EP0787179A4 - INTERLEUKIN-1-g(b) DEFICIENT TRANSGENIC ANIMALS - Google Patents

INTERLEUKIN-1-g(b) DEFICIENT TRANSGENIC ANIMALS

Info

Publication number
EP0787179A4
EP0787179A4 EP95938264A EP95938264A EP0787179A4 EP 0787179 A4 EP0787179 A4 EP 0787179A4 EP 95938264 A EP95938264 A EP 95938264A EP 95938264 A EP95938264 A EP 95938264A EP 0787179 A4 EP0787179 A4 EP 0787179A4
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
mouse
gene
altered
animal
mice
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP95938264A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0787179A1 (en
Inventor
Howard Y Chen
Kathryn J Hofmann
Der Ploeg Leonardus H T Van
Myrna E Trumbauer
Hui Zheng
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Merck and Co Inc
Original Assignee
Merck and Co Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Merck and Co Inc filed Critical Merck and Co Inc
Publication of EP0787179A1 publication Critical patent/EP0787179A1/en
Publication of EP0787179A4 publication Critical patent/EP0787179A4/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/85Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for animal cells
    • C12N15/8509Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for animal cells for producing genetically modified animals, e.g. transgenic
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01KANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K67/00Rearing or breeding animals, not otherwise provided for; New or modified breeds of animals
    • A01K67/027New or modified breeds of vertebrates
    • A01K67/0275Genetically modified vertebrates, e.g. transgenic
    • A01K67/0276Knock-out vertebrates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K14/00Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • C07K14/435Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
    • C07K14/52Cytokines; Lymphokines; Interferons
    • C07K14/54Interleukins [IL]
    • C07K14/545IL-1
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01KANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K2217/00Genetically modified animals
    • A01K2217/07Animals genetically altered by homologous recombination
    • A01K2217/075Animals genetically altered by homologous recombination inducing loss of function, i.e. knock out
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01KANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K2227/00Animals characterised by species
    • A01K2227/10Mammal
    • A01K2227/105Murine
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01KANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K2267/00Animals characterised by purpose
    • A01K2267/03Animal model, e.g. for test or diseases
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01KANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K2267/00Animals characterised by purpose
    • A01K2267/03Animal model, e.g. for test or diseases
    • A01K2267/035Animal model for multifactorial diseases
    • A01K2267/0368Animal model for inflammation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to transgenic nonhuman animals wherein an interleukin-l ⁇ gene is mutated.
  • IL- 1 Mammalian interleukin- 1
  • IL- 1 is an immuno-regulatory protein secreted by certain cell types as part of the general inflammatory response.
  • the primary cell type responsible for IL- 1 production is the peripheral blood monocyte.
  • Other non-transformed cell types have, however, been described as releasing or containing IL- 1 or IL- 1 -like molecules. These include epithelial cells (Luger et aL, J. Immunol. 127: 1493-1498 1 1981 1. Le et al.. J. Immunol. 138: 2520- 2526 1 1987
  • Transformed cell lines have also been shown to produce IL- 1. These include monocytic leukemia lines P388D, J774, THP. l , U-937 (Krakauer and Oppenheimer. Cell. Immunol. 80: 223- 229 1 1983
  • Biologically active IL-1 exists in two distinct forms, IL-l with an isoelectric point of about 5.2 and IL-l ⁇ with an isoelectric point of about 7.0 with both forms having a molecular mass of about 17,500 (Bayne et aL, J. Exp. Med. 163: 1267-1280 ] 1986] and Schmidt. J. Exp. Med. 160: 772 [ 1984
  • the poly-peptides appear evolutionarily conserved, showing about 27-33% homology at the amino acid level (Clark et aL. Nucleic Acids Res. 14: 7897-7914 [ 19861).
  • Mammalian IL-l ⁇ is synthesized as a cell associated precursor polypeptide of about 31.5 kDa (Limjuco et aL, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 3972-3976 [ 1986 ]).
  • Precursor IL-l ⁇ is unable to bind to IL- 1 receptors and is biologically inactive (Mosley et aL, J. Biol. Chem. 262: 2941 -2944 1 1987 ]).
  • Biological activity appears dependent upon some form of proteolytic processing which results in the conversion of the precursor 31.5 kDa form to the mature 17.5 kDa form.
  • the complete human nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequence of the pre-IL-l ⁇ translation product is known, and is disclosed by March et aL. Nature 315: 641 -647 ( 1985).
  • IL-l ⁇ molecules from five different species do not contain hydrophobic signal sequences (Lomedico et aL, Nature 312: 458 [1984
  • IL-l ⁇ secretion may be linked to processing.
  • These experiments show that the intracellular pool of unprocessed precursor is chased to extracellular mature IL- l ⁇ (Hazuda et aL, J. Biol. Chem. 263: 8473 [ 1989
  • IL-l ⁇ precursor is occasionally found extracellularly but does not appear to contribute to the formation of 17 kDa IL-l ⁇ unless incubated at high concentrations in the presence of excess trypsin, chvmotrypsin or collagenase in vitro (Hazuda et aL, J. Biol. Chem.
  • Interleukin-l ⁇ Converting Enzyme that is capable of cleaving the IL-l ⁇ precursor at Asp - 16- Ala l ' 7, as well as at a homologous site at Asp-7-Gly- ⁇ , and generating mature IL-l ⁇ with the appropriate amino terminus at Ala l 17 has now been identified.
  • the Asp at position 1 16 has been found to be essential for cleavage, since substitution of Ala (Kostura et aL, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 86: 5227-5231 1 1989]) or other amino acids (Howard et aL. J. Immunol.. 147.
  • IL-l ⁇ deficient transgenic mice would aid in defining the normal role(s) of IL-l ⁇ , and allow an animal model of IL-l ⁇ deficiency to be used in the design and assessment of various approaches to modulating IL-l ⁇ activity.
  • Such IL-l ⁇ modified transcenic mice can also be used as a source of cells for cell culture.
  • IL-l ⁇ is a cytokine believed to be the major mediator of chronic and acute inflammation.
  • Transgenic animals having a modified copy of the endogenous native IL-l ⁇ gene are produced. These transgenic animals are useful in the analysis of the in vivo activity of IL-l ⁇ as well as modulators of IL-l ⁇ activity, and are useful as an animal model of IL-l ⁇ -mediated diseases including chronic and acute inflammation.
  • Figure 1 is a genomic map of the mouse IL- l ⁇ gene and the predicted modification of the mouse chromosomal IL-l ⁇ gene by targeted recombination using the replacement vector pi 2849-316- 1.
  • Figure 2 is a Southern blot analysis of two targeted embryonic stem (ES) clones having an inactivated IL-l ⁇ (knockout) gene.
  • ES embryonic stem
  • Figure 3 is a Southern blot analysis of tail DNA from transgenic mice having an IL-l ⁇ knockout. Southern analysis of genomic DNA from heterozygous x heterozygous crosses yielded the expected number of mice homozygous for the disrupted IL- l ⁇ allele.
  • Figure 4 is a Northern hybridization analysis for IL- l ⁇ RNA in the knockout and wild-type control mice after LPS induction.
  • Transgenic animals are generated which have a partially deleted IL-l ⁇ gene.
  • the potential alterations of the naturally occurring gene are nucleotide and amino acid modifications, deletions and substitutions. Modifications and deletions may render the naturally occurring gene nonfunctional, producing a "knockout" animal.
  • These transgenic animals are critical for the creation of animal models of human diseases, and for eventual treatment of disorders or diseases associated with IL-l ⁇ elicited responses.
  • a transgenic animal carrying a "knockout" of IL-l ⁇ is useful for the establishment of a nonhuman model of diseases involving IL-l ⁇ , and to distinguish between the activities of the different interleukins in an in vivo system.
  • mouse genomic IL-l ⁇ gene permits the construction of a targeting vector for the disruption of the mouse IL- 1 ⁇ gene.
  • the mouse genomic IL-l ⁇ gene is isolated using the mouse IL- l ⁇ cDNA (Telford, J.L. et aL, Nucl. Acids Res. 14: 9955-9963, 1986).
  • the term "animal” is used herein to include all vertebrate animals, except humans. It also includes an individual animal in all stages of development, including embryonic and fetal stages.
  • transgenic animal is any animal containing one or more cells bearing genetic information altered or received, directly or indirectly, by deliberate genetic manipulation at a subcellular level, such as by targeted recombination or microinjection or infection with recombinant virus.
  • the term "transgenic animal” is not intended to encompass classical cross-breeding or in vitro fertilization, but rather is meant to encompass animals in which one or more cells are altered by or receive a recombinant DNA molecule. This molecule may be specifically targeted to a defined genetic locus, be randomly integrated within a chromosome, or it may be extrachromosomally replicating DNA.
  • germ cell line transgenic animal refers to a transgenic animal in which the genetic alteration or genetic information was introduced into a germ line cell, thereby conferring the ability to transfer the genetic information to offspring. If such offspring in fact possess some or all of that genetic alteration or genetic information, then they, too, are transgenic animals.
  • the genetic alteration or genetic information may be foreign to the species of animal to which the recipient belongs, or foreign only to the particular individual recipient, or may be genetic information already possessed by the recipient. In the last case, the altered or introduced gene may be expressed differently than the native gene.
  • the altered IL-l ⁇ gene generally should not fully encode the same IL-l ⁇ as native to the host animal, and its expression product should be altered to a minor or nreat decree, or absent altogether. However. it is conceivable that a more modestly modified IL-l ⁇ gene will fall within the scope of the present invention.
  • genes used for altering a target gene may be obtained by a wide variety of techniques that include, but are not limited to, isolation from genomic sources, preparation of cDNAs from isolated mRNA templates, direct synthesis, or a combination thereof.
  • ES cells may be obtained from pre- implantation embryos cultured in vitro and fused with embryos (M. J. Evans et aL. Nature 292: 154-156 ( 1981 ): Bradley et al.. Nature 309: 255-258 ( 1984): Gossler et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 9065- 9069 ( 1986): and Robertson et al.. Nature 322. 445-448 ( 1986)).
  • Transgenes can be efficiently introduced into the ES Cells by a variety of standard techniques such as DNA transfection, microinjection, or by retrovirus-mediated transduction.
  • the resulting transformed ES cells can thereafter be combined with blastocysts from a non-human animal.
  • the introduced ES cells thereafter colonize the embryo and contribute to the germ line of the resulting chimeric animal (R. Jaenisch, Science 240: 1468- 1474 ( 1988)).
  • IL-l ⁇ can function as an independent component of a complex mechanism, IL-l ⁇ must be examined both individually and in the context of the whole mechanism if its contribution to the mechanisms of the general inflammatory response or other mechanisms involving IL-l ⁇ are to be understood.
  • One approach to the problem of determining the contributions of individual genes and their expression products is to use isolated genes to selectively inactivate the native wild- type gene in totipotent ES cells (such as those described herein) and then generate transgenic mice.
  • the use of gene-targeted ES cells in the generation of gene-targeted transgenic mice was described 1987 (Thomas et aL. CeU 5J_: 503- 12, ( 1987)) and is reviewed elsewhere
  • homologous plasmid- chromosome recombination was originally reported to only be detected at frequencies between 10-6 and 10-3 (Lin et aL, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 1391 -1 95 ( 1985); Smithies et al.. Nature 317: 230-234 ( 1985); Thomas et aL. Cell 44:419-428, ( 1986); Song et al.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 6820-6824 ( 1987)).
  • Nonhomologous plasmid- chromosome interactions are more frequent, occurring at levels 105- fold (Lin et aL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 1391 - 1395 ( 1985)) to 102-fold (Thomas et aL, Cell 44: 419-428 ( 1986); Song et aL, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 6820-6824 ( 1987)) greater than comparable homologous insertion.
  • PPS positive- negative selection
  • Nonhomologous recombinants are selected against by using the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) gene and selecting against its nonhomologous insertion with the herpes drugs such as ganciclovir (GANC) or FIAU ( l -(2-deoxy 2-fluoro-B-D-arabinofluranosyl)-5- iodouracil).
  • GANC ganciclovir
  • FIAU l -(2-deoxy 2-fluoro-B-D-arabinofluranosyl)-5- iodouracil.
  • the targeted genes of the invention include DNA sequences which are designed to specifically alter cognate endogenous alleles.
  • the mouse cosmid library cESI was screened using mIL- l ⁇ cDNA as a probe.
  • the ES cell genomic DNA library derived from ES- J 1 cells and propagated in HB 101 bacterial cells was screened using the mouse IL- l ⁇ cDNA sequence.
  • the 0.8 kb mouse IL-l ⁇ cDNA probe was generated by PCR using the Bi 1 1 -neo plasmid as a template and the following oligonucleotide primers: 5'-GCT AGC GTT CCT GAA AAC TTG-3' (SEQ ID NO: l ) and 5 -CTA GCT TAG GAA GAC ACA GAT TCC ATG GT-3' (SEQ ID NO:2).
  • the conditions for in situ localization of plasmid DNA in E. coli colonies are described by
  • the cosmid clones for mouse IL-l ⁇ of Example 1 were mapped with restriction endonucleases by end-ordered partial digestion (Evans et aL. Gene 79: 9-20. ( 1989)).
  • the location and extent of the IL-l ⁇ hybridizing regions of the IL-l ⁇ gene were localized by hybridizing complete and end-ordered partial digestions of the cosmids with the mouse IL-l ⁇ cDNA and oligonucleotide probes.
  • the cloned mouse IL-l ⁇ gene (designated as p 12849- 146-
  • Mouse IL-l ⁇ orientation and exon locations were determined by DNA sequencing, digestion with restriction endonuclease and Southern hybridization analysis (Sambrook et aL, supra) and by comparison with the predicated restriction endonuclease digestion pattern of the previously cloned murine IL-l ⁇ sequence (Telford et aL. Nucl. Acad Res. V. 14- No. 24, 9955-9963 ( 1986)). It was determined that pi 2849- 146-3 contains the 5' promoter region and exons of mouse IL-l ⁇ .
  • a 7.7 kb EcoRI restriction fragment containing the mouse IL- 1 ⁇ gene beginning 136 bps upstream of exon 1 and extending to approximately 1 kb downstream of exon 7 was gel-isolated from clone p i 2849- 146-3.
  • the 5' untranslated IL- l ⁇ genomic sequence was isolated on a 9.5 kb Kpn I restriction fragment which begins approximately 4 kb upstream of exon 1 and extends to the Kpn I site between exons 6 and 7.
  • a gene targeting vector for inactivating the IL-l ⁇ gene was prepared using standard cloning techniques (Sambrook et aL, supra).
  • the targeting vector p i 2849-316- 1 contained a 4.0 kb BamH l fragment of the IL- l ⁇ gene as the long arm and a 1.3kb Kpnl-Bglll fragment as the short arm.
  • Plasmid pGEM7(TK) contains the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene (TK) driven by the highly efficient mouse phosphoglycerate kinase- 1 promoter (PGKp). Plasmid pGEM7(TK ) was digested with Eco Rl which cuts immediately upstream of the PGKp-TK cassette, made blunt-ended with T4 DNA polymerase (T4 pol) and dephosphorylated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIAP).
  • T4 pol T4 DNA polymerase
  • CIAP calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase
  • the short arm of the mouse IL- l ⁇ gene was isolated from pBlue EcoRI-IL- l ⁇ as a 1.3 kb, Kpn I-Bgl II fragment and made blunt-ended with T4 pol. Since Kpn I cuts between exons 6 and 7 of the mouse IL-l ⁇ genomic DNA, the short arm contains all 641 bps of exon 7 including 208 bps of open reading frame (ORF) in addition to the required 3' untranslated DNA sequence.
  • ORF open reading frame
