EP0772929B1 - Procedes et systemes de creation et d'authentification d'articles inalterables a auto-verification - Google Patents

Procedes et systemes de creation et d'authentification d'articles inalterables a auto-verification Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0772929B1
EP0772929B1 EP95928140A EP95928140A EP0772929B1 EP 0772929 B1 EP0772929 B1 EP 0772929B1 EP 95928140 A EP95928140 A EP 95928140A EP 95928140 A EP95928140 A EP 95928140A EP 0772929 B1 EP0772929 B1 EP 0772929B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
recipient
data
data set
specific
article
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP95928140A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0772929A1 (fr
EP0772929A4 (fr
Inventor
Dennis G. Priddy
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Energy and Automation Inc
Original Assignee
Siemens Energy and Automation Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Energy and Automation Inc filed Critical Siemens Energy and Automation Inc
Publication of EP0772929A1 publication Critical patent/EP0772929A1/fr
Publication of EP0772929A4 publication Critical patent/EP0772929A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0772929B1 publication Critical patent/EP0772929B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07F—COIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS
    • G07F7/00—Mechanisms actuated by objects other than coins to free or to actuate vending, hiring, coin or paper currency dispensing or refunding apparatus
    • G07F7/08—Mechanisms actuated by objects other than coins to free or to actuate vending, hiring, coin or paper currency dispensing or refunding apparatus by coded identity card or credit card or other personal identification means
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
    • G07C9/20—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass
    • G07C9/22—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass in combination with an identity check of the pass holder
    • G07C9/25—Individual registration on entry or exit involving the use of a pass in combination with an identity check of the pass holder using biometric data, e.g. fingerprints, iris scans or voice recognition
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07F—COIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS
    • G07F7/00—Mechanisms actuated by objects other than coins to free or to actuate vending, hiring, coin or paper currency dispensing or refunding apparatus
    • G07F7/08—Mechanisms actuated by objects other than coins to free or to actuate vending, hiring, coin or paper currency dispensing or refunding apparatus by coded identity card or credit card or other personal identification means
    • G07F7/12—Card verification

Definitions

  • the present invention relates in general to encoding methods and systems, and in particular to methods, systems and articles of manufacture for creating and authenticating self-verifying articles.
  • Authenticity of the endorsement is determined by comparing the signature appearing upon the check with a signature sample of the check writer on file with the bank. A reasonably good forgery of the endorsement might enable an unauthorized person to illegally cash the check.
  • identification issues often arise in the context of security.
  • common apartment and office building security systems require that anyone wishing to enter the building "sign in" in front of a security guard, and often, to present the guard with a previously issued personal identification document which authorizes access to the building.
  • the security guard is required to exercise his best personal judgment to determine that the identification document is authentic and that the person presenting it is the person identified on the identification document.
  • a security guard may be deceived by a person who is correctly identified on a forged or altered identification document.
  • private individuals are required to present to the police personal identification, such as a driver's license, at the scene of a traffic accident or when stopped for a traffic violation.
  • personal identification documents are required for admittance to voting polls, and when crossing international boundaries and/or importing or exporting goods.
  • an article shall be defined as any item having a surface, which may include a substrate, to which data may be fixed.
  • the term fixed shall mean one or more of the following, but is not limited to, attached, imprinted, adhered, etched, scratched, painted, printed, peened, embedded, machined, drilled, stamped, or otherwise imaged.
  • biometric information refers to a characteristic personal to an individual, such as a signature, a finger print or a picture, for example.
  • a sample of biometric information to be used is obtained from the person at an "encodation" site where the memory device is programmed under secure conditions.
  • the sample is formed into a code by conventional encoding techniques.
  • the sample may be obtained by having the person place a hand, eye, face or other unique physical feature upon a scanning input device.
  • the scanned information is then encoded to form a code which is subsequently stored to an alterable, portable memory device (i.e., magnetic strips, electronic or optical memory cards, floppy disks, etc.).
  • the portable memory device is issued to the person.
  • the person presents the portable memory device at a "remote access/decodation" site where identification verification is to occur, and the information contained within the portable memory device is read from memory.
  • Another sample of biometric information is then obtained by the person again placing a particular physical feature upon the input scanning device.
  • the read code and the just sampled biometric information are compared by a machine to determine authenticity.
  • the read code may be decoded, e.g., using a process that reverses the encodation performed previously, or the sample information encoded, e.g., using the same encoding process used at the encryption site, to make the comparison. Because this method requires a processing system for performing data encoding and/or decoding, complex opto-electric hardware at every encodation and remote access site, and a memory device for each person, this solution is exceedingly expensive.
  • an identification card and method and apparatus for producing and authenticating such an identification card.
  • Identity, Status or characteristics are scanned to produce a digital signal which is compressed, encrypted, and coded as a two dimensional barcode or as some other appropriate form of coding, which is incorporated into one portion of the identification card.
  • the image is also printed or otherwise embodied onto another portion of the identification card.
  • a text message maybe appended to the signal before it is encrypted and also printed as plain text on the identification card.
  • the signal representing the image is encrypted using a public key encryption system and the key is downloaded from a center. This key maybe changed from time to time to increase security.
  • To facilitate authentication the corresponding decryption key is encrypted with another key and incorporated on the card.
  • To validate the card the coded message is scanned, decoded, decrypted, expanded and displayed. The card may then be authenticated by comparison of the displayed representation of the image and the displayed text message with the image and text message printed on the card.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide methods and systems for inexpensively, accurately and efficiently producing unalterable self-verifying personal and commercial articles.
  • a further object of the present invention is to provide methods and systems for accurately, efficiently and inexpensively authenticating presented self-verifying articles.
  • a still further object of the present invention is to provide methods and systems for verifying the authenticity of self-verifying articles presented at remote access sites which do not require expensive verification equipment, such as physical-trait-scanning input devices, or the inconvenience of a communication channel to a central location.
  • the invention is directed to a self-verifying article which contains an encoded machine-readable data set which includes recipient-specific biometric data.
  • Self-verifying articles include, for example, commercial instruments (i.e., notes, drafts, checks, bearer paper, etc.), transaction cards (i.e., ATM cards, calling cards, credit cards, etc.), personal identification documents (i.e., driver's licenses, government benefit cards, passports, personal identification papers, etc.) and labels affixed to package surfaces, including for example identification of the package owner or sender, which may be used for verifying imported goods by customs agents.
  • a subset of, or the whole of, the biometric data set may be, for example, a graphic image of a personal characteristic considered unique to a particular individual, such as, for example, a fingerprint, a retinal scan, a photo, a signature, etc., or some combination of the foregoing, is encoded to generate a machine readable data set.
  • This article is preferably a low cost article, of paper or plastic, but may be any substrate, and the machine-readable data set is preferably fixed upon or in the article.
  • the article also may, but need not, contain a human readable version of the biometric data set.
  • the encoded machine readable data set is fixed upon the article in a manner which is neither comprehensible, nor detectable, by the human-eye, unless assisted by a suitably arranged reading device.
  • a check, or any other article for that matter has fixed thereon a machine readable data set including the authorized user's signature.
  • a would be forger would not have a sample of an authorized signature to copy.
  • a comparison of the user's signature with the decoded signature permits verification at the site of use.
  • a human-readable textual data set also appears on the article, optionally with selected subsets of the textual data set also being encoded and concatenated, interleaved, etc. with the encoded biometric data set.
  • a textual data set comprises all data which is not biometric data.
  • FIG. 1A illustrates a functional diagram of a system for producing a self-verifying article in accordance with the present invention.
  • the system includes an input data set 100, which includes a biometric data set 101 and an optional textual data set 102, an article 10, a processing system 103 and a self verifying article 104.
  • data set 100 is comprised of recipient specific data.
  • Biometric data set 101 may include one or more physical traits personal to the potential article recipient (i.e., photo, retinal scan, finger print, signature, etc.), while textual data set 102, which is optionally included in input data set 100, may include one or more textual attributes (i.e., name, address, height/weight, eye color, etc.).
  • Processing system 103 is operable to produce self verifying article 104 by generating a unique machine-readable data set for fixing upon article 10.
  • Processing system 103 includes input means, processing means, output means and article producing means.
  • the input means are for receiving input data set 100 and article 10.
  • the processing means are for validating input data set 100, both syntactically and semantically, and encoding selected subsets of biometric data set 101, and, optionally, selected portions of textual data set 102 (optionally, the data to be encoded may first be encrypted, if desired).
  • the output means are for transmitting a validated and encoded data set, along with the selected subsets of biometric data set 101, and optionally with the textual data set 102, to the article producing means.
  • the article producing means are for fixing the validated and encoded data set, and for optionally fixing the selected subsets of biometric data set 101 and optionally textual data set 102, to article 10, thereby producing self-verifying article 104.
  • processing system 103 ensures data integrity by encoding all selected biometric and textual data subsets into a compact unalterable machine-readable data set, and subsequently, configuring the machine-readable data set as one or more matrices.
  • the machine-readable data set may be divided into two or more individual segments, which segments may then be incorporated into two or more two dimensional machine-readable matrices, which may or may not appear visually similar in size.
  • the multiple matrices though physically separate, may contain check values and features which assure the detection of any attempted alteration of either the human-readable text and/or the machine-readable matrices.
  • the encoded biometric data and textual data can be concatenated into one data string, divided by approximately two, and then formed into two matrices of approximately equal size.
  • the biometric data and text data may be interleaved, for example, in alternating bits, bytes, group of bytes, etc. to form a data string which is then divided into the two matrices.
  • each matrix is provided with a checksum for verifying the data integrity of each matrix independently.
  • the matrices may have an interdependent checksum that is used to verify the data integrity of both matrices collectively. As a result of these checksums, if one matrix is altered, or if both matrices are altered, invalid data will be read.
  • interleaving biometric data and textual data according to a predetermined routine enhances the ability to detect altered matrices.
  • biometric data set 101 could be formed as one matrix and textual data set 102 could be formed as a second matrix.
  • Enhanced data security is obtained and maintained by verifying the machine-readable data set for acceptability against predetermined criteria which may include searching a data base (e.g., an organized, comprehensive collection of data stored for use by processing system(s)) of previously issued articles to determine uniqueness.
  • input data set 100 may be received at a remote access encodation site not equipped with the verification and/or encodation algorithm(s), in which case, a data signal representation or both the recipient-specific biometric data and the related textual data may be transmitted to a secure central host (shown in a similar context in FIG. 2A), the central host then performs the above mentioned verification.
  • the transmission may be by wired or non-wired communication.
  • the recipient-specific biometric data is encoded, which preferably includes utilization of compression algorithms, combining the biometric data subsets, and optionally, the textual data subsets, into one or more machine-readable matrices. If input data set 100 was received at a remote access encodation site not equipped with the encodation algorithm(s), the resulting encoded binary string is transmitted as previously discussed to the remote access encodation site. A standard article issuance device (shown in FIG. 1B) then fixes the machine-readable data set onto one or more self-verifying articles.
  • a record of the event is automatically entered into the data base, which, if input data set 100 is received at a remote access encodation site, may be located at the central host. Entry of the record insures that duplicate articles are not inadvertently issued at a later date. Note that the number of articles issued is directly related to the intended use of the articles.
  • Apps of this aspect of the invention include issuing only a single driver's license having a unique encoded photo, or issuing multiple articles, such as checks, traveler's checks, bank account withdrawal slips, etc. having the same encrypted signatures.
  • FIG. 1B illustrates an isometric view of processing system 103.
  • Processing system 103 includes a personal computer ("PC") 105 coupled with a article issuance device 114.
  • PC 105 is comprised of a hardware casing 106 (shown as having a cut away view), a monitor 109. a keyboard 110 and optionally a mouse 113.
  • Hardware casing 106 includes both a floppy disk drive 107 and a hard disk drive 108.
  • Floppy disk drive 107 is operable to receive, read and write to external disks, while hard disk drive 108 is operable to provide fast access data storage and retrieval.
  • PC 105 may be equipped with any suitably arranged structure for receiving and transmitting data, including, for example, tape and compact disc drives, and serial and parallel data ports.
  • CPU central processing unit
  • RAM random access memory
  • PC 105 is shown having a single CPU 111, PC 105 may be equipped with a plurality CPUs 111 operable to cooperatively carry out the principles of the present invention.
  • Article generating device 114 is operable to receive one or more output data sets from PC 105, and fix the output data sets to the article's surface.
  • PC 105 and article generating device 114 have been utilized for illustrating one implementation of processing system 103, the invention may alternately be implemented within any processing system having at least one processing unit, including, for example, sophisticated calculators and hand held, mini, main frame and super computers, including RISC and parallel processing architectures, as well as within network combinations of the foregoing, and may utilize any suitably arranged article producing means.
  • FIG. 1C illustrates a conceptual block diagram of one of any number of sub-processing systems which may be utilized in conjunction with FIGS. 1A and 1B.
  • the sub-processing system includes a single processing unit, such as CPU 111, coupled via data bus 118 with a memory storage device, such as RAM 112.
  • Memory storage device 112 is operable to store one or more instructions which processing unit 111 is operable to retrieve, interpret and execute.
  • Processing unit 111 includes a control unit 115, an arithmetic logic unit (“ALU") 116, and a local memory storage device 117, such as, for example, stackable cache or a plurality of registers.
  • Control unit 115 is operable to fetch instructions from memory storage device 112.
  • ALU 116 is operable to perform a plurality of operations, including addition and Boolean AND needed to carry out instructions.
  • Local memory storage device 117 is operable to provide high speed storage used for storing temporary results and control information.
  • FIG. 2A illustrates a functional block diagram of a system for verifying the authenticity of a received self-verifying article in accordance with the present invention.
  • the system includes self-verifying article 104, a remote access site processing system 200, optionally coupled with a central host processing system 103 (as indicated by the broken line), and an authenticity message displaying means 201, such as a display device, a printer, or other suitably arranged indicating device.
  • Self-verifying article 104 includes at least one encoded data set which includes a first data subset that is an encoded copy of a portion, or the whole, of a biometric data set.
  • Self-verifying article 104 also includes both a text data set and a biometric data set.
  • Remote access site processing system 200 includes input means, processing means and output means.
  • the input means are for receiving self-verifying article 104.
  • the processing means are for verifying the authenticity of self-verifying article 104, which may include communications between remote access site processing system 200 and central host processing system 103.
  • the output means are for transmitting an authenticity message produced by the processing means to display means 201.
  • the processing means are operable to scan self-verifying article 104 to locate and decode the encoded first data set and to compare the decoded first data set with a second data set, which is either obtained from the bearer of the article or is fixed to self-verifying article 104, and to generate the output signal indicating authenticity of article 104.
  • the processing means either selectively bypasses or is not operable to perform the comparison of the decoded first data set and the second data set. Instead, the processing means generates an output signal representative of the decoded first data set, e.g., a graphic image display of the portion of the biometric data set, and the second data set to a display device for manual comparison and verification by a processing system operator.
  • the processing system operator may manually compare the decoded first data set, and optionally the second data set (if one is fixed to the article), with the article bearer or a biometric data set obtained from the bearer, e.g., the bearer's signature or appearance, or from a database.
  • the illustrated system for verifying the authenticity of self-verifying article 104 may utilize a variety of devices including, for example, portable terminals, fixed station readers, and flat bed scanners, each of which may directly incorporate decoder capability or have decoder capability available at a base/host station, such as processing system 103, via wired or radio frequency, short wave, cellular, infrared or other form of non-wired communication.
  • Remote access site processing system 200 and/or central host processing system 103 may be configured with keyboards and display screens of sufficient resolution to accurately display the encoded biometric image and/or textual data, and may incorporate imaging apparatus necessary to convert machine-readable data sets into binary machine language bits in preparation for decoding.
  • the imaging apparatus may be based on any of a number of technologies, including CCD, CMOS, and NMOS or other forms of light sensitive sensors, which sensors may be structured in the form of a two dimensional area or one-dimensional linear arrays, or a single beam laser reading for scanning a two-dimensional image in a raster pattern.
  • imaging apparatus is a linear array scanner that is vertically aligned with a solid border of an imprinted machine readable code 205, and when two or more matrices are used, these matrices are arrayed in parallel orientation so that the two symbols can be passed by the CCD scanner using a conventional card swipe action as in conventional magnetic strip reading. The matrices are then read and a video image of each matrix is stored in memory for processing. Imaging may also be achieved through the use of lasers, laser-diodes, infrared or other such binary imaging technologies which devices may also be structured in the form of two-dimensional area or one-dimensional linear arrays.
  • readers may include the ability to automatically verify the images and information encoded within the machine-readable matrix to the human recognizable version on the same article. In one embodiment, this comparison may be accomplished internal to remote access site processing system 200's memory thereby precluding the need for key pads and/or high resolution display screens on the terminals. Alternately, as introduced, operators may visually compare the information displayed on the terminal screen to the human readable information now present on the article and/or to the article bearer.
  • FIG. 2B illustrates an isometric view of a hand held computer which may be used as remote access site processing system 200.
  • Hand held computer 200 includes a keypad 202, a display screen 203 and an input port 204.
  • Keypad 202 includes a systematic arrangement of keys for manually receiving input data from a user.
  • Display screen 203 is for displaying an authenticity message, and/or biometric and/or textual data.
  • Input port 204 is for receiving self-verifying article 104, here illustrated as a driver's license, which in the illustrated embodiment includes encrypted machine-readable data sets 205 a;b configured as two optically readable binary matrices.
  • Remote access site processing system 200 includes at least one processing unit and one memory storage device, such as the subprocessing system illustrated in FIG. 1C.
  • the processing unit includes a microprocessor having associated memory (non-volatile storage for containing the program instruction set to identify and decode the matrices, and volatile memory for a data processing work area), a video memory for storing an image of the matrices to be decoded, and associated signal conditioning circuits, which are mounted on a single printed circuit board.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a preferred single machine-readable binary coded matrix, generally indicated as a matrix 205.
  • Matrix 205 is a sample of the Data Matrix symbology developed by International Data Matrix, Inc., Clearwater, Florida, the assignee of this invention.
  • Matrix 205 has a perimeter 300 formed by intersecting sides 301 formed of solid lines and intersecting perimeter sides 302 formed of dark perimeter squares 303 and light perimeter squares 304 in an alternating pattern.
  • Data is stored within perimeter 301 of matrix 204 by converting each character to be stored to a visual binary code represented by dark and light squares corresponding to ones and zeros of encoded binary information.
  • FIG. 4A illustrates a flow diagram for producing an unalterable self-verifying article in accordance with the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1A.
  • the recipient-specific data set which is comprised of at least one data subset, is received by processing system 103 (input block 401).
  • Processing system 103 preferably performs a graphic image compression of a first data subset.
  • Image compression by a factor of approximately 50:1 or better is preferred to obtain a digital representation of the acquired data.
  • Such compressed data is capable of reproducing on a conventional graphic display screen the recipient specific image without any significant degradation of visual quality (block 402).
  • the image compression may be by any standard routine e.g., Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), LZW (Lempcl-Ziv), fractal, or others to reduce the amount of bits required to encode the first data subset.
  • DCT Discrete Cosine Transform
  • LZW Lempcl-Ziv
  • fractal or others to reduce the amount of bits required to encode the first data subset.
  • a compression ratio of 50:1 is deemed suitable, but other ratios may be used.
  • a graphic image enhancement routine may be performed on the first data subset, preferably before the data compression step, in order to enhance the image contrast, sharpen and smooth edges and reduce the effect of shadows, particularly for imaging a photograph of the recipient.
  • Suitable image enhancement routines are known, and described R. Gonzalez et al., Digital Image Processing, published by Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. (Reading MA) 1987.
  • Processing system 103 selectively encodes the compressed first data set, thereby generating a machine readable data set (processing block 403). This selectively encoding step is more fully discussed in connection with the detail description of FIG. 4B.
  • Processing system 103 is further operable to configure the machine-readable data set as an optically readable binary code forming one or more matrices (processing block 404).
  • Processing system 103 fixes the machine-readable data set and the first recipient-specific data subset onto a surface of an article, thereby producing self-verifying article 104 (processing block 405).
  • the matrix is fixed on the article using a conventional printing process, e.g., thermal, thermal transfer, ink-jet, bubble-jet, laser jet, dot matrix printing, etc.
  • the matrix or matrices may be fixed sub-surface, e.g., by laminating a top surface or by placing the matrix over the printed layer of a multilayer article.
  • the machine-readable data set is imprinted over an already printed area of the article, such as the photograph on a driver's license for example.
  • the matrix is formed by introducing bubbles or voids into the article, or drilling or punching holes into or through the article, according to the matrix pattern, such that the code is machine readable by a technique capable of detecting the absence or presence of material, or the relative density of material, or the depth of a bubble, void, hole or the like in the article, e.g., ultrasonically, or by a light measuring system or other suitable imaging system having a bounceback signal capable of distinguishing the code.
  • FIG. 4B illustrates a more detailed flow diagram of processing block 402 illustrated in FIG. 4A.
  • START block 406 Upon entering START block 406, the selective encodation of the first data set begins.
  • Processing system 103 compares the first data set with system control values to determine if the first data set is within acceptable tolerances (processing block 407).
  • the step of comparing may include, for example, syntactic and/or semantic analysis. If it is determined that the first data set is invalid as received ("N" branch of decisional block 408), then processing system 103 aborts self-verifying article production (termination block 409). Alternatively, if it is determined that the first data set is valid as received ("Y" branch of decisional block 408), then processing system 103 searches a data base of previously issued articles to determine if the issued article is unique (processing block 410), uniqueness being determined on a subjective basis as a function of the type of article being produced.
  • processing system 103 may be internal or external to processing system 103, and that in either system, processing system 103 may search the data base directly, or indirectly.
  • the data base may be stored remotely and controlled by another processing system with which processing system 103 communicates. If it is determined that the first data set is not unique as received ("N" branch of decisional block 411), then processing system 103 aborts self verifying article production (termination block 412).
  • processing system 103 selectively inserts one or more subsets of the received recipient-specific data set as al least one record into the data base (processing block 413). Processing system 103 then encodes the first data set (processing block 414), and in one embodiment adds error correction bits to the encoded first data set (processing block 415).
  • the selective encodation of only the first data set as embodied within FIGS. 4A and 4B was for illustrative purposes only, and it is understood that among the various aspects and features of the present invention is the ability to selectively encode a plurality of compressed recipient-specific data subsets, and to subsequently concatenate, interleave, etc. the encoded subsets, thereby forming a single machine-readable data set.
  • processing system 103 is operable to configure the machine-readable data set into one or more optically readable matrices wherein individual encoded data subsets may span two or more matrices.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram for verifying the authenticity of a received self-verifying article in accordance with the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2A.
  • the self-verifying article which in this embodiment includes a plurality of data sets wherein a first data set is an encoded copy of a second data set, is received by a remote access site processing system 200 (input block 501).
  • Remote access site processing system 200 then scans the received self-verifying article to locate the encoded first data set (processing block 502).
  • Remote access site processing system 200 decodes the encoded first data set (processing block 503), and compares the decoded first data set with the second data set to determine the authenticity ot the received self-verifying article (processing block 504).
  • the comparison step is accomplished through communications between remote access site processing system 200 and processing system 103, wherein processing system 103 maintains a data base of recipient-specific data relating to previously issued self-verifying articles. Communications between remote access site processing system 200 and processing system 103 may be accomplished via wired or nonwired communication means. In an alternate embodiment, at least the decoded first data set, and optionally the second data set, are transmitted to an output display device for manual comparison by a system operator. If it is determined that the decoded first data set is not authentic ("N" branch of decisional block 505), then remote access site processing system 200 displays an authenticity message 201 indicating that the self-verifying article is invalid (output block 506). Alternatively, if it is determined that the decoded first data set is authentic ("Y" branch of decisional block 505), then remote access site processing system 200 displays an authenticity message 201 indicating that the self-verifying article is valid (output block 507).
  • remote access site processing system 200 prior to decoding the encoded first data set, converts the received self-verifying article into a digital bit-map image, and separates the digital bit-map image into a plurality of regions, wherein a first region includes the encoded first data set and a second region includes the second data set.
  • both the first and second regions may include a plurality of biometric and/or textual data subsets which remote site processing system 200 is further operable to convert into common data formats for processing.
  • the self verifying article contains two matrices which have a first data set of biometric data and a second data set of textual data.
  • the article also may contain a magnetic stripe for containing alterable data, which may be programmed by scanning the machine readable matrices, decoding certain data contained therein and, decoding that data (with or without other data), onto the magnetic stripe. This makes the self verifying article useful in applications which require reading a magnetic stripe.
  • a further use of the invention is to prevent software piracy.
  • Software is a special form of program which has been recorded to a storage medium, such as one of the above identified storage mediums.
  • Software enables programs to be freely transferred or copied from one storage medium to another, which enables unlicensed users to obtain illegal copies of the software.
  • the purchaser of a processing system provides a hardware vendor with industry standardized personal data, which may include biometric data, which is, optionally encrypted, and stored internal to the processing system.
  • the processing system purchaser buys software
  • the purchaser is again required to provide such industry standardized personal data, which is compressed, optionally encrypted, encoded into a machine-readable data set, preferably as one or more binary coded matrices, and fixed to the surface of a portable storage medium, such as a floppy or compact disk.
  • the software is loaded onto the processing system, the matrices are scanned, decoded and verified in accordance with the principles of the present invention, compared with the previously stored data to ensure a commonality of ownership, thereby limiting software piracy. If common ownership is found, then the software is loaded onto the processing system along with the decoded industry standardized personal data.
  • the new owner in order to load his software, will have to have the industry standardized personal data redefined, which could suspend the new owner's use of the existing software or automatically delete the existing software.
  • a "transfer" of ownership routine might be available to reactivate the suspended use of the existing software if ownership of the particular software was legally transferred.

Claims (28)

  1. Procédé de production d'un article auto-vérificateur spécifique du bénéficiaire, le procédé comprenant les étapes suivantes :
    la réception d'un ensemble de données biométriques spécifiques d'un bénéficiaire, l'ensemble de données spécifiques d'un bénéficiaire étant formé d'un ou plusieurs sous-ensembles de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire, le codage d'un premier sous-ensemble de données biométriques spécifiques du bénéficiaire pour la création d'un ensemble de données lisibles par la machine, la configuration de l'ensemble de données lisibles par la machine sous forme d'un code binaire lisible optiquement formant au moins une matrice (205), et la fixation de l'ensemble de données lisibles par la machine sur un article, caractérisé en ce que l'étape de comparaison, après détermination de l'acceptabilité, comporte en outre les étapes suivantes : la recherche d'une base de données d'articles inaltérables produits auparavant pour la détermination du fait que l'ensemble de données biométriques spécifiques du bénéficiaire est unique, la base de données d'articles inaltérables produits auparavant comprenant un ou plusieurs enregistrements, dans le cas de la détermination du défaut d'unicité, l'abandon de la production de l'article unique d'identification spécifique du bénéficiaire, et, après détermination de l'unicité, l'insertion de l'ensemble de données biométriques spécifiques du bénéficiaire dans l'un au moins des enregistrements dans la base de données des articles inaltérables produits auparavant.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape de codage comprend en outre l'étape de comparaison d'une partie au moins du premier sous-ensemble de données biométriques spécifiques du bénéficiaire à une valeur de commande pour la détermination du fait que le premier sous-ensemble de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire se trouve dans une plage de tolérances acceptable de la valeur de commande.
  3. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'étape de configuration est précédée par l'étape de codage sélectif d'un second sous-ensemble de données du bénéficiaire.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans lequel l'étape de configuration est précédée par des étapes de codage sélectif d'un second sous-ensemble de données de bénéficiaire, et de combinaison du second sous-ensemble codé de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire avec le premier sous-ensemble codé de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire avec ainsi formation de l'ensemble de données lisibles par la machine.
  5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'étape de fixation comprend en outre l'étape de gravure de la matrice (205) dans l'article.
  6. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'étape de fixation comprend en outre l'étape d'entaille de la matrice (205) dans l'article.
  7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'étape de codage comprend en outre l'étape de chiffrage du premier sous-ensemble de données biométriques spécifiques du bénéficiaire.
  8. Procédé selon la revendication 7 lorsqu'elle dépend de la revendication 4 ou 5, dans lequel l'étape de combinaison comprend une étape d'entrelacement du second sous-ensemble codé de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire avec le premier sous-ensemble codé de données biométriques spécifiques du bénéficiaire.
  9. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes lorsqu'elle dépend de la revendication 3 ou 4, dans lequel le second sous-ensemble de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire contient des données de texte (102).
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape de codage comprend en outre l'étape de configuration de l'ensemble de données lisibles par la machine sous forme d'un code binaire lisible optiquement formant deux matrices.
  11. Procédé de vérification de l'authenticité d'un article auto-vérificateur spécifique du bénéficiaire et qui a été reçu, l'article auto-vérificateur spécifique du bénéficiaire comprenant plusieurs ensembles de données contenant un premier ensemble de données biométriques et un second ensemble de données biométriques, dans lequel le premier ensemble de données est une copie codée du second ensemble de données, le procédé comprenant les étapes suivantes : la lecture de l'article reçu spécifique du bénéficiaire pour la localisation du premier ensemble codé de données biométriques, le décodage du premier ensemble codé de données biométriques, et la comparaison du premier ensemble décodé de données biométriques au second ensemble de données biométriques pour la détermination de l'authenticité de l'article reçu d'identification spécifique du bénéficiaire, et étant caractérisé en ce que les ensembles de données comprennent des données de texte, le premier ensemble de données biométriques étant entrelacé avec une copie codée de données de texte en fonction d'un programme prédéterminé et ayant la configuration d'une matrice de données binaires lisibles optiquement par une machine, la matrice ayant une somme de vérification, et le procédé comprend l'étape de détection du fait que la matrice a été altérée par lecture de la matrice en fonction de la somme de vérification, et de vérification si des données invalides sont lues.
  12. Procédé selon la revendication 11, dans lequel l'étape de lecture comprend en outre l'étape de conversion des ensembles de données en une image numérique en mode points, et de séparation de l'image numérique en mode points en plusieurs régions dans lesquelles une première région comprend le premier ensemble codé de données et une seconde région contient le second ensemble de données.
  13. Procédé selon la revendication 12, dans lequel la première région contient un sous-ensemble codé de données de texte (102), et l'étape de décodage comprend en outre l'étape de conversion du sous-ensemble décodé de données de texte de la première région (102) et d'un sous-ensemble de données de texte d'une seconde région (102) à un premier format de données.
  14. Procédé selon la revendication 12, dans lequel la première région comprend un sous-ensemble codé de données biométriques (101) et l'étape de décodage comprend en outre l'étape de conversion du sous-ensemble de données biométriques décodées de la première région (101) et d'un sous-ensemble de données biométriques de la seconde région (101) à un premier format de données.
  15. Procédé selon la revendication 11, dans lequel l'étape de comparaison comprend en outre l'étape de transmission du premier ensemble décodé de données et des secondes données à un système de traitement pour la détermination de l'authenticité.
  16. Système de traitement destiné à produire un ensemble unique de données lisibles par la machine destiné à être fixé sur un article à authentification automatique et spécifique du bénéficiaire, le système de traitement comprenant une voie d'entrée destinée à fonctionner pour recevoir un ensemble de données biométriques spécifiques d'un bénéficiaire, l'ensemble de données biométriques spécifiques du bénéficiaire étant formé d'au moins un sous-ensemble de données biométriques spécifiques du bénéficiaire, un dispositif de mémorisation à mémoire destiné à mémoriser plusieurs instructions de système de traitement, une unité de traitement destinée à créer l'ensemble de données lisibles par la machine destinées à être imprimées sur un article à authentification automatique spécifique du bénéficiaire par récupération et exécution d'au moins l'une des instructions de l'unité de traitement dans le dispositif de mémorisation à mémoire, l'unité de traitement étant destinée à coder un premier sous-ensemble de données biométriques spécifiques du bénéficiaire, et une voie de sortie destinée à transmettre le premier sous-ensemble codé de données biométriques spécifiques du bénéficiaire sous forme d'un ensemble de données lisibles par la machine, dans lequel l'unité de traitement est en outre destinée à configurer le premier sous-ensemble codé de données biométriques spécifiques du bénéficiaire sous forme d'un code binaire lisible optiquement formant au moins une matrice (205),
    caractérisé en ce que le système comporte en outre un dispositif destiné à chercher dans une base de données d'articles à authentification automatique produits auparavant pour la détermination du fait que l'ensemble de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire est unique, la base de données des articles à authentification automatique produits auparavant étant formée d'un ou plusieurs enregistrements, et un dispositif destiné à insérer l'ensemble de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire dans l'un au moins des enregistrements de la base de données d'articles à authentification automatique produits auparavant après détermination de l'unicité.
  17. Système de traitement selon la revendication 16, dans lequel l'unité de traitement est en outre destinée à coder sélectivement un second sous-ensemble de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire, et à combiner le second sous-ensemble codé de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire avec le premier sous-ensemble codé de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire avec formation de cette manière de l'ensemble de donnés lisibles par la machine.
  18. Système de traitement selon la revendication 17, dans lequel l'unité de traitement est en outre destinée à donner à l'ensemble de données lisibles par la machine une configuration d'un code binaire lisible optiquement formant deux matrices.
  19. Système de traitement selon la revendication 16, comprenant en outre un dispositif de comparaison du premier sous-ensemble de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire à une ou plusieurs valeurs de commande pour la détermination du fait que le premier sous-ensemble de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire est valide.
  20. Système de traitement selon la revendication 16, comprenant en outre un dispositif de production d'articles, couplé à la voie de sortie et destiné à fixer l'ensemble de données lisibles par la machine sur un article à authentification automatique spécifique du bénéficiaire.
  21. Système de traitement selon la revendication 20, dans lequel le dispositif de production d'articles comprend en outre un dispositif destiné à fixer une partie au moins de l'ensemble de données spécifiques du bénéficiaire sur l'article à authentification automatique.
  22. Système de traitement destiné à vérifier l'authenticité d'un article auto-vérificateur (104), le système de traitement comprenant une voie d'entrée destinée à recevoir un ensemble de données biométriques comprenant un premier et un second sous-ensemble de données tels que le premier sous-ensemble de données est une version codée d'un second sous-ensemble de données, la voie d'entrée comprenant un dispositif commandé par une unité de traitement et destiné à lire sélectivement la surface de l'article auto-vérificateur (104), un dispositif de mémorisation à mémoire destiné à mémoriser plusieurs instructions du système de traitement, l'unité de traitement étant destinée à vérifier l'authenticité de l'article auto-vérificateur (104) par récupération et exécution de l'une au moins des instructions d'unité de traitement depuis le dispositif de mémorisation à mémoire, l'unité de traitement étant destinée à décoder le premier sous-ensemble codé de données, caractérisé en ce que la voie d'entrée est destinée à recevoir des données de texte, dans lesquelles le premier ensemble de données biométriques est entrelacé à une copie codée des données de texte et a une configuration de matrice de données binaires lisibles optiquement par la machine, la matrice ayant une somme de vérification, et le système est destiné à détecter le fait que la matrice a été altérée par lecture de la matrice en fonction de la somme de vérification et par vérification du fait que des données invalides sont lues.
  23. Système de traitement selon la revendication 22, comprenant en outre un dispositif de comparaison du premier sous-ensemble décodé de données au second sous-ensemble de données.
  24. Unité de traitement selon la revendication 23, comprenant en outre un dispositif destiné à créer un signal de sortie indiquant l'authenticité de l'article auto-vérificateur (104).
  25. Système de traitement selon la revendication 22, dans lequel l'unité de traitement est en outre destinée à transformer l'ensemble reçu de données en une image numérique en mode points, et à séparer sélectivement l'image numérique en mode points en plusieurs régions dans lesquelles une première région contient le premier sous-ensemble codé de données et une seconde région contient le second sous-ensemble de données.
  26. Système de traitement selon la revendication 25, dans lequel la première région et la seconde région comprennent chacune un sous-ensemble de données biométriques (101) et l'unité de traitement est en outre destinée à transformer le sous-ensemble de données biométriques de la première région (101) et le sous-ensemble de données biométriques de la seconde région (101) à un premier format de données.
  27. Système de traitement selon la revendication 24, dans lequel la première région et la seconde région comprennent chacune un sous-ensemble de données de texte (102), et l'unité de traitement est en outre destinée à transformer le sous-ensemble de données de texte de la première région (102) et le sous-ensemble de données de texte de la seconde région (102) à un premier format numérique.
  28. Système de traitement selon la revendication 22, comprenant en outre un dispositif destiné à afficher le premier sous-ensemble décodé de données.
EP95928140A 1994-07-26 1995-07-26 Procedes et systemes de creation et d'authentification d'articles inalterables a auto-verification Expired - Lifetime EP0772929B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US28078594A 1994-07-26 1994-07-26
US280785 1994-07-26
PCT/US1995/009397 WO1996003821A1 (fr) 1994-07-26 1995-07-26 Procedes et systemes de creation et d'authentification d'articles inalterables a auto-verification

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0772929A1 EP0772929A1 (fr) 1997-05-14
EP0772929A4 EP0772929A4 (fr) 1998-12-02
EP0772929B1 true EP0772929B1 (fr) 2006-09-06

Family

ID=23074643

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95928140A Expired - Lifetime EP0772929B1 (fr) 1994-07-26 1995-07-26 Procedes et systemes de creation et d'authentification d'articles inalterables a auto-verification

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0772929B1 (fr)
JP (2) JPH10503609A (fr)
CN (1) CN1153402C (fr)
AT (1) ATE338988T1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2195681A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE69535212T2 (fr)
HK (1) HK1002213A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO1996003821A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE69739017D1 (de) * 1996-11-28 2008-11-13 Nec Corp Kartenartiges Registriermittel, Beglaubigungsverfahren und -vorrichtung für das Registriermittel, System zum Erzeugen eines solchen Registriermittels, Chiffriersystem und Dekodierer dazu, und Registriermittel
FI117077B (fi) * 1998-10-14 2006-05-31 Sonera Smarttrust Oy Menetelmä ja järjestelmä turvamerkinnän käyttämiseksi
DE19940341A1 (de) * 1999-08-25 2001-03-01 Kolja Vogel Verfahren zum Schutz von Daten
GB0023904D0 (en) * 2000-09-29 2000-11-15 Rue De Int Ltd Verification system and method
JP2002312579A (ja) * 2001-04-11 2002-10-25 Ufj Bank Ltd 届出処理方法、届出処理システム、口座開設方法、届出システム、届出方法、及び届出処理プログラム
CN108197470A (zh) * 2008-10-20 2018-06-22 王英 快速特征码扫描
GB2483952B (en) * 2011-04-20 2013-02-13 Howe Renovation Yorks Ltd Motor vehicle security device
CN105868192A (zh) * 2015-01-19 2016-08-17 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 一种信息校验方法及装置
JP6934231B2 (ja) * 2016-10-14 2021-09-15 アイディー メトリクス グループ インコーポレイテッド 身分証明書の改ざん検出方法
JP6803804B2 (ja) * 2017-06-05 2020-12-23 株式会社日立製作所 画像情報検証装置

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0486973A2 (fr) * 1990-11-20 1992-05-27 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Système pour la sécurité de passagers et le contrôle de bagages

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2119491A1 (de) * 1971-04-21 1972-11-09 Ostertag-Werke Ag, 7080 Aalen System zur Verteilung von Werteinheiten
US3956615A (en) * 1974-06-25 1976-05-11 Ibm Corporation Transaction execution system with secure data storage and communications
US4004089A (en) * 1975-02-28 1977-01-18 Ncr Corporation Programmable cryptic device for enciphering and deciphering data
US4016404A (en) * 1975-08-05 1977-04-05 Frank Appleton Credit card verifier
US4179686A (en) * 1976-11-03 1979-12-18 Bonicalzi Maria P System for checking the authenticity of identification papers
US4939354A (en) * 1988-05-05 1990-07-03 Datacode International, Inc. Dynamically variable machine readable binary code and method for reading and producing thereof
DE69024476T2 (de) * 1989-08-23 1996-05-23 Dainippon Printing Co Ltd System zur ausgabe von personalausweisen
GB2248360A (en) * 1990-09-25 1992-04-01 Securitag Systems Limited Card with combined video image and text
US5241600A (en) * 1991-07-16 1993-08-31 Thinking Machines Corporation Vertification system for credit or bank card or the like
US5864622A (en) * 1992-11-20 1999-01-26 Pitney Bowes Inc. Secure identification card and method and apparatus for producing and authenticating same

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0486973A2 (fr) * 1990-11-20 1992-05-27 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Système pour la sécurité de passagers et le contrôle de bagages

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
HK1002213A1 (en) 1998-08-07
CN1164306A (zh) 1997-11-05
WO1996003821A1 (fr) 1996-02-08
CA2195681A1 (fr) 1996-02-08
CN1153402C (zh) 2004-06-09
DE69535212T2 (de) 2007-08-23
DE69535212D1 (de) 2006-10-19
EP0772929A1 (fr) 1997-05-14
ATE338988T1 (de) 2006-09-15
JPH10503609A (ja) 1998-03-31
EP0772929A4 (fr) 1998-12-02
JP2006313534A (ja) 2006-11-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5984366A (en) Unalterable self-verifying articles
US6546112B1 (en) Security document with steganographically-encoded authentication data
US5841886A (en) Security system for photographic identification
EP0730243B1 (fr) Système et méthode de vérification de cartes d'identification
US5913542A (en) System for producing a personal ID card
CA2170440C (fr) Carte d'identite a auto-verification
EP0729120A2 (fr) Méthode et dispositif pour la validation de documents imprimés à partir de leur image
US20060157559A1 (en) Systems and methods for document verification
JP2006313534A (ja) 修正不可能な自己確認物品を製造しかつその真偽性を確認するための方法およびシステム
US20070078780A1 (en) Bio-conversion system for banking and merchant markets
JP2004504954A (ja) 印刷対象物と関連した適用業務の為の認証用ウォータマーク
EP1481347A2 (fr) Systemes de securite faisant appel a des permis de conduire et a d'autres documents
JP2002099209A (ja) 印刷物検証情報付加及び印刷物検証に関連する装置、システム、方法、プログラム、印刷物及び記録媒体
US20040081319A1 (en) Check verification and authentication process and apparatus
JP2010079515A (ja) 認証システム、そのシステムに用いるキー、認証方法およびプログラム
EA006012B1 (ru) Система защиты подлинности носителя печатной информации

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19970224

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19981020

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

RHK1 Main classification (correction)

Ipc: G07C 9/00

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19991229

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20041208

18RA Request filed for re-establishment of rights before grant

Effective date: 20050524

D18D Application deemed to be withdrawn (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: SIEMENS ENERGY AND AUTOMATION, INC.

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060906

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060906

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060906

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060906

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060906

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060906

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69535212

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20061019

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061206

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061206

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061217

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070219

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20070607

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20070726

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070731

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061207

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070726

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070726

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20080919

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20080715

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20080729

Year of fee payment: 14

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070726

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20100331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100202

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090726