EP0728833A1 - Process for the preparation of aviation turbine fuel - Google Patents

Process for the preparation of aviation turbine fuel Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0728833A1
EP0728833A1 EP96101975A EP96101975A EP0728833A1 EP 0728833 A1 EP0728833 A1 EP 0728833A1 EP 96101975 A EP96101975 A EP 96101975A EP 96101975 A EP96101975 A EP 96101975A EP 0728833 A1 EP0728833 A1 EP 0728833A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
feedstock
catalyst
carrier
weight
turbine fuel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP96101975A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Barry Cooper
Bjorn Donnis
Joan Legino Larsen
Peter Sogaard-Andersen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Topsoe AS
Original Assignee
Haldor Topsoe AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Haldor Topsoe AS filed Critical Haldor Topsoe AS
Publication of EP0728833A1 publication Critical patent/EP0728833A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G45/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
    • C10G45/44Hydrogenation of the aromatic hydrocarbons
    • C10G45/46Hydrogenation of the aromatic hydrocarbons characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G45/54Hydrogenation of the aromatic hydrocarbons characterised by the catalyst used containing crystalline alumino-silicates, e.g. molecular sieves

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to the preparation of aviation turbine fuel, and, more particular, to a process for the preparation of such fuel by upgrading of FCC heavy gasoline.
  • FCC heavy gasoline is produced by fluid catalytic cracking of vacuum distillates and boils in the range of 100-300°C.
  • FCC heavy gasoline has a high content of aromatics and olefins, which makes it unsuitable for aviation turbine fuel.
  • Aviation turbine fuel composition characteristics include a maximum content of aromatic compounds of 20 per cent by volume, a smokepoint of 20 at a minimum and a final boiling point of not higher than 300°C.
  • Aviation turbine fuels are conventionally prepared by upgrading middle distillate feedstock, in particular kerosene by applying a two stage hydrogenation process.
  • the conventional process consists of four main sections, initial hydrotreating, intermediate stripping, final hydrotreating and product stripping.
  • the reactor will normally contain several beds of a metal sulphide catalyst, such as CoMo, NiMo or NiW on alumina. Most or all hydrogenation of olefins occurs in this stage. Quenching by treat-gas, make-up gas or by feedstock may be employed.
  • the reactor effluent is cooled, and gas and liquid are separated.
  • the liquid is passed to an intermediate stripper, where dissolved H 2 S and NH 3 are stripped off using either steam or recycle hydrogen.
  • the final hydrotreating is performed using a process layout similar to that of the initial hydrotreater.
  • the reactor contains typically several beds of a sulphur and nitrogen sensitive noble metal catalyst.
  • Temperature control in the final hydrotreater can be achieved using interbed quenching by cold treat-gas, make-up gas, feed oil or product oil.
  • the product stripper column removes H 2 S, dissolved gases and any naphtha formed in the process.
  • catalytic hydrogenation may be applied for upgrading of low value FCC heavy gasoline to high value aviation turbine fuel, when employing in the final hydrotreating step of a hydrogenation process a Group VIII metal catalyst supported on a carrier comprising a crystalline alumina silicate.
  • this invention provides a process for the hydrotreating of FCC heavy gasoline feedstock comprising the step of hydrogenating aromatic compounds in the feedstock by contacting the feedstock in the presence of hydrogen with a catalyst having at least one metal of group VIII in the Periodic Table as its active ingredient supported on a carrier comprising a crystalline alumina silicate.
  • Group VIII metals being active as catalyst in the above process comprise preferably of platinum and/or platinum and palladium. Further active hydrogenation catalysts from Group VIII metals are ruthenium, rhodium, osmium, and iridium.
  • a carrier being composed of 20-100% by weight of the crystalline alumina silicate and up to 80% by weight of alumina, silica alumina or clay minerals.
  • most preferred catalysts consist of 0.2-0.8% by weight of palladium and 0.2-0.5% by weight of platinum supported on a carrier with 30-70% by weight of zeolitic material as the crystalline alumina silicate, the zeolitic material having a unit cell size of 24.30-24.40 ⁇ and 30-70% by weight of alumina.
  • Suitable methods for preparing the above hydrogenation catalysts comprise any of the known methods for the preparation of supported catalysts, including impregnation or ion-exchange of the carrier or of the crystalline alumina-silica prior to incorporation in the carrier with a solution of salts of the active metal or metals and subsequent calcination of the carrier.
  • a further advantage of the inventive process is a much lower sensitivity to sulphur and nitrogen compounds in the feedstock, which allows the process to be operated at less severe conditions and at high space velocity or reduced catalyst volume.
  • FCC heavy gasoline feedstock is desulphurized and denitrogenated in an initial hydrotreating step to levels of less than 500 ppm by weight S and less than 50 ppm by weight N by contact with a conventional high activity desulphurization catalyst, as the known NiMo, NiW or CoMo catalysts mentioned above.
  • a conventional high activity desulphurization catalyst as the known NiMo, NiW or CoMo catalysts mentioned above.
  • the treated feedstock is then passed to the hydrotreating step and hydrogenated with hydrogen at a H 2 /oil ratio of between 100-1000 Nm 3 /m 3 and hydrogen partial pressure of 10-90 atm, preferably 20-50 atm.
  • the feedstock is contacted with the catalyst arranged as fixed bed in the hydrogenation reactor at 190-340°C, preferably 210-290°C weight average bed temperature and a pressure of 25-60 atm.
  • the calcined carrier was then impregnated by pore volume filling with an impregnation solution containing 0.6 g of Pt(NH 2 ) 4 (HCO 3 ) 2 and 1.4 g of Pd(NH 3 ) 4 (HCO 3 ) 2 and distilled water up to 60 ml. After impregnation, the catalyst was dried at room temperature for 16 hrs. The dried impregnated catalyst was then calcined in air at 310°C for 2 hours.
  • FCC heavy gasoline having a composition as summarized in Table 1 below was in a first step subjected to desulphurization and denitrogenation by hydrotreating in an isothermal bench-scale reactor being loaded with 75 cc of a NiMo based conventional HDS catalyst, commercial available from Haldor Tops ⁇ e A/S under the tradename TK-525.
  • the product collected was used for aromatics saturation using the catalyst as prepared under Example 1.
  • the hydrodearomatization was conducted in an isothermal bench-scale reactor with a volume of 50 cc.
  • Table 4 The conditions for aromatics saturation and the corresponding properties are shown in Table 4 and Table 5, respectively.
  • Table 4 Test Conditions Temperature, °C 242 Pressure, ato 35 LHSV, h -1 1.0 H 2 /oil ratio, Nl/l 600
  • Table 5 Product Properties HPLC Aromatics, vol% Mono- 5.5 Di- 0.1 Tri- 0 Simulated TBP Dist, °C 10% 145 30% 172 50% 189 70% 204 90% 231 Smoke Point, mm 23

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

A process for the preparation of aviation turbine fuel hydrotreating of FCC heavy gasoline feedstock to produce a product being useful as aviation turbine fuel, comprising the step of contacting the feedstock in the presence of hydrogen with a catalyst having at least one metal of Group VIII in the Periodic Table as its active ingredient supported on a carrier, wherein the carrier comprises a crystalline alumina silicate.

Description

  • The present invention is directed to the preparation of aviation turbine fuel, and, more particular, to a process for the preparation of such fuel by upgrading of FCC heavy gasoline.
  • FCC heavy gasoline is produced by fluid catalytic cracking of vacuum distillates and boils in the range of 100-300°C. FCC heavy gasoline has a high content of aromatics and olefins, which makes it unsuitable for aviation turbine fuel.
  • Aviation turbine fuel composition characteristics include a maximum content of aromatic compounds of 20 per cent by volume, a smokepoint of 20 at a minimum and a final boiling point of not higher than 300°C.
  • Aviation turbine fuels are conventionally prepared by upgrading middle distillate feedstock, in particular kerosene by applying a two stage hydrogenation process.
  • The conventional process consists of four main sections, initial hydrotreating, intermediate stripping, final hydrotreating and product stripping.
  • In the initial hydrotreating section, sulphur and nitrogen levels are reduced to levels that allow a catalyst in the final hydrotreater to achieve the required degree of aromatic saturation. Some aromatics conversion might occur in this section, but for the most part two and three ring aromatics are converted to single ring aromatics. The reactor will normally contain several beds of a metal sulphide catalyst, such as CoMo, NiMo or NiW on alumina. Most or all hydrogenation of olefins occurs in this stage. Quenching by treat-gas, make-up gas or by feedstock may be employed.
  • The reactor effluent is cooled, and gas and liquid are separated. The liquid is passed to an intermediate stripper, where dissolved H2S and NH3 are stripped off using either steam or recycle hydrogen.
  • The final hydrotreating is performed using a process layout similar to that of the initial hydrotreater. The reactor contains typically several beds of a sulphur and nitrogen sensitive noble metal catalyst.
  • Temperature control in the final hydrotreater can be achieved using interbed quenching by cold treat-gas, make-up gas, feed oil or product oil.
  • The product stripper column removes H2S, dissolved gases and any naphtha formed in the process.
  • Due to high sensitivity to sulphur and nitrogen compounds, the conventional hydrogenation process is presently limited to feedstocks with a low content of those compounds.
  • To meet low sulphur and nitrogen specification required in the final hydrotreating step, the known processes have to date been exclusively applied to aromatics saturation of light straight-run hydrocarbon feedstocks.
  • It has now been found that catalytic hydrogenation may be applied for upgrading of low value FCC heavy gasoline to high value aviation turbine fuel, when employing in the final hydrotreating step of a hydrogenation process a Group VIII metal catalyst supported on a carrier comprising a crystalline alumina silicate.
  • Accordingly, this invention provides a process for the hydrotreating of FCC heavy gasoline feedstock comprising the step of hydrogenating aromatic compounds in the feedstock by contacting the feedstock in the presence of hydrogen with a catalyst having at least one metal of group VIII in the Periodic Table as its active ingredient supported on a carrier comprising a crystalline alumina silicate.
  • Group VIII metals being active as catalyst in the above process comprise preferably of platinum and/or platinum and palladium. Further active hydrogenation catalysts from Group VIII metals are ruthenium, rhodium, osmium, and iridium.
  • Most active catalysts for use in the process are obtained with the above supported catalysts having platinum at a concentration of between 0.1% and 0.6% by weight and palladium in the range of between 0.1% and 1.0% by weight.
  • It is, furthermore, preferred to use a carrier being composed of 20-100% by weight of the crystalline alumina silicate and up to 80% by weight of alumina, silica alumina or clay minerals. Presently, most preferred catalysts consist of 0.2-0.8% by weight of palladium and 0.2-0.5% by weight of platinum supported on a carrier with 30-70% by weight of zeolitic material as the crystalline alumina silicate, the zeolitic material having a unit cell size of 24.30-24.40 Å and 30-70% by weight of alumina.
  • Suitable methods for preparing the above hydrogenation catalysts comprise any of the known methods for the preparation of supported catalysts, including impregnation or ion-exchange of the carrier or of the crystalline alumina-silica prior to incorporation in the carrier with a solution of salts of the active metal or metals and subsequent calcination of the carrier.
  • Beside of being applicable for upgrading low value FCC heavy gasoline to high value aviation turbine fuel, a further advantage of the inventive process is a much lower sensitivity to sulphur and nitrogen compounds in the feedstock, which allows the process to be operated at less severe conditions and at high space velocity or reduced catalyst volume.
  • In operating the process of the invention, FCC heavy gasoline feedstock is desulphurized and denitrogenated in an initial hydrotreating step to levels of less than 500 ppm by weight S and less than 50 ppm by weight N by contact with a conventional high activity desulphurization catalyst, as the known NiMo, NiW or CoMo catalysts mentioned above.
  • After cooling, gas separation, and stripping off dissolved H2S and NH3 the treated feedstock is then passed to the hydrotreating step and hydrogenated with hydrogen at a H2/oil ratio of between 100-1000 Nm3/m3 and hydrogen partial pressure of 10-90 atm, preferably 20-50 atm. The feedstock is contacted with the catalyst arranged as fixed bed in the hydrogenation reactor at 190-340°C, preferably 210-290°C weight average bed temperature and a pressure of 25-60 atm.
  • At the above conditions and a space velocity of between 0.4-10 m3 oil/m3 cat./h, it is possible to upgrade FCC heavy gasoline feedstock to meet the specifications of aviation turbine fuel.
  • Example 1
  • Preparation of a Pd/Pt hydrogenation catalyst supported on a zeolite/alumina carrier according to the invention.
  • The catalyst carrier was prepared by mixing 69 g of Catapal B (Vista Corporation), 1.3 g of 65% HNO3 and 70 g of water. To 97.7 g of the gel prepared were added 14 g Catapal B and 70 g of dried CBV 600 HY Zeolite available from P.Q. Zeolites, having a unit cell size of 24,34 Å and a SiO2/Al2O3 = 5.5. The components were thoroughly mixed in a Z-kneader until a pasta was formed. The pasta was then extruded to 1/32" extrudates. After extrusion, the wet extrudates were dried at room temperature for 16 hours, and the dried extrudates calcined at least 250°C for 2 hours in a laboratory furnace.
  • The calcined carrier was then impregnated by pore volume filling with an impregnation solution containing 0.6 g of Pt(NH2)4(HCO3)2 and 1.4 g of Pd(NH3)4(HCO3)2 and distilled water up to 60 ml. After impregnation, the catalyst was dried at room temperature for 16 hrs. The dried impregnated catalyst was then calcined in air at 310°C for 2 hours.
  • Example 2
  • FCC heavy gasoline having a composition as summarized in Table 1 below was in a first step subjected to desulphurization and denitrogenation by hydrotreating in an isothermal bench-scale reactor being loaded with 75 cc of a NiMo based conventional HDS catalyst, commercial available from Haldor Topsøe A/S under the tradename TK-525.
  • At hydrotreating conditions as summarized in Table 2, a hydrotreated product was obtained having the properties as specified in Table 3. Table 1
    FCC Heavy Gasoline Composition
    FIA Aromatics, Vol% 51.1
    Olefins 34.3
    Paraffins 9.9
    HPLC Aromatics, Vol%
    Mono- 38.8
    Di- 5.5
    Tri- 0.5
    Sulphur, wt% 0.268
    Nitrogen, wppm 266
    ASTM D-86 Distillation, °C
    IBP 128
    10% 168
    30% 184
    50% 196
    70% 210
    90% 238
    FBP 263
    Table 2
    Test Conditions
    Temperature, °C 325-328
    Pressure, ato 35
    LHSV, h-1 3.0
    H2/Oil ratio, Nl/l 600
    Table 3
    Product at Test Conditions
    HPLC Aromatics, Vol%
    Mono- 45.7
    Di- 0.2
    Tri- 0.1
    Sulphur, wppm 24
    Nitrogen, wppm 4
    Simulated TBP Dist., °C
    10% 149
    30% 177
    50% 197
    70% 213
    90% 238
  • The product collected was used for aromatics saturation using the catalyst as prepared under Example 1. The hydrodearomatization was conducted in an isothermal bench-scale reactor with a volume of 50 cc.
  • The conditions for aromatics saturation and the corresponding properties are shown in Table 4 and Table 5, respectively. Table 4
    Test Conditions
    Temperature, °C 242
    Pressure, ato 35
    LHSV, h-1 1.0
    H2/oil ratio, Nl/l 600
    Table 5
    Product Properties
    HPLC Aromatics, vol%
    Mono- 5.5
    Di- 0.1
    Tri- 0
    Simulated TBP Dist, °C
    10% 145
    30% 172
    50% 189
    70% 204
    90% 231
    Smoke Point, mm 23

Claims (6)

  1. A process for the preparation of aviation turbine fuel by hydrotreating of a FCC heavy gasoline feedstock, comprising the step of hydrogenating aromatic compounds in the feedstock by contacting the feedstock in the presence of hydrogen with a catalyst having at least one metal of Group VIII in the Periodic Table as its active ingredient supported on a carrier, comprising a crystalline alumina silicate.
  2. The process of claim 1, wherein the Group VIII metal comprises platinum and/or palladium.
  3. The process of claim 1, wherein the Group VIII metal is supported in an amount of between 0.3 and 0.5% by weight on the carrier.
  4. The process of claim 1, wherein the crystalline alumina silicate comprises dealuminated Y-zeolite with a unit cell size of between 24.30-24.40 Å.
  5. The process of claim 1, wherein the carrier consists of between 30% and 70% by weight of the crystalline alumina silicate and between 30% and 70% by weight of alumina.
  6. The process according to anyone of the preceding claims, wherein the feedstock is contacted with the catalyst at a space velocity of between 0.4 and 10 m3 feedstock/m3 catalyst/h.
EP96101975A 1995-02-24 1996-02-12 Process for the preparation of aviation turbine fuel Withdrawn EP0728833A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK201/95 1995-02-24
DK20195 1995-02-24

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0728833A1 true EP0728833A1 (en) 1996-08-28

Family

ID=8090895

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP96101975A Withdrawn EP0728833A1 (en) 1995-02-24 1996-02-12 Process for the preparation of aviation turbine fuel

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0728833A1 (en)
JP (1) JPH08245968A (en)
AU (1) AU4567996A (en)
BR (1) BR9600798A (en)
CA (1) CA2170220A1 (en)
NO (1) NO960740L (en)
NZ (1) NZ280999A (en)
ZA (1) ZA961474B (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2179880A1 (en) * 1972-04-10 1973-11-23 British Petroleum Co
US4240900A (en) * 1979-05-18 1980-12-23 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Process for the hydrogenation of olefins and aromatic compounds
EP0042461A1 (en) * 1980-06-23 1981-12-30 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Process for catalytic hydrogenation of hydrogenatable compounds in a hydrocarbon feedstock, and hydrogenated hydrocarbon products
EP0303332A1 (en) * 1987-08-14 1989-02-15 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Process for the hydrogenation of hydrocarbon oils
EP0519573A1 (en) * 1991-06-21 1992-12-23 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Hydrogenation catalyst and process
WO1994026846A1 (en) * 1993-05-10 1994-11-24 Akzo Nobel N.V. Hydrogenation of aromatics in hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2179880A1 (en) * 1972-04-10 1973-11-23 British Petroleum Co
US4240900A (en) * 1979-05-18 1980-12-23 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Process for the hydrogenation of olefins and aromatic compounds
EP0042461A1 (en) * 1980-06-23 1981-12-30 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Process for catalytic hydrogenation of hydrogenatable compounds in a hydrocarbon feedstock, and hydrogenated hydrocarbon products
EP0303332A1 (en) * 1987-08-14 1989-02-15 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Process for the hydrogenation of hydrocarbon oils
EP0519573A1 (en) * 1991-06-21 1992-12-23 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Hydrogenation catalyst and process
WO1994026846A1 (en) * 1993-05-10 1994-11-24 Akzo Nobel N.V. Hydrogenation of aromatics in hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ZA961474B (en) 1996-10-03
JPH08245968A (en) 1996-09-24
NO960740L (en) 1996-08-26
BR9600798A (en) 1997-12-23
NO960740D0 (en) 1996-02-23
NZ280999A (en) 1997-02-24
AU4567996A (en) 1996-09-05
CA2170220A1 (en) 1996-08-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4983273A (en) Hydrocracking process with partial liquid recycle
US6149800A (en) Process for increased olefin yields from heavy feedstocks
EP0093552B1 (en) Hydrocracking process
US4218308A (en) Hydrogenation catalyst
US20040004020A1 (en) Process for catalytic dewaxing and catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon streams
EP0523679B2 (en) A process for the production of low-sulfur diesel gas oil
JP2003516465A (en) Method for removing sulfur from hydrocarbon feedstock
KR20020086951A (en) Flexible method for producing oil bases with a zsm-48 zeolite
US5741414A (en) Method of manufacturing gas oil containing low amounts of sulfur and aromatic compounds
US20060009666A1 (en) Hydrogenation of aromatics and olefins using a mesoporous catalyst
US5868921A (en) Single stage, stacked bed hydrotreating process utilizing a noble metal catalyst in the upstream bed
EP0755426B1 (en) Process for cetane improvement of distillate fractions
US5198099A (en) Three-stage process for producing ultra-clean distillate products
KR19980033042A (en) Catalysts Containing Two or More Dealumina Treated Zeolites and Conventional Hydrogen Conversion Methods of Petroleum Classifications Using Such Catalysts
JP4248142B2 (en) Low pressure naphtha hydrocracking process
US4755279A (en) Process for the manufacture of lubricating oils
EP0728833A1 (en) Process for the preparation of aviation turbine fuel
JP2000073072A (en) Production of high cetane number, low sulfur diesel gas oil
US20220204873A1 (en) Hydrocracking operation with reduced accumulation of heavy polynuclear aromatics
EP1762606A1 (en) A process for hydrodesulphurisation of a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock
JP2000313891A (en) Method and system for desulfurizing fuel oil
AU3067199A (en) Hydrocarbon conversion process and catalysts used therein
JPH06116570A (en) Production of low-aromatic hydrocarbon oil
JPH07166175A (en) Production of gas oil
RU2039788C1 (en) Method of motor fuel producing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB IE IT LI LU MC NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19970228

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19981201

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 19990612