EP0254758B1 - Pervaporation process and membrane - Google Patents

Pervaporation process and membrane Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0254758B1
EP0254758B1 EP19860110455 EP86110455A EP0254758B1 EP 0254758 B1 EP0254758 B1 EP 0254758B1 EP 19860110455 EP19860110455 EP 19860110455 EP 86110455 A EP86110455 A EP 86110455A EP 0254758 B1 EP0254758 B1 EP 0254758B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
membrane
zeolite
range
pervaporation
weight
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP19860110455
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0254758A1 (en
Inventor
Hendrikus J.C. Te Hennepe
Marcellinus H.V. Mulder
Cornelis A. Smolders
Derk Bargeman
George A.T. Schröder
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Gft Gesellschaft fur Trenntechnik Mbh Te Neunkirc
Original Assignee
Gft Gesellschaft fur Trenntechnik MbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Gft Gesellschaft fur Trenntechnik MbH filed Critical Gft Gesellschaft fur Trenntechnik MbH
Priority to AT86110455T priority Critical patent/ATE64690T1/en
Priority to EP19860110455 priority patent/EP0254758B1/en
Priority to DE8686110455T priority patent/DE3679990D1/en
Priority to US07/076,733 priority patent/US4925562A/en
Priority to JP62187868A priority patent/JPH0755287B2/en
Publication of EP0254758A1 publication Critical patent/EP0254758A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0254758B1 publication Critical patent/EP0254758B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D67/00Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
    • B01D67/0079Manufacture of membranes comprising organic and inorganic components
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/36Pervaporation; Membrane distillation; Liquid permeation
    • B01D61/362Pervaporation
    • B01D61/3621Pervaporation comprising multiple pervaporation steps
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D69/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D69/14Dynamic membranes
    • B01D69/141Heterogeneous membranes, e.g. containing dispersed material; Mixed matrix membranes
    • B01D69/147Heterogeneous membranes, e.g. containing dispersed material; Mixed matrix membranes containing embedded adsorbents
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D69/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D69/14Dynamic membranes
    • B01D69/141Heterogeneous membranes, e.g. containing dispersed material; Mixed matrix membranes
    • B01D69/148Organic/inorganic mixed matrix membranes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D71/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D71/02Inorganic material
    • B01D71/028Molecular sieves
    • B01D71/0281Zeolites
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D71/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D71/06Organic material
    • B01D71/70Polymers having silicon in the main chain, with or without sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen or carbon only
    • B01D71/701Polydimethylsiloxane

Definitions

  • This invention relates to pervaporation processes. In accordance with another aspect, this invention relates to membranes useful in such pervaporation processes.
  • Pervaporation is a separation process where a liquid feed mixture to be separated is brought in contact with a first or feed side of a suitable membrane. If at the second or permeate side of the membrane the partial vapour pressures of the components of the liquid feed mixture are kept below the partial vapour pressures of the components at the feed side, a driving force for the migration of these components through the membrane is established. According to their respective permeabilities the components will pass through the membranes at different rates, whereby permeation rates or permeabilities are complex functions of a number of different parameters, such as nature and concentration of the permeating species, nature and structure of the membrane, composition of the mixture, temperature, and others.
  • the components will evaporate after passing through the membrane, forming a vaporous permeate.
  • the process is therefore called "pervaporation". Due to the different permeabilities of the components the composition of the permeate will differ from the composition of the composition of the feed mixture, and a separation of the feed mixture is observed.
  • FR-A-2 079 460 describes a membrane comprising a silicone rubber film containing zeolite, which membrane is used for enriching the oxygen content in air.
  • a further object of this invention is to provide a new membrane useful in a pervaporation process exhibiting good separation efficiency for various separation tasks. More specifically, it is an object of this invention to provide a continuous pervaporation process, in which the feed material is passed continuously through an inlet chamber which is closed by a semi-permeable membrane and in which the permeate is continuously withdrawn from a permeate chamber located at the other side of this membrane with improved efficiency over known processes. Yet more specifically it is an object of this invention to provide a pervaporation process for industrial processes, and in particular for processes in which the removal of low concentrations of impurities, particularly organic impurities from water constitutes a significant task.
  • the invention relates to the membrane defined in claim 1 and the use thereof in a pervaporation process as defined in claim 11.
  • the polymer matrix and film, respectively employed in the membrane of this invention is made from an elastomeric polymer.
  • elastomeric refers to the property of the polymer that it can be stretched a significant amount and after a release of the stretching force returned substantially to its original shape.
  • a preferred group of elastomeric polymers useful in accordance with this invention as the polymer matrix are the silicone rubbers, preferably polysiloxane rubbers, in particular polydimethylsiloxane rubber, the nitrilebutadiene rubbers (NBR), polyisobutylene, polyisoprene and styrenebutadiene copolymer rubbers.
  • silicone rubbers preferably polysiloxane rubbers, in particular polydimethylsiloxane rubber, the nitrilebutadiene rubbers (NBR), polyisobutylene, polyisoprene and styrenebutadiene copolymer rubbers.
  • the elastomeric polymers useful for the membrane of this invention preferably are those which already exhibit a certain separation efficiency as a membrane even without the zeolite incorporation therein. These preferred polymers can be broadly described as hydrophobic.
  • the yet more preferred and more specific polymers useful in accordance with this invention are silicone rubber polymers, and in particular polyhydrocarbyl siloxane.
  • the elastomeric polymer employed in accordance with this invention is a polyhydrocarbyl siloxane having hydrocarbyl substituents with l to l0 carbon atoms, preferably aryl or alkyl substituents, wherein these substituents may carry one or more flourine substituents; most preferably, these fluorine substituents when present are remote from the silicone atom, i.e., are not on the carbon atom attached to the silicone atom.
  • the polydimethylsiloxane is particularly useful and thus preferred as the elastomeric polymer matrix in the membrane of this invention.
  • the elastomeric polymer used in the membrane of this invention can be characterized by a molecular weight in the range of 50 thousand to l0 million.
  • the polymers used in this invention have been described above as preferably being hydrophobic. In other words, the polymers show selectivity toward organic molecules over water. These preferred polymers thus allow molecules of significantly lower polarity than others to pass, while they reject molecules of higher polarity, e.g., water.
  • the zeolites used in accordance with the invention have a high Si/Al ratio, more particularly have an Si/Al ratio of l2 or more and an SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 35 or more. These ratios can be determined by known processes, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), X-ray spectroscopy and classical techniques, such as volumetric and titration methods.
  • AAS atomic absorption spectroscopy
  • X-ray spectroscopy and classical techniques, such as volumetric and titration methods.
  • the zeolites embedded in the membrane of this invention preferably are as hydrophobic as possible. These zeolites can also be described as selectively sorbing organic molecules.
  • crystalline aluminosilicates or zeolites Some properties of crystalline aluminosilicates or zeolites are described in U.S. patent 3,732,326 and European patent 3l 676. Zeolites with a high Si/Al ratio exhibit hydrophobic behavior in that they sorb the less polar component from a mixture of said components with a more polar component. These zeolites are therefore preferred.
  • the zeolites are finely divided materials when incorporated in the elastomeric polymer matrix.
  • the particle size of the zeolite incorporated will be less than and preferably significantly less than the thickness of the membrane.
  • the particle size of the zeolite is preferably 0.l to l0 microns.
  • One particularly advantageous zeolite material involves a mixture of two fractions, one having a particle size in the average of one micrometer and the larger fraction having a particle size average of about five micrometers. The particle size is determined by B.E.T. methods or X-ray diffraction.
  • Zeolites of this type can be produced in different ways. In general, zeolites can be treated to remove alumina from the framework so that the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio is at least 35. On the other hand, zeolites can be synthesized in a form wherein said ratio is already at least 35. Such zeolites are especially useful for the present invention because they can be used without further treatment.
  • One preferred such zeolite is silicalite, the preparation of which is disclosed in U.S. patent 4,06l,724.
  • Other zeolites ZSM-5, ZSM-ll and silicalite-2 are disclosed in U.S. patent 3,702,886, U.S. patent 3,709,979 and described by D.M. Bibby et al., Nature 280 (l979) 664, respectively.
  • the preferred zeolites employed in accordance with this invention can also be characterized by their ethanol adsorption capacity.
  • this ethanol adsorption capacity is in the range of 0.02 to 0.4 g/g, most preferably in the range of 0.04 to 0.20 g/g.
  • the adsorption capacity values are measured using adsorption isotherms.
  • the membranes of this invention preferably consist essentially of the elastomeric polymer and the zeolite. Usual additives, such as stabilizers, etc., are contained in the polymer.
  • the zeolite particles embedded in the polymer matrix film of this invention are present in a quantity determined by stability considerations with respect to such film.
  • the film or membrane contains l0 to 80, most preferably 60 to 75, weight percent zeolite based on the total weight of the membrane including the zeolite particles.
  • the thickness of the membrane typically is l to 200 micrometers, preferably about 5 to 20 micrometers.
  • the heterogenous membrane in accordance with this invention may be shaped in various ways and may be self-supporting or supported.
  • the membrane can preferably be formed as a hollow fiber.
  • it is presently preferred that the membrane is supported.
  • the membranes of this invention are selective toward molecules of low polarity in a mixture with a material of high polarity.
  • the membranes exhibit both high flux and high selectivity. Therefore the resulting heterogenous membrane can be used in various membrane pervaporation separation processes.
  • the membranes can be used in particular for a continuous process, although they are useful also in batchlike operations when desired.
  • a pervaporation process is provided.
  • This pervaporation process is characterized by the fact that a membrane in accordance with this invention is used in the separation.
  • the pervaporation separation process of this invention can be broadly described as one in which a feed material containing at least two components having different permeability with respect to a membrane is passed to an inlet chamber and into contact with said membrane. Due to the different permeabilities the product passing through the membrane is enriched in the component having the higher permeability.
  • the product at the permeate side of the membrane is withdrawn in the form of a vapor.
  • the latter can be accomplished preferably by providing a condensor remote from the membrane so that the vapor leaving the membrane on the permeate side condenses in this condensor.
  • the preferred process of this invention involves providing the feed material with the two components of different permeability on one side of the membrane and providing a permeate chamber on the other side of the membrane, with the proviso that the temperature of the permeate chamber is substantially below the temperature of the feed liquid on the other side of the membrane.
  • the most advantageous process involves continuously passing the feed material through the feed chamber which is closed by the membrane, and the continuous withdrawal of the cold vapor from the permeate chamber.
  • the membranes as defined above are used as the active separation element.
  • the process can be carried out under various pressures. For certain applications it may be desirable to utilize substantially atmospheric pressure at the feed chamber, and in other cases a reduced pressure, even vacuum, may be applied, to the permeate chamber.
  • a reduced pressure, even vacuum may be applied, to the permeate chamber.
  • the actually employed temperatures and pressures depend upon the material to be separated, specifically upon the individual boiling points of the two components in the preferred process.
  • the permeate vapor is condensed after it has been withdrawn from the permeate chamber and subjected to further treatment.
  • the most preferred way of carrying out the process of this invention is in a multi-step of continuous operation in which the individual materials are passed through a series of pervaporation cells of which at least one contains the membrane of this invention as the active material, thus achieving a fractionation through such a series of pervaporation cells.
  • the number of such cells in a multi-step operation is preferably 2 to l0.
  • the material depleted of the desired component may be recycled, e.g., to an initial separation column in which a predestination of the material is carried out from which the feed material is withdrawn.
  • this feed material could be an azeotrope of the two components which are withdrawn from the initial distillation column.
  • a preferred field of application of the membrane according to the invention and a preferred process of this invention is the continuous separation of small organic molecules of low polarity from dilute aqueous solutions.
  • organic molecules are in particular hydrocarbons, substituted hydrocarbons, in particular chlorinated hydrocarbons and alcohols having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, in particular from 1 to 5 carbon atoms in the alcohol molecule, such as methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, butanol and the like, and organic compounds with comparable polarity.
  • the membrane and process of this invention thus are particularly advantageously suited for the continous removal of impurities, such as alcohols, from industrial or municipal waste waters.
  • Another example for the application of this invention is the removal of trace impurities from ground water.
  • Still another case of application of the invention is the recovery of fermentation alcohol from the fermentation broth in a continuous membrane process.
  • the concentration of the impurities to be at least partially removed by the process of this invention range from l ppm to the solubility limits; typically these concentrations are in the range of 5 ppm to 5 percent.
  • the impurities of the feed stuffs used will be in the range of 20 to l0,000 ppm.
  • the process of this invention is particularly suitable for the separation of hydrocarbons and chlorinated hydrocarbons, alcohols, esters, ethers, and amines from aqueous solutions containing these impurities.
  • the mentioned impurities typically have l to l2 carbon atoms.
  • chlorinated hydrocarbons they will be present in a concentration of 5 mg organic chlorine per liter or less.
  • concentrations of the alcohol will generally be less than 20 weight percent, and preferably less than l5 weight percent.
  • FIG. l shows a schematic drawing of the pervaporation test apparatus.
  • Said apparatus comprises a membrane l supported by supporting means 2 and supplied with a feed solution 3.
  • said feed solution is a dilute aqueous solution of an alcohol --namely methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol or butanol-- from which the alcohol admixture has to be separated by a membrane pervaporation process.
  • the amount of said alcohol (i.e., the small organic molecule compound) being transported through the membrane is vacuum frozen by means of a cooling trap 4 (i.e., a Dewar flask cooled with liquid nitrogen).
  • This example illustrates the preparation of polymer membranes, without zeolite added, and their pervaporation performance.
  • Silicone rubber compounds RTV 615A and 615B from General Electric were mixed in a l0:l ratio according to the procedure described by General Electric.
  • the rubber is polydimethylsiloxane.
  • the mixture was transferred past a doctor's knife and cast on a perspex plate, casting thickness l50 ⁇ m.
  • the perspex plate with the rubber film was put in an oven and the film was cured at 80 °C for four hours to assure complete crosslinking of the film.
  • the silicone rubber film or membrane was removed from the perspex plate. The thickness of the film was measured with help of a micrometer. Part of the membrane was put to the test on the pervaporation apparatus (see Figure l).
  • the feed solution was a mixture of water and alcohol, the alcohol concentration 5.3 + 0.2 % by weight.
  • the feed temperature was maintained at 22.5 °C.
  • the flux was determined by weighing of the collected permeate. All fluxes were normalized to l00 ⁇ m membrane thickness.
  • the subscript alc stands for alcohol.
  • This example shows the preparation of a zeolite-filled silicone rubber membrane.
  • Zeolite was prepared according to the original patent U.S. Pat. 4,06l,724. The particle size was determined through scanning electron microscopy and was found to be between 0.5 and l0 ⁇ m. To avoid the unwanted presence of larger particles the zeolite was sieved on a test sieve with a 40 ⁇ m aperture before further use.
  • a silicone rubber mixture was prepared as in example l. An amount of l0 g of the prepared silicalite was mixed in a 25 ml jar with 4.4 g of the silicone rubber mixture. The resulting paste was transferred past a doctor's knife and cast on a perspex plate, casting thickness l50 ⁇ m.
  • the membrane thickness was measured as in example l.
  • This example illustrates the dependence of membrane performance for a zeolite-filled membrane on the sorption capacity of the silicalite used.
  • This example illustrates the influence of the zeolite content on membrane performance for various alcohols.
  • Zeolite was prepared according to the original patent U.S. Pat. 4,06l,724.
  • the zeolite was characterized by ethanol adsorption as in example 3. Batches with an adsorption capacity of 0.l0 + 0.0l g/g were selected.
  • membranes were made but with different zeolite content. Said membranes were tested as in example l to obtain pervaporation data. The data is collected in Table 3.
  • This example gives the flux and selectivity of a zeolite-filled silicone rubber membrane for butanol.
  • Zeolite was made according to the original patent U.S. Pat. 4,06l,724.
  • the zeolite was characterized through ethanol adsorption as in example 3, the sorption capacity being 0.l0 + 0.0l g/g.
  • a membrane was made but with a filling of 70 % by weight.
  • the membrane performance was tested as in example l but the alcohol used was butanol.
  • the feed solution contained 2.87 % by weight butanol and the temperature of the feed was 2l °C.
  • This example illustrates the influence of temperature on pervaporation performance for various alcohols.
  • Zeolite was prepared according to the original patent U.S. Pat. 4,06l,724.
  • the adsorption capacity for ethanol was measured as in example 3. Batches with a sorption capacity of 0.l0 + 0.0l g/g were selected and membranes were made as in example 2 but with 60 % by weight zeolite content. The membranes were tested as in example l but the temperature of the feed was raised to 35 °C for methanol. For ethanol and propanol the temperature was raised to 35 °C and to 50 °C.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)

Abstract

A pervaporation process is disclosed in which a membrane is employed which comprises an elastomer polymer matrix containing zeolite.

Description

  • This invention relates to pervaporation processes. In accordance with another aspect, this invention relates to membranes useful in such pervaporation processes.
  • Pervaporation is a separation process where a liquid feed mixture to be separated is brought in contact with a first or feed side of a suitable membrane. If at the second or permeate side of the membrane the partial vapour pressures of the components of the liquid feed mixture are kept below the partial vapour pressures of the components at the feed side, a driving force for the migration of these components through the membrane is established. According to their respective permeabilities the components will pass through the membranes at different rates, whereby permeation rates or permeabilities are complex functions of a number of different parameters, such as nature and concentration of the permeating species, nature and structure of the membrane, composition of the mixture, temperature, and others. As the partial vapour pressures are lower at the permeate side than at the feed side of the membrane, the components will evaporate after passing through the membrane, forming a vaporous permeate. The process is therefore called "pervaporation". Due to the different permeabilities of the components the composition of the permeate will differ from the composition of the composition of the feed mixture, and a separation of the feed mixture is observed.
  • Provided a sufficiently high difference in partial vapour pressures is maintained between feed and permeate side the separation capacity of a given membrane toward a given feed mixture is determined only by the permeabilities of the respective components. Only non-porous membranes can be used for pervaporation and it is believed that solubility of a component in the membrane material together with diffusivities are governing the mass transport across the membrane. Pervaporation is a non-equilibrium dynamic process, where transport phenomena determine separation efficiency.
  • The membrane process of pervaporation is generally known and has been described in the literature; see, for instance, M. H. V. Mulder et al., J. Membr. Sci. l6 (l983) 269 or G. F. Tusel et al., Desalination 53 (l985) 327. Further pervaporation membranes are described by J. Neel et al., Desalination 53 (l985) 297 and J.-P. Brun et al., J. Membr. Sci. 25 (l985) 55.
  • Other prior art that should be mentioned is: D. R. Paul et al., J. Pol. Sci. Symp. No. 4l (l973) 79, who discloses zeolite in conjunction with a polymer. FR-A-2 079 460 describes a membrane comprising a silicone rubber film containing zeolite, which membrane is used for enriching the oxygen content in air.
  • It is an object of this invention to provide a pervaporation process with excellent separation efficiency. A further object of this invention is to provide a new membrane useful in a pervaporation process exhibiting good separation efficiency for various separation tasks. More specifically, it is an object of this invention to provide a continuous pervaporation process, in which the feed material is passed continuously through an inlet chamber which is closed by a semi-permeable membrane and in which the permeate is continuously withdrawn from a permeate chamber located at the other side of this membrane with improved efficiency over known processes. Yet more specifically it is an object of this invention to provide a pervaporation process for industrial processes, and in particular for processes in which the removal of low concentrations of impurities, particularly organic impurities from water constitutes a significant task.
  • Accordingly, the invention relates to the membrane defined in claim 1 and the use thereof in a pervaporation process as defined in claim 11.
  • The polymer matrix and film, respectively employed in the membrane of this invention is made from an elastomeric polymer. The term "elastomeric" refers to the property of the polymer that it can be stretched a significant amount and after a release of the stretching force returned substantially to its original shape.
  • A preferred group of elastomeric polymers useful in accordance with this invention as the polymer matrix are the silicone rubbers, preferably polysiloxane rubbers, in particular polydimethylsiloxane rubber, the nitrilebutadiene rubbers (NBR), polyisobutylene, polyisoprene and styrenebutadiene copolymer rubbers.
  • The elastomeric polymers useful for the membrane of this invention preferably are those which already exhibit a certain separation efficiency as a membrane even without the zeolite incorporation therein. These preferred polymers can be broadly described as hydrophobic. The yet more preferred and more specific polymers useful in accordance with this invention are silicone rubber polymers, and in particular polyhydrocarbyl siloxane. Yet more specifically and preferably the elastomeric polymer employed in accordance with this invention is a polyhydrocarbyl siloxane having hydrocarbyl substituents with l to l0 carbon atoms, preferably aryl or alkyl substituents, wherein these substituents may carry one or more flourine substituents; most preferably, these fluorine substituents when present are remote from the silicone atom, i.e., are not on the carbon atom attached to the silicone atom.
  • For some of the processes herein described the polydimethylsiloxane is particularly useful and thus preferred as the elastomeric polymer matrix in the membrane of this invention.
  • In broad terms, the elastomeric polymer used in the membrane of this invention can be characterized by a molecular weight in the range of 50 thousand to l0 million.
  • The polymers used in this invention have been described above as preferably being hydrophobic. In other words, the polymers show selectivity toward organic molecules over water. These preferred polymers thus allow molecules of significantly lower polarity than others to pass, while they reject molecules of higher polarity, e.g., water.
  • The zeolites used in accordance with the invention have a high Si/Al ratio, more particularly have an Si/Al ratio of l2 or more and an SiO₂/Al₂O₃ ratio of 35 or more. These ratios can be determined by known processes, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), X-ray spectroscopy and classical techniques, such as volumetric and titration methods.
  • The zeolites embedded in the membrane of this invention preferably are as hydrophobic as possible. These zeolites can also be described as selectively sorbing organic molecules.
  • The incorporation of the preferred hydrophobic zeolites in the elastomeric polymer membrane has been found to improve the performance of this membrane in such processes as the pervaporation process.
  • Some properties of crystalline aluminosilicates or zeolites are described in U.S. patent 3,732,326 and European patent 3l 676. Zeolites with a high Si/Al ratio exhibit hydrophobic behavior in that they sorb the less polar component from a mixture of said components with a more polar component. These zeolites are therefore preferred.
  • The zeolites are finely divided materials when incorporated in the elastomeric polymer matrix. Generally the particle size of the zeolite incorporated will be less than and preferably significantly less than the thickness of the membrane. The particle size of the zeolite is preferably 0.l to l0 microns. One particularly advantageous zeolite material involves a mixture of two fractions, one having a particle size in the average of one micrometer and the larger fraction having a particle size average of about five micrometers. The particle size is determined by B.E.T. methods or X-ray diffraction.
  • Zeolites of this type can be produced in different ways. In general, zeolites can be treated to remove alumina from the framework so that the SiO₂/Al₂O₃ ratio is at least 35. On the other hand, zeolites can be synthesized in a form wherein said ratio is already at least 35. Such zeolites are especially useful for the present invention because they can be used without further treatment. One preferred such zeolite is silicalite, the preparation of which is disclosed in U.S. patent 4,06l,724. Other zeolites ZSM-5, ZSM-ll and silicalite-2 are disclosed in U.S. patent 3,702,886, U.S. patent 3,709,979 and described by D.M. Bibby et al., Nature 280 (l979) 664, respectively.
  • Many zeolites of this nature are commercially available.
  • The preferred zeolites employed in accordance with this invention can also be characterized by their ethanol adsorption capacity. Preferably this ethanol adsorption capacity is in the range of 0.02 to 0.4 g/g, most preferably in the range of 0.04 to 0.20 g/g. The adsorption capacity values are measured using adsorption isotherms.
  • The membranes of this invention preferably consist essentially of the elastomeric polymer and the zeolite. Usual additives, such as stabilizers, etc., are contained in the polymer.
  • The zeolite particles embedded in the polymer matrix film of this invention are present in a quantity determined by stability considerations with respect to such film. Preferably the film or membrane contains l0 to 80, most preferably 60 to 75, weight percent zeolite based on the total weight of the membrane including the zeolite particles.
  • The thickness of the membrane typically is l to 200 micrometers, preferably about 5 to 20 micrometers.
  • The heterogenous membrane in accordance with this invention may be shaped in various ways and may be self-supporting or supported. In a self-supporting embodiment the membrane can preferably be formed as a hollow fiber. In accordance with this invention it is presently preferred that the membrane is supported. The membranes of this invention are selective toward molecules of low polarity in a mixture with a material of high polarity. The membranes exhibit both high flux and high selectivity. Therefore the resulting heterogenous membrane can be used in various membrane pervaporation separation processes. The membranes can be used in particular for a continuous process, although they are useful also in batchlike operations when desired. In accordance with another embodiment of this invention a pervaporation process is provided. This pervaporation process is characterized by the fact that a membrane in accordance with this invention is used in the separation. The pervaporation separation process of this invention can be broadly described as one in which a feed material containing at least two components having different permeability with respect to a membrane is passed to an inlet chamber and into contact with said membrane. Due to the different permeabilities the product passing through the membrane is enriched in the component having the higher permeability. The product at the permeate side of the membrane is withdrawn in the form of a vapor. The latter can be accomplished preferably by providing a condensor remote from the membrane so that the vapor leaving the membrane on the permeate side condenses in this condensor. Thus, in yet other terms, the preferred process of this invention involves providing the feed material with the two components of different permeability on one side of the membrane and providing a permeate chamber on the other side of the membrane, with the proviso that the temperature of the permeate chamber is substantially below the temperature of the feed liquid on the other side of the membrane. The most advantageous process involves continuously passing the feed material through the feed chamber which is closed by the membrane, and the continuous withdrawal of the cold vapor from the permeate chamber. In accordance with this invention the membranes as defined above are used as the active separation element.
