EP0789310B1 - Intelligent CAD method embedding product performance knowledge - Google Patents
Intelligent CAD method embedding product performance knowledge Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0789310B1 EP0789310B1 EP96306929A EP96306929A EP0789310B1 EP 0789310 B1 EP0789310 B1 EP 0789310B1 EP 96306929 A EP96306929 A EP 96306929A EP 96306929 A EP96306929 A EP 96306929A EP 0789310 B1 EP0789310 B1 EP 0789310B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- design
- knowledge
- instructions
- inputting
- information
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/15—Vehicle, aircraft or watercraft design
Definitions
- This invention relates to computer aided design, and more particularly to computer systems that embed product performance knowledge as a rule in computer aided design software programming.
- EP-A-0561564 discloses a knowledge-based artificial intelligence system which provides design advice.
- the artificial intelligence system includes a knowledge base of design information. Users of the system indicate an area about which they require design advice.
- the system provides the relevant advice. Included in the advice is an indication of the 'owner' of the advice.
- the advice and the relationship between the design made by the user are part of a trace of the users' session with the system. The trace becomes part of a design document for the design. When the design is reviewed, the trace is reviewed as well.
- the system includes an interface for updating the knowledge base, and if the design review indicates a need to correct the knowledge base, the corrections are made using the interface for updating.
- US-A-5297054 discloses an automated generative gear design process, which designs parallel axis gear sets to meet constraints and performance goals.
- the process uses state space searches, generate and test, and other knowledge based techniques to automatically generate gear set designs and recommend cutting and inspection tools.
- Specific knowledge applied includes standard gear and gear set equations and conditions for use, standard and specially developed gear set design methodologies, models of generic gears and gear sets, the specific limitations of geometry of various gears and gear sets, the ability to evaluate designs based on performance relative to goals, characteristics of available cutting and inspection tools, lubricants, and materials.
- a method embodying the invention embeds product performance knowledge as a rule or as geometric parameters into a design and development process software program that not only stores knowledge from the development process but provides for two-way associativity influencing the design. Rules, parameters, associativity, relations, and knowledge generated by the process are used to revise and improve an unformed design as it is morphically developed.
- An intelligent CAD process is provided that is capable of morphically changing the design shape of a part based upon its relation to other parts and other external influences.
- unorganised human data 10 unorganised machine data 11 and previously stored data 12 are put into a computer gathering process 13; the gathering process calculates, makes calculations, observations and measures to provide organised knowledge 14.
- the human data 10 would be a designer's instructions based upon skill and prior work steps performed by the designer.
- the stored data 12 would be previous prints, drawings, layouts and geometric data generated by algorithms.
- the stored data may also include features: rounds, fillets, bosses, slots, customising aspects, or parametric (indefinite) dimensions.
- the organised knowledge 14 can be a three-dimensional data file having a viewable geometry displayable on a raster or vector device.
- the invention not only goes through the gathering step 13 as described in Figure 1, but additionally goes through an organising step 9 that provides script as a deliverable along with data 16 that together define an inchoate design.
- the script is an executable set of instructions created by the organising step.
- Such script and/or data is then subjected to an iterative editing process 17 (manual or machine) using special stored information 18a or 18b to affect the inchoate design and eventually produce an executable 19 in the form of a viewable geometry of the part as well as new script.
- the editing process 17 may take place in several subprocesses 20, 21 ,22, etc., each dedicated to a specific function that responds to new current information on such function such as illustrated in figure 3.
- the example of a part to be designed utilises a cantilevered beam 23 supported on a fixed surface 24 prescribed to support a load 25 with beam deflection not to exceed X.
- the beam length is to be no less than L; the diameter is to be no greater than D, and the material is aluminium (an environmental consideration).
- the beam is not to contact part B and the clearance Y is not to be encroached.
- Loads may be associated (related) to an arbitrary set of geometric entities possessing parameters and features; in the case of the beam this will be a set of points, lines, surfaces, etc. and the sets will contain subsets.
- the broad steps involve (30) creating an initial front bumper design, (31) optimising the initial front bumper design (32) generating the protection zone layout, (33) building and testing prototypes, and (34) correlating finite element analysis results to the physical tests.
- (30) creating an initial front bumper design (31) optimising the initial front bumper design (32) generating the protection zone layout, (33) building and testing prototypes, and (34) correlating finite element analysis results to the physical tests.
- Subprocesses 1.1 and 1.2 respectively comprise determining the initial vehicle package constraints (35) and determining the initial bumper system designs (36). This will require considerable input of human generated information and techniques, as well as machine generated information and rules. For the bumper design development this will constitute cost and weight targets, styling requirements such as whether the bumper will have a certain type of curved shape and any styling theme facia for packaging constraints, radiator information that may require cooling slots in the bumper for the air conditioning condenser as a constraint, same information that may require the bumper to be capable of sustaining multiple 5 mph collisions as well as 30 mph crash or not violate a mandated approach angle, and other engine or package constraints, such as not violating an overall vehicle length.
- the inputted or gathered data is then processed to generate a bumper system design 37.
- the data is processed to produce processed knowledge containing script without a part design. This may involve calculating the maximum allowable packaging volume in the car position (38), see figure 5A, using input data as to performance requirements and vehicle rail span. This calculation subprocess may be broken down, as shown in figure 5B, into determining the height of the beam in car position (39) and calculating the width of the bumper system (40); the height width decision is fed along with styling and determining a tentative design 42 for the bumper system at the centreline and frame sections which renders a maximum allowable depth of bumper system in the car position.
- Step 43 is expanded upon in figure 5C and involves recursively editing by associative techniques, relations and features, such as the step 44 for determining the constraints on the beam geometry due to packaging and pendulum impact dimensions, using bumper system packaging information and impact barrier test requirements for beam height, depth and sweep.
- the processed information is edited by using input data that is knowledge-based rules and instructions, such as from a library 46, and which rules and instructions may incorporate recently learned data.
- a selection and range 45 is checked to support the required dimensions (48). Then the range of acceptable values for each topological parameter is calculated (49) to produce a unique section 50 with associated manufacturing process and material with a defined range of acceptable topological parameters.
- the unique section 50 is then tested by rules and instructions for every possible energy absorber and rail support, first as to the smallest section (51) and then as to the largest section (52).
- the testing of the selected beam section is expanded upon in figure 5D.
- a selection of the energy absorber is made from library (53) and then calculation of the required geometry and dimensions of the energy absorber is made (54).
- the results are checked to see if energy absorbed supports required dimensions. If the results fail, a new energy absorber is selected and this subprocess recursively carried out. If the results pass, a rail support is selected (55) and, along with beam section information, performance information, and acceptable range of beam sweep values, is checked as to structural integrity of every combination of energy absorber and rail support (56). This is lumped mass analysis to produce small section result 57.
- step 5C The same procedure in figure 5C is followed for the largest section (52) if necessary and the passed result (58), along with result 57, is fed to step 59 (figure 5A) for optimising, if necessary, the section design based on input of optimisation strategy rules and information 60.
- step 59 figure 5A
- optimised bumper system designs is accumulated.
- the feasible bumper system designs 61, including energy absorber is then analysed as to meeting associated cost and weight (62) and then tested as to whether the objectives have been met (63). If not, a determination is made as to whether styling and/or vehicle constraints can be relaxed (64). If yes, the modified information is sent back for recursive use in the process; if not, the design is deemed not meeting the targets. This completes step 30 of figure 5.
- the other basic steps 31-34 follow in the order listed.
- the human interactive design process of the Intelligent CAD system triggers machine driven design subprocesses.
- the method may spawn one or more machine driven (non-human) processes involving calculation of the design worthiness, such as an initiation of an analysis (finite element method of structural analysis) for simulation of a 5 mph pendulum impact test; concurrently, a spawned machine driven process may generate another finite element analysis for the purpose of assessing 30 mph crash worthiness.
- a design optimisation executable may be spawned along with a mould flow analysis and a fatigue analysis while, at the same time, another executable is calculating material, piece and assembly cost. All these subprocesses (and more) may be initiated sequentially or concurrently and generate design knowledge never before available. Such knowledge is fed back, not only to refine the evolving design, but to add to the data base of accumulated knowledge which, in effect, becomes an ever increasing repository of bookshelf knowledge. This knowledge may be retrieved for future designs.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Processing Or Creating Images (AREA)
Description
None of these concepts integrate updated product performance knowledge or specifications into the design development process to morphically and recursively change the design. The unknown design should evolve by continuous iteration based on cross-assessments of design influencing factors.
Claims (5)
- A method in a computer of evolving and dynamically adapting a computer aided part design having unknown initial form, comprising: (a) gathering data related to said part consisting of (i) human generated information and techniques, and (ii) machine generated information or rules; (b) processing the gathered data by instructions to produce processed knowledge containing script defining an executable set of instructions without a part design; (c) iteratively and recursively editing the processed knowledge to continuously adapt and improve the script to form an initial executable part design by inputting into the editing process (i) recently learned data, (ii) associative techniques, relations and features, and (iii) knowledge-based rules or instructions whereby product performance information is included; and (d) inputting the editing history of step (c) into processed knowledge, such inputting creating captured improvement criteria that is iteratively and recursively fed back into either the recursive editing process or into the processing of step (b) to effect evolvement of a different executable design form.
- A method as claimed in claim 1, in which step (c) is carried out by inputting market acceptance information, product performance information, and updated targets for weight and costs.
- A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, in which said associated techniques comprise relating the part design to adjacent parts of an assembly.
- A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, in which said knowledge-based rules and instructions are associated with a library of design elements and sections.
- A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which said iterative and recursive feeding back of said captured improvement criteria is carried out by a computer.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US538925 | 1983-10-04 | ||
US08/538,925 US5748943A (en) | 1995-10-04 | 1995-10-04 | Intelligent CAD process |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0789310A2 EP0789310A2 (en) | 1997-08-13 |
EP0789310A3 EP0789310A3 (en) | 1997-09-17 |
EP0789310B1 true EP0789310B1 (en) | 2001-05-30 |
Family
ID=24149011
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP96306929A Expired - Lifetime EP0789310B1 (en) | 1995-10-04 | 1996-09-24 | Intelligent CAD method embedding product performance knowledge |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5748943A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0789310B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2186181A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69613095T2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (43)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU6247094A (en) * | 1993-03-11 | 1994-09-26 | Fibercraft/Descon Engineering, Inc. | Design and engineering project management system |
US5825651A (en) | 1996-09-03 | 1998-10-20 | Trilogy Development Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for maintaining and configuring systems |
US20030217252A1 (en) | 1998-10-03 | 2003-11-20 | Neeraj Gupta | Method and apparatus for maintaining and configuring systems |
GB2327289B (en) * | 1997-07-15 | 1999-09-15 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Job aiding apparatus |
JP3571526B2 (en) * | 1997-10-23 | 2004-09-29 | 富士通株式会社 | System design / evaluation CAD system and its program storage medium |
US6282531B1 (en) | 1998-06-12 | 2001-08-28 | Cognimed, Llc | System for managing applied knowledge and workflow in multiple dimensions and contexts |
US6230066B1 (en) * | 1998-09-08 | 2001-05-08 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Simultaneous manufacturing and product engineering integrated with knowledge networking |
US6292707B1 (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2001-09-18 | Trw Inc. | Integrated design and manufacturing system |
US6768928B1 (en) * | 1999-05-20 | 2004-07-27 | Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. | Mechanism component design support system |
US6725112B1 (en) | 1999-10-29 | 2004-04-20 | General Electric Company | Method, system and storage medium for optimizing a product design |
GB0000672D0 (en) * | 2000-01-13 | 2000-03-08 | Atlas Ward Structures Limited | Method of designing a structural element |
US6775647B1 (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2004-08-10 | American Technology & Services, Inc. | Method and system for estimating manufacturing costs |
US6598036B1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2003-07-22 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method for serving engineering rules on a network through servlet and applet |
US6535863B1 (en) | 2000-04-06 | 2003-03-18 | Ford Motor Company | Method for utilizing a knowledge-based system |
US6766205B1 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2004-07-20 | General Electric Company | Method, system and storage medium for providing network based optimization tools |
JP2002157282A (en) * | 2000-11-20 | 2002-05-31 | Toshiba Corp | Method/device for estimating man-hour and storage medium |
US20020107749A1 (en) * | 2001-02-05 | 2002-08-08 | David Leslie | Networked based paralleling switchgear equipment configuration process |
US6823342B2 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2004-11-23 | Vykor, Inc. | Method and system for capturing, managing, and disseminating manufacturing knowledge |
JP2002351928A (en) | 2001-05-23 | 2002-12-06 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Three-dimensional cad system and parts cost computing system |
JP4751017B2 (en) * | 2001-08-23 | 2011-08-17 | エフ・イ−・アイ・カンパニー | A method for controlling a system and a computer readable medium comprising instructions for performing the steps of the method |
GB0123136D0 (en) | 2001-09-26 | 2001-11-14 | Fabsec Ltd | Structural Beam |
US7069202B2 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2006-06-27 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for virtual interactive design and evaluation and manipulation of vehicle mechanisms |
US7174280B2 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2007-02-06 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for replacing parametrically described surface features with independent surface patches |
US6928389B2 (en) * | 2002-10-04 | 2005-08-09 | Copeland Corporation | Compressor performance calculator |
US7286975B2 (en) * | 2002-10-24 | 2007-10-23 | Visteon Global Technologies, Inc. | Method for developing embedded code for system simulations and for use in a HMI |
US8463441B2 (en) | 2002-12-09 | 2013-06-11 | Hudson Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for optimizing refrigeration systems |
US6775995B1 (en) * | 2003-05-13 | 2004-08-17 | Copeland Corporation | Condensing unit performance simulator and method |
US7426578B2 (en) * | 2003-12-12 | 2008-09-16 | Intercall, Inc. | Systems and methods for synchronizing data between communication devices in a networked environment |
US7606683B2 (en) * | 2004-01-27 | 2009-10-20 | Emerson Climate Technologies, Inc. | Cooling system design simulator |
US7471989B2 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2008-12-30 | The Boeing Company | Identification of engineering intent requirements in an electronic environment |
US7725299B2 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2010-05-25 | Purdue Research Foundation | Multi-tier and multi-domain distributed rapid product configuration and design system |
DE102004035838A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-02-16 | Faurecia Innenraum Systeme Gmbh | A computer system and method for determining an index for evaluating the quality of an automotive interior trim part |
US20060129461A1 (en) * | 2004-12-10 | 2006-06-15 | Gerold Pankl | Data entry and system for automated order, design, and manufacture of ordered parts |
US20060129270A1 (en) * | 2004-12-10 | 2006-06-15 | Gerold Pankl | Processes and systems for creation of machine control for specialty machines requiring manual input |
US7908126B2 (en) * | 2005-04-28 | 2011-03-15 | Emerson Climate Technologies, Inc. | Cooling system design simulator |
US8812965B2 (en) * | 2005-06-01 | 2014-08-19 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Creation and publishing of virtual components |
KR100638826B1 (en) * | 2005-06-03 | 2006-10-27 | 삼성전기주식회사 | Method of manufacturing a high sag lens |
US8065623B2 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2011-11-22 | Krueger International, Inc. | Method for designing a customized work area |
US20150149124A1 (en) * | 2008-12-09 | 2015-05-28 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft system verification |
US9098673B2 (en) * | 2010-03-23 | 2015-08-04 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Structural optimization for vehicle crashworthiness |
WO2013020297A1 (en) * | 2011-08-11 | 2013-02-14 | Autodesk, Inc. | Configurable business rules |
US10592401B2 (en) * | 2016-01-27 | 2020-03-17 | Panasonic Automotive Systems Company Of America, Division Of Panasonic Corporation Of North America | Human machine blur testing method |
US11604906B2 (en) * | 2019-09-17 | 2023-03-14 | Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. | System and method for crashworthiness analytics in design |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5079690A (en) * | 1987-11-16 | 1992-01-07 | Li Chou H | Self-optimizing method and machine |
US4910660A (en) * | 1984-09-19 | 1990-03-20 | Li Chou H | Self-optimizing method and machine |
US5410634A (en) * | 1984-09-19 | 1995-04-25 | Li; Chou H. | Self-optimizing method and machine |
US4928233A (en) * | 1987-08-24 | 1990-05-22 | International Business Machines | System for providing three dimensional object descriptions |
US5019992A (en) * | 1987-08-24 | 1991-05-28 | International Business Machines Corp. | System for designing intercommunication networks |
US4939668A (en) * | 1987-08-24 | 1990-07-03 | International Business Machines Corp. | System for designing intercommunications networks |
US4875162A (en) * | 1987-10-28 | 1989-10-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated interfacing of design/engineering software with project management software |
US4922432A (en) * | 1988-01-13 | 1990-05-01 | International Chip Corporation | Knowledge based method and apparatus for designing integrated circuits using functional specifications |
JPH05128085A (en) * | 1991-11-08 | 1993-05-25 | Toshiba Corp | Method for learning system control |
US5388188A (en) * | 1992-03-17 | 1995-02-07 | At&T Corp. | Apparatus and methods for providing design advice |
US5297054A (en) * | 1992-04-03 | 1994-03-22 | General Motors Corporation | Expert system for automically generating gear designs |
US5309366A (en) * | 1992-08-03 | 1994-05-03 | Ford Motor Company | Method of defining complex geometries to transpose flow boxes into pattern equipment for the production of automotive components |
US5519633A (en) * | 1993-03-08 | 1996-05-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for the cross-sectional design of multi-layer printed circuit boards |
US5515524A (en) * | 1993-03-29 | 1996-05-07 | Trilogy Development Group | Method and apparatus for configuring systems |
JP3201156B2 (en) * | 1993-08-30 | 2001-08-20 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Method and apparatus for assisting design |
US5552995A (en) * | 1993-11-24 | 1996-09-03 | The Trustees Of The Stevens Institute Of Technology | Concurrent engineering design tool and method |
US5539652A (en) * | 1995-02-07 | 1996-07-23 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Method for manufacturing test simulation in electronic circuit design |
-
1995
- 1995-10-04 US US08/538,925 patent/US5748943A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1996
- 1996-09-23 CA CA002186181A patent/CA2186181A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1996-09-24 DE DE69613095T patent/DE69613095T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1996-09-24 EP EP96306929A patent/EP0789310B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US5748943A (en) | 1998-05-05 |
EP0789310A2 (en) | 1997-08-13 |
DE69613095T2 (en) | 2001-09-13 |
EP0789310A3 (en) | 1997-09-17 |
CA2186181A1 (en) | 1997-04-05 |
DE69613095D1 (en) | 2001-07-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0789310B1 (en) | Intelligent CAD method embedding product performance knowledge | |
US7467074B2 (en) | System and method of interactively assembling a model | |
Chang | Design theory and methods using CAD/CAE: The computer aided engineering design series | |
US5552995A (en) | Concurrent engineering design tool and method | |
Di Angelo et al. | A reliable build orientation optimization method in additive manufacturing: The application to FDM technology | |
US7440879B2 (en) | Finite element simulation | |
JP4747474B2 (en) | Computer program for planning new vehicles | |
US6477517B1 (en) | Method of knowledge-based engineering design of an instrument panel | |
US6535775B1 (en) | Processor system and method for integrating computerized quality design tools | |
US7209869B1 (en) | Method and system for resource requirement planning and generating a production schedule using a uniform data model | |
Van Vliet et al. | State-of-the-art report on design for manufacturing | |
Fayek et al. | A fuzzy expert system for design performance prediction and evaluation | |
Ramnath et al. | Design science meets data science: Curating large design datasets for engineered artifacts | |
Hsu et al. | Synthesis of design concepts from a design for assembly perspective | |
Li et al. | An investigation of a generative parametric design approach for a robust solution development | |
JP2001297117A (en) | Method for comparing parts | |
Schelkle et al. | Virtual vehicle development in the concept stage-current status of CAE and outlook on the future | |
Kim | A framework for set-based manufacturing analysis and visual feedback | |
Johansson et al. | How to successfully implement automated engineering design systems: Reviewing four case studies | |
JP2022080367A (en) | Model evaluation device, model evaluation method, and program | |
Qureshi et al. | Design automation with the characteristics properties model and property driven design for redesign | |
Cappelletti et al. | Design for X Tool to Introduce Sustainability in the Design Process | |
Kundla et al. | Utilizing artificial neural networks and design solution spaces to cope with the complexity in subframe design | |
Van der Auweraer et al. | New approaches enabling NVH analysis to lead design in body development | |
JP7355605B2 (en) | Design support device, design support method, and design support program |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19980103 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19990216 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20010530 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69613095 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20010705 |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20070809 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20070928 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20080924 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090401 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080924 |