EP0614538B1 - Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures - Google Patents

Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0614538B1
EP0614538B1 EP92925404A EP92925404A EP0614538B1 EP 0614538 B1 EP0614538 B1 EP 0614538B1 EP 92925404 A EP92925404 A EP 92925404A EP 92925404 A EP92925404 A EP 92925404A EP 0614538 B1 EP0614538 B1 EP 0614538B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
spin
relaxation
geologic structure
signals
nuclear magnetic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP92925404A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0614538A4 (en
EP0614538A1 (en
Inventor
Georges R. Coates
Melvin N. Miller
John C. Bouton
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Numar Corp
Original Assignee
Numar Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Numar Corp filed Critical Numar Corp
Publication of EP0614538A1 publication Critical patent/EP0614538A1/en
Publication of EP0614538A4 publication Critical patent/EP0614538A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0614538B1 publication Critical patent/EP0614538B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N24/00Investigating or analyzing materials by the use of nuclear magnetic resonance, electron paramagnetic resonance or other spin effects
    • G01N24/08Investigating or analyzing materials by the use of nuclear magnetic resonance, electron paramagnetic resonance or other spin effects by using nuclear magnetic resonance
    • G01N24/081Making measurements of geologic samples, e.g. measurements of moisture, pH, porosity, permeability, tortuosity or viscosity
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V3/00Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
    • G01V3/18Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation specially adapted for well-logging
    • G01V3/32Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation specially adapted for well-logging operating with electron or nuclear magnetic resonance

