EP0614538B1 - Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures - Google Patents
Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0614538B1 EP0614538B1 EP92925404A EP92925404A EP0614538B1 EP 0614538 B1 EP0614538 B1 EP 0614538B1 EP 92925404 A EP92925404 A EP 92925404A EP 92925404 A EP92925404 A EP 92925404A EP 0614538 B1 EP0614538 B1 EP 0614538B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- spin
- relaxation
- geologic structure
- signals
- nuclear magnetic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000005481 NMR spectroscopy Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title description 4
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000000611 regression analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 27
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 27
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 16
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 13
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000002595 magnetic resonance imaging Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 5
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000013101 initial test Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000005415 magnetization Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000329 molecular dynamics simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003909 pattern recognition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010420 art technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002592 echocardiography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005251 gamma ray Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009878 intermolecular interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006101 laboratory sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001208 nuclear magnetic resonance pulse sequence Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N24/00—Investigating or analyzing materials by the use of nuclear magnetic resonance, electron paramagnetic resonance or other spin effects
- G01N24/08—Investigating or analyzing materials by the use of nuclear magnetic resonance, electron paramagnetic resonance or other spin effects by using nuclear magnetic resonance
- G01N24/081—Making measurements of geologic samples, e.g. measurements of moisture, pH, porosity, permeability, tortuosity or viscosity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
- G01V3/18—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation specially adapted for well-logging
- G01V3/32—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation specially adapted for well-logging operating with electron or nuclear magnetic resonance
Definitions
- the present invention relates to systems for obtaining quantitative and qualitative measurements of geologic structures. More specifically, the present invention provides an efficient and effective system for using nuclear magnetic resonance techniques for obtaining information relating to geologic structures.
- T1 the mechanism which determines the value of T1 depends on molecular dynamics.
- molecular dynamics are a function of molecular size and inter-molecular interactions. Therefore, water and different types of oil have different T1 values.
- the dynamics of molecules close to the solid surface are also significant and differ from the dynamics of the bulk liquid. It may thus be appreciated that the T1 parameter provides valuable information relating to well logging parameters.
- each of these techniques provides means for measuring T1 of a rock formation within a certain volume (called the "sensitive volume”) which is determined mainly by the shape of the magnetic field surrounding the magnetic structure.
- the signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement is limited by the ratio of the sensitive volume to the uniformity (maximum flux density minus flux density) of the magnetic field within said volume, and increases in proportion to this ratio.
- the apparatus will respond only to nuclei residing within the sensitive volume.
- the boundaries of the sensitive volume are determined by radiation patterns of transmitting and receiving antennae as well as a combination of the detailed structure of the magnetic field with the receiver's frequency passband.
- the radio frequency that a given nucleus will respond to or emit when excited is proportional to the flux density of the magnetic field in which it is immersed. The proportionality factor depends upon the nuclear species. For hydrogen nuclei, that factor is 42.5759 MHz/Tesla.
- the NMR receiver's passband extends from 1.30 MHz to 1.31 MHz, the instrument will be sensitive to hydrogen nuclei in regions of the magnetic field that have flux densities between 30.5 mT and 30.8 mT, providing the antenna radiation pattern allows receiving sufficient signal from that locations.
- the magnetic field structure, antenna radiation pattern and receiver passband must all be adjusted to be sensitive to that and only that region. Since the signal-to-noise ratio of the resulting signal is proportional to (among other factors) the square root of the receiver passband width, it is important to minimize the variation of the magnetic field within the desired sensitive volume; smaller variations (better field uniformity) mean a better signal-to-noise ratio. Since the signal-to-noise ratio also increases with increasing frequency, the nominal magnetic field intensity within the volume is also very important. It is immaterial whether this nominal intensity is defined as the central value, average value or some other value within the range of values encompassed by the sensitive volume because only large differences in signal-to-noise ratio are significant.
- the Schlumberger Nuclear Magnetic Logging Tool measures the free precession of proton nuclear magnetic moments in the earth's magnetic field by applying a relatively strong DC polarizing field to the surrounding rock formation in order to align proton spins approximately perpendicularly to earth's magnetic field.
- the polarizing field must be applied for a period roughly five times T1 (the spin-lattice relaxation time) for sufficient polarization (approximately two seconds). At the end of polarization, the field is turned off rapidly.
- the spin precession induces in a pick-up coil a sinusoidal signal whose amplitude is proportional to the density of protons present in the formation.
- the signal decays with a time constant "T2" (transverse relaxation time) due to non-homogeneities in the local magnetic field over the sensing volume.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,728,892 to Vinegar et al. NMR discloses methods for determining spatial petrophysical properties of materials. These methods employ generation of separate initial magnetization Mo, T1 and T2 images, from which additional petrophysical characteristics of the materials may be obtained.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,551 to Kleinber et al. discloses using a NMR pulse sequence in a horehole environment to determine the Mo and T1 parameters which can later be used to derive additional formation parameters.
