EP0283690B1 - Flame arrestor and method of manufacture - Google Patents

Flame arrestor and method of manufacture Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0283690B1
EP0283690B1 EP19880101880 EP88101880A EP0283690B1 EP 0283690 B1 EP0283690 B1 EP 0283690B1 EP 19880101880 EP19880101880 EP 19880101880 EP 88101880 A EP88101880 A EP 88101880A EP 0283690 B1 EP0283690 B1 EP 0283690B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pieces
rod
tube
shim
arrestor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP19880101880
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0283690A3 (en
EP0283690A2 (en
Inventor
Alan R. Gaul
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dresser Industries Inc
Original Assignee
Dresser Industries Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dresser Industries Inc filed Critical Dresser Industries Inc
Publication of EP0283690A2 publication Critical patent/EP0283690A2/en
Publication of EP0283690A3 publication Critical patent/EP0283690A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0283690B1 publication Critical patent/EP0283690B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A62LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
    • A62CFIRE-FIGHTING
    • A62C4/00Flame traps allowing passage of gas but not of flame or explosion wave

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a precisely manufactured flame arrestor and to a simple, economical method of manufacture that achieves the precise tolerances required in an arrestor to provide a flameproof path.
  • Flame arrestors are used in pneumatic control devices to provide a flameproof path for the pneumatics into and out of a control or instrument. Flame arrestors provide a restricted pneumatic passage over an extended length such that a flame cannot propagate through the passage.
  • a sintered metal arrestor has been commonly used; however, recently adopted European standards no longer permit the use of this type of flame arrestor.
  • Another type is a Lisk arrestor which is comprised of layers of crimped and flat sheet metal that are wrapped together and held in a case by a rivet.
  • Other types include the parallel plate types that usually consist of flat plates with a slot ground into the plate to a depth equal to the maximum gap allowed for the length of the flame path. The plates are then stacked and bonded together at the unground area to form a series of parallel flame retardant paths.
  • This type of construction is quite expensive due to the grinding of the slot, and the arrestors are more bulky due to the solid area that supports the gap and forms the bond area.
  • Another type of flame arrestor would be a gear shaped rod that is pressed into a tube with the flameproof path provided between the gear teeth. This type of arrestor would be quite expensive as it requires the machining of the fine gear teeth, and it would provide a restricted flow area. These types of flame arrestors are expensive to make and required fine machining of the various parts.
  • the present invention provides a method of manufacturing a flame arrestor wherein the spacing and tolerances are critical.
  • the present invention teaches a method of manufacturing a flame arrestor comprising the steps of: using a multiplicity of precision ground stock pieces (10,20), spacing the pieces (10,20) with a shim (12) that is of such a thickness that the spacing between the pieces (10,20) provided by the shim (12) is within the necessary tolerances to provide a barrier to the propagation of a flame through the arrestor, welding the pieces together, and removing the shim (12) from between the pieces (10,20) to leave a gap (14) between the pieces (10,20) such that the gap (14) is within the tolerances necessary to provide a flameproof path through the arrestor.
  • the method taught by the present invention is used to construct a rod and tube type flame arrestor.
  • a precision ground rod and tube are used such that the rod will fit inside the tube, and when held concentrically by the shim, it provides a radial gap within the required tolerances for a flameproof path.
  • the rod is welded to the tube and the assembly is heated to dissolve the shim.
  • the method taught by the present invention may be used to produce various types and sizes of flame arrestors.
  • the invention also relates to a flame arrestor which comprises: a multiplicity of precision ground stock pieces (10,20) a removable shim (12) used to space the pieces generally concentrically to create a gap (14) that allows air flow between the pieces (10,20) when the shim (12) is removed but such spacing is within tolerances to create a flame barrier through the arrestor; and the pieces (10,20) being welded at such points as to hold the pieces (10,20) securely together when the shim (12) is removed.
  • the present invention relates to a flame arrestor and method of manufacturing the same that is economical and easy to machine and to assemble while maintaining the precise tolerances necessary to make the arrestor flameproof.
  • the invention relates to flame arrestors that can be used in pneumatic control devices to prevent the propagation of a flame.
  • the invention relates to a rod and tube type flame arrestor, but the method of manufacturing can also be applied to other types of arrestors such as the parallel plate type.
  • One embodiment of the present invention is a method for making a rod and tube type flame arrestor.
  • the dimensions of the rod and tube to be used in the invention must be such that the diameter of the rod is less than the inner diameter of the tube, and the difference between the diameter of the rod and the inner diameter of the tube is within the required tolerances for a flameproof path. This difference includes both the diameter difference and radial difference when the rod is held almost concentrical within the tube.
  • Precision ground stock is used for the rod and tube with the rod being precision ground on the outer surface and the tube being precision ground on the inner surface.
  • the rod 10 is prepared as shown in FIGURE 1 with a shim 12 wrapped circumferentially around rod 10 near both ends, or alternatively in the middle, leaving gaps 14 in the shim to allow weld gases to escape.
  • the shim is preferably of a material that will decompose when heated in a nonoxidizing environment or dissolve in a solvent. Most preferably, the shim is a plastic tape.
  • the shim 12 is wrapped around rod 10 in such a manner as to leave a free weld zone 16 in the center of the surface of rod 10. Rod 10, with the shim attached, is then inserted inside tube 20.
  • the shim 12 is of such a thickness in relation to the diameter difference between rod 10 and the inside of tube 20 that when the rod with the shim attached is inserted into the tube, the rod is held practically concentric inside the tube by the shim 12.
  • the tube 20 is then welded, preferably using an electron beam welder 22, to rod 10 at two spots 32 in the free weld zone 16 that are preferably about 180° apart.
  • the welding may be done in the center as illustrated in Figure 2 or at the ends of the rod and tube.
  • a cross-sectional view along the line 3-3 as shown in FIGURE 3 shows the two welds 32 in the middle section of the assembly about 180° apart.
  • the shim is removed by one of several methods.
  • the assembly may be heated in a nonoxidizing environment such as hydrogen, nitrogen, argon or even a vacuum to decompose the shim.
  • Another method of removing the shim would be to immerse the assembly in a solvent including organic solvents and acids.
  • the welded assembly is heated in a hydrogen atmosphere at 1200°F for 20 minutes to decompose the shim 12.
  • the assembly then may be ultrasonically cleaned to remove any residue. This leaves the rod 10 held nearly concentrically within tube 20 by the welds 32 such that the spacing between the rod and the tube allows for pneumatic flow but is within the critical diameter and radial gap tolerances necessary to meet prescribed standards to provide a flameproof path.
  • FIGURE 4 shows an end view of the assembled rod and tube flame arrestor with a uniform circumferential air gap 34 between rod 10 and tube 20.
  • the assembly is designed such that gap 34 is less than the maximum allowable radial and diameter differences as known in the art for providing a flameproof path across the length of the arrestor.
  • the critical feature is the spacing between the pieces such that it allows for the flow of gas through the device but prevents the propagation of a flame.
  • the volume flow of the gas and the length of the flame arrestor determine the critical spacing requirements.
  • European Standards provide that for a volume of 400 cubic centimeters and a rod and tube arrestor having a length greater than .374 inches (9.5 mm), the diameter difference between the rod and the tube can be only .00591 inches (.15 mm) maximum, and the radial gap cannot be greater than .00394 inches (.10 mm). (European Standards EN50018).
  • a rod of length .4 inches is precision ground to a diameter of .1842 ⁇ .0001 inches (4,679 ⁇ 0,003 mm).
  • the inside diameter of a tube is reamed and honed to .1898 ⁇ .0002 inches (4,679 ⁇ 0,003 mm). This maintains a diameter difference equal to or less than .00591 inches (0,150 mm) as required by EN50018.
  • the tube is cut at a length of .402 inches (10,211 mm) to insure a flame path the full length of the rod.
  • a plastic tape with a thickness of .0025 inches (0,0635 mm) and width of .080 inches (2,032 mm) serves as the shim and is wrapped circumferentially around the rod near both ends of the rod leaving a gap of .04 inches (1,016 mm) in the wrap to allow weld gases to escape.
  • a shim of this thickness will hold the rod practically concentric within the tube as a diameter gap of only .0009 inches (0,0223 mm) exists between the tube, the shim and the rod.
  • With a radial gap standard of .00394 inches (0.10 mm) the tolerance in the concentricity of the rod within the tube is .001 inches (0,0254 mm).
  • the selected shim therefore, adequately spaces the rod within the tube. Holding the rod to this degree of concentricity within the tube is critical in order to provide the maximum amount of flow area between the rod and tube while still meeting the radial gap requirements.
  • the radial gap between the rod and tube is .0028 ⁇ .0002 inches (0,071 ⁇ 0,005 mm) if the rod was held perfectly concentric within the tube.
  • a diameter gap of .00091 inches (0,0231 mm) with the shim inserted allows the rod to be held within the tube such that the maximum radial gap that could occur is less than the .00394 inches (0,10 mm) maximum radial gap allowed by the European Standards.
  • the tube is electron beam welded to the rod at two spots in the center of the tube, or alternatively at the ends, approximately 180° apart. The assembly is then heated to a temperature sufficient to dissolve the plastic shim.
  • the use of a removable shim in the method of manufacture just described provides an economical means of holding the rod concentrically within the tube to the required degree of tolerance.
  • the present invention may be used to construct a nonconcentric rod and tube flame arrestor, but a concentric construction is preferred as the concentric configuration provides a greater flow area for the same radial gap requirement. If a nonconcentric configuration in which the rod contacted one side of the tube was used, the diameter of the rod would have to be increased from the concentric rod diameter in order to meet the radial gap requirement. A larger rod provides less flow area between the rod and the tube requiring a greater pressure to achieve the same flow rate as a concentric configuration allows.
  • the flow rate for the concentric construction is more than three times greater than the flow rate for the nonconcentric arrestor with the larger rod for the same pressure drop across the arrestors.
  • the present invention therefore, provides a means for positioning the rod within the tube that allows for a smaller diameter rod to be used thereby allowing a greater gas flow rate through the flame arrestor.
  • This method of manufacture can also be used to construct various types and sizes of flame arrestors.
  • precision ground plates are alternatively stacked with sheets of the shim material. Spaces may be left in the shim to provide a weld zone.
  • the plates may be welded together as each successive plate is stacked on the underlying plate, or the plates may be welded at the ends after all the plates have been stacked together.
  • the assembly then may be heated to remove the shim. Again, the shim must not have a thickness greater than that allowed gap for a flameproof path through a parallel plate arrestor.
  • the method of inserting a shim, welding the pieces together and removing the shim allows for precision manufacture of flame arrestors.
  • the method of manufacturing taught by the present invention achieves these tolerances in an economical and simple manner without requiring the fine machining of many parts.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Gas Burners (AREA)
  • Welding Or Cutting Using Electron Beams (AREA)
  • Filtering Materials (AREA)
  • Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Electron Tubes, Discharge Lamp Vessels, Lead-In Wires, And The Like (AREA)
  • Laser Beam Processing (AREA)
  • Thermistors And Varistors (AREA)
  • Mechanical Coupling Of Light Guides (AREA)

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • This invention relates to a precisely manufactured flame arrestor and to a simple, economical method of manufacture that achieves the precise tolerances required in an arrestor to provide a flameproof path.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Flame arrestors are used in pneumatic control devices to provide a flameproof path for the pneumatics into and out of a control or instrument. Flame arrestors provide a restricted pneumatic passage over an extended length such that a flame cannot propagate through the passage.
  • Several types of arrestors are known in the art see for example GB-A-363 628. A sintered metal arrestor has been commonly used; however, recently adopted European standards no longer permit the use of this type of flame arrestor. Another type is a Lisk arrestor which is comprised of layers of crimped and flat sheet metal that are wrapped together and held in a case by a rivet. Other types include the parallel plate types that usually consist of flat plates with a slot ground into the plate to a depth equal to the maximum gap allowed for the length of the flame path. The plates are then stacked and bonded together at the unground area to form a series of parallel flame retardant paths. This type of construction is quite expensive due to the grinding of the slot, and the arrestors are more bulky due to the solid area that supports the gap and forms the bond area. Another type of flame arrestor would be a gear shaped rod that is pressed into a tube with the flameproof path provided between the gear teeth. This type of arrestor would be quite expensive as it requires the machining of the fine gear teeth, and it would provide a restricted flow area. These types of flame arrestors are expensive to make and required fine machining of the various parts.
  • Since the allowable gap dimensions in small flame arrestors are very small, manufacture of a small flame arrestor is particularly difficult and expensive. Thus, a need exists for an easy, economical method of manufacturing precision flame arrestors both small and large that would meet the necessary standards here and abroad.
  • "Pipes Positioned by water-Soluble Metal," Mechanical Engineering, page 19, July 1986, has an advertisement that discloses a metallic shim made from a proprietary alloy that dissolves in water and is shown as being useful in positioning concentric pipes. Once the pipes have been welded in place, the shims are removed by flushing the pipes with water thereby dissolving the shims.
  • In contrast, the present invention provides a method of manufacturing a flame arrestor wherein the spacing and tolerances are critical.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • According to claim 1, the present invention teaches a method of manufacturing a flame arrestor comprising the steps of:
       using a multiplicity of precision ground stock pieces (10,20),
       spacing the pieces (10,20) with a shim (12) that is of such a thickness that the spacing between the pieces (10,20) provided by the shim (12) is within the necessary tolerances to provide a barrier to the propagation of a flame through the arrestor,
       welding the pieces together, and
       removing the shim (12) from between the pieces (10,20) to leave a gap (14) between the pieces (10,20) such that the gap (14) is within the tolerances necessary to provide a flameproof path through the arrestor.
  • According to one embodiment of the invention, the method taught by the present invention is used to construct a rod and tube type flame arrestor. A precision ground rod and tube are used such that the rod will fit inside the tube, and when held concentrically by the shim, it provides a radial gap within the required tolerances for a flameproof path. The rod is welded to the tube and the assembly is heated to dissolve the shim. The method taught by the present invention may be used to produce various types and sizes of flame arrestors.
  • According to claim 12, the invention also relates to a flame arrestor which comprises:
       a multiplicity of precision ground stock pieces (10,20)
       a removable shim (12) used to space the pieces generally concentrically to create a gap (14) that allows air flow between the pieces (10,20) when the shim (12) is removed but such spacing is within tolerances to create a flame barrier through the arrestor; and
       the pieces (10,20) being welded at such points as to hold the pieces (10,20) securely together when the shim (12) is removed.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a more complete understanding of the present invention and other advantages of it, a Detailed Description is given in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings, in which like reference characters denote like parts in all views and wherein:
    • FIGURE 1 is an exploded view of a rod and tube flame arrestor showing the rod with a shim wrapped circumferentially around the rod at each end being inserted into the tube;
    • FIGURE 2 shows a perspective view of a rod and tube flame arrestor;
    • FIGURE 3 shows a longitudinal cross-sectional view along line 3-3 showing a rod welded inside a tube; and
    • FIGURE 4 shows an end view of a rod and tube flame arrestor.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The present invention relates to a flame arrestor and method of manufacturing the same that is economical and easy to machine and to assemble while maintaining the precise tolerances necessary to make the arrestor flameproof. The invention relates to flame arrestors that can be used in pneumatic control devices to prevent the propagation of a flame. Particularly, the invention relates to a rod and tube type flame arrestor, but the method of manufacturing can also be applied to other types of arrestors such as the parallel plate type.
  • One embodiment of the present invention is a method for making a rod and tube type flame arrestor. The dimensions of the rod and tube to be used in the invention must be such that the diameter of the rod is less than the inner diameter of the tube, and the difference between the diameter of the rod and the inner diameter of the tube is within the required tolerances for a flameproof path. This difference includes both the diameter difference and radial difference when the rod is held almost concentrical within the tube. Precision ground stock is used for the rod and tube with the rod being precision ground on the outer surface and the tube being precision ground on the inner surface. The rod 10 is prepared as shown in FIGURE 1 with a shim 12 wrapped circumferentially around rod 10 near both ends, or alternatively in the middle, leaving gaps 14 in the shim to allow weld gases to escape. The shim is preferably of a material that will decompose when heated in a nonoxidizing environment or dissolve in a solvent. Most preferably, the shim is a plastic tape. The shim 12 is wrapped around rod 10 in such a manner as to leave a free weld zone 16 in the center of the surface of rod 10. Rod 10, with the shim attached, is then inserted inside tube 20. The shim 12 is of such a thickness in relation to the diameter difference between rod 10 and the inside of tube 20 that when the rod with the shim attached is inserted into the tube, the rod is held practically concentric inside the tube by the shim 12.
  • As shown in FIGURE 2, the tube 20 is then welded, preferably using an electron beam welder 22, to rod 10 at two spots 32 in the free weld zone 16 that are preferably about 180° apart. Alternatively, the welding may be done in the center as illustrated in Figure 2 or at the ends of the rod and tube. A cross-sectional view along the line 3-3 as shown in FIGURE 3 shows the two welds 32 in the middle section of the assembly about 180° apart.
  • After the welding, the shim is removed by one of several methods. The assembly may be heated in a nonoxidizing environment such as hydrogen, nitrogen, argon or even a vacuum to decompose the shim. Another method of removing the shim would be to immerse the assembly in a solvent including organic solvents and acids. Preferably the welded assembly is heated in a hydrogen atmosphere at 1200°F for 20 minutes to decompose the shim 12. The assembly then may be ultrasonically cleaned to remove any residue. This leaves the rod 10 held nearly concentrically within tube 20 by the welds 32 such that the spacing between the rod and the tube allows for pneumatic flow but is within the critical diameter and radial gap tolerances necessary to meet prescribed standards to provide a flameproof path. FIGURE 4 shows an end view of the assembled rod and tube flame arrestor with a uniform circumferential air gap 34 between rod 10 and tube 20. The assembly is designed such that gap 34 is less than the maximum allowable radial and diameter differences as known in the art for providing a flameproof path across the length of the arrestor.
  • In a flame arrestor, the critical feature is the spacing between the pieces such that it allows for the flow of gas through the device but prevents the propagation of a flame. The volume flow of the gas and the length of the flame arrestor determine the critical spacing requirements. These standards are well known in the industry and are established by regulations in some countries. As one example, European Standards provide that for a volume of 400 cubic centimeters and a rod and tube arrestor having a length greater than .374 inches (9.5 mm), the diameter difference between the rod and the tube can be only .00591 inches (.15 mm) maximum, and the radial gap cannot be greater than .00394 inches (.10 mm). (European Standards EN50018).
  • As an example of one construction of the invention that meets these precise requirements, a rod of length .4 inches is precision ground to a diameter of .1842 ± .0001 inches (4,679 ± 0,003 mm). The inside diameter of a tube is reamed and honed to .1898 ± .0002 inches (4,679 ± 0,003 mm). This maintains a diameter difference equal to or less than .00591 inches (0,150 mm) as required by EN50018. The tube is cut at a length of .402 inches (10,211 mm) to insure a flame path the full length of the rod. A plastic tape with a thickness of .0025 inches (0,0635 mm) and width of .080 inches (2,032 mm) serves as the shim and is wrapped circumferentially around the rod near both ends of the rod leaving a gap of .04 inches (1,016 mm) in the wrap to allow weld gases to escape. A shim of this thickness will hold the rod practically concentric within the tube as a diameter gap of only .0009 inches (0,0223 mm) exists between the tube, the shim and the rod. With a radial gap standard of .00394 inches (0.10 mm), the tolerance in the concentricity of the rod within the tube is .001 inches (0,0254 mm). The selected shim, therefore, adequately spaces the rod within the tube. Holding the rod to this degree of concentricity within the tube is critical in order to provide the maximum amount of flow area between the rod and tube while still meeting the radial gap requirements. In the construction just mentioned, the radial gap between the rod and tube is .0028 ± .0002 inches (0,071 ± 0,005 mm) if the rod was held perfectly concentric within the tube. A diameter gap of .00091 inches (0,0231 mm) with the shim inserted allows the rod to be held within the tube such that the maximum radial gap that could occur is less than the .00394 inches (0,10 mm) maximum radial gap allowed by the European Standards. To complete the construction, the tube is electron beam welded to the rod at two spots in the center of the tube, or alternatively at the ends, approximately 180° apart. The assembly is then heated to a temperature sufficient to dissolve the plastic shim.
  • Since the allowable gap dimensions are very small, manufacture of such a small flame arrestor using previously known methods is difficult. The present method of manufacture allows for the precise manufacture of even small flame arrestors. As the size of the flame arrestor increases, a shim with the appropriate thickness may be selected. The insertion of a removable shim provides an inexpensive means to temporarily fix and hold the pieces of the flame arrestor to the required precise gap dimensions. Welding the pieces together then permanently fixes the precise dimensions, and the weld results in only a small area that interferes with the flow through the arrestor.
  • The use of a removable shim in the method of manufacture just described provides an economical means of holding the rod concentrically within the tube to the required degree of tolerance. The present invention may be used to construct a nonconcentric rod and tube flame arrestor, but a concentric construction is preferred as the concentric configuration provides a greater flow area for the same radial gap requirement. If a nonconcentric configuration in which the rod contacted one side of the tube was used, the diameter of the rod would have to be increased from the concentric rod diameter in order to meet the radial gap requirement. A larger rod provides less flow area between the rod and the tube requiring a greater pressure to achieve the same flow rate as a concentric configuration allows. Using the same dimensions and requirements as illustrated above, the flow rate for the concentric construction is more than three times greater than the flow rate for the nonconcentric arrestor with the larger rod for the same pressure drop across the arrestors. The present invention, therefore, provides a means for positioning the rod within the tube that allows for a smaller diameter rod to be used thereby allowing a greater gas flow rate through the flame arrestor.
  • This method of manufacture can also be used to construct various types and sizes of flame arrestors. For example, to construct a parallel plate type of flame arrestor, precision ground plates are alternatively stacked with sheets of the shim material. Spaces may be left in the shim to provide a weld zone. The plates may be welded together as each successive plate is stacked on the underlying plate, or the plates may be welded at the ends after all the plates have been stacked together. The assembly then may be heated to remove the shim. Again, the shim must not have a thickness greater than that allowed gap for a flameproof path through a parallel plate arrestor. The method of inserting a shim, welding the pieces together and removing the shim allows for precision manufacture of flame arrestors. The method of manufacturing taught by the present invention achieves these tolerances in an economical and simple manner without requiring the fine machining of many parts.

Claims (18)

  1. A method of manufacturing a flame arrestor comprising the steps of:
       using a multiplicity of precision ground stock pieces (10,20),
       spacing the pieces (10,20) of such a thickness that the spacing between the pieces (10,20) is within the necessary tolerances to provide a barrier to the propagation of a flame through the arrestor,
       welding the pieces together, characterized by: using a shim (12) to space the pieces (10,20) before welding, and
       removing the shim (12) from between the pieces (10,20) to leave a gap (14) between the pieces (10,20) such that the gap (14) is within the tolerances necessary to provide a flameproof path through the arrestor.
  2. The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the multiplicity of precision ground pieces includes a rod (10) and a tube (20), said rod (10) and tube (20) being dimensioned such that the rod (10) can be inserted inside the tube (20) and the diameter difference between the rod (10) and the inner diameter of the tube (20) is less than the maximum diameter difference that would provide a flameproof path through the rod (10) and tube (20).
  3. The method as claimed in Claim 2 in which the spacing of the pieces (10,20) with a shim (12) is performed by wrapping the rod (20) circumferentially with a removable shim (12) and leaving a free weld zone (16), said removable shim (12) being of such a thickness to allow the rod (10) to be inserted and held almost concentrically inside the tube (20).
  4. The method as claimed in Claim 3 in which the removable shim (12) comprises two pieces of shim (12) with one piece being wrapped circumferentially around the rod (10) at each end thereof, the two pieces of wrapped shim (12) being gapped in at least one place.
  5. The method as claimed in Claim 1 in which the welding of the pieces (10,20) is performed by using an electron beam welder.
  6. The method as claimed in Claim 1 in which the welding of the pieces is performed at two points which are generally 180 degrees apart.
  7. The method as claimed in Claim 1 in which the welding of the pieces is performed near the center of the tube (20).
  8. The method as claimed in Claim 1 in which the welding of the pieces is performed near the ends of the tube (20).
  9. The method as claimed in Claim 1 in which the shim (12) is removed by heating the rod (10) and tube (20) in a nonoxidizing environment.
  10. The method as claimed in Claim 1 in which the shim (12) is removed by dissolving it in a solvent.
  11. The method as claimed in Claim 1 in which the shim (12) is a plastic tape.
  12. A flame arrestor comprising:
       a multiplicity of precision ground stock pieces (10,20),
       said pieces (10,20) being spaced to create a gap (14) that allows air flow between the pieces (10,20), such spacing between the pieces being within tolerances to create a flame barrier through the arrestor;
       the pieces (10,20) being welded at such points as to hold the pieces (10,20) securely together, characterized in that a removable shim is used to space the pieces before welding.
  13. The flame arrestor as claimed in Claim 12 in which the multiplicity of pieces (10,20) includes a precision ground rod (10) and a tube (20) with a precision ground inner surface, said rod (10) having a diameter less than the inner diameter of the tube (20) but the diameter difference between the rod (10) and the tube (20) is less than the maximum difference allowed to achieve a flameproof path over the length of said tube (20) and still allow pneumatic flow between the rod (10) and the tube (20) when the rod (10) is inserted in the tube (20).
  14. The flame arrestor as claimed in Claim 12 in which the shim (12) is wrapped circumferentially around the rod (10) at each end of the rod (10) and being gapped in at least one place.
  15. The flame arrestor as claimed in Claim 12 in which the shim (12) is a plastic tape.
  16. The flame arrestor as claimed in Claim 12 in which the shim (12) is capable of being removed from the flame arrestor by heating the shim (12) in a nonoxidizing environment.
  17. The flame arrestor as claimed in Claim 12 in which the shim (12) is capable of being removed from the flame arrestor by dissolving the shim in a solvent.
  18. The flame arrestor as claimed in Claim 13 in which the rod (10) and tube (20) are welded together at two points near the longitudinal center of the tube (20) with the two points being approximately 180 degrees apart.
EP19880101880 1987-03-25 1988-02-09 Flame arrestor and method of manufacture Expired EP0283690B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US2991687A 1987-03-25 1987-03-25
US29916 1987-03-25

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0283690A2 EP0283690A2 (en) 1988-09-28
EP0283690A3 EP0283690A3 (en) 1989-08-23
EP0283690B1 true EP0283690B1 (en) 1992-08-19

Family

ID=21851559

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19880101880 Expired EP0283690B1 (en) 1987-03-25 1988-02-09 Flame arrestor and method of manufacture

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0283690B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS6458273A (en)
AU (1) AU607741B2 (en)
BR (1) BR8801239A (en)
CA (1) CA1299036C (en)
DE (1) DE3873796T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2033949T3 (en)
MX (1) MX172293B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5752812A (en) * 1996-02-28 1998-05-19 Delaware Capital Formation, Inc. Vapor recovery pump

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB363628A (en) * 1930-09-12 1931-12-14 Arthur Stephenson A device for the prevention of back fires in gas apparatus
FR1136632A (en) * 1955-11-07 1957-05-16 Panergon Fire protection device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU1238488A (en) 1988-09-29
AU607741B2 (en) 1991-03-14
MX172293B (en) 1993-12-13
ES2033949T3 (en) 1993-04-01
EP0283690A3 (en) 1989-08-23
JPS6458273A (en) 1989-03-06
CA1299036C (en) 1992-04-21
DE3873796D1 (en) 1992-09-24
EP0283690A2 (en) 1988-09-28
BR8801239A (en) 1988-10-25
DE3873796T2 (en) 1993-02-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20030181121A1 (en) Method of making a spark plug
US4114794A (en) Method of autogenously bonding filter assemblies
EP0183902B1 (en) Method of attaching segments to cutting tool
US4785158A (en) Flame arrestor and method of manufacture
WO1997032686A1 (en) A method of friction welding tubular members
EP0283690B1 (en) Flame arrestor and method of manufacture
EP1775481A1 (en) Joint structure of pipe
US4964882A (en) Flame arrestor
US2623148A (en) Welding joint and backing therefor
CA1240128A (en) Method of joining together two pipe ends to form a pipe, preferably of metal
EP2614914B1 (en) A fuel nozzle and process of fabricating a fuel nozzle
JPS58163264A (en) Rotary electric machine with superconductive rotor
EP3167999A1 (en) Weld filler metal for superalloys and methods of making
JPS6137375A (en) Pipe welding method
JP3513776B2 (en) Brazing method of metal tube and bracket
US5359771A (en) Process for the manufacture of a gear wheel in an internal greared
US4659897A (en) Method of making a watchcase
JP3513775B2 (en) Brazing method of metal tube and bracket
US3609275A (en) Butt welding of tube plates and the like
JPH031095A (en) Spiral sheet type heat exchanger and manufacture thereof
DE10022325B4 (en) Arrangement for transporting liquids using capillary forces and method for producing a capillary structure layer for such an arrangement
JP2917068B2 (en) Manufacturing method of cylindrical yoke for wet type solenoid
JPS6284874A (en) Production of duplex pipe
EP0795876A3 (en) Apparatus and methods for sealing end plugs for nuclear fuel rods
JPH1088806A (en) Joining method deformed reinforcing bar

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900125

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19910311

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3873796

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19920924

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2033949

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19941216

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19950103

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 19950206

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19950331

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19960209

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19960210

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19960209

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19961031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19961101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 19990301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050209