EP0449881A4 - Method and apparatus for determining osseous implant fixation integrity - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for determining osseous implant fixation integrity

Info

Publication number
EP0449881A4
EP0449881A4 EP19900900585 EP90900585A EP0449881A4 EP 0449881 A4 EP0449881 A4 EP 0449881A4 EP 19900900585 EP19900900585 EP 19900900585 EP 90900585 A EP90900585 A EP 90900585A EP 0449881 A4 EP0449881 A4 EP 0449881A4
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
bone
implant
vibrator
limb
output signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP19900900585
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0449881A1 (en
Inventor
Alexander D. Rosenstein
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP0449881A1 publication Critical patent/EP0449881A1/en
Publication of EP0449881A4 publication Critical patent/EP0449881A4/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01HMEASUREMENT OF MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OR ULTRASONIC, SONIC OR INFRASONIC WAVES
    • G01H1/00Measuring characteristics of vibrations in solids by using direct conduction to the detector
    • G01H1/12Measuring characteristics of vibrations in solids by using direct conduction to the detector of longitudinal or not specified vibrations
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/0048Detecting, measuring or recording by applying mechanical forces or stimuli
    • A61B5/0051Detecting, measuring or recording by applying mechanical forces or stimuli by applying vibrations
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4504Bones
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4528Joints
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2/32Joints for the hip
    • A61F2/36Femoral heads ; Femoral endoprostheses
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2/46Special tools or methods for implanting or extracting artificial joints, accessories, bone grafts or substitutes, or particular adaptations therefor
    • A61F2/468Testing instruments for artificial joints
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/02Prostheses implantable into the body
    • A61F2/30Joints
    • A61F2/46Special tools or methods for implanting or extracting artificial joints, accessories, bone grafts or substitutes, or particular adaptations therefor
    • A61F2/4657Measuring instruments used for implanting artificial joints
    • A61F2002/4671Measuring instruments used for implanting artificial joints for measuring resonant frequency

Definitions

  • the present invention relates, in general, to diagnostic methods and apparatus for determining the integrity of bone implants and, more particularly, to diagnostic methods and apparatus for detecting the loosening of a cemented femoral hip implant, Background Art
  • Total hip replacement is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures.
  • the acetabulum of the hip is replaced with a cup-shaped socket device which receives and articulates with a prosthetic femoral implant which consists of a ball portion and a stem portion which inserted fixedly in the femur.
  • the femur is the longest bone in the skeleton, and is almost perfectly cylindrical in the greater part of its extent.
  • the head At its proximate portion are the head, the neck, a greater trochanter and a lesser trochanter.
  • the head is globular and generally hemispheric in shape.
  • the surface of the femur head is smoothly contoured and, under normal conditions, moves freely within the acetabulum of the hip.
  • the neck of the femur is a pyramidal process of bone connecting the head with the femur body, disposed at approximately a 135° angle relative to the shaft of the bone.
  • the greater trochanter is a large, irregular, quadrilateral eminence which projects from the angle of the junction between the neck of the femur and the body.
  • the lesser trochanter is a conical imminence which projects posteriorly from the base of the neck.
  • An intertrochanteric line runs obliquely from the greater trochanter to the lesser trochanter on the anterior surface of the femur.
  • the prosthetic cup-shaped device generally composed of a high molecular weight polyethylene (sometimes supplemented by a metallic shell) , is fixed into the acetabulum with use of bone cement or by other mechanical means, and the replacement of portions of the femur with the usually metallic "ball and stem" device, stem portion of which fixed into the femur with either cement or other mechanical means.
  • the prosthetic devices cooperate swivelly to permit articulation between the femur and the hip.
  • the patient gains mobility of the lower extremity and freedom from pain.
  • the proximal portion of the femur comprising the head and neck, are removed, generally by incision above the intertrochanteric line.
  • the femoral prosthetic device is also composed of corrosion resistant metal alloy.
  • the femoral device includes a head, a neck, and a stem.
  • the stem is adapted for insertion rigidly and securely within an • opening formed in the femur, after the femoral head and neck have been surgically removed.
  • the proximal femur os filled with bone cement, then the femoral implant is inserted.
  • x-ray .examination two procedures have been utilized in the attempt to diagnose prosthesis implant integrity.
  • One of such procedures is to inspect the bone/implant area by x-ray .examination.
  • This technique has several limitations. In the first place, the technique is not entirely accurate, since it frequently fails to identify areas of implant loosening. Additionally, the x-ray technique entails the exposure of the patient to unwanted radiation. In addition, such techniques are generally ineffective in diagnosing implant failure at an early stage. Further, the x-ray use in such a technique presents a health hazard to the patient.
  • Another technique for attempting to evaluate bone implant fixation integrity utilizes conventional or digital subtraction arthrography methods. These methods are limited, because they utilize a contrast medium which must be introduced in close proximity to the area of cement failure, otherwise the medium does not effectively disclose the failure.
  • arthrographic techniques often produce false negatives. Reliance on such false negatives can lead to injury to the patient.
  • Another important limitation of arthrographic techniques is the fact that it is invasive, causes patient discomfort and, has a risk of introducing infection.
  • a further limitation of the Chung technique is that it is invasive, utilizing a needle driven by a speaker diaphragm.
  • measurements could only be made by using a hypodermic needle brought into contact with the underlying bone.
  • Such a technique would certainly be painful and carry the risk of infection.
  • the above and further objects of the present invention are realized by providing a method and apparatus for determining hip implant integrity by detecting loosening of the implant imbedded in a bone of a limb of a patient.
  • the implant fixation integrity determining apparatus includes a vibrator, which is pressed into engagement with the limb to impart vibratory motion to the bone.
  • the vibrator is controlled to cause the vibratory motion to have a predetermined recurring pattern.
  • a pick-up device is pressed into engagement with the limb spaced from the vibrator, over the same bone near the implant for detecting the vibratory motion transmitted through the bone implant composite to generate an output signal.
  • the recurring pattern of the output signal transmitted through the bone implant composite is analyzed.
  • Implant loosening is determined when the sustained wave superimposition is noted on the oscilloscope and/or significant secondary harmonics are noted on the spectrum ai-.alyzer. Therefore, the present invention provides a nonevasive method and apparatus for determining bone implant fixation integrity.
  • inventive technique is substantially risk free and generally painless to the patient.
  • present invention does not involve the introduction of any harmful radiation, or substances into the body of the patient and, for that reason, may be utilized repetitively with decreased patient risk.
  • inventive apparatus may be used conveniently in the physician's office to monitor limb implant fixation integrity.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic, fragmentary representation of a hip implant fixation integrity determining apparatus, which is constructed in accordance with the present invention
  • FIGS. 2-5 are waveform diagrams useful in understanding the invention. Best Mode for Carrying- Out the Invention
  • an apparatus 9 which is constructed according to the present inve. tion, and which is adapted to perform a limb implant fixation integrity diagnosis.
  • a partially sectioned human femur 10 has a hip replacement prosthesis 20, under test by the apparatus 9, applied at the distal end of the femur. While a bone is shown for illustration purposes, it should be understood that the apparatus 9 is adapted to test a live person, and thus the apparatus 9 comes into contact with the outer skin (not shown) and not directly into contact with the bone.
  • the apparatus 9 generally comprises a signal generator, such as sine wave generator 30, controls a vibrator 40 to .impart vibratory motion to the bone 10 to determine the fixation integrity of the prosthetic implant. Spaced apart from the vibrator 40.
  • a signal pickup device such as accelerometer 50 receives the vibrations transmitted through the bone implant composites 10, 20, 28.
  • An amplifier 60 enhances the output of the accelerometer 50 to enable the amplified signal indicative of the transmitted vibratory signal to be supplied to an oscilloscope 72 for graphical display purposes.
  • a spectrum analyzer 76 also processes the output of the amplifier 60 to facilitate the analysis of the signal transmitted through the bone implant composite under test.
  • a tape recorder 70 and/or a chart recorder 80 are also used to record the transmitted signals.
  • Prosthesis implant loosening can be determined when a recurring signal having a predetermined pattern, for example, in the form of a sine wave signal produced by the sine wave generator 30, is imparted to the femur, and the output signal transmitted through the bone implant composite displaying wave superimposition. This is the case, because the input signal and the output signal are substantially identical (in this example, regular sinusoid pattern without superimposition) in a nonimplanted bone, as well as in a bone in which prosthesis is firmly implanted.
  • the signal generator 30 produces the recurring input signal having a predetermined pattern in the form, for example, of a sine wave signal.
  • a generator output cable 32 supplies the input signal to the vibrator 40, which has an arm 42 connected to an enlarged spherical head or tip 44 at its outer distal end. Vibratory motion is imparted at the skin tissue (not shown) surrounding a condyle 12 of the bone 10 by the spherical tip 44.
  • the spherical tip 44 provides an effective method for imparting vibratory motion to the femur of a patient.
  • the spherical tip is about
  • the spherical tip 44 is about 19 millimeters in diameter.
  • the hip prosthesis 20 implanted in the femur 10 is conventional and includes a head 22 which is adapted to fit within acetabular cup. A neck 24 interconnects the head 22 and a stem 26. During hip replacement surgery, the stem 26 is cemented into the femur 10.
  • a cement layer 28 provides a firm, uninterrupted interposition between- he surfaces of the stem 26 and the bony tissue of the bone 10.
  • the integrity of the bone implant composite can be determined by the present invention.
  • vibratory motion having a predetermined recurring pattern in the form, for example, of a sine wave signal is imparted to the bone 10 at the lateral condyle 12.
  • the signal pickup device 50 is spaced from the lateral condyle and, as depicted in the drawing, is near the greater trochanter 14.
  • the signal from the accelerometer 50 is supplied via an accelerometer output cable 52 to the amplifier 60. After amplification, the signal is transmitted by an oscilloscope input cable 62 to the oscilloscope 72, by means of which the output signal can be analyzed and displayed.
  • the output signal from the amplifier 60 dan also be transmitted by, for example, an analyzer input cable 64 from the amplifier 60 to an analyzer 76 which is used for further analysis of the output signal.
  • the signal can be transmitted, for example, to the tape recorder 70 by means of a tape recorder input cable 66 whereby the output signal can be stored for later retrieval and analysis.
  • the output signal can be transmitted by, for example, a chart recorder input cable 74 from the oscilloscope 72 to the chart recorder 80, in order to obtain an easily readable tracing of the output signal to be used for documentation.
  • replacement hip implantation integrity can be readily determined by analysis of the output signal received via the pick-up device 50, with the input signal supplied from the generator 30.
  • the output signal will demonstrate a pure tone without wave superimposition. Where a sustained wave superimposition is observed, a diagnosis of a loose prosthesis can be made.
  • the method and apparatus herein disclosed have been utilized in both in vitro and in vivo tests.
  • femurs derived from cadavers were utilized while, for the in vivo tests, the integrity of hip implantations in living patients was performed.
  • Ten fresh cadaver femurs were obtained from pos mortem specimens and deep frozen until required. Specimens were taken from patients in the age group 31-82 years and known to be free from pathological bone disorders. The specimens were obtained from six females and four males and comprised equal numbers of right and left femurs. After defrosting, the bone was supported by clamping each end in resilient plastic foam in an attempt to simulate anatomical supports. A vibration of known frequency and power was applied over the lateral aspect of the lateral femoral condyle using a "mini-shaker" vibration apparatus 40 fitted with a 19 mm diameter spherical tip 44 and driven by a sine-wave generator 30.
  • a "mini-shaker" vibration apparatus 40 fitted with a 19 mm diameter spherical tip 44 and driven by a sine-wave generator 30.
  • the output was recorded using a PCB Piezotronics 303A03 low mass accelerometer 50 applied to the greater trochanter and connected, through an amplifier 60, to a digital storage oscilloscope 72 and an X-Y plotter 80.
  • the input frequency was scanned from 100 -1000 Hz, and the resonant frequency was determined.
  • the output waveform was studied and recorded throughout the frequency range.
  • a Charnley femoral prosthesis was then cemented in standard fashion, and vibration testing of the femur with the prosthesis firmly implanted was repeated.
  • the femoral implant was then deliberately loosened at the cement- implant interface. This was achieved by removal of a small amount of proximal cement 28 and separation of the implant from its cement mantle (cement layer) .
  • the vibration testing was again performed.
  • a frequency analysis was obtained in both the above groups using the spectrum analyzer 76.
  • the natural resonant frequency of intact cadaveric femurs varied from 220 to 375 Hz, with a mean of 302 Hz, and was unaffected by repositioning in the plastic foam clamps (not shown) .
  • Markedly differing output waveforms were observed between the cases of firmly implanted and loose femoral implants (at both the prosthesis/cement and bone/cement interfaces) .
  • the vibration signal was applied over the lateral femoral condyle, just above the joint line and output signals were recorded using the accelerometer placed over the greater trochanter. The output signals were recorded, displayed and processed as described above. Although the vibration signal was applied and detected through a significant thickness of flesh, an adequate output signal was obtained. The maximum power applied was 0.5 watts. The patients reported no feelings of discomfort.

Abstract

An apparatus (19) for detecting loosening of an implant (20) imbedded in a bone (10) of a limb of a patient, includes a vibrator (40) pressed into engagement with the limb to impart vibratory motion to the bone. The vibration (40) is controlled to cause the vibratory motion to have a predetermined recurring pattern. A pickup device (50) is pressed into engagement with the limb spaced from the vibrator over the same bone near the implant, for detecting the vibrating motion transmitted through the bone implant composite to generate an output signal. Implant loosening is determined when the recurring pattern of the output signal transmitted through the bone implant composite demonstrates sustained superimposition on the oscilloscope (72) and/or significant secondary harmonics on the spectrum analyzer (76).

Description

Description
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING OSSEOUS IMPLANT FIXATION INTEGRITY Technical Field The present invention relates, in general, to diagnostic methods and apparatus for determining the integrity of bone implants and, more particularly, to diagnostic methods and apparatus for detecting the loosening of a cemented femoral hip implant, Background Art
Total hip replacement is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures. In such a procedure, the acetabulum of the hip is replaced with a cup-shaped socket device which receives and articulates with a prosthetic femoral implant which consists of a ball portion and a stem portion which inserted fixedly in the femur. The femur is the longest bone in the skeleton, and is almost perfectly cylindrical in the greater part of its extent. At its proximate portion are the head, the neck, a greater trochanter and a lesser trochanter. The head is globular and generally hemispheric in shape. The surface of the femur head is smoothly contoured and, under normal conditions, moves freely within the acetabulum of the hip. The neck of the femur is a pyramidal process of bone connecting the head with the femur body, disposed at approximately a 135° angle relative to the shaft of the bone. The greater trochanter is a large, irregular, quadrilateral eminence which projects from the angle of the junction between the neck of the femur and the body. The lesser trochanter is a conical imminence which projects posteriorly from the base of the neck. An intertrochanteric line runs obliquely from the greater trochanter to the lesser trochanter on the anterior surface of the femur.
Because of the affects of age, injury and/or disease, patients all too frequently require hip replacement. In such a surgical procedure, the prosthetic cup-shaped device, generally composed of a high molecular weight polyethylene (sometimes supplemented by a metallic shell) , is fixed into the acetabulum with use of bone cement or by other mechanical means, and the replacement of portions of the femur with the usually metallic "ball and stem" device, stem portion of which fixed into the femur with either cement or other mechanical means. The prosthetic devices cooperate swivelly to permit articulation between the femur and the hip. As a result, the patient gains mobility of the lower extremity and freedom from pain. During surgery, the proximal portion of the femur comprising the head and neck, are removed, generally by incision above the intertrochanteric line.
In general, the femoral prosthetic device is also composed of corrosion resistant metal alloy. The femoral device includes a head, a neck, and a stem. The stem is adapted for insertion rigidly and securely within an opening formed in the femur, after the femoral head and neck have been surgically removed. The proximal femur os filled with bone cement, then the femoral implant is inserted.
After the acrylic cement solidifies it acts as a filler to firmly secure the implant to the femur. After patient has recovered-"from the surgical procedure, in successful cases, the patient is able to move about with more freedom and less pain than previously. With such an increasing number of hip replacement surgeries being performed, there is a concomitant increase in failure of the implant. This failure may be caused by infection. However, it is frequently caused by a mechanical loosening between the osseous tissue and implant. Fixation failure is a very serious condition which, in most cases, necessitates early surgical intervention.
Whatever the cause of implant failure, a common characteristic is noted. It is loosening either at the tissue/cement interface, or at the cement/prosthetic stem interface.
When fixation at either interface fails, a serious condition exists, because of the occurrence of movement of the stem in relation to the bone. In such cases, the stem acts as a rasp to abrade the bone tissue. Debris causes inflammation reaction which in turn causes more bone reabsorption. If not diagnosed and corrected early, such abrasion and inflammation can result in such a large amount of bone loss, that subsequent implantation may be impossible, or at least difficult to achieve. In addition to the problem of bone loss experienced in implant failure, the condition, if not corrected, results in great pain for the patient.
Therefore, in order to prevent bone loss due to implant loosening and to alleviate pain caused by a loosened implant, it would be highly desirable to have a method of discovering prosthetic implant fixation failure at an early stage. However, from the diagnostic aspect, it should be noted that pain experienced by the patient is not always a reliable indicator of implant failure, because the pain may be caused by other factors. Thus, a need exists for a reliable method for discovering fixation failure, which method does not depend upon the occurrence of pain in diagnosis.
Generally, two procedures have been utilized in the attempt to diagnose prosthesis implant integrity. One of such procedures is to inspect the bone/implant area by x-ray .examination. This technique has several limitations. In the first place, the technique is not entirely accurate, since it frequently fails to identify areas of implant loosening. Additionally, the x-ray technique entails the exposure of the patient to unwanted radiation. In addition, such techniques are generally ineffective in diagnosing implant failure at an early stage. Further, the x-ray use in such a technique presents a health hazard to the patient. Another technique for attempting to evaluate bone implant fixation integrity utilizes conventional or digital subtraction arthrography methods. These methods are limited, because they utilize a contrast medium which must be introduced in close proximity to the area of cement failure, otherwise the medium does not effectively disclose the failure.
In addition, the arthrographic techniques often produce false negatives. Reliance on such false negatives can lead to injury to the patient. Another important limitation of arthrographic techniques is the fact that it is invasive, causes patient discomfort and, has a risk of introducing infection.
Therefore, it would be highly desirable to have a method and apparatus for determining implant fixation integrity, without the necessity of employing harmful radiation. Also, such techniques should be non invasive, painless and substantially risk free. Chung et al., (1979) reported a limited anatomical study of the alteration of natural resonant frequency of the femur during curing of the cement. They alluded to the possibility of diagnosing prosthetic loosening by small alterations in the natural resonant frequency of the bone- implant unit in secure and loose prostheses. Van der Perre (1984) reported that in the case of a loose prosthesis, there was a decrease in the resonant frequencies, and that the frequency spectrum was 'rather noisy1. He also proposed that monitoring of the resonant frequencies over time would be the best method of determining loosening of the prosthesis. In previous studies, a considerable variation in the natural resonant frequency of whole cadaver femurs and in femurs with secure prosthetic implants in situ ha been observed consistent with the individual differences in the mass and shape of the bones. Hence, if the phenomenon of frequency shift on loosening of the prosthesis is to effectively used, as proposed by Chung and his colleagues and by Van der Perre, prior knowledge of the resonant frequency of the bone- implant unit before loosening has occurred is required for every patient. This information would not realistically be available in the clinical situation.
A further limitation of the Chung technique is that it is invasive, utilizing a needle driven by a speaker diaphragm. In this regard, in clinical practice, measurements could only be made by using a hypodermic needle brought into contact with the underlying bone. Such a technique would certainly be painful and carry the risk of infection.
Therefore, in light of the limitations in the prior known techniques, it would be highly desirable to have a method and apparatus, which would be useful in the dynamic analysis of bone implant composite integrity, in a painless and non-evasive manner. Such a technique would provide reliable clinical data, irrespective of age, bone differences. Further, it would be highly desirable if such a method and apparatus could be developed in such a manner that they could be utilized at any time after prosthetic implantation, without the requirement for acquisition of base-line reference values immediately after implantation surgery.
Disclosure of Invention
It is an object of the present invention to provide a new and improved method and an apparatus for determining the integrity of implants fixation in the bone, without the need for the utilization of X-rays, in a nonevasive, relatively painless manner.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a new and improved method and apparatus for determining the integrity of bone implants in such a manner that a determination can be made at any time after surgical implantation, in an absolute manner without the need for prior base-line reference values for comparison.
Briefly, the above and further objects of the present invention are realized by providing a method and apparatus for determining hip implant integrity by detecting loosening of the implant imbedded in a bone of a limb of a patient.
The implant fixation integrity determining apparatus includes a vibrator, which is pressed into engagement with the limb to impart vibratory motion to the bone. The vibrator is controlled to cause the vibratory motion to have a predetermined recurring pattern. A pick-up device is pressed into engagement with the limb spaced from the vibrator, over the same bone near the implant for detecting the vibratory motion transmitted through the bone implant composite to generate an output signal. The recurring pattern of the output signal transmitted through the bone implant composite is analyzed. Implant loosening is determined when the sustained wave superimposition is noted on the oscilloscope and/or significant secondary harmonics are noted on the spectrum ai-.alyzer. Therefore, the present invention provides a nonevasive method and apparatus for determining bone implant fixation integrity. In addition, the inventive technique is substantially risk free and generally painless to the patient. Further, the present invention does not involve the introduction of any harmful radiation, or substances into the body of the patient and, for that reason, may be utilized repetitively with decreased patient risk. Additionally, the inventive apparatus may be used conveniently in the physician's office to monitor limb implant fixation integrity.
Brief Description of Drawings
The above mentioned and other objects and features of this invention and the manner of attaining them will become apparent, and the invention itself will be best understood by reference to the following description of an embodiment of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic, fragmentary representation of a hip implant fixation integrity determining apparatus, which is constructed in accordance with the present invention; and FIGS. 2-5 are waveform diagrams useful in understanding the invention. Best Mode for Carrying- Out the Invention
Referring now to the drawing, there is shown an apparatus 9, which is constructed according to the present inve. tion, and which is adapted to perform a limb implant fixation integrity diagnosis. - A partially sectioned human femur 10 has a hip replacement prosthesis 20, under test by the apparatus 9, applied at the distal end of the femur. While a bone is shown for illustration purposes, it should be understood that the apparatus 9 is adapted to test a live person, and thus the apparatus 9 comes into contact with the outer skin (not shown) and not directly into contact with the bone. The apparatus 9 generally comprises a signal generator, such as sine wave generator 30, controls a vibrator 40 to .impart vibratory motion to the bone 10 to determine the fixation integrity of the prosthetic implant. Spaced apart from the vibrator 40. A signal pickup device, such as accelerometer 50, receives the vibrations transmitted through the bone implant composites 10, 20, 28. An amplifier 60 enhances the output of the accelerometer 50 to enable the amplified signal indicative of the transmitted vibratory signal to be supplied to an oscilloscope 72 for graphical display purposes. A spectrum analyzer 76 also processes the output of the amplifier 60 to facilitate the analysis of the signal transmitted through the bone implant composite under test. A tape recorder 70 and/or a chart recorder 80 are also used to record the transmitted signals.
Prosthesis implant loosening can be determined when a recurring signal having a predetermined pattern, for example, in the form of a sine wave signal produced by the sine wave generator 30, is imparted to the femur, and the output signal transmitted through the bone implant composite displaying wave superimposition. This is the case, because the input signal and the output signal are substantially identical (in this example, regular sinusoid pattern without superimposition) in a nonimplanted bone, as well as in a bone in which prosthesis is firmly implanted. Considering now the generator 30 in greater detail, the signal generator 30 produces the recurring input signal having a predetermined pattern in the form, for example, of a sine wave signal. A generator output cable 32 supplies the input signal to the vibrator 40, which has an arm 42 connected to an enlarged spherical head or tip 44 at its outer distal end. Vibratory motion is imparted at the skin tissue (not shown) surrounding a condyle 12 of the bone 10 by the spherical tip 44.
The spherical tip 44 provides an effective method for imparting vibratory motion to the femur of a patient. In a preferred form of the invention, the spherical tip is about
15 to about 25 millimeters in diameter. In a more preferred form of the invention, the spherical tip 44 is about 19 millimeters in diameter.
Because of its shape and size, spherical tip 44 has a large surface area to engage the skin over a large area. The tip 44 is effective in depressing the skin and underlying muscle of the patient to engage firmly the tissues without causing pain to the patient. Because of its size and shape, the tip 44 is effective in imparting substantially distortion free vibratory motion to the femur in accordance with the present invention. Referring to the drawing, the hip prosthesis 20 implanted in the femur 10, is conventional and includes a head 22 which is adapted to fit within acetabular cup. A neck 24 interconnects the head 22 and a stem 26. During hip replacement surgery, the stem 26 is cemented into the femur 10. In a successful surgical procedure, a cement layer 28 provides a firm, uninterrupted interposition between- he surfaces of the stem 26 and the bony tissue of the bone 10. Subsequent to hip implant surgery, the integrity of the bone implant composite can be determined by the present invention. As discussed above, vibratory motion having a predetermined recurring pattern in the form, for example, of a sine wave signal is imparted to the bone 10 at the lateral condyle 12. The signal pickup device 50 is spaced from the lateral condyle and, as depicted in the drawing, is near the greater trochanter 14. The signal from the accelerometer 50 is supplied via an accelerometer output cable 52 to the amplifier 60. After amplification, the signal is transmitted by an oscilloscope input cable 62 to the oscilloscope 72, by means of which the output signal can be analyzed and displayed.
It will be readily clear to one skilled in the art of electronic diagnostic procedures that the output signal from the amplifier 60 dan also be transmitted by, for example, an analyzer input cable 64 from the amplifier 60 to an analyzer 76 which is used for further analysis of the output signal. In addition, the signal can be transmitted, for example, to the tape recorder 70 by means of a tape recorder input cable 66 whereby the output signal can be stored for later retrieval and analysis. It will be further apparent to those skilled in the art of utilizing electronic equipment for diagnosis, that the output signal can be transmitted by, for example, a chart recorder input cable 74 from the oscilloscope 72 to the chart recorder 80, in order to obtain an easily readable tracing of the output signal to be used for documentation.
By utilizing the methods and apparatus herein disclosed, replacement hip implantation integrity can be readily determined by analysis of the output signal received via the pick-up device 50, with the input signal supplied from the generator 30. In cases where successful implantation has occurred and a firm implant fixation has resulted, the output signal will demonstrate a pure tone without wave superimposition. Where a sustained wave superimposition is observed, a diagnosis of a loose prosthesis can be made.
The method and apparatus herein disclosed have been utilized in both in vitro and in vivo tests. In the jLn vitro tests, femurs derived from cadavers were utilized while, for the in vivo tests, the integrity of hip implantations in living patients was performed.
Following are examples of the in vitro and in vivo tests of the present invention. EXAMPLE I - IN VITRO TESTS
Ten fresh cadaver femurs were obtained from pos mortem specimens and deep frozen until required. Specimens were taken from patients in the age group 31-82 years and known to be free from pathological bone disorders. The specimens were obtained from six females and four males and comprised equal numbers of right and left femurs. After defrosting, the bone was supported by clamping each end in resilient plastic foam in an attempt to simulate anatomical supports. A vibration of known frequency and power was applied over the lateral aspect of the lateral femoral condyle using a "mini-shaker" vibration apparatus 40 fitted with a 19 mm diameter spherical tip 44 and driven by a sine-wave generator 30.
Care was taken to ensure firm contact with the bone as intermittent contact gave rise to distortion of the signal due to rattling between the vibrator and hard bone surface. The output was recorded using a PCB Piezotronics 303A03 low mass accelerometer 50 applied to the greater trochanter and connected, through an amplifier 60, to a digital storage oscilloscope 72 and an X-Y plotter 80. The input frequency was scanned from 100 -1000 Hz, and the resonant frequency was determined. The output waveform was studied and recorded throughout the frequency range.
A Charnley femoral prosthesis was then cemented in standard fashion, and vibration testing of the femur with the prosthesis firmly implanted was repeated. The femoral implant was then deliberately loosened at the cement- implant interface. This was achieved by removal of a small amount of proximal cement 28 and separation of the implant from its cement mantle (cement layer) . The vibration testing was again performed. A frequency analysis was obtained in both the above groups using the spectrum analyzer 76.
A further experiment was performed on five of the femurs where cement/bone interface loosening was simulated by allowing the cement mantle to cure on a prosthesis before inserting it in a prepared femur. All of these cases underwent similar vibration testing and frequency analysis of the output signal. IN VITRO RESULTS In intact cadaveric femurs, a sinusoidal output waveform was observed on the oscilloscope. Harmonic content, as detected by the spectrum analysizer, was a small percentage of the primary signal. There was considerable variation in the natural resonant frequency of the specimens, determined as the excitation frequency at which the amplitude of the output signal was seen to reach a maximum. The natural resonant frequency of intact cadaveric femurs varied from 220 to 375 Hz, with a mean of 302 Hz, and was unaffected by repositioning in the plastic foam clamps (not shown) . With a firmly implanted femoral prosthesis in situ, the natural frequency varied from 230-325 Hz (mean = 293 Hz) . Markedly differing output waveforms were observed between the cases of firmly implanted and loose femoral implants (at both the prosthesis/cement and bone/cement interfaces) . Where the prosthesis was firmly cemented, the application of a vibration throughout the frequency range (100 - 1000 Hz) consistently produced a visibly regular sinusoidal output in all the specimens tested (FIG. 2) . Frequency analysis of this output demonstrated that it was a pure tone with no significant superimposed harmonics (FIG. 3). In the groups of loose prostheses (at the bone/cement and prosthesis/cement interface) the applied vibration produced, in every case, an output signal displaying distinct and sustained wave superimposition (FIG. 4) . For each femur this pattern of distortion was observed over a narrow frequency band within a few tens of Hz about the resonant frequency. When this signal was frequency analyzed, the magnitude of the secondary harmonics relative to the primary frequency was observed to be markedly increased (FIG. 5) .
EXAMPLE 2 - IN VIVO TESTS To test the efficacy of the vibration technique as an in vivo diagnostic tool, a number of in-patients were examined. Seven of these patients (with ages ranging from 76-85 years, mean = 80 years) had been admitted for revision on the basis of symptomatic "loosening" of the prosthesis. Subsequently, four of these subjects had aspiration arthrogra s performed pre-operatively. At surgery, the adequacy of fixation of the femoral component' was assessed. A further four patients who were approximately two weeks following total hip replacement were also tested. During testing, the patient was placed in the lateral position with the test hip uppermost. The vibration signal was applied over the lateral femoral condyle, just above the joint line and output signals were recorded using the accelerometer placed over the greater trochanter. The output signals were recorded, displayed and processed as described above. Although the vibration signal was applied and detected through a significant thickness of flesh, an adequate output signal was obtained. The maximum power applied was 0.5 watts. The patients reported no feelings of discomfort.
IN VIVO RESULTS Seven patients underwent revision surgery for symptomatic "loosening." In five cases a loose femoral prosthesis was demonstrated at operation. In all five of these cases, the vibration test was positive, showing distortion of the waveform. Four patients underwent pre- operative arthrograms, two of which were falsely negative. In the remaining two cases, although clinical evaluation and plain X-rays were suggestive of loosening, both vibrometry and arthrogra were negative. The femoral components were found to be securely fixed at operation. In the four cases tested two weeks after total hip replacement, no output distortion was observed.
While a particular embodiment of the present invention have been disclosed, it is to be understood that various different modifications are possible and are contemplated within the true spirit and scope of the appended claims. There is no intention, therefore, of limitations to the exact abstract or disclosure herein presented.
What is claimed is:

Claims

Claims
1. A method for determining integrity of an implant fixation in a bone of a limb of a patient, comprising: using a vibrator; pressing the vibrator into engagement with the limb to impart vibratory motion to the bone; controlling said vibrator to cause said vibratory motion to have a predetermined recurring pattern; using a pick-up device; pressing the pick-up device into engagement with the outer surface of the limb spaced from the vibrator at the same bone, for detecting the vibratory motion of the bone implant composite to generate an output signal; analyzing the recurring pattern of the output signal transmitted through the bone implant composite; and determining implant loosening when said recurring pattern of said output signal is persistently distorted.
2. An apparatus for determining integrity of an implant fixation in a bone of a limb of a patient, comprising: vibrator means for imparting to the bone vibratory motion having a predetermined recurring pattern; a signal generator for controlling the vibrator; pick-up means for detecting the vibratory motion of said bone; and means for analyzing the pattern of the vibratory motion transmitted through the bone implant composite to determine implant fixation integrity.
3. An apparatus of claim 2, wherein said vibrator includes a spherical head for engaging the limb, and means for vibrating said head. 4. An apparatus of claim 3, wherein said spherical head is between about 15 mm and about 25 mm in diameter.
5. An apparatus of claim 4, wherein said diameter is about 19 mm. 6. An apparatus of claim , wherein said signal generator is a sine wave generator.
7. An apparatus of claim 2, wherein said pick-up device is an accelerometer.
8. An apparatus of claim 2, wherein said means for analyzing presence or absence of sustained wave superimposition is an oscilloscope.
9. An apparatus of claim 7, wherein said means for analyzing presence or absence of significant secondary harmonics in the output signal to distinguish between loose or firm implant fixation is a spectrum analyzer.
10. An apparatus of claim 9, further including an oscilloscope for displaying graphically said output signal.
11. An apparatus of claim 10, further including a chart recorder. 12. An apparatus of claim 11, further including an amplifier coupled to the output of said pick-up means. 13. An apparatus of claim 2, further including a spectrum analyzer for analyzing to the signal received via said pick-up means.
EP19900900585 1988-12-21 1989-12-20 Method and apparatus for determining osseous implant fixation integrity Withdrawn EP0449881A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US29024088A 1988-12-21 1988-12-21
US290240 1988-12-21

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0449881A1 EP0449881A1 (en) 1991-10-09
EP0449881A4 true EP0449881A4 (en) 1992-04-01

Family

ID=23115111

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19900900585 Withdrawn EP0449881A4 (en) 1988-12-21 1989-12-20 Method and apparatus for determining osseous implant fixation integrity

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0449881A4 (en)
JP (1) JPH02246923A (en)
CA (1) CA2006133C (en)
WO (1) WO1990006720A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2069324A1 (en) * 1989-10-24 1991-04-25 Christopher Marden John Cain Vibrational analysis of bones
JP2690064B2 (en) * 1990-11-30 1997-12-10 科学技術振興事業団 Bone elasticity tester for living body
GB9107700D0 (en) * 1991-04-11 1991-05-29 Imperial College Testing implants
ES2257084T3 (en) * 1998-11-13 2006-07-16 Exogen, Inc. PROTESIS TO INDUCE INTERNAL OSEO GROWTH USING ULTRASOUND THERAPY.
WO2001037733A2 (en) * 1999-11-23 2001-05-31 Noveon Ip Holdings Corp. Implant loosening and fracture healing evaluation apparatus and method
US6413215B1 (en) 2000-04-05 2002-07-02 The University Of Vermont Implant wear debris detection apparatus and method
ATE294552T1 (en) * 2002-12-11 2005-05-15 Univ Bologna DEVICE FOR INTRA-OPERATIVE MEASURING THE MECHANICAL STRENGTH OF AN ENDOPROSTHESIS IMPLANTED IN A BONE
JP4874970B2 (en) 2004-06-07 2012-02-15 ジンテス ゲゼルシャフト ミット ベシュレンクテル ハフツング Orthopedic implant with sensor
AU2005304912A1 (en) 2004-11-04 2006-05-18 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Cycle and load measurement device
US20090216126A1 (en) * 2005-05-03 2009-08-27 Katz Lawrence J Implantable miniaturized ultrasonic transducers
CA2620247C (en) 2005-08-23 2014-04-29 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Telemetric orthopaedic implant
EP2114247B1 (en) 2007-02-23 2013-10-30 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Processing sensed accelerometer data for determination of bone healing
RU2545424C2 (en) 2008-10-15 2015-03-27 Смит Энд Нефью, Инк. Composite inner retainer
DE202009004348U1 (en) 2009-03-27 2009-06-10 Bader, Rainer, PD Dr.med. Dipl.-Ing. Device for measuring the anchoring strength of endoprostheses in situ
PL2717779T3 (en) * 2011-06-09 2018-09-28 Tays Sydänkeskus Oy Device and method for measuring vibration transmittance of sternum
DE102014109683B4 (en) 2014-07-10 2016-09-15 Universität Rostock Device for detecting a relaxation and / or wear of an endoprosthesis
JP7281770B2 (en) 2017-09-14 2023-05-26 慶應義塾 IMPLANT INSTALLATION STRENGTH EVALUATION METHOD, IMPLANT INSTALLATION STRENGTH EVALUATION DEVICE, AND PROGRAM
ES2875309T3 (en) * 2017-11-30 2021-11-10 Endotact Implantable distraction device
DE102021127697A1 (en) 2021-10-25 2023-04-27 Universität Rostock, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts Interchangeable adapter for coupling to an insertion device for joining and implanting prosthetic implants

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0181131A2 (en) * 1984-11-01 1986-05-14 Kent Scientific and Industrial Projects Limited Apparatus for detecting the resonant frequency of a bone

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3200814A (en) * 1963-03-12 1965-08-17 Ellis R Taylor Apparatus for measuring reflexes, tremors and the like
US3477422A (en) * 1965-10-15 1969-11-11 John M Jurist Jr Vibratory bone density determination method and apparatus
JPS5638509Y2 (en) * 1972-04-18 1981-09-08
JPS5720257A (en) * 1980-07-11 1982-02-02 Teikoku Hormone Mfg Co Ltd Vibrator for ulna or twin-bone of living body
JPS5733048A (en) * 1980-08-04 1982-02-23 Honda Motor Co Ltd Throttle reaction control device of car
DD225045A1 (en) * 1983-07-04 1985-07-24 Adl Der Ddr Forschungszentrum DEVICE FOR IMMEDIATE DIAGNOSIS OF SHAEDEL FRACTURES
GB2156983B (en) * 1983-08-26 1987-03-11 Mintowt Czyz Witek Method and apparatus for assessing the structure and mechanical integrity of osseous systems
JPS62117553A (en) * 1985-11-16 1987-05-29 肥後 矢吉 Function evaluation apparatus
US4754763A (en) * 1987-06-17 1988-07-05 Noninvasive Technology, Inc. Noninvasive system and method for testing the integrity of an in vivo bone

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0181131A2 (en) * 1984-11-01 1986-05-14 Kent Scientific and Industrial Projects Limited Apparatus for detecting the resonant frequency of a bone

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE. vol. 203, no. H2, July 1989, LONDON GB pages 77 - 81; A.D.ROSENSTEIN ET AL.: 'The Differentiation of loose and secure femoral implants in total hip replacement using a vibrational technique: an anatomical and pilot clinical study' *
See also references of WO9006720A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0449881A1 (en) 1991-10-09
CA2006133C (en) 1995-10-31
CA2006133A1 (en) 1990-06-21
JPH02246923A (en) 1990-10-02
WO1990006720A1 (en) 1990-06-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5024239A (en) Method and apparatus for determining osseous implant fixation integrity
CA2006133C (en) Method and apparatus for determining osseous implant fixation integrity
US6583630B2 (en) Systems and methods for monitoring wear and/or displacement of artificial joint members, vertebrae, segments of fractured bones and dental implants
Rosenstein et al. The differentiation of loose and secure femoral implants in total hip replacement using a vibrational technique: an anatomical and pilot clinical study
Baker et al. Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review
Le Huec et al. Distal rupture of the tendon of biceps brachii: evaluation by MRI and the results of repair
US8236005B2 (en) System and method for preventing intraoperative fracture in cementless hip arthroplasty
Mathieu et al. Variation of the impact duration during the in vitro insertion of acetabular cup implants
JP2003518973A (en) Device for in vivo measurement of pressure and pressure changes in or on bone
Christensen et al. Assessment of tibial stiffness by vibration testing in situ—I. Identification of mode shapes in different supporting conditions
RICCIARDI et al. Mechanical monitoring of fracture healing using ultrasound imaging
Alshuhri et al. Development of a non-invasive diagnostic technique for acetabular component loosening in total hip replacements
Lannocca et al. Intra-operative evaluation of cementless hip implant stability: A prototype device based on vibration analysis
Choi et al. Knee Acoustic Emission Characteristics of the Healthy and the Patients with Osteoarthritis Using Piezoelectric Sensor.
US6413215B1 (en) Implant wear debris detection apparatus and method
Shao et al. Natural frequency analysis of osseointegration for trans-femoral implant
Field et al. Proximal femoral surface strain gauge analysis of a new epiphyseal prosthesis
Yousefsani et al. A vibrational technique for in vitro intraoperative prosthesis fixation monitoring
Chiu Quantitative monitoring of osseointegrated implant stability using vibration analysis
Glinkowski et al. Clinical experiences with ultrasonometric measurement of fracture healing
Zhang et al. Monitoring the Stability of Artificial Prosthesis Performance for Hip Replacement
Carls et al. A comparative study of two cerclage systems
Safaei et al. Vibration stimulation as a non-invasive approach to monitor the severity of meniscus tears
Schwalbe et al. Detection of defects in the human skeletal system and production of failure optimized artificial bone applying acoustic emission analysis (AEA)
RU2302199C1 (en) Method for investigating biomechanical joint properties

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19910715

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19920210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18W Application withdrawn

Withdrawal date: 19940106