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to systems for obtaining quantitative and qualitative measurements of geologic structures. More specifically, the present invention provides an efficient and effective system for using nuclear magnetic resonance techniques for obtaining information relating to geologic structures.
  • T1 the mechanism which determines the value of T1 depends on molecular dynamics.
  • molecular dynamics are a function of molecular size and inter-molecular interactions. Therefore, water and different types of oil have different T1 values.
  • the dynamics of molecules close to the solid surface are also significant and differ from the dynamics of the bulk liquid. It may thus be appreciated that the T1 parameter provides valuable information relating to well logging parameters.
  • each of these techniques provides means for measuring T1 of a rock formation within a certain volume (called the "sensitive volume”) which is determined mainly by the shape of the magnetic field surrounding the magnetic structure.
  • the signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement is limited by the ratio of the sensitive volume to the uniformity (maximum flux density minus flux density) of the magnetic field within said volume, and increases in proportion to this ratio.
  • the apparatus will respond only to nuclei residing within the sensitive volume.
  • the boundaries of the sensitive volume are determined by radiation patterns of transmitting and receiving antennae as well as a combination of the detailed structure of the magnetic field with the receiver's frequency passband.
  • the radio frequency that a given nucleus will respond to or emit when excited is proportional to the flux density of the magnetic field in which it is immersed. The proportionality factor depends upon the nuclear species. For hydrogen nuclei, that factor is 42.5759 MHz/Tesla.
  • the NMR receiver's passband extends from 1.30 MHz to 1.31 MHz, the instrument will be sensitive to hydrogen nuclei in regions of the magnetic field that have flux densities between 30.5 mT and 30.8 mT, providing the antenna radiation pattern allows receiving sufficient signal from that locations.
  • the magnetic field structure, antenna radiation pattern and receiver passband must all be adjusted to be sensitive to that and only that region. Since the signal-to-noise ratio of the resulting signal is proportional to (among other factors) the square root of the receiver passband width, it is important to minimize the variation of the magnetic field within the desired sensitive volume; smaller variations (better field uniformity) mean a better signal-to-noise ratio. Since the signal-to-noise ratio also increases with increasing frequency, the nominal magnetic field intensity within the volume is also very important. It is immaterial whether this nominal intensity is defined as the central value, average value or some other value within the range of values encompassed by the sensitive volume because only large differences in signal-to-noise ratio are significant.
  • the Schlumberger Nuclear Magnetic Logging Tool measures the free precession of proton nuclear magnetic moments in the earth's magnetic field by applying a relatively strong DC polarizing field to the surrounding rock formation in order to align proton spins approximately perpendicularly to earth's magnetic field.
  • the polarizing field must be applied for a period roughly five times T1 (the spin-lattice relaxation time) for sufficient polarization (approximately two seconds). At the end of polarization, the field is turned off rapidly.
  • the spin precession induces in a pick-up coil a sinusoidal signal whose amplitude is proportional to the density of protons present in the formation.
  • the signal decays with a time constant "T2" (transverse relaxation time) due to non-homogeneities in the local magnetic field over the sensing volume.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,728,892 to Vinegar et al. NMR discloses methods for determining spatial petrophysical properties of materials. These methods employ generation of separate initial magnetization Mo, T1 and T2 images, from which additional petrophysical characteristics of the materials may be obtained.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,551 to Kleinber et al. discloses using a NMR pulse sequence in a horehole environment to determine the Mo and T1 parameters which can later be used to derive additional formation parameters.
  • Improved nuclear magnetic resonance logging tools and methods for using these tools are described generally in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,710,713; 4,717,876; 4,717,877; and 4,717,878, all of which are commonly owned by the assignee of the present invention.
  • the method and apparatus of the present invention uses the logging tool and techniques described in the above-referenced patents to obtain previously unavailable data relating to the composition of a geologic formation.
  • the present invention uses a variable time-window to improve the signal quality obtained from a measurement of a particular formation and to optimize the logging speed of the system.
  • the method and apparatus of the present invention provide improved nuclear magnetic resonance technique for obtaining information relating to geologic structures.
  • a nuclear magnetic resonance logging tool is used to impart magnetic polarization fields to a portion of a geologic formation.
  • Nuclear magnetic resonance signals from the excited nuclei in the formation are then detected to obtain data for calculating a number of important petrophysical parameters of geologic interest.
  • the method and apparatus of the present invention provide greater signal to noise ratios for measurements made in shaly-rocks. More specifically, the repeat rate of the measurement, or the logging speed, is greatly increased in these shaly-rocks to provide an enhanced signal.
  • a variable time-window echo-recording system is used to obtain significant improvements in signal quality and logging speed.
  • An initial test is performed to provide an assessment of the relaxation qualities of the sample. If the test reveals that the sample is a slow-relaxation rock, then the full time is allocated to measuring echoes. However, if the test reveals that the sample is a fast decay rock, then the echo acquisition time-window is reduced. This provides increased efficiency since the system is able to maximize the number of measurements made by optimizing the individual sampling intervals to the particular geologic structure being tested.
  • the system of the present invention is capable of providing additional information relating to the very-fast relaxation rocks where signal levels are typically very low using prior art techniques.
  • FIG. 1 is a partially pictorial, partially block diagram illustration of a well logging apparatus for obtaining nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of a geologic structure.
