EP0780483B1 - High-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel having improved weldability - Google Patents

High-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel having improved weldability Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0780483B1
EP0780483B1 EP19960120536 EP96120536A EP0780483B1 EP 0780483 B1 EP0780483 B1 EP 0780483B1 EP 19960120536 EP19960120536 EP 19960120536 EP 96120536 A EP96120536 A EP 96120536A EP 0780483 B1 EP0780483 B1 EP 0780483B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
amount
steels
strength
present
content
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP19960120536
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0780483A1 (en
Inventor
Tetsuo c/o Nippon Steel Corporation Ishitsuka
Hiroyuki c/o Nippon Steel Corporation Mimura
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=26469269&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0780483(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Publication of EP0780483A1 publication Critical patent/EP0780483A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0780483B1 publication Critical patent/EP0780483B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/48Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with niobium or tantalum
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/44Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/46Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with vanadium

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an austenitic heat-resisting steel having an excellent high-temperature strength, an improved weldability, and a high resistance to grain boundary corrosion and advantageously applicable to boilers used under severe service conditions.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide an austenitic heat-resisting steel having a good weldability and high-temperature strength.
  • a high-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel having improved weldability, consisting of:
  • a high-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel having improved weldability, consisting of:
  • the C amount must be reduced to as little as possible to prevent high-temperature cracking during welding or reduction in elongation. To ensure good weldability, the upper limit of the C content was determined based on the following experimental results.
  • Figure 1 shows a Varestraint test result indicating the weldability for steels (plots " ⁇ ") containing main components in amounts falling within the specified range of the present invention (Cr: 18%, Ni: 13%, W: 4%) except that the C content was varied, and a reference steel of JIS SUS310STB (plots " ⁇ ", corresponding to Comparative Steel Q in Examples to follow). It can be seen from Fig. 1 that the weldability is better than that of JIS SUS310STB when the C content is less than 0.05%. The upper limit of the C content was thus determined to be less than 0.05%.
  • Si is not only effective as a deoxidizer but also improves the oxidation resistance and the resistance to high-temperature corrosion. However, Si, when present in an excessive amount, reduces the creep rupture strength, the toughness and the weldability, and therefore, the Si content is limited to not more than 5%.
  • Mn is a deoxidizer and improves the weldability and the hot workability.
  • Mn when present in an excessive amount, causes degradation of the oxidation resistance, and therefore, the Mn content is limited to less than 2%.
  • Cr is essential for the oxidation resistance, resistance to steam oxidation, and resistance to high-temperature corrosion. To ensure properties comparable with or better than those of the conventional austenitic stainless steels, Cr must be present in an amount of not less than 15%. However, Cr, when present in an excessive amount, causes an increase in the Ni amount necessary to stabilize austenite and is not economical, and therefore, the Cr content is limited to not more than 20%.
  • Ni is essential for improving the stability of austenite and suppressing the formation of the ⁇ phase.
  • Ni In the steel according to the present invention, Ni must be present in an amount of 6% or more to stabilize austenite with respect to Cr and other ferrite formers present in the specified amounts.
  • the use of Ni in a large amount is not economical, and therefore, the Ni content is limited to not more than 15%.
  • Mo, W: Mo and W improve the high-temperature strength by solid solution strengthening or precipitation of the Laves phase and the effect is generally described as a function of the (Mo + W)% as shown in Fig. 2. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that, when the total amount of Mo and W is 2% or more, the creep rupture strength is sharply improved and the improvement is not substantially increased if the total amount of Mo and W is more than 10%.
  • the creep rupture strength substantially varies with the amounts of C and Nb.
  • the amounts of C and Nb are 0.025% or more and 0.25% or more, respectively, an improved creep rupture strength is obtained through a synergistic or combined effect of the W or W + Mo amount and the C + Nb amount.
  • the synergistic effect is not obtained when the W or W + Mo amount is less than 1.5%.
  • Mo and W when present in a total amount of more than 10%, also cause a problem in that the Laves phase and other intermetallic compounds coarsen and reduce the creep rupture strength.
  • W when Mo is added alone or not combined with W, the resistance to high-temperature corrosion is reduced with increase of the Mo amount as shown in Fig. 3.
  • W even when added alone or not combined with Mo, does not cause reduction in the resistance to high-temperature corrosion, and when combined with Mo, improves the resistance to high-temperature corrosion in comparison with that achieved when Mo alone is added. Therefore, W must be present in an amount of 1.5 to 10%. Mo may be present in combination with W but the Mo content must not be more than 2.0% because the resistance to high-temperature corrosion is sharply reduced when the Mo content is more than 2.0%, even when combined with W.
  • Nb sharply improves the long duration creep rupture strength by the formation of fine carbonitrides.
  • the Nb content must be 0.1% or more as can be seen from Fig. 4. The effect becomes more significant as the Nb amount is increased within a range in which Nb is completely dissolvable in a solid solution state. However, when the Nb amount is more than this range, undissolved carbides and nitrides are retained to reduce the creep rupture strength. Therefore, the Nb amount must not be more than 0.5%.
  • V forms fine nitrides and improves the long duration creep rupture strength. As shown in Fig. 5, this effect is obtained when the V amount is 0.05% or more and the improvement is reduced when the V amount is more than 1.5%. Therefore, the V amount is 0.05 to 1.5%.
  • P forms phosphides and improves the long duration creep rupture strength as shown in Fig. 6.
  • P when present in an excessive amount, sharply reduces not only the weldability but also the hot workability, and therefore, the P must not be present in an amount of more than 0.03%.
  • S segregates at crystal grain boundaries and reduces the hot workability and also facilitates the grain boundary embrittlement under the creep condition, and therefore, the S content is limited to not more than 0.005%.
  • N sharply improves the creep rupture strength by solid solution strengthening and the formation of nitrides. To compensate for the strength reduction because of the reduced C content for ensuring an improved weldability, N must be present in an amount of more than 0.15%. However, when N is present in an amount of more than 0.4%, the improvement in the long time creep rupture strength is not substantially increased but the toughness is reduced. Therefore, the N content is more than 0.15% and up to 0.4%.
  • Tables 1-1 and 2-1 summarize the chemical compositions and the properties of the steels tested. After being subjected to a solid solution heat treatment at 1250°C, the steels were subjected to a Varestraint test, a creep rupture test at 700, 750 and 800°C, and a high-temperature corrosion test at 650°C.
  • the Varestraint test was carried out using the GTAW welding method, under the conditions of a test piece thickness of 4 mm, a welding voltage of 10V, a welding current of 80A, a welding speed of 80 mm/min, and an applied strain of 4%.
  • the creep rupture data were standardized by the Larson-Miller method to estimate the creep rupture strength at 650°C for 100,000 hours.
  • the test results are summarized in Tables 1-2 and 2-2.
  • the steels A to Q in Tables 1-1 and 1-2 are the present inventive steels and the steels R to AI in Tables 2-1 and 2-2 are comparative steels.
  • Steels R and S correspond to JIS SUS347H and JIS SUS310S, respectively, which are commonly used in the conventional art.
  • the present inventive steels A to Q have a remarkably improved high-temperature strength and resistance to high-temperature corrosion in comparison with the comparative steel R or JIS SUS347H and an improved weldability in comparison with the comparative steel S or JIS SUS310S.
  • the comparative steels S to V have a poor weldability and exhibit a large total crack length in the Varestraint test.
  • the comparative steels X to Z contain W in amounts less than the present inventive range and the comparative steels AE, AF, AG contain Nb, V and N in amounts less than the present inventive ranges, respectively, so that all these comparative steels X to AG have a poor high-temperature strength.
  • the comparative steels AA to AD contain Mo in an amount more than the present inventive range and have an improved high-temperature strength but have a poor resistance to high-temperature corrosion.
  • inventive steel P and the comparative steels W and AH demonstrate the synergistic effect of the combined addition of W with C and Nb, in which the inventive steel P contains more than 0.025% C and more than 0.25% Nb and has an improved high-temperature strength even though the W content is near the lower limit of the specified range, whereas the comparative steel W contains less than 0.025% C and less than 0.25% Nb and has a poor high-temperature strength and the comparative steel AH contains W in an amount less than the lower limit of the specified range and has a poor high-temperature strength although C and Nb are present in amounts more than 0.025% and 0.25%, respectively.
  • the comparative steel AI contains an excessive amount of P and has an improved high-temperature strength but has a poor weldability.
  • the present invention provides a high-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel, having an improved weldability, which is inexpensive and commercially applicable.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
  • Arc Welding In General (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to an austenitic heat-resisting steel having an excellent high-temperature strength, an improved weldability, and a high resistance to grain boundary corrosion and advantageously applicable to boilers used under severe service conditions.
  • In planned thermal electric power generation plants, ultra-supercritical boilers will be used to achieve improved profitability and to comply with recent regulations regarding carbon dioxide gas exhaust. The conventional heat-resisting austenitic steels such as JIS SUS347H have too poor a creep rupture strength to be used under such severe conditions. New heat-resisting austenitic steels utilizing a precipitation strengthening by carbonitrides of Nb, Ti, etc. or a solid solution strengthening by Mo, etc. have been developed, as described in "Tetsu-to-Hagane (Iron and Steel)", vol. 70, page S1409 or "Thermal and Nuclear Electric Power Generation", vol. 38, page 75.
  • However, these new heat-resisting steels contain large amounts of alloying elements and are not more weldable than JIS SUS310S which has relatively poor weldability for a conventional austenitic heat-resisting steel, and therefore, the welding workability must be improved.
  • It is well known that purification of steels, including reduction in the P and S contents, and also reduction in the C content, is one of the most effective measures to improve weldability. However, many heat-resisting steels are strengthened by carbonitrides as mentioned above, and reduction in the C content would also reduce the high-temperature strength of the steels.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide an austenitic heat-resisting steel having a good weldability and high-temperature strength.
  • Regarding the steel compositions in which the C content is reduced to improve weldability, various experiments were conducted to compensate for a reduction in the high-temperature strength due to the reduced C content by adding other alloying elements, and it was finally found that a combined addition of W, Nb, V and N in an specified range will provide a synergistic effect to ensure high-strength at elevated temperatures. The steel also has a resistance to high-temperature corrosion comparable with those of conventional steels.
  • According to the present invention, there is provided a high-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel, having improved weldability, consisting of:
  • C: less than 0.05 wt%,
  • Si: not more than 5 wt%,
  • Mn: less than 2 wt%,
  • P: not more than 0.03 wt%,
  • S: not more than 0.005 wt%,
  • Cr: 15 to 20 wt%,
  • Ni: 6 to 15 wt%,
  • W: 1.5 to 10 wt%,
  • Nb: more than 0.1 up to 0.5 wt%,
  • V: 0.05 to 1.5 wt%,
  • N: more than 0.15 up to 0.4 wt%, and
  •    the balance consisting of Fe and unavoidable impurities.
  • According to the present invention, there is also provided a high-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel, having improved weldability, consisting of:
  • C: less than 0.05 wt%,
  • Si: not more than 5 wt%,
  • Mn: less than 2 wt%,
  • P: not more than 0.03 wt%,
  • S: not more than 0.005 wt%,
  • Cr: 15 to 20 wt%,
  • Ni: 6 to 15 wt%,
  • W: 1.5 to 10 wt%,
  • Mo: not more than 2.0 wt% and within the range defined by Mo + W ≦ 10 wt%,
  • Nb: more than 0.1 up to 0.5 wt%,
  • V: 0.05 to 1.5 wt%,
  • N: more than 0.15 up to 0.4 wt%, and
  •    the balance consisting of Fe and unavoidable impurities.
  • The amounts of the alloying elements are limited as specified above for the following reasons. For simplicity, "%" means "wt%" in the following discussion.
  • C: The C amount must be reduced to as little as possible to prevent high-temperature cracking during welding or reduction in elongation. To ensure good weldability, the upper limit of the C content was determined based on the following experimental results.
  • Figure 1 shows a Varestraint test result indicating the weldability for steels (plots "◆") containing main components in amounts falling within the specified range of the present invention (Cr: 18%, Ni: 13%, W: 4%) except that the C content was varied, and a reference steel of JIS SUS310STB (plots "□", corresponding to Comparative Steel Q in Examples to follow). It can be seen from Fig. 1 that the weldability is better than that of JIS SUS310STB when the C content is less than 0.05%. The upper limit of the C content was thus determined to be less than 0.05%.
  • Si: Si is not only effective as a deoxidizer but also improves the oxidation resistance and the resistance to high-temperature corrosion. However, Si, when present in an excessive amount, reduces the creep rupture strength, the toughness and the weldability, and therefore, the Si content is limited to not more than 5%.
  • Mn: Mn is a deoxidizer and improves the weldability and the hot workability. However, Mn, when present in an excessive amount, causes degradation of the oxidation resistance, and therefore, the Mn content is limited to less than 2%.
  • Cr: Cr is essential for the oxidation resistance, resistance to steam oxidation, and resistance to high-temperature corrosion. To ensure properties comparable with or better than those of the conventional austenitic stainless steels, Cr must be present in an amount of not less than 15%. However, Cr, when present in an excessive amount, causes an increase in the Ni amount necessary to stabilize austenite and is not economical, and therefore, the Cr content is limited to not more than 20%.
  • Ni: Ni is essential for improving the stability of austenite and suppressing the formation of the δ phase. In the steel according to the present invention, Ni must be present in an amount of 6% or more to stabilize austenite with respect to Cr and other ferrite formers present in the specified amounts. On the other hand, the use of Ni in a large amount is not economical, and therefore, the Ni content is limited to not more than 15%.
  • Mo, W: Mo and W improve the high-temperature strength by solid solution strengthening or precipitation of the Laves phase and the effect is generally described as a function of the (Mo + W)% as shown in Fig. 2. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that, when the total amount of Mo and W is 2% or more, the creep rupture strength is sharply improved and the improvement is not substantially increased if the total amount of Mo and W is more than 10%.
  • When the W amount or the total amount of Mo and W is 1.5 to 2.0%, the creep rupture strength substantially varies with the amounts of C and Nb. When the amounts of C and Nb are 0.025% or more and 0.25% or more, respectively, an improved creep rupture strength is obtained through a synergistic or combined effect of the W or W + Mo amount and the C + Nb amount. However, the synergistic effect is not obtained when the W or W + Mo amount is less than 1.5%.
  • Mo and W, when present in a total amount of more than 10%, also cause a problem in that the Laves phase and other intermetallic compounds coarsen and reduce the creep rupture strength.
  • Moreover, when Mo is added alone or not combined with W, the resistance to high-temperature corrosion is reduced with increase of the Mo amount as shown in Fig. 3. On the other hand, W, even when added alone or not combined with Mo, does not cause reduction in the resistance to high-temperature corrosion, and when combined with Mo, improves the resistance to high-temperature corrosion in comparison with that achieved when Mo alone is added. Therefore, W must be present in an amount of 1.5 to 10%. Mo may be present in combination with W but the Mo content must not be more than 2.0% because the resistance to high-temperature corrosion is sharply reduced when the Mo content is more than 2.0%, even when combined with W.
  • Nb: Nb sharply improves the long duration creep rupture strength by the formation of fine carbonitrides. To achieve this effect, the Nb content must be 0.1% or more as can be seen from Fig. 4. The effect becomes more significant as the Nb amount is increased within a range in which Nb is completely dissolvable in a solid solution state. However, when the Nb amount is more than this range, undissolved carbides and nitrides are retained to reduce the creep rupture strength. Therefore, the Nb amount must not be more than 0.5%.
  • V: V forms fine nitrides and improves the long duration creep rupture strength. As shown in Fig. 5, this effect is obtained when the V amount is 0.05% or more and the improvement is reduced when the V amount is more than 1.5%. Therefore, the V amount is 0.05 to 1.5%.
  • P: P forms phosphides and improves the long duration creep rupture strength as shown in Fig. 6. However, P, when present in an excessive amount, sharply reduces not only the weldability but also the hot workability, and therefore, the P must not be present in an amount of more than 0.03%.
  • S: S segregates at crystal grain boundaries and reduces the hot workability and also facilitates the grain boundary embrittlement under the creep condition, and therefore, the S content is limited to not more than 0.005%.
  • N: N sharply improves the creep rupture strength by solid solution strengthening and the formation of nitrides. To compensate for the strength reduction because of the reduced C content for ensuring an improved weldability, N must be present in an amount of more than 0.15%. However, when N is present in an amount of more than 0.4%, the improvement in the long time creep rupture strength is not substantially increased but the toughness is reduced. Therefore, the N content is more than 0.15% and up to 0.4%.
  • Figure 1 is a graph showing a Varestraint test result for steels containing elements other than C in amounts within the specified range of the present invention, in comparison with the result for a JIS SUS310STB steel;
  • Fig. 2 is a graph showing the creep rupture strength as a function of the W + Mo content;
  • Fig. 3 is a graph showing the resistance to high-temperature corrosion as a function of the amounts of W and Mo;
  • Fig. 4 is a graph showing the creep rupture strength as a function of the Nb content;
  • Fig. 5 is a graph showing the creep rupture strength as a function of the V content; and
  • Fig. 6 is a graph showing the creep rupture strength as a function of the P content.
  • The present invention will be described in detail by way of the following examples.
  • EXAMPLES
  • Tables 1-1 and 2-1 summarize the chemical compositions and the properties of the steels tested. After being subjected to a solid solution heat treatment at 1250°C, the steels were subjected to a Varestraint test, a creep rupture test at 700, 750 and 800°C, and a high-temperature corrosion test at 650°C. The Varestraint test was carried out using the GTAW welding method, under the conditions of a test piece thickness of 4 mm, a welding voltage of 10V, a welding current of 80A, a welding speed of 80 mm/min, and an applied strain of 4%. The creep rupture data were standardized by the Larson-Miller method to estimate the creep rupture strength at 650°C for 100,000 hours. The high-temperature corrosion strength was carried out in a simulated combustion ash having the composition of K2SO4:Na2SO4:Fe2(SO4)3 = 0.28:0.2:0.5 (by weight), in which the steels were held at 650°C for 200 hours and the corrosion weight loss was determined. The test results are summarized in Tables 1-2 and 2-2.
  • The steels A to Q in Tables 1-1 and 1-2 are the present inventive steels and the steels R to AI in Tables 2-1 and 2-2 are comparative steels. In the comparative steels, Steels R and S correspond to JIS SUS347H and JIS SUS310S, respectively, which are commonly used in the conventional art. The present inventive steels A to Q have a remarkably improved high-temperature strength and resistance to high-temperature corrosion in comparison with the comparative steel R or JIS SUS347H and an improved weldability in comparison with the comparative steel S or JIS SUS310S. The comparative steels S to V have a poor weldability and exhibit a large total crack length in the Varestraint test. The comparative steels X to Z contain W in amounts less than the present inventive range and the comparative steels AE, AF, AG contain Nb, V and N in amounts less than the present inventive ranges, respectively, so that all these comparative steels X to AG have a poor high-temperature strength. The comparative steels AA to AD contain Mo in an amount more than the present inventive range and have an improved high-temperature strength but have a poor resistance to high-temperature corrosion.
  • The inventive steel P and the comparative steels W and AH demonstrate the synergistic effect of the combined addition of W with C and Nb, in which the inventive steel P contains more than 0.025% C and more than 0.25% Nb and has an improved high-temperature strength even though the W content is near the lower limit of the specified range, whereas the comparative steel W contains less than 0.025% C and less than 0.25% Nb and has a poor high-temperature strength and the comparative steel AH contains W in an amount less than the lower limit of the specified range and has a poor high-temperature strength although C and Nb are present in amounts more than 0.025% and 0.25%, respectively.
  • The comparative steel AI contains an excessive amount of P and has an improved high-temperature strength but has a poor weldability.
  • As herein described above, the present invention provides a high-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel, having an improved weldability, which is inexpensive and commercially applicable.
    Figure 00090001
    Figure 00100001
    Figure 00110001
    Figure 00120001

Claims (2)

  1. A high-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel having improved weldability, consisting of:
    C: less than 0.05 wt%,
    Si: not more than 5 wt%,
    Mn: less than 2 wt%,
    P: not more than 0.03 wt%,
    S: not more than 0.005 wt%,
    Cr: 15 to 20 wt%,
    Ni: 6 to 15 wt%,
    W: 1.5 to 10 wt%,
    Nb: more than 0.1 up to 0.5 wt%,
    V: 0.05 to 1.5 wt%,
    N: more than 0.15 up to 0.4 wt%, and
       the balance consisting of Fe and unavoidable impurities.
  2. A high-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel having improved weldability, consisting of:
    C: less than 0.05 wt%,
    Si: not more than 5 wt%,
    Mn: less than 2 wt%,
    P: not more than 0.03 wt%,
    S: not more than 0.005 wt%,
    Cr: 15 to 20 wt%,
    Ni: 6 to 15 wt%,
    W: 1.5 to 10 wt%,
    Mo: not more than 2.0 wt% and within the range defined by Mo + W ≦ 10 wt%,
    Nb: more than 0.1 up to 0.5 wt%,
    V: 0.05 to 1.5 wt%,
    N: more than 0.15 up to 0.4 wt%, and
       the balance consisting of Fe and unavoidable impurities.
EP19960120536 1995-12-20 1996-12-19 High-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel having improved weldability Expired - Lifetime EP0780483B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP332341/95 1995-12-20
JP33234195 1995-12-20
JP33234195 1995-12-20
JP135412/96 1996-05-29
JP13541296 1996-05-29
JP13541296A JP3388998B2 (en) 1995-12-20 1996-05-29 High strength austenitic heat-resistant steel with excellent weldability

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0780483A1 EP0780483A1 (en) 1997-06-25
EP0780483B1 true EP0780483B1 (en) 2002-04-17

Family

ID=26469269

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19960120536 Expired - Lifetime EP0780483B1 (en) 1995-12-20 1996-12-19 High-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel having improved weldability

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0780483B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3388998B2 (en)
DE (1) DE69620722T2 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4523696B2 (en) * 2000-04-18 2010-08-11 新日本製鐵株式会社 TIG welding material for austenitic heat resistant steel with excellent high temperature strength
DE10063117A1 (en) * 2000-12-18 2003-06-18 Alstom Switzerland Ltd Conversion controlled nitride precipitation hardening tempering steel
JP3838216B2 (en) * 2003-04-25 2006-10-25 住友金属工業株式会社 Austenitic stainless steel
BR112013033576B1 (en) * 2011-07-06 2018-10-16 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp welded joint of austenitic steel
JP5661001B2 (en) * 2011-08-23 2015-01-28 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 High strength austenitic heat resistant steel with excellent post-aging toughness
JP5794945B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2015-10-14 新日鐵住金ステンレス株式会社 Heat resistant austenitic stainless steel sheet
JP6112270B1 (en) 2015-06-05 2017-04-12 新日鐵住金株式会社 Austenitic stainless steel

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB617194A (en) * 1945-06-13 1949-02-02 Haynes Stellite Co Alloys for high temperature use
LU52783A1 (en) * 1966-01-13 1967-03-10
BE715586A (en) * 1967-06-07 1968-10-16 Ugine Kuhlmann
JPH0694583B2 (en) * 1984-10-03 1994-11-24 株式会社東芝 Heat-resistant austenitic cast steel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0780483A1 (en) 1997-06-25
JPH09228003A (en) 1997-09-02
JP3388998B2 (en) 2003-03-24
DE69620722D1 (en) 2002-05-23
DE69620722T2 (en) 2002-12-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR100216683B1 (en) 2-phase stainless steel with excellent corrosion resistance
US6485679B1 (en) Heat resistant austenitic stainless steel
EP0545753A1 (en) Duplex stainless steel having improved strength and corrosion resistance
JPH0621323B2 (en) High strength and high chrome steel with excellent corrosion resistance and oxidation resistance
EP0708184A1 (en) High-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel with excellent weldability and good high-temperature corrosion resistance
JP2000129403A (en) Austenitic heat-resistant alloys with excellent high-temperature strength and corrosion resistance and applications
EP0780483A1 (en) High-strength austenitic heat-resisting steel having improved weldability
JPS5914097B2 (en) Ferritic heat-resistant steel with improved toughness
JPS61113749A (en) High corrosion resistance alloy for oil well
JP2561592B2 (en) Welding material for high Cr ferritic heat resistant steel
JP3527640B2 (en) Weld metal for high Cr ferritic heat resistant steel
JPH07290275A (en) Welding wire for high strength cr-mo steel
JP4523696B2 (en) TIG welding material for austenitic heat resistant steel with excellent high temperature strength
JPH0770681A (en) High chrome austenitic heat resistant alloy
JP3418884B2 (en) High Cr ferritic heat resistant steel
JPH06262388A (en) Coated arc welding rod for high Cr ferritic heat resistant steel
JP2543801B2 (en) Coated arc welding rod for high Cr ferritic heat resistant steel
JPH0753898B2 (en) High strength austenitic heat resistant alloy
JPH0142346B2 (en)
JP2551511B2 (en) Welding material for high Cr ferritic heat resistant steel
JP2551512B2 (en) Welding material for high Cr ferritic heat resistant steel
JPH02156049A (en) Heat resisting steel for ethylene decomposition furnace tube
JPH06142981A (en) Welding material for high Cr ferritic heat resistant steel
JP2001234276A (en) Cr-Mo steel with high toughness and excellent reheat cracking resistance
JPS60162757A (en) Austenitic stainless steel having high corrosion resistance at high temperature

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19970117

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR SE

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20001208

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69620722

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20020523

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20021030

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20030120

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 69620722

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: VOSSIUS & PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE RECHTSANWAELT, DE

Effective date: 20130227

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 69620722

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: VOSSIUS & PARTNER, DE

Effective date: 20130227

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 69620722

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORPORATION, JP

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: NIPPON STEEL CORP., TOKIO/TOKYO, JP

Effective date: 20130227

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

Owner name: NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORPORATION, JP

Effective date: 20130913

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

Effective date: 20130913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20151215

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20151211

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20151110

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69620722

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG