EP0760991A1 - Identification markers and methods for forming the same - Google Patents

Identification markers and methods for forming the same

Info

Publication number
EP0760991A1
EP0760991A1 EP95919528A EP95919528A EP0760991A1 EP 0760991 A1 EP0760991 A1 EP 0760991A1 EP 95919528 A EP95919528 A EP 95919528A EP 95919528 A EP95919528 A EP 95919528A EP 0760991 A1 EP0760991 A1 EP 0760991A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
printed matter
marker
tags
characters
identification
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP95919528A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0760991B1 (en
Inventor
Peter Thomas Reid
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ALPHA SCIENTIFIC (HOLDINGS) Ltd
Original Assignee
ALPHA SCIENTIFIC (HOLDINGS) Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ALPHA SCIENTIFIC (HOLDINGS) Ltd filed Critical ALPHA SCIENTIFIC (HOLDINGS) Ltd
Publication of EP0760991A1 publication Critical patent/EP0760991A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0760991B1 publication Critical patent/EP0760991B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09FDISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; LABELS OR NAME-PLATES; SEALS
    • G09F3/00Labels, tag tickets, or similar identification or indication means; Seals; Postage or like stamps

Definitions

  • This invention relates to identification markers and their application, and particularly to such markers for products.
  • products as used herein is to be widely interpreted to include any product usefully susceptible to marking such personal property items owned by individuals and corporately, and items capable of removal as widely varied as automobiles and watches, for example, and to products comprising toxic and/or hazardous materials, for example.
  • the identification of products can be important particularly to prove ownership in the event of loss of that product through theft or accidental misplacement, for example.
  • the subsequent recovery of the product requires accurate identification of the product so that the correct product is returned to the owner. This problem is significant even where the particular item is visibly marked with a serial number or such other device since there is rarely a properly recorded serial number of individual personal property.
  • Serial number plate While the use of a Serial number plate is of limited value for indicating ownership, another method for marking a product involves physically marking a serial number on the item with an indelible ink or by engraving the serial number on the item for example.
  • Each of the foregoing techniques for property identification can be circumvented, for example, by the simple removal of the serial number or replacement of the serial number plate with another plate. The ease by which these marking systems are circumvented has created a significant problem in product recovery.
  • Another problem with the foregoing techniques for property identification is that the certain marking tag systems are inappropriate in that they may interfere with the function or even aesthetic appearance of the product. For example, an item of jewellery such as a valuable gem stone mounted in a ring setting is difficult, if not impossible, to mark with an identification system that cannot be easily circumvented.
  • tag particles each of which carrying an identical indicia.
  • These tag particles are preferably, but not necessarily, of a small miniature size and may be generally circular of no more than 1 or 2mm in diameter or strip or thread-like of no more than 1 or 2mm width, for example, and carry microscopic identification indicia.
  • the tags may be produced by any convenient method from any suitable material and may be, for example, punched, essentially as miniature particles, from a microfiche film having an identical plurality of indicia printed, or slit from an elongate film.
  • tag tags are referred to herein as "marker tags of the kind described" .
  • the tag particles may be loosely spread over and throughout the product concerned, and/or may be adhered to the product, and indeed may be applied to one or more surfaces of the item of property by being suspended in a liquid adhesive such as a lacquer for example which is then sprayed upon the relevant surface or surfaces, adhering the tag particle to those surfaces under the dried adhesive or lacquer layer.
  • tag marker is strip or thread-like it may be used specifically in this form with the product concerned, such as, for example, tear strips on wrapped products, woven into hems of cloth, and security threads in banknotes, these being formed of plastics film, for example, which may be metallised.
  • a weaknesses of any form of security labelling system is that exact copies can be made of the labels and these copies can then be used to mark items for which they were not intended in an attempt to alter or mask genuine identity of those items.
  • labels can be made in the style of legitimate labels but with different indicia and these counterfeit labels can be used in an attempt to alter or mask the identity of items.
  • an identification marker tag of the kind described including the step of slightly varying the physical characteristics of printed matter applied to the tagging particle between, or within and between, batches of the same or groups of batches of such tags.
  • the appropriate plurality of identifying indicia are produced on a computer screen which is then photographed and reduced in size to form the microfiche. Since the printing is computer generated, it is possible to impose encryption features on any or all of the characters for any particular indicia identification text, and also to produce a highly varying pattern of background printing, such as a series of rectilinear and curvilinear lines of the kind frequently used on bank notes as referred to above. It is clear that by recording the nature of the encryption and the nature of the background printing employed on every batch, it would be a relatively simple task to differentiate between counterfeit labels and legitimately produced ones. For simplicity, this recording can be held on a computer which is programmed to store a log of all labels produced with the associated encryption data.
  • Variations that are possible include the following:- a) the script size of all characters can be very slightly atypical; b) the script style of all characters can be very slightly atypical; c) the overall script can be slightly rotated from its true angle; d) a specific character may appear slightly "out of position"; e) a specific character may have a slightly atypical shape; f) a specific character may be slightly larger or smaller than usual; g) a specific character may be slightly rotated from its true angle; h) a specific character may be formed with one or more lines of a different thickness to the usual; i) a character (not necessarily alpha-numeric) may be added to the text which is generated by a random generator or by a complex algorithm so it would not be possible to anticipate which character would appear after any given string of text. j) a sub-character, such as a dot, may be added to the text in relation to one or more alpha-numeric characters, the disposition of such sub-character being made variable with respect to
  • the invention includes within its scope tagging particles made using the method hereinabove specified.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic view of a marker tag according to the invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows schematically printed matter variations in accordance with the invention.
  • Figure 1 there is shown schematically a marker tag 1, grossly enlarged, punched out from a film including microscopic identification characters 2.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates character variations for the tag of Figure 1.
  • the lower line shows encryption where:- the "A” is slightly smaller than normal the "C” is a slightly atypical shape the "*” is a non-standard character and is slightly “bolder” than normal.
  • the "*" character can in any event either be:- derived from the other characters in the indicia by a complex algorithm, or selected as a random (non- anticipatable) character.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Credit Cards Or The Like (AREA)

Abstract

A method of forming a marker tag carrying identification indicia to provide identification of products includes the steps of varying slightly the physical characteristics of printed matter applied to the marker tag during production of same.

Description

Identification Markers and Methods for forming the sane
This invention relates to identification markers and their application, and particularly to such markers for products.
It is to be understood that the expression "products" as used herein is to be widely interpreted to include any product usefully susceptible to marking such personal property items owned by individuals and corporately, and items capable of removal as widely varied as automobiles and watches, for example, and to products comprising toxic and/or hazardous materials, for example.
The identification of products can be important particularly to prove ownership in the event of loss of that product through theft or accidental misplacement, for example. The subsequent recovery of the product requires accurate identification of the product so that the correct product is returned to the owner. This problem is significant even where the particular item is visibly marked with a serial number or such other device since there is rarely a properly recorded serial number of individual personal property.
The problem is of course made much worse where the item is subject to criminal activity such as theft, particularly where commonly this will involve removal of serial number plates and even their replacement with counterfeit or even legitimate serial numbers taken from other articles. The primary purpose of this activity is to enable the thief to sell or otherwise dispose of the item. The altered serial number conceals the origin and ownership of the property.
While the use of a Serial number plate is of limited value for indicating ownership, another method for marking a product involves physically marking a serial number on the item with an indelible ink or by engraving the serial number on the item for example. Each of the foregoing techniques for property identification can be circumvented, for example, by the simple removal of the serial number or replacement of the serial number plate with another plate. The ease by which these marking systems are circumvented has created a significant problem in product recovery.
Another problem with the foregoing techniques for property identification is that the certain marking tag systems are inappropriate in that they may interfere with the function or even aesthetic appearance of the product. For example, an item of jewellery such as a valuable gem stone mounted in a ring setting is difficult, if not impossible, to mark with an identification system that cannot be easily circumvented.
Satisfactory marking of products comprising toxic and/or hazardous materials is of great importance for security and/or safety reasons, for example.
To overcome or at least reduce these problems it has been proposed to provide identification of products by means of a plurality of marker or tag particles each of which carrying an identical indicia. These tag particles are preferably, but not necessarily, of a small miniature size and may be generally circular of no more than 1 or 2mm in diameter or strip or thread-like of no more than 1 or 2mm width, for example, and carry microscopic identification indicia. The tags may be produced by any convenient method from any suitable material and may be, for example, punched, essentially as miniature particles, from a microfiche film having an identical plurality of indicia printed, or slit from an elongate film.
Such tags are referred to herein as "marker tags of the kind described" . The tag particles may be loosely spread over and throughout the product concerned, and/or may be adhered to the product, and indeed may be applied to one or more surfaces of the item of property by being suspended in a liquid adhesive such as a lacquer for example which is then sprayed upon the relevant surface or surfaces, adhering the tag particle to those surfaces under the dried adhesive or lacquer layer.
Where the tag marker is strip or thread-like it may be used specifically in this form with the product concerned, such as, for example, tear strips on wrapped products, woven into hems of cloth, and security threads in banknotes, these being formed of plastics film, for example, which may be metallised.
A weaknesses of any form of security labelling system is that exact copies can be made of the labels and these copies can then be used to mark items for which they were not intended in an attempt to alter or mask genuine identity of those items. Similarly, labels can be made in the style of legitimate labels but with different indicia and these counterfeit labels can be used in an attempt to alter or mask the identity of items. These weaknesses make it difficult to rely on any labelling system as a secure item identification system.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome or at least significantly reduce the above-mentioned problems.
In accordance with the invention there is provided a method of forming an identification marker tag of the kind described including the step of slightly varying the physical characteristics of printed matter applied to the tagging particle between, or within and between, batches of the same or groups of batches of such tags.
By means of the invention it is possible to ensure that every particular batch of tag particles is sufficiently different from any other batch of tag particles, in a known way, so that, by microscopic examination all batches can be differentiated between those produced by a counterfeiter, so that counterfeit tagging particles can clearly be identified in a manner readily provable in a court of law.
In addition to varying the printing of the appropriate indicia on the tag particles, it is also possible within the scope of the invention to provide a printed background, spread, in formation of the tag particles, across a number of similar particles so that no two tagging particles will be identical even within a single batch because of variation in background printing. Where the tagging particles are punched from a prepared sheet carrying a plurality of the appropriate identifying indicia of microscopic size, such background printing can extend across the total microfiche with random variation in direction, curve, and in any other way desired.
In one manner of formation of a film from which the tagging particles are punched, the appropriate plurality of identifying indicia are produced on a computer screen which is then photographed and reduced in size to form the microfiche. Since the printing is computer generated, it is possible to impose encryption features on any or all of the characters for any particular indicia identification text, and also to produce a highly varying pattern of background printing, such as a series of rectilinear and curvilinear lines of the kind frequently used on bank notes as referred to above. It is clear that by recording the nature of the encryption and the nature of the background printing employed on every batch, it would be a relatively simple task to differentiate between counterfeit labels and legitimately produced ones. For simplicity, this recording can be held on a computer which is programmed to store a log of all labels produced with the associated encryption data.
Variations that are possible include the following:- a) the script size of all characters can be very slightly atypical; b) the script style of all characters can be very slightly atypical; c) the overall script can be slightly rotated from its true angle; d) a specific character may appear slightly "out of position"; e) a specific character may have a slightly atypical shape; f) a specific character may be slightly larger or smaller than usual; g) a specific character may be slightly rotated from its true angle; h) a specific character may be formed with one or more lines of a different thickness to the usual; i) a character (not necessarily alpha-numeric) may be added to the text which is generated by a random generator or by a complex algorithm so it would not be possible to anticipate which character would appear after any given string of text. j) a sub-character, such as a dot, may be added to the text in relation to one or more alpha-numeric characters, the disposition of such sub-character being made variable with respect to its related character.
It will be appreciated that with c-.e or all of the above features varied between batches, and with the certainty of being able to identify which features were varied in which way with any particular batch, counterfeit tagging particles can clearly be identified from this.
In addition computer or alternatively generated background printing of the kind herein described, leads to every single tagging particles produced, even within the same batch, being unique and different from all others, so that any exact copy by a counterfeiter of any one genuine tagging particle would clearly be shown to be counterfeit since no two legitimate particles could be identical. Similarly any attempt by a counterfeiter to provide background printing would inevitably show differences from all genuine tagging particles.
It will be appreciated that changes to the configuration of the text and printing, and background printing can be made from one batch of tagging particles to the next, whilst always the legitimate tagging particles can, batch by batch, clearly be identified by the legitimate producers.
The invention includes within its scope tagging particles made using the method hereinabove specified.
One example of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawing in which : -
Figure 1 is a schematic view of a marker tag according to the invention; and
Figure 2 shows schematically printed matter variations in accordance with the invention.
In Figure 1 there is shown schematically a marker tag 1, grossly enlarged, punched out from a film including microscopic identification characters 2.
Figure 2 illustrates character variations for the tag of Figure 1.
In Figure 2 the top line shows the characters as "normally" produced.
The lower line shows encryption where:- the "A" is slightly smaller than normal the "C" is a slightly atypical shape the "*" is a non-standard character and is slightly "bolder" than normal.
The "*" character can in any event either be:- derived from the other characters in the indicia by a complex algorithm, or selected as a random (non- anticipatable) character.
It is to be understood that the foregoing is merely exemplary of tagging devices and methods of forming the same in accordance with the invention and that modifications can readily be made thereto without departing from the true scope of the invention, thus the invention may be applied generally to multiple labelling systems where a plurality of similar or identical labels are produced which contain the same code or indicia whether or not the labels are miniature and the code or indicia are microscopic.

Claims

1. A method of forming an identification marker tag carrying identification indicia to provide identification of products including the steps of varying slightly the physical characteristics of printed matter applied to the marker tag during production of same.
2. The method as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the physical characteristics of printed matter are applied to the marker tag between, or within and between, batches of the same or groups of batches of such tags.
3. The method as claimed in Claim 1 or 2 wherein the marker tags are of miniature dimensions and the printed matter applied thereto is of a microscopic size.
4. A method as claimed in Claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein the marker tags are effectively two-dimensional dot-like items.
5. A method as claimed in Claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein the tags are in the form of miniature strips or threads.
6. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims including applying a printed background on the tag marker to the printed matter applied thereto, the printed background being spread, in formation of the marker tags, across a number of similar tags whereby no tags will be identical.
7. The method as claimed in any on of the preceding Claims wherein the marker tags are punched or cut from a film of material produced by photography from a computer screen on which the printed matter are computer generated, or from any other computer generated output, such computer generation facilitating variations in inscription features in the printed matter and a varying pattern of background printing.
8. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein the size of at least one of the characters in the printed matter is varied slightly from its norm.
9. The method as claimed in any on of the preceding Claims wherein the style of at least one of the characters in the printed matter is varied slightly from its norm.
10. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein at least one of the characters in the printed matter is slightly rotated from its true alignment.
11. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein at least one of the characters in the printed matter is displaced slightly from its natural position.
12. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein at least one of the characters in the printed matter is formed with one or more lines having a different thickness to that normally provided.
13. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding Claims wherein a surplus character is added to the printed matter on a random basis.
14. An identification marker tag carrying identification indicia to provide identification of products, the physical characteristics of printed matter applied to the marker tag being varied during production of same.
EP95919528A 1994-05-21 1995-05-22 Identification markers and methods for forming the same Expired - Lifetime EP0760991B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9410196 1994-05-21
GB9410196A GB9410196D0 (en) 1994-05-21 1994-05-21 Identification markers and methods for forming the same
PCT/GB1995/001156 WO1995032490A1 (en) 1994-05-21 1995-05-22 Identification markers and methods for forming the same

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0760991A1 true EP0760991A1 (en) 1997-03-12
EP0760991B1 EP0760991B1 (en) 1999-05-06

Family

ID=10755495

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95919528A Expired - Lifetime EP0760991B1 (en) 1994-05-21 1995-05-22 Identification markers and methods for forming the same

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0760991B1 (en)
AU (1) AU2531595A (en)
DE (1) DE69509521D1 (en)
GB (1) GB9410196D0 (en)
WO (1) WO1995032490A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9820672D0 (en) * 1998-09-24 1998-11-18 Alpha Scient Holdings Ltd Security marker
EP1216758A1 (en) 2000-11-17 2002-06-26 McLaws, Brent D. Identifier label application system
AU2002367316A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-24 F. Charles Baggeroer Security printing apparatus and method
DE102014005801A1 (en) * 2014-04-15 2015-10-15 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Numbered data carriers and methods for their production

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1095286A (en) * 1963-07-08 1967-12-13 Portals Ltd Security device for use in security papers
US3772200A (en) * 1971-04-30 1973-11-13 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Method of tagging with microparticles
US4053433A (en) * 1975-02-19 1977-10-11 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Method of tagging with color-coded microparticles
CA1056653A (en) * 1975-11-10 1979-06-19 Edward J. Stevens Color-coded identifier microparticles
US4243734A (en) * 1978-07-10 1981-01-06 Dillon George A Micro-dot identification
US4390452A (en) * 1979-08-20 1983-06-28 Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company Microparticles with visual identifying means
GB8410918D0 (en) * 1984-04-27 1984-06-06 De La Rue Thomas & Co Ltd Numbered documents
IT1222851B (en) * 1987-10-08 1990-09-12 Mantegazza A Arti Grafici MAGNETICALLY DETECTABLE IDENTIFICATION CODE TO MARK PRODUCTS, DOCUMENTS AND SIMILAR
US5429392A (en) * 1993-06-18 1995-07-04 Loving; Charles D. Composite microdot and method

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9532490A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB9410196D0 (en) 1994-07-13
AU2531595A (en) 1995-12-18
EP0760991B1 (en) 1999-05-06
DE69509521D1 (en) 1999-06-10
WO1995032490A1 (en) 1995-11-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3412493A (en) Tamper-proof record structure
JP5463519B2 (en) Unique label stored by optical device, method for producing unique label, method for verifying uniqueness of product with unique label, and method for using unique label
US3833395A (en) Continuous form computer print-out document protection system
US4336754A (en) Property identification system
CZ200353A3 (en) Optical structure
WO1993018924A1 (en) Holographic signature panel and holographic bank draft
JPH04212984A (en) Hologram product having discontinuous metal part including alphanumeric shape
DE60230445D1 (en) RECORDING MATERIAL WITH FAKE PROTECTION
WO1996003714A1 (en) Procedure for identification of objects based on forming and verifying their surface roughness as well as objects suitable to be identified
US3545380A (en) Identification and printing device with fraud preventing means
US5020831A (en) Imprinted product with tamperproof seal method of producing product
US20030107639A1 (en) Process for printing a fluorescent security feature on identification cards and cards produced therefrom
CN100442325C (en) Two-part security sticker and document system therefor
WO2004029915A1 (en) Holographic bar code compound label and making process thereof
JP2009109703A (en) Two-layer concealing label with discrimination function for opening
US4816322A (en) Anticounterfeit metallized labels
EP0760991B1 (en) Identification markers and methods for forming the same
AU2004227545B2 (en) Security arrangement
RU2220449C1 (en) Method and label for labeling items with aid of set of labels
JP2013508205A (en) Counterfeit proof license plate with hologram to be stamped
US9248673B2 (en) Counterfeit-resistant labels and method
CN2552093Y (en) Transfer anti-forge identifying sign
US4816321A (en) Anticounterfeit metallized labels
GB2278098A (en) Anti-theft labels
JP2017156947A (en) Matrix-type two-dimensional code and method for manufacturing the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19961209

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19970730

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19990506

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19990506

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19990506

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19990506

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69509521

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19990610

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19990807

EN Fr: translation not filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20000821

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010522

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20010522