EP0760875A1 - Improved track control mat and method of making the same - Google Patents

Improved track control mat and method of making the same

Info

Publication number
EP0760875A1
EP0760875A1 EP94916596A EP94916596A EP0760875A1 EP 0760875 A1 EP0760875 A1 EP 0760875A1 EP 94916596 A EP94916596 A EP 94916596A EP 94916596 A EP94916596 A EP 94916596A EP 0760875 A1 EP0760875 A1 EP 0760875A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
track control
washable
denier
yam
mat
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP94916596A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0760875B1 (en
EP0760875A4 (en
Inventor
John S. Combs
Michael Mchargue
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
KLEENTEX INDUSTRIES Inc
Original Assignee
KLEENTEX INDUSTRIES Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by KLEENTEX INDUSTRIES Inc filed Critical KLEENTEX INDUSTRIES Inc
Priority to DK94916596T priority Critical patent/DK0760875T3/en
Publication of EP0760875A4 publication Critical patent/EP0760875A4/en
Publication of EP0760875A1 publication Critical patent/EP0760875A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0760875B1 publication Critical patent/EP0760875B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D05SEWING; EMBROIDERING; TUFTING
    • D05CEMBROIDERING; TUFTING
    • D05C17/00Embroidered or tufted products; Base fabrics specially adapted for embroidered work; Inserts for producing surface irregularities in embroidered products
    • D05C17/02Tufted products
    • D05C17/026Tufted products characterised by the tufted pile surface
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D02YARNS; MECHANICAL FINISHING OF YARNS OR ROPES; WARPING OR BEAMING
    • D02GCRIMPING OR CURLING FIBRES, FILAMENTS, THREADS, OR YARNS; YARNS OR THREADS
    • D02G3/00Yarns or threads, e.g. fancy yarns; Processes or apparatus for the production thereof, not otherwise provided for
    • D02G3/44Yarns or threads characterised by the purpose for which they are designed
    • D02G3/445Yarns or threads for use in floor fabrics

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to carpet, and more particularly relates to an improved carpet with coarse and fine fibers, and a process for making the same.
  • the carpet when used as a mat, removes large and small dirt particles from footwear due to improved grit and particulate gripping and moisture absorbing capabilities.
  • carpets are manufactured generally by feeding yarn from spools through needles into a substrate. This process is known in the art as "tufting.” The type of yarn, length of needle, the needle spacing, and whether the yarn is looped or cut are just a few factors that relate to the final carpet product and its intended use.
  • This invention relates to carpet that is manufactured for use in making mats, such as welcome mats or "track control" mats as they are known in the industry.
  • track control mats are placed at or near an entrance of a house or other building to remove dirt, moisture or other matter from the bottom of the shoes, and conveyances (such as grocery carts and dollies) used by persons entering the building.
  • conveyances such as grocery carts and dollies
  • the wiping action should occur as the result of normal walking of one or two steps on the mat before the persons walk through the interior of the building.
  • the mats To prevent dirt and moisture from being tracked from outside throughout the interior of the building, the mats must not only have the ability to remove moisture and dirt from footwear, but also to store the dirt and moisture within the body of the mat. If a mat does not effectively store the dirt and moisture within the mat, and leaves the dirt and moisture on the surface of the mat, the dirt and moisture will re-attach or stick to the bottom of footwear of other persons who subsequently walk on the mat. Dirt and moisture which re-attaches or sticks in this manner will then be tracked throughout the building, a condition known in the art as "re-tracking".
  • Some types of track control mats are made of a combination of coarse and fine fibers or filaments (hereinafter collectively referred to as "fibers"). These mats have been widely used in the past for the purpose of removing soil, moisture and other matter from a person's shoes or outer footwear.
  • the coarse fibers help to remove large particles of dirt and the fine fibers help to remove the fine particulate and moisture. There should be sufficient space between fibers to temporarily hold dirt and moisture to prevent re-tracking.
  • mats if a mat will be Because of the desirability for periodic washings, mats should be manufactured in a manner that will withstand continued exposure to washing and drying. The materials used to make the mat should be able to withstand elevated temperatures in both the washing and drying processes. In addition, mats should be constructed so that the tufts do not separate from the backing during the cleaning process. Adhesion of the tufts to the carpet backing is known as "tuft lock.” Many commercially available track control mats at present exhibit poor tuft lock and, as a result, are ineffective for reuse after washing.
  • the concentrated areas of stiff fibers exhibits poor tuft lock and become dislodged from the track control mat during use as well as during washing and drying. Moreover, the concentrated areas of stiff fibers, described in Breens et al., tend to lie down against the backing. Conversely, if the mat were manufactured to provide sufficient stability for the coarse fibers, the fine fibers exposed to significant moisture, the mat may be designed to contain a greater number of fine fibers to absorb and hold the moisture within its recesses. On the other hand, a mat that may be exposed to a significant amount of large particles of dirt may need to have a greater number of coarse fibers.
  • the degree of coarseness or fineness of a fiber is measured by its denier.
  • the term "denier” refers to the weight in grams for a 9,000 meter fiber.
  • a coarse fiber or filament for use in track control mats typically ranges in denier from 100 to 2,000 denier per filament ("dpf"); and fine fibers for the same application typically range from 15 to 100 dpf.
  • the backing is typically a plastic or rubber material that is melted or vulcanized and applied to the substrate. In this state, the backing bonds the tufts to the substrate. would have to be so densely tufted to support the coarse fibers inserted therein that the mat would be completely ineffective in retaining dirt or moisture.
  • the '566 and '333 patents teach that the coarse fibers should be separated from the fine fibers, typically to form a striped or checkerboard arrangement between the two types of fibers. While this type of track control mat may be effective at removing and storing dirt and other particles from the bottoms of shoes, the coarse fibers tend to become dislodged during use or washing of the mat because they are not adequately secured to the mat backing.
  • the tuft lock for these fibers is poor because when the coarse fibers are bonded to the backing at separate locations from the fine fibers, the coarse fibers do not bond well by themselves to the backing. Thus, when the mat is used and washed, many of the coarse fibers become dislodged from the backing. This renders the mat less effective in dirt and moisture removal and storage after a short period of time.
  • the '566 patent also describes a mat made with at least some crimped coarse fibers.
  • Mats manufactured in accordance with the '566 patent are extremely difficult to manufacture because the crimped fibers kink up as they are fed through the tufting needles which causes the fibers to eventually break. This requires the entire process to be shut down, the needles rethreaded and the process restarted.
  • the continuous kinking and ultimate breakage of the crimped coarse fibers results in a poor quality mat having many broken coarse fibers and many unattractive knots where the crimped fibers had to be reknotted or spliced to continue the tufting process.
  • the frequent breakage of the crimped coarse fibers results in a significant decrease in productivity.
  • the '333 patent describes a mat made with at least one looped, uncrimped, coarse fiber. While mats made in accordance with the '333 patent do not have some of the above- identified problems associated with crimped fibers, it has been found that looped pile mats are less effective in dirt removal.
  • the term "pile" refers to the surface appearance of the ca ⁇ et or mat. Ca ⁇ et pile is either cut or looped. Mats having looped pile are difficult to clean and remove the dirt held therein. Thus, after a period of time, the mats having looped pile become less effective at dirt removal and storage. Accordingly, there is a need for a washable track control mat made of varied denier fibers that is effective in removing and storing large and small dirt particles, moisture and other matter.
  • washable track control mat that exhibits good tuft-lock so that the tufted fibers do not separate from the backing.
  • washable track control mat made of varied denier fibers wherein the coarse, high denier fibers will not separate from the backing after use or when subjected to commercial washing and drying.
  • an effective washable track control mat made with reduced yarn processing costs There is yet a further need for an effective washable track control mat made with reduced yarn processing costs.
  • the present invention overcomes these and other disadvantages associated with prior art track control mats.
  • the present invention provides a washable track control mat comprising tufts with at least one tuft being made of a yarn that is made of at least one fine denier fiber and at least one coarse denier fiber.
  • the yarn is made by twisting together the coarse denier fiber with the fine denier fiber.
  • the mat includes a substrate for receiving the tufts. The tufts in the substrate are bonded to a backing.
  • the present invention also is directed to a method for manufacturing a washable track control mat.
  • the method includes twisting together at least one coarse denier fiber with at least one fine denier fiber to create a yarn.
  • the method also includes tufting the yam through a substrate and bonding the tufts to the substrate.
  • Fig. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of a washable track control mat of the present invention made with single yarn tufts; and Fig. 2 is a perspective view of a double-ply yam that may be used in the manufacture of the present invention.
  • Fig. 1 shows a side view of a portion of a track control mat 10.
  • the mat 10 is made of a plurality of tufts 12.
  • the tufts 12 each include a yam 14 made of a plurality of fine fibers 16 and one coarse fiber 18.
  • the coarse fiber 18 is preferably made of nylon or polyester.
  • the tufts 12 are secured to a substrate 20 by means of a backing 22.
  • the backing 22 bonds the tufted yams 14 to the substrate 20.
  • the backing 22 is preferably vulcanized rubber.
  • the mat 10 is made by first manufacturing the yam 14 used in the tufting process.
  • the yam 14, as shown in Fig. 2 is made of a plurality of fine fibers 16 twisted with one or more coarse fibers 18.
  • the denier range for the fine fibers 16 is preferably between 20 and 24, and the denier range for the coarse fibers 18 is 300-600. It is preferable that one coarse fiber 18 is used with a plurality of fine fibers 16 in each yam 14.
  • the preferred weight ratio of fine fibers 16 to coarse fibers 18 is 20- 24% to 76-80%, respectively.
  • the fine fibers 16 are twisted with the coarse fiber 18 to form a single-ply yam 14.
  • the twist of the fine fibers 16 enables the fine fibers to stand up better when they are tufted into the substrate 20.
  • the twist of the fine fibers 16 help to support the coarse fiber 18 within the body of the yam 14 so that the coarse fiber does not lie down when the mat 10 is finished. It is preferred that the yam 14 be twisted 5 to 6 turns per inch.
  • the yam 14 may be heat treated to set the twist in the fine fibers 16.
  • Some of the preferred fine fibers 16 used in the yam 14 are made of non-heatset materials and do not need to be heat treated. Thus, the heat treatment of the yam 14 after twisting is optional.
  • a plurality of yams 14 or "plies" may be used in the manufacture of the mat 10 of the present invention.
  • Fig. 2 shows two single-ply yams 14 being twisted together to form a double or two-ply yam 24.
  • the number of plies affects the resultant mat product 10, along with other factors discussed in detail below.
  • the yam 14 is twisted and heat treated, if desired, and twisted with another yam, if desired, the yam is wound on spools and fed into tufting needles of a tufting machine where the tufts 12 of the mat 10 are formed into the substrate 20, shown in Fig 1.
  • the tufting machine cuts the tufts at the desired length.
  • the tuft length or pile height preferably ranges from 1/4 to 3/4 inches.
  • the needles in the tufting machine may be arranged to alter the density of the mat 10. The distance between needles or "gauge" should preferably range from 5/32 to 3/16 inches.
  • the needles make between 5 to 7 stitches per inch for a 5/32 inch gauge and between 5 to 8 stitches per inch for a 3/16 gauge.
  • the particular dimensions specified herein provides a mat 10 with sufficient numbers of voids 26 between the tufts 12 to receive and store dirt and moisture in sufficient volumes required of an effective track control mat.
  • the resultant mat 10 will vary in weight for a fixed length of ca ⁇ et as a result of the different variables discussed above. It is preferred that the resultant mat 10 weigh between 16 to 24 ounces per square yard prior to the application of any backing 22.
  • the mat 10 is moved from the tufting machines to an area where the backing 22 is applied to the to bond the tufts 12 to the substrate 20.
  • the backing 22 holds the individual tufts 12 to the substrate 20 and is machine washable. This feature enables the mat 10 to be subjected to commercial washing without degradation of the tufts 12.
  • a backing 22 made of mbber is also skid resistant and prevents the mat 10 from moving around once it is placed on the floor.
  • the first test involved washing a first mat made in accordance with the present invention and a second mat made pursuant to the disclosure in the '566 and '333 patents. Both mats were washed twenty (20) times. A visual comparison was made of the two mats.
  • the mat made in accordance with the teachings of the present invention showed no significant loss of coarse or fine fiber.
  • the mat made in accordance with the '566 and '333 patents showed significant loss of coarse fiber. This test demonstrates the capability of the present invention to achieve effective tuft-lock and maintain such tuft-lock after many washings.
  • the second test was related to analytically determining the effectiveness of the tuft-lock of the present invention.
  • Applicant compared the fiber loss of mat samples made in accordance with the present invention (set 1) with those made in accordance with the '566 and '333 patents (set 2). Both sets of samples were bone dried and weighed, then soaked with water, hung and allowed to drip dry for five (5) minutes. Both sets were then abraded for 2,500 cycles on a U.S. Testing Abrasion Tester. After being abraded, both sets were bone dried and weighed again. Set 1 showed a loss of 0.555 grams. Set 2 showed a loss of 2.094 grams.
  • the significant fiber loss of the mats made in accordance with the '566 and '333 patents further demonstrates the effectiveness of the tuft lock achieved with the mats made pursuant to the present invention.

Abstract

An improved, washable track control mat (10) made of varied denier fibers and method of making the same. The mat (10) is made by first making yarn (14) made of fine (16) and coarse (18) denier fibers. The fibers (16, 18) are twisted together. More than one yarn (14) may be twisted together. The yarn or yarns (14) may be heat treated. The yarn or yarns (14) are then fed into a tufting machine where tufts (12) of varied denier fibers are held within a substrate (20). The tufts (12) are bonded to the substrate (20) by a backing (22), preferably rubber.

Description

"IMPROVED TRACK CONTROL MAT AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME"
Technical Field
The present invention relates generally to carpet, and more particularly relates to an improved carpet with coarse and fine fibers, and a process for making the same. The carpet, when used as a mat, removes large and small dirt particles from footwear due to improved grit and particulate gripping and moisture absorbing capabilities.
Background of the Invention
Many different carpets exist for varied purposes. Carpets are manufactured generally by feeding yarn from spools through needles into a substrate. This process is known in the art as "tufting." The type of yarn, length of needle, the needle spacing, and whether the yarn is looped or cut are just a few factors that relate to the final carpet product and its intended use. This invention relates to carpet that is manufactured for use in making mats, such as welcome mats or "track control" mats as they are known in the industry.
Typically, track control mats are placed at or near an entrance of a house or other building to remove dirt, moisture or other matter from the bottom of the shoes, and conveyances (such as grocery carts and dollies) used by persons entering the building. The wiping action should occur as the result of normal walking of one or two steps on the mat before the persons walk through the interior of the building.
To prevent dirt and moisture from being tracked from outside throughout the interior of the building, the mats must not only have the ability to remove moisture and dirt from footwear, but also to store the dirt and moisture within the body of the mat. If a mat does not effectively store the dirt and moisture within the mat, and leaves the dirt and moisture on the surface of the mat, the dirt and moisture will re-attach or stick to the bottom of footwear of other persons who subsequently walk on the mat. Dirt and moisture which re-attaches or sticks in this manner will then be tracked throughout the building, a condition known in the art as "re-tracking".
Some types of track control mats are made of a combination of coarse and fine fibers or filaments (hereinafter collectively referred to as "fibers"). These mats have been widely used in the past for the purpose of removing soil, moisture and other matter from a person's shoes or outer footwear. The coarse fibers help to remove large particles of dirt and the fine fibers help to remove the fine particulate and moisture. There should be sufficient space between fibers to temporarily hold dirt and moisture to prevent re-tracking.
The intended use of a mat relates to the manner in which the mat is constructed. For example, if a mat will be Because of the desirability for periodic washings, mats should be manufactured in a manner that will withstand continued exposure to washing and drying. The materials used to make the mat should be able to withstand elevated temperatures in both the washing and drying processes. In addition, mats should be constructed so that the tufts do not separate from the backing during the cleaning process. Adhesion of the tufts to the carpet backing is known as "tuft lock." Many commercially available track control mats at present exhibit poor tuft lock and, as a result, are ineffective for reuse after washing.
Other types of track control mats already exist. In United States Patent No. 4,045,605 ("the '605 patent") issued to Breens et al., coarse and fine fibers are used to create one type of track control mat. Breens et al. describes consecutively feeding coarse and fine fibers into the tufting machine from two separate sources. In addition, according to Breens et al., the coarse and fine fibers can be alternately fed to the tufting machine to create alternating areas of course and fine fibers on the mat. While this type of track control mat appears to be effective in removing undesirable dirt and other particles from footwear, it is susceptible to wear out in a short period of time. The concentrated areas of stiff fibers exhibits poor tuft lock and become dislodged from the track control mat during use as well as during washing and drying. Moreover, the concentrated areas of stiff fibers, described in Breens et al., tend to lie down against the backing. Conversely, if the mat were manufactured to provide sufficient stability for the coarse fibers, the fine fibers exposed to significant moisture, the mat may be designed to contain a greater number of fine fibers to absorb and hold the moisture within its recesses. On the other hand, a mat that may be exposed to a significant amount of large particles of dirt may need to have a greater number of coarse fibers.
The degree of coarseness or fineness of a fiber is measured by its denier. The term "denier" refers to the weight in grams for a 9,000 meter fiber. A coarse fiber or filament for use in track control mats typically ranges in denier from 100 to 2,000 denier per filament ("dpf"); and fine fibers for the same application typically range from 15 to 100 dpf.
Commercial and public buildings receive large volumes of pedestrian traffic. As a result, the mats in these buildings should be able to remove and store large quantities of dirt and moisture on a daily basis. For continuously effective dirt removal, most mats should be cleaned periodically so that the dirt and moisture stored within the mat are removed. The most effective way to clean mats is to wash them. Some mats cannot be washed due to the types of materials used and method employed in manufacturing the mat. Mats that cannot be washed and reused have a limited effectiveness or lifetime.
Most track control mats are made with a backing that holds the tufts in place relative to the substrate. The backing is typically a plastic or rubber material that is melted or vulcanized and applied to the substrate. In this state, the backing bonds the tufts to the substrate. would have to be so densely tufted to support the coarse fibers inserted therein that the mat would be completely ineffective in retaining dirt or moisture.
United States Patent Nos. 4,820,566 ("the '566 patent") and 5,055,333 ("the '333 patent"), both issued to Heine et al., also describe the use of a mixture of fine and coarse fibers tufted to form a track control mat. The '566 and '333 patents teach that the coarse fibers should be separated from the fine fibers, typically to form a striped or checkerboard arrangement between the two types of fibers. While this type of track control mat may be effective at removing and storing dirt and other particles from the bottoms of shoes, the coarse fibers tend to become dislodged during use or washing of the mat because they are not adequately secured to the mat backing. The tuft lock for these fibers is poor because when the coarse fibers are bonded to the backing at separate locations from the fine fibers, the coarse fibers do not bond well by themselves to the backing. Thus, when the mat is used and washed, many of the coarse fibers become dislodged from the backing. This renders the mat less effective in dirt and moisture removal and storage after a short period of time.
The '566 patent also describes a mat made with at least some crimped coarse fibers. Mats manufactured in accordance with the '566 patent are extremely difficult to manufacture because the crimped fibers kink up as they are fed through the tufting needles which causes the fibers to eventually break. This requires the entire process to be shut down, the needles rethreaded and the process restarted. The continuous kinking and ultimate breakage of the crimped coarse fibers results in a poor quality mat having many broken coarse fibers and many unattractive knots where the crimped fibers had to be reknotted or spliced to continue the tufting process. The frequent breakage of the crimped coarse fibers results in a significant decrease in productivity. In addition, mats using crimped fibers are also more expensive to manufacture due to the added process cost of crimping the fiber. The '333 patent describes a mat made with at least one looped, uncrimped, coarse fiber. While mats made in accordance with the '333 patent do not have some of the above- identified problems associated with crimped fibers, it has been found that looped pile mats are less effective in dirt removal. The term "pile" refers to the surface appearance of the caφet or mat. Caφet pile is either cut or looped. Mats having looped pile are difficult to clean and remove the dirt held therein. Thus, after a period of time, the mats having looped pile become less effective at dirt removal and storage. Accordingly, there is a need for a washable track control mat made of varied denier fibers that is effective in removing and storing large and small dirt particles, moisture and other matter.
There is a further need for a washable track control mat that exhibits good tuft-lock so that the tufted fibers do not separate from the backing. There is still a further need for a washable track control mat made of varied denier fibers wherein the coarse, high denier fibers will not separate from the backing after use or when subjected to commercial washing and drying. There is yet a further need for an effective washable track control mat made with reduced yarn processing costs.
There is yet a further need for a method of manufacturing a washable track control mat made of varied denier fibers wherein the mat is effective in removing and storing large and small dirt particles, moisture and other matter.
There is a further need for a method of manufacturing a washable track control mat that exhibits good tuft-lock so that the tufted fibers do not separate from the backing. There is still a further need for a method of manufacturing a washable track control mat made of varied denier fibers wherein the coarse, high denier fibers will not separate from the backing after use or when subjected to commercial washing and drying. There is yet an even further need for a method of manufacturing a washable track control mat where yarn processing costs are reduced.
Summary of the Invention As will be seen, the present invention overcomes these and other disadvantages associated with prior art track control mats. Stated generally, the present invention provides a washable track control mat comprising tufts with at least one tuft being made of a yarn that is made of at least one fine denier fiber and at least one coarse denier fiber. The yarn is made by twisting together the coarse denier fiber with the fine denier fiber. The mat includes a substrate for receiving the tufts. The tufts in the substrate are bonded to a backing.
The present invention also is directed to a method for manufacturing a washable track control mat. The method includes twisting together at least one coarse denier fiber with at least one fine denier fiber to create a yarn. The method also includes tufting the yam through a substrate and bonding the tufts to the substrate.
Thus, it is an object of the present to provide a washable track control mat made of varied denier fibers that is effective in removing and storing large and small dirt particles, moisture and other matter.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a washable track control mat that exhibits good tuft-lock so that the tufted fibers do not separate from the backing. It is a further object of the present invention to provide a washable track control mat made of varied denier fibers wherein the coarse, high denier fibers will not separate from the backing after use or when subjected to commercial washing and drying. It is a further object of the present invention to provide an effective, washable track control mat with reduced yarn processing costs. It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a method of manufacturing a washable track control mat made of varied denier fibers wherein the mat is effective in removing and storing large and small dirt particles, moisture and other matter.
It is yet an even further object of the present invention to provide for a method of manufacturing a washable track control mat that exhibits good tuft-lock so that the tufted fibers do not separate from the backing. It is still a further object of the present invention to provide a method of manufacturing a washable track control mat made of varied denier fibers wherein the coarse, high denier fibers will not separate from the backing after use or when subjected to commercial washing and drying. It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a method of manufacturing a washable track control mat where yarn processing costs are reduced.
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon reading the following specification taken in conjunction with the drawings and appended claims.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Fig. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of a washable track control mat of the present invention made with single yarn tufts; and Fig. 2 is a perspective view of a double-ply yam that may be used in the manufacture of the present invention.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments Referring now to the drawings in which like numerals indicate like elements throughout the several views, Fig. 1 shows a side view of a portion of a track control mat 10. The mat 10 is made of a plurality of tufts 12. The tufts 12 each include a yam 14 made of a plurality of fine fibers 16 and one coarse fiber 18. The coarse fiber 18 is preferably made of nylon or polyester. The tufts 12 are secured to a substrate 20 by means of a backing 22. The backing 22 bonds the tufted yams 14 to the substrate 20. The backing 22 is preferably vulcanized rubber.
The mat 10 is made by first manufacturing the yam 14 used in the tufting process. The yam 14, as shown in Fig. 2, is made of a plurality of fine fibers 16 twisted with one or more coarse fibers 18. The denier range for the fine fibers 16 is preferably between 20 and 24, and the denier range for the coarse fibers 18 is 300-600. It is preferable that one coarse fiber 18 is used with a plurality of fine fibers 16 in each yam 14. The preferred weight ratio of fine fibers 16 to coarse fibers 18 is 20- 24% to 76-80%, respectively.
The fine fibers 16 are twisted with the coarse fiber 18 to form a single-ply yam 14. The twist of the fine fibers 16 enables the fine fibers to stand up better when they are tufted into the substrate 20. Moreover, the twist of the fine fibers 16 help to support the coarse fiber 18 within the body of the yam 14 so that the coarse fiber does not lie down when the mat 10 is finished. It is preferred that the yam 14 be twisted 5 to 6 turns per inch.
Once the yam 14 is twisted, it may be heat treated to set the twist in the fine fibers 16. Some of the preferred fine fibers 16 used in the yam 14 are made of non-heatset materials and do not need to be heat treated. Thus, the heat treatment of the yam 14 after twisting is optional.
It has been found that a plurality of yams 14 or "plies" may be used in the manufacture of the mat 10 of the present invention. Fig. 2 shows two single-ply yams 14 being twisted together to form a double or two-ply yam 24. The number of plies affects the resultant mat product 10, along with other factors discussed in detail below.
After the yam 14 is twisted and heat treated, if desired, and twisted with another yam, if desired, the yam is wound on spools and fed into tufting needles of a tufting machine where the tufts 12 of the mat 10 are formed into the substrate 20, shown in Fig 1. After the tufts 12 are formed, the tufting machine cuts the tufts at the desired length. In the present invention, the tuft length or pile height preferably ranges from 1/4 to 3/4 inches. Moreover, the needles in the tufting machine may be arranged to alter the density of the mat 10. The distance between needles or "gauge" should preferably range from 5/32 to 3/16 inches. In addition, the number of stitches each needle makes per inch impacts the final product of the mat 10. It is preferred that the needles make between 5 to 7 stitches per inch for a 5/32 inch gauge and between 5 to 8 stitches per inch for a 3/16 gauge. The particular dimensions specified herein provides a mat 10 with sufficient numbers of voids 26 between the tufts 12 to receive and store dirt and moisture in sufficient volumes required of an effective track control mat. The resultant mat 10 will vary in weight for a fixed length of caφet as a result of the different variables discussed above. It is preferred that the resultant mat 10 weigh between 16 to 24 ounces per square yard prior to the application of any backing 22. Once the yam 14 has been fed through the tufting needles and into the substrate 20, the mat 10 is moved from the tufting machines to an area where the backing 22 is applied to the to bond the tufts 12 to the substrate 20. The backing 22 holds the individual tufts 12 to the substrate 20 and is machine washable. This feature enables the mat 10 to be subjected to commercial washing without degradation of the tufts 12. A backing 22 made of mbber is also skid resistant and prevents the mat 10 from moving around once it is placed on the floor.
Applicant has conducted two tests to determine the effectiveness of the tuft-lock of mats made in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. The first test involved washing a first mat made in accordance with the present invention and a second mat made pursuant to the disclosure in the '566 and '333 patents. Both mats were washed twenty (20) times. A visual comparison was made of the two mats. The mat made in accordance with the teachings of the present invention showed no significant loss of coarse or fine fiber. However, the mat made in accordance with the '566 and '333 patents showed significant loss of coarse fiber. This test demonstrates the capability of the present invention to achieve effective tuft-lock and maintain such tuft-lock after many washings. The second test was related to analytically determining the effectiveness of the tuft-lock of the present invention. Applicant compared the fiber loss of mat samples made in accordance with the present invention (set 1) with those made in accordance with the '566 and '333 patents (set 2). Both sets of samples were bone dried and weighed, then soaked with water, hung and allowed to drip dry for five (5) minutes. Both sets were then abraded for 2,500 cycles on a U.S. Testing Abrasion Tester. After being abraded, both sets were bone dried and weighed again. Set 1 showed a loss of 0.555 grams. Set 2 showed a loss of 2.094 grams. The significant fiber loss of the mats made in accordance with the '566 and '333 patents further demonstrates the effectiveness of the tuft lock achieved with the mats made pursuant to the present invention.
It will be appreciated that the embodiments discussed above are the preferred embodiments, and that various altemative embodiments are contemplated, falling within the scope of the appended claims. For example, while nylon or polyester may be the preferred materials for use as the coarse fiber, natural fibers, such as jute may be used. It should be understood that the foregoing relates only to preferred embodiments of the present invention and that numerous modifications or alterations may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.

Claims

CLAIMSWe claim:
1. A process for making a washable track control mat comprising the following steps: twisting together at least one coarse denier fiber with at least one fine denier fiber to create a yam; tufting the yam through a substrate; and bonding the tufts to the substrate.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein there are a plurality of fine denier fibers.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the coarse fiber ranges from 100 to 2000 denier.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein the coarse fiber ranges from 300 to 600 denier.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein the fine fiber ranges from 15 to 100 denier.
6. The process of claim 5 wherein the fine fiber ranges from 18 to 24 denier.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein the tufting is accomplished with 5/32 inch gauge tufting needles.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein the yam is tufted through the backing at a rate of 3 to 10 stitches per inch.
9. The process of claim 1 wherein the yam is twisted 5-6 turns per inch.
10. The process of claim 1 wherein the yam is tufted to a pile height of 1/4 to 3/4 inches.
11. The process of claim 1 wherein the step of bonding the tufts to the substrate is accomplished by applying mbber to the substrate.
12. The process of claim 1 wherein the step of bonding the tufts to the substrate is accomplished by applying latex to the substrate.
13. The process of claim 1 wherein the step of twisting a yam is accomplished by twisting the yam five to six turns per inch.
14. The process of claim 1 wherein the coarse denier fiber is nylon.
15. The process of claim 1 wherein the coarse denier fiber is polyester.
16. The process of claim 1 further comprising the step of heat treating the yam after the yam is twisted.
17. A washable track control mat comprising: a plurality of tufts, at least one tuft comprising a yam made of at least one fine denier fiber twisted together with at least one coarse denier fiber; a substrate to receive the tufts; and bonding means for bonding the tufts to the substrate.
18. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the yam is heat treated.
19. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the fine denier fiber ranges from 15 to 100 denier.
20. The washable track control mat of claim 19 wherein the fine denier fiber ranges from 18 to 24 denier.
21. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the coarse denier fiber ranges from 100 to 1,000 denier.
22. The washable track control mat of claim 121 wherein the coarse denier fiber ranges from 300 to 600 denier.
23. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the coarse denier fiber is nylon.
24. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the coarse denier fiber is polyester.
25. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the bonding means is vulcanized rubber.
26. The washable track control mat of claim 25 wherein the bonding means is latex.
27. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the tufts are made with 5/32 inch gauge tufting needles.
28. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the yam is received into the substrate at a rate of 3 to 10 stitches per inch.
29. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the yam is twisted 5-6 rums per inch.
30. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the yam is tufted to a pile height of 1/4 to 3/4 inches.
31. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the mat weighs between 16 and 24 ounces per square yard without the bonding means.
32. The washable track control mat of claim 17 wherein the weight ratio range of coarse denier fibers to fine denier fibers is between 20-24% to 76-80% respectively.
EP94916596A 1994-04-29 1994-04-29 Improved track control mat and method of making the same Expired - Lifetime EP0760875B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK94916596T DK0760875T3 (en) 1994-04-29 1994-04-29 Improved cleaning mat and its process

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US1994/004687 WO1995030040A1 (en) 1994-04-29 1994-04-29 Improved track control mat and method of making the same

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0760875A4 EP0760875A4 (en) 1997-01-16
EP0760875A1 true EP0760875A1 (en) 1997-03-12
EP0760875B1 EP0760875B1 (en) 2004-06-23

Family

ID=22242508

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP94916596A Expired - Lifetime EP0760875B1 (en) 1994-04-29 1994-04-29 Improved track control mat and method of making the same

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0760875B1 (en)
AU (1) AU6820794A (en)
DE (1) DE69433864T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1995030040A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6969437B1 (en) 1997-01-30 2005-11-29 Alliedsignal Inc. Yarn with heat-activated binder material and process of making
US6682618B1 (en) 1986-11-24 2004-01-27 Alliedsignal Inc. Yarn with heat-activated binder material and process of making
JPH08302556A (en) * 1995-05-08 1996-11-19 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Co <3M> Loop pile sheet
EP0828873B1 (en) * 1995-05-26 2000-05-31 Milliken Denmark A/S Floor textile material
IT1285077B1 (en) * 1996-05-03 1998-06-03 Robert Ross Di Ernesto De Gran SYNTHETIC YARN DOOR AND RELATED MANUFACTURING PROCEDURE.
GB2320934A (en) * 1997-01-06 1998-07-08 Palencia Ltd Yarn for use in tufted fabrics
JP3735437B2 (en) * 1997-02-14 2006-01-18 株式会社ダスキン Rental mat
JP3957383B2 (en) * 1997-02-14 2007-08-15 株式会社ダスキン mat
AU741990B2 (en) * 1997-09-18 2001-12-13 Shaw Industries Group, Inc. Yarn with heat-activated binder material and process of making
US6159576A (en) * 1997-12-11 2000-12-12 Milliken & Company Floor mat solely comprised of monofilament nylon fiber and having an ozone resistant, non-staining rubber backing sheet
AU8418298A (en) 1998-09-11 2000-03-23 Jayfield Pty Ltd Non slip, lay flat bar runner
US6296919B1 (en) 1999-08-13 2001-10-02 Milliken & Company Cushioned carpeted floor mat with at least one cushioning integrated rubber protrusion
USRE38422E1 (en) 1999-08-13 2004-02-10 Milliken & Co. Cushioned carpeted floor mat with at least one cushioning integrated rubber protrusion
US6726975B2 (en) * 2000-06-27 2004-04-27 Milliken & Company Multiple fiber floor mat and method
US6921502B1 (en) 2000-09-01 2005-07-26 Milliken & Company Cushioned rubber floor mat article and method
US6420015B1 (en) 2000-09-27 2002-07-16 Milliken & Company Cushioned rubber floor mat and process
US6589631B1 (en) 2000-10-04 2003-07-08 Milliken & Company Flashless rubber floor mat and method
DE60322178D1 (en) * 2002-01-24 2008-08-28 Milliken Denmark WASHABLE FLOOR MAT
ITPI20130060A1 (en) * 2013-06-27 2014-12-28 Furpile Moda Spa CLEANING MAT FOR SHOES AND THE LIKE
US20200190718A1 (en) * 2017-06-07 2020-06-18 Invista North America S.A.R.L. Carpet with self-twisted loop pile and methods for making the same

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4711191A (en) * 1986-11-04 1987-12-08 Techniservice Monofilament-wrap texturizing method and product
FR2645004A1 (en) * 1989-03-29 1990-10-05 Alazet Jean Mat as for a doormat
EP0430916A2 (en) * 1989-11-30 1991-06-05 Monsanto Company Continuous filament yarn for trackless carpet

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3011243A (en) * 1957-12-23 1961-12-05 Firth Carpet Company Inc Special effect pile fabrics
US3940522A (en) * 1971-05-27 1976-02-24 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Synthetic fibers and pile fabrics made therefrom
US3982977A (en) * 1974-09-04 1976-09-28 Deering Milliken Research Corporation Dust collection mats
GB1527622A (en) * 1975-06-24 1978-10-04 Smith Ass Ltd Carpeting
JPS5761716A (en) * 1980-09-25 1982-04-14 Teijin Ltd Polyester multifilaments and their production
US4430851A (en) * 1982-01-29 1984-02-14 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Twisted ceramic fiber sewing thread
US4466331A (en) * 1983-06-06 1984-08-21 Redden Net Co., Inc. Method of forming twisted multiple strand synthetic twine, twines produced thereby, and fishnets formed thereof
US4619108A (en) * 1985-04-19 1986-10-28 Amikan Fishing Net Mfg. Co., Ltd. Multiple strand twines comprising monofilaments and multiple filaments, and fishnets formed thereof
JPS6392769A (en) * 1986-10-07 1988-04-23 根来産業株式会社 Tufted pile cloth
US4820566A (en) * 1987-05-08 1989-04-11 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Tufted carpet with tufts of fine fibers and tufts of crimped coarse fibers
US4808459A (en) * 1987-09-16 1989-02-28 Collins & Aikman Corporation Carpet with polyvinylidene chloride latex tuft-lock adhesive coating
US5055333A (en) * 1989-01-09 1991-10-08 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Tufted carpet
JPH02191733A (en) * 1989-01-17 1990-07-27 Kawashima Textile Manuf Ltd Pile yarn and carpet
US5209974A (en) * 1991-10-15 1993-05-11 Monsanto Company Copolymeric yarns for textured carpets
US5284009A (en) * 1993-03-09 1994-02-08 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Fiber blends for improved carpet texture retention

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4711191A (en) * 1986-11-04 1987-12-08 Techniservice Monofilament-wrap texturizing method and product
FR2645004A1 (en) * 1989-03-29 1990-10-05 Alazet Jean Mat as for a doormat
EP0430916A2 (en) * 1989-11-30 1991-06-05 Monsanto Company Continuous filament yarn for trackless carpet

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DATABASE WPI Section Ch, Week 8822 Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A12, AN 88-151643 XP002021877 & JP-A-63 092 769 (NEGI SANGUO KK) , 23 April 1988 *
Exhibit to the affidavit of Leslie Schwartz, 02.04.2003 *
See also references of WO9530040A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69433864T2 (en) 2005-06-30
EP0760875B1 (en) 2004-06-23
EP0760875A4 (en) 1997-01-16
DE69433864D1 (en) 2004-07-29
AU6820794A (en) 1995-11-29
WO1995030040A1 (en) 1995-11-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0760875B1 (en) Improved track control mat and method of making the same
US5725927A (en) Cleaning cloth
US7303804B2 (en) Pile cloth for cleaning
US6468622B1 (en) Track control mat and method of making the same
EP0858769A2 (en) Mats
AU698610B2 (en) Tufted articles and method of making same
CA1284702C (en) Closed end mops and process for manufacture
US5987867A (en) Floor textile material
US6726975B2 (en) Multiple fiber floor mat and method
MXPA97008446A (en) Affiliated items and method for the manufacturing of mis
US5786083A (en) Floor mat and yarn therefor
EP1467648B1 (en) Washable floor mat
US4752985A (en) Closed end mops
EP0965300A1 (en) Mat
EP1736092A2 (en) Flooring article
US4811990A (en) Process for manufacture of closed end wet mops
US4811989A (en) Process for manufacture of closed end mops
GB2338411A (en) Mat manufacture
AU694035C (en) Floor textile material
JPH06116858A (en) Pile carpet
KR20230118857A (en) Abrasive materials, accessories for tools containing such abrasive materials, and methods for producing such abrasive materials
JPH1066674A (en) Pile thread for dust mat
AU2003208336A1 (en) Washable floor mat
JPH0648572U (en) mat
JPH02300341A (en) Pile yarn for mop and production thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched
AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): DE DK GB

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19961128

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE DK GB

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19980717

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE DK GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69433864

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040729

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20050324

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20120302

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20120420

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20120418

Year of fee payment: 19

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20130430

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20130429

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131101

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130429

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69433864

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130430