EP0488473B1 - Heavy oil conversion process - Google Patents

Heavy oil conversion process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0488473B1
EP0488473B1 EP91203091A EP91203091A EP0488473B1 EP 0488473 B1 EP0488473 B1 EP 0488473B1 EP 91203091 A EP91203091 A EP 91203091A EP 91203091 A EP91203091 A EP 91203091A EP 0488473 B1 EP0488473 B1 EP 0488473B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
reactor
coke
temperature
process according
solid particles
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP91203091A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0488473A1 (en
Inventor
Diederik Visser
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Original Assignee
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV filed Critical Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV
Publication of EP0488473A1 publication Critical patent/EP0488473A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0488473B1 publication Critical patent/EP0488473B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G47/00Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions
    • C10G47/22Non-catalytic cracking in the presence of hydrogen
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G47/00Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions
    • C10G47/24Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions with moving solid particles
    • C10G47/30Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions with moving solid particles according to the "fluidised-bed" technique

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for the conversion of a heavy hydrocarbon oil by contacting the hydrocarbon oil with solid particles in the presence of hydrogen at elevated temperature and moderate pressure.
  • Thermal cracking of residual material is usually performed at a relatively low or moderate pressure (usually 5 to 30 bar) and at a relatively high temperature (420-520 °C) without the use of a catalyst and in the absence of hydrogen.
  • the middle distillates obtained from thermal cracking of high boiling residues are of good quality as far as the ignition properties are concerned.
  • An intrinsic problem of thermal cracking is the occurrence of condensation reactions which lead to the formation of polyaromatics and at high severity can lead to coke in the cracked residue.
  • Hydrocracking is usually performed at a relatively high hydrogen partial pressure (usually 100-140 bar) and a relatively low temperature (usually 300 to 400 °C).
  • the catalyst used in this reaction has several functions: acid catalyzed cracking of the hydrocarbon molecules and activation of hydrogen and hydrogenation. A long reaction time is used (usually 0.3 to 2 l/l/h liquid hourly space velocity). Due to the high hydrogen pressure only small amounts of coke are deposited on the catalyst which makes it possible to use the catalyst for 0.5 to 2 years in a fixed bed operation without regeneration.
  • the product slates obtained in this process are dependent on the mode of operation. In one mode of operation, predominantly naphtha and lighter products are obtained.
  • the naphtha fraction contains paraffins with a high iso/normal ratio, making it a valuable gasoline blending component.
  • kerosene and gas oil are mainly obtained.
  • the quality of these products is rather moderate, due to the presence of remaining aromatics together with an undesired high iso/normal ratio of the paraffins among others.
  • an object of the present invention is to provide a non-catalytic process wherein the production of liquid hydrocarbons together with substantial amounts of coke can be controlled and optimized. Furthermore, it is highly advantageous when part or all of the coke produced can be used in the production of energy or hydrogen containing streams for further use in e.g. refineries.
  • a process has now been found which is especially suitable for the conversion of heavy hydrocarbon oils with the help of non-catalytic solid particles in the presence of hydrogen and at elevated temperature and moderate pressure.
  • the solid particles and hydrogen-containing gas must be of such a temperature when in contact with the hydrocarbon oil that at least part of the hydrogen is thermally dissociated. In this way hydrogenation of hydrocarbons takes place and condensation reactions resulting in the formation of aromatic components are suppressed.
  • this process combines the favourable aspects of carbon rejection and hydrogen addition in one process step.
  • the present invention relates to a process for the conversion of a heavy hydrocarbon oil, which process comprises:
  • EP-A-0 400 743 discloses catalytic and non-catalytic processes for the conversion of heavy hydrocarbon oils at the same hydrogen partial pressures and reactor temperatures.
  • a further process is the Fluidized Thermal Cracking (FTC) process which is, for instance, described in US patent specification 4,668,378.
  • the process is carried out in a fluidized system in which residual feedstock is contacted with fine porous catalytically inactive particles, which particles are fluidized by steam or a hydrogen-containing gas at a rather low (hydrogen) partial pressure.
  • the conversion in the present process leading to molecular weight reduction is essentially determined by the hydrogen dissociating role of the solid particles of high temperature and the hydrogen partial pressure of between 10 and 80 bar.
