EP0346045B1 - Product discrimination system and method therefor - Google Patents

Product discrimination system and method therefor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0346045B1
EP0346045B1 EP89305650A EP89305650A EP0346045B1 EP 0346045 B1 EP0346045 B1 EP 0346045B1 EP 89305650 A EP89305650 A EP 89305650A EP 89305650 A EP89305650 A EP 89305650A EP 0346045 B1 EP0346045 B1 EP 0346045B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
product unit
product
light
sensed
unit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP89305650A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0346045A2 (en
EP0346045A3 (en
Inventor
Gerald Ray Richert
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP0346045A2 publication Critical patent/EP0346045A2/en
Publication of EP0346045A3 publication Critical patent/EP0346045A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0346045B1 publication Critical patent/EP0346045B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07CPOSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
    • B07C5/00Sorting according to a characteristic or feature of the articles or material being sorted, e.g. by control effected by devices which detect or measure such characteristic or feature; Sorting by manually actuated devices, e.g. switches
    • B07C5/34Sorting according to other particular properties
    • B07C5/342Sorting according to other particular properties according to optical properties, e.g. colour
    • B07C5/3425Sorting according to other particular properties according to optical properties, e.g. colour of granular material, e.g. ore particles, grain

Definitions

  • the field of the present invention is product discrimination systems based on color.
  • More complicated sensing devices have been developed which use line scan cameras for determining such attributes as cross-sectional area. Such cameras have used light to present pixel information which may then be processed for summation and the like. In order to detect color using such a system, a very complicated system would be required because of the substantial amount of data to be received and processed. With product units traveling at any reasonable speed past such a discrimination system, it quickly becomes impossible to keep up with the processing of relevant information without a very substantial data processing system.
  • the present invention is directed to a product discrimination system employing the sensing of a variety of light spectra, which may include wavelengths both in and beyond the visible spectrum, from product units being classified.
  • the magnitudes of the sensed light spectra may then be analysed for determining such attributes of a product as size, ripeness, blemishes and colour.
  • a manageable amount of data is received and processed by such a system with a maximum number of product factors being determined.
  • US-A-4 454 029 discloses a method of discriminating products in accordance with the prior art portion of claim 1.
  • This prior disclosure utilises a filtered chromatic light signal to recognise a product unit to be rejected simply when a single signal showing a blemish is received.
  • the present invention as characterised in claim 1, does not rely upon a single signal but instead sums a number of individual signals for each product unit with the result that a far more flexible discrimination operation can be achieved rich can be used for sorting functions additional simply to recognising blemishes due to a colour change.
  • the present invention provides a method for discriminating attributes of product units, rich uses absolute magnitudes and comparative relationships between the sums of magnitudes of various spectra of light sensed from a product unit to determine such attributes as size, as well as colour, ripeness and blemishes averaged over the role product unit.
  • US-A-4 150 287 and US-A-3 993 899 show other apparatus by which different light spectra reflected from an article are sensed to recognise characteristics of the article being sensed.
  • these are typical of the prior art in that they contain no suggestion as to how features other than simple colour or appearance changes at single locations can be utilised for discrimination purposes.
  • Other and further objects and advantages will appear hereinafter.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of a discrimination system of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a schematic illustration of an optical sensing device of the present invention.
  • Figure 3 is a schematic view of the viewing area of the device of Figure 2.
  • Figure 4 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 4-4 of Figure 2.
  • Figure 5 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 5-5 of Figure 2.
  • Figure 6 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 6-6 of Figure 2.
  • Figure 7 is a logic flow chart for analysis of the sensed light.
  • a product discrimination system is schematically illustrated in Figure 1.
  • One or more objects 10, which are units of product to be sensed, are brought into appropriate position at a viewing station by a conveying means. Such a conveying means is illustrated in copending EP-A-0345036
  • the objects 10 may be illuminated as needed for appropriate sensing by conventional lights.
  • Lens assemblies 12 are positioned to view and sense the electromagnetic energy, or light spectrum, from the objects 10.
  • the lens assemblies 12 are positioned in accordance with the system design. It is possible to sense characteristics of each product unit passing through a station with one, two, three or more lens assemblies 12 directed at the station. With two such lens assemblies, as illustrated in Figure 1, a substantial portion of the object may be viewed.
  • Fiber optic cables 18 convey the sensed electromagnetic energy to a signal conditioning and processing unit. Depending on the capability of the processing unit, more than one station may be established on separate conveying paths with separate sets of lens assemblies.
  • each lens assembly 12 includes a housing 14 with a lens 16 positioned at an aperture to the housing 14.
  • the lens 16 is positioned at a specific distance from the path along which product units are to pass. With the single lens 16, a focal plane is thus defined within the housing 14. But for the aperture at which the lens 16 is located, the housing 14 is conveniently closed to prevent extraneous light from entering the housing and projecting on the focal plane.
  • a randomized fiber optic cable 18 Extending into the lens assembly 12 is a randomized fiber optic cable 18.
  • a cable 18 is made up of a plurality of light transmitting fibers which are randomly bundled such that a pattern of light impinging on one end of the cable 18 will be mixed, or averaged, upon exiting the other end of the cable 18.
  • the cable 18 has a first end which is positioned at the focal plane of the lens 16. Further, the first end is arranged in a thin rectangular pattern in that focal plane. The pattern of this first end 20 is best illustrated in Figure 4.
  • the arrangement of the first end 20 in a thin rectangular array at the focal plane of the lens 16 causes the image received by the cable 18 to be a thin rectangular area of the pathway through which product units travel.
  • the image received by the cable 18 is, therefore, like that of a line scan camera.
  • the length of the rectangle transverse to the direction of movement of the product unit is preferably greater than the largest dimension transverse to the conveying path of any anticipated product unit.
  • the width of the rectangular viewing area parallel to the direction of a movement is substantially smaller than the dimension along the conveying path of the anticipated product units.
  • the discrimination system can be configured such that sequential sensings are made as the product passes by the lens assemblies 12.
  • a complete view of the product unit may be achieved by collecting sequential readings from the viewing area as the product moves across that viewing area.
  • the light energy received by the rectangular first end 20 of the cable 18 is transmitted along the cable to a second end 22.
  • the second end 22 is conveniently circular in the present embodiment.
  • the light transmitted through the cable is averaged and directed against a plano convex lens 24.
  • the lens 24 is positioned such that the second end 22 lies at the focal point of the lens.
  • the light passing through the lens from the second end 22 of the cable 18 is directed in a substantially nonconverging and nondiverging path. If the second end 22 of the cable 18 is in a circular shape, a similar yet magnified pattern will be transmitted by the lens 24.
  • the filter assembly 26 Adjacent the lens 24 is a filter assembly 26.
  • the filter assembly 26 may be positioned against or near the lens 24 to receive the light from the cable 18.
  • the filter assembly 26 includes filter elements 28.
  • the filter elements 28 are selected such that the separate elements filter different spectra of light.
  • the filter assembly may include, for example, a red filter, a green filter, a yellow filter and even a filter outside of the visible spectrum. If the light from the lens 24 is arranged as discussed above, the filter assembly 26 is most conveniently circular with sectors of the circular assembly constituting the filter elements 28.
  • a plurality of differently filtered light portions of the averaged light of the image are derived through the filter assembly 26. Four such equal portions are shown in the preferred embodiment. However, other arrangements could well be found beneficial for viewing particular product units.
  • photodiodes 30 are presented adjacent the filter elements 28.
  • one such diode 30 is associated with each filter element sector 28.
  • an electronic signal is generated by each diode responsive to the magnitude of light conveyed through each of the filter elements.
  • the magnitude of each filtered portion may be compared against a standard stored in the data processing unit or converted by a factor or factors developed from prior comparisons with standard samples or tests.
  • the accumulated segments or views making up an image formed by sequential images of the entire unit may also be processed in like manner.
  • the standards within the processor or forming a basis for data conversion can be derived from sample product units having known physical attributes.
  • a pattern of magnitudes from the separate filtered portions or accumulation of portions for an entire unit can be compared with standards or converted for cross-sectional size, blemishes, ripeness and color.
  • An indexing of the unit is also processed to fix the product unit on the conveying system.
  • the processing unit may then time the diversion of each product unit according to its physical attribute or attributes to predetermined off-loading stations on the conveying system.
  • Step 100 initiates the program.
  • Step 102 initializes the sensed values, i.e., the product length and the magnitude of the light spectra separately sensed.
  • the product length is set to zero.
  • Product length is the length of the product in the direction of motion of the conveyor regardless of the product orientation. For example, what might normally be thought of as the product length may be lying crosswise to the conveyor and hence become its width as recognized by the system for purposes of discrimination.
  • the length is measured in units of movement of the conveyor by a conventional indexing mechanism.
  • the summation of light magnitudes perceived by the photodiodes 30 is also set to zero. With multiple diodes 30, a plurality of light magnitudes are stored in separate sums. In the present example, four such magnitude summations are processed by the system.
  • Step 104 times the measurement of light magnitude to coincide with the presentation of a new unit length of product.
  • This step is controlled by the indexing mechanism for the conveyor.
  • a line scan process is approximated.
  • the light received is averaged and individual units of the line scan, or pixels, do not exist.
  • the useful attribute received is spectra magnitude.
  • Step 106 stores the magnitude of each light spectra sensed as the successive unit length passes through the viewing station. This storage of magnitude is controlled by step 104 such that an area which is one unit in length and the actual dimension of the product transverse to the direction of motion of the conveyor is sensed. The magnitudes of the selected light spectra are sensed by the photodiodes 30 and stored by this step.
  • Step 108 detects whether or not a product unit is present and whether or not the product unit just ceased to be present at the sensing station. If no product is sensed and no product was sensed in the just prior view, the no product logic path 110 is selected. Under this circumstance, logic step 102 is again initiated. If a product is sensed as being present, the product present logic path 112 is followed. If a product unit is not sensed but the just prior view did sense a product unit, the product end logic path 114 is followed.
  • each light spectra is added to any prior sum of such magnitudes in logic step 116.
  • the sum is zero from logic step 102.
  • each reading is added to the cumulative sum of magnitudes.
  • the length is also summed in a similar manner with each sensed view being added to the prior length in step 118.
  • Logic step 104 is then instituted to time the next reading.
  • the product end logic path 114 represents the conclusion of the sensing process on a product unit.
  • the logic step 120 takes an average of the summed magnitude per unit length by dividing the summed magnitude by the length of the product unit.
  • Other algorithms could be employed in this step. Such algorithms would depend on the unit being observed and the physical attribute or attributes to be employed for discrimination. Further, multiple algorithms could also be used where necessary. One such algorithm would be to pick the largest magnitude value of the units measured of a given product.
  • logic step 122 allows the selection of an algorithm for calculating one or more of a plurality of physical attributes. Such attributes might include color, size of the product and product grade.
  • the average color magnitude in association with the product length may give a sufficient approximation of cross-sectional area that the size or weight of the product unit might be determined.
  • the readings might be used directly to provide discrimination or might be first converted into conventional units such as weight or volume through a comparison of the sensed values with a standard. Such a comparison might be undertaken with a constant factor, a table or other conventional means by which a standard is integrated into the interpretation of measured data.
  • the recognition of the physical attribute of the product may be result in a binary output or present specific magnitudes.
  • the product may be either retained or rejected at a given station through an on or off signal to an actuator employed to remove products from a conveyor.
  • an actuator employed to remove products from a conveyor.
  • heavily blemished product units or unusually large or small product units might be automatically off-loaded from the conveying system at an appropriate off-loading station.
  • Further processing of sensed magnitudes on the other hand might be employed, for example, in selecting from a plurality of off-loading stations to achieve a specific load at each station.
  • the estimated weight of individual units could be calculated and units selectively off-loaded at a at a plurality of stations to achieve a certain bag weight at each station.
  • the signals generated by the system typically may actuate solenoid devices which in turn actuate off-loading systems.
  • the indexing mechanism associated with the conveyor is required to present input to the logic system such that the logic system can determine when a given product unit reaches an off-loading station and time the off-loading of the product unit.
  • a mechanism for inputting light images of product units or portions thereof in an arrangement such that the output presents a plurality of measurable magnitudes of light in specified spectra useful for distinguishing between product units.

Landscapes

  • Sorting Of Articles (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
  • Spectrometry And Color Measurement (AREA)

Description

  • The field of the present invention is product discrimination systems based on color.
  • Fruit and vegetable products have been subject to sorting based on color in the past. Initially, such tasks were performed manually. More recently, as labor continues to be more and more expensive and unavailable, machine sorting by color has been attempted. A device capable of sorting by color is described in U.S -A- 4,106,628. In this system, color from a product unit is directed through lenses, fiber optics and filters to a sensing mechanism. Light from both sides of a product unit are equally mixed by a splitting and reforming of optic fibers used to transmit the light. In this way, an average from both sides of the product unit is achieved. The optic fibers are then split into two bundles. Filters of different wavelength capacity are employed to filter the light derived from the fiber optic bundles. Red and green filters are given as examples. The signals generated by the filtered light are then compared with a standard such that a red/green color classification may be made based on the readings compared with the standard.
  • More complicated sensing devices have been developed which use line scan cameras for determining such attributes as cross-sectional area. Such cameras have used light to present pixel information which may then be processed for summation and the like. In order to detect color using such a system, a very complicated system would be required because of the substantial amount of data to be received and processed. With product units traveling at any reasonable speed past such a discrimination system, it quickly becomes impossible to keep up with the processing of relevant information without a very substantial data processing system.
  • The present invention is directed to a product discrimination system employing the sensing of a variety of light spectra, which may include wavelengths both in and beyond the visible spectrum, from product units being classified. The magnitudes of the sensed light spectra may then be analysed for determining such attributes of a product as size, ripeness, blemishes and colour. According to the present invention, a manageable amount of data is received and processed by such a system with a maximum number of product factors being determined.
  • US-A-4 454 029 discloses a method of discriminating products in accordance with the prior art portion of claim 1. This prior disclosure utilises a filtered chromatic light signal to recognise a product unit to be rejected simply when a single signal showing a blemish is received. The present invention, as characterised in claim 1, does not rely upon a single signal but instead sums a number of individual signals for each product unit with the result that a far more flexible discrimination operation can be achieved rich can be used for sorting functions additional simply to recognising blemishes due to a colour change. Thus, the present invention provides a method for discriminating attributes of product units, rich uses absolute magnitudes and comparative relationships between the sums of magnitudes of various spectra of light sensed from a product unit to determine such attributes as size, as well as colour, ripeness and blemishes averaged over the role product unit.
  • US-A-4 150 287 and US-A-3 993 899 show other apparatus by which different light spectra reflected from an article are sensed to recognise characteristics of the article being sensed. However, these are typical of the prior art in that they contain no suggestion as to how features other than simple colour or appearance changes at single locations can be utilised for discrimination purposes. Other and further objects and advantages will appear hereinafter.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of a discrimination system of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a schematic illustration of an optical sensing device of the present invention.
  • Figure 3 is a schematic view of the viewing area of the device of Figure 2.
  • Figure 4 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 4-4 of Figure 2.
  • Figure 5 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 5-5 of Figure 2.
  • Figure 6 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 6-6 of Figure 2.
  • Figure 7 is a logic flow chart for analysis of the sensed light.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • A product discrimination system is schematically illustrated in Figure 1. One or more objects 10, which are units of product to be sensed, are brought into appropriate position at a viewing station by a conveying means. Such a conveying means is illustrated in copending EP-A-0345036 The objects 10 may be illuminated as needed for appropriate sensing by conventional lights. Lens assemblies 12 are positioned to view and sense the electromagnetic energy, or light spectrum, from the objects 10. The lens assemblies 12 are positioned in accordance with the system design. It is possible to sense characteristics of each product unit passing through a station with one, two, three or more lens assemblies 12 directed at the station. With two such lens assemblies, as illustrated in Figure 1, a substantial portion of the object may be viewed. Additionally, the object may be rotated for sensing by the same elements or by additional elements further along the conveying path. Fiber optic cables 18 convey the sensed electromagnetic energy to a signal conditioning and processing unit. Depending on the capability of the processing unit, more than one station may be established on separate conveying paths with separate sets of lens assemblies.
  • Looking in greater detail to the optical sensing device, each lens assembly 12 includes a housing 14 with a lens 16 positioned at an aperture to the housing 14. The lens 16 is positioned at a specific distance from the path along which product units are to pass. With the single lens 16, a focal plane is thus defined within the housing 14. But for the aperture at which the lens 16 is located, the housing 14 is conveniently closed to prevent extraneous light from entering the housing and projecting on the focal plane.
  • Extending into the lens assembly 12 is a randomized fiber optic cable 18. Such a cable 18 is made up of a plurality of light transmitting fibers which are randomly bundled such that a pattern of light impinging on one end of the cable 18 will be mixed, or averaged, upon exiting the other end of the cable 18.
  • The cable 18 has a first end which is positioned at the focal plane of the lens 16. Further, the first end is arranged in a thin rectangular pattern in that focal plane. The pattern of this first end 20 is best illustrated in Figure 4. The arrangement of the first end 20 in a thin rectangular array at the focal plane of the lens 16 causes the image received by the cable 18 to be a thin rectangular area of the pathway through which product units travel. The image received by the cable 18 is, therefore, like that of a line scan camera. The length of the rectangle transverse to the direction of movement of the product unit is preferably greater than the largest dimension transverse to the conveying path of any anticipated product unit. The width of the rectangular viewing area parallel to the direction of a movement is substantially smaller than the dimension along the conveying path of the anticipated product units. Given a constant speed of advancement of each product unit along the conveying path, the discrimination system can be configured such that sequential sensings are made as the product passes by the lens assemblies 12. A complete view of the product unit may be achieved by collecting sequential readings from the viewing area as the product moves across that viewing area.
  • The light energy received by the rectangular first end 20 of the cable 18 is transmitted along the cable to a second end 22. The second end 22 is conveniently circular in the present embodiment. The light transmitted through the cable is averaged and directed against a plano convex lens 24. The lens 24 is positioned such that the second end 22 lies at the focal point of the lens. Thus, the light passing through the lens from the second end 22 of the cable 18 is directed in a substantially nonconverging and nondiverging path. If the second end 22 of the cable 18 is in a circular shape, a similar yet magnified pattern will be transmitted by the lens 24.
  • Adjacent the lens 24 is a filter assembly 26. The filter assembly 26 may be positioned against or near the lens 24 to receive the light from the cable 18. The filter assembly 26 includes filter elements 28. The filter elements 28 are selected such that the separate elements filter different spectra of light. Thus, the filter assembly may include, for example, a red filter, a green filter, a yellow filter and even a filter outside of the visible spectrum. If the light from the lens 24 is arranged as discussed above, the filter assembly 26 is most conveniently circular with sectors of the circular assembly constituting the filter elements 28. Thus, from a rectangular image of a small slice of the product unit being viewed, a plurality of differently filtered light portions of the averaged light of the image are derived through the filter assembly 26. Four such equal portions are shown in the preferred embodiment. However, other arrangements could well be found beneficial for viewing particular product units.
  • To receive the divided and filtered portions of light from the original image, photodiodes 30 are presented adjacent the filter elements 28. In the preferred embodiment, one such diode 30 is associated with each filter element sector 28. Thus, an electronic signal is generated by each diode responsive to the magnitude of light conveyed through each of the filter elements.
  • The magnitude of each filtered portion may be compared against a standard stored in the data processing unit or converted by a factor or factors developed from prior comparisons with standard samples or tests. The accumulated segments or views making up an image formed by sequential images of the entire unit may also be processed in like manner. The standards within the processor or forming a basis for data conversion can be derived from sample product units having known physical attributes. Thus a pattern of magnitudes from the separate filtered portions or accumulation of portions for an entire unit can be compared with standards or converted for cross-sectional size, blemishes, ripeness and color. An indexing of the unit is also processed to fix the product unit on the conveying system. The processing unit may then time the diversion of each product unit according to its physical attribute or attributes to predetermined off-loading stations on the conveying system.
  • Figure 7 schematically illustrates analysis of the sensed light received by the photodiodes 30. Step 100 initiates the program. Step 102 initializes the sensed values, i.e., the product length and the magnitude of the light spectra separately sensed.
  • By step 102, the product length is set to zero. Product length is the length of the product in the direction of motion of the conveyor regardless of the product orientation. For example, what might normally be thought of as the product length may be lying crosswise to the conveyor and hence become its width as recognized by the system for purposes of discrimination. The length is measured in units of movement of the conveyor by a conventional indexing mechanism.
  • The summation of light magnitudes perceived by the photodiodes 30 is also set to zero. With multiple diodes 30, a plurality of light magnitudes are stored in separate sums. In the present example, four such magnitude summations are processed by the system.
  • Step 104 times the measurement of light magnitude to coincide with the presentation of a new unit length of product. This step is controlled by the indexing mechanism for the conveyor. By viewing sequential units or slices of the product as it passes through the station, a line scan process is approximated. However, the light received is averaged and individual units of the line scan, or pixels, do not exist. Thus, the useful attribute received is spectra magnitude.
  • Step 106 stores the magnitude of each light spectra sensed as the successive unit length passes through the viewing station. This storage of magnitude is controlled by step 104 such that an area which is one unit in length and the actual dimension of the product transverse to the direction of motion of the conveyor is sensed. The magnitudes of the selected light spectra are sensed by the photodiodes 30 and stored by this step.
  • Step 108 detects whether or not a product unit is present and whether or not the product unit just ceased to be present at the sensing station. If no product is sensed and no product was sensed in the just prior view, the no product logic path 110 is selected. Under this circumstance, logic step 102 is again initiated. If a product is sensed as being present, the product present logic path 112 is followed. If a product unit is not sensed but the just prior view did sense a product unit, the product end logic path 114 is followed.
  • In the product present logic path 112 when a product is sensed, the magnitude of each light spectra is added to any prior sum of such magnitudes in logic step 116. When the first sensing of a product unit passing through the viewing station occurs, the sum is zero from logic step 102. In successive views, each reading is added to the cumulative sum of magnitudes. The length is also summed in a similar manner with each sensed view being added to the prior length in step 118. Logic step 104 is then instituted to time the next reading.
  • The product end logic path 114 represents the conclusion of the sensing process on a product unit. In this path, the logic step 120 takes an average of the summed magnitude per unit length by dividing the summed magnitude by the length of the product unit. Other algorithms could be employed in this step. Such algorithms would depend on the unit being observed and the physical attribute or attributes to be employed for discrimination. Further, multiple algorithms could also be used where necessary. One such algorithm would be to pick the largest magnitude value of the units measured of a given product. Finally, logic step 122 allows the selection of an algorithm for calculating one or more of a plurality of physical attributes. Such attributes might include color, size of the product and product grade. In the case of size, the average color magnitude in association with the product length may give a sufficient approximation of cross-sectional area that the size or weight of the product unit might be determined. Under such circumstances, the readings might be used directly to provide discrimination or might be first converted into conventional units such as weight or volume through a comparison of the sensed values with a standard. Such a comparison might be undertaken with a constant factor, a table or other conventional means by which a standard is integrated into the interpretation of measured data. Once having resolved the nature of the product, the program is returned to initialize the summations of light spectra magnitude and length at zero.
  • The recognition of the physical attribute of the product may be result in a binary output or present specific magnitudes. In the case of a binary output, the product may be either retained or rejected at a given station through an on or off signal to an actuator employed to remove products from a conveyor. As an example, heavily blemished product units or unusually large or small product units might be automatically off-loaded from the conveying system at an appropriate off-loading station. Further processing of sensed magnitudes on the other hand might be employed, for example, in selecting from a plurality of off-loading stations to achieve a specific load at each station. Through such a scheme, the estimated weight of individual units could be calculated and units selectively off-loaded at a at a plurality of stations to achieve a certain bag weight at each station. The signals generated by the system typically may actuate solenoid devices which in turn actuate off-loading systems. Naturally, the indexing mechanism associated with the conveyor is required to present input to the logic system such that the logic system can determine when a given product unit reaches an off-loading station and time the off-loading of the product unit.
  • Thus, a mechanism is contemplated for inputting light images of product units or portions thereof in an arrangement such that the output presents a plurality of measurable magnitudes of light in specified spectra useful for distinguishing between product units.

Claims (6)

  1. A method of discriminating product units by physical attributes using light spectra, wherein a product unit is viewed sequentially in a first direction across the product unit (10) as a series of thin rectangular segments, each substantially narrower than the product unit in the first direction, the viewed light from each segment is averaged and then divided into portions which are separately filtered (at 28) to obtain spectra different from one another, the magnitude of each filtered portion is sensed (at 30), and the product unit is discriminated in dependence of characteristics determined by such sensing, characterised in that the thin rectangular segments are at least as wide as the product unit in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction and in that for each light spectrum the magnitude (at 106) of the filtered portions for a single product unit are summed (at 116) and the separate sums are processed (at 120,122) to provide a discriminating signal for such product unit.
  2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the processing (at 120) of the summed signal includes dividing the sum by a signal representative of the length of the product unit as determined by the number of thin rectangular segments needed to scan the product unit to obtain average values for the separate spectrum portions for the product unit.
  3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the size of the product unit is determined (at 122) by processing the average values and the sensed length of the product unit.
  4. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the product unit (10) is viewed from two different directions (12).
  5. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the viewed light is randomly mixed with a randomised fibre optic cable (18) and the light from the cable is directed to different filter elements (28).
  6. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein a standard is established by performing the method steps on products having known attributes to be measured and collecting the magnitudes of each filtered portion, the summed magnitudes sensed of the product unit being compared with the standard to provide the discrimination decision.
EP89305650A 1988-06-09 1989-06-05 Product discrimination system and method therefor Expired - Lifetime EP0346045B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US20468588A 1988-06-09 1988-06-09
US204685 1988-06-09

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0346045A2 EP0346045A2 (en) 1989-12-13
EP0346045A3 EP0346045A3 (en) 1990-06-20
EP0346045B1 true EP0346045B1 (en) 1992-09-23

Family

ID=22759000

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89305650A Expired - Lifetime EP0346045B1 (en) 1988-06-09 1989-06-05 Product discrimination system and method therefor

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0346045B1 (en)
AU (1) AU614619B2 (en)
DE (1) DE68902952T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2013194A6 (en)
IL (1) IL90441A (en)
NZ (1) NZ229341A (en)
ZA (1) ZA894091B (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5156278A (en) * 1990-02-13 1992-10-20 Aaron James W Product discrimination system and method therefor
US5835200A (en) * 1990-04-24 1998-11-10 Gersan Establishment Method and apparatus for examining an object
GB9009132D0 (en) * 1990-04-24 1990-06-20 Gersan Ets Method and apparatus for examining an object
GB2274165B (en) * 1990-04-24 1994-10-26 Gersan Ets Method and apparatus for examining a diamond

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1449519A (en) * 1973-12-13 1976-09-15 Gunssons Sortex Ltd Light-sensitive sorting machine
US4150287A (en) * 1978-02-01 1979-04-17 Amf Incorporated Optical system for use with color sorter or grader
AU534431B2 (en) * 1979-01-19 1984-01-26 H F & Ph F Reemtsma, GmbH & Co. Sorting forein bodies from a material
US4454029A (en) * 1981-05-27 1984-06-12 Delta Technology Corporation Agricultural product sorting
JPS61216787A (en) * 1985-03-19 1986-09-26 株式会社 安西製作所 Mechanism deciding, selecting and removing mixed foreign matter
AU599931B2 (en) * 1985-10-29 1990-08-02 Roger Frederick Bailey Optical sorting apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU614619B2 (en) 1991-09-05
EP0346045A2 (en) 1989-12-13
DE68902952D1 (en) 1992-10-29
AU3582589A (en) 1989-12-14
IL90441A (en) 1992-11-15
DE68902952T2 (en) 1993-02-04
EP0346045A3 (en) 1990-06-20
IL90441A0 (en) 1990-01-18
ZA894091B (en) 1990-11-28
ES2013194A6 (en) 1990-04-16
NZ229341A (en) 1991-07-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5401954A (en) Product ripeness discrimination system and method therefor with area measurement
US5223917A (en) Product discrimination system
US4515275A (en) Apparatus and method for processing fruit and the like
US5339963A (en) Method and apparatus for sorting objects by color
Kim et al. Detection of skin tumors on chicken carcasses using hyperspectral fluorescence imaging
US4534470A (en) Apparatus and method for processing fruit and the like
US5502559A (en) Apparatus and method for detection of material used in construction of containers and color of same
KR100190737B1 (en) Produce recognition system
CN102325605B (en) The method and apparatus of sorting
US6369892B2 (en) Method for discrimination of produce
EP3676027B1 (en) Classification method and apparatus
EP0382466A2 (en) Methods and apparatus for optically determining the acceptability of products
US5729473A (en) Method and device for generating colorimetric data for use in the automatic sorting of products, notably fruits or vegetables
NZ196038A (en) Apparatus for sorting fruit according to colour
KR20110076989A (en) Method and system for item identification
US6191859B1 (en) Optical systems for use in sorting apparatus
EP0025284A1 (en) A method and apparatus for the classification of articles which are in a state of motion
US5018864A (en) Product discrimination system and method therefor
EP0346045B1 (en) Product discrimination system and method therefor
CN1074947C (en) Sorting machine using dual frequency optical detectors
US5493404A (en) Method and apparatus for sensing color of articles
US5557414A (en) Method and apparatus for classifying articles according to their color
WO1994025838A1 (en) Method and apparatus for sensing the color of articles and for classification thereof
JPH11502611A (en) Method and apparatus for detecting a predetermined color
GB2349215A (en) Object recognition system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19901002

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19910319

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19920923

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68902952

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19921029

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20020605

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20020610

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20020612

Year of fee payment: 14

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040101

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20030605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040227

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST