EP0338865B1 - Apparatus for supporting the walls of trenches - Google Patents

Apparatus for supporting the walls of trenches Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0338865B1
EP0338865B1 EP19890304022 EP89304022A EP0338865B1 EP 0338865 B1 EP0338865 B1 EP 0338865B1 EP 19890304022 EP19890304022 EP 19890304022 EP 89304022 A EP89304022 A EP 89304022A EP 0338865 B1 EP0338865 B1 EP 0338865B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
strut
shoring
spring
panel
cylinder
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP19890304022
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0338865A1 (en
Inventor
John Collins
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mabey Hire Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Mabey Hire Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mabey Hire Co Ltd filed Critical Mabey Hire Co Ltd
Publication of EP0338865A1 publication Critical patent/EP0338865A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0338865B1 publication Critical patent/EP0338865B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D17/00Excavations; Bordering of excavations; Making embankments
    • E02D17/06Foundation trenches ditches or narrow shafts
    • E02D17/08Bordering or stiffening the sides of ditches trenches or narrow shafts for foundations

Definitions

  • This invention relates to apparatus for supporting the walls of trenches, or other excavations, and of the kind generally designated as a trench shoring box and comprised of two opposed shoring panels provided with vertically directed support members to which two opposite ends of struts of adjustable length, normally extending substantially perpendicularly to the shoring panels, are horizontally pivotally attached so that the shoring panels can be relatively displaceable in the vertical direction as excavation progresses.
  • FR-A-2 195 240 discloses - in Fig. 3 thereof and the related description - apparatus for supporting the walls of trenches, or other excavations, and of the kind generally designated as a trench shoring box and comprised of two opposed shoring panels provided with vertically directed support members to which two opposite ends of struts of adjustable length, normally extending substantially perpendicularly to the shoring panels, are horizontally pivotally attached so that the shoring panels can be relatively displaceable in the vertical direction as excavation progresses, wherein each strut is additionally resiliently coupled to the shoring panel by a leaf spring which is adapted to dampen angular movement between the strut and the panel, a portion of the leaf spring being secured to the end of the strut and extending perpendicularly thereto, a remote end of the leaf spring being connected to the shoring panel, the spring exerting damping action against deviations of the strut from its normal position substantially perpendicular
  • opposite halves of the leaf spring in Fig. 3 of FR-A-2 195 240 are prestressed to act in opposition to each other, so that any deviation of the panel from its normal angular position relative to the strut is aided by one half of the spring, which half depending upon the direction of the deviation, and opposed by the other half of the spring.
  • both halves of the spring are greatly curved, with a puzzling effect. It appears that the strut is constrained to pivot about the the pin at the centre of the boss in FR-A-2 195 240, so that there would be circumferential movement of the curved spring, moving one extreme end of the spring out of the associated slot and transferring the reaction to the adjacent bar. The other extreme end of the spring would be pushed deeper into the associated slot, also causing eventual reaction from the adjacent bar. Apparently there is no end stop to limit angular deviation.
  • leaf spring in Fig. 3 of FR-A-2 195 240 appears to be of spring steel and yet shown welded to the strut and not to the boss, which is not good practice.
  • the present invention has been devised with the general object of providing a damping system which does not have the above mentioned disadvantages.
  • each spring is substantially rectilinear, so that substantially the entire spring extends substantially parallel to the shoring panel, and in that substantially the entire spring opposes any deviation of the strut, in either direction, from its normal position in which the strut is substantially perpendicular to the panel.
  • Fig. 1 shows a heavy duty strong box strut which comprises a central cylinder 1 formed in two cylindrical parts A, B, with abutting flanges 2, 3 secured together by bolts 4 and nuts 5 and each formed from end to end internally with a quick feed screw thread 6.
  • a pair of thrust rods 9, 10 Retained within the cylinder parts A and B, are the correspondingly screw-threaded cylindrical heads 7, 8 of a pair of thrust rods 9, 10.
  • Attached to the outward end of each of these thrust rods 9, 10 is a perpendicular plate 13 which supports a central part of a multi-leaf spring 12 which is clamped thereto by a second plate 11 by means of bolts 14 and nuts 15, so that the leaf spring 12 extends perpendicularly to the strut.
  • each plate 11 Attached to the outward side of each plate 11 is a U-shaped saddle 16 by which the strut is swivelably mounted on an horizontal pin 17 which, as shown in Fig. 2, extends between a pair of end post plates or brackets 18 which project at right angles from a shoring panel 20, and which are part of an end post 19 fixed to the shoring panel 20 as shown in Fig. 4.
  • each leaf spring is located in slotted tubes 21 which are welded between the end post plates or brackets 18 of the side panel 20, these details being shown more clearly in Fig. 2, and also in Figs. 3 and 4.
  • the centre lines C of the struts are indicated in Fig. 4.
  • Rapid extending or retracting of each strut is effected by turning the cylinder 1 in a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction by use of any suitable tool such as for instance a lever arm inserted into one or other of four radial openings in a collar 22 which is welded to the cylinder part B.
  • Fig. 1 there is also illustrated by a chain-dashed line a lifting bracket which is attached only to the topmost extension strut.
  • the construction is of course such that none of the screw-threading is exposed in use to the environment in which the shoring box operates. Also, in the formation of the screw threading, the minimum amount of metal is removed from the cylinder parts A, B consistent with the maximum designed load-carrying capacity of the strut. This will provide greater local strength and will minimise the possibility of dents being formed in the cylinders during normal use of the struts.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Paleontology (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Springs (AREA)
  • Tents Or Canopies (AREA)
  • Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
  • Forms Removed On Construction Sites Or Auxiliary Members Thereof (AREA)

Description

  • This invention relates to apparatus for supporting the walls of trenches, or other excavations, and of the kind generally designated as a trench shoring box and comprised of two opposed shoring panels provided with vertically directed support members to which two opposite ends of struts of adjustable length, normally extending substantially perpendicularly to the shoring panels, are horizontally pivotally attached so that the shoring panels can be relatively displaceable in the vertical direction as excavation progresses.
  • It has been appreciated that during normal handling of a fully assembled trench shoring box there is considerable differential movement between each of the shoring panels and due to the weight of the assembly unless some damping restraint is provided considerable shock forces are applied at the limits of angular movement between the struts and the panels. Various damping assemblies for this purpose have hitherto been employed, such as for instance hydraulically operating dampers or by the provision of two helical springs positioned equally one each side of each strut centre line, but these have not proved entirely satisfactory. For instance with a damping system embodying two helical springs, one spring only at a time can contribute to the damping action. Also in this damping system the stiffness of the damper is fixed by the geometry of the spring which cannot easily be changed to accommodate extremes of use.
  • FR-A-2 195 240, on which the preamble of claim 1 is based, discloses - in Fig. 3 thereof and the related description - apparatus for supporting the walls of trenches, or other excavations, and of the kind generally designated as a trench shoring box and comprised of two opposed shoring panels provided with vertically directed support members to which two opposite ends of struts of adjustable length, normally extending substantially perpendicularly to the shoring panels, are horizontally pivotally attached so that the shoring panels can be relatively displaceable in the vertical direction as excavation progresses, wherein each strut is additionally resiliently coupled to the shoring panel by a leaf spring which is adapted to dampen angular movement between the strut and the panel, a portion of the leaf spring being secured to the end of the strut and extending perpendicularly thereto, a remote end of the leaf spring being connected to the shoring panel, the spring exerting damping action against deviations of the strut from its normal position substantially perpendicular to the shoring panel.
  • However, opposite halves of the leaf spring in Fig. 3 of FR-A-2 195 240 are prestressed to act in opposition to each other, so that any deviation of the panel from its normal angular position relative to the strut is aided by one half of the spring, which half depending upon the direction of the deviation, and opposed by the other half of the spring. Moreover, both halves of the spring are greatly curved, with a puzzling effect. It appears that the strut is constrained to pivot about the the pin at the centre of the boss in FR-A-2 195 240, so that there would be circumferential movement of the curved spring, moving one extreme end of the spring out of the associated slot and transferring the reaction to the adjacent bar. The other extreme end of the spring would be pushed deeper into the associated slot, also causing eventual reaction from the adjacent bar. Apparently there is no end stop to limit angular deviation.
  • Also, the leaf spring in Fig. 3 of FR-A-2 195 240 appears to be of spring steel and yet shown welded to the strut and not to the boss, which is not good practice.
  • The present invention has been devised with the general object of providing a damping system which does not have the above mentioned disadvantages.
  • The apparatus of the present invention is characterised in that each spring is substantially rectilinear, so that substantially the entire spring extends substantially parallel to the shoring panel, and in that substantially the entire spring opposes any deviation of the strut, in either direction, from its normal position in which the strut is substantially perpendicular to the panel.
  • In order however that the invention may be more readily understood reference should be made to the following description of a preferred embodiment which is illustrated in the accompanying drawings. In these drawings:-
    • Fig. 1 is a side elevation, partly in section, of an adjustable length strut for attachment between opposite shoring panels;
    • Fig. 2 is a plan view of a shoring panel end post showing the mode of connection of an adjustable length strut thereto;
    • Fig. 3 is an elevation view on the inside of a shoring panel; and
    • Fig. 4 is an elevation view on arrow IV in Fig. 3.
  • Referring now to the drawings, Fig. 1 shows a heavy duty strong box strut which comprises a central cylinder 1 formed in two cylindrical parts A, B, with abutting flanges 2, 3 secured together by bolts 4 and nuts 5 and each formed from end to end internally with a quick feed screw thread 6. Retained within the cylinder parts A and B, are the correspondingly screw-threaded cylindrical heads 7, 8 of a pair of thrust rods 9, 10. Attached to the outward end of each of these thrust rods 9, 10 is a perpendicular plate 13 which supports a central part of a multi-leaf spring 12 which is clamped thereto by a second plate 11 by means of bolts 14 and nuts 15, so that the leaf spring 12 extends perpendicularly to the strut. Attached to the outward side of each plate 11 is a U-shaped saddle 16 by which the strut is swivelably mounted on an horizontal pin 17 which, as shown in Fig. 2, extends between a pair of end post plates or brackets 18 which project at right angles from a shoring panel 20, and which are part of an end post 19 fixed to the shoring panel 20 as shown in Fig. 4.
  • The ends of each leaf spring are located in slotted tubes 21 which are welded between the end post plates or brackets 18 of the side panel 20, these details being shown more clearly in Fig. 2, and also in Figs. 3 and 4. The centre lines C of the struts are indicated in Fig. 4.
  • Rapid extending or retracting of each strut is effected by turning the cylinder 1 in a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction by use of any suitable tool such as for instance a lever arm inserted into one or other of four radial openings in a collar 22 which is welded to the cylinder part B.
  • In Fig. 1 there is also illustrated by a chain-dashed line a lifting bracket which is attached only to the topmost extension strut.
  • It will be appreciated that adjustment of the length of a strut is based on the turnbuckle or bottlescrew principle but it is a requirement that strut release should be rapid. A satisfactory screw thread pitch for the elements A, B, 7, 8 would be one which alters the strut length by 48 mm for each revolution of the cylinder 1.
  • The construction is of course such that none of the screw-threading is exposed in use to the environment in which the shoring box operates. Also, in the formation of the screw threading, the minimum amount of metal is removed from the cylinder parts A, B consistent with the maximum designed load-carrying capacity of the strut. This will provide greater local strength and will minimise the possibility of dents being formed in the cylinders during normal use of the struts.
  • It is characteristic of the invention, and advantageous that:
    • a) Any deviation of the strut, in either direction, from its normal position perpendicular to the panel 20, results in restraining action by both halves of the leaf spring 12, that is, the upper spring half and the lower spring half, relative to the horizontal pin 17;
    • b) The stiffness of each spring is easily changed by the addition or reduction of the number of leaves;
    • c) The spring may be shaped to give the maximum stiffness for each leaf, or may be shaped to approach the configuration of constant strength, whereby the stiffness is reduced for the same thickness.
    • d) To guard against injury, in the event of the spring leaves breaking, a guard leaf of a ductile steel may be fitted on the clear side of the spring leaf assembly to prevent a piece of the more elastic and brittle steel spring from flying out and causing personal injury.

Claims (6)

1. Apparatus for supporting the walls of trenches, or other excavations, and of the kind generally designated as a trench shoring box and comprised of two opposed shoring panels (20) provided with vertically directed support members to which two opposite ends of struts of adjustable length, normally extending substantially perpendicularly to the shoring panels (20), are horizontally pivotally attached so that the shoring panels (20) can be relatively displaceable in the vertical direction as excavation progresses, wherein each strut is additionally resiliently coupled to the shoring panel (20) by a leaf spring (12) which is adapted to dampen angular movement between the strut and the panel (20), a portion of the leaf spring (12) being secured to the end of the strut (1) and extending perpendicularly thereto, a remote end (21) of the leaf spring (12) being connected to the shoring panel (20), the spring (12) exerting damping action against deviations of the strut from its normal position substantially perpendicular to the shoring panel (20), characterised in that each spring (12) is substantially rectilinear, so that substantially the entire spring (12) extends substantially parallel to the shoring panel (20), and in that substantially the entire spring (12) opposes any deviation of the strut, in either direction, from its normal position in which the strut is substantially perpendicular to the panel (20).
2. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 1 wherein at least some of the leaf springs (12) are comprised of a plurality of leaves of varying length and/or thickness.
3. Apparatus as claimed in claim 2 wherein the stiffness of each leaf spring is changeable by changing the number of the leaves.
4. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 1, 2 or 3 in which the ends of the leaf springs (12) are received within, and located by, slotted tubes (21) which are fixed indirectly to the shoring panels (20).
5. Apparatus as claimed in any one of Claims 1 to 4 wherein each strut comprises a central internally screw-threaded cylinder (1) and a pair of thrust rods (9, 10) which project one from each end of the cylinder (1) and each having, within the cylinder (1), an externally screw-threaded head (7, 8) which engages the screw threads of the cylinder (1), whereby rotation of the cylinder (1) in one direction or the other causes extension or retraction of the thrust rods (9, 10) relative thereto in order to vary the overall length of the strut.
6. Apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim wherein a guard leaf of a ductile steel is fitted to at least one of the leaf springs (12).
EP19890304022 1988-04-21 1989-04-21 Apparatus for supporting the walls of trenches Expired - Lifetime EP0338865B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8809439A GB2217750B (en) 1988-04-21 1988-04-21 Apparatus for supporting the walls of trenches
GB8809439 1988-04-21

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0338865A1 EP0338865A1 (en) 1989-10-25
EP0338865B1 true EP0338865B1 (en) 1992-06-17

Family

ID=10635588

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19890304022 Expired - Lifetime EP0338865B1 (en) 1988-04-21 1989-04-21 Apparatus for supporting the walls of trenches

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0338865B1 (en)
DE (2) DE338865T1 (en)
GB (1) GB2217750B (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2249114B (en) * 1990-10-22 1994-08-31 Mabey Hire Co Trench box for shoring
CN112746619A (en) * 2020-12-19 2021-05-04 徐东新 Inner supporting structure capable of solving pit bias problem in deep and shallow foundation pit

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BE755176A (en) * 1969-11-08 1971-02-01 Krings Jozef TRENCH SHIELDING DEVICE FOR PIPELINES
AT317782B (en) * 1972-08-04 1974-09-10 Krings Josef Slide shoe for a tensioning device of a trench sheeting device
CH559828A5 (en) * 1972-08-04 1975-03-14 Krings Josef
DE2702750C3 (en) * 1977-01-24 1979-08-16 Josef 5138 Heinsberg Krings Slide shoe for the tensioning device of a Gnfcenverbmivorrichtung
DE2832321C2 (en) * 1978-07-22 1982-10-14 Josef Ing.(grad) 5142 Hückelhoven Emunds Roughly adjustable clamping frame for shoring panels

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2217750A (en) 1989-11-01
EP0338865A1 (en) 1989-10-25
DE68901806D1 (en) 1992-07-23
DE338865T1 (en) 1990-08-16
GB2217750B (en) 1992-04-08
DE68901806T2 (en) 1993-02-04
GB8809439D0 (en) 1988-05-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5314261A (en) Vehicle crash cushion
US4823522A (en) Energy absorbing and assembly for structural system
US6857227B2 (en) Vehicle crash barrier
US4828425A (en) Pre-loaded hinges for lane barrier system
EP0338865B1 (en) Apparatus for supporting the walls of trenches
DE3936198C2 (en)
US5228810A (en) Mine support post
US5433292A (en) Stacker
EP0028365B1 (en) Lifting device for transporting containers
JP2712013B2 (en) Fall prevention device for work on steel beams
GB2263918A (en) Cladding support system
CN216132687U (en) Clamp for detecting physical properties of seamless steel pipe
KR102420849B1 (en) Safety rope fixing mechanism for coupling a clamp
CN214946898U (en) Concrete pump pipe bending arc section fixing device
EP1541459B1 (en) Support unit for mounting several extensible devices on a submarine
JP3764951B2 (en) Pier suspension system
DE2841387C2 (en) chimney
CN221219786U (en) Cantilever anti-falling net mounting structure
DE69728070T2 (en) Elevated cable car
CN220433555U (en) Anti-collision fender for wharf
EP0086407B1 (en) Device for the suspension and support of reactor pressure vessels for nuclear reactor systems
US5217406A (en) Mine ventilation tubing system and method of installation
EP0536675B1 (en) Shelf with cantilever brackets
CN219035796U (en) Multitube door-type lateral anti-seismic support and hanger
CN220727347U (en) Detachable pipeline bracket

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT LU NL

ITCL It: translation for ep claims filed

Representative=s name: BARZANO' E ZANARDO MILANO S.P.A.

TCNL Nl: translation of patent claims filed
17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900425

EL Fr: translation of claims filed
DET De: translation of patent claims
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19910604

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: MABEY HIRE LIMITED

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT LU NL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19920617

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19920617

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19920617

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68901806

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19920723

ET Fr: translation filed
NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19930421

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19930430

26N No opposition filed
GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19930421

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19931229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19940101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST