EP0786796B1 - Verfahren zum Betrieb von Ionenfallenmassenspektrometern - Google Patents

Verfahren zum Betrieb von Ionenfallenmassenspektrometern Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0786796B1
EP0786796B1 EP97104015A EP97104015A EP0786796B1 EP 0786796 B1 EP0786796 B1 EP 0786796B1 EP 97104015 A EP97104015 A EP 97104015A EP 97104015 A EP97104015 A EP 97104015A EP 0786796 B1 EP0786796 B1 EP 0786796B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
ions
trap
mass
sample
ion
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP97104015A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0786796A1 (de
Inventor
Gregory J. Wells
Mingda Wang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Varian Inc
Original Assignee
Varian Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Varian Inc filed Critical Varian Inc
Priority claimed from EP19930108670 external-priority patent/EP0575777B1/de
Publication of EP0786796A1 publication Critical patent/EP0786796A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0786796B1 publication Critical patent/EP0786796B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/004—Combinations of spectrometers, tandem spectrometers, e.g. MS/MS, MSn
    • H01J49/0045—Combinations of spectrometers, tandem spectrometers, e.g. MS/MS, MSn characterised by the fragmentation or other specific reaction
    • H01J49/005—Combinations of spectrometers, tandem spectrometers, e.g. MS/MS, MSn characterised by the fragmentation or other specific reaction by collision with gas, e.g. by introducing gas or by accelerating ions with an electric field
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/02—Details
    • H01J49/10—Ion sources; Ion guns
    • H01J49/14—Ion sources; Ion guns using particle bombardment, e.g. ionisation chambers
    • H01J49/145—Ion sources; Ion guns using particle bombardment, e.g. ionisation chambers using chemical ionisation
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/26—Mass spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/34—Dynamic spectrometers
    • H01J49/42—Stability-of-path spectrometers, e.g. monopole, quadrupole, multipole, farvitrons
    • H01J49/4205—Device types
    • H01J49/424—Three-dimensional ion traps, i.e. comprising end-cap and ring electrodes
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/26—Mass spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/34—Dynamic spectrometers
    • H01J49/42—Stability-of-path spectrometers, e.g. monopole, quadrupole, multipole, farvitrons
    • H01J49/426—Methods for controlling ions
    • H01J49/4265—Controlling the number of trapped ions; preventing space charge effects

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods of adjusting the dynamic range of ion trap mass spectrometers ("ion traps") in the chemical ionization mode, and for conducting multiple mass spectroscopy experiments ("MS n ").
  • the quadrupole ion trap is a well-known device for performing mass spectroscopy.
  • a ion trap comprises a ring electrode and two coaxial end cap electrodes defining an inner trapping volume.
  • Each of the electrodes preferably has a hyperbolic surface, so that when appropriate AC and DC voltages (conventionally designated “V” and “U”, respectively) are placed on the electrodes, a quadrupole trapping field is created. This may be simply done by applying a fixed frequency (conventionally designated "f") AC voltage between the ring electrode and the end caps. The use of an additional DC voltage is optional.
  • an ion trap is operated by introducing sample molecules into the ion trap where they are ionized.
  • ions may be stably contained within the trap for relatively long periods of time. Under certain trapping conditions, a large range of masses may be simultaneously held within the trap.
  • Various means are known for detecting ions that have been so trapped.
  • One known method is to scan one or more of the trapping parameters so that ions become sequentially unstable and leave the trap where they may be detected using an electron multiplier or equivalent detector.
  • Another method is to use a resonance ejection technique whereby ions of consecutive masses can be sequentially scanned out of the trap and detected.
  • the equations set forth actually relate to stability in the direction of the z axis, i.e., the direction of the axis of the electrodes. Ions will become unstable in this direction before becoming unstable in the r direction, i.e., a direction radial to the axis. Thus, it is normal to limit consideration of stability to z direction stability.
  • the differential in stability results in the fact that unstable ions will leave the trap in the z direction, i.e. , axially.
  • the DC voltage, U is set at 0.
  • U the DC voltage
  • a z 0 for all mass values.
  • the value of q z will be inversely proportional to the mass of the particle, i.e. , the larger the value of the mass the lower the value of q z .
  • V the higher the value of q z .
  • EI electron impact ionization
  • Chemical ionization involves the use of a reagent gas which is ionized, usually by EI within the trap, and allowed to react with sample molecules to form sample ions.
  • Commonly used reagent gases include methane, isobutane, and ammonia. Chemical ionization is considered to be a "softer" ionization technique. With many samples CI produces fewer ion fragments than the EI technique, thereby simplifying mass analysis.
  • Chemical ionization is a well known technique that is routinely used not only with quadrupole ion traps, but also with most other conventional types of mass spectrometers such as quadrupole mass filters, etc.
  • photoionization is a well known technique that, similar to electron impact ionization, will affect all molecules contained in the trap.
  • ion trap mass spectrometer systems in use today include a gas chromatograph ("GC") as a sample separation and introduction device.
  • GC gas chromatograph
  • sample which elutes from the GC continuously flows into the mass spectrometer, which is set up to perform periodic mass analyses.
  • Such analyses may, typically, be performed at a frequency of about one scan per second. This frequency is acceptable since peaks typically elute from a modern high resolution GC over a period of several seconds to many tens of seconds.
  • a continuous flow of reagent gas is maintained. As a practical matter it is undesirable to interrupt the flow of sample gas from the GC to the ion trap.
  • the trap when operating using the RF only method, which is preferred in the '367 patent and which is the method used in all known commercial embodiments of the ion trap, the trap inherently traps all masses above a cut-off mass which is set by the value of the RF trapping voltage.
  • V When V is set low enough the trap inherently has a poor efficiency in trapping high mass ions due to space charge effects.
  • a theoretical way of looking at this is that the volume of the interior of the ion trap which stores ions of a particular mass is proportional to the value of V and is inversely proportionally to the mass.
  • V a smaller volume of the ion trap is available to store high mass ions than low mass ones.
  • the volume is quite small the number of ions than can be stored is reduced due to space charge effects.
  • Some reagent molecules form a variety of ions having different masses. Ionization at RF voltages substantially below that necessary to trap the lowest mass reagent ion, which is necessary to remove most of the high mass sample ions, will reduce the number of reagent ions that are trapped, as well as the high mass sample ions. This effect is related to mass so that the higher mass reagent ions will be disproportionately lost from the trap.
  • the method of the lowering the trapping voltage is not applicable, however, to solving this problem since it would not eliminate low mass reagent ions from the trap.
  • One solution used to solve this problem is to raise the RF trapping voltage so as not to store the low mass reagent ions.
  • this has the undesired effect of changing the trapping conditions from those which are normally used. For example, when the trapping voltage is set to store ions of mass 20 and above, the average ionizing energy of electron entering the trap is 70 eV. Raising the trapping voltage to store only ions of mass 45 and above, so as to eliminate methane reagent ions at mass 43, would double the average electron energy. Such an increase would change the mass spectrum of many compounds and would reduce the trapping efficiency for the sample ions.
  • product ions In a CI process it is desirable to optimize the number of product ions that undergo mass analysis. If there are too few product ions, the mass analysis will be noisy, and if there are too many product ions resolution and linearity will be lost.
  • the formation of product ions is a function of the number of reagent ions present in the trap, the number of sample molecules in the trap, the reaction rate between the reagent ions and the sample ions, and the reaction time during which reagent ions are allowed to react with sample molecules.
  • This prescan is a complete CI scan cycle in which the ionization and reaction times are fixed at values smaller than those that would be used in a normal analytical scan, and in which the product ions are scanned out of the trap faster than in a normal analytical scan.
  • the resulting product ions that are ejected from the trap during the prescan are not mass resolved and the ion signal is only integrated to give a total product ion signal.
  • the prescan the total number of product ions in the trap are measured and the parameters, i.e. , the ionization time and/or the reaction time for the subsequent mass analysis scan are adjusted.
  • the patent covers a two-step process consisting of first conducting a "prescan" of the contents of the ion trap to obtain a gross determination of the number of product ions in the trap, followed by a mass analysis scan of the type taught in the '367 patent, with the parameters of mass analysis scan being adjusted based on the data collected during the prescan.
  • the disadvantage of the prior art method of extending the dynamic range by using a prescan to estimate the sample amounts in the trap is that it requires additional time to perform the prescan, and thus fewer analytical scans can be performed in the same time period. Not only does each of the prescans consume time, but each produces data which has no independent value apart from its use in adjusting the parameters for the mass analysis scan.
  • MS n experiments There is a demand to employ the ion trap mass spectrometer in conducting so-called MS n experiments.
  • MS n experiments a single ion species is isolated in the trap and is dissociated into fragments.
  • the fragments created directly from the sample species are known in the art as daughter ions, and the sample is referred to as the parent ion.
  • the daughter ions may also be fragmented to create granddaughter ions, etc.
  • the value of n refers to the number of ion generations that are formed; thus, in an MS 2 or MS/MS experiment, only daughter ions are formed and analyzed.
  • the ions oscillate within the trap they collide with molecules of the damping gas in the trap and undergo collision induced dissociation thereby forming daughter ions.
  • the ions can similarly be fragmented.
  • the difficulty with the method of the '101 patent is that the precise resonant frequency of the ions of interest cannot be determined a priori but must be determined a posteriori .
  • the resonant frequency of an ion also referred to as its secular frequency, varies with the ion mass-to-charge ratio, the number of ions in the trap, hardware variances and other parameters which cannot be precisely determined in a simple way.
  • the precise resonant frequency must of an ion species be determined empirically. While empirical determination can be performed without great difficulty when a static sample is introduced into the trap, it is quite difficult to accomplish when a dynamic sample, such as the output of a GC, is used.
  • One prior art approach to overcoming the foregoing problem in determining the precise resonant frequency of a sample ion of interest is to use a broadband excitation centered around the calculated frequency.
  • a broadband excitation may have a bandwidth of about 10 KHz.
  • Another method is to conduct a frequency prescan, i.e. , sweep the supplemental field across a frequency range in the area of interest and observe the resonant frequency empirically.
  • a frequency prescan i.e.
  • the object of the present invention relates to a method of optimizing the experimental parameters utilized in an ion trap in order to operate within dynamic range of the trap.
  • mass spectral data associated with the largest peak measured during one scan of the ion trap is used to adjust, if necessary, experimental parameters utilized during the subsequent scan so that the trap is operated within its dynamic range.
  • FIG. 1 is a plot of the stability diagram associated with an ion trap.
  • FIG. 2 is a partially schematic view of apparatus used to practice the method of the present inventions.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the control of the supplemental broadband AC field in relation to the gating of the electron beam used for electron impact ionization.
  • FIGS. 4A - 4G are mass spectra of various samples comparing the present invention with the method of the prior art.
  • FIG. 5 shows an alternate arrangement of the apparatus of FIG. 2 for use in practicing the present invention.
  • FIGS. 6A - 6E are mass spectra of various samples showing how the application of a supplemental low frequency field may be used to cause fragmentation of a parent ion within an ion trap.
  • FIGS. 7A - 7C are mass spectra showing how the application of a supplemental low frequency field may be used to eliminate high mass ions from an ion trap.
  • FIGS. 8A - 8C are mass spectra showing how the application of a supplemental low frequency field may be used in conducting chemical ionization experiments.
  • Ion trap 10 shown schematically in cross-section, comprises a ring electrode 20 coaxially aligned with upper and lower end cap electrodes 30 and 35, respectively.
  • the trap electrodes have hyperbolic inner surfaces, although other shapes, for example, electrodes having a cross-sections forming an arc of a circle, may also be used to create trapping fields.
  • the design and construction of ion trap mass spectrometers is well-known to those skilled in the art and need not be described in detail.
  • a commercial model ion trap of the type described herein is sold by the assignee hereof under the model designation Saturn.
  • Sample gas for example from a gas chromatograph 40, is introduced into the ion trap 10. Since GC's typically operate at atmospheric pressure while ion traps operate at greatly reduced pressures, pressure reducing means (not shown) are required. Such pressure reducing means are conventional and well known to those skilled in the art. While the present invention is described using a GC as a sample source, the source of the sample is not considered a part of the invention and there is no intent to limit the invention to use with gas chromatographs. Other sample sources, such as, for example, liquid chromatographs with specialized interfaces, may also be used.
  • Sample and reagent gas that is introduced into the interior of ion trap 10 may be ionized by electron bombardment as follows.
  • a beam of electrons such as from a thermionic filament 60 powered by filament power supply 65, is controlled by a gate electrode 70.
  • the center of upper end cap electrode 30 is perforated (not shown) to allow the electron beam generated by filament 60 and gate electrode 70 to enter the interior of the trap.
  • the electron beam collides with sample and reagent molecules within the trap thereby ionizing them.
  • Electron impact ionization of sample and reagent gases is also a well-known process that need not be described in greater detail.
  • a trapping field is created by the application of an AC voltage having a desired frequency and amplitude to stably trap ions within a desired range of mass-to-charge ratios.
  • RF generator 80 is used to create this field, and is applied to the ring electrode. While it is well known that one may also apply a DC voltage to modify the trapping field and to work at a different portion of the stability diagram of FIG. 1, as a practical matter, commercially available ion traps all operate using an AC trapping field only.
  • a variety of methods are known for determining the mass-to-charge ratios of the ions which are trapped in the ion trap to thereby obtain a mass spectrum of the sample.
  • One known method is to scan the trap so that ions of sequential mass-to-charge ratio are ejected in order.
  • a first known method of scanning the trap is to scan one of the trapping parameters, such as the magnitude of the AC voltage, so that ions sequentially become unstable and leave the trap where they are detected using, for example, electron multiplier means 90.
  • a supplemental AC dipole voltage applied across end caps 30 and 35 of ion trap 10.
  • a voltage may be created by a supplemental waveform generator 100, coupled to the end caps electrodes by transformer 110.
  • the supplemental AC field is used to resonantly eject ions in the trap.
  • Each ion in the trap has a resonant frequency which is a function of its mass-to-charge ratio and of the trapping field parameters.
  • Ions ejected in this manner can also be detected by electron multiplier 90 or an equivalent detector.
  • the contents of the trap can be scanned in sequential order by either scanning the frequency of the supplemental RF field or by scanning one of the trapping parameters such as the magnitude of V, the AC trapping voltage. As a practical matter, scanning the magnitude of the AC voltage is preferred.
  • the supplemental RF generator 100 which may also be used for scanning the trap as described above, is capable of generating a broadband RF field which is used to resonantly eject sample ions created by EI during the time that the reagent gas is being ionized.
  • FIG. 3(a) shows the gating of the electron beam used to ionize the reagent gas. Beginning at t1 and ending at t2, electron gate 70 is turned on to allow the electron beam to enter the trap to form reagent ions from the neutral reagent gas. As shown in FIG.
  • supplemental waveform generator 100 applies a broadband signal to the end caps of the trap, 30, 35, for a period of time that begins at t1 and ends at t3. As shown, the broadband excitation exceeds the gate time. Alternately, the supplemental broadband signal could be applied starting at a time later than t1, or even later than t2, i.e. , after the electron ionization is complete. Likewise, the supplemental signal could also start at a time prior to t1. The important aspect being that the supplemental field for elimination of unwanted sample ions be kept "on" for a period of time extending after the end of the period during which ions are created.
  • the broadband AC voltage applied to the end caps can either be out of phase (dipole excitation) or in phase (quadrupole excitation).
  • An alternative method of obtaining quadrupole excitation is the application of the supplemental waveform to the ring electrode as shown in FIG. 5, rather than to the end caps.
  • the supplemental waveform contains a range of frequencies of sufficient amplitude to eject unwanted sample ions of mass greater than the highest mass reagent ion, by means of resonant power absorption by the trapped ions.
  • Each of the sample ions is in resonance with a frequency component of the supplementary waveform. Accordingly, they absorb power from the supplementary field and leave the trapping field. After the supplemental field has ejected the unwanted ions it is turned off and the CI reagent ions react with the sample molecules to produce CI sample ions. These ions are then scanned from the trap for detection in a conventional manner as described above.
  • the supplemental waveform described above is broadband and has a first frequency component corresponding to the lowest mass to be ejected and a last frequency corresponding to the highest mass to be ejected. Between the first and last frequencies are a series of discrete frequency components which may be spaced evenly or unevenly, and which may have phases that are either random or with a fixed functional relationship.
  • the amplitudes of the frequency components can either be uniform or they can be tailored to a functional form so as to compensate for frequency dependencies of the hardware or to compensate for the distribution of q values due to the distribution of the masses that are stored in the trap.
  • the broadband waveform has a sufficient number of frequency components so that any ion with a resonant frequency between the first and last components of the waveform will be resonantly ejected by this supplemental field.
  • all sample ions formed during EI will be eliminated from the trap before the mass analysis scan and there will be no gaps in the mass range that is affected.
  • the reagent gases that are used in CI experiments are all low in molecular weight such that the reagent ions formed during EI of the contents of the trap will, in almost all cases, be lower in mass-to-charge ratio than the sample ions.
  • a specific frequency may be added to the broadband excitation to cause that specific mass to be ejected along with others.
  • the advantage of this method over prior art is the ability to remove unwanted sample ions formed by EI during the ionization of the CI reagent gas.
  • the ability to reject these ions will allow longer ionization times and greater emission currents to be used, thus increasing the sensitivity of CI.
  • FIG. 4A shows the residual EI spectrum of a sample of tetrachloroethane using the scan conditions that are used in the prior art method.
  • FIG. 4B shows the elimination of the sample ions formed during the ionization step using the broadband waveform.
  • FIG. 4C shows the residual EI spectrum of a sample of trichloroethane and PFTBA with methane reagent gas present in the trap using the prior art method.
  • FIG. 4D shows the elimination of the sample ions formed during the ionization step using the broadband waveform of the present invention. It can be seen that the reagent ions at mass 43 are still present even though the sample ions that are just above them in mass are removed.
  • FIG. 4E shows the spectrum under the same conditions as in FIG.
  • FIG. 4F shows a spectrum of hexachlorobenzene using the prior art method. A mixture of EI ion fragments are observed at mass 282, 284, 286, 288 and 290. In addition, ions due to the protonated sample (from CI) are observed at mass 283, 285, 287, 289 and 291.
  • FIG. 4G shows the spectrum using the method described herein. It can be seen that the unwanted ions from the EI process are almost completely removed.
  • Data obtained from one scan are used, if necessary, to adjust the parameters of the subsequent scan to ensure that the trap is operated within its dynamic range.
  • the amplitude of the most intense ion of a scan (the base peak) is used to adjust the ionization and/or reaction time for the next scan.
  • the magnitude of the base peak is used to adjust the ionization and reaction times for the subsequent scan so as to maintain a substantially constant number of ions of the base peak. Since most of the charge ejected from the trap during the scan is due to the base peak, it is a good representation of the total amount of charge from the sample in the trap. By keeping the total sample charge nearly constant in the trap the dynamic range of the sample can be increased.
  • the mass spectral information from one scan it is possible to adjust the parameters of the subsequent mass analysis scan to focus, for example, on only particular sample ions of interest, i.e., to optimize for a particular species.
  • both the reaction time and the ionization time are changed in a set ratio. This makes it easier to normalize the results from one scan to the next.
  • An advantage of this method is the reduction in the scan time for large dynamic range samples. This is accomplished by using the intensity of the base peak from the previous scan as a measure of the amount of sample in the trap; thus eliminating the need for a time-consuming prescan as is used in the prior art.
  • a broadband supplemental field can also be used to eliminate reagent ions from the trap when conducting an EI experiment.
  • the user of an ion trap may wish to conduct both EI and CI experiments on the same sample stream. Under such circumstances, it is undesirable to stop the flow of reagent gas into the trap while conducting EI, yet the presence of reagent ions is likely to cause confused analytic data.
  • a supplemental RF broadband excitation any reagent ions formed during electron impact ionization of the sample can be resonantly ejected from the trap as soon as they are created. The same timing sequence shown in FIG. 3 can be used.
  • the broadband RF excitation may be constructed in accordance with any of the above-described alternatives, except that the frequency range should be tailored to eliminate only the low mass reagent ions.
  • Waveform generator 100 of FIG. 2 can also be used to apply a low frequency non-resonant field to perform CI experiments, to conduct MS n , experiments and to scan the contents of the trap to obtain a mass spectrum.
  • a low frequency supplemental voltage from waveform generator 100 is applied as a dipole field across end caps 30, 35 of ion trap 10.
  • the frequency of the dipole field is unrelated to the resonant frequencies of any of the ions (whether sample or reagent ions) stored in the trap.
  • the waveform shape is preferably a square wave, but may be almost any shape including sine, sawtooth, triangular waveforms.
  • the frequency of the supplemental voltage is relatively low, such as between 100 Hz and several thousand Hz. Experiments suggest that the present invention would work at frequencies below about 10,000 Hz, which is about the beginning of the range of resonant frequencies of sample ions. Preferably, however, the frequency should be in the range of hundreds of Hz.
  • the supplemental squarewave dipole field alternately displaces the center of the pseudo-potential well of the trapping field to different locations along the z-axis.
  • trapped ions pick up translational energy from the trapping field and begin to oscillate around the new center.
  • displacement of the center of the oscillations tends to increase the magnitude of the oscillations.
  • the ions lose energy to the background gas, they move towards the new center. If the center of the pseudo-potential field is again moved, such as when the squarewave changes polarity, the process repeats itself. It can be seen that the frequency of the supplemental dipole field should be low so that ions are able to migrate towards the new center before the field is changed.
  • the ions When the center of the pseudo-potential well is moved, as described above, the ions begin oscillating about a new point in space becoming more energetic. The energy added to ions will be sufficient to cause many of them to dissociate due to collisions with the damping gas, thereby forming daughter ions. As the process is repeated, more and more of the ions will dissociate in this manner.
  • Another advantage of this method is that it imparts more energy to the ions than resonance excitation and, thus, in some cases, can result in more extensive ion fragmentation.
  • the method described above does not rely on the resonant frequency of the ions in the ion trap, it operates on all ions in the trap simultaneously. Thus, using this method it is possible to simultaneously create several generations of ion fragments without the need to apply resonant frequencies associated with each of the fragments. If desired, prior to practicing the present invention, an ion species of interest could first be isolated in the trap in accordance with known prior art methods.
  • Mass-to-charge ratio cannot, alone, be used to unambiguously identify a parent ion. However, knowing not only the mass-to-charge ratio of the parent ion, but also the masses of all of the ion fragments can be used to unambiguously identify the parent.
  • a low frequency voltage to the ion trap can be used as a mechanism to cause ions having masses above a certain cutoff mass to be eliminated from the ion trap.
  • the cutoff mass is a function of the magnitude of the supplemental low-frequency voltage.
  • One model of how an ion trap operates is that the ions are, in essence, trapped in a potential well, with the "depth" of the well being a function of, among other things, the mass-to-charge ratio. The higher the mass, the shallower the well. It is believed that the observed phenomenon of elimination of high mass ions by application of a low frequency supplemental field is related to the relatively shallow depth of the potential well associated with high mass ions. In particular, it is believed that the shifting of the center of the pseudo-potential well causes high mass ions to gain sufficient energy to overcome the well barrier and leave the ion trap.
  • This phenomenon can be used to advantage both in chemical ionization experiments and in scanning the ion trap.
  • An alternate method of eliminating the sample ions is to apply a low-frequency supplemental field, as described above, having a magnitude which is sufficient to eliminate all sample ions from the trap, while leaving the reagent ions unaffected.
  • the timing sequence for applying this supplemental low-frequency field may be as depicted in FIG. 3, or any of the alternatives timing sequences described above in connection therewith. In this regard, it is noted that the ionization period of FIG.
  • FIG. 3(a) which may be less than a millisecond in duration, may be shorter in duration than a half-cycle of the low-frequency supplemental voltage.
  • the duration of application of the supplemental voltage as shown in FIG. 3(b), may be much longer in duration, and FIG. 3 is not drawn to scale.
  • a low-frequency supplemental voltage can also be used as a mechanism for scanning the ion trap to obtain a mass spectrum. This can be done by scanning the magnitude of the supplemental low-frequency voltage. If the supplemental voltage is initially low and is ramped-up, masses will be ejected from the trap sequentially in descending order. Alternately, the low-frequency supplemental voltage can be held constant and one of the trapping parameters scanned to obtain the equivalent effect.
  • FIG. 6A is a mass spectrum of 1,1,1-trichloroethane obtained in a conventional manner.
  • the peak at mass 97 corresponds to CH 3 CCl 2 + .
  • FIG. 6B is a mass spectrum of 1,1,1-trichloroethane obtained using the same experimental parameters as FIG. 6A, except that a low-frequency supplemental squarewave voltage (100 Hz, 42 volts) was applied for 20 milliseconds. It can be seen from FIG. 6B that the peak intensity at mass 97 has been reduced, and that ions of mass 61 (CH 2 CCl + ) are abundant. As a result of non-resonant excitation, the mass 97 ions absorbed energy and some were dissociated to form the mass 61 ions.
  • FIGS. 6C and 6D show spectra of 1,1,1-trichloroethane obtained using the same parameters used to obtain the results of FIGS. 6A and 6B, except that the frequency of the supplemental squarewave was set at 300 and 600Hz, respectively.
  • the similarity of the spectra of FIGS. 6B, 6C and 6D show that the dissociation is largely independent of the frequency of the supplemental field over a broad range.
  • FIG. 6E shows a mass spectrum of 1,1,1-trichloroethane obtained using the method of the prior art, i.e.
  • a resonant sine wave of 139.6KHz (the z-axis resonant frequency of ion mass 97) was applied for 20ms at a level of 800 mv. It can be seen that the daughter ion yields of both methods were about the same.
  • FIGS. 7A-C show mass spectra of PFTBA under various conditions to demonstrate how this method may be used to eliminate high mass ions from the ion trap.
  • FIG. 7A shows a complete mass spectra including both the parent and fragment ions.
  • FIG. 7B shows that all ions with mass above 131 were eliminated from the trap when the voltage of the supplemental squarewave was raised to 20v.
  • FIG. 7C shows that raising the voltage to 33v causes all ions with mass greater than 100 to be eliminated from the trap.
  • FIGS. 8A-C show the application to chemical ionization experiments of the ability to eliminate high mass ions from the ion trap by using a low frequency supplemental field.
  • FIGS. 8A-C show the same CI experiments of FIGS. 4B, 4D and 4G, respectively.
  • a low frequency supplemental waveform was used. It can be seen that the results are substantially the same by either method.
  • the FIG. 8A results were obtained using a supplemental field having a frequency of 600 Hz; the FIG. 8B results were obtained using a supplemental field having frequency of 300 Hz; and the FIG. 8C results were obtained using a supplemental field having frequency of 400 Hz.
  • the magnitude of the supplemental voltage was between 20 and 40 v.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
  • Electron Tubes For Measurement (AREA)

Claims (1)

  1. Verfahren zum Einstellen des dynamischen Bereichs eines Ionenfallen-Massenspektrometers, das im chemischen Ionisationsmodus mit Mehrfachabtastung verwendet wird, umfassend die Schritte:
    (a) Anlegen eines Einfangfeldes an die Ionenfalle derart, daß Ionen innerhalb eines Bereichs von gewünschten Masse-Ladungs-Verhältnissen stabil eingefangen werden,
    (b) Einleiten eines Proben- und Reagenzgases in die Ionenfalle,
    (c) Ionisieren des Proben- und Reagenzgases für einen Ionisationszeitraum,
    (d) Entfernen von Probenionen, die während des Ionisationszeitraums gebildet werden, aus der Falle,
    (e) Reagierenlassen von Probenmolekülen mit den Reagenzionen für einen Zeitraum für die chemische Ionisation, um Probenionen zu bilden,
    (f) Abtasten der Falle, um zu bewirken, daß Probenionen mit fortlaufenden Masse-Ladungs-Verhältnissen die Falle der Reihe nach verlassen,
    (g) Erfassen der Probenionen, wenn sie die Falle verlassen,
    (h) Identifizieren des Probenions, das in der größten Konzentration vorlag, und Ermitteln der Konzentration des Probenions,
    (i) Wiederholen der Schritte (a) bis (g) unter Verwendung der Konzentrationsinformation, um entweder den Ionisationszeitraum oder den Zeitraum für die chemische Ionisation oder beide einzustellen.
EP97104015A 1992-05-29 1993-05-28 Verfahren zum Betrieb von Ionenfallenmassenspektrometern Expired - Lifetime EP0786796B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US89099192A 1992-05-29 1992-05-29
US890991 1992-05-29
EP19930108670 EP0575777B1 (de) 1992-05-29 1993-05-28 Verfahren zur Verwendung eines Massenspektrometers

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP93108670.6 Division 1993-05-28
EP19930108670 Division EP0575777B1 (de) 1992-05-29 1993-05-28 Verfahren zur Verwendung eines Massenspektrometers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0786796A1 EP0786796A1 (de) 1997-07-30
EP0786796B1 true EP0786796B1 (de) 2000-07-05

Family

ID=26133243

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP97104015A Expired - Lifetime EP0786796B1 (de) 1992-05-29 1993-05-28 Verfahren zum Betrieb von Ionenfallenmassenspektrometern
EP98103434A Expired - Lifetime EP0852390B1 (de) 1992-05-29 1993-05-28 Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Ionenfallen-Massenspektrometers

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98103434A Expired - Lifetime EP0852390B1 (de) 1992-05-29 1993-05-28 Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Ionenfallen-Massenspektrometers

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (2) EP0786796B1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7586089B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2009-09-08 Bruker Daltonik Gmbh Feedback fragmentation in ion trap mass spectrometers

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3951741B2 (ja) * 2002-02-27 2007-08-01 株式会社日立製作所 電荷調整方法とその装置、および質量分析装置

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3688215T3 (de) * 1985-05-24 2005-08-25 Thermo Finnigan Llc, San Jose Steuerungsverfahren für eine Ionenfalle.
US4686367A (en) * 1985-09-06 1987-08-11 Finnigan Corporation Method of operating quadrupole ion trap chemical ionization mass spectrometry
US4771172A (en) * 1987-05-22 1988-09-13 Finnigan Corporation Method of increasing the dynamic range and sensitivity of a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer operating in the chemical ionization mode

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7586089B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2009-09-08 Bruker Daltonik Gmbh Feedback fragmentation in ion trap mass spectrometers

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0786796A1 (de) 1997-07-30
EP0852390A1 (de) 1998-07-08
EP0852390B1 (de) 2004-08-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5381006A (en) Methods of using ion trap mass spectrometers
EP0711453B1 (de) Verfahren zum steuern der raumladung zur verbesserung der ionenisolierung in einem ionen fallenmassenspektrometer durch dynamischadaptieve optimierung
US6713757B2 (en) Controlling the temporal response of mass spectrometers for mass spectrometry
US5128542A (en) Method of operating an ion trap mass spectrometer to determine the resonant frequency of trapped ions
EP0701471B1 (de) Verfahren zur raumladungskontrolle in einem ionenfallemassenspektrometer
EP0700069B1 (de) Ionenselektion durch Frequenzmodulation in einer Quadrupolionenfalle
EP0215615A2 (de) Betriebsverfahren einer Quadrupolionenfalle
AU2002238327A1 (en) Controlling the temporal response of mass spectrometers for mass spectrometry
EP0512700B1 (de) Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Ionenfalle-Massenspektrometers im hochauflösenden Modus
JPH095298A (ja) 四重極イオントラップ内の選択イオン種を検出する方法
EP0746873B1 (de) Verfahren zur isolierung einer quadrupolionenfalle
EP0643415B1 (de) Massenspektrometrie mittels kollisionsinduzierter Dissoziation
EP0575777A2 (de) Verfahren zur Verwendung eines Massenspektrometers
EP1846937A2 (de) Schnelle mehrmassenspektrometrie für die ionensequenzierung
EP0350159A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Ionenfallenmassenspektrometers
EP0786796B1 (de) Verfahren zum Betrieb von Ionenfallenmassenspektrometern
Wells et al. MS n using CID

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 575777

Country of ref document: EP

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19971103

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19990716

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: VARIAN, INC.

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 575777

Country of ref document: EP

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE BREITER + WIEDMER AG

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69328979

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20000810

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: ING. C. GREGORJ S.P.A.

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Owner name: VARIAN, INC.

Free format text: VARIAN, INC.#3120 HANSEN WAY#PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (US) -TRANSFER TO- VARIAN, INC.#3120 HANSEN WAY#PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (US)

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20070530

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20070702

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20070525

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20070530

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20070517

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20080528

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080531

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20090119

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080602

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081202

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080528

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080528