EP0496782B1 - High efficiency chlorine dioxide pulp bleaching process - Google Patents

High efficiency chlorine dioxide pulp bleaching process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0496782B1
EP0496782B1 EP90915570A EP90915570A EP0496782B1 EP 0496782 B1 EP0496782 B1 EP 0496782B1 EP 90915570 A EP90915570 A EP 90915570A EP 90915570 A EP90915570 A EP 90915570A EP 0496782 B1 EP0496782 B1 EP 0496782B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
bleaching
chlorine dioxide
process according
bleaching process
stage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP90915570A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0496782A4 (en
EP0496782A1 (en
Inventor
Hou-Min Chang
Geoffrey Eugene C/O Proctor & Gamble Seger
Hasan Jameel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
North Carolina State University
University of California
Original Assignee
North Carolina State University
University of California
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=23682296&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0496782(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by North Carolina State University, University of California filed Critical North Carolina State University
Publication of EP0496782A1 publication Critical patent/EP0496782A1/en
Publication of EP0496782A4 publication Critical patent/EP0496782A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0496782B1 publication Critical patent/EP0496782B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C9/00After-treatment of cellulose pulp, e.g. of wood pulp, or cotton linters ; Treatment of dilute or dewatered pulp or process improvement taking place after obtaining the raw cellulosic material and not provided for elsewhere
    • D21C9/10Bleaching ; Apparatus therefor
    • D21C9/12Bleaching ; Apparatus therefor with halogens or halogen-containing compounds
    • D21C9/14Bleaching ; Apparatus therefor with halogens or halogen-containing compounds with ClO2 or chlorites
    • D21C9/142Bleaching ; Apparatus therefor with halogens or halogen-containing compounds with ClO2 or chlorites with ClO2/Cl2 in a multistage process involving ClO2/Cl2 exclusively

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the bleaching of pulp and more particularly to an improved process for bleaching wood pulp with chlorine dioxide in a manner whereby the wood pulp is subjected to a 2-step high pH/low pH bleaching stage which results in a substantial decrease in the usage of chlorine dioxide required to brighten wood pulp.
  • the main objectives of wood pulp bleaching are to increase the brightness of the pulp and to make it suitable for the manufacture of printing and tissue grade papers by removal or modification of some of the constituents of the unbleached pulp, including the lignin and its degradation products, resins, metal ions, non-cellulosic carbohydrate components, and various other types of flecks.
  • the bleaching of chemical wood pulp is normally carried out in multiple processing stages utilizing elemental chlorine, caustic soda, hypochlorites, oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, and chlorine dioxide. The number of stages required in a particular bleaching process is dependent upon the nature of the unbleached pulp as well as the end use to which the pulp will be put.
  • DE-A-3239811 discloses a process for bleaching cellulose-containing materials in a multi-stage sequence.
  • the cellulose-containing materials are treated with chlorine (Cl2) under careful pH control, followed by chlorine dioxide.
  • U.S.-A-3433702 discloses a process employing a chlorine dioxide stage followed by a chlorination stage, instead of a chlorination stage followed by a chlorine dioxide stage, as is conventional.
  • a sulphate or kraft pulp is today most typically bleached in a five stage sequence which is designated as (CD)(EO)DED.
  • D denotes chlorine dioxide
  • C denotes elemental chlorine
  • E denotes caustic extraction
  • O denotes oxygen gas.
  • the multi-stage process in essence comprises a chlorination step (CD), a first oxidative extraction stage (EO), a first bleaching stage (D1), a second caustic extraction stage (E2), and a second and final bleaching stage (D2).
  • each of the two chlorine dioxide bleaching stages is carried out in an one-step process at an end pH of about 3.8 for three hours at 70°C. It is commonly known that pH has an important bearing on brightness and strength properties as well as the chemical species present in the wood pulp mixture, and this particular pH has heretofore been considered optimal for each of the two chlorine dioxide bleaching stages in the (CD)(EO)DED sequence. It should also be appreciated that although the (CD) (EO)DED sequence has been specifically addressed, the one-step chlorine dioxide bleaching stage can be used in any D stage for most other three, four, five or six-stage bleaching processes known to those familiar with the art of wood pulp bleaching.
  • a shortcoming of the one-step chlorine dioxide bleaching stage presently used in the pulp and paper industry is that approximately 30% of the chlorine dioxide is lost to the formation of the unreactive species chlorite and chlorate, and this is very undesirable in view of the relatively high cost of chlorine dioxide.
  • the present invention solves this well-known deficiency in state of the art chlorine dioxide bleaching by significantly reducing the chlorine dioxide loss during the chlorine dioxide bleaching process.
  • the advantages of the reduced loss of chlorine dioxide are a very significant reduction in the cost of the wood pulp bleaching process as well as the reduction of pollution levels.
  • a bleaching process for bleaching wood pulp in the D1 or D2 bleaching stage in an aqueous suspension using chlorine dioxide and providing high brightness and a high brightness ceiling characterised by the steps of:
  • Chlorine dioxide bleaching of kraft pulps is typically carried out at an end pH of 3.8 for 3 hours at 70° centigrade. It is commonly known that pH has an important bearing on brightness and strength properties as well as the chemical species present in the mixture. As shown in Figure 1 of the drawings, the formation of chlorate increases as the pH of the solution is decreased. Below pH 5 a major loss of oxidizing power occurs since the chlorate formed is inactive as a bleaching agent. Conversely, as the pH is increased, the conversion of chlorine dioxide to the chlorite anion is increased which is also inactive toward lignin. The sum of chlorite plus chlorate is lowest at end pH 3.8 which is found to be optimal for chlorine dioxide bleaching. However, formation of chlorite is not actually lost oxidizing capability since acidifying the chlorite solution forms chlorous acid which is known to be very reactive toward lignin.
  • Chlorination stage charges were varied to achieve target (CD)E kappa numbers, and all charges are on OD brownstock pulp. Optimum high/low pH values are 6-7.5 and 3.8, respectively. Large batches of (CD)E pulp were made and then divided into individual DED runs for comparison. All comparisons were made on pulps from the same (CD)E batch, and all water used in bleaching and washing was distilled. Chlorine dioxide solutions used in testing were generated on site by acidifying sodium chlorite solution and absorbing the ClO2 gas in cold distilled water. Chlorine content in the solutions was kept between 7 and 10% (active basis).
  • Pulp viscosity measurements were made using TAPPI standard T 230 os-76. Earlier experimental work has indicated that chlorine dioxide at a pH of less than 5 reacts selectively with lignin, and at a pH greater than 7 chlorine dioxide reacts with the carbohydrate and lignin in the pulp vigorously, which in turn degrades the cellulose chain. As shown in Figure 7, pulp viscosity depends heavily on the pH of the reacting mixture. Pulp viscosity decreases slowly from pH 6 to 7, then falls rapidly at pH values higher than 7. The decrease in viscosity at the high pH for the two-step high/low pH bleaching process is not significant because of the low reaction time in the high pH step. From viscosity and brightness data obtained, a pH of 6-7.5 and a pH of 3.8 is optimal for the high pH and low pH, respectively, in the two-step high/low pH bleaching process.
  • TOCl (AOX) measurements in applicant's tests were made on both the D1 and E2 for one data set. The values were added together and are shown in Figure 8 of the drawings. Surprisingly, conventional bleaching TOCl values were parabolic versus an increasing ClO2 charge while TOCl values with the high/low pH bleaching method varied only slightly. A greater decrease in TOCl from bleaching with the two-step high/low pH bleaching process can be realized by substituting the chlorine dioxide saved in the D1 stage back into the chlorination stage (CD) of the multi-stage bleach sequence. This would result in a decrease in TOCl (AOX) in effluents from the bleach plant.
  • CD chlorination stage
  • Chlorate (ClO 3 - ) is a well known herbicide, and discharge of chlorate from paper mills has been gaining more attention from environmentalists now that possible detrimental effects on various microalgaes have been observed. Thus, improving the efficiency of chlorine dioxide bleaching by lowering chlorate production may have a favorable impact on both economic and environmental issues. Conversion of chlorine dioxide to chlorate can be lowered by the two-stage high/low pH bleaching method for most chemical charges on pulp. At very high chemical charges (or lower lignin concentrations), chlorate formation is independent of whether the new or conventional bleaching method is used, because a brightness ceiling is reached.
  • Equation 1 2ClO2 + 2OH ⁇ ----> ClO 3 - + ClO 2 - + H2O Equation 2 2HClO2 ----> H+ + HClO + ClO 3 -
  • Equation 1 is not a very prominent reaction in bleaching carried out at pH 7 since only a small concentration of hydroxyl ions are present. Under typical bleaching conditions, the pH starts around 5 and drops to less than 4 by the end of the bleaching process. At pH 5, less than 1% hydroxyl ions would be present for reaction, and at pH 4 only 0.1% exist. Supporting evidence for this observation is shown in Figure 9 of the drawings. The trend indicated shows that as the pH is increased up to 9, the formation of chlorate decreases.
  • Equation 2 The major pathway for chlorate formation is Equation 2 above.
  • chlorous acid reacts with itself to form chlorate and hypochlorous acid. This is a biomolecular reaction which is considered to be slow at low concentrations.
  • Chlorous acid as stated above, is very reactive toward lignin. Chlorous acid oxidizes lignin and is reduced to hypochlorous acid according to Equation 3: Equation 3 HClO2 + LIGNIN ---> HClO + OXIDIZED LIGNIN
  • FIG. 10 shows a plot of D1 charge of chlorine dioxide versus % chlorine dioxide converted to chlorate for conventional chlorine dioxide bleaching. As the lignin concentration is increased (low chemical charge or higher kappa number) less chlorate is formed. Likewise if a high concentration of chemical is present (low kappa number), the higher the formation of chlorate. The same trend also holds true for the two-step high/low pH bleaching process as can be seen in Figure 11. From Figures 10 and 11, it is evident that the two-step high/low pH bleaching process significantly lowers chlorate formation at most chemical charges. However, little difference is seen at high charges where the brightness ceiling is reached.
  • the two-step high/low pH bleaching process can be implemented in both a new plant or an existing pulp bleaching plant.
  • the optimum design schematic is shown in Figure 15, where ClO2 and caustic are added to the first mixer.
  • the pulp flows into a J or U tube ( Figure 15A) or upflow tower ( Figure 15B) with a retention time of approximately 5-40 minutes.
  • a second mixer is provided to mix the acid for pH adjustment of the wood pulp.
  • the pulp can then be discharged directly to a downflow tower.
  • the retention time in the downflow tower is 2 or more hours and most suitably between about 2.5-3.9 hours.
  • the simplest method for implementing the two-step high/low pH bleaching process technology would be to install a mixer on the discharge from the upflow leg of the tower to the downflow leg of the tower.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Polysaccharides And Polysaccharide Derivatives (AREA)
  • Noodles (AREA)

Abstract

A high-efficiency wood pulp bleaching process to produce wood pulps with higher brightness at equal chlorine dioxide usage or of equal brightness at significantly reduced chlorine dioxide usage. The process comprises reacting the chlorine dioxide with wood pulp at a pH of about 5-10 for about 5-40 minutes and then acidifying the mixture to a pH of about 1.9-4.2. The mixture is then allowed to react for about 2 or more hours to complete the two-step high/low pH bleaching process.

Description

  • The present invention relates to the bleaching of pulp and more particularly to an improved process for bleaching wood pulp with chlorine dioxide in a manner whereby the wood pulp is subjected to a 2-step high pH/low pH bleaching stage which results in a substantial decrease in the usage of chlorine dioxide required to brighten wood pulp.
  • As is well known in the wood pulp bleaching art, the main objectives of wood pulp bleaching are to increase the brightness of the pulp and to make it suitable for the manufacture of printing and tissue grade papers by removal or modification of some of the constituents of the unbleached pulp, including the lignin and its degradation products, resins, metal ions, non-cellulosic carbohydrate components, and various other types of flecks. The bleaching of chemical wood pulp is normally carried out in multiple processing stages utilizing elemental chlorine, caustic soda, hypochlorites, oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, and chlorine dioxide. The number of stages required in a particular bleaching process is dependent upon the nature of the unbleached pulp as well as the end use to which the pulp will be put.
  • DE-A-3239811 discloses a process for bleaching cellulose-containing materials in a multi-stage sequence. The cellulose-containing materials are treated with chlorine (Cl₂) under careful pH control, followed by chlorine dioxide.
  • An article in the Journal of Pulp and Paper Science, volume 13, No. 1, January 1987, Annergren, Häggkvist and Lindblad, discloses chlorine dioxide bleaching carried out for extended reaction times in order to achieve a low residual chlorine dioxide level.
  • An article in Tappi Journal, volume 61, No. 12, December 1979, Teder and Tormund, discloses a chlorine dioxide stage having distinct steps, the first employing a pH of up to 6, for 5 or 6 minutes as a pre-treatment, prior to bleaching at a pH of 4 to 5, for 35, 80, 85 or 115 minutes. The purpose is to inhibit carbohydrate degradation.
  • U.S.-A-3433702 discloses a process employing a chlorine dioxide stage followed by a chlorination stage, instead of a chlorination stage followed by a chlorine dioxide stage, as is conventional.
  • Notwithstanding the prior disclosures referred to in the previous four paragraphs, a sulphate or kraft pulp is today most typically bleached in a five stage sequence which is designated as (CD)(EO)DED. In the (CD)(EO)DED designation, D denotes chlorine dioxide, C denotes elemental chlorine, E denotes caustic extraction, and O denotes oxygen gas. The multi-stage process in essence comprises a chlorination step (CD), a first oxidative extraction stage (EO), a first bleaching stage (D₁), a second caustic extraction stage (E₂), and a second and final bleaching stage (D₂).
  • In the conventional (CD) (EO)DED multi-stage bleaching process, each of the two chlorine dioxide bleaching stages is carried out in an one-step process at an end pH of about 3.8 for three hours at 70°C. It is commonly known that pH has an important bearing on brightness and strength properties as well as the chemical species present in the wood pulp mixture, and this particular pH has heretofore been considered optimal for each of the two chlorine dioxide bleaching stages in the (CD)(EO)DED sequence. It should also be appreciated that although the (CD) (EO)DED sequence has been specifically addressed, the one-step chlorine dioxide bleaching stage can be used in any D stage for most other three, four, five or six-stage bleaching processes known to those familiar with the art of wood pulp bleaching.
  • A shortcoming of the one-step chlorine dioxide bleaching stage presently used in the pulp and paper industry is that approximately 30% of the chlorine dioxide is lost to the formation of the unreactive species chlorite and chlorate, and this is very undesirable in view of the relatively high cost of chlorine dioxide. The present invention solves this well-known deficiency in state of the art chlorine dioxide bleaching by significantly reducing the chlorine dioxide loss during the chlorine dioxide bleaching process. The advantages of the reduced loss of chlorine dioxide are a very significant reduction in the cost of the wood pulp bleaching process as well as the reduction of pollution levels.
  • In accordance with the present invention there is provided a bleaching process for bleaching wood pulp in the D₁ or D₂ bleaching stage in an aqueous suspension using chlorine dioxide and providing high brightness and a high brightness ceiling, characterised by the steps of:
    • subjecting said aqueous wood pulp suspension to a first bleaching step during the D₁ or D₂ bleaching stage by mixing it with chlorine dioxide and/or alkali for about 5-40 minutes so that the pH at the end of said first bleaching step is between about 6.0-10.0;
    • decreasing the pH of the mixture after said first bleaching step; and
    • subjecting said mixture to a second bleaching step during the D₁ and/or D₂ bleaching stage for about 2 or more hours so that the pH at the end of the second step is between about 1.9-4.2.
  • Further aspects of the bleaching process of the present invention are set forth in the accompanying claims, to which reference should now be made.
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide more efficient chlorine dioxide bleaching in the wood pulp bleaching process.
  • It is another object of the present invention to significantly reduce the conversion of chlorine dioxide to non-bleaching chemicals during the wood pulp bleaching process.
  • It is still another object of the present invention to reduce the cost of the wood pulp bleaching process.
  • It is yet another object of the present invention to achieve a higher wood pulp brightness with a selected chlorine dioxide charge than has heretofore been possible.
  • Description of the Drawings
  • Some of the objects having been stated, other objects will become evident as the description proceeds, when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
    • Figure 1 is a graph of the effect of pH on chlorate and chlorite formation in chlorine dioxide bleaching of kraft pulp (reprinted from "The Bleaching of Pulp", Ed. R. P. Singh, p. 137);
    • Figure 2 is a graph of D₁ brightness for the pulp of Figure 2 when the D₁ charge is varied on the pulp for the conventional one-step bleaching process and the novel two-step bleaching process of the present invention;
    • Figure 3 is a graph of D₂ brightness versus chlorine dioxide charge for the conventional one-step bleaching process and the novel two-step bleaching process of the present invention wherein the D₂ charge is 0.2% ClO₂ on pulp;
    • Figure 4 is a graph of D₁ and D₂ brightness versus chlorine dioxide charge for the conventional one-step bleaching process and the novel two-step bleaching process of the present invention;
    • Figure 5 is a graph of D₁ brightness versus percentage (%) chlorine dioxide on the pulp (D₁ charge) for the conventional one-step bleaching process and the novel two-step bleaching process of the present invention;
    • Figure 6 is a graph of D₂ brightness for the pulp of Figure 5 when the D₂ charge is 0.2% chlorine dioxide on the pulp for the conventional one-step bleaching process and the novel two-step bleaching process of the present invention;
    • Figure 6(a) is a graph of final brightness versus ClO₂ charge for the conventional one-step process and the novel two-step bleaching process of the present invention using a (CD) (EO)D sequence. Reverted brightness is also shown after 24 hours at 105°C;
    • Figure 7 is a graph of D₁ viscosity versus D₁ pH for the conventional one-step bleaching process and high pH for the novel two-step bleaching process of the present invention;
    • Figure 8 is a graph of total organic chlorine (TOCl) or (AOX) in D₁ plus E₂ effluents versus chlorine dioxide charge in D₁ for the conventional one-step bleaching process and the novel two-step bleaching process of the present invention;
    • Figure 9 is a graph of chlorate formed in the D₁ stage versus end pH;
    • Figure 10 is a graph of chlorate formed versus D₁ charge and CE kappa number for conventional bleaching;
    • Figure 11 is a graph of chlorate formed versus D₁ charge and CE kappa number for the novel two-step high/low pH bleaching process of the present invention;
    • Figure 12 is a graph of chlorate formed as a percentage (%) of chlorine dioxide converted to chlorate versus percent (%) chlorine dioxide in D₁ for the conventional one-step bleaching process and the novel two-step high/low bleaching process of the present invention;
    • Figure 13 is a graph of D₁ pulp brightness versus the percentage of chlorine dioxide on the pulp (D₁ charge) for the conventional one-step bleaching process and the novel two-step high/low pH bleaching process of the present invention (wherein the middle line is the calculated brightness due to reduced chlorate formation);
    • Figure 14 is a graph of chlorate formation versus D₁ brightness for the conventional one-step bleaching process and the novel two-step high/low pH bleaching process of the present invention; and
    • Figure 15 is a schematic representation of two (2) different process systems for a wood pulp bleaching plant for incorporating the two-step high/low pH bleaching process of the present invention.
    Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
  • Chlorine dioxide bleaching of kraft pulps is typically carried out at an end pH of 3.8 for 3 hours at 70° centigrade. It is commonly known that pH has an important bearing on brightness and strength properties as well as the chemical species present in the mixture. As shown in Figure 1 of the drawings, the formation of chlorate increases as the pH of the solution is decreased. Below pH 5 a major loss of oxidizing power occurs since the chlorate formed is inactive as a bleaching agent. Conversely, as the pH is increased, the conversion of chlorine dioxide to the chlorite anion is increased which is also inactive toward lignin. The sum of chlorite plus chlorate is lowest at end pH 3.8 which is found to be optimal for chlorine dioxide bleaching. However, formation of chlorite is not actually lost oxidizing capability since acidifying the chlorite solution forms chlorous acid which is known to be very reactive toward lignin.
  • In order to increase the efficiency of chlorine dioxide bleaching, a new two-step process has been discovered. The process is as follows:
    • 1. Pulp is mixed with sodium hydroxide and subsequently mixed with chlorine dioxide in a conventional manner. The pH is maintained between about 6 and 7.5 for optimum brightness and viscosity although beneficial results are also found in a pH range of about 5-10. Reaction time is varied between about 5-40 minutes, and the reaction temperature is between about 55-85° centigrade, most suitably about 70° centigrade.
    • 2. After the initial bleaching step, the pulp mixture is acidified to an optimum end pH of 3.8 with sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, or other suitable acid. Although a pH of 3.8 is optimal for brightness, end pH values of 1.9-4.2 have been recorded with substantial brightness gains over conventional bleaching methods. Final consistency of the pulp is between about 3-12%, most suitably about 10%, and reaction time in this second step is 2 or more hours, most suitably between about 2.5 and 3.9 hours. Reaction temperature is between about 55-85° centigrade, and most suitably about 70° centigrade.
  • To prove the efficacy of the new process generally described above, detailed bleaching experiments were carried out by applicant on southern pine kraft pulp. The furnish was obtained from the decker before the bleach plant, and to insure maximum mixing CD stage bleaching was done in plastic Nalgene bottles which rolled on a ball-mill type apparatus for the full reaction time. All other bleaching stages were carried out in sealed polyester bags which were kneaded at various times throughout the bleach to insure proper mixing.
  • Processing parameters used by applicants for the multiple bleaching stages are listed in Table 1 below. Chlorination stage charges were varied to achieve target (CD)E kappa numbers, and all charges are on OD brownstock pulp. Optimum high/low pH values are 6-7.5 and 3.8, respectively. Large batches of (CD)E pulp were made and then divided into individual DED runs for comparison. All comparisons were made on pulps from the same (CD)E batch, and all water used in bleaching and washing was distilled. Chlorine dioxide solutions used in testing were generated on site by acidifying sodium chlorite solution and absorbing the ClO₂ gas in cold distilled water. Chlorine content in the solutions was kept between 7 and 10% (active basis).
  • Processing parameters for the bleaching experiments and the analytical methods used in the experiments are as follows:
    Figure imgb0001
  • Brightness
  • On the basis of the results achieved in the bleaching tests, a substantial increase in brightness is always found using the high/low pH bleaching method as compared to conventional bleaching methods. As seen in Figure 2, the D₁ brightnesses achieved were higher than those of the present ClO₂ bleaching techniques. In Figure 2, high pH values are between 8 and 9.5, and low pH values are from 1.9-2.1. The control had end pH values of 3.3 to 3.7. At a brightness level of 76 ISO, a charge of 0.9% ClO₂ on OD pulp was needed for conventional bleaching while only 0.68% was needed using the high/low bleaching method. This accounts for a 24% savings in chlorine dioxide. In 5-stage (CD) (EO)DED bleaching, however, the effect of the brightness gain is reduced in the final bleaching stage (D₂). This is shown in Figure 3, where the pulps of Figure 2 are further bleached in the E₂ and D₂ stages wherein the D₂ stages are run conventionally. After the final bleaching stage, a 15% savings in chlorine dioxide is realized at a brightness of 88.3 ISO.
  • Regardless of the incoming (CD)E kappa number (lignin concentration), chlorine dioxide savings are always found using the high/low pH bleaching process. This is illustrated in Figure 4 for pulp with a (CD)E kappa number of 8.5. Again a savings of approximately 0.2% ClO₂ on pulp is realized in the D₁ stage, and the magnitude of savings is lower at a comparable D₂ brightness. Thus, even at high (CD)E kappa values, substantial reductions in chlorine dioxide use are realized by the bleaching method of the invention.
  • Similar brightness ceilings are reached in the D₁ stage irrespective of which method of bleaching is used. This occurs around 84.0 ISO for both methods for an incoming (CD)E kappa of 4.4 (see Figure 5). In Figure 6, D₂ pulp from Figure 5 was found to have an 11% savings in chlorine dioxide even at a very high brightness of 90.5 ISO, but eventually the ceiling is reached at 91.4 ISO at a total charge of 1.2% ClO₂ on OD pulp.
  • One of the major applications of the novel high/low pH bleaching process is in a three stage sequence (see Figure 6(a)). Current trends toward reducing operational and capital costs of pulp mills have led to the development of short sequence technologies in the pulp and paper industry. The major three-stage sequences are (CD) (EO)D and (CD) (EOP)D, and with high/low pH bleaching it is possible to decrease chlorine dioxide usage by as much as 29% in these processes.
  • Pulp Viscosity
  • Pulp viscosity measurements were made using TAPPI standard T 230 os-76. Earlier experimental work has indicated that chlorine dioxide at a pH of less than 5 reacts selectively with lignin, and at a pH greater than 7 chlorine dioxide reacts with the carbohydrate and lignin in the pulp vigorously, which in turn degrades the cellulose chain. As shown in Figure 7, pulp viscosity depends heavily on the pH of the reacting mixture. Pulp viscosity decreases slowly from pH 6 to 7, then falls rapidly at pH values higher than 7. The decrease in viscosity at the high pH for the two-step high/low pH bleaching process is not significant because of the low reaction time in the high pH step. From viscosity and brightness data obtained, a pH of 6-7.5 and a pH of 3.8 is optimal for the high pH and low pH, respectively, in the two-step high/low pH bleaching process.
  • Table 2 below gives an example of pulp qualities measured from a bleach run performed on a pulp of (CD)E kappa = 4.4 and viscosity 25 cp. An average viscosity drop of 0.6 centipoise was detected for the two-step high/low pH bleaching process as compared to conventional bleaching results. Other bleach runs performed showed a similar effect. TABLE 2
    CONVENTIONAL BLEACHING
    Charge End pH CED Bright ISO (CD)EDED Bright ISO Viscosity CP
    0.4% 3.6 60.2 86.0 24.8
    0.6% 3.4 70.5 89.2 24.7
    0.8% 3.4 78.3 90.4 24.7
    1.0% 3.5 84.6 91.4 24.5
    HIGH/LOW pH BLEACHING
    Charge High pH Low pH CED Bright ISO (CD)EDED Bright ISO Viscosity CP
    0.4% 7.2 3.8 67.5 87.6 24.5
    0.6% 7.1 3.7 78.5 89.9 24.1
    0.8% 6.7 3.2 82.2 90.9 24.0
    1.0% 7.0 3.0 84.5 91.4 24.1
  • Total Organic Chlorine (TOCl) or (AOX)
  • TOCl (AOX) measurements in applicant's tests were made on both the D₁ and E₂ for one data set. The values were added together and are shown in Figure 8 of the drawings. Surprisingly, conventional bleaching TOCl values were parabolic versus an increasing ClO₂ charge while TOCl values with the high/low pH bleaching method varied only slightly. A greater decrease in TOCl from bleaching with the two-step high/low pH bleaching process can be realized by substituting the chlorine dioxide saved in the D₁ stage back into the chlorination stage (CD) of the multi-stage bleach sequence. This would result in a decrease in TOCl (AOX) in effluents from the bleach plant.
  • Chlorate
  • Chlorate (ClO3-) is a well known herbicide, and discharge of chlorate from paper mills has been gaining more attention from environmentalists now that possible detrimental effects on various microalgaes have been observed. Thus, improving the efficiency of chlorine dioxide bleaching by lowering chlorate production may have a favorable impact on both economic and environmental issues. Conversion of chlorine dioxide to chlorate can be lowered by the two-stage high/low pH bleaching method for most chemical charges on pulp. At very high chemical charges (or lower lignin concentrations), chlorate formation is independent of whether the new or conventional bleaching method is used, because a brightness ceiling is reached.
  • Thus, it is important to determine if the chlorine dioxide saved using the two-step high/low pH bleaching process is due to a subsequent decrease in the formation of chlorate. The two possible pathways of forming chlorate are set forth in Equations 1 and 2 below: Equation 1   2ClO₂ + 2OH⁻ ----> ClO 3 - + ClO 2 - + H₂O
    Figure imgb0002
    Equation 2   2HClO₂ ----> H⁺ + HClO + ClO 3 -
    Figure imgb0003
  • Equation 1 is not a very prominent reaction in bleaching carried out at pH 7 since only a small concentration of hydroxyl ions are present. Under typical bleaching conditions, the pH starts around 5 and drops to less than 4 by the end of the bleaching process. At pH 5, less than 1% hydroxyl ions would be present for reaction, and at pH 4 only 0.1% exist. Supporting evidence for this observation is shown in Figure 9 of the drawings. The trend indicated shows that as the pH is increased up to 9, the formation of chlorate decreases.
  • The major pathway for chlorate formation is Equation 2 above. In principle, chlorous acid reacts with itself to form chlorate and hypochlorous acid. This is a biomolecular reaction which is considered to be slow at low concentrations. Chlorous acid, as stated above, is very reactive toward lignin. Chlorous acid oxidizes lignin and is reduced to hypochlorous acid according to Equation 3: Equation 3   HClO₂ + LIGNIN ---> HClO + OXIDIZED LIGNIN
    Figure imgb0004
  • During chlorine dioxide bleaching, a competitive pathway is present for consumption of chlorous acid. A high chemical charge would increase the rate of reaction of Equation 2, and a high lignin concentration would increase the rate of reaction of Equation 3. Figure 10 shows a plot of D₁ charge of chlorine dioxide versus % chlorine dioxide converted to chlorate for conventional chlorine dioxide bleaching. As the lignin concentration is increased (low chemical charge or higher kappa number) less chlorate is formed. Likewise if a high concentration of chemical is present (low kappa number), the higher the formation of chlorate. The same trend also holds true for the two-step high/low pH bleaching process as can be seen in Figure 11. From Figures 10 and 11, it is evident that the two-step high/low pH bleaching process significantly lowers chlorate formation at most chemical charges. However, little difference is seen at high charges where the brightness ceiling is reached.
  • Corresponding chlorate measurements for the brightness shown in Figure 5 are plotted on Figure 12. Again, as the charge is increased, the formation of chlorate rises. In order to determine the chlorine dioxide savings in terms of chlorate reduction, the chlorate measurements are expressed as available chlorine. At a brightness of 78.3 ISO, the high/low pH bleaching process and conventional bleaching required 0.6% and 0.8% ClO₂ on pulp, respectively. These charges correspond to 1753 parts per million (ppm) and 2338 ppm, respectively, as available chlorine. The difference provides a savings of 585 ppm available chlorine. Chlorate measurements were found to be 351 ppm and 423.3 ppm as available chlorine for the high/low pH bleaching process and normal bleaching, respectively, at a charge of 0.6% on pulp for a 17% reduction. Subtraction yields a savings of 72.3 ppm available chlorine, which corresponds to only 17% of the total savings realized of 423.3 ppm. Figure 13 of the drawings demonstrates this effect by replotting Figure 6 with the calculated savings due to chlorate reduction. It is apparent that a decrease of chlorate is not sufficient to explain the total ClO₂ savings. A change in lignin structure and/or greater solubilization of the lignin may be possible explanations for the total savings in the ClO₂ observed in the tests.
  • A larger reduction in chlorate is realized at a comparable D₁ brightness. As shown in Figure 14, it is possible to reduce chlorate by as much as 45% (at 78.3 ISO) using the two-step high/low pH bleaching process as compared to a conventional ClO₂ bleaching stage. Chlorate formation in the D₂ stage is identical for either bleaching process since they are carried out identically.
  • Process Apparatus
  • The two-step high/low pH bleaching process can be implemented in both a new plant or an existing pulp bleaching plant. The optimum design schematic is shown in Figure 15, where ClO₂ and caustic are added to the first mixer. The pulp flows into a J or U tube (Figure 15A) or upflow tower (Figure 15B) with a retention time of approximately 5-40 minutes. A second mixer is provided to mix the acid for pH adjustment of the wood pulp. The pulp can then be discharged directly to a downflow tower. The retention time in the downflow tower is 2 or more hours and most suitably between about 2.5-3.9 hours. In an existing bleach plant the simplest method for implementing the two-step high/low pH bleaching process technology would be to install a mixer on the discharge from the upflow leg of the tower to the downflow leg of the tower.
  • Typical chemical charges for conventional bleaching process and high/low pH bleaching process stages are listed in Table 3 below. The chlorine dioxide savings is 4 lb/ton, while the caustic and the acid charge increase by 3 lb/ton and 3.6 lb/ton, respectively. TABLE 3
    Conventional Bleaching High/Low pH Bleaching
    Chlorination
    % Chlorine 4.10 4.10
    % ClO₂ .46 .46
    Extraction
    % Caustic 3.4 3.4
    CE kappa 4.4 4.4
    Chlorine Dioxide
    % ClO₂ 0.8 0.6
    % NaOH 0.55 0.7
    % H₂SO₄ 0.18
    Brightness (ISO) 78.3 78.5
  • The following conclusions can be drawn about the novel 2-step high/low pH bleaching process described herein from the bleaching of mill southern pine kraft pulps:
    • 1. The high/low pH bleaching process reduces chlorine dioxide usage by as much as 24% in the D₁ stage;
    • 2. The formation of chlorinated organic material characterized by TOCl can be decreased by the use of the high/low pH bleaching process if the ClO₂ saved is substituted into the CD stage;
    • 3. The formation of chlorate is decreased by as much as 45% in the D₁ stage using the high/low pH bleaching process at a target D₁ brightness;
    • 4. The high/low pH bleaching process can be easily implemented in either a new mill or an existing mill; and
    • 5. The formation of chlorate at acidic bleaching conditions is due to the biomolecular reaction of chlorous acid with itself. Formation of chlorate can be reduced by lower bleach chemical charges or higher kappa number pulps.
  • It will be understood that various details of the invention may be changed without departing from the scope of the invention. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation--the invention being defined by the claims.

Claims (17)

  1. A bleaching process for bleaching wood pulp in the D₁ or D₂ bleaching stage in an aqueous suspension using chlorine dioxide and providing high brightness and a high brightness ceiling, characterised by the steps of:
    subjecting said aqueous wood pulp suspension to a first bleaching step during the D₁ or D₂ bleaching stage by mixing it with chlorine dioxide and/or alkali for about 5-40 minutes so that the pH at the end of said first bleaching step is between about 6.0-10.0;
    decreasing the pH of the mixture after said first bleaching step; and
    subjecting said mixture to a second bleaching step during the D₁ and/or D₂ bleaching stage for about 2 or more hours so that the pH at the end of the second step is between about 1.9-4.2.
  2. A bleaching process according to claim 1 wherein, in the said first bleaching step, the wood pulp suspension is mixed with alkali and 10% to 50% of the total chlorine dioxide charge, the remaining chlorine dioxide charge being added for the second bleaching step.
  3. A bleaching process according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said alkali comprises sodium hydroxide.
  4. A bleaching process according to any preceding claim, wherein the end pH of the mixture during said first bleaching step is between about 6.0-7.5.
  5. A bleaching process according to any preceding claim, wherein the temperature during said first bleaching step is between about 50-85°C.
  6. A bleaching process according to claim 5, wherein the temperature during said first bleaching step is about 70°C.
  7. A bleaching process according to any preceding claim, wherein the end pH of the mixture during said second bleaching step is about 3.8.
  8. A bleaching process according to any preceding claim, wherein the temperature during said second bleaching step is about 55-85°C.
  9. A bleaching process according to claim 8, wherein the temperature during said second bleaching step is about 70°C.
  10. A bleaching process according to any preceding claim, wherein the final consistency of the mixture after said second bleaching step is between about 3-12%.
  11. A bleaching process according to claim 10, wherein the final consistency of the mixture after said second bleaching step is about 10%.
  12. A bleaching process according to any preceding claim, wherein the duration of the second bleaching step is about 2.5 to 3.9 hours.
  13. A bleaching process according to any preceding claim, wherein the pH is decreased with an acid.
  14. A bleaching process according to claim 13, wherein said acid is selected from the group consisting of sulphuric acid and hydrochloric acid.
  15. A bleaching process according to any preceding claim, where said bleaching process is used in a three stage sequence process.
  16. A bleaching process according to claim 15, wherein said bleaching process is used in the first chlorine dioxide bleaching stage in a five stage sequence process.
  17. A bleaching process according to claim 16, wherein the five stage sequence process is a (CD)(EO)D₁E₂D₂ process and the first bleaching stage is followed by conventional extraction and bleaching stages.
EP90915570A 1989-10-19 1990-10-17 High efficiency chlorine dioxide pulp bleaching process Revoked EP0496782B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US42434789A 1989-10-19 1989-10-19
US424347 1989-10-19
PCT/US1990/005825 WO1991005909A1 (en) 1989-10-19 1990-10-17 High efficiency chlorine dioxide pulp bleaching process

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0496782A1 EP0496782A1 (en) 1992-08-05
EP0496782A4 EP0496782A4 (en) 1993-02-03
EP0496782B1 true EP0496782B1 (en) 1996-03-20

Family

ID=23682296

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP90915570A Revoked EP0496782B1 (en) 1989-10-19 1990-10-17 High efficiency chlorine dioxide pulp bleaching process

Country Status (12)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0496782B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1052157A (en)
AR (1) AR243945A1 (en)
AU (1) AU6537690A (en)
CA (1) CA2069322A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69026105T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2085358T3 (en)
MX (1) MX172853B (en)
NZ (1) NZ235754A (en)
PL (1) PL164745B1 (en)
WO (1) WO1991005909A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA908341B (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5268075A (en) * 1989-10-19 1993-12-07 North Carolina State University High efficiency two-step, high-low pH chlorine dioxide pulp bleaching process
BR9901291B1 (en) * 1999-04-27 2011-11-01 process for bleaching low consistency chemical pulps.
SE524896C2 (en) * 2003-03-07 2004-10-19 Kvaerner Pulping Tech Bleaching of cellulose pulp with chlorine dioxide in two phases with heating between the phases
BRPI0520253B1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2016-09-06 Novozymes As methods for delignifying and / or bleaching a pulp, and for treating tailings and / or sludge water
FI122626B (en) * 2006-03-31 2012-04-30 Laennen Tutkimus Western Res Inc Oy Chemical pulp bleaching process
CN103469663B (en) * 2013-08-13 2016-05-04 广西大学 A kind of by response surface method optimization paper pulp ClO 2 bleaching method
FR3062138B1 (en) * 2017-01-23 2019-06-07 Centre Technique De L'industrie Des Papiers, Cartons Et Celluloses PROCESS FOR WHITENING A PAPER PULP
CN111979818A (en) * 2020-08-07 2020-11-24 齐鲁工业大学 Sulfate wood pulp short-procedure ECF bleaching process X/Z/D-EOP-D or X/D/Z-EOP-D

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA1004805A (en) * 1973-10-18 1977-02-08 Louis O. Torregrossa Non-neutral bleaching of pulp
CA1239253A (en) * 1983-05-20 1988-07-19 Louis O. Torregrossa Method of chlorine dioxide bleaching

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3433702A (en) * 1965-06-28 1969-03-18 Hooker Chemical Corp Woodpulp bleaching process
FR2432574A1 (en) * 1978-08-01 1980-02-29 Europeen Cellulose PROCESS FOR BLEACHING PAPER PULP
SE8106334L (en) * 1981-10-27 1983-04-28 Sunds Defibrator SETTLE TO TREAT CELLULOSIC MATERIAL

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA1004805A (en) * 1973-10-18 1977-02-08 Louis O. Torregrossa Non-neutral bleaching of pulp
CA1239253A (en) * 1983-05-20 1988-07-19 Louis O. Torregrossa Method of chlorine dioxide bleaching

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
A. Wong, Effect of Tetrahydroanthraquinone (THAQ) on the Neutral Sulphite Pulping of Seed Flax Fibres, Journal of Pulp and Paper Science: Vol. 13 No. 1, Jan 1987. A. Teder and Lisa Tormund, Carbohydrate degradation in chlorine dioxide bleaching, Tappi, Vol. 61, No 12, Dec 1978 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69026105T2 (en) 1996-09-26
CN1052157A (en) 1991-06-12
WO1991005909A1 (en) 1991-05-02
PL287415A1 (en) 1991-09-23
MX172853B (en) 1994-01-17
NZ235754A (en) 1993-03-26
AR243945A1 (en) 1993-09-30
DE69026105D1 (en) 1996-04-25
EP0496782A4 (en) 1993-02-03
PL164745B1 (en) 1994-10-31
CA2069322A1 (en) 1991-04-20
ES2085358T3 (en) 1996-06-01
ZA908341B (en) 1991-08-28
EP0496782A1 (en) 1992-08-05
AU6537690A (en) 1991-05-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1190360A (en) Catalyzed alkaline peroxide delignification
EP0512590B1 (en) Process for bleaching of lignocellulose-containing material
EP0511695B1 (en) Process for bleaching of lignocellulose-containing pulp
EP0670928B1 (en) Process for delignification of lignocellulose-containing pulp
CA1150011A (en) Method at bleaching ligno-cellulose containing material
EP0402335A2 (en) Process for bleaching lignocellulose-containing pulps
CA2040871C (en) Process for bleaching of lignocellulose-containing material
EP2022887A1 (en) Process for producing bleached pulp
EP2224055B1 (en) Process for production of bleached pulp
EP0496782B1 (en) High efficiency chlorine dioxide pulp bleaching process
FI105213B (en) Method for production of bleached pulp from lignocellulose material
EP0587270B1 (en) Method of bleaching paper pulp
EP0576541B1 (en) High efficiency chlorine dioxide pulp bleaching process
US3020197A (en) Method for production of high brightness high strength wood pulps
EP0622491A2 (en) Method for bleaching lignocellulose-containing pulp
CA2074715C (en) Process for bleaching of ligno-cellulosic material
EP0464110B1 (en) Bleaching process for the production of high bright pulps
US11384480B2 (en) Method for bleaching paper pulp
WO1991005910A1 (en) Chlorine dioxide pulp bleaching process using sequential chlorine addition
CA2236004A1 (en) Hot water extraction for pulp bleaching sequences
US5792316A (en) Bleaching process for kraft pulp employing high consistency chlorinated pulp treated with gaseous chlorine and ozone
CN1072746A (en) A kind of method of efficient bleached pulp
EP1180172B1 (en) Process for bleaching chemical pulps with low organic halogen compounds content
Brelid et al. TCF bleaching of softwood kraft pulp: Part 1. Ion exchange of softwood kraft pulp with calcium and magnesium prior to hydrogen peroxide bleaching

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19920512

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched
AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19930430

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: JAMEEL, HASAN

Inventor name: SEGER, GEOFFREY, EUGENE C/O PROCTOR & GAMBLE

Inventor name: CHANG, HOU-MIN

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69026105

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19960425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2085358

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
ET Fr: translation filed
PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: EKA CHEMICALS AB

Effective date: 19961213

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19981012

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19981015

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 19981016

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19981029

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19981030

Year of fee payment: 9

PLAW Interlocutory decision in opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP

PLAW Interlocutory decision in opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP

RDAH Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REVO

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 19991126

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Free format text: 991126