EP0869855B1 - Mmc and liquid metal infiltration process - Google Patents
Mmc and liquid metal infiltration process Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0869855B1 EP0869855B1 EP95939851A EP95939851A EP0869855B1 EP 0869855 B1 EP0869855 B1 EP 0869855B1 EP 95939851 A EP95939851 A EP 95939851A EP 95939851 A EP95939851 A EP 95939851A EP 0869855 B1 EP0869855 B1 EP 0869855B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- preform
- ceramic
- metal
- particles
- molten metal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Definitions
- This invention relates to the manufacture of metalceramic composites having a high tensile modulus, good ductility, toughness, formability, and machinability, and more particularly, to light-weight, metal-matrix composites, including uniformly distributed ceramic particles which increase the mechanical properties of the composite without significantly reducing its ductility and machinability.
- MMCs Metal matrix composites
- MMCs are metals or alloys strengthened with tiny inclusions of another material which inhibit crack growth, and increase performance. MMCs have mechanical properties that are superior to those of most pure metals, some alloys, and most polymer-matrix composites, especially at high temperatures. The ability to tailor both mechanical and physical characteristics of MMCs is a unique and important feature of these materials.
- MMCs are known to have higher strength-to-density ratios and higher stiffness-to-density ratios with better fatigue resistance than most unreinforced metals and some polymer matrix composites.
- matrixes and reinforcements Numerous combinations of matrixes and reinforcements have been attempted since work on metal matrix composites began in the late 1950's.
- the most important matrix materials have been aluminum, titanium, magnesium, copper, and superalloys.
- Particular metal matrix composites that have been employed in the art have included aluminum matrixes containing boron, silicon carbide, alumina, or graphite in continuous fiber, discontinuous fiber, whisker, or particulate form.
- Magnesium, titanium, and copper have also been used as matrix metals with similar ceramic inclusions.
- superalloy matrixes have been impregnated with tungsten wires to provide greater creep resistance at extremely high temperatures, such as those found in jet turbine engines.
- Fabrication methods are an important part of the design process for MMCs. Considerable work is underway in this critical area, and significant improvements in existing processes appear likely. Current methods can be divided into two major categories: primary and secondary fabrication methods. Primary fabrication methods are used to create the metal matrix composite from its constituents. The resulting material may be in the form that is close to the desired final configuration, or it may require considerable additional processing, called secondary fabrication. Some of the more popular secondary fabrication methods include forming, rolling, metallurgical bonding, and machining.
- MMCs One of the more successful techniques for producing MMCs, first suggested by Toyota for making pistons in 1983, is by infiltrating liquid metal into a fabric or prearranged fibrous configuration called a preform. Frequently, ceramic and/or organic binder materials are used to hold the fibers in position. The organic materials are then burned off before or during metal infiltration, which can be conducted under a vacuum, positive pressure, or both.
- squeeze-casting One commonly employed pressure infiltration technique, which is known to reduce porosity in the final composite, is referred to as squeeze-casting.
- the squeeze-casting process usually consists of placing a fiber or whisker preform in a cavity of a die, adding molten metal, and infiltrating the preform with the metal by closing the die and applying high pressure with a piston.
- the process is typically used for near net shaped parts of small dimensions. See Siba P. Ray and David I. Yun, "Squeeze-Cast Al 2 O 3 /Al Ceramic-Metal Composites", Ceramic Bulletin , Vol. 70, No. 2 (1991).
- Ceramic matrix composites can be manufactured using preforms composed of alumina particles of .2 micron average particle size and including 14 to 48% open pores, this disclosure is limited to the production of ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs) having severely limited toughness, ductility, and machinability.
- CMCs ceramic-matrix composites
- Their set-up requires the use of expensive, heavy-walled dies and presses designed to withstand large pressure differentials, such as a 1,500-ton press.
- Particles ranging in size from .05 to 5 microns are used. By limiting the particles to a specific size range, this reference teaches that greater porosity in the close-packed particles can be provided, since the gaps between the particles are not filled by significantly smaller particles. It is this porosity volume fraction that is relied upon to permit the low pressure force to cause the molten liquid to infiltrate the loose layers of ceramic particles. Unfortunately, since the particles are loose and not sintered, they tend to agglomerate and randomly orient themselves during metal infiltration. This results in a relatively non-uniform distribution of particles throughout the matrix. Despite the expedient of using less pressure, therefore, the composite produced by infiltrating loose particles fails to achieve its full ductility and strength.
- Metal-matrix composites are not without other well recognized drawbacks.
- the ceramic inclusions used to strengthen these composites are extremely hard, and are difficult to machine using conventional techniques. This results in serious tool-wear problems when the composite is machined into its final configuration. In some cases, the tool-wear becomes such a serious problem, that manufacturers resort to near-net shape manufacturing techniques, such as die casting and squeeze-casting, and the like, where machining is kept to a minimum, or is eliminated altogether.
- near-net shape manufacturing techniques such as die casting and squeeze-casting, and the like
- TaC/metal matrix composites wherein the metal is aluminum or copper.
- Aluminum is infiltrated into the TaC preform under argon at a temperature of 1300 - 1900 °C and a pressure of 0.1 MPa and reacts with the TaC.
- Copper has to be infiltrated in vacuum of ⁇ 100 Pa at a temperature of 1500 °C and yields two continuous matrices, one ductile (Cu) and one brittle (TaC).
- Cu ductile
- TaC brittle
- This invention provides a metal-matrix composite and methods for the manufacture of metal matrix composites.
- the methods of this invention include providing a ceramic preform containing ceramic particles of average particle size no greater than about 3 microns. These tiny ceramic particles are distributed uniformly throughout the preform and are sintered to one another so that at least about one half of the volume of the preform is occupied by porosity.
- the method next includes the steps of placing the ceramic preform into a mold and contacting it with a molten metal. The molten metal is then forced into the preform so as to penetrate therethrough and occupy the pores. Finally, the molten metal is solidified to form a solid metal-matrix composite.
- the resulting composite is machineable, and preferably, can be machined with a high-speed steel (HSS) tool bit for greater than about 1 minute without excessive wear to the bit.
- HSS high-speed steel
- this invention combines the high strength, stiffness, and wear resistance of ceramics with the machinability, toughness, and formability of metals.
- a small characteristic reinforcement size of less than about 3 microns, and preferably less than about 1 micron, in conjunction with a large volume fraction of porosity and a substantially uniform distribution of ceramic particles in a sintered preform are all employed to provide these composites.
- the composites of this invention provide improved room and elevated temperature strengths, increased modulus, and, unexpectedly, excellent machinability and ductility, even at high. ceramic loadings. These composites have been machined using only high-speed steel (HSS) milling, drilling, and tapping tooling without experiencing any difficulty. Excellent surface finishes were produced.
- HSS high-speed steel
- the MMCs of this invention exhibit high strength at room and elevated temperatures, since the small reinforcement size and interparticle spacing meets the criteria for dispersion strengthening.
- the small uniformly distributed ceramic particles permit the composite to behave much more like a metal than a typical MMC, permitting their use in applications requiring greater ductility, toughness, and formability.
- the particular metal infusion procedures of this invention are adaptable to multiple alloy and ceramic pairings and permit greater latitude for increasing the tensile modulus, as loadings approach 50 vol.%.
- Specific reinforcement ceramics and volume fractions can be selected which will permit designable engineered properties dictated by the application, including high elastic modulus, strength, and ductility.
- preform porosities within the range of about 50 to 80 vol. %, a minimum preform compressive strength of about 3.45 MPa (500 psi), and the selection of preferred ceramic and metal alloy combinations for providing light-weight, high modulus composites.
- very low gas pressures can be used instead of a piston, to permit greatly facilitated processing of these composites without large capital expenditures.
- These processes can produce both bulk billets and near-net shape articles made from submicron sized particles by using pressures of less than about 20.68 MPa (3,000 psi). These processes are therefore inexpensive, and employ readily-available raw materials and otherwise standard liquid metal infusion techniques. All of these expedients can be accomplished by using a very uniform distribution of small reinforcement ceramics in a preform having readily infiltrated porosity.
- Machinable metal-matrix composites are provided by this invention which are derived from combining ceramic particles of no greater than about 3 microns with molten metal in an extremely uniform manner.
- ceramic particles preferably of submicron size, and distributing them throughout a metal-matrix so as to avoid agglomeration, both high ductility and strength can be provided to the composite without limiting machinability.
- at least 80% of the ceramic particles are uniformly distributed on a scale of three times the particle size, and more preferably, at least 90% of the ceramic particles are uniformly distributed on a scale of twice the particle size. This degree of fine particle distribution virtually eliminates large inclusions and agglomerations which detract from the ductility, strength, and machinability of the composites.
- MMCs metal-matrix composites
- This invention contemplates employing ultra-high strength metal matrixes including those having a yield strength of about 70 to 2,000 MPa.
- metals include, for example, cobalt and its alloys, martensitic stainless steels, nickel and its alloys, and low-alloy hardening steels.
- High strength metals and alloys are also potential candidates for the matrixes of this invention, including tungsten, molybdenum and its alloys, titanium and its alloys, copper casting alloys, bronzes, coppers, niobium and its alloys, and superalloys containing nickel, cobalt, and iron.
- Medium strength metals and alloys can also be considered, including hafnium, austenitic stainless steels, brasses, aluminum alloys between 2,000 and 7,000 series, beryllium-rich alloys, depleted uranium, magnesium alloys, silver, zinc die casting alloys, coppers, copper nickels, copper-nickel-zincs, and other metals having a yield strength of about 40 to 690 MPa.
- this invention optionally employs low strength, low density alloys for the matrixes of this invention.
- Such metals are represented by gold, cast magnesium alloys, platinum, aluminum alloys of the 1,000 series, lead and its alloys, and tin and its alloys. These materials have a yield strength of only about 5 to 205 MPa.
- this invention employs light-weight metals and those which are relatively inexpensive and widely available, such as aluminum, lithium, beryllium, lead, tin, magnesium, titanium, and zinc, and metals which have superior electrical properties, such as copper, silver, and gold. All of these selections can be provided in commercially pure, or alloyed, form. Specific alloys which have been recognized to have particular usefulness in MMCs include Al-1 Mg-0.6 Si, Al-7 Si-1 Mg, Al-4.5 Cu, Al-7 Mg-2 Si, and Al-Fe-V-Si.
- alloys and commercially pure metals can be employed to produce the matrixes of this invention, a pure metal is the matrix of choice, since ceramic dispersion strengthening is all that is required for improved properties.
- a pure metal also offers enhanced corrosion resistance over alloys, and eliminates the effects of overaging of precipitates. Pure metals also boost elevated temperature capability by increasing the homologous melting point over comparable alloys. Finally, pure metals eliminate the difficulties associated with microsegregation and macrosegregation of the alloying elements in non-eutectic alloys during solidification.
- the ceramic or second phase constituents of the metal matrix composites of this invention are desirably of a size which does not interfere with machining by HSS tooling. It has been discovered that machinability can be preserved only if these ceramic particles are less than about 3 microns, although this invention preferably employs a size range of about 0.01 to .5 microns.
- the ceramic particles should be thermally and chemically stable for the time and temperature of the particle fabrication process and environmental conditions of service.
- Exemplary second phase ceramic candidates include borides, carbides, oxides, nitrides, silicates, sulfides, and oxysulfides of elements which are reactive to form ceramics, including, but not limited to, transition elements of the third to sixth groups of the Periodic Table.
- Particularly useful ceramic-forming or intermetallic compound-forming constituents include aluminum, titanium, silicon, boron, molybdenum, tungsten, niobium, vanadium, zirconium, chromium, hafnium, yttrium, cobalt, nickel, iron, magnesium, tantalum, thorium, scandalum, lanthanum, and the rare earth elements.
- More exotic ceramic materials include titanium diboride, titanium carbide, zirconium diboride, zirconium disilcide, and titanium nitride.
- Carbon-based ceramics can also be useful as the ceramic phase, including natural and synthetic diamonds, graphite, fullerenes, diamond-like graphite, etc. Certain ceramics, because of their availability, ease of manufacture, low cost, or exceptional strength-inducing properties, are most desirable. These include Al 2 O 3 , SiC, B 4 C, MgO, Y 2 O 3 , TiC, graphite, diamond, SiO 2 , ThO 2 , and TiO 2 . These ceramic particles desirably have an aspect ratio of no greater than about 3:1, and preferably no greater than about 2:1, but can be represented by fibers, particles, beads, and flakes, for example. However, particles are preferred for machinability.
- the ceramic reinforcements of this invention can have aspect ratios ranging from equiaxed, to platelets and spheredized configurations.
- the particle size distribution can range from mono-sized, to a gausean distribution, or a distribution having a wide tail at fine sizes. These particles can be mixed using a variety of wet and dry techniques, including ball milling and air abrasion.
- the preferred binders employed in connection with the ceramic reinforcements can include: inorganic colloidal and organic binders, such as, sintering binders, low temperature (QPAC), and high temperature colloidal binders.
- inorganic colloidal and organic binders such as, sintering binders, low temperature (QPAC), and high temperature colloidal binders.
- binders have included polyvinyl alcohol, methyl cellulose, colloidal alumina, and graphite.
- Metal-matrix composites made in accordance with this invention and containing one or more of the above metals, alloys, and ceramic particles, can be fabricated into many useful configurations for a variety of applications. Some of the more interesting applications appear below in TABLE I. Representative Metal-Ceramic Composites and Potential Applications Matrix Fiber Potential Applications Aluminum Graphite Satellite, missile, and helicopter structures Magnesium Graphite Space and satellite structures Lead Graphite Storage-battery plates Copper Graphite Electrical contacts and bearings Aluminum Boron Compressor blades and structural supports Magnesium Boron Antenna structures Titanium Boron Jet-engine fan blades Aluminum Borsic Jet-engine fan blades Titanium Borsic High-temperature structures and fan blades Aluminum reactors Alumina Superconductor restraints in fusion-power Lead Alumina Storage-battery plates Magnesium Alumina Helicopter-transmission structures Aluminum SiC High-temperature structures Titanium SiC High-temperature structures Superalloy (Co-base) SiC High-temperature engine components
- the performance of the resulting composites of this invention is intimately linked to the uniformity of the preform used in the preferred metal infiltration procedures.
- These preforms can be made by a variety of procedures including sediment casting, injection molding, gel casting, slip casting, isopressing, ultrasonic techniques, filtering, extruding, pressing, and the like.
- colloidal processing is employed to make the preforms.
- Volatile additions and controlled agglomeration of the slurries can be used to adjust particle volume fraction within the desired ranges.
- the preform is preferably dried, or fired. This can be accomplished by microwave processing, freeze drying, or air/inert gas firing. Test bars can also be prepared along with the preform so that a determination of the modulus of rupture, or tensile properties, can be evaluated prior to pressure infiltration. A target compressive strength of at least about 3.45 MPa (500 psi), and preferably about 4.83 to 8.274 MPa (700 to 1,200 psi), is desirable for the sintered preform.
- the preforms of this invention are ideally pressure infiltrated with liquid metal to produce billets or shaped articles.
- Pressure infiltration can include all types of liquid metal infiltration (LMI) processes, including: inert gas pressure techniques, squeeze casting, and die casting, etc.
- LMI liquid metal infiltration
- inert gas pressure infiltration is employed. This technique includes the key steps of: evacuation of the preform prior to infiltration, adequate pressure control for infiltration without preform disruption, and directional solidification under pressure to feed solidification shrinkage.
- Applicants have evaluated the preferred loading ranges for the MMCs of this invention, and have determined that a 15 vol. % ceramic loading improves the modulus of commercially pure aluminum and magnesium by about 30%. A 25 vol. % of ceramic particles improves the modulus by about 50 to 60%, and a 55 vol.% ceramic loading improves the modulus by about 100%, but ductility begins to suffer. Ceramic loadings of up to 45 vol. % produced MMCs which were machined with high speed steel without significant wear. It was further noted that when ceramic particles exceeded about 3 microns, the machinability of the MMC decreased dramatically. With respect to the volume fraction, it was further noted that ceramic loadings greater than about 50% significantly lowered the ductility of the composite, and loadings significantly below 15 vol. % produced no significant modulus boost. Lower loadings were also very difficult to infiltrate, since the preforms were too weak to sustain infiltration pressures without disruption.
- a composite material was prepared having a commercially pure Al matrix including 25 vol. % Al 2 O 3 , about .2 micron average particle size on a population basis.
- the raw materials were weighed out as follows:
- This mixture was combined in a mill using the following mill parameters: slurry solids content of 10% and mill fill level of 30%.
- the slurry batch was milled for about 23 to 25 hours, removed from the mill, and disposed in a pressure filtration unit.
- the slurry was filtrated at 2.41 MPa (350 psi) for about 36 to 60 hours.
- the green preform was removed from the filtration unit. It was measured to have dimensions of about 4.9 cm in diameter X 12 cm long.
- the green preform had a reinforcement loading of about 22 vol. %.
- the green preform was then dried at ambient conditions until a weight loss of at least about 25 wt.% had been achieved. This took about five days.
- the dry preform was then placed in a furnace and fired according to the following schedule: Ramp Seq. Ramp Rate (°C/hr) Ramp Time (hr) Hold Temp (°C) Hold Time (hr) 1/2 25 14 325 2 3/4 50 12 900 30 5/6 50 6 1,200 1.5 7/8 100 12 22 24
- the fired preform had a loading of about 25 vol. % of sintered ceramic particles. It was removed and inspected, and a weight loss of about 40 wt.% was noted. This weight loss insured that all filler material had been removed.
- a mild steel infiltration crucible was then prepared by coating with a graphite wash coating DAG 154 Graphite Lubricating/Resistance Coating, available from Achesion Colloids Company. The interior of the crucible was then lined with GRAFOIL graphite paper, Grade GTB available from UCAR Carbon Company, Inc. The fired preform was then inserted into the lined crucible and a preform support rod was inserted to prevent floating. The crucible was then inserted into the pressure infiltration unit, which was custom built. The pressure infiltration unit was evacuated, and then preheated using the following heat cycle: Ramp Seq. Ramp Time (hr) Hold Temp (°C) Hold Time (hr) 1/2 2 200 0:05 3/4 8 700 2
- the unit was once again repressurized to 6.895 MPa (1,000 psi) for solidification.
- the mixture was permitted to cool for about one hour until directionally solidified.
- the sample was removed from the pressure infiltration unit, the crucible was cut off, and the alloy head was removed.
- FIG. 1 Under a scanning electron microscope, a fracture surface of one sample of the above composite was visually inspected at 35,000 X. The micrograph is shown in FIG. 1. The observed particle size was found to be about .05 to .4 microns, with .2 microns being typical, and an interparticle spacing of about .05 to .4 microns was measured.
- a composite material was prepared using an Al-2.SMg matrix having 25 vol. % fraction Al 2 O 3 particles, about .2 micron average particle size on a population basis using the same procedure as described in Example I, except the matrix included 5052-H32 Al-2.5Mg alloy, in the form of a 0.249 cm X 48 cm X 24 cm plate.
- the process parameters were identical, except the Al-2.5Mg alloy was substituted for the commercially pure aluminum. No cover flux was used during melting of the alloy, and the hold temperature during infiltration was about 695°C. The following properties were obtained using some of the same testing procedures as disclosed in Example I:
- a composite material was prepared which included a commercially pure Al matrix including 40 vol. % Al 2 O 3 , .2 micron average particle size on a population basis.
- the raw materials of Example I were the same except for the fact that an organic binder, AIRVOL 540, polyvinyl alcohol, from Chemicals Group Sales of Air Products and Chemical, Inc. was employed, and a colloidal chemistry adjustment was made which included the addition of nitric acid, 69.0 to 71.0%, BAKER ANALYZED Reagent, HNO 3 , from VWR Scientific.
- the dried ingredients were weighed out as follows:
- This mixture was combined in a similar milling procedure as was used in Example I with the following mill parameters: slurry solids content of 17.5% and mill fill level of 25%.
- the slurry batch was milled for about 23 to 25 hours, removed from the mill, and disposed in a pressure filtration unit.
- the slurry was filtrated at 350 psi for about 20 to 30 hours.
- the green preform 37 vol. % ceramic, was removed from the filtration unit. It was measured to have dimensions of 4.9 cm in diameter X 14 cm long.
- the green preform was then dried at ambient conditions until a weight loss of at least 23 wt. % had been achieved. This took about five days.
- the dried preform was then placed in a furnace and fired according to the following schedule: Ramp Seq. Ramp Rate (°C/hr) Ramp Time (hr) Hold Temp (°C) Hold Time (hr) 1/2 25 14 325 2 3/4 50 12 900 30 5/6 50 4 1,100 2 7/8 100 11 22 24
- the fired preform had a loading of about 40 vol. % of sintered ceramic particles. It was removed and inspected, and a weight loss in excess of about 15 wt. % was noted.
- a mild steel infiltration crucible was then prepared, inserted into the infiltration unit and evacuated in accordance with substantially the same procedure as described for Example I.
- the unit was thereafter preheated using the following heat cycle: Ramp Seq. Ramp Time (hr) Hold Temp (°C) Hold Time (hr) 1/2 2 200 0:05 3/4 8 700 2
- Example I Approximately 600 grams of commercially pure aluminum, as used above in Example I, was then melted, and inert gas infiltration was used to prepare a composite substantially in accordance with the procedures of Example I.
- a composite material was prepared having a commercially pure Mg matrix including 30 vol. % MgO ceramic particles, about .8 micron average particle size (about .2 micron after milling).
- the raw materials employed were the same as those used in Example I with the following exceptions: the reinforcement included MAGCHEM 20-M, technical grade magnesium oxide from Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, Inc.; the carrier employed was denatured ethanol from E.K. Industries, Inc.; the organic binder was Bulls Eye Shellac, Clear Sealer and Finish, from Williams Zinsser & Co., Inc., and the matrix consisted of commercially pure magnesium, 99.8 wt. % magnesium 0.453kg, (1 pound) sticks, 3.3cm (1.3 inch)diameter X 30cm (12 inch) in length.
- the raw materials were weighted out as follows:
- This mixture was combined in a mill using the following mill parameters: slurry solids content of 10% and mill fill level of 25%.
- the slurry batch was milled according to the milling procedures of Example I. When filtration was complete, the green preform was removed from the filtration unit. It was measured to have dimensions of about 4.9 cm diameter X 10 cm long. The green preform had a reinforcement loading of about 26 vol. %, and was then dried at ambient conditions until a weight loss of at least about 25 wt.% had been achieved. This took about five days.
- the dried preform was then placed in a furnace and fired according to the following schedule: Ramp Seq. Ramp Rate (°C/hr) Ramp Time (hr) Hold Temp (°C) Hold Time (hr) 1/2 25 14 325 6 3/4 50 14 700 30 5/6 50 4 1,100 1 7/8 100 12 22 24
- the fired preform had a loading of about 29 vol.% of sintered ceramic particles. It was removed and inspected, and a weight loss of at least about 34 wt. % was noted.
- An infiltration crucible was prepared and set up substantially as described for Example I. Approximately 300 grams of matrix magnesium alloy was deposited on the top of the preform and preform support rod. The crucible was inserted into the pressure infiltration unit, the unit was evacuated and backfilled to an argon pressure of about 300 psi. The unit was then preheated using the following heat cycle: Ramp Seq. Ramp Time (hr) Hold Temp (°C) Hold Time (hr) 1/2 2 200 0:05 3/4 8 705 2
- the unit was evacuated. Alter evacuation, it was pressurized with argon to about 14.82 MPa (2,150 psi) and held for five minutes.
- the directional solidification and removal steps were substantially the same as those described above for Example I. Samples were prepared and a hardness value of 65 Rb was measured. Hot hardness values substantially paralleled the trend for the aluminum-matrix samples.
- Samples were prepared from the Al/25 vol.% Al 2 O 3 (Example I); Al/40 vol.% Al 2 O 3 (Example II); Al-2.5Mg/25 vol.% Al 2 O 3 (Example III); and Mg/30 vol. % MgO (Example IV).
- Drilling was performed with uncoated regular-twist HSS drills without problems.
- the drill was operated at about 0.51m/sec (100 sfm). Drilling holes from about 0.85mm (1/32 inch) diameter up to about 1.59cm (5/8 inch) diameter were made with no apparent limitation in the depth.
- Tapping was performed with an uncoated 3 flute HSS tap, tapped by hand to sizes ranging from about 0.52cm (1/8 inch) to about 1.9cm (3/4 inch)course and fine threads. No difficulty was encountered.
- Samples prepared from the Al/25 vol. % Al 2 O 3 and Al2.5 vol. % Mg/25 vol. % Al 2 O 3 were turned on a lathe at about 1.78 m/sec (350 sfm) using a solid carbide tool bit.
- the tool bit removed at least 98.3 cm 3 (6 cubic inches) of material and operated for at least three hours without difficulty.
- Al/40 vol. % Al 2 O 3 sample was turned on a lathe at about 1.78 m/sec (350 sfm)using a HSS tool bit.
- the tool bit removed at least about 49.2 cm 3 (3 cubic inches) of material and operated for at least two hours without difficulty. Good to excellent surface finishes were obtained.
- Drilling was performed using a 356-T6 Al-matrix reinforced with 20 vol. % SiC (10 to 15 micron average particle size), (DURALCAN F3A.20S). The drilling operation was preformed with a 0.63cm (1/4 inch)HSS drill bit using a hand drill. The drill bit penetrated about 0.63cm (1/4 inches) and was dulled to the point where it required sharpening to be used again.
- An additional comparative sample was prepared by gas pressure infiltration of loose ceramic powder of 10 micron average particle size SiC and commercially pure Mg liquid metal.
- the resulting Mg/40 to 45 vol. % SiC composite was turned on a lathe using a solid carbide tool bit. The lathe cut for only a few seconds, when the bit began to dull and merely push the material.
- a further comparative sample was prepared using the same technique as described for Example VI with 3 micron average particle size SiC. An attempt was made to band saw the resulting Mg/40 to 45 vol.% SiC composite. The band saw quickly stopped in about 10 to 15 seconds without significant penetration into the matrix.
- this invention provides machinable, high modulus metal-matrix composites and metal infiltration techniques for preparing these composites.
- Critical parameters have been discovered which map the necessary ranges of volume fraction of porosity and particle size distribution necessary for low pressure metal infiltration and optimum mechanical properties.
Description
Representative Metal-Ceramic Composites and Potential Applications | ||
Matrix | Fiber | Potential Applications |
Aluminum | Graphite | Satellite, missile, and helicopter structures |
Magnesium | Graphite | Space and satellite structures |
Lead | Graphite | Storage-battery plates |
Copper | Graphite | Electrical contacts and bearings |
Aluminum | Boron | Compressor blades and structural supports |
Magnesium | Boron | Antenna structures |
Titanium | Boron | Jet-engine fan blades |
Aluminum | Borsic | Jet-engine fan blades |
Titanium | Borsic | High-temperature structures and fan blades |
Aluminum reactors | Alumina | Superconductor restraints in fusion-power |
Lead | Alumina | Storage-battery plates |
Magnesium | Alumina | Helicopter-transmission structures |
Aluminum | SiC | High-temperature structures |
Titanium | SiC | High-temperature structures |
Superalloy (Co-base) | SiC | High-temperature engine components |
Superalloy | Molybdenum | High-temperature engine components |
Superalloy | Tungsten | High-temperature engine components |
Approximate Physical Properties of Dispersion Strengthened Aluminum and Magnesium | ||
Aluminum 25% Alumina | Magnesium 20% Diamond | |
Density | 3.00 g/cc | 2.00 g/cc |
Tensile Strength | 413 MPa (60 ksi) | 379 MPa (55 ksi) |
Vickers Hardness | 120 MPa | 110 MPa |
Young's Modulus | 124 Pa (18 msi) | 151 Pa (22 msi) |
Ramp Seq. | Ramp Rate (°C/hr) | Ramp Time (hr) | Hold Temp (°C) | Hold Time (hr) |
1/2 | 25 | 14 | 325 | 2 |
3/4 | 50 | 12 | 900 | 30 |
5/6 | 50 | 6 | 1,200 | 1.5 |
7/8 | 100 | 12 | 22 | 24 |
Ramp Seq. | Ramp Time (hr) | Hold Temp (°C) | Hold Time (hr) |
1/2 | 2 | 200 | 0:05 |
3/4 | 8 | 700 | 2 |
Hardness | |
As extruded | Rb 57 |
As solutionized (940 F/1 hr/WQ) | Rb 59 |
Solutionized (940 F/1 hr/WQ) plus Age (400 F/2 hr/AC) | Rb 56 |
Hot Hardness | ||
Temperature, °C (°F) | Load, Kg | BHN |
RT | 750 | 103 |
RT | 500 | 99.3 |
149 (300) | 500 | 68.7 |
260 (500) | 500 | 46.1 |
315 (600) | 500 | 41.6 |
Tensile Properties | |||
Property | RT | 149°C (300°F) | 260°C (500°F) |
UTS MPa (KSI) | 344 (49.9) | 245 (35.6) | 170 (24.7) |
YS MPa (KSI) | 203 (29.5) | 189 (27.5) | 158 (22.9) |
% El. | 11 | 11 | 12 |
% RofA | 17 | 17 | 15.5 |
Smooth Fatigue | ||
Stress, KSI | Temperature, °C (°F) | Cycles to Failure X 10E6 |
20 | 260 (500) | 0.335 |
15 | 260 (500) | 0.690 |
10 | 260 (500) | 187.5 |
Test Temp °C (F) | Uniform Elongation % | Plastic Elongation % | U.T.S. MPa (KSI) | YS MPa (KSI) |
25 (77) | 6.33 | 6.514 | 389.4 (56.47) | 321.7 (46.66) |
93.3 (200) | 5.20 | 8.68 | 335.4 (48.64) | 265.0 (38.43) |
149 (300) | 4.78 | 16.2 | 274.2 (39.77) | 70.40 (10.21) |
25 (77) | 3.92 | 3.948 | 392.6 (56.94) | 321.7 (46.66) |
Ramp Seq. | Ramp Rate (°C/hr) | Ramp Time (hr) | Hold Temp (°C) | Hold Time (hr) |
1/2 | 25 | 14 | 325 | 2 |
3/4 | 50 | 12 | 900 | 30 |
5/6 | 50 | 4 | 1,100 | 2 |
7/8 | 100 | 11 | 22 | 24 |
Ramp Seq. | Ramp Time (hr) | Hold Temp (°C) | Hold Time (hr) |
1/2 | 2 | 200 | 0:05 |
3/4 | 8 | 700 | 2 |
Sonic Modulus Pa (MSI) = 122 (17.7)
Poisons Ratio = 0.288
Density (g/cm3) -3.113
Ultimate Tensile Strength MPa (ksi) = 448 (65)
Elongation = 4%
Ramp Seq. | Ramp Rate (°C/hr) | Ramp Time (hr) | Hold Temp (°C) | Hold Time (hr) |
1/2 | 25 | 14 | 325 | 6 |
3/4 | 50 | 14 | 700 | 30 |
5/6 | 50 | 4 | 1,100 | 1 |
7/8 | 100 | 12 | 22 | 24 |
Ramp Seq. | Ramp Time (hr) | Hold Temp (°C) | Hold Time (hr) |
1/2 | 2 | 200 | 0:05 |
3/4 | 8 | 705 | 2 |
Claims (21)
- A method for manufacturing a metal-matrix composite comprising the steps of:providing a ceramic preform having submicron ceramic particles and sintering the ceramic particles to one another;disposing of said ceramic preform into a mold;contacting said ceramic preform with a molten metal;causing said molten metal to penetrate into said preform; andpermitting said molten metal to solidify to form a metal matrix composite;
characterised in that
in a first step a colloidal slurry of ceramic particles in a liquid is subjected to a milling step to provide the colloidal slurry of ceramic particles wherein said particles have a particle size of no greater than 1 micron; and subsequently said ceramic particles are separated from the liquid to provide a ceramic preform having a uniform distribution of said submicron ceramic particles. - A method for manufacturing a metal-matrix composite in accordance with claim 1 wherein at least 80% of said ceramic particles are uniformly distributed on a scale of three times the average particle size.
- A method for manufacturing a metal-matrix composite in accordance with claim 2 wherein at least 90% of the ceramic particles are uniformly distributed on a scale of twice the average particle size.
- A method for manufacturing a metal-matrix composite in accordance with claim 1 wherein the step of causing said molten metal to penetrate into said preform is accomplished by pressure infiltration.
- The method of claim 4 wherein said ceramic preform includes 50 to 85% porosity by volume.
- The method of claim 5 wherein said ceramic preform consists of 60 to 80% porosity by volume.
- The method of claim 4 wherein said composite comprises a tensile modulus which is at least 30 to 200% greater than the tensile modulus of said metal.
- The method of claim 1 wherein said providing step of a ceramic preform comprises filtering, extruding, pressing or slip casting a precursor of said particles to produce a green preform.
- The method of claim 1 wherein said causing step comprises molten metal infiltration, whereby said molten metal is forced into the pores of said preform by a pressurized gas.
- The method of claim 9 wherein said pressurized gas has a pressure of 6.895 to 20.685 MPa (1,000 to 3,000 psi), and said preform has a compressive strength of at least 3.448 MPa (500 psi).
- The method, of claim 1 wherein said molten metal is driven into said preform by pressure infiltration so as to cause said molten metal to penetrate into the pores of said preform without disrupting said preform.
- The method of claim 11 wherein the ceramic particles comprise: an oxide, boride, nitride, carbide, carbon, silicide, sulfide, oxysulfide or a mixture thereof.
- The method of claim 11 wherein the colloidal slurry of the ceramic particles is mixed with up to 70 vol.%, based upon the volume of dry ingredients, of a filler, binder or mixture thereof.
- The method of claim 10 wherein said pressurized gas is an inert gas having a pressure of 10.34 MPa to 17.23 MPa (1,500 to 2,500 psi).
- The method of claim 11 wherein said metal-matrix composite comprises a near net shape.
- The method of claim 1, wherein said molten metal is selected from the group consisting of: Al, Li, Be, Pb, Ag, Au, Sn, Mg, Ti, Cu, Zn or a mixture thereof.
- The method of claim 1 wherein said step of providing a preform comprises:pressure filtrating a precursor of said ceramic particles with a graphite filter in the separation step, suspending said filtered particles with a graphite filler andinorganic binder to form a green preform; and firing said green preform to remove said filler, whereby a portion of said ceramic particles are sintered to one another.
- The method of claim 9 wherein said forcing step comprises evacuating a gas from said preform by an applied vacuum, and forcing said molten metal into the pores of said preform with a pressurized argon-containing gas.
- The method of any of claims 1 to 18 wherein said particles are Al2O3 and said molten metal is Al.
- The method of any of claims 1 to 19, wherein said particles have a particle size of from 0.01 to 0.5 microns.
- A metal-matrix composite comprising a uniform distribution of alumina particles having an average particle size no greater than 1 micron and aluminum substantially uniformly distributed with said alumina particles, at least 80% of said alumina particles being uniformly distributed on a scale of three times the average particle size wherein the alumina ceramic loading is from 15 vol% to 50 vol.%.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1995/014557 WO1997019774A1 (en) | 1994-06-16 | 1995-11-27 | Machinable mmc and liquid metal infiltration process |
CA2238520A CA2238520C (en) | 1994-06-16 | 1995-11-27 | Machinable mmc and liquid metal infiltration process |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0869855A1 EP0869855A1 (en) | 1998-10-14 |
EP0869855A4 EP0869855A4 (en) | 1998-10-21 |
EP0869855B1 true EP0869855B1 (en) | 2005-03-23 |
Family
ID=56289669
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP95939851A Expired - Lifetime EP0869855B1 (en) | 1995-11-27 | 1995-11-27 | Mmc and liquid metal infiltration process |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0869855B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114345935B (en) * | 2021-12-28 | 2024-01-12 | 浙江精瑞工模具有限公司 | High-speed steel rolling method |
CN115233119A (en) * | 2022-06-22 | 2022-10-25 | 昆明理工大学 | Amorphous alloy reinforced and toughened aluminum-based composite material and preparation method thereof |
-
1995
- 1995-11-27 EP EP95939851A patent/EP0869855B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0869855A4 (en) | 1998-10-21 |
EP0869855A1 (en) | 1998-10-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5511603A (en) | Machinable metal-matrix composite and liquid metal infiltration process for making same | |
US5702542A (en) | Machinable metal-matrix composite | |
Surappa | Aluminium matrix composites: Challenges and opportunities | |
US4623388A (en) | Process for producing composite material | |
US4557893A (en) | Process for producing composite material by milling the metal to 50% saturation hardness then co-milling with the hard phase | |
US4915905A (en) | Process for rapid solidification of intermetallic-second phase composites | |
US6180258B1 (en) | Metal-matrix composites and method for making such composites | |
US5143795A (en) | High strength, high stiffness rapidly solidified magnesium base metal alloy composites | |
Ward-Close et al. | A fibre coating process for advanced metal-matrix composites | |
Singh et al. | An overview of metal matrix composite: processing and SiC based mechanical properties | |
US5433799A (en) | Method of making Cr-bearing gamma titanium aluminides | |
US5015534A (en) | Rapidly solidified intermetallic-second phase composites | |
US4699849A (en) | Metal matrix composites and method of manufacture | |
Yang et al. | Casting particulate and fibrous metal-matrix composites by vacuum infiltration of a liquid metal under an inert gas pressure | |
US4797155A (en) | Method for making metal matrix composites | |
US4853182A (en) | Method of making metal matrix composites reinforced with ceramic particulates | |
US20040118547A1 (en) | Machineable metal-matrix composite and method for making the same | |
Nie | Patents of methods to prepare intermetallic matrix composites: A Review | |
EP0869855B1 (en) | Mmc and liquid metal infiltration process | |
Dash et al. | Studies on synthesis of magnesium based metal matrix composites (MMCs) | |
Geng et al. | Metal matrix composites | |
US5149496A (en) | Method of making high strength, high stiffness, magnesium base metal alloy composites | |
Mehrabian | New pathways to processing composites | |
Froes et al. | Processing of light metals for enhanced performance | |
Feest et al. | Comparative viability of processing routes for intermetallic based materials |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19980527 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 19980908 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A4 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19991222 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RTI1 | Title (correction) |
Free format text: MMC AND LIQUID METAL INFILTRATION PROCESS |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69534107 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20050428 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20051227 |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20051130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050323 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20081127 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081127 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: S28 Free format text: APPLICATION FILED |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: S28 Free format text: RESTORATION ALLOWED Effective date: 20101101 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20121227 AND 20121231 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20140528 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20140602 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 69534107 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20141127 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150602 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141127 |