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a geologic structure investigated using a nuclear magnetic resonance system such as that shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3a is a graphical illustration of time interval windows which can be used to determine the amplitude decay characteristics of the sample in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3b is an illustration of the relative slope of a sample having a fast relaxation time and a sample having a slow relaxation time.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustration of the components for controlling the echo acquisition time-window in the system of the present invention.
  • a borehole 10 is shown adjacent to formations 12 and 14 having structures to be examined using the method and apparatus of the present invention.
  • a logging tool 16 which is suspended by a cable 18 routed over pulleys 20 and 22, with the position of the cable 18 being determined by a motor 24.
  • the upper portion of the logging tool 16 comprises telemetry electronics 26, gamma ray sensing electronics 28 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) electronics 30.
  • An MRI probe 32 is suspended at the bottom of the probe to provide excitation to the surrounding geologic formation.
  • the excitation field has a generally cylindrical shape as represented by reference numeral 34.
  • Improved devices which can be used for the probe 32 are described generally in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,710,713; 4,717,876; 4,717,877; and 4,717,878, which, by this reference, are incorporated herein for all purposes.
  • the MRI electronics 30 employed in the system of the present invention comprise both the electronics to control the signals emitted by the MRI probe 32 and detection electronics for receiving the spin-spin pulse-echo signals from the formation being tested. The operation of these components to select an optimized sampling interval will be discussed in greater detail below.
  • the spin-spin pulse-echo measurement of the spin-echo relaxation of the sample, in a homogenous isotropic media, reflects the surface-to-volume characteristics of the pores.
  • the rocks are complex mixtures of minerals which often include a variety of pore sizes. consequently, the measured spin-echo relaxation in such an environment is a complex phenomenon, a reflection of the variations which exist in terms of pore surface-to-volume ratios and surface-to-fluid interactions.
  • the method and apparatus of the present invention is based on the discovery that for a select time-window of echo-relaxation there is an associated select range of surface-to-volume response.
  • spin-echo time-windows it is possible to determine the relative fraction of select surface-to-volume components.
  • these changes in relaxation time can also be used as a measure of a representative pore-size condition.
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a geologic structure investigated using a nuclear magnetic resonance system such as that shown in FIG. 1.
  • the spacing of the time intervals between the pulses in this application is typically between 1.5 and 3 milliseconds.
  • the time intervals labelled "A-H” correspond to the signal intervals for various particle sizes, with interval “A” corresponding to the interval for particles larger than 500 ⁇ and interval "H” corresponding to the interval for particles of larger than 8 ⁇ , etc.
  • the transmitter activation and echo-recordings are normally synchronized to ensure the full spectrum of T2 relaxation is accomplished (typically 300 msecs).
  • the technique is typically calibrated to the slowest relaxation condition since these constitute the best reservoir pore-size condition.
  • the vast majority of the formations are comprised of very-fine pore structures associated with the shale and shaly-sand formations. Since the recording interval is typically the full 300 msec, the repeat rate of the measurement, and thus the logging speed is greatly reduced in these shaly-rocks.
  • FIG. 3a is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a particular geologic structure. The slope of the pulse amplitude curve is characteristic of the particular geologic formation being tested.
  • FIG. 3b is an illustration of the possible slopes for pulse amplitude curves corresponding to a fast decay (very-fine pore formation), medium decay (medium-pore formation), and slow decay (reservoir-type pore formation).
  • the time intervals w 1 , w 2 , and w 3 correspond to the sampling intervals which would optimize the collection of spin-echo pulse information relating to the respective geologic composition of a formation.
  • the time-window w 1 is the time interval which optimizes the collection of data relating to very-fine pore structures.
  • the time intervals w 2 and w 3 are the time intervals for optimizing the collection of data relating to medium and large pore structures, respectively.
  • an initial test is performed to determine the relaxation characteristics of the formation being tested.
  • the information obtained from this initial test is then used to select a sampling interval which optimizes the collection of data for the particular pore structure of the formation being tested.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the components used to control the data collection interval in the system of the present invention.
  • the MRI electronics 30 comprise an MRI probe controller and pulse-echo detection electronics.
  • an initial test is conducted to determine the relaxation characteristics of the sample. This is accomplished by a full 300 msec test cycle.
  • the output signal from the detection electronics is processed by the amplitude processor 44 to obtain an initial regression analysis of the relaxation characteristics of the sample.
  • the output of the amplitude processor 44 is provided to the echo-time selector 46 which selects the optimum sampling time interval. This time interval is implemented by the measurement cycle controller 48 which provides an appropriate control signal to the MRI probe controller.
  • the measurement cycle controller 48 provides an appropriate control signal to the MRI probe controller.
  • the full sampling interval e.g., 300 msec
  • a shorter sampling interval e.g., 50-100 msec
  • the reduction in the sampling interval time-window allows the system to obtain additional measurements in the same amount of time which would otherwise be required for a single measurement. These additional measurements are especially useful for analyzing formations having very fast relaxation characteristics for which signal levels are typically very low.
  • the system of the present invention therefore, has the advantage of providing improved measurements of fast decay formations, while maintaining the current signal-to-noise qualities in the slow relaxation rocks.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Apparatus (AREA)
  • Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)

Abstract

A system for using nuclear magnetic resonance techniques to obtain information relating to geologic structures. The system employs a variable sample window (W1, W2, W3) which increases sampling efficiency by allowing the system to optimize the sampling interval, thereby maximizing the amount of data which can be obtained in a series of data samples.

Description

  • The present invention relates to systems for obtaining quantitative and qualitative measurements of geologic structures. More specifically, the present invention provides an efficient and effective system for using nuclear magnetic resonance techniques for obtaining information relating to geologic structures.
  • As is known, fluid flow properties of porous media have long been of interest in the oil industry. In an article by A. Timur, entitled "Pulsed Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of Porosity, Movable Fluid, and Permeability of Sandstones," in the Journal of Petroleum Technology, June 1969, page 775, it was shown experimentally that NMR methods provide a rapid non-destructive determination of porosity, movable fluid, and permeability of rock formation.
  • It is known that when an assembly of magnetic moments, such as those of hydrogen nuclei, are exposed to a static magnetic field they tend to align along the direction of the magnetic field, resulting in bulk magnetization. The rate at which equilibrium is established in such bulk magnetization upon provision of a static magnetic field is characterized by the parameter T1, known as the spin-lattice relaxation time.
  • It has been observed that the mechanism which determines the value of T1 depends on molecular dynamics. In liquids, molecular dynamics are a function of molecular size and inter-molecular interactions. Therefore, water and different types of oil have different T1 values.
  • In the heterogeneous media, such as a porous solid which contains liquid in its pores, the dynamics of molecules close to the solid surface are also significant and differ from the dynamics of the bulk liquid. It may thus be appreciated that the T1 parameter provides valuable information relating to well logging parameters.
  • There exist a number of techniques for disturbing the equilibrium of an assembly of magnetic moments, such as those of hydrogen nuclei, for T1 parameter measurements. Each of these techniques provides means for measuring T1 of a rock formation within a certain volume (called the "sensitive volume") which is determined mainly by the shape of the magnetic field surrounding the magnetic structure. The signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement is limited by the ratio of the sensitive volume to the uniformity (maximum flux density minus flux density) of the magnetic field within said volume, and increases in proportion to this ratio.
  • In any given nuclear magnetic resonance instrument configuration, the apparatus will respond only to nuclei residing within the sensitive volume. In the present invention and prior art instruments described herein, the boundaries of the sensitive volume are determined by radiation patterns of transmitting and receiving antennae as well as a combination of the detailed structure of the magnetic field with the receiver's frequency passband. The radio frequency that a given nucleus will respond to or emit when excited is proportional to the flux density of the magnetic field in which it is immersed. The proportionality factor depends upon the nuclear species. For hydrogen nuclei, that factor is 42.5759 MHz/Tesla. If the NMR receiver's passband extends from 1.30 MHz to 1.31 MHz, the instrument will be sensitive to hydrogen nuclei in regions of the magnetic field that have flux densities between 30.5 mT and 30.8 mT, providing the antenna radiation pattern allows receiving sufficient signal from that locations.
  • If it is desired to study nuclei located with a particular region, the magnetic field structure, antenna radiation pattern and receiver passband must all be adjusted to be sensitive to that and only that region. Since the signal-to-noise ratio of the resulting signal is proportional to (among other factors) the square root of the receiver passband width, it is important to minimize the variation of the magnetic field within the desired sensitive volume; smaller variations (better field uniformity) mean a better signal-to-noise ratio. Since the signal-to-noise ratio also increases with increasing frequency, the nominal magnetic field intensity within the volume is also very important. It is immaterial whether this nominal intensity is defined as the central value, average value or some other value within the range of values encompassed by the sensitive volume because only large differences in signal-to-noise ratio are significant.
  • One technique for measuring T1 of a rock formation is exemplified by what is known as the "Schlumberger Nuclear Magnetic Logging Tool." That tool is described by R.C. Herrick, S.H. Couturie, and D.L. Best in "An Improved Nuclear Magnetic Logging System and Its Application to Formation Evaluation," SPE8361 presented at the 54th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, held in Las Vegas, Nev., Sept. 23-26, 1979, and also by R.J.S. Brown et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 3,213,357 entitled "Earth Formation and Fluid Material Investigation by Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Rate Determination."
  • The Schlumberger Nuclear Magnetic Logging Tool measures the free precession of proton nuclear magnetic moments in the earth's magnetic field by applying a relatively strong DC polarizing field to the surrounding rock formation in order to align proton spins approximately perpendicularly to earth's magnetic field. The polarizing field must be applied for a period roughly five times T1 (the spin-lattice relaxation time) for sufficient polarization (approximately two seconds). At the end of polarization, the field is turned off rapidly. Since the proton spins are unable to follow this sudden change, they are left aligned perpendicularly to the earth's magnetic field and precess about this field at the "Larmor Frequency" corresponding to the local earth's magnetic field (roughly from 1300 to 2600 Hz, depending on location).
  • The spin precession induces in a pick-up coil a sinusoidal signal whose amplitude is proportional to the density of protons present in the formation. The signal decays with a time constant "T2" (transverse relaxation time) due to non-homogeneities in the local magnetic field over the sensing volume.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,728,892 to Vinegar et al. NMR discloses methods for determining spatial petrophysical properties of materials. These methods employ generation of separate initial magnetization Mo, T1 and T2 images, from which additional petrophysical characteristics of the materials may be obtained.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,551 to Kleinber et al. discloses using a NMR pulse sequence in a horehole environment to determine the Mo and T1 parameters which can later be used to derive additional formation parameters.
  • Improved nuclear magnetic resonance logging tools and methods for using these tools are described generally in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,710,713; 4,717,876; 4,717,877; and 4,717,878, all of which are commonly owned by the assignee of the present invention. The method and apparatus of the present invention, described in greater detail below, uses the logging tool and techniques described in the above-referenced patents to obtain previously unavailable data relating to the composition of a geologic formation. In particular, the present invention uses a variable time-window to improve the signal quality obtained from a measurement of a particular formation and to optimize the logging speed of the system.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • The method and apparatus of the present invention provide improved nuclear magnetic resonance technique for obtaining information relating to geologic structures. In the present invention, a nuclear magnetic resonance logging tool is used to impart magnetic polarization fields to a portion of a geologic formation. Nuclear magnetic resonance signals from the excited nuclei in the formation are then detected to obtain data for calculating a number of important petrophysical parameters of geologic interest.
  • The method and apparatus of the present invention provide greater signal to noise ratios for measurements made in shaly-rocks. More specifically, the repeat rate of the measurement, or the logging speed, is greatly increased in these shaly-rocks to provide an enhanced signal.
  • In the method and apparatus of the present invention, a variable time-window echo-recording system is used to obtain significant improvements in signal quality and logging speed. An initial test is performed to provide an assessment of the relaxation qualities of the sample. If the test reveals that the sample is a slow-relaxation rock, then the full time is allocated to measuring echoes. However, if the test reveals that the sample is a fast decay rock, then the echo acquisition time-window is reduced. This provides increased efficiency since the system is able to maximize the number of measurements made by optimizing the individual sampling intervals to the particular geologic structure being tested. The system of the present invention is capable of providing additional information relating to the very-fast relaxation rocks where signal levels are typically very low using prior art techniques.
  • Brief Description of the Drawings
  • FIG. 1 is a partially pictorial, partially block diagram illustration of a well logging apparatus for obtaining nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of a geologic structure.
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a geologic structure investigated using a nuclear magnetic resonance system such as that shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3a is a graphical illustration of time interval windows which can be used to determine the amplitude decay characteristics of the sample in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3b is an illustration of the relative slope of a sample having a fast relaxation time and a sample having a slow relaxation time.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustration of the components for controlling the echo acquisition time-window in the system of the present invention.
  • Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment
  • Referring to FIG. 1, a borehole 10 is shown adjacent to formations 12 and 14 having structures to be examined using the method and apparatus of the present invention. Within the borehole, there is a logging tool 16 which is suspended by a cable 18 routed over pulleys 20 and 22, with the position of the cable 18 being determined by a motor 24.
  • The upper portion of the logging tool 16 comprises telemetry electronics 26, gamma ray sensing electronics 28 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) electronics 30. An MRI probe 32 is suspended at the bottom of the probe to provide excitation to the surrounding geologic formation. The excitation field has a generally cylindrical shape as represented by reference numeral 34. Improved devices which can be used for the probe 32 are described generally in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,710,713; 4,717,876; 4,717,877; and 4,717,878, which, by this reference, are incorporated herein for all purposes.
  • The MRI electronics 30 employed in the system of the present invention comprise both the electronics to control the signals emitted by the MRI probe 32 and detection electronics for receiving the spin-spin pulse-echo signals from the formation being tested. The operation of these components to select an optimized sampling interval will be discussed in greater detail below.
  • The spin-spin pulse-echo measurement of the spin-echo relaxation of the sample, in a homogenous isotropic media, reflects the surface-to-volume characteristics of the pores. In typical rocks encountered in the well-logging environment, the rocks are complex mixtures of minerals which often include a variety of pore sizes. consequently, the measured spin-echo relaxation in such an environment is a complex phenomenon, a reflection of the variations which exist in terms of pore surface-to-volume ratios and surface-to-fluid interactions.
  • The method and apparatus of the present invention is based on the discovery that for a select time-window of echo-relaxation there is an associated select range of surface-to-volume response. Thus, by proper selection of spin-echo time-windows it is possible to determine the relative fraction of select surface-to-volume components. In addition, these changes in relaxation time can also be used as a measure of a representative pore-size condition.
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a geologic structure investigated using a nuclear magnetic resonance system such as that shown in FIG. 1. The spacing of the time intervals between the pulses in this application is typically between 1.5 and 3 milliseconds. The time intervals labelled "A-H" correspond to the signal intervals for various particle sizes, with interval "A" corresponding to the interval for particles larger than 500µ and interval "H" corresponding to the interval for particles of larger than 8µ, etc.
  • The calibration of the process is accomplished through multi-dimension regression analysis utilizing optimally selected and prepared laboratory samples. Such regression techniques are known to those skilled in the art and are described in the following references: K. Fukunaga, Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, Academic Press, 1972; Bhattacharyya & Johnson, Statistical Concepts and Methods, Wiley & Sons, 1977; and Devijver & Kittler, Pattern Recognition -- A -Statistical Approach, Prentice Hall, 1982.
  • In the present invention, the transmitter activation and echo-recordings are normally synchronized to ensure the full spectrum of T2 relaxation is accomplished (typically 300 msecs). The technique is typically calibrated to the slowest relaxation condition since these constitute the best reservoir pore-size condition.
  • However, in most well-bores, the vast majority of the formations are comprised of very-fine pore structures associated with the shale and shaly-sand formations. Since the recording interval is typically the full 300 msec, the repeat rate of the measurement, and thus the logging speed is greatly reduced in these shaly-rocks.
  • The method and apparatus of the present invention employs a variable time-window echo-recording system which provides significant improvements in signal quality and logging speed. FIG. 3a is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a particular geologic structure. The slope of the pulse amplitude curve is characteristic of the particular geologic formation being tested. FIG. 3b is an illustration of the possible slopes for pulse amplitude curves corresponding to a fast decay (very-fine pore formation), medium decay (medium-pore formation), and slow decay (reservoir-type pore formation). The time intervals w1, w2, and w3 correspond to the sampling intervals which would optimize the collection of spin-echo pulse information relating to the respective geologic composition of a formation. For example, the time-window w1 is the time interval which optimizes the collection of data relating to very-fine pore structures. Likewise the time intervals w2 and w3 are the time intervals for optimizing the collection of data relating to medium and large pore structures, respectively.
  • In the present invention, an initial test is performed to determine the relaxation characteristics of the formation being tested. The information obtained from this initial test is then used to select a sampling interval which optimizes the collection of data for the particular pore structure of the formation being tested.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the components used to control the data collection interval in the system of the present invention. The MRI electronics 30 comprise an MRI probe controller and pulse-echo detection electronics. As was discussed above, an initial test is conducted to determine the relaxation characteristics of the sample. This is accomplished by a full 300 msec test cycle. The output signal from the detection electronics is processed by the amplitude processor 44 to obtain an initial regression analysis of the relaxation characteristics of the sample. The output of the amplitude processor 44 is provided to the echo-time selector 46 which selects the optimum sampling time interval. This time interval is implemented by the measurement cycle controller 48 which provides an appropriate control signal to the MRI probe controller. Once the sampling interval has been selected, the repeated data samples are obtained and processed by the amplitude processor 44, with the processed data being stored in data storage 50.
  • If the initial data indicates that the sample has slow-relaxation characteristics, then the full sampling interval (e.g., 300 msec) is maintained for subsequent samples. However, if the initial data indicates that the formation has fast relaxation characteristics, then a shorter sampling interval (e.g., 50-100 msec) is used for subsequent data acquisition. The reduction in the sampling interval time-window allows the system to obtain additional measurements in the same amount of time which would otherwise be required for a single measurement. These additional measurements are especially useful for analyzing formations having very fast relaxation characteristics for which signal levels are typically very low. The system of the present invention, therefore, has the advantage of providing improved measurements of fast decay formations, while maintaining the current signal-to-noise qualities in the slow relaxation rocks.