  • the coke make calculated on Conradson Carbon Content of the feedstock, varies between 0.5 and 1.4 weight/weight, respectively.
  • the dissociated hydrogen apparently participates in the radical reaction mechanisms and contributes to the saturation of the larger hydrocarbyl radicals resulting in less condensed aromatic structures and finally a lower coke make.
  • the middle distillates obtained in the present process are of good quality due to the high amount of n-paraffins and the low amount of olefins although they may contain a certain amount of aromatic compounds.
  • the hydrogen consumption of the process is relatively low compared to pure hydrogen-addition processes, as the aromatic components are not substantially hydrogenated.
  • a large part of the metals and nitrogen components present in the feed is deposited on the solid particles leaving a high quality distillate with a low metal(s) and nitrogen content which makes the distillate very suitable for product blending or as a feedstock for further upgrading in, for instance, catalytic cracking or hydrocracking units.
  • the present process has the important advantage that a considerable hydrogenation takes place in the presence of the dissociated hydrogen at relatively elevated hydrogen partial pressure. This results in a higher middle distillate yield of a higher quality and a lower and controllable coke production on feed.
  • the process of the present invention is relatively insensitive to feedstock impurities, as there are no catalytic sites needed.
  • a feedstock which can suitably be applied in the present process is a heavy hydrocarbon oil comprising at least 35 %wt of material boiling above 520 °C, and usually more than 15 %wt of material boiling above 620 °C.
  • Vacuum distillates, catalytically cracked cycle oils and slurry oils, deasphalted oils, atmospheric and vacuum residues, thermally cracked residues, asphalts originating from various kinds of deasphalting processes, synthetic residues and hydrocarbon oils originating from tar sands and shale oils of any source can suitably be converted as such or in mixtures in the process according to the present invention.
  • hydrocarbon oils which comprise at least 50 %wt of material boiling above 520 °C, in particular to hydrocarbon oils comprising at least 90 %wt of material boiling above 520 °C.
  • Feedstocks comprising at least 3 %wt of asphaltenic constituents, in particular at least 10 %wt, can suitably be processed.
  • asphaltenic constituents mentioned hereinbefore “C7-asphaltenes” are meant, i.e. the asphaltenic fraction removed from the oil fraction by precipitation with heptane.
  • the solid particles to be applied in the present process can comprise any non-catalytic solid material which can withstand the high temperatures applied, e.g. coke, alumina, silica and zirconia.
  • the particles substantially consist of coke.
  • the process is initially carried out with the help of ex-situ coke particles on which in-situ coke deposits during the reaction, which in-situ coke is thereafter (partly) removed.
  • the particles may be ground and sieved in order to obtain particles of a preferred diameter.
  • the non-catalytic solid particles are contacted with the hydrogen-containing gas and the heavy hydrocarbon oil, the particles should have a temperature of at least 600 °C, in order to dissociate the hydrogen present.
  • the particles have a temperature of at least 650 °C.
  • the process according to the present invention is suitably carried out at a hydrogen partial pressure of between 10 and 80 bar, preferably between 12 and 50 bar, and a temperature of between 450 and 850 °C and at a substantially uniform bulk temperature within the reactor.
  • a difference in bulk temperature of not more than 100 °C can be measured within the reactor, more specifically not more than 50 °C.
  • the process according to the present invention can suitably be carried out in various types of moving bed reactors: a fluidized bed reactor and a riser reactor.
  • Each type of moving bed reactor has its specifically preferred reaction conditions.
  • a suitable temperature is between 450 and 650 °C, preferably between 470 and 600 °C.
  • the hydrogen partial pressure is then suitably chosen between 10 and 80 bar, preferably between 12 and 50 bar, more preferably between 15 and 40 bar.
  • the non-catalytic solid particles/oil ratio can suitably be chosen between 1-20 weight/weight, preferably between 2-12 weight/weight, more preferably between 2-8 weight/weight.
  • the particles residence time in the fluidized bed reactor is chosen between 0.2 and 10 minutes, preferably between 0.4 and 5 minutes.
  • a hydrogen containing gaseous stream is supplied to the fluidized bed reactor to provide the hydrogen required for the desired reactions and to maintain a good fluidization, this is suitably achieved at a superficial gas velocity between 0.01 and 3.50 m/s.
  • the temperature is suitably between 450 and 850 °C, preferably between 500 and 750 °C.
  • the hydrogen partial pressure is suitably chosen between 10 and 80 bar, preferably between 12 and 50 bar, most preferably between 15 and 40 bar.
  • the non-catalytic solid particles/oil ratio is suitably chosen between 1-20 weight/weight, preferably between 2 and 12 weight/weight, most preferably between 2 and 8 weight/weight.
  • the particles residence time in the riser reactor is below 2 minutes, preferably between 0.1 and 10.0 seconds.
