EP0587969B1 - Sub-combat unit - Google Patents
Sub-combat unit Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0587969B1 EP0587969B1 EP92850217A EP92850217A EP0587969B1 EP 0587969 B1 EP0587969 B1 EP 0587969B1 EP 92850217 A EP92850217 A EP 92850217A EP 92850217 A EP92850217 A EP 92850217A EP 0587969 B1 EP0587969 B1 EP 0587969B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sub
- combat unit
- combat
- axis
- unit
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 230000000979 retarding effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009987 spinning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B10/00—Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
- F42B10/32—Range-reducing or range-increasing arrangements; Fall-retarding means
- F42B10/48—Range-reducing, destabilising or braking arrangements, e.g. impact-braking arrangements; Fall-retarding means, e.g. balloons, rockets for braking or fall-retarding
- F42B10/50—Brake flaps, e.g. inflatable
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a sub-combat unit disposed to be separated from a flying body, for example a carrier shell or the like over a target area, the sub-combat unit comprising a warhead, a target detector and a device which imparts to the sub-combat unit a rotation for scanning the target area in a helical pattern during the fall of the sub-combat unit towards the target area.
- a flying body for example a carrier shell or the like over a target area
- the sub-combat unit comprising a warhead, a target detector and a device which imparts to the sub-combat unit a rotation for scanning the target area in a helical pattern during the fall of the sub-combat unit towards the target area.
- a sub-combat unit has been previously described in European patent specification 0 252 036.
- the target detector is pivotally disposed on a journal shaft which is parallel to the line of symmetry of the warhead so as to permit outward pivoting of the target detector from a closed position where the optical axis of the target detector coincides with the line of symmetry of the warhead, and to in opened position where the optical axis of the target detector is parallel to the line of symmetry of the warhead so as to permit a free view of the target detector beside the warhead, and that, furthermore, carrier surface is pivotally disposed on a journal shaft which is also parallel to the line of symmetry of the warhead so as to permit outward pivoting of the carrier surface from a closed position to an opened position beside the warhead.
- Swedish patent application number 8903474-8 describes a sub-combat unit in which the retarding area has been made considerably larger.
- the characterizing feature of the sub-combat unit is that two diametrically located carrier surfaces are pivotally disposed each on their shaft located in a plane which is at right angles to the axis of symmetry of the warhead, from a closed position where the carrier surfaces follow the casing surface of the sub-combat unit, to a 90 opened position where both of the carrier surfaces form a retarding area for the fall velocity of the sub-combat unit.
- the carrier surfaces are made of an elastically flexible material, so that, when they pivot out from their closed position, they are at the same time bent to a substantially straight or gently curved surface.
- both of the carrier surfaces may be made comparatively thin, which is favourable from the point of view of weight and payload.
- the carrier surfaces may be made of titanium and bent so that, in their opened position, they have a certain radius. The bending may be varied and the carrier surfaces may be of different lengths, in which event further parameters for varying the aeronautical properties of the unit will be obtained.
- the sub-combat units are disposed to be separated from a missile, a carrier shell or other flying platform, for example a canister which in its turn has been separated from a carrier shell or missile, for example a 15.5 cm artillery shell.
- the flying state of the sub-combat units is, however, highly varied, depending upon discharge descent, different from the described state, i.e. a state in which the axis of rotation is near to vertical as is to apply during the scanning phase.
- the carrier for example an artillery shell, missile or canister
- the sub-combat units will, on discharge of the sub-combat units, have a trajectory which may be as good as horizontal.
- the sub-combat unit will begin to rotate about its major main inertia axis, at the same time as this axis will begin to oscillate.
- the major direction of the axis will, however, be largely parallel to the trajectory tangent of the carrier prior to separation.
- the object of the present invention is to obviate the problem inherent in causing the direction of the axis of rotation of the sub-combat unit to be deflected to as good as vertical, at the same time as the pendulum motion of the axis is damped, i.e. changing the orientation of the sub-combat unit into the prescribed state.
- the mass of the subcombat unit is distributed such that the ratio between the largest main inertia moment and the other main inertia moments of the sub-combat unit lies within the range of between 1.05 to 1.15.
- a value of lower than 1.05 means that the pendulum motion or oscillation of the axis of rotation is damped too slowly
- a value higher than 1.15 implies that the deflection of the axis to almost vertical position will take too long time, i.e. will require too long a trajectory length.
- the moment is developed as a result of the angle of entry or angle of attack and the angle of wind impingement on the sub-combat unit.
- the moment also damps oscillations in the sub-combat unit, so that stationary flying state with small oscillation amplitudes is achieved at the beginning of the scanning phase. In stationary flight state, the aerodynamic moments are slight on the sub-combat unit.
- sub-combat units which are described here are disposed in an artillery shell which is discharged by means of a 155 mm howitzer in a ballistic trajectory towards the target area.
- the artillery shell may, for instance carry two sub-combat units.
- the sub-combat units are separated from the shell and, during a transitional phase, the sub-combat units are to be set in a pre-determined rotation, fall velocity and orientation at the beginning of the scanning phase.
- the sub-combat units are enclosed in a cylindrical canister which is fitted with brake fins in order to deduce the rotation of the sub-combat units.
- two diametrically located carrier surfaces 1, 2 on the sub-combat unit are activated, the two carrier surfaces being pivotally disposed from a collapsed position where the carrier surfaces follow the casing surface 3 of the sub-combat unit, and to an opened position where both of the retarding surfaces form a retarding area.
- the sub-combat unit comprises a warhead 4 and a target detector 5 which is displaced from a collapsed position in a stirrup-like superstructure 6 on the warhead to an opened position where it has free view beside the warhead.
- the detector When the prescribed flying state of the sub-combat unit has been achieved, i.e. predetermined rotation, fall velocity and orientation, and additional conditions such as prescribed altitude over the target area have been achieved, the detector is activated and the scanning phase begins.
- the detector scans the target area in a helical pattern, similar to the groove in a gramophone record, during the fall of the sub-combat unit down towards the target area.
- a SAF safety, arming and firing unit
- a directed explosive projectile is discharged with high kinetic energy towards the target, for example the turret roof on a tank.
- the carrier surfaces, detector and warhead proper are of per se known type and will not, therefore, be described in greater detail here.
- the sub-combat unit will, after the separation, begin to rotate about its major main inertia axis. It is important that a sufficient aerodynamic moment is created so that oscillations in the sub-combat unit are damped and that the orientation of the main inertia axis is modified to almost vertical. According to the present invention, this is achieved by causing the moment of inertia to maintain a ratio in a given manner.
- the ratio between the largest main inertia moment, i.e. the moment of inertia of the main inertia axis and the other main inertia moments must be about 1:1.
- the co-ordinate system XYZ (see figure) of the sub-combat unit coincides with the main inertia axis, with the largest inertia moment on the X axis and the other main inertia axis on the Z and Y axes which make an angle of 90 with the X axis.
- the X axis makes an angle of 30 with the line of symmetry of the warhead.
- the rotation vector of the sub-combat unit must coincide with the X axis.
- the aerodynamic damping must be sufficiently great such that both directions are caused to coincide before the beginning of the scanning phase, i.e. any possible oscillations in the sub-combat unit are damped out.
- the aerodynamic carrier surfaces 1, 2 develop moments in suitable directions in order, together with gyration forces of the rotating sub-combat unit, to modify the orientation to the prescribed state, i.e. that the orientation of the main inertia axis, the X axis, will be close to vertical.
- the relationship between the main inertia moment must lie within the range of between 1.05 and 1.15, preferably about 1.1. If the main inertia moment is of such relationship, a sufficiently rapid modification will be obtained of the orientation of the sub-combat unit, at the same time as a sufficient damping of oscillations in the sub-combat unit will be obtained.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to a sub-combat unit disposed to be separated from a flying body, for example a carrier shell or the like over a target area, the sub-combat unit comprising a warhead, a target detector and a device which imparts to the sub-combat unit a rotation for scanning the target area in a helical pattern during the fall of the sub-combat unit towards the target area. One such sub-combat unit has been previously described in European patent specification 0 252 036.
- The characterizing features of the sub-combat unit described in the above-mentioned patent are that the target detector is pivotally disposed on a journal shaft which is parallel to the line of symmetry of the warhead so as to permit outward pivoting of the target detector from a closed position where the optical axis of the target detector coincides with the line of symmetry of the warhead, and to in opened position where the optical axis of the target detector is parallel to the line of symmetry of the warhead so as to permit a free view of the target detector beside the warhead, and that, furthermore, carrier surface is pivotally disposed on a journal shaft which is also parallel to the line of symmetry of the warhead so as to permit outward pivoting of the carrier surface from a closed position to an opened position beside the warhead.
- By a suitable aerodynamic design of the sub-combat unit and the retarding area of the detector and carrier surface, there will be obtained a suitable fall velocity of the sub-combat unit and further an impelling moment about the spinning axis which gives the sub-combat unit its rotation. This is achieved without the aid of a parachute, which is an advantage since the parachute is bulky and requires space. Within the available space in a carrier shell, more space can instead be made available for the warhead proper.
- Even if the above-described sub-combat unit has proved to possess superior properties in respect of fall velocity and scanning rotation, wishes have been voiced in the art to be able to increase the retarding area even further. This may, for instance, be the case when it is desired to employ heavier warheads. The retarding area of the target detector and carrier surface is restricted to the cross-sectional area of the cylindrical sub-combat unit body, which may entail that the fall velocity will become too high with the existing size of the retarding area if, at the same time, the weight of the warhead is increased.
- Swedish patent application number 8903474-8 describes a sub-combat unit in which the retarding area has been made considerably larger. The characterizing feature of the sub-combat unit is that two diametrically located carrier surfaces are pivotally disposed each on their shaft located in a plane which is at right angles to the axis of symmetry of the warhead, from a closed position where the carrier surfaces follow the casing surface of the sub-combat unit, to a 90 opened position where both of the carrier surfaces form a retarding area for the fall velocity of the sub-combat unit.
- In this case, the carrier surfaces are made of an elastically flexible material, so that, when they pivot out from their closed position, they are at the same time bent to a substantially straight or gently curved surface.
- The advantage inherent in the above-described design, in addition to the larger retarding area, is that both of the carrier surfaces may be made comparatively thin, which is favourable from the point of view of weight and payload. For example, the carrier surfaces may be made of titanium and bent so that, in their opened position, they have a certain radius. The bending may be varied and the carrier surfaces may be of different lengths, in which event further parameters for varying the aeronautical properties of the unit will be obtained.
- The sub-combat units are disposed to be separated from a missile, a carrier shell or other flying platform, for example a canister which in its turn has been separated from a carrier shell or missile, for example a 15.5 cm artillery shell.
- In order that the sub-combat unit in its functional phase (the scanning phase) operate in the intended manner, it is necessary that the axis of rotation is close to vertical and that the pendulum movements of the axes are slight, with an amplitude of at most a few degrees. By designing the two carrier surfaces with accurately indicated geometry and by providing them with means for completely relieved (turbulent) flow, see our copending patent European application number 92850218.6, pendulum motion and instabilities can be reduced to a minimum and a predetermined rotation, fall velocity and orientation can be maintained during the scanning phase.
- When the sub-combat units are first separated from the shell and subsequently from the canister, the flying state of the sub-combat units is, however, highly varied, depending upon discharge descent, different from the described state, i.e. a state in which the axis of rotation is near to vertical as is to apply during the scanning phase.
- In most cases, the carrier (for example an artillery shell, missile or canister) will, on discharge of the sub-combat units, have a trajectory which may be as good as horizontal. On discharge, the sub-combat unit will begin to rotate about its major main inertia axis, at the same time as this axis will begin to oscillate. The major direction of the axis will, however, be largely parallel to the trajectory tangent of the carrier prior to separation.
- The object of the present invention is to obviate the problem inherent in causing the direction of the axis of rotation of the sub-combat unit to be deflected to as good as vertical, at the same time as the pendulum motion of the axis is damped, i.e. changing the orientation of the sub-combat unit into the prescribed state.
- This problem is solved according to the present invention in that the mass of the subcombat unit is distributed such that the ratio between the largest main inertia moment and the other main inertia moments of the sub-combat unit lies within the range of between 1.05 to 1.15. A value of lower than 1.05 means that the pendulum motion or oscillation of the axis of rotation is damped too slowly, a value higher than 1.15 implies that the deflection of the axis to almost vertical position will take too long time, i.e. will require too long a trajectory length.
- The moment is developed as a result of the angle of entry or angle of attack and the angle of wind impingement on the sub-combat unit. In addition to modifying the orientation of the sub-combat unit, the moment also damps oscillations in the sub-combat unit, so that stationary flying state with small oscillation amplitudes is achieved at the beginning of the scanning phase. In stationary flight state, the aerodynamic moments are slight on the sub-combat unit.
- The present invention will be described in greater detail hereinbelow with particular reference to the accompanying drawings which, in Figs. 1, 2 and 3 show the sub-combat unit with main inertia axis marked, and in different positions.
- Those sub-combat units which are described here are disposed in an artillery shell which is discharged by means of a 155 mm howitzer in a ballistic trajectory towards the target area. The artillery shell may, for instance carry two sub-combat units. When the shell arrives at the target area, the sub-combat units are separated from the shell and, during a transitional phase, the sub-combat units are to be set in a pre-determined rotation, fall velocity and orientation at the beginning of the scanning phase.
- In the first stage of the transitional phase, the sub-combat units are enclosed in a cylindrical canister which is fitted with brake fins in order to deduce the rotation of the sub-combat units. After separation from the canister, two diametrically located
carrier surfaces 1, 2 on the sub-combat unit are activated, the two carrier surfaces being pivotally disposed from a collapsed position where the carrier surfaces follow thecasing surface 3 of the sub-combat unit, and to an opened position where both of the retarding surfaces form a retarding area. - The sub-combat unit comprises a
warhead 4 and atarget detector 5 which is displaced from a collapsed position in a stirrup-like superstructure 6 on the warhead to an opened position where it has free view beside the warhead. - When the prescribed flying state of the sub-combat unit has been achieved, i.e. predetermined rotation, fall velocity and orientation, and additional conditions such as prescribed altitude over the target area have been achieved, the detector is activated and the scanning phase begins. The detector scans the target area in a helical pattern, similar to the groove in a gramophone record, during the fall of the sub-combat unit down towards the target area. When a target is detected, a SAF (safety, arming and firing unit) is initiated which triggers the
warhead 4. A directed explosive projectile is discharged with high kinetic energy towards the target, for example the turret roof on a tank. - The carrier surfaces, detector and warhead proper are of per se known type and will not, therefore, be described in greater detail here.
- As was mentioned by way of introduction, the sub-combat unit will, after the separation, begin to rotate about its major main inertia axis. It is important that a sufficient aerodynamic moment is created so that oscillations in the sub-combat unit are damped and that the orientation of the main inertia axis is modified to almost vertical. According to the present invention, this is achieved by causing the moment of inertia to maintain a ratio in a given manner. The ratio between the largest main inertia moment, i.e. the moment of inertia of the main inertia axis and the other main inertia moments must be about 1:1.
- The co-ordinate system XYZ (see figure) of the sub-combat unit coincides with the main inertia axis, with the largest inertia moment on the X axis and the other main inertia axis on the Z and Y axes which make an angle of 90 with the X axis. In its turn, the X axis makes an angle of 30 with the line of symmetry of the warhead. During the scanning phase, the rotation vector of the sub-combat unit must coincide with the X axis.
- If the rotation vector does not have the same direction as the main inertia axis (the X axis), the aerodynamic damping must be sufficiently great such that both directions are caused to coincide before the beginning of the scanning phase, i.e. any possible oscillations in the sub-combat unit are damped out.
- The
aerodynamic carrier surfaces 1, 2 develop moments in suitable directions in order, together with gyration forces of the rotating sub-combat unit, to modify the orientation to the prescribed state, i.e. that the orientation of the main inertia axis, the X axis, will be close to vertical. In order to modify the orientation within the prescribed time, the relationship between the main inertia moment must lie within the range of between 1.05 and 1.15, preferably about 1.1. If the main inertia moment is of such relationship, a sufficiently rapid modification will be obtained of the orientation of the sub-combat unit, at the same time as a sufficient damping of oscillations in the sub-combat unit will be obtained. - In the foregoing, we have emphasized the importance that a sufficient aerodynamic moment is created so that oscillations in the sub-combat unit are damped out. This also implies that the rotation damping must have a positive derivative of sufficient magnitude in order that a predetermined rotation can be imparted to the sub-combat unit when velocity varies. In increasing angle of entry or angle of attack α, see Fig. 2, it is important that the rotation modifications are slight. The reason for this is that an increase in the rotation speed could cause the sub-combat unit to be gyro-stabilized, in which event the change in the direction of the largest main inertia axis towards the prescribed vertical direction will take too long time or will not occur at all if the speed of rotation becomes far too great.
- In order that the prescribed flying state occur, i.e. almost vertical rotation axis (main inertia axis), it is also necessary that the pitching moment fades with increased angle of attack α, but increases with increased slide slip angle β, see Fig. 3. The yawing moment must increase with both increased angle of attack α and increased slide slip angle β.
Claims (1)
- A sub-combat unit disposed to be separated from a flying body, for example a carrier shell or the like, over a target area, the sub-combat unit comprising a warhead (4), a target detector (5) and two diametrically located carrier surfaces (1, 2) wich impart to the sub-combat unit a rotation for scanning the target area in a helical pattern during the fall of the sub-combat unit down towards the target area, and both of the carrier surfaces (1, 2) being pivotally disposed from a collapsed position to an opened position in which both of the carrier surfaces form a retarding area for the fall velocity of the sub-combat unit, characterized in that the mass of the sub-combat unit is distributed such that the relationship between the largest main inertia moment and the other main inertia moments of the sub-combat unit lies in the range of between 1.05 and 1.15.
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
SE9101037A SE468261B (en) | 1991-04-08 | 1991-04-08 | SUBSTRATE PART ORGANIZED TO BE SEPARATED FROM AN AIRCRAFT |
AT92850217T ATE152511T1 (en) | 1992-09-14 | 1992-09-14 | SUBMUNION |
DE69219468T DE69219468T2 (en) | 1992-09-14 | 1992-09-14 | Submunition |
EP92850217A EP0587969B1 (en) | 1992-09-14 | 1992-09-14 | Sub-combat unit |
US07/957,488 US5280752A (en) | 1991-04-08 | 1992-10-07 | Sub-combat unit |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP92850217A EP0587969B1 (en) | 1992-09-14 | 1992-09-14 | Sub-combat unit |
US07/957,488 US5280752A (en) | 1991-04-08 | 1992-10-07 | Sub-combat unit |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0587969A1 EP0587969A1 (en) | 1994-03-23 |
EP0587969B1 true EP0587969B1 (en) | 1997-05-02 |
Family
ID=26132595
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP92850217A Expired - Lifetime EP0587969B1 (en) | 1991-04-08 | 1992-09-14 | Sub-combat unit |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0587969B1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SE452505B (en) * | 1986-03-27 | 1987-11-30 | Bofors Ab | SUBSCRIPTION PART WITH SWINGABLE MOLD DETECTOR |
USH685H (en) * | 1988-06-20 | 1989-10-03 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Deployable fin configuration for free flight control of cylindrical bodies |
SE464834B (en) * | 1989-10-20 | 1991-06-17 | Bofors Ab | SUBSCRIPTION PART WITH SWINGABLE BEAR SURFACES |
SE465440B (en) * | 1990-04-04 | 1991-09-09 | Bofors Ab | submunition |
-
1992
- 1992-09-14 EP EP92850217A patent/EP0587969B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0587969A1 (en) | 1994-03-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR100851442B1 (en) | 2-d projectile trajectory correction system and method | |
US4583703A (en) | One fin orientation and stabilization device | |
US4546940A (en) | Projectile, adapted to be given a rotation on firing, which makes the projectile spin-stabilized | |
US5108051A (en) | Deployment mechanism of a projectile fin | |
CA1271084A (en) | Submunitions | |
US4374495A (en) | Warhead for antitank missiles featuring a shaped charge | |
US4607810A (en) | Passive constraint for aerodynamic surfaces | |
US5280752A (en) | Sub-combat unit | |
CN109506878A (en) | A kind of multiple-degree-of-freedom mechanism | |
EP0424337B1 (en) | Subwarhead | |
US4523728A (en) | Passive auto-erecting alignment wings for long rod penetrator | |
US5067410A (en) | Flexible wing | |
EP0587969B1 (en) | Sub-combat unit | |
IL115992A (en) | Method and device for launching warheads to combat targets along a back loop flight path | |
GB2284251A (en) | Projectile | |
USH685H (en) | Deployable fin configuration for free flight control of cylindrical bodies | |
US5155294A (en) | Subwarhead | |
EP0587970B1 (en) | Sub-combat unit | |
EP0277470B1 (en) | Spin braking device for ammunition | |
US5505136A (en) | Core-generating charge with means for correcting entrainment rotation effects | |
US5063849A (en) | Subwarhead | |
EP1087201B1 (en) | Method and device for correcting the trajectory of a spinstabilised projectile | |
US4452124A (en) | Stabilizing tab for missile launcher | |
EP0540484A1 (en) | Improvements to sub-combat units | |
DE69219468T2 (en) | Submunition |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI NL SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19940817 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19951005 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI NL SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19970502 Ref country code: LI Effective date: 19970502 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 19970502 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19970502 Ref country code: ES Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 19970502 Ref country code: DK Effective date: 19970502 Ref country code: CH Effective date: 19970502 Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19970502 Ref country code: AT Effective date: 19970502 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 152511 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19970515 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69219468 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19970605 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Effective date: 19970802 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19980813 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19980907 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19981123 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990914 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19990914 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000701 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |