EP0541544B1

EP0541544B1 - Method for tagging articles used in conjunction with an electronic article surveillance system

Info

Publication number: EP0541544B1
Application number: EP90915373A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Peter L. Gill; Anthony F. Piccoli
Original assignee: Checkpoint Systems Inc
Current assignee: Checkpoint Systems Inc
Priority date: 1989-10-31
Filing date: 1990-10-04
Publication date: 1999-05-06
Anticipated expiration: 2010-10-04
Also published as: KR0172100B1; FI920847A0; NZ235685A; NO921564L; DE69033093T2; JP2002197159A; ES2194951T3; CA2064191C; DK0774740T3; IE903893A1; EP0541544A4; DE69034050D1; JP2000315284A; WO1991006934A1; EP0774740B1; FI112553B; ATE234491T1; DE69034050T2; EP0774740A1; CA2064191A1

Abstract

Electronic article surveillance (EAS) tags (20) are attached to articles of merchandise, not at the store (16) using EAS equipment (18), but in conjunction with the manufacture (10) of these articles. At that stage, the tags (20) are not detectable by the EAS equipment (18). They are made detectable upon receipt by an EAS-using store (16). For swept frequency RF EAS equipment (18), the tags (20) are initially provided with two capacitors (24, 25) which make the tags (20) resonant at a first frequency not detectable by the store's EAS equipment (18). To activate them, one capacitor (24, 25) is disabled, thereby making the tags (20) resonant at a different frequency which is detectable. <IMAGE>

Description

The invention relates to a method according to the preamble of independent claim 1.
The present invention relates generally to so-called "electronic article surveillance", and in particular, to a system which involves the use of electronically detectable tags or labels which are attached to articles of merchandise in order to protect these articles from unauthorized removal, such as by shoplifting.
For enhanced security and inventory control, the use of electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems has become increasingly widespread. These systems utilize tags or labels which contain an electronic circuit (e.g., a resonant circuit) for interacting with an applied (e.g., swept radio-frequency) electromagnetic field. A transmitter and accompanying antenna produce this field, and a nearby receiver and accompanying antenna detect variations in the received field caused by the presence of a tag. This transmitting and receiving equipment is positioned at the location or locations where it is desired to detect the unauthorized removal of tag-bearing articles, e.g., at the exit of a retail store.
The tags attached to those articles whose removal is authorized (e.g., because these articles have been properly checked out) are either physically removed from the articles, or deactivated, i.e. treated so that they become incapable of producing detectable variations in the received field. Otherwise, these tags will be detected and an alarm signal will be produced by the equipment. Commercial EAS systems as generally described above are available from manufacturers such as Checkpoint Systems, Inc. of Thorofare, New Jersey, among others.
An important consideration in the use of such EAS systems is the manner in which the detectable tags or labels are applied to the articles which are to be protected. Some retail stores, for example, wish to have tags applied to all the articles in their inventory, while others wish to have tags applied only to some of these articles, leaving others untagged. Likewise the selection of the kinds of merchandise to be tagged may vary from store to store, and from time to time within the same store. Even within a common "family" of stores, such as the member stores of a chain, these practices may--and frequently do--vary from one store to another. This variety, coupled with the absence until now of any practical technique for avoiding local tag application, has led to the common practice for users of EAS systems to tag articles locally, at each EAS equipped store.
However, such "store" tagging is time consuming and labor intensive. Also, store tagging is often delegated to personnel who may be limited in training or interest. This can compromise the effectiveness of EAS, which is obviously significantly dependent upon proper tagging of the articles to be protected.
In view of all this, not-published theoretical consideration has previously been given to the possibility of performing the desired tagging of articles at some other point, upstream from the store itself in the distribution chain, such as at the merchandise manufacturing stage, or at some intermediate stage of warehousing or distribution. This theoretical possibility has not found practical realization because of certain formidable obstacles.
If detectable tags were to be applied to articles of merchandise at their manufacturing stage, then a given product line would have to be processed in two different varieties, one tagged and one not tagged. Moreover, this segregation would have to be perpetuated throughout the subsequent distribution channels. The reason for this is that many--indeed most--stores do not yet use EAS. These non-EAS using stores would need to be reliably supplied with non-tagged articles; otherwise EAS tags would leave these stores, still attached to the articles being sold, and thereby create what is sometimes called "pollution" of the marketplace with EAS tags. Conversely, stores which do use EAS would have to be reliably supplied with tagged articles, or their EAS protection would become ineffective.
If, on the other hand, EAS tags were to be applied at an intermediate distribution stage, this would require breaking the bulk packaging which is typically used at those stages, handling the individual articles, and repackaging them in bulk. Furthermore, subsequent segregation of tagged and not-tagged articles would again be required.
US-A-4 021 705 forming the base of independent claim 1 discloses a resonant circuit tag having fuses to be destroyed for activation and deactivation. Such resonant circuit tag is generally affixed in retail stores, libraries and the like facilities to items to be protected and is so used in the same labor intensive manner like other known resonant tags.
From US-A-4 498 076, a resonant circuit tag is known which can be electronically deactivated without need of fuses. Before deactivation the resonant circuit exhibits two resonant frequencies one for detection of the tag by an associated electronic security system and the other for deactivation of the tag. Such resonant characteristics are achieved by two capacitors of different sizes whereof the larger one can be shortened out for deactivation to cancel both resonant frequencies. Therefore, such resonant circuit tag cannot be activated but must be active from the beginning. Finally, such tags must be affixed individually to articles, i.e. in an labor intensive manner.
It is the aim of the present invention to provide a method with which the use of an EAS in protecting articles at the location of a facility is considerably facilitated without any effect to EASs used in other facilities.
To achieve this, the method of the invention is characterized by the steps claimed in the characterizing portion of independent claim 1. Further embodiments of the method of the invention are defined in the dependent claims.
It is therefore the primary advantage of the present invention to provide a technique for protecting articles by means of EAS, without having to apply the necessary detectable tags or labels to these articles at the actual EAS-using stores.
It is also an advantage of the present invention to provide a tagging technique which no longer requires a store to individually tag articles which are to be protected by EAS.
It is also an advantage of the present invention to provide a tagging technique which can be performed without having to break the bulk packaging of the articles to be protected by EAS.
It is also an advantage of the present invention to provide a tagging technique which can be performed without having to break bulk packaging, while still enabling individual stores to adhere to their individual practices with regard to which articles are to bear EAS detectable tags.
It is also an advantage of the present invention to provide an EAS tagging technique which makes it unnecessary to create two segregated varieties of the same articles, one tagged and one not tagged, upstream from the stores in which these articles are to be retailed.
These and other advantages are achieved in accordance with the present invention by tagging the articles in question, not at the individual EAS equipped stores, as heretofore, but upstream in the distribution chain in conjunction with their manufacture. This upstream tagging is performed by means of tags which, at that stage, are not yet detectable by the EAS equipment with which they are ultimately destined to function. Furthermore, these tags remain undetectable through the subsequent distribution channel, until they reach that stage at which it is inherently determined that all the so-tagged articles in a given bulk package will be used in an EAS equipped store. This will typically occur at the merchandise receiving facility of such an individual store. At that stage, the tags previously attached to the individual articles are rendered detectable and the articles with the now-detectable tags attached, are then processed through the store in conventional manner.
By proceeding in accordance with the present invention, the time and labor required for store tagging is eliminated and the reliability of the tagging procedure greatly enhanced. Moreover, it becomes practical to tag articles in ways which are less visible to the shopper, thereby further improving the protection provided by EAS, and also overcoming possible esthetic as well as functional objections to the use of visible EAS tags.
For further details, reference is made to the detailed description which is provided below, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Figure 1 is a flow diagram of the EAS tag treatment technique embodying the present invention.
Figure 2 is a diagram of the equivalent circuit of a tag suitable for use in the treatment technique of Figure 1.
Referring to the flow diagram of Figure 1, block 10 represents the manufacturing stage of the articles of merchandise which are to be subjected to the technique embodying the present invention.
As indicated by block 11, in accordance with the invention EAS tags are applied to these articles in conjunction with their manufacture.
Further in accordance with the present invention, these tags are then in a state in which they would not be detectable by the particular type of EAS equipment with which they are designed to ultimately function.
Block 13 represents the distribution channel through which these now-tagged articles then pass on their way to the retail stores.
Block 14 represents the merchandise receiving facility of one of these retail stores.
Block 15 represents means, located preferably at store receiving facility 14, for "activating" the EAS tags attached to the articles which reach receiving facility 14 from distribution channel 13. By "activating" is meant rendering these tags detectable by the store's EAS equipment.
Block 16 represents the retail store in which the received articles, now bearing tags which are detectable, are displayed for retail sale.
Block 17 represents the means, in store 16, for deactivating those tags which are attached to articles whose removal from store 16 has become authorized, by virtue of the fact that these articles have been properly checked out.
Block 18 represents the EAS detection equipment with which the store 16 is equipped and the activity of detecting tags which have not been deactivated at checkout.
In the flow diagram of Figure 1, the manufacturing stage represented by block 10 may be entirely conventional, with the sole exception that EAS tags are applied to the merchandise at that stage. However, this application can also be carried out by various, but well known and conventional means. For example, an EAS tag may simply be adhesively attached either to each article itself, or to the individual package for that article. Since these EAS tags are typically similar in external configuration to a thick piece of paper, 2,5 cm or 5 cm (an inch or two) square, and coated on one side with pressure sensitive adhesive, such application may involve nothing more than simply pressing them against a surface of the article or its individual packaging. In this regard, the application procedure may be the same as would previously have been performed at the retail store, itself, except that it can now be performed more efficiently, and more reliably, by means of the same type of machinery which is conventionally used in manufacturing to apply other kinds of tags and labels to articles of merchandise.
The distribution channel represented by block 13 in Figure 1 may be entirely conventional, comprising the various transportation means for moving merchandise to retail stores, the warehouses in which it is stored, etc. While in this channel, the merchandise is typically contained in bulk packaging, such as cardboard cases, each containing multiple units of the individual articles. In accordance with the present invention, these cases now contain articles to which not-yet-detectable EAS tags have already been attached.
Store receiving facility 14 may also be conventional, in that it comprises the customary unloading location and material handling equipment used by retail stores to receive their merchandise.
However, in accordance with the invention, there is also provided at this receiving facility 14 the means 15 for activating the heretofore not-detectable tags attached to the received merchandise. How this is done is described later in this specification.
Thereafter, this received merchandise is treated in the same way as in any other EAS equipped store. That-is, it is processed through store 16 in conventional manner, e.g. by being displayed in the merchandise display area and checked out after being selected by customers for purchase. As part of the checkout operation, the EAS tags are subjected to deactivation by means 17, or alternatively are detected by EAS detection equipment 18 upon unauthorized removal. All of this may be accomplished in completely conventional manner by completely conventional means.
In particular, the conventional EAS equipment 18 used to detect EAS tags which have not been deactivated by means 17 may be of the so-called swept-frequency RF type. Briefly, this type of equipment transmits a radio frequency (RF) signal whose frequency is periodically varied between, say, 7.4 and 9.0 MHz. The EAS tags for use with this type of equipment comprise an inductor-capacitor (LC) circuit which is resonant within that transmitted band, e.g. at approximately 8.2 MHz. The presence of the EAS tag distorts the RF signal and that distortion is detected by a nearby receiver which then gives an alarm.
Such swept-frequency RF EAS-detection equipment is disclosed for example, in US-A-3 500 373, US-A-3 810 147 and US-A-3 828 337. As for the deactivating means 17, this may also operate on a swept-frequency RF basis in the 7.4 to 9.0 MHz range. Such deactivating means is disclosed, for example, in above mentioned US-A-4 498 076 and in US-A-4 567 473. Commercial EAS detection equipment, as well as deactivation equipment of this swept-frequency RF type is available from Checkpoint Systems, Inc. of Thorofare, New Jersey.
A kind of EAS tag which is suitable for use in the method of the present invention, in conjunction with EAS equipment of the above-mentioned swept-frequency RF type is disclosed in not-prepublished international publication no. WO 91/06934 (European divisional patent application no. 96 120 857.6/0 774 740).
Referring to Figure 2, the equivalent circuit of such an EAS tag is seen to consist of a resonant circuit defined by inductor 22a and capacitors 24 and 25.
The electronic equipment which is used at activation stage 15 in Figure 1 in cooperation with a tag may be the same as illustrated and described in said US-A-4 498 076 and US-A-4 567 473, with two exceptions.
One exception is that the frequencies at which it operates are in a range which includes the higher frequency (of approximately 18 MHz) at which the tag is initially resonant. This higher range may be from 16.5 to 19.5 MHz.
The other exception is that this electronic equipment operates at a substantially higher power.
By operating in the higher frequency range, the equipment becomes capable of shorting out the capacitor 25 via an indentation . By operating at high enough power, it becomes capable operating at high enough power, it becomes capable of shorting out that same capacitor simultaneously in a plurality of tags, such as would be present in a bulk package containing multiple units of merchandise articles to which such tags had been attached at the manufacturing and tag application stage 10, 11 of Figure 1.
With their capacitors 25 so shorted out, all the tags in the bulk package at receiving facility 14 in Figure 1 have now become activated, and have therefore become detectable at stage 18 in completely conventional manner.
Moreover, they have now also become deactivatable at stage 17, also in completely conventional manner.
Detection at stage 18 would result simply from having such an activated tag present in the swept-frequency RF field, whose distortion by that tag is then sensed by the EAS receiver, causing an alarm.
Deactivation at stage 17 would result from operating as disclosed in said US-A-4 498 076 and US-A-4 567 473, namely by shorting out capacitor 24. With both capacitors 24 and 25 (see Figure 2) so shorted out the tag again becomes undetectable at stage 18 of Figure 1.
As previously noted, in order to perform the simultaneous activation of the tags attached to all the articles in a bulk package of merchandise, in accordance with the present invention, it may be necessary to operate the activating means 15 at higher power than the deactivating means 17, which is typically used to deactivate only one tag at a time. Such higher power may exceed the limit imposed by regulatory agencies such as the United States Federal Communications commission. If that should be the case, then a simple treatment is to provide an enclosure which contains the RF fields produced by the activating means and which is large enough to contain both that means and the EAS tag bearing merchandise, still in its bulk package. This enclosure may take any of various conventional forms, such as a metal box. The same treatment, namely enclosure of the activating means and the bulk package, may also be used if the frequency range within which the activating signal is transmitted presents a problem in terms of regulatory requirements. That frequency range is preferably so chosen that it does not include integral multiples of the frequency range within which the deactivation signal is subsequently transmitted. That is to forestall the possibility that the activating signal may also cause deactivation of the now-activated tags due to possible spurious resonances at multiples of the resonant frequency of the activated tags.
As previously noted, in order to activate the tag by changing its resonant frequency from its initial value (e.g. approximately 18 MHz) to its second value (e.g. approximately 8.2 MHz), capacitor 25 is shorted out by the application of a sufficiently strong field at the initial frequency. The total voltage developed by this applied field will appear across the series combination of that capacitor 25 and capacitor 24 (see Figure 2). However, this total voltage will be distributed between those capacitors in inverse proportion to their plate sizes. By making capacitor 25 substantially smaller than capacitor 24, the voltage across the former will always be substantially larger than that across the latter. In view of this capacitor 25 will break down before capacitor 24, as is desired.
By proceeding in accordance with this invention, it is not necessary to distinguish, in manufacturing or distribution, between products to be delivered to EAS equipped stores and others. Rather, all products can be tagged, and the EAS equipped stores themselves can then activate those which they receive, while other stores need do nothing at all.
Moreover, these tags can now be applied to the individual articles of merchandise in a manner which would not be convenient for store tagging. For example, there would be no problem, at the manufacturing and tag application stage (10, 11 in Figure 1), to apply EAS tags on the inside of the "bubble pack" or on the inside of a cardboard box containing a particular article. This would have the advantage of concealing the EAS tag, so that a shopper would not even know that this particular article is protected.
It will be understood that many other variations are possible, in accordance with the present invention, without departing from the inventive concept.
For example, the invention is not limited to use with articles for sale in retail stores. Other applications can also benefit, such as book stores, video stores, etc.
The initial change in the tag's resonant frequency in order to "activate" it, may involve an indentation in a capacitor. Rather, the tags may be provided with two sets of capacitors connected by a fusible link, as disclosed more fully in US-A-3 967 161.
The fusible link may be opened at the activating stage 15 in Figure 1 in order to change the frequency to that which will then be detectable by the store's EAS system. The even higher power which would be required to open such a fusible link is then dealt with by enclosure in an RF confining box, as previously discussed.
Also, although the preferred application of the invention is to situations in which all the tagged articles in a bulk package are activated simultaneously, it will be understood that the same technique can be utilized to activate these articles after they have been subdivided into smaller quantities, or even one at a time. The other advantages which arise from having applied the tags in conjunction with the manufacture will then still apply.
Accordingly, it is desired that the scope of the present invention be defined only by the appended claims.

Claims

A method for providing a facility (16) with articles and devices which latter are not capable of being detected by article surveillance equipment (18) located at said facility (16) but are capable of being activated to become capable of being so detected, characterized by:

attaching the devices which are not yet activated to the articles in conjunction with the manufacturing (10) of the articles;

supplying the articles, to which devices have been attached, to the facility (16), and

activating (15) the devices upon receipt at the facility (16).
The method of claim 1, characterized in that the supplying is in bulk packages containing multiple units of the articles.
The method of claim 2, characterized in that the activating (15) is performed while the articles are still in their bulk packages.
The method of claim 2 or 3, characterized in that the devices comprise electronic circuits which are resonant at a first frequency when supplied to the facility (16) and are made resonant at a second frequency by the activating (15) upon receipt at the facility (16).
The method of claim 4, characterized in that the circuits which are resonant at the first frequency are not detectable by the electronic article surveillance equipment (18), but the circuits which are resonant at the second frequency are so detectable.
The method of any of the claims 2 to 5, characterized in that the articles are enclosed in the bulk packages in conjunction with the supplying of the articles.
The method of any of the claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the facility (16) is a retail store and the articles are articles of merchandise for the store.
The method according to claim 7, characterized in that the supplying of the articles is performed in the distrubution channel (13) for the merchandise for the store.