  • the hydrogen containing gaseous stream is suitably supplied to the riser reactor at a superficial gas velocity of between 0.6 and 3.5 m/s to provide the hydrogen required for the desired process reactions and to maintain a good fluidization and aeration.
  • the hydrogen-containing gas applied in the present process suitably comprises molecular hydrogen.
  • Hydrogen containing refinery streams can be applied. They may also contain lower hydrocarbons, steam and/or mixtures thereof.
  • Removal of coke from the coked non-catalytic solid particles can suitably be carried out by burning off or gasifying coke.
  • the synthesis gas obtained in the gasification of the coke can suitably be used as a refinery fuel gas or as a hydrogen source for hydro-processes in the refinery, or as a feedstock for hydrocarbon synthesis processes.
  • the removal step can suitably be carried out by supplying the heat required for gasification via hot particles which preferably have a larger diameter and a higher density than the solid particles from which coke is to be removed.
  • the use of relatively large particles e.g. 3-20 times the diameter of the solid particles from which coke is to be removed) allows easy separation by fluidization and/or centrifugation in a cyclone.
  • the hot particles which provide the external heat for the removal step are suitably brought to the desired temperature by heating in a combustive atmosphere (e.g. in an air/fuel gas system).
  • coked particles are preferably replaced by fresh solid particles.
  • at least 90 % of the coked solid particles being withdrawn from the reactor is replaced by particles from which coke has been removed.
  • the feedstock and the liquid product were analyzed for the boiling point distribution using a TBP-GLC (true boiling point measured by gas liquid chromatography) method. On basis thereof conversions and product yields were calculated.
  • the 520 °C+ conversion has been defined as the amount of 520 °C+ material present in the feedstock minus the amount of 520 °C+ material present in the total liquid product, divided by the amount of 520 °C+ material present in the feedstock.
  • the product slate was split up into gas (C1-C4), the total liquid product (C5+) and the coke deposited on the catalyst. The respective fractions have been calculated as the amount of product in question, divided by the total amount of products.
  • the following experiments were carried out:
  • the Arabian light vacuum residue was contacted with coke particles having a temperature of 650 °C.
  • the reaction was carried out at a temperature of 500 °C, a hydrogen partial pressure of 25 bar and at substantially uniform bulk temperature.
  • the product obtained is described in Table 2.
  • the Arabian light vacuum residue was contacted with coke particles having a temperature of 650 °C.
  • the reaction was carried out at a temperature of 500 °C, a hydrogen partial pressure of 50 bar and at substantially uniform bulk temperature.
  • the product obtained is described in Table 2.
  • the Maya vacuum residue was contacted with coke particles having a temperature of 700 °C.
  • the reaction was carried out at a temperature of 540 °C, a hydrogen partial pressure of 25 bar and at substantially uniform bulk temperature.
  • the product obtained is described in Table 2.
  • the Maya vacuum residue was contacted with coke particles having a temperature of 700 °C.
  • the reaction was carried out at a temperature of 540 °C, a hydrogen partial pressure of 50 bar and at substantially uniform bulk temperature.
  • the product obtained is described in Table 2.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Hydrogen, Water And Hydrids (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to a process for the conversion of a heavy hydrocarbon oil by contacting the hydrocarbon oil with solid particles in the presence of hydrogen at elevated temperature and moderate pressure.
  • Various processes have been developed in order to convert heavy hydrocarbons into valuable light fractions. These processes can be roughly divided into carbon rejecting type of processes, e.g. thermal cracking, and hydrogen addition type of processes, e.g. hydrocracking.
  • Thermal cracking of residual material is usually performed at a relatively low or moderate pressure (usually 5 to 30 bar) and at a relatively high temperature (420-520 °C) without the use of a catalyst and in the absence of hydrogen. The middle distillates obtained from thermal cracking of high boiling residues are of good quality as far as the ignition properties are concerned. The high content of olefins and heteroatoms (especially sulphur and nitrogen), however, make a hydrofinishing treatment necessary for many applications. An intrinsic problem of thermal cracking is the occurrence of condensation reactions which lead to the formation of polyaromatics and at high severity can lead to coke in the cracked residue.
  • Hydrocracking is usually performed at a relatively high hydrogen partial pressure (usually 100-140 bar) and a relatively low temperature (usually 300 to 400 °C). The catalyst used in this reaction has several functions: acid catalyzed cracking of the hydrocarbon molecules and activation of hydrogen and hydrogenation. A long reaction time is used (usually 0.3 to 2 l/l/h liquid hourly space velocity). Due to the high hydrogen pressure only small amounts of coke are deposited on the catalyst which makes it possible to use the catalyst for 0.5 to 2 years in a fixed bed operation without regeneration. The product slates obtained in this process are dependent on the mode of operation. In one mode of operation, predominantly naphtha and lighter products are obtained. The naphtha fraction contains paraffins with a high iso/normal ratio, making it a valuable gasoline blending component. In a mode for heavier products, kerosene and gas oil are mainly obtained. In spite of the extensive hydrogenation, the quality of these products is rather moderate, due to the presence of remaining aromatics together with an undesired high iso/normal ratio of the paraffins among others.
  • At the present there is much interest in processes combining carbon rejection with hydrogen addition. Conceptually, these processes combine the benefits of carbon rejection and hydrogen addition, both contributing to the desired hydrogen/carbon ratio of the valuable distillate products. Such processes could be very attractive because of controlled production of coke and simultaneous upgrading of the distillates obtained.
  • Further, in general it is advantageous when a process can be operated in the absence of a catalyst as catalysts tend to become deactivated in heavy hydrocarbon conversion processes, due to the presence of asphaltenes and metals therein. Deactivated catalyst must then be regenerated, involving metal removal and catalyst rejuvenation, which leads to higher operating costs.
  • Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a non-catalytic process wherein the production of liquid hydrocarbons together with substantial amounts of coke can be controlled and optimized. Furthermore, it is highly advantageous when part or all of the coke produced can be used in the production of energy or hydrogen containing streams for further use in e.g. refineries.
  • A process has now been found which is especially suitable for the conversion of heavy hydrocarbon oils with the help of non-catalytic solid particles in the presence of hydrogen and at elevated temperature and moderate pressure. The solid particles and hydrogen-containing gas must be of such a temperature when in contact with the hydrocarbon oil that at least part of the hydrogen is thermally dissociated. In this way hydrogenation of hydrocarbons takes place and condensation reactions resulting in the formation of aromatic components are suppressed. Thus, this process combines the favourable aspects of carbon rejection and hydrogen addition in one process step.
  • The present invention relates to a process for the conversion of a heavy hydrocarbon oil, which process comprises:
    • (i) contacting non-catalytic solid particles of a temperature of at least 600 °C with a hydrogen-containing gas and a heavy hydrocarbon oil in a reactor which is operated at a hydrogen partial pressure of between 10 and 80 bar and a temperature of between 450 and 850 °C, whereby the coke make calculated on Conradson Carbon content of the feedstock is between 0.5 and 1.4 weight/weight and in which reactor the bulk temperature is substantially uniform,
    • (ii) withdrawing coked solid particles from the reactor and removing coke from said particles, and
    • (iii) recycling particles from which coke has been removed in step (ii), to the reactor.
  • The earlier application EP-A-0 400 743 discloses catalytic and non-catalytic processes for the conversion of heavy hydrocarbon oils at the same hydrogen partial pressures and reactor temperatures.
  • In British patent specification 1,460,615 a process is described for cracking heavy hydrocarbons in a reactor, in which feed is introduced together with granular solid in an upper zone, which is maintained at a temperature of not higher than 550 °C, and preheated hydrogen-containing gas is introduced in a lower zone. Gaseous components are withdrawn from the top of the reactor. In this way an upper zone is created in which heavy hydrocarbons are converted under non-hydrogenating conditions and a lower zone in which hydrogen addition takes place of heavy material. The required temperature differences within the reactor will present large difficulties, both because of the operating conditions which need to be such that separate reaction zones are maintained and because of the reactor which has to be made such that it can stand such differences in process temperature.
  • Another non-catalytic process is the so-called Dynacracking Process, described for example in Hydrocarbon Processing, May 1981 pp. 86-92, which is in essence a thermal hydroconversion process carried out in a moving particles system. The feed is thermally converted in the presence of hydrogen in the upper part of the system in the presence of synthesis gas producing substantial amounts of coke which are deposited on inert carrier material. In the lower part of the system coke on the inert material is gasified to synthesis gas with steam and oxygen. The problems to be faced in designing and operating such reactor would seem to be quite formidable.
  • A further process is the Fluidized Thermal Cracking (FTC) process which is, for instance, described in US patent specification 4,668,378. The process is carried out in a fluidized system in which residual feedstock is contacted with fine porous catalytically inactive particles, which particles are fluidized by steam or a hydrogen-containing gas at a rather low (hydrogen) partial pressure.
  • The conversion in the present process leading to molecular weight reduction is essentially determined by the hydrogen dissociating role of the solid particles of high temperature and the hydrogen partial pressure of between 10 and 80 bar. The coke make, calculated on Conradson Carbon Content of the feedstock, varies between 0.5 and 1.4 weight/weight, respectively. The dissociated hydrogen apparently participates in the radical reaction mechanisms and contributes to the saturation of the larger hydrocarbyl radicals resulting in less condensed aromatic structures and finally a lower coke make.
  • The middle distillates obtained in the present process are of good quality due to the high amount of n-paraffins and the low amount of olefins although they may contain a certain amount of aromatic compounds. The hydrogen consumption of the process is relatively low compared to pure hydrogen-addition processes, as the aromatic components are not substantially hydrogenated. A large part of the metals and nitrogen components present in the feed is deposited on the solid particles leaving a high quality distillate with a low metal(s) and nitrogen content which makes the distillate very suitable for product blending or as a feedstock for further upgrading in, for instance, catalytic cracking or hydrocracking units.
  • When compared with a usual thermal cracking process a higher middle distillate yield is produced with a comparable product quality, assuming that the thermal cracking product is subjected to an additional hydrofinishing treatment.
  • When compared with the Dynacracking and FTC processes as described hereinbefore and the process described in British patent specification 1,460,615, the present process has the important advantage that a considerable hydrogenation takes place in the presence of the dissociated hydrogen at relatively elevated hydrogen partial pressure. This results in a higher middle distillate yield of a higher quality and a lower and controllable coke production on feed.
  • With regard to the usual hydrocracking process, the process of the present invention is relatively insensitive to feedstock impurities, as there are no catalytic sites needed.
  • A feedstock which can suitably be applied in the present process is a heavy hydrocarbon oil comprising at least 35 %wt of material boiling above 520 °C, and usually more than 15 %wt of material boiling above 620 °C. Vacuum distillates, catalytically cracked cycle oils and slurry oils, deasphalted oils, atmospheric and vacuum residues, thermally cracked residues, asphalts originating from various kinds of deasphalting processes, synthetic residues and hydrocarbon oils originating from tar sands and shale oils of any source can suitably be converted as such or in mixtures in the process according to the present invention. Preference is given to hydrocarbon oils which comprise at least 50 %wt of material boiling above 520 °C, in particular to hydrocarbon oils comprising at least 90 %wt of material boiling above 520 °C. Feedstocks comprising at least 3 %wt of asphaltenic constituents, in particular at least 10 %wt, can suitably be processed. With the asphaltenic constituents mentioned hereinbefore "C₇-asphaltenes" are meant, i.e. the asphaltenic fraction removed from the oil fraction by precipitation with heptane.
  • The solid particles to be applied in the present process can comprise any non-catalytic solid material which can withstand the high temperatures applied, e.g. coke, alumina, silica and zirconia. Preferably, the particles substantially consist of coke. Suitably, the process is initially carried out with the help of ex-situ coke particles on which in-situ coke deposits during the reaction, which in-situ coke is thereafter (partly) removed. Before recycling, the particles may be ground and sieved in order to obtain particles of a preferred diameter. When the non-catalytic solid particles are contacted with the hydrogen-containing gas and the heavy hydrocarbon oil, the particles should have a temperature of at least 600 °C, in order to dissociate the hydrogen present. Preferably, the particles have a temperature of at least 650 °C.
  • The process according to the present invention is suitably carried out at a hydrogen partial pressure of between 10 and 80 bar, preferably between 12 and 50 bar, and a temperature of between 450 and 850 °C and at a substantially uniform bulk temperature within the reactor. Suitably a difference in bulk temperature of not more than 100 °C can be measured within the reactor, more specifically not more than 50 °C.
  • It will be appreciated that a higher conversion will be obtained when the temperature is higher, as the rate of cracking of hydrocarbons will be higher at higher temperatures.
  • The process according to the present invention: can suitably be carried out in various types of moving bed reactors: a fluidized bed reactor and a riser reactor. Each type of moving bed reactor has its specifically preferred reaction conditions.
  • In case the process according to the present invention is carried out in a fluidized bed reactor, i.e. in which part or all of the feed is sprayed on the non-catalytic solid particles, a suitable temperature is between 450 and 650 °C, preferably between 470 and 600 °C. The hydrogen partial pressure is then suitably chosen between 10 and 80 bar, preferably between 12 and 50 bar, more preferably between 15 and 40 bar. The non-catalytic solid particles/oil ratio can suitably be chosen between 1-20 weight/weight, preferably between 2-12 weight/weight, more preferably between 2-8 weight/weight. Suitably the particles residence time in the fluidized bed reactor is chosen between 0.2 and 10 minutes, preferably between 0.4 and 5 minutes. A hydrogen containing gaseous stream is supplied to the fluidized bed reactor to provide the hydrogen required for the desired reactions and to maintain a good fluidization, this is suitably achieved at a superficial gas velocity between 0.01 and 3.50 m/s.
  • If the present process is carried out in a riser reactor, in which the liquid feed is sprayed onto the incoming hot non-catalytic solid particles, the temperature is suitably between 450 and 850 °C, preferably between 500 and 750 °C. The hydrogen partial pressure is suitably chosen between 10 and 80 bar, preferably between 12 and 50 bar, most preferably between 15 and 40 bar. The non-catalytic solid particles/oil ratio is suitably chosen between 1-20 weight/weight, preferably between 2 and 12 weight/weight, most preferably between 2 and 8 weight/weight. Suitably, the particles residence time in the riser reactor is below 2 minutes, preferably between 0.1 and 10.0 seconds. The hydrogen containing gaseous stream is suitably supplied to the riser reactor at a superficial gas velocity of between 0.6 and 3.5 m/s to provide the hydrogen required for the desired process reactions and to maintain a good fluidization and aeration.
  • The hydrogen-containing gas applied in the present process suitably comprises molecular hydrogen. Hydrogen containing refinery streams can be applied. They may also contain lower hydrocarbons, steam and/or mixtures thereof.
  • Removal of coke from the coked non-catalytic solid particles can suitably be carried out by burning off or gasifying coke. The synthesis gas obtained in the gasification of the coke can suitably be used as a refinery fuel gas or as a hydrogen source for hydro-processes in the refinery, or as a feedstock for hydrocarbon synthesis processes. If desired, the removal step can suitably be carried out by supplying the heat required for gasification via hot particles which preferably have a larger diameter and a higher density than the solid particles from which coke is to be removed. The use of relatively large particles (e.g. 3-20 times the diameter of the solid particles from which coke is to be removed) allows easy separation by fluidization and/or centrifugation in a cyclone. The hot particles which provide the external heat for the removal step are suitably brought to the desired temperature by heating in a combustive atmosphere (e.g. in an air/fuel gas system).
  • In order to prevent accumulation of contaminants, such as metals originally present in the heavy hydrocarbon oils, it is preferred to continuously remove a small amount of coked particles from the process of the present invention. Such coked particles are preferably replaced by fresh solid particles. Preferably, at least 90 % of the coked solid particles being withdrawn from the reactor is replaced by particles from which coke has been removed.
  • The present invention will now be illustrated by means of the following Example.
  • EXAMPLE
  • An Arabian light vacuum residue and a Maya vacuum residue, respectively, were used as feedstock to demonstrate the conversion process according to the present invention. The feed properties are described in Table 1.
  • Experiments were carried out using coke particles having a diameter between 0.01 and 5 mm.
  • The feedstock and the liquid product were analyzed for the boiling point distribution using a TBP-GLC (true boiling point measured by gas liquid chromatography) method. On basis thereof conversions and product yields were calculated. The 520 °C⁺ conversion has been defined as the amount of 520 °C⁺ material present in the feedstock minus the amount of 520 °C⁺ material present in the total liquid product, divided by the amount of 520 °C⁺ material present in the feedstock. The product slate was split up into gas (C₁-C₄), the total liquid product (C₅⁺) and the coke deposited on the catalyst. The respective fractions have been calculated as the amount of product in question, divided by the total amount of products. The following experiments were carried out:
  • Experiment 1
  • The Arabian light vacuum residue was contacted with coke particles having a temperature of 650 °C. The reaction was carried out at a temperature of 500 °C, a hydrogen partial pressure of 25 bar and at substantially uniform bulk temperature. The product obtained is described in Table 2.
  • Experiment 2
  • The Arabian light vacuum residue was contacted with coke particles having a temperature of 650 °C. The reaction was carried out at a temperature of 500 °C, a hydrogen partial pressure of 50 bar and at substantially uniform bulk temperature. The product obtained is described in Table 2.
  • Experiment 3
  • The Maya vacuum residue was contacted with coke particles having a temperature of 700 °C. The reaction was carried out at a temperature of 540 °C, a hydrogen partial pressure of 25 bar and at substantially uniform bulk temperature. The product obtained is described in Table 2.
  • Experiment 4
  • The Maya vacuum residue was contacted with coke particles having a temperature of 700 °C. The reaction was carried out at a temperature of 540 °C, a hydrogen partial pressure of 50 bar and at substantially uniform bulk temperature. The product obtained is described in Table 2.
    Figure imgb0001
    Figure imgb0002

Claims (11)

  1. Process for the conversion of a heavy hydrocarbon oil, which process comprises:
    (i) contacting non-catalytic solid particles of a temperature of at least 600 °C with a hydrogen-containing gas and a heavy hydrocarbon oil in a reactor which is operated at a hydrogen partial pressure of between 10 and 80 bar and a temperature of between 450 and 850 °C, whereby the coke make calculated on Conradson Carbon Content of the feedstock is between 0.5 and 1.4 weight/weight and in which reactor the bulk temperature is substantially uniform;
    (ii) withdrawing coked solid particles from the reactor and removing coke from said particles; and
    (iii) recycling particles from which coke has been removed in step (ii), to the reactor.
  2. Process according to claim 1, wherein the heavy hydrocarbon oil comprises at least 35 %wt of material boiling above 520 °C.
  3. Process according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the heavy hydrocarbon oil comprises at least 3 %wt of asphaltenic constituents, preferably at least 10 %wt.
  4. Process according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein a difference in bulk temperature of not more than 100 °C can be measured within the reactor, preferably not more than 50 °C.
  5. Process according to any one of claims 1-4, wherein the non-catalytic solid particles substantially consist of coke.
  6. Process according to any one of claims 1-5, wherein the solid particles have a temperature of at least 650 °C.
  7. Process according to any one of claims 1-6, wherein in the reactor the hydrogen partial pressure is between 12 and 50 bar.
  8. Process according to any one of claims 1-7, wherein coke is removed from the coked non-catalytic solid particles by burning off or gasifying coke.
  9. Process according to any one of claims 1-8, wherein at least 90 % of the coked solid particles being withdrawn from the reactor is replaced by particles from which coke has been removed.
  10. Process according to any one of claims 1-9, wherein the reaction is carried out in a fluidized bed reactor at a temperature of between 450 and 650 °C, and wherein the non-catalytic solid particles have a residence time of between 0.2 and 10 minutes.
  11. Process according to any one of claims 1-9, wherein the reaction is carried out in a riser reactor at a temperature of between 450 and 850 °C and wherein the non-catalytic solid particles have a residence time below 2 minutes.
EP91203091A 1990-11-28 1991-11-26 Heavy oil conversion process Expired - Lifetime EP0488473B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB909025818A GB9025818D0 (en) 1990-11-28 1990-11-28 Heavy oil conversion process
GB9025818 1990-11-28

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0488473A1 EP0488473A1 (en) 1992-06-03
EP0488473B1 true EP0488473B1 (en) 1994-07-06

Family

ID=10686086

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP91203091A Expired - Lifetime EP0488473B1 (en) 1990-11-28 1991-11-26 Heavy oil conversion process

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0488473B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH04292688A (en)
CA (1) CA2056256A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69102758T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2057742T3 (en)
GB (1) GB9025818D0 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7744753B2 (en) 2007-05-22 2010-06-29 Uop Llc Coking apparatus and process for oil-containing solids

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0400743A1 (en) * 1989-06-02 1990-12-05 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Heavy oil conversion process

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3622111A1 (en) * 1986-07-02 1988-01-07 Union Rheinische Braunkohlen Method for processing heavy oils

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0400743A1 (en) * 1989-06-02 1990-12-05 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Heavy oil conversion process

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7744753B2 (en) 2007-05-22 2010-06-29 Uop Llc Coking apparatus and process for oil-containing solids

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69102758T2 (en) 1995-01-12
EP0488473A1 (en) 1992-06-03
DE69102758D1 (en) 1994-08-11
GB9025818D0 (en) 1991-01-09
ES2057742T3 (en) 1994-10-16
JPH04292688A (en) 1992-10-16
CA2056256A1 (en) 1992-05-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5932090A (en) Process for the conversion of heavy crude oils and distillation residues to distillates
US4564439A (en) Two-stage, close-coupled thermal catalytic hydroconversion process
US5080777A (en) Refining of heavy slurry oil fractions
US4336160A (en) Method and apparatus for cracking residual oils
US7144498B2 (en) Supercritical hydrocarbon conversion process
US3622498A (en) Slurry processing for black oil conversion
US4316794A (en) Direct conversion of residual oils
US20090127161A1 (en) Process and Apparatus for Integrated Heavy Oil Upgrading
US20090129998A1 (en) Apparatus for Integrated Heavy Oil Upgrading
US4126538A (en) Process for the conversion of hydrocarbons
US9868915B2 (en) Slurry hydroconversion and coking of heavy oils
JP2002534559A (en) Integrated staged catalytic cracking and staged hydrotreating processes
WO1991001360A1 (en) Resid hydrotreating with resins
US4411767A (en) Integrated process for the solvent refining of coal
JP2003531243A (en) Method for converting naphtha and cycle oil
CA1304034C (en) Method for hydrocracking heavy fraction oil
JPS5898387A (en) Preparation of gaseous olefin and monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
US3238118A (en) Conversion of hydrocarbons in the presence of a hydrogenated donor diluent
US4218306A (en) Method for catalytic cracking heavy oils
JP2801725B2 (en) Hydrocarbon cracking method using two-stage catalyst
US4853105A (en) Multiple riser fluidized catalytic cracking process utilizing hydrogen and carbon-hydrogen contributing fragments
JPH01161088A (en) Two-step catalytic hydrogenation of coal
US4405442A (en) Process for converting heavy oils or petroleum residues to gaseous and distillable hydrocarbons
US20120067775A1 (en) Two-stage, close-coupled, dual-catalytic heavy oil hydroconversion process
EP0400743B1 (en) Heavy oil conversion process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT NL

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19921020

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19921218

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69102758

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19940811

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2057742

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19980924

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19981029

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19981104

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 19981119

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19981126

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19981201

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19991126

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19991127

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19991130

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ B.V.

Effective date: 19991130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000601

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19991126

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000731

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20000601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000901

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20001214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20051126