- Improved nuclear magnetic resonance logging tools and methods for using these tools are described generally in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,710,713; 4,717,876; 4,717,877; and 4,717,878, all of which are commonly owned by the assignee of the present invention.
- the method and apparatus of the present invention uses the logging tool and techniques described in the above-referenced patents to obtain previously unavailable data relating to the composition of a geologic formation.
- the present invention uses a variable time-window to improve the signal quality obtained from a measurement of a particular formation and to optimize the logging speed of the system.
- the method and apparatus of the present invention provide improved nuclear magnetic resonance technique for obtaining information relating to geologic structures.
- a nuclear magnetic resonance logging tool is used to impart magnetic polarization fields to a portion of a geologic formation.
- Nuclear magnetic resonance signals from the excited nuclei in the formation are then detected to obtain data for calculating a number of important petrophysical parameters of geologic interest.
- the method and apparatus of the present invention provide greater signal to noise ratios for measurements made in shaly-rocks. More specifically, the repeat rate of the measurement, or the logging speed, is greatly increased in these shaly-rocks to provide an enhanced signal.
- a variable time-window echo-recording system is used to obtain significant improvements in signal quality and logging speed.
- An initial test is performed to provide an assessment of the relaxation qualities of the sample. If the test reveals that the sample is a slow-relaxation rock, then the full time is allocated to measuring echoes. However, if the test reveals that the sample is a fast decay rock, then the echo acquisition time-window is reduced. This provides increased efficiency since the system is able to maximize the number of measurements made by optimizing the individual sampling intervals to the particular geologic structure being tested.
- the system of the present invention is capable of providing additional information relating to the very-fast relaxation rocks where signal levels are typically very low using prior art techniques.
- FIG. 1 is a partially pictorial, partially block diagram illustration of a well logging apparatus for obtaining nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of a geologic structure.
- FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a geologic structure investigated using a nuclear magnetic resonance system such as that shown in FIG. 1.
- FIG. 3a is a graphical illustration of time interval windows which can be used to determine the amplitude decay characteristics of the sample in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention.
- FIG. 3b is an illustration of the relative slope of a sample having a fast relaxation time and a sample having a slow relaxation time.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustration of the components for controlling the echo acquisition time-window in the system of the present invention.
- a borehole 10 is shown adjacent to formations 12 and 14 having structures to be examined using the method and apparatus of the present invention.
- a logging tool 16 which is suspended by a cable 18 routed over pulleys 20 and 22, with the position of the cable 18 being determined by a motor 24.
- the upper portion of the logging tool 16 comprises telemetry electronics 26, gamma ray sensing electronics 28 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) electronics 30.
- An MRI probe 32 is suspended at the bottom of the probe to provide excitation to the surrounding geologic formation.
- the excitation field has a generally cylindrical shape as represented by reference numeral 34.
- Improved devices which can be used for the probe 32 are described generally in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,710,713; 4,717,876; 4,717,877; and 4,717,878, which, by this reference, are incorporated herein for all purposes.
- the MRI electronics 30 employed in the system of the present invention comprise both the electronics to control the signals emitted by the MRI probe 32 and detection electronics for receiving the spin-spin pulse-echo signals from the formation being tested. The operation of these components to select an optimized sampling interval will be discussed in greater detail below.
- the spin-spin pulse-echo measurement of the spin-echo relaxation of the sample, in a homogenous isotropic media, reflects the surface-to-volume characteristics of the pores.
- the rocks are complex mixtures of minerals which often include a variety of pore sizes. consequently, the measured spin-echo relaxation in such an environment is a complex phenomenon, a reflection of the variations which exist in terms of pore surface-to-volume ratios and surface-to-fluid interactions.
- the method and apparatus of the present invention is based on the discovery that for a select time-window of echo-relaxation there is an associated select range of surface-to-volume response.
- spin-echo time-windows it is possible to determine the relative fraction of select surface-to-volume components.
- these changes in relaxation time can also be used as a measure of a representative pore-size condition.
- FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a geologic structure investigated using a nuclear magnetic resonance system such as that shown in FIG. 1.
- the spacing of the time intervals between the pulses in this application is typically between 1.5 and 3 milliseconds.
- the time intervals labelled "A-H” correspond to the signal intervals for various particle sizes, with interval “A” corresponding to the interval for particles larger than 500 ⁇ and interval "H” corresponding to the interval for particles of larger than 8 ⁇ , etc.
- the transmitter activation and echo-recordings are normally synchronized to ensure the full spectrum of T2 relaxation is accomplished (typically 300 msecs).
- the technique is typically calibrated to the slowest relaxation condition since these constitute the best reservoir pore-size condition.
- the vast majority of the formations are comprised of very-fine pore structures associated with the shale and shaly-sand formations. Since the recording interval is typically the full 300 msec, the repeat rate of the measurement, and thus the logging speed is greatly reduced in these shaly-rocks.
- FIG. 3a is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a particular geologic structure. The slope of the pulse amplitude curve is characteristic of the particular geologic formation being tested.
