EP0782660A1 - Centralisers - Google Patents

Centralisers

Info

Publication number
EP0782660A1
EP0782660A1 EP95932810A EP95932810A EP0782660A1 EP 0782660 A1 EP0782660 A1 EP 0782660A1 EP 95932810 A EP95932810 A EP 95932810A EP 95932810 A EP95932810 A EP 95932810A EP 0782660 A1 EP0782660 A1 EP 0782660A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
centraliser
casing
tonnes
centralisers
lateral load
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP95932810A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0782660B1 (en
Inventor
Arnold Stokka
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Weatherford Lamb Inc
Original Assignee
Weatherford Lamb Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GB9419313A external-priority patent/GB9419313D0/en
Application filed by Weatherford Lamb Inc filed Critical Weatherford Lamb Inc
Publication of EP0782660A1 publication Critical patent/EP0782660A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0782660B1 publication Critical patent/EP0782660B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B17/00—Drilling rods or pipes; Flexible drill strings; Kellies; Drill collars; Sucker rods; Cables; Casings; Tubings
    • E21B17/10—Wear protectors; Centralising devices, e.g. stabilisers
    • E21B17/1078—Stabilisers or centralisers for casing, tubing or drill pipes

Definitions

  • CENTR LISERS This invention relates to centralisers. During the construction of oil and gas wells a bore is drilled into the ground. Casing is then lowered into the bore and the annular space between the casing and the bore filled with cement.
  • the centralisers comprise two spaced apart bands which can be slipped over the casing and a plurality of spring bows which extend between and are connected to the bands.
  • centralisers with rigid members instead of spring bows.
  • Examples of such centralisers are shown in GB-A-2 171 436 and GB-A- 682 362.
  • the overall diameter of such centralisers is somewhat smaller than the bore so that said centralisers can be readily moved along the bore. Whilst such centra ⁇ lisers are not as versatile as centralisers with spring bows they do provide a reasonable centralising action.
  • the disadvantage of such centralisers is that if part of the bore collapses and it is necessary to with ⁇ draw the casing some of the rigid members are nearly always broken off as the casing is withdrawn. This is extremely undesirable since the broken fragments can later be carried to the surface and obstruct or damage flow control equipment.
  • the present invention provides a centraliser which is provided with at least one rigid member which, when said centraliser is mounted on casing / will substantially irreversibly collapse against said casing when subjected to a lateral load of from 5 to 30 tonnes.
  • the rigid member will substanti- ally irreversibly collapse against said casing when subjected to a lateral load of from 10 to 25 tonnes.
  • the rigid member will substantially irreversibly collapse against said casing when subjected to a lateral load of from 18 to 22 tonnes.
  • the casing will substantial ⁇ ly irreversibly collapse against said casing when sub ⁇ jected to a lateral load of from 5 to 10 tonnes with 8 tones being most preferred.
  • the rigid member is of generally U-shape cross section.
  • the rigid member comprises a crushable material.
  • the rigid member is preferably provided with a reinforcing member to provide the centraliser with acceptable tensile strength.
  • the reinforcing member may comprise, for example a metal such as steel or aluminium although it could also comprise a plastics material.
  • the reinforcing member may be provided with protrusions and/or adhesive to improve the adhesion between the reinforcing member and the crushable material and to reduce the probability of any broken pieces separating from the centraliser. More generally stated, it is preferred that the reinforcing member co-operates with the crushable material to inhi ⁇ bit broken pieces of said rigid member separating from said centraliser.
  • Figure 1 is a vertical cross-section through one embodiment of a centraliser in accordance with the present invention
  • Figure 2 is a side view of the centraliser shown in Figure 1;
  • Figure 3 is a horizontal cross-section taken on line III-III of Figure 2;
  • Figure 4 is a side view of a second embodiment of a centraliser in accordance with the present invention.
  • Figure 5 is a horizontal cross-section taken on line V-V of Figure 4.
  • centra ⁇ liser which is generally identified by the reference numeral 1.
  • the centraliser 1 comprises an upper ring 2 and a lower ring 3 which are spaced apart and connected by six rigid members 4 which are welded to the upper ring 2 and the lower ring 3 at their respective ends.
  • each rigid member 4 is of generally U-shape cross-section.
  • each rigid member 4 is approximately 180mm.
  • the maximum width of each rigid members 4 is approximately 45mm and the thickness of the wall of the rigid members 4 is approximately 2mm.
  • the centralisers 1 are mounted at the desired spacing. Conveniently, the centralisers 1 are secured between two stop collars to prevent them moving along the casing.
  • the casing In normal use the casing is simply lowered into a bore and cemented in position, the rigid members 4 acting as centring members. If the casing has to be withdrawn for any reason prior to cementing, for example due to collapse of part of the wellbore, the casing is simply raised by the draw works.
  • the obstruction exerts a force on the centra ⁇ liser 1. If the force is sufficient the rigid members 4 irreversibly collapse thereby enhancing the prospects of the centraliser 1 remaining in one piece on the casing.
  • the rigid members 4 could be of any convenient cross-section, for example semi circular, arcuate or trapezoidal. If desired, the rigid members could be locally weakened to facilitate their collapse.
  • the rigid members could comprise two generally aligned sections joined by, for example an epoxy resin bonding the sections together but formulated to fail under a desired load.
  • the rigid members comprise two generally aligned sections connected by a shear pin intended to fail at a desired load. Whilst both the alternatives just described are within the scope of the present invention the embodiment shown in Figures 1 to 3 is preferred as there is believed to be less chance of parts becoming detached from the centra ⁇ liser after collapse of the rigid members.
  • the rigid members could be made of a crush ⁇ able material, for example a cellular material. Such an embodiment is shown in Figures 4 and 5.
  • a centraliser 11 which comprises an upper ring 12 and a lower ring 13 which are spaced apart and connected by six rigid members 14.
  • Each rigid member 14 comprises a thin reinforcing member 15 of metal, for example steel or aluminium, which is embedded in a crushable material comprising polyurethane foam 16.
  • Each of the thin reinforcing members 15 is welded to the upper ring 12 and the lower ring 13 at its ends.
  • the polyurethane foam 16 In use, if the centraliser 11 is withdrawn through an obstruction the polyurethane foam 16 irreversibly collapses thereby enhancing the prospects of the centra ⁇ liser 11 remaining in one piece on the casing.
  • the polyurethane foam 16 is designed to irreversibly col ⁇ lapse under a lateral load of about 20 tonnes.
  • the reinfor ⁇ cing members 15 could be separate and distinct from the rigid members 14 which could simply comprise a crushable material such as polyurethane foam. Whilst preferably made of metal, the reinforcing members 15 could also be made of plastics material.
  • the arrangement described with reference to Figures 4 and 5 is preferred as it provides a conve ⁇ nient method of mounting the rigid member 14 to the upper ring 12 and lower ring 13. Since our initial work we have discovered that the rigid member is preferably designed to substantially irreversibly collapse against the casing when subjected to a lateral load of as little as 5 to 10 tonnes with 8 tonnes being most preferred.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Casings For Electric Apparatus (AREA)
  • Earth Drilling (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Stackable Containers (AREA)

Abstract

A centraliser (1) comprises an upper ring (2) and a lower ring (3) connected by six rigid members (4). The centraliser (1) can be mounted on casing to be lowered down deviated bores. The rigid members (4) are designed to collapse under a lateral load of about 8 tonnes. Thus if, for example, part of the bore collapses and the casing has to be withdrawn the rigid members will collapse enabling the centraliser (1) to be recovered on the casing in one piece.

Description

CENTR LISERS This invention relates to centralisers. During the construction of oil and gas wells a bore is drilled into the ground. Casing is then lowered into the bore and the annular space between the casing and the bore filled with cement.
It is important that the casing is held substanti¬ ally centrally in the bore while the annular space is filled with cement and for this purpose centralisers are mounted on the casing as it is lowered into the bore.
Usually wellbores extend substantially vertically downwardly and the centralisers comprise two spaced apart bands which can be slipped over the casing and a plurality of spring bows which extend between and are connected to the bands.
If part of the wellbore collapses and it is neces¬ sary to withdraw the casing then the spring bows simply compress against the side of the casing as they pass through the obstruction after which they expand against the side of the bore.
More recently the demand for deviated drilling has increased significantly. In deviated drilling a branch bore, which can be nearly horizontal, is drilled out¬ wardly from an existing vertical bore. Many problems arise with deviated drilling. One of these problems is that centralisers with spring bows are not entirely satisfactory since the spring bows will not withstand the lateral forces as the casing turns into the branch bore. Furthermore, the spring bows are gener- ally not strong enough to centre casing in nearly hori¬ zontal bores.
One solution to this problem is to use centralisers with rigid members instead of spring bows. Examples of such centralisers are shown in GB-A-2 171 436 and GB-A- 682 362. The overall diameter of such centralisers is somewhat smaller than the bore so that said centralisers can be readily moved along the bore. Whilst such centra¬ lisers are not as versatile as centralisers with spring bows they do provide a reasonable centralising action. The disadvantage of such centralisers is that if part of the bore collapses and it is necessary to with¬ draw the casing some of the rigid members are nearly always broken off as the casing is withdrawn. This is extremely undesirable since the broken fragments can later be carried to the surface and obstruct or damage flow control equipment.
In order to help reduce this problem the present invention provides a centraliser which is provided with at least one rigid member which, when said centraliser is mounted on casing/ will substantially irreversibly collapse against said casing when subjected to a lateral load of from 5 to 30 tonnes.
Centralisers in accordance with the present inven¬ tion can readily be distinguished from prior art centra- users which use rigid members since these were either formed by solid castings (GB-A-2 171 436), for example of aluminium or steel, or by very robust steel sections (GB-A-682 362).
In one embodiment, the rigid member will substanti- ally irreversibly collapse against said casing when subjected to a lateral load of from 10 to 25 tonnes.
Advantageously, the rigid member will substantially irreversibly collapse against said casing when subjected to a lateral load of from 18 to 22 tonnes. In another embodiment, the casing will substantial¬ ly irreversibly collapse against said casing when sub¬ jected to a lateral load of from 5 to 10 tonnes with 8 tones being most preferred.
In a preferred embodiment the rigid member is of generally U-shape cross section. In another embodiment the rigid member comprises a crushable material. In this embodiment the rigid member is preferably provided with a reinforcing member to provide the centraliser with acceptable tensile strength.
The reinforcing member may comprise, for example a metal such as steel or aluminium although it could also comprise a plastics material.
If the reinforcing member is embedded in the crush- able material there will be some adhesion between the reinforcing member and the crushable material. If the crushable material becomes broken for any reason this adhesion will inhibit separation of the broken pieces from the centraliser. If desired the reinforcing member may be provided with protrusions and/or adhesive to improve the adhesion between the reinforcing member and the crushable material and to reduce the probability of any broken pieces separating from the centraliser. More generally stated, it is preferred that the reinforcing member co-operates with the crushable material to inhi¬ bit broken pieces of said rigid member separating from said centraliser.
For a better understanding of the present invention reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings in which:-
Figure 1 is a vertical cross-section through one embodiment of a centraliser in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 2 is a side view of the centraliser shown in Figure 1;
Figure 3 is a horizontal cross-section taken on line III-III of Figure 2;
Figure 4 is a side view of a second embodiment of a centraliser in accordance with the present invention; and
Figure 5 is a horizontal cross-section taken on line V-V of Figure 4.
Referring to the drawings there is shown a centra¬ liser which is generally identified by the reference numeral 1. The centraliser 1 comprises an upper ring 2 and a lower ring 3 which are spaced apart and connected by six rigid members 4 which are welded to the upper ring 2 and the lower ring 3 at their respective ends.
As shown in Figures 1 and 3, each rigid member 4 is of generally U-shape cross-section.
In the embodiment shown in Figures 1 to 3 the overall diameter of the upper ring 2 and the lower ring
3 is approximately 180mm. The maximum width of each rigid members 4 is approximately 45mm and the thickness of the wall of the rigid members 4 is approximately 2mm.
In use, as casing is being lowered down a wellbore the centralisers 1 are mounted at the desired spacing. Conveniently, the centralisers 1 are secured between two stop collars to prevent them moving along the casing.
In normal use the casing is simply lowered into a bore and cemented in position, the rigid members 4 acting as centring members. If the casing has to be withdrawn for any reason prior to cementing, for example due to collapse of part of the wellbore, the casing is simply raised by the draw works.
When the centraliser 1 is pulled through the ob- struction the obstruction exerts a force on the centra¬ liser 1. If the force is sufficient the rigid members 4 irreversibly collapse thereby enhancing the prospects of the centraliser 1 remaining in one piece on the casing.
In trials using centralisers 1 designed to fully collapse with a lateral load of 20 tonnes nearly all the centralisers 1 were recovered at the surface fully collapsed but in one piece.
Various modifications to the preferred embodiment described are envisaged. For example, the rigid members 4 could be of any convenient cross-section, for example semi circular, arcuate or trapezoidal. If desired, the rigid members could be locally weakened to facilitate their collapse. Thus, for example the rigid members could comprise two generally aligned sections joined by, for example an epoxy resin bonding the sections together but formulated to fail under a desired load.
Another objective would be for the rigid members to comprise two generally aligned sections connected by a shear pin intended to fail at a desired load. Whilst both the alternatives just described are within the scope of the present invention the embodiment shown in Figures 1 to 3 is preferred as there is believed to be less chance of parts becoming detached from the centra¬ liser after collapse of the rigid members. In another embodiment, the rigid members could be made of a crush¬ able material, for example a cellular material. Such an embodiment is shown in Figures 4 and 5.
Referring to Figures 4 and 5, there is shown a centraliser 11 which comprises an upper ring 12 and a lower ring 13 which are spaced apart and connected by six rigid members 14.
Each rigid member 14 comprises a thin reinforcing member 15 of metal, for example steel or aluminium, which is embedded in a crushable material comprising polyurethane foam 16. Each of the thin reinforcing members 15 is welded to the upper ring 12 and the lower ring 13 at its ends.
In use, if the centraliser 11 is withdrawn through an obstruction the polyurethane foam 16 irreversibly collapses thereby enhancing the prospects of the centra¬ liser 11 remaining in one piece on the casing. The polyurethane foam 16 is designed to irreversibly col¬ lapse under a lateral load of about 20 tonnes.
Various modifications to the embodiment shown in Figures 4 and 5 are envisaged, for example the reinfor¬ cing members 15 could be separate and distinct from the rigid members 14 which could simply comprise a crushable material such as polyurethane foam. Whilst preferably made of metal, the reinforcing members 15 could also be made of plastics material.
However, the arrangement described with reference to Figures 4 and 5 is preferred as it provides a conve¬ nient method of mounting the rigid member 14 to the upper ring 12 and lower ring 13. Since our initial work we have discovered that the rigid member is preferably designed to substantially irreversibly collapse against the casing when subjected to a lateral load of as little as 5 to 10 tonnes with 8 tonnes being most preferred.

Claims

Claims
1. A centraliser (1; 11) which is provided with at least one rigid member (4; 14), characterised in that when said centraliser (1; 11) is mounted on casing said rigid member (4; 14) will substantially irreversibly collapse against said casing when subjected to a lateral load of from 5 to 30 tonnes.
2. A centraliser (1;11) as claimed in Claim 1, wherein said lateral load is from 10 to 25 tonnes.
3. A centraliser (1;11) as claimed in Claim 2, wherein said lateral load is from 18 to 22 tonnes.
4. A centraliser (1;11) as claimed in Claim 1, wherein said lateral load is from 5 to 10 tonnes.
5. A centraliser (1;11) as claimed in Claim 4, wherein said lateral load is 8 tonnes.
6. A centraliser (1) as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein said rigid member (4) is of generally U- shape cross-section.
7. A centraliser (11) as claimed in any of Claims 1 to 5, wherein said rigid member (14) comprises a crushable material (16).
8. A centraliser (11) as claimed in Claim 7, wherein said rigid member ( 14 ) is provided with a reinforcing member (15).
9. A centraliser (11) as claimed in Claim 8, wherein said reinforcing member (15) comprises plastics mater¬ ial.
10. A centraliser (11) as claimed in Claim 8 or 9, wherein said reinforcing member (15) co-operates with said crushable material (16) to inhibit broken pieces of said rigid member ( 14 ) separating from said centraliser
(11).
* * *
EP95932810A 1994-09-24 1995-09-25 Centralisers Expired - Lifetime EP0782660B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9419313A GB9419313D0 (en) 1994-09-24 1994-09-24 Centralisers
GB9419313 1994-09-24
US08/388,603 US5566754A (en) 1994-09-24 1995-02-14 Centralisers
US388603 1995-02-14
PCT/GB1995/002272 WO1996009459A1 (en) 1994-09-24 1995-09-25 Centralisers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0782660A1 true EP0782660A1 (en) 1997-07-09
EP0782660B1 EP0782660B1 (en) 2001-11-21

Family

ID=26305686

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95932810A Expired - Lifetime EP0782660B1 (en) 1994-09-24 1995-09-25 Centralisers

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0782660B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1159848A (en)
AU (1) AU691665B2 (en)
BR (1) BR9509169A (en)
CA (1) CA2198619C (en)
DE (1) DE69524109T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1996009459A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2316422A (en) * 1996-08-24 1998-02-25 Weatherford Lamb Centralizer
GB9715006D0 (en) * 1997-07-15 1997-09-24 Weatherford Lamb Centralizer
GB2331534B (en) * 1998-02-23 2000-01-19 Weatherford Lamb Centralizer
EP1060321B1 (en) 1998-03-05 2003-07-16 Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. An axle, a friction reducing fitting and an axle installation method
US6688409B1 (en) 1999-01-22 2004-02-10 Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. Friction reducing tool and method for its use in a wellbore
WO2021163759A1 (en) * 2020-02-18 2021-08-26 Kwik-Zip Pty Ltd A spacer segment and a spacer

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1997880A (en) * 1932-03-25 1935-04-16 Louis T Watry Guide coupling
US2389906A (en) * 1944-02-03 1945-11-27 Willis J Heard Rod guide
US2602512A (en) * 1949-02-12 1952-07-08 Baker Oil Tools Inc Casing centering device
US2622684A (en) * 1950-01-26 1952-12-23 Kluck Louis Rib type casing centralizer
GB682362A (en) * 1950-12-18 1952-11-05 Baker Oil Tools Inc A centring device for centring conduits and the like in well bores
US3666013A (en) * 1969-12-30 1972-05-30 Texaco Inc Reinforced concrete stabilizer for an insulated tubing string in a secondary recovery steam stimulation operation
US3762472A (en) * 1972-07-24 1973-10-02 Gem Oil Tool Co Casing stand-off band for use during the running and cementing of casing in wellbores
CA1231642A (en) * 1985-02-22 1988-01-19 Raymond F. Mikolajczyk Casing centralizer/stabilizer
US5377751A (en) * 1992-01-29 1995-01-03 Rickert Precision Industries Apparatus and method for centralizing downhole pipe and blast joints

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9609459A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU691665B2 (en) 1998-05-21
CA2198619C (en) 2005-08-02
DE69524109D1 (en) 2002-01-03
CA2198619A1 (en) 1996-03-28
BR9509169A (en) 1997-09-30
EP0782660B1 (en) 2001-11-21
DE69524109T2 (en) 2002-06-06
WO1996009459A1 (en) 1996-03-28
CN1159848A (en) 1997-09-17
AU3570595A (en) 1996-04-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5566754A (en) Centralisers
US6116343A (en) One-trip well perforation/proppant fracturing apparatus and methods
US6533040B2 (en) Multi-function apparatus for adding a branch well sealed liner and connector to an existing cased well at low cost
EP2092156B1 (en) Casing expansion and formation compression for permeability plane orientation
AU2001269810B2 (en) Radial expansion of tubular members
US7063163B2 (en) Multi-layer deformable composite construction for use in a subterranean well
CA2228415C (en) One-trip well perforation/proppant fracturing apparatus and methods
CA2450515C (en) Plug and ball seat assembly
CN104246108A (en) Cementing whipstock apparatus and methods
US20130008671A1 (en) Wellbore plug and method
EP1701000A1 (en) A method and apparatus for consolidating a wellbore
JPH0748984A (en) Chute finishing device
GB2511068A (en) Apparatus and method for setting a cementitious material plug
NO310206B1 (en) Method and apparatus for decentralizing a diverter in the underground multilateral wellbore and completion
NO334196B1 (en) Multilateral completion with regard to well construction and sand management
AU691665B2 (en) Centralisers
US11519234B2 (en) Contingency release of mill from whipstock
WO2021211179A1 (en) Frac plug high expansion element retainer
CA1223525A (en) Casing structures having core members under radial compressive force
CA3121417A1 (en) Minimize trapped fluid impact on expandable liner hangers in geothermal applications
GB2346398A (en) Liner assembly and method of running the same
US5806595A (en) Wellbore milling system and method
CN108316866B (en) Hydraulic casing centralizer
CN102713132A (en) Landing system for well casing
CN211524727U (en) Water-detecting and draining drilling orifice pipe device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19970207

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20000114

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20011121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69524109

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20020103

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20021002

Year of fee payment: 8

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20030909

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20140910

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20140924

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: SD

Effective date: 20150318

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MK

Effective date: 20150924

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20150924

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20150924

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20151022 AND 20151028