-03-05 | Erich Matouschek | Device for triggering an alarm and anti-intrusion device |
DE102013009544A1 (en) | 2013-06-04 | 2014-12-04 | Erich Matouschek | Alarm-triggering burglar alarm |
DE102014106532B4 (en) | 2014-05-09 | 2017-06-22 | Erich Matouschek | Device for alarm triggering and burglar alarm |
EP4390039A1 (en) * | 2022-12-22 | 2024-06-26 | Arconic Technologies LLC | Pressure transducing gasket systems |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2562296B1 (en) * | 1984-04-02 | 1987-03-20 | Marchand Raymond | MAGNETIC ASSEMBLY FOR DETECTING THE RELATIVE MOVEMENT OF TWO PARTS, IN PARTICULAR A DOOR OPENING DETECTOR |
DE3419526A1 (en) * | 1984-05-25 | 1985-11-28 | Polycont Kunststofftechnik GmbH, 8000 München | Window and door seals |
CH664840A5 (en) * | 1985-06-04 | 1988-03-31 | Alexandra Alioth | ALARM DEVICE. |
CH668137A5 (en) * | 1986-05-07 | 1988-11-30 | Alexandra Alioth | DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING AN ELECTRICAL ALARM APPARATUS. |
DE8701282U1 (en) * | 1987-01-27 | 1987-05-07 | Unirollka-Baufertigteile GmbH, 6927 Bad Rappenau | Security window/door |
DE3930735A1 (en) * | 1988-10-01 | 1990-04-26 | Erbsloeh Julius & August | Security element for building door or window - uses optical signal transmitted between opposing door or window panels |
US4945340A (en) * | 1989-04-25 | 1990-07-31 | Pittway Corporation | Tamper-resistant magnetic security system |
GB9301709D0 (en) * | 1993-01-28 | 1993-03-17 | Highfalls Holdings Inc | Detector for wing sash or frame |
DE9318529U1 (en) * | 1993-12-03 | 1994-03-10 | PaX GmbH, 55218 Ingelheim | Burglar protection on windows, doors or the like. |
NL1000644C2 (en) * | 1995-06-23 | 1996-12-24 | Nijenstein Holding B V | Double glazed panel with intruder detection circuit |
DE19546225A1 (en) * | 1995-12-01 | 1997-06-05 | Siegfried Breuer | Safety device for windows and doors |
-
1997
- 1997-05-07 DE DE19719231A patent/DE19719231B4/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1998
- 1998-05-07 WO PCT/EP1998/002683 patent/WO1998050666A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-05-07 PL PL98336522A patent/PL336522A1/en unknown
- 1998-05-07 EP EP98925551A patent/EP0980460B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-05-07 AT AT98925551T patent/ATE277264T1/en active
- 1998-05-07 DE DE59812001T patent/DE59812001D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO9850666A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE19719231B4 (en) | 2013-07-11 |
ATE277264T1 (en) | 2004-10-15 |
DE19719231A1 (en) | 1998-11-19 |
WO1998050666A1 (en) | 1998-11-12 |
DE59812001D1 (en) | 2004-10-28 |
PL336522A1 (en) | 2000-07-03 |
EP0980460B1 (en) | 2004-09-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0744002B1 (en) | Alarm-triggering locking device for the catch and/or hinge region of a door or window to be protected | |
EP0980460B1 (en) | Window/door for a building | |
DE7735191U1 (en) | SHUTTERS | |
EP2058460B9 (en) | Anti-tamper locking device for building | |
DE3419526A1 (en) | Window and door seals | |
CH702121B1 (en) | Keeper for a panic door lock. | |
EP0831442B1 (en) | Anti burglary device | |
EP3847332B1 (en) | Protection device for a door leaf for a motor vehicle, and door device for a motor vehicle | |
EP1024238B1 (en) | Device for detecting the position of a lock bolt | |
EP0779945B1 (en) | Alarm-triggering closure device for the closure and/or hinge area of a door or window to be made secure | |
AT504296B1 (en) | SLIM COUNTERCASE FOR A PANIC DOOR LOCK | |
DE10013719B4 (en) | closure element | |
EP0845566A2 (en) | Wing assembly | |
EP3865642A1 (en) | Closing element for an opening in a building | |
DE29709259U1 (en) | Wing unit | |
DE4008441A1 (en) | Roller shutter with transverse slats in side guides - has current conductors on slats coupled to alarm for protection against intruder | |
DE102014106532B4 (en) | Device for alarm triggering and burglar alarm | |
DE1283124B (en) | Alarm device for doors or windows | |
DE19714594C2 (en) | Alarm-triggering striking plate for the locking area of a door or window to be secured | |
EP3085876B1 (en) | Drop-down seal device | |
WO2004015232A1 (en) | Burglar-proof fitting for a multi-light window or multi-leaf door | |
EP0213356B1 (en) | Device for mechanically monitoring and/or securing the operating position of electrical or electronic proximity switches, e.g. magnet contacts | |
DE8603304U1 (en) | High-speed door device | |
EP1347424B1 (en) | Combination of a border of an opening, a closure element for the opening and a burglar alarm | |
DE19605955A1 (en) | Security apparatus for securing danger zones |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19991002 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB LI LU NL |
|
19U | Interruption of proceedings before grant |
Effective date: 20010501 |
|
19W | Proceedings resumed before grant after interruption of proceedings |
Effective date: 20011116 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: PAX AG |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB LI LU NL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 59812001 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20041028 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: E. BLUM & CO. PATENTANWAELTE |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20050112 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20050623 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Owner name: PAX AG Free format text: PAX AG#NEUWEG 7#55218 INGELHEIM (DE) -TRANSFER TO- PAX AG#NEUWEG 7#55218 INGELHEIM (DE) |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Payment date: 20110531 Year of fee payment: 14 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20110512 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20110504 Year of fee payment: 14 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20110601 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 59812001 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: MUELLER, JOCHEN, DIPL.-ING., DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 59812001 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: JOCHEN MUELLER, DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20120210 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V1 Effective date: 20121201 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20120507 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20130131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121201 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20120521 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120531 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120507 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20130522 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *PAX A.G. Effective date: 20130531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120507 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 277264 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20140507 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140531 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140507 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20150731 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 59812001 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161201 |