- FIG. 3b is an illustration of the possible slopes for pulse amplitude curves corresponding to a fast decay (very-fine pore formation), medium decay (medium-pore formation), and slow decay (reservoir-type pore formation).
- the time intervals w 1 , w 2 , and w 3 correspond to the sampling intervals which would optimize the collection of spin-echo pulse information relating to the respective geologic composition of a formation.
- the time-window w 1 is the time interval which optimizes the collection of data relating to very-fine pore structures.
- the time intervals w 2 and w 3 are the time intervals for optimizing the collection of data relating to medium and large pore structures, respectively.
- an initial test is performed to determine the relaxation characteristics of the formation being tested.
- the information obtained from this initial test is then used to select a sampling interval which optimizes the collection of data for the particular pore structure of the formation being tested.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the components used to control the data collection interval in the system of the present invention.
- the MRI electronics 30 comprise an MRI probe controller and pulse-echo detection electronics.
- an initial test is conducted to determine the relaxation characteristics of the sample. This is accomplished by a full 300 msec test cycle.
- the output signal from the detection electronics is processed by the amplitude processor 44 to obtain an initial regression analysis of the relaxation characteristics of the sample.
- the output of the amplitude processor 44 is provided to the echo-time selector 46 which selects the optimum sampling time interval. This time interval is implemented by the measurement cycle controller 48 which provides an appropriate control signal to the MRI probe controller.
- the measurement cycle controller 48 provides an appropriate control signal to the MRI probe controller.
- the full sampling interval e.g., 300 msec
- a shorter sampling interval e.g., 50-100 msec
- the reduction in the sampling interval time-window allows the system to obtain additional measurements in the same amount of time which would otherwise be required for a single measurement. These additional measurements are especially useful for analyzing formations having very fast relaxation characteristics for which signal levels are typically very low.
- the system of the present invention therefore, has the advantage of providing improved measurements of fast decay formations, while maintaining the current signal-to-noise qualities in the slow relaxation rocks.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Apparatus (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to systems for obtaining quantitative and qualitative measurements of geologic structures. More specifically, the present invention provides an efficient and effective system for using nuclear magnetic resonance techniques for obtaining information relating to geologic structures.
- As is known, fluid flow properties of porous media have long been of interest in the oil industry. In an article by A. Timur, entitled "Pulsed Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of Porosity, Movable Fluid, and Permeability of Sandstones," in the Journal of Petroleum Technology, June 1969, page 775, it was shown experimentally that NMR methods provide a rapid non-destructive determination of porosity, movable fluid, and permeability of rock formation.
- It is known that when an assembly of magnetic moments, such as those of hydrogen nuclei, are exposed to a static magnetic field they tend to align along the direction of the magnetic field, resulting in bulk magnetization. The rate at which equilibrium is established in such bulk magnetization upon provision of a static magnetic field is characterized by the parameter T1, known as the spin-lattice relaxation time.
- It has been observed that the mechanism which determines the value of T1 depends on molecular dynamics. In liquids, molecular dynamics are a function of molecular size and inter-molecular interactions. Therefore, water and different types of oil have different T1 values.
- In the heterogeneous media, such as a porous solid which contains liquid in its pores, the dynamics of molecules close to the solid surface are also significant and differ from the dynamics of the bulk liquid. It may thus be appreciated that the T1 parameter provides valuable information relating to well logging parameters.
- There exist a number of techniques for disturbing the equilibrium of an assembly of magnetic moments, such as those of hydrogen nuclei, for T1 parameter measurements. Each of these techniques provides means for measuring T1 of a rock formation within a certain volume (called the "sensitive volume") which is determined mainly by the shape of the magnetic field surrounding the magnetic structure. The signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement is limited by the ratio of the sensitive volume to the uniformity (maximum flux density minus flux density) of the magnetic field within said volume, and increases in proportion to this ratio.
- In any given nuclear magnetic resonance instrument configuration, the apparatus will respond only to nuclei residing within the sensitive volume. In the present invention and prior art instruments described herein, the boundaries of the sensitive volume are determined by radiation patterns of transmitting and receiving antennae as well as a combination of the detailed structure of the magnetic field with the receiver's frequency passband. The radio frequency that a given nucleus will respond to or emit when excited is proportional to the flux density of the magnetic field in which it is immersed. The proportionality factor depends upon the nuclear species. For hydrogen nuclei, that factor is 42.5759 MHz/Tesla. If the NMR receiver's passband extends from 1.30 MHz to 1.31 MHz, the instrument will be sensitive to hydrogen nuclei in regions of the magnetic field that have flux densities between 30.5 mT and 30.8 mT, providing the antenna radiation pattern allows receiving sufficient signal from that locations.
- If it is desired to study nuclei located with a particular region, the magnetic field structure, antenna radiation pattern and receiver passband must all be adjusted to be sensitive to that and only that region. Since the signal-to-noise ratio of the resulting signal is proportional to (among other factors) the square root of the receiver passband width, it is important to minimize the variation of the magnetic field within the desired sensitive volume; smaller variations (better field uniformity) mean a better signal-to-noise ratio. Since the signal-to-noise ratio also increases with increasing frequency, the nominal magnetic field intensity within the volume is also very important. It is immaterial whether this nominal intensity is defined as the central value, average value or some other value within the range of values encompassed by the sensitive volume because only large differences in signal-to-noise ratio are significant.
- One technique for measuring T1 of a rock formation is exemplified by what is known as the "Schlumberger Nuclear Magnetic Logging Tool." That tool is described by R.C. Herrick, S.H. Couturie, and D.L. Best in "An Improved Nuclear Magnetic Logging System and Its Application to Formation Evaluation," SPE8361 presented at the 54th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, held in Las Vegas, Nev., Sept. 23-26, 1979, and also by R.J.S. Brown et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 3,213,357 entitled "Earth Formation and Fluid Material Investigation by Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Rate Determination."
- The Schlumberger Nuclear Magnetic Logging Tool measures the free precession of proton nuclear magnetic moments in the earth's magnetic field by applying a relatively strong DC polarizing field to the surrounding rock formation in order to align proton spins approximately perpendicularly to earth's magnetic field. The polarizing field must be applied for a period roughly five times T1 (the spin-lattice relaxation time) for sufficient polarization (approximately two seconds). At the end of polarization, the field is turned off rapidly. Since the proton spins are unable to follow this sudden change, they are left aligned perpendicularly to the earth's magnetic field and precess about this field at the "Larmor Frequency" corresponding to the local earth's magnetic field (roughly from 1300 to 2600 Hz, depending on location).
- The spin precession induces in a pick-up coil a sinusoidal signal whose amplitude is proportional to the density of protons present in the formation. The signal decays with a time constant "T2" (transverse relaxation time) due to non-homogeneities in the local magnetic field over the sensing volume.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,728,892 to Vinegar et al. NMR discloses methods for determining spatial petrophysical properties of materials. These methods employ generation of separate initial magnetization Mo, T1 and T2 images, from which additional petrophysical characteristics of the materials may be obtained.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,551 to Kleinber et al. discloses using a NMR pulse sequence in a horehole environment to determine the Mo and T1 parameters which can later be used to derive additional formation parameters.
- Improved nuclear magnetic resonance logging tools and methods for using these tools are described generally in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,710,713; 4,717,876; 4,717,877; and 4,717,878, all of which are commonly owned by the assignee of the present invention. The method and apparatus of the present invention, described in greater detail below, uses the logging tool and techniques described in the above-referenced patents to obtain previously unavailable data relating to the composition of a geologic formation. In particular, the present invention uses a variable time-window to improve the signal quality obtained from a measurement of a particular formation and to optimize the logging speed of the system.
- The method and apparatus of the present invention provide improved nuclear magnetic resonance technique for obtaining information relating to geologic structures. In the present invention, a nuclear magnetic resonance logging tool is used to impart magnetic polarization fields to a portion of a geologic formation. Nuclear magnetic resonance signals from the excited nuclei in the formation are then detected to obtain data for calculating a number of important petrophysical parameters of geologic interest.
- The method and apparatus of the present invention provide greater signal to noise ratios for measurements made in shaly-rocks. More specifically, the repeat rate of the measurement, or the logging speed, is greatly increased in these shaly-rocks to provide an enhanced signal.
- In the method and apparatus of the present invention, a variable time-window echo-recording system is used to obtain significant improvements in signal quality and logging speed. An initial test is performed to provide an assessment of the relaxation qualities of the sample. If the test reveals that the sample is a slow-relaxation rock, then the full time is allocated to measuring echoes. However, if the test reveals that the sample is a fast decay rock, then the echo acquisition time-window is reduced. This provides increased efficiency since the system is able to maximize the number of measurements made by optimizing the individual sampling intervals to the particular geologic structure being tested. The system of the present invention is capable of providing additional information relating to the very-fast relaxation rocks where signal levels are typically very low using prior art techniques.
- FIG. 1 is a partially pictorial, partially block diagram illustration of a well logging apparatus for obtaining nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of a geologic structure.
- FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a geologic structure investigated using a nuclear magnetic resonance system such as that shown in FIG. 1.
- FIG. 3a is a graphical illustration of time interval windows which can be used to determine the amplitude decay characteristics of the sample in accordance with the method and apparatus of the present invention.
- FIG. 3b is an illustration of the relative slope of a sample having a fast relaxation time and a sample having a slow relaxation time.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustration of the components for controlling the echo acquisition time-window in the system of the present invention.
- Referring to FIG. 1, a borehole 10 is shown adjacent to
formations logging tool 16 which is suspended by acable 18 routed overpulleys cable 18 being determined by a motor 24. - The upper portion of the
logging tool 16 comprises telemetry electronics 26, gamma ray sensing electronics 28 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)electronics 30. AnMRI probe 32 is suspended at the bottom of the probe to provide excitation to the surrounding geologic formation. The excitation field has a generally cylindrical shape as represented byreference numeral 34. Improved devices which can be used for theprobe 32 are described generally in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,710,713; 4,717,876; 4,717,877; and 4,717,878, which, by this reference, are incorporated herein for all purposes. - The
MRI electronics 30 employed in the system of the present invention comprise both the electronics to control the signals emitted by theMRI probe 32 and detection electronics for receiving the spin-spin pulse-echo signals from the formation being tested. The operation of these components to select an optimized sampling interval will be discussed in greater detail below. - The spin-spin pulse-echo measurement of the spin-echo relaxation of the sample, in a homogenous isotropic media, reflects the surface-to-volume characteristics of the pores. In typical rocks encountered in the well-logging environment, the rocks are complex mixtures of minerals which often include a variety of pore sizes. consequently, the measured spin-echo relaxation in such an environment is a complex phenomenon, a reflection of the variations which exist in terms of pore surface-to-volume ratios and surface-to-fluid interactions.
- The method and apparatus of the present invention is based on the discovery that for a select time-window of echo-relaxation there is an associated select range of surface-to-volume response. Thus, by proper selection of spin-echo time-windows it is possible to determine the relative fraction of select surface-to-volume components. In addition, these changes in relaxation time can also be used as a measure of a representative pore-size condition.
- FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a geologic structure investigated using a nuclear magnetic resonance system such as that shown in FIG. 1. The spacing of the time intervals between the pulses in this application is typically between 1.5 and 3 milliseconds. The time intervals labelled "A-H" correspond to the signal intervals for various particle sizes, with interval "A" corresponding to the interval for particles larger than 500µ and interval "H" corresponding to the interval for particles of larger than 8µ, etc.
- The calibration of the process is accomplished through multi-dimension regression analysis utilizing optimally selected and prepared laboratory samples. Such regression techniques are known to those skilled in the art and are described in the following references: K. Fukunaga, Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, Academic Press, 1972; Bhattacharyya & Johnson, Statistical Concepts and Methods, Wiley & Sons, 1977; and Devijver & Kittler, Pattern Recognition -- A -Statistical Approach, Prentice Hall, 1982.
- In the present invention, the transmitter activation and echo-recordings are normally synchronized to ensure the full spectrum of T2 relaxation is accomplished (typically 300 msecs). The technique is typically calibrated to the slowest relaxation condition since these constitute the best reservoir pore-size condition.
- However, in most well-bores, the vast majority of the formations are comprised of very-fine pore structures associated with the shale and shaly-sand formations. Since the recording interval is typically the full 300 msec, the repeat rate of the measurement, and thus the logging speed is greatly reduced in these shaly-rocks.
- The method and apparatus of the present invention employs a variable time-window echo-recording system which provides significant improvements in signal quality and logging speed. FIG. 3a is a graphical illustration of a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals as a function of amplitude versus time for a particular geologic structure. The slope of the pulse amplitude curve is characteristic of the particular geologic formation being tested. FIG. 3b is an illustration of the possible slopes for pulse amplitude curves corresponding to a fast decay (very-fine pore formation), medium decay (medium-pore formation), and slow decay (reservoir-type pore formation). The time intervals w1, w2, and w3 correspond to the sampling intervals which would optimize the collection of spin-echo pulse information relating to the respective geologic composition of a formation. For example, the time-window w1 is the time interval which optimizes the collection of data relating to very-fine pore structures. Likewise the time intervals w2 and w3 are the time intervals for optimizing the collection of data relating to medium and large pore structures, respectively.
- In the present invention, an initial test is performed to determine the relaxation characteristics of the formation being tested. The information obtained from this initial test is then used to select a sampling interval which optimizes the collection of data for the particular pore structure of the formation being tested.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the components used to control the data collection interval in the system of the present invention. The
MRI electronics 30 comprise an MRI probe controller and pulse-echo detection electronics. As was discussed above, an initial test is conducted to determine the relaxation characteristics of the sample. This is accomplished by a full 300 msec test cycle. The output signal from the detection electronics is processed by theamplitude processor 44 to obtain an initial regression analysis of the relaxation characteristics of the sample. The output of theamplitude processor 44 is provided to the echo-time selector 46 which selects the optimum sampling time interval. This time interval is implemented by themeasurement cycle controller 48 which provides an appropriate control signal to the MRI probe controller. Once the sampling interval has been selected, the repeated data samples are obtained and processed by theamplitude processor 44, with the processed data being stored indata storage 50. - If the initial data indicates that the sample has slow-relaxation characteristics, then the full sampling interval (e.g., 300 msec) is maintained for subsequent samples. However, if the initial data indicates that the formation has fast relaxation characteristics, then a shorter sampling interval (e.g., 50-100 msec) is used for subsequent data acquisition. The reduction in the sampling interval time-window allows the system to obtain additional measurements in the same amount of time which would otherwise be required for a single measurement. These additional measurements are especially useful for analyzing formations having very fast relaxation characteristics for which signal levels are typically very low. The system of the present invention, therefore, has the advantage of providing improved measurements of fast decay formations, while maintaining the current signal-to-noise qualities in the slow relaxation rocks.
Claims (8)
- A method for determining the composition of a geologic structure, comprising the steps of:(a) imparting a polarizing magnetic field to a geologic structure for a predetermined period of time;(b) measuring during a first time interval the nuclear magnetic resonance signals representing spin-echo relaxation of a population of particles in said geologic structure;(c) constructing a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals characteristic of said population of particles; and(d) analyzing said chain of spin-echo relaxation signals to determine an optimum sampling interval for obtaining a plurality of subsequent data measurements relating to said geologic structure.
- The method according to claim 1, said step of analyzing said chain of spin-echo relaxation signals comprising the step of performing a regression analysis of said chain of signals to determine the relaxation characteristics of said geologic structure.
- The method according to claim 1 or claim 2, said first time interval for measuring said nuclear magnetic resonnance signals being approximately 300 milliseconds.
- The method according to any previous claim, further comprising the step of obtaining a plurality of subsequent data measurements relating to said geologic structure, said subsequent data measurements comprising a plurality of nuclear magnetic resonance spin-echo relaxation measurements obtained using said optimum sampling interval.
- The method according to any one of claims 2 to 4, further comprising the step of using said regression analysis to determine an optimum sampling interval.
- The method according to any previous claim, said optimum sampling interval being less than or equal to said first time interval.
- Apparatus for determining the composition of a geologic structure, comprising :means for imparting a polarizing magnetic field to a geologic structure for a predetermined period of time;means for measuring during a first time interval the nuclear magnetic resonance signals representing spin-echo relaxation of a population of particles in said geologic structure;means for constructing a chain of spin-echo relaxation signals characteristic of said population of particles; andmeans for analyzing said chain of spin-echo relaxation signals to determine an optimum sampling interval for obtaining data relating to said geologic structure.
- The apparatus according to claim 7, said means for analyzing said chain of spin-echo relaxation signals comprising means for performing a regression analysis of said chain of signals to determine the relaxation characteristics of said geologic structure.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US07/800,599 US5309098A (en) | 1991-05-16 | 1991-11-27 | Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures |
US800599 | 1991-11-27 | ||
PCT/US1992/010143 WO1993011451A1 (en) | 1991-11-27 | 1992-11-25 | Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0614538A1 EP0614538A1 (en) | 1994-09-14 |
EP0614538A4 EP0614538A4 (en) | 1996-12-27 |
EP0614538B1 true EP0614538B1 (en) | 1999-02-03 |
Family
ID=25178830
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP92925404A Expired - Lifetime EP0614538B1 (en) | 1991-11-27 | 1992-11-25 | Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5309098A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0614538B1 (en) |
AR (1) | AR247950A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2117291C (en) |
DE (1) | DE69228387T2 (en) |
MX (1) | MX9206856A (en) |
RU (1) | RU2115142C1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1993011451A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (59)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5557200A (en) * | 1991-05-16 | 1996-09-17 | Numar Corporation | Nuclear magnetic resonance determination of petrophysical properties of geologic structures |
US5530350A (en) * | 1991-11-20 | 1996-06-25 | Auburn International, Inc. | Magnetic resonance analysis in real time, industrial usage mode |
US5596274A (en) * | 1992-12-31 | 1997-01-21 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Determining bound and unbound fluid volumes using nuclear magnetic resonance pulse sequences |
US5497087A (en) * | 1994-10-20 | 1996-03-05 | Shell Oil Company | NMR logging of natural gas reservoirs |
US5680043A (en) * | 1995-03-23 | 1997-10-21 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Nuclear magnetic resonance technique for determining gas effect with borehole logging tools |
US5936405A (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 1999-08-10 | Numar Corporation | System and method for lithology-independent gas detection using multifrequency gradient NMR logging |
US6242912B1 (en) | 1995-10-12 | 2001-06-05 | Numar Corporation | System and method for lithology-independent gas detection using multifrequency gradient NMR logging |
US6512371B2 (en) | 1995-10-12 | 2003-01-28 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method for determining oil, water and gas saturations for low-field gradient NMR logging tools |
US6956371B2 (en) * | 1995-10-12 | 2005-10-18 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method and apparatus for detecting diffusion sensitive phases with estimation of residual error in NMR logs |
US6005389A (en) * | 1996-03-15 | 1999-12-21 | Numar Corporation | Pulse sequences and interpretation techniques for NMR measurements |
US6531868B2 (en) | 1996-12-30 | 2003-03-11 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and methods for formation evaluation while drilling |
US6051973A (en) * | 1996-12-30 | 2000-04-18 | Numar Corporation | Method for formation evaluation while drilling |
US6204663B1 (en) | 1997-03-26 | 2001-03-20 | Numar Corporation | Pulse sequence and method for suppression of magneto-acoustic artifacts in NMR data |
US6081116A (en) * | 1997-04-21 | 2000-06-27 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Nuclear magnetic resonance apparatus and method for geological applications |
US6177794B1 (en) | 1997-05-13 | 2001-01-23 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Use of earth field spin echo NMR to search for liquid minerals |
US6166540A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2000-12-26 | Wollin Ventures, Inc. | Method of resistivity well logging utilizing nuclear magnetic resonance |
US6094048A (en) * | 1997-12-18 | 2000-07-25 | Shell Oil Company | NMR logging of natural gas reservoirs |
US6111408A (en) * | 1997-12-23 | 2000-08-29 | Numar Corporation | Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and techniques for downhole measurements |
AR015217A1 (en) | 1998-01-16 | 2001-04-18 | Numar Corp | A NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE TOOL (NMR) TO DRIVE MEASUREMENTS OF A LAND FORMATION THAT SURROUND A PROBE WELL, A METHOD FOR CARRYING OUT THESE MEASUREMENTS WHILE THE DRILL IS MADE AND A PROVISION TO MAKE NMR MEASUREMENTS. |
US6023164A (en) * | 1998-02-20 | 2000-02-08 | Numar Corporation | Eccentric NMR well logging apparatus and method |
FR2781053B1 (en) | 1998-07-10 | 2000-08-11 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | CHARACTERIZATION OF A POROUS PERMEABLE MEDIUM BY NMR OF POLARIZED GAS |
US6107796A (en) * | 1998-08-17 | 2000-08-22 | Numar Corporation | Method and apparatus for differentiating oil based mud filtrate from connate oil |
US6377042B1 (en) | 1998-08-31 | 2002-04-23 | Numar Corporation | Method and apparatus for merging of NMR echo trains in the time domain |
US6366087B1 (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2002-04-02 | George Richard Coates | NMR logging apparatus and methods for fluid typing |
US6316940B1 (en) | 1999-03-17 | 2001-11-13 | Numar Corporation | System and method for identification of hydrocarbons using enhanced diffusion |
US6661226B1 (en) | 1999-08-13 | 2003-12-09 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | NMR apparatus and methods for measuring volumes of hydrocarbon gas and oil |
US6255819B1 (en) | 1999-10-25 | 2001-07-03 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method for geologically-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging logs |
US6541969B2 (en) | 1999-12-15 | 2003-04-01 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method and apparatus for improving the vertical resolution of NMR logs |
US6646437B1 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2003-11-11 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method for clay typing using NMR-based porosity modeling |
US6624629B1 (en) * | 2000-05-08 | 2003-09-23 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Optimizing characteristics of RF pulses used in NMR measurements |
US6577125B2 (en) | 2000-12-18 | 2003-06-10 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Temperature compensated magnetic field apparatus for NMR measurements |
US7135862B2 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2006-11-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | NMR logging using time-domain averaging |
US6518756B1 (en) * | 2001-06-14 | 2003-02-11 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining motion tool parameters in borehole logging |
US6525534B2 (en) | 2001-06-15 | 2003-02-25 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and methods for NMR signal processing without phase alternated pair stacking |
US7117733B2 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2006-10-10 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Dynamic logging speed |
US7301338B2 (en) * | 2001-08-13 | 2007-11-27 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Automatic adjustment of NMR pulse sequence to optimize SNR based on real time analysis |
FR2832255B1 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2004-11-26 | France Telecom | COMB AND METHOD FOR DERIVING PRE-EXISTING WIRING |
US6859032B2 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2005-02-22 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for determining molecular properties of hydrocarbon mixtures from NMR data |
US6856132B2 (en) | 2002-11-08 | 2005-02-15 | Shell Oil Company | Method and apparatus for subterranean formation flow imaging |
US6937014B2 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2005-08-30 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Method for obtaining multi-dimensional proton density distributions from a system of nuclear spins |
US7463027B2 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2008-12-09 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Systems and methods for deep-looking NMR logging |
CA2852097A1 (en) * | 2003-10-03 | 2005-04-21 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and methods for t1-based logging |
WO2005036338A2 (en) * | 2003-10-04 | 2005-04-21 | Halliburton Energy Services Group | System and methods for upscaling petrophysical data |
WO2005065277A2 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2005-07-21 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Contamination estimation using fluid analysis models |
WO2005067569A2 (en) * | 2004-01-04 | 2005-07-28 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method and apparatus for detecting hydrocarbons with nmr logs in wells drilled with oil-based muds |
CN100373172C (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2008-03-05 | 北京大学 | Apparatus and method for measuring stratum rock physical property by rock NMR relaxation signal |
US20110093199A1 (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2011-04-21 | Kittridge Mark Gerard | Characterization of logging tool performance |
US9562989B2 (en) | 2011-06-07 | 2017-02-07 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Rotational indexing to optimize sensing volume of a nuclear magnetic resonance logging tool |
US9304179B1 (en) | 2011-08-12 | 2016-04-05 | University Of New Brunswick | Method of magnetic resonance imaging combining phase and frequency encoding |
US9405035B2 (en) | 2012-01-10 | 2016-08-02 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Enhanced transmitter and method for a nuclear magnetic resonance logging tool |
AU2012369222B2 (en) | 2012-02-08 | 2015-05-07 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Nuclear magnetic resonance logging tool having multiple pad-mounted atomic magnetometers |
US10254433B2 (en) | 2013-07-15 | 2019-04-09 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging tool calibration |
US20160025825A1 (en) * | 2014-07-25 | 2016-01-28 | Gersh Z. Taicher | Nuclear magnetic resonance apparatus and methods |
US9851315B2 (en) | 2014-12-11 | 2017-12-26 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Methods for quantitative characterization of asphaltenes in solutions using two-dimensional low-field NMR measurement |
CN108028129B (en) * | 2015-10-20 | 2020-03-17 | 哈利伯顿能源服务公司 | Logging tool ferrite and method of manufacture |
US10634746B2 (en) | 2016-03-29 | 2020-04-28 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | NMR measured pore fluid phase behavior measurements |
WO2019222300A1 (en) | 2018-05-15 | 2019-11-21 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Adaptive downhole acquisition system |
WO2020069378A1 (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2020-04-02 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Elastic adaptive downhole acquisition system |
US11726227B2 (en) | 2021-06-18 | 2023-08-15 | Terrasee Tech, LLC | Determining resonant frequencies and magnetic influence factors of materials in the earth |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3213357A (en) * | 1962-10-22 | 1965-10-19 | California Research Corp | Earth formation and fluid material investigation by nuclear magnetism relaxation rate determination |
US4728892A (en) * | 1985-08-13 | 1988-03-01 | Shell Oil Company | NMR imaging of materials |
US4710713A (en) * | 1986-03-11 | 1987-12-01 | Numar Corporation | Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and techniques |
US4717876A (en) * | 1986-08-13 | 1988-01-05 | Numar | NMR magnet system for well logging |
US5055788A (en) * | 1986-08-27 | 1991-10-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Borehole measurement of NMR characteristics of earth formations |
US4933638A (en) * | 1986-08-27 | 1990-06-12 | Schlumber Technology Corp. | Borehole measurement of NMR characteristics of earth formations, and interpretations thereof |
US4717877A (en) * | 1986-09-25 | 1988-01-05 | Numar Corporation | Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and techniques |
US4717878A (en) * | 1986-09-26 | 1988-01-05 | Numar Corporation | Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and techniques |
EP0295134A2 (en) * | 1987-06-11 | 1988-12-14 | Numar Corporation | Nuclear magnetic resonance sensing apparatus and methods |
-
1991
- 1991-11-27 US US07/800,599 patent/US5309098A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1992
- 1992-11-25 WO PCT/US1992/010143 patent/WO1993011451A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1992-11-25 CA CA002117291A patent/CA2117291C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1992-11-25 DE DE69228387T patent/DE69228387T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1992-11-25 EP EP92925404A patent/EP0614538B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1992-11-25 RU RU94026261A patent/RU2115142C1/en active
- 1992-11-27 MX MX9206856A patent/MX9206856A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1992-11-27 AR AR92323773A patent/AR247950A1/en active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE69228387D1 (en) | 1999-03-18 |
US5309098A (en) | 1994-05-03 |
WO1993011451A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 |
MX9206856A (en) | 1993-05-01 |
EP0614538A4 (en) | 1996-12-27 |
DE69228387T2 (en) | 1999-09-30 |
CA2117291C (en) | 2003-04-22 |
RU94026261A (en) | 1996-04-20 |
CA2117291A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 |
AR247950A1 (en) | 1995-04-28 |
EP0614538A1 (en) | 1994-09-14 |
RU2115142C1 (en) | 1998-07-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0614538B1 (en) | Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures | |
EP0646250B1 (en) | Nuclear magnetic resonance determination of petrophysical properties of geologic structures | |
EP0765486B1 (en) | Determination of petrophysical properties of geologic structures | |
US6600316B2 (en) | Rapid NMR multi-frequency T1 and T2 acquisition for earth formations evaluation with MWD or wireline tools | |
CA2540791C (en) | System and methods for t1-based logging | |
EP0835463B1 (en) | Nmr system and method for formation evaluation using diffusion and relaxation log measurements | |
US5680043A (en) | Nuclear magnetic resonance technique for determining gas effect with borehole logging tools | |
EP0544585B1 (en) | Nuclear magnetic resonance pulse sequences for determining bound fluid volume | |
US6344744B2 (en) | Multiple frequency method for nuclear magnetic resonance longitudinal relaxation measurement and pulsing sequence for power use optimization | |
EP1236057B1 (en) | Nuclear magnetic resonance method and logging apparatus | |
US20080204013A1 (en) | Logging method for determining characteristic of fluid in a downhole measurement region | |
WO1995035514A9 (en) | Nuclear magnetic resonance determination of petrophysical properties of geologic structures | |
US6883702B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for NMR measurement of wettability | |
US7812602B2 (en) | Multiple echo train inversion | |
EP0584224A1 (en) | Nuclear magnetic resonance detection of geologic structures |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19940616 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL |
|
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 19961108 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A4 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19970401 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69228387 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19990318 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed | ||
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CA |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20001120 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20001122 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20001130 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20011113 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20011125 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20020601 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20020702 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20011125 |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20020601 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20051125 |