  • the 1.3 kb short arm was ligated into the blunt-ended Eco Rl site of pGEM7(TK ) to form plasmid A.
  • Plasmid A contains the short arm and the PGKp- TK cassette in the same orientation which regenerates the Eco Rl site immediately upstream of the IL-l ⁇ exon 7. Following digestion with Eco Rl, plasmid A was made blunt-ended with T4 pol and dephosphorylated with CIAP. The neomycin resistance gene (NEO) driven by the PGKp was isolated from plasmid pGK-neo as a 1.8 kb Eco Rl-Sal I fragment. The PGKp-NEO fragment was made blunt- ended with T4 pol and ligated into the blunt-ended Eco Rl site of plasmid A.
  • NEO neomycin resistance gene
  • Plasmid B contains the PGKp-NEO cassette in the same orientation as the short arm and PGKp- TK fragments.
  • Plasmid B was digested with Xho I which cuts immediately upstream of the PGKp-NEO cassette, made blunt-ended with T4 pol and dephosphorylated with CIAP.
  • the long arm of the mouse IL- l ⁇ gene was isolated from pBlue/Kpnl-IL-l ⁇ as a 4.0 kb, Bam HI fragment, and made blunt-ended with T4 pol.
  • the long arm fragment consists mostly of IL-l ⁇ 5' untranslated DNA sequence and contains only 45 bps of exon 1 (no ORF sequences).
  • the 4.0 kb long arm fragment was ligated with the blunt-ended, Xho I-digested plasmid B.
  • the resulting gene replacement vector designated p i 2849-316- 1 , contains a 4.0 kb IL- l ⁇ gene fragment as the 5'-end long arm, a PGKp- NEO selectable marker located between the long arm and the 1 .3 kb IL- 1 ⁇ gene short arm and a PGKp-TK marker gene attached to the carboxy-terminal end of the short arm. All of the component fragments in pi 2849-316- 1 are oriented in the same direction.
  • plasmid DNA was prepared using pZ523® columns according to the supplier (5 Prime-3Prime, Inc.) and linearized by digestion with Sal I endonuclease which cuts at the junction between the TK gene and the pGEM7 polylinker.
  • the gene targeting vector used in the IL-l ⁇ gene disruption experiments was the pi 2849-316- 1 vector of Example 3.
  • IL-l ⁇ KO IL-l ⁇ knockout
  • exons 1 to 6 of the coding region were deleted (Fig. 1 ).
  • the mouse embryonic stem cell line AB2.1 was electroporated with Sall-linearized p i 2849-316- 1 in multiple experiments. All AB2.1 ES cells were cultured on SNL feeder cells as described (Robertson, in Teratocarcinomas and embryonic stem cells. IRL Press, pp. 7 1 - 1 12 ( 1987)).
  • Electroporations were performed with l x l ()7 ES cells and 25 ⁇ g linearized vector in 0.8 ml PBS buffer at 230V, 500 ⁇ F using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser.
  • ES cell transformants were selected with the antibiotic GENETICIN® (Gibco G418: 200 ⁇ g/ l active G41 ) 24 hr post electroporation. and some transformants were counter-selected with FIAU (Bristol Myers Squibb; 0.2 ⁇ M) 48 hours later for enhancement of homologous recombinants.
  • FIAU Bacillus Squibb; 0.2 ⁇ M
  • Murine leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF: ESGRO, Gibco BRL. Inc.) was used at 200 U/ml.
  • G418- and FIAU-resistant ES clones were isolated, grown up and analyzed by a mini-Southern protocol (Ramirez-Solis, R. et al.. Anal. Biochem. 201 : 331 -335, 1992). A total of three targeted clones were identified from 350 double resistant colonies analyzed. Therefore, the frequency of targeted recombination vs. random integration at the IL- l ⁇ locus is 1/930.
  • Detailed Southern blot analysis of targeted clones using 5'-. 3'- and neo probes showed the expected integration pattern both within and flanking the IL-l ⁇ gene and there is no other integration events in addition to targeted recombination.
  • IL-l ⁇ -targeted AB2.1 cell lines were characterized by Southern hybridization analysis to confirm that the IL- l ⁇ gene was indeed disrupted.
  • the cell lines were grown in culture and characterized.
  • Targeted cell lines which crew normally and did not contain an abnormal proportion of differentiated cells (Robertson, in supra) were then separated from their feeder cells by treating the cell culture with trypsin. allowing the feeder cell to attach for 30-45 min, and removing the unattached ES cells. The ES cells were injected into recipient blastocysts.
  • IL-l ⁇ targeted ES clones were injected into C57B1/6J recipient blastocysts in separate experiments using techniques described previously (Bradley, A. "Production and analysis of chimeric mice. In Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach", EJ. Robertson, ed. Oxford:IRL Press, ( 1987), ppl 13- 151 ).
  • the injected C57B1/6J recipient blastocysts were reimplanted into the uteri of day 3 pseudopregnant Tac:SW(fBR ) mice and allowed to develop to term. Progeny were screened initially by coat color chimerism. the agouti color (which is the ES cell background strain) being an indicator of ES cell chimerism.
  • IL- l ⁇ targeting was confirmed by Southern hybridization analysis performed on genomic DNA isolated from tail samples obtained from these mice.
  • the chimeric coat color mice were bred to wild-type C57BI/6 (black coated) and 129/J (agouti coated) female mice. Some of the progeny from the chimera X C57B1/6 cross were expected to be agouti if the chimeric male had ES cell genetic material incorporated into its germline (agouti is dominant to black coat color). The chimera X 129/J cross would yield only agouti mice. These crosses were performed to transfer ES cell genetic information, including the disrupted IL- l ⁇ allele. to its offspring. Three male chimeras and one female chimera from both clone #214 and #318 resulted in agouti pups when crossed with C57B1/6J females.
  • genomic DNA was purified from about 1 cm of tail from each mouse after weaning. The genomic DNA was isolated as described (Laird et aL, a). followed b ⁇ phenol hloroform extractions and ethanol precipitation. Southern hybridization analysis (as described in Example 5) were used to identity offspring which contained the disrupted IL-l ⁇ allele. These transgenic offspring were heterozygous for the IL-l ⁇ disruption. Both transgenic heterozygous and nontransgenic mouse (tail) genomic DNAs weie digested with EcoRI. and were hybridized with a 3' flanking DNA piobe to confirm the transgenic IL- l ⁇ structure. Southern hybridization analysis confirmed that the structure of thereteied IL- l ⁇ allele was identical to that predicted, and previously characterized in the IL- l ⁇ targeted ES clones.
  • mice Male and female transgenic mice, each of which contained one copy of the altered IL-l ⁇ allele (heterozygous mice), weie mated with each other to generate mice in which both copies of the IL- l ⁇ gene were the targeted, altered transgenic IL-l ⁇ gene. It was predicted that one fourth of the mouse embryos would be homozygous for the altered IL-l ⁇ gene.
  • Surviving offspring were genotyped by Southern hybridization as described above (Fig. 3). It was determined that 25 (24.5% ) of the 102 offspring mice were homozygous IL- l ⁇ -/-.
  • mice of Example 9 Surviving homozygous IL-l ⁇ deficient mice of Example 9 were bred with wild-type or heterozygous mates to determine if they were fertile. All homozygous IL-l ⁇ -/- males and females tested were fertile. Significant differences in gross morphology or histology between the IL-l ⁇ deficient mice and the wild-type or heterozygous mice were not observed.
  • mice Both the wild-type and IL- l ⁇ KO mice were sensitized by i.p. injection of JP. acnes and challenged by i.p. injection of 10 ⁇ g LPS 6 days later to induce the expression of IL- l ⁇ . 3-3.75 hours after challenge, mice were sacrificed by C02 asphyxiation. Heparinized blood was obtained by cardiac puncture. The peritoneal cavities were lavaged. Both the plasma and cell-free lavage fluids were assayed for IL- l ⁇ by ELISA (Table 1 ). Table 1 is the result of ELISA analysis of IL- l ⁇ protein after LPS induction. As expected, in contrast to the wild- type controls, the knockout mice did not exhibit any significant IL- l ⁇ activity.
  • Liver RNA was prepared from the same mice and Northern hybridizations were carried out by standard procedures using the mouse IL-l ⁇ cDNA as probe (Fig. 4). As expected, the liver RNA from the knockout mice did not exhibit any detectable IL-l ⁇ expression, whereas wild-type control animals showed a significant amount of IL- l ⁇ activity.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

A transgenic animal with alterations in an IL-1β gene is prepared by introduction of a gene encoding an altered IL-1β gene into a host animal.

Description

TITLE OF THE INVENTION
INTERLEUKIN- l β DEFICIENT TRANSGENIC ANIMALS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to transgenic nonhuman animals wherein an interleukin-l β gene is mutated.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Mammalian interleukin- 1 (IL- 1 ) is an immuno-regulatory protein secreted by certain cell types as part of the general inflammatory response. The primary cell type responsible for IL- 1 production is the peripheral blood monocyte. Other non-transformed cell types have, however, been described as releasing or containing IL- 1 or IL- 1 -like molecules. These include epithelial cells (Luger et aL, J. Immunol. 127: 1493-1498 1 1981 1. Le et al.. J. Immunol. 138: 2520- 2526 1 1987 | and Lovett and Larsen, J. Clin. Invest. 82: 1 15- 122 1 1988]), connective tissue cells (Ollivierre et al** Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 141 : 904-91 1 1 19861. Le et al, J. Immunol. 138: 2520-2526 [ 1987 |). cells of neuronal origin (Giulian et aL, J. Exp. Med. 164: 594-604 1 19861 ) and leukocytes (Pistoia et al*, J. Immunol. 136: 1688- 1692 1 19861, Acres et al.. Mol. Immuno. 24: 479-485 [ 1987], Acres et aL, .1. Immunol. 138: 2132-2136 1 1987] and Lindemann et ah, J. Immunol. 140: 837-839 1 1988]). Transformed cell lines have also been shown to produce IL- 1. These include monocytic leukemia lines P388D, J774, THP. l , U-937 (Krakauer and Oppenheimer. Cell. Immunol. 80: 223- 229 1 1983 | and Matsushima et al., Biochem. 25: 3242-3429 1 1986], EBV-transfoπned human B lymphoblastoid lines (Acres, et aL, J. Immunol. 138: 2132-2136 [ 1987]) and transformed murine keratinocytes (Luger et al.. J. Immunol. 125: 2147-2152 [ 1982]). Biologically active IL-1 exists in two distinct forms, IL-l with an isoelectric point of about 5.2 and IL-lβ with an isoelectric point of about 7.0 with both forms having a molecular mass of about 17,500 (Bayne et aL, J. Exp. Med. 163: 1267-1280 ] 1986] and Schmidt. J. Exp. Med. 160: 772 [ 1984|). The poly-peptides appear evolutionarily conserved, showing about 27-33% homology at the amino acid level (Clark et aL. Nucleic Acids Res. 14: 7897-7914 [ 19861).
Mammalian IL-l β is synthesized as a cell associated precursor polypeptide of about 31.5 kDa (Limjuco et aL, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 3972-3976 [ 1986 ]). Precursor IL-l β is unable to bind to IL- 1 receptors and is biologically inactive (Mosley et aL, J. Biol. Chem. 262: 2941 -2944 1 1987 ]). Biological activity appears dependent upon some form of proteolytic processing which results in the conversion of the precursor 31.5 kDa form to the mature 17.5 kDa form. The complete human nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequence of the pre-IL-l β translation product is known, and is disclosed by March et aL. Nature 315: 641 -647 ( 1985).
Recent studies suggest that the processing and secretion of IL-l β is specific to monocytes and monocytic cell lines (Matsushima et ai.. J. Immunol. 135: 1 132 1 1985 |). For example, fibroblasts and keratinocytes synthesize the IL-l β precursor, but have not been shown to actively process the precursor or secrete mature IL-l β (Young et ai*. J. Cell Biol. 107: 447 ( 1988) and Corbo et aL, Eur. J. Biochem. 169: 669 1 1987 ]). Several observations support the hypothesis that the processing and secretion of IL-l β occurs by a unique pathway distinct from that used by classical secretory proteins. IL-l β molecules from five different species do not contain hydrophobic signal sequences (Lomedico et aL, Nature 312: 458 [1984|, Auron et aL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 8i: 7907 [ 19841, Gray et aL , J. Immunol. 137: 3644 [ 1986], Maliszewski et al.. Mol. Immunol. 25: 429 [ 1988 ], Mori et aL, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 150: 1237 1 1988 ], and Furutani et aL. Nucleic Acid Res. 13: 5869 1 1985|). Furthermore, neither the human nor the murine IL-l β precursors, when synthesized in vitro, translocate across competent microsomal membranes, and despite the presence of N-linked carbohydrate addition sites, do not contain N-linked carbohydrate. Finally, light and electron microscopy studies immunolocalize IL-l β to the cytoplasm and fail to demonstrate IL-l β in orcanelles that are involved in classical secretion (Bayne et aL, J. Exp. Med. 163: 1267- 1280 [ 1986] and Singer et aL, J. Exp. Med. 167: 389 [ 19881).
In activated monocytes, pulse-chase experiments suggest that IL-l β secretion may be linked to processing. These experiments show that the intracellular pool of unprocessed precursor is chased to extracellular mature IL- l β (Hazuda et aL, J. Biol. Chem. 263: 8473 [ 1989|). IL-l β precursor is occasionally found extracellularly but does not appear to contribute to the formation of 17 kDa IL-l β unless incubated at high concentrations in the presence of excess trypsin, chvmotrypsin or collagenase in vitro (Hazuda et aL, J. Biol. Chem. 264: 1689 1 19891, Black et al.. J. Biol. Chem. 263: 9437 1 19881 and Hazuda et aL. J. Biol. Chem. 265: 6318 | 1990|). However, none of these proteinases appear capable of generating mature IL-l β with the amino terminus at Ala - 17. Proteolytic maturation of precursor IL-l β to mature, 17 kDa IL- l β apparently results from cleavage between Asp- - ° and Ala l - 7. An endoproteinase. termed Interleukin-l β Converting Enzyme (ICE), that is capable of cleaving the IL-l β precursor at Asp - 16- Ala l ' 7, as well as at a homologous site at Asp-7-Gly-^, and generating mature IL-l β with the appropriate amino terminus at Ala l 17 has now been identified. The Asp at position 1 16 has been found to be essential for cleavage, since substitution of Ala (Kostura et aL, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 86: 5227-5231 1 1989]) or other amino acids (Howard et aL. J. Immunol.. 147. 2964-9, 1991 ) for Asp inhibits this cleavage event. The precise roles of IL-l β in normal tissue development and maintenance, as well as in embryonal and fetal development, are not fully understood at this time. Due to the biological importance of IL- 1 β in acute and chronic inflammation, it is important to evaluate whether IL- l β is a suitable drug target. The generation of IL-l β deficient transgenic mice would aid in defining the normal role(s) of IL-l β, and allow an animal model of IL-l β deficiency to be used in the design and assessment of various approaches to modulating IL-l β activity. Such IL-l β modified transcenic mice can also be used as a source of cells for cell culture. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
IL-l β is a cytokine believed to be the major mediator of chronic and acute inflammation. Transgenic animals having a modified copy of the endogenous native IL-l β gene are produced. These transgenic animals are useful in the analysis of the in vivo activity of IL-l β as well as modulators of IL-l β activity, and are useful as an animal model of IL-l β-mediated diseases including chronic and acute inflammation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a genomic map of the mouse IL- l β gene and the predicted modification of the mouse chromosomal IL-l β gene by targeted recombination using the replacement vector pi 2849-316- 1. Figure 2 is a Southern blot analysis of two targeted embryonic stem (ES) clones having an inactivated IL-l β (knockout) gene.
Figure 3 is a Southern blot analysis of tail DNA from transgenic mice having an IL-l β knockout. Southern analysis of genomic DNA from heterozygous x heterozygous crosses yielded the expected number of mice homozygous for the disrupted IL- l β allele. Figure 4 is a Northern hybridization analysis for IL- l β RNA in the knockout and wild-type control mice after LPS induction.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Transgenic animals are generated which have a partially deleted IL-l β gene. Among the potential alterations of the naturally occurring gene are nucleotide and amino acid modifications, deletions and substitutions. Modifications and deletions may render the naturally occurring gene nonfunctional, producing a "knockout" animal. These transgenic animals are critical for the creation of animal models of human diseases, and for eventual treatment of disorders or diseases associated with IL-l β elicited responses. A transgenic animal carrying a "knockout" of IL-l β is useful for the establishment of a nonhuman model of diseases involving IL-lβ, and to distinguish between the activities of the different interleukins in an in vivo system.
The isolation of the mouse genomic IL-l β gene permits the construction of a targeting vector for the disruption of the mouse IL- 1 β gene. The mouse genomic IL-l β gene is isolated using the mouse IL- l β cDNA (Telford, J.L. et aL, Nucl. Acids Res. 14: 9955-9963, 1986). The term "animal" is used herein to include all vertebrate animals, except humans. It also includes an individual animal in all stages of development, including embryonic and fetal stages. A "transgenic animal" is any animal containing one or more cells bearing genetic information altered or received, directly or indirectly, by deliberate genetic manipulation at a subcellular level, such as by targeted recombination or microinjection or infection with recombinant virus. The term "transgenic animal" is not intended to encompass classical cross-breeding or in vitro fertilization, but rather is meant to encompass animals in which one or more cells are altered by or receive a recombinant DNA molecule. This molecule may be specifically targeted to a defined genetic locus, be randomly integrated within a chromosome, or it may be extrachromosomally replicating DNA. The term "germ cell line transgenic animal" refers to a transgenic animal in which the genetic alteration or genetic information was introduced into a germ line cell, thereby conferring the ability to transfer the genetic information to offspring. If such offspring in fact possess some or all of that genetic alteration or genetic information, then they, too, are transgenic animals.
The genetic alteration or genetic information may be foreign to the species of animal to which the recipient belongs, or foreign only to the particular individual recipient, or may be genetic information already possessed by the recipient. In the last case, the altered or introduced gene may be expressed differently than the native gene.
The altered IL-l β gene generally should not fully encode the same IL-lβ as native to the host animal, and its expression product should be altered to a minor or nreat decree, or absent altogether. However. it is conceivable that a more modestly modified IL-l β gene will fall within the scope of the present invention.
The genes used for altering a target gene may be obtained by a wide variety of techniques that include, but are not limited to, isolation from genomic sources, preparation of cDNAs from isolated mRNA templates, direct synthesis, or a combination thereof.
A type of target cell for transgene introduction is the embryonal stem cell (ES). ES cells may be obtained from pre- implantation embryos cultured in vitro and fused with embryos (M. J. Evans et aL. Nature 292: 154-156 ( 1981 ): Bradley et al.. Nature 309: 255-258 ( 1984): Gossler et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 9065- 9069 ( 1986): and Robertson et al.. Nature 322. 445-448 ( 1986)). Transgenes can be efficiently introduced into the ES Cells by a variety of standard techniques such as DNA transfection, microinjection, or by retrovirus-mediated transduction. The resulting transformed ES cells can thereafter be combined with blastocysts from a non-human animal. The introduced ES cells thereafter colonize the embryo and contribute to the germ line of the resulting chimeric animal (R. Jaenisch, Science 240: 1468- 1474 ( 1988)). Since IL-l β can function as an independent component of a complex mechanism, IL-l β must be examined both individually and in the context of the whole mechanism if its contribution to the mechanisms of the general inflammatory response or other mechanisms involving IL-l β are to be understood. One approach to the problem of determining the contributions of individual genes and their expression products is to use isolated genes to selectively inactivate the native wild- type gene in totipotent ES cells (such as those described herein) and then generate transgenic mice. The use of gene-targeted ES cells in the generation of gene-targeted transgenic mice was described 1987 (Thomas et aL. CeU 5J_: 503- 12, ( 1987)) and is reviewed elsewhere
(Frohman et aL, Ceϋ 56: 145- 147 ( 1989): Capecchi, Trends in Genet. 5: 70-76 ( 1989): Baribault et aL, Mol. Biol. Med. 6: 481 -492, ( 1989): Wagner. EMBO J. 9: 3025-3032 ( 1990): Bradley et ai.. Bio/Technology 10: 534-539 ( 1992)). Techniques are available to inactivate or alter any genetic region to any mutation desired by using targeted homologous recombination to insert specific changes into chromosomal alleles. However, in comparison with homologous extrachromosomal recombination, which occurs at a high frequency, homologous plasmid- chromosome recombination was originally reported to only be detected at frequencies between 10-6 and 10-3 (Lin et aL, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 1391 -1 95 ( 1985); Smithies et al.. Nature 317: 230-234 ( 1985); Thomas et aL. Cell 44:419-428, ( 1986); Song et al.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 6820-6824 ( 1987)). Nonhomologous plasmid- chromosome interactions are more frequent, occurring at levels 105- fold (Lin et aL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 1391 - 1395 ( 1985)) to 102-fold (Thomas et aL, Cell 44: 419-428 ( 1986); Song et aL, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 6820-6824 ( 1987)) greater than comparable homologous insertion.
To overcome this low proportion of targeted recombination in murine ES cells, various strategies have been developed to detect or select rare homologous recombinants. One approach for detecting homologous alteration events uses the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to screen pools of transformant cells for a homologous insertion event, followed by screening individual clones (Kim et aL. Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 8887-8903 ( 1988); Kim et aL* Gene 103: 227-233 ( 1991 )). Alternatively, a positive genetic selection approach has been developed in which a marker gene is constructed which will only be active if homologous insertion occurs, allowing these recombinants to be selected directly (Sedivy et aL, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 227-231 ( 1989)). One of the most general approaches developed for selecting homologous recombinants is the positive- negative selection (PNS) method developed for genes (such as IL-l β) for which no direct selection of the alteration exists (Mansour et aL- Nature 336: 348-352: ( 1988): Capecchi. Science 244: 1288- 1292, ( 1989); Capecchi, Trends in Genet. 5: 70-76 ( 1989)). Nonhomologous recombinants are selected against by using the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) gene and selecting against its nonhomologous insertion with the herpes drugs such as ganciclovir (GANC) or FIAU ( l -(2-deoxy 2-fluoro-B-D-arabinofluranosyl)-5- iodouracil). By this counter-selection, the number of homologous recombinants in the surviving transformants can be enriched. As used herein, a "targeted gene" or "knockout" (KO) is a
DNA sequence introduced into the germline of a non-human animal by way of human intervention, including but not limited to, the above described methods. The targeted genes of the invention include DNA sequences which are designed to specifically alter cognate endogenous alleles.
The following is presented by way of examples and is not to be construed as a limitation on the scope of the invention.
EXAMPLE
Isolation of mouse IL-l β cosmid clones
The mouse cosmid library cESI was screened using mIL- l β cDNA as a probe. The ES cell genomic DNA library derived from ES- J 1 cells and propagated in HB 101 bacterial cells was screened using the mouse IL- l β cDNA sequence. The 0.8 kb mouse IL-l β cDNA probe was generated by PCR using the Bi 1 1 -neo plasmid as a template and the following oligonucleotide primers: 5'-GCT AGC GTT CCT GAA AAC TTG-3' (SEQ ID NO: l ) and 5 -CTA GCT TAG GAA GAC ACA GAT TCC ATG GT-3' (SEQ ID NO:2). The conditions for in situ localization of plasmid DNA in E. coli colonies are described by
Sambrook et aL in "Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual", Cold Spring Harbor Press. ( 1989). Approximately 85.000 colony forming units were plated on each of six 150mm NZCYM plates containing 60ug/ml of kanamycin. The hybridization conditions were maintained at high stringency to reduce the chances of isolating different but homologous genes and related pseudogenes.
Primary clones were purified through secondary and tertiary screenings. DNAs for the positive cosmids were prepared using standard conditions ( Sambrook et aL. supra). Cosmid DNAs were digested with different restriction endonucleases, electrophore.sed on agarose gels, and hybridized with the mouse IL- l β cDNA sequence using standard conditions (Sambrook et aL, supra).
EXAMPLE 2
Characterization of the mouse IL-l β clones
The cosmid clones for mouse IL-l β of Example 1 were mapped with restriction endonucleases by end-ordered partial digestion (Evans et aL. Gene 79: 9-20. ( 1989)). The location and extent of the IL-l β hybridizing regions of the IL-l β gene were localized by hybridizing complete and end-ordered partial digestions of the cosmids with the mouse IL-l β cDNA and oligonucleotide probes. The cloned mouse IL-l β gene (designated as p 12849- 146-
3 ) was characterized to determine restriction endonuclease sites and exon locations. Mouse IL-l β orientation and exon locations were determined by DNA sequencing, digestion with restriction endonuclease and Southern hybridization analysis (Sambrook et aL, supra) and by comparison with the predicated restriction endonuclease digestion pattern of the previously cloned murine IL-l β sequence (Telford et aL. Nucl. Acad Res. V. 14- No. 24, 9955-9963 ( 1986)). It was determined that pi 2849- 146-3 contains the 5' promoter region and exons of mouse IL-l β. A 7.7 kb EcoRI restriction fragment containing the mouse IL- 1 β gene beginning 136 bps upstream of exon 1 and extending to approximately 1 kb downstream of exon 7 was gel-isolated from clone p i 2849- 146-3. The 5' untranslated IL- l β genomic sequence was isolated on a 9.5 kb Kpn I restriction fragment which begins approximately 4 kb upstream of exon 1 and extends to the Kpn I site between exons 6 and 7. Both the Kpn I and Eco Rl fragments were subcloned into pBluescript SK (Stratagene) and designated as pBlue/EcoRl-IL- l β and pBlue/Kpnl-IL-l β, respectively. These plasmids were used for further analysis and construction of the IL-l β taπietine vector. EXAMPLE 3
Construction of IL-l β gene targeting vector
From the knowledge of the genomic organization of the mouse IL-l β gene with regard to restriction sites and exons (Example 2), a gene targeting vector for inactivating the IL-l β gene was prepared using standard cloning techniques (Sambrook et aL, supra). The targeting vector p i 2849-316- 1 contained a 4.0 kb BamH l fragment of the IL- l β gene as the long arm and a 1.3kb Kpnl-Bglll fragment as the short arm. The 5.7 kb sequence between the BamHI to Kpnl restriction enzyme sites encoding part of exon 1 to intron 6 of the IL- l β gene was deleted and inserted with the selectable marker PGKneo in cis orientation. The PGKtk gene was inserted at the end of the short ami. Selection against the HSV-TK gene with FIAU allowed for the enhancement of targeted recombinants as described (Mansour et aL. Nature 336: 348-352. ( 1988); Capecchi. Science 244: 1288- 1292, ( 1989): Capecchi. Trends in Genet. 5: 70-76 ( 1989). Use of the resulting vector in gene targeting resulted in the insertion of the neo marker in the IL-l β coding region and the deletion of a portion of the IL-l β sequences including the ATG initiation codon and the ICE cleavage site.
More specifically, plasmid pGEM7(TK) contains the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene (TK) driven by the highly efficient mouse phosphoglycerate kinase- 1 promoter (PGKp). Plasmid pGEM7(TK ) was digested with Eco Rl which cuts immediately upstream of the PGKp-TK cassette, made blunt-ended with T4 DNA polymerase (T4 pol) and dephosphorylated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIAP). The short arm of the mouse IL- l β gene was isolated from pBlue EcoRI-IL- l β as a 1.3 kb, Kpn I-Bgl II fragment and made blunt-ended with T4 pol. Since Kpn I cuts between exons 6 and 7 of the mouse IL-l β genomic DNA, the short arm contains all 641 bps of exon 7 including 208 bps of open reading frame (ORF) in addition to the required 3' untranslated DNA sequence. The 1.3 kb short arm was ligated into the blunt-ended Eco Rl site of pGEM7(TK ) to form plasmid A. Plasmid A contains the short arm and the PGKp- TK cassette in the same orientation which regenerates the Eco Rl site immediately upstream of the IL-l β exon 7. Following digestion with Eco Rl, plasmid A was made blunt-ended with T4 pol and dephosphorylated with CIAP. The neomycin resistance gene (NEO) driven by the PGKp was isolated from plasmid pGK-neo as a 1.8 kb Eco Rl-Sal I fragment. The PGKp-NEO fragment was made blunt- ended with T4 pol and ligated into the blunt-ended Eco Rl site of plasmid A. The resulting plasmid, designated as plasmid B, contains the PGKp-NEO cassette in the same orientation as the short arm and PGKp- TK fragments. Plasmid B was digested with Xho I which cuts immediately upstream of the PGKp-NEO cassette, made blunt-ended with T4 pol and dephosphorylated with CIAP. The long arm of the mouse IL- l β gene was isolated from pBlue/Kpnl-IL-l β as a 4.0 kb, Bam HI fragment, and made blunt-ended with T4 pol. The long arm fragment consists mostly of IL-l β 5' untranslated DNA sequence and contains only 45 bps of exon 1 (no ORF sequences). The 4.0 kb long arm fragment was ligated with the blunt-ended, Xho I-digested plasmid B. The resulting gene replacement vector, designated p i 2849-316- 1 , contains a 4.0 kb IL- l β gene fragment as the 5'-end long arm, a PGKp- NEO selectable marker located between the long arm and the 1 .3 kb IL- 1 β gene short arm and a PGKp-TK marker gene attached to the carboxy-terminal end of the short arm. All of the component fragments in pi 2849-316- 1 are oriented in the same direction. For electroporation of ES cells, plasmid DNA was prepared using pZ523® columns according to the supplier (5 Prime-3Prime, Inc.) and linearized by digestion with Sal I endonuclease which cuts at the junction between the TK gene and the pGEM7 polylinker.
EXAMPLE 4
Targeted disruption of the IL-l β gene in urine ES cells
The gene targeting vector used in the IL-l β gene disruption experiments was the pi 2849-316- 1 vector of Example 3. When this vector recombined with the wild-type IL- l β allele to generate the IL-l β knockout (IL-l β KO), exons 1 to 6 of the coding region were deleted (Fig. 1 ). The mouse embryonic stem cell line AB2.1 was electroporated with Sall-linearized p i 2849-316- 1 in multiple experiments. All AB2.1 ES cells were cultured on SNL feeder cells as described (Robertson, in Teratocarcinomas and embryonic stem cells. IRL Press, pp. 7 1 - 1 12 ( 1987)). Electroporations were performed with l x l ()7 ES cells and 25 μg linearized vector in 0.8 ml PBS buffer at 230V, 500 μF using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser. ES cell transformants were selected with the antibiotic GENETICIN® (Gibco G418: 200 μg/ l active G41 ) 24 hr post electroporation. and some transformants were counter-selected with FIAU (Bristol Myers Squibb; 0.2 μM) 48 hours later for enhancement of homologous recombinants. Murine leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF: ESGRO, Gibco BRL. Inc.) was used at 200 U/ml. Selection with FIAU resulted in about eightfold fewer colonies as compared to G418 selection alone, thereby enhancing the isolation of targeted transformants. G418- and FIAU-resistant ES clones were isolated, grown up and analyzed by a mini-Southern protocol (Ramirez-Solis, R. et al.. Anal. Biochem. 201 : 331 -335, 1992). A total of three targeted clones were identified from 350 double resistant colonies analyzed. Therefore, the frequency of targeted recombination vs. random integration at the IL- l β locus is 1/930. Detailed Southern blot analysis of targeted clones using 5'-. 3'- and neo probes showed the expected integration pattern both within and flanking the IL-l β gene and there is no other integration events in addition to targeted recombination.
EXAMPLE 5
Injection of IL-l β KO clones into donor blastocysts
All IL-l β-targeted AB2.1 cell lines were characterized by Southern hybridization analysis to confirm that the IL- l β gene was indeed disrupted. The cell lines were grown in culture and characterized. Targeted cell lines which crew normally and did not contain an abnormal proportion of differentiated cells (Robertson, in supra) were then separated from their feeder cells by treating the cell culture with trypsin. allowing the feeder cell to attach for 30-45 min, and removing the unattached ES cells. The ES cells were injected into recipient blastocysts. Three IL-l β targeted ES clones (#214, #318 and #334) were injected into C57B1/6J recipient blastocysts in separate experiments using techniques described previously (Bradley, A. "Production and analysis of chimeric mice. In Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach", EJ. Robertson, ed. Oxford:IRL Press, ( 1987), ppl 13- 151 ). The injected C57B1/6J recipient blastocysts were reimplanted into the uteri of day 3 pseudopregnant Tac:SW(fBR ) mice and allowed to develop to term. Progeny were screened initially by coat color chimerism. the agouti color (which is the ES cell background strain) being an indicator of ES cell chimerism. IL- l β targeting was confirmed by Southern hybridization analysis performed on genomic DNA isolated from tail samples obtained from these mice.
Injection of the IL-l β targeted lines #214 and #318 yielded 1 1 male chimeras and 6 female chimeras, with the chimerism ranging from 5% to 100%. As the ES cell line AB2.1 is homozygous for the agouti (A) coat color gene, penetrance of ES cells into the injected (black coat color) C57BI/6 blastocyst gives rise to chimeric coat color mice.
EXAMPLE 6
Breeding chimeric mice
The chimeric coat color mice were bred to wild-type C57BI/6 (black coated) and 129/J (agouti coated) female mice. Some of the progeny from the chimera X C57B1/6 cross were expected to be agouti if the chimeric male had ES cell genetic material incorporated into its germline (agouti is dominant to black coat color). The chimera X 129/J cross would yield only agouti mice. These crosses were performed to transfer ES cell genetic information, including the disrupted IL- l β allele. to its offspring. Three male chimeras and one female chimera from both clone #214 and #318 resulted in agouti pups when crossed with C57B1/6J females.
To determine the IL-l β genotypes, genomic DNA was purified from about 1 cm of tail from each mouse after weaning. The genomic DNA was isolated as described (Laird et aL, a). followed b\ phenol hloroform extractions and ethanol precipitation. Southern hybridization analysis (as described in Example 5) were used to identity offspring which contained the disrupted IL-l β allele. These transgenic offspring were heterozygous for the IL-l β disruption. Both transgenic heterozygous and nontransgenic mouse (tail) genomic DNAs weie digested with EcoRI. and were hybridized with a 3' flanking DNA piobe to confirm the transgenic IL- l β structure. Southern hybridization analysis confirmed that the structure of the alteied IL- l β allele was identical to that predicted, and previously characterized in the IL- l β targeted ES clones.
EXAMPLE 7
Breeding heterozygous mice and generation of homozygous IL- l β deficient mice
Male and female transgenic mice, each of which contained one copy of the altered IL-l β allele (heterozygous mice), weie mated with each other to generate mice in which both copies of the IL- l β gene were the targeted, altered transgenic IL-l β gene. It was predicted that one fourth of the mouse embryos would be homozygous for the altered IL-l β gene. Surviving offspring were genotyped by Southern hybridization as described above (Fig. 3). It was determined that 25 (24.5% ) of the 102 offspring mice were homozygous IL- l β-/-. 23 ( 22.5 %) were wild-type IL-l β+/+, and 53 % were heterozygous IL- 1 β-/+. These numbers indicate that there was no significant decrease in the number of IL- l β deficient transgenic mice which survived past weaning. EXAMPLE 8
Characterization of homozygous IL-l β deficient mice
Surviving homozygous IL-l β deficient mice of Example 9 were bred with wild-type or heterozygous mates to determine if they were fertile. All homozygous IL-l β-/- males and females tested were fertile. Significant differences in gross morphology or histology between the IL-l β deficient mice and the wild-type or heterozygous mice were not observed.
EXAMPLE 9
Confirmation of IL- l β inactivation by Northern and ELISA
Both the wild-type and IL- l β KO mice were sensitized by i.p. injection of JP. acnes and challenged by i.p. injection of 10 μg LPS 6 days later to induce the expression of IL- l β. 3-3.75 hours after challenge, mice were sacrificed by C02 asphyxiation. Heparinized blood was obtained by cardiac puncture. The peritoneal cavities were lavaged. Both the plasma and cell-free lavage fluids were assayed for IL- l β by ELISA (Table 1 ). Table 1 is the result of ELISA analysis of IL- l β protein after LPS induction. As expected, in contrast to the wild- type controls, the knockout mice did not exhibit any significant IL- l β activity.
Liver RNA was prepared from the same mice and Northern hybridizations were carried out by standard procedures using the mouse IL-l β cDNA as probe (Fig. 4). As expected, the liver RNA from the knockout mice did not exhibit any detectable IL-l β expression, whereas wild-type control animals showed a significant amount of IL- l β activity.
SEQUENCE LISTING
(1) GENERAL INFORMATIO :
(it APPLICANT: HOFMAN , I'.ATHRYN J . TRUMEAUEF , MYRNA E. CHEM, HOWARD ZHENG, H I VAN DER PLOEG, LEONARDUS
(Hi TITLE OF INVENTION: INTERLEUKIN-1BETA DEFICIENT TRANSGENIC ANIMALS
(iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCE.':.: 2
I iv i CORRESPONDENCE ADDFES :
A ADDRESSEE: HN '". 'FALLEN, III
(Li STREET: 126 Ξ. LINCOLN AVE. , P. BOX 2000
((" i CITY: R H.-A
1D • STATE: JERSEY
'E COUNTRY: USA
IF ZIP: OT όT.-O.'':"
:OIIPUTER READABLE FORM: (Al MEDIUM TYPE: Ficppy dish iBi COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (Ci OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS (Di SOFTWARE: Patentln Release #1.0, ,'ersion f?l
(vi) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA:
(A) APPLICATION NUMEER: 08/326,431
(B) FILING DATE: 20-OCT-95 (f'l CLASSIFICATION:
(viiii ATTORNEY AGENT INFORMATION: (Ai NAME: V.ALLEN, JOHN . (El REGISTRATIOIJ IT MBEF.: 35,40 Ki REFERENCE DOCKET NUMBER: l?23c liy.i TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION:
(A) TELEPHONE: (90S' 594-3905
(B) TELEFAX: (9 ? 594-4720
l2l INFORMATION FOP SEQ H MS:!:
(ii SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTIC.:: (A; LENGTH: 21 b_.__÷ paii: ICI STRAI.DEDNE : _. incii*=• (D) TOPOLOGY: lineal iii) MOLECULE TYPE: cDI..- ( I "EQUENCE DESCRIPTION: ^EQ ID NO: 1 GCTAGΓGTT: CTGAAAACTT & __ I INF FMATI N F^F "E,, ID NO: 2 : "I "EQUENCE CHARACTERISTIC : i A) LENGTH: 2r< base p__ι_._. (E l TYPE: nucleic ac id
"TFANDEDNE""- -ιι_αl~ E ' TuFOLOGi : liiw.n
' 11 MOLECULE TYFE: cDN-
Γ'IIIP]] τr ; "-.F IFTI ' 1. rE IF NO : _ TAG' TT- .4 AAGV A'AGA TTC ATGGT

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1 . A transgenic animal whose somatic and germ cells contain an altered gene coding for an altered form of IL-l β, the altered gene having been targeted to replace a wild-type IL-l β allele into the animal or an ancestor of the animal at an embryonic stage using embryonic stem cells.
2. The transgenic animal of Claim 1 wherein said animal is a mouse.
3. The mouse of Claim 2, wherein said mouse is fertile and capable of transmitting the altered IL-l β gene to its offspring.
4. The mouse of Claim 2, wherein the altered IL- l β gene has been introduced into an ancestor of the mouse at an embryonic stage by microinjection of altered embryonic stem cells into mouse blastocysts.
5. The mouse of Claim 2, wherein the altered IL- l β gene has been introduced into the mouse at an embryonic stage by microinjection of altered embryonic stem cells into mouse blastocysts.
6. The mouse of Claim 2, which is designated IL- l β KO.
7. The transgenic animal of Claim 1. wherein said animal is a mouse, and said altered form of a IL-l β is nonfunctional.
8. A method of producing a mouse whose somatic and germ cells contain a gene coding for an altered form of IL-l β, the altered gene having been targeted to replace wild-type IL-l β allele into the animal or an ancestor of the animal at an embryonic stage using embryonic stem cells, which comprises: (a) providing a gene encoding an altered form of IL-l β designed to target a IL-l β allele of mouse embryonic stem cells;
(b) introducing the altered gene into mouse embryonic stem cells;
(c) selecting embryonic stem cells which contain the altered gene:
(d) injecting the embryonic stem cells containing the altered IL-l β gene into mouse blastocysts: (e) transplanting the injected blastocysts into a pseudopregnant mouse, and ( f) allowing the embryo to develop to term: to produce a founder transgenic mouse.
9. The method of Claim 8 wherein the introducing of step (b) is by microinjection.
10. The method of Claim 9 which further comprises the steps: (g) breeding the chimeric transgenic mice to wild- type mice to obtain heterozygous (FI ) mice; and (h) breeding the heterozygous (FI ) mice to generate homozygous (F2) IL- l β transgenic mice.
A cell line derived from a trans cenic animal of
Claim 1
EP95938264A 1994-10-20 1995-10-16 INTERLEUKIN-1-g(b) DEFICIENT TRANSGENIC ANIMALS Withdrawn EP0787179A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US32643194A 1994-10-20 1994-10-20
PCT/US1995/013341 WO1996012792A1 (en) 1994-10-20 1995-10-16 INTERLEUKIN-1β DEFICIENT TRANSGENIC ANIMALS
US326431 2002-12-20

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0787179A1 EP0787179A1 (en) 1997-08-06
EP0787179A4 true EP0787179A4 (en) 1999-05-19

Family

ID=23272171

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95938264A Withdrawn EP0787179A4 (en) 1994-10-20 1995-10-16 INTERLEUKIN-1-g(b) DEFICIENT TRANSGENIC ANIMALS

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0787179A4 (en)
JP (1) JPH10507637A (en)
WO (1) WO1996012792A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6437216B1 (en) 1997-11-13 2002-08-20 Interleukin Genetics Inc. Transgenic models of inflammatory disease
GB9723835D0 (en) * 1997-11-13 1998-01-07 Nicklin Martin Interleukin knockout
JP2003500005A (en) * 1999-02-10 2003-01-07 インターリューキン ジェネティックス インコーポレイテッド Treatment and diagnosis based on mutations in the IL-1β gene
HUE029021T2 (en) * 2005-06-21 2017-02-28 Xoma (Us) Llc IL-1beta binding antibodies and fragments thereof

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1988010118A1 (en) * 1987-06-23 1988-12-29 Biogen N.V. Expression of proteins in milk
JPH02207727A (en) * 1989-02-08 1990-08-17 Yuu Honshiyou Trans-genic mouse
WO1991013979A1 (en) * 1990-03-05 1991-09-19 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Transgenic mouse overexpressing il-4 and method of use
WO1995003402A1 (en) * 1993-07-22 1995-02-02 Merck & Co., Inc. EXPRESSION OF HUMAN INTERLEUKIN-1β IN A TRANSGENIC ANIMAL
WO1995003397A1 (en) * 1993-07-22 1995-02-02 Merck & Co., Inc. Transgenic animal model for cognitive disorders

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1988010118A1 (en) * 1987-06-23 1988-12-29 Biogen N.V. Expression of proteins in milk
JPH02207727A (en) * 1989-02-08 1990-08-17 Yuu Honshiyou Trans-genic mouse
WO1991013979A1 (en) * 1990-03-05 1991-09-19 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Transgenic mouse overexpressing il-4 and method of use
WO1995003402A1 (en) * 1993-07-22 1995-02-02 Merck & Co., Inc. EXPRESSION OF HUMAN INTERLEUKIN-1β IN A TRANSGENIC ANIMAL
WO1995003397A1 (en) * 1993-07-22 1995-02-02 Merck & Co., Inc. Transgenic animal model for cognitive disorders

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 9039, Derwent World Patents Index; Class B04, AN 90-294644, XP002030369 *
See also references of WO9612792A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1996012792A1 (en) 1996-05-02
EP0787179A1 (en) 1997-08-06
JPH10507637A (en) 1998-07-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6187992B1 (en) Transgenic mouse having a disrupted amyloid precursor protein gene
AU633958B2 (en) Homologous recombination for universal donor cells and chimeric mammalian hosts
WO1995003402A1 (en) EXPRESSION OF HUMAN INTERLEUKIN-1β IN A TRANSGENIC ANIMAL
KR20050084318A (en) Transgenic mice expressing human cd20
US5750826A (en) Bradykinin B2 receptor modified transgenic non-human animals
US6002066A (en) H2-M modified transgenic mice
EP0787179A1 (en) INTERLEUKIN-1$g(b) DEFICIENT TRANSGENIC ANIMALS
WO1993019166A1 (en) Small animal model for studying cholesterol metabolism
CA2202549C (en) Transgenic nonhuman animal having functionally disrupted interleukin-1.beta. converting enzyme gene
AU712016B2 (en) Ikaros transgenic cells and animals
US6194633B1 (en) Non-human animal having a functionally disrupted SLP-76 gene
NZ289197A (en) Alpha lactalbumin gene constructs and transgenic cattle
JP4565531B2 (en) DNA for targeting the bikunin gene
WO1996017926A1 (en) Transgenic animal lacking native amyloid precursor protein
US20020104112A1 (en) Ikaros regulatory elements and uses thereof
WO2005037994A2 (en) Transgenic rodents selectively expressing human b1 bradykinin receptor protein
US20060064766A1 (en) Histamine receptor h3 modified transgenic mice
CA2158428A1 (en) Stromelysin-1 deficient transgenic mice
AU2002342156A1 (en) Transgenic mice knockout for histamine receptor H3 gene

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19970520

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19990407

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

RHK1 Main classification (correction)

Ipc: C12N 15/00

RTI1 Title (correction)

Free format text: INTERLEUKIN-1BETA DEFICIENT TRANSGENIC ANIMALS

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20000503