EP0708852B1 - New fiberfill battings - Google Patents

New fiberfill battings Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0708852B1
EP0708852B1 EP94920307A EP94920307A EP0708852B1 EP 0708852 B1 EP0708852 B1 EP 0708852B1 EP 94920307 A EP94920307 A EP 94920307A EP 94920307 A EP94920307 A EP 94920307A EP 0708852 B1 EP0708852 B1 EP 0708852B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
batt
resin
amount
bonded
weight
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP94920307A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0708852A1 (en
Inventor
Michael Stephen Frankosky
Wo Kong Kwok
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
advansa Bv
Original Assignee
EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co filed Critical EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Publication of EP0708852A1 publication Critical patent/EP0708852A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0708852B1 publication Critical patent/EP0708852B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04HMAKING TEXTILE FABRICS, e.g. FROM FIBRES OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL; FABRICS MADE BY SUCH PROCESSES OR APPARATUS, e.g. FELTS, NON-WOVEN FABRICS; COTTON-WOOL; WADDING ; NON-WOVEN FABRICS FROM STAPLE FIBRES, FILAMENTS OR YARNS, BONDED WITH AT LEAST ONE WEB-LIKE MATERIAL DURING THEIR CONSOLIDATION
    • D04H1/00Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres
    • D04H1/40Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties
    • D04H1/58Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties by applying, incorporating or activating chemical or thermoplastic bonding agents, e.g. adhesives
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04HMAKING TEXTILE FABRICS, e.g. FROM FIBRES OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL; FABRICS MADE BY SUCH PROCESSES OR APPARATUS, e.g. FELTS, NON-WOVEN FABRICS; COTTON-WOOL; WADDING ; NON-WOVEN FABRICS FROM STAPLE FIBRES, FILAMENTS OR YARNS, BONDED WITH AT LEAST ONE WEB-LIKE MATERIAL DURING THEIR CONSOLIDATION
    • D04H1/00Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres
    • D04H1/40Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties
    • D04H1/42Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties characterised by the use of certain kinds of fibres insofar as this use has no preponderant influence on the consolidation of the fleece
    • D04H1/4326Condensation or reaction polymers
    • D04H1/435Polyesters
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04HMAKING TEXTILE FABRICS, e.g. FROM FIBRES OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL; FABRICS MADE BY SUCH PROCESSES OR APPARATUS, e.g. FELTS, NON-WOVEN FABRICS; COTTON-WOOL; WADDING ; NON-WOVEN FABRICS FROM STAPLE FIBRES, FILAMENTS OR YARNS, BONDED WITH AT LEAST ONE WEB-LIKE MATERIAL DURING THEIR CONSOLIDATION
    • D04H1/00Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres
    • D04H1/40Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties
    • D04H1/42Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties characterised by the use of certain kinds of fibres insofar as this use has no preponderant influence on the consolidation of the fleece
    • D04H1/4382Stretched reticular film fibres; Composite fibres; Mixed fibres; Ultrafine fibres; Fibres for artificial leather
    • D04H1/43835Mixed fibres, e.g. at least two chemically different fibres or fibre blends
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04HMAKING TEXTILE FABRICS, e.g. FROM FIBRES OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL; FABRICS MADE BY SUCH PROCESSES OR APPARATUS, e.g. FELTS, NON-WOVEN FABRICS; COTTON-WOOL; WADDING ; NON-WOVEN FABRICS FROM STAPLE FIBRES, FILAMENTS OR YARNS, BONDED WITH AT LEAST ONE WEB-LIKE MATERIAL DURING THEIR CONSOLIDATION
    • D04H1/00Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres
    • D04H1/40Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties
    • D04H1/58Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties by applying, incorporating or activating chemical or thermoplastic bonding agents, e.g. adhesives
    • D04H1/587Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties by applying, incorporating or activating chemical or thermoplastic bonding agents, e.g. adhesives characterised by the bonding agents used
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04HMAKING TEXTILE FABRICS, e.g. FROM FIBRES OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL; FABRICS MADE BY SUCH PROCESSES OR APPARATUS, e.g. FELTS, NON-WOVEN FABRICS; COTTON-WOOL; WADDING ; NON-WOVEN FABRICS FROM STAPLE FIBRES, FILAMENTS OR YARNS, BONDED WITH AT LEAST ONE WEB-LIKE MATERIAL DURING THEIR CONSOLIDATION
    • D04H1/00Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres
    • D04H1/40Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties
    • D04H1/58Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties by applying, incorporating or activating chemical or thermoplastic bonding agents, e.g. adhesives
    • D04H1/64Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties by applying, incorporating or activating chemical or thermoplastic bonding agents, e.g. adhesives the bonding agent being applied in wet state, e.g. chemical agents in dispersions or solutions
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04HMAKING TEXTILE FABRICS, e.g. FROM FIBRES OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL; FABRICS MADE BY SUCH PROCESSES OR APPARATUS, e.g. FELTS, NON-WOVEN FABRICS; COTTON-WOOL; WADDING ; NON-WOVEN FABRICS FROM STAPLE FIBRES, FILAMENTS OR YARNS, BONDED WITH AT LEAST ONE WEB-LIKE MATERIAL DURING THEIR CONSOLIDATION
    • D04H1/00Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres
    • D04H1/40Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties
    • D04H1/42Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties characterised by the use of certain kinds of fibres insofar as this use has no preponderant influence on the consolidation of the fleece
    • D04H1/4382Stretched reticular film fibres; Composite fibres; Mixed fibres; Ultrafine fibres; Fibres for artificial leather
    • D04H1/43825Composite fibres
    • D04H1/43828Composite fibres sheath-core
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04HMAKING TEXTILE FABRICS, e.g. FROM FIBRES OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL; FABRICS MADE BY SUCH PROCESSES OR APPARATUS, e.g. FELTS, NON-WOVEN FABRICS; COTTON-WOOL; WADDING ; NON-WOVEN FABRICS FROM STAPLE FIBRES, FILAMENTS OR YARNS, BONDED WITH AT LEAST ONE WEB-LIKE MATERIAL DURING THEIR CONSOLIDATION
    • D04H1/00Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres
    • D04H1/40Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties
    • D04H1/42Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres without existing or potential cohesive properties characterised by the use of certain kinds of fibres insofar as this use has no preponderant influence on the consolidation of the fleece
    • D04H1/4382Stretched reticular film fibres; Composite fibres; Mixed fibres; Ultrafine fibres; Fibres for artificial leather
    • D04H1/43825Composite fibres
    • D04H1/43832Composite fibres side-by-side

Definitions

  • This invention is concerned with improvements in and relating to bonded polyester fiberfill batts, sometimes referred to as battings, especially such improved batts with desirable aesthetic and serviceable qualities, and to articles incorporating such improved batts.
  • a process for preparing a bonded batt comprising forming a blend of polyester fiberfill, in amount by weight about 70 to about 96%, intimately mixed with a binder fiber, preferably a bicomponent binder fiber, having binder material of melting point lower than the softening point of the polyester fiberfill, in amount by weight about 4 to about 30%, preparing a continuous batt from said blend, said batt having an upper face and a lower face, advancing said batt through one or more spray zones, whereby both faces of the batt are sprayed with resin, in total amount about 10 to about 30% of the weight of the sprayed batt, including the resin, said resin being selected to provide, after curing, a cured resin having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of about 0 degrees Celsius or less, heating the sprayed batt in an oven to cure the resin and soften the binder material,
  • Tg glass transition temperature
  • a bonded batt with upper and lower faces, said batt comprising polyester fiberfill of denier per filament greater than 0.2 and not more than 1, in amount about 75 to about 96%, and bonded throughout with lower melting binder material, complementally in amount about 4 to 25%, said amounts being calculated on the basis weight of the batt, said batt having a wash durability (WD, as defined) of at least 4, and a bending stiffness (B, as defined) of about 40 cN/cm 2 or less, wherein at least one of said faces is sealed with a resin having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of about 0 deg Celsius or less, in amount about 0.02 to about 0.35 oz/yd 2 (0.7 to 12 g/m 2 ), preferably about 0.1 to about 0.25 oz/yd 2 (3.4 to 8.5 g/m 2 ), calculated with regard to said face of the batt, whereby the sealing rating (SR, as defined) of said face is at least 4, said bonded batt having been prepared without the
  • metric units such as dtex, and denier are used herein, 1 dtex being the same as 0.9 denier per filament (dpf).
  • the present invention provides fiberfill batts, such as are needed for use in premium apparel, by first preparing a homogeneous blend of polyester fiberfill (75-96% by weight of the blend) and a suitable binder fiber (4-25% by weight of the blend). This blend is converted on a card or garnet to a web which may then be layered or cross lapped to form a batting to whose upper (and preferably serially also to whose lower) face is applied a suitable latex (e.g., a colloidal dispersion of acrylic polymers and/or copolymers in water, discussed in more detail hereinafter), e.g., by spraying.
  • a suitable latex e.g., a colloidal dispersion of acrylic polymers and/or copolymers in water, discussed in more detail hereinafter
  • the sprayed batting is heated, e.g., conveniently by being passed through a heated oven to dry the coating(s) and to polymerize the polymeric component(s) to high molecular weight, and to activate the binder fiber. This may be conveniently done, for example, in three passes through such an oven, two to serially dry and partially cure each such coating, after it has been applied to any face, and a final pass to supplement the other(s).
  • the resins that may be used herein are termed variously, by different manufacturers, as “soft” or “medium”, or even “very soft”, but are characterized by having second order glass transition temperatures (Tg) of about 0 C or less. They provide both softness and drapability to the batt when used in, e.g., apparel, while acting as barrier to fiber leakage from the batt.
  • the final batts may have a basis weight of 1.5 to 12 oz/yd 2 (50 to 400 g/m 2 ) and a thickness of 0.07 to 0.20 inch/oz/yd 2 (0.05 to 0.15 mm/g/m 2 ).
  • the batts of this invention are prepared from a blend of polyester fiberfill and binder fibers, and the fibers in the face(s) are sealed by a suitably soft-type resin coating.
  • the polyester fiberfill may all be slickened, e.g., as described herein, or may be a blend of slickened and unslickened fibers.
  • the fiberfill may be solid, hollow, or a blend of solid and hollow fibers and is not limited to any type of fiber cross section, i.e., it may be of cruciform, trilobal, Y-shaped, dog bone, scalloped oval, and other non-circular cross sections as well as round.
  • the fiberfill has a denier per filament (dpf) within the range of 0.2 to 10, with a dpf of about 1.65 being very useful, and constitutes about 70 to 96% by weight of the blend.
  • dpf denier per filament
  • subdenier fibers give good sealing in the face(s) of the bonded batt, so are often preferred in such face(s).
  • the individual fibers are provided with crimp by conventional means and typically exhibit from 5 to 15 crimps per inch (cpi) and have a length within the range of 3/4 to 3 inches.
  • the binder fibers constitute from about 4 to 30% by weight of the batt and may be of the sheath/core (s/c), side/side (s/s), or monocomponent types.
  • binder fibers are described in, e.g., "Nonwovens World", March/April, 1990, page 37.
  • the initial dpf of suitable binder fibers in the blend is typically within the range of 2 to 15 with a dpf of 4 being commonly used.
  • Useful binder fibers include those disclosed in the aforementioned U. S. Patents to Scott, Pamm, Frankosky, and Marcus, together with those shown in Harris et al U. S. Patent No. 4,732,809; Taniguchi et al U. S.
  • Preferred binder fibers include the commercially-available "Melty 4080" (Unitika Co., Japan) and the “ES” and “EA" polyolefins (Chisso Corporation, Japan).
  • the cured resin coatings on both faces of the batt may conveniently constitute about 10 to 30% by weight of the final bonded batt, with 12 to 25% being preferred for 1.65 dpf (1.83 dtex), where lesser amounts of resin tend to reduce wash durability and sealing rating while greater amounts tend to increase stiffness and reduce insulating efficiency. If only one face of the batt is so sealed, only half as much resin need be applied. When low fiber deniers (about 1 dpf or less) are used, less resin coating is needed to achieve fiber leakage control. Moreover, the amount of resin in the surface(s) need not depend on the basis weight of the batting, and so, for heavier battings, the total resin add-on may be as little as 3%, even for slickened fiberfill batts. For entirely dry (unslickened) fibers, less resin is needed than when slickened fiberfill is used.
  • a suitable resin for coating has a Tg of about 0 C or less.
  • the useful resins are obtained from commercially-available acrylic and vinyl latex compositions among which are included, e.g., Rhoplex E-32 (Rohm and Haas Co.), TR-934 (Rohm and Haas Co.), X-4280J (Kanebo, Japan), these Hycar® latex compositions of B. F.
  • Preparation of the batts is generally begun by conventional opening and blending of the polyester fiberfill and binder fiber, followed by carding or garnetting to make a web.
  • This web can be layered with other webs from a train of cards or garnets, or it can be cross lapped and combined with other webs to form an unbonded batting.
  • This batting is then sprayed with the latex composition on one or both sides of the batting and is fed to the oven for curing of the resin and bonding of the binder fibers.
  • the oven treatment is conducted at 150-190 C for 2 to 5 minutes, and may be conveniently done in three passes of the batt, as previously noted.
  • the batts exhibit the basis weight and thickness ranges previously indicated.
  • the batts of this invention exhibit desirable levels of thermal resistance or insulation, commonly reported as CLO ratings (see Hwang U.S. Patent No. 4,514,455). Batts of this invention desirably exhibit a CLO value of at least about 0.36 CLO/oz/yd 2 (0.01 CLO/g/m 2 ) and preferably 0.48 CLO/oz/yd 2 (0.014 CLO/g/m 2 ) or higher.
  • the components and processes described herein should be selected to provide the batts of this invention. Care must be taken to select combinations that do so provide.
  • the slickener on the fiber and the latex applied to the batt should be selected so as to adhere sufficiently, so that the final batt may exhibit, for example, sufficient wash durability.
  • Wash durability of the batts of this invention is evaluated by the procedures of ASTM D-4770-88. In the Examples, the panels were 24 inches x 24 inches in size. Durability ratings are reported for measurements made according to paragraph 8.6.1. Batts of the invention exhibit a rating of 3 or higher (paragraph 8.5 scale).
  • Fiber leakage or percolation through shell fabric is measured as a sealing rating ("SR") by the method described in LeVan U. S. Patent No. 4,869,771 (after 3 wash cycles), a sealing rating (SR) of 5 being excellent and a sealing rating (SR) of 1 being poor.
  • the batts of this invention exhibit a sealing rating (SR) of 3 or higher (after 3 wash cycles).
  • SR sealing rating
  • Table 2 Example 3
  • sealing values are additionally reported after one wash (1W) as well as after 3 washes (3W) and compared with initial values before any washing (NEW).
  • the batts of this invention exhibit a bending stiffness ("B" being the sum of values determined for MD and XD samples from the batt) of 80 cN/cm. 2 or less, a lower bending stiffness being preferred.
  • BW Basis Weight, i.e., to the amount of polyester filberfill and binder fiber only, (i.e., without the added resin sprayed onto the faces to improve the sealing).
  • Samples A, B, C and D were prepared from a commercially-available blend of polyester fibers consisting of 37.5% of slickened 1.65 dpf (finished with a silicone slickener), 37.5% of dry 1.65 dpf (without any silicone slickener), and 25% binder fiber.
  • the blend was processed on conventional card and cross-lapper equipment similar to the equipment as described in Example 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,225,242.
  • the resulting battings were fed through a triple-pass oven maintained at about 165 C.
  • the battings (except for A) were sprayed with equivalent amounts of a soft resin (glass transition temperature (Tg) equals -10 deg C) on each side such that the total resin add-on was as stated in the Table, based on "BW", the basis weight of the fiber in the batting at this stage which was about 4.5 oz/yd 2 (150 g/m 2 ).
  • Tg glass transition temperature
  • BW basis weight of the fiber in the batting at this stage which was about 4.5 oz/yd 2 (150 g/m 2 ).
  • One side of the batting was sprayed with resin before entering the first pass and the other side was sprayed before entering the second pass.
  • the entire batting was exposed to adequate time at a temperature sufficiently high to assure complete cure of the resin and set of the binder fiber (1 minute after the batt has reached 165 C has generally been sufficient).
  • the battings were then calendered in a separate operation which served to seal the surfaces and reduce loft.
  • the battings were also tested for fiber leakage by encasing in a fabric with a yarn count of 104 X 84, and a Frazier air permeability rating of 13.2 cu ft/min at a pressure drop of 0.5 inches of water.
  • Samples E and F were the same as Samples A and D, respectively, except these were tested in a fabric with a yarn count of 102 x 84 and a Frazier rating of 48. Since 0.7 dpf battings were also tested in a more permeable fabric than for Samples A-D, results on Samples E and F (1.65 dpf) are included in the Table to bridge the data between Samples A-D and G-Q. Sample E, without resin, failed when new because of the openness of the fabric, but after three wash cycles had become sufficiently matted that it improved its leakage performance. Sample F's Sealing Value was 5 initially and provided a satisfactory Sealing Rating, i.e., after 3 wash cycles).
  • Samples G, H, I and J were prepared from a blend of about 85 pounds of dry polyester fibers (0.7 dpf, 0.78 dtex, 1.5 inch cut, 12 cpi, without any special slickening finish) and 15 pounds of binder fiber. These samples were resin-sprayed, calendered and tested as for samples E and F.
  • Samples K and L were prepared from a blend of about 55 pounds of similar 0.7 dpf slick fiber, finished with a silicone slickener, 27 pounds of dry (unslickened) 0.7 dpf fiber, and 18 pounds of binder fiber. These samples were not calendered, as indicated by the double asterisks in the Table, but gave good sealing ratings.
  • Samples M, O, P and Q were similarly prepared from the same kind of blend as K and L, but were made to higher basis weights, as shown, and also showed good sealing ratings, despite lower (less than 10%) resin add-on and despite not being calendered, because of use of low dpf fiber. N was calendered (unlike the others). A comparison of these results shows that calendering was not needed to improve the sealing rating (when the subdenier fibers were used with the soft resin).
  • Samples G through L were all tested for fiber leakage using the 48 Frazier fabric.
  • samples K-M and O-Q are all according to the invention, whereas the others show comparisons, some without any resin sprayed on, some with regular denier fiberfill and whose sealing ratings are not adequate after washing, and some which were calendered.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Nonwoven Fabrics (AREA)
  • Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Description

This invention is concerned with improvements in and relating to bonded polyester fiberfill batts, sometimes referred to as battings, especially such improved batts with desirable aesthetic and serviceable qualities, and to articles incorporating such improved batts.
In parent U.S. Patent No. 5,225,242 and WO 93/11292, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, we provided a process for preparing a bonded batt, comprising forming a blend of polyester fiberfill, in amount by weight about 70 to about 96%, intimately mixed with a binder fiber, preferably a bicomponent binder fiber, having binder material of melting point lower than the softening point of the polyester fiberfill, in amount by weight about 4 to about 30%, preparing a continuous batt from said blend, said batt having an upper face and a lower face, advancing said batt through one or more spray zones, whereby both faces of the batt are sprayed with resin, in total amount about 10 to about 30% of the weight of the sprayed batt, including the resin, said resin being selected to provide, after curing, a cured resin having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of about 0 degrees Celsius or less, heating the sprayed batt in an oven to cure the resin and soften the binder material, followed by hot-rolling the heated batt to achieve intimate contact between the resin and the fibers in the faces of the batt, and cooling the rolled batt, such hot-rolling being preferably effected by use of heated rolls in a calender or S-wrap configuration, and bonded batts of improved aesthetics and performance such as were made by such a process. The weight of the fibers in the batt (i.e., of the blend of polyester fiberfill and of binder fiber) is referred to as the "basis weight" of the batt, i.e., before the sealing resin is sprayed on.
We have, however, according to the present invention, found that, surprisingly, hot rolling need not necessarily be performed to impart adequate sealing, provided low denier fiberfill (referred to variously as subdenier or microfibers) is used to help with sealing at least in one or both face(s) of the batt. Thus, there is now provided a bonded batt, with upper and lower faces, said batt comprising polyester fiberfill of denier per filament greater than 0.2 and not more than 1, in amount about 75 to about 96%, and bonded throughout with lower melting binder material, complementally in amount about 4 to 25%, said amounts being calculated on the basis weight of the batt, said batt having a wash durability (WD, as defined) of at least 4, and a bending stiffness (B, as defined) of about 40 cN/cm2 or less, wherein at least one of said faces is sealed with a resin having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of about 0 deg Celsius or less, in amount about 0.02 to about 0.35 oz/yd2 (0.7 to 12 g/m2), preferably about 0.1 to about 0.25 oz/yd2 (3.4 to 8.5 g/m2), calculated with regard to said face of the batt, whereby the sealing rating (SR, as defined) of said face is at least 4, said bonded batt having been prepared without the use of hot rolling. Preferably each of said faces is so sealed.
Both metric units, such as dtex, and denier are used herein, 1 dtex being the same as 0.9 denier per filament (dpf).
Thus, the present invention provides fiberfill batts, such as are needed for use in premium apparel, by first preparing a homogeneous blend of polyester fiberfill (75-96% by weight of the blend) and a suitable binder fiber (4-25% by weight of the blend). This blend is converted on a card or garnet to a web which may then be layered or cross lapped to form a batting to whose upper (and preferably serially also to whose lower) face is applied a suitable latex (e.g., a colloidal dispersion of acrylic polymers and/or copolymers in water, discussed in more detail hereinafter), e.g., by spraying. The sprayed batting is heated, e.g., conveniently by being passed through a heated oven to dry the coating(s) and to polymerize the polymeric component(s) to high molecular weight, and to activate the binder fiber. This may be conveniently done, for example, in three passes through such an oven, two to serially dry and partially cure each such coating, after it has been applied to any face, and a final pass to supplement the other(s).
When the fiberfill is greater than 0.2 and not more than 1 denier per filament, however, and when said resin applied to the batting faces has a glass transition temperature (Tg) of about 0 degrees Celsius and has been applied in amounts between about 0.02 oz/yd2 (0.7g/m2) to 0.35 oz/yd2 (12 g/m2), then additional treatment, as with hot rolls, is not undertaken to prevent fiber leakage, especially when dry fiberfill is used.
The resins that may be used herein are termed variously, by different manufacturers, as "soft" or "medium", or even "very soft", but are characterized by having second order glass transition temperatures (Tg) of about 0 C or less. They provide both softness and drapability to the batt when used in, e.g., apparel, while acting as barrier to fiber leakage from the batt. The final batts may have a basis weight of 1.5 to 12 oz/yd2 (50 to 400 g/m2) and a thickness of 0.07 to 0.20 inch/oz/yd2(0.05 to 0.15 mm/g/m2). Thus the batts of this invention are prepared from a blend of polyester fiberfill and binder fibers, and the fibers in the face(s) are sealed by a suitably soft-type resin coating. The polyester fiberfill may all be slickened, e.g., as described herein, or may be a blend of slickened and unslickened fibers. The fiberfill may be solid, hollow, or a blend of solid and hollow fibers and is not limited to any type of fiber cross section, i.e., it may be of cruciform, trilobal, Y-shaped, dog bone, scalloped oval, and other non-circular cross sections as well as round. The fiberfill has a denier per filament (dpf) within the range of 0.2 to 10, with a dpf of about 1.65 being very useful, and constitutes about 70 to 96% by weight of the blend. As indicated, subdenier fibers give good sealing in the face(s) of the bonded batt, so are often preferred in such face(s). The individual fibers are provided with crimp by conventional means and typically exhibit from 5 to 15 crimps per inch (cpi) and have a length within the range of 3/4 to 3 inches. The binder fibers constitute from about 4 to 30% by weight of the batt and may be of the sheath/core (s/c), side/side (s/s), or monocomponent types. These may be obtained from (co)polyesters, polyolefins, polyolefin/polyester, polyamide/polyamide, e.g., and the like. Useful types of binder fibers, and their modes of functioning, are described in, e.g., "Nonwovens World", March/April, 1990, page 37. The initial dpf of suitable binder fibers in the blend is typically within the range of 2 to 15 with a dpf of 4 being commonly used. Useful binder fibers include those disclosed in the aforementioned U. S. Patents to Scott, Pamm, Frankosky, and Marcus, together with those shown in Harris et al U. S. Patent No. 4,732,809; Taniguchi et al U. S. Patent No. 4,789,592; Tomioka et al U. S. Patent No. 4,500,384; Hirose et al Japanese Patent Publication Kokai 57-210,015(1982); and others known in the art which will function within the oven temperatures disclosed herein. Preferred binder fibers include the commercially-available "Melty 4080" (Unitika Co., Japan) and the "ES" and "EA" polyolefins (Chisso Corporation, Japan).
The cured resin coatings on both faces of the batt may conveniently constitute about 10 to 30% by weight of the final bonded batt, with 12 to 25% being preferred for 1.65 dpf (1.83 dtex), where lesser amounts of resin tend to reduce wash durability and sealing rating while greater amounts tend to increase stiffness and reduce insulating efficiency. If only one face of the batt is so sealed, only half as much resin need be applied. When low fiber deniers (about 1 dpf or less) are used, less resin coating is needed to achieve fiber leakage control. Moreover, the amount of resin in the surface(s) need not depend on the basis weight of the batting, and so, for heavier battings, the total resin add-on may be as little as 3%, even for slickened fiberfill batts. For entirely dry (unslickened) fibers, less resin is needed than when slickened fiberfill is used.
As noted previously, a suitable resin for coating has a Tg of about 0 C or less. The useful resins are obtained from commercially-available acrylic and vinyl latex compositions among which are included, e.g., Rhoplex E-32 (Rohm and Haas Co.), TR-934 (Rohm and Haas Co.), X-4280J (Kanebo, Japan), these Hycar® latex compositions of B. F. Goodrich Co.: 26146, 26171, 26322, 26083, 26092, 2671, 26120, 2679, 26796, these latex products of National Starch and Chemical Corporation: NACRYLIC X 4445, NACRYLIC X 788-6007, NACRYLIC X 4483, NACRYLIC X 4460, NACRYLIC X 4260, NACRYLIC X 4425, NACRYLIC X 4465, NACRYLIC 4401, NACRYLIC X 78-3990, NACRYLIC X 78-3997, NACRYLIC X 78-3905, NACRYLIC X 4280, NACRYLIC 4441, NACRYLIC 78-6114, X-LINK 2873, X-LINK 2849, X-LINK 78-6119, X-LINK 2893, X-LINK 2833, X-LINK 78-6004, X-LINK 2813, RESYN 2375, DUR-O-SET E-230, DUR-O-SET E-669, and other commercially-available latexes which are cured to resins whose Tg values are about 0 C or less. Some of such commercially-available resins and their Tg values are listed in brochures, e.g., one by B. F. Goodrich, dated 1989, entitled HYCAR® Acrylic Latexes, and one by National Starch and Chemical Corporation, entitled Binders, Saturants, Laminants.
Preparation of the batts is generally begun by conventional opening and blending of the polyester fiberfill and binder fiber, followed by carding or garnetting to make a web. This web can be layered with other webs from a train of cards or garnets, or it can be cross lapped and combined with other webs to form an unbonded batting. This batting is then sprayed with the latex composition on one or both sides of the batting and is fed to the oven for curing of the resin and bonding of the binder fibers. The oven treatment is conducted at 150-190 C for 2 to 5 minutes, and may be conveniently done in three passes of the batt, as previously noted. The batts exhibit the basis weight and thickness ranges previously indicated.
The batts of this invention exhibit desirable levels of thermal resistance or insulation, commonly reported as CLO ratings (see Hwang U.S. Patent No. 4,514,455). Batts of this invention desirably exhibit a CLO value of at least about 0.36 CLO/oz/yd2 (0.01 CLO/g/m2) and preferably 0.48 CLO/oz/yd2 (0.014 CLO/g/m2) or higher.
It is to be understood that the components and processes described herein should be selected to provide the batts of this invention. Care must be taken to select combinations that do so provide. For example, the slickener on the fiber and the latex applied to the batt should be selected so as to adhere sufficiently, so that the final batt may exhibit, for example, sufficient wash durability.
TEST PROCEDURES
CLO ratings are obtained as described in Hwang, above.
Wash durability ("WD") of the batts of this invention is evaluated by the procedures of ASTM D-4770-88. In the Examples, the panels were 24 inches x 24 inches in size. Durability ratings are reported for measurements made according to paragraph 8.6.1. Batts of the invention exhibit a rating of 3 or higher (paragraph 8.5 scale).
Fiber leakage or percolation through shell fabric is measured as a sealing rating ("SR") by the method described in LeVan U. S. Patent No. 4,869,771 (after 3 wash cycles), a sealing rating (SR) of 5 being excellent and a sealing rating (SR) of 1 being poor. The batts of this invention exhibit a sealing rating (SR) of 3 or higher (after 3 wash cycles). In Table 2 (Example 3), sealing values are additionally reported after one wash (1W) as well as after 3 washes (3W) and compared with initial values before any washing (NEW).
The softness or drapability of the batts of this invention is measured according to German Industrial Standard 53362 Cantilever (DIN 53362 Cantilever) which determines and totals the bending stiffness ("B") of the batting in machine and cross machine directions; the combined results are related to drapability and softness. Batting samples are cut to 25 cm. length and 2.5 cm. width, and are cut in both machine (MD) and cross machine (XD) directions. Each Test specimen is weighed and its weight recorded as "W". Bend length ("LU") is then determined by sliding the sample horizontally on a platform until the front of the bent sample reaches an angle of 41 degrees and 30 seconds. The following calculation is then made: B = F1(LU÷2)3    where
B =
bending stiffness in cN/cm.2
LU =
bend length in cm.
F1 =
9.8 (W÷L)
W =
weight of the specimen sample in grams
L =
sample specimen length in cm.
The batts of this invention exhibit a bending stiffness ("B" being the sum of values determined for MD and XD samples from the batt) of 80 cN/cm.2 or less, a lower bending stiffness being preferred.
The invention is further illustrated in the following Examples, all parts and percentages being by weight, unless otherwise indicated, calculated with regard to the "BW" (Basis Weight, i.e., to the amount of polyester filberfill and binder fiber only, (i.e., without the added resin sprayed onto the faces to improve the sealing).
EXAMPLE
Various batting samples were prepared and tested, with results being shown in the Table. The binder fiber each time was "Melty 4080" (4 dpf), but different fiberfill fibers were used.
Samples A, B, C and D were prepared from a commercially-available blend of polyester fibers consisting of 37.5% of slickened 1.65 dpf (finished with a silicone slickener), 37.5% of dry 1.65 dpf (without any silicone slickener), and 25% binder fiber. The blend was processed on conventional card and cross-lapper equipment similar to the equipment as described in Example 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,225,242. The resulting battings were fed through a triple-pass oven maintained at about 165 C. The battings (except for A) were sprayed with equivalent amounts of a soft resin (glass transition temperature (Tg) equals -10 deg C) on each side such that the total resin add-on was as stated in the Table, based on "BW", the basis weight of the fiber in the batting at this stage which was about 4.5 oz/yd2(150 g/m2). One side of the batting was sprayed with resin before entering the first pass and the other side was sprayed before entering the second pass. Importantly, the entire batting was exposed to adequate time at a temperature sufficiently high to assure complete cure of the resin and set of the binder fiber (1 minute after the batt has reached 165 C has generally been sufficient). The battings were then calendered in a separate operation which served to seal the surfaces and reduce loft.
From the Sealing Values in the Table, it can be seen that, under these conditions, even with 8% resin (Sample B), the effect of calendering did not improve the sealing of the 1.65 dpf fibers batt after 1 wash cycle, and even with 15% resin (Sample C), the sealing was improved after 1 wash cycle, but still inadequate after 3 cycles. At 25% resin, under these conditions, the Sealing Rating of the surface of Sample D was satisfactory (after three wash cycles).
The battings were also tested for fiber leakage by encasing in a fabric with a yarn count of 104 X 84, and a Frazier air permeability rating of 13.2 cu ft/min at a pressure drop of 0.5 inches of water.
Samples E and F were the same as Samples A and D, respectively, except these were tested in a fabric with a yarn count of 102 x 84 and a Frazier rating of 48. Since 0.7 dpf battings were also tested in a more permeable fabric than for Samples A-D, results on Samples E and F (1.65 dpf) are included in the Table to bridge the data between Samples A-D and G-Q. Sample E, without resin, failed when new because of the openness of the fabric, but after three wash cycles had become sufficiently matted that it improved its leakage performance. Sample F's Sealing Value was 5 initially and provided a satisfactory Sealing Rating, i.e., after 3 wash cycles).
Samples G, H, I and J were prepared from a blend of about 85 pounds of dry polyester fibers (0.7 dpf, 0.78 dtex, 1.5 inch cut, 12 cpi, without any special slickening finish) and 15 pounds of binder fiber. These samples were resin-sprayed, calendered and tested as for samples E and F.
Samples K and L were prepared from a blend of about 55 pounds of similar 0.7 dpf slick fiber, finished with a silicone slickener, 27 pounds of dry (unslickened) 0.7 dpf fiber, and 18 pounds of binder fiber. These samples were not calendered, as indicated by the double asterisks in the Table, but gave good sealing ratings.
Samples M, O, P and Q were similarly prepared from the same kind of blend as K and L, but were made to higher basis weights, as shown, and also showed good sealing ratings, despite lower (less than 10%) resin add-on and despite not being calendered, because of use of low dpf fiber. N was calendered (unlike the others). A comparison of these results shows that calendering was not needed to improve the sealing rating (when the subdenier fibers were used with the soft resin).
Samples G through L were all tested for fiber leakage using the 48 Frazier fabric.
Accordingly, in the Table, samples K-M and O-Q are all according to the invention, whereas the others show comparisons, some without any resin sprayed on, some with regular denier fiberfill and whose sealing ratings are not adequate after washing, and some which were calendered.
Frazier BW Fiber dpf Resin Sealing Values
% (g/m2) New 1W 3W
A 13.2 4.5 1.65 0 0 (0) 5 1 1
B 13.2 4.5 1.65 8 0.36 (12.2) 5 1 1
C 13.2 4.5 1.65 15 0.67 (22.7) 5 3 1
D 13.2 4.5 1.65 25 1.125 (38.1) 5 5 5
E 48 4.5 1.65 0 0 (0) 1 1 4
F 48 4.5 1.65 25 1.125 (38.1) 5 5 5
G 48 4.5 0.7 4 0.18 (6.1) 5 5 5
H 48 4.5 0.7 2.2 0.10 (3.4) 5 5 5
I 48 4.5 0.7 1.6 0.07 (2.4) 5 5 5
J 48 4.5 0.7 0 0 (0) 4 1 1
K 48 4.5 0.7 10 0.45 (15.3) 5 5 5
L 48 4.5 0.7 5 0.225 (7.6) 5 5 5
M 48 6.1 0.7 6 0.37 (12.5) 5 5 4
N 48 5.1 0.7 7 0.36 (12.2) 5 5 5
O 48 8.0 0.7 6 0.48 (16.3) 5 5 5
P 48 8.1 0.7 8 0.65 (22.0) 5 5 5
Q 48 9.3 0.7 5 0.47 (15.9) 5 5 5

Claims (6)

  1. A bonded batt with upper and lower faces, said batt comprising polyester fiberfill of denier per filament greater than 0.2 and not more than 1, in amount about 75 to about 96% and bonded throughout with lower melting binder material, complementally in amount about 4 to 25%, said amounts being calculated on the basis weight of the batt, said batt having a wash durability (WD) of at least 4, and a bending stiffness (B) of about 40 cN/cm2 or less, wherein at least one of said faces is sealed with a resin having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of about 0 deg Celsius or less, in amount about 0.7 g/m2 (0.02 oz/yd2) to about 12 g/m2 (0.35 oz/yd2), calculated with regard to said face of the batt, whereby the sealing rating (SR) of said face is at least 4, said bonded batt having been prepared without the use of hot rolling.
  2. A batt according to Claim 1, wherein the amount of resin is about 3.4 to about 8.5 g/m2 (about 0.1 to about 0.25 oz/yd2).
  3. A batt according to Claim 1 or 2, wherein each of said upper and lower faces is sealed with said resin in said amount and has a sealing rating of at least 4.
  4. A process for preparing a bonded batt in accordance with Claim 1, Claim 2 or Claim 3, which process comprises preparing a homogeneous blend of 75-96% by weight of said polyester fiberfill and 4-25% by weight of said binder material in the form of fiber, converting the blend on a card or garnet to a web which is layered or cross lapped to form a batt, applying said resin to the upper face of said batt, and heating the batt to cure the resin and bond the binder fibers, and wherein hot rolling is not performed on the batt.
  5. A process according to Claim 4 wherein the resin is sprayed onto the batt.
  6. A process according to Claim 4 or Claim 5 wherein the batt is heated in three passes through a heated oven.
EP94920307A 1993-07-01 1994-06-29 New fiberfill battings Expired - Lifetime EP0708852B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US8493693A 1993-07-01 1993-07-01
US84936 1993-07-01
PCT/US1994/007076 WO1995001475A1 (en) 1993-07-01 1994-06-29 New fiberfill battings

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0708852A1 EP0708852A1 (en) 1996-05-01
EP0708852B1 true EP0708852B1 (en) 1998-03-18

Family

ID=22188144

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP94920307A Expired - Lifetime EP0708852B1 (en) 1993-07-01 1994-06-29 New fiberfill battings

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0708852B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH08512105A (en)
KR (1) KR100215684B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1062922C (en)
DE (1) DE69409115T2 (en)
HK (1) HK1001774A1 (en)
TW (1) TW305889B (en)
WO (1) WO1995001475A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5840634A (en) * 1996-01-22 1998-11-24 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Sealing of bonded batts
RU2545548C1 (en) * 2014-05-13 2015-04-10 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Предприятие нетканых материалов" Method of production of spacer nonwoven fabric by method of combined bonding
CN115180184A (en) * 2022-08-08 2022-10-14 中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速空气动力研究所 Filling type protection structure

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4304817A (en) * 1979-02-28 1981-12-08 E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company Polyester fiberfill blends
IN168824B (en) * 1986-10-21 1991-06-15 Du Pont
US4869771A (en) * 1987-10-26 1989-09-26 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Bonded polyester fiberfill batts
US5030507A (en) * 1990-01-12 1991-07-09 National Starch And Chemical Investment Holding Corporation Formaldehyde-free nonwoven binder composition
US5225242A (en) * 1991-11-27 1993-07-06 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Method of making a bonded batt with low fiber leakage

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR19990037961A (en) 1999-06-05
DE69409115D1 (en) 1998-04-23
CN1062922C (en) 2001-03-07
EP0708852A1 (en) 1996-05-01
JPH08512105A (en) 1996-12-17
WO1995001475A1 (en) 1995-01-12
KR100215684B1 (en) 1999-08-16
CN1156486A (en) 1997-08-06
TW305889B (en) 1997-05-21
DE69409115T2 (en) 1998-10-08
HK1001774A1 (en) 1998-07-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0614499B1 (en) New fiberfill battings
US4514455A (en) Nonwoven fabric for apparel insulating interliner
US4304817A (en) Polyester fiberfill blends
US4818599A (en) Polyester fiberfill
EP0760029B1 (en) Multilayer nonwoven thermal insulating batts
US4281042A (en) Polyester fiberfill blends
US5527600A (en) Bonded polyester fiberfill battings with a sealed outer surface
US4999232A (en) Making new stretchable batts
CA1306102C (en) Polyester fiberfill
EP0708852B1 (en) New fiberfill battings
US20030232552A1 (en) Bonded polyester fiberfill battings with a sealed outer surface having improved stretch and recovery capability
RU2162905C2 (en) Fastened fibrous cloth
JPH0230711B2 (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19951025

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19960524

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69409115

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19980423

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: ING. C. GREGORJ S.P.A.

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

BECA Be: change of holder's address

Owner name: *ADVANSA B.V.HOLLAND OFFICE CENTRE, KRUISWEG 829,

Effective date: 20050922

BECH Be: change of holder

Owner name: *ADVANSA B.V.

Effective date: 20050922

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20060630

Year of fee payment: 13

BECA Be: change of holder's address

Owner name: *ADVANSA B.V.HOLLAND OFFICE CENTRE, KRUISWEG 829,

Effective date: 20050922

BECH Be: change of holder

Owner name: *ADVANSA B.V.

Effective date: 20050922

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070629

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20110616

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20110620

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20110613

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20110610

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20110609

Year of fee payment: 18

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *ADVANSA B.V.

Effective date: 20120630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20120629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20130228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69409115

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120702

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120630

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130101

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120629