  • The process can be carried out under various pressures. For certain applications it may be desirable to utilize substantially atmospheric pressure at the feed chamber, and in other cases a reduced pressure, even vacuum, may be applied, to the permeate chamber. The actually employed temperatures and pressures depend upon the material to be separated, specifically upon the individual boiling points of the two components in the preferred process. The permeate vapor is condensed after it has been withdrawn from the permeate chamber and subjected to further treatment.
  • The most preferred way of carrying out the process of this invention is in a multi-step of continuous operation in which the individual materials are passed through a series of pervaporation cells of which at least one contains the membrane of this invention as the active material, thus achieving a fractionation through such a series of pervaporation cells. The number of such cells in a multi-step operation is preferably 2 to l0.
  • The material depleted of the desired component may be recycled, e.g., to an initial separation column in which a predestination of the material is carried out from which the feed material is withdrawn. For instance, this feed material could be an azeotrope of the two components which are withdrawn from the initial distillation column.
  • A preferred field of application of the membrane according to the invention and a preferred process of this invention is the continuous separation of small organic molecules of low polarity from dilute aqueous solutions. Such organic molecules are in particular hydrocarbons, substituted hydrocarbons, in particular chlorinated hydrocarbons and alcohols having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, in particular from 1 to 5 carbon atoms in the alcohol molecule, such as methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, butanol and the like, and organic compounds with comparable polarity. The membrane and process of this invention thus are particularly advantageously suited for the continous removal of impurities, such as alcohols, from industrial or municipal waste waters. Another example for the application of this invention is the removal of trace impurities from ground water. Still another case of application of the invention is the recovery of fermentation alcohol from the fermentation broth in a continuous membrane process.
  • In the preferred process of this invention the concentration of the impurities to be at least partially removed by the process of this invention range from l ppm to the solubility limits; typically these concentrations are in the range of 5 ppm to 5 percent. For special purification purposes the impurities of the feed stuffs used will be in the range of 20 to l0,000 ppm.
  • The process of this invention is particularly suitable for the separation of hydrocarbons and chlorinated hydrocarbons, alcohols, esters, ethers, and amines from aqueous solutions containing these impurities. The mentioned impurities typically have l to l2 carbon atoms. In the case of chlorinated hydrocarbons they will be present in a concentration of 5 mg organic chlorine per liter or less.
  • If this invention is used in conjunction with separating alcohols from aqueous solutions containing such alcohols the concentrations of the alcohol will generally be less than 20 weight percent, and preferably less than l5 weight percent.
  • Further features and advantages will be apparent from the following example in connection with the drawing. These examples serve to illustrate the invention without limiting the same.
  • Figure l shows a schematic drawing of the pervaporation test apparatus. Said apparatus comprises a membrane l supported by supporting means 2 and supplied with a feed solution 3. In the case of examples l to 6 described hereinafter, said feed solution is a dilute aqueous solution of an alcohol --namely methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol or butanol-- from which the alcohol admixture has to be separated by a membrane pervaporation process. The amount of said alcohol (i.e., the small organic molecule compound) being transported through the membrane is vacuum frozen by means of a cooling trap 4 (i.e., a Dewar flask cooled with liquid nitrogen).
  • Example l
  • This example illustrates the preparation of polymer membranes, without zeolite added, and their pervaporation performance.
  • Silicone rubber compounds RTV 615A and 615B from General Electric were mixed in a l0:l ratio according to the procedure described by General Electric. The rubber is polydimethylsiloxane. The mixture was transferred past a doctor's knife and cast on a perspex plate, casting thickness l50 µm. In accordance with the procedure given by General Electric the perspex plate with the rubber film was put in an oven and the film was cured at 80 °C for four hours to assure complete crosslinking of the film.
  • After completion of the crosslinking, the silicone rubber film or membrane was removed from the perspex plate. The thickness of the film was measured with help of a micrometer. Part of the membrane was put to the test on the pervaporation apparatus (see Figure l). The feed solution was a mixture of water and alcohol, the alcohol concentration 5.3 + 0.2 % by weight. The feed temperature was maintained at 22.5 °C. The flux was determined by weighing of the collected permeate. All fluxes were normalized to l00 µm membrane thickness. The permeation selectivity was computed as
    Figure imgb0001
    with x = weight fraction, the superscripts feed and perm are for feed solution and permeate respectively. The subscript alc stands for alcohol.
  • Tested were the alcohols methanol, ethanol, propanol and isopropanol. The results are listed in Table l.
    Figure imgb0002
    Figure imgb0003
  • Example 2
  • This example shows the preparation of a zeolite-filled silicone rubber membrane.
  • Zeolite was prepared according to the original patent U.S. Pat. 4,06l,724. The particle size was determined through scanning electron microscopy and was found to be between 0.5 and l0 µm. To avoid the unwanted presence of larger particles the zeolite was sieved on a test sieve with a 40 µm aperture before further use. A silicone rubber mixture was prepared as in example l. An amount of l0 g of the prepared silicalite was mixed in a 25 ml jar with 4.4 g of the silicone rubber mixture. The resulting paste was transferred past a doctor's knife and cast on a perspex plate, casting thickness l50 µm. The zeolite-containing film, zeolite content 69.4 % by weight, was cured as in example l. The membrane thickness was measured as in example l.
  • Example 3
  • This example illustrates the dependence of membrane performance for a zeolite-filled membrane on the sorption capacity of the silicalite used.
  • Several batches of zeolite were prepared according to the original patent U.S. Patent 4,06l,724, in batches of about 30 g. The different batches were characterized through ethanol adsorption at room temperature and surface area measurement (B.E.T. method). The ethanol adsorption was measured from the liquid phase through contacting about l g of zeolite with about l0 g of an ethanol/water mixture of about l0 % by weight ethanol. The composition of the liquid was determined before and after adsorption was completed. The amount of ethanol adsorbed per gram of zeolite was computed from these data as
    Figure imgb0004
    with Mmix the mass of the liquid in contact with the zeolite. Msil is the mass of the zeolite.
  • Due to scattering in the synthesis results some batches with different Mads were obtained. To obtain pervaporation data for each batch of zeolite, membranes were made from the different batches according to the method in example 2 but with a 60 % by weight filling. The membranes were tested as in example l, the alcohol being ethanol. In table 2 the sorption and pervaporation data are listed for three different zeolite batches.
    Figure imgb0005
  • Example 4
  • This example illustrates the influence of the zeolite content on membrane performance for various alcohols.
  • Zeolite was prepared according to the original patent U.S. Pat. 4,06l,724. The zeolite was characterized by ethanol adsorption as in example 3. Batches with an adsorption capacity of 0.l0 + 0.0l g/g were selected. As in example 2 membranes were made but with different zeolite content. Said membranes were tested as in example l to obtain pervaporation data. The data is collected in Table 3.
    Figure imgb0006
  • Example 5
  • This example gives the flux and selectivity of a zeolite-filled silicone rubber membrane for butanol.
  • Zeolite was made according to the original patent U.S. Pat. 4,06l,724. The zeolite was characterized through ethanol adsorption as in example 3, the sorption capacity being 0.l0 + 0.0l g/g. As in example 2 a membrane was made but with a filling of 70 % by weight. The membrane performance was tested as in example l but the alcohol used was butanol. The feed solution contained 2.87 % by weight butanol and the temperature of the feed was 2l °C.
  • The pervaporation result for butanol was:
    Figure imgb0007
  • Example 6
  • This example illustrates the influence of temperature on pervaporation performance for various alcohols.
  • Zeolite was prepared according to the original patent U.S. Pat. 4,06l,724. The adsorption capacity for ethanol was measured as in example 3. Batches with a sorption capacity of 0.l0 + 0.0l g/g were selected and membranes were made as in example 2 but with 60 % by weight zeolite content. The membranes were tested as in example l but the temperature of the feed was raised to 35 °C for methanol. For ethanol and propanol the temperature was raised to 35 °C and to 50 °C.
  • The results are listed in Table 4 together with reference data for T=22.5 °C from Table 3.
    Figure imgb0008
  • In the above examples l to 6 the zeolite has been diffracted. It has been determined that the structure corresponds to that of silicalite.

Claims (15)

  1. A membrane for the separation of small organic molecules from aqueous solutions a fluid containing same comprising zeolite embedded into a matrix made from an elastomeric polymer, characterized in that
    the Si:Al atomic ratio of said zeolite is at least l2 or the SiO₂:Al₂O₃ ratio is at least 35.
  2. The membrane of claim l characterized in that said zeolite has an ethanol absorption capacity in the range of 0.04 to 0.20 g/g.
  3. The membrane of claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the content of said zeolite is in the range from l0 to 90 percent by weight.
  4. The membrane of claim 3, characterized in that said content is in the range from 50 to 70 percent by weight.
  5. The membrane of any of the preceding claims characterized in that said zeolite has a particle size of less than 40 micrometers.
  6. The membrane of claim 5 characterized in that said particle size is in the range from 0.5 to l0 micrometers.
  7. The membrane of any of the preceding claims characterized in that the membrane thickness is in the range from 10 to 200 micrometers.
  8. The membrane of claim 7, characterized in that said thickness is in the range from 5 to 20 micrometers.
  9. The membrane of any of the preceding claims characterized in that said polymer matrix is made of, silicone rubber, preferably a polysiloxane.
  10. The membrane of claim 9 characterized in that said polysiloxane is polydimethylsiloxane.
  11. Use of the membrane according to any of claims 1 to 10 in a membrane pervaporation process for the separation of small organic molecules from aqueous solutions containing same.
  12. The use of claim 11, characterized in that said organic molecules are alcohols being dissolved in said water.
  13. The use of claim 12 characterized in that said alcohols are methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol or butanol.
  14. The use of claim 13, characterized in that the concentration of said alcohols is in the range from 0.5 to 20 percent by weight.
  15. The use of claim 14 characterized in that said concentration is in the range from 2 to 6 percent by weight.
EP19860110455 1986-07-29 1986-07-29 Pervaporation process and membrane Expired EP0254758B1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT86110455T ATE64690T1 (en) 1986-07-29 1986-07-29 PERVAPORATION PROCESS AND MEMBRANE.
EP19860110455 EP0254758B1 (en) 1986-07-29 1986-07-29 Pervaporation process and membrane
DE8686110455T DE3679990D1 (en) 1986-07-29 1986-07-29 PERVAPORATION METHOD AND MEMBRANE.
US07/076,733 US4925562A (en) 1986-07-29 1987-07-23 Pervaporation process and membrane
JP62187868A JPH0755287B2 (en) 1986-07-29 1987-07-29 Pervaporation method and film used therefor

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19860110455 EP0254758B1 (en) 1986-07-29 1986-07-29 Pervaporation process and membrane

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0254758A1 EP0254758A1 (en) 1988-02-03
EP0254758B1 true EP0254758B1 (en) 1991-06-26

Family

ID=8195305

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19860110455 Expired EP0254758B1 (en) 1986-07-29 1986-07-29 Pervaporation process and membrane

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US4925562A (en)
EP (1) EP0254758B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH0755287B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE64690T1 (en)
DE (1) DE3679990D1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2719445A1 (en) 2012-10-09 2014-04-16 Clariant International Ltd. Process for concentrating small organic molecules from liquid or gaseous mixtures using a composite membrane comprising a fluoropolymer and hydrophobic siliceous particles

Families Citing this family (81)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2625690B1 (en) * 1988-01-11 1993-04-23 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR SEPARATING THE CONSTITUENTS OF A GAS PHASE MIXTURE USING A COMPOSITE MEMBRANE
DE3804236A1 (en) * 1988-02-11 1989-08-24 Gft Ges Fuer Trenntechnik METHOD FOR REDUCING THE ALCOHOL CONTENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
EP0458790B1 (en) * 1989-12-20 1995-11-15 Atlas Copco Airpower N.V. A method for drying of gases, especially compressed air, a membrane for carrying out said method and a process for the manufacturing of said membrane
US5019263A (en) * 1990-06-05 1991-05-28 Mobil Oil Corp. Membrane composed of a pure molecular sieve
GB9022836D0 (en) * 1990-10-19 1990-12-05 British Petroleum Co Plc Membranes
US5230801A (en) * 1992-11-02 1993-07-27 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Recovery of alcohols from n-paraffins by pervaporation
ATE339249T1 (en) * 1993-04-23 2006-10-15 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co MOLECULAR SIEVE LAYERS AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF
US5416259A (en) * 1993-09-21 1995-05-16 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Feed pretreatment for pervaporation process
US5464798A (en) * 1994-02-24 1995-11-07 Jia; Meng-Dong Ceramic-zeolite composite membranes and use for separation of vapor/gas mixtures
FR2717798B1 (en) * 1994-03-28 1996-05-10 Inst Francais Du Petrole Process for the purification of ethyl tertiary butyl ether combining a membrane process and a distillation.
DE69533510T2 (en) * 1994-07-08 2005-09-15 Exxon Research And Engineering Co. ZEOLITE COMPOSITION COMPRISING A SELECTIVITY INCREASING COATING
US5639375A (en) * 1995-03-01 1997-06-17 Neomecs Incorporated Concentration of pesticides by membrane perstraction
ATE236709T1 (en) * 1995-07-14 2003-04-15 Us Environment MEMBRANES FILLED WITH ADSORBING MATERIAL FOR THE REMOVAL OF VOLATILE COMPOUNDS FROM WASTEWATER
EP0807459A1 (en) * 1996-05-15 1997-11-19 K.U. Leuven Research & Development Method for preparing membranes, said membranes, separation methods using said membranes and the use of said membranes as catalytic membranes
US5755967A (en) * 1996-05-22 1998-05-26 Meagher; Michael M. Silicalite membrane and method for the selective recovery and concentration of acetone and butanol from model ABE solutions and fermentation broth
GB9707501D0 (en) * 1997-04-14 1997-06-04 Univ East London Liquids separation
DE19853971B4 (en) 1998-11-23 2011-06-16 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Inorganic / organic polysiloxane hybrid polymers and their use
US6316684B1 (en) 1999-09-01 2001-11-13 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Filled superglassy membrane
US6500233B1 (en) 2000-10-26 2002-12-31 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Purification of p-xylene using composite mixed matrix membranes
US6447856B1 (en) * 2000-11-22 2002-09-10 The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska Hydrothermal gel process for preparation of silicalite particles and process for preparation of composite membrane
PT102608B (en) * 2001-05-11 2003-04-30 Faculdade De Ciencias Da Unive METHOD OF DETERMINING VOLTAGE, VOLTAGE CELL AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINATION IN FLOW
US6620958B2 (en) * 2001-06-26 2003-09-16 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Use of membranes to separate organic liquids having different polarities
US6508860B1 (en) * 2001-09-21 2003-01-21 L'air Liquide - Societe Anonyme A'directoire Et Conseil De Surveillance Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude Gas separation membrane with organosilicon-treated molecular sieve
US6626980B2 (en) 2001-09-21 2003-09-30 L'air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude Mixed matrix membranes incorporating chabazite type molecular sieves
US6755975B2 (en) * 2002-06-12 2004-06-29 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Separation process using pervaporation and dephlegmation
US6899743B2 (en) * 2002-06-12 2005-05-31 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Separation of organic mixtures using gas separation or pervaporation and dephlegmation
US20060219636A1 (en) * 2003-02-10 2006-10-05 Waters Investments Limited Siloxane-immobilized particulate stationary phases for chromatographic separations and extractions
US7122709B2 (en) * 2003-03-13 2006-10-17 3M Innovative Properties Company Method for obtaining ethanol
US7105089B2 (en) * 2003-03-13 2006-09-12 3M Innovative Properties Company Liquid—liquid extraction system and method
US6986802B2 (en) * 2003-08-28 2006-01-17 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Selective separation of fluid compounds utilizing a membrane separation process
GB0329106D0 (en) * 2003-12-16 2004-01-21 Leuven K U Res & Dev Pressure driven separations of liquid feeds
US7138006B2 (en) * 2003-12-24 2006-11-21 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Mixed matrix membranes with low silica-to-alumina ratio molecular sieves and methods for making and using the membranes
US20050268782A1 (en) * 2004-03-26 2005-12-08 Kulkarni Sudhir S Novel polyimide based mixed matrix membranes
US7527673B2 (en) * 2004-03-26 2009-05-05 L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme A Directoire Et Conseil De Surveillance Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude Polyimide based mixed matrix composite membranes
US20050230305A1 (en) * 2004-03-26 2005-10-20 Kulkarni Sudhir S Novel method for forming a mixed matrix composite membrane using washed molecular sieve particles
WO2006007096A2 (en) * 2004-06-24 2006-01-19 North Carolina A & T University An ultrahigh-selectivity oxygen enrichment filled elastomeric silicone polymer membrane incorporating nanofillers
CA2601258A1 (en) * 2005-03-11 2006-09-21 Uop Llc High flux, microporous, sieving membranes and separators containing such membranes and processes using such membranes
US7846322B2 (en) * 2005-03-11 2010-12-07 Uop Llc Integrated refinery with enhanced olefin and reformate production
US20110309016A1 (en) * 2005-08-24 2011-12-22 Mikel Duke Desalination method and apparatus
DE102006000984A1 (en) * 2006-01-05 2007-07-12 Heggemann Aerospace Ag headstock
US7846496B2 (en) * 2006-03-10 2010-12-07 Uop Llc Mixed matrix membranes incorporating surface-functionalized molecular sieve nanoparticles and methods for making the same
JP4899122B2 (en) * 2006-08-31 2012-03-21 独立行政法人産業技術総合研究所 Organic compound separation membrane and organic compound separation method
US7815712B2 (en) * 2006-12-18 2010-10-19 Uop Llc Method of making high performance mixed matrix membranes using suspensions containing polymers and polymer stabilized molecular sieves
US20080142440A1 (en) * 2006-12-18 2008-06-19 Chunqing Liu Liquid Separations Using High Performance Mixed Matrix Membranes
WO2008076602A1 (en) * 2006-12-18 2008-06-26 Uop Llc Method of making mixed matrix membranes
US7998246B2 (en) * 2006-12-18 2011-08-16 Uop Llc Gas separations using high performance mixed matrix membranes
US20080296527A1 (en) * 2007-06-01 2008-12-04 Chunqing Liu Uv cross-linked polymer functionalized molecular sieve/polymer mixed matrix membranes
US20080295692A1 (en) * 2007-06-01 2008-12-04 Chunqing Liu Uv cross-linked polymer functionalized molecular sieve/polymer mixed matrix membranes for sulfur reduction
US20080295691A1 (en) * 2007-06-01 2008-12-04 Chunqing Liu Uv cross-linked polymer functionalized molecular sieve/polymer mixed matrix membranes
US20080300336A1 (en) * 2007-06-01 2008-12-04 Chunqing Liu Uv cross-linked polymer functionalized molecular sieve/polymer mixed matrix membranes
US7812207B2 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-10-12 Uop Llc Membrane separation processes and systems for enhanced permeant recovery
US7638675B2 (en) * 2007-09-07 2009-12-29 Uop Llc Processes for the isomerization of normal butane to isobutane
US7638674B2 (en) * 2007-09-07 2009-12-29 Uop Llc Processes for the isomerization of paraffins of 5 and 6 carbon atoms with methylcyclopentane recovery
US7638676B2 (en) * 2007-09-07 2009-12-29 Uop Llc Processes for the isomerization of feedstocks comprising paraffins of 5 to 7 carbon atoms
US20090126567A1 (en) * 2007-11-16 2009-05-21 Chunqing Liu Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Molecular Sieves With Thin Plate Morphology
US20090149313A1 (en) * 2007-12-11 2009-06-11 Chunqing Liu Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Low Acidity Nano-Sized SAPO-34 Molecular Sieves
US20090152755A1 (en) * 2007-12-12 2009-06-18 Chunqing Liu Molecular Sieve/Polymer Hollow Fiber Mixed Matrix Membranes
US20090155464A1 (en) * 2007-12-12 2009-06-18 Chunqing Liu Molecular Sieve/Polymer Mixed Matrix Membranes
US8226862B2 (en) * 2007-12-12 2012-07-24 Uop Llc Molecular sieve/polymer asymmetric flat sheet mixed matrix membranes
CN101518719B (en) * 2008-02-29 2012-02-01 中国科学院过程工程研究所 Preparation method of organic-inorganic hybrid pervaporation preferential alcohol permeation membrane
US20090239288A1 (en) * 2008-03-19 2009-09-24 Gas Technology Institute Integrated membrane separation - bioreactor for selective removal of organic products and by-products
US20090236285A1 (en) * 2008-03-19 2009-09-24 Gas Technology Institute Ethanol separation by a mixed matrix membrane
CA2762169C (en) * 2009-05-18 2015-10-13 Vito N.V. Thin film pervaporation membranes comprising nanoparticle aggregate
US8597518B2 (en) * 2009-08-19 2013-12-03 The University Of Connecticut Pervaporation composite membrane for aqueous solution separation and methods for using the same
JP5578565B2 (en) * 2009-12-02 2014-08-27 独立行政法人産業技術総合研究所 Separation and concentration method of butanol from low-concentration butanol aqueous solution and butanol separation and concentration membrane used in the method
WO2011160261A1 (en) * 2010-06-25 2011-12-29 Bp P.L.C. Composite membrane
US8617395B2 (en) 2010-09-30 2013-12-31 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture Thin film composite membranes and their method of preparation and use
EP2714250A4 (en) * 2011-05-25 2015-03-11 Dalian Chemical Physics Inst MEMBRANES
JP5762861B2 (en) * 2011-07-15 2015-08-12 オルガノ株式会社 Method and apparatus for purifying alcohol
JP5762860B2 (en) * 2011-07-15 2015-08-12 オルガノ株式会社 Method and apparatus for purifying alcohol
JP5801763B2 (en) * 2012-06-19 2015-10-28 株式会社フジクラ Direct methanol fuel cell
JP5880399B2 (en) 2012-11-13 2016-03-09 信越化学工業株式会社 Method for producing silicone rubber molding
KR101695215B1 (en) * 2013-10-07 2017-01-11 (주)에어레인 Combined membrane separation process for concentration of IPA and treatment of wastewater from IPA-containing wastewater
JP7070408B2 (en) * 2016-05-27 2022-05-18 三菱ケミカル株式会社 Dehydration system for hydrous organic compounds, its operation method, and dehydration method
US11097226B2 (en) * 2016-08-29 2021-08-24 Phillips 66 Company Systems, devices and methods for molecular separation
EP4032602A4 (en) * 2019-09-18 2023-10-04 Nitto Denko Corporation CLEANING SYSTEM, CLEANING METHOD, MEMBRANE SEPARATION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SOLVENT
JP7838352B2 (en) * 2021-03-25 2026-04-01 三菱ケミカル株式会社 Gas separation membrane, method for manufacturing the same, module using a gas separation membrane, and gas separation method
JP2023137101A (en) * 2022-03-17 2023-09-29 日東電工株式会社 Storage method for membrane separation unit, and membrane separation system
JPWO2024070573A1 (en) * 2022-09-26 2024-04-04
EP4596090A1 (en) * 2022-09-26 2025-08-06 Nitto Denko Corporation Pervaporation membrane
JPWO2024070575A1 (en) * 2022-09-26 2024-04-04

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2924630A (en) * 1957-06-28 1960-02-09 Union Oil Co Fluid diffusion fractionation
FR2079460A5 (en) * 1970-02-02 1971-11-12 Rhone Poulenc Sa Polyorganosiloxane elastomer membranes - contng zeolite for gaseous separation procedures in conventional appts
NL7509076A (en) * 1974-08-05 1976-02-09 Monsanto Co PROCEDURE FOR SEPARATING PHENOLS FROM Aqueous MIXTURES.
US4061724A (en) 1975-09-22 1977-12-06 Union Carbide Corporation Crystalline silica
US4311594A (en) * 1975-12-01 1982-01-19 Monsanto Company Membrane separation of organics from aqueous solutions
JPS6028826A (en) * 1983-07-26 1985-02-14 Hiroshi Suzuki Compound film having surface layer of thin film of cage zeolite and preparation thereof
US4737165A (en) * 1983-11-10 1988-04-12 Uop Inc. Multicomponent membranes
JPS60129139A (en) * 1983-12-16 1985-07-10 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Zeolite film
DE3407149A1 (en) * 1984-02-28 1985-08-29 Basf Ag, 6700 Ludwigshafen ORGANIC POLYMER MEMBRANES CONTAINING CRYSTALLINE CARRIER COMPOUNDS, THEIR PRODUCTION AND USE

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2719445A1 (en) 2012-10-09 2014-04-16 Clariant International Ltd. Process for concentrating small organic molecules from liquid or gaseous mixtures using a composite membrane comprising a fluoropolymer and hydrophobic siliceous particles
WO2014056965A1 (en) 2012-10-09 2014-04-17 Clariant International Ltd. Process for concentrating at least one chemical from liquid or gaseous mixtures using a membrane comprising fluoropolymer and hydrophobic silica particles

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS63116705A (en) 1988-05-21
US4925562A (en) 1990-05-15
ATE64690T1 (en) 1991-07-15
DE3679990D1 (en) 1991-08-01
EP0254758A1 (en) 1988-02-03
JPH0755287B2 (en) 1995-06-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0254758B1 (en) Pervaporation process and membrane
Te Hennepe et al. Zeolite-filled silicone rubber membranes: Part 1. Membrane preparation and pervaporation results
Lee et al. Sorption, diffusion, and pervaporation of organics in polymer membranes
Wegner et al. Polycrystalline MFI zeolite membranes: xylene pervaporation and its implication on membrane microstructure
US5127925A (en) Separation of gases by means of mixed matrix membranes
Leemann et al. Vapour permeation for the recovery of organic solvents from waste air streams: separation capacities and process optimization
US4900402A (en) Pervaporation process of separating a liquid mixture
US4218312A (en) Membrane separation of organics from aqueous solutions
US6316684B1 (en) Filled superglassy membrane
Kim et al. A short review on hydrophobic pervaporative inorganic membranes for ethanol/water separation applications
US5707423A (en) Substituted polyacetylene separation membrane
Nakajima et al. Calixarene-composited host–guest membranes applied for heavy metal ion adsorbents
US5688307A (en) Separation of low-boiling gases using super-glassy membranes
WO2008034581A1 (en) Gas separation membrane
US5084181A (en) Enrichment of water in components of heavy water
Wesslein et al. Pervaporation of liquid mixtures through poly (vinyl alcohol)(PVA) membranes. II. The binary systems methanol/1-propanol and methanol/dioxane and the ternary system water/methanol/1-propanol
JP2910898B2 (en) Method for separating alkanol having 1 to 3 carbon atoms from another organic solution
EP3322506B1 (en) Continuous process for cleaning process waste air obtained in the production of silicones
Ye Zeolite Membrane Separation at Low Temperature
US6602418B2 (en) Solution dewatering with concomitant ion removal
US3733367A (en) Process for the separation of styrene from ethyl benzene
Islam Poly (Dimethylsiloxane)(PDMS)/Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Nanocomposite Membranes: Preparation and Characterizations
KR102569568B1 (en) Hydrocarbon capture catalyst containing alpo-based molecular sieve, hydrocarbon separation method using the same, and hydrocarbon separation device including the same
JP2002069012A (en) METHOD FOR ISOLATING p-XYLENE
JPH06327952A (en) Separation of mixed solution

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19880803

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GFT GESELLSCHAFT FUER TRENNTECHNIK MBH

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19890703

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 64690

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19910715

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3679990

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19910801

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PUE

Owner name: GFT GESELLSCHAFT FUER TRENNTECHNIK MBH

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: GFT GESELLSCHAFT FUER TRENNTECHNIK MBH

RAP4 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: GFT GESELLSCHAFT FUER TRENNTECHNIK MBH

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
ET Fr: translation filed
NLT2 Nl: modifications (of names), taken from the european patent patent bulletin

Owner name: GFT GESELLSCHAFT FUER TRENNTECHNIK MBH TE NEUNKIRC

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
EPTA Lu: last paid annual fee
EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 86110455.2

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19990708

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19990719

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19990722

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19990722

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 19990722

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19990722

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 19990722

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19990723

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19990827

Year of fee payment: 14

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000729

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000729

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000729

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000730

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000731

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000731

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000731

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: GFT G.- FUR TRENNTECHNIK M.B.H.

Effective date: 20000731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 86110455.2

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20000729

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010330

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20010201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050729