Claims (8)

  1. A method for determining the composition of a geologic structure, comprising the steps of:
    (a) imparting a polarizing magnetic field to a geologic structure for a predetermined period of time;
    (b) measuring during a first time interval the nuclear magnetic resonance signals representing spin-echo relaxation of a population of particles in said geologic structure;
    (c) constructing a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals characteristic of said population of particles; and
    (d) analyzing said chain of spin-echo relaxation signals to determine an optimum sampling interval for obtaining a plurality of subsequent data measurements relating to said geologic structure.
  2. The method according to claim 1, said step of analyzing said chain of spin-echo relaxation signals comprising the step of performing a regression analysis of said chain of signals to determine the relaxation characteristics of said geologic structure.
  3. The method according to claim 1 or claim 2, said first time interval for measuring said nuclear magnetic resonnance signals being approximately 300 milliseconds.
  4. The method according to any previous claim, further comprising the step of obtaining a plurality of subsequent data measurements relating to said geologic structure, said subsequent data measurements comprising a plurality of nuclear magnetic resonance spin-echo relaxation measurements obtained using said optimum sampling interval.
  5. The method according to any one of claims 2 to 4, further comprising the step of using said regression analysis to determine an optimum sampling interval.
  6. The method according to any previous claim, said optimum sampling interval being less than or equal to said first time interval.
  7. Apparatus for determining the composition of a geologic structure, comprising :
    means for imparting a polarizing magnetic field to a geologic structure for a predetermined period of time;
    means for measuring during a first time interval the nuclear magnetic resonance signals representing spin-echo relaxation of a population of particles in said geologic structure;
    means for constructing a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals characteristic of said population of particles; and
    means for analyzing said chain of spin-echo relaxation signals to determine an optimum sampling interval for obtaining data relating to said geologic structure.
  8. The apparatus according to claim 7, said means for analyzing said chain of spin-echo relaxation signals comprising means for performing a regression analysis of said chain of signals to determine the relaxation characteristics of said geologic structure.
EP92925404A 1991-11-27 1992-11-25 Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures Expired - Lifetime EP0614538B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/800,599 US5309098A (en) 1991-05-16 1991-11-27 Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures
US800599 1991-11-27
PCT/US1992/010143 WO1993011451A1 (en) 1991-11-27 1992-11-25 Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0614538A1 EP0614538A1 (en) 1994-09-14
EP0614538A4 EP0614538A4 (en) 1996-12-27
EP0614538B1 true EP0614538B1 (en) 1999-02-03

Family

ID=25178830

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP92925404A Expired - Lifetime EP0614538B1 (en) 1991-11-27 1992-11-25 Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US5309098A (en)
EP (1) EP0614538B1 (en)
AR (1) AR247950A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2117291C (en)
DE (1) DE69228387T2 (en)
MX (1) MX9206856A (en)
RU (1) RU2115142C1 (en)
WO (1) WO1993011451A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (59)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5557200A (en) * 1991-05-16 1996-09-17 Numar Corporation Nuclear magnetic resonance determination of petrophysical properties of geologic structures
US5530350A (en) * 1991-11-20 1996-06-25 Auburn International, Inc. Magnetic resonance analysis in real time, industrial usage mode
US5596274A (en) * 1992-12-31 1997-01-21 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Determining bound and unbound fluid volumes using nuclear magnetic resonance pulse sequences
US5497087A (en) * 1994-10-20 1996-03-05 Shell Oil Company NMR logging of natural gas reservoirs
US5680043A (en) * 1995-03-23 1997-10-21 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Nuclear magnetic resonance technique for determining gas effect with borehole logging tools
US5936405A (en) * 1995-09-25 1999-08-10 Numar Corporation System and method for lithology-independent gas detection using multifrequency gradient NMR logging
US6242912B1 (en) 1995-10-12 2001-06-05 Numar Corporation System and method for lithology-independent gas detection using multifrequency gradient NMR logging
US6512371B2 (en) 1995-10-12 2003-01-28 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. System and method for determining oil, water and gas saturations for low-field gradient NMR logging tools
US6956371B2 (en) * 1995-10-12 2005-10-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method and apparatus for detecting diffusion sensitive phases with estimation of residual error in NMR logs
US6005389A (en) * 1996-03-15 1999-12-21 Numar Corporation Pulse sequences and interpretation techniques for NMR measurements
US6531868B2 (en) 1996-12-30 2003-03-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. System and methods for formation evaluation while drilling
US6051973A (en) * 1996-12-30 2000-04-18 Numar Corporation Method for formation evaluation while drilling
US6204663B1 (en) 1997-03-26 2001-03-20 Numar Corporation Pulse sequence and method for suppression of magneto-acoustic artifacts in NMR data
US6081116A (en) * 1997-04-21 2000-06-27 Baker Hughes Incorporated Nuclear magnetic resonance apparatus and method for geological applications
US6177794B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2001-01-23 The Regents Of The University Of California Use of earth field spin echo NMR to search for liquid minerals
US6166540A (en) * 1997-06-30 2000-12-26 Wollin Ventures, Inc. Method of resistivity well logging utilizing nuclear magnetic resonance
US6094048A (en) * 1997-12-18 2000-07-25 Shell Oil Company NMR logging of natural gas reservoirs
US6111408A (en) * 1997-12-23 2000-08-29 Numar Corporation Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and techniques for downhole measurements
AR015217A1 (en) 1998-01-16 2001-04-18 Numar Corp A NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE TOOL (NMR) TO DRIVE MEASUREMENTS OF A LAND FORMATION THAT SURROUND A PROBE WELL, A METHOD FOR CARRYING OUT THESE MEASUREMENTS WHILE THE DRILL IS MADE AND A PROVISION TO MAKE NMR MEASUREMENTS.
US6023164A (en) * 1998-02-20 2000-02-08 Numar Corporation Eccentric NMR well logging apparatus and method
FR2781053B1 (en) 1998-07-10 2000-08-11 Commissariat Energie Atomique CHARACTERIZATION OF A POROUS PERMEABLE MEDIUM BY NMR OF POLARIZED GAS
US6107796A (en) * 1998-08-17 2000-08-22 Numar Corporation Method and apparatus for differentiating oil based mud filtrate from connate oil
US6377042B1 (en) 1998-08-31 2002-04-23 Numar Corporation Method and apparatus for merging of NMR echo trains in the time domain
US6366087B1 (en) * 1998-10-30 2002-04-02 George Richard Coates NMR logging apparatus and methods for fluid typing
US6316940B1 (en) 1999-03-17 2001-11-13 Numar Corporation System and method for identification of hydrocarbons using enhanced diffusion
US6661226B1 (en) 1999-08-13 2003-12-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. NMR apparatus and methods for measuring volumes of hydrocarbon gas and oil
US6255819B1 (en) 1999-10-25 2001-07-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. System and method for geologically-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging logs
US6541969B2 (en) 1999-12-15 2003-04-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method and apparatus for improving the vertical resolution of NMR logs
US6646437B1 (en) 2000-04-07 2003-11-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. System and method for clay typing using NMR-based porosity modeling
US6624629B1 (en) * 2000-05-08 2003-09-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Optimizing characteristics of RF pulses used in NMR measurements
US6577125B2 (en) 2000-12-18 2003-06-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Temperature compensated magnetic field apparatus for NMR measurements
US7135862B2 (en) 2001-03-13 2006-11-14 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc NMR logging using time-domain averaging
US6518756B1 (en) * 2001-06-14 2003-02-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Systems and methods for determining motion tool parameters in borehole logging
US6525534B2 (en) 2001-06-15 2003-02-25 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. System and methods for NMR signal processing without phase alternated pair stacking
US7117733B2 (en) * 2004-04-07 2006-10-10 Baker Hughes Incorporated Dynamic logging speed
US7301338B2 (en) * 2001-08-13 2007-11-27 Baker Hughes Incorporated Automatic adjustment of NMR pulse sequence to optimize SNR based on real time analysis
FR2832255B1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2004-11-26 France Telecom COMB AND METHOD FOR DERIVING PRE-EXISTING WIRING
US6859032B2 (en) * 2001-12-18 2005-02-22 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method for determining molecular properties of hydrocarbon mixtures from NMR data
US6856132B2 (en) 2002-11-08 2005-02-15 Shell Oil Company Method and apparatus for subterranean formation flow imaging
US6937014B2 (en) * 2003-03-24 2005-08-30 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Method for obtaining multi-dimensional proton density distributions from a system of nuclear spins
US7463027B2 (en) * 2003-05-02 2008-12-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Systems and methods for deep-looking NMR logging
CA2852097A1 (en) * 2003-10-03 2005-04-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. System and methods for t1-based logging
WO2005036338A2 (en) * 2003-10-04 2005-04-21 Halliburton Energy Services Group System and methods for upscaling petrophysical data
WO2005065277A2 (en) 2003-12-24 2005-07-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Contamination estimation using fluid analysis models
WO2005067569A2 (en) * 2004-01-04 2005-07-28 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method and apparatus for detecting hydrocarbons with nmr logs in wells drilled with oil-based muds
CN100373172C (en) * 2004-10-21 2008-03-05 北京大学 Apparatus and method for measuring stratum rock physical property by rock NMR relaxation signal
US20110093199A1 (en) * 2009-09-29 2011-04-21 Kittridge Mark Gerard Characterization of logging tool performance
US9562989B2 (en) 2011-06-07 2017-02-07 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Rotational indexing to optimize sensing volume of a nuclear magnetic resonance logging tool
US9304179B1 (en) 2011-08-12 2016-04-05 University Of New Brunswick Method of magnetic resonance imaging combining phase and frequency encoding
US9405035B2 (en) 2012-01-10 2016-08-02 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Enhanced transmitter and method for a nuclear magnetic resonance logging tool
AU2012369222B2 (en) 2012-02-08 2015-05-07 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Nuclear magnetic resonance logging tool having multiple pad-mounted atomic magnetometers
US10254433B2 (en) 2013-07-15 2019-04-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging tool calibration
US20160025825A1 (en) * 2014-07-25 2016-01-28 Gersh Z. Taicher Nuclear magnetic resonance apparatus and methods
US9851315B2 (en) 2014-12-11 2017-12-26 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Methods for quantitative characterization of asphaltenes in solutions using two-dimensional low-field NMR measurement
CN108028129B (en) * 2015-10-20 2020-03-17 哈利伯顿能源服务公司 Logging tool ferrite and method of manufacture
US10634746B2 (en) 2016-03-29 2020-04-28 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. NMR measured pore fluid phase behavior measurements
WO2019222300A1 (en) 2018-05-15 2019-11-21 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Adaptive downhole acquisition system
WO2020069378A1 (en) * 2018-09-28 2020-04-02 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Elastic adaptive downhole acquisition system
US11726227B2 (en) 2021-06-18 2023-08-15 Terrasee Tech, LLC Determining resonant frequencies and magnetic influence factors of materials in the earth

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3213357A (en) * 1962-10-22 1965-10-19 California Research Corp Earth formation and fluid material investigation by nuclear magnetism relaxation rate determination
US4728892A (en) * 1985-08-13 1988-03-01 Shell Oil Company NMR imaging of materials
US4710713A (en) * 1986-03-11 1987-12-01 Numar Corporation Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and techniques
US4717876A (en) * 1986-08-13 1988-01-05 Numar NMR magnet system for well logging
US5055788A (en) * 1986-08-27 1991-10-08 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Borehole measurement of NMR characteristics of earth formations
US4933638A (en) * 1986-08-27 1990-06-12 Schlumber Technology Corp. Borehole measurement of NMR characteristics of earth formations, and interpretations thereof
US4717877A (en) * 1986-09-25 1988-01-05 Numar Corporation Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and techniques
US4717878A (en) * 1986-09-26 1988-01-05 Numar Corporation Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and techniques
EP0295134A2 (en) * 1987-06-11 1988-12-14 Numar Corporation Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and methods

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69228387D1 (en) 1999-03-18
US5309098A (en) 1994-05-03
WO1993011451A1 (en) 1993-06-10
MX9206856A (en) 1993-05-01
EP0614538A4 (en) 1996-12-27
DE69228387T2 (en) 1999-09-30
CA2117291C (en) 2003-04-22
RU94026261A (en) 1996-04-20
CA2117291A1 (en) 1993-06-10
AR247950A1 (en) 1995-04-28
EP0614538A1 (en) 1994-09-14
RU2115142C1 (en) 1998-07-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0614538B1 (en) Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures
EP0646250B1 (en) Nuclear magnetic resonance determination of petrophysical properties of geologic structures
EP0765486B1 (en) Determination of petrophysical properties of geologic structures
US6600316B2 (en) Rapid NMR multi-frequency T1 and T2 acquisition for earth formations evaluation with MWD or wireline tools
CA2540791C (en) System and methods for t1-based logging
EP0835463B1 (en) Nmr system and method for formation evaluation using diffusion and relaxation log measurements
US5680043A (en) Nuclear magnetic resonance technique for determining gas effect with borehole logging tools
EP0544585B1 (en) Nuclear magnetic resonance pulse sequences for determining bound fluid volume
US6344744B2 (en) Multiple frequency method for nuclear magnetic resonance longitudinal relaxation measurement and pulsing sequence for power use optimization
EP1236057B1 (en) Nuclear magnetic resonance method and logging apparatus
US20080204013A1 (en) Logging method for determining characteristic of fluid in a downhole measurement region
WO1995035514A9 (en) Nuclear magnetic resonance determination of petrophysical properties of geologic structures
US6883702B2 (en) Method and apparatus for NMR measurement of wettability
US7812602B2 (en) Multiple echo train inversion
EP0584224A1 (en) Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19940616

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19961108

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19970401

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69228387

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19990318

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20001120

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20001122

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20001130

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20011113

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20011125

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020702

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20011125

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20020601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20051125