EP0574546A1 - Element photosensible epluchable - Google Patents

Element photosensible epluchable

Info

Publication number
EP0574546A1
EP0574546A1 EP19920910541 EP92910541A EP0574546A1 EP 0574546 A1 EP0574546 A1 EP 0574546A1 EP 19920910541 EP19920910541 EP 19920910541 EP 92910541 A EP92910541 A EP 92910541A EP 0574546 A1 EP0574546 A1 EP 0574546A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
layer
coversheet
photohardenable
contiguous
image
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP19920910541
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Charles D. Lang
Scott Dixon Mccalmont
John Choi
Anchi Hou
Alan Shobert
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EIDP Inc
Original Assignee
EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co filed Critical EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Publication of EP0574546A1 publication Critical patent/EP0574546A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F7/00Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
    • G03F7/26Processing photosensitive materials; Apparatus therefor
    • G03F7/34Imagewise removal by selective transfer, e.g. peeling away
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03FPHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
    • G03F3/00Colour separation; Correction of tonal value
    • G03F3/10Checking the colour or tonal value of separation negatives or positives

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a multilayer, photosensitive element for image reproduction. More particularly, it relates to a photosensitive element comprising a coversheet, a photohardenable layer, a contiguous layer, an isolation layer, an adhesive layer, and a support.
  • Photosensitive elements for image-reproduction are well-known in the graphics arts industry. Elements are exposed to actinic radiation through an image-bearing transparency, such as a color separation transparency, to produce an image that is either a positive or negative of the transparency. After imagewise exposure, the photosensitive elements are developed by washing out the soluble image areas, toning with a colorant, peeling apart, or combinations of these techniques.
  • Peel-apart photosensitive elements which do not require a solvent for their development, are disclosed in Cohen, U.S. Patents 4,174,216 and 4,247,619. These elements comprise, in order a strippable coversheet, a photoadherent photohardenable layer, a tonable contiguous layer, and a support. The element is imagewise exposed through the coversheet, and the coversheet is subse-quently peeled off. The exposed areas of the photosensitive layer adhere to the coversheet and are removed, revealing the tonable contiguous layer. The unexposed areas of the photosensitive layer which remain on the contiguous layer do not accept toner. The revealed contiguous layer is toned in a succeeding step to produce a negative image of the transparency used for exposure.
  • the toned image may be used as a single-color surprint proof.
  • the process described above can be used to produce a multicolored image.
  • the support is removed from a photosensitive element thereby revealing the contiguous layer.
  • the contiguous layer of the resulting element is adhered to the exposed and peeled-apart photohardenable layer of a previously formed colored image.
  • the resulting element is then imagewise exposed through the coversheet, peeled-apart, and toned with a different colored toner to produce a two-color image.
  • This sequence of steps may be repeated as many times as desired to produce a multicolored surprint proof.
  • the elements disclosed by Cohen have numerous advantages for the production of colored images. However, imperfections known as "pickoff defects" can occur during image formation. In addition, these elements may have a higher dot gain than the press print. A high dot gain is unsuitable in the printing industry.
  • Pickoff defects occur when portions of the contiguous layer adhere to the exposed photohardenable layer and are removed with the photohardenable layer when the exposed element is peeled apart. Regions which should accept toner are not able to do so because the tonable contiguous layer has been removed. Also, in the production of multicolored images, the contiguous layer from an earlier formed colored image may be revealed and accept toner during the toning process. Consequently, pickoff defects have a deleterious effect on the image and may make it unsuitable for use as a prepress proof. The production and mounting of printing plates is expensive and time consuming. Thus, it is essential that a proof accurately predict the appearance and quality of the image obtained by printing.
  • the dots on a halftone press print are larger than the dots on the corresponding halftone separation transparency. This phenomenon is known as dot gain.
  • dot gain A discussion of dot gain and its causes can be found in PrJnc-i les of Color Proofing,, by Michael H. E :no, G.AMA Communications, Salem, NH, 1986, pp 84-87.
  • For a prepress proof to be an acceptable representation of the press print it must accurately duplicate the dot gain of the press print.
  • the elements described by Cohen generally produce too much dot gain and thus, the resulting proof does not completely simulate the press print.
  • Precolored peel apart photosensitive elements in which the photohardenable layer comprises a colorant, are disclosed in Taylor, U.S. Patent 4,489,154, and in Choi, U.S. Patent 5,001,036. In certain instances, these elements have an advantage over tonable elements because it is unnecessary to apply a colorant to the element after it has been exposed and peeled apart. Although these elements have been used to produce overlay proofs, it has not been possible to use them to produce multicolor surprint proofs due to pickoff defects. Accordingly, a need exists for a photosensitive element which does not have pickoff defects and which more accurately duplicates the dot gain of the printing press.
  • this invention concerns a multilayer, peel-apart, photosensitive element comprising, in order:
  • said photosensitive element additionally comprises:
  • the photohardenable layer comprises a monomer, a binder, and a photoinitiator system activatible by actinic radiation.
  • the unexposed regions of the photohardenable layer adhere more strongly to the contiguous layer and the exposed regions of the photohardenable layer adhere more strongly to the coversheet.
  • the photohardenable layer additionally comprises a colorant and the support is removable. This invention also concerns improved processes for forming colored images using the multilayer, peel-apart, photosensitive elements of the invention.
  • Figure IA illustrates a photosensitive element of this invention.
  • Figure IB illustrates a preferred embodiment of this invention, that is, a photoadherent photosensitive element, with the support removed and adhered to a receptor, being peeled apart following exposure to actinic radiation.
  • Figure IC illustrates another preferred embodiment of the invention, that is, a photosensitive element additionally comprising a photorelease layer, with the support removed and adhered to a receptor, being peeled apart following exposure to actinic radiation.
  • the photosensitive element (10) comprises, in order, a coversheet (12), a photohardenable layer (14), a contiguous layer (16), an isolation layer (18), an adhesive layer (20), and a support (22) .
  • the support (22) is removable. Referring to Figure IB, the support (22) has been removed and the element minus support (22) is adhered to a receptor (24) .
  • the adhesive relationship of the photohardenable layer (14) relative to the coversheet (12) and contiguous layer (16) is such that the unexposed regions (26) of the photohardenable layer (14) adhere more strongly to the contiguous layer (16) and the exposed regions (28) of the photohardenable layer (14) adhere more strongly to the coversheet (12) and are thus removed.
  • the element is not precolored, i.e., the photohardenable layer (14) does not comprise a colorant, the revealed regions (30) of the contiguous layer (16) are toned to produce a colored image which is a negative of the transparency used for exposure. Thus, the element is said to be "negative working”. If the element is precolored, i.e., the photohardenable layer (14) comprises a colorant and therefore does not need to be subsequently toned, the unexposed regions (26) which remain on the contiguous layer (16) form a colored image which is a positive of the transparency used for -exposure. Thus, the element is said to be "positive working".
  • the support (22) is removable, and the element (10) is precolored, and additionally comprises a photorelease layer between the coversheet and the photohardenable layer.
  • the support (22) has been removed and the element minus the support (22) is adhered t ⁇ a receptor (24) .
  • the adhesive relationship of the photohardenable layer (14) relative to the coversheet (12) and the contiguous layer (16) is altered by the photorelease layer (32) such that the exposed regions (34) of the photohardenable layer (14) adhere to the contiguous layer (16) and the unexposed regions (36) of the photohardenable layer (14) adhere more strongly to the photorelease layer (32) and the coversheet (12) and are removed.
  • the exposed regions (34) of the photohardenable layer (14) which remain on the contiguous layer (16), produce a colored image which is a negative of the transparency used for exposure.
  • the element is said to be "negative working".
  • Positive-working and negative-working refer to the relationship of the final image produced by the element to the transparency used for exposure, and not to the operation of the element.
  • Positive-working elements produce a duplicate image of the transparency; that is, the colored regions of the transparency are colored and the uncolored regions in the transparency are uncolored in the final image.
  • Negative-working elements produce an image that is the reverse of the transparency; that is, the colored regions of the transparency are uncolored and the uncolored regions in the transparency are colored in the final image.
  • Non-precolored and precolored peel apart elements in which the exposed regions are removed with the coversheet on peeling apart, i.e., the element operates by photoadherence, will produce opposite images.
  • the exposed regions (28) of the photohardenable layer (14) are removed, revealing the contiguous layer (16) which is then toned.
  • the colored regions correspond to the exposed regions of the photohardenable layer (14) which, in turn, correspond to the uncolored regions of the transparency. Since the colored regions of the final .image correspond to the uncolored regions in the transparency, a negative image is produced.
  • a photoadherent element may be reversed, i.e., act as if it was not a photoadherent element, by the process disclosed in Taylor, U.S. Patent 4,987,051.
  • the coversheet (12) is first removed, and the element is imagewise exposed. Following imagewise exposure, the coversheet (12) is replaced, and the element is overall exposed. The element is subsequently peeled apart.
  • the exposed regions of the photohardenable layer (14) remain on the contiguous layer (16) and the unexposed regions are removed with the coversheet (12) .
  • the use of this process is considered to be equivalent to using a photorelease peel-apart photosensitive element.
  • the contiguous layer (16) is a tacky, or slightly soft, deformable material which is able to accept toner.
  • suitable materials for the contiguous layer should resist monomer diffusion from the photohardenable layer into the contiguous layer. In addition, these materials should not migrate into the photohardenable layer.
  • Preferred materials are elastomeric polymers and mixtures thereof, which are inherently tacky at ambient temperatures, such as, for example, natural or synthetic rubbers.
  • Especially preferred materials are polymers of butadiene or isoprene and random, teleblock, block copolymers of butadiene or isoprene copolymerized with styrene, and poly(alpha-olefins) in which the alpha- olefin contains from about five to about ten carbon atoms.
  • the contiguous layer must be tonable, i.e., the toner must adhere to the contiguous layer.
  • precolored elements it's not essential for the contiguous layer to be tonable.
  • the contiguous layer may also contain oxidation inhibitors, optical brlghteners, ultraviolet absorbers, antihalation agents, and the like.
  • a preferred oxidation inhibitor is Irganox® 1010, which is preferably present at a level of 0.1% to 1% by weight.
  • the adhesive layer (20) adheres the element to the support (22) or to the exposed and peeled apart photohardenable layer of the previous element when the element is used to prepare a multicolor image.
  • Preferred materials for the adhesive layer (20) are elastomeric polymers and mixtures thereof, which are inherently tacky at ambient temperatures, such as the polymers described above for the contiguous layer (16) .
  • the same material may be used in both the contiguous layer and the adhesive layer. Alternatively, different materials may be used.
  • the isolation layer (18) comprises a film forming organic polymer which is less deformable than the polymers contained in the contiguous layer and the adhesive layer.
  • the isolation layer must also possess good clarity and low color. In addition, it must adhere to the contiguous layer and to the adhesive layer.
  • non-elastomeric organic polymers which can be used include (a) polymers and copolymers of vinyl acetate, such as, for example, poly(vinyl acetate) and ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer; (b) acrylic and methacrylic polymers and copolymers, such as, for example, poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(ethyl methacrylate), poly(n-butyl methacrylate), poly(iso ⁇ butyl methacrylate), and methyl methacrylate/butyl methacrylate copolymers; and (c) compatible mixtures thereof.
  • a preferred polymer is poly(vinyl acetate) .
  • the photohardenable layer (14) is one whose adhesive relationship relative to the coversheet (12) and the contiguous layer (16) is such that, after exposure to actinic radiation, the unexposed or exposed regions of the photohardenable layer adhere more strongly to the coversheet while the other regions of the photohardenable layer adhere more strongly to the contiguous layer.
  • Materials with ethylenically unsaturated groups which are photohardenable, photopolymerizable, photocrosslinkable, and/or photodi erizable, are used in the photohardenable layer, and are "photohardenable" within the meaning of this application.
  • the preferred photohardenable compositions are photopolymerizable and comprise an organic polymeric binder, an addition polymerizable ethylenically unsaturated monomer, and an initiator system activatible by actinic radiation.
  • the element (10), is imagewise exposed and the exposed regions of the photohardenable layer are removed with the coversheet when the element is peeled apart.
  • Photoadherent peel-apart photosensitive elements are disclosed in Cohen, U.S. Patents 4,174,216 and 4,247,619; and Taylor, U.S. Patent, U.S. Patent 4,489,154.
  • the element (10) In an element which operates by photorelease, the element (10) , is imagewise exposed and the unexposed regions of photohardenable layer are removed with the coversheet when the element is peeled apart.
  • Photorelease photosensitive elements are disclosed in Cohen, U.S. Patent 4,282,308; Choi, U.S. Patent 5,001,036; and Applicant's assignee's U.S. Patent Application No. 07/542,470, filed on June 22, 1990 and U.S. Patent Application No. 07/741,715 filed August 7, 1991.
  • the monomer has at least one and preferably two or more terminal ethylenically unsaturated groups capable of free-radical initiated, chain propagated, addition polymerization, and preferably has some degree of polarity.
  • the monomer must be compatible with the binder and substantially nondiffusible in the contiguous layer.
  • Useful monomers include epoxy monomers containing ethylenic unsaturation, such as those disclosed in Crary, U.S. Patent 3,661,576.
  • Preferred monomers are the diacrylate and dimethacrylate esters of the epichlorohydrin adduct of bis-phenol A.
  • the binder can be a polar material, such as an acidic polymer containing at least 1.5 mole percent free acid groups to impart polarity to the polymer, or a nonpolar material such as the materials described in Burg, U.S. Patent 3,060,023; Chu, U.S. Patent 3,649,268; and Collier, U.S. Patent 3,984,244.
  • Suitable binders include polymers of methyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, and copolymers thereof.
  • a preferred binder is poly(methyl methacrylate) .
  • the photoinitiator system comprises one or more compounds which directly furnish free-radicals when activated by actinic radiation. It can also comprise a plurality of compounds, one of which yields free- radicals after having been caused to do so by another compound, or sensitizer, which has been activated by the radiation. Numerous conventional photoinitiator systems may be used provided they (a) are compatible with the other ingredients of the system, (b) do not alter the unique relationship between the coversheet; the contiguous layer; the photorelease layer, if present; and the -exposed and unexposed photohardenable layer required for the operation of the element, and (c) do not impart unwanted color to the final image.
  • Preferred photoinitiator systems are 2,4,5- triphenylimidazolyl dimers in combination with chain transfer agents, or hydrogen donors, such as are disclosed in Chambers, U.S. Patent 3,479,185; Cescon, U.S. Patent 3,784,557; Dessauer, U.S. Patent 4,311,783; and Sheets, U.S. Patent 4,622,286.
  • Preferred hexaarylbisimidazoles (HABI) are 2- ⁇ -chloro-substituted hexaphenylbisimidazoles in which the other positions on the phenyl radicals are unsubstituted or substituted with chloro, methyl or methoxy.
  • the most preferred initiator is ⁇ -Cl-HABI, i.e., l,l'-biimidazole, 2,2'- bis( ⁇ -chloro-phenyl)-4, , '5,5'-tetraphenyl-.
  • a preferred sensitizer is 7-diethylamino-4-methyl- coumarin.
  • Hydrogen donor compounds useful as chain transfer agents in the photopolymer compositions include: 2- mercaptobenzoxazole, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole, 4-methyl- 4H-l,2,4,triazole-3-thiol, and the like.
  • a preferred hydrogen donor is 2-merca ⁇ tobenzoxazole.
  • HABI initiating systems are preferred, other initiating systems may be used in practicing this invention.
  • Typical free radical-generating addition polymerization initiators include: quinones; ketones, such as Michler's ketone and benzophenone; dialkylamino benzaldehyde; benzaldehyde; dialkylamino benzoate esters; and combinations thereof.
  • Patent 2,760,863 include vicinal ketaldonyl alcohols, such as benzoin, pivaloin, acyloin ethers, e.g., benzoin methyl and ethyl ethers; alpha- hydrocarbon-substituted aromatic acyloins, such as alpha-methylbenzoin.
  • Redox systems such as those involving dyes, e.g.. Rose Bengal/2-dibutylaminoethanol, may be also used.
  • a useful discussion of dye sensitized photopolymerization can be found in "Dye Sensitized Photopolymerization" by D. F. Eaton in Adv. in Photochemistry. Vol. 13, D. H. Volman, G. S. Hammond, and K.
  • one or more colorants will be present in the photohardenable layer (14) .
  • Dyes and pigments may be used as colorants.
  • suitable colorants include: yellow: Cromophtal® Yellow 3G (C.I. No. Pigment Yellow 93), Hostaperm® Yellow 3G (C.I. No. Pigment Yellow 154); magenta: Monastral® Violet R (C.I. No. Pigment Violet 19), 2,9-Dimethylquinacridone (C.I. No. Pigment Red 122), Indofast® Brilliant Scarlet R6300 (C.I. No. Pigment Red 123), Quindo Magenta RV 6803; cyan: Monastral® Blue G (C.I. No.
  • Pigment Blue 15 Monastral® Blue (BT 383D) (C.I. No. Pigment Blue 15) Monastral® Blue G (BT 284D) (C.I. No. Pigment Blue 15), Monastral® Green GT (751D) (C.I. No. Pigment Green 7); black: Raven® 450 (C.I. No. Pigment Black 7), Raven® 1035 (C.I. No. Pigment Black 7), Elftex® 8 (C.I. No. Pigment Black 7), Elftex® 12 (C.I. No. Pigment Black -7) .
  • the photohardenable layer (14) of both precolored and non-precolored photosensitive elements may also contain other ingredients which are conventional components of photohardenable systems provided they (a) are compatible with the other ingredients present in the photohardenable layer, (b) do not alter the unique relationship between the coversheet; the contiguous layer; the photorelease layer, if present; and the exposed and unexposed photohardenable layer required for the operation of the element, and (c) do not impart unwanted color to the final image.
  • Such components may include stabilizers, antihalation agents, optical brightening agents, release agents, surfactants, coating aids, plasticizers, fillers, and the like.
  • triacetin For non-precolored, tonable elements, about 3-15% of triacetin and preferably about 5-7%, may be added to the photohardenable layer (14) to prevent fine toned line defects. These defects appear as very fine lines of color in regions of the image which should be uncolored. Triacetin may also be added to the photohardenable layer of precolored photosensitive elements as disclosed in Peiffer, U.S. Patent 5,087,549. A conventional thermal polymerization inhibitor is normally present to increase the storage stability of the element. The dinitroso dimers described in Pazos, U.S. Patent 4,168,982, may also be useful. However, it is frequently unnecessary to add additional inhibitor because monomers generally contain polymerization inhibitors added by their manufacturers.
  • Nonionic surfactants may be added to the photohardenable layer as coating aids.
  • Preferred coating aids are polyethylene oxide, such as Polyox® SRN 3000, and fluorinated nonionic surfactants, such as Fluorad® FC-430.
  • optical brightening agents to the photohardenable layer produces an image which is free from distortion due to halation.
  • Useful ultraviolet radiation absorbing materials and brighteners are disclosed in Held, U.S. Patent 3,854,950.
  • Particularly useful optical brighteners are 2-(stibyl-4")-(naphto- l',2',4,5)-l,2,3-triazol-2"-sulfonic acid phenyl ester and 7-(4'-chloro-6'-diethylamino-l , ,3',5 , -triazine-4'- yl)amino-3-phenyl coumarin.
  • the binder must be present in sufficient amount to form a film when the composition is coated.
  • the monomer must be present in sufficient amount to alter the relative adhesive relationship so that, on peeling apart, either the unexposed or exposed regions of the photohardenable layer are removed with the coversheet while the other regions remain on the contiguous layer.
  • the photoinitiator system must be present in sufficient amount to initiate polymerization of the monomer on exposure to actinic radiation.
  • -the colorant In precolored systems, -the colorant must be present in a sufficient amount to uniformly color the image to a sufficient optical density, but not to the extent that it adversely affects the properties of the photohardenable layer, such as photospeed, adhesion, etc., needed for the operation of the element. Optical densities between 1 and 2 are desirable for surprint proofs.
  • the binder/monomer ratio may vary widely but in general should be about 3:1 to 1:3.
  • the monomer should be compatible with, and may be a solvent for, and/or have a plasticizing action on the binder.
  • the proportions of monomer and binder are made in accordance with the requirements of selective photoadhesion or photorelease and of hardness. To provide a suitable hardness, the monomer concentration* is normally kept low so that the photohardenable layer will be sufficiently hard and non-tacky.
  • the composition of the photohardenable layer will typically be within the following percentage ranges, based on total weight of the photohardenable layer: about 5-60% monomer, preferably about 35-50%; about 0.1-10% initiator system, preferably about 1-5%; about 25-75% binder, preferably about 35-50%; and about 0-15% other ingredients, preferably about 3-10%.
  • the composition will normally contain, based on total weight of the photohardenable layer about 5-60% monomer, preferably about 35-50%; about 0.1-10% initiator system, preferably about 1-5%; about 20-70% binder, preferably about 30-45%; 0.5-20% colorant(s), preferably 8-15%; and about 0-15% other ingredients, preferably about 3-10%.
  • the support (22) may be any suitable film which has the necessary stiffness and dimensional stability and which exhibits proper adhesion to the adhesive layer.
  • a preferred material is polyethylene terephthalate film.
  • a removable support is required for the preparation of a multicolor surprint proof.
  • a silicon release treated polyethylene terephthalate film is preferred for this application.
  • the support is typically about 25 to about 125 microns thick.
  • the coversheet (12) is strippable, i.e., removable by peeling it apart from the rest of the element. The adhesive relationship of the coversheet to the photohardenable layer will vary depending on whether the element operates by photoadherence or photorelease.
  • the exposed regions of the photohardenable layer adhere more strongly to the coversheet while the unexposed regions adhere more strongly to the contiguous layer.
  • the unexposed regions of the photohardenable layer adhere more strongly to the coversheet while the exposed regions adhere more strongly to the contiguous layer.
  • the coversheet (12) must be transparent to actinic radiation because irradiation is carried out through the coversheet.
  • the topography of the coversheet may be altered, and its polarity increased, by electrostatic discharge treatment as disclosed by Buzzell, U.S. Patent 4,356,253 or by flame treatment with an air-propane flame. This will enable the exposed areas of the photohardenable layer to adhere better to the surface of the coversheet.
  • Preferred materials for the coversheet are polymeric films, particularly polyethylene terephthalate film.
  • the most preferred material is an electric discharge treated polyethylene terephthalate film.
  • the most preferred material is untreated polyethylene terephthalate film.
  • coversheet may vary over a wide range, films having a thickness of about 13-50 microns are preferred. Although thinner coversheets produce halftone dots of good roundness with sharp edges, the coversheet should be thick enough to prevent tearing when it is stripped from the element. If the coversheet is to be flame or electric discharge treated, it should be thick enough to prevent such treatment from injuring the coversheet. In general, a rapid rate of coversheet stripping produces better image quality.
  • the receptor (24) may be any material which has the necessary stiffness and dimensional stability.
  • the receptor is flat and preferably smooth and opaque.
  • Exemplary materials which may be used as the receptor include adhesive subbed opaque polyethylene terephthalate film base, e.g., Melinex® 994 (ICI Americas Inc., Wilmington, DE); and paper stock, e.g., Kromekote® opaque white paper (Champion Paper Co., Stamford, CT) , or Cromalin® receptor stock (E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE) .
  • the preferred material is an opaque white paper.
  • Photosensitive elements which operate by photorelease may comprise photohardenable compositions which photorelease, such as those described by Cohen, U.S. Patent 4,282,308, and those described in U.S. Patent Application No. 07/542,470, filed on June 22, 1990.
  • photosensitive elements that operate by photorelease may comprise a photorelease layer (32) situated between the coversheet (12) and the photohardenable layer (14) .
  • the photorelease layer modifies the adhesive relationship between the coversheet and the photohardenable layer so that after the photohardenable layer has been exposed to actinic radiation, the unexposed, i.e., unphotohardened regions of the photohardenable layer, adhere more strongly to the coversheet than to the contiguous layer and are removed with the coversheet.
  • photorelease layers adhere more strongly to the contiguous layer than to the coversheet and remain on the contiguous layer when the element is peeled apart.
  • Agents suitable for use in photorelease layers are disclosed in Choi, U.S. Patent 5,001,036. These photorelease agents are solid, polymeric compounds which consist essentially of the oxyethylene repeat unit, i.e. : -[OCH2CH2]-
  • end groups such as hydroxyl or alkoxyl
  • Various end groups such as hydroxyl or alkoxyl, may be present. While small amounts of co-monomers (up to about 5%) may be present in the polyoxyethylene chain, provided the polymer is still solid at room temperature, oxyethylene homopolymers are preferred.
  • Oxyethylene homopolymers are generally divided, on the basis of molecular weight into two groups. Those two groups are (a) polyethylene glycols and (b) polyethylene oxides. Both groups, however, are oxyethylene homopolymers with primary hydroxyl end groups, i.e., H(OCH2CH2) n OH.
  • the polyethylene glycols are a series of low to medium weight homopolymers of ethylene oxide. They can be regarded chemically as polyether diols consisting of -long, linear chains of oxyethylene units with primary hydroxyl groups at each end. Depending on chain length, they range in physical form at room temperature from viscous liquids (MW 200-700) , to waxy semisolids (MW 100-2000), to hard, waxlike solids (MW 3,000 to 20,000 and above) .
  • the polyethylene oxides are a series of high molecular weight oxyethylene homopolymers. They are free-flowing white powders commercially available in a broad range of molecular weight grades, i.e., as low as 100,000 to as high as 5,000,000. Polyethylene oxides are available from the Union Carbide Corporation under the tradename Polyox®. Oxyethylene polymers are discussed in detail in Chapters 18 and 19 of Handbook of Water-fioluhl flums and Res-jns. R. L. Davidson, Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
  • the photorelease agent is typically coated onto the coversheet.
  • the polymer used as a photorelease agent must be of sufficient molecular weight to be a solid at ambient temperature.
  • the polymer must also form a film at ambient temperature.
  • polyethylene oxides with varying molecular weights can be used, oxyethylene homopolymers with a molecular weight greater than 20,000 are preferred. More preferred are oxyethylene homopolymers in the molecular weight range of about 100,000 to about 600,000.
  • the most preferred photorelease agents have a molecular weight of about 300,000 to 400,000.
  • the photorelease layer consists essentially of the photorelease agent, but it may also contain minor amounts of other ingredients that do not materially affect its essential characteristic, i.e, photorelease.
  • the photorelease layer will contain at least 65%, and more preferably, at least 75% of a photorelease agent.
  • Other ingredients can be added to the photorelease layer to improve performance.
  • a surfactant may be added as a coating aid.
  • Preferred coating aids for the photorelease layer are low molecular weight, non-ionic polyethylene oxide/polypropylene oxide/polyethylene oxide copolymers.
  • the coating aid may be added at 0-1% (weight/volume) of the coating solution, preferably at about 0.1% (weight/volume) of the coating solution.
  • poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) improves image quality by providing a cleaner separation of the coversheet when the element is peeled apart.
  • PVP poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)
  • a preferred PVP is PVP K- 90, a high molecular weight PVP.
  • PVP may be added as 0- 5% of the photorelease layer, preferably 1-3%.
  • Poly(acrylic acid) improves aging performance and reduces peel sensitivity, that is, the sensitivity of the quality of the image to the rate and smoothness of the peeling apart of the element. Poly(acrylic acid) may be added at about 0-10% of the photorelease layer, and preferably about 4-10%.
  • the photohardenable layer (14) is prepared by (a) mixing the ingredients of the system in a suitable solvent, such as dichloromethane, usually in the weight ratio of about 15:85 to 25:75 (solids to solvent), (b) coating the photohardenable layer onto a coversheet (12), and (c) evaporating the solvent.
  • a suitable solvent such as dichloromethane
  • the coating should be uniform.
  • the coating weight is typically about 15-40 mg/dm 2 , and preferably about 20-30 mg/dm 2 .
  • the contiguous layer typically has a dry coating weight of about 5 to 120 mg/dm 2 , preferably 10 to 80 mg/dm 2 .
  • the isolation layer typically has a dry coating weight of 20 to 100 mg/dm 2 .
  • the adhesive layer typically has a dry coating weight of 15 to 70 mg/dm 2 .
  • the photorelease layer (32) may be coated onto the coversheet (12) from water or any other solvent or solvent mixture in which it is soluble. Good image reproduction requires formation of a discrete, uniform, contiguous film.
  • the photorelease layer may be 0.03 to 0.3 micron thick, preferably 0.05 to 0.2 micron, and more preferably, about 0.1 to 0.15 micron thick.
  • the photosensitive element (10) may be prepared using conventional coating techniques. If the photorelease layer is not present, the photohardenable layer is coated onto the coversheet. After the solvent has evaporated, a release film, such as polyethylene, may be placed over the coating to protect the photohardenable layer until the rest of the element is formed. The contiguous layer is then coated over the photohardenable layer. If a release film is present on the photohardenable layer, it must be stripped off before the contiguous layer is coated. The adhesive layer is coated onto the support. Following evaporation of the solvent, the isolation layer is coated onto the adhesive layer. After the solvent has evaporated, the surface of the isolation layer is laminated to the surface of the contiguous layer.
  • a release film such as polyethylene
  • the photosensitive element (10) may also be prepared using conventional multilayer coating techniques.
  • the photohardenable layer and the contiguous layer may be coated simultaneously onto the coversheet.
  • the adhesive layer and the isolation layer may be coated simultaneously onto the support. The surface of the isolation layer is then laminated to the surface of the contiguous layer.
  • the photorelease layer is present, it is first coated onto the coversheet. The element is then formed as described above. Other ways of preparing the photosensitive elements of this invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Exposure
  • any convenient source may be selected to provide actinic radiation absorbed by the photoinitiator system.
  • the radiation can be natural or artificial, monochromatic or polychromatic, incoherent or coherent. Most of the actinic radiation should be absorbed by the photoinitiator system to provide efficient .image formation.
  • Conventional sources of actinic radiation include fluorescent, mercury vapor, mercury-xenon, metal additive, and arc lamps.
  • Useful sources of coherent radiation are lasers whose emissions fall within or overlap the absorption bands of the photoinitiator system.
  • Exposure is conventionally carried out through an image-bearing transparency, preferably a halftone or continuous tone color separation transparency. However, other means, such as a modulated scanning laser beam, cathode ray tube, and the like, can be used to imagewise expose the element. These alternative methods of exposing the element are considered to be equivalent to exposure through an image-bearing transparency.
  • the element is colored by applying a suitable colorant, generally know as a toner.
  • a suitable colorant generally know as a toner.
  • the excess toner is removed, and toner remains only on the revealed regions (30) of the contiguous layer (16), i.e., the regions of the contiguous layer (16) from which the exposed regions (28) of the photohardenable layer (14) were removed.
  • Suitable toners are described in Chu, U.S. Patent 3,620,726; Gray, U.S. Patent 3,909,282; Manger, U.S. Patent 4,215,193; and Ruskin, U.S. Patent 4,661,439. Toners may be applied by dusting with pads dipped in toners as disclosed in Burg, U.S.
  • Patent 3,060,024 hand-operated machine toning as disclosed in Sandner, U.S. Patent 4,019,821; and automatic toning as disclosed in Tobias, U.S. Patent 4,069,791.
  • Colorant applied by a transfer process described in Burg, U.S. Patent 3,060,025 using a precolored toning film, such as described in Fr ⁇ hlich, U.S. Patent 4,806,451, is considered to be toning within the scope of this application.
  • a non-precolored photosensitive element with a removable support is used to prepare multicolor surprint proofs from conventional negative halftone color separation transparencies. First, the support is removed from the photosensitive element; and the element minus the removable support is then adhered to a permanent support known as the receptor.
  • the resulting composite structure is then exposed to actinic radiation through the coversheet using a color separation transparency or by an equivalent exposure process.
  • the coversheet is subsequently peeled off the exposed element at room temperature or at an elevated temperature by stripping with a smooth, moderate to rapid, continuous motion, preferably at a peel angle of 180°.
  • the revealed contiguous layer is then colored by applying a toner of a color corresponding to the color separation transparency used in the exposure step.
  • a multicolor surprint proof is prepared, by adhering an additional photosensitive element, minus its removable support, to the exposed, peeled apart photohardenable layer of the image previously prepared. The resulting element is exposed in register through a different color separation transparency, peeled apart, and toned as described above to produce a two color image. This sequence of steps may be repeated as many times as desired to produce a multicolor proof.
  • a typical surprint proof comprises yellow, magenta, cyan, and black images.
  • a topcoat such as that described in Taylor, U.S. Patent 4,921,776, may be applied to the surprint proof as a final protective layer.
  • a precolored image refers to an image produced from a precolored element, i.e., an element comprising a colorant.
  • a precolored photosensitive element with a removable support is used to prepare surprint proofs from conventional halftone color separation transparencies.
  • the support is removed from the photosensitive element and the element minus the removable support is then adhered to a permanent support known as the receptor.
  • the resulting composite structure is exposed to actinic radiation through the coversheet using a color separation transparency or by an equivalent exposure process. If exposure is through a negative color separation transparency, an element which operates by photorelease should be used. If exposure is through a positive separation transparency, an element which operates by photoadherence should be used.
  • the coversheet is then peeled off the exposed element as described above, to produce a single-color surprint proof.
  • a multicolor surprint proof is prepared by adhering an additional photosensitive element, minus its removable support, to the exposed, peeled apart photohardenable layer of the image previously prepared. The resulting element is exposed in register through a different color separation transparency and peeled apart as described above to produce a two-color image. This sequence of steps may be repeated as many times as desired to produce a multicolor proof.
  • a topcoat such as that described in Taylor, U.S. Patent 4,921,776, may be applied to the surprint proof as a final protective layer.
  • Multicolor images may also be prepared by combining precolored and non-precolored photosensitive elements.
  • a four color surprint proof may be prepared from the precolored elements by the process described above.
  • a fifth color is then added by removing the support from a non-precolored element and the element, minus the removable support, is laminated to the precolored image.
  • the element is then exposed in register, peeled apart, and toned as described above to produce a five color proof which is made up of four precolored elements and one non-precolored element.
  • a non-precolored element may replace one of the precolored elements in a four color proof.
  • the precolored elements may also be combined with the non- precolored elements disclosed in Chu, U.S. Patents 3,620,726 and 3,649,268.
  • precolored and non-precolored photosensitive elements permits the preparation of surprint proofs containing standard colors, i.e., colors which are supplied in precolored element, and specialty colors, i.e., colors which are not supplied in precolored elements.
  • the elements of this invention are useful for preparing colored images. These images are particularly useful in the graphic arts field, especially for color proofing in which proofs are prepared to duplicate the images produced by printing.
  • coating solution refers to the mixture of solvents and additives coated on the coversheet, even though some of the additives may be in suspension rather than in solution.
  • Total solids refers to the total amount of nonvolatile material in the coating solution even though some of the additives may be nonvolatile liquids at ambient temperature.
  • Cyan pigment Monastral® Blue G (BT 284D) ; C.I.
  • Pigment Blue 15 copper phthalocyanine Diene 55AC Poly(cis-butadiene) ; Firestone, Akron, OH
  • Irganox® 1010 Tetra-bis-methylene-3-(3,5-di-tert- butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl) propionate methane; Ciba-Geigy, Hawthorne, NY
  • Methacrylate Elveron® 6037 Poly(methyl- dispersant methacrylate/2-ethylhexyl acrylate Desmodur® N adduct; Mn 9,000
  • Taktene® CB221 Poly (cis-butadiene) ; Polysar, Akron, OH
  • Tinuvin® 328 2-(2'-Hydroxy-3 • ,5'-di-tert- amylphenyl)-benzotriazole; Ciba-Geigy, Hawthorne, NY
  • Triacetin Glyceryl triacetate Haarman & Reimer Corp., Springfield, NJ
  • Control Example A and Examples 1-8 compare the number of pickoff defects and the effective dot area obtained using the photosensitive elements of this invention with the number of pickoff defects and the effective dot area obtained using elements which do not comprise the isolation and adhesive layers.
  • Photohardenable Layer (14) The composition described in Table 1 was coated onto about 12.2 micron thick clear polyethylene terephthalate coversheet, which had been surface treated by electrostatic discharge at about 0.05 coulomb/ft 2 (0.544 coulomb/m 2 ) , using conventional coating techniques. Coating conditions were 22.5% solids in dichloromethane at a coating weight of about 30 mg/dm 2 . Following coating, a polyethylene release film was placed on top of the photohardenable layer to protect it until the rest of the element was formed. An element consisting of coversheet, photohardenable layer, and release film was formed.
  • Adhesive Layer (20) A coating solution Of 89.78% Diene 55AC, 9.97% Gentro® 1506/27, and 0.25% Irganox® 1010 (5.5% solution in dichloromethane) was prepared.
  • Step 3 Contiguous Layer (16) A coating solution of 79.5% Taktene® 221, 20.0% Gentro® 1506, and 0.5% of Irganox® 1010 (7.7% solids in dichloromethane) was prepared.
  • Step 4 Isolation Layer HBi A coating solution of Vinac® B-15 (22.5% solids in dichloromethane) was prepared. Step 5. Photosensitive Element 1101 The coating solutions for the contiguous layer and the isolation layer were coated simultaneously onto about 0.92 mil (about 23 micron) thick silicon treated polyethylene terephthalate film by a conventional multilayer coating technique to form an element consisting of polyethylene terephthalate film, isolation layer, and contiguous layer.
  • the release film was removed from the element formed in Step 1, and the photohardenable layer was pressure laminated at room temperature to the contiguous layer to form an element consisting of: coversheet, photohardenable layer, contiguous layer, isolation layer, and polyethylene terephthalate film.
  • the solution prepared in Step 2 was coated onto a support of about 0.92 mil (about 23 micron) thick silicon treated polyethylene terephthalate film to form an element consisting of adhesive layer and support.
  • the polyethylene terephthalate film was removed from the element consisting of coversheet, photohardenable layer, contiguous layer, isolation layer, and polyethylene terephthalate film and the resulting element was pressure laminated at room temperature to the element consisting of adhesive layer and support to form photosensitive element (10) consisting of coversheet (12), photohardenable layer (14) , contiguous layer (16), isolation layer (18), adhesive layer ( ⁇ 0), and support (22) .
  • Coating weights for the photohardenable layer, contiguous layer, isolation layer, and adhesive layer are provided in Table 2.
  • Step 6 Image Formation
  • the support was removed from the photosensitive element and the revealed adhesive layer laminated to Du Pont Cromalin® CRS/3 receptor stock (E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wiplmington, DE) to form an element consisting of receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, photohardenable layer, and coversheet.
  • This element was placed in a vacuum frame with the coversheet up, i.e., facing the light source.
  • a test form consisting of an UGRA target (copyright 1982) and a field of 50 1.5 in (3.8 cm) diameter circles was placed on top of the coversheet with the emulsion side in contact with the coversheet.
  • a vacuum was drawn on the element and transparency for 90 sec prior to exposure.
  • the element was exposed for about 36 sec with the radiation from a 5 kw high pressure mercury vapor lamp (Violux® 5002S, Exposure Systems Company, Bridgeport, CT) equipped with a photopolymer bulb with a Kokorao® filter about 54 in (137 cm) above the element and transparency.
  • a 5 kw high pressure mercury vapor lamp (Violux® 5002S, Exposure Systems Company, Bridgeport, CT) equipped with a photopolymer bulb with a Kokorao® filter about 54 in (137 cm) above the element and transparency.
  • the exposed element was removed from the vacuum frame and placed on a heated (about 26°C) peel table.
  • the coversheet was removed by peeling back at 180° ("peel-back mode") in a smooth, continuous motion.
  • the revealed portions of the contiguous layer were toned with Du Pont negative Cromalin® black toner using a Du Pont Automatic Toning Machine (E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE) to produce a black, one-color image consisting of receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, black toned contiguous layer, and exposed and peeled-apart photohardenable layer.
  • the support was removed from a second photosensitive element and the revealed adhesive layer laminated to the one color image to form an element -consisting of receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, black toned contiguous layer, exposed and peeled-apart photohardenable layer, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, photohardenable layer and coversheet.
  • the element was exposed through the UGRA target and field of 50 1.5 in (3.8 cm) diameter circles as previously described.
  • the UGRA target was placed in over an untoned region of the image. The circles overlapped, but were not in register with, those of the black image.
  • the element was peeled apart and toned with cyan toner as previously described to form a two color image consisting of receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, black toned contiguous layer, exposed and peeled-apart photohardenable layer, adhesive layer, isolation layer, cyan toned contiguous layer, and exposed and peeled-apart photohardenable layer.
  • This process was repeated, first with magenta toner and then with yellow toner, to produce a four-color image consisting of: receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, black toned contiguous layer, exposed and peeled- apart photohardenable layer, adhesive layer, isolation layer, cyan toned contiguous layer, exposed and peeled- apart photohardenable layer, adhesive layer, isolation layer, magenta toned contiguous layer, exposed and peeled-apart photohardenable layer, adhesive layer, isolation layer, yellow toned contiguous layer, and exposed and peeled-apart photohardenable layer.
  • the .image was protected by a layer of conventional Cromalin® off-press proofing system topcoat. step 7.
  • Effective Dot Area Effective dot area was measured for the cyan and magenta portions of the 30% and 50% regions of the UGRA test targets using a MacBeth RD 918 reflection densitometer which measures the amount of light reflected by a solid image.
  • the instrument contains a series of filters so that each image may be illuminated with light appropriate for the colored image being evaluated. (The cyan image is illuminated with red light, etc.)
  • To calculate the effective dot area the amount of light reflected by a particular region is compared with the amount of light reflected by the receptor and the amount of light reflected by a region with 100% toner coverage.
  • Step 8 Pickoff Defects The 50 circles for each color and their overlapping regions were inspected for areas in which portions of the toned contiguous layer was missing. The number of locations in which the toned contiguous layer was missing was the number of pickoff defects. The number of pickoff defects is provided in Table 3.
  • Control Example A is a commercial multilayer, peel- apart, tonable photosensitive element (Cromalin® C/N negative off-press proofing film, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE) and represents the state of the art. Coating weights are given in Table 2. The element was exposed and toned as described in Step 6 of Example 1 to produce a four-color image. The number of pickoff defects and the effective dot areas for the cyan and magenta images at 30% dots and 50% dots using an UGRA target with 150 lines/in (60 lines/cm) are provided in Table 3.
  • Example 9 The procedure of Example 9 was repeated except that the isolation layer was Elvax® 140. Coating weights were photohardenable layer, 30 mg/dm 2 ; contiguous layer, 30 mg/dm 2 ; isolation layer, 30 mg/dm 2 ; and adhesive layer, 35 mg/dm 2 . The number of pickoff defects and the effective dot areas for the cyan and magenta images at 30% dots and 50% dots using an UGRA target with 150 lines/in (60 lines/cm) are provided in Table 6.
  • Example 1 The general procedure of Example 1 was followed to prepare a photosensitive element.
  • the materials were the same as those in Example 1 except (1) the isolation layer was Elvacite® 2042 and (2) the adhesive layer had the same composition as the contiguous layer. Coating weights were photohardenable layer, 30 mg/dm 2 ; contiguous layer, 42 mg/dm 2 ; isolation layer, 60 mg/dm 2 ; and adhesive layer, 25 mg/dm 2 .
  • a one-color image was formed by removing the support from the photosensitive element and laminating the resulting element to Cromalin® CR5 receptor stock (E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE) .
  • the resulting element was exposed, peeled apart, and toned with magenta toner as described in Step 6 of Example 1. Exposure was carried out through a UGRA target. A special target consisting of a right triangle and a square was used to measure pickoff defects. An effective dot area was 72% was measured for 50% dots. No pickoff defects were observed.
  • Example 14 The general procedure of Example 14 was followed to prepare a photosensitive element.
  • the materials were the same as those in Example 14 except that the isolation layer was Elvacite® 2044.
  • Coating weights were photohardenable layer, 30 mg/dm 2 ; contiguous layer, 42 mg/dm 2 ; isolation layer, 63 mg/dm 2 ; and adhesive layer, 29 mg/dm 2 .
  • An effective dot area was 73% was measured for 50% dots. No pickoff defects were observed.
  • Example 14 The general procedure of Example 14 was followed to prepare a photosensitive element.
  • the materials were the same as those in Example 14 except that the isolation layer was Elvacite® 2014. Coating weights were photohardenable layer, 30 mg/dm 2 ; contiguous layer, 42 mg/dm 2 ; isolation layer, 63 mg/dm 2 ; and adhesive layer, 29 mg/dm 2 . An effective dot area of 75% was measured for 50% dots. No pickoff defects were observed.
  • Example 14 The general procedure of Example 14 was followed to prepare a photosensitive element.
  • the materials were the same as those in Example 1 except that the isolation layer was the material indicated in Table 8. Coating weights are provided in Table 7. Effective dot areas and pickoff defects are provided in Table 8.
  • Photorelease Layer (3?i A solution of Polyox® WSRN-3000 (70.74% by weight total solids), PVP K-90 (2.19%), Goodrite® K-732 (16.90%), and Pluronic® L- 92 (10.17%), was coated onto about 12.2 micron thick clear polyethylene terephthalate coversheet using conventional coating techniques. Coating conditions were 0.85% solids in water and coating weight about 2 mg/dm 2 . After coating the element was rewound. An element consisting of a coversheet and a photorelease layer was formed.
  • Step 2 Precolored Photohardenable Layer fl4i
  • Table 9 The composition of the colored chips used in the precolored photopolymerizable layers is provided in Table 9. Table 9
  • the coating solutions described in Table 10 were prepared by adding the ingredients shown in each of the columns to dichloromethane.
  • compositions were each coated onto the element formed in Step 1.
  • Each composition was extrusion die coated on top of the photorelease layer using conventional coating techniques.
  • the coating solution was about 12% solids in dichloromethane. Coating weights are indicated in Table 10.
  • a polyethylene release film was placed on top of the precolored photohardenable layer to protect it until the rest of the element was formed.
  • Step 4 Isolation Layer flRi
  • Vinac® B-15 22.5% solids in dichloromethane
  • Adhesive Layer (?C ⁇ .
  • Irganox® 1010 (7.7% solids in dichloromethane) was prepared.
  • Step fi Precolored Photosen it ive Element
  • the coating solutions for the contiguous layer prepared in Step 3 and the isolation layer prepared in Step 4 were coated simultaneously onto about 14 micron thick silicon treated polyethylene terephthalate release film by a conventional multilayer coating technique to form an element consisting of silicon treated polyethylene terephthalate release film, isolation layer, and contiguous layer.
  • the release film was removed from the element formed in Step 2, and the precolored photohardenable layer was pressure laminated at room temperature to the contiguous layer of the element just formed to form an element consisting of coversheet, photorelease layer, precolored photohardenable layer, contiguous layer, isolation layer, and silicon treated polyethylene terephthalate release film.
  • the coating weight of the contiguous layer was 12 mg/dm 2 and the coating weight of the isolation layer was 75 mg/dm 2 .
  • the solution prepared in Step 5 was coated onto a support of about 23 micron thick silicon treated polyethylene terephthalate release film to form an element consisting of adhesive layer and support.
  • the coating weight of the adhesive layer was 50 mg/dm 2 .
  • the polyethylene terephthalate film was removed from the element consisting of coversheet, photorelease layer, precolored photohardenable layer, contiguous layer, isolation layer, and silicon treated polyethylene terephthalate release film and the resulting element was pressure laminated at room temperature to the element consisting of adhesive layer and support to -form a precolored photosensitive element consisting of: coversheet, photorelease layer, precolored photohardenable layer, contiguous layer, isolation layer, adhesive layer and support.
  • the support was removed from the black precolored photosensitive element and the revealed adhesive layer laminated to Du Pont Cromalin® CRS/3 receptor stock (E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE) to form an element consisting of receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, black pigmented photopolymer layer, photorelease layer and coversheet.
  • This element was placed in a vacuum frame with the coversheet up (i.e., facing the light source) .
  • a test form consisting of an UGRA target (copyright 1982) and the Cromalin® Comm Guide was placed on top of the coversheet with the emulsion side in contact with the coversheet. A vacuum was drawn on the element and transparency for 120 sec prior to exposure.
  • the element was exposed for about 10 sec with the radiation from a 5 kw high pressure mercury vapor lamp (Violux® 5002S, Exposure Systems Company, Bridgeport, CT) equipped with a photopolymer bulb with a Kokomo filter about 54 in (137 cm) above the element and transparency.
  • the exposed element was removed from the vacuum frame and placed on a peel table that was heated at about 26°C.
  • the coversheet was removed by peeling back at 180°, i.e., the "peel-back mode", in a smooth, continuous motion.
  • the regions which were exposed to actinic radiation released from the coversheet during the peeling process to produce a black, one color image consisting of receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, and black precolored photohardenable layer.
  • the unexposed regions remained with the coversheet and were removed.
  • the image was the negative of the transparency used for exposure.
  • Step 8 Two Color T age Formation
  • the support was removed from the cyan precolored photosensitive element and the revealed adhesive layer laminated to the one color image formed in Step 7 to form an element consisting of receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, exposed black precolored photohardenable layer, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, cyan precolored photohardenable layer, photorelease layer and coversheet.
  • the element was exposed and peeled apart as described in Step 7.
  • the two-color image produced therefrom consisted of receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, black precolored photohardenable layer, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, and cyan precolored photohardenable layer.
  • Step 9 Three and Four Color Image Formation The process of Step 8 was repeated, first with the magenta precolored photopolymerizable element and then with the yellow precolored photopolymerizable element to produce first a three color image and then a four-color image.
  • the four color image consisted of receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, black pre- colored photohardenable layer, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, cyan precolored photohardenable layer, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, magenta precolored photohardenable layer, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, and yellow precolored photohardenable layer.
  • the image was protected by a layer of conventional Cromalin® off press proofing system topcoat.
  • Step 10 Image Evaluation Effective dot area was measured for the cyan and magenta portions of the 30% and 50% regions of the UGRA test targets using a MacBeth RD 918 reflection densitometer as described in Step 7 of Example 1. The resolution was measured on the UGRA target by observing the dots in both the high light and shadow dot regions with a conventional lOx graphic arts magnification loop. Image quality is provided in Table 11.
  • a magenta one-color image was prepared by following the general procedure of Example 21, Steps 1-7 except that sufficient triacetin to make up 5% by weight total solids was added to the composition for the magenta precolored photohardenable layer described in Table 10. The element was then laminated to CRS/3 receptor stock, exposed, and peeled apart as described in Example 21, Step 7. The exposure was for about 10 sec. Effective dot areas at 30% and 50% dots were 55% and 73%, respectively. The image had 2-97% dots (UGRA target with 60 lines/cm) . No pickoff defects were observed.
  • a magenta precolored photosensitive element was prepared by following the procedure of Example 21. Coating weights were as follows: photorelease layer, 2 mg/dm 2 ; photohardenable layer, 30 mg/dm 2 ; contiguous layer, 40 mg/dm 2 ; isolation layer, 75 mg/dm 2 ; and adhesive layer, 50 mg/dm 2 .
  • a four layer image was prepared following the procedure of Example 23 except that the magenta precolored element was used for each layer. Each exposure was for about 10 sec. Image quality is provided in Table 12.
  • This example illustrates the preparation and exposure of photosensitive elements comprising a precolored photohardenable layer to form a multicolor positive surprint proof.
  • the photosensitive element was prepared as described in Example 1, except that the coating solutions for the precolored photohardenable layer described in Table 13 were used in place of the composition for the photohardenable layer described in Step 1 of Example 1. As described in Example 1, the coating solutions were coated onto an electric discharge treated polyethylene terephthalate film. Table 13
  • the support was removed from the black precolored photosensitive element and the revealed adhesive layer laminated to Du Pont Cromalin® CRS/3 receptor stock (E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE) to form an element consisting of receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, black pigmented photopolymer layer, and coversheet.
  • This element was exposed to actinic radiation and peeled apart as described in Example 21, Step 7, to produce a black, one-color image consisting of receptor, adhesive layer, isolation layer, contiguous layer, and black precolored photohardenable layer. The exposed regions remained with the coversheet and were removed. The. image was the positive of the transparency used for exposure.
  • a cyan precolored photosensitive element was prepared by following the general procedure of Example 1. Coating weights were as follows: photohardenable layer, 20 mg/dm 2 ; contiguous layer, 45 mg/dm 2 ; isolation layer, 75 mg/dm 2 ; and adhesive layer, 50 mg/dm 2 . A four layer image was prepared following the procedure of Example 1 except that the cyan precolored element was used for each layer. Each exposure was for about 10 sec. Image quality is given in Table 15.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Photosensitive Polymer And Photoresist Processing (AREA)
  • Photoreceptors In Electrophotography (AREA)
  • Preparing Plates And Mask In Photomechanical Process (AREA)
  • Mechanical Treatment Of Semiconductor (AREA)
  • Element Separation (AREA)
  • Dicing (AREA)

Abstract

Elément multicouche photosensible comprenant une couche de couverture, une couche photodurcissante, une couche contiguë, une couche d'isolation, une couche adhésive et un support. Cet élément sert à la reproduction d'images.
EP19920910541 1991-03-04 1992-03-04 Element photosensible epluchable Withdrawn EP0574546A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US66399991A 1991-03-04 1991-03-04
US663999 1991-03-04

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0574546A1 true EP0574546A1 (fr) 1993-12-22

Family

ID=24664096

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19920910541 Withdrawn EP0574546A1 (fr) 1991-03-04 1992-03-04 Element photosensible epluchable

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0574546A1 (fr)
AU (1) AU1787292A (fr)
WO (1) WO1992015920A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9225687D0 (en) * 1992-12-09 1993-02-03 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Peel-apart proofing system
WO1996010214A1 (fr) * 1994-09-27 1996-04-04 Agfa-Gevaert Naamloze Vennootschap Systeme de tirage d'epreuve pour verification des couleurs en mode superposition a l'aide d'un procede negatif
WO1996010216A1 (fr) * 1994-09-27 1996-04-04 Agfa-Gevaert Naamloze Vennootschap Systeme de tirage d'epreuve pour verification des couleurs en mode surimpression a l'aide d'un procede negatif ou positif
WO1996010215A1 (fr) * 1994-09-27 1996-04-04 Agfa-Gevaert Naamloze Vennootschap Systeme de tirage d'epreuve pour verification des couleurs en mode surimpression a l'aide d'un procede negatif
US5939232A (en) * 1996-07-03 1999-08-17 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Photosensitive elements and their process of use
EP0890878A3 (fr) * 1997-07-08 1999-01-20 Agfa-Gevaert N.V. Matériau de développement et procédé pour réaliser une épreuve couleur négative ainsi qu'un procédé pour réaliser aussi bien une épreuve couleur négative qu'une épreuve positive sur un récepteur commun
US6001532A (en) * 1997-09-25 1999-12-14 E.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company Peel-apart photosensitive elements and their process of use
US5965321A (en) * 1997-09-25 1999-10-12 E. U. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Peel-apart photosensitive elements and their process of use
US6100006A (en) * 1999-08-19 2000-08-08 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Peel-apart photosensitive elements and their process of use

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9215920A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU1787292A (en) 1992-10-06
WO1992015920A2 (fr) 1992-09-17
WO1992015920A3 (fr) 1992-10-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5234790A (en) Peel-apart photosensitive element
US4174216A (en) Process for image reproduction using multilayer photosensitive tonable element
US5001036A (en) Multi-layer peel-apart photosensitive reproduction element containing a photorelease layer
US4247619A (en) Negative-working multilayer photosensitive tonable element
US4489154A (en) Process for preparing a surprint proof
US4282308A (en) Negative-working multilayer photosensitive element
US5028511A (en) Process for preparing a precolored image using photosensitive reproduction element containing a photorelease layer
US4987051A (en) Image-reversal process using photosensitive peel-apart elements
US4937168A (en) Solid transfer negative- or positive-working color proofing method on diverse paper stocks
EP0365358B1 (fr) Fabrication de matériaux pour couches réceptrices pour développement par arrachement, système d'épreuve en couleurs à couche unique
US5725988A (en) Solid transfer negative- or positive-working color proofing element
US5100757A (en) Method for forming a colored image on a degradable sheet material
EP0574546A1 (fr) Element photosensible epluchable
EP0437015A2 (fr) Système pour épreuve en couleurs positif, développable par dépouillage à couches photosensibles
US5122437A (en) Overlay proofs comprising precolored and toned images
EP0448387B1 (fr) Film blanc partiellement transparent avec surface métallisée
US5008174A (en) Color proofing system having a graduated layer of resins with different solubilities
EP0867768A1 (fr) Système d'épreuve en couleurs utilisant une couche unique négative développable par arrachement avec une couche photoadhesive contenant un polyvinylacetal
EP0514436B1 (fr) Epreuves de mise en train comprenant des images precolorees et contrastees
JPH09288353A (ja) ネガ型剥離式色校正方法
EP0365357A2 (fr) Film d'épreuve en couleurs photopolymérisable nigatif sans extinction de l'état triplet de l'oxygène
US5183723A (en) Colored image on a degradable sheet material and method of formation
US5840464A (en) Single coating transfer color proofing system
US5360688A (en) Composite black and white substrate for color proofing films
US5288570A (en) Composite black and white substrate for color proofing films

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19930827

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19970213

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18W Application withdrawn

Withdrawal date: 19971104