EP0268635B1 - Reflector antenna with a self-supported feed - Google Patents
Reflector antenna with a self-supported feed Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0268635B1 EP0268635B1 EP87903452A EP87903452A EP0268635B1 EP 0268635 B1 EP0268635 B1 EP 0268635B1 EP 87903452 A EP87903452 A EP 87903452A EP 87903452 A EP87903452 A EP 87903452A EP 0268635 B1 EP0268635 B1 EP 0268635B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- reflector
- tube
- sub
- waveguide
- antenna
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q19/00—Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic
- H01Q19/10—Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic using reflecting surfaces
- H01Q19/12—Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic using reflecting surfaces wherein the surfaces are concave
- H01Q19/13—Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic using reflecting surfaces wherein the surfaces are concave the primary radiating source being a single radiating element, e.g. a dipole, a slot, a waveguide termination
- H01Q19/134—Rear-feeds; Splash plate feeds
Definitions
- the invention consists of a reflector antenna with a self-supported feed of the type indicated in the introduction to Claim of Patent 1, for the transmission or reception of polarized electromagnetic waves.
- the antenna is principally intended for the reception of TV signals from satellites, however it can be used as a radio link, and as a ground station for satellite communications.
- reflector antennas are chiefly used because they are straightforward and inexpensive to manufacture. They also provide greater antenna efficiency and lower side lobes in the radiation pattern than is the case when the feed has to be supported by diagonal struts.
- the drawback with the latter configuration is that the main reflector becomes blocked.
- a self-supported feed is also easily accessible from the back of the reflector, thus is frequently selected when it is best to locate the transmitter and/or the receiver there. This also reduces the loss that occurs when the waves have to be led in a cable along one of the support struts.
- A.Chlavin "A New Antenna Feed Having Equal E and W-Plane Patterns", IRE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol.AP-2, pp.113-119, July 1954, describes a reflector antenna with a self-supporting feed. However since this antenna uses a wavequide with a rectangular cross-section, it can only transmit or receive waves with one particular linear polarization.
- the main purpose of the present invention is to design a reflector antenna which has dual polarization with low crosspolarization within the main lobe of the radiation pattern. Dual polarization means that the antenna is capable of receiving or transmitting two waves with ortogonal linear or circular polarization simultaneously.
- the waveguide must have an almost circular or square cross-section.
- the surface of the subreflector is treated by e.g. corrugations so that the electromagnetic waves are reflected from and propagated along the surface in approximately the same way regardless of whether the electric field is normal to the surface or is tangential to it. Furthermore, the design of the other geometries of the feed ensures that the cross-polarization remains low within the main lobe of the radiation pattern.
- the present invention has conceived an antenna where this distance is so small that some of the waves propagate along the surface of the sub-reflector. Then, low cross-polarization is only ensured by a surface where the reflection coefficient for radial waves is made independent of the polarization, e.g. by using corrugations.
- the main advantager of the present invention over P. Newham's solution is that the diameter of the sub-reflector can be reduced so that the blockage in the centre of the main reflector is also smaller.
- the dual polarized antenna that radiates around a cylinder is described by A.W.Love, "Scale Model Development of a High Efficiency Dual Polarized Line Feed for the Arecibo Spherical Reflector", IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. AP-21, pp. 628-639, Sept. 1973.
- This antenna is however a linear array antenna consisting of numerous elements, which feed a main spherical reflector antenna. Further, this antenna has no sub-reflector.
- the tube in the present invention is cylindrical rather than conical, the sub-reflector and the outside of the tube are unable to form radial waveguides. Consequently, the waves are not propagated in the form of radial wave modes in this area, as is the case in the US Patent mentioned above.
- the US Patent describes an antenna with a ring-shaped focus (the equivalent to the phase centre of the feed element) in the opening or aperture of the radial waveguide, and there is no subreflector outside this phase-centre.
- the feeds ring-shaped phase centre is close to the cylindrically shaped apeture surface between the end of the tube and the middle of the sub-reflector. Consequently, in the invention the sub-reflector is mainly outside the phase centre.
- both walls in the radial waveguide have circular corrugations which are approximtely 0.25 ⁇ wavelengths deep. These corrugations give the walls an anisotropic surface impedance which results in the radial waves being propagated so that they are independent of the polarization in the waveguide.
- the sub-reflector which is supplied with such an anisotropic, reactive surface impedance.
- the invention is based on a theoretical model concerning the way in which radiation is released from a circumferencial slot in a cylindrical tube (cf. the paper mentioned in IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagat., Vol. AP-34, Feb.1986).
- the antenna in Fig. 1 consists of a dish-shaped main reflector 10. In the middle of this there is a self-supporting tubular feed element 11. This consists of a cylindrical tube 12, and a sub-reflector 13. The tube and the sub-reflector are separated by a space 14 which is bounded on the outside by a circular, cylindrical aperture surface 16 which will henceforth be termed the aperture surface or the aperture.
- Fig. 2 shows an axial section through the feed.
- the tube 12 contains a cylindrical waveguide 15 which preferably has a circular cross-section.
- the tube can also be such a waveguide itself.
- the waveguide is constructed to propagate the basic mode. This is the TE11 mode when the internal cross-section is circular with smooth conducting walls.
- the waveguide must have a larger diameter than 0,6 (approx.) wavelengths ⁇ and be smaller then 1,2 ⁇ (approx.).
- the tube and the waveguide are mostly made of conducting materials. Though a smooth surface is shown it could also be manufactured so that the surface impedance is anisotropic and reactive.
- the thickness of the walls measured between the inside of the waveguide and the outside of the tube is under 1.0 ⁇ (approx.).
- the wall can also be extremely thin.
- Fig. 2 shows a case where the intermediate space 14 extends slightly into the tube so that a circular waveguide is formed with a larger diameter than waveguide 15.
- the intermediate space can also have another design.
- the sub-reflector is drawn as a plate with a conical element in the middle. It can also be shaped otherwise.
- the part of the sub-reflector's surface that is located outside the aperture surface 16 is drawn to appear smooth, however in fact it is treated so that the surface impedance is anisotropic and reactive. This ensures that the electromagnetic waves are reflected from and propagate along the surface in approximately the same way regardless of whether the electric fields are normal to the surface or are tangential to it. This is important to achieve low cross-polarization.
- the best results come from making the surface impedance so that there is only a minor amount of radiation in a radial direction along the sub-reflector both when the fields are normal to the surface and when the fields are tangential to it.
- the diameter of the sub-reflector is always larger than the diameter of the tube, typical values are between 3 ⁇ and 6 ⁇ .
- the aperture surface 16 is indicated in Fig. 2 by a broken line.
- the cross-section of the aperture 16 is under 1,0 ⁇ , preferably 0,5 ⁇ (approx.).
- the end of the waveguide 15 is marked by a broken line.
- Fig. 3 shows an axial section of a sub-reflector 13 where the other part that lies outside the aperture 16 has circular corrugations or grooves 17 in the surface. These grooves are about 0,25 ⁇ deep.
- the objective is as mentioned before to obtain as little radiation as possible in a radial direction along the sub-reflector both when the fields are normal to the surface and also when the fields are tangential to it. This is important to obtain low cross-polarization. This objective can also be achieved by a surface with other characteristics.
- Fig. 4 shows an axial cross-section of a tube 12 where there are circular corrugations 18 in the surface. These corrugations are about 0,25 ⁇ deep and produce an anisotropic reactive surface impedance. The purpose is to obtain as little radiation as possible along the tube when the fields are orthogonal to the surface and when they are tangential to it. This can also be achieved by a surface with different characteristics.
- Fig. 5 shows a cross-section of a tube 12 where the surface has longitudinal corrugations 19, these are filled with dielectric with a relative permittivity of ⁇ .
- the depth of the corrugations 0,25 ⁇ / ⁇ -1 .
- These corrugations provide an anisotropic reactive surface impedance.
- the objective is to produce powerful radiation along the tube both when the field is normal to the surface and when it is tangential to it. This can also be managed by using a surface with other characteristics.
- Fig. 6 shows a normal means of designing the feed element.
- the space 14 is filled with a dielectric plug 21 which is glued or screwed into both the tube and the sub-reflector by means of an extra corrugation 23 inside the aperture surface or by means of a central outlet 22 in the conical part 20 of the sub-reflector 13.
- the part of the sub-reflector which lies outside the aperture surface is plane and has circular corrugations.
- the dielectric plug 21 passes into the tube and forms a cylindrical waveguide with a larger diameter than the waveguide 15.
- Fig. 7 also shows the design in Fig. 6.
- the critical dimensions which must be trimmed in the laboratory model are marked x,y,z and 2a.
- a wave in the TE11 mode is propagated in the waveguide 15. This wave is coupled to two modes at the surface of the aperture 16. For one mode the electric fields are directed exclusively in the z-direction (z-mode), and for the other the fields are directed in the azimuth-direction transverse to the z-direction ( ⁇ -mode). These two modes radiate out of the aperture 16, the z- mode principally in the E-plane and the ⁇ -mode chiefly in the H-plane. To get a rotationally, symmetrical radiation pattern with low cross-polarization, the radiation patterns in the E- and H-planes must be similar in both amplitude and phase.
- the anisotropic and reactive surface impedance to the sub-reflector 13 is the reason why the z-mode radiates the same way in the E- plane as the ⁇ -mode radiates in the H-plane.
- the internal dimensions of the feed element are controlled so that the z-mode and the ⁇ -mode are excited by the correct amplitude and phase, relatively speaking.
- the z-mode and the ⁇ - mode radiate differently along the tube. This can be improved by making the surface impedance along the tube anisotropic and reactive as described previously. This is an extra cost and was not found to be necessary for the application the alternative in Fig. 6 was developed for.
- the reactive and anisotropic surface impedance of the sub- reflector is realized by means of circular corrugations 17. These prevent the z-mode radiating strongly in the radial direction.
- the excitation of the ⁇ -mode and the z-mode are controlled by varying the dimensions of x, y, z and 2a in Fig. 7. The best results are obtained if the external part of the tube forms a waveguide with a larger diameter than the waveguide 15, enabling both the TE11 and the TM 11 modes to propagated here.
- the resulting radiation pattern from the feed antenna has low cross-polarization. Unfortunately there are considerable phase errors because the source of radiation, the aperture 16, is a long way from the axis.
- phase errors can be compensated for by shaping the main reflector differently from a parabolic surface. It the diameter of the tube is about 1 ⁇ , the optimal reflector shape will deviate by upto 1,6 mm from the best fitted parabola. The resultant radiation characteristics of the whole antenna are excellent and have low cross-polarization.
- Fig. 6 shows one design of the antenna, it should nevertheless be apparent from the claims of patent that there are numerous other forms of design possible.
- the part of the sub-reflector's surface which is outside the aperture 16 has an anisotropic and reactive surface impedance, and that the sub-reflector is located as close to the end of the waveguide 15 that the field at the aperture surface is described by two modes.
- Other common features are that the geometries of the central part 20 of the sub-reflector 13 and the condition of the intermediate space 14 is designed so that the required modes are excited with the correct phase and amplitude, relatively speaking.
- This design makes particular allowance on how the modes radiate both along the tube and the surface of the sub-reflector.
- the ideal shape is when the radiation patterns from both modes are integrated in an optimal manner so that the resultant pattern is in rotational symmetry and has low cross-polarization. Altering the shape of the intermediate space or filling this completely or partially with dielectric, are two means of influencing the relative excitation of the modes.
- the self-supporting feed antenna has already been christened and is known as the hat antenna or the hat feed.
- the tube 12 can be a polygonal or square cylinder.
- the sub-reflector can be manufactured of plastic with a metallic surface coating.
- the plug 21 in the intermediate space can be combined with the sub-reflector 13 in other ways that those shown, for instance just one of elements 22 or 23 are used. If only element 23 is used, the sub-reflector will not have a central outlet at its point 20. If only element 22 is used, the sub-reflector will not have any corrugations inside the aperture 16.
Landscapes
- Aerials With Secondary Devices (AREA)
- Road Signs Or Road Markings (AREA)
- Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)
- Waveguide Aerials (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The invention consists of a reflector antenna with a self-supported feed of the type indicated in the introduction to Claim of Patent 1, for the transmission or reception of polarized electromagnetic waves. The antenna is principally intended for the reception of TV signals from satellites, however it can be used as a radio link, and as a ground station for satellite communications.
- These types of reflector antennas are chiefly used because they are straightforward and inexpensive to manufacture. They also provide greater antenna efficiency and lower side lobes in the radiation pattern than is the case when the feed has to be supported by diagonal struts. The drawback with the latter configuration is that the main reflector becomes blocked. A self-supported feed is also easily accessible from the back of the reflector, thus is frequently selected when it is best to locate the transmitter and/or the receiver there. This also reduces the loss that occurs when the waves have to be led in a cable along one of the support struts.
- A.Chlavin, "A New Antenna Feed Having Equal E and W-Plane Patterns", IRE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol.AP-2, pp.113-119, July 1954, describes a reflector antenna with a self-supporting feed. However since this antenna uses a wavequide with a rectangular cross-section, it can only transmit or receive waves with one particular linear polarization.
- C.C-Cutler, "Parabolic-antenna design for microwaves", Proc.IRE.Vil.35, pp. 1284-1294, Nov. 1947, describes a dual polarized reflector antenna with two variants of a self-supporting feed, called the "ring focus and the waveguide cup" feeds respectively. A circular waveguide is used in these two feeds with a reflecting object in front of the waveguide opening, this reflector being respectively shaped as a flat disc and a cup. Both these feeds unfortunately produce high crosspolarization within the main lobe of the radiation pattern.
- The main purpose of the present invention is to design a reflector antenna which has dual polarization with low crosspolarization within the main lobe of the radiation pattern. Dual polarization means that the antenna is capable of receiving or transmitting two waves with ortogonal linear or circular polarization simultaneously. Here, the waveguide must have an almost circular or square cross-section.
- This objective can be achieved by a design which is in accordance with the Claim of Patent 1. Further details about the invention are given in Claims of Patent 2-10.
- The surface of the subreflector is treated by e.g. corrugations so that the electromagnetic waves are reflected from and propagated along the surface in approximately the same way regardless of whether the electric field is normal to the surface or is tangential to it. Furthermore, the design of the other geometries of the feed ensures that the cross-polarization remains low within the main lobe of the radiation pattern.
- It should be mentioned that a dual polarized reflector antenna with a self-supporting feed is already known from among other sources P. Newham, "The Search for an Efficient Splashplate Feed", Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Antennas and Propagation (ICAP 83), IEE Conference Publication No.219, pp. 348-352, April 1983, as in previous publications by the same author. In this design the sub-reflector has a smooth surface. Low cross-polarization is obtained by locating the subreflector at a distance from the waveguide aperture so that the waves are prevented from becoming radial and thereby cannot propagate along the surface of the sub-reflector. This avoids the polarization-dependent reflection coefficient for radial waves found in the smooth sub-reflector. The present invention, on the other hand, has conceived an antenna where this distance is so small that some of the waves propagate along the surface of the sub-reflector. Then, low cross-polarization is only ensured by a surface where the reflection coefficient for radial waves is made independent of the polarization, e.g. by using corrugations.
- The main advantager of the present invention over P. Newham's solution is that the diameter of the sub-reflector can be reduced so that the blockage in the centre of the main reflector is also smaller.
- It should be noted that the dual polarized antenna that radiates around a cylinder is described by A.W.Love, "Scale Model Development of a High Efficiency Dual Polarized Line Feed for the Arecibo Spherical Reflector", IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol. AP-21, pp. 628-639, Sept. 1973. This antenna is however a linear array antenna consisting of numerous elements, which feed a main spherical reflector antenna. Further, this antenna has no sub-reflector.
- Mention should also be made of a dual polarized element which radiates around a smooth conductor cylinder. This is reported in P.S.Kildal. "Study of Element Patterns and Excitions of the Line Feed of the Spherical Reflector Antenna in Arecibo", IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., Vol.AP-34, pp. 197-207, Feb.1986.
Section 11 of this paper provides a theoretical analysis of such an element. Once again there is no sub-reflector and the element does not feed a main reflector. One result of this theoretical work is in fact the present invention. - In US Patent 3.162.858 a dual polarized reflector antenna is described with a self-supporting feed element which mainly consists of a radial waveguide shaped as two plane surfaces or two coaxial conical surfaces with a common apex. In the present invention there are no such radial waveguides, a sub-reflector is employed instead.
- Since the tube in the present invention is cylindrical rather than conical, the sub-reflector and the outside of the tube are unable to form radial waveguides. Consequently, the waves are not propagated in the form of radial wave modes in this area, as is the case in the US Patent mentioned above.
- The US Patent describes an antenna with a ring-shaped focus (the equivalent to the phase centre of the feed element) in the opening or aperture of the radial waveguide, and there is no subreflector outside this phase-centre. In the invention however, the feeds ring-shaped phase centre is close to the cylindrically shaped apeture surface between the end of the tube and the middle of the sub-reflector. Consequently, in the invention the sub-reflector is mainly outside the phase centre.
- In the US Patent both walls in the radial waveguide have circular corrugations which are approximtely 0.25 λ wavelengths deep. These corrugations give the walls an anisotropic surface impedance which results in the radial waves being propagated so that they are independent of the polarization in the waveguide. In the invention it is first and foremost only the sub-reflector which is supplied with such an anisotropic, reactive surface impedance. Using the investigations derived from the formula in the paper already mentioned in IEEE Trans.Antennas Propagat., Vol.AP-34, Feb. 1986, it has been found that in most cases it is unnecessary to treat the outside of the tube with such a surface impedance. This consequently makes the invention cheaper to manufacture than the existing antenna where two surfaces have to be corrugated.
- There is no reason why the outside of the tube described in the present invention cannot be given an anisotropic reactive surface impedance. This may even be advantageous since in some applications particulary strict demands regarding cross-polarization may be required.
- The invention is based on a theoretical model concerning the way in which radiation is released from a circumferencial slot in a cylindrical tube (cf. the paper mentioned in IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagat., Vol. AP-34, Feb.1986).
- The bandwidth problem in the invention is solved by the means mentioned in Claims of
Patent 6 and 10. This means that the central part of the sub-reflector is designed as a cone that is aimed in the direction of the main reflector. This cone reflects the incidence waves from the waveguide in a radial direction so that only small amplitude waves are reflected back to the waveguide. This minimizes return loss. - At the same time a correct balance is achieved between the axial and the circular E-fields over the cylindrical aperture, thus ensuring low cross-polarization. This can be achieved over a relative bandwidth of about 10%.
- All mechanical dimensions between the middle of the sub- reflector and the end of the tube are critical, nevertheless there are a good number of dimension combinations which provide satisfactory results.
- The invention will be explained in more detail by making reference to the diagrams, where:
- Fig. 1 illustrates an example of a reflector antenna with a self- supporting feed.
- Fig. 2 shows an axial cross-section through a feed designed in accordance with the invention,
- fig. 3 shows an axial cross-section through a sub-reflector which has a corrugated surface,
- Fig. 4 shows an axial cross-section through a tube with circular corrugations on the surface,
- Fig. 5 shows a normal section on a tube with longitudinal corrugations on the surface,
- Fig. 6 shows an axial cross-section through a means of designing a feed element in accordance with the invention, and
- Fig. 7 indicates which dimensions for the design in Fig. 6 must be trimmed and are critical.
- The antenna in Fig. 1 consists of a dish-shaped
main reflector 10. In the middle of this there is a self-supportingtubular feed element 11. This consists of acylindrical tube 12, and a sub-reflector 13. The tube and the sub-reflector are separated by aspace 14 which is bounded on the outside by a circular,cylindrical aperture surface 16 which will henceforth be termed the aperture surface or the aperture. - Fig. 2 shows an axial section through the feed. The
tube 12 contains acylindrical waveguide 15 which preferably has a circular cross-section. The tube can also be such a waveguide itself. The waveguide is constructed to propagate the basic mode. This is the TE11 mode when the internal cross-section is circular with smooth conducting walls. The waveguide must have a larger diameter than 0,6 (approx.) wavelengths λ and be smaller then 1,2 λ (approx.). The tube and the waveguide are mostly made of conducting materials. Though a smooth surface is shown it could also be manufactured so that the surface impedance is anisotropic and reactive. The thickness of the walls measured between the inside of the waveguide and the outside of the tube is under 1.0λ (approx.). The wall can can also be extremely thin. Fig. 2 shows a case where theintermediate space 14 extends slightly into the tube so that a circular waveguide is formed with a larger diameter thanwaveguide 15. The intermediate space can also have another design. - The sub-reflector is drawn as a plate with a conical element in the middle. It can also be shaped otherwise. The part of the sub-reflector's surface that is located outside the
aperture surface 16 is drawn to appear smooth, however in fact it is treated so that the surface impedance is anisotropic and reactive. This ensures that the electromagnetic waves are reflected from and propagate along the surface in approximately the same way regardless of whether the electric fields are normal to the surface or are tangential to it. This is important to achieve low cross-polarization. The best results come from making the surface impedance so that there is only a minor amount of radiation in a radial direction along the sub-reflector both when the fields are normal to the surface and when the fields are tangential to it. The diameter of the sub-reflector is always larger than the diameter of the tube, typical values are between 3 λ and 6 λ. - The
aperture surface 16 is indicated in Fig. 2 by a broken line. The cross-section of theaperture 16 is under 1,0 λ , preferably 0,5 λ (approx.). In the same way the end of thewaveguide 15 is marked by a broken line. There is anintermediate space 14 between the aperture and the end of the waveguide,. This is bounded by the sub-reflector and the tube. Both the intermediate space and the aperture are drawn so that they appear to be filled with air. In practice they would be partly or totally filled with dielectric matter, or they could be partially sealed with metallic or dielectric rods or discs being respectively located in a plane with the axis of symmetry. Though this is necessary to attach the sub-reflector to the tube, this is also a means of controlling the radiation characteristics. - Fig. 3 shows an axial section of a sub-reflector 13 where the other part that lies outside the
aperture 16 has circular corrugations orgrooves 17 in the surface. These grooves are about 0,25 λ deep. This is one way of realizing the anisotropic and reactive surface impedance. The objective is as mentioned before to obtain as little radiation as possible in a radial direction along the sub-reflector both when the fields are normal to the surface and also when the fields are tangential to it. This is important to obtain low cross-polarization. This objective can also be achieved by a surface with other characteristics. - Fig. 4 shows an axial cross-section of a
tube 12 where there arecircular corrugations 18 in the surface. These corrugations are about 0,25 λ deep and produce an anisotropic reactive surface impedance. The purpose is to obtain as little radiation as possible along the tube when the fields are orthogonal to the surface and when they are tangential to it. This can also be achieved by a surface with different characteristics. - Fig. 5 shows a cross-section of a
tube 12 where the surface haslongitudinal corrugations 19, these are filled with dielectric with a relative permittivity of ε . The depth of the corrugations 0,25 λ/ - Fig. 6 shows a normal means of designing the feed element. The
space 14 is filled with adielectric plug 21 which is glued or screwed into both the tube and the sub-reflector by means of anextra corrugation 23 inside the aperture surface or by means of acentral outlet 22 in theconical part 20 of the sub-reflector 13. The part of the sub-reflector which lies outside the aperture surface is plane and has circular corrugations. Thedielectric plug 21 passes into the tube and forms a cylindrical waveguide with a larger diameter than thewaveguide 15. Fig. 7 also shows the design in Fig. 6. The critical dimensions which must be trimmed in the laboratory model are marked x,y,z and 2a. This can be done by making theconical element 20 so that it can be screwed into the sub-reflector. In addition, thewaveguide 15 and thedielectric plug 21 are both to be made so that they can be screwed into thetube 12. The manner in which the design in Fig. 6 works for linear polarization is explained in the next paragraph. In the case of circular polarization the design works in an equivalent way because the geometry has rotational symmetry. The manner of operation is explained for transmission but is equivalent when receiving. - A wave in the TE11 mode is propagated in the
waveguide 15. This wave is coupled to two modes at the surface of theaperture 16. For one mode the electric fields are directed exclusively in the z-direction (z-mode), and for the other the fields are directed in the azimuth-direction transverse to the z-direction (φ -mode). These two modes radiate out of theaperture 16, the z- mode principally in the E-plane and the φ -mode chiefly in the H-plane. To get a rotationally, symmetrical radiation pattern with low cross-polarization, the radiation patterns in the E- and H-planes must be similar in both amplitude and phase. The anisotropic and reactive surface impedance to the sub-reflector 13 is the reason why the z-mode radiates the same way in the E- plane as the φ -mode radiates in the H-plane. At the same time the internal dimensions of the feed element are controlled so that the z-mode and the φ-mode are excited by the correct amplitude and phase, relatively speaking. The z-mode and the φ - mode radiate differently along the tube. This can be improved by making the surface impedance along the tube anisotropic and reactive as described previously. This is an extra cost and was not found to be necessary for the application the alternative in Fig. 6 was developed for. - The reactive and anisotropic surface impedance of the sub- reflector is realized by means of
circular corrugations 17. These prevent the z-mode radiating strongly in the radial direction. The excitation of the φ -mode and the z-mode are controlled by varying the dimensions of x, y, z and 2a in Fig. 7. The best results are obtained if the external part of the tube forms a waveguide with a larger diameter than thewaveguide 15, enabling both the TE11 and theTM 11 modes to propagated here. The resulting radiation pattern from the feed antenna has low cross-polarization. Unfortunately there are considerable phase errors because the source of radiation, theaperture 16, is a long way from the axis. These phase errors can be compensated for by shaping the main reflector differently from a parabolic surface. It the diameter of the tube is about 1 λ ,the optimal reflector shape will deviate by upto 1,6 mm from the best fitted parabola. The resultant radiation characteristics of the whole antenna are excellent and have low cross-polarization. - Fig. 6 shows one design of the antenna, it should nevertheless be apparent from the claims of patent that there are numerous other forms of design possible. Common for all is that the part of the sub-reflector's surface which is outside the
aperture 16 has an anisotropic and reactive surface impedance, and that the sub-reflector is located as close to the end of thewaveguide 15 that the field at the aperture surface is described by two modes. Other common features are that the geometries of thecentral part 20 of the sub-reflector 13 and the condition of theintermediate space 14 is designed so that the required modes are excited with the correct phase and amplitude, relatively speaking. - This design makes particular allowance on how the modes radiate both along the tube and the surface of the sub-reflector. The ideal shape is when the radiation patterns from both modes are integrated in an optimal manner so that the resultant pattern is in rotational symmetry and has low cross-polarization. Altering the shape of the intermediate space or filling this completely or partially with dielectric, are two means of influencing the relative excitation of the modes.
- Finally, it should be mentioned that the self-supporting feed antenna has already been christened and is known as the hat antenna or the hat feed.
- The different elements that are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3 can be combined and modified in various ways. The
tube 12 can be a polygonal or square cylinder. The sub-reflector can be manufactured of plastic with a metallic surface coating. Theplug 21 in the intermediate space can be combined with the sub-reflector 13 in other ways that those shown, for instance just one ofelements only element 23 is used, the sub-reflector will not have a central outlet at itspoint 20. Ifonly element 22 is used, the sub-reflector will not have any corrugations inside theaperture 16.
Claims (10)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT87903452T ATE70924T1 (en) | 1986-06-03 | 1987-06-03 | REFLECTOR ANTENNA WITH A SELF-SUPPORTING FEEDER. |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NO862192A NO862192D0 (en) | 1986-06-03 | 1986-06-03 | REFLECTOR ANTENNA WITH SELF-SUSTAINABLE MEASUREMENT ELEMENT. |
NO862192 | 1986-06-03 | ||
NO864563 | 1986-11-17 | ||
NO864563A NO864563L (en) | 1986-06-03 | 1986-11-17 | REFLECTOR ANTENNA WITH SELF-SUSTAINABLE MEASUREMENT ELEMENT. |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0268635A1 EP0268635A1 (en) | 1988-06-01 |
EP0268635B1 true EP0268635B1 (en) | 1991-12-27 |
Family
ID=26647959
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP87903452A Expired - Lifetime EP0268635B1 (en) | 1986-06-03 | 1987-06-03 | Reflector antenna with a self-supported feed |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0268635B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPH01500790A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE70924T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE3775528D1 (en) |
NO (2) | NO864563L (en) |
WO (1) | WO1987007771A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110140257A (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2019-08-16 | 华为技术有限公司 | A kind of antenna and communication equipment |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE4002913A1 (en) * | 1990-02-01 | 1991-08-08 | Ant Nachrichtentech | DOUBLE REFLECTOR ANTENNA |
GB9007976D0 (en) * | 1990-04-09 | 1990-06-06 | Marconi Electronic Devices | Antenna arrangement |
EP1004151B1 (en) * | 1997-08-21 | 2006-12-13 | Kildal Antenn Consulting AB | Improved reflector antenna with a self-supported feed |
SE515493C2 (en) | 1999-12-28 | 2001-08-13 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Sub reflector, feeder and reflector antenna including such a sub reflector. |
EP1821365A4 (en) * | 2004-12-13 | 2007-11-21 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Antenna device |
JP6051904B2 (en) * | 2013-02-06 | 2016-12-27 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Primary radiator for antenna device and antenna device |
US9246233B2 (en) | 2013-03-01 | 2016-01-26 | Optim Microwave, Inc. | Compact low sidelobe antenna and feed network |
JP6198647B2 (en) * | 2014-03-19 | 2017-09-20 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Antenna device |
CN104979622A (en) * | 2014-04-08 | 2015-10-14 | 蒋云阳 | Special-shaped cone cylinder broadband antenna |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
BE466752A (en) * | 1945-07-21 | |||
NL272285A (en) * | 1960-12-19 | |||
DE2240893A1 (en) * | 1972-08-19 | 1974-03-07 | Gruenzweig & Hartmann | MIRROR ANTENNA, IN PARTICULAR FOR THE 12 GHZ BAND |
-
1986
- 1986-11-17 NO NO864563A patent/NO864563L/en unknown
-
1987
- 1987-06-03 AT AT87903452T patent/ATE70924T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1987-06-03 WO PCT/NO1987/000044 patent/WO1987007771A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1987-06-03 EP EP87903452A patent/EP0268635B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1987-06-03 JP JP62503322A patent/JPH01500790A/en active Pending
- 1987-06-03 DE DE8787903452T patent/DE3775528D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1988
- 1988-02-03 NO NO880464A patent/NO163928C/en unknown
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110140257A (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2019-08-16 | 华为技术有限公司 | A kind of antenna and communication equipment |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
NO163928C (en) | 1990-08-08 |
DE3775528D1 (en) | 1992-02-06 |
NO880464L (en) | 1988-02-03 |
WO1987007771A1 (en) | 1987-12-17 |
NO880464D0 (en) | 1988-02-03 |
NO864563D0 (en) | 1986-11-17 |
ATE70924T1 (en) | 1992-01-15 |
EP0268635A1 (en) | 1988-06-01 |
NO864563L (en) | 1987-12-04 |
NO163928B (en) | 1990-04-30 |
JPH01500790A (en) | 1989-03-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4963878A (en) | Reflector antenna with a self-supported feed | |
US6020859A (en) | Reflector antenna with a self-supported feed | |
US6861998B2 (en) | Transmission/reception sources of electromagnetic waves for multireflector antenna | |
US20190229427A1 (en) | Integrated waveguide cavity antenna and reflector dish | |
TW494605B (en) | Coaxial dielectric rod antenna | |
EP2020053B1 (en) | Integrated waveguide antenna and array | |
Zucker et al. | Surface-wave antennas | |
US6697027B2 (en) | High gain, low side lobe dual reflector microwave antenna | |
US7554505B2 (en) | Integrated waveguide antenna array | |
EP1004151B1 (en) | Improved reflector antenna with a self-supported feed | |
WO2018075407A1 (en) | Integrated single-piece antenna feed and circular polarizer | |
US5461394A (en) | Dual band signal receiver | |
US20020067315A1 (en) | Aperture coupled slot array antenna | |
US20080117114A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for antenna rf feed | |
US10714834B2 (en) | Broadband quad-ridge horn antennas | |
EP0217820A1 (en) | Hybrid mode horn antennas | |
EP0268635B1 (en) | Reflector antenna with a self-supported feed | |
Abbosh et al. | Printed tapered slot antennas | |
RU195632U1 (en) | Two-channel transceiver antenna system with improved polarization isolation characteristic | |
Lee | A compact QK-band dual frequency feed horn | |
Tong et al. | An NRD fed dielectric rod antenna for the short millimeter wave band | |
EP0628217A4 (en) | ||
JPH11308019A (en) | Array antenna | |
Jackson et al. | Antennas: Representative Types | |
Ruze | 1.4. Feed Systems for Paraboloidal Reflectors |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19880130 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19910226 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: PATRITO BREVETTI |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 70924 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19920115 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3775528 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19920206 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 19920518 Year of fee payment: 6 Ref country code: BE Payment date: 19920518 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Payment date: 19920527 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 19920529 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 19920630 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
EPTA | Lu: last paid annual fee | ||
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: POUL JAKOBSEN Effective date: 19920925 |
|
NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: POUL JAKOBSEN |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19930512 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19930519 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19930603 Ref country code: AT Effective date: 19930603 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Effective date: 19930630 Ref country code: CH Effective date: 19930630 Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19930630 |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: POUL JAKOBSEN Effective date: 19920925 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: SINTEF Effective date: 19930630 Owner name: STIFTELSEN FOR INDUSTRIELL OG TEKNISK FORSKNING VE Effective date: 19930630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Effective date: 19940101 |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Effective date: 19940603 |
|
EAL | Se: european patent in force in sweden |
Ref document number: 87903452.8 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19940603 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Effective date: 19950228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
PLBQ | Unpublished change to opponent data |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO |
|
PLBO | Opposition rejected |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REJO |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: POUL JAKOBSEN Effective date: 19920925 |
|
PLBN | Opposition rejected |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED |
|
27O | Opposition rejected |
Effective date: 19961027 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20050603 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20060614 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20060616 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed |