EP0431448B1 - Catalytic process for manufacture of low pour lubricating oils - Google Patents

Catalytic process for manufacture of low pour lubricating oils Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0431448B1
EP0431448B1 EP19900122676 EP90122676A EP0431448B1 EP 0431448 B1 EP0431448 B1 EP 0431448B1 EP 19900122676 EP19900122676 EP 19900122676 EP 90122676 A EP90122676 A EP 90122676A EP 0431448 B1 EP0431448 B1 EP 0431448B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
process according
composite
catalyst
dewaxing
less
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP19900122676
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0431448A1 (en
Inventor
Robert Peter Leonard Absil
Philip Jay Angevine
Thomas Francis Degnan, Jr.
George Harry Hatzikos
Rene Bernard Lapierre
John Paul Mcwilliams
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ExxonMobil Oil Corp
Original Assignee
Mobil Oil Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mobil Oil Corp filed Critical Mobil Oil Corp
Publication of EP0431448A1 publication Critical patent/EP0431448A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0431448B1 publication Critical patent/EP0431448B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G45/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
    • C10G45/58Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to change the structural skeleton of some of the hydrocarbon content without cracking the other hydrocarbons present, e.g. lowering pour point; Selective hydrocracking of normal paraffins
    • C10G45/60Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to change the structural skeleton of some of the hydrocarbon content without cracking the other hydrocarbons present, e.g. lowering pour point; Selective hydrocracking of normal paraffins characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G45/64Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to change the structural skeleton of some of the hydrocarbon content without cracking the other hydrocarbons present, e.g. lowering pour point; Selective hydrocracking of normal paraffins characterised by the catalyst used containing crystalline alumino-silicates, e.g. molecular sieves
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2400/00Products obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00 - C10G69/14
    • C10G2400/10Lubricating oil

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the processing of higher molecular weight vacuum distillates such as bright stock raffinates to lower their pour point.
  • a suitable feedstock for lubricant refining contains a quantity of lubricant stock having a predetermined set of properties such as appropriate viscosity, oxidation stability, and maintenance of fluidity at low temperatures.
  • the process of refining to isolate that lubricant stock consists of a set of subtractive unit operations which removes the unwanted components.
  • the most important of these unit operations include distillation, solvent refining, and dewaxing, which basically are physical separation processes in that if all the separated functions were recombined one would reconstitute the crude oil.
  • the complexity of the molecular makeup of the desired components is reflected by the first step in the lube refining process, vacuum distillation.
  • vacuum distillation the feed is separated into four boiling fractions, each of which has a different viscosity and a different mix of aromatics, naphthenes, paraffins, resins and asphaltenes. Separation must be exact because the resulting viscosity and composition cannot be adjusted later in subsequent refining steps.
  • the lightest fraction of the vacuum distillation step vacuum tower overhead, has a boiling range up to approximately 700°F (370°C) and is usually consigned to a fuel refinery to be made into light products.
  • the remaining three fractions can be used in preparing lube stock.
  • the second fraction, light neutral distillate has a boiling range between approximately 700 and 850°F (371 and 454°C), and is used to make low viscosity oils.
  • the fourth fraction, vacuum resid will not boil even under vacuum and will result in a lube base called "bright stock". This vacuum resid contains most of the resins and metals in the crude and all of the asphaltines.
  • Hydrotreating has been proposed to accomplish such upgrading.
  • a suitable fraction of a poor grade crude such as a California crude
  • the process is complex in that some of the oil is reduced in molecular weight and made unsuitable for lubes, but concurrently a substantial fraction of the polynuclear aromatics is hydrogenated to form naphthenes and paraffins.
  • Process conditions and choice of catalyst are selected to provide an optimal conversion of the polynuclear aromatic content of the stock, since this component degrades the viscosity index and stability of the stock.
  • hydrocracking is employed for processes such as the foregoing; by contrast the purpose of “hydrotreating” is to stabilize the lube base stock produced by hydrocracking. Hydrocracking and hydrotreating steps may be distinguished also by the amount of hydrogen consumed, the hydrocracking step typically consuming about 178 to 356 m3/m3 (1000-2000 SCF/bbl) while the hydrotreating step consumes only about a tenth as much.
  • hydrocracking process for increasing the availability of lube oils has an attractive feature that is not immediately apparent.
  • composition and properties of hydrocracked stocks are generally not particularly affected by the source and nature of the crude, i.e., they tend to be much more alike than fractions prepared from different crudes by conventional means.
  • the process therefore promises to free the refiner from dependence on a particular crude, with all of the advantages that this freedom implies.
  • Hydrocracked lube stocks tend to be unstable in the presence of air when exposed to sunlight. On such exposure, an unacceptable sludge is formed, sometimes very rapidly and in fairly substantial amount. Additionally, some hydrocracked lube oils tend to darken or to form a haze. Several methods have been proposed to correct this instability, such as those described in US-A-4,031,016, 3,666,657, 3,530,061, 4,162,962, 3,530,061 and 3,852,207.
  • Hydrocracked lubricating oils generally have an unacceptably high pour point and require dewaxing.
  • Catalytic methods for dewaxing have been proposed, for instance in US-A-3,700,585. Hydrotreating after catalytic dewaxing is disclosed in US-A-4,137,148.
  • US-A-4,283,271, 4,283,272, and 4,414,097 disclose processes for producing dewaxed lubricating oil base including hydrocracking a hydrocarbon feedstock, catalytically dewaxing the hydrocrackate and hydrotreating the dewaxed hydrocrackate, and employ catalyst compositions comprising zeolite ZSM-5, ZSM-11 and ZSM-23 for the dewaxing phase.
  • This invention provides an energy-efficient continuous process for producing dewaxed hydrocracked lubricating oil stock from a hydrocarbon feedstock effluent boiling over about 288°C (550°F), by passing such an effluent through a catalytic hydrodewaxing process in which the supported catalyst composition comprises a zeolite and matrix and, optionally, a Group VIII metal.
  • a cyclic catalytic dewaxing process for improving the pour point of a demetallized petroleum fraction free of components boiling below 371°C, comprises contacting a bright stock raffinate with a dewaxing catalyst at a temperature of 260 to 482°C, a pressure of 14.8 to 242.4 bar, a liquid hourly space velocity of 0.2 to 20 and a hydrogen circulation rate of 89 to 3560 m3/m3, said catalyst comprising a porous composite of a zeolite having a constraint index of 1 to 12 and a matrix whereof the zeolite constitutes 35 to 75 weight percent, at least 60 volume percent of the pores of said composite having a diameter less than 20 nm, the composite having a particle density of at least 1.0 g/cm3.
  • the aging rate of dewaxing catalysts in dewaxing has been reduced. Accordingly, the start-of-cycle temperature in the second cycle, and subsequent cycles, of a multicycle dewaxing operation is reduced.
  • the capacity to reduce the aging rate of the dewaxing catalyst allows for longer periods between oxygen regeneration and hydrogen reactivation cycles and thus increases overall catalyst lifetime. It is noted that aging rate can be expressed by the daily increase in operating temperature necessary to maintain a product of constant pour point.
  • the benefits of the invention apply particularly to bright stock raffinate feedstocks, which induce among the fastest catalyst aging rates.
  • pore volume, pore size distribution and particle density can significantly affect catalytic performance.
  • a good example of this is in the design of demetallation catalysts, where a majority of the pores must be in the greater than 10 nm range to prevent pore plugging by deposited metals and to allow for diffusion of Ni- and V-containing porphyrins.
  • the design of the demetallation catalysts involves a critical balance between the required pore size distribution and the high surface area needed to produce the requisite activity.
  • the catalyst is a porous mixture, at least 60 percent of the pores of which, as measured by mercury porosimetry, have diameters less than 20 nm.
  • the average pore size of the mixture is preferably lower than 15 nm, more preferably lower than 10 nm, and in certain embodiments is less than 7 nm, and even less than 4 nm.
  • the particle density of the porous composite is at least 1.0 g/cm3.
  • the zeolite component of the catalyst has a constraint index of 1 to 12.
  • the method by which constraint index is determined is described fully in US-A-4,016,218.
  • Constraint index (CI) values for some typical materials are:
  • test conditions e.g. temperature
  • constraint index of a particular zeolite e.g. ZSM-5, ZSM-11 and Beta.
  • the crystal size of the zeolite ranges from 0.02 to 0.05 micrometers.
  • the catalyst composition will generally, although not necessarily, contain a Group VIII metal, which when present may be exchanged into the composition, impregnated therein or physically and intimately admixed therewith by well known techniques.
  • the amount of Group VIII metal in the catalyst composition can range from 0.10 to 10 weight percent, preferably from about 0.1 to about 3 weight percent, most preferably from about 0.2 to about 1 weight percent, based on the total weight of the catalyst composition.
  • the Group VIII metal component can be platinum, palladium, iridium, ruthenium, cobalt, nickel, copper, molybdenum and mixtures thereof.
  • the preferred metal is nickel.
  • the Group VIII metal may be present alone or together with a metal from Group VI, such as chromium, molybdenum, tungsten and mixtures thereof.
  • the particle size (effective or hydraulic diameter) of preferred forms of the catalyst ranges from 0.75 to 3.2 mm.
  • the binder or matrix is suitably an alumina other than alpha alumina, preferably gamma-alumina. Generally it is a small particle alumina with a packing density of 0.5 to 0.6 g/cm3.
  • the matrix is characterized by a particle density of 0.95 to 1.50 g/cm3.
  • Alumina monohydrate (pseudoboehmite) is converted into a desirably dense analogue during catalyst formation.
  • An alumina source for the matrix used for catalyst preparation preferably has a water content of 20 to 30 weight percent.
  • the alumina monohydrate used as the source of matrix material in the Examples has a water content of 28 percent.
  • the alumina source is convertible to gamma-alumina.
  • Gamma-alumina is a phase of alumina which occurs as a result of calcination at a temperature of no greater than about 538°C (1000°F).
  • delta-alumina is a result of calcination at a temperature of about 927°C (1700°F).
  • the zeolite, a Group VIII metal and a source of binder or matrix are mulled together to form a homogeneous mixture.
  • the important feature of the mulling step is the water content of the mixture.
  • the water content can be expressed as ash content of the mixture: the ash content can range from 40 to 60 wt%.
  • Water content can also be expressed as solid content, which can range from 45 to 60, preferably from 42 to 55 weight percent.
  • Mulling is undertaken at a temperature ranging from 10 to 37.7°C (50 to 100°F).
  • the mixture may contain 0.05 to 5 wt% of an extrusion aid such as polyvinyl alcohol.
  • Extrusion is undertaken in conventional apparatus to produce a particle with a length to diameter ratio of at least 2.
  • the matrix precursor can be alumina monohydrate (.e., pseudoboehmite), which during catalyst formation is converted to a more dense analogue.
  • alumina monohydrate .e., pseudoboehmite
  • the feed to the dewaxing unit is a fraction produced by vacuum distillation of crude oil which has been demetallized and is free of boiling range components having a boiling range up to about 700°F (371°C), in particular one based on the vacuum resid which as noted above will produce a lube base called bright stock.
  • a lube dewaxing catalyst was produced by preparing a mixture of 65 percent ZSM-5, 35 percent of a coarse, high-chemical purity, low density, high-surface-area alpha alumina monohydrate (pseudoboehmite), nickel nitrate hexahydrate, and enough water to form a paste-like mixture, mulling this mixture, and extruding it into 1.6 mm (1/16 inch) cylindrical pellets by conventional means.
  • the catalyst was pre-calcined in nitrogen for 3 hours at 482°C (900°F) (2.8°C/min heat-up) and then in air at 538°C (1000°F) for 3 hours. This procedure converts the alpha alumina monohydrate into gamma-alumina.
  • the physical properties and pore size distribution are shown in Table 1.
  • the catalyst in this example will be referred to as a medium pore diameter catalyst. This catalyst has 60 percent of its pore with diameters less than 20 nm (as measured by mercury porosimetry).
  • a lube dewaxing catalyst was produced by preparing a mixture of 65 percent ZSM-5, 21 percent of the same alpha alumina monohydrate (pseudoboehmite) used in Example 1, 14 percent delta alumina, nickel nitrate hexahydrate, and enough water to form a paste-like mixture, mulling this mixture, and extruding it into 1.6 mm (1/16 inch) cylindrical pellets by conventional means.
  • the delta alumina was prepared by calcining the alpha alumina monohydrate in air at 927°C (1700°F) for 4 hours.
  • the catalyst was pre-calcined in nitrogen for 3 hours at 482°C (900°F) (2.8°C/min heat-up) and then in air at 538°C (1000°F) for 3 hours.
  • the physical properties and pore size distribution are shown in Table 1.
  • the catalyst in this example will be referred to as a large pore diameter catalyst.
  • This catalyst has 44 volume percent of its pores (as measured by mercury porosimetry) with diameters less than 20 nm.
  • a lube dewaxing catalyst was produced by preparing a mixture of 65% ZSM-5, 35% of a finely divided, dense, high chemical purity alpha alumina monohydrate, Keith alumina (pseudoboehmite from Keith Corporation), nickel nitrate hexahydrate, and enough water to form a paste-like mixture, mulling this mixture, and extruding it into 1.6 mm (1/16 inch) cylindrical pellets by conventional means.
  • the catalyst was precalcined in nitrogen for 3 hours at 482°C (900°F) (2.8°C/min heat-up) and then in air at 538°C (1000°F) for 3 hours. This procedure converts the alpha alumina monohydrate into gamma alumina.
  • the physical properties and pore size distribution are shown in the following Table.
  • the catalyst in this example will be referred to as a small pore diameter catalyst. It has an average pore diameter of 4 nm, 92 volume percent of its pores (as measured by mercury porosimetry) being of diameter less than 20 nm.
  • the catalysts of Examples 1 and 2 were examined for dewaxing of paraffinic North Sea Heavy Neutral and Bright Stock raffinates. Properties of the feedstocks are given in Table 2. Both catalysts were able to produce -6.6°C (20°F) pour point products. The aging rates of the catalysts were tracked by adjusting the reaction temperature to compensate for activity loss so as to maintain a target -6.6°C (20°F) pour point while maintaining all other conditions constant.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)

Description

  • This invention relates to the processing of higher molecular weight vacuum distillates such as bright stock raffinates to lower their pour point.
  • A suitable feedstock for lubricant refining contains a quantity of lubricant stock having a predetermined set of properties such as appropriate viscosity, oxidation stability, and maintenance of fluidity at low temperatures. The process of refining to isolate that lubricant stock consists of a set of subtractive unit operations which removes the unwanted components. The most important of these unit operations include distillation, solvent refining, and dewaxing, which basically are physical separation processes in that if all the separated functions were recombined one would reconstitute the crude oil.
  • The complexity of the molecular makeup of the desired components is reflected by the first step in the lube refining process, vacuum distillation. In vacuum distillation, the feed is separated into four boiling fractions, each of which has a different viscosity and a different mix of aromatics, naphthenes, paraffins, resins and asphaltenes. Separation must be exact because the resulting viscosity and composition cannot be adjusted later in subsequent refining steps.
  • The lightest fraction of the vacuum distillation step, vacuum tower overhead, has a boiling range up to approximately 700°F (370°C) and is usually consigned to a fuel refinery to be made into light products. The remaining three fractions can be used in preparing lube stock.
  • The second fraction, light neutral distillate, has a boiling range between approximately 700 and 850°F (371 and 454°C), and is used to make low viscosity oils. The third fraction, heavy neutral distillate, with a boiling range of from 850 to 1000°F (454 to 538°C), is used to make high viscosity oils. The fourth fraction, vacuum resid, will not boil even under vacuum and will result in a lube base called "bright stock". This vacuum resid contains most of the resins and metals in the crude and all of the asphaltines.
  • Crude oils suitable for the manufacture of lubes are becoming less available due to exhaustion of reserves, and obtaining a steady, adequate supply from a known course can be difficult. Accordingly, the desirability of upgrading a crude fraction normally considered unsuitable for lubricant manufacture to one from which good yields of lubes can be obtained has long been recognized. However the complexity of the molecular constitution of lubricating oils makes it necessary to consider many variables in developing practically useful processes to production of lube stock from petroleum crude oils.
  • "Hydrocracking", sometimes referred to in the art as "severe hydrotreating", has been proposed to accomplish such upgrading. In this process, a suitable fraction of a poor grade crude, such as a California crude, is catalytically reacted with hydrogen under pressure. The process is complex in that some of the oil is reduced in molecular weight and made unsuitable for lubes, but concurrently a substantial fraction of the polynuclear aromatics is hydrogenated to form naphthenes and paraffins. Process conditions and choice of catalyst are selected to provide an optimal conversion of the polynuclear aromatic content of the stock, since this component degrades the viscosity index and stability of the stock. Also, in the hydrocracking process, paraffins can be isomerized, imparting good viscosity index characteristics to the final lube product. The term "hydrocracking" is employed for processes such as the foregoing; by contrast the purpose of "hydrotreating" is to stabilize the lube base stock produced by hydrocracking. Hydrocracking and hydrotreating steps may be distinguished also by the amount of hydrogen consumed, the hydrocracking step typically consuming about 178 to 356 m³/m³ (1000-2000 SCF/bbl) while the hydrotreating step consumes only about a tenth as much.
  • The hydrocracking process for increasing the availability of lube oils has an attractive feature that is not immediately apparent. Thus the composition and properties of hydrocracked stocks are generally not particularly affected by the source and nature of the crude, i.e., they tend to be much more alike than fractions prepared from different crudes by conventional means. The process therefore promises to free the refiner from dependence on a particular crude, with all of the advantages that this freedom implies.
  • Hydrocracked lube stocks tend to be unstable in the presence of air when exposed to sunlight. On such exposure, an unacceptable sludge is formed, sometimes very rapidly and in fairly substantial amount. Additionally, some hydrocracked lube oils tend to darken or to form a haze. Several methods have been proposed to correct this instability, such as those described in US-A-4,031,016, 3,666,657, 3,530,061, 4,162,962, 3,530,061 and 3,852,207.
  • Hydrocracked lubricating oils generally have an unacceptably high pour point and require dewaxing. Catalytic methods for dewaxing have been proposed, for instance in US-A-3,700,585. Hydrotreating after catalytic dewaxing is disclosed in US-A-4,137,148. US-A-4,283,271, 4,283,272, and 4,414,097 disclose processes for producing dewaxed lubricating oil base including hydrocracking a hydrocarbon feedstock, catalytically dewaxing the hydrocrackate and hydrotreating the dewaxed hydrocrackate, and employ catalyst compositions comprising zeolite ZSM-5, ZSM-11 and ZSM-23 for the dewaxing phase.
  • There is a need for processes which can efficiently provide modern high quality lubricants from interchangeable and readily available low grade crudes, and for manufacturing lubricating oils, including hydrocracked lubricating oils, having a low pour point
  • This invention provides an energy-efficient continuous process for producing dewaxed hydrocracked lubricating oil stock from a hydrocarbon feedstock effluent boiling over about 288°C (550°F), by passing such an effluent through a catalytic hydrodewaxing process in which the supported catalyst composition comprises a zeolite and matrix and, optionally, a Group VIII metal.
  • According to the present invention a cyclic catalytic dewaxing process for improving the pour point of a demetallized petroleum fraction free of components boiling below 371°C, comprises contacting a bright stock raffinate with a dewaxing catalyst at a temperature of 260 to 482°C, a pressure of 14.8 to 242.4 bar, a liquid hourly space velocity of 0.2 to 20 and a hydrogen circulation rate of 89 to 3560 m³/m³, said catalyst comprising a porous composite of a zeolite having a constraint index of 1 to 12 and a matrix whereof the zeolite constitutes 35 to 75 weight percent, at least 60 volume percent of the pores of said composite having a diameter less than 20 nm, the composite having a particle density of at least 1.0 g/cm³.
  • In the catalytic processing of heavy petroleum fraction it is generally believed to be desirable to have as open a catalyst pore structure as possible, i.e., a large average pore diameter while maintaining a reasonable surface area, in order to reduce diffusion limitations. Thus, for example, in petroleum resid demetallation catalysts it is desirable to minimize the number of pores with diameters less than 7.5 nm.
  • Unexpectedly, we have now found that in the catalytic dewaxing of heavy oil fractions such as lubricant basestocks, it is desirable to maximize the number of pores with diameters less than 20 nm in the dewaxing catalyst composite. Specifically, we find that the aging rate of the catalyst in the dewaxing reaction is affected by the catalyst pore size distribution. As will be demonstrated in the examples, the beneficial effect of catalyst pore size distribution becomes more significant as the average molecular weight of the feedstock increases.
  • In the drawings:
    • Figure 1 is a plot of pore volume (cm³/g) vs. pore diameter;
    • Figure 2 is a plot of reaction temperature vs. days on stream;
    • Figure 3 is a plot of reaction temperature vs. days on stream; and
    • Figure 4 is a plot of reactor temperature vs. days on stream.
  • In accordance with the invention the aging rate of dewaxing catalysts in dewaxing has been reduced. Accordingly, the start-of-cycle temperature in the second cycle, and subsequent cycles, of a multicycle dewaxing operation is reduced. The capacity to reduce the aging rate of the dewaxing catalyst allows for longer periods between oxygen regeneration and hydrogen reactivation cycles and thus increases overall catalyst lifetime. It is noted that aging rate can be expressed by the daily increase in operating temperature necessary to maintain a product of constant pour point. The benefits of the invention apply particularly to bright stock raffinate feedstocks, which induce among the fastest catalyst aging rates.
  • Physical properties such as pore volume, pore size distribution and particle density can significantly affect catalytic performance. A good example of this is in the design of demetallation catalysts, where a majority of the pores must be in the greater than 10 nm range to prevent pore plugging by deposited metals and to allow for diffusion of Ni- and V-containing porphyrins. The design of the demetallation catalysts involves a critical balance between the required pore size distribution and the high surface area needed to produce the requisite activity.
  • By comparison, in accordance with the invention, the catalyst is a porous mixture, at least 60 percent of the pores of which, as measured by mercury porosimetry, have diameters less than 20 nm. The average pore size of the mixture is preferably lower than 15 nm, more preferably lower than 10 nm, and in certain embodiments is less than 7 nm, and even less than 4 nm. Preferably the particle density of the porous composite is at least 1.0 g/cm³.
  • The zeolite component of the catalyst has a constraint index of 1 to 12. The method by which constraint index is determined is described fully in US-A-4,016,218.
  • Constraint index (CI) values for some typical materials are:
    Figure imgb0001
  • It will be appreciated that it may be possible to so select test conditions, e.g. temperature, as to establish more than one value for the constraint index of a particular zeolite. This explains the range of constraint indices for some zeolites, such as ZSM-5, ZSM-11 and Beta.
  • Preferably, the crystal size of the zeolite ranges from 0.02 to 0.05 micrometers. The catalyst composition will generally, although not necessarily, contain a Group VIII metal, which when present may be exchanged into the composition, impregnated therein or physically and intimately admixed therewith by well known techniques. The amount of Group VIII metal in the catalyst composition can range from 0.10 to 10 weight percent, preferably from about 0.1 to about 3 weight percent, most preferably from about 0.2 to about 1 weight percent, based on the total weight of the catalyst composition. The Group VIII metal component can be platinum, palladium, iridium, ruthenium, cobalt, nickel, copper, molybdenum and mixtures thereof. The preferred metal is nickel. The Group VIII metal may be present alone or together with a metal from Group VI, such as chromium, molybdenum, tungsten and mixtures thereof.
  • The particle size (effective or hydraulic diameter) of preferred forms of the catalyst ranges from 0.75 to 3.2 mm. The binder or matrix is suitably an alumina other than alpha alumina, preferably gamma-alumina. Generally it is a small particle alumina with a packing density of 0.5 to 0.6 g/cm³. The matrix is characterized by a particle density of 0.95 to 1.50 g/cm³. Alumina monohydrate (pseudoboehmite) is converted into a desirably dense analogue during catalyst formation.
  • An alumina source for the matrix used for catalyst preparation preferably has a water content of 20 to 30 weight percent. By way of illustration, the alumina monohydrate used as the source of matrix material in the Examples has a water content of 28 percent. Preferably, the alumina source is convertible to gamma-alumina. Gamma-alumina is a phase of alumina which occurs as a result of calcination at a temperature of no greater than about 538°C (1000°F). As noted in the Examples, delta-alumina is a result of calcination at a temperature of about 927°C (1700°F).
  • In a favoured catalyst preparation procedure the zeolite, a Group VIII metal and a source of binder or matrix are mulled together to form a homogeneous mixture. The important feature of the mulling step is the water content of the mixture. With respect to the mixture resulting from mulling for use in extrusion, the water content can be expressed as ash content of the mixture: the ash content can range from 40 to 60 wt%. Water content can also be expressed as solid content, which can range from 45 to 60, preferably from 42 to 55 weight percent. Mulling is undertaken at a temperature ranging from 10 to 37.7°C (50 to 100°F). The mixture may contain 0.05 to 5 wt% of an extrusion aid such as polyvinyl alcohol.
  • Extrusion is undertaken in conventional apparatus to produce a particle with a length to diameter ratio of at least 2.
  • The matrix precursor can be alumina monohydrate (.e., pseudoboehmite), which during catalyst formation is converted to a more dense analogue.
  • The feed to the dewaxing unit is a fraction produced by vacuum distillation of crude oil which has been demetallized and is free of boiling range components having a boiling range up to about 700°F (371°C), in particular one based on the vacuum resid which as noted above will produce a lube base called bright stock.
  • Process conditions in the catalytic dewaxer are summarized in the following Table.
    Figure imgb0002
  • A preferred embodiment of the invention is described in the Examples which follow.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • A lube dewaxing catalyst was produced by preparing a mixture of 65 percent ZSM-5, 35 percent of a coarse, high-chemical purity, low density, high-surface-area alpha alumina monohydrate (pseudoboehmite), nickel nitrate hexahydrate, and enough water to form a paste-like mixture, mulling this mixture, and extruding it into 1.6 mm (1/16 inch) cylindrical pellets by conventional means. The catalyst was pre-calcined in nitrogen for 3 hours at 482°C (900°F) (2.8°C/min heat-up) and then in air at 538°C (1000°F) for 3 hours. This procedure converts the alpha alumina monohydrate into gamma-alumina. The physical properties and pore size distribution (as measured by mercury porosimetry) are shown in Table 1. The catalyst in this example will be referred to as a medium pore diameter catalyst. This catalyst has 60 percent of its pore with diameters less than 20 nm (as measured by mercury porosimetry).
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • A lube dewaxing catalyst was produced by preparing a mixture of 65 percent ZSM-5, 21 percent of the same alpha alumina monohydrate (pseudoboehmite) used in Example 1, 14 percent delta alumina, nickel nitrate hexahydrate, and enough water to form a paste-like mixture, mulling this mixture, and extruding it into 1.6 mm (1/16 inch) cylindrical pellets by conventional means. The delta alumina was prepared by calcining the alpha alumina monohydrate in air at 927°C (1700°F) for 4 hours. The catalyst was pre-calcined in nitrogen for 3 hours at 482°C (900°F) (2.8°C/min heat-up) and then in air at 538°C (1000°F) for 3 hours. The physical properties and pore size distribution (as measured by mercury porosimetry) are shown in Table 1. The catalyst in this example will be referred to as a large pore diameter catalyst. This catalyst has 44 volume percent of its pores (as measured by mercury porosimetry) with diameters less than 20 nm.
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • A lube dewaxing catalyst was produced by preparing a mixture of 65% ZSM-5, 35% of a finely divided, dense, high chemical purity alpha alumina monohydrate, Keith alumina (pseudoboehmite from Keith Corporation), nickel nitrate hexahydrate, and enough water to form a paste-like mixture, mulling this mixture, and extruding it into 1.6 mm (1/16 inch) cylindrical pellets by conventional means. The catalyst was precalcined in nitrogen for 3 hours at 482°C (900°F) (2.8°C/min heat-up) and then in air at 538°C (1000°F) for 3 hours. This procedure converts the alpha alumina monohydrate into gamma alumina. The physical properties and pore size distribution (as measured by mercury porosimetry) are shown in the following Table. The catalyst in this example will be referred to as a small pore diameter catalyst. It has an average pore diameter of 4 nm, 92 volume percent of its pores (as measured by mercury porosimetry) being of diameter less than 20 nm.
    Figure imgb0003
  • EXAMPLE 4
  • The catalysts of Examples 1 and 2 were examined for dewaxing of paraffinic North Sea Heavy Neutral and Bright Stock raffinates. Properties of the feedstocks are given in Table 2. Both catalysts were able to produce -6.6°C (20°F) pour point products. The aging rates of the catalysts were tracked by adjusting the reaction temperature to compensate for activity loss so as to maintain a target -6.6°C (20°F) pour point while maintaining all other conditions constant.
  • In comparing the performances of the medium and large pore diameter catalysts, only a slight aging rate benefit was observed with the medium pore diameter catalyst in dewaxing the Heavy Neutral raffinate (Figure 2).
  • However, a much more significant aging rate benefit was observed with this same catalyst in dewaxing the Bright Stock raffinate (Figure 3). Thus the catalyst with the smaller pore diameter is more suitable for processing the heavier feedstock.
    Figure imgb0004
  • EXAMPLE 5
  • The performance of the medium pore and small pore dewaxing catalysts in the dewaxing of Statfjord Bright stock are shown in Figure 4. The process conditions were: LHSV = 0.5, 28.6 bar (400 psig) and 445 m³/m³ hydrogen/oil (2500 SCF H₂/bbl). In dewaxing bright stock raffinate, this example shows that the small pore Keith alumina based catalyst has an improved performance over the medium pore catalyst.

Claims (12)

  1. A cyclic catalytic dewaxing process for improving the pour point of a demetallized petroleum fraction free of components boiling below 371°C, which comprises contacting a bright stock raffinate with a dewaxing catalyst at a temperature of 260 to 482°C, a pressure of 14.8 to 242.4 bar, a liquid hourly space velocity of 0.2 to 20 and a hydrogen circulation rate of 89 to 3560 m³/m³, said catalyst comprising a porous composite of a zeolite having a constraint index of 1 to 12 and a matrix whereof the zeolite constitutes 35 to 75 weight percent, at least 60 volume percent of the pores of said composite having a diameter less than 20 nm as measured by mercures porosimetry, the composite having a particle density of at least 1.0 g/cm³.
  2. A process according to claim 1 wherein said zeolite is ZSM-5.
  3. A process according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein said catalyst further comprises 0.01 to 10 percent, by weight of the composite, of a Group VIII metal.
  4. A process according to claim 3 wherein said metal is nickel.
  5. A process acccrding to any preceding claim wherein said matrix comprises small-particle alumina having a packing density of 0.5 to 0.6 g/cm³ and a particle density of 0.95 to 1.50 g/cm³.
  6. A process according to any preceding claim wherein the average pore diameter of said composite is less than 15 nm.
  7. A process according to any preceding claim wherein the average pore diameter of the said composite is less than 10 nm.
  8. A process according to any preceding claim wherein the average pore diameter of the said composite is less than 7 nm.
  9. A process according to any preceding claim wherein the average pore diameter of the said composite is less than 4 nm.
  10. A process according to any preceding claim wherein the crystal size of the zeolite is from 0.02 to 0.05 micrometers.
  11. A process according to any preceding claim wherein the pour point of the product of the dewaxing is at least 39°C (70°F) lower than that of said bright stock.
  12. A process according to any preceding claim wherein said contacting is carried out at a temperature below 375°C, a pressure below 140 bar, a hydrogen circulation rate below 534 m³/m³ and a liquid hourly space velocity of 0.5 to 5.
EP19900122676 1989-12-04 1990-11-27 Catalytic process for manufacture of low pour lubricating oils Expired - Lifetime EP0431448B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US44520489A 1989-12-04 1989-12-04
US445204 1989-12-04

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0431448A1 EP0431448A1 (en) 1991-06-12
EP0431448B1 true EP0431448B1 (en) 1993-11-18

Family

ID=23767989

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19900122676 Expired - Lifetime EP0431448B1 (en) 1989-12-04 1990-11-27 Catalytic process for manufacture of low pour lubricating oils

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0431448B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH03212493A (en)
AU (1) AU629425B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2029999A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69004670T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2045729T3 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2765206B1 (en) * 1997-06-25 1999-08-06 Inst Francais Du Petrole ZEOLITHE EU-1, CATALYST AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE FLOW POINT CONTAINING PARAFFINS
FR2765207B1 (en) * 1997-06-25 1999-08-06 Inst Francais Du Petrole ZEOLITHE NU-85, CATALYST AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE FLOW POINT CONTAINING PARAFFINS
FR2765208B1 (en) * 1997-06-25 1999-09-03 Inst Francais Du Petrole ZEOLITHE NU-85, CATALYST AND METHOD AND FOR IMPROVING THE FLOW POINT CONTAINING PARAFFINS
FR2765209B1 (en) * 1997-06-25 1999-10-22 Inst Francais Du Petrole ZEOLITHE EU-1, CATALYST AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE FLOW POINT CONTAINING PARAFFINS

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4292166A (en) * 1980-07-07 1981-09-29 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic process for manufacture of lubricating oils
US4510044A (en) * 1982-02-08 1985-04-09 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for hydrotreating petroleum residua and catalyst therefor
US4440630A (en) * 1982-02-08 1984-04-03 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for simultaneous hydrodesulfurization and hydrodewaxing with a catalyst of controlled pore size and metals content
US4508615A (en) * 1984-02-16 1985-04-02 Mobil Oil Corporation Multi-stage process for demetalation, desulfurization and dewaxing of petroleum oils
US4510043A (en) * 1984-02-16 1985-04-09 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for dewaxing of petroleum oils prior to demetalation and desulfurization

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2045729T3 (en) 1994-01-16
CA2029999A1 (en) 1991-06-05
DE69004670D1 (en) 1993-12-23
AU629425B2 (en) 1992-10-01
DE69004670T2 (en) 1994-03-10
EP0431448A1 (en) 1991-06-12
AU6652990A (en) 1991-06-06
JPH03212493A (en) 1991-09-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0464546B1 (en) Production of high viscosity index lubricants
US6506297B1 (en) Biodegradable high performance hydrocarbon base oils
EP0464547B1 (en) Process for the production of high viscosity index lubricants
US6190532B1 (en) Production of high viscosity index lubricants
KR100695180B1 (en) Flexible process for producing base stock and middle distillates by conversion-hydroisomerisation followed by catalytic dewaxing
AU666068B2 (en) Lubricant production by hydroisomerization of solvent extracted feedstocks
EP0092376A2 (en) Catalytic process for manufacture of low pour point lubricating oils
US6231749B1 (en) Production of high viscosity index lubricants
JP3628023B2 (en) Wax hydroisomerization
JP2003522251A (en) Production of high viscosity lubricating base stocks using improved ZSM-5 catalysts
ZA200600299B (en) Fuels and lubricants using layered bed catalysts in hydrotreating waxy feeds, including Fischer-Tropsch wax, plus solvent dewaxing
KR20000023803A (en) Layered catalyst system for lube oil hydroconversion
EP1789187B1 (en) Improved molecular sieve containing hydrodewaxing catalysts
EP1720961B1 (en) Process to continuously prepare two or more base oil grades and middle distillates
EP0775184B2 (en) Lubricating oil production with vi-selective catalyst
US4541919A (en) Shape selective dewaxing using coke modified large pore zeolites
EP1054936A1 (en) A method for upgrading waxy feeds using a catalyst comprising mixed powdered dewaxing catalyst and powdered isomerization catalyst formed into a discrete particle
US4908120A (en) Catalytic dewaxing process using binder-free zeolite
US4744884A (en) Process for producing lubrication oil of high viscosity index
JP4496647B2 (en) An adaptable (flexible) production method of very high quality base oils and possibly middle distillates
EP0431448B1 (en) Catalytic process for manufacture of low pour lubricating oils
US4921593A (en) Catalytic dewaxing process
US5985132A (en) Process for the simultaneous production of lubricating oil base stocks and motor fuel
EP0155822B1 (en) Catalytic dewaxing process using zsm-11 zeolite
KR20210044226A (en) Heavy base oil and manufacturing method without haze at 0℃

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19901210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT NL

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19911227

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69004670

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19931223

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2045729

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19960912

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19960916

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19960925

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19960925

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 19961112

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19961128

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971127

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 19971128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19971130

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971130

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: MOBIL OIL CORP.

Effective date: 19971130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980601

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19971127

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980801

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19980601

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20010301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20051127