EP0509068A1 - Dynamic association of rf radio data communication system in a pre-existing computer controlled network - Google Patents

Dynamic association of rf radio data communication system in a pre-existing computer controlled network

Info

Publication number
EP0509068A1
EP0509068A1 EP91917859A EP91917859A EP0509068A1 EP 0509068 A1 EP0509068 A1 EP 0509068A1 EP 91917859 A EP91917859 A EP 91917859A EP 91917859 A EP91917859 A EP 91917859A EP 0509068 A1 EP0509068 A1 EP 0509068A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
portable radio
hunt group
radio data
sessions
terminals
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP91917859A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0509068A4 (en
Inventor
Leopold Alonso
Frank W. Korinek
John E. Stoner
Bin Lo
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Motorola Solutions Inc
Original Assignee
Motorola Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Motorola Inc filed Critical Motorola Inc
Publication of EP0509068A1 publication Critical patent/EP0509068A1/en
Publication of EP0509068A4 publication Critical patent/EP0509068A4/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W4/00Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
    • H04W4/06Selective distribution of broadcast services, e.g. multimedia broadcast multicast service [MBMS]; Services to user groups; One-way selective calling services
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F13/00Interconnection of, or transfer of information or other signals between, memories, input/output devices or central processing units
    • G06F13/10Program control for peripheral devices
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W74/00Wireless channel access, e.g. scheduled or random access
    • H04W74/08Non-scheduled or contention based access, e.g. random access, ALOHA, CSMA [Carrier Sense Multiple Access]
    • H04W74/0833Non-scheduled or contention based access, e.g. random access, ALOHA, CSMA [Carrier Sense Multiple Access] using a random access procedure
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W92/00Interfaces specially adapted for wireless communication networks
    • H04W92/02Inter-networking arrangements

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to RF Radio Communication Systems and, in particular, to such systems having a capability of interfacing within an existing, standardized computer controlled communication network of linked controllers and fixed terminal devices operating on a pre-established protocol.
  • Computer control communication networks are of course known in the art. Typically, such systems utilize one or more cluster controllers interfacing with a plurality of individual terminal devices, all controlled by a host computer.
  • the IBM 3270 system which is recognized as a standard in the industry.
  • the 3270 system employs a Host Computer which includes one or more Logic Units (LU) interfacing to one or more associated 3274 Cluster Controllers, which in turn control a plurality of fixed terminal devices, such as a 3274 Display Terminal or a 3278 line Printer.
  • LU Logic Unit
  • the IBM 3270 system operates with a standard operating protocol, also well known in the industry.
  • the Radio Data System may operate with some arrangement of pre-established but typically different operating protocol, which then may or may not require a separate host computer. In any event, appropriate programming must be effected to accommodate the particular operating protocol being utilized. If, on the other hand, the RF Radio Data Communication System can operate with, or at least emulate that of the pre- established computer controlled fixed communications network, say, for example, the referenced IBM 3270 system, the RF Radio Data Communications System can be made to interface with the host computer as one or more 3274 cluster controllers which in turn control a plurality of radio data portable terminals emulating either a 3278 fixed display or a 3287 line Printer.
  • Portable is used to designate either a portable or mobile unit, and distinguish the same from a fixed terminal unit.
  • the portable radio terminals may be programmed to redefine its keyboard and display output to simulate in all respects a 3278 fixed terminal device.
  • the portable radio terminal may connect to an optional printer device and then be programmed to simulate the IBM 3287 line printer. No reprogramming of the host computer is then necessary because all of the end terminal devices, fixed or portable, look like a 3270 device operating with standardized protocol being employed within the particular IBM 3270 computer controlled communications network.
  • each of the portable radio data terminals in running the 3270 emulation package will appear to the system controller as a single fixed terminal device. As such, it occupies one of the available links to the controller in the same way as any other like fixed terminal display device. However, this could very likely necessarily prove wasteful since the radio data system portable data terminals are normally not all active, at least not all at once, but only occasionally, and on a selective basis. Moreover, if any particular link or controller fails, the portable data terminal assigned thereto would be cut off and unable to communicate with the host computer.
  • an object of the present invention to provide an RF Radio Data Communication system that emulates a component part of a known computer-controlled communications network and operates to interface with a host computer as one or more cluster controllers and in this fashion functions to effectively overcome the foregoing deficiencies.
  • a more particular object of the present invention is to provide and RF Radio Data Communication System of the foregoing type wherein the system portable radio data terminals emulate a known and fully compatible fixed terminal display device, but the number of such emulating portable devices may be maximized by being shared between a number of available cluster controller links.
  • Still another object of the present invention is to provide an RF Radio Data Communication System of the foregoing type wherein the sharing of the portable Radio Data terminals is effected by the association thereof with a pool (hunt group) of selected controller link devices.
  • an RF Radio Data Communication System which is capable of interfacing as a plurality of controller links to a host computer in a computer controlled communications network of controlled terminal devices operating with a given, i.e., standardized, operating protocol.
  • a network control processor (NCP) is interconnected to at least one of a plurality of logic units included in a host computer which supports a given number of LU sessions with each of said interconnected host computer logic units.
  • NCP network control processor
  • a plurality of portable radio terminals intended for operation within the RF Data Communication System are provided wherein each such terminals are adapted to emulate a compatible fixed terminal display normally operating in the controlled communication network with the standardized operating protocol.
  • the portable radio terminals are each associated with a defined hunt group comprised of a plurality of LU sessions from the given number of LU sessions available, and wherein such portable radio terminals may freely contend for an available LU session in its assigned hunt group. And finally, wherein there are a greater number of portable radio data terminals associated with the hunt group than there are LU sessions.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a typical computer-controlled communication network, in this case, the IBM 3270 system;
  • Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a typical RF Radio Data Communication System controlled by an associated host computer
  • Fig. 3 is a block diagram of an RF Radio Data Communication System similar to that of Fig. 2, but in which the infrastructure interfaces with the host computer as a plurality of cluster controllers and in which portable radio data terminals emulate a fixed terminal device, as in accordance with the present invention;
  • Fig. 4 is a partial block diagram showing a plurality of portable radio data terminals of the system of Fig. 3 either dynamically or statically associated with an assigned LU session;
  • Fig. 5 is graphic representation of a series of hunt groups formed by individual portable radio data terminals associated therewith;
  • Fig. 6 is a flow chart indicating the initialization procedure in which a given portable radio data terminal may associate with a particular LU session
  • Fig. 7 is flow chart of the procedure followed by the network control processor (NCP) upon receiving an inbound message from a portable radio terminal;
  • NCP network control processor
  • Fig. 8 is a flow chart indicating the background actions periodically effected by the NCP regarding the dynamic association of the systems' portable radio data terminals.
  • Fig. 9 is a flow chart indicating the action taken by the NCP upon host link failure.
  • a typical computer-controlled communication network is shown at 10 in Fig. 1.
  • the network is shown as an IBM 3270 System, well known in the art wherein a host computer 12 is provided which interfaces with a plurality of 3274 Cluster Controllers 14, which in turn interface with and control individual 3278 Display Terminal Devices 16. The later could be substituted with 3287 Line Printer Devices, as desired.
  • Network 10 operates with a known, pre- established operating protocol, the details of which may not be described in detail for purposes of the present invention.
  • system 20 includes a Network Control Processor (NCP) 22 interfacing with a Host Computer 24 and controlling in response thereto a plurality of RF Stations 26 at various locations, each of which comprise an RF Modem 28 a Transmitter 30, and a Receiver 32. Station 26 then communicates over antenna 34 with a plurality of portable radio data terminals 40.
  • NCP Network Control Processor
  • System 20 conventionally operates over inbound and outbound communications channels on a contention basis in accordance with an established operating protocol, such as that referenced in US Patent Application. Serial No. 07/175,888, filed 31 March 1988 on behalf of Kenneth J. Zdunek, et al, and assigned to the same assignee as the present invention.
  • operating protocol may be referenced to as Motorola MDC 4800 operating protocol.
  • remote data terminals transmit data messages to the Host Computer (via the NCP) in the form of data packets by RF link over the inbound channel, and receive like messages therefrom over the outbound channel.
  • a Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA) technique is utilized, which is of course well known in the art.
  • the messages sent to the associated system remote data terminals originate at the Host Computer, and it is to the Host Computer that the remote terminals remotely communicate with in sending inbound messages. Without more, such an arrangement requires a dedicated Host Computer operating with the above-referenced protocol procedures.
  • a radio data network can be added to such computer network, if, but only if, such radio data network can be made to emulate one or more cluster controllers already operating in such computer network system. For example, if the Radio Data Network 20 in Fig. 2 can be made to emulate one or more 3274 Cluster Controllers as referenced in the example of Fig. 1, the result is the overall system 100 as set forth in Fig. 3, which system has been constructed in accordance with the present invention.
  • Radio Data System 20' is linked to the Radio Data System 20'
  • each LU Session presented through line connections 102a, 102b and 102c would interface with an associated terminal unit (terminal session) on a one-to-one basis. Since not all of the system Radio Data Terminals are active at the same time, it would otherwise represent a less than efficient use of available resources. Moreover, if any of the LU Sessions (emulating a cluster 3274 controller) fails, the Radio Data Terminals permanently interfaced to such LU Session would thereby be cut off and denied communications access and capability.
  • the present invention provides an advantageous enhancement to the aforementioned 3270 emulation protocol whereby substantially increased numbers of radio data terminals may be incorporated into the system. Also, a redundancy feature is provided to cover the drop out of any emulated 3274 Cluster Controllers and LU Session failure. And, finally, such enhancement effectively minimizes the total number of 3270 LU Sessions that may in fact be required in a particular system.
  • each of the Radio Data Terminals 40 are selectively associated with a particular Hunt Group.
  • Fig. 5 illustrates this feature.
  • the key criteria in this event is that all such data terminals associated with a particular Hunt Group must be of the same type.
  • type 2 is designated for conventional (3278) terminals and type 3 for (3287) printers.
  • each of the LU Sessions with the Host Computer are associated with a select Hunt Group. As indicated in Fig.
  • Terminals 1 through 4 of terminal session 1 are associated with Hunt Groups in this case, a type 2 LU.
  • terminal 6 of session 1 is indicated as associated with Hunt Group 2 a LU type 3 accommodating 3287 printers.
  • terminals 7 and 8 of session 1 are indicated as associated with Hunt Group 3 while terminal 9 et seq. are associated with Hunt Group N.
  • Link 1 are associated with Hunt Group 1 while others may be associated with still different Hunt Groups, such as those shown interfacing with Hunt Group 2.
  • Host Link 2 LU Sessions are shown selectively interfacing with Hunt Groups 2, 3 and 4. In this selective manner, it will be readily appreciated that a greater number of Data Terminals 40 can be associated with a lesser number of available LU Sessions through a particular Hunt Group.
  • a failure of that Link Controller simply means communications are rerouted through a different link
  • a terminal session is considered strongly linked (dynamically) to an LU Session once such session is successfully logged on.
  • a static linking always requires a particular data terminal to be associated with a predefined LU Session, as graphically portrayed in Fig. 4.
  • the flow chart represented by Fig. 6 indicates the particularized actions effected on each 3274 LU initialization request.
  • the inquiry is made as to whether the LU is static as indicated in step 120. If yes, the LU is strongly linked to a terminal session and may proceed accordingly as indicated at step 122. If, however, the answer that the LU is not static, it by definition must be dynamic as indicated at step 124. Thereupon the further inquiry is made at step 126 as to whether the LU is weakly or strongly linked to a terminal session.
  • the process continues with the linked terminal session at step 128 and if terminal session is logged in at step 130, a strong terminal link is effected between that terminal session and the referenced LU as indicated at 132. If the terminal session is not logged in, it simply returns to the same condition as at the beginning of the initialization process. Further, if the LU is weakly linked to a terminal session as indicated at step 126, the LU is added to the list of available LUs for the associated Hunt Group as indicated at step 134 whereupon the LU initialization process may be terminated.
  • Fig. 7 represents a flow chart of the executed actions occurring upon the Network Control Processor 22 receiving inbound terminal messages.
  • the initial query at step 140 is as to whether the terminal session is static. If yes, the message is then forwarded to the linked LU at step 142 whereupon the process is completed at that point. If, however, the answer is that the terminal session is not static, then it must be dynamic as indicated at step 142 and the further query is made at step 144 as to whether the terminal session is weakly of strongly linked to a LU. If strongly linked, the message is forwarded to the linked LU at step 146. If the terminal session is logged in at step 148, it is strongly linked to this LU as indicated at step 150.
  • the terminal session does not log in, it terminates and the LU initialization process will reactivate subsequently.
  • the terminal session is weakly linked to an LU
  • the further query is made at step 152 as to whether the LU is available in this terminal's Hunt Group. If in the negative, an indication is returned to terminate this session because the host is not available as indicated in step 154. If on the other hand, a LU is available in the particular Hunt Group, the LU is removed at step 156 from the list of available LUs for that Hunt Group, whereupon the terminal session is weakly linked to this particular LU as indicated at step 158.
  • the message is forwarded to the weakly linked LU at step 160 and, if the terminal session is static, the message is forwarded to the linked LU. If not, the process will terminate at this point.
  • Fig. 8 illustrates in flow chart form the background actions executed by the network control processor 22 for dynamic LUs while Fig. 9 illustrates in flow chart form the actions executed by such network controller upon 3274 Host Link failure.
  • the controller 22 delays for the specific delay interval as indicated at step 180 and then scans weakly linked LUs for those that have not processed traffic from their terminal session in a weak time out interval, as indicated at step 182. Accordingly, for those found, the temporary terminal session link is removed and the LU is returned to the list of available LUs for the appropriate Hunt Group as indicated in step 184.
  • step 190 indicates that all failed 3274 LUs are removed from all associated Hunt Groups and, further, that all terminal to LU session linkages are likewise broken for the failed 3274 LUs, as shown at step 192.
  • the associated data terminals that would otherwise be locked out of its ability to communicate may be reassigned to viable Hunt Groups and working 3274 Link Controllers. This redundancy feature is therefore significant in insuring communication linkages with all communication capable radio data terminals.

Abstract

On décrit un système de transmission de données radioélectrique (20) pouvant connecter un réseau de transmission classique existant (10) de contrôleurs reliés (14) et un dispositif d'équipement terminal fixe (16) qui fonctionnent tous d'après un protocole préétabli. Le réseau de données radioélectrique (20) comprend une pluralité d'équipements terminaux radioélectriques portatifs (40) dont chacun peut émuler un affichage terminal fixe (16) fonctionnant normalement dans le réseau informatisé existant. Il est prévu que ledit système comporte plus d'équipements terminaux radioélectriques (40) qu'il n'y a de sessions d'unités logiques, chacun desdits équipements terminaux radioélectriques portatifs (40) correspondant à un groupe de recherche de ligne défini particulier constitué par une pluralité de certaines des sessions d'unités logiques disponibles, et auquel les équipements terminaux radioélectriques portatifs (40) peuvent effectivement essayer d'avoir accés.A radio data transmission system (20) is described which can connect an existing conventional transmission network (10) of connected controllers (14) and a fixed terminal equipment device (16) which all operate according to a pre-established protocol. The radio data network (20) includes a plurality of portable radio terminal equipment (40) each of which can emulate a fixed terminal display (16) operating normally in the existing computer network. It is expected that said system includes more radio terminal equipment (40) than there are sessions of logical units, each of said portable radio terminal equipment (40) corresponding to a particular defined hunt group consisting by a plurality of some of the available logical unit sessions, and to which the portable radio terminal equipment (40) can effectively try to gain access.

Description

DYNAMIC ASSOCIATION OF RF RADIO DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEM IN A PRE-EXISTING COMPUTER
CONTROLLED NETWORK
Background of the Invention
This invention relates generally to RF Radio Communication Systems and, in particular, to such systems having a capability of interfacing within an existing, standardized computer controlled communication network of linked controllers and fixed terminal devices operating on a pre-established protocol.
Computer control communication networks are of course known in the art. Typically, such systems utilize one or more cluster controllers interfacing with a plurality of individual terminal devices, all controlled by a host computer.
One such communication network, for purposes of illustration and by way of example only, is the IBM 3270 system which is recognized as a standard in the industry. The 3270 system employs a Host Computer which includes one or more Logic Units (LU) interfacing to one or more associated 3274 Cluster Controllers, which in turn control a plurality of fixed terminal devices, such as a 3274 Display Terminal or a 3278 line Printer. The IBM 3270 system operates with a standard operating protocol, also well known in the industry.
Accordingly, it will be appreciated that where an RF Radio Data Communications System is to be established, the Radio Data System may operate with some arrangement of pre-established but typically different operating protocol, which then may or may not require a separate host computer. In any event, appropriate programming must be effected to accommodate the particular operating protocol being utilized. If, on the other hand, the RF Radio Data Communication System can operate with, or at least emulate that of the pre- established computer controlled fixed communications network, say, for example, the referenced IBM 3270 system, the RF Radio Data Communications System can be made to interface with the host computer as one or more 3274 cluster controllers which in turn control a plurality of radio data portable terminals emulating either a 3278 fixed display or a 3287 line Printer. "Portable" is used to designate either a portable or mobile unit, and distinguish the same from a fixed terminal unit. In any event, the portable radio terminals may be programmed to redefine its keyboard and display output to simulate in all respects a 3278 fixed terminal device. Similarly, the portable radio terminal may connect to an optional printer device and then be programmed to simulate the IBM 3287 line printer. No reprogramming of the host computer is then necessary because all of the end terminal devices, fixed or portable, look like a 3270 device operating with standardized protocol being employed within the particular IBM 3270 computer controlled communications network.
There remains still one other consideration to be taken into account. First, without more, each of the portable radio data terminals in running the 3270 emulation package, will appear to the system controller as a single fixed terminal device. As such, it occupies one of the available links to the controller in the same way as any other like fixed terminal display device. However, this could very likely necessarily prove wasteful since the radio data system portable data terminals are normally not all active, at least not all at once, but only occasionally, and on a selective basis. Moreover, if any particular link or controller fails, the portable data terminal assigned thereto would be cut off and unable to communicate with the host computer. Summary of the Invention
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an RF Radio Data Communication system that emulates a component part of a known computer-controlled communications network and operates to interface with a host computer as one or more cluster controllers and in this fashion functions to effectively overcome the foregoing deficiencies.
A more particular object of the present invention is to provide and RF Radio Data Communication System of the foregoing type wherein the system portable radio data terminals emulate a known and fully compatible fixed terminal display device, but the number of such emulating portable devices may be maximized by being shared between a number of available cluster controller links.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide an RF Radio Data Communication System of the foregoing type wherein the sharing of the portable Radio Data terminals is effected by the association thereof with a pool (hunt group) of selected controller link devices.
In practicing the invention, an RF Radio Data Communication System is provided which is capable of interfacing as a plurality of controller links to a host computer in a computer controlled communications network of controlled terminal devices operating with a given, i.e., standardized, operating protocol. A network control processor (NCP) is interconnected to at least one of a plurality of logic units included in a host computer which supports a given number of LU sessions with each of said interconnected host computer logic units. Further, a plurality of portable radio terminals intended for operation within the RF Data Communication System are provided wherein each such terminals are adapted to emulate a compatible fixed terminal display normally operating in the controlled communication network with the standardized operating protocol. Further, the portable radio terminals are each associated with a defined hunt group comprised of a plurality of LU sessions from the given number of LU sessions available, and wherein such portable radio terminals may freely contend for an available LU session in its assigned hunt group. And finally, wherein there are a greater number of portable radio data terminals associated with the hunt group than there are LU sessions.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The features of the present invention which are believed to be novel are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, together with further objects and inventions thereof, may be best understood by reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a typical computer-controlled communication network, in this case, the IBM 3270 system;
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a typical RF Radio Data Communication System controlled by an associated host computer;
Fig. 3 is a block diagram of an RF Radio Data Communication System similar to that of Fig. 2, but in which the infrastructure interfaces with the host computer as a plurality of cluster controllers and in which portable radio data terminals emulate a fixed terminal device, as in accordance with the present invention;
Fig. 4 is a partial block diagram showing a plurality of portable radio data terminals of the system of Fig. 3 either dynamically or statically associated with an assigned LU session; Fig. 5 is graphic representation of a series of hunt groups formed by individual portable radio data terminals associated therewith;
Fig. 6 is a flow chart indicating the initialization procedure in which a given portable radio data terminal may associate with a particular LU session;
Fig. 7 is flow chart of the procedure followed by the network control processor (NCP) upon receiving an inbound message from a portable radio terminal;
Fig. 8 is a flow chart indicating the background actions periodically effected by the NCP regarding the dynamic association of the systems' portable radio data terminals; and
Fig. 9 is a flow chart indicating the action taken by the NCP upon host link failure.
Description of the preferred Embodiment
Referring now to the drawings, a typical computer-controlled communication network is shown at 10 in Fig. 1. In this instance, for purposes of example only, the network is shown as an IBM 3270 System, well known in the art wherein a host computer 12 is provided which interfaces with a plurality of 3274 Cluster Controllers 14, which in turn interface with and control individual 3278 Display Terminal Devices 16. The later could be substituted with 3287 Line Printer Devices, as desired. Network 10 operates with a known, pre- established operating protocol, the details of which may not be described in detail for purposes of the present invention.
Similarly, an RF Radio Communications System or network is indicated at 20 in Fig. 2, which network may likewise be considered as typical of those known in the art. As shown, system 20 includes a Network Control Processor (NCP) 22 interfacing with a Host Computer 24 and controlling in response thereto a plurality of RF Stations 26 at various locations, each of which comprise an RF Modem 28 a Transmitter 30, and a Receiver 32. Station 26 then communicates over antenna 34 with a plurality of portable radio data terminals 40.
System 20 conventionally operates over inbound and outbound communications channels on a contention basis in accordance with an established operating protocol, such as that referenced in US Patent Application. Serial No. 07/175,888, filed 31 March 1988 on behalf of Kenneth J. Zdunek, et al, and assigned to the same assignee as the present invention. For purposes of brevity, such operating protocol may be referenced to as Motorola MDC 4800 operating protocol. As referenced in the 07/175,888 Zdunek Patent Application, remote data terminals transmit data messages to the Host Computer (via the NCP) in the form of data packets by RF link over the inbound channel, and receive like messages therefrom over the outbound channel. A Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA) technique is utilized, which is of course well known in the art.
As will be appreciated, the messages sent to the associated system remote data terminals originate at the Host Computer, and it is to the Host Computer that the remote terminals remotely communicate with in sending inbound messages. Without more, such an arrangement requires a dedicated Host Computer operating with the above-referenced protocol procedures. However, if a user already has a pre-existing Computer Controlled Network in which a Host Computer is included, and if available capacity is present, a radio data network can be added to such computer network, if, but only if, such radio data network can be made to emulate one or more cluster controllers already operating in such computer network system. For example, if the Radio Data Network 20 in Fig. 2 can be made to emulate one or more 3274 Cluster Controllers as referenced in the example of Fig. 1, the result is the overall system 100 as set forth in Fig. 3, which system has been constructed in accordance with the present invention.
As therein indicated, the Radio Data System 20' is linked to the
Host Computer 12 of Computer Controlled Network 10' by a plurality of direct connections 102a, 102b and 102c. In this instance, however, the RF radio data infrastructure is made to emulate a plurality of 3274 cluster controllers and in this manner, no change in the operating protocol is necessary as far as the Host Computer 12 is concerned. Each of the direct line connections 102a, 102b and 102c looks like a 3274 Cluster Controller, each of which presents a plurality of LU Sessions (typically about 32 in number). In this fashion, the full RF Radio Data System 20' may operate as usual, but in the Computer Controlled Network 10', and the Host computer 12 accommodates both system 20' as well as the various Cluster Controllers 14. However, it will be appreciated that, without more, each LU Session presented through line connections 102a, 102b and 102c would interface with an associated terminal unit (terminal session) on a one-to-one basis. Since not all of the system Radio Data Terminals are active at the same time, it would otherwise represent a less than efficient use of available resources. Moreover, if any of the LU Sessions (emulating a cluster 3274 controller) fails, the Radio Data Terminals permanently interfaced to such LU Session would thereby be cut off and denied communications access and capability.
Accordingly, the present invention provides an advantageous enhancement to the aforementioned 3270 emulation protocol whereby substantially increased numbers of radio data terminals may be incorporated into the system. Also, a redundancy feature is provided to cover the drop out of any emulated 3274 Cluster Controllers and LU Session failure. And, finally, such enhancement effectively minimizes the total number of 3270 LU Sessions that may in fact be required in a particular system.
To accomplish these and other objectives, each of the Radio Data Terminals 40 are selectively associated with a particular Hunt Group. Fig. 5 illustrates this feature. Conceptually, there are no limits to the number of data terminals that can in fact be associated with a Hunt Group. In practical terms, however, there are of course limits. The key criteria in this event is that all such data terminals associated with a particular Hunt Group must be of the same type. For essentially arbitrary reasons, but consistent with (IBM) protocol and architectural guidelines, type 2 is designated for conventional (3278) terminals and type 3 for (3287) printers. Similarly, each of the LU Sessions with the Host Computer (thru a link controller) are associated with a select Hunt Group. As indicated in Fig. 5, neither the group of data terminals constituting a particular terminal session, nor the LU Sessions from a particular emulated 3274 link controller, are limited to only one Hunt Group. In fact, they are to be disbursed, as indicated specifically in Fig. 5. As shown, and by way of example only, Terminals 1 through 4, of terminal session 1, are associated with Hunt Groups in this case, a type 2 LU. As will also be noted, terminal 6 of session 1, is indicated as associated with Hunt Group 2 a LU type 3 accommodating 3287 printers. Further, terminals 7 and 8 of session 1 are indicated as associated with Hunt Group 3 while terminal 9 et seq. are associated with Hunt Group N.
Similarly, a portion of the available LU Sessions of 3274 Host
Link 1 are associated with Hunt Group 1 while others may be associated with still different Hunt Groups, such as those shown interfacing with Hunt Group 2. Host Link 2 LU Sessions are shown selectively interfacing with Hunt Groups 2, 3 and 4. In this selective manner, it will be readily appreciated that a greater number of Data Terminals 40 can be associated with a lesser number of available LU Sessions through a particular Hunt Group. Moreover, since the LU Sessions of a particular emulated Link Controller are associated with one or more Hunt Group, a failure of that Link Controller simply means communications are rerouted through a different link
Controller, thereby providing the very important redundancy feature. This is made possible by the adaptable linking of the terminals to a particular LU Session (through a particular Hunt Group). This linking may be dynamic, as through a particular Hunt Group (to any one of a number of value sessions), or static (as always associated with a specific one), as best seen in Fig. 4.
As therein shown, a terminal session is considered strongly linked (dynamically) to an LU Session once such session is successfully logged on. As previously stated, a static linking always requires a particular data terminal to be associated with a predefined LU Session, as graphically portrayed in Fig. 4.
Given the LU associations as described above, the flow chart represented by Fig. 6 indicates the particularized actions effected on each 3274 LU initialization request. At the start, the inquiry is made as to whether the LU is static as indicated in step 120. If yes, the LU is strongly linked to a terminal session and may proceed accordingly as indicated at step 122. If, however, the answer that the LU is not static, it by definition must be dynamic as indicated at step 124. Thereupon the further inquiry is made at step 126 as to whether the LU is weakly or strongly linked to a terminal session. If yes, the process continues with the linked terminal session at step 128 and if terminal session is logged in at step 130, a strong terminal link is effected between that terminal session and the referenced LU as indicated at 132. If the terminal session is not logged in, it simply returns to the same condition as at the beginning of the initialization process. Further, if the LU is weakly linked to a terminal session as indicated at step 126, the LU is added to the list of available LUs for the associated Hunt Group as indicated at step 134 whereupon the LU initialization process may be terminated.
From the remote data terminal viewpoint, Fig. 7 represents a flow chart of the executed actions occurring upon the Network Control Processor 22 receiving inbound terminal messages. As indicated, the initial query at step 140 is as to whether the terminal session is static. If yes, the message is then forwarded to the linked LU at step 142 whereupon the process is completed at that point. If, however, the answer is that the terminal session is not static, then it must be dynamic as indicated at step 142 and the further query is made at step 144 as to whether the terminal session is weakly of strongly linked to a LU. If strongly linked, the message is forwarded to the linked LU at step 146. If the terminal session is logged in at step 148, it is strongly linked to this LU as indicated at step 150. If, however, the terminal session does not log in, it terminates and the LU initialization process will reactivate subsequently. If, on the other hand, the terminal session is weakly linked to an LU, the further query is made at step 152 as to whether the LU is available in this terminal's Hunt Group. If in the negative, an indication is returned to terminate this session because the host is not available as indicated in step 154. If on the other hand, a LU is available in the particular Hunt Group, the LU is removed at step 156 from the list of available LUs for that Hunt Group, whereupon the terminal session is weakly linked to this particular LU as indicated at step 158. The message is forwarded to the weakly linked LU at step 160 and, if the terminal session is static, the message is forwarded to the linked LU. If not, the process will terminate at this point.
Fig. 8 illustrates in flow chart form the background actions executed by the network control processor 22 for dynamic LUs while Fig. 9 illustrates in flow chart form the actions executed by such network controller upon 3274 Host Link failure. In Fig. 8 the controller 22 delays for the specific delay interval as indicated at step 180 and then scans weakly linked LUs for those that have not processed traffic from their terminal session in a weak time out interval, as indicated at step 182. Accordingly, for those found, the temporary terminal session link is removed and the LU is returned to the list of available LUs for the appropriate Hunt Group as indicated in step 184.
In Fig. 9 step 190 indicates that all failed 3274 LUs are removed from all associated Hunt Groups and, further, that all terminal to LU session linkages are likewise broken for the failed 3274 LUs, as shown at step 192. In this manner, the associated data terminals that would otherwise be locked out of its ability to communicate may be reassigned to viable Hunt Groups and working 3274 Link Controllers. This redundancy feature is therefore significant in insuring communication linkages with all communication capable radio data terminals.
Accordingly, What is Claimed is:

Claims

_
1. An RF Radio Data Communications System for interfacing as a plurality of controller links to a host computer in a computer controlled communications network of controlled fixed terminal display devices and which network operates with a given, standardized operating protocol, comprising in combination: a network control processor (NCP) interconnected to at least one of a plurality of logic units included in the host computer and supporting a given number of LU sessions with each of said interconnected host computer logic units; a plurality of portable radio terminals operating within the RF Radio Data System, each such terminal adapted to run an emulation program so as to simulate a fixed terminal display normally operating in the computer controlled communication network with the standardized operating protocol, each of said portable radio terminals being associated with a defined hunt group comprised of a plurality of LU sessions from said given number of LU sessions wherein said portable radio terminals may freely contend for an available LU session in its assigned hunt group, and wherein there are a greater number of portable radio data terminals associated with a hunt group than there are LU sessions; and control means for breaking the association of any failed Logic Unit with a defined Hunt Group whereby an involved portable radio terminal may seek access to the Host Computer thru any other active and functional Logic Unit still associated with that same Hunt Group.
2. An RF Radio Data Communication System in accordance with Claim 1 wherein each of said portable radio terminals is either statically or dynamically associated with its said defined Hunt Group.
3. An RF Radio Data Communication System in accordance with Claim 2 wherein said dynamically associated portable radio terminals are either strongly or weakly linked to a Logic Unit through a defined Hunt Group.
4. An RF Radio Data Communication System in accordance with Claim 3 wherein a dynamically but weakly linked portable radio terminal becomes strongly linked to a given Logic Unit through a defined Hunt Group upon LU Session log-in by that portable radio terminal.
5. An RF Radio Data Communication System in accordance with Claim 2 wherein a statically associated portable radio terminal is always strongly linked to a given logic unit through its defined Hunt Group.,
6 An RF Radio Data Communication System in accordance with Claim 1 wherein each of said Hunt Groups accommodate a particular type of emulated fixed terminal device.
7 An RF Radio Data Communication System in accordance with Claim 6 wherein the types of emulated fixed terminal devices encompass at least a fixed terminal display device or a printer device.
8. An Rf Radio Data Communication System in accordance with Claim 7 wherein any such portable radio terminals previously assigned to a Hunt Group having a failed Logic Unit may be ffi
disassociated therewith and reassigned to one or more different Hunt Groups.
9. In a computer controlled communications network of host computer, linked controllers and a plurality of fixed terminal devices and operating on a given, standardized operating protocol, a method of interfacing an added RF Radio Data Communications System thereto as a plurality of controller links, including the steps of: interconnecting a network control processor (NCP) to at least one of a plurality of logic units included in the host computer and supporting a given number of LU sessions with each of said interconnected host computer logic units; adapting each of the plurality of portable radio terminals operating within the RF Radio Data System to run an emulation program so as to simulate a fixed terminal device normally operating in the computer controlled communication network with the standardized operating protocol; and further associating each of said portable radio terminals with a defined hunt group comprised of a plurality of LU sessions from said given number of LU sessions wherein said portable radio terminals may freely contend for an available LU session in its assigned hunt group, and wherein there are a greater number of portable radio data terminals associated with a hunt group than there are LU sessions; and control means for breaking the association of any failed Logic Unit with a defined Hunt Group whereby an involved portable radio terminal may seek access to the Host Computer thru any other active and functional Logic Unit still associated with that same Hunt Group.
10. A method of interfacing an RF Radio Data Communications System in a computer controlled communications network in accordance with Claim 8 which includes the further step of statically or dynamically associating each of said portable radio terminals with its defined Hunt Group.
EP19910917859 1990-11-05 1991-09-26 Dynamic association of rf radio data communication system in a pre-existing computer controlled network Ceased EP0509068A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US60876890A 1990-11-05 1990-11-05
US608768 1990-11-05

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0509068A1 true EP0509068A1 (en) 1992-10-21
EP0509068A4 EP0509068A4 (en) 1993-05-12

Family

ID=24437905

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19910917859 Ceased EP0509068A4 (en) 1990-11-05 1991-09-26 Dynamic association of rf radio data communication system in a pre-existing computer controlled network

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0509068A4 (en)
JP (1) JPH05502993A (en)
KR (1) KR950008224B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1025266C (en)
BR (1) BR9106179A (en)
CA (1) CA2070996A1 (en)
MX (1) MX9101917A (en)
WO (1) WO1992008195A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6694134B1 (en) * 2002-03-18 2004-02-17 Interwave Communications International, Ltd. Terminal device emulator
SE525104C2 (en) * 2004-02-24 2004-11-30 Tagmaster Ab Identity authentication method for providing access to e.g. computers, uses central computer to compare ID code sent to device via mobile terminal with code received from this device
US8369795B2 (en) 2005-01-12 2013-02-05 Microsoft Corporation Game console notification system
US9289678B2 (en) 2005-01-12 2016-03-22 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc System for associating a wireless device to a console device

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2217149A (en) * 1988-03-31 1989-10-18 Motorola Inc Voice/data communication system
EP0379829A2 (en) * 1989-01-24 1990-08-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method of providing non-disruptive recovery in a communication system
GB2237907A (en) * 1989-07-19 1991-05-15 Hitachi Ltd Information handling system

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4168532A (en) * 1977-02-24 1979-09-18 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Multimode data distribution and control apparatus
DE3069365D1 (en) * 1979-10-09 1984-11-08 Burroughs Corp Data communications controller
US5020132A (en) * 1987-08-14 1991-05-28 Ericsson Ge Mobile Communications Inc. Processor-to-processor communications protocol for a public service trunking system

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2217149A (en) * 1988-03-31 1989-10-18 Motorola Inc Voice/data communication system
EP0379829A2 (en) * 1989-01-24 1990-08-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method of providing non-disruptive recovery in a communication system
GB2237907A (en) * 1989-07-19 1991-05-15 Hitachi Ltd Information handling system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO9208195A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR950008224B1 (en) 1995-07-26
CA2070996A1 (en) 1992-05-06
CN1025266C (en) 1994-06-29
WO1992008195A1 (en) 1992-05-14
CN1061500A (en) 1992-05-27
KR920704220A (en) 1992-12-19
EP0509068A4 (en) 1993-05-12
MX9101917A (en) 1992-06-01
JPH05502993A (en) 1993-05-20
BR9106179A (en) 1993-03-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5388243A (en) Multi-sort mass storage device announcing its active paths without deactivating its ports in a network architecture
US6473795B1 (en) In-band/out-of-band alert delivery system
US5475867A (en) Distributed supervisory control and data acquisition system
AU594057B2 (en) Communication system
US4574284A (en) Communication bus interface unit
EP0074864A2 (en) System and method for name-lookup in a local area network data communication system
US20050250494A1 (en) Method of assigning unique network code to devices in a home network and a home network system therefor
US5553135A (en) Point-to-multipoint communication system and method
JP2002511993A (en) Process and system for controlling use of satellite transmission capacity in terrestrial networks
CN1076910C (en) Multi-master supervisory system
CN111245660B (en) Network-based equipment upgrading self-adaptive transmission method
EP0509068A1 (en) Dynamic association of rf radio data communication system in a pre-existing computer controlled network
US5511230A (en) Communication system between master system and multiple slave systems in time division mode where a next slave is serviced upon receipt of final acknowledgement
KR19990054464A (en) Network Management Method in Network Management System
Carpenter et al. Serving users with a local area network
JP3489717B2 (en) Resource Initialization Method for Distributed Processing Service Control Station
JP2715137B2 (en) Communication network control method
Parr Data Transport Subsystem: The SFOC Glue
JPH02217039A (en) Poling/selecting control procedure system
JPH03121641A (en) Multiple address communication system for electronic exchange system
JPH118630A (en) Communication terminal system
Bernhard Communications: The quandary of office automation: Systems designers are heatedly debating the most efficient communication hardware for the electronic office of the future
JPH022246A (en) Communication network control method
JPS6142984B2 (en)
KR19980036225A (en) Connection device and access control method between radio call data transmission earth station system and network management system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19920804

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19930324

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19